WEBVTT - Is Yu Darvish Back? Carrasco Injury Update | Fantasy BFFs, Ep. 440 0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640 Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you 0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160 want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, 0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080 download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy 0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760 Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also, 0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360 if you want to watch the video of this podcast, 0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000 check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope 0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840 and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll 0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200 find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. 0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:41.680 You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Listen Do 0:00:43.680 --> 0:01:11.160 Do Yeah. Now welcome up, bab, your fy Bay from 0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:22.959 that Spin, your Fine Dive from Sat Francis Frantic stand 0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:31.040 all ladies and job in your pfs. And with that 0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.640 and we welcome you inside Studio thirty four. This is 0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.919 the BFFs alongside Frank Stafell. I am Greg Suspen Frank. 0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.600 What's going on about? Happy Thursday? The week it's almost over? 0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:43.680 It feels like this week's going pretty fast. Agreed, having 0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.800 a good time. I honestly felt like this week it 0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:48.560 was almost like last week. We had Monday off because 0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:50.360 it's been going so fast. They didn't feel like we 0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.160 worked a whole four days this week. I couldn't I 0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.880 couldn't agree more. It's flying by. It's fine. Let every 0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.560 week fly by like this, perfectly fine with this, swim away, 0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:01.280 that's good, pertly fine with that. How are you doing? 0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.480 But how did you sleep last night? I slept. I 0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.360 slept really well. You know, I had to back up 0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.720 early this morning, that didn't do some stuff before the programming. Um, 0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.880 but I slept really well. I don't believe I woke 0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:13.160 up in the middle of the night and at all 0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:15.799 until the alarm went off this morning. But it was 0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:17.679 good for you know what. You know what it was. 0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.160 I went on the scale this morning and I liked 0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.400 the number that I saw. So after that, I listened to, 0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.680 like listening to like a Live the Killers live all 0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:28.720 the yesterday and today. I was in a great mood 0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.880 coming to work today. Is Live the Killers a live 0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.280 album that's something that just came out recently. No, it 0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.480 came out like ten years ago. But the reason I 0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.040 decided to listen to it, I mean, big fan of 0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:41.919 the Killers, put me in a great mood, like it 0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.520 was awesome. So I'm pretty good mood. Do well, it's 0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:47.480 good to hear great, Yeah, man, how are you I? 0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:51.480 I'm doing it right now? And sorry, And tonight Judy 0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:53.960 is going at dinner with their friends and I make 0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:58.120 a pass for myself, pad to himself. I feel awesome 0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.959 tonight he's got the penthouse open. Who wants to chill? 0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.160 Who wants to chill? Let's go man, So a bunch 0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:09.040 of baseball tonight for you? Great? Like baking championship a bachelorette? 0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:15.560 Can I watch the Yankees? Yes? All right, solid, Bud? Well, 0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.079 what's going on? What's going on? Everything? I slept well, 0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.919 it was it was a little intoxicated. I I went 0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.960 to a graduation dinner last night and at an Italian restaurant, 0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:29.280 the Treats he is of Williamsburg. Um. We didn't order 0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.440 any beer. We had a bunch of pictures of sangria. 0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.560 So I had to settle for that. Not really, I 0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:38.400 don't like any wine really, but you know what, you 0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:40.520 have to live with the hand that you were dealt, Greg, 0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:42.840 and that's what I was doing. So I slept very 0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.160 well after that. Also, this conversation came up about like 0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.600 musical genres that we hate, and I realized it was 0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:54.720 like everything that you love so opposite track, Greg. I 0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.200 think it's and that's where we're at right now. I 0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.080 think it's what it's been. Talking point was Dave Matthews 0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.240 band I said, I kid you not. My co host 0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.920 has seen them live over thirty times. I hate them, 0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:09.520 Greg loves them. Yeah, alright, well coo enough shin. It's funny. 0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:14.120 So this year they're playing in Camden Father's Day weekend? 0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.719 Uh does Robbie sufsman like he likes? Doesn't love? Rob's 0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.200 actually away? More respect now earned for Rob. He's away, 0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.840 He's not around Father's Day weekend this year. Well, my 0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.440 problem is it's not problems. I'm willing to Judy's your 0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.960 Father's Day weekend, which is fine, but I'd like to 0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.520 go to Camden to see the show. And Canda's actually 0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.880 closer to Philly where she lives. So I was like Judy, like, 0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.800 what if we went out to your family Friday night, 0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.880 I'll borrow the cars, drive to the concert on Saturday, 0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:46.640 and then just drive home to drive back to your 0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.160 how Saturday night with your home Father's Day Sunday. All good? 0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:51.960 What do you think? Did you drive yourself? And I 0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.560 have no interesting I have no interest in going. Yeah, 0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.520 more respect for Jude now too, Let's go. And she's 0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.600 just here for the Dave Matthews and hate. You know, 0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.160 she went with me to the Garden last year and 0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.039 like that was fine. She doesn't need basically, she doesn't 0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:07.840 need to go and spend money another concert where I'm 0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:09.840 just like, oh, this sucks, this sucks, just chocks that 0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.240 songs good? Oh it sucks. She's like, don hearing me 0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.480 and do that. That's what's going on? Is that? Is 0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:19.000 that the reaction of Greg at Dave Matthews band. I'd 0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.240 say so, yeah, I'd say she's not wrong. You don't 0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.840 love everything that they do. Know. So is it like 0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.360 a wrestling relationship that you have, Yes, exactly, yeah, like 0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.520 you basically hate most of it? Right, So why do 0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:37.000 you go? I don't know. I can't talk to you 0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:38.719 out of it, Greg, whatever, whatever you want to do, bro, 0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:40.600 what it makes me happy? Right? You know? What makes 0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:42.680 me sound like it makes you happy? Does make it 0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.440 makes me happy. It makes me happy to be a 0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.960 miserable fan. That's what a true fan is. I think 0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:50.520 Greg really have an hour to talk baseball nowadays, So 0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.479 jump in. You want to get right to you said 0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:59.680 that last night? You said last night that or this morning? 0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:01.640 One thing you really wanted to talk about from from 0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:03.720 last night? Was you Darvish, I want to get you 0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.320 the opportunity. Did you do just that? Because I wanted 0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.640 to start with the Cubs in particular, Craig Kimberal. Craig 0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.880 Kimberill signed with the Cubs last night a three year, 0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.600 forty five million dollars of the guaranteed. He does have 0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.719 an option to make that even larger um in year four. 0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.400 But Kimbrall's going to the Cubs, which means Pedro Strope, 0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.800 Steve c Sheck, Brandon Morrow, They're all useless to you. Now, 0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.240 Kimball could be ready to rock. I read as soon 0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:28.840 as two weeks from today June, he could be ready 0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:33.080 to go. Um inside that bull been doing twenty two weeks, 0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.680 and that's for a reliever. So I think the questions 0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:37.400 that you brought up the other day about Dallas Kikol 0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.840 are really valid because if that's for a reliever, it 0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:41.480 takes him two weeks to get ready. I mean, how 0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:43.240 long is it gonna take Dallas Kaiko to get ready 0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.440 once he signs with the team. Greg, I did want 0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.680 to pose this question to you, and I put it 0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.920 up as a poll today. I'm a Fantasy VFF Twitter. 0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.160 Where where would you rank Craig Kimberell rest of season 0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.120 in terms of closer rankings? Is he, you know, the 0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.440 normal elite Craig Kimberal's the top five ouption. Is he 0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.720 a a closer one and RP one? Is he like 0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.120 a more of like a top twelve guy or is 0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.880 he outside the top twelve? Where would you rank him 0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.080 right now? He's a really good question. Letally seem like 0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:12.960 a figure out twelve names. I like more how's that? 0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.600 Let's start there and it does help you too. I 0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.360 have the same leaders up right now, but doesn't matter, Like, 0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.200 like I know we're trying to do top twelve, but 0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:21.720 like why does it matter if he's in the top 0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.880 twelve where he's not? I think some people who might 0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.160 have held onto him all year might just want to 0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.320 know what our thoughts are on him moving forward, like 0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.400 rest of season? You know, how do you feel about 0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.600 Craig Kimberall or if someone's trying to like buy low 0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:36.360 on him right now or make a trade because he's 0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.320 gonna go to the Cubs and they're obviously gonna have 0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.040 the opportunity to win a lot of games. And where 0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:41.679 does he kind of fit into the mix for everything? 0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:43.440 I think people might be trying to wonder if I 0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:45.160 want to go out there and acquire him, or if 0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.440 I've held onto him. What can I expect from Craig 0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.200 kimberll rest of seas. So we're just a little bit 0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.960 nervous in regards that Kimberroll. Just see what Greg Holland 0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.800 did when he came back was last year where where 0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.440 he signed out, he got released by the Cubs or 0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.760 at least by the Cardinals rather or traded mane with 0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.160 years he was awful and he only missed April, so 0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:07.040 or miss sorry spring training, miss March. I'm a little 0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.960 bit nervous about Kimberle. So to answer your question, I 0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:11.880 will name the relievers I have ahead of him. You 0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.280 could let me know if you disagree, Ready, hers, I 0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:21.440 agree or all this? Chapman, Kenley, Jansen, yep, Roberto Osuna, 0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:36.400 Felippe Vasquez, sure, Brad Hand yes, Josh Heater, Yes, it 0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:41.440 was at six or seven, at seven? Edwin Diaz eight 0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:46.280 like train in nine, Well tryin it has not been 0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:51.600 as good to No. Twelve said it's not really his fault. Yes, 0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:57.280 that's true. That's probably about it makes sense anybody else 0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.920 for you? No, I mean, look, as much as we 0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.360 love the main green saving machine, he's got one point 0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:03.719 zero eight e r A. I don't know that we 0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:05.640 expect that to last the rest of the season. He's 0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.640 got nineteen saves. He's been awesome, but I would probably 0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.600 rank him just behind Kimbera and then everyone else that's 0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.160 in this mix. You know, Will Smith has thirteen savee 0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:20.520 so the Giants, he's been awesome, but you traded at 0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.440 some point, like maybe you put dool little ahead of him. 0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:24.679 That might be the only other name man. Yeah, he 0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:26.840 got thirteen saves, he's got four wins on the season, 0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:28.880 he's got three point zero four either A. What about 0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:30.680 it's another name of kind of mind? What about Ken Giles? 0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:33.319 I mean, you know, I'm not a Ken Jahs guy. 0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.320 He's been he's been awesome. He's got eleven saves, got 0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.440 a fifteen k per nine. It seems like he's finally 0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.319 figuring it out. Maybe what he needed was to not 0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.000 be pitching for a contender. Maybe maybe he just didn't 0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.679 you couldn't deal with that type of pressure. But he's 0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:50.559 been awesome. I think he's probably right in that mix. 0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.840 He's right around there. He's like a low end top 0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.480 twelve option. I think he's right there. Yeah, I would 0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.520 say like him and Doolittle are like right in that mix, 0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.840 like if you're if you're running up top twelve right 0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.959 so named nine and probably like kimber Will Doolittle, Ken 0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.880 Giles like eleven twelve rounding out the top twelve. Who 0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.880 who was the name that you just said, Jackson, Luke Jackson. No, 0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:15.360 he's he's like probably high end to like middling RP 0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:20.320 two closer to in that in that territory. But yeah, 0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.240 I guess I agree with that. I agree with that. 0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.079 So there you go, Craig kimberll more of like a 0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.280 top ten, you know, back end closer one rest of season. 0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.760 Let's see what the guy's got. But obviously he's been 0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:34.200 awesome for a long time now. And the Cubs are 0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.040 a good team this year. They're thirty one and twenty 0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.480 six their game and a half out of first place 0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.160 in the NL Central. Is this the best spot that 0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.960 he could have landed in. It's one of them. It's 0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:48.880 probably a little bit better than Atlanta. I think the 0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.079 Cubs right now are are a little bit, you know, 0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:52.920 right on par with Atlanta, maybe a little bit better. 0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.280 You're expecting to win more games or or have more 0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:59.720 close games, but better than Minnesota. I mean, Minnesota has 0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:01.319 forty wins on the season. That might have been the 0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.199 optimal spot. He might have had his most save opportunities there, 0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.280 but lands in a really good spot with the Cubs. 0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:08.800 And you you mentioned you, Darvish, you didn't have a 0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.280 phenomenal start yesterday. The wheels kind of fell off here 0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.400 for him, but live in the third Endings pitched three hits, 0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.440 three walks, two earned runs, five strikeouts against a really 0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.040 good Colorado Rocky's lineup. And I tweeted this out before 0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:22.679 the show. If you're into like lying grass and like 0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.640 really nerdy things, it's his cutter usage. His cutter usage 0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.959 has changed completely from earlier on in the season. His 0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.000 first eight starts, the cutter usage eighteen point one percent 0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.160 a five point four zero e r A during that time. 0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.760 Greg His walks per nine first eight starts of the 0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:42.560 season for you, Darvish, eight point one zero. That makes 0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:48.200 Robbie Ray look like Kyle Hendrix. Seriously. Eight point one 0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.480 zero walks per nine. His next five starts the cutter 0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.880 usage up to thirty nine percent. That's up over twenty 0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:59.199 percentage points. Cutter usage for you, Darvish, four point to 0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.800 five e r A still not where you want him 0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.280 to be, but at three point five one x fit. 0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.520 And he had thirty four strikeouts in twenty nine and 0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.320 two thirds and he's pitched eleven walks during that time 0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.839 three point three four walks per nine. That's closer to 0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:17.000 the picture we were expecting you, Darvish to be swinging. 0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.080 Strike grade is up during that time. The first pitch 0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:23.040 strike percentage up tremendously from fifty two point six percent 0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.760 in those first eight starts to sixty three percent, so 0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.760 up ten percentage points on the first pitch strike percentage, 0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:32.080 throwing more strikes, establishing the strike zone early on, getting 0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.679 more swings, and mrs getting people to chase more. And 0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:35.800 I think a lot of that has to do with 0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.360 the cutter usage. Greg he threw the cutter fifty two 0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.800 times last night. That is too shy of his career high, 0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.040 which I went all the way back to his rookie season. 0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.400 He was he was throwing, he had a stretch where 0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.280 he threw it a lot like this, over fifty times 0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.560 per game, throwing his cutter. So if you held on too, you, Darvish, Greg, 0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.360 I think it's coming. I think it's coming. So the 0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.040 one thing that I'll say next week to start a 0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:05.520 week at Colorado at Los Angeles Dodgers doesn't get much 0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:07.640 harder than that. But it seems like it's coming around 0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.040 for you, darbish, You Darvish finally making some changes for 0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.000 the good. It looks like he'll be the right and 0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.000 you're gonna want him for that to start week if 0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:22.240 you are feeling risky the Dodgers, and of course against 0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.679 the Rockies, both in Colorado and in Los Angeles. All right. 0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.400 Also last night, I'm gonna get get to the Yankees 0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.000 and get to James Paxton, who came up from d 0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.880 L last week or I l rather made a second 0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.920 start back in Toronto here he's home country, and it 0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:37.760 wasn't very good. He didn't get through five minute he 0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:39.520 was here. He threw no hitter, I believe that's correct. 0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:41.840 Four hits, four runs allowed, only three of them earn. 0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:43.600 The Yankees defense let him down a lot last night, 0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.360 three walks uh four striker as Yankee bullpen was bad, 0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:50.760 specifically John and Holder Louis Sessa and Zach Brittain. Admittedly 0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.280 I didn't get to catch this game, Greg was was 0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.840 was it then Frasier who let him down? Specifically susion 0:13:57.960 --> 0:13:59.959 do anything wrong? Alright? A lot of luke voit prob 0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.800 whom was last night? Oh well, those are gonna rear 0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.400 their ugly head at times, right, Yeah, I mean there 0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:10.800 were issues. There were labor tores issues last night. It 0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.280 was very annoying. Alright, So not great here for for 0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.840 James Packson, was there anything that you saw watching him? Greg? 0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.720 Because four and two thirds, I mean outside of the 0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.480 defense behind him, it seems like he didn't get as 0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.200 many swings and mrs strikeouts that he normally does against 0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.320 a team that frankly, I feel like he should be 0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.880 able to dominate. Yeah, I thought the control wasn't where 0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:31.160 it needed to be last night. You can see that 0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:33.000 by the three walks he allows that it doesn't really 0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.200 walk many people normally. I just think he had it 0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.720 in a Honestly, he didn't have it last night. Yeah, yeah, yeah. 0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.360 He still had fourteen swinging strikes on eighty three pitches, 0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:43.960 so terrible. It was like effectively wild, you know what 0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.480 I mean? But only four strikeouts, but yeah, you're not 0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.800 used to seeing the three walks out of James Paxson 0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.920 and only the four and two thirds endings pitched. You know, 0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.400 I think everyone's ears are gonna perk up a little bit. 0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.560 Let's pay attention here. Is it is he's still dealing 0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.360 with anything with this many injury. I don't think you 0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.360 don't have any concerned about that. They don't all right, well, 0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:04.800 it could just be him shaking rust off. That's that 0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.640 seems more accurate the io. Yeah, that makes sense. Yeah, 0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.920 um pa Toronto vladihit or no data. That was awesome 0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.760 for him. Um it was alad my eighth home running 0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.360 the year, right, don't look now the ops up after 0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.120 a really really slow start, and you know, if you 0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.400 look at his zone percentage. I think I mentioned to 0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.280 see their last week or two weeks ago. He's basically 0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.680 getting the Barry Bonds treatment and he's what twenty years 0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.520 old pictures don't want to pitch to him. It's crazy. 0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.280 I know that he's, you know, one of the top 0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.520 prospects in the game, but really he's getting like Mike Trout, 0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.320 Mike Trout treatment. I was about to say Mike Trout 0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.520 Mint speaking, So I'm glad you bring I'm glad you 0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.920 bring up Mike Trout. So I read a good article 0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.680 today on ESPN about my Trout, how he lasted and 0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.520 what the Angels did in that draft. So they had 0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.000 like five picks in the top one or something along 0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.440 those lines. They are, including the twenty four overall pick 0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:04.080 and the twenty fifth overall pick, which would have been 0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.880 the Mets and the Yankees. The Mets gave up with 0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.240 the pick for Frankie Rodriguez. The Yankees get to pick 0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.640 from Mark to Shara, the Angels, and a couple of 0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:15.280 other picks. Do you know who they took with all 0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.080 this picks? So Trout went at twenty five and they 0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.160 took him as the second player that chose to try 0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.960 to get the bonus like slightly less. Okay, do you 0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:28.320 know who they picked it? Twenty four? One minute Peter Borges, No, 0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.560 I have no idea. It's relevance to what we're talking about. 0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:36.320 Randall Gritchick was there pick at four who took the 0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.240 Yankees deep not once, but twice last night for his 0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.840 eleventh and twelve home runs of the season. Brandon Jury 0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.000 also gonna be of revenge last night, his sixth home 0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:49.800 run of the year. Also included in those picks were 0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.160 Tyler Skaggs, who was traded away to the Diamondbacks and 0:16:54.200 --> 0:17:00.080 then brought back. Interesting one person who I don't remember me, 0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:05.560 who's never made it, and then the other one was 0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:11.680 you see here. The other pick was, oh god, I 0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:16.159 lost it. Now come on, come on, Greg Garrett Richards 0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.080 Richards all right, pretty good? First four? Yeah, pretty good, 0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.560 first four. It was like a break. Virginia Zakis joins 0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:30.520 us an Inside Injuries coming up next. Daily Rodo dot 0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.560 Com learned from the game's best DFS players. We don't 0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:39.800 just give you advice. We play every day, all major sports, 0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:44.240 all year round. We never stopped industry leading DFS tools 0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.880 and custom projections, and now the Daily roado dot Com 0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.200 optimize her in minutes, build an optimized line up for 0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:55.000 cash games and tourneys. Learned from the game's best DFS 0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:59.199 players joined Daily Roado dot Com. You can't get enough 0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:03.320 fantasy football. Rhoto Experts has launched their NFL three Fantasy 0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.720 Football package, which includes the best math based seasonal projections 0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.879 and rankings available anywhere on the internet. Davis Madigan, the 0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.359 Roto Experts are providing Dynasty, season long betting, best Ball 0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:15.800 and Edevil draft content every day of the year to 0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.080 give you an edge regardless of what type of fantasy 0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.000 football you play. Save Temper sent at roto Experts dot 0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:22.879 com with the promo code EV and t s Y. 0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:27.160 It's the NFL three Fantasy football package only at Rhoto 0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:32.679 Experts dot com. Rain is Make It Rain. Todd Gurley 0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.480 did an interview on on Interrupted, and he was asked 0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.080 about Drake's you know, hanging out in l A. Are 0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:39.880 you friends? Are you closing up with Drake where you've 0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.479 got his phone number? And Gurley said, oh, hell now, man, 0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:44.080 I don't want his phone number in my phone. To 0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.960 dude is nothing but beads. I just want to send 0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.240 a shout out to Gurley for recognizing everything that dude 0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:54.400 touches from an athletic standpoint. Turns to Graft weekdays six 0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:56.840 and nine am Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on 0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:00.359 your popular podcast providers calling old drivers what I career 0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.600 that will take you places? Then Coach USA and Megabus 0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.879 is the place for you. Coach USA and Megabus leaders 0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.879 in the local and Peter City bus transportation industry are 0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.440 looking for career minded conscientious drivers with a valid CDL 0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.600 Class A or B license with passenger endorsement. They offered 0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:20.520 paid training, competitive salary and many benefits. Apply now and 0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.920 start driving to a better future. Visit coach us A 0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:37.159 dot jobs. That's coach us A dot jobs got with 0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:42.399 you Fantasy The f F Sausman Faggy sample now joined 0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.639 as we are reaching every week by Virginia zags of 0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.840 inside injuries. What's going to Virginia? You guys got from 0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.439 me in how are you doing very well? Fantastic? All right, 0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:54.760 So we wanted to get into some of the latest 0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:56.760 injuries and the biggest, one of the most surprising will 0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:58.760 come out of nowhere. With cars crasher last night. It's 0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.320 scratched from his start and he has something wrong with 0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:05.480 his his blood that sounds not so good. What is 0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.680 his injury? What's the deal with Carlos carrasco. Yeah, so 0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.360 I'll start by saying, we really have no idea what's 0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.119 going on here. Um, we have a few things that 0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.840 we think could be going on, but you know, they 0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:19.920 want to wait until he feels comfortable and his family 0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.840 feels comfortable revealing exactly what this blood condition is. UM, 0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:26.960 we do know he's out in definitely. UM. They're hopeful 0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:28.840 he's going to be able to return later in the season, 0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:30.600 but it sounds like this is going to be something 0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:34.120 that takes multiple months for him to recover from. UM. 0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:36.920 You know some examples of a blood condition that could 0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.720 cause a player to miss this much time. UM could 0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.680 be something like leukemia or another sort of blood cancer 0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.760 like my aloma. UM, it could be a bone mirror disease. 0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.840 Any of these things could make you feel lethargic, which 0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:50.720 is sort of what he's been experiencing over the last 0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.920 few weeks. UM. Of course those sound very scary, and 0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:58.000 they are, UM often very treatable. But Yeah, unfortunately, right now, 0:20:58.040 --> 0:20:59.640 we really don't know what's going on, and I don't 0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.480 think we're gonna know for sure until UM. I think 0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:04.560 it's gonna be a while before they, you know, really 0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.320 reveal exactly what's going on with Carrasco. It's crazy because 0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.920 we talk like yesterday, Frank, how my clements your story, 0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.880 rehab assignment, Corey Klumer, like things are kind of looking 0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:16.080 up for him, and then boom, another starter for Cleveland 0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.359 goes down. If your regas hits the I L and 0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.000 now Carlos Carrasco as well. It seems like it's been 0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.560