Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.
Speaker 2: Arms Strong and Getty and he Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 3: Now we've put together a list of some of the
Speaker 3: things USCID is spending money on with your taxpayer dollars.
Speaker 3: One million gender diverse support in Bangladesh, one point eight
Speaker 3: million for hon Duran LGBT group of some of the
Speaker 3: bigger ticket items, fifteen million for condoms to the Taliban,
Speaker 3: nineteen millions assisting migrants in the Columbia. The list goes
Speaker 3: on and on, as you can see here, three point
Speaker 3: three million for a Caribbean LGBT group, twenty nine million
Speaker 3: for young and female working et the Egyptians, and fourteen
Speaker 3: point nine million for supporting lgb QT youth in Cambodia,
Speaker 3: and forty nine million from improving reading scores in Zambia.
Speaker 4: Again, as we've said to me, it just shows how
Speaker 4: bulletproof these people felt that they didn't have to be
Speaker 4: the slightest concern that they could spread their money or
Speaker 4: your spread your money around the world in just the
Speaker 4: most woke way as possible, just thinking there'd be no
Speaker 4: scrutiny ever, which there hasn't been usually.
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, just ridiculous.
Speaker 1: And if they go a little too far, you know,
Speaker 1: if it actually costs people their lives, like everybody's screaming,
Speaker 1: it's going to you know, people with AIDS in Africa
Speaker 1: or whatever, you know, little Zambian kids who can't read.
Speaker 2: I mean, nobody's in favor of that.
Speaker 1: But that's always the sort of hue and cry here
Speaker 1: in opposition to any sort of reform.
Speaker 4: That's why I refuse to honor it at all. I
Speaker 4: refuse to honor the warnings not going to Could they exist, yes,
Speaker 4: but I'm not gonna go there because you always play
Speaker 4: that game. You always freaking play that game. You try
Speaker 4: to do anything, you're gonna fire teachers and firefighters.
Speaker 2: Oh, shut the hell up. I was so sick of
Speaker 2: that game.
Speaker 1: I'm working with an angry militant here, folks. If I
Speaker 1: use the word muskrat, it means I'm afraid of a
Speaker 1: safe word.
Speaker 2: Now there's the safe word working with you yet. So
Speaker 2: I thought this was so interesting.
Speaker 1: Tom Nicholson wrote a piece for The Wall Street Journal
Speaker 1: about the left, who they have far from loved USA
Speaker 1: through the years. They used to get lots of criticism
Speaker 1: from the lefts and centrists for various reasons. But you know,
Speaker 1: obviously this is just another example of you know, when
Speaker 1: the shoe is on the other foot, they will just
Speaker 1: how precisely the opposite of what they're saying today. But
Speaker 1: the history of political supporter opposition to the agency's complex
Speaker 1: USA today may look like a cherished agent see of
Speaker 1: political progressives because it is really, but it is long
Speaker 1: faced skepticism and outright opposition from leftists and some centrist
Speaker 1: liberals and many of the vocal left leanding groups that
Speaker 1: today behave as though USAID is a selfless and wonderful
Speaker 1: aid political agency would have employed a more thoughtful assessment
Speaker 1: decades past.
Speaker 2: A primary complaint through the years, and.
Speaker 1: Jack, this is just going to shock you has been
Speaker 1: the failure of aid dollars to reach their stated beneficiaries.
Speaker 2: No way critics.
Speaker 1: Critics have long noted that a substantial portion of foreign
Speaker 1: aid never leaves the US, instead staying within USAID are
Speaker 1: circulating among well healed US AID subcontractors.
Speaker 4: Wow, I didn't know that this was where it's going
Speaker 4: to go. So it's worse than I even thought. I
Speaker 4: thought you meant it gets to a country and it
Speaker 4: stays at the high levels of their government. Never actually,
Speaker 4: they never actually act too. They never act. Yeah, I'm
Speaker 4: sure that happens too. Of course that happens. They never
Speaker 4: actually have a trendsgender play in Ireland. But somebody gets
Speaker 4: the eight million or whatever the hell it.
Speaker 1: Was, right, And it's been a while since I've seen
Speaker 1: this and talked about it, but I remember it was
Speaker 1: a few years ago that a list came out of
Speaker 1: the fifteen I think it was richest zip codes in America,
Speaker 1: and there were several of them clustered around Manhattan, which
Speaker 1: is not shocking at all, but like just over half
Speaker 1: of them were clustered around Washington, d C. Now, what
Speaker 1: is manufactured in Washington, d C. Well, that's, of course
Speaker 1: the cars America's automotive center. Oh no, no, it's the Eastern
Speaker 1: Silicon Valley. No no, no, wait a minute, it's the
Speaker 1: agricultural center.
Speaker 2: Oh wait, wait no.
Speaker 1: The only thing that's manufactured is government policy and the
Speaker 1: flow of tax dollars. And apparently that is a lucrative
Speaker 1: enough enterprise. Obviously that Washington, DC is just teeming with
Speaker 1: rich people. Anyway, this is a great example of it.
Speaker 1: So a substantial portion of quote unquote foreign aid stays
Speaker 1: within US eight or circulating among their favorite subcontractors. Many
Speaker 1: of these subcontractors later work for USAID and sustain the
Speaker 1: revolving door of self interest. Some dollars do reach intended
Speaker 1: recipients around the world, but plenty of the funding goes
Speaker 1: to local affiliates of those same USAID subcontracts.
Speaker 4: Wow, this is the most underreported part of this whole
Speaker 4: argument for the past two weeks. That's why they're on
Speaker 4: the steps with bullhorns, screaming with spit coming out of
Speaker 4: their mouths over this aid being cut, because they're actually
Speaker 4: gonna get less money in their own pockets.
Speaker 1: Bingo, listen to this and be prepared to retrieve your socks.
Speaker 1: I'm about to knock them off.
Speaker 4: Okay.
Speaker 1: By most assessments, less than ten percent of US non
Speaker 1: military foreign aid ends up with locally based organizations, less
Speaker 1: than ten percent. And critics on the left have been
Speaker 1: making these charges for decades.
Speaker 2: Because they actually were.
Speaker 1: And this is the old left, Okay, this is not
Speaker 1: the wackeddoodle woke left. This is just your classical we
Speaker 1: need to help people and be a good country around
Speaker 1: the world.
Speaker 2: They are pissed off that they had these noble.
Speaker 5: Goals for AIDS relief or hunger relief, or literacy among
Speaker 5: girls in oppressive third world countries or whatever, some thoroughly
Speaker 5: defensible ideas.
Speaker 2: Even if you don't want the government.
Speaker 1: To fund them, at least they're good, decent ideas. But
Speaker 1: the left used to be pissed off because USAID and
Speaker 1: organizations like it were a big scam that would milk
Speaker 1: the cow and just maybe sprinkle a couple of drops
Speaker 1: on the people they claimed to be helping. Now, all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, Oh, my, USAID is just so important
Speaker 1: and so beautiful.
Speaker 2: It must not be even looked at it. Don't even
Speaker 2: look at it.
Speaker 4: Yeah. From Mark Beeson's column in the Washington Post today,
Speaker 4: making this very point, please shuddering. US eight is not
Speaker 4: some evil magaplot. In fact, it was first proposed by
Speaker 4: a Democrat Secretary of State, Warren Christopher. He was the
Speaker 4: Secretary of the State as a Democrat who tried to
Speaker 4: close the Foreign Aid Agency during the Clinton administration. In
Speaker 4: nineteen ninety five, Christopher proposed a plan to eliminate three
Speaker 4: independent foreign policy agencies, USAID, the US Information Agency, which
Speaker 4: is USIA and the arms controlling this bubba another acronym,
Speaker 4: and merge them into some department that they could keep
Speaker 4: better track of the money because so much of it
Speaker 4: was not getting where it was supposed to go. That
Speaker 4: was the Secretary of State under Clinton.
Speaker 1: I think it is really useful, as if you need
Speaker 1: even more fuel for your fire, folks, really useful to
Speaker 1: remember that government is a for profit enterprise. It doesn't
Speaker 1: show a profit on the balance sheet, but everybody in
Speaker 1: it profits from it, and they don't want it to.
Speaker 2: Shrink at all. The idea horrifies them.
Speaker 4: The fact that the first attempt to shut down USAID
Speaker 4: comes from the Clinton administration. Now, most reporters are born
Speaker 4: in the two thousands, so they don't know that.
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, oh, which brings us back to this is
Speaker 1: so good it bears repeating as long as we're on
Speaker 1: the topic. So Hillary Clinton, who sciences determined has no soul,
Speaker 1: tweeted yes, yes, tweeted US airlines had gone sixteen years
Speaker 1: without fatal crashes. Then MAGA fired the FAA chief, gutted
Speaker 1: the Aviation Security Advisory Committee, and threatened air traffic controllers
Speaker 1: with layoffs.
Speaker 2: Oh my god.
Speaker 1: Blaming the plane crash on MAGA and Sean Duffy, the
Speaker 1: current Secretary of Transportation, blasted back. And you know, as
Speaker 1: I said earlier, I'm for more gentle and minliness and
Speaker 1: being decent too, even to your opponents. But she deserved
Speaker 1: the nass kicking, and he delivered. I know you're lashing
Speaker 1: out because Doge is uncovering your family's obscene grifting via USAID,
Speaker 1: but I won't let you lie into.
Speaker 2: Story or the facts.
Speaker 1: And then he goes into how the FAA administrator resigned.
Speaker 1: Before they came into office, air traffic controllers were always
Speaker 1: exempt from the civil service buyouts, and they are trying desperate.
Speaker 2: Well, I'm just going to read the rest of it.
Speaker 1: The previous administration shamelessly used us DOT as a slush.
Speaker 2: Fund for the Green new scam.
Speaker 1: Sound familiar, throwing away money and resources on wasteful environmental
Speaker 1: and social justice projects enriching their cronies, rather than updating
Speaker 1: our nation's antiquated air traffic control systems and other critical infrastructure.
Speaker 1: I'm returning this department to its mission of safety by
Speaker 1: using innovative technology and transportation infrastructure. Your team had its
Speaker 1: chance and failed. We're moving on without you because the
Speaker 1: American people want us to make America's transportation system great again.
Speaker 1: And yes, we're bringing the twenty two year olds with us.
Speaker 1: That was a reference to something else. She said, how
Speaker 1: quickly can we get to the bottom of the Clinton
Speaker 1: Foundation's obscene grifting via Usaid? Because Sean Duffy is a
Speaker 1: serious guy, he must know something.
Speaker 4: I thought, Uh, Trump blaming the plane crashes on DEI
Speaker 4: hours after those people died was out of line. But
Speaker 4: it's even further for Hillary to claim MAGA budget cuts
Speaker 4: caused the crashes. No, no crashes for twenty years than
Speaker 4: Trump's in office for a week, and we have these
Speaker 4: crashes coincidence. I mean, are you serious? Wow, you must
Speaker 4: think your voters are really morons.
Speaker 2: That is so weak.
Speaker 1: So I threw out I'm sorry, I'm sorry. I knew
Speaker 1: I had one more thought on this. But going back
Speaker 1: to the USAID article, at least ninety percent of their
Speaker 1: brilliant programs disappear into the pockets of contractors. What's one
Speaker 1: of the biggest contractors to USAID, the Clinton Foundation.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's something. So if you can get whatever the
Speaker 4: process is for getting something approved, condoms for the tally
Speaker 4: ban and it's a million dollars.
Speaker 1: Well, I don't want to to reproduce, so I'm kinda
Speaker 1: in favor of that.
Speaker 4: And you think shipping them condoms they're gonna use them, Well,
Speaker 4: the United States sent them. It'd be a shame to
Speaker 4: waste them. That's what's gonna happen.
Speaker 2: Uh make it less likely for sheep to get STDs.
Speaker 4: I know, also stereotype.
Speaker 1: Come on, Michael, that's tough audience tonight. Is this thing working?
Speaker 2: Hello?
Speaker 4: But so if you can get something like that approved
Speaker 4: because it sounds good enough, or whoever checks the box
Speaker 4: and says, okay, million dollars for condoms for the Taliban,
Speaker 4: then you get to decide. Okay, who am I going
Speaker 4: to give this money to? Because on your mind is
Speaker 4: not condoms getting to the teally ban.
Speaker 2: No, it doesn't matter. He spread it around hoever.
Speaker 4: You want chocolate chip cookies for the wigers, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: I'm keeping ninety percent of it. I don't just cook
Speaker 1: something up and.
Speaker 2: Tell me I'll pitch that and then we'll get paid.
Speaker 2: All right? Wow, I put out the question earlier.
Speaker 4: Is there anything more annoying than putting a fitted sheet
Speaker 4: on a bed? We got one example, among other things
Speaker 4: we got to talk about on the way stay here.
Speaker 2: What happened to plugs? When did we get rid of plugs?
Speaker 2: Why is everything USB?
Speaker 6: We've just we've been opening baby stuff, and every baby
Speaker 6: thing is USB. Nobody has a plug. If it does
Speaker 6: come with a plug, they give you a cord, but
Speaker 6: they don't give you the box to plug it into.
Speaker 6: Takes a lock, ten apple, you piece of They just
Speaker 6: to have plugs that went into the wall and it
Speaker 6: was the whole unit. I'm getting the middle of a plug.
Speaker 6: What is happening?
Speaker 4: That is the first one of those I've heard a
Speaker 4: lot time that I really like. Was genuine anger as
Speaker 4: opposed to like, you know, faked up for a video
Speaker 4: or so. Guy was like me, I agree, Well, did
Speaker 4: we all have a vote in the side.
Speaker 2: Now, no more plugs. It's too easy.
Speaker 1: If you got enough of those transformer things till you plug,
Speaker 1: you just give me the middle part of the plug.
Speaker 2: As he says, oh god, oh my god.
Speaker 7: Just to give you the visual he is doing the
Speaker 7: whole walk around your house and talking to your phone thing,
Speaker 7: and he's just holding up a variety of random chords
Speaker 7: without boxes.
Speaker 4: That ald time. Oh yeah, And I want I want
Speaker 4: every the square part that you put in the wall,
Speaker 4: you plug the thing into what do you call that
Speaker 4: the charger box thingy? I want them all to be
Speaker 4: different sizes, Yeah, as many I want. I want c
Speaker 4: I want USB, I want lightning, I want the little trapezoid.
Speaker 4: I want every one of them to be a completely
Speaker 4: different effing shape. So and then on the other end
Speaker 4: of the cord, who knows what that shape needs to be?
Speaker 2: Also, Yeah, that's one.
Speaker 1: Realm of human technology life that I need no more
Speaker 1: progress on. We've invented a chord that actually carries data. Nope, nope,
Speaker 1: this one's fine, This one's exactly I was perfectly happy with.
Speaker 1: Oh you don't understand you can transfer data? No, no,
Speaker 1: this was fun.
Speaker 4: I did throw earlier on how I don't find anything
Speaker 4: personally in my life more frustrating than putting on a
Speaker 4: fitted sheet. I just I have always hated doing it,
Speaker 4: and it hasn't gotten better with age. And uh I
Speaker 4: even bought the super expensive kind of sheets I won't
Speaker 4: mention the brand that have the label in the corner
Speaker 4: or whatever, And a lot of people said, you know,
Speaker 4: get a magic marker and mark the corner. So you know,
Speaker 4: because I always have that problem. I put the short
Speaker 4: side on the long side, and then I turn in
Speaker 4: a quarter turn and somehow the short side is still
Speaker 4: on the long side. I don't even know how that's possible.
Speaker 4: Newton would say, it's not, but it happens to me
Speaker 4: all the time. But I just did never fit right,
Speaker 4: even the expensive kind I bought. They're either just a
Speaker 4: little too big or a little too small. And I
Speaker 4: don't understand.
Speaker 2: Yes, Katie, did you just say magic marker?
Speaker 4: Yeah? Is that as the corner?
Speaker 2: What is she talking about?
Speaker 4: To put a little like X on the corner? I
Speaker 4: don't do it, but everybody suggested it. We probably got
Speaker 4: sixty texts saying that's what they do, get a.
Speaker 2: Little marker and you don't know what a magic marker is?
Speaker 2: That is that the confution?
Speaker 7: I know what, I'm okay, yes, I know what imagic. No,
Speaker 7: but you're marking your sheets.
Speaker 4: I thought that might be a boomer term that young
Speaker 4: people like you don't use magic marker. You put a yeah,
Speaker 4: so I don't want to put a mark on my sheets.
Speaker 4: That's part of it. Do you put an L and
Speaker 4: an R in your shoes? Due to make sure you know.
Speaker 2: I know, you know. I wasn't gonna say anything, Katie.
Speaker 4: But but we got so many textors, you idiot, put them,
Speaker 4: get a magic marker and put an X on the corner.
Speaker 1: Was it one person who didn't realize they texted sixty
Speaker 1: times because they're the sort of person who has to
Speaker 1: sharp e their sheets.
Speaker 2: I'm with Joe here, like folks, I was just making light.
Speaker 2: I didn't mean it. I'm not. That's bizarre. Do you
Speaker 2: put eleanor in your shoes? Oh?
Speaker 1: Oh, he's a victim of monks syndrome. Can help from
Speaker 1: sounding make Nelson months.
Speaker 7: I think I speak for the entire listening audience, Jack,
Speaker 7: that you should videotape yourself next time you tried to
Speaker 7: put on a fitted sheet.
Speaker 2: Boy, last night would have been the perfect one.
Speaker 4: Last night would have been the perfect one because it
Speaker 4: was a very long, annoying day with all kinds of
Speaker 4: different things. Doctor's appointments are running in, this is on
Speaker 4: the phone with the lawyer, and it didn't get a
Speaker 4: nap or meditation. And at the end of the day,
Speaker 4: I'm putting this feeted sheet on there and it won't
Speaker 4: effing fit.
Speaker 2: Man.
Speaker 4: I wish I had a video of that. I would
Speaker 4: like to see it because I was losing my freaking mind.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but I have some blood pressure cuff going in
Speaker 1: your heart rate and everything is yes with.
Speaker 4: A fit bit on and where you could look on
Speaker 4: the screen and see what's happening physiologically, that would be fantastic.
Speaker 7: I'm just writing down. February seventh, Jack claimed he didn't
Speaker 7: get a nap or his meditation.
Speaker 4: Man, I tell you what.
Speaker 1: So Trump's no dudes in women's sports announcement has drawn
Speaker 1: backlash and it is deliciously lame that coming up.
Speaker 4: Also, didn't get my juice box.
Speaker 2: Where is my blanky?
Speaker 4: Dammit?
Speaker 2: Where is it? There is no bath bomb in my
Speaker 2: bath I'm really upset.
Speaker 1: Wow, Wow, this is cool mockery. It's not too much.
Speaker 2: I don't approve Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 8: To see President Trump's decisive action. There was a campaign
Speaker 8: promise of his issue number seventeen on his platform, no
Speaker 8: men and women's sports. So to see him deliver in
Speaker 8: the way that he did. That visual that you saw
Speaker 8: him signing this executive order with I mean dozens of
Speaker 8: young girls surrounding him. I mean, I can't even tell
Speaker 8: you what that visual means. To me, man, I just
Speaker 8: feel vindicated and I feel this, this overwhelming feeling of gratitude.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Well she had to feel crazy there for a while,
Speaker 4: like a lot of us did, Like how is this happening?
Speaker 4: How is this still happening? Does anybody agree with this?
Speaker 4: Nobody I know agrees with this.
Speaker 1: This is that was Riley Gaines who had to dress
Speaker 1: an undress or swim met in front of a six
Speaker 1: foot four inch man. Not only that, but then the
Speaker 1: university forced her to say that's a woman, which is
Speaker 1: an incredible humiliation. I can't believe any feminists put up
Speaker 1: with it for a second.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: This is a bit of an aside, But let's hear
Speaker 1: Caroline Levitt, the new Press Secretary, on this topic briefly.
Speaker 9: This common sense action from President Trump ends the disgusting
Speaker 9: betrayal of women and girls by the previous administration, who
Speaker 9: four years catered to radical activists who wanted biological males
Speaker 9: to be treated as women and workplace showers, combetitive sports prisons,
Speaker 9: and even rape shelters. Gender ideology insanity is over.
Speaker 1: Well, let's compare and contrast that with the previous gal
Speaker 1: in the gig clip ninety two Michael ninety two, if
Speaker 1: you would sorry.
Speaker 10: Our deepest obviously, our deepest condolences go out and our
Speaker 10: heartfelt condolences go out to the families who lost brave,
Speaker 10: three brave, three brave of three folks who are who
Speaker 10: are military, folks who are brave, who are always fighting,
Speaker 10: who are fighting on behin.
Speaker 1: Wow, Wow, you want to talk about a national upgrade? Anyway,
Speaker 1: getting back to the topic of the gender bending madness.
Speaker 2: I think that was the example.
Speaker 4: I was watching Mark Alprin's podcast a couple of weeks
Speaker 4: ago and they played a clip a KJP. This was
Speaker 4: like the last week of Biden's administration, and Mark Alprin said, Hey,
Speaker 4: a tip from me, just because I've been around Washington,
Speaker 4: d C. A long time that this is when all
Speaker 4: the conversation was going on about who Trump was going
Speaker 4: to appoint this or that and everything like that. And
Speaker 4: he said, don't take a job you're not qualified for,
Speaker 4: even if you want it and it seems like a
Speaker 4: cool job. Do not take a job you're not qualified for.
Speaker 4: I've seen it happen before. And I think he was
Speaker 4: talking about her because they just played a clip of her,
Speaker 4: because I think.
Speaker 2: That's what happened to her. I think she took a job.
Speaker 2: I think it was a DEI higher.
Speaker 4: I mean, she she was the first black lesbian and
Speaker 4: and and she wasn't quite for it, which was not
Speaker 4: I couldn't do that job either. But you know it's
Speaker 4: not gonna do you any favors.
Speaker 1: Yeah, what a terrible position to put her into. I mean,
Speaker 1: because the cable news is teeming with I mean, their
Speaker 1: ideas are awful, but they're extremely articulate and bright liberals, progressives,
Speaker 1: be they women or men. It's not like there aren't
Speaker 1: any and you put poor little KJP up there just
Speaker 1: because she's checked some boxes. Well, if you're gonna do
Speaker 1: that with your presidential candidate, I suppose you do it
Speaker 1: with your press secretary.
Speaker 2: Now, what do you respect here? Please? Okay when it's due.
Speaker 1: So a couple of headlines, though in that direction, are
Speaker 1: on that topic. A federal judge has stepped in and
Speaker 1: blocked Donald J's transfer of three self declared transgender men
Speaker 1: back to all mel jails from the current cells in
Speaker 1: women's gels, with what reasoning it's a temporary restraining order
Speaker 1: while it can be heard and dealt with, which to me,
Speaker 1: I mean it's fine. It's this is completely necessary and
Speaker 1: it was one hundred percent certain to happen. Fine and dandy,
Speaker 1: let's get started now, and it'll end up probably at
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court if they hear it.
Speaker 4: Do you know what's the argument from the other side, though,
Speaker 4: other than they feel like they're a woman, so they're
Speaker 4: a woman, so put them in the female jail.
Speaker 1: And that's what's meant risk to be in the wrong
Speaker 1: gender jail essentially.
Speaker 4: Yeah, okay, yeah, Well, I wouldn't want to be in
Speaker 4: a man a male prison as a dude dressed as
Speaker 4: a woman. I wouldn't want to be Oh, I don't
Speaker 4: want to be a female in a female prison with dudes.
Speaker 2: So right, exactly.
Speaker 1: And you go very far down the road of granting
Speaker 1: exceptions and variations, you get into a no man's land
Speaker 1: where nothing is real anymore, and you end up with dudes,
Speaker 1: fully intact dudes who are dudes, throwing a wig and
Speaker 1: sam a girl. Now send me to the women's prison,
Speaker 1: and in California they get accommodated. So anyway, don't get
Speaker 1: discouraged that the judge has granted a temporary restraining order,
Speaker 1: because it's.
Speaker 2: A step in the process.
Speaker 1: Anyway, I thought this was this was so good, And
Speaker 1: normally you've heard us rail against the sort of journalism
Speaker 1: that says that the controversy erupts as and then it quotes,
Speaker 1: you know, angry people on Twitter, because Twitter woke up
Speaker 1: angry anyway, But I thought this was a little different
Speaker 1: in a way in that what's being said is so plain,
Speaker 1: so true. I'm almost to the point of being like,
Speaker 1: why would you bother saying that about this topic?
Speaker 2: But it was verboten only a year or two.
Speaker 1: Ago talking about ESPN, who faced extreme ridicule online, especially
Speaker 1: after they posted the announcement of Trump's executive order banning
Speaker 1: male athletes from girls sports women's sports. The way they
Speaker 1: reported it was, President Donald Trump will sign an executive
Speaker 1: order designed to prevent people who were biologically assigned male
Speaker 1: at birth from participating in women's or girls sporting events.
Speaker 1: One person replied, Trump is banning dudes from competing in
Speaker 1: women's sports.
Speaker 2: There fixed it for you. Another opined, and this is.
Speaker 1: A perfectly reasonable expression of what is true. Why is
Speaker 1: it that you people are so obsessed with letting men
Speaker 1: compete in women's sports?
Speaker 2: Why can't you.
Speaker 4: Accept that Nobody wants to do this woke bullless anymore.
Speaker 2: The charade is over cut. The crap.
Speaker 1: People who were biologically assigned at male at birth?
Speaker 2: You mean men?
Speaker 1: Another reader questioned, right, one person road. As I've said
Speaker 1: many many times, no one is assigned a Our sex
Speaker 1: is set it conception and observed at birth, and often
Speaker 1: these days it has been observed in utero. Nobody assigns anything.
Speaker 1: You're not assigned an effing thing. You absolute imbeciles. Somebody wrote,
Speaker 1: let's see h A. Nancy Mace replied, This executive order
Speaker 1: restores fairness of PHOLS Title nine's original attent and defends
Speaker 1: the right of female athletes who have worked their whole
Speaker 1: lives to compete at the highest levels.
Speaker 2: Absolutely plainly true.
Speaker 4: Well I got, I forgot, I got this good thing yesterday.
Speaker 4: This combines doge with this conversation. So we had one
Speaker 4: point three million dollars going to the Center for Innovative
Speaker 4: Public Health Research out of the Department of Health and
Speaker 4: Human Services. And this is what the one point three
Speaker 4: million dollars was for adapting an LGB plus inclusive teen
Speaker 4: pregnancy prevention program for transgender boys. Youth thro were a
Speaker 4: signed female at birth and identify as transgender, not as girls,
Speaker 4: are at risk for negative sexual health outcomes, yet are
Speaker 4: effectively excluded from sexual health programs because gender diverse youth
Speaker 4: do not experience the cisgender heteronormative teen sexual education messaging
Speaker 4: available to them as salient or applicable. In other words,
Speaker 4: if you're point, in other words, if you're a you're
Speaker 4: born a girl, and now you call yourself a dude,
Speaker 4: you're not. You don't feel like the regular sex education
Speaker 4: stuff applies to you.
Speaker 2: So you need special.
Speaker 4: Some sort of health class at school that we're going
Speaker 4: to spend one point three million dollars on. And this
Speaker 4: is what it leads to. Uh. This lack of programming
Speaker 4: is likely contributing to obstacles to sexual health. Data suggests
Speaker 4: that trends identified youth may be less likely to use
Speaker 4: condoms when having sex with people who have penises.
Speaker 2: This is the way it's written. I'm gonna need a.
Speaker 4: Chart one point three million dollars for this. Trans Identified
Speaker 4: youth may be less likely to use condoms and having
Speaker 4: sex with people who have penises, and are at least
Speaker 4: as likely as sis gender girls to be pregnant.
Speaker 2: I'm seriously lost.
Speaker 4: Well, the reason you're at least as likely to get
Speaker 4: pregnant as sis gender girls because you're a girl.
Speaker 2: Also is the thing you you are at least as likely.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 1: Listen, I try very hard not to criticize the kids,
Speaker 1: and this will be short, Jack, you can get right
Speaker 1: back to it, because they're confused and they've been led
Speaker 1: astray by activists. But if you are a quote transidentifying boy,
Speaker 1: meaning you're a girl and you don't know your skill
Speaker 1: susceptible to girl stuff, that's still making.
Speaker 4: Pregnant as just almost as likely as other girls.
Speaker 1: You're crazy and stupid, or so crazy it makes you
Speaker 1: effectively stupid.
Speaker 7: Yes, Katie, we already have a class for this and
Speaker 7: it's called anatomy, right.
Speaker 4: But they the quaim here is that the trands girls
Speaker 4: trends boys. I have so much trouble with this, same
Speaker 4: as the time change. I just can't keep it straight
Speaker 4: in my head. But they they don't feel like that
Speaker 4: message is for them, or whoever came up with this
Speaker 4: one point three million dollar grant that is now being
Speaker 4: gotten rid of because of a doge didn't think that
Speaker 4: message was getting through to them because of the way
Speaker 4: it's presented.
Speaker 7: Well to quote the left, trust the science, Trust trust
Speaker 7: the science.
Speaker 1: Well, don't use the term trends. Use the word pretend
Speaker 1: that that helps keep tracking it. The pretend boys are
Speaker 1: more susceptible to getting pregnant because they don't realize that
Speaker 1: male identifying whatever the hell terminology you's just through as
Speaker 1: people will actually get pregnant people who have penises. I
Speaker 1: they have sex with people with penises. Yeah, sometimes it
Speaker 1: comes with a super bonus. It's a little cell they
Speaker 1: call the sperm mitozoa. Now, if you watch this film strip.
Speaker 4: I gotta talk about what my biology teacher in seventh grade,
Speaker 4: the speech he gave us. It was so funny. But
Speaker 4: I'm hoping that I really hope this is true. I'm
Speaker 4: gonna be disappointed if it's not true. I think we'll
Speaker 4: look back on this very thing I'm holding in my hand,
Speaker 4: this paragraph.
Speaker 2: Mhm.
Speaker 4: Five years from now, ten years from now, one hundred
Speaker 4: years from now, people look back at this and like
Speaker 4: they look at the Salem witch trials and think, yeah,
Speaker 4: how the hell.
Speaker 2: Did that ever happen.
Speaker 4: They were drowning women to prove they were a witch
Speaker 4: or not, and if they drowned, they weren't a witch.
Speaker 4: And you say, well, I guess we didn't need to
Speaker 4: drown that one or something.
Speaker 1: Wait, but we're so much more a technical, technologically advanced age.
Speaker 1: We have no excuse the punchline to this whole discussion.
Speaker 1: If you're playing along at home and you get this right,
Speaker 1: one hundred A and G points, So stay tuned. Speaking
Speaker 1: of winning things, are friends at Prize Picks reminding you
Speaker 1: that the big game is almost here, it's now or never,
Speaker 1: and Prize Picks is the best place to win cash
Speaker 1: while watching El Grande Contest. Prize Picks is giving away
Speaker 1: a free pick for the game where Pat Mahomes only
Speaker 1: needs to throw one yard to win, So then you
Speaker 1: just need to be correct on one more stat projection
Speaker 1: to win real cash.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Xavier Worthy maybe the most exciting player on the Chiefs.
Speaker 4: Will he have more than fifty six and a half
Speaker 4: receiving yards? Or if you're an Eagles fan, Barkley will
Speaker 4: he rush for more than one hundred and twelve and
Speaker 4: a half He had sixty to one run in that
Speaker 4: last game. Anyway, those are your more or lessons for
Speaker 4: your Prize Picks. Download the Prize Picks app today.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and then use the code armstrong to get fifty
Speaker 1: dollars instantly. After you play your first five dollars lineup.
Speaker 1: You don't need to win, you get it automatically. Play five,
Speaker 1: they give you fifty to play round with later prize picks.
Speaker 1: Run your game.
Speaker 2: Remember that coat Armstrong.
Speaker 4: Negative sellers the punch negative self negative self health outcomes,
Speaker 4: yet are effectively excluded from sexual health programs because gender
Speaker 4: diverse youth do not experience the cis gender heteronomative teen
Speaker 4: sexual education messaging available to them as salient. Wow, a
Speaker 4: lot of words and stuff, and somebody, you know, a
Speaker 4: number of people, probably a team of lawyers and legislators,
Speaker 4: wrote this crap, right, And and when having sex with
Speaker 4: people who have penises?
Speaker 2: How do you write that phrase? With the straight faith?
Speaker 1: I think your Salem witch trial comparison is a really
Speaker 1: good one. This era will be looked back upon with
Speaker 1: with with horror and derision and mockery, I certainly hope.
Speaker 1: So all right, so all that mumbo jumble bull ass
Speaker 1: that you were not allowed to call bullss on for
Speaker 1: several years, particularly in blue parts of the country. I
Speaker 1: refer back to our count station a little earlier this
Speaker 1: hour about those USAID consultants. Now this was talking about
Speaker 1: foreign stuff, but I'll bet it's similar domestically, keeping in
Speaker 1: mind that barely ten percent of the funding actually was
Speaker 1: rubber meeting road. The rest of it disappeared into the
Speaker 1: consultants and the activist groups and their payrolls. So, yeah,
Speaker 1: they cook up this impenetrable mumbo jumbo. They tell you
Speaker 1: you're a bigot and will ruin your career if you
Speaker 1: question it. Then they all get rich administering phony programs
Speaker 1: to deal with it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and the scam, it's not even about trying to
Speaker 4: get that program through DEI.
Speaker 2: Black Lives Matter, it's all the same.
Speaker 4: That's interesting.
Speaker 2: A lot more on the way.
Speaker 4: Stay here. Did you see the prophie that Benjamin net
Speaker 4: and Yahoo gave Trump the other day when they met
Speaker 4: at the White House. He gave him a golden pager. Oh,
Speaker 4: in honor of that amazing pager attack where he blow
Speaker 4: up all those hamass genitals.
Speaker 2: Wow, that's a little bad. I want one.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's a great It's like a it looks like
Speaker 4: a trophy and it's got a little plaque on the
Speaker 4: bottom that says, what does it say to President Donald Trump?
Speaker 4: Ingratitude for you know, supporting Israel blah blah blah. And
Speaker 4: then it's a gold you know, Trump likes things are gold.
Speaker 4: It's a gold pager on this little trophy stand.
Speaker 1: That is such a great appeal to Trump's ego too,
Speaker 1: right mm hmm, as if he was, you know, part
Speaker 1: of that, or an honorary pager blower upper.
Speaker 4: Right or something like that. Yeah, that's awesome.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, man, I would pay a lot for a
Speaker 1: glimpse into ten years from now what Gaza looks like,
Speaker 1: what Israel looks like, that relationship, just all of it.
Speaker 4: All the stuffy thing could happen ai what we were
Speaker 4: just talking about, if we've moved past a lot of
Speaker 4: this in ten years. But here's the thing, you know,
Speaker 4: God Willing, I've invented the time machine. The only problem
Speaker 4: is it only moves forward at regular speed. So I'm
Speaker 4: just gonna wait it out and see what happens.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, yeah, Well it'll be interesting, that is guaranteed.
Speaker 1: It's interesting. Some of the changes going on at the FBI.
Speaker 1: That's one of those I don't want them to be
Speaker 1: too hasty and make too many mistakes because there's a
Speaker 1: lot at stake.
Speaker 2: But some of the moves are are pretty intriguing.
Speaker 1: Apparently the Justice Department FBI are going to dial back
Speaker 1: a bit on cracking down on foreign corruption, Russian oligarchs
Speaker 1: and like corporate shenanigans in the US and devote more
Speaker 1: time and energy to fighting the giant cartels. And it's oversimplified,
Speaker 1: but you could absolutely make the argument that well, one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand Americans have been dying per year because of
Speaker 1: the drugs that cartels spring into the country and just
Speaker 1: purely a human cost. I mean, it's it's difficult to
Speaker 1: argue against that. This priority reminds me. I just saw
Speaker 1: that the new drug that they're on the watch out for.
Speaker 1: Let me find that, uh, fentanyl laced marijuana. Horse tranquilizer.
Speaker 1: Is that the trenk that we've been talking about in
Speaker 1: the past. Horse tranquilizer is that a new could be
Speaker 1: And nightazines, which I don't even know, listed as the
Speaker 1: top emerging drug threats in the United States. So if
Speaker 1: you hear about your kids getting a hold of some nightazines,
Speaker 1: whatever the hell that is. Uh, the horse tranquilizer is zeidlazine.
Speaker 2: Yeah that's trank yep. Yeah, oh yeah, Well.
Speaker 4: I'm running in the Kentucky Derby Saturday and mine here
Speaker 4: it's what am I.
Speaker 2: Get you some drink?
Speaker 1: Just don't don't be a junkie Kid's goodness sakes, it's
Speaker 1: a it's a it's.
Speaker 2: A super highway to hell. Not the fun one ac
Speaker 2: DC is saying about.
Speaker 4: This is a real one. Is trying the one that
Speaker 4: leaves holes in your legs? Yes, gross sores right down
Speaker 4: to your bone.
Speaker 2: What a party?
Speaker 7: Oh, turns into like a zombie literally, like your skin's
Speaker 7: falling off.
Speaker 4: The're the ones just kind of lean over.
Speaker 7: Yeah yeah, I believe the street name for that they do.
Speaker 2: It's called blues. Yeah, and then they end up. You
Speaker 2: don't start there, right, you work up to that.
Speaker 1: Nobody nobody like yeah yeah, but more cheerful pharmaceutical to
Speaker 1: go ahead, Katie, finish up if you want to know.
Speaker 7: I was just it's just like you used once and
Speaker 7: then you're there. I mean, it's not a slow build.
Speaker 4: You get hooked. I get it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, in a hurry, I was just gonna say,
Speaker 1: more cheerful pharmaceutical news. Uh, the FDA approved a new
Speaker 1: opioid free pain medication that doesn't mess with your brain chemistry.
Speaker 1: It blocks the pain at the receptor level in your
Speaker 1: body first time.
Speaker 2: I hope it's as safe as effective as they say
Speaker 2: it is, but.
Speaker 4: It could be really important, first new painkiller approved in decades,
Speaker 4: so let's all check that out. Have you miss an
Speaker 4: hour segment gets the podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand
Speaker 4: Hour four coming up if you get it.
Speaker 1: Armstrong and Getty