WEBVTT - While You Were Sleeping, Trump Was "Tweeting" (A LOT)

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey, there are folks.

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Good morning on this Sunday, November twenty third, and while

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 2>you were sleeping, the President was tweeting with welcome to

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 2>this Sunday or early Sunday edition of Amy and TJ.

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Robes.

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 3>I need to check my language here first. It's so

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 3>easy to keep saying he was tweeting. It's not a tweet,

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 3>is it? Can you still call it a tweet if

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 3>it's not Twitter.

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 4>You're not supposed to. He's posting on social posting on

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 4>social Sorry okay, but it's so easy to say tweet.

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 3>But it didn't go with my intro. While you were sleeping,

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 3>the president was posting that's no good. Okay, So you'll

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 3>get where we're coming from.

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Now the president. Look, the President has.

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Been notorious about his messages, and he was on one

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 3>once again overnight. Now ropes, this was your idea, like, wow,

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 3>he's this president is giving us content every single night,

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 3>and we.

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Have it in the morning.

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Why not do a collection of his overnight messages in

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 3>an episode? This is We could almost do this seven

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 3>days a week, but trying in here on Sunday, I.

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Think actually this it jumped out at me because the

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 4>posts I was gonna say. Tweets too, range from comical

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 4>to frightening, to enlightening to what the hell is he

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 4>talking about? I mean, it runs the gamut, but it

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 4>evokes lots of emotions, and I figured, Man, if we

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 4>just read these and people could all see them in

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 4>one space, we don't have to interpret it's wow.

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 3>So yes, from the collection we have here, there were

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 3>nothing short of fifteen messages the president has sent since

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 3>in the past twenty four hours. Now, that is my count.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 3>That is, it is higher. There are some retweets and

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 3>reposts and things he's done that I can't necessarily keep

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 3>up with all of those, but essentially, folks in the

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 3>past twenty four hours and late last night his last

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 3>one was at midnight last night. Actually, the President was

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 3>talking about everything from Sedition to Marjorie Taylor Green Newsmax,

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Larry Summers and Elon Musk. We're all a part of

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 3>the President's tweets yesterday.

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 4>It's remarkable just now that we're going to be probably

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 4>doing this on a regular basis. It is wild to

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 4>me that the access we have to where his head is.

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 4>Think about any other president especially, but really, frankly, a

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 4>lot of politicians you don't know what they're thinking and

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 4>what they're doing. You know what President Trump is thinking,

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 4>and you know he barely sleeps. But there's so much

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 4>insight into where his head is and what makes him

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 4>tick if you just read what he is putting out there.

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 4>He is giving people so much content, and I think

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 4>it maybe it's so much people kind of just laugh

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 4>it off or glaze over or don't really pay attention.

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 4>But when he says things we've talked about this, he

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 4>means them.

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 3>And some of these robes to your I guess so

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.119
<v Speaker 3>many of his tweets make headlines, right, and news networks

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 3>will take those particular ones, and that seem to be

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 3>the most outrageous, But there are so many day in,

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 3>day out, and this is I'll give you credit for

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 3>when you said, I'm like, holy hell, he says he's

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 3>handing us here, guys. There's so much news and so

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 3>much understanding. And is he not as much as people

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 3>might try to come or want to some complain about

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 3>the things that he does say? Are we not getting

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 3>more access to a president and insight into his thoughts

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 3>and having him put out his own words more than

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 3>we have ever seen.

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 4>The answer to that is absolutely And Carolyn Lovett says

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot of things that rub a lot of people

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 4>the wrong way, but one thing she does say that

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 4>we can confirm is true. She says, this is the

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 4>most transparent president in history. And with what you just said,

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 4>she's kind of right.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 3>And then there are some people listening says, Okay, he's

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 3>not the most transparent. He's just the most talkative, saying

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot, but he's really not given us what we want.

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, he's definitely not giving people what they want, or

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 4>at least a lot of folks, but he is saying

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 4>what he what's on his mind in a way that

0:03:58.760 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 4>just it's just in real.

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and we don't get that. So, folks, we're going

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 3>to start at midnight. This is the president. We're going

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 3>to go start going backwards here. But yes, at midnight,

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 3>your president of the United States was tweeting. Is there

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 3>another it? Can it still be a tweet? It's a

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 3>it's a message you sent it. It's a tweet, even

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 3>if it's.

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 4>Not tweet this podcast. Let's go ahead, all.

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, midnight? He wrote this.

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 3>Many great legal scholars agree that the Democrat traders that

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 3>told the military to disobey my orders as president have

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 3>committed a crime of serious proportion and a exclamation point

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 3>at the end of that one, Robes, this kind of

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 3>went away the sedition thing. He is still on it,

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 3>even though he said no, I'm not calling on anybody

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 3>to be killed. He is not letting this go.

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.239
<v Speaker 4>No, that's right, because that was at midnight. But about

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 4>forty five minutes before that, he put out the traders

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 4>that told the military to disobey my orders should be

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 4>in jail right now, not roaming the fake news networks

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 4>trying to explain that what they said was okay, it

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 4>wasn't and or will be. It was sedition at the

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 4>highest level, and sedition is a major crime. There can

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 4>be no other interpretation of what they said. So, yes,

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 4>he might be backing off of the death penalty jargon

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 4>he was using a few days earlier. But he is

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 4>saying that these six lawmakers should be in prison for

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 4>the video they released.

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 3>We should mention several points throughout his messages over the weekend, Robes,

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 3>he was reposting or pointing out other people who are

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 3>in support of his sedition idea. So he is looking

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 3>for other people to shore up people outside of his

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 3>administration to shore that up. He also posted at nine

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 3>to ten pm last night two video clips of conservative

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 3>commentator Mark Levin, who, of course you listened to it

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 3>more than I did, but it was essentially supporting the

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 3>president's positions on some of the stuff.

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 4>Basically just saying all of the president's policies are brilliant

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 4>and amazing. That is what I got out of Mark

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 4>Levin's arry, and anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot.

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 4>That's how I summed it up.

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, it was like it was total, but two

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 3>of them end up like twenty minutes between two.

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 4>Yes, one was fourteen when was heah around six?

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 3>So yes, correct, thank you for the summary, all right now,

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 3>About forty minutes before that, he posted a BBC article

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 3>On the BBC as we know, right.

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>He is well how much did he sue it?

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 4>One it was fifteen billion, because it's always the beast,

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 4>I think it was fifteen billion. But yes, you had

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 4>two of the heads of the BBC actually stepped down

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 4>and admit that they made a mistake by editing Trump's

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 4>speech on January sixth that seemed to basically elicit storming

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 4>the Capitol and left out the part where he asked

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 4>them to peacefully protest.

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, So he posted an eight twenty eight an

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 3>article with this title BBC has questions to answer over

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 3>edited Trump speech. So, as you see, he spends on look,

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm aware of this, but to roll this is the

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 3>first time I've really sat and gone through one after

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 3>the other. He spends a lot of time doing PR

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 3>for himself.

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 4>I was just gonna say he is a one man

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 4>PR machine. Now he has Carolyn Levin talking to reporters

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 4>in the press gaggles. But and he will obviously hold

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 4>court as well in the Oval office on Air Force one.

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 4>But he is constantly on top of his PR.

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 3>So that's from eight thirty until midnight, the President put

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 3>out several tweets for here by our count all of

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 3>them having to do within some way explaining, justifying or

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 3>making a case for headlines or things he had been

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.559
<v Speaker 3>criticized for. And he posted twenty minutes of a clip

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 3>of somebody completely supporting him. So this is what the

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 3>president is on from eight thirty on last night. Earlier

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 3>in the day, Wow, he was don't you notice as well?

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 3>He has clusters, yes, like you could see like in

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 3>a fifteen minute period. He might be ten that go

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 3>out kind of a thing, but he sits down, like

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 3>what is he doing?

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 4>I think he takes breaks to eat and maybe nap,

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 4>and that's it. And then the rest of the time

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 4>he is consuming what people are saying about him, looking

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 4>at what media reports are telling folks, and then having

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 4>his own say or yeah. He promotes what he wants

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 4>and he tears down what he doesn't like all day long,

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 4>throughout the night.

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 3>So let's see, around just before six o'clock, he had

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 3>at least and I'm counting here one two wow, between

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 3>five forty three and five fifty three, So in a

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 3>ten minute period, I'm looking at what five six posts

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 3>that he makes in a.

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Ten minute period.

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 3>That's hard for me to do. He's beat me for

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 3>the week in a ten minute period. I didn't post

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 3>that many times for the week.

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.719
<v Speaker 4>He's beaten me in a month. I hardly post it

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 4>all that, you know, Literally, I have come now to

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 4>the point where I realize social media is so much

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 4>hard work. I've kind of given up. We keep saying

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 4>we need to do better, we need to be promoting

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 4>our podcast and what we're doing, and yet when you

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 4>start working as much as you do. That part of

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 4>it falls by the wayside. He's the president of the

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 4>United States, busier than us, way busier than us, and

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 4>manages to post in ways I don't even know how

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 4>he has enough time in the day to do what

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 4>he does.

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, maybe he realizes the value of social media more

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 3>than we do.

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Row he won the election, I would say, in large part.

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 3>That's how we lost our jobs. Now, five fifty three pm,

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 3>he reposted a message from something called Maga Voices, obviously

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 3>something on an account on Twitter, obviously supportive of the

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 3>president and conservatives, but he retweeted a message from them.

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Their message said, and I quote, Elon Musk just told

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 3>his two hundred and twenty nine million followers that he

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 3>wants to thank Donald Trump for everything he's done for

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 3>the world. Such an epic moment for America. We are

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 3>so back. Okay, So maybe it's obvious why he might

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 3>repost that.

0:09:56.480 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, did he mention that he basically chided Elon Musk

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 4>for not thanking him, and so he basically asked for

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 4>some gratitude, And then Elon knows exactly how to kiss

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 4>the ring. At this point, he knew and he found

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 4>out what it was like to go against the president.

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 4>So now he is back on board, and yes, thanks

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.719
<v Speaker 4>to the President. After he was called out for not thinking.

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 3>These people aren't this rich because they're stupid. He self

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 3>preservation is probably one of the best traits of somebody.

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>That's that rich.

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Five point fifty three was that message five to fifty

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 3>two Robes One minute before he reposted a message from

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 3>You don't have to I don't have to explain what

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 3>this one is, but a group on Twitter calling themselves

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Fan Trump Army.

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>You're familiar with this group?

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 4>Nope, but it's self explanatory. We always like to say

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 4>we walk into a restaurant and says tacos and tequila.

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 4>You know exactly what you're getting Fan Trump Army. I'm

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 4>pretty sure I know what I'm getting.

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 3>No, what you're getting now. This one included a segment

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 3>from Fox News that highlighted the Supreme Court decision in

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Trump's favor over immigration.

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>You see this a little bit, Robes. We've seen he will.

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Repost a segment from Fox or Newsmax or something that

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 3>he feels the supportive of.

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 4>His cause, certainly incentivizing for folks who want to get

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 4>more followers who want to get more eyeballs, who want

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 4>to be considered more mainstream or at least credible in

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 4>terms of the audiences they're trying to bring in. You

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 4>get Trump to retweet you, You're on.

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>The map, all right, five point fifty two.

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 3>A moment before that, No, it was in the same

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 3>minute he posted the video itself from Fox News. And

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 3>then in the same minute he must have seen somebody

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 3>else speak positively about that same video, and he posted

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 3>that this was all in the same within the same

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 3>minute these were up. He's quick, dude is on it also.

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Five point fifty reposted another message, this one again Robes.

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Not a lot of this anything policy related so far.

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 4>It's it's not policy. It's more about winning the ability

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 4>to maintain after creating a policy, like any legal victory

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 4>anything were the Supreme Court or a judge or anyone

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 4>basically rules in his favor. Yes, he's all over.

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 3>It, okay. And then there's a Nick sore Tour. I

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 3>don't know this generleman, but a conservative journalist. But at

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 3>five pif fifty the President reposted a message from this guy,

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 3>and Robes, I am surprised. As much as he talks

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 3>about Epstein. But this was another Again he reposted this

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 3>long message that this guy posted.

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 4>I think what he's trying to do is obviously he's

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 4>been connected with him in so many ways. It's followed him,

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 4>it's dogged him. So he knows people are not going

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 4>to stop talking about it. So if he can just

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 4>change how they're talking about it, and so let's talk

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 4>about how the Democrats are now being exposed according to him,

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 4>so he reposted this. It says, holy crap, House Oversight

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Chair James Comb were just exposed Hakeem Jeffries on the

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 4>House floor for soliciting a meeting and donations from Jeffrey

0:12:55.760 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 4>Epstein even after Epstein was a convicted sex press. This

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 4>Epstein thing going to backfire massively on the Democrats. Democrat

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 4>fundraisers invited Epstein to an event or to meet privately

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 4>with a Keem Jeffries as part of their twenty thirteen

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 4>effort to win a majority. Comer said the text of

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 4>their email solicitation to Epstein has been released.

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Wow, okay he is now he's being very consistent about

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 3>this as of late, saying Democrats are the ones who

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 3>got a problem with Epstein, not us, and he's starting

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 3>putting names out and anything he can do to actually

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 3>flip Is it possible you can after all this, you

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 3>can flip this conversation to be Oh, it's actually democrats.

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 4>After Epstein wrote in his own emails, Trump knew about

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 4>the girls, and yet still he is able to turn

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 4>the tables in some way.

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, But does he just need to turn them in

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 3>his own party, with his own MAGA group to make

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 3>sure because he can get them on board.

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you remember Piggy Peggy, they were defending that.

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 4>Look, I think if you are a rabid, fervent follower

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 4>and believer in President Trump, you will take any opportunity

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 4>to justify that. And aren't we all like that as humans?

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 4>When you think something or you feel something, and then

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 4>there's one bit of information that can validate how you feel,

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 4>then you're gonna run with it. So yes, I think

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 4>that he knows that people are looking for fuel to

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 4>point the finger in the other.

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Direction, and he's giving them. What did you just say?

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Something to run with? All? Right?

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Saturday five forty three, Again, just a few minutes before

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 3>all that, he wrote this note quote, thank you Greg

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Kelly of Newsmax for this wonderful piece on Sedition a

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 3>must watch, and he posted that video again. This was

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 3>someone who was making a case that is in line

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 3>with the one he's trying to make about Sedition, and

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 3>he's highlighting the Newsmax is a conservative, right leaning news

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 3>organization that you and I as soon as I told

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 3>you they're based in Palm Beach, Florida.

0:14:57.800 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>You like, hey, let's apply.

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 4>The and I'm like, maybe not, but no, but to

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 4>your point, the like Newsmax, I've never heard of it.

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 4>And then you said, wait, how do we know the

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 4>name Greg Kelly? Like, oh, he was a former Fox

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 4>News anchor. But it's funny. So now I'm thinking about

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Greg Kelly, I'm googling Newsmax. This is all these folks

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 4>who know that they need to be put on the

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 4>map or need to have some sort of recognition. This

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 4>is exactly how you do it right.

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 3>You get his attention, you say something favorable. There's so

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 3>many times we watch particular news channels and there'll be

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 3>a guest or an anchor and you absolutely are sure

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 3>they are talking to one person and one person alone

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 3>in their performance.

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 4>President Trump, We've watched it and we've said, wow, I

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 4>know they're hoping President Trump is listening.

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 3>We have seen that plenty. All right, well, folks, stay here.

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 3>The President was not done. I had a few more

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 3>for you when we come back. What he had to

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 3>say about Marjorie Trader Brown, which is what he calls

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 3>her now. Also he has some to say about Chicago,

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 3>the trillions of dollars he's bringing in the best political

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 3>poll numbers he's ever received in his life. And folks,

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 3>would you believe he was just getting warmed up? Stay here,

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 3>all right, we continue on Amy and TJ. This is

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 3>really it is. You know what some of us entertaining,

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 3>as you said, Robes about some of the things he,

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 3>the president tweets.

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you sit and just.

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Read through a day or two of his stuff, you

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 3>get such an insight into this man, what he is thinking,

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 3>and what he's thinking and what's pissing them off.

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Oh, you know exactly what he is feeling, at least

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 4>in that moment. He's obviously changed his mind with days

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 4>in perspective, but yes, you know where his head is

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 4>at really, hour by hour throughout the day, each and

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 4>every day. That is unprecedented. Can you imagine even doing

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 4>that as a human being? Like if you were just

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 4>putting out how you were feeling or what you were thinking,

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 4>or your reaction to anything you were seeing on social

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.959
<v Speaker 4>media all day long, you're the like, you're the opposite.

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 4>You're so private, So I mean, this has to feel

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 4>so strict, like this is this is a very interesting

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 4>way to go about your life. But I guess at

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 4>that point, if you're talking, maybe you're not allowing people

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 4>to talk as much about you because you're giving them

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 4>stuff to talk about. You're directing the commedy.

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>You're steing racked down robes. That is where we screwed

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>up terribly.

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 4>Yes, you continue to do so sometimes, but.

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 3>You let people fell in the blanks. And he never

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 3>gives folks an opportunity. You never have to wonder what

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 3>he thinks about something, and if you do, it won't

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 3>be long before he gives you an answer. What time

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 3>his last one last night? What we say around midnight night? Yeah, okay,

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 3>now let's go back. You know what time his first

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 3>one was, folks, It was at six forty five am.

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 3>This man is engaged from six am hour until midnight

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 3>during the day.

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and he's telling you everything he thinks and feels

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 4>along the way.

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 3>He started with six forty five, am. Marjorie Trader Brown

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 3>is what he calls her. Now, this is how we

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 3>started it, Marjorie Trader Brown.

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 4>It's smart because I have to think about what her

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 4>name actually is, because now it's so easy to that

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 4>that that just makes sense. And I can because I

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 4>know why he's calling her that. I had to go, wait,

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 4>what is her name Marjorie Taylor Green? But it's hard.

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:25.479
<v Speaker 4>I had to think about it.

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 3>You remember you didn't like We like the name Trader

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 3>better than Brown as a nickname because you don't have

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 3>to explain the brown. The brown was funny to me

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 3>when he started using it. He said, because her name

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 3>is green and grass. When it starts to rot, it

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 3>turns brown. I thought, okay, he had to explain it,

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 3>but I still.

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Thought it was solid.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 4>And now it's Marjorie Trader Brown, so he wrote. He

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 4>wrote Marjorie Trader Brown. Because of plummeting poll numbers and

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 4>not wanting to face a primary challenger with a strong

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Trump endorsement where she would have had no chance of winning,

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.479
<v Speaker 4>has decided to call it quits. Her relationship with the

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 4>worst Republican congress in decades Tom Massey of Kentucky, also

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 4>known as Rand Paul Junior.

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Another good nickname.

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 4>That's good because he votes against the Republican Party and

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 4>really good legislation. Did not help her for some reason,

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 4>primarily that I refused to return her never ending barrage

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 4>of phone calls. That was my favorite line, Marjorie went bad,

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 4>thus you know the brown. Nevertheless, I will always appreciate

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 4>Marjorie and thank her for her service to our country.

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 4>President DJT he sounded.

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Like he reserved a little option there for her to

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>come back into the fole.

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 4>It was a little strange, that last little compliment.

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 3>But we see what happens, Mom, Donnie, Marjorie Taylor Green

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk people that you would think he would actually

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 3>send off to some prison in a frozen tundra somewhere

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 3>if he could Elon's back in the fore.

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 4>Cracks the door open, you know what you did wrong.

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:55.400
<v Speaker 4>If you'd like to come back, you know what you'll

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 4>have to do to re enter.

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 3>Wow, damn, just a crack, just the crack in the door. Well,

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 3>all right, all right, that was at six forty five.

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 3>You're talking about Margie j Y the Green seven on

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 3>one AM yesterday quote, I have just gotten the highest

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 3>poll numbers of my political career. Why does he do quotes?

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand some of his quotes. Sometimes he put

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 3>political career in quotation marks.

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 4>I guess, I don't know why you put that in quotes,

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 4>Maybe to distinguish from his high ratings when he wasn't

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 4>a politician, Like I don't really know.

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 3>We well anyway, he starts off that way, I've gotten

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the highest poll numbers of my political career. While my

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 3>great work on the economy has not been fully appreciated,

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 3>it will be exclamation point. Things are really rocking. Capital

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 3>are on rockin and no g he shortened it rocking,

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 3>not rocking, rocking.

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 4>When he put a little yeah you like that, yeah,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 4>little apostrophe over the end like Rockin' quote.

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Stopping wars and foreign relations seems to be a strong suit.

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 3>Also great the border and stopping crime. I predict that

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 3>the economy will, with the already highest stock market ever

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 3>and prices coming sharply down from the Biden disaster, will

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 3>soon be at the top of the list make America

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 3>great again. So first thing on his mind that he's

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.719
<v Speaker 3>sitting out is talking about a political adversary. Now I

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 3>guess and now seven oh one, check me out. I'm awesome.

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 3>He starts the day off. I'm awesome this way.

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we should all start our day off just telling

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 4>ourselves we're awesome? Am I too? Good for our mental

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 4>health and our productivity?

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Could I tweet with him? Could you tweet with him?

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Tip fa tat? Like every time he's sends something. Okay,

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 3>he's talking about his political adversary. Do you have an

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 3>adversary the first thing in the morning you would write about?

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to spend my time on that.

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>No, okay.

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Then the next thing he's talking about is uh, I've

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 3>got he's bragging about where he is in his political career.

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 4>But that seems so weird. I could never do that.

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>No. No, Then in nine on one he went again

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>nine on one. This was a pretty long one. Heroes.

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 1>He's talking about tariffs.

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 4>Yes, he says, we are taking in trillions, all caps

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 4>of dollars in tariffs and investment dollars from lands because

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 4>of tariffs. I have stopped five of the eight wars

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 4>directly because of the threat of terriffs. If they don't

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 4>stop fighting, or better yet, if they start there is

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 4>almost no inflation and the worst in USA history Under

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Sleepy Joe Biden. The stock market just hit an all

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 4>time high for the forty eighth time in nine months.

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if that's true, but that's what he says.

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It's been doing gangbusters.

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 4>It has been doing well. But also the highest pull

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 4>numbers we didn't mention are is that is a stretch.

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>We're not sure what he's looking at.

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 4>He's coming down from the lowest maybe he's going up

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 4>from the lowest pull numbers ever. But okay, all right,

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 4>he says there is almost no inflation and the worst

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 4>in USA history. Inner sleepy Joe Biden. The stock market

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 4>is hit an all time high. Okay, I already said

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 4>this to Leonard Leo Coke and all of the countries

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 4>and slimeballs that have ripped off the United States of

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 4>America for years through the use of their own tariffs.

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 4>We don't have a court system that's going to let

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 4>you destroy our country any longer. This is the richest, strongest,

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 4>and most respected the USA has ever been November fifth,

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 4>and the tariffs are the reasons why. Thank you for

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 4>your attention to this matter. Exclamation point. President DJT so.

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Not sure what happened between nine oh one and about

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 3>three in the afternoon, but he had a little break.

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 3>He wasn't putting as much stuff.

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 4>He was meeting with foreign leaders signing. I don't know.

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I was just saying, you think, what was his schedule yesterday?

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 4>Six hours? That is a long window for him not

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 4>to be on social media.

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>But he did.

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 3>There was a three thirty eight yesterday. This was for

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 3>you folks in Chicago. Quote, massive crime and rioting in

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 3>the Chicago Loop area. Multiple police officers attacked and badly

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 3>injured three hundred people rioting, six victims shot, one critical,

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 3>one dead. In the meantime, Governor Pritzker and the low

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 3>IQ mayor of Chicago are refusing federal government help for

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 3>a situation that could be quickly remedied. The people are

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 3>chanting bring in Trump.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 3>I didn't see any other reports anywhere that they were

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 3>literally chanting that, so I didn't know if he meant

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 3>that figuratively or literally. But yeah, there was a Yes,

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 3>that was a nasty open ideal in Chicago where I

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 3>don't know if you saw, please correct me. I saw

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 3>at least five maybe six shot.

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it was around those numbers. I didn't. I don't

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 4>have the exact but yes, it was a violent weekend

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 4>in Chicago.

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 3>They had a particular what was it they were all

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 3>collect Oh the Christmas tree lighting?

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, four yeah, so and a fourteen year old

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 4>was among those killed. Eight teenagers injured. So this they

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 4>call it a chaotic Chicago shootings. Yes, all around the

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 4>lighting at the Christmas tree.

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's awful, and there's video of it.

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 3>It is a scary scene where you see people take

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 3>off and scattering when gunfire. Sorry, so he's talking about

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 3>something there. Of course, that is real, that is relevant,

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 3>and it's factually correct. We've seen him call people low

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 3>IQ before. I don't think anyone is immune from that. Necessarily.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 1>He throws that around to any and everybody, man, woman, child.

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 4>He's indiscriminatory when he calls people stupid in various ways.

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 3>And the thing people are chanting bring in Trump. He

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 3>might just be making the argument that, hey, people see

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 3>this and want me to take action. I don't know

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 3>if he meant literally that people were.

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 4>In the street. I think if that happened, there would

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 4>be video and we would be able to see that.

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:14.959
<v Speaker 4>But I think maybe in his mind, folks are basically

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 4>chanting that in their minds, that's what he sees.

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 3>Look, this was what we gave you here, what was

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 3>twenty four hours for the president and the messages he

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 3>puts out.

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I am grateful for content. I am grateful. I wish

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>ever Biden Obama. Obviously Twitter was around during Clinton and Bush.

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Can you imagine those guys putting out no Tony tweets

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 3>today about what they are thinking on personal levels, how

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 3>they feel about this other person. This is not what

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 3>is traditionally presidential.

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 4>Fine, this is something you usually say for your journal

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 4>and you keep it to yourself. He's sharing it with

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 4>all of us, and so why not talk about it.

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Why not let people read it, hear it, see it. Look,

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 4>I wasn't somebody, and I think a lot of folks

0:25:57.600 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 4>this is the truth. Who aren't fans. And I'm not

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 4>saying if you have a political leaning and you're against

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 4>President Trump, probably you're not going on to true social

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 4>to read about him. You're probably trying to avoid Trump headlines.

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 4>But I don't think that's smart. I think this is

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 4>something everyone Republicans, Democrats, independents, whomever. It actually is worth

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 4>a read. It actually does matter what he's saying, because

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 4>this isn't somebody who usually just spouts off. He follows through.

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 3>So hope, don't just pay attention to some of the

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 3>sound bites you see on teal television. Don't just pay

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 3>attention to the major speeches that he makes. This man

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 3>speaks every single day and every single night directly to

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 3>you in a way that's different from anything you're going

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.719
<v Speaker 3>to see at elector on a teleprompter. And I know

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 3>he goes off the cuff here and there, but roades

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 3>to you. I think you make a very good point.

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 3>It's important no matter who you are, this is your president.

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 3>This is what he's saying, and you should be aware.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 4>And if he you know, he and Carolyn Levitt will

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:56.199
<v Speaker 4>constantly be complaining that his policies and his feelings and

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 4>thoughts are all filtered through a left leaning biased media.

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.239
<v Speaker 4>So here's one way to avoid all of that and

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 4>just read it for yourself and think what you want

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 4>to think about what he says for yourself.

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 3>You know, you made that point, and we made it

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 3>before we started. We don't need to interpret, we don't

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 3>need to add any commentary to these things.

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>For the most part, he said it. That's what he said.

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 3>And as we are wrapping up here now, folks, he

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 3>is not nothing yet this early ropes. We don't have

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 3>anything new yet from the President to report from his tweet,

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 3>but we can't wait till he starts posting, yes slash

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 3>tweeting again.

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 4>And with that everyone, thank you so much for listening

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 4>to us on this Sunday morning. I'm Amy Robock alongside TJ.

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Holmes.

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 4>We will talk to you soon