WEBVTT - TechStuff Predicts 2015

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with Text Stuff from Hey there,

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to Text Stuff. I'm Jonathan Strickland, and today

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I am joined by a special guest, the busiest man

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>in podcasting, Mr Tom Merritt. Hi, Tom, Hey John. How's

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it going man? It's going great, Thomas, it's fantastic. Um,

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call me if you call me John Thomas,

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, totally fair. Well, make up the it's the

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>conservation of syllables. Yes, we have to. We have to

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>maintain that balance. If we end up dropping in a

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>then obviously people are going to realize the quality of

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the audios. And they can't see that we're both wearing

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>white Thai Texas, so they don't know how formal we

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>really are. Right, We've actually decided that normally we would

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>only communicate through our servants, but we we've given them

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>some time off. Yes, well, uh, tom Merritt. For those

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of you who who may not know hosts about every

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>other podcast, that's not how Stuff Works. I think I

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>think How Stuff Works and Serial are the only two

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you're not doing. So yeah, yeah, So I mean come on, well, unfortunately,

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this this episode will air well after everyone's had a

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>chance to listen to that, although I have not. Tom,

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you are the host of numerous shows, as I said,

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>including Daily Tech News Show, a phenomenal show. If you

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>want to know what is going on in technology on

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a day to day basis, you gotta go check that

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>one out. Highly recommended. I've even been a host a

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>few times on that show. It's been hooray. I love

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>doing it. And I've asked Tom here to do the

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing in the world that I look forward to

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the most every single year, which is the end of

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the year, beginning of the year predictions for the next

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>twelve months. But instead of sticking my neck out or

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>having Tom stick his neck out making ridiculous predictions for

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen in two thousand fifteen, we decided we

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>were going to look at other people's predictions and then

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>way in uh with our opinion about whether or not

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we agree with those predictions, or maybe maybe we conditionally

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>agree something like that, And we've picked a whole bunch

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of them to go through. I have put on a

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>powdered wig to sit in judgment over these predictions. I

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:47.959
<v Speaker 1>I have my scrying glass here. Um it's uh, it's

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>actually a Palin Beer. It's not quite the Palantine. You know.

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I've always said, Jonathan, that you know all there is

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to know about the scrying game. This is true. You

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>have said that. All right. So we're gonna start with

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>some Samsung predictions that The Verge published, and these are

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the ones that that I thought would be kind of

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>fun to begin with. The first one is that wearable

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>technology is going to create a new era of power

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>dressing for business leaders. So a a smart watch or

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>other wearable device is now going to be seen as

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a status symbol. You're gonna be able to tell how

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>important an executive is by the type of smart accessories

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>they're wearing. I guess where do you? Where do you

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>come in on this? Tom? So this is a prediction

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>coming from Samsung, right, Yes, yeah, this is a fairly

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>aspirational prediction, don't you think? I agree? I feel like

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Samson is trying to accept this into the mind of

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>business leaders, like you'll need a gear watch if you

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>want to be seen as powerful, which sometimes that's the

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>way it works. I think if anybody makes that happen,

0:03:58.280 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be Apple. They're the ones trying to

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>push the fashion end of this a lot harder. I agree.

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I think obviously, Sam Sung, I mean, all of Sam

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Suck's predictions are going to have that sort of of bias,

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>if you will. You know, obviously it's it's how they

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>want things to go because it's going to be where

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>their businesses will be successful. So there's nothing wrong with that.

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there is something to say about drumming

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>up enthusiasm for something that you have an interest in.

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I just I just don't know that there's been anything

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>out yet that is really going to catch on. And

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean I say that as someone who owns a

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>smart watch, and I've got a couple of other independent

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>smart watches that I backed on various crowdfunding campaigns that

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll supposedly get to me it's some day. But I'm

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>an early adopter type. I don't know that we're going

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to see high powered executives, you know, casually pulling their

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>sleeves back to show off their smart accessory at every

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>given opportunity without being mocked. Yeah, that's it's actually been.

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that Apple addressed when they announced

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:08.799
<v Speaker 1>the Apple Watch was the fact that watches haven't looked

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to that good and and that That's not to say

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>that I am judging that Apple solve that problem or not, um,

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>but that is that is the issue. Is they have

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>to get that tag heure Rolex crowd to decide that

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>they want to smart watch if they really want to

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 1>get into the high dollar item game of this. Maybe

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this is Samsung tip in their hand a little huh,

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>saying we will be coming with the Rolex of smart

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>watches this year. Well, we'll have to keep an eye

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>out and see. I I like you, Tom, I am

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>a little skeptical of this one. So their next one

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>is that people will restructure their working lives around personal

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>power hours as technology reveals peak performance times. So this

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is this seems to say, as we're using these devices,

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>they give us real time feedback on what is going

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>on with our bodies, our heart rates. That way, you

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>will start to see the peaks and troughs of our

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>activity and when we are most effective, and that we

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>will magically restructure our days so that they match those

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>peaks and troughs and we avoid everything else, which I

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>think sounds amazing, But I'm not sure that corporate America

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>is ready to two go that route. Yeah, I can't

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>see the excuse. Oh, I'm sorry, I can't have a meeting.

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Then it's not during my power hours going down very well.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>This one, at least is less directly related to a

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Samsung product, right, This is a general like Samsung is

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>great with productivity, and so you know, this is the

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing you'll be able to get. I'm totally

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>cool with this one. I just don't think it's gonna

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>be true. I mean, I would like the idea of

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>them telling me like, hey, you're gonna you're most productive.

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>We've analyzed your personal data and you're most productive at

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>these times of days. That'd be kind of cool. I

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>just don't see that becoming a common track. And yeah,

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm lucky in that I work for a company where

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>they are very flexible with the way we do our work.

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>So I come in super early because I tend to

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>be I'm one of those people. I'm most effective first

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>thing in the morning, and so I also tend to

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>stay late. But if I could leave earlier, if I

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>so chose, I just tend to have other things going

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.679
<v Speaker 1>on in the office, like recording episodes of tech stuff stuff.

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah no, no, no, this is not for me, not

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>unusual for me. But yeah, I don't. I don't see

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>this as being something that easily gets gets rolled out.

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's something we'll see happened in the United States

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>over time. I mean, certainly in Europe they have very

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>different approaches to the work day. But it may be

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that that it'll still take some time for that to

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>come over to North America. Um. They also said that

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>virtual reality technology and innovative you of displays will lead

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to a new generation of digital shops, allowing retailers to

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>overcome space constraints and high rent. So I guess this

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>would be where you'd go to a mall, except the

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>mall is a kiosk with a head mounted display and

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you put that on and then you just virtually walk

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>through all the stores, and the gear VR will be

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the way to do it. Um. You know, I'm actually

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>with them right up until they say a new generation

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of digital shops. I could totally see as as things

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>like the gear VR and the Oculus Rift and Sony's

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Morpheus Project Morpheus come around and and and this seems

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to be is the year will see the first of

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>these really hit retail that. Um. They Yeah, there will

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>be digital shops and we'll be able to walk around

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the shop. Whether that will actually allow retailers to overcome

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>space constraints and high rent that seems more of a stretch. Well,

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they still have to have the inventory somewhere right right right.

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean I can see it taking a business that

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>might have been stu I mean by the fact that

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>they really can't afford the shop front that they need

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>open a digital shop instead. In that case, yeah, they

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>would overcome space constraints. But I don't Yeah, I don't

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>see the mall Kiosks suddenly becoming a huge showroom. Yeah.

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I also worry about, um, the the disorientation factor because

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I've played with the Oculus Rift for a while and

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I want to go to a mall

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that's just coded and vomit um. I mean, it's not

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>my scene. Hey, you know, we'll not judge, but I'm

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>with you not my not my scene either. Uh yeah,

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And maybe I'm just maybe I've just reached that age, Tom,

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I've just always loved the vomit covered mall. Well, I

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>was thinking more about being being able to to adjust

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to the disorientation of the Oculus Rift. But sure, let's

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>go back, all right. Well, they also said that automated

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>home systems will move from geek to sheet driven by

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a dramatically improved user experience. This is one I really

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>can get behind because we've been seeing the progression of

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>this with stuff like Nest, despite their their smoke detector

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>problems that they had in two thousand fourteen, we've seen

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>these sort of systems that are starting to get more

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and more interconnected, become more user friendly, easier to install,

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>more attractive, and less of the Jerry Riggs systems that

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of geeks were using the bleeding edge adapter

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 1>adopters rather and uh so I actually agree with this one.

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we will see a lot more automated home

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>systems enter into the mainstream. Yeah, this is one that

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you could easily dismiss his self share of incause Samsung

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 1>Smart Home exists, But I think that doesn't matter. I

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.719
<v Speaker 1>think they're totally right. Maybe geek Tschika is overstating at

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a touch, but yeah, I'm with you. I think automated

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>home systems this year will come into their own and

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, like you say, the like Nest become even

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>more popular, more competitors for that, and more people who

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>aren't on the bleeding edge, uh, saying oh, yeah, I

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 1>think I might try out one of those smart lightbulbs,

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>slash thermostats, slash smoke alarms, etcetera. Yeah, I think it's

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of the way I see it as I see

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the automated home system year of two thousand fifteen be

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the fitness wearable of two thousand fourteen,

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>where we saw two thousand fourteen we saw numbers double

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in in fitness adoption wearable adoption, but it was still

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it's still relatively small compared to the overall consumer market,

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.959
<v Speaker 1>but it shows a trend of growth. So I think

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're gonna see. Definitely with you on that one.

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And then I love this one. I don't know that

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I agree with it, particularly living in the state of Georgia,

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>but every child born the next twelve months will learn

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>coding as a core subject alongside numeracy and literacy. Did

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you say codeine ding programming? Yeah? Yeah, not no, no,

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>not not opiates. That's good. That's good because I would

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>totally disagree with that one. This one, you know, it

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>throws you off the way they phrased it here where

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>they say, like every child born in the next twelve

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>months will learn coding. You gotta keep reading because it's like, no,

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>they won't, little baby Pappy learning right, right. But what

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>they're saying is as they grow up over the next

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve to thirteen years, coding will become a course subject.

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And I kind of think they're right about this. You

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>know that. The nice thing about this prediction for them

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is that's going to take a while before they're proven

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>right or wrong. Yeah, it's a clever way to do right.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>You're saying, the baby is born this year will and

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 1>now a prediction that will take twelve years to prove through. Yeah, yeah, So,

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>uh look cool. I like that you're optimistic about this.

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little more pessimistic simply because I see so

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>many issues with the various school programs that are already

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>in existence. I do think cod coding is a very

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Porton's skill set to to learn. It's something that I

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>learned on my own, and even then it was very limited.

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was working in Apple Basic at the time. Um,

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>so it's one of those things I think definitely needs

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to be taught. If you talk to computer scientists professors,

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>they always mentioned about how incoming classes coming into the

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>freshman level computer science courses have little to no experience

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 1>encoding usually at the college level, and that it's very

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the reason why we see things like

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the Raspberry Pie coming out like it was supposed to

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>be an inexpensive way to help young kids learn and

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>get interested in programming. So I certainly many programs and

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean the pun in that case, uh, that

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>are trying to encourage education to pick up programming and

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>coding as as something that they need to teach that

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like over the time scale they're saying, which is,

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, children born next year will grow up into

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a world where it becomes that that it's almost inevitable

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to me. But I also see where you're coming from, John,

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing where it actually uh it actually is going to

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>take a lot to get it there. Um, there's my

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>My my belief in the prediction is because there just

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>seems to be an overwhelming force pushing for it. But

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna happen next year. It's not even gonna

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>happen the year after that. It's gonna it's gonna take

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that force to continue to build up and and people

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>starting to see the benefits of it directly and and

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>all of that. So yeah, it's gonna take probably five

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to ten years before it actually happens. But then that

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>still works with this predict right, I mean, yeah, this

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is that, And you make a really good point. Plus

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>things that I didn't even consider, things that will probably

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about a little bit later in this episode, uh,

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that have unfolded also create a real impetus to teaching

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>people how to code things like security breaches, where we're

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>going to knee a new generation of people thinking about

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>security in a new way to protect the data that

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>we have. I mean, two thousand fourteen was the year

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of the security breach. We had so many eBay you had,

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you had target yet Kmart, you had mount Gox getting destroyed.

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was entertainment and timely picture. Yes, yes,

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>so this is definitely something I could I could see

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>as being a real, a real incentive to try and

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>get coding into schools more more universally. So all right,

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm coming around to that one. Well, I've I've got

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>some other predictions here. Here's some from the street dot com.

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And the first one is kind of interesting that Facebook

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in sometime in two thousand fifteen will come out with

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a Facebook for Work campaign, which would make it more

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of a competitor to LinkedIn, and it would incorporate things

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook's already worked with, things like instant messaging or

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe even bringing back some of the Facebook email stuff

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>they experimented with earlier, and that it would also include

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>probably some form of productivity, cloud based software, you know,

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>doc sharing, collaboration. And so the thought here is that Facebook,

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in order to grow, uh, you know once once you

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.479
<v Speaker 1>hit a billion users, it's it's hard to find those opportunities,

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>is really going to aim at the enterprise level to

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>create something that specifically allows companies to work together. But

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:39.479
<v Speaker 1>in the Facebook realm, do you agree with that? I

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>think it is almost a hud certain that Facebook has

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>at least one project underway exploring this, and probably multiple

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>projects exploring this. When there's a lot of you know,

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft Bot Yamur long time ago, LinkedIn is extremely popular.

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of case studies to show that social

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 1>networks in the workplace, you know, are helpful in this

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in that way. And I can't believe that Facebook wouldn't

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>be exploring this. It's a different matter of whether they

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>will get it to the point where they say, yes,

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>we've got a product that we're gonna we're gonna launch

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this year. The one thing that I think people forget though,

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>which might make you think, I don't know if Facebook

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>is gonna want to do this? Would work? Places want

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to be associated with the Facebook name because it's you know,

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it's got all of this baggage about personal sharing and privacy, etcetera.

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Facebook is now lots of other companies, you know, the

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>most prominent being Instagram, but they own lots of other

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>projects like paper that they launched that uses Facebook more

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>as a back end for something. I could see them

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>basically creating a startup within Facebook that's not called Facebook,

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't market themselves as Facebook, that does this. That seems

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to be the most likely way that this happens. I agree.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that if they position themselves in such a

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>way where it's not you know, not Facebook for work,

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>which and I don't mean to suggest that the street

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>dot com feels like that would be the name of

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>the service. Obviously they had to call it something for

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>their prediction, but I agree. I think if they marketed

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a different way, but use the Facebook back end as

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the platform upon which all this was built, it makes

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>perfect sense. Um, it is an untapped market for Facebook,

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>apart from I mean, you could argue that Pages is

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of them dipping their toe in that, but that's

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a different That's a forward facing, a customer facing approach

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to something that allows companies to do the

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:38.199
<v Speaker 1>work they need to do, uh internally. So yeah, I

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>agree with that one. To the next one, I'm not

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>so sure about. I go back and forth on it.

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is going to get there, gosh darn delivery drones

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in the air before the end of two thousands, get

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>their drone on. Yeah, that was the prediction they went

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>They went on to say that they felt that the

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>f a A and Congress would be under intense pressure

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to allow this to happen, and that that alone would

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>be enough to propel the issue forward so that Amazon

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>would get the clearance. A couple of companies have already

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 1>received some clearance to use drones in commercial matters, but

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>not Amazon. So the thought is that by pointing out

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>these other cases, Amazon would be able to make a

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 1>very strong argument to get their drones in the air.

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that is true. Do you think by

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the end of two thousand fifteen, the stuff that you

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 1>will be ordering for the holidays for your friends and

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>family will be delivered by drone. If I live in Sydney, Australia. Possibly,

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I don't. The f a A is famously

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>not sensitive to pressure. They're not pressure sensitive. Uh. I

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.199
<v Speaker 1>think I think back to how long it took to

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>get the ability to keep your phone on during takeoff

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>even an airplane mode. This is this is not an

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>agency that moves fast, and they've proven that with the

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>drone issue. Uh. And they've shown in all of the

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>decisions they've made about the drone issue that they are

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to drag their feet. They wouldn't describe

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it that way. They would say, you know, be cautious

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and careful. And so no, they're they're not going to

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to fly Amazon drone shipping in the United

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>States by the end of this year. We might have

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a little movement on on the approval. They might get

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a test site by the end of this year maybe,

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.719
<v Speaker 1>but as far as launching a service, absolutely no way. Now.

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>In other countries like Australia that I mentioned, where they're

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>they're much more open about drone testing and allowing people

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>UH to fly this around. It's still an outside possibility,

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>but I think at least could happen there. It's definitely

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 1>not gonna happen in the US. Yeah, I have to

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>agree with you once again. Um, I can't imagine the

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>f a A even with the argument that other businesses

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>are able to kind of try this out. I mean,

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the size of Amazon's delivery business,

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.959
<v Speaker 1>they just that the lot of that many drones flying

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>through the air dropping packages, willy nilly, is enough to

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>send most people to say, we need to be really

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>careful and make sure this works of the time before

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>we agree to it, because this is an incredibly huge

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and diverse and complicated system. So uh yeah, I will

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>be absolutely shocked if Amazon's drone program is in the air. Uh.

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>It also will mean that will probably by the time

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Amazon does get this launched. Literally, um, we're else gonna

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>see the competing services like Google's proposed drone delivery service.

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So at that point we may not ever see the

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 1>sky again. Yeah, that'll just be covered in drones, just

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>covered in drones. Yeah, you you'll but you'll get your

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>electric toothbrush on time, So that's good alright. Our next

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>prediction was that in two thousand and fifteen, Uber will

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>file an I p O. Uber will go public in

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>two in fifteen. That's despite the various trials and tribulations

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Uber has had UH not just with trying to get

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 1>UH trying to get a foothold in various markets that

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>have resisted Uber moving in, but also the internal issues

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that have faced Uber. So do you think Uber is

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to overcome all that and go

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>forward in declaring H or to to file an I

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>p O. And my instinct is to say no, that

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that would be a bad idea. They really need to

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>focus on their public image, etcetera, etcetera. But two things

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>make me think that I'm wrong in having that impulse.

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 1>One is, whenever I think that about a company going

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I p O, they always go ip O anyway, because

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the reason they put out their stock has nothing to

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>do with my instincts. They usually have some other, much

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>more arcane financial calculation that shows them that it is

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the right time. And the other thing I would say

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>is the folks at Uber don't really seem to mind

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>if people have a perception of them that they don't

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>agree with. They go ahead and do what they want anyway.

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Like operating their service in places that have declared it illegal,

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>for instance. So yeah, I think it's probably like that

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>if Uber thinks it's the right time to I p

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 1>O the l I p O this year. Now I've

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>got another related question this, This doesn't have to do

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>with the prediction, just uh, I want to get your

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>perspective on this. Uh. You know, Uber is often referred

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to as part of the the sharing economy. Do you

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>actually see Uber as as a type of sharing kind

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of service. I always think of Uber as really a

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>taxi replacement. I mean that I've used it, but I

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>don't think of it as sharing like the way I

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.719
<v Speaker 1>thought the sharing economy was intended to be used. And

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 1>actually I think that's the problem that Uber has run

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>into an Airbnb start to run into this a little

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>bit as well, which is it started as Hey, it's

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>just somebody who wants to use a thing they already

0:23:57.520 --> 0:23:59.479
<v Speaker 1>have and make a little extra money off it. Right,

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have a ride, and so I'm going

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>to make my car available when I'm driving somewhere, and

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it's become people who said, oh, that's a really great idea.

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to become a professional at that, and then

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Uber has to start vetting the drivers, and then Uber

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>has to start taking more responsibility for the system as

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 1>a whole and institute surge pricing, and suddenly you're right,

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it is a taxi service. So I think it has

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>evolved beyond just being the sharing economy. Like I think

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of the sharing economy, Airbnb still exists more in that

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>where it's I can say, Okay, I'm going to rent

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>out the place that I live in for a couple

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. But even then, the airbnb economy has become

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>so big you have to do a lot to prepare

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>your place for someone to stay in it. It's less

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of the couch surfing feel. And I think Uber's well

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>beyond that. Like just because you own a car doesn't

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>mean you're just gonna hop in and start using Uber

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>as a driver. I mean, I totally agree. Well, how

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>about a couple of predictions. These came from a site

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>called Bread and beyond that. I assumed the predictions were

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>made quite some time ago, but they are for two fifteen.

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>But here's one that I thought was incredibly optimistic. They

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>said they believe that Google glass will head into mass

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>production in two thousand and fifteen. Mm. Yeah, yeah, I can.

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll give that one like a s Okay, you're you're

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>more optimistic than I am. Although I well, I'll say this,

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Google has proven time and again that they are willing

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to charge into something, whether there's any proof that there's

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be a modicum of success or not a lot.

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a lot of strikes against Google Glass.

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I say this as someone who owns Google Glass. I

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>love Google Glass, but there have been I think most

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of the coverage of Google Glass, the vast majority of

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>it has really been couched in caution, saying it's not

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>really ready yet. It's not it's not appealing enough to consumers,

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and that makes me think that it's just enough of

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 1>a risk, considering that this is a hardware thing as well,

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>that Google may not jump in by the end of

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fifteen. But that's that's just based upon

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the thing, the various articles I've read. Uh, and you know, I, well,

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>I have mine, so I don't I don't have a

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 1>dog in this fight. I've got my pair. So yeah,

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>but don't you want the new pair, the more stylish pair,

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the more capable pair with a better resolution. Well, yes,

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of course I do. Yeah, exactly, that's why. And and

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Google has formed so many partnerships with design companies, people

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>who do eyewear. I feel like this has been on

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>simmer because they're busy making sure that what they come

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 1>out with looks a lot better. Uh. And as we

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>saw there were those leaked snapchat emails about them partnering

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>with an eye word company. In fact, I think they

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>might have acquired uh, the eyewear company that makes a

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of Google glass, except it's not actively connected to

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. It doesn't have WiFi in it. You have

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>to download the video later, and it's very focused on video.

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But they looked like stylish glasses, and that that's really

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the big thing that I think people think of when

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>they think of Google glasses, that they're kind of awkward looking.

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And so Google, don't forget they made partnerships with several

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>different eyewear companies. I I would be very surprised if

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we didn't see at least a line of stylish Google

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Glass showed off at that maybe Google I oh in

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the summer, uh and then possibly launched in I can

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>also see them sort of saying, well, we're going to

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>do another pilot program for certain people to try these

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>out to kind of build the buzz back up around

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.400
<v Speaker 1>them being stylish before they actually put them in mass production.

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's why i'm more because they might not quite

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>go into mass production until Okay, all right, well how

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>about this one. This is also from Brent and beyond.

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Firefox OS will flop and never go mainstream. Well, the

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>OS from the mobile device. Um, yes, I'm going to

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:14.199
<v Speaker 1>make the same prediction about sail Fish and all the

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>other operating systems that have small market share, Like, why

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>are you picking on Firefox O S. Yeah, I I

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone has huge expectations for Firefox O S.

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I kind of hope that it catches fire and I

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>think it has a shot at catching on because the

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>developing market, especially for low cost phones is kind of

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>open for everybody right now, and they've got a compelling offering.

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's pretty obvious the cards are stacked

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>against them, So I'm not going to dispute that, but

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm still cheering for Firefox away. Well, yeah, you've got

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got the mountain of Android and iOS. Basically, I mean,

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft can't overcome those problems, so I mean, and they've

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>been in this game for a while. Of course, you

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>could argue that they've just been playing the wrong game

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the entire time, but but they've been in it. I

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>guess my reaction is because they say Firefox OS will flop,

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>as if the entire world is cheering, like Firefox OS

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the big hit of And I

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>think to flop it would have to have that kind

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.719
<v Speaker 1>of expectation, I don't thin so, so it's more like

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Firefox OS will U we'll we'll never get beyond a

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>modest but respectable market cheer. Yeah, that's probably right on

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>right there. All right, How about this one? This is

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>another pretty ambitious one. We might see autonomous cars before

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the end of Wow. Really that's true, but I'm very

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>skeptical that that would be true. I can't believe it.

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I've covered this so much. But the Google,

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, they have their prototype uh smart cars that

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>they produce like a maybe like a hundred of them.

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>They're not meant to go on sale there specifically for testing.

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But uh, if if we saw a truly autonomous car

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>for sale in it would shock me. I would I

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I would also be shocked and lying on the floor

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>next to you. Okay, yeah, because because just for my

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>listeners here, it's not the technology that I really see

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>as the big obstacle, although there you know, you still

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>want to get the technology in a form factor that's

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be pleasant. You don't want a car that

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>has a big, weird antenna things sticking out of it

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna make everyone stare at your vehicle. Uh, or

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe you do, I don't know. But the real challenge

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I think is going to be legislative. How do we

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>convince the various UH regions to allow this sort of thing. Now,

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>there's some places that have already passed laws that have

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>made it very simple for Google to test their vehicles

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in those areas. But the thing about cars is their

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>mobile and they go to different places. So what if

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>your car suddenly becomes illegal when you pass a certain area.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't wouldn't a self driving car have to already be

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in the approval process to be able to be sold.

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>But I would imagine, I would imagine, So, I mean,

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine that that would move quickly enough for

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that to happen. So that's another reason. I mean, especially

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the Google cars they have essentially

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>two controls, which is start this car and turn this

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>car off, and then everything else is handled by I

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>guess pairing with a phone or something along those lines.

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>But there's no break or accelerators. So even if you

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to take manual control of one of those prototype cars,

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't. There's no option there. They in fact, they

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>had to modify them to meet the street rules because

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of that. People, you know people, they're like, look, as

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>long as you have a stop button, that's really all

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that matters, and and they got a lot of flak

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>for that. So there's still a lot of a lot

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of fear, uncertainty, and doubt around self driving cars. And

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>then I personally, I'm really looking for it. I don't drive,

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>so I'm really looking forward to self driving cars coming

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>around and being being a real thing because I know

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:10.959
<v Speaker 1>that these systems can react at a fraction of the

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>time that it takes a human to react in those situations.

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>It's really only the worst case scenario where something has

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>gone irreparably wrong with the system that you would have

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to worry about something. And I don't think it's as

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.719
<v Speaker 1>common as a lot of people seem to think it is.

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Especially when you compare it to all the terrible things

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that can happen to a human behind the wheel of

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a car, where something as simple as a distraction can

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 1>cause a terrible accident. Yeah. Absolutely, it's it is a

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>psychological reluctance, not a scientific reluctance. Yeah. Well, I d

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>C also had some predictions. One was that the fablet market.

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you a fan of the term fablet? Okay, that's

0:32:56.480 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad to hear it. Those those phone tablet hybrids,

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the enormous phones like the six plus and the next

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to six uh that that market will grow as people

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>demand these larger devices, but wearables will underperform, which is

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of going against what that first prediction said. I

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>think the the idea that I and and by the way,

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>when you when you asked me if I don't like fablett,

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you said the name, and that's where met right. I

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want people to get the misimpression that I don't

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>like six inch devices and they're fine. You know, I

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have a moral stance on them. If that's the

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of size of uh screen you need them, that's great,

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>And I know that's right for a lot of people.

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is a very safe prediction for

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I dc like, oh, we got our first couple of

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>six inch phones this year, so we'll have more and

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>therefore we'll sell more. I think that's true because we

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen a big backlash or disappointing sales from the

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>next to six or the iPhone six plus, So why

0:33:56.360 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't we sell more? The wearables underperforming is is more

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of it not a risky prediction, but that to me

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is more of a substantial prediction that what we've been

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing with wearables won't be changed by the onslaught of

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:14.399
<v Speaker 1>more wearable releases, in which we're definitely going to see

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see more products put out there. What they're

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:18.839
<v Speaker 1>saying is people still won't flock to them. I think

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that's probably true. Yeah, I mean there's certain certain markets

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that I think, Uh, wearables obviously appeal to the fitness market,

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>being like that was such a great way of getting

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:36.280
<v Speaker 1>into the whole fitness or the wearable industry, I should say,

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>because it appeals in so many ways that that is

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a that is a particular space in our lives where

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we crave to have that feedback, that data, where we

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 1>can either use it to figure out if we're if

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we're pushing ourselves enough, if we're pushing too hard, we're

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>not doing something correctly. It makes perfect sense. Going beyond

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that is a real challenge, and I don't I think

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it's I think it's a challenge will overcome. I don't

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>know necessarily that the products that are going to be

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>coming out in two thousand and fifteen are going to

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>do that where we start to see wearables that are

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>addressing other things in our lives apart from fitness and

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>activity tracking, to make it more of a um something

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that we absolutely must have. I still think the fitness

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:26.320
<v Speaker 1>ones are gonna do fine. I think those are gonna

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>continue to do well. Um assuming that the bands that

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 1>people may don't have medals in them that cause folks

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>to break out. So don't they keep saying it's not

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the band, it's not the band. Yeah, I think they do.

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I didn't own one of those, so

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have that particular experience. I am particularly sensitive

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to nickel. I can't have nickel against me or else

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I break out, So I just get careful about any

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of wearable device at this point. But yeah, I

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I think I agree, and especially not just that we're

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 1>going to see more of the fablet form factor come

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:07.879
<v Speaker 1>out in two thousand and fifteen, but just that it's

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. It's a reverse of the trend that we

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 1>used to see. Do you remember back when the trend

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:16.839
<v Speaker 1>was that our phones were getting smaller and smaller, and

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that became like a status symbol if you had a

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 1>really small phone. Yeah, I remember being so proud and

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>excited that I had gotten a Motorola razor because it

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>was so thin and small, right and slide it in

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a pocket. I remember there was an snl skit where

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Will Ferrell had a character who pulls out a phone

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that's so small. I think you had to use tweezers

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to do the little flip. Wasn't that a Steve Job's imitation?

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 1>It may have been. There was. There was one of

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the it was one of the mall ones. Jimmy Fallon

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>was in. It was laughing the whole time. I know

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't narrow it down at all. Right, So there

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>was the tonight show, the entire run exactly it was

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that the roots came out. It was amazing. So but no,

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's so funny that now it's the other way around.

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And of course the obvious answer to that is that

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>now we have these devices that can act as a

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 1>second screen, and obviously screen landscape is going to be

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>really important in that in that form factor. Now we

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>now we've shifted what our phones do, so it wouldn't

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.320
<v Speaker 1>make sense to continue to push for smaller and smaller

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 1>phones in that new world. So, uh, it's just funny

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to me that we've we've gone from an era where

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>we always thought the future is going to have us

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:34.399
<v Speaker 1>have smaller and smaller phones. Now it's no, we want

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>bigger and bigger phones because it stopped being about voice.

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Right when it was all about voice, they're like, well,

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>we don't, we don't need an object, We just want

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to hear the voice. And now it's the opposite. Smartphones

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:49.240
<v Speaker 1>are rarely about calls. They are almost entirely about apps

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>and and and messaging, So you need a screen to

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:55.399
<v Speaker 1>be able to take advantage of that. That's absolutely correct. Well,

0:37:55.440 --> 0:38:00.919
<v Speaker 1>here's another incredibly risky prediction from I d C. The

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Internet of Things will continue to grow and drive innovation,

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>with embedded tech and preventive maintenance becoming really important. I

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>think you could just drop off things. Yeah, yeah, I don't.

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how we could be how we can

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>make that not be true. You know, I guess. I

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>guess there's still some people who might be skeptical about

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>the Internet of Things just to play Devil's advocate, uh

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and and that it will end up just being a

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>bunch of buzzwords that don't do anything, so that that's

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:31.919
<v Speaker 1>why they make this prediction. Is like, no, it's gonna

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 1>continue to grow. We're gonna tendue to have more sensors.

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 1>The one prediction that I saw someone make out there

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that I've started to think about is the idea of

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the Internet of things being rentable, so that you don't

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>buy the things, but there's an't there's an internet of

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 1>things out there you can take advantage of when you

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>need it. Interesting. I could see that because I mean

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that it obviously if you were to to jump into

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the world to the Internet of things, if you wanted

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to incorporate embeddable technology in your world, that's a pretty

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>big upfront cost that not everyone can do. But something

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>along those lines where it's more like a service as

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 1>opposed to something you own, I could I could see that,

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>like the one. The one example I saw I had

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to do with the insurance company. It was like Internet

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of Things as a service, so that you can only

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 1>pay for just the amount you actually need. Mm hmm.

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Now I like that idea. Someone should get on that.

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:32.399
<v Speaker 1>As for whether or not the Internet of Things ends

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>up being a bunch of buzzwords, at least in the

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:38.399
<v Speaker 1>short term, it doesn't matter because so many companies are

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 1>so invested in bringing this kind of stuff to market

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to be a factor. Whether or not

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:49.399
<v Speaker 1>it works is another question, but it's gonna be out there,

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's definitely gonna play an important role in it.

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe is the year where we decide whether or not

0:39:56.280 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 1>it ends up working and or what it works for. Like,

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling that it's just too broad of

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 1>a concept for it not to work somewhere in some

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>niche somewhere, and I think we'll figure out what that

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>is in the coming year, or at least in going

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.839
<v Speaker 1>back to automotives. I mean, you could easily see an

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Internet of things approach helping out there with everything from uh,

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>just route planning for your daily commute to on a

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>city planning level to figure it out, Well, what's the

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:32.879
<v Speaker 1>best way we need to relook at at how all

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 1>of our intersection uh traffic lights time out. And now

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:40.240
<v Speaker 1>we've got all this amazing data that we can sift

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 1>through and actually make a city that you're not gonna

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>be sitting in traffic for you know, two and a

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 1>half hours every day, Tom, you live in Los Angeles, Right, yeah,

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we we don't have that problem here because, as the

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>City of Los Angeles is proud to point out, all

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of our lights are timed across the entire city, which

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>has solved all traffic proble. Was in Los Angeles, exactly

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 1>the same in Atlanta just the other day, as we

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>were stopped on the highway, I got my car and

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:10.919
<v Speaker 1>just marveled at how well everything was moving. Alright, Well,

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 1>moving over to to Gartner, Uh, there was There were

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of predictions. They said lots of stuff was

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna double in two thousand and fifteen. For example, getting

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>back to the Internet of Things, that the number of

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>physical objects connected to the Internet would double. That would

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:31.760
<v Speaker 1>be from six fifty million to thirty one point three billion.

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's a lot. They also thought that the

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>market for three D printers would go from a billion

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 1>dollars to two billion dollars, so it would double as well,

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 1>that we would see twice as many car models with

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 1>connectivity to the Internet as we did in two thousand

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen. I don't know that that's that huge of

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a number really when you get down to it, depending

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:54.879
<v Speaker 1>upon what you mean by connectivity. And then um, we'll

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>see more companies create positions for chief data officers in

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 1>chief digital officers. So a lot of these I I

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I would agree that all of

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>them are going to double. I certainly see all of

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 1>these being trends that are on the rise. Yeah, I

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I doubled down on Gardner's predictions, but

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I and that's really what Gardner is saying. I mean,

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Gardner deals in numbers, so they're probably pretty close to accurate.

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:25.719
<v Speaker 1>But they're saying like, we are going to see significant

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:27.879
<v Speaker 1>increases in all of those areas. And I think the right.

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I think three D printing is ripe for its big

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:33.839
<v Speaker 1>moment in the sun. Uh you know it's I don't

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's quite to the level of three D printer

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in every home yet, but I think it'll start to

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 1>hit the mainstream probably, so I'm with most of those.

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I actually think the chief Digital Officer chief data officer

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is definitely going to be affected by what we talked

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 1>about earlier with the security hacks. Yeah, I think it

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>will become even more of a security position, or even

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 1>a position of chief cyber security officer. As much as

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I hate that term, it does convey what companies mean

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 1>when they talk about it. M hmm, that's excellent point,

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:10.839
<v Speaker 1>I agree. Uh. Moving over to to Recode, I love

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that almost all of their predictions were about cloud based

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 1>services and mobile devices. We almost I didn't write it down.

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Who was this Steve Sonofsky, Microsoft head of UH office

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and so yeah, it was all about cloud based services,

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>mobile devices. I love that the first one was about

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the behavior of millennials and talking about UH, the behavior

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of millennials on top of the security issues related to

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>having emails that contain attachments. The problems that that that

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:46.319
<v Speaker 1>ends up bringing along with companies means that we're going

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to see more of a move to alternatives to email,

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:52.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff like instant messaging or other means of linking to

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:56.400
<v Speaker 1>content but not actually sending it as an attachment so

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have all these copies floating around. Uh,

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 1>meaning that email isn't gonna die, but it's importance is

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 1>going to decrease in two thousand and fift What do

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you think, Yeah, I I think this plays into a

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:11.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of other things. I think the idea of ubiquitous

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>cloud is going to make it so that you can

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 1>use that option more often. It's interesting to me that

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Google this very week announced that you can now attach

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Google Docs to email, not just send a link. So

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>there's obviously still a demand out there for No I

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:29.799
<v Speaker 1>actually needed the attachment. I don't want to link. I

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>want the document to be there in their inbox, even offline,

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:35.839
<v Speaker 1>once that email has been downloaded. Uh. So it maybe

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a little early for getting rid of attachments altogether, but

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it is certainly is more efficient. So having that option

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 1>is great, and it will continue to be used in

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:47.279
<v Speaker 1>more than greater numbers. I think we are starting to

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>learn as a society how to use email. I don't

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 1>think email is gonna go away. I don't think email

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is gonna die, but I think he is pointing to

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:58.839
<v Speaker 1>something important here, which is there are times when you

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 1>need to message some one and people sometimes use email

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>for that and I think we're we're learning, oh, you

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:06.320
<v Speaker 1>know what, don't use email as if it's into messenger,

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 1>use instan a messenger, use text messaging for that. Uh,

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and we'll probably start getting better at figuring out what

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:16.880
<v Speaker 1>tool to use for the right communication. John and I

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>also agree with the point that we're seeing, you know,

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the millennial generation moving through the workforce, getting promoted, getting

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>further up into leadership positions over time. Obviously that's going

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to be go hand in hand with a shift in

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:36.799
<v Speaker 1>the way we use the technology, because just because there's

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a generational difference. I mean, I remember when I first

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:44.320
<v Speaker 1>got into the workforce that there was a generational difference.

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:46.759
<v Speaker 1>I work for people who asked me to print out

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:50.400
<v Speaker 1>all their emails, so they had to have all of

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 1>them like printed out on file. They didn't they didn't

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 1>understand that they could go and look at the digital

0:45:56.040 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 1>version anytime they wanted to, and that it was in

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:02.360
<v Speaker 1>fact easier to track it down then it filing away

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of a printed out email. So it is one of

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>those things that does change over time. And again, maybe

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just that I've gotten to this certain age where

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just thinking, like, don't maybe use all those new

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>fangled messagings things. I'm tired of learning things. I don't

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:19.399
<v Speaker 1>wanna don't make me snap my chat. I don't want

0:46:19.400 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to instant my Graham. I just want my emails. Yeah, yeah, no,

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:26.799
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. I worry about that, Like, am I assifying?

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Or is this a bad app? I just don't know anymore. Yeah, yeah,

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I I sit there and I usually have to turn

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to my wife and say, does this come across as

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:39.760
<v Speaker 1>someone who is rationally pointing out flaws in the design

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of an app? Or does just descended into cranky old

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:47.399
<v Speaker 1>man territory? And uh, yeah, it's a it's a coin

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 1>flip usually you know, situation. Uh. There was also an

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting prediction that said that tablets in two thousand and

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:59.439
<v Speaker 1>fifteen would make a surprising come back, that they would

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 1>become more uh popular, which is particularly interesting because there

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:07.840
<v Speaker 1>was another site, msp Mentor that predicted that tablets would

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 1>fade away as a secondary device behind laptops and smartphones.

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So somebody's gonna be wrong, but somebody's gonna be right.

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So who do you think it's gonna be right? Tom,

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, Jonathan, don't call it a comeback. Tablets have

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>been here for years. That's fair. Uh No, I I

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 1>think probably we won't see a huge spike in tablet sales,

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:33.359
<v Speaker 1>but they're far from dying. My theory of why we've

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:36.400
<v Speaker 1>seen a stall in tablet sales is based on my

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>own experience, which I have an original next to seven

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that I still use. I'm just now getting to the

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:43.880
<v Speaker 1>point where I think maybe I should get a new

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:46.400
<v Speaker 1>seven inch tablet because there are a few apps that

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>have come out that won't run on it because it's old.

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 1>The operating system still up to date, but it just

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:54.359
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the oomph uh to run certain things. And

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I have an iPad third generation that I still haven't run.

0:47:59.840 --> 0:48:03.359
<v Speaker 1>I haven't run into a problem with. So tablets are

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 1>more like desktop computers in that way you can use

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 1>them for longer. And so, yeah, we had a huge

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:12.840
<v Speaker 1>spike in sales of tablets as people discovered them and

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>started using them and buying them. And of course we're

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:17.879
<v Speaker 1>going to have a stall as people say I've got

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a tablet, I don't need to buy another tablet, And

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:23.280
<v Speaker 1>then it will start to come back as those tablets

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:25.479
<v Speaker 1>get older and you're like, wow, this one's this one's

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 1>starting to not be as useful, I need to upgrade,

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 1>get a new one. Uh And and so I think

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll maybe see a slight rise, a slight come back.

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't think it'll be sharp, but probably

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a come back. In tablets, I

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 1>can see that being more of a kind of a

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 1>cyclical thing, Like when when the first iPad came out

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and then iPad two came out, we saw a lot

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of people upgrading from the iPad to iPad two because

0:48:48.360 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the novelty was still there, right, the desire to have

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the newest, shiniest thing, this thing that was so amazing

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that Apple had come out with this tablet that no

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>one had ever made a table buble it before, or

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 1>at least no one made one that was appealing to

0:49:03.280 --> 0:49:06.759
<v Speaker 1>a mass consumer market like Apple did. And then the

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:09.919
<v Speaker 1>iPad two recaptured some of that excitement. And I think

0:49:10.000 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 1>since then it's it's people have realized, like you were saying,

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that this is a device that is there's no need

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 1>for me to upgrade it yet there's not a compelling

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:23.880
<v Speaker 1>enough reason it does what I need it to do.

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm actually seeing that across a lot of different

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:30.239
<v Speaker 1>things now where people are kind of settling in the

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 1>way they would with computers. They buy a computer and

0:49:32.640 --> 0:49:35.399
<v Speaker 1>they think, well, sure, the computer I owned this year,

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I bought it last year. It's nowhere near

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:39.640
<v Speaker 1>as fast as the newest ones, but it does everything

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I needed to do, So I'm gonna stick with it

0:49:41.760 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 1>until I need to upgrade. I'm seeing that more with

0:49:44.760 --> 0:49:48.279
<v Speaker 1>other kinds of electronics now, so I and I do

0:49:48.360 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>think we are hitting that that part of the phase.

0:49:51.280 --> 0:49:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I also have an excess seven. I also I'm getting

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:56.120
<v Speaker 1>into the point where I'm thinking it might be time

0:49:56.160 --> 0:49:59.799
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade because there's some loading issues I'm having now.

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Things are taking longer, gets it just gets a little

0:50:02.560 --> 0:50:06.239
<v Speaker 1>slower at running everything. Yeah, so, uh yeah, I can.

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I can see it that way. I I that makes

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 1>more sense to me than calling it a comeback. It

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:13.759
<v Speaker 1>definitely makes more sense in that respect, as opposed to

0:50:13.760 --> 0:50:18.319
<v Speaker 1>people just suddenly rediscovering tablets again. Um well, I've got

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of questions that are just general questions for you, Uh,

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:25.359
<v Speaker 1>something that I've been wondering every single year. I kind

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of have an NFC prediction, which was always that NFC

0:50:30.960 --> 0:50:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue to be pushed and it's going

0:50:33.080 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to continue to encounter resistance for adoption and we're not

0:50:37.480 --> 0:50:39.880
<v Speaker 1>going to see it happen. But do you think that

0:50:39.880 --> 0:50:43.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fifteen is finally the year that NFC actually

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:48.760
<v Speaker 1>enters mainstream use in the United States. I think Apple

0:50:48.840 --> 0:50:51.799
<v Speaker 1>may have done NFC the biggest favor it could ever

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 1>have as a standard by putting in an Apple Pay.

0:50:55.360 --> 0:51:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I still don't think NFC is going to be a

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 1>huge thing that people thought it was going to revolutionize

0:51:02.680 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the way you use devices. I just I just don't

0:51:05.200 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 1>see that. There's plenty of things that can do similar

0:51:07.560 --> 0:51:09.759
<v Speaker 1>things to NFC, which is why I don't think we've

0:51:09.800 --> 0:51:12.360
<v Speaker 1>ever seen people get on board. At the same time,

0:51:12.880 --> 0:51:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we're seeing NFC follow the route of Bluetooth.

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Bluetooth was out in comdex right, and it it took

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 1>years for the technology to finally figure out, oh, that's

0:51:26.680 --> 0:51:28.480
<v Speaker 1>what we can use bluetooth for. And at first it

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:31.920
<v Speaker 1>was bluetooth headsets for your cell phones, and and then

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it marched on into other things. So NFC maybe following

0:51:34.960 --> 0:51:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that more plotting route to like, oh, Apple Pay is

0:51:38.160 --> 0:51:41.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of the equivalent of the Bluetooth headset. The Bluetooth earpiece,

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and and and we'll we'll have another one coming along

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:47.880
<v Speaker 1>here in the next year or two. That. Oh, NFC

0:51:47.960 --> 0:51:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is also good for that, But I still don't think

0:51:49.960 --> 0:51:52.479
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be that revolutionary thing that some people

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:55.399
<v Speaker 1>said it would become. Yeah, I think the one thing

0:51:55.480 --> 0:51:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that is really in favor of NFC, apart from Apple

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:06.319
<v Speaker 1>getting involved, obviously, that just adds more confusion and competition

0:52:06.360 --> 0:52:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in that that space because we've seen vendors, so some

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:14.840
<v Speaker 1>retail establishments resist Apple Pay because they have their own

0:52:16.000 --> 0:52:21.880
<v Speaker 1>NFC based payment system base. But yeah, right, that's true.

0:52:22.320 --> 0:52:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh So it's it's interesting to see, right, have you

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 1>heard of these things? Uh? They used to be on

0:52:30.120 --> 0:52:33.560
<v Speaker 1>movie posters and no one knew why. Um no, it's

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it's I think I think the the hack the hacks

0:52:37.719 --> 0:52:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw with the Kmart incident, for example, that Kmart's

0:52:41.400 --> 0:52:44.920
<v Speaker 1>credit card machines were that essentially hacked, that people got

0:52:44.920 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 1>credit cards that information that way. That is adding a

0:52:48.640 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 1>lot more pressure, and the United States government is adding

0:52:51.840 --> 0:52:56.799
<v Speaker 1>more pressure calling for more secure systems to protect consumers.

0:52:56.800 --> 0:53:00.320
<v Speaker 1>That that might end up helping more than anything else,

0:53:00.560 --> 0:53:04.279
<v Speaker 1>at least in two thousand fifteen. Uh, whether we see

0:53:04.360 --> 0:53:07.680
<v Speaker 1>n FC being the solution, I don't know. I think

0:53:07.760 --> 0:53:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Chip and Pin is another possibility, UM, not necessarily in

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:17.400
<v Speaker 1>NFC implementation, but I think it's got the best chance

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:20.439
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand fifteen that it's ever had. I agree

0:53:20.480 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 1>with you there. I don't know that it's gonna make it,

0:53:23.520 --> 0:53:26.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's way closer than it was in two

0:53:26.520 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand fourteen. Uh. And then my last question for you,

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:35.839
<v Speaker 1>a burning question everyone wants to know. Will the Firefox

0:53:35.880 --> 0:53:40.799
<v Speaker 1>browsers switching to Yahoo search engine make a big difference? Huge? Huge?

0:53:40.800 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna see Google selling off YouTube and it's headquarters buildings.

0:53:47.400 --> 0:53:49.640
<v Speaker 1>All of their autonomous cars are now going to come

0:53:49.680 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 1>with drivers, right right, They're gonna hire drivers. No. I

0:53:54.600 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be interesting. I think it'll be

0:53:57.200 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 1>good for Yahoo. I think it will make Google a

0:54:00.560 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 1>little sharper. But that company Google, UH in particular, UH

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:11.080
<v Speaker 1>has way too much money as it is. UH. So

0:54:11.280 --> 0:54:14.279
<v Speaker 1>I think all this does is pokes the bear and

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:17.279
<v Speaker 1>lets them know that they can't rest on their laurels. UH.

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And it gives Marissa Mayer a victory, which she desperately needed.

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's good for Yahoo in that way. And yeah,

0:54:22.640 --> 0:54:25.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean it makes a difference. I don't know that

0:54:25.800 --> 0:54:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it it really is going to upset the balance of

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the search engine marketplace too terribly. Um, you know, being

0:54:35.560 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 1>got onto uh iOS in Syrie. Uh and and that

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:45.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't like shake the ground. Bing is the default search

0:54:45.000 --> 0:54:47.160
<v Speaker 1>engine on iOS and a couple of different areas, just

0:54:47.200 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 1>not in the browser. Yet. Maybe it'll get in the browser.

0:54:49.480 --> 0:54:52.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think I think those sorts of

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:58.040
<v Speaker 1>things pale by comparison to Google's ridiculously dominant market share worldwide,

0:54:58.080 --> 0:55:02.280
<v Speaker 1>especially in Europe where it's like abo. Yeah, I agree,

0:55:02.680 --> 0:55:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I when I read about it, I thought, well,

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting, and I respect what's going on. Um, it

0:55:10.040 --> 0:55:13.520
<v Speaker 1>almost sounded like Google was just bidding up its own

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:17.960
<v Speaker 1>uh its own claim to Firefox, just enough for it

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to be inconvenient for anyone else. And I disclosed that

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:24.319
<v Speaker 1>my wife is an employee of Google, So don't believe

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:26.640
<v Speaker 1>anything I say. Okay, that's fair, all right, we will

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:30.520
<v Speaker 1>just completely disregard the last question. Well, well then, Tom,

0:55:30.560 --> 0:55:32.359
<v Speaker 1>is there anything else you want to say, any other

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:36.160
<v Speaker 1>predictions that we didn't mention that you felt were interesting

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:40.360
<v Speaker 1>or controversial or anything like that. Um, no. I you

0:55:40.400 --> 0:55:42.600
<v Speaker 1>know what, we didn't bring up any of the like

0:55:42.680 --> 0:55:45.160
<v Speaker 1>will Apple release X because we know they're doing the

0:55:45.160 --> 0:55:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple Watch that's coming next year, that's announced, and you know,

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:50.520
<v Speaker 1>there are certain things you can count on every year.

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:54.800
<v Speaker 1>You can count on updates to the hardware from Apple,

0:55:54.960 --> 0:55:57.959
<v Speaker 1>that sort of stuff. Uh, there's not really any point

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in predicting that. I guess the click the burning question

0:56:01.000 --> 0:56:03.279
<v Speaker 1>that we've had for years. The other burning question we've

0:56:03.320 --> 0:56:07.040
<v Speaker 1>had for years is an Apple television Are we gonna

0:56:07.080 --> 0:56:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Are we actually going to get that? I saw that

0:56:09.719 --> 0:56:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Jane Munster said we're gonna get one, in which you know,

0:56:13.440 --> 0:56:15.279
<v Speaker 1>every year Jean Munster has been saying we're gonna get

0:56:15.320 --> 0:56:17.640
<v Speaker 1>one in a couple of years, so that seems pretty consistent.

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't disbelieve that he has sources on the inside.

0:56:23.120 --> 0:56:26.080
<v Speaker 1>That's ay. Yeah, Apples still working on something regarding television.

0:56:26.400 --> 0:56:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't know that we'll see it this year.

0:56:29.200 --> 0:56:33.040
<v Speaker 1>That that is such a problematic arena. I guess the

0:56:33.080 --> 0:56:35.080
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I would say is, don't forget that

0:56:35.200 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 1>both Verizon, Dish, and Sony plan to come out with

0:56:41.120 --> 0:56:45.920
<v Speaker 1>internet only cable television services in the United States. In

0:56:45.960 --> 0:56:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the coming year. We don't know what shape they're gonna take,

0:56:48.840 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 1>but they will have many of the same channels that

0:56:51.520 --> 0:56:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you would get in a normal cable or satellite package.

0:56:54.360 --> 0:56:56.359
<v Speaker 1>And of course you have HBO saying they're gonna launch

0:56:56.480 --> 0:57:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a direct to the consumer Internet service. Cb I already

0:57:00.480 --> 0:57:03.160
<v Speaker 1>launched their direct to the Internet direct to the consumer

0:57:03.200 --> 0:57:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Internet service, so that landscape will changed by the end

0:57:06.160 --> 0:57:08.319
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I don't know if Apple is UH

0:57:08.640 --> 0:57:10.319
<v Speaker 1>is going to get in on it yet, but maybe

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:13.360
<v Speaker 1>in after we see how that all shakes out. That

0:57:13.520 --> 0:57:16.640
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. It could be that, who knows, Maybe at

0:57:16.680 --> 0:57:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the predictions episode for for sixteen, we start talking about serious,

0:57:22.040 --> 0:57:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, some serious talk about the decline of cable

0:57:24.640 --> 0:57:29.040
<v Speaker 1>at that point. I mean, we're we're we've been talking

0:57:29.080 --> 0:57:31.680
<v Speaker 1>about this for years and we've been seeing this. I mean,

0:57:31.720 --> 0:57:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got a whole show devoted to this kind of thing.

0:57:34.280 --> 0:57:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Cord cutters or cord killers is er. Yeah, I apologize,

0:57:40.000 --> 0:57:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I I am such a guy, you know, but no

0:57:45.760 --> 0:57:48.080
<v Speaker 1>chord killers where you talk about these kind of things,

0:57:48.120 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's something that we've seen for a while. Heck,

0:57:50.080 --> 0:57:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I talked to CNN about it several years ago and

0:57:52.040 --> 0:57:56.280
<v Speaker 1>then got in trouble um. But now we're we're actually

0:57:56.480 --> 0:58:00.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing this come to fruition. It's it's pretty interesting and

0:58:00.240 --> 0:58:02.080
<v Speaker 1>exciting to see it, you know, roll out on a

0:58:02.120 --> 0:58:05.040
<v Speaker 1>broader scale. And I really do wonder by the end

0:58:05.080 --> 0:58:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of what that's going to mean for the cable industry

0:58:09.520 --> 0:58:12.880
<v Speaker 1>as a whole, not just um, not just a channel

0:58:12.920 --> 0:58:15.880
<v Speaker 1>here are a channel there. I mean the it may

0:58:15.920 --> 0:58:19.200
<v Speaker 1>open up opportunities, and I'm sure it's going to put

0:58:19.240 --> 0:58:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people in a very stressful position for

0:58:22.480 --> 0:58:26.479
<v Speaker 1>most of Yeah, I think we might be seeing peak

0:58:26.640 --> 0:58:30.240
<v Speaker 1>cable right now. Yeah, I think you might be right.

0:58:30.320 --> 0:58:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if we get to a point, if we

0:58:32.560 --> 0:58:36.120
<v Speaker 1>ever get to that point where people can go more

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a lak heart, which is it's incredibly hard to do.

0:58:40.200 --> 0:58:43.560
<v Speaker 1>It's incredibly from a from a provider standpoint, it's incredibly

0:58:43.600 --> 0:58:46.360
<v Speaker 1>hard to do because you're a counting as a provider

0:58:46.400 --> 0:58:49.320
<v Speaker 1>on the money from your big name channels to support

0:58:49.640 --> 0:58:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the ones that supply content to a niche audience but

0:58:53.960 --> 0:58:56.080
<v Speaker 1>just don't make the money that they would in order

0:58:56.120 --> 0:58:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to survive on their own. If you enter into a

0:58:58.640 --> 0:59:01.000
<v Speaker 1>world where people just get to pick and choose, some

0:59:01.000 --> 0:59:03.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff is gonna die. It's just not gonna it's not

0:59:03.640 --> 0:59:06.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to maintain the level of production

0:59:06.560 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that people expect. So it may be that, who knows,

0:59:10.400 --> 0:59:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of years, our expectations for what is

0:59:13.600 --> 0:59:18.440
<v Speaker 1>entertainment is going to change fundamentally. Yeah. I don't even

0:59:18.480 --> 0:59:22.000
<v Speaker 1>think that necessarily means we'll have worse things to watch either.

0:59:22.200 --> 0:59:26.040
<v Speaker 1>It just means that we might have fewer outlets or

0:59:26.320 --> 0:59:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a different selection of outlets. I mean, don't forget Amazon, Prime,

0:59:30.800 --> 0:59:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Hulu and obviously Netflix all making high quality television entertainment

0:59:36.280 --> 0:59:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that they deliver through their internet only services. So it's

0:59:39.160 --> 0:59:41.280
<v Speaker 1>not like there's a lack of providers out there. I

0:59:41.280 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 1>think some of those on off channels that not as

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:49.880
<v Speaker 1>many people watch, though, go the way of the nineties.

0:59:49.920 --> 0:59:54.160
<v Speaker 1>You just you think of them as as something old fashioned. Right, Well,

0:59:54.440 --> 0:59:56.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if this just means that I get more

0:59:57.160 --> 1:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>quality programming, like a re a a reincarnation of the Tick,

1:00:03.600 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's coming back on Amazon, I'm happy. I love

1:00:08.480 --> 1:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that series, all right. Well, Tom Merritt, thank you so

1:00:12.240 --> 1:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>much for joining me on this episode. Thank you, Jonathan.

1:00:15.400 --> 1:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>It's it was. It was a fun talk. I can't

1:00:17.280 --> 1:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>believe it's already been through an hour. Here, this was

1:00:19.960 --> 1:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>just time flew by. This was fun. Yeah, this is

1:00:22.360 --> 1:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>this was This was the right way to do a

1:00:23.840 --> 1:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>predictions episode. Two smart movie looks great other people and

1:00:28.160 --> 1:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>not talking about UM. So, where can people find your stuff? Well,

1:00:33.520 --> 1:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>tom Merritt dot com to ours two t s is

1:00:35.640 --> 1:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>my main website to collects all the shows I do

1:00:38.320 --> 1:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in one place, so you can find the subscription page

1:00:41.120 --> 1:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>there and and find out the different shows. But probably

1:00:44.680 --> 1:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of most interest to it folks interested in tech stuff

1:00:47.800 --> 1:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>would be Daily Tech News Show, Daily Tech News Show

1:00:50.280 --> 1:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com. I do it entirely crowdfunded. Uh so it's

1:00:54.320 --> 1:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely free and add free. Go check it out. We

1:00:57.520 --> 1:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>do it every day Monday through Friday, most of the day.

1:01:00.040 --> 1:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll have a little holiday break, but we'll have some

1:01:02.400 --> 1:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>special episodes. They're including a predictions episode where I will

1:01:06.120 --> 1:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>actually go out on a limb and and make some

1:01:09.080 --> 1:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>some predictions. I will learn next year from Jonathan not

1:01:12.320 --> 1:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to do that. I can't believe you haven't learned that. Yeah,

1:01:17.440 --> 1:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you did it with Cena. You've got it.

1:01:20.040 --> 1:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>You've done a long history of making predictions. The fun

1:01:23.800 --> 1:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>part is coming back a year later and actually grading

1:01:27.480 --> 1:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>yourself yeah, I do that too. Actually, the Predictions Results

1:01:30.560 --> 1:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>show is actually really fun. Yeah, it could be a blast.

1:01:33.000 --> 1:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I usually end up giving fake prizes for all the

1:01:37.240 --> 1:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>nice well yeah, yeah, this year I think um, I

1:01:41.200 --> 1:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>think the top prize was a stretch armstrong whose arms

1:01:44.200 --> 1:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>have been stretched out too far. That's prize. Yeah, that's

1:01:47.560 --> 1:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. Well, it gives up, gives a good hug. Well, guys,

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for listening. Remember you can get

1:01:54.120 --> 1:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>in touch with me with the email address tech stuff

1:01:56.800 --> 1:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff Works dot com, or drop me a

1:01:58.960 --> 1:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>line on Facebook or Tumbler. I have to handle tech

1:02:01.880 --> 1:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff hs W at all three and we'll talk to

1:02:04.880 --> 1:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you again. Releases for more on this and thousands of

1:02:10.960 --> 1:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>other topics. Because it has to work dot Com