WEBVTT - MLB Season Preview 2022 (Ep. 162)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros.

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in everybody to betting pros.

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 3>It is me joeyp Joe Pizzapia, and today my guest

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 3>is the Welsh, my co host from leading off over

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 3>on the Fantasy pro side, and we're gonna break down

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 3>the MLB wagering for you heading into the twenty twenty

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 3>two season.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 2>This is the preview show.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk a little win totals here when it

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>comes to teams, the overs and unders we like early

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>on here, we're also gonna talk about some player futures,

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 1>hand out some awards, and we'll get all the way

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to the division winners and of course World Series at

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day. In Welsh, this is that

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>time of year where we start to look at the

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>teams and we think we know who we've got, and then,

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, as always, something happens, like the San Francisco

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Giants come out of nowhere last year and show up

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Seattle Mariners and change the perspective.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>But I think it's a very exciting time here.

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>We've got some rookies that are breaking camp, so that

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>should be an interesting award to give out, but Welsh,

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>We've got an exciting potential twenty twenty two season ahead

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 1>of us.

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 4>It's glorious. It's glorious with all the futures to be had.

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 4>We were talking about this soft air. I've never even

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 4>before gambling became legal here in Arizona, I never was

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 4>like a crazy, crazy, big futures guy, you madly into

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 4>futures and very successful. But I gotta admit it's kind

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 4>of the most enticing I think it's ever been in

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 4>years that I've paid attention to it, watched it. Bogin

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 4>and I had talked about it over years and years.

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 4>With the advent of the of baseball being incentivized to

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 4>bring up rookies, Bam, we've got a whole bigger, different

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 4>race for Rookie of the Year awards and even some of.

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 5>The win totals.

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 4>I gotta tell you, scouring through there's some stuff in

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:50.559
<v Speaker 4>there that I'm like.

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 5>Am I missing something? What am I missing? What is

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 5>Vegas trying to do here?

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 4>So if you are comfortable making a little bit of

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 4>an investment for the future in the game that you love,

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 4>discounts and money to be made today and hopefully we're

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 4>gonna nail some of those guys.

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one hundred percent, man.

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And just to you know, kind of lay it out

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>there when it comes to these sort of early, you know,

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>season wagers when we're starting out the top of the year.

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 2>I like to think of it like investments.

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, you see the things you like on the board,

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and you invest a small amount or even a large amount,

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>depending on what your pank roll is, and then as

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the season goes on, you reevaluate them. Is it time

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to get off of that investment into another investment or

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>is it time to double down that investment. Let's say,

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have Shoeotani who was a player last

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>year who did this show. We talked about him for MVP.

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>I said, if he pitches and he hits, how is

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>anyone going to deny him? Dan Harris of course called

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>me crazy. Both of those things were true. Cho Hoyotani

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>was MVP and I am crazy. So Dan was right

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>about one thing, wrong about the other. But it's the

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>whole point of being in early, even in small amounts,

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>as small investments, and then as the season progresses, you

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>reevaluate a month in, two months in, and then three

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>four months in and then obviously get the end as

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>well for that final push if there's still money to

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>be made. Now, when we're looking here, we're going to

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>be using our bettingpro site at bettingpros dot com, where

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>if all the consensus odds and all the different houses

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>there like bet, MGM, FanDuel DraftKings are all there. But

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>what's great about this is it gives you the consensus line.

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>They can go out there see the things you like

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and then find the best odds anywhere can get them.

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And also, if you're going to be doing in season wagering,

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I strongly suggest you take a look at our prop

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>bet cheat sheets. So right there under MLB you go

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>under picks, you find the prop bet cheat sheet and

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>every day it's going to have that projection for you

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>with certain players, certain prop bets you can make there.

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.119
<v Speaker 2>And the best location to make those wagers.

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>So if you haven't already, head over to bettingpros dot

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>com because that is the place to be to make

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>all these wagers. And I know New York is legal now,

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of people are getting into this. A

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people from Fantasy World are starting to dip

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>their toes in the water of gambling, and I think

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a fun thing to do. And if you understand

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're a really good fantasy player, there's money to

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>be made.

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's continue to educate the people.

0:03:58.240 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 5>Wels.

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll start with the over unders on the games. So

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>here are some of the win totals for some teams

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that right now really pop to me, and I'm going

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to give you a few of them. The first one

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is the Mariners at eighty three and a half. This

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is a team that won ninety games last year. They

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>just acquired the reigning al Cy Young and Robbie Ray.

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>To me, this is a huge upgrade in that rotation.

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I expect Logan Gilbert to make another step forward. We

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>just got news that Julia Rodriguez is going to open

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the season with the team. That is a huge win

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>here for the Mariners. They acquired Winker Suarez. I think

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>might be done, but still, you know, they went out

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>there and they made adjustments. Do I expect Minch Hannigert

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>at forty bombs again, No, but eighty three and a half.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I expect them to be much better than a five

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>hundred team, especially as the Oakland As continue the jettison

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>players as Sean and I got dealt.

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 2>So the Mariners over.

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>At eighty three and a half for me, the Rays

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>at eighty nine and a half. Welsh, I don't know

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>how many times you have to get beaten over the

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>head with this. The Rays are always going to win

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.359
<v Speaker 1>ninety something games. It's how they manage the one sixty

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>two season. It's the way they do it. They will

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>make an addition to the team at some point in

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>time that makes sense to them and add more offense.

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Likely to me, this is a team once again, every

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>year we sit here with the Rays. Every year it

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>should be an over, because every year it is. The

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>White Sox went from ninety two and a half to

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>ninety one and a half actually overnight when the Lance

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Lynn news broke. He's going to miss some time here.

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>But I still like the over on this one. I

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>still think they're the kings of this division. I think

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>they're going to roll. I think top to bottom it's

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>a great offensive, defensive team, still a great rotation, even

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>if Lynn misses some time. The bullpen's very solid as well.

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>And then it's the Brewers at eighty nine and a half.

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Another thing where I look at the division itself. I

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>really don't see a whole lot of competitors outside the

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Saint Louis Cardinals really giving them any runs for their money.

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>That pitching staff is so good. They've got a pipeline

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of some young pitchers as well. So those are the overs.

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I like the Mariners at eighty nine and a half,

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox at ninety one and a half, the

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Rays at eighty nine and a half, and the Mariners

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>at eighty three and a half. So when you're looking

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>at some of the overs, who kind of pop to you, well,

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>so you thought might be a good early investment.

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 5>Well, I really like the Mariners one. It's interesting.

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 4>You've got a lot of high totals here. You've got

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 4>great teams. High totals can be a little bit scary.

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 5>But I love the Mariners one.

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm such a you know, I'm such a sucker for

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 4>everything that they do. I absolutely love Logan Gilbert. I

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 4>love the step that he's gonna make, Julio Rodriguez. It's

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 4>a whole nother ballgame, you know, for me and my love,

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 4>and I think they've got depth from outfield to infield,

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 4>so I think it's a great team. Eighty three and

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 4>a half. Fantastic love that one. Not to say I

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 4>don't like the other ones' just high totals. I picked

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 4>on two really low total teams that I think actually

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 4>made improvements and I'd be really interested in. Number one

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 4>is the Royals, and the Royals are at seventy one

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 4>and a half, and this team is built to win,

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.239
<v Speaker 4>that's what they are. They got brought in Zach Grank,

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 4>They've got another year in of this really good young rotation.

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 4>They got Brady Singer, They've got Daniel Lynch, they've got

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 4>Chris Boobie, they've got Jackson Kowhar that's kind of sitting

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 4>in the wings.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 5>Brad Keller's in there.

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 4>I think they've got a really solid rotation, They've got

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 4>a decent bullpen, and I think they have a fantastic

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 4>explosive offense with Bobby in there. Seventy one and a

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 4>half that's really really good. That actually might be one

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 4>of my favorites. When all push comes to shove, there's

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 4>a there are the under we're going to talk about

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 4>might be my absolute favorite, but the Royals would be

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 4>one that I would want to hammer.

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 5>At seventy one and a half, and then this.

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 4>Other one's kind of also about team context and improvement.

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 4>It's the Tigers. The Tigers are down here. And and

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 4>by the way, I didn't look at every single one

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 4>of these. These were numbers I saw over on just

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 4>happening to be DraftKings at sixty six and a half,

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 4>So you might have to shop around whatever book you're

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 4>looking at, going to betting Pros and you can see

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 4>all the totals sixty six and a half.

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 5>I like that.

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 4>Hobby Baias comes in, Torklsen is in there again. This

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 4>is kind of you know, mymo here, you've got another

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 4>year improved of these young pitchers with Terrek Skugel, Casey Maiz,

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Matt Manning, and Wardo Rodriguez. They bring in to kind of,

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, boost out that entire rotation. They just got better.

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 4>They just they're not awesome, They're not a great team,

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 4>but they just got better. And at sixty six and

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 4>a half, there's a lot of upsides. So as far

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 4>as like two really you know, I don't know, maybe

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.119
<v Speaker 4>stigma teams of not being good. I think both teams

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 4>made concerted efforts to improve more teams in it, and

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 4>I like both of those as far as over as

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 4>I would take on some team totals.

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Now the Tigers right now, that consensus number is seventy

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half and the Tigers on betting pros,

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's something to take notice of. You can find

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it somewhere else cheaper in terms of a lower number.

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>You could certainly bet that variance. And that's why it's

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>so important. That's why it's so great to have these

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>tools at our fingertips.

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 5>What is the what are they? What are they over there?

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Their seventy seven and a half is the consensus for

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the over under for the Tigers this year for winning.

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 4>Okay, and the consensus well, yeah, like I said, I

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 4>just happened to find sixty six and a half was

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 4>over on draftking. So that's the number that I got now,

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 4>seventy seven and a half. I ain't playing that. I

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 4>ain't playing Homeie, don't play that.

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 2>You play the under on that?

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, way, I'm gonna take out that rather wap. I'm

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 4>not doing that one if it's seventy seven and a half.

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 4>But I found sixty six and a half on DraftKings,

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 4>and I like, I like, E.

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to some of the unders here and for me.

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.079
<v Speaker 1>The first one is gonna be the Orioles at sixty

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. And yes, it's already a low number.

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>But this Orioles team is not very good. I mean

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>after John Means, and even John Means, I'm not sure

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 1>what we're getting out of him from a pitching standpoint.

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>I do think they're gonna sell off some more pieces

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>they continue to rebuild. I think they're gonnat bludgeoned by

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the other teams in this division too. The Blue Jays

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>are great, The Yankees are gonna be the Yankees. The

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox will continue to be a very good offense.

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what happens without sale how they do. But

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, really, I just I look at this East

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's such a monstrous division. I think it's really hard.

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, and that Rays team that already picked the

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>over on. I mean, the Orioles are going to be

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in for a long season. The Nationals I think are

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. I know it's been encouraging to see Patrick

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn pitch a little bit better in this spring. I

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>understand that they've got some young talent potentially to break

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>through still in this team, I know Jan Sota is

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the best player on the planet. But seventy one and

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a half, I still like the under there. I think

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a team that really struggles, and I do

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna jettison more pieces like Nelson Cruz as

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the season goes on, just because they really can't compete

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. They just can't do it. And I don't

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>axce Exprassburg to do anything. That thoracic outlet syndrome thing

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>has really crushed many careers in Major League Baseball with

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>pitchers over the last decade, and I expect to be

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the same with him. So the under on the Nationals

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at seventy one and a half, and then the Giants,

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 1>the Darling last year, the Cinderello eighty five and a half,

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the under here. Their move from Gossman

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to Rodin. You can certainly argue that Rodin had a

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>wonderful season last year. I'm gonna argue he's got track

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 1>record of not pitching games, and I think that's a

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>huge one. Buster Posey's gone. You missed that leadership that

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>was there last year. Evan Longoria already on the shelf

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to open the season. Everything broke right, I think for

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, and I'm not trying to take anything away

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>from them as a team, but Welsh to me, the

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Giants were a great story last year, but I'm not

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>buying them again to repeat it in twenty twenty two,

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>especially with some of those juggernaut teams you've got there,

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>like the Padres pitching staff now and the Dodgers. So

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the under on the eighty five and a half for

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, the under for the Nationals at seventy one

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half, and the under for the Orioles at

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 1>sixty four and a half. Those are my three favorite

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Who are your three favorite unders or two favorite unders

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got here potentially?

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 4>First, Okay, so a couple a couple things real quick.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 4>I have the best and just most perfect sell of

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 4>why you go over to the cheat sheet over on

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 4>betting pros because I'm such a dummy. And when I

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 4>was looking on DraftKings, absolutely was looking at the wrong

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 4>team and the Tigers, and I was like, what is

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 4>going on here? And had I, on that moment just

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 4>been on the sheet, I would have seen that I

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 4>was completely wrong. So getting back to the Tigers one

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 4>and I was one or two off as well because

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 4>I did the same dummy thing with the Royals, but

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 4>the Royals were seventy four and a half, I think,

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 4>and that doesn't change anything for me. I still love

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 4>the Royals ones. Tigers, big dummy hands up, go on

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 4>the cheet sheet on betting pros, that's the way to

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 4>do that.

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 5>One.

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 4>On the Giants one, I don't know, man, I don't

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 4>love that under because as you say, what everything you

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 4>said to the Rays you can just copy and paste

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 4>over to the Giants. They just win by the way

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 4>they made their rotation better. You know, they made that

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 4>rotation better. Alex Cobb, Alex would both really good pieces.

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 4>You've got Deskalafani and I don't know. I think they

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 4>are continuously a sneaky team with a really good bullpen

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 4>and a bad division. Dodgers fantastic Dodgers.

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 5>We'll talk about them later.

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 4>Padres little bit dicey on my two favorite bets here,

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 4>whatever the numbers are, the under on the Diamondbacks and

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 4>the Rockies wins is for me this year the Rockies

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 4>are going to not be great. I don't feel as

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 4>confident maybe with that one, but the Diamondbacks one. Now,

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 4>the Diamondbacks one I think is that sixty six and

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 4>a half. Yeah, the consensus is sixty six and a

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 4>half on the win totals here and the Diamondbacks, even

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 4>though they're going to try to put some of this together,

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 4>it's not a great team. It's a Dodger team that's

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 4>going to be pounding them. It's a Giants team that's

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 4>going to get extra wins. So that eighty five I

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 4>actually like me personally, I'm probably avoiding that one because

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 4>I think they're super sneaky. I think they're super super

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 4>sneaky on this one. But I think the Diamondbacks are

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 4>going to be one of the worst teams in baseball.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 5>Again.

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 4>They continuously show that, and that is why I would

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 4>move off of them and I would go on the under.

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 4>And then, you know, the only other one I want

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 4>to look at real quick, Joe, because I'm gonna give

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 4>you on the fly after Yeah, yeah, well we're gonna

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 4>do this one. Even though this team has been kind

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 4>of similar to the Giants and the Rays over time.

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 4>When you just had the A's trade shamm and Aya

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 4>to the Padres and can continue to decimate that team,

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 4>they blatantly are staring you in the face to take

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 4>an under because they are rebuilding, and I don't think

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 4>they're gonna do it quick because they don't have a

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 4>lot of young pieces that are ready to come up.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 4>Sixty eight and a half, they are a higher win

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 4>total than the Arizona Diamondbacks. I don't think so, Scooter

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 4>eight and a half. I'm gonna take the under. Betting

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 4>consensus bending pros consensus shows minus one twenty two. So

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 4>you're almost getting out of like good juice range. So

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 4>give me the A's, give me the Rockies, and boy,

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 4>give me the Diamondbacks unders.

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love the A's one too. I could not

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>agree more. All right, let's switch gears to a little hardware.

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about MVP will start in the American League.

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Vlad Guerrero right now is sitting at consensus at plus

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>three hundred, same as Shoeotani right around there, plus three fifty.

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Now at BETMGM Blad, Guerrero is plus five hundred. Interesting

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>note there, Mike Trout is at plus three seventy five

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in the consensus line, but at bet MGM you get

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in for plus four to fifty. Right now on FanDuel

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>plus five to fifty. Those are kind of the odds

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on favorites in the American League. So I still am

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of the mind that as long as show hey O

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Tani continues to pitch and hit. If he's gonna throw

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and forty innings this year and he's going

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to hit anything close than we did last year, I

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know how anyone else wins Most Valuable Player. He

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>is literally pitching and hitting at a very high level.

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter what Trout does, It doesn't matter what

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Vladd does. I told you last year Lad could win

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the Triple Crown. I would still vote for Otani if

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I had to vote. And if you're looking right now

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>for the best line in Otani right now, that MGM

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>is the best place at plus three fifty, you can

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>get it because some have it at three hundred, some

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>at three forty.

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 2>But to me, it's still Otani in terms of favorites.

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm going to look a little deeper, Welsh

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna dig, and I'm trying to make a

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>case for somebody plus twenty two hundred on Louis Robert,

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>who I know is a favorite of yours. You're looking

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>for a narrative, right, it's a high profile team, a

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>team that, if everything breaks right, could win ninety five

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to one hundred games, right if Link comes back healthy,

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, they just kind of roll the White Sox.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>We're just scratching the surface of how good Louis Robert

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>can be At plus twenty two hundred, He's my favorite

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of the long shots for American League MVP. How do

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you feel about the favorites and how do you feel

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>about any long shots potentially that you would want to

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>put money on. I've already put money on Otani and Robert.

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Those are my two guys. You have any guys you

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>like in the American League.

0:15:57.480 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 4>I just wanted to add I agree with the Otani stuff.

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 4>If Kings says have him at four hundred, so that

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 4>would actually I don't think it's just curated yet, so

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 4>that would actually be the current best odds. Really like

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 4>that if you.

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 5>Can jump good yeah. Plus.

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean the problem too is with Atani is the

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 4>only thing that takes him away is injury, and that's

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 4>still very There's a big Possibilityory's out there, and that's

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 4>why he's not a minus number like he should be

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 4>a minus number.

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>He's so much far and away a favorite in that

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>sense because he does something that nobody else can do,

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's why it's the injury risk that makes it

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it's still three.

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 4>To one, and that's why it's easy money to throw

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 4>out there, because it's still plus four hundred.

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 5>Now here's the only thing.

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't mean to extend all this conversation, but here's

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 4>the only thing that I do. Wonder is there going

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 4>to you know how they just created like the Otani

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 4>rule out there where Otani can now stay in the

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 4>game as a DH if he comes out. I wonder

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 4>if there's going to be an MVP Otani rule that

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 4>just think about this, If Otani continues to do what

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 4>he does, that MVP will never go to anybody else

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 4>by this logic. I just wonder if there's going to

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 4>be a narrative to writers and voters where they've seen

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 4>him do this, the expectation is there and they're now

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 4>looking for other players to do something otherworldly, even though

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 4>it is the best player. So I only put that

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 4>out there to say monitor that it's the easiest bet

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 4>you could do. You got to go show heyo Tani.

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 4>If I'm going to go deeper two that I like,

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I hate to say it. I like Fyron

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Bucks and at eighteen hundred, he's a little bit face.

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a long shot. Why not.

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 4>He's a little bit higher of a favorite than Robert,

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 4>which actually don't like that. I like Robert a little

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 4>bit better, but at the same odds. And that was

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 4>on just drafting one of the ones I really like,

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 4>and I think it is on bet MGM. They're giving

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 4>you the best odds right now. No, no, no, it's

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 4>actually FanDuel. When I look at the betting Pro's cheat sheet,

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 4>here is Bobaschet at plus three thousand. I love you

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 4>three thousand, Bobaschet, And I think that's a solid bet

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 4>for a five tool, five tool player that's on a

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 4>team that is going to back up wins. And I

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 4>know we always put our focus in the Vladimir ger Junior,

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.959
<v Speaker 4>but Bobashett at plus three thousand, that's pretty solid. So

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 4>I like your Robert Buxton, Bashett. Those would be my

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 4>big long shots. But Otani at four hundred.

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you what you know.

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I always struggle with guys who are on the same

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>team like vlad and Bishett. Uh typically it would be

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Otani and Trout, but because Otani does what he does.

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Unless Trout is gonna start closing down.

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 5>They take away from each other.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's smart, it's really smart.

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Typically they do because how do you how do you

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>disseminate them? You know, it's the same thing I have

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a problem with the Dodgers in the National League, Like,

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, you have Trey Turner, you have Freddie Freeman,

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 1>you have all those guys towards the top of the board,

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>along with Mookie Betts. Right all those guys are towards

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the top of the board of MVP.

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Robert kind of has that as well. Though

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 4>with Eloy Jimenez and jose A Brady, there's.

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Star Frans send it like a Bray is a really

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>good player, Elloy is a We all love Eloya Menez,

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>but I think the public vision of him is still

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>he's a good player who's young, and we'll see. Whereas

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>if Robert has a thirty thirty season, Let's say that's

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna trend upwards and he's gonna be like the new

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>hot look at the superstar guy in the National League.

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>A little bit trickier obviously, because we're talking about it.

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's a tougher road here. Juan Soto's

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on a terrible team, so he is the consensus number

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>one guy at plus three hundred.

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 2>That's a tough sell for Nano Tatistas. Gonna miss too

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 2>much time.

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I hate to be boring Welsh, but I'm right back

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>at Bryce Harper, who is the guy that I picked

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:26.719
<v Speaker 1>last year. You can get him at ten to one

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>on bet MGM. Right now, the consensus line is plus

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>six fifty. I would run to bet MGM for that

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>one at that ten to one because to me, even

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>though he had a Cassieanilson Schwarber, they're still more visioned

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>as ancillary pieces, whereas Harper is the star. He's the

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>guy that carried him. And we all know these awards

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes go in clusters. You get guys winning back to

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>back or two out of three, whether it be Cy

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Young or MVP. So I think the Harper narrative is

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>still very strong, and he's viewed as the guy and

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the leader, and I think he would be my one

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and only wager in the National League that I would

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>want to make. But how about you, Do you like Harper?

0:19:58.359 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you like somebody else potentially for this?

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 4>So I love the Harper one, and you know the

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 4>smart bet to do on these and I think you've

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of alluded to it on all this type of

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 4>stuff in Team Futures.

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 5>It's set a.

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Couple, you know, increase your odds. You know, you don't

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 4>have to go crazy units. But it's like if you're like, hey,

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 4>I want to spend one hundred bucks on all these guys,

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, on different stuff, and it's like, get into

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 4>MVP Awards and maybe you know, pick two or three

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 4>and odds on in at the end, if you're betting,

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 4>you're going to make money, you know, especially if you

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 4>don't go nuts with it. So I love the Harper one.

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 4>But here is a side one that I'm gonna throw

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 4>out to you. And on FANDO you're getting plus nine hundred.

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 4>The only thing I don't like about this is you

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 4>get better odds in other places on Bryce Harper. But

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna throw out Ronald acunya. So Ronald d'acunya, he's

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 4>gonna start dhing and April's gonna miss up to two weeks,

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 4>that's all we're looking at. Then he's gonna start dhing

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 4>and then hit the field. This is a fantastic Braves

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 4>team that is going to be playoff bound, that's going

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 4>to win divisionally, is going to be up there. And

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 4>Ronald d'acunya fighting through that's gonna be a narrative, fighting

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 4>through dhing while he was hurt coming back from injury.

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 4>And if he puts up I mean, projections are wild

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 4>on Acunya right now.

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 5>If he puts up the numbers.

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 4>Yes there's stars there, but it stars in the same

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 4>respect that Robert has stars. Akunya is the guy.

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 5>If he puts up.

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 4>A thirty five to twenty five season while missing a

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 4>little bit of time and bringing them up to one

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 4>of the best teams in baseball, he's going.

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 5>To be in that conversation.

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 4>It's crazy that we're not picking a Dodger here, but

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 4>they all kind of eat into each other.

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 5>I suppose they do.

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Chris, I think I'll go with the Coula.

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just it's hard to how do you

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>peel off Turner from Bets from Freeman, Like, I don't know,

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, unless two guys get hurt and one guy

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>carries them, and that's that's a lot to ask.

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 2>It's that young different store here.

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>You got Garrett Cole, of course, you know the Yankee

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the board American League of plus

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>four twenty five. In the America League, you also got

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber plus seven fifty on the consensus line. You

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>got Robbie Ray to repeat over at plus eight hundred.

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>So those are kind of the favorites. I still go

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to Lucas Giolito at ten to one. I like those

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>odds there, But for me, the really fun one is

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>going down to Justin Verlander, who the consensus is plus

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>sixteen hundred. But at bet MGM, you can get this

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>at twenty to one. If fan do, we can get

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it to twenty to one. Verlander, if he gets back

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to that forum where he's striking out two hundred and

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>ninety guys, three hundred guys and he's got a two

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>ERA and a one point zero something whip, Justin Verlander

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>could easily get back.

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 2>And he's a great narrative story.

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 1>He's, you know, the crown Jewel if you will, on

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a Hall of Fame career coming back from Tommy John

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Because you know, Garret Cole did struggle sometimes, Shane Bieber

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>did struggle. Both had the sticky stuff issues, right we've

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>got Verlander coming back here. To me, he's the most

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>exciting long shot. Glito is the one I like who's

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more in between. But to me, Verlander especially,

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we can get him at twenty to one in some places.

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 2>That's the dude.

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to put money on Early and I have,

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and I've a post will put money on Gilito. So

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>anybody I'm talking about today, I've made investments and then

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 1>same thing from like ten dollars to one hundred dollars.

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Just to be transparent, because I don't try to advise

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>anything that I'm not in because I think that's called

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>bad advice. Now, when you're looking at this market, anything

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>pop out to you in the American lead, Well.

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 4>I love the Lucasgilido. One that would be I have

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 4>not made all of my futures bets.

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 5>That will be.

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 4>One that I make on Lucasgilito. I was around him

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 4>multiple times in White Sox camp. He looks as jacked

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 4>as he's ever done before. Also, you know, this is

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 4>a weird, dumb thing, but like it really seemed like

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 4>arbitration was like a.

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 5>Weight on him.

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 4>I saw him the day he signed his arbitration and

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 4>he seemed like the monkey was off his back. He

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 4>seems so much more relaxed. The team's gonna be more

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 4>reliant on him as well. Lid lance Lynn going down

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 4>that that's probably my absolute favorite. I mean, you know,

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 4>both of the great ones. Verlander two, it's the sneakiest

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 4>one out there, and getting you know, plus two thousand

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 4>is such a good bet as far as Ale the

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 4>only other one. But I never make bets on like repeats,

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 4>especially for a guy that popped like this. But you know,

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 4>Robbie Ray going to Seattle. It's kind of interesting, but

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm probably not doing it. Odds are all right, bet

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 4>MGM has given you twelve to one, but you know,

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, Like I think he will be important

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 4>and he will be in the race. This would be

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 4>one where it's like finishing, you know, could I get

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 4>a bet on finishing top three in the cy Young

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 4>I would like that.

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 5>But Jillie in some places, yeah you can. Jilli Verlander,

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 5>I think are the ones.

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 2>In the National League.

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I got Corbyn Burns a plus six hundred is the

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 1>favorite consensus wise, and then Sure's are a plus six fifty.

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>These odds have changed significantly over the last forty eight

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 1>hours after the Jacob deGrom news because Dagram was up

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>there as well. That has now changed a lot. You've

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>got Woodroff at plus eight hundred. I keep landing on

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Walker Buehler, who I think really has a shot to

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>win twenty games, which is a feat we don't see

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>very often. Bullpen's really good, the offense is really good.

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>The division at the bottom part is a little weak.

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Walker Buler plus seven fifty. You can get him a

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>plus nine hundred on MGM. To me, Walker Buehler's where

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>I want to make my investment in the National League.

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't love a ton of the other guys outside

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of him. You know, Burns and Sures are always good

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>investments if you want to invest in them, that's fine.

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Max Free to plus eleven hundred. Maybe, just maybe he

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>takes another step forward, but I don't know in the

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 1>National League. To me, I'm just trying to keep it

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>simple and to me, it's Walker Buehler's race to lose

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>this year. I think this is his quote unquote Cy

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Young season after contending and being in that conversation last year,

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about national leagues?

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 5>I know it would have been to Grom, would have

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 5>been to Grom for me.

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's a problem, I mean de Grom at this point,

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what kind of it's.

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 4>Just no, no, I mean you're not now, You're not now

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 4>Suzier plus seven hundred, you know where you say Buehler.

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 4>I like Schurzer, and the odds are not that far off,

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 4>even though it's a little bit of banged upness. I

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 4>like the Schurzer one probably my favorite. But you mentioned

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 4>the other guy, like and you can get a twenty

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 4>five to one on fan duel right now? Is Max

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 4>Freid just same repeat he stuff, Go back to the brain,

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 4>go back to the braves.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 5>See him pick up a bunch of wins.

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, if he jumps into fifteen sixteen wins on

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 4>one of the best teams in the NL and he

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 4>is the lynch pin to it that. I think he

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 4>is a really good long shot guy for that award

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 4>because there's not a lot of arms, and there's a

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 4>lot of injuries that are surrounding that area. There's probably

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 4>someone we're not even talking about or thinking about. But

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Max and Freed would be my both.

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 5>Maxes, I'll see.

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Yep, those would be my my money one and my

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 4>long shot one.

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's move over to Rookie of the Year.

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>This is exciting because this is one you might want

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to jump on as soon as you listen to the

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 1>podcast before it changes. So Bobby Wood Junior in the

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>American League at plus two eighties and the consensus, then

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you got torcos In a plus five hundred, Julio Rodriguez

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a plus five fifty. We we just found out before

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>recording is going to break with the team and be

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>there opening day. Normally, when it comes to Rookie of

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the Year, I waited out a little bit. I've already

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>put money on Bobby Witt. I've already put money on Julio.

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I put bigger money on Julio because it's a bigger

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>payoff potentially, because I think there's that there's that path

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for him.

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 2>But I still think Bobby Wit deserves to be the favorite.

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.199
<v Speaker 1>I think he is going to actually be the favorite

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>who wins, which is also something that doesn't happen very often.

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>A couple of years ago, I remember having arguments with

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>people about Gavin Lux was basically a two to one

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>favorite for Rookie of the Year. I said, guys, he's

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>missed all this development time in twenty twenty, all the

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>crazy covid uff I don't even know. I think we

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>might invest in a pitcher or something like that. It

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>might be easier to invest in this guy. We're all

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>giving him the award spoiler alert, he didn't win. And

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>now I think Bobby Witt is that guy that might

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to buck that trend where the favorite is

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the favorite for reason, and he might be the wire

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to wire favorite too. But Julio could get in that

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>conversation that you've got some other guys in the American

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>League too, you think you can compete.

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, yeah, you got Spencer Torkolsen in there.

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 4>That's gonna be from day one, you know, and hitting

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 4>it a pretty prominent piece of the lineup. Adley is

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 4>going to be up there at some point. Adley's impossible though,

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 4>because he's not day one and the Orioles are going

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 4>to be atrocious. You could throw O'Neill crew that's NL.

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 4>There was one other No I got all n l.

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Other guys is probably out there too, but he is

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>very starting to eat. I don't like Yeah, Jeremy Panya,

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Riley Green's hurt already it's to me, it's a favorite

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of race in the AL.

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 4>In the AL there it is the three guys. Bobby

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 4>Witt is the only one I would feel putting hard

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 4>cash on, like really good cash. And the best odds

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 4>are currently DraftKings at three ten plus three ten bet

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 4>and GM has got three hundred, which is pretty decent.

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 4>That would be my hard odds. If I want, and

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 4>I do, by the way, to have a fun bet,

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 4>I gotta go Julio Rodriguez as well, because Julio is

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 4>electric and this team. You know, when you look at

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 4>these teams as well, here look at the top three

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 4>rookie guys, Torque Tigers, Wit Royals, Julio Mariners. What's the

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 4>difference between these teams? The Mariners are hands down the

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 4>best team here, and that is something that is going

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 4>to carry a little bit of weight as far as

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 4>like statistically if these guys are close. But Julio Rodriguez

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 4>at plus six hundred on DraftKings right now, right now,

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 4>as this has been announced, this all could change. Like

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 4>you said before, I like Julio as a long bet.

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 4>I really like Bobby Witt, and if I wanted to

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 4>just feel comfortable getting a win. You could go torque,

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 4>but then I feel like you're really eating into your

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 4>potential money. I would go high bet like this would

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 4>of all the stuff we've done, I wouldn't be like

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 4>big unit betting. This would be a big unit bet

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 4>for me on Bobby Witt. And then I would go smaller,

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, maybe cut it in half since it's plus

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 4>six hundred on Julio Rodriguez and.

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 5>You know, cash it at the end of the year.

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 4>This is the best one, that's the most that's my favorite.

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 5>One is the Rookie of the Year one. But no

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 5>surprise for me.

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh absolutely.

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, Julio, I think you make a

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>great point there, which is Seattle's probably gonna be the

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>most you know, public team that's going to get a

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention potentially, and Rodriguez will go along with that.

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good situation a wager on. And the

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>National League it's a little murkier. Seya Suzuki is at

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>plus three fifty. I'm not running there Anyo. Cruz plus

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>four hundred. He's starting the year in the minor leagues.

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>This might be the time to bet on him if

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to get in while he's learning to play

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the outfit a little bit in Triple A. In the

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>National League not clearer. You've got names like Kybert Ruiz,

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Joey Part. I hate betting on catches. To me, the

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>only guy that I've bet on so far for the

0:29:57.480 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>National League is Hunter Green at plus eight hundred. I

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like the I know he's a pitcher. Sometimes that could

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>be a dicey thing, but he is starting in that rotation.

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the pitches well, he'll probably leave him in

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>there the entire season. Maybe he'll max out at one

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty innings potentially this year, somewhere around there.

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be enough to get it done

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the National League because it's not a great crop unless

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody really pops out of nowhere. So Hunter Green's my

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>guy in the NL. Welsh, do you have a guy

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in the National League so young race.

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 4>I do want to say, I think Suzuki is the

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 4>safe bet to play. I don't see an issue making

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 4>that bet, even though he's not as fun or anything

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 4>like that. I just don't see the issue making it.

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 4>You get plus three to eighty over on DraftKings right now.

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 5>Here's I got?

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Oh, by the way, on the hundred green one. Actually

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 4>like Nicolodolo a little bit better. I think he's a

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 4>better pitcher and he's going to be fifth in the

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 4>rotation and a rookie. But the deeper guy that I

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 4>would try to make a bet on. You want to

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 4>talk about guys coming out of nowhere. We still haven't

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 4>heard if he is going to break, but it might

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 4>be soon. But Bryson Stott, Bryson Stott with the Phillies,

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 4>they've talked about him being a guy that was going

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 4>to break camp as the basement. He's a shortstop, he is,

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 4>he's super patient, he walks, he doesn't strike out, he

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 4>can jump into homers and this is another high team win.

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 4>And he's plus one thousand, you know, ten times on

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 4>on DraftKings right now if you wanted to jump on that.

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 5>So I like Stuck.

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 4>That's a much more wide open race. So I might

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 4>take some chances, some liberties with the Rookie of the

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Year award because I don't think it's locked in your

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Owneil Cruiz one is a good one, but I would

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 4>probably go Suzuki and then I would throw a big

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 4>futures on Stott.

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's switch Gears Welsh to the division winners.

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Most of the favorites are minus money, so you're not

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a whole lot of juice there. But what

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to do is look for ones that have

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>potential to me the ones that stick out right away.

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>If things do break out for the Yankees and they

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe acquire another pitcher, plus two to fifty, that's something

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you could bet on, but it's the Yankees, so you're

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>always gonna have that premium. However, the consensus is plus

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>two to fifty. The Padres plus three twenty five. That's

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>an interesting one because with this pitching staff, if they

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>all are right, and we're talking Darvish, Manaia, Smell, Clevenger,

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>potentially Musgrove was great last year, that's a formidable rotation.

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>If they stay healthy and Tatis comes back and is

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Tatis and they just tread water offensively for the first

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>few months, Padres at plus three twenty five are not impossible.

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Neither of the Angels of plus three fifty.

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>If they get some pitching with Otani, with Cindergaard, with Sandoval,

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>those guys are certainly in it as well. And maybe

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you can make a case for the Phillies with de

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Gramou two plus four to fifty. If you want to

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>get a little funky there, if you think that the

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Braves aren't as good as they were last year, or

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>without Freddy Freeman, or however you want to see that.

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>But the Angels at plus three fifty, the Padres a

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>plus three twenty five, the Yankees at plus two to fifty.

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Those are the few division teams winners potentially in terms

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of numbers I think you can get behind. Others are

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>all you know, Dodgers are minus two hundred. That ship

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is sailed already, So anything else stick out to you

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to division winners.

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, no, I think you nailed them.

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if you wanted to get I could see

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Marinders fans, you can always throw out a plus four

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 4>to fifty if crazy, you know, I mean, if you

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 4>wanted to get crazy. This is not the place where

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking to get crazy. And you're gonna just have

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 4>to bite, you know, some of that juice. But just

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, take your money home and maybe make some

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 4>bigger bets, especially on the big dogs if you're comfortable.

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, Astro's one sixty two. But now I think

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 4>you nail the most.

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 4>The other thing you can get tricky with is just

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 4>like a really good division with a couple of teams

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 4>that are vuying for that same spot.

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 4>So if you're looking at like the Mets and Braves

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 4>and you just go, well, you know, the Mets at

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 4>one seventy five, with everything that they've done, I'm going

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 4>to take that bet. As Dagrom comes back and they're

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 4>gonna be able to win this division, bam, you're getting

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 4>some plus money on that.

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:30.719
<v Speaker 5>But now you nailed it.

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>If you want to bet the Dodgers for anything, you

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>bet them to win the National League at plus two

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to twenty five. Right now, the Astros are up at

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the top at plus four fifty, the J's at plus

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>four seventy five in the American League, the Braves to

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>repeat to go to the World's Series again plus five hundred.

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with the White Sox. Who I'm I'm in

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that White Sox world. Still, I'm still buying the White Sox,

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 1>White Sox and Dodgers right now. Feel right to me.

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>That's where I'd be putting my money. But for you Welsh,

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>who do you want to win those American League and

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>National leg where would you be putting your money. I mean,

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's on a team like Milwaukee too. That pitching

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is spectacular. They are plus seven hundred. That would be

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a fun one, and you can write that narrative because

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in a short series that pitching could be absolutely electric,

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>especially if Yellish bounces back and becomes the player he

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>was a couple of years ago.

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean I would throw out the Padres.

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 5>Is all crazy?

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 4>It is, because I just want to point this out.

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 4>The Padres have an insane rotation of depth with guys

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 4>like Darvish and Snell, and obviously there's question marks that

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 4>are always going. But you put them in a small

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.280
<v Speaker 4>series against anyone, and they could throw out Joe muskro

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 4>of you, Darvish and Blake Snell. Then the next series

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 4>they could throw out Clevenger and Sean Manaya. Plus they're

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 4>going to get Fernando Tatis Junior back. That actually might

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 4>be one of my favorites at plus eight point fifty

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.320
<v Speaker 4>as far as NL goes al, I kind of like

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 4>the Blue Jays at four to seventy five. I think

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 4>that's a fun one. I might throw in the Yankees

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 4>as well as plus five to fifty. I'm probably this

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 4>is another spot I wouldn't be getting too crazy. The

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Padres are as crazy as I'm gonna get at plus

0:34:56.920 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 4>eight fifty.

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Padres a good one. Brewers, I think are a

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:01.439
<v Speaker 2>good one too.

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the World Series winner Dodgers, obviously the

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>favorites of four to seventy five. On the plus side,

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:08.879
<v Speaker 1>you've got plus eight seventy five for the Blue Jays,

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>which I understand, the Astros at ten to one, the

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Yankees are eleven to one. Same with the Braves and

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>White Sox. I'm still going with the White Sox. I

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 1>believe in the White Sox this year. I think it's

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:22.240
<v Speaker 1>their turn to kind of learn. And you know, these Dodgers,

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.840
<v Speaker 1>as great as they are, you know what if Kershaw

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>falters again and gets.

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Hurt, what's the back of that rotation? Like, I don't know.

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>In a short series, they worry me a little bit more.

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that when I'm looking, I'm trying to

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:35.720
<v Speaker 1>look for those teams that might be that short series pitching.

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 1>The White Sox can throw g Lito, lind Cease and

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Copak at you.

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot.

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>That is a lot, so for me That's where I'm

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>going at plus eleven hundred. That's my favorite wager on

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the board. Do you have a favorite that you like

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:48.479
<v Speaker 1>in terms of where you might put your money early

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>for World Series.

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 4>Welsh, I think I'm sticking with I mean, like, I

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 4>just want to point out, like the Dodgers I think

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 4>are just synonymous with this and you just kind of

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 4>go with them unanimously. I'm putting any bet on them

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 4>because I think they're ridiculou But look at those Blue

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Jays at eight seventy five. They've continuously been aggressive in

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:09.479
<v Speaker 4>the market. They replaced Robbie Ray with Kevin Gossman, which

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 4>I really like that move. You've got Barrios in there.

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Plus they're still trying to be aggressive. There's still rumors

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:17.840
<v Speaker 4>out there of Jose Ramirez. What happens if they go

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 4>out and acquire Jose Ramirez at the trade deadline, if

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 4>no extension with him is done and they've got the

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 4>assets to do it. They seem hyper, hyper aggressive. They've

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 4>got some bullpen, they've got a good rotation, and they've

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 4>got a fantastic offense of stars that are out there

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 4>that almost you know, nine to one.

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 5>I like the Blue Jays.

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, there you have it, everybody, make sure you

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.399
<v Speaker 1>head over to Bettingpros dot com so you can take

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a look at all these consensus lines and every day

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that prop bet cheat sheet will be out there for you.

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 2>And we'll be talking about it on Leading Off as well.

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>That's on our MLB side of our content on Fantasy

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Pros again, that's the Fantasy Pros MLB channel, but we

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:56.320
<v Speaker 1>encourage you all to subscribe to our Betting Pros channel

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube as well, YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>so you can always get the latest in terms of

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>all the pods and all the information and short videos

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and live streams we do here in the way Dream

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Market and Baseball is gonna be a great way Dream

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Market this year.

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:11.479
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be wide open. It's gonna be super fun.

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 2>I can't wait to do it and hope you guys

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 2>are excited about it as well. That'll do it for us,

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 2>But the story of the game goes on for the Welsh.

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joey p. We'll see you next time. Kids,