WEBVTT - Howard Marks LIVE (Replay) with Barry Ritholtz (Podcast)

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>This week we have an extra special show. On Monday,

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>we did Masters in Business Live and my guest was

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the incomparable Howard Marks of oak Tree Capital. They run

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred and twenty billion dollars and have put

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>up numbers that have been quite astonishing for their entire

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty four year history. This is the second Masters in

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Business Live we've done. The first one was Ray Dalio.

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>We're going to continue doing these every few months and

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>we have an interesting list of guests coming up. If

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you were anywhere near the New York City headquarters on

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the day we do one of these, I strongly advise

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you to get tickets. Not only is it live so

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>anything can happen, but it's really a fascinating conversation and

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in both cases, um our guests stick around, chat with

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the audience, um take questions, signed books. It's very informal

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and how often you get to really hang around and

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and have that sort of interaction with legends in finance

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>like that. Plus, Bloomberg is a great place to come

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to an event. They always serve drinks and appetizers. They

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>really roll out the red carpet. It was. It was

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a lovely and delightful evening. Everybody who attended had a

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>great time. Rather than me continue to babble with no

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>further ado, my masters in business live with oak Tree

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Capitals Howard Marks, and once again I get to start

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>out by announcing, um that I am cheating. By bringing

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>someone like Howard here makes my job really easy. Uh.

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>If you're not familiar with his background, I'm going to

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>give you just a really short uh CV of Howard Marks.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>He's the co chairman and co founder of oak Tree Capital,

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>which now manages over a hundred and twenty billion dollars

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in assets. Howard formed oak Tree to run high yield bonds,

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>distress debt, in private equity, and other strategies back They

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>run seventeen separate distress debt funds unless It's Risen two more,

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>which have averaged annual gains of after fees for the

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>past about seven hundred basis points above its peers in

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the fixed income space, and handily beating a lot of

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>equity funds over the same time period. He is the

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>author of the Most Important Thing, Uncommon Sense for the

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Thoughtful Investor, his new book, which everyone here will get

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>copy of is Mastering the market cycle, getting the odds

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>on your side. Howard Marks, Welcome to Bloomberg Life. Mary,

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it's great to be here. So I'll get to the

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>books um in a few minutes. But I want to

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 1>start with an interesting question that I think people may

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>not be aware of your background. You began as an

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>equity analyst. How does one of the world's most famous

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>bond managers being in his career as an equity analyst. Well,

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that, I think that certainly at that point

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in time, Uh, the starting off as an equity analyst

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>was there was the normal course. Uh No, bonds at

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that time were considered a backwater that nobody was interested in.

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>They had two old uh European refugees in the research

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>department of City Bank, and I remember, uh they would

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>publish a bi weekly bond summary, and I remember at

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>one point one came around with the black box in

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the upper right hand cornersay, is the last issue because

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody lost interest in stocks were doing so well. You

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>know how it works. Stocks were doing so well, bonds

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>were doing so poorly that people lose interest. Now, Uh,

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>what the contrarian says is I want to get out

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of the thing that's been doing well and into the

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>things that that's doing poorly. But contrarianism hadn't become invented

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>yet at that point in time. But anyway, so I

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>started off in the equity research as you say. I

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>had a summer job in sixty eight, came back full

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>time after grad school in sixty nine, became UH senior analysts,

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the United head director of Research from seventy to seventy

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>eight UH. And then I got my lucky break in

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight when I switched to UH what was called

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the bond Department. But I wasn't ever managing straight fixed income.

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I was started with convertible bonds. And then in the

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>summer of seventy eight, I got the phone call that

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>changed my life. The head of the bond department called

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>me and he said, there's some guy in California named

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.799
<v Speaker 1>Milken or something and he deals in something called hi bonds.

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Can you figure out what that mean? Because the client

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>had come in and asked for Ohio bond portoyo, and

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I was smart enough to say yes. So that's the

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>transition from equities to regular bonds to high yield bonds.

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>How do you end up over at Trust Company of

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the West in UH. In the first business trip of

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>my life in January nineteen seventy, I went to California

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and UH I was stuttering studying a group that doesn't

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>exist anymore called the Conglomerates. And after the doing, the

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>company visits my boss and I. His in laws lived

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in uh Laguna Beach, so he went down there and

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>spent the weekend. I fell in love with California, and

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I spent the seventies trying to figure out a way

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to get to California, which I did in nineteen eighty.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>UH City, I got City back to move me in

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty and then in eighty five, Trust Company the West,

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>which was in l a company, approached me because they

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to expand into my asset classes. And that's how

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I moved there in eighty five. So it's worth mentioning

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in passing that when you were working at Trust Company

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of the West, you were supervising a young whiz kid

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>named Jeff Gunlock or working with tell us what it

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>was like writing herd on him. He seems to be

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a person that doesn't lend himself to UH being told

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>what to do well. I never kidded myself into thinking

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that that I was actually supervising him. Uh, but you know,

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>uh I was. I was asked to, well, you used

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the term right herd, which is as good as any

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know he uh kind of respected me

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>intellectually and so and so we got along. And uh

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think with Jeff that's the key, um, you know.

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And uh, he was very innovative in his approach. He

0:06:55.760 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>he was managing mortgage backed securities from the late eighties, uh, um,

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>which was innovative. And you know he would he would

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>figure out strategies and then share them with me in

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the hope that I would understand. So so fast forward

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and I would assume you you probably did understand pretty well. Um.

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Fast forward a couple of years you launched oak Tree.

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>And then a decade or so after that, Jeff decides

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the part ways with Trust Company of the West, and

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>he comes to you for some career advice. How did

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that work? Well, of course, he didn't decide to part ways.

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean they decided to part ways with him. Um,

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and he got canned is the technical term. And and

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think it was December oh nine, if I'm

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>not mistaken, and uh, you know he hey, he had

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a great following among his clients and among his his staff,

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and as soon as he got let go, I think

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the rest of him all quit and his whole team,

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I think his whole team. And then, through a brokerage

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>firm or they nowadays they say, investment bank approached us

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and said would you, uh, would you help us get

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>started in exchange for fift of our company? And so

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we were again smart enough to say yes. And it

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a matter of finances. It was a matter of infrastructure,

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>back office, tax, legal registration, all those things. And there's

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 1>a you know, when we started oak Tree, people would say,

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>what's been the biggest surprise. I said, the biggest surprise

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>is how much non investment stuff there is in an

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>investment management job. So we helped him with that. He's

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in our building in California and we just meet and

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>chat periodically. But as I say, we started with fifteen

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of the company. Then we realized that under accounting rules,

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 1>in order to bring in our share of their profits,

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>we would have to uh, so we bought another seven

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>percent and we got de looted down to twenty which

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is where we are now. We have delution protection. Were

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>extremely happy to be owner of Double Line, and I

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>want to say Double Line is the fastest growing asset

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>management firm to reach all. I wouldn't swear to it,

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>but I believe that's right. So let's talk a little

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>about the Chairman's Memos, which you're somewhat um infamous for. Um.

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna quote Warren Buffett when I see memos from

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Howard Marks in my mailbox that the first thing I

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>opened and read, I always learned something. Tell us what

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>led you to publishing the Chairman's Memos? When when did

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 1>they start? And why did you feel the need to

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>write them they started? So this is the thirtieth year, um,

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and thank you. And I don't remember uh thinking that

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>if I wrote him I'd get more business or anything

0:09:56.320 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>like that. But uh, there were events that happened in

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:07.239
<v Speaker 1>my environment, the juxtaposition of which was I thought extremely informative,

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and so I wanted to write it up and share

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it with my clients. Now it is all and and

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.839
<v Speaker 1>you're you're well known for them today. Buffett had has

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>lauded them, and other people have tooked so um approvingly

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of them. But when you first started publishing these, what

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>was the response, like big fat zero zero, literally barry there.

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>It was ten years before I ever had a response.

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 1>Not only did nobody say, oh that was good, nobody

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>ever said I got it. So it was, you know,

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and this is this was this is the day of

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>running the xerox machine, folding them up, putting them in envelopes,

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>addressing them, putting stamps on, and then, as far as

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I knew, tossing him down to this sewer. Because I

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>never had a response for ten years, and so so

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:00.959
<v Speaker 1>I kind of remember or what made me right the

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>first one. I have no idea what kept me going.

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>So you said, there's no response for a decade. That

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>response though, I very specifically remember that one, because Barons

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>did a giant cover on it bubble dot com in

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>January two thousand and only were you right? But the

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>timing couldn't have been any better. Tell us about that

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>particular chairmans, Well, of course, uh, in our business, um,

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't do any good to be right if the

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>timing is not good. You know, there's an old saying

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in our business that being too far ahead of your

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>time is indistinguishable from being wrong. So if I would

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>have published the same insight in I'd be forgotten because

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it would have taken three plus years to work. It

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>happens that only took a few months to work. And

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>basically the premise of the menu memo was that the

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>TMT tech media telecom bubble that had been pushing stocks

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>up for the last few years of the nineties and

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>into two thousand UH was overdone. The subject of excessive

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>optimism and excessive faith in the future, and entirely free

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of any kind of analytical or valuation rigor. You know,

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're used to paying fifteen times earnings for

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>an average company, and maybe thirty times earnings for what

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>we think is a great company. But how do you

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>value a company that has no earnings? Hold on? How

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>do you value a company that has no sales? You know?

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean you were valuing an idea, and people were

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you see, and and in the investment business, there's a

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>tendency to succumb to platitudes, generalizations, and so what was

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>going on in nine was the Internet will change the world.

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And as a consequence, any stock which is Internet or

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>UH e commerce related is the right price is infinity,

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>There's and and as I say in the book. Can

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I say in the book slight slap slug, But as

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I say in the book, if you want to understand bubbles,

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to me, the defining characteristic of the bubble is the

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>belief that quote, there's no price too high, if it's

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 1>if it's an Internet stock, there's no price too high,

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>if there was the nifty fifty back when I started, Xerox, Kodak,

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>mark Lily, no price too high. And of course it's

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:47.839
<v Speaker 1>obvious that everything there is no there's nothing so good

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that it can't be overvalued. And if you buy something

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>at a price which is excessive for its merits by

0:13:55.000 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna require magic to make it into a successful investment.

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>So uh, that was the theme of the memo, you

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>know I talked about I talked about businesses. And by

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, we still some see some today which which

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have a profit plan, you know, and uh, companies

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that you know that as I said in the memo, well,

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>people used to say, the great thing about this company

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is that its costs are almost zero, and I wrote, well,

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that's great because it's revenues are absolutely zero, you know.

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I quoted my dad who was a big

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>joke teller. And he said that the two guys were

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>talking and one guy says, everything I sell, I sell

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>at cost. He said, well, how do you make money?

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>He's why I buy below cost. But but the but

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the internet business model at that time seemed equally uh irrational,

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and yet the stocks were selling at sky high prices.

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And of course, and as I said in a memo

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>which which reviewed this progression later, you know, in my

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>first thirty years in the business, after a bubble popped,

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>we would see a table in the upper right hand

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>corner of the journal, and they show all the stocks

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that were down. Remember, and then with this they showed

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>all the socks who are down or more. And so

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the bubble popped. The memo look smart, I said in

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the in the introduction to my first book. After ten years,

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I became an overnight success. And that's the story. So

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about that first book, which is the

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>most important thing uncommon sense for the thoughtful investor. You're

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>writing these memos on a regular basis, um what motivated

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you to say, I know, let's let's now spend three

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>pages and a year writing a book that was simple.

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I got a letter from Warren Warren Buffett saying saying,

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>if you know I wrote a memo, I think I

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>forget which one it was, um, which was right up

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>his alley. And I wrote him afterwards and I said,

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>did you see this one? He says, yes, it was fine.

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And he says, by the way, if you'll write a book,

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you a quote for the jacket suburb. Enough said,

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and and you know you don't pass that one. Boy.

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>So I had always thought that I would write a

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>book pulling the philosophy together, um when I retired, and

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>instead it got accelerated. What was the experience of writing

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a book like? It was great? Um? You know? Um?

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>For me, the challenge is not to think up what

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to say that the challenges to get it from here

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to there, you know. And yeah, yeah, the thoughts are

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>coming so fast you're afraid they're going to evaporate, so

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to sit there. And yet, so so let's

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of those thoughts which I've pulled from books. Quote,

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>we can make excellent investment decisions on the basis of

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>present observations with no need to make guesses about the future.

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't that run kind of contrary to how lots and

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>lots of people invest their capital. Yeah, I mean the

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the the irony is that what is what is investing

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>investing is positioning your capital to profit from the future

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that unfolds. And yet in my book, we can't know

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>what the future holds. So I an oak Tree through

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>its investment philosophy. Uh, specifically as true macro forecasts. And

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe we ever know enough about the coming economy, markets, currencies,

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>and interest rates to make us a successful and a

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 1>superior investor. It's very hard to hold the view which

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is different and from the consensus, and it's very hard

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to have a non consensus view which turns out to

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>be more correct than the consensus. And so so I

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in forecasts. Uh. Now everybody says, but the

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>macro is so important. It's the macro that moves the

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>markets these days, and it it truly does feel, let's say,

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>for the last fifteen or twenty years that yes, the

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>macro is much more important than company news, uh, in

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>moving the market. So they say, well, how can you,

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>how can you not do macro forecasting? And h I

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>was sitting and having dinner with Warren you know who. Uh,

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.719
<v Speaker 1>that one a few years ago, and he said to me,

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>for a piece of information to be desirable, it has

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to satisfy two criteria. It has to be important and

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the macro is extremely important, and it has to be noble.

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So you can have something which is very important, but

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>if you spend your time trying to figure it out,

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it could be a waste of time if it's not knowable.

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And I believe that the macro future is not knowable.

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>So uh. In in the first book the Most Important Thing,

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>there are twenty one chapters, and each one starts off

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the title the most important thing is, and then it's

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>a different thing because in investing there is no one

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>thing which is the most important. There are in that

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>According to the book, there are twenty one things, all

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of which are the most important thing um and one

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of those is knowing where we stand in the cycle.

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>And when it was time to write a second book,

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I pulled that out and that's what I devoted the

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>book too. So so since you brought that up, let's

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about the second book, Mastering the market cycle. Getting

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the odds on your side. Of all those twenty one

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>chapters in the first book, why cycles? Why did you

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>pick that um is shooting the other twenty when you

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>really you can write a twenty one volume encyclopedia, each

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>chapter being a book. Well, Barry, I believe of the

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>things of all the twenty one most important things, I

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>think that there are two that are more important than

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the others, and they are risk and where we stand

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>in the cycle. I believe that risk management, risk control

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is the mark of an exceptional investor. It's not hard

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to make money in the market. It's especially not hard

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>when the market goes up. And the market goes up

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>most of the time, and most of the time everybody

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>in the market makes money. But if you don't know

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing, if if you're throwing darts, if you're

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>just surfing, uh, you know what we call beata slipping. Uh,

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>that's not an accomplishment. To me. An exceptional investor is

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>someone who makes a lot of money when things go well,

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>but does it with the risk under control so that

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>he or she won't lose a lot of money when

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the market does poorly. So I think that I devote

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>actually three chapters in the first book to risk, understanding risk,

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>recognizing risk, controlling risk, and I think that is the

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>mark of the superior investor. That's number one, Number two

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the cycle. There's a connection here because I believe that

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>where the market is in its cycle determines how risky

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it is. When when everything has been going swimmingly, and

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>as a consequence, the market is elevated in its cycle

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>relative to something we might think of as the midpoint

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>or the intrinsic value, then I think it's risky. And

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>when it's depressed in its cycle and low relative to

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>intrinsic value or the midpoint or the norm, then I

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>think the risk is very low. So understanding, even though

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>we can't benefit from predictions of the future, I believe

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that where the market is in its cycle can tell

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>us a lot about what the odds are. And that

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned the subtitle of the book, Getting the

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Odds on your Side, And I actually prefer the subtitle

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>to the title because it conveys, I hope, a sense

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>for my belief that we cannot know what the future holds.

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>The future is nothing but a probability distribution. But if

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>we think and study right, we can have an idea

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>about the shape of the probability distribution and what returns

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>are most likely. It's interesting you say that you prefer

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the subtitle those the title itself sort of is at

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>odds with some things you've said before about you really

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have a mantra. Not only can people not predict the future,

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>they can't time the market especially well either. How do

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you reconcile mastering a market cycle that seems a little

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>contradictory to being able to time it. Well, let me

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>say up front, I believe very firmly that we sometimes

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>have a sense for what's going to happen, we never

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>know when. So when you say timing, the word time

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is something I just discard. Uh. You know, since I'm

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a writer. Everybody at oak Tree has the habit of writing.

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Everybody at oak Tree writes a letter every quarter to

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:55.719
<v Speaker 1>his clients. And um, there's a guy there who I

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>was reading, and I review all the letters before they

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>go out, and one of them, the portfolio manager, said,

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>if you name a date, don't name a price. And

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>if you name a price, don't name a date. And

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, if you never name both

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the date and a price, you can never be wrong.

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and but but I do think that you

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>can have an idea about what the future holds you

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>can have an idea whether this is a good time

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to invest or not, but you you never know when

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the things you're hoping for will unfold, and if you

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, I believe that everything an

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>investor does, what you do, what I do, falls under

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>one of two headings, assets selection and what I call

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>cycle positioning. In order to avoid using the word timing,

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>what do they mean? Assets election means trying to hold

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>more of the things that will do better and less

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>of the things that will do worse, pretty easy, and

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>psycle positioning means trying to have more of your capital

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>invested and more aggressively when the odds are favorable, and

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>less of your capital invested more defensively when the odds

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>are against you. I think you can we can know

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>something about the odds that doesn't mean we're going to

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>be right or we're gonna be right right away, especially uh,

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and that can enable us to effectively do cycle positioning

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>h through an understanding of where we stand in the cycle.

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned two things earlier that I have to

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>circle back to. One was the concept of intrinsic value,

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.239
<v Speaker 1>where assets might be above or below that, and the

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:57.719
<v Speaker 1>second is the implication about psychology, which really, Um, we

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 1>went by too quickly, so I have to come back

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to that. Um. Intrinsic value clearly refers to paying less

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.719
<v Speaker 1>for an asset than you think it's ultimately worth. I

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>think you've written extensively about the advantages of being a

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>value investor. But let's let's explore the psychology of that.

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Because it seems much easier to buy when things are

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>going up than to sell, and conversely, when everything is down,

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it's much easier to sell with the crowd. Then take

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the trade. Well, first of all,

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>intrinsic value. Every every asset that produces cash flow, you

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>can talk reasonably about its intrinsic value. What would you

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>pay to get those cash flows. It might be a company,

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a stock, a bond, a building. Anything that produces cash

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>flow can be valued. That's what value investors do. We

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out the value and buy for less.

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>That makes perfect sense in my opinion. Um. Now, the

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>next question is do assets sell at their intrinsic value?

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is no. The asset the prices of

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 1>assets very very significantly from intrinsic value from time to time. Why, well,

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you said it, psychology sometimes people are excited and the

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>price goes way above the intrinsic value, and sometimes they're

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>depressed and the price goes below the intrinsic value. Now

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you the next thing you mentioned was how easy it

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 1>is to buy things that are going up. You mean

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>easy psychologically, right? Um? Uh? You know. Dave Swenson, who

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 1>runs the indowminant Yale, which is the probably the best

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>performing endowminant in the country over the last thirty plus

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>years that he's been doing it. Uh, wrote a book

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in which he said that period performance in investment management

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>requires the adoption of uncomfortably idiosyncratic positions. In other words,

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>if you the job in investing. We'll let me say this,

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Investing is a funny area because it's really easy to

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>be average, and it's really hard to be above average.

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>But for professional like myself or like Swinson, since it's easy,

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>being average is not what we seek. We seek to

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>be above average. Uh. This may shock you, but professional

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>investors do it for the money and they hope to

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>be paid highly. But clearly, since anybody can be average

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>without any effort or professionalism, the payoff is in being

0:28:55.480 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>above average. If you think like everybody else, you'll behave

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>like everybody else. If you behave like everybody else, you'll

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>perform like everybody else. So clearly, exceptional performance has to

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>come from diverging from the crowd. And that's what Swenson

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>means when he's when he says uncomfortably idiosyncratic. Because if

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're behaving in an idiosyncratic way, that is to say,

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody else is buying and you say, well, they're buying

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>has raised the price too high relative to the intrinsic

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>value I'm going to sell. If they're all buying and

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you're selling, believe me, it's uncomfortable. Now we do it

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>because we believe we have performed a competent, intellectual process.

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't make it comfortable. What about the flip side when

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody is selling, is that a little I would imagine

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a little more comfortable because the sell off in

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a panic at least makes it appear things are falling

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>below that intrinsic value. So there's that, Well, there's some

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>truth in that, because the trouble with the difficulty in

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>selling when a market has been rising for several months

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>or years uh comes from the fear that it will

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>continue to rise and you'll miss out fomo, right, And

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a very strong force. You know. There's a book

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>out on Bubbles and Crashes by a guy named Charles Kindleberger,

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and he says in there something like, there's nothing as

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>injurious for your mental well being as to watch your

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>friend get rich, and you know, and it's that's that's

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>one of these sayings which is captures it all right there,

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that's human nature. Uh So, so fomo is very challenging. Uh.

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, UH, I don't know if it's

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>any easier on the way down. Uh. I mean, intellectually,

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you should be able to look at assets like stocks

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and bonds that have on on sale and say that

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>three day goes the inexpensive. I'm going to jump in.

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>But as I spend a lot of time in the book,

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>uh dissecting a common phrase which is catching a falling knife,

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and so many people say, I'm not going to try

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to catch a falling knife. You know, this thing is collapsing.

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea how far it's gonna go. I

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>don't want to stand in front of that process. I'm

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna wait until the dust settles and the uncertainty is

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>resolved and believe me, Barry, as I know you know well,

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>when the dust settles and the uncertainty has been resolved,

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no more bargains left. Because what causes great bargains?

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, let's diverge for a second. What

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>is a bargain? A bargain is an asset that's selling

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>too cheap. What causes assets to sell it too cheap? Error?

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>If if for you to get a great bargain in

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the market, somebody else has to be making a big mistake.

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>As if you can buy something that is exceptionally cheap,

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody else has to be selling something which is exceptionally cheap.

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>What makes anybody want to sell something at a price

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>which is exceptionally cheap? And the answer is human nature

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>or what you call psychology. And the answer is that

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>when prices go up, people get excited and buy. When

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>things go down, people get the pressed and sell. They

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>don't say, well, you know it's on sale. It used

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a hundred now at seventy five. I'm a buyer, Warren,

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you know who says, I like Hamburgers, and when Hamburgers

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 1>go on sale, I eat more Hamburgers. And that's how

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>value investors try to behave We try to be unemotional,

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>not get down because prices have fallen, even you know,

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the prices of the things we own have fallen. But

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>we try to say it's a bargain. I'm going to

0:32:56.080 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>buy more. But but that requires you to get control

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of your psychology. Let me bring you back to the

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>book for at least one more question, and I want

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to ask um you write rule number one, most things

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>will prove to be cyclical. Rule number two. Some of

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the greatest opportunities for gaining the laws come when other

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.479
<v Speaker 1>people forget rule number one. That's pretty much what you're

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>referring to the people exactly panic selling. And when when

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>things are rising and the stock prices have been rising,

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:30.959
<v Speaker 1>like you know in a in a great bull market

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>for five, six, eight, nine years, what do they say,

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to go up forever. And when

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it's been collapsing and the prices and an asset is

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a third of what it was a year or two ago,

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>what do they say, I think it's going to zero?

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, and so what they what they do

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>is they extrapolate. You need directional trends. Whereas I believe

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>most events are cyclical, and trees don't grow to the

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>sky and very little ghost to zero. So mean, let

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>me bring up one of your pet peeves that I'm

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm amused by, Um, what inning is this? People ask

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:10.359
<v Speaker 1>you that question and you you hate that question? Explain why? Well,

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate I don't hate it, but I mean,

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 1>it's it's challenging to know the answer. Right now, I say,

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we're in the ethnic. That's great, Howard. The

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>only trouble is I've been saying the athanning for a

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of years now, and uh, what I realized about

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, by the way, that question started to

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>come up really in oh eight when we were in

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>the global financial crisis, and people used to say, what

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>inning are we in? And what they really meant is

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>when is the collapse going to end? Now? They mean

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>when is the up cycle going to end? And most

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>people say, I I realized that it can't go well forever,

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 1>but I can't imagine what's going to make it come

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to an end. But the truth is, you know, we

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>are at an advanced stage of the economic recovery and

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of the bull market, and uh, there are very secure

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a few securities around that are absolutely cheap, and most

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>investors are happy doing risk investing and have lots of

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>money for the purpose, so they're bidding up asset prices.

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>So let's so. But but so, I think we're in

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the eighth inning. But I realized about a year ago

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>an important distinction this is in baseball. In baseball, we

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 1>know that a regulation game has nine innings, and in

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this game it could go nine or eleven or fourteen.

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:45.879
<v Speaker 1>We have no idea. So again, the fact that I

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>think we're in the eighth and that things are extended

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.399
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that the game is just about to end.

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about that. Um, the FED.

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Some people have been complaining they've tightened too much. Other

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>people are saying behind the curve. You've been a student

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of the credit markets for decades. What do you think

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of what where the FED is and what their future

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>behavior might be. Well, I talked about the FED a

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit in the In the book, Uh, there's a

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>as a as a chapter on the role of government

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and central banks with regard to the economic cycle. The

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>FED has a tough job. Well it actually it has

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>three tough jobs. Number one, it's supposed to manage inflation

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and keep it under control, which means that the economy

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't get too hot. Number two, it's supposed to support

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>economic growth and employment, for which they would rather the

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:40.839
<v Speaker 1>market did get hot. And number three, there are now

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who think that the Fed job

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is to prevent a recession and the declining stock market.

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think J. Powell certainly feels the ladder. Uh.

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>But um uh you know, UM, I think that in

0:36:56.160 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. Low interest rates have been the outstanding characteristic

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:03.359
<v Speaker 1>of the financial markets for the last ten years. They

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:08.919
<v Speaker 1>have dominated behavior over that period. They've been too low.

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 1>They've been unnaturally low. They were made unnaturally low in

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:14.720
<v Speaker 1>order to bring the economy back from the global financial

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>crisis and the abyss of collapse. Uh. There are reasons

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>why rates should be higher. Number one, rates should probably

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>be at their naturally occurring level so that so that

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the free market will allocate resources prudently. To date, it

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 1>has been subsidizing borrowers and penalizing savers and lenders. Um.

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Number two, the Fed wants rates to be high enough

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 1>so that if the economy slows down, they can drop

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>rates and stimulate the economy. UM and uh. And so forth. Um,

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>so you know, Uh, there's a belief that there's a

0:37:54.440 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 1>correlation inverse correlation between unemployment and and uh inflation that

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:04.800
<v Speaker 1>when when unemployment gets really low, that target that triggers inflation.

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>That's called the Phillips curve. And uh, everybody, since we

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 1>now are at a fifty year low and unemployment, everybody's

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>been waiting for inflation to get going, which is the

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Fed's main concern is that it shouldn't get going too strongly,

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and so that's why they've been talking about raising rates.

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 1>But it hasn't happened, and everybody's mystified by why we

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have inflation, And there's no easy answer. I think.

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that a risk factor for a credit investor like yourself? Inflation? Well?

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>The FED inflation? Yeah, well it is, but I also

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's unpredictable. Uh you know, Uh to me that

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>my the question over the last five years or more

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 1>has been our inflation rates going up or not? And

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I believed that they would and they have for good reason,

0:38:54.200 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>as I've explained, Um, and uh not. You know, people

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 1>people for for years, you remember, people would would talk

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to you and they say, do you think the rates

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>are going up in January or March, and I would say,

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:12.959
<v Speaker 1>what do you care? What's the difference that what month

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>they go up doesn't matter? People were so preoccupied, especially

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.840
<v Speaker 1>when when they were looking for the first rate increase, remember,

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and I would say, the only thing that matters are

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they going to go up? And are they going to

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>go up a lot? And are they going to go

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:29.280
<v Speaker 1>up fast? And what month it starts happening in doesn't matter?

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 1>And of course nobody got it right, proving I think

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>my point uh as to the timing. But they did

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>raise rates, and my guess is that they'll raise them

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a little more. But I never thought they would go

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to go up far or fast than I still don't.

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 1>So at one point in time, UM debt investors were

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:55.839
<v Speaker 1>concerned with deficits from the federal government. Seems like we've

0:39:55.960 --> 0:40:00.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of lost our enthusiasm for for fighting deficits. What

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts on the government balance sheet? Uh? And

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>perhaps modern monetary theory? What or deficits now? Okay? Or

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 1>my mother's term for that, Barry is passe a rorrying

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:18.280
<v Speaker 1>about the debt? The deficit is pass a. Nobody seems

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to care anymore. When I was a boy, There used

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to be debates about whether it was okay to have debt,

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>for a nation to have debt. I don't see anybody

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>discussing that anymore. The only question is whether there's such

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a thing as having too much debt, and some people

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 1>think there is, but nobody can say what it is.

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Of course. Uh. Historically, of course, the Democrats believed in

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>tax and spend and I would say deficits, and the

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Republicans were the fiscal disciplinarians who would fight against deficits.

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>That seems to have gone out the window. Nobody really

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>stands four square for deficit and debt reduction. Uh. And

0:40:56.200 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact, most recently we start seeing articles ing that

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>it's an old fashioned to worry about deficits and debt

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it's much more important too pursue society's needs

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>h even at the cost of a deficit. So it's troublesome.

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there probably is such a thing

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 1>as too much um. You know, the bottom line is

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:27.879
<v Speaker 1>it probably doesn't matter how much debt you have as

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>long as you can print the world's reserve currency. You know,

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>we were in the debt. It goes up, up, up up,

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the interest bill goes interest goes up with the debt,

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>or it will go up faster if rates rise as

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>they have been um but and and paying the interest

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 1>will occupy an increasing and increasing increasing percentage of the

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:53.359
<v Speaker 1>federal budget. It doesn't matter as long as you can

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>print money, as long as you can sell an infinite

0:41:56.280 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 1>number of UH bonds overseas at the world's lowest rates

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>because of the quality of the credit. And the question

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is what if that ever stops? So that's the risk factor.

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>What is the risk factor of deficits to fixed income purchasers?

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's well to the nation. It is that

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 1>someday China says, you know, we have enough treasuries, We're

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna start buying euro But the difficulty is what are

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:26.319
<v Speaker 1>you going to buy? If it's not the dollar, You're

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna invest in the in the in the euro that

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>looks precarious. You're gonna invest in the pound. That's difficult.

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 1>With brexit, are you going to invest in in UH

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>ruble one? Whatever it might be? So it looks like

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:43.799
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna you know, this is all this is when

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at the government and how badly it functions.

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:51.960
<v Speaker 1>The optimism with regard to the future comes from the

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 1>belief that we always have modeled through and we will

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>continue to model through, and that we don't have to

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 1>worry about the at and the deficit because we can

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>always print money to pay the interest until we can't.

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Until we can't, but the day but the arrival of

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the date when we can't. It comes under the heading

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of what I call improbable disasters. It would be a

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>terrible thing. It would have a lot of negative ramifications,

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>but you can't assign a very high probability to it.

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Next year, the year after, the year after that. You

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 1>know so, And one of the most interesting dilemmas is

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:35.439
<v Speaker 1>what does the investor do about the improbable disaster. Since

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it's improbable, you can't do enough in your portfolio to

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>prepare for it, and and certainly if it happens, it

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 1>will have disastrous consequences and it will turn out you

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:48.919
<v Speaker 1>didn't do enough. But given that it's improbable, you can't

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:52.320
<v Speaker 1>do a lot. That's that's there's a lot of things.

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Hyper inflation, deflation, all these things fall into that category.

0:43:57.680 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So we have two segments left. I want to be

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:02.319
<v Speaker 1>able to get save some time to get to some

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>questions from the room, but not yet. The last thing

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to do with you is our speed rounds.

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Ten questions, five minutes, short answers. Well, by now you

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>probably know I don't know anything about speed rounds or

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.560
<v Speaker 1>short answers, but um, but I'll try. Well let's let's

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 1>let's give it a shot. Let's start out. First car

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>you ever owned, year making model N five old cutlass

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 1>um now Aqua Marine. Uh, my parents paid half. What's

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the biggest political surprise we might see over the next

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of quarters. Well, it might be the Muller Report,

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 1>but I mean it's it's a great example of having

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:54.239
<v Speaker 1>no idea. What's what's going to happen? It's gonna be

0:44:54.280 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a surprise favorite NBA team, I guess the Lakers. I've

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:02.879
<v Speaker 1>lived in l A for the last thirty four years

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>until well I came. We moved My wife and I

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 1>moved back here six years ago because our kids moved here,

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:12.279
<v Speaker 1>and she said that we're going to be in New York,

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 1>so that we are, and I was again, I was

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:18.360
<v Speaker 1>smart enough to say, yes, that's the that's a maybe

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:20.799
<v Speaker 1>I'll make that the title of my book. Smart enough

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to say yes, Um, name three of your favorite books

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:32.279
<v Speaker 1>about any subject. Um. There's a book called Fooled by

0:45:32.320 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Randomness by to leb which you know, when you talk

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>about the limits on fore knowledge, when you talk about

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that things are unpredictable because of randomness, I think, Uh,

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>this book contains very very important ideas, and I know

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 1>it was very valuable for me. Uh. Peter Bernstein, who

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 1>was a great investment stage wrote a book called Against

0:45:54.760 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the Gods um and Story of Risk, Story of Risk,

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and again it all understanding risk at risk is so

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>provocative and so important. And then I would say there's

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a book by John Kenneth call Braith called A Short

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 1>History of Financial Euphoria, which talked about introduced me to cycles,

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:20.319
<v Speaker 1>the extremes of cycles, the error of cycles. And one

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite quotes from gall Braiths it was that

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>we have two kinds of forecasters, the ones who don't

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 1>know and the ones who don't know. They don't know that.

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a classic quote. What do you do for fun? Uh, Well,

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of time with the kids and their kids. Now,

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:39.839
<v Speaker 1>because my wife was prescient, since we've moved back here

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 1>six years ago, they both got married, they both had children,

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 1>so you know we're in a great place in that regard.

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I like architecture and decorating and that kind

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of thing. You you actually do a little bit of

0:46:53.960 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>an architectural tour when you visit other cities. Sure, I

0:46:58.080 --> 0:47:01.279
<v Speaker 1>recall you talking about that not too long ago. Um,

0:47:01.520 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 1>favorite asset for the next decade? Well, I mean, I

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 1>hate to say that kind of thing because I hate

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 1>to think of anybody else buying on my say so.

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, I'm I'm willing to be a long

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 1>term investor in the emerging markets, both dead and equity. UM.

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that the you know, the way I put it, Barry,

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is that Japan and Europe are senior citizens economically speaking,

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the US is a mature adult, and the emerging markets

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>are teenagers. And if you ever had a teenager in

0:47:37.719 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>your house, you know it can be chaotic, chaotic and volatile.

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know that the teenagers best decades lie ahead.

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's the way I think about the emerging markets.

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So so let me ask you the same question, favorite

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>asset for the next century a house high up in

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a hill. Who is the investor goat the greatest of

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:10.279
<v Speaker 1>all time? In the greatest investor of all time, Oh,

0:48:10.360 --> 0:48:12.759
<v Speaker 1>of all times. Well, I don't know. I mean, I

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:16.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't read that much about the personalities, but everybody assumes

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 1>it is that Warren guy. And you know he has

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a he has a great record with a lot of money.

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Uh he And there's a book out called The Warren

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Buffet Way, and I was asked to write the preface,

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and I wrote, it's for the like fourth and fifth edition,

0:48:38.040 --> 0:48:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and I wrote something called what makes Warren Bufett Warren Buffet?

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And I talked about the fact that he's intelligent and unemotional,

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:45.879
<v Speaker 1>and he figures out what's important. He has a quick

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 1>study on what's important, he ignores the things that are unimportant,

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and all these different things. And then at the end,

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:52.319
<v Speaker 1>I said, and he's not afraid to lose the job.

0:48:53.480 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if you are afraid to lose your job,

0:48:56.719 --> 0:48:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to do things that are different and bold,

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and yet being different in bold is necessary to be superior.

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:09.959
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, he spends long periods of time

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in the wilderness. In two thousand, when I wrote the memo,

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:15.839
<v Speaker 1>everybody's saying, well, it's too bad about Warren Buffett. But

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:18.719
<v Speaker 1>you know he's lost his touch because he didn't have

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:21.400
<v Speaker 1>any of the text docks and then of course a

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 1>year later everybody was saying, you know, what a genius.

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there is no approach in the investment world.

0:49:30.520 --> 0:49:34.239
<v Speaker 1>There is no approach which will always be right. No

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:36.919
<v Speaker 1>matter what approach you have, there will be periods when

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you're in the doghouse. And the more strongly you hold

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 1>your philosophy, the more strongly you hue to it, the

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>worst those periods in the doghouse will be. And yet

0:49:50.239 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>what else is there? You certainly can't, especially since we

0:49:55.160 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 1>can't time events. It can't work to jump from style

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to style the style and expect to be had the

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:04.520
<v Speaker 1>right style at the right time. You have to hold

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a style. It has to be the one you believe

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:07.839
<v Speaker 1>in you as to be the one you're good at.

0:50:08.160 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And then you have to live through and survive the

0:50:10.520 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 1>periods in the doghouse. And that's to me, the mark

0:50:13.760 --> 0:50:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of a great investor. And by the way, it's it's

0:50:17.280 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 1>not how well you do while your style is in favor,

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it's how you do when your style is out of

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:27.239
<v Speaker 1>favor that determines whether you're excellent or not. That's a

0:50:27.280 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>perfect spot to open this up. Um, two questions from

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the audience before you do. Let's hear it for Howard

0:50:34.560 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>marks and and sharing his insights. We have we have

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a microphone. UM, raise your hand if you have any

0:50:44.200 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>questions and identify yourself by name and company. UM, who

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>has some questions? I right over here? That not a plant.

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I uh. I work at rid Holds Wealth Management, Barry UM,

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks for coming out, Howard. Quick question, if you had

0:51:04.680 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like a crystal ball, I could tell you anything, any question.

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to answer about the world? What? What

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:21.840
<v Speaker 1>would you want to know? You know? Let me change

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit, not crystal ball. If I could

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:30.320
<v Speaker 1>get an accurate answer with regard to every security that

0:51:30.360 --> 0:51:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of buying, it would be how much optimism

0:51:34.080 --> 0:51:39.440
<v Speaker 1>is baked into the price. Remember that the psychology causes

0:51:39.520 --> 0:51:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the price to diverge from the intrinsic value. If the

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:45.960
<v Speaker 1>optimism is really high, then the price is high relative

0:51:45.960 --> 0:51:50.000
<v Speaker 1>intrinsic value. That's a dangerous investment. If the optimism is

0:51:50.000 --> 0:51:53.719
<v Speaker 1>really low, the price is probably depressed and very attractive.

0:51:53.760 --> 0:51:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So if I could get a measure, and this is

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:58.120
<v Speaker 1>something I tried to do, especially with regard to the

0:51:58.160 --> 0:52:02.400
<v Speaker 1>overall market, rather than individual skill. I tried to do

0:52:02.440 --> 0:52:04.719
<v Speaker 1>what I call take the temperature of the market, and

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I would spend my one uh phone of friend question

0:52:08.560 --> 0:52:14.640
<v Speaker 1>on that, any of the questions right over here, if

0:52:14.640 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we can bring the mic over here, I mean Andy,

0:52:21.120 --> 0:52:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm a paralyxis capital. What was the lowest low

0:52:23.640 --> 0:52:29.120
<v Speaker 1>when you started oak Tree? The lowest It may not

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:32.000
<v Speaker 1>be very interesting, but the lowest low was the day

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we figured out that we didn't have a publishable record.

0:52:35.239 --> 0:52:40.799
<v Speaker 1>When I moved from City to tc W, I walked in,

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I said, here's my record. They published it Bingo. When

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:47.759
<v Speaker 1>I went from tc W to oak Tree and nine,

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I said, here's the record, publish it. They said, well,

0:52:50.080 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 1>where's the data you need? You have to have monthly

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:58.279
<v Speaker 1>orderable data in order to publish a record. Well, of

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:00.359
<v Speaker 1>course we walked out of tc W with out that

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:03.439
<v Speaker 1>information and we said, I said, my god, we don't

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:05.759
<v Speaker 1>have a record we can publish. How are we ever

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 1>going to get any business? And uh, and we figured

0:53:08.719 --> 0:53:11.360
<v Speaker 1>out a solution. It was worked out pretty well because

0:53:11.400 --> 0:53:14.040
<v Speaker 1>what we said is we we wrote the clients and

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:17.239
<v Speaker 1>we said we'd love to have you come over to

0:53:17.280 --> 0:53:22.359
<v Speaker 1>oak Tree and if you come and give us your

0:53:22.680 --> 0:53:27.640
<v Speaker 1>monthly statements over the years, we'll audit them and we'll

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:32.480
<v Speaker 1>ascertain what your performance really was and and and so

0:53:32.520 --> 0:53:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of a bootstrap operation. Uh. The the

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:39.400
<v Speaker 1>accounts we got permitted us to develop a record, which

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 1>which enabled us to get more accounts. It was that

0:53:43.120 --> 0:53:46.880
<v Speaker 1>was the lowest day. Interesting question, Thank you Andy, anybody

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:49.840
<v Speaker 1>else any other questions out of here for Howard marks

0:53:49.880 --> 0:53:53.600
<v Speaker 1>here in the back. I am a names Richard M.

0:53:54.560 --> 0:53:58.120
<v Speaker 1>How do you go about spotting the above average investors

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned before before they become one? And do

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 1>you think you're good at spotting that? Well? Clearly we

0:54:07.400 --> 0:54:14.120
<v Speaker 1>hide before they have track records. Um, and uh. We

0:54:14.280 --> 0:54:21.680
<v Speaker 1>look for a high degree of intelligence, a natural contrarian streak,

0:54:23.080 --> 0:54:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say, a willingness to be wrong. We give

0:54:26.000 --> 0:54:30.320
<v Speaker 1>people cases to analyze, and we look at what they

0:54:30.360 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 1>call attention to and hopefully it will be the things

0:54:34.719 --> 0:54:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that hopefully they'll put a great emphasis on, finding the

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:41.720
<v Speaker 1>things that other people haven't figured out. If you figure

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:43.640
<v Speaker 1>out what everybody else has figured out, that you have

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 1>no advantage, so I think. And then the other thing

0:54:47.800 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is I use the word inference a lot, use it

0:54:51.040 --> 0:54:59.960
<v Speaker 1>all over the book. Um not seeing events but figuring

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:04.440
<v Speaker 1>out what they mean deeper significance. So we try to

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:06.879
<v Speaker 1>hire people like that. In addition, we try to hire

0:55:06.960 --> 0:55:09.760
<v Speaker 1>good people that other people, including us, will will enjoy

0:55:09.840 --> 0:55:12.000
<v Speaker 1>working with, and people who want to be part of

0:55:12.080 --> 0:55:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a long term team rather than maximize for themselves. How

0:55:16.120 --> 0:55:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to give you a fire a follow

0:55:18.120 --> 0:55:21.279
<v Speaker 1>up question. You've talked in the past about second level

0:55:21.360 --> 0:55:24.719
<v Speaker 1>thinking or second order thinking. Describe that in a little

0:55:24.760 --> 0:55:28.920
<v Speaker 1>more detail. What is it when that that's the illusion

0:55:28.920 --> 0:55:31.439
<v Speaker 1>when you're you're looking to hire somebody, How does second

0:55:31.520 --> 0:55:34.440
<v Speaker 1>level thinking apply to either that or to invest in Well,

0:55:34.440 --> 0:55:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Mary, when when I was thinking about writing

0:55:38.400 --> 0:55:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the first book, and I said, and it was I

0:55:41.160 --> 0:55:44.880
<v Speaker 1>had been approached by Columbia Business School Press about writing

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:47.799
<v Speaker 1>a book, and I told him my idea for the

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:50.040
<v Speaker 1>most important thing. They said, we'll send us a sample chapter.

0:55:50.480 --> 0:55:52.359
<v Speaker 1>And the funny thing is that I sat down at

0:55:52.360 --> 0:55:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the keyboard and I wrote a chapter that I had

0:55:54.800 --> 0:55:57.040
<v Speaker 1>never even thought about writing before. And it wasn't even

0:55:57.080 --> 0:55:59.600
<v Speaker 1>something that that was in front of mind before that,

0:55:59.640 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 1>but it was. And so the first chapter in the

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:03.880
<v Speaker 1>book says the most important thing is second level thinking,

0:56:04.280 --> 0:56:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and it goes. I go through the thing that I

0:56:06.120 --> 0:56:07.719
<v Speaker 1>just said to you, that if you think the same

0:56:07.760 --> 0:56:10.959
<v Speaker 1>as others, you'll perform, behave the same, behave the same

0:56:11.239 --> 0:56:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll have the same performance. That's clearly in a formula

0:56:14.000 --> 0:56:17.080
<v Speaker 1>for superiority. So the answer is that you have to performed.

0:56:17.400 --> 0:56:21.600
<v Speaker 1>You have to think differently. But it's not so easy

0:56:21.680 --> 0:56:24.839
<v Speaker 1>because most of the time when people think differently, it's

0:56:24.880 --> 0:56:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the consensus. It's rights of the different thinker is wrong.

0:56:27.640 --> 0:56:30.480
<v Speaker 1>You have to think differently and better. Those are the

0:56:30.520 --> 0:56:32.680
<v Speaker 1>two criteria for a second level things and we look

0:56:32.719 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 1>for second level thinkers um which requires number one exceptional insight,

0:56:38.160 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a number two a willingness to be wrong, because when

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you diverge from the crowd, you you can't do it

0:56:43.239 --> 0:56:45.960
<v Speaker 1>with certainty that you're gonna be right. But you know,

0:56:46.080 --> 0:56:51.240
<v Speaker 1>just to give you a simple idea, Uh, the first

0:56:51.320 --> 0:56:54.160
<v Speaker 1>level thinker says, this is a great company, we should

0:56:54.160 --> 0:56:57.719
<v Speaker 1>buy the stock. The second level thinker says, it's a

0:56:57.760 --> 0:57:00.319
<v Speaker 1>great company as everybody thinks. It's not as great as

0:57:00.360 --> 0:57:04.879
<v Speaker 1>everybody thinks, we should sell the stock. If you if

0:57:04.920 --> 0:57:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you get that, like you know, you might say, if

0:57:07.160 --> 0:57:10.359
<v Speaker 1>you get the joke, then you have an insight that

0:57:10.440 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 1>we think is valuable. There are people who just don't

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:17.560
<v Speaker 1>get that. There are people who don't understand contrarian thinking.

0:57:18.440 --> 0:57:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And um, I think it's extremely important that one does. Um.

0:57:25.360 --> 0:57:27.400
<v Speaker 1>We still have time for one or two more questions

0:57:27.720 --> 0:57:32.080
<v Speaker 1>over here? How about right over here? This is the

0:57:32.560 --> 0:57:37.200
<v Speaker 1>up from Stanley. The length of the cycles could be different, right,

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:41.480
<v Speaker 1>So some cycles could have prizes to press for one year,

0:57:41.560 --> 0:57:44.640
<v Speaker 1>two years, three years, five years. So when that happens,

0:57:44.680 --> 0:57:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for example of the energy industry or anything like that,

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:52.160
<v Speaker 1>how do you manage it on that? Oh? You know,

0:57:52.640 --> 0:57:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to be able to say I have a

0:57:54.000 --> 0:57:57.160
<v Speaker 1>brilliant answer to that, but there is no answer because

0:57:57.160 --> 0:58:00.840
<v Speaker 1>because because as I said, we sometimes know I have

0:58:00.920 --> 0:58:02.920
<v Speaker 1>an idea. I don't even want to use the word no.

0:58:03.400 --> 0:58:05.880
<v Speaker 1>We sometimes have an idea for what's going to happen.

0:58:06.160 --> 0:58:09.880
<v Speaker 1>We never know when we know. We may know that

0:58:09.920 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 1>oils looks cheap, we never know when it's going to

0:58:13.360 --> 0:58:19.560
<v Speaker 1>go up. And I think that everybody has to get

0:58:19.640 --> 0:58:25.680
<v Speaker 1>rid of this illusion that these things are noble, you know. Uh.

0:58:25.880 --> 0:58:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Mark Twain said, it ain't what you don't know that

0:58:30.360 --> 0:58:33.480
<v Speaker 1>gets you into trouble, it's what you know for certain

0:58:33.520 --> 0:58:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that just ain't true. A lot of my answers start

0:58:38.440 --> 0:58:42.600
<v Speaker 1>with I have no idea. But and when you say,

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:45.560
<v Speaker 1>when you start your answer that way, it's impossible to

0:58:45.600 --> 0:58:49.240
<v Speaker 1>get into trouble. You get into trouble when you say

0:58:49.280 --> 0:58:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm confident of X, y Z, and you're bed heavily

0:58:54.240 --> 0:58:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're wrong. So if you accept that the that

0:58:58.680 --> 0:59:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the investment world is is a place where there's a

0:59:01.320 --> 0:59:03.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of uncertainty, you're gonna stay out of trouble. Uh.

0:59:04.240 --> 0:59:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Henry Kaupman, who was the chief economist of Solomon Brothers

0:59:08.400 --> 0:59:11.160
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen seventies, once said, there are two kinds

0:59:11.160 --> 0:59:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of people who lose a lot of money, the ones

0:59:13.560 --> 0:59:16.760
<v Speaker 1>who are nothing and the ones who know everything. And

0:59:16.800 --> 0:59:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very important not to be either of those.

0:59:20.640 --> 0:59:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I saw some more questions over here, how about right?

0:59:24.160 --> 0:59:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh here? Hi, my name is Keith win. Um. I'm

0:59:32.360 --> 0:59:34.560
<v Speaker 1>an architect by trade, so I'm what I'm what you

0:59:34.680 --> 0:59:38.240
<v Speaker 1>call a mom and pop investor. So my question is

0:59:38.280 --> 0:59:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that, Um, the macro economics doesn't influence your

0:59:43.120 --> 0:59:47.160
<v Speaker 1>investment decisions, but how do you know where you are

0:59:47.200 --> 0:59:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in the cycle without paying attention to or being influenced

0:59:50.840 --> 0:59:53.760
<v Speaker 1>by the macro economics. For example, you know, the trade

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:57.040
<v Speaker 1>war may maybe something that's gonna blow over soon, and

0:59:57.040 --> 1:00:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to focus on the fundamentals again of you know, investments,

1:00:00.840 --> 1:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>but then what about China and all that, the kinds

1:00:05.080 --> 1:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of things that they're investing in. When I look at

1:00:07.400 --> 1:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a country, don't I pay attention to the politics among

1:00:09.880 --> 1:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>different countries and what they do, what they invest in,

1:00:12.400 --> 1:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>what they what they want to do in the future. Well,

1:00:17.040 --> 1:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the short answer is yes, the long end, but your

1:00:20.880 --> 1:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>answers are no good. The long answer is that number one,

1:00:24.360 --> 1:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the things you're talking about are not cyclical. These are

1:00:28.760 --> 1:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>one time what we call exogenous events, whether we'll have

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a trade war, etcetera. And uh, this goes back to

1:00:39.920 --> 1:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>really what I said about the macro what's going to

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>happen in these regards China, future growth, trade war, etcetera.

1:00:52.480 --> 1:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Is very important? But is it knowable? And if it's

1:00:57.640 --> 1:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>not knowable, then you just have to understand that it's

1:01:02.440 --> 1:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>an uncertainty out there. And and and you you may

1:01:07.280 --> 1:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you may say, you know, I'm concerned about China. The

1:01:09.560 --> 1:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>possibility of a trade war raises the uncertainty for me.

1:01:12.480 --> 1:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to invest conservatively. That's not a sick

1:01:14.600 --> 1:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>local consideration, but that's a prudent consideration. Um and uh.

1:01:21.120 --> 1:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I keep coming back to this thought

1:01:24.720 --> 1:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that it would be nice to know what's going to happen,

1:01:27.400 --> 1:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>but you don't know, and nobody knows. And you're an architect,

1:01:31.360 --> 1:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and what that means is you build buildings and you

1:01:33.960 --> 1:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>put in enough steel and brick so that it won't

1:01:36.800 --> 1:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>fall down because it works according to certain physical laws.

1:01:42.840 --> 1:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>And you have to understand that there are no physical

1:01:46.080 --> 1:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>laws at work in investing, and the future is uncertain

1:01:52.320 --> 1:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and vague and and random. Um and psychology dominates. And

1:02:01.000 --> 1:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I say in the book, I quote Richard Feyinneman, who

1:02:03.320 --> 1:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>was the great physicist, and he said physics would be

1:02:06.920 --> 1:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>much harder if electrons had feelings. A great quote. You know,

1:02:12.120 --> 1:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you come in the room, you'd s flip up the switch.

1:02:14.040 --> 1:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>The lights go on every time. Why is that because

1:02:17.640 --> 1:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the electrons flow from the switch to the lights. They

1:02:20.680 --> 1:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>never flow this way. They never go on strike, they

1:02:23.560 --> 1:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>never fall asleep, they never say today, I don't feel

1:02:25.880 --> 1:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>like flowing from the switch to the light. That's physical science.

1:02:30.280 --> 1:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You have to understand the distinction between your field and

1:02:38.480 --> 1:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the field of investing, where there are no laws, there

1:02:41.920 --> 1:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>are only tendencies. We can get the tendencies on our side,

1:02:46.440 --> 1:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>but we can't. You can't build a bridge that's incapable

1:02:50.040 --> 1:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of falling down. I think that's the perfect place to

1:02:54.400 --> 1:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>leave us off. So before I asked for rental plause,

1:02:57.880 --> 1:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I just want to let everybody know they will be

1:03:00.000 --> 1:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>links and snacks on the other side of those doors,

1:03:03.080 --> 1:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>as well as uh copies of Howard's book. I know

1:03:07.040 --> 1:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you have copies, um, well, somebody paid for them. There

1:03:10.800 --> 1:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is there is no free lunch, um. But Howard's gonna

1:03:14.320 --> 1:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to stick around for another ten minutes. And

1:03:16.240 --> 1:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I promised his wife I would not make him late

1:03:18.720 --> 1:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>for dinner. So let's hear it for Howard Marks. I

1:03:22.160 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>feel