WEBVTT - 1145 | MLB Trade Deadline Preview: Most Valuable Assets Available

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>God is a record.

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Bring we will sue you to the gunner.

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome, The Just Baseball Show is live. Thank you so

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Jack McMullin, arm label right, fakel Stude, Peyton,

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Jesus here with you as always, and we've got our

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>MLB trade deadline preview on the horizon. It is live

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>at just baseball dot com. You should go check that out.

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Where they have power ring to be top fifty most

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>valuable assets possibly available at the deadline is Byronston in there.

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know is Byron Buxton mentioned at the end

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of the article for sure? Why? As he mentioned, you've

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>got to go read it to find out. So it's

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a very layered description in primer for the MLB trade deadline,

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, with the one through fifty ranking of trade assets.

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 1>So what we're gonna do today, We're gonna talk about

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the most valuable trade assets, the top ten to fifteen

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>most valuable pieces that could be on the move at

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the trade deadline, which I believe is nine days away

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>at this point. And then we are also going to

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>get into the rental starter market. How hard is bullpen

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>help going to be to come by? And then I

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>think the catcher conundrum is fascinating and we can really

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>dive into that. But you and the editorial team have

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>done obviously a kick ass job with this. Again, the deadline.

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like that's where you cook the most

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>over the course of a single season. It feels like

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you really live for the trade deadline.

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, me and Klais Noden, we felt like

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 3>it was old JB days. We felt like it was

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty one. Again. We were about to hop on

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 3>the State of the Division podcast and talk about all

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 3>thirty teams. We wrote eight thousand plus words on this

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 3>and shout out to Clay again for carrying a lot

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 3>of that heavy lifting on the right up side. Well,

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.239
<v Speaker 3>I kind of handled the ranking side of it, but yeah,

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 3>the deadline is my time off season, you know, the

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 3>transaction stuff. That's what I live for. And this was

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 3>a labor of love to spend this much time on

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 3>something and you know, care too much about who was

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 3>ranked thirty fourth and thirty fifth on this list.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 4>If you extra days, fuxture days for it to breathe.

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 4>We got the August third deadline this year.

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I know, I know, the random August third deadline.

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 3>I like that they laid it out this year. I

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 3>don't think there's any games played, so it should be

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 3>a nice, crazy Monday for us when everything starts to unfold.

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So I guess we're like, what eleven days away then, yeah,

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>because today is Wednesday, July twenty second, that we got

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>August third, which is a Monday, So you pretty much

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.839
<v Speaker 1>have a week and a half to decide if these

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>teams are going in the buying and selling direction. What

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen teams overall kind of change the outlook of

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>their season over the course of the last two weeks.

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 1>And there are teams slipping and sliding. There are teams

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that are climbing the Boston Red Sox, slipping and sliding

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the Toronto Blue Jays. But it is really interesting to

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of keep tabs because I think I was reading

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>yesterday twenty three of the thirty teams in Major League

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Baseball are within five games of a postseason spot. Twenty

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>three of thirty or within five games. Five games used

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to be like be this barometer of if you're within

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>five games, you're probably gonna buy and go for it.

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>So arm I want to kick it to you and

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>then we'll kind of go piece by piece for these

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>valuable assets, Like do you expect that number to go

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>down or do you expect this deadline to be underwhelming?

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Because if twenty three teams actually think they're in it,

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing's gonna happen.

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 4>I think it's gonna be underwhelming, with the caveat that

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 4>we might just get some crazy big lea for big

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 4>leaguer deal. So I asked some people about the big

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 4>leaguer people and I immediately get it shot down like, oh,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 4>those never happened, right, And I agree they don't happen,

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 4>But if they ever were to really happen, I feel

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 4>like it's gotta be this year now, Like this is

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 4>if you're not a seller, which there's not many of,

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 4>but you're not a full fledged buyer, what better way

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 4>than to just trade from the big league team to

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 4>assess a need elsewhere? And I think you have a

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 4>couple of teams where in theory that would make more sense,

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 4>but you have teams that could actually do it. We

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 4>talk about the Mariners all the time, but I think

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 4>there's several other teams, Like a J. Prower is gonna

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 4>very much, but we're going to talk about that position

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 4>himself to do it. I think you've even heard like

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 4>from the Marlins and they got to snap the skid.

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 4>But all the reports have been, hey, you know, we

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 4>want to trade a little bit. If we're going to

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 4>make some moves from the big league team to maybe

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 4>address the big league team. I think it's gonna happen

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 4>this year, and maybe we don't get the blockbuster like

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 4>you know, NBA type of trades that you see, but

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:58.799
<v Speaker 4>I do think that's the one way that this deadline

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 4>could get spiced up a little bit more.

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so we'll see what happens here. I do want

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to take us into the top fifteen most valuable assets

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that Just baseball dot com has listed. Again, this article

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is live on Just baseball dot com. It will be

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>linked to the episode description as well, but it is

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the top story on Just baseball dot com. Just go

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to it in your browser and you will find it

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>at the tippy top of your page, whether it's on

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>your phone or laptop or iPad or tablet, whatever you

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>may choose to use and scroll the internet. I think

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>before we get into like actual names of one through fifteen,

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>how do you look at it? Because spoiler alert schoobles

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>five a lot of people would look at the back

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to back American League, say Yaga Award winner and say,

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>how is he not one or two? But you clearly

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>value years of control. Teams very clearly value years of control.

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Fangrafs is doing their annual series right now where they're

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of ranking the most valuable assets in baseball, like

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Drake Baldwin for the sake of the exercises like the

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty first most valuable player in baseball in terms of

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>if everybody was on the trademarket. So how do you

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>balance overall talent and years of control to kind of

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>go into this cocktail that is trade value.

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 3>So I think the one thing that I wanted to

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 3>do here because you can look right now, you could

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 3>check out Jeff Patson's ranking and what they're doing over

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 3>there at ESPN, and that comes with a lot of

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 3>reporting from pass and it gives you the likelihood of

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 3>guys getting traded. Then it's also a ranking of who's

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 3>just the best players that can be acquired. What I

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 3>wanted to do with this list is to assess value,

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 3>and I think part of the things that we don't

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 3>talk about that much when it comes to players getting traded.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 3>One it's years of control, is definitely going to boost

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 3>their trade value and pretty significantly. Like Terrek, Schoolble is amazing,

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that he's even in the top five

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 3>as a rental there's part of me that was wondering,

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 3>is he too high because there's other guys that have control,

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 3>you know, is we'll get into a minute, but is

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Schoolble more valuable than read debt nerves because he comes

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 3>with two and a half years of control. So that

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 3>was one balance. The other thing is money, and that's

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 3>the thing that I think a lot of times we

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 3>forget and that's why I put the contract right here

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 3>because as much as you might prefer a Kevin Gossman

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 3>over a Freddy Peralta, there's teams out there that say, well,

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Gosman's making pro rated from the twenty three million

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 3>compared to Freddy Perlta at the eight million, and these

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 3>are both veteran pitchers, and we'll roll the dice on

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Freddy because it costs less money. So that was part

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 3>of how these rankings come together. The other thing, I

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 3>will say, just getting back to the uncertainty of this

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 3>deadline and so many teams in the middle this list

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 3>looked a lot worse a couple days ago because I

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 3>didn't have the Padres guys on here. I didn't have

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 3>the Blue Jays guys on here. And at a certain point,

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 3>there's some teams that just feel like, all right, we

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 3>need to include these these for one, to just make

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 3>the lists look better, but also we need to include

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 3>these teams so that we can kind of understand, yeah,

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 3>maybe the Padres should sell because hey, they have four

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 3>really valuable trade assets that they can they can shop here.

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 3>So that was another big thing with this list, was

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 3>trying to decide which teams to include. And when you're

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 3>reading at the end, there's a list of teams that

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 3>we did not consider, like a Roldist, Chapmans not on

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 3>this list, with think the Red Sox are going to buy.

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 3>There's some players done on the bottom too, where it's

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>guys that are unlikely to be sold low on. And

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 3>then there's also a grouping like Hunter Goodman. We'll talk

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 3>about him with the Catchers in a little bit. He's

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 3>not in the top fifty because I don't know if

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 3>a team is going to meet the value of Hunter

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Goodman with three and a half years of control. So

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 3>that's how he kind of came down to fifty names,

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 3>and if you read the whole article, almost every name

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 3>that you can think of is going to be listed somewhere.

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 3>They just might not all be in that top fifty.

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Arm you gave the nod of approval and the kind

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 1>of vocal mm like them of approval. When when a

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Fink mentioned money, why is money such a big caveat here?

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 4>I think it's the biggest aspect of the scooball component

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 4>in particular, and we've talked about that a little bit

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 4>on the show in the past, and that's why I

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 4>love the rankings that we have out right now, because

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 4>I think it just accounts for all of those things

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.719
<v Speaker 4>really well. Where if you trade for two school, yeah

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 4>it's Terek scouple and you might think, you know, in theory, oh,

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 4>ten million dollars like no brainer for Terrek Schouble the

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 4>rest of the way, ten million for a rental is

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot of money, no brainer if you have the

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 4>ability to do it. But think about how many gms

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 4>have to then go sell that to ownership, like you

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 4>better be damn sure you're making the playoffs if you're

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 4>paying not only what the prospect return is going to

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 4>be for a school, then ten million that could eat

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 4>into I don't know how every time operates, but that

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 4>could eat into what's available for you in free agency

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 4>the next year if you guys don't make the playoffs,

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 4>like it really does compound it, and it also shortens

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 4>the list of teams that can pull this trade off,

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 4>which is what we've talked about now. I think about

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 4>the Rays historically, that could have been something that eliminates him.

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 4>With this new ownership group, I think it's something that

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 4>they might leverage here and say, here's our chance to

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 4>swing for the fences. But traditionally, speaking like that could

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 4>have been something that disqualifies a race team that has

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 4>the prospect capital. So you don't create the bidding war

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 4>necessarily because several teams may just disqualify themselves by saying

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 4>we're not taking on ten million dollars for the rest

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 4>of this season. That's more than some teams pay, you know,

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 4>free agents for a whole season. So I think that

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 4>part's really important, especially with other teams that are up

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 4>against the CBT. Like for the sake of argument, let's

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 4>say the Astros were in on Schooble and they could

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 4>pull off the deal if they don't have enough wiggle

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 4>room up to the CBT, like they're not gonna pay.

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't know exactly what the tax rate would be,

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 4>but it will be more than ten now to pull

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 4>that off, So it is limiting, I think for teams.

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 4>And I also think it's part of the reason why

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 4>I still wonder if the Tigers are gonna be able

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 4>to pull this off, because if even if there's a

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 4>sniff of salary dump in the respect that it's just, hey,

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 4>you didn't get the return that you thought, you might

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 4>as well just hold on to them at that point,

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 4>And how many teams are gonna be lining up to

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 4>give you the prospect return that a player of his

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 4>caliber demands, even as a rental and taking on the money.

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a stalemate here.

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Someone's gonna need to pony up, and I'd be curious

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to see what that looks like. And to the point

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that we were initially discussing, it feels very likely that

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>if Schooble is on the move, there's a good Big

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>leagueer going back to Detroit in return, because Detroit, mind you,

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is not far off. We thought they were the class

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of the American League Central coming into this year, it's

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>been incredibly disappointing. There are a whole bunch of different

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:18.719
<v Speaker 1>ways that Detroit can get good big league players in

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>return for Trek schoolbel and maybe that offset's a little

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>bit of the cash. But without further ado, it's time

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to get into the top ten to fifteen most valuable

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>trade assets according to Just Baseball dot Com. Ryan Finkelstein,

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you take us through this man, because the

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>top dog is a fascinating discussion. I'm sure we will

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>talk plenty more about bullpen arms a little bit later

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 1>on in the program. But how did you see the

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>top ten to fifteen unfold?

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think starting off with like the top three,

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 3>the guys that stood out to me, Mason Miller late edition,

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 3>just because Jeff Passer reported that the pods are listening,

0:11:55.280 --> 0:12:00.079
<v Speaker 3>and I completely understand why they would consider it. I

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 3>also understand why it's going to be tough to move him.

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 3>But you're talking about a guy who's three and a

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 3>half years of control, a team that is very much

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:09.839
<v Speaker 3>in the middle right now, and also a market that

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 3>we'll get into layer that does not have a lot

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 3>of relievers. So Mason Miller was number one Zach Netto

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 3>number two Neto also three and a half years of control,

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 3>also a lad addition to this list for Neto another one.

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Recent reporting suggests that angels will listen. I wrote multiple

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 3>times in the rite up, I said, I just don't

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 3>know how many twenty five year old shortstops with three

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 3>and a half years of control get traded. But because

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 3>of that, he's very valuable, and so he's high up

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 3>on this list. Joe Ryan number three because the difference

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 3>between Joe Ryan and School bol it's twofold. One, it's

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 3>a year and a half of control. Two. He's only

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 3>making six point one million this season. He's got a

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 3>thirteen million dollar mutual option for next season. If he

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 3>decides it can make more in arbitration, which I don't

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 3>know if he would get that much more. He can

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 3>decide to not pick up his end of it and

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 3>go through arb but either I think you're kind of

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 3>set with what that's gonna look like for Joe Ryan,

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 3>probably around twenty million dollars for a year and a half,

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's a lot more valuable than School.

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 3>So I guess we can maybe start with those three

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 3>and move on from there.

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>There are plenty of famous examples of starting pitchers having

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>one blow up start or one amazing start before the

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>deadline and it heavily impacting their value. I think about

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Cole Hammil's throwing a no hitter right before the trade deadline.

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>If I'm not mistaken, that was what early to mid

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty tens, and then he gets moved for a much

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>greater haul than he would have been moved for four

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 1>days prior. With Joe Ryan, who allowed six homers on

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Monday to the Cleveland Guardians, P D Halpin hit two

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of them. Do you think that docks Joe Ryan's value

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>at all? Yes? Or no? Arm Leighton, I.

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 4>Don't think so. I think you'd have to do it again.

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Not that bad, but just have another PD help another

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>multi homer day.

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah then I think so. But yeah, it just could

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 4>be one of those days where verdy fastball guy just

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 4>leaves didn't sound too much and hanks a couple of

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 4>the breaking balls and it's just a rough one. But yeah,

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean if he has another one, like, you don't

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 4>want to slump right into that for a team that

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 4>was already on the fence, like they're gonna need to

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 4>be absolutely wowed I think to do it anyways, So

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 4>I think the only way that the Twins really move him,

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 4>I think is if they which I think they should.

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 4>But it's also hard. We talk about these teams and

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 4>where they're at, and just I think the next week

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 4>or so will determine that just how the Twins play,

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 4>who all of a sudden now are back the four

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 4>under five hundred. But I think, assuming he doesn't have

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 4>another bad starter too, I just think that the bulk

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 4>sample of Joe Ryan and just how consistent he has been, uh, ultimately,

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 4>I don't think will affect it too too much.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Interesting that I think you think Joe Ryan is a

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>more valuable asset than school, But this is probably controlling

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>money coming into play, right and Ryan is getting a

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit steeper I guess in price tag, but at

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, like that year is doing

0:14:58.520 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of heavy lifting.

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 3>No one hundred percent. I mean again, it's the combination

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 3>of the money side of it. I think Joe Ryan

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 3>at only six million this year, that that barrier of entry,

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 3>that that's going to open up a lot more teams

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 3>being able to call on him. As you know I

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 3>mentioned with Schoogle, you could be looking at two or

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 3>three teams that can actually really, you know, viably do

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 3>it on the combination of prospects and money. The other

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 3>thing is, I just look at Joe Ryan and I

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 3>feel like this year he's been healthy all year. He

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 3>gives you that upside. And I think for a team

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 3>that's going to give up the type of return to

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 3>get one of these pitchers, having the extray of control,

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 3>even with the looming lockout, I still think that that's

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 3>going to help a GM put that prospect they really

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 3>don't want to trade on the table because at least

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 3>they have two playoff runs with him.

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 4>And it also sets up your rotation at such a

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 4>low cost. So whatever your budget is presumably for the

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 4>off season, once we have the off season, you can

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 4>address rotation. And also we talk about free agency and

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 4>how bad it is like you may have to overpay

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 4>for a picture that's going to be lesser than Joe Ryan.

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 4>How nice to have Joe Ryan for about a year

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 4>and a quarter at less than twenty million dollars, literally

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 4>less than the qualifying offer. You're gonna get two playoff

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 4>runs with Joe Ryan. So I think that's where a

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 4>lot of teams could you know Pony up and if

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 4>the Twins get offered, you know, Sean down Hue puts

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 4>a great question one of our awesome writers just baseball,

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 4>like could Atlanta be a sneaky team for Joe Ryan?

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Like if they offer you controllable starters, like if you

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 4>get offered JR. Ritchie or whatever, it may be all

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 4>of a sudden. I think the Twins just when you

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 4>when you when you put it in the model and

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 4>you look about you look at your present and your future,

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 4>it becomes hard to say say no to you know,

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 4>those controllable arms.

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Griffin Jacks was hard to move until what TDZ Bradley

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>was on the table right Like there, those are really

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting names. And I saw Ken Rosenthals reporting you know

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>about long term uh you know, younger starting pitchers that

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>could trade chips in a schoobl conversation, right like Emmitt

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Sheen with the Dodgers. Who else to the fl listed

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>painter with the Phillies. Guys like that. Those are really

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 1>interesting names that could be available or somewhat available at

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the deadline real quick. On number two, Zach Netto, I

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>think the Angels should move a lot. That's the one

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>guy I would yeah, if I were the angels, and

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing that they're willing to listen on Netto. We're

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna get into the Catcher conversation momentarily, and I'm gonna

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>pour some cold water on the Catcher market in a moment.

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>But I guess I'm pouring cold water on the first

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>one here. I really don't understand why Ardi Moreno, who

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>hugs det Meers and Soriano and doesn't move rental O

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Tani is even thinking about moving as Zach Netto. Does

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that make any sense to you?

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 4>Are No, it doesn't really, because like I think you

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 4>could listen, especially in the world where like it sounds

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 4>like the Astros aren't gonna trade Jeremy Panine. It's like

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 4>you could just say, hey, we've got the one controllable

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 4>shortstop on the market. Wow us, you know, just just

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 4>give me the most ridiculous off forever. They don't get it,

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 4>and it is what it is. It's also off a

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 4>year where Netto's swinging and missing more than ever, and

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 4>I think you're still very productive. I love Zach Meto,

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 4>always have since he was a prospect, which wasn't very long.

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 4>But I just I could understand just saying, hey, let's

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 4>sit and listen, because if you can get multiple close

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 4>to big league ready pieces, I get it. But I'm

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 4>not a big proponent of like trading a guy with

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 4>three and a half years of control, because especially when

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 4>you have some other pieces, Like I don't have a

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 4>lot of faith in the Angels organization, but you have

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 4>a new guy in charge right now in mosay Loc

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 4>you get a year and a half to like try

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 4>to be semi competitive, and then by then if you're not,

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 4>you still have two plus years of control to trade

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 4>Neto and still get a haul. And there's a certain

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 4>tipping point where it's like three and a half years

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.239
<v Speaker 4>versus two and a half years. I don't know how

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 4>much more you're gonna get because teams just aren't gonna

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 4>go that much further outside of their comfort zone. So

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 4>I think it's worth listening. But trading a guy like

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 4>that with three and a half years of control, I'd

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 4>only be doing that if you had zero big league pieces.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:08.959
<v Speaker 4>Maybe the Angels should have done that, you know, if

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 4>they were where they were at last year, but now

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 4>all of a sudden, they got some pictures and like

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 4>you put in a couple other good bats like trouts,

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 4>the healthiest he's been in a little bit, like there's

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 4>a world where they can be all right next year.

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, I'm totally with you. All right. Moving to

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the next clump of guys here, you've got a handful

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of starting pitchers. What you guys got Are we gonna

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 1>do Mason Miller?

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 4>Any question on that?

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh you want to talk Mason Miller. You want to

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>save him for the bullpen conversation?

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh, save him for the bullpen. Sorry, I just want

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 4>to double chuck next clumping of guys real quick.

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>As we kind of pushed through the top fifteen most

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>valuable assets, we've got a couple of starting pitchers, and

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>then we've got a couple of catchers as well. I

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>think you guys have Shay Langliers the Athletics listed as

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>the number four most valuable trade asset that could be

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>moved at the deadline, followed by school Bold, Debt, Mers,

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and Soriano in there as well. Michael Watkee in there

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>as well, and the other catcher is Adley Ritchman of

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore Orioles. I want to hold the catcher conversation

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>because we're gonna expand on that but that clump of

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers who jumps out to you and why outside

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of school because we just had a school conversation, Ryan, Yeah,

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Read Detmers is the one that jumps out. It feels

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 3>like if there's a guy that gets moved for a

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 3>crazy return, I think Debtmers might kind of be the

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 3>sweet spot where it's enough control that I think teams

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 3>will really be aggressive on bidding for him. And if

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 3>you're the Angels right now and you're trying to decide

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 3>which piece to sell, you can keep Jose Sorano, who

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we'll have the same trade value, and

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 3>you can just move Debtmers and get the return to

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 3>boush your farm system without going into a full fire sale.

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 3>And it kind of builds off of the Zach Nettle

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 3>thing like you're gonna listen on all these guys. I

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 3>think Detmers might be the sweet spot where you might

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 3>actually be moved enough to actually sell on them. Also,

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 3>you got to remember, like this is the guy who's

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 3>pitching out of the bullpen last year, so it feels

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 3>like a guy that is finally putting all together. Maybe

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 3>sell high there. And like you mentioned, talk about the

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 3>catchers later, but Langelier's I think with two and a

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 3>half years of control, deserve to be in the top five.

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 3>We'll see if they actually move them. Adleye is going

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 3>to be interesting again. We'll talk about that with the catchers.

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 3>But I look at Jose Soriano, Reed Detmers and Michael Waka.

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 3>That that trio of arms. If you're trying to get

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 3>a starting pitcher with control, I think those are the

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 3>three that are most likely to move. And Waka is

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 3>a guy that like that is such a good contract.

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 3>It's crazy. He's making eighteen this year, fourteen next year.

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 3>And then it's not a mutual, it's not a player.

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 3>It's a club option for fourteen million dollars in twenty

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 3>twenty eight with only a million dollar buyouts. So it's

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 3>like the best of both worlds. It's either affordable or

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.239
<v Speaker 3>if Waka falls off a cliff in the next year

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 3>and a half, you're out of the deal. So I

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 3>almost look at at Waka and think like that's the

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 3>guy that I would be targeting because I just don't

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 3>think you'll have to give up the return of a

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 3>younger pitcher like a debt meers, but you're getting the

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 3>same control at a pretty affordable rate.

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm fascinated by the Detmers thing, and I know,

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 4>like i've I've floated that he should be moved, and

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 4>then I got a lot of pushback, and I kind

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 4>of understood it from Angels spins, where it's like we've

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 4>waited to have this pitching for such a long time. Sure,

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 4>and I get that. I think that's some leverage that

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 4>you can have there. But again, if the compensation is

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 4>more pitching, and I'm not talking about like a low

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 4>way arm, I'll just keep using.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 3>The Braves example.

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 4>But there's other teams that are in this position, or

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 4>the Dodgers. But if you're getting multiple either guys that

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 4>have already debuted or guys that are just really close

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 4>to being able to do so pitching prospects with six

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 4>years of control, that's where it gets really interesting. And

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Detmers is what two years of control after this one

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 4>Compared to Neto, you have an extra one if you

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 4>have a bad year, you can revisit it at the

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 4>deadline next year with Netto. But that's where I get

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 4>just fascinated, because you mentioned they have some other guys

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 4>that already you can plug in and look look at

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 4>next year and say, right, we've got Soriano. You know,

0:22:56.840 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 4>we've got Urania. Hopefully you have a healthy Kikuchi and

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 4>if one or one of the young arms that you

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 4>acquire you can plug right into the rotation, it's not bad.

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 4>And then you're gonna get a couple other major pieces

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 4>because not only is Deptmers controllable, it's extremely cheap and

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 4>I think that's the really exciting part too. And there's

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 4>not gonna be a slew of left handed arms on

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 4>the market. I think that's one where if you're listening

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 4>on netto, you better be listening with some intent on

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 4>Deptmers because at that price point, you know, in terms

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 4>of his contract, you might get wowed.

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we are going to hold a couple of the

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>next guys because some of them are rental starting pitchers.

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>But to round out the top fifteen, there are two

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>guys that jump out to me that are fascinating. Number

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>one at number ten is the top reliever available in

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the market, the Mets right hander Luke Weavers, and you're

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>one of a two year deal. And then the other

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>one that you guys have listed is fascinating to me,

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Luis Garcia junior with the Washington Nationals. Big, do you

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 1>really think that Luis Garcia Junior is on the move,

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>because this is a super value ascent to me, this

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>breakout your offensively kind of screams building block, Like I

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Abrams is going anywhere, Wood is going anywhere,

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Garcia going anywhere, Lyle going anywhere. All of a sudden,

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>you look at that National offense and they kind of

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>look the way we were thinking they were gonna look

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of last year. We're like, Wow, there

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of future cornerstones here.

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 3>So I think with Louis Garcia, it's taken a sneaky

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 3>long amount of time for him to have this breakout,

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 3>and it's only a year and a half of control.

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's where if you're gonna move one

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 3>like Abrams, I think it's at least two years after

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 3>this season, maybe three. And that's why he fell into

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 3>the bucket of guys who are too valuable to be traded.

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Louis Garcia, you can sell high right now on a

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 3>market that has almost no bats. I mean, if the

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 3>catchers don't go Luis Garcia, it's Louis Garcia and Luisa

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Ryes are like the best bat that you can get,

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 3>and with Garcia you get that extra year of control.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 3>So that's why he's on this list and pretty high

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 3>on this. As far as Luke Weaver, again, we'll talk

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 3>about it more when we're going through why this relief

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 3>market is so bad, But there's not the clear cut

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 3>closer on the market right now. Luke Weaver can be

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 3>that for some teams. We know he has closed games

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 3>before and that extra ray of control again should incentivize

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 3>teams to maybe put a bigger prospect on the table,

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 3>knowing all right, even if we don't win this year,

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Luke Weaver is locked in for twelve and a half

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 3>million dollars next season, which is something that he would

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 3>get on the market probably, you know, if he was

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 3>a free agent, you'd probably get that over maybe three years,

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 3>like three years at twelve million. So those guys are

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.959
<v Speaker 3>definitely really valuable. I also will talk about the rental starters,

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 3>but just because it ties into school ball, Casey Mice

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 3>at six point, like, I think the Tigers might be

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 3>getting more phone calls on Casey Mimes over the next

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 3>eleven days than Schooble because it's only six point one

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 3>five million dollars that any team can theoretically trade for him,

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 3>and you wouldn't think you'd had to give up as much.

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 3>But there's a reason why I put him right outside

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 3>the top ten, because I think he's that valuable for

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 3>the Tigers right now.

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I dig it.

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 4>Arm what jumps out to you the Luis Garcia conversations

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 4>is a good one because I think, like the point

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 4>you bring up Jack is like the initial first thought,

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 4>and then when you think about the market and what

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 4>Fink brings up, and you also think about the fact

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 4>that the Nationals like they're cooking beyond what we're seeing

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 4>at the big league level. They've got guys coming up,

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 4>and if they're not going to trade Abrams, going to

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 4>have to clear up some space somewhere for some of

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 4>these bats that they've got coming up. And they also

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how they're going to operate in terms

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 4>of spending, but I still think they're at a position

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 4>where money matters. And if he's making about seven million

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 4>Garcia and Arb this year, you think we'll probably especially

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 4>after the year he had probably exceed ten and I'm

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 4>sure they will have to allocate that money towards pitching

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 4>and if you can get a little bit of a

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 4>prospect return. With the way that Taboni is, this is

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 4>a different Mats front office, with the way that they

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 4>can snipe prospects and maximize these returns. I think they

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 4>might be eager to do that in a market that

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 4>may play into their favor. So that's one why I

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 4>think we saw the report from Will Salmon of the

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Athletic and Spencer and USPAM that said multiple teams have

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 4>asked about Garcia, and at first I was kind of man, sure,

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 4>you know, but when you think about the market has

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.159
<v Speaker 4>been alluded to, there's not a lot out there, and

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 4>I assume that that's one hundred percent true. A lot

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 4>of teams are probably just looking for any kind of

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 4>offensive upgrade, and here's a guy that's on pace to

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 4>hit thirty.

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>No doubt about that. So again, that was the Rundown Podcast.

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>PEF you wouldn't un flash in the graphic one more

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>time at the top fifteen of the top fifteen most

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>valuable trade chips at the twenty twenty six trade deadline. Again,

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the article live on Just Baseball dot Com has one

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>through fifty ranked. We're going to get into a fascinating

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>catcher conversation before we wrap the back half of the

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>episode with pitching. But before that, let's hear about some peanuts.

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 5>Imagine you take your seat at the ballpark, the smell

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 5>of fresh cut grass and ice, cold beer, peanuts and

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 5>the promise of three hours of uninterrupted baseball. What if

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 5>you could bring the ballpark home to you with Hampton

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 5>Farms peanuts. You can, America's number one in shell brand

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 5>can be found in your local produce aisle, or twenty

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 5>five percent off at Hampton Farms dot com with code

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 5>just Baseball. Bring the ballpark home to you with Hampton

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 5>Farms Peanuts.

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Let us continue the conversation with the catchers that could

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>be on the move, because Ryan Finkelstein just offered the

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>caveat if the catchers aren't moving. Luis s Garcia is

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>right there with Luisa Rise in terms of the best

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>and most valuable bats that could be available at the

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline. The catching crop is what throws a massive

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>wrench into this whole deadline conversation and the names that

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>jump up. Jay Langliers with the Athletics, Hunter Goodman with

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the Colorado Rockies, Adlie Ritchman with the Baltimore Orioles, Francisco

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Alvarez with the New York Bets. There are a couple

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>other guys, Tyler Stevenson in Cincinnati. Yeah, he's a step

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>below or a couple steps below in terms of weight class.

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>From those big guys, I see two top dogs, to

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, I see Goodman in Colorado based

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>on what he has done away from Corsfield this year,

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming majority of his thirty one homers have come away

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>from cors Field. And then Langaliers as well, who was

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the starting catcher for the American League of the All

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Star Game. I will start by pouring cold water on

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>those two guys, and then we could expand the conversation.

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Sacramento would be silly to move Langaliirs right now.

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I also think Colorado would be silly to move Goodman

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. I think Goodman is what the Rockies have

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>been clamoring for for quite a while, and with how

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>much control they have over Hunter Goodman, they should be

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>retaining him. I understand that this is a new regime

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and they feel like they have a lot of work

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to do, especially on the pitching side, but they're finding

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the best of Mickey moniac and they're finding the best

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of Jake McCarthy Like TJ. Rumfield's a hell of a player.

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>This offense can be sneaky dangerous next year or the

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>year after. And when you have a forty homer threat

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>behind the dish, that does a lot of heavy lifting

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>for you. Similar with Langoliers. If Langaliers goes, I mean,

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>right now, with how many injuries they have, what are

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the redeeming qualities in that lineup? Outside of Kurts. Everybody's

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>hurt right now, and I know the guys are gonna

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>get healthy, but Langaliers has proven to be a top

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>five catcher in Major League Baseball. I just don't think

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you move those guys with two and a half years.

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>What say you about Langaliers? And Goodman? Think you first?

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 3>So I'm with you. And there's a reason why Hunter

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Goodman's now on this list, And that's exactly what the

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 3>read is. And I just don't think that there's going

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 3>to be a team that's going to offer enough for

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 3>a catcher with three and a half years of control.

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Langaliers was again another late edition, and ultimately the fact

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 3>that there was some reporting that came out that they

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 3>tried to extend him and they didn't get a deal done.

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 3>That kind of perked my ears up a little bit

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:50.239
<v Speaker 3>on it. He's so consistent, this guy. Every year it's

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty plus. It's a catcher some baseball year in, year out,

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 3>just always there.

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 4>So it have to be a lot.

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 3>But it's kind of like last year where we were

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 3>all saying, there's no world that they trade Mason Miller.

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 3>But then if they, if a good enough prospect gets

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 3>put on the table, I think it can happen. And

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 3>so this is where I just wonder if there's enough

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 3>dialogue on teams trying to get a goodman or a

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 3>lengeliers do teams pivot and now all of a sudden,

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 3>the Ridals get overwhelmed for a year and a half

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 3>of ADLEI, or the Mets get overwhelmed for three and

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 3>a half years of Francisco Alvarez. That's where I think

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 3>those two are more likely to be moved. And I

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 3>will say one thing about Adli I just you just

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 3>look at the surface level numbers and you say, like, Okay,

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 3>he's having a good bounce back season. Then you look

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 3>at this savant and look under the hood the fact

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 3>that you can get a catcher in Adlie that you're

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 3>not gonna have to worry that much about the sort

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 3>of learning curve of a new pitching staff and everything.

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, he's going to handle the defensive side of

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 3>things while giving you a really good bat. Like, I

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 3>think there is a real chance that Ali gets moved

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 3>here because again it's a year and a half of control,

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 3>you have Bisillo locked up. I just wonder if the

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 3>Orioles pull the trigger on this. It's an interesting one.

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 3>And also he just hurt his wrists, which is I

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 3>was going to say a complication too.

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 4>I was going to say that works both ways, where

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 4>I assuming that he returns healthy and he's going to

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 4>go this bounce back year of Adlie, he's still been

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 4>banged up, like it's going to be a battle to

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 4>get to one hundred and ten games, and when you

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 4>look at next year and you just want to continue

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:28.239
<v Speaker 4>to get more reps for a Besalloh and that's your

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 4>extended future of the position, and you're also a team

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>That just is.

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 4>I know they've been playing better of late, and overall,

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of depends what day we check in of

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 4>what they should do ultimately probably not going to make

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 4>a major run here. This is probably your last chance

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 4>to really cash in. And I do think like a

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 4>lot of teams would have still interest in adding Adelie

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 4>to the fold. I don't know, it just it always

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 4>feels like the Oils are never going to do it.

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 4>But the names that we mentioned, it feels like he

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 4>would be the most likely given less control bounce back

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Yere but still injured and of the same frustrations that

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 4>the Orioles may have. I'm just I'm curious on that

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 4>side of things. And then with Goodman, I agree one

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent, Jack, like, just extend that guy, and who

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 4>cares if you pay above market value whatever, you have

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 4>two years of control, leverage those and am whatever it takes.

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 4>The Athletics have tried with Langliers, you know, the deal

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 4>with John Fisher at this point, like even with the

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 4>new franchise, with the new location in Vegas, whatever, like

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 4>they're quickly seemed to be far apart. If you think

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 4>there's no path to being able to extend Langliers, like

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 4>this would be the most valuable time to do it,

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 4>so you might as well listen. But I just don't

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 4>see how another one where it's just I know it's

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 4>not my money, but it's a building block here, and

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 4>you have one of the best catchers in the game

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 4>who gets better every year and is a great clubhouse guy,

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 4>like pay the man, and those two guys have earned it,

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 4>But I just I don't if you don't think you're

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 4>gonna pay them, now would be the time to trade them.

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Theoretically, historically speaking, catchers have always been an off season trade. Like,

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>very few good catchers are moved at a demi line

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>because to the point of learning a new staff, like

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that's hard, especially in the midst of a postseason run,

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 1>and you've got guys that are clicking probably with one

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>or two catchers. Now it's probably easier in this day

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and age than previously, where the pitcher catcher dynamic in

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the battery relationship was of the utmost importance, and now

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it's still really important. But it's not like dire because

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>there are some teams that are calling pitches from the dugout.

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>But like I'm looking at this catching crop and saying, Okay,

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Adley would be very valuable at the deadline, but maybe

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>he's moved in the off season. Francisco Alvarez would be

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>very valuable at the deadline, but maybe he's moved in

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>the off season where you can kind of think with

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 1>a clear mind and you're not making a decision coming

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>off of five losses in a row or coming off

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of five wins in a row saying we're going to

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>give up a top ten prospect in baseball for two

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half years of shehe Langeliers and we got

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>to add more The interesting name here that I can't

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>decide where I sit on is Alvarez. Think like Francisco,

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Alvarez is someone that I'm still holding out a ton

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of hope for. And I've always just associated Alvarez and

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Gabby Moreno in my head, and that's the next group

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of star young catchers, and Moreno has become that for Arizona,

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and he's not going anywhere. Alvarez feels like he's been

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>knocking on the door for the last two years, but

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 1>then a thumb thing, and then a handmate and then

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>something else. Where do you sit on Alvarez? Getting to

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>watch this guy when he's on the field every day,

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>do you think it makes sense to cash it on

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 1>three and a half years remaining of Francisco Alvarez.

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 3>I am so torn on this one. Again. I think

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 3>there is a situation that can unfull where it makes sense,

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's the one that I laid out. You have

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 3>teams that are going all in on Goodman or Lengeliers

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:48.760
<v Speaker 3>and they're not getting him, and all of a sudden,

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 3>you get offered a crazy return for Francisco Alvarez where

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 3>you're getting maybe it's a top one hundred starting pitching

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.760
<v Speaker 3>prospect that you think you can slot into irrotation next season.

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you're getting a big bat that you can move

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 3>over like a can't miss first base prospect. You can

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 3>finally have your answer there. I don't know exactly what

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 3>that return is, but I do think that because the

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Mets have Luise Terrenz, who I think the front office

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 3>absolutely loves, they extended him and he's really I mean,

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.760
<v Speaker 3>by the metrics, he's maybe the best defensive catcher in baseball.

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 3>If you are going to continue to give Turrenz a

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 3>ton of playing time and Alvarez is catcher DH, that

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 3>offense looks a little different if Alvarez is dhing instead

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 3>of catching. Now as a catcher, you're talking about a

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 3>guy that despite all the injuries. Despite everything else, he

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 3>has at this point in his career only run a

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:40.839
<v Speaker 3>WRC plus under one hundred and one time. His rookie season,

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 3>when he hit twenty five homers. Last year was a

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 3>one twenty four WRC plus. This year it's a one

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 3>fourteen WRC plus. I absolutely love Francisco Alvarez. I would

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 3>be very upset as a Mets fan to see him

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 3>go somewhere else and blossom.

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 4>But I also.

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.919
<v Speaker 3>Understand the state of the Mets. They are in full cellar.

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:02.720
<v Speaker 3>So that's the other thing compared to these other teams.

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think you know, for the Orioles, they

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 3>got a there. They've probably been going back and forth

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 3>on if they're selling or not. For the Mets, you've

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 3>known your selling for a little bit and you're gonna

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 3>be entertaining a ton of conversations. So I could see

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 3>the Mets moved to sell Alvarez. The one last note

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 3>I'll have is there was an article that came out

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 3>probably about three or four weeks ago now from Will

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Sam and The Athletic, and it was an article saying

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 3>the Mets catching could get a bounty at this deadline.

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 3>And I feel like that came from the front office

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 3>to gauge what kind of bounty they could get. It

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 3>felt to me like a little bit of a leak

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 3>to Will Salmon. Let's just throw out there that we're listening.

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 3>And because of that, I can't shut out the possibility

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:44.959
<v Speaker 3>that Alvarez gets moved.

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 4>So I have two follow ups on that. Do you

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 4>think Francisco Alvarez is more valuable to another team kind

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 4>of based on what you laid out than he is

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 4>to the Mets right now and even moving forward?

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I think because of the need to catch a position

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 3>like I could, like, for example, the Rays might need

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 3>to catch her. I can see the Rays say, you

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 3>know what, We're gonna make Francisco alvaas way better than

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:06.720
<v Speaker 3>he's ever been, and we're going to put the prospects

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 3>on the table to get him because he's cheap. We

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 3>have three and a half years of control, and he's

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 3>gonna help us right now. So I think that the

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 3>market really might might value him. I don't know if

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 3>I want to say more than the Mets. Necessarily, I

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 3>think the Mets still value him highly, but I think

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:22.800
<v Speaker 3>the market might meet the Mets value of him to

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:24.879
<v Speaker 3>the point where they decid, you know what, let's catch

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 3>in two.

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Would he be by far the most valuable return that

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 4>they would get at the deadline? Because that's why I

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 4>get stuck with the Mets. Rebuild is or not rebuild? Sorry,

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm just selling at this deadline is who's going to

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 4>really help you rebuild the pieces? Like, who's going to

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 4>really help you recoup value other than you know Weaver

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 4>and maybe Clay Holmes, Like who's the guy that's going

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 4>to really shift the org a little bit and send things,

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 4>you know into I would say, with momentum into the

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 4>next season and into the off season, do you feel

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 4>like Alvarez would be far and away the best return?

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:00.359
<v Speaker 4>So I I think.

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Alvarez would would bring you the best return, But I

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 3>think Luke Weaver is a little bit close. And I

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 3>think that's why Alvarez. My guess right now, if I

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:09.840
<v Speaker 3>deput my my on it, I think that Alvarez stays

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 3>because it's so hard to replace Francisco Alvarez. But I

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 3>think that and I also think the Mets can really

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 3>as we'll talk about in a minute, they can corner

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 3>the relief market. They have two rental starting pitchers. They

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 3>can flip so I ultimately think it's move the three leivers,

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 3>move homes and Perolta for whatever you can. I think

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 3>that's going to give you enough of a return that

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 3>you don't have to trade Francisco Alvarez, I will say.

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 3>At the same time, we'll probably do it next week.

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 3>We're working on a lot of mock trades behind the

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 3>scenes here, and we were mocking some trades for the

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Cubs for an article we have coming. In one of

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 3>those trades, I think it was Luke Weaver going the

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 3>other way and the Mets getting Owen a Ers. So

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 3>it's like, if you've got if you've made another trade

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 3>where you got a potential catcher of the future, well

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 3>now you're even more kind of willing to put Avaz

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 3>on the table. The problem for the Mets is in

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 3>the system right now. The catchers are too far away

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:00.320
<v Speaker 3>to think that you have somebody else us and I

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 3>don't believe the Mets would want Louis Trenz to catch,

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, one hundred and twenty five games. So that's

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 3>where I think it's it's really tough to move them,

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 3>and ultimately it's going to be a lot easier to

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 3>just move the pitching that's expiring and try to build

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:17.839
<v Speaker 3>around Alvarez, benj Ewing, Sodo Lindor and then the young

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:19.760
<v Speaker 3>pitching I have you in your rotation.

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Makes sense, all right, Let's pivot the conversation here rental starters,

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>because the rental starter market is going to be one

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that could move quite a bit, and you can kind

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of clump out the top ten rental starting pitchers. And

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you did that for us, and the top two are

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Tigers. The top rental starter available, obviously is Trek Scooble,

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the back to back of America League. So Young Award

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>winner first got to do that since Pedro in ninety

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>nine and two thousand and then Casey Mice former number

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 1>one overall pick. Schooble and Mice. We opened up that

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>conversation already. And think you mentioned Scott Harris could be

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 1>getting more calls about MAZ than school ball just based

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>on where the money is. For Casey Mice, he'll be

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>out about two million dollars for the final two months

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>versus school who's gonna be owned about ten million dollars

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>for the final two months. But I do want to

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:09.919
<v Speaker 1>clump in three and four to this conversation as well.

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Clay Holmes is valuable. Kevin Gosman is someone who confuses

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>me because I would be willing to. I not like

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 1>sell the farm for Kevin Gosman because it's a rental

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and he is a older veteran's darter. But I love

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:28.760
<v Speaker 1>watching Gosman throw and he feels like such a safety

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 1>net in a playoff rotation. If he is my playoff three,

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I can win a lot of series.

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Where do you sit on Gosman?

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I honestly I almost want to look at that

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 3>that three through five because that was the toughest ones Holmes, Gosman,

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 3>and Foster Griffin. Because Foster Griffin is having the best

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 3>season of the three. He is the cheapest, only five

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 3>million dollars, so per write that out right. But the

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 3>thing about Foster Griffin is he was in the KBO

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.439
<v Speaker 3>for the past three years, so how do you feel

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:59.839
<v Speaker 3>like he is going to translate in a playoff race?

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 3>And that's where Kevin Gosman is really valuable, as you mentioned,

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 3>even though he's not having the best season. Even though

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 3>his contract it's twenty three million, so whatever that comes

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 3>out to maybe seven million something along those lines. Even

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 3>with all of that, Kevin Gosman is the guy that

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 3>I'd probably want to hand the ball to. At the

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 3>same time, Clay Holmes was so good earlier this season.

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:24.919
<v Speaker 3>He does still have postseason experience grant to come out

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 3>of the bullpen. But because Holmes is cheaper on the

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 3>contract by pretty fair amount thirteen million this season, so

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 3>that's probably like three and a half maybe four, I

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 3>think Holmes is slightly more valuable. But I just think

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 3>that of those rentals, I believe teams would look at

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Holmes and Gosman and say, you know what, even though

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Foster Griffin's been way better this year, I still trust

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 3>those guys more in a playoff game.

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree with that sentiment orum with Gosman.

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, just just got to see it up

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:55.799
<v Speaker 4>close and personal in the playoff run last year, You've

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 4>got a guy that's thrown. You don't often get to

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 4>acquire somebody that's thrown what fifty plus innings in the postseason,

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 4>I believe in it's fifty six and a third, and

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:07.719
<v Speaker 4>you went out and made two starts in the World

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 4>Series last year and was really effective. Overall. It was

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 4>a great playoff run. In general last year, So I

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:17.320
<v Speaker 4>think from that lens, like if teams really value that,

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 4>I think that's going to be something that's important with

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Gosman because yeah, you can you can acquire this breakout player,

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 4>and the Griffin's been amazing. He might just go out

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:26.080
<v Speaker 4>there and keep throwing, but it's also never been there,

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 4>so you just don't know. The other aspect that I

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 4>think is fascinating is Holmes because Holmes looked like he

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.879
<v Speaker 4>was really putting it all together. So if somebody looks

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 4>at that and says, look, assuming he's healthy and we

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 4>see him throwing the ball, well, like we think this

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 4>guy's the most effective of the bunch, I could also

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 4>see that. I think the Holmes Griffin thing is interesting,

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 4>but I do understand like the Gosman just been there,

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 4>done that, even though he has just been so jeckoing

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 4>highe this year, which could maybe spook some teams too.

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 3>One other note on Holmes, I think if he had

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 3>gone down with an elbow injury or something, the value

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 3>is not there. He got hit in the leg with

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 3>the comebacker and fractured his fibulous so I just think

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 3>he's I'm sure he's been able to throw this whole time,

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 3>and I just imagine that you're you're gonna be getting

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:12.399
<v Speaker 3>an arm that's pretty fresh down the stretch too, Yeah,

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 3>which I think teams will look at and say, all right,

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 3>there's no reason why Clay Holmes can't pick up where

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:20.840
<v Speaker 3>he left off. That's one guy though, He's gonna make

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:23.720
<v Speaker 3>a start next week. And like you were talking before,

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Jack about the Cole Hamill situation, that's one where that

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 3>start is gonna be over analyzed a lot because if

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:32.360
<v Speaker 3>he comes back he gives up nine runs, you're not

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:34.759
<v Speaker 3>gonna get anywhere near the value. If he comes back

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 3>and looks like he hasn't you know, skipped to be

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 3>even if it's seventy five pitches, but he gives you,

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, five scoreless innings, I think team will say,

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:43.320
<v Speaker 3>all right, same guy, we're gonna we're gonna trade for

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 3>what he was before the injury.

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, makes perfect sense. Arm, you had something else, no.

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 4>That that was that was kind of part of it

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:50.840
<v Speaker 4>us and say like how many highs are going to

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:52.800
<v Speaker 4>be on that Clay home start when he when he

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 4>comes back. And I think the one thing would just

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 4>be kind of like the landing spot to see how

0:44:56.040 --> 0:44:58.320
<v Speaker 4>he's if he's able to have the same level of

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 4>command that he had before. And I so one comment.

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 4>I just saw a couple of people confuse on the

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:05.439
<v Speaker 4>Joe Ryan mutual option. This isn't your typical mutual option

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 4>where it gets declined eye one side and he's a

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 4>free agent. It's a mutual option to fore go arbitration.

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 4>If one side declines a mutual option, then they just

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 4>go to arbitration. So you still have the year of control.

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Just to clarify that.

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so it is a one and a half year

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.279
<v Speaker 1>by for Joe Ryan, which is why he is not

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>a top ten rental starter on just Baseball dot com.

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:27.320
<v Speaker 1>The next group of guys Freddy Peralta of the Mets,

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber the Blue Jays, Robbie Ray of the Giants,

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and then Trevor Rodgers of the Orioles, and Brady Singer

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Cincinnati Reds. Hand up. I probably wouldn't be

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 1>touching Brady Singer. It was bombs away at the beginning

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Brady Singer scares me quite a bit.

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Rodgers is an interesting one to me because it's

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 1>just so volatile. I look at this next group of guys.

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:52.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of unknown with Bieber, a lot of unknown.

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Peralta, I think is still going to command a

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:58.800
<v Speaker 1>decent haul because of the name value and because of

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>what he has done and things that he could snap

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it into gear over the course of a single start.

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:05.839
<v Speaker 1>But my eyes go to Robbie Ray. Man. I think

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of teams out there that want

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a quality left handed starter in their hunt for October

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and once they get into October. As someone that has

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:17.800
<v Speaker 1>not seen the value to the one hundredth percentile of

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray over the course of the life of this podcast,

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.360
<v Speaker 1>hand up, I think Robbie Ray is pretty damn valuable

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:24.240
<v Speaker 1>at this deadline.

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 4>I like that shout too. When I watch him, I

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 4>feel like it should be way better than the peripherals are. Yeah,

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 4>Like you look at his strikeout numbers. How was the

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:33.800
<v Speaker 4>only striking out seven point eight per nine. I don't know,

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 4>but he's effective out there, and we have back to

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 4>back years now Robbie Ray just being very very effective,

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, and being in the load to mid three.

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 4>So I think that is a guy that, yeah, plenty

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 4>of teams would would love to add to the phone

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:48.320
<v Speaker 4>and that was gonna be my question kind of is

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 4>the stacking there, Like Shane Bieber looking much better off

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 4>off of the last start. He's another guy where I

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 4>think start by start because it was finally good, it

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:59.360
<v Speaker 4>was so bad off the understandable was off the il.

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:01.719
<v Speaker 4>If he has a couple of good starts, I think

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:04.400
<v Speaker 4>he really like validates that spot or maybe climbs a

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:06.440
<v Speaker 4>little bit more if he has a couple other duds,

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:09.759
<v Speaker 4>Like would you think he slips pink to a little

0:47:09.760 --> 0:47:11.319
<v Speaker 4>bit lower. Yeah.

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:14.399
<v Speaker 3>So Shane Bieber the reason why I put him where

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:16.000
<v Speaker 3>I did it just because I think there's gonna be

0:47:16.040 --> 0:47:17.879
<v Speaker 3>teams that are gonna look at what happened last year

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 3>and they're gonna say, you know what last year it

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 3>was he was coming off TJ and he found a

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:24.840
<v Speaker 3>way to be very valuable for the Blue Jays. I

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 3>think that's gonna help him a little bit. When it

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 3>comes to Robbie Ray, I was really torn on him because,

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:32.919
<v Speaker 3>like you mentioned, the peripherals kind of suggest that he's

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:36.239
<v Speaker 3>not as good as the era. But again, you watch

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:38.480
<v Speaker 3>him pitch and he's a veteran, So I think there's

0:47:38.480 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 3>teams that are gonna like him The other thing that

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of dragged him down, which is contract. He's getting

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 3>paid twenty five million this season. If the Giants ate

0:47:45.320 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 3>that down, which I think they should, all of a sudden,

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 3>like Robby Ray shoots up this list, if you don't

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 3>have to pay whatever it is, you know, eight million

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 3>dollars for the rest of the season of Robby Ray.

0:47:55.600 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 3>And let's just say they eat five of that and

0:47:57.600 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 3>now it's okay. I got to pay three million dollars

0:47:59.520 --> 0:48:01.959
<v Speaker 3>in prospect, and then I think Robbie Ray is above

0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Trevor Rodgers. I think he might be above Bieber and

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:07.239
<v Speaker 3>theoretically above par Alta as well. So the money is

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 3>what kind of slid him down the rankings. I do

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 3>have a couple of Freddy Peralta things that I want

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 3>to ask you guys about, But if you want to

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:16.239
<v Speaker 3>run out the rest of the list, then I can

0:48:16.320 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 3>give you a couple of my questions here.

0:48:18.080 --> 0:48:19.439
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm good on the rest of the list

0:48:19.719 --> 0:48:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Rogers and Singer. Again, it's a little too hot and

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 1>too cold at points for me. I know Singer is

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 1>on a hot stretch. I appreciate Ray for pointing that

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:30.359
<v Speaker 1>out in the YouTube comments here, but Singer Man again,

0:48:30.440 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it was very not good at the beginning of the year,

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and that just scares me.

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:36.799
<v Speaker 4>He's more of the guy that gets you to the playoffs,

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 4>like in terms of like you just need someone to

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 4>get on the mound, give you innings, and then in

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 4>the playoffs it's like mop up the yeah, yeah you

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 4>we don't need young leverage, and those guys are valuable.

0:48:47.239 --> 0:48:48.359
<v Speaker 3>We see it all the time.

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 4>At the deadline, those guys, you know, be moved and

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 4>get at least some sort of return. Rogers is a

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 4>little bit different where I could see if he's clicking,

0:48:56.040 --> 0:48:57.759
<v Speaker 4>I can give him a playoff start. Right, We've seen

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 4>him be fantastic, so I think his ceilings a little

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:02.240
<v Speaker 4>litle bit higher and that's where it becomes interesting.

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, fake take us to Freddie Parlton.

0:49:05.800 --> 0:49:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, one last note for everyone was curious about rental starters.

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Brady Singer just got the spot. But there's three guys

0:49:11.120 --> 0:49:13.320
<v Speaker 3>that are the same picture to me. Brady Singer, Jack Flaherty,

0:49:13.360 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Tyler Mallley. All of them I think could get moved.

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 3>But it's just because teams need pitching. That pat getting

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 3>to per Alta, I did a show on this last week.

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 3>If Matt Arnold and David Stern's get on the phone,

0:49:26.520 --> 0:49:28.279
<v Speaker 3>you think they just say, hey, let's do trade backs

0:49:28.320 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 3>and go Jet Williams for par Alta straight up and

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:34.279
<v Speaker 3>just call it a day, because Jet's not having the

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:38.200
<v Speaker 3>best year in the Brewers system for the Mets. Optically

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:39.800
<v Speaker 3>it's not great. But at the same time, then you

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:42.920
<v Speaker 3>pretty much traded Brandon Sprote for Tobias Myers and you

0:49:43.040 --> 0:49:45.879
<v Speaker 3>get Jet back in your system that needs some infield help.

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 3>So that's just a crazy trade idea that I kind

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:50.800
<v Speaker 3>of love, and I'm curious what your guys thoughts is

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:51.040
<v Speaker 3>on it.

0:49:52.320 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 4>I asked you when we talked about this, is like,

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:59.279
<v Speaker 4>can you optically do that? Can you survive that? It

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 4>almost feels like like a rebate, like you just getting

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:04.320
<v Speaker 4>a partial refund quickly.

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:07.759
<v Speaker 1>It's like when game stop. It's like I played it once,

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:09.040
<v Speaker 1>but here's eight dollars.

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 4>That's the hard part. And I wonder if the Brewers

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:15.319
<v Speaker 4>at this point, like one side maybe they'd say, hey,

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:17.719
<v Speaker 4>we we really think we can get them right. But

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 4>the other side is like, I know they were very

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:21.440
<v Speaker 4>excited to acquire Jet. I know Jet hasn't had the great,

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:24.160
<v Speaker 4>the greatest yri ever either. But they seem very hell

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 4>bent on acquiring Jet in that deal, so I would

0:50:26.680 --> 0:50:29.399
<v Speaker 4>struggle to see how they would then trade him back.

0:50:29.600 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 4>So I'm gonna I'm gonna say no, I don't think

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:32.360
<v Speaker 4>it's possible.

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 3>I just wonder if the Mets can get a prospect

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:37.239
<v Speaker 3>as good as Jet, well as you're Freddy Prault at

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:40.319
<v Speaker 3>this point. But I'll sit here and wait on that. Uh.

0:50:40.560 --> 0:50:42.839
<v Speaker 3>The other part of this, there's a guy that's likely

0:50:42.920 --> 0:50:45.440
<v Speaker 3>a rental if the Padres put him on the table.

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:47.960
<v Speaker 3>And people who read this article are gonna be surprised

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:51.200
<v Speaker 3>that I put Michael King below Freddie PEARLTA in trade value,

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:53.879
<v Speaker 3>and I want to explain that really quick and see

0:50:53.920 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 3>your guys thoughts. So King's making nine million is ye,

0:50:56.760 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 3>it's a super weird contract. I have no idea what

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:01.120
<v Speaker 3>he got this year onion pots or whatever. But what

0:51:01.239 --> 0:51:05.719
<v Speaker 3>I do know, if he opts in, it's two years

0:51:05.800 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 3>fifty eight million. Also, if he opts out, he gets

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:11.839
<v Speaker 3>a five million dollar buyout. So I just the way

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:15.320
<v Speaker 3>that Peller has structured these contracts Pavetta and King, it

0:51:15.400 --> 0:51:17.800
<v Speaker 3>makes them very hard to trade. So this would be

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:20.200
<v Speaker 3>a guy again likely a rental. He's pitching well enough

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 3>that he should just opt out and an acquiring team

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:24.759
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't worry about it except for, oh, I got to

0:51:24.760 --> 0:51:27.680
<v Speaker 3>pay him five million after the season, and also if

0:51:27.719 --> 0:51:29.400
<v Speaker 3>he gets hurt with the guy that has had an

0:51:29.400 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 3>injury history. Now he's opting into fifty eight million for

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 3>the next two years after this, and I think that

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of makes him, I don't want to say, untradeable,

0:51:37.120 --> 0:51:38.720
<v Speaker 3>but very unlikely.

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 4>To be moved. Here's the downside. It's kind of that

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 4>it's not full poison pill, but it's it's poison pill

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:47.440
<v Speaker 4>adjacent there. I feel like where Yeah, I mean if

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:49.759
<v Speaker 4>the Padres said we'll cover the buyout if he opts out,

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 4>maybe with them, why would the Padres do that? Like

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:54.760
<v Speaker 4>maybe the new ownership would. But the sale isn't even official.

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:57.719
<v Speaker 4>There's so many moving parts there. I don't even know.

0:51:58.320 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 3>I do.

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 4>I do think that that's enough. But you had him

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:02.800
<v Speaker 4>behind who was that?

0:52:03.600 --> 0:52:06.560
<v Speaker 3>So I put and ended up being Parolta at twenty one,

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 3>King at twenty two, Bieber at twenty three, So he

0:52:09.960 --> 0:52:11.560
<v Speaker 3>was like right in the middle there, and I thought

0:52:11.560 --> 0:52:14.000
<v Speaker 3>about putting them above those guys, and I just think

0:52:14.080 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 3>that I still think that even though per Alta has

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:19.439
<v Speaker 3>been terrible, that there's going to be a team that says, Okay,

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:21.279
<v Speaker 3>I have to pay him two million dollars and it's

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 3>Freddy Peralta. We can get him right where it's just

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:27.439
<v Speaker 3>compared to, hey, I got a pay king five million,

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:30.120
<v Speaker 3>I fije ops out, and I'm taking on so much

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:33.440
<v Speaker 3>risk if something happens where I just I kind of

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:36.720
<v Speaker 3>think that that Peralta still has more value. And I'd

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 3>almost s like I even labored on Bieber, but it's

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 3>like Bieber's been hurt this year, so that's where I said,

0:52:42.000 --> 0:52:43.880
<v Speaker 3>all right, he's still a little more valuable than that.

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 3>But I just like you said it is it's kind

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:48.360
<v Speaker 3>of poison pillar, Jason. It's it's really tough for a

0:52:48.440 --> 0:52:50.239
<v Speaker 3>team to take on that level of risk.

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:53.080
<v Speaker 4>I think that's fair because I'd just be nervous every

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:56.320
<v Speaker 4>start if an often injured guy gets hurt. Your hostage

0:52:56.400 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 4>now for the next season, and you just tied up

0:52:58.160 --> 0:52:58.759
<v Speaker 4>a ton of money.

0:52:59.320 --> 0:53:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Yep, all right, that was our rental starter conversation. We

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:05.160
<v Speaker 1>are gonna end with bullpen arms and why there might

0:53:05.320 --> 0:53:08.400
<v Speaker 1>not be too many available, but one last word from

0:53:08.400 --> 0:53:09.799
<v Speaker 1>our friends at Hampton Farms.

0:53:10.200 --> 0:53:13.359
<v Speaker 4>Just Baseball's number one ranked peanut prospect is none other

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:16.719
<v Speaker 4>than the Hampton Farms in Shell peanut hit tool plus

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:20.480
<v Speaker 4>plus that crack of the shell is elite power easy

0:53:20.600 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 4>plus seven grams of protein per serving makeup great source

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:28.279
<v Speaker 4>of fiber in America's number one in shell brand. This

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:32.080
<v Speaker 4>is a five tool snack future value eighty grade. Get

0:53:32.120 --> 0:53:35.120
<v Speaker 4>the top peanut prospect in the produce aisle or twenty

0:53:35.160 --> 0:53:39.200
<v Speaker 4>five percent off at Hamptonfarms dot com with code just Baseball.

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:42.319
<v Speaker 4>That's one word, just Baseball for twenty five percent off

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 4>at Hamptonfarms dot Com.

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Ripping the shell on peanut and just taking it straight

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:49.279
<v Speaker 1>to the mouth is absolutely insane from him.

0:53:49.800 --> 0:53:52.279
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, for those that are listening on audio, you got

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 4>to check out the YouTube ad for Hampton Farm Peanuts just.

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>To full full.

0:53:57.360 --> 0:54:00.640
<v Speaker 4>Didn't crack the shell eight the peanut crazy plat crazy.

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:03.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like eating an egg, like just getting the shell,

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:07.800
<v Speaker 1>taking it on, all right, just popping it down at it.

0:54:07.920 --> 0:54:10.319
<v Speaker 1>It does seem kind of dangerous. All right. We're tying

0:54:10.360 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a ball on the show with bullpen help and the

0:54:12.640 --> 0:54:15.360
<v Speaker 1>relievers that could be available, but it's tough to know

0:54:15.520 --> 0:54:19.680
<v Speaker 1>which relievers are available right now. Ryan Finkelstein, how did

0:54:19.719 --> 0:54:23.239
<v Speaker 1>you interpret the reliever market. It's near impossible for me

0:54:23.320 --> 0:54:25.359
<v Speaker 1>to look at it and say, outside of the met

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:29.000
<v Speaker 1>relievers and the Rocky relievers and the Giant relievers, allegedly,

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:31.239
<v Speaker 1>there are some other people available. I have no idea

0:54:31.280 --> 0:54:31.839
<v Speaker 1>how that works.

0:54:33.280 --> 0:54:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Last year we saw Mason Miller get traded, Juan Durang

0:54:37.640 --> 0:54:40.840
<v Speaker 3>to get traded, David Bednar, Ryan Helson, Griffin, Jacks, Louis Varlin,

0:54:41.040 --> 0:54:44.919
<v Speaker 3>Camilla de Evalt, Tyler Rogers, Kyle Finnigan. There's not those

0:54:45.000 --> 0:54:47.000
<v Speaker 3>names in this market. If you look at the upcoming

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:50.160
<v Speaker 3>free agent class, the best pictures are on good teams,

0:54:50.160 --> 0:54:54.279
<v Speaker 3>so Roldest Chapman, David Bednar, right as Elliglesias. And then

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:56.960
<v Speaker 3>you look at the rental list we're coming out with.

0:54:57.640 --> 0:54:59.680
<v Speaker 3>As we've alluded to the rental starters that's going to

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:01.520
<v Speaker 3>be in our for us, We're gonna do one on

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:05.280
<v Speaker 3>rental bats. We couldn't come up with ten rental relievers

0:55:05.440 --> 0:55:07.640
<v Speaker 3>because there's not that many, And all of a sudden,

0:55:07.680 --> 0:55:10.160
<v Speaker 3>you're getting to guys like I think maybe JG. Brubricker

0:55:10.239 --> 0:55:13.440
<v Speaker 3>might be a rental like yeah, JG. Brubrick, Like it's

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:16.239
<v Speaker 3>just and even like Antonio's sense of tel has been

0:55:16.280 --> 0:55:19.120
<v Speaker 3>good this year, but he still has a starter contract,

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:20.040
<v Speaker 3>so there's still.

0:55:20.120 --> 0:55:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Ferguson's value went down, mind you, Caleb Ferguson's value

0:55:23.719 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 1>went down the other.

0:55:24.480 --> 0:55:29.239
<v Speaker 3>Day for for cussing out the umpire. Yeah, is as

0:55:29.320 --> 0:55:31.560
<v Speaker 3>bad as as Valdez hitting his catcher. What do you think?

0:55:32.239 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's as bad, but I think it's

0:55:34.040 --> 0:55:34.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty bad.

0:55:35.719 --> 0:55:38.759
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, there's not a lot on this market. And

0:55:38.880 --> 0:55:43.040
<v Speaker 3>that's where I think if the Padres wanted to all

0:55:43.040 --> 0:55:45.520
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden, they put Mason Miller and Adrian Morehane

0:55:45.560 --> 0:55:47.960
<v Speaker 3>on the market, and they don't have to go into

0:55:48.000 --> 0:55:51.879
<v Speaker 3>some crazy you know, rebuild or any any crazy fire sale.

0:55:52.600 --> 0:55:55.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean they can trade those two guys and I

0:55:55.560 --> 0:55:58.640
<v Speaker 3>mean still theoretically even compete this season. So that's a

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:00.200
<v Speaker 3>team at thick and corner of the market. And then

0:56:00.239 --> 0:56:02.560
<v Speaker 3>the Mets, I think they're going to do really well

0:56:02.560 --> 0:56:04.840
<v Speaker 3>in their relievers. You know, Mintor and Railey are gonna

0:56:04.840 --> 0:56:08.320
<v Speaker 3>get moved. Those are arguably the best two rentals on

0:56:08.440 --> 0:56:10.400
<v Speaker 3>the block. And then you have Luke Weaver with a

0:56:10.480 --> 0:56:12.360
<v Speaker 3>year and a half of control, and I think they

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:15.120
<v Speaker 3>might even get overwhelmed on Juascar Brazabam. He's got three

0:56:15.160 --> 0:56:17.400
<v Speaker 3>and a half years of control. The Mets basically control

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:20.080
<v Speaker 3>this guy's career because I don't know what happened when

0:56:20.120 --> 0:56:22.360
<v Speaker 3>he was with the Marlins. The service time is a

0:56:22.560 --> 0:56:25.000
<v Speaker 3>riddle to me. He has been pitching for a long

0:56:25.080 --> 0:56:27.120
<v Speaker 3>time and he still has three and a half. Like,

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:30.120
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't make sense, but I think he had a

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:31.160
<v Speaker 3>lot of visa issues.

0:56:31.239 --> 0:56:33.800
<v Speaker 4>I remember very often whenever I was around the ballpark

0:56:34.160 --> 0:56:36.319
<v Speaker 4>and spring training, one of the most common questions it'd

0:56:36.320 --> 0:56:39.520
<v Speaker 4>be like, is braza Ban making it? Do we know

0:56:39.560 --> 0:56:42.560
<v Speaker 4>where Braza Ban's at yet? And fortunately ironed that all out.

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:45.319
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, he's gonna be under team control into thirty six.

0:56:45.880 --> 0:56:47.759
<v Speaker 3>Just read this, though it doesn't make sense. Thirty two

0:56:47.800 --> 0:56:50.239
<v Speaker 3>innings in twenty twenty two, fifty eight and two thirds

0:56:50.320 --> 0:56:53.279
<v Speaker 3>and twenty three, fifty one and two thirds, twenty four

0:56:53.440 --> 0:56:56.239
<v Speaker 3>sixty three innings last year, forty seven and two thirds

0:56:56.320 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 3>this year, and he still has three and a half

0:56:58.640 --> 0:57:01.879
<v Speaker 3>years of team control. He's arbitration eligible for the first time.

0:57:01.960 --> 0:57:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Lect you know, this year was his first Rberry. He's

0:57:03.920 --> 0:57:07.320
<v Speaker 3>a super two guy, arbitration eligible for three more years,

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:09.160
<v Speaker 3>and he still has an option.

0:57:10.520 --> 0:57:11.560
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't make any sense.

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:14.880
<v Speaker 3>And he's thirty six years old. I feel bad for

0:57:14.960 --> 0:57:16.840
<v Speaker 3>the guy. I mean, he's just never gonna get paid.

0:57:17.200 --> 0:57:20.200
<v Speaker 3>But again, in this market, the Mets my appeal to

0:57:20.200 --> 0:57:22.440
<v Speaker 3>get a return that you that would shock you for brazenbon,

0:57:22.880 --> 0:57:24.880
<v Speaker 3>but he's he's under control for so much that I

0:57:24.920 --> 0:57:27.280
<v Speaker 3>don't even know if they move him. Those other arms though,

0:57:27.280 --> 0:57:29.439
<v Speaker 3>I think Weaver, Mentor and Rali are probably.

0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:33.160
<v Speaker 1>All gone, Yeah, I hear you on that. No, the

0:57:33.240 --> 0:57:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Mets absolutely controlled the reliever market. I think that's abundantly clear.

0:57:36.840 --> 0:57:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Rayley is an interesting one to me, where it's like

0:57:38.960 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it feels like every single buyer could be in on

0:57:42.240 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 1>someone like Rayley or mintor uh with WEA were obviously

0:57:45.800 --> 0:57:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the big dogs are gonna be hunting that because you

0:57:47.840 --> 0:57:51.800
<v Speaker 1>do take on a oh let's see, is that uh

0:57:52.960 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 1>he said, a seven figure reliever, an eight figure reliever.

0:57:56.000 --> 0:57:59.479
<v Speaker 1>You take on an eight figure reliever next year because

0:57:59.480 --> 0:58:03.400
<v Speaker 1>he'd be making about eleven million dollars, so Weaver, it

0:58:03.480 --> 0:58:05.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like the market would shrink just a little bit.

0:58:06.240 --> 0:58:09.040
<v Speaker 1>But with a guy like Rayley, a lefty specialist. It

0:58:09.120 --> 0:58:12.800
<v Speaker 1>feels like that is a desired bullpen roll for so

0:58:13.120 --> 0:58:16.960
<v Speaker 1>many teams that are solid right now. So yeah, like

0:58:17.120 --> 0:58:20.520
<v Speaker 1>middle of the pack relief market. The Mets absolutely control

0:58:20.960 --> 0:58:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the other names that jump out on this list. I like,

0:58:24.440 --> 0:58:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know, to be honest with you, man,

0:58:26.760 --> 0:58:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess Holderman in Cleveland because he's excess for them.

0:58:30.360 --> 0:58:32.800
<v Speaker 1>But Holderman's been really good this year and he's back

0:58:32.840 --> 0:58:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to throwing ninety nine to one hundred mile an hour sinkers.

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:37.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's another name that jumps to the forefront of

0:58:38.000 --> 0:58:42.120
<v Speaker 1>my mind. But it's gonna be boring and super underwhelming

0:58:42.680 --> 0:58:43.600
<v Speaker 1>on the reliever front.

0:58:44.640 --> 0:58:49.000
<v Speaker 4>I want to shout out TJ and tone Crazy just

0:58:49.280 --> 0:58:52.720
<v Speaker 4>the amount of elbow arm issues he's had to overcome

0:58:52.880 --> 0:58:54.680
<v Speaker 4>and the fact that he's having the success that he's

0:58:54.680 --> 0:58:58.120
<v Speaker 4>having at the big league level through all that, I

0:58:58.240 --> 0:59:00.960
<v Speaker 4>think he's an interesting guy. You get a year and

0:59:01.000 --> 0:59:04.440
<v Speaker 4>a half through and a half minor league deal, but

0:59:05.000 --> 0:59:07.480
<v Speaker 4>referencing the article, it's a year and a half of

0:59:07.600 --> 0:59:11.360
<v Speaker 4>control through arbitration. I mean Antone would be a guy

0:59:11.440 --> 0:59:14.640
<v Speaker 4>that also elite clubhouse guy. I think teams would love

0:59:14.680 --> 0:59:16.440
<v Speaker 4>to add to the fold there, and I think the

0:59:16.480 --> 0:59:18.600
<v Speaker 4>Reds are very colely going to get a cash in

0:59:18.720 --> 0:59:20.360
<v Speaker 4>on him. I just think that's a fun one and

0:59:20.440 --> 0:59:23.840
<v Speaker 4>a fun story there. But I think all roads lead

0:59:23.920 --> 0:59:26.280
<v Speaker 4>back to Mason Miller and what the heck they're going

0:59:26.360 --> 0:59:28.800
<v Speaker 4>to do. Yeah, yeah, that's.

0:59:29.120 --> 0:59:32.760
<v Speaker 3>It's it's crazy with me. I just the question is

0:59:33.080 --> 0:59:34.640
<v Speaker 3>that today I think it came out. I think it

0:59:34.760 --> 0:59:37.320
<v Speaker 3>was the Athletic Report. They want to top one hundred

0:59:37.320 --> 0:59:40.960
<v Speaker 3>prospects for Mason Miller. You know, I feel like there's

0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 3>a team that would do that. No, I mean it's

0:59:42.680 --> 0:59:46.480
<v Speaker 3>still you know, and it's the one thing too for

0:59:46.600 --> 0:59:51.520
<v Speaker 3>the padres is like Mason Miller now isn't too expensive,

0:59:51.600 --> 0:59:53.960
<v Speaker 3>but he's going to make a ton of money through arbitration,

0:59:54.080 --> 0:59:56.520
<v Speaker 3>so it's not even like, you know, he's not going

0:59:56.600 --> 0:59:59.360
<v Speaker 3>to cost anything. He made four million first year of

0:59:59.520 --> 1:00:01.760
<v Speaker 3>arb and he's turning in one of the best seasons

1:00:01.840 --> 1:00:04.760
<v Speaker 3>like ever for a reliever. By the end of arbitration,

1:00:05.320 --> 1:00:07.840
<v Speaker 3>he could be looking at like legitimate closer money like

1:00:07.920 --> 1:00:10.040
<v Speaker 3>he could be He's probably going to set a new

1:00:10.080 --> 1:00:12.480
<v Speaker 3>benchmark for what relievers are going to make in arbitration,

1:00:12.840 --> 1:00:14.960
<v Speaker 3>and like that final year in twenty two nine. Is

1:00:15.000 --> 1:00:17.080
<v Speaker 3>it crazy to think he's close to twenty million by then.

1:00:18.080 --> 1:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's crazy.

1:00:19.480 --> 1:00:22.320
<v Speaker 4>He's going to be the new precedent setter without a doubt.

1:00:22.360 --> 1:00:24.200
<v Speaker 4>I also think like that it's a good point jack

1:00:24.240 --> 1:00:25.840
<v Speaker 4>with Weaver with how many people are going to be

1:00:25.920 --> 1:00:28.040
<v Speaker 4>lining up to take that on. But I think because

1:00:28.080 --> 1:00:30.600
<v Speaker 4>of what the market has now become, even for relievers,

1:00:30.720 --> 1:00:32.920
<v Speaker 4>and how good Weaver's been, and if Mason Miller is

1:00:32.960 --> 1:00:35.000
<v Speaker 4>not available or you just have to give up the

1:00:35.640 --> 1:00:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Kings Ransms, that it is that's the most impactful guy

1:00:39.120 --> 1:00:40.600
<v Speaker 4>that you can add. And you set up your team

1:00:40.600 --> 1:00:42.280
<v Speaker 4>for next year too, where if you were planning to

1:00:42.280 --> 1:00:44.800
<v Speaker 4>shop in the free agent market, like you're gonna have

1:00:44.840 --> 1:00:47.160
<v Speaker 4>to pay more than that for Weaver or or reliever

1:00:47.240 --> 1:00:50.280
<v Speaker 4>of Weaver's caliber next year. So it sets you up

1:00:50.320 --> 1:00:52.120
<v Speaker 4>to where you have a run this year and you

1:00:52.200 --> 1:00:53.920
<v Speaker 4>have a run next year. It's still I think a

1:00:54.000 --> 1:00:55.840
<v Speaker 4>really reasonable number. That's so I think Weaver is going

1:00:55.880 --> 1:00:58.000
<v Speaker 4>to bring in a sneaky haul because it's not going

1:00:58.080 --> 1:01:01.520
<v Speaker 4>to be nearly what Mason Miller requires. But there's gonna

1:01:01.520 --> 1:01:03.360
<v Speaker 4>be a lot of teams that are immediately priced out

1:01:03.400 --> 1:01:05.160
<v Speaker 4>of that and say, but we're willing to make a splash,

1:01:05.400 --> 1:01:06.800
<v Speaker 4>And I think there's gonna be a fun bidding war

1:01:06.840 --> 1:01:09.200
<v Speaker 4>on Weaver. Where I think it's interesting with Mason Miller

1:01:09.320 --> 1:01:12.320
<v Speaker 4>is you have this unprecedented opportunity to make the game

1:01:12.400 --> 1:01:15.160
<v Speaker 4>eight innings for your team, and we've fully seen that.

1:01:15.320 --> 1:01:17.120
<v Speaker 4>And I know people are gonna say, well, Prower gave

1:01:17.200 --> 1:01:19.480
<v Speaker 4>up too much, blah blah blah, and we all knew

1:01:19.480 --> 1:01:22.920
<v Speaker 4>what Mason Miller was capable of. But Mason Miller proceeded

1:01:22.960 --> 1:01:25.880
<v Speaker 4>to go and he started it with the athletics, but

1:01:25.960 --> 1:01:28.720
<v Speaker 4>proceeded to go to the padres and reach new heights.

1:01:29.080 --> 1:01:31.800
<v Speaker 4>So yes, he lost a year of control, but he's

1:01:31.920 --> 1:01:35.520
<v Speaker 4>also become better and more dominant to the point where

1:01:35.560 --> 1:01:37.960
<v Speaker 4>it's like he's so far and away the best reliever

1:01:38.080 --> 1:01:39.960
<v Speaker 4>in the game, and so far and away I think

1:01:40.000 --> 1:01:42.120
<v Speaker 4>one of the best relievers we've seen in a really

1:01:42.200 --> 1:01:46.080
<v Speaker 4>long time. That I think there's a very valid case

1:01:46.120 --> 1:01:49.920
<v Speaker 4>from AJ Prewer that's like, I don't think he's much

1:01:50.000 --> 1:01:52.040
<v Speaker 4>less valuable than he was when I acquired him. And

1:01:52.080 --> 1:01:54.440
<v Speaker 4>even if you think I overpaid, I still want eighty

1:01:55.160 --> 1:01:57.080
<v Speaker 4>to ninety cents on the dollar for what I paid,

1:01:57.320 --> 1:01:59.160
<v Speaker 4>And will a team have a Leo Devreze to give up.

1:01:59.200 --> 1:02:02.880
<v Speaker 4>Probably not, But if you have two top one hundred guys,

1:02:02.920 --> 1:02:05.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's that far off from Leo Devrees

1:02:05.200 --> 1:02:08.280
<v Speaker 4>and then a slew of solid forty to maybe a

1:02:08.280 --> 1:02:11.800
<v Speaker 4>couple forty five future value guys. So I'm just curious

1:02:11.800 --> 1:02:15.320
<v Speaker 4>to see if anyone makes that splash. I think that

1:02:15.560 --> 1:02:19.160
<v Speaker 4>there's a good chance they two, because even if you

1:02:19.200 --> 1:02:22.840
<v Speaker 4>don't make it happen this year, you have so much control.

1:02:23.120 --> 1:02:25.400
<v Speaker 4>You have a guy that's gonna bring Not often do

1:02:25.560 --> 1:02:28.360
<v Speaker 4>closers bring that level of eyeballs to your ball club too.

1:02:28.960 --> 1:02:31.280
<v Speaker 4>I think what he brings from an extentment from a

1:02:31.320 --> 1:02:35.120
<v Speaker 4>fan perspective, I think, just generally speaking, this is a

1:02:35.280 --> 1:02:37.280
<v Speaker 4>star that you're bringing to the fold. And it's not

1:02:37.360 --> 1:02:39.080
<v Speaker 4>often that you can say that about a closer. But

1:02:39.240 --> 1:02:41.840
<v Speaker 4>Mason Miller is gonna sell us some jerseys like he's

1:02:41.880 --> 1:02:43.640
<v Speaker 4>gonna be a guy that his intro is gonna be

1:02:43.640 --> 1:02:45.080
<v Speaker 4>part of the reason why people go to games and

1:02:45.160 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 4>stay beyond the fact that you're getting a guy that

1:02:48.400 --> 1:02:50.880
<v Speaker 4>legitimately ends the game almost every single time. In the

1:02:50.960 --> 1:02:53.520
<v Speaker 4>ninth and we'll do that now for four playoff runs

1:02:53.560 --> 1:02:55.240
<v Speaker 4>would be four playoff runs that you would.

1:02:55.040 --> 1:02:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Have with him.

1:02:56.200 --> 1:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I hate to plant this thought, but I'm thinking

1:02:59.760 --> 1:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>about like the best possible prospect that could be going

1:03:03.320 --> 1:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>back to them. And I really don't think the Dodgers

1:03:06.080 --> 1:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are in the Mason Miller hunt at all. But is

1:03:08.760 --> 1:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>host way to Paula too much for Mason Miller at

1:03:11.480 --> 1:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>this point? Probably don't think so.

1:03:14.040 --> 1:03:15.400
<v Speaker 4>The crazy thing is today they could say, well, we

1:03:15.440 --> 1:03:17.280
<v Speaker 4>don't want to go to Paula. We'll just give you

1:03:17.400 --> 1:03:19.560
<v Speaker 4>hope in Cantaro or we'll give you hope in s

1:03:19.880 --> 1:03:22.440
<v Speaker 4>Seroda or whatever, and like even then proer, like, how

1:03:22.440 --> 1:03:24.160
<v Speaker 4>do you say no to that? The only thing was

1:03:24.160 --> 1:03:25.800
<v Speaker 4>would be in division is the problem. But for the

1:03:25.880 --> 1:03:28.600
<v Speaker 4>sake of just like value, I think it's pretty crazy.

1:03:28.760 --> 1:03:30.360
<v Speaker 4>The other one that I don't think we'd ever see

1:03:30.640 --> 1:03:32.840
<v Speaker 4>because I just don't see Brezel operating that way. But

1:03:32.920 --> 1:03:35.600
<v Speaker 4>the Red Sox have so much starting pitching that you

1:03:35.640 --> 1:03:39.080
<v Speaker 4>could get big league arms, like, you could get multiple

1:03:39.080 --> 1:03:43.160
<v Speaker 4>big league arms, you could get tons of prospect talent

1:03:43.200 --> 1:03:46.200
<v Speaker 4>if you want it as well. And then the Chapman

1:03:46.280 --> 1:03:48.880
<v Speaker 4>to Mason Miller thing in the eighth and ninth. Yeah,

1:03:49.320 --> 1:03:52.360
<v Speaker 4>would be the most ridiculous thing in I think we've

1:03:52.400 --> 1:03:55.320
<v Speaker 4>ever seen when it comes to the eight to nine combination.

1:03:55.640 --> 1:03:57.320
<v Speaker 4>And I think for the Padres, you'd be able to

1:03:57.360 --> 1:04:01.080
<v Speaker 4>get some starters. Now, like, where do some of these

1:04:01.120 --> 1:04:03.440
<v Speaker 4>guys fit in? Patrick Sanderval could be a throw in

1:04:03.480 --> 1:04:05.560
<v Speaker 4>and he's probably one of the better starters right now

1:04:05.600 --> 1:04:07.720
<v Speaker 4>immediately with the way he's looking. But I mean, you know,

1:04:07.840 --> 1:04:10.480
<v Speaker 4>if Connolly early is healthy, with some of the other

1:04:10.520 --> 1:04:13.240
<v Speaker 4>guys that they've got, Jake Bennett's been fantastic, and then

1:04:13.280 --> 1:04:15.919
<v Speaker 4>you throw in some top level you know, prospects as well,

1:04:16.560 --> 1:04:19.200
<v Speaker 4>that helps you now and later. I just I think

1:04:19.240 --> 1:04:20.600
<v Speaker 4>that could be an interesting one, and I think you

1:04:20.640 --> 1:04:23.520
<v Speaker 4>could try to theorize that with several other teams and

1:04:23.640 --> 1:04:26.040
<v Speaker 4>it could be very fascinating. Could that be, you know,

1:04:26.600 --> 1:04:28.800
<v Speaker 4>a route for some of these other ball clubs that

1:04:29.200 --> 1:04:31.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, don't want to trade from the farm too much,

1:04:31.760 --> 1:04:33.440
<v Speaker 4>but have starting pitching to be able to do it.

1:04:34.800 --> 1:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to end the show on one wild card team.

1:04:39.800 --> 1:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Here in the Miller conversation, Uh, you guys know where

1:04:44.080 --> 1:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Miller's from.

1:04:46.040 --> 1:04:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Miller, He's from I know, went to Gardner Webb,

1:04:51.080 --> 1:04:52.560
<v Speaker 4>but I don't know if it was because it was close.

1:04:52.440 --> 1:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>To home or not. He's from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Pittsburgh needs

1:04:57.920 --> 1:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>bullpen help really bad. Charrington is effectively operating for his

1:05:02.920 --> 1:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>gig right now, and I'm just thinking of package leading

1:05:06.000 --> 1:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>with Florentino like Seth Fernandez wouldn't be going anywhere. No,

1:05:09.720 --> 1:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>but if Florentino leads with another young big leaguer, that's good.

1:05:14.400 --> 1:05:16.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they can they can't afford the four million,

1:05:17.720 --> 1:05:17.960
<v Speaker 3>you know.

1:05:19.520 --> 1:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>See I think they could for a Pittsburgh guy.

1:05:23.680 --> 1:05:25.480
<v Speaker 3>I have another team I'd want to throw out there,

1:05:25.680 --> 1:05:26.600
<v Speaker 3>and that's Seattle.

1:05:26.960 --> 1:05:27.120
<v Speaker 4>You know.

1:05:27.320 --> 1:05:30.200
<v Speaker 3>I One of the guys that's ranked really low on

1:05:30.320 --> 1:05:32.840
<v Speaker 3>my top fifty here in trade deadline value is the

1:05:32.880 --> 1:05:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Louis Castillo. Because you're looking at twenty four point one

1:05:36.280 --> 1:05:39.720
<v Speaker 3>to five million next year and then a kind of

1:05:39.800 --> 1:05:42.800
<v Speaker 3>a poison pill ish option of twenty five million investing

1:05:42.880 --> 1:05:45.080
<v Speaker 3>for twenty twenty eight if it's one hundred and eighty innings,

1:05:45.280 --> 1:05:47.000
<v Speaker 3>and I just don't want to be the team that

1:05:47.160 --> 1:05:49.320
<v Speaker 3>tries to manipulate his innings next year, so it doesn't

1:05:49.360 --> 1:05:52.560
<v Speaker 3>get that option. So I just don't know if Castillo

1:05:52.640 --> 1:05:55.640
<v Speaker 3>has that much trade value. Would Seattle say, you know what,

1:05:55.800 --> 1:05:58.440
<v Speaker 3>We're just we're better off keeping Castillo as our five

1:05:58.520 --> 1:06:01.680
<v Speaker 3>starter and trading one of our young arms for Mason Miller.

1:06:01.720 --> 1:06:03.800
<v Speaker 3>And I think like that that's where I go as

1:06:03.800 --> 1:06:05.840
<v Speaker 3>a team, that makes perfect sense to make the move

1:06:05.880 --> 1:06:09.160
<v Speaker 3>because then if you're if you're Preller, because I think

1:06:09.200 --> 1:06:11.600
<v Speaker 3>the one thing we have to remember a J Preller,

1:06:11.640 --> 1:06:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I think thought he was going to turn Mason Miller

1:06:13.440 --> 1:06:15.760
<v Speaker 3>into a starting pitcher. And then Mason Miller got there

1:06:15.800 --> 1:06:17.960
<v Speaker 3>and said, I'm gonna make plenty of money in arbitration.

1:06:18.080 --> 1:06:21.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm not getting hurt. No, I'm a closer. And so

1:06:21.440 --> 1:06:23.439
<v Speaker 3>that's and he's been amazing at that. But I think

1:06:23.840 --> 1:06:25.080
<v Speaker 3>this would be a way to kind of get what

1:06:25.160 --> 1:06:26.640
<v Speaker 3>you might have won it in the first place, which

1:06:26.720 --> 1:06:28.120
<v Speaker 3>is a controllable young arm.

1:06:28.480 --> 1:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And I keep on bringing Kirby man like Kirby for

1:06:31.000 --> 1:06:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Mason Miller. How does that sound?

1:06:32.760 --> 1:06:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And you could get more with the control. You

1:06:34.520 --> 1:06:36.880
<v Speaker 4>could probably get them to attack something on there and

1:06:36.960 --> 1:06:40.240
<v Speaker 4>get some position player help because there's a lot of

1:06:40.280 --> 1:06:44.240
<v Speaker 4>good position players in that system that I think they'd

1:06:44.280 --> 1:06:46.440
<v Speaker 4>be happy to bring in. And again with the way

1:06:46.480 --> 1:06:48.280
<v Speaker 4>the Mariners drafted I'd be happy to bring in a

1:06:48.320 --> 1:06:49.720
<v Speaker 4>prospect there. I do want to shout out though the

1:06:49.720 --> 1:06:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Pirates thing. If it's Bubba and Florentino, you just say, Bubba,

1:06:53.440 --> 1:06:55.440
<v Speaker 4>change of scenery. Set's gonna get up here sooner than

1:06:55.480 --> 1:06:58.640
<v Speaker 4>we thought. It's hard to say no to that.

1:06:59.520 --> 1:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Come on, man, I don't know, let's get frisky. You

1:07:03.560 --> 1:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>guys got anything else? Heck of a preview, man, I

1:07:05.800 --> 1:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>appreciate think you and Clay really putting all this together.

1:07:09.160 --> 1:07:11.280
<v Speaker 3>I just hope they make If they make the Mason

1:07:11.360 --> 1:07:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Miller trade, the Pirates are going to control the twenty

1:07:14.640 --> 1:07:16.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty eight deadline with Skins and Miller. Are you kidding?

1:07:19.400 --> 1:07:22.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm just I'm just hoping Preller goes crazy and saves

1:07:22.480 --> 1:07:24.280
<v Speaker 4>this deadline, because otherwise I could see it being a

1:07:24.320 --> 1:07:24.800
<v Speaker 4>little tame.

1:07:25.440 --> 1:07:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, one quick note on I will say, as far

1:07:28.120 --> 1:07:30.720
<v Speaker 3>as selling, not only do they have Miller more hone,

1:07:31.120 --> 1:07:34.680
<v Speaker 3>they also could really get value for ty France. I

1:07:34.800 --> 1:07:37.240
<v Speaker 3>just want to said, like ty France is making nothing,

1:07:37.480 --> 1:07:40.680
<v Speaker 3>He's crushing lefties. He's a really good chip, and I

1:07:40.760 --> 1:07:42.600
<v Speaker 3>honestly think if they leaned into it, they could even

1:07:42.640 --> 1:07:45.120
<v Speaker 3>get something for someone like Gavin Sheet. So that's a

1:07:45.160 --> 1:07:48.200
<v Speaker 3>team like if they lost six games, you know, six

1:07:48.240 --> 1:07:50.280
<v Speaker 3>of the next eight or something, they're going to the

1:07:50.360 --> 1:07:53.440
<v Speaker 3>deadlines getting if they decide to lean into it, I

1:07:53.520 --> 1:07:55.240
<v Speaker 3>think they would get a lot. The only issue there

1:07:55.360 --> 1:07:59.000
<v Speaker 3>is just like does Preller think that he has, you know,

1:07:59.320 --> 1:08:01.280
<v Speaker 3>five more years this job? Or is he thinking like,

1:08:01.600 --> 1:08:03.480
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea what this new ownership, how long

1:08:03.480 --> 1:08:05.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna be here? Screwed? I'm just going for it,

1:08:05.560 --> 1:08:07.120
<v Speaker 3>which it feels like more of a Preller move.

1:08:07.560 --> 1:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, certainly. So all right, I really appreciate everybody tuning

1:08:12.240 --> 1:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>into this one. Such a fun episode. Plenty more trade

1:08:15.800 --> 1:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>deadline stuff to happen over the next two weeks again,

1:08:18.200 --> 1:08:20.599
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be Trade deadline is on Monday, August third,

1:08:20.920 --> 1:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe, six pm Eastern time, So it's gonna be

1:08:23.160 --> 1:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a fun one to monitor. That's all we got. You guys,

1:08:26.200 --> 1:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>got anything else? You gotta plug anything or no.

1:08:29.160 --> 1:08:30.800
<v Speaker 3>I got the article and all the other good stuff

1:08:30.840 --> 1:08:32.679
<v Speaker 3>we got. We've got a lot of deadline stuff coming.

1:08:33.120 --> 1:08:34.840
<v Speaker 4>And tonight as we're listening to this, we'll be doing

1:08:34.880 --> 1:08:37.840
<v Speaker 4>a minor league baseball simulcast on our YouTube. Come watch

1:08:37.880 --> 1:08:40.000
<v Speaker 4>out with Us're gonna whip around some minor league games.

1:08:39.760 --> 1:08:43.519
<v Speaker 1>And have some fun tomorrow night. We're live right now,

1:08:43.720 --> 1:08:47.519
<v Speaker 1>so people are getting this on Wednesday. Yeah, tomorrow, excuse me, tomorrow,

1:08:48.000 --> 1:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll be well. I was doing was plugging on the

1:08:49.920 --> 1:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>call up for the next day, but we'll be doing that.

1:08:51.680 --> 1:08:53.840
<v Speaker 4>I think it'll be a lot of fun, uh, breaking

1:08:53.880 --> 1:08:55.400
<v Speaker 4>down the minor leaguers, all the will of the games

1:08:55.439 --> 1:08:57.320
<v Speaker 4>are happening. It's gonna be a lot of fun. And

1:08:57.360 --> 1:08:59.600
<v Speaker 4>then also we're live on Whatnot. Link is in the

1:08:59.640 --> 1:09:02.000
<v Speaker 4>episod description. If you've not been on what Not before,

1:09:02.000 --> 1:09:05.280
<v Speaker 4>we're ripping tops. Chrome just came out today. It's loaded,

1:09:05.320 --> 1:09:07.240
<v Speaker 4>loaded checklist wise. If you haven't been on there before,

1:09:07.520 --> 1:09:10.160
<v Speaker 4>use that link. You got twenty five dollars to apply

1:09:10.280 --> 1:09:12.200
<v Speaker 4>to our store, which could get you pretty much a

1:09:12.240 --> 1:09:13.240
<v Speaker 4>break spot right away.

1:09:13.920 --> 1:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely love it all right. We will talk to you

1:09:16.080 --> 1:09:16.759
<v Speaker 1>guys tomorrow