WEBVTT - What's the misery index?

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to you stuff you should know from house Stuff

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Josh Clark, and there's Charles W. Chuck Bryant. The W

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>stands for Wayne Dr Wayne Coyne. It gets you every time.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's funny to be forty five years old

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and named after Wayne Coyne because he's like forty eight. Right, No,

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>he's in the fifties too, But it would be weird.

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I would have been named after a very uh like

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>kindergarten age Wayne coin A. Right. You know, maybe your

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>parents were friends with his parents and they really thought

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot about him. Play he's a real achiever, right

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that Wayne Coyn going places? Okay, Uh, that's a weird

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>side track. It was already out of the gate. Man.

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>How are you feeling. I'm good. I got a lot

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>on your plate, got a lot going on. Oh you

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>know what today is? What? Dude? Today is the day

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that I leave this office and I go to a

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>shop in Edmond Park and pick up four brand new

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>last chance garage hats. Oh wow, it's a big day,

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>very big day. So I have a couple of people

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>would like to thank It's a bigger deal than it

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>should be for a grown man in a hat. But

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we all understand, first of all, Katie, my custom patchmaker,

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>this is really where it all came together. The patches

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>isn't right, the hat's not right. Katie killed it. It

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>looks identical and you can find her work at tulip

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>cake dot com c U L I P. Cake. And

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I said, you know people might ask you to make

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you to make them last chance garage patches. Did you

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>have her destroy the mold? And I said, I don't

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know. It's on you. It's up to you legally.

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying you might get requests. You should have

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>been like Ivan the Terrible who blinded his architect, except

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that they built his pal Now, I don't care people.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see these things around and la mood

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>big hats l A m o O d uh for

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>big heads because part of the problem was finding uh

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>big and tall hat. Yeah, man, like, uh the problem

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I have with hats these days. I don't look like

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I have a huge head, but they just fit so

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>snugly and they don't go far down enough on my head.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So I finally looked up oversized hats and found La

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>mood hats and dude, they're exactly like the old hat

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>except it doesn't stink. Oh yeah, like these are great.

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I got four brands, an improvement for sure. So are

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you gonna put one in like the seed Vault in Norway? Uh?

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Probably one there. Uh, there will be one in the

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>nuclear suitcase, and um, I'll wear the other two at

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 1>the same time at the same that's right. Anyway, I'm

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>super excited. So it's pretty cool. Thank you to Katie

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and the mood Hats for allowing me to spend too

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>much money getting four hats remade. And speaking of while

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we're thanking people, we we owe a long overdue thank

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you to a guy who um made us a really

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 1>cool sign. Um. Oh you mean the sign this guy

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>made for us like seven years ago. Yeah. His name's

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Matt Street. He's at fat Bison dot com. And it

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>made a really cool woodcarved sign. It was in our

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>TV show. It was like like the production company got

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>clearance rights for it and all this stuff, and we

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>love the sign, but we just forgot to ever thank Matt.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So Matt, thank you so much for the sign. We

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>love it. We have it hanging here in the studio.

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>It is a work of art and we appreciate it.

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>We're sorry for the oversight. Um. Is that all the

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you? So let's talk about the misery index high. Yeah.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>What a great transition, have you? Um? Had you heard

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of it before you came across this article? Yeah? I

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't know a lot about it though, And um, apparently

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going a little bit out of fashion lately from

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>what I understand. Yeah, I think so, because well, well

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>let's get into it. Okay. It turns out economics as

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a whole is in danger of going out of fashion.

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I've read this really interesting article on a on, which

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>is maybe the greatest website on the planet a e

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>O N dot It might be dot CEO because British

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of websites. I think I said about

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a on a lot and and it just seems like

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about different ones. But there's this article by

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Allen J. Levinovitz and it's called the New Astrology, and

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>he basically makes a parallel between economics and economists and

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>economic theory when you take economics and try to apply

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it to future forecasting and the um the b CE

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Chinese astrologers that basically directed the way that the economy

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>or the government was going to move based on the

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>movements of the stars, you might as well just do that.

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>He drew some pretty pretty interesting parallels between the two

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that that economics in and of itself is not necessarily flawed,

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>but when it's used to forecast the future, then it

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>becomes inherently flaw odd. Yeah, this this article really kind

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of kind yeah, a little bit. Yeah, to an extent.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the misery index is a legitimate economic tool,

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's hit or miss in a lot of ways. Yeah.

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing that hit home to me with

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>researching this is it just seems impossible to say that

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>there's one correct way of doing things right or that

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>is absolute, and you're like, you know, if you do

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.239
<v Speaker 1>things this way, then there will be nothing but growth

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in jobs and the GDP s and g m P

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it just it just doesn't seem to work

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that way, right. I think the problem is is that

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>if you listen to economists, they like to act like

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>they do have a handle on that kind of thing.

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>But if you really look into economics, it's very politicized.

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 1>There's liberal economics and there's conservative economics, and the fact

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that each one saying it's right kind of makes you

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>think that maybe no one is, you know, but the

0:05:56.320 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 1>misery index actually is is it started out from a

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>guy who was pretty good at walking the line between

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>conservative and liberal economics. UM, a guy uh what was

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>his name Okin? Yeah, Arthur Oakin, and he uh he

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>worked on Kennedy's staffs, Council of Economic Advisors, John F.

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy that is, and he was, UM, I get the feeling,

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the main influences and talking Kennedy, who initially

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>did not necessarily agree, but talking Kennedy into kind of

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to enact both conservative and liberal economic policies simultaneously.

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Right they were. The US was intercession when Kennedy took

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>office in nine one, UM, and they talked him into

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>not only increasing government spending like welfare programs. They raised

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the UM, the minimum wade and UM some other stuff

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>like that, but they also cut taxes, which is, you

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>do one or the other. You cut taxes and hope

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>everything goes for the best because businesses will start investing

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and spending, or you start you start investing in welfare

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>programs to help your ailing UM lower in middle classes. Right,

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't do both, and Kennedy did both and it

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>was successful. Yeah. He well he at first he said,

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about this. I don't know about this author.

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike Kennedy sounds like a robot. My kinda did too.

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Actually this is fine, but Arthur mr Okun Okon, I

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's a weird name. Okay, you in uh. He

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>talked him into it and said trust me, and things

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>worked out in that case. Yeah. Well, and a lot

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of guys, including Oaken's names, were made by this advice

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that panned out like the US Center to Boom and

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>um Okin ended up as being the head of the

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:56.559
<v Speaker 1>Council of Economic Advisors for Kennedy's successor, Lyndon Johnson. Right, yeah,

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and um one thing that economic economists economists love to

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>do is um I mean, he loved the forecasts and

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. But it's all about data, man. They

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>love to pour over data, like stuff that makes the

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>average person their mind bleed from boredom. They just find

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>it fascinating. That's what they do on Friday nights. Friday nights,

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>they pour over data, historical data, trying to find you know,

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like the big puzzle and they're all trying to

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>solve it, so they pour over this data. Oakland did,

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and um he said, you know what, I noticed something

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>here between when we started recording some some decent unemployment rates,

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>which I didn't know. I didn't know we started that.

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>It seems like it would have gone back before then.

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>But between sixty he said, you know what, I've noticed

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 1>that the gross national product rises three for every percentage

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>point that unemployment falls. With the caveat that unemployment has

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to be between three and seven point five percent, which

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty like, it's pretty bold statement to say

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I've noticed this is a definite trend. It is, and

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it came to be called Oakland's law because it was

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>verified other people poured over the data and like, this

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>guy is right, man, he just keeps coming up with hits,

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't he. Um. And the reason you would want to

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>know some arcane piece of data like that is that

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>if you know that that's the case, then you can say, well,

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>if we attack unemployment can get it down a couple

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of points. We can you know, raise g d P

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 1>or g MP, you know, by three percent every time

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>we drop it. So when we need to bulk g

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>m P up, we just attack unemployment, right, easy, peasy,

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, and everyone said, thank you are Yeah. Things

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>worked out pretty well for a while, but then the

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies came along, and UM, if you what, we're

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk a little bit about stagflation now. But if

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you haven't heard it, we have a two good episode

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I think. So it's called what is Stagflation? From February

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, two thousand. Um. Yeah, I think as far

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>as our economics episodes, it was not bad. I went

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>back and listened to a lot of it before I

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>got bored out. Yeah, the first three minutes were great. Um.

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I go back and listen to that. But um,

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>like he said, he served as chairman of the c

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>e A for Johnson, and then in seventy three, a

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>very unfortunate thing happened that kind of ended up rocking

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the world and the United States in particular with our economy. Um,

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna take a break and we're gonna talk

0:10:42.120 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>when we get back about the Middle East. All right,

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>what happened in the old I am negative three? The

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>arab oil embargo happened. Right, So, at the time, until

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>very recently, the US was super dependent on foreign oil

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like like other countries. We wouldn't even sit down at

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the table with we were getting oil from right. Yeah,

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 1>we're doing better now, yeah, with our dependency, But back then,

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>very bad, very um. And it was it was a

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>source of anxiety for a lot of people, and that

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>anxiety actually panned out. So in Um nineteen seventy three,

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Egypt and Syria and a few other Arab nations invaded

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:52.599
<v Speaker 1>the Golden Heights and the Sinai Peninsula to attempt to

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>take back land Um from the State of Israel. The

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>US was found to be supply arms to Israel, So

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>as far as the Arab States were concerned, the US

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>had cast its lot on israel side, and they were

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>fairly peeved about that. So they literally shut off the

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>tap of oil flowing to the United States and other

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>countries that were found considered to be on the side

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of Israel in this in this war Um huge deal.

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>It was an enormous deal. The the this foreign dependency

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in the the precarious situation that it placed the United

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.959
<v Speaker 1>States and came to pass, and the price of oil

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>rose thirty seven. The long lines at the gas station

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>were never seen before or since. Even after the financial

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 1>crisis of two thousand eight. UM, it was just insane.

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>There was gas rationing in the United States in nineteen

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>because the UM the oil embargo, and after a while

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the taps were turned back on. But that shocked to

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the system, screwed the economy up for a decade. Inflation

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>went out of control, and UM a very another unfortunately

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>happened along the same timeline. Unemployment started to creep up.

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And these two things happening at the same time as devastating. Yeah,

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and up to this point, so first of all, the

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>US had never had a shock to the system like that.

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.599
<v Speaker 1>That was one thing. It wasn't a gradual thing. It

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>was like yeah. But the other thing is when you

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>have something that has never happened before, you can look

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>at it and say, wow, what what happened, and new

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>things that have never happened before come out of that.

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things was inflation and unemployment going up,

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>because up to this point, economists just assumed that the

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>two were mutually exclusive. If you're if you're UM. If

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>inflation was up, prices were high, that meant that companies

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>could go out and hire more people, so unemployment of

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>course would be low. Yeah, it kind of made sense.

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Well not not after the oil embargo. The shock to

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the system led to, like you said, high unemployment rates

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and high inflation, and uh, it was a miserable time. Yeah,

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and that was called stagflation. It also led to skateboarding,

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>as we all know. Oh yeah, because of the pools, right, yeah,

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>they could and cal well actually that was the drought.

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think the drought was also tied into the economics. Sure,

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>but they couldn't fill up swimm pools that they started

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>skating in swimming pools. Well, yeah, if you have a drought,

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>then you lose your crops. And if you lose your crops,

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you lose money, a significant sector of money exactly. So

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>good news. We have half pipes now and quarter pipes

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and peralta they're still around, right, I think bad news

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>is like you said, it had a devastating effect for many,

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>many years on the United States. So Oakin starts to

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>look around. He said, you know what, things are pretty

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>bad here. One might even say miserable. I haven't gotten

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>any acclaim for a while. Yeah, nothing's been named after

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>me in a while. So let me create this new

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>uh list, new method for looking at the economy. And

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it turns out to not be like a look over

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a period of time or anything, but just sort of

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>like a polaroid of that day and not just that

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>day for like the country as a whole, or um

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>for the FED or anything like that. But what he

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>did that was different was he looked into what the

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>what it was like that day or that year for

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the average American in their daily life. And he called

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>it the misery Index. Yeah, and it was very rudimentary

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>at the time. It was just simple calculation of the

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>yearly rate of inflation plus the unemployment rate. Yeah. So

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>if you have like five percent inflation and two percent unemployment,

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a seven percent misery index. It's as simple

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>as that. I don't know why it got so much,

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what. It was hailed as a big deal

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>because I think Oakin had a a a knack for

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>noticing things that seemed obvious in retrospect, but at the

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>time no one had ever noticed before. I'll buy it.

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank why not? Alright, So now he has this index,

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and not only can he look at a snapshot of

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that day, he can go back because he was a

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a data walk sure he could look at data throughout history. Well,

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>at least in nine, Yeah, which is when we started

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>recording unemployment, like we said, which must have been frustrating

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>for him because our um our inflation rates data goes

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>back to nineteen fourteen. But that's only part of the equation. Well,

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it must have been like, oh, sure, and to be

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>able to look at the Great Depression, you could have

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot, you know. Uh. So he went and

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>he looked back, and he says, here is what we've noticed,

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is so obvious to me, uh, that that

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>presidents and political parties are brought in and out of

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>office largely depending on how the economy is doing. Yeah,

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>but they kind of proved it, but not even just

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>how the economy is doing. Like he he was saying,

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>like the misery index you can use to predict whether

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the the presidency's going to change hands politically. Yeah. So

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty six, Uh, misery index is six point five three,

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>which is great. That's during like, yeah, very low, Mr Eisenhower,

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>President Eisenhower, and he got reelected because things were pretty good,

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>right as far as the misery index goes. Yeah, Yeah,

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody was pretty happy, even though they didn't really know

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>what the misery index was because it wasn't invented yet.

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 1>They just had a general sense. Well, yeah, they didn't

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 1>call it that at a time. No, They're just like,

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>seems fine to me. You're miserable. We like, no, I'm

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>not miserable, are you. So in Johnson came to the

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>end of his term and the misery index was up

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to eight point one three, and then he had his

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Democratic successor, Hubert Humphrey in line, and because the thing

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>had crept up, people a little more miserable and they said, no,

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.479
<v Speaker 1>get out of here, I want Mr Nixon in office, right,

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>And I guess I'm not. I'm not sure about this.

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So I don't understand why Johnson was replaced by Humphrey

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>by the Democrats and in this article, and it seems

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to be because of this misery index that it would

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>have predicted that. But he was the incumbent president, so

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>let's see, so he was he would have should know this. No,

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>he yeah, he was a one term or technically one

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in a third or one in a quarter because he

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>took over after Kennedy's assassination. But if his term was

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 1>up in sixty eight, then he would have won the

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty four election. So he technically I think would have

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>been able to have been president. Again, I'm not sure

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.479
<v Speaker 1>we could have found this out too sure, but I'll

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>bet there's somebody out there who can explain it to us,

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and so email us, will you? Uh? At any rate,

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Nixon gets elected and um, the misery index shot up

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to eleven point six seven during the first term, but

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>then started to this decline enough that he did get

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>re elected. Um. But then uh in n with Watergate,

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the misery index leapt all the way up to seventeen

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>point oh one. That's not good. Now, that's that is

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the all time high at the time from what I understand. UM,

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and that happened around nineteen seventy four, which meant that

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>when Watergate broke, some people who really subscribed to the

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>misery index say Watergate might not have been quite as

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>big a deal. If um, the misery index have been

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>low at the time, he might have been able to

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>squeak by without resigning or being forced out of office.

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone has more leeway if things are great,

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you know. But he his his his his currency had

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>been spent. Man. I watched all the president's men a

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago. Again, you ever seen that great, great movie. Yeah,

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I've always meant to really really good and just sort

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of like, they don't make a lot of movies like

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that anymore. Spotlight reminded me of all it's good. It's

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>just I call it movies for adults. You know. There's

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>no chase scenes or anything remarkable. It's just good dramatic

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>movie making. Yeah, good stuff anyway. Wait, what's wrong with

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the chasing? Uh? What's wrong with chase? No, there's nothing

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>inherently wrong with this, but I know what you mean,

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>just for the sake of a chasing, which we see

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these days, you know what I mean,

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Like Mark Ruffalo is chasing a priest in a car

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and spotlight. Yeah, um, where were we? Okay, we're with Nixon. Um, well,

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>not with Nixon, you know what I mean. Ford comes

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>in office for a short time, and he actually managed

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to get the misery indext year down. Well. I think

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>just the fact that Nixon was out. I think that

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>probably helped um you know and inspire like consumer confidence

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in the like. So it crept back down to twelve

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>point six six, but not enough to keep um, the

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and Jimmy Carter from coming into office and Carter

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>actually cited the misery Index. It was relatively new at

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the time. He talked too much about it, but it

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>was it was a g whiz thing that you could

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>really just point to, like this post this, This is

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the misery index. Can you can you hear me? That's

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>my car? But that was his amous quote, can you

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>hear me? It came back to haunt him though, to

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 1>say the least, because he talked a lot about the

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>misery Index, and then in his term the it reached

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>an all time high of twenty one. Yeah, which, man,

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>I really think that shock to the system under the

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>oil embargo, um and plenty of other stuff. This stuff

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>gets laid at Carter's feet, I think unfairly in a

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of respects. Well, I mean, I would love for

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>someone to really that really knows their stuff to explain

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to me exactly how much a president's influence has on

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the economy and how long it takes for that to

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>bear fruit. Yeah, I would love to know that too.

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I think though, Uh, the guy who came after Carter, Reagan,

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty sterling, unassailable example of an impact a

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>president can have on the economy, whether you agree with

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>his politics or his economic policies are not. He most

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>decidedly had an effect on the economy. Yeah. I just

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>remember hearing one time. I need to look this up,

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>but somebody told me once that that the economic impact

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>of the presidential a four year term is felt the

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>most like eight years later or something. Yeah, that makes

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>sense to me. Economies don't move on a dime. Yeah,

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't know if that's talking lumbering things.

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>They aren't fully understood by anybody. Yeah, it's interesting to

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>me now more than ever before though, because remember economics

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>used to I know, I was really really surprised when

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you suggested this one. It's slightly more interesting to me. Oh,

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>just wondering things like that, and during an election season,

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>like are the decisions we make now gonna affect us

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>in one year or two years? Eight years? Uh? Yeah, Well,

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>if there's any economists who are still listening after that

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>initial remark about the new astrology, we'd love to to

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>get a primer on how long it takes for a

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 1>president to impact an economy, if they do at all.

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it's a arrange, you know, it's not like

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>starting it eight years and really, honestly was Carter that

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>band or was he a victim of cross stars. Yeah.

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can make a case where a lot

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of bills of presidencies not being directly at their feet.

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>But you remember that, uh Simpsons where they unveil a

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>statue of Jimmy Carter in Springfield and on the pedestal

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it says Malaise Forever, and somebody goes, Jimmy Carter, He's

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>history's greatest monster Carter. So, like we said, it came

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>back to haunt Carter because he talked a lot about

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>the index. It rose a lot. Then Reagan came in

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>was like, well, let's talk about that misery index that

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you like to talk about so much. That's in an

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 1>all time high. Reagan got in there, um knocked it

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 1>down to nine point five five by the end of

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>his term, enough to get Bush Senior in Um, it

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 1>inched up some then Clinton was able to Uh, it

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't go up that much though. And I read an

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting article to day on whether or not ross Pero

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>really got Clinton elected, because that's sort of the popular

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>thought he was a spoiler. Yeah, I could see that,

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>but um, he was definitely more in line with um

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Bush seniors policies and Clinton's well at the time, yeah,

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you would think, but I read, uh, I read one

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 1>article that said that it was kind of a myth

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that basically that Clinton won by six million votes and

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it would have taken of Paros supporters to have uh

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>been aligned with UM with Bush m hm, and supposedly

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>exit polls showed showed it more like thirty And so

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they're saying it's sort of a myth that Pero swung

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the election to Clinton. I see, but I mean that

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>was one person's opinion to who knows. You know, I've

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>been reading a lot about you know that we that

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that suspicion you can't quite kick that there's really no

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>difference between Republicans and Democrats these days, that they're really

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>just kind of all in the same little club. I

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>think people feel that way sometimes. I've been reading a

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 1>lot about that, and apparently it's all based on neoliberalism.

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>That's like the key and um, there's there's a lot

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of If you look into Neil liberalism and the policies

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of neoliberalism, you realize we're like living in the thick

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of it. But no one everyone's kind of blind to

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea that it's just a single thing that basically

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody in power subscribes to and that it has a

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 1>triple down effect of screwing over everybody below the top. Um.

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>But just the name itself seems totally fine, you know.

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's uh, it's it's interesting. Yeah. I researched that

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit lately too. Yeah, there's been some good article.

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>We totally should let's do it, agreed. Man, we're gonna

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 1>get some emails for that one from billionaires. Yeah. Um,

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's just finish out this quick little recap. Clinton

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>brought it down to seven point three five. Things were great,

0:25:56.600 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Bush Junior gets elected. Um, despite the fact that Clinton

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>had a low index. Well, it depends on how you

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>look at the two thousand election. We should do one

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:07.959
<v Speaker 1>on that one too. But this is the this is

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that's considered one of those rare instances where the misery

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>index didn't indicate where it was going to go. But

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you could also say it might have had things gone

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>slightly differently. In the Supreme Court George W. Bush, the

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>index rose from seven point three five to eleven point four,

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and then Obama came in it went down to seven

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>point eight seven. But another weird flaw in the system

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is exposed there because, um, despite the fact that the

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>misery index was lower, things were not good. The stock

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>market had crashed, unemployment was rising at a rapid rate,

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and they said, you know this. It basically was another

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 1>example of like, look, this misery index isn't all it's

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>cracked up to be right, so let's work on it. Yeah.

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people said this is too simplistic.

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.199
<v Speaker 1>You can't rely on this. But we'll talk about some

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>of the additional factors that people have worked into the

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>misery index after this. All right, Chuck, so the misery

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>index open. Everybody's happy with him. They're like, this is

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>just too simple, especially in what's called the post stag

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>inflation era after the oil embargo. Um. And so some

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>people have said, okay, you can there's certainly there's other

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>things you can add in to give a genuine, true

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>snapshot of what the conditions are like on the ground,

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>as it were. Right, Well, yeah, not only what the

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>conditions are, but whether or not performance over a period

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of time is getting better getting worse. Yes, And you know,

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>rather than say, oh, under under this president, the misery

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>index was this, you know, and it gives you a

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty good idea this with this one guy UM named

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Robert Barrow. He wrote a book called Getting It Right,

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Markets and Choices in a Free Society, and in it

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>he takes the misery index Oakin's Misery Index, and he says,

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 1>we can add some stuff to this to to make

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it an even clearer picture, not just of the conditions

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, but you can take it and apply

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it genuinely to a president's entire term to see just

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>how good their economic policies were or weren't for the

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>health of the economy. And he added some other stuff. Yeah,

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>he added four main new measurements. Uh. Took the inflation

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>rate during the last year of the president's term, compared

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it to the average inflation rate over the entire course

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of the subsequent presidents, which is based on what you

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>were saying that like the a four year term, the

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>effects are felt like years down the road. So I

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's what he was doing there, right, Yeah, it

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Did the same thing with the rate of unemployment.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>That was number two. Uh. He added in changes for

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the thirty year government bond yield over a presidency. And

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>then finally he said, um, I need to look at

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the difference between the long term GDP growth the real

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>rate of growth. Compare all these things along with the

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>original Uh, this plus this equals this, right, and with

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the real growth rate. Um, that's where you take the

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>actual change either the shrinking or the growth of the

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>economy the g d P year over year. Right. And

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>he took that for year after year over the course

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of the presidency and averaged it out. I guess that's right. Yeah,

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>And he came up with what's called the Barrow Misery Index.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And UM, a lot of people think that that's where

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the misery Index started, when in fact it was Oakin

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>who came up with it about twenty years before Barrow

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>took it up and improved it. So under Barrow's Misery Index, UM,

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Clinton and Reagan, that's Bill. Clinton of course came out

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>on top. And then it got named Steve Hankey about

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>ten years later. This was originally in and then Hankey

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>came along in two thousand six and said, you know what,

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>we need to add even more things. And this all

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>just makes sense. You need to if you want a

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>more detailed picture, then add more detail to the data

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:18.479
<v Speaker 1>going in, you know. So he said, we need more

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>detail Uh, why don't we do this. Let's um, let's

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>measure inflation and unemployment like we're doing, and then let's

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>now add interest rates and subtract annual percentages from the

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>GDP to get a more accurate picture. And he said,

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you can use this anywhere, you can use it all

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>over the world. Well, that's what he did, and that's

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of what made his his version of it pretty famous.

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>He figured out how to apply it to other countries,

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>even countries that used UM price controls to keep inflation

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in check, which means price inflation is held back artificially.

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>So Hanky looked into other things like UM the exchange

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>rate in the black market, and then given country that

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing UM, and he figured out real inflation rates,

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and he applied it around the world to find out

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>what country is the most miserable in what country is

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the least miserable. And what he found in two thousand

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>fourteen was that the most miserable country in the world

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was Venezuela, which had a Hanky misery index of seventy

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>nine point four. It's pretty high, very high. And then

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Japan had the lowest misery at five point four one. Yeah,

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the US came in at about nineteen, correct, I think eleven? Yeah? No, no, no,

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>eleven was our Oh I'm sorry. Nineteenth yeah, yeah, ranked

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen within eleven. I didn't hear that, yeah, because my

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>tooth is still gone. You think it'd be. It would

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>be more pronounced if they were nineteen. I would have

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>heard it clearly as about August can't get here soon enough.

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So um, there are critics of this one too, though,

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>there's critics all these indexes. Well, yeah, the the A

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of them say, no, still too elementary. Some people

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>say this is all just try like you can't. You

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>can't use this stuff to to make any real predictions.

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>You could use it to look back at the past,

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>but to use it for the future, probably not. But

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>some people do believe in the idea that if you

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>have enough data and the right kind of data, you

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>can get a clear picture of misery. And again that's

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>what we're after here, Like, the whole point of the

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>misery index is to figure out how unhappy and and

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>just low the average person in a country is feeling

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>at that moment, right, so um, HuffPo actually came up

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>with a pretty good one. HuffPo boo in two thousand nine,

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>HuffPo came up with what they called the Real Misery Index, right,

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot of people cite the the use

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of what's called YOU three unemployment statistics, which when you

0:32:57.440 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>hear unemployment numbers in the news, that till you're hearing

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what the Bureau of Labor Statistics issues as the

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>official unemployment numbers. Right, yeah, And that's the very first

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 1>thing that people will say if they want to poopoo

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment numbers, that that these are these are just

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>false numbers. Yeah. If someone says, hey, man, look how

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>great ex president is doing. Look at the unemployment rate,

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>right man, they're just using the U three. They need

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to use the U six. Wake up, pal up in

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>your eyes, which you know is valid. Well yeah, so, um,

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the BLS has six measurements of unemployment you one through

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>U six, and YOU six is the broadest. It includes

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>people who are so discouraged with the state of the

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>job market that they've given up looking for work and

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>they're just like, have given themselves over entirely to judge

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Alex right, and then um. It also includes people who

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>are working part time but wish they could work full time,

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but there's no full time work available. I'm a graphic designer,

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>but I work at Starbucks. So that's the U six

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>measurement that and that's considered the the broadest snapshot of unemployment,

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the real m vision of unemployment. Yeah, like you said,

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 1>mostly they use you three, I guess because it's in

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the middle. I mean you one. They would never use

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>you two. Everybody used to like, but not anymore. I

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>still like you too, get yeah, you know, not like

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I used to. I'm not anything, but I did see

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that concert they did on the HBO, and I have

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to hand it to him. My big problem with you

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>two for years was that they just got so out

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of control with those live shows like these giant spider

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:49.439
<v Speaker 1>spaceships and things. And I was always of the belief that, man,

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 1>you need to go back to basics and just get

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>up on stage and play again. And that's what they

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>did with this new tour. I mean, there was a

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>cool visual element, but the stage set up in the

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:00.720
<v Speaker 1>way they did it was very much back to basics

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in it. I think they really connected with fans again. Yeah,

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of help. Yeah, because you can only when

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the when the interactions between you and the fans rather

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 1>than the fans and giant spiders. Yeah, you just you

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>can only go so far in that direction. I think

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>they realize that. Sure, anyway, where do you go, Youtuo,

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll defend those guys. Um, even though I know everyone

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in the world generally wants to punch Bono in the face,

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:28.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not one of them. It's kind of feel weird

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:33.919
<v Speaker 1>like them. Yeah, I'm on record. I know if you're listening, well,

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're Jared indicators, any any predictor Bonno is going

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>to come out to be canonized one day. What oh yeah, yeah,

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 1>you know you're like, there's something about Jared. I don't

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>like him, and you know, we found out about Jared

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and then um, you're saying something's good, like they're gonna

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>find a cure for cancer and a saliva or something.

0:35:55.160 --> 0:36:00.080
<v Speaker 1>You never know. Um, so did we even mention what

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>the HuffPo what kind of outrageous numbers they came up with? No, well,

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:05.919
<v Speaker 1>we didn't mention everything they used. We were talking about

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the use six measurement. HuffPo used that measurement the most

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>extreme of unemployment numbers. They also used other things like, um,

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the inflation rate of food and drink and fuel and

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 1>healthcare because other The misery index just uses the consumer

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 1>price index, which is inflation as a whole. HuffPo used, um,

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>the the inflation of some really essential things that people

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>can't do without and where you're gonna immediately feel the

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>pinch when prices go up. With those two factors, right. Um.

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>They also included the rate of credit card delinquency, the

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>cost of housing, how many people are using food stamps

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that seems like a smart move home, equity loan deficiencies,

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess, people who are laid on their payments. Um.

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>And then they took the average of those seven numbers

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and added it to the U six unemployment numbers, which

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>here you can step back and say, wait a minute,

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 1>how would you how are you adding this together? How

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>does this make any sense? You can't just keep adding things, right,

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 1>And really you can take that all the way back

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to the initial misery index, Like what you're just adding

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>unemployment percentage and inflation, and all of a sudden you

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>have a magic number that doesn't make any sense. This

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 1>HuffPo metric really points out the inherent flaw in it.

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, because in two thousand eight, the Oakland

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Misery index was eight point one, but huff po's Real

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Misery Index a k A. You think things are bad,

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>here's how bad they really are index was twenty nine

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>point nine compared to the eight point one, right, and

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>some people are like, oh, well, that just shows how

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 1>off the oaken misery index is. Who knows. I know

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they quit doing the real Misery Index at HuffPo like

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>five years ago. I think it was a am I

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 1>going to call it a stunt. It was a bit

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of a stunt maybe, but I'm sure really what happened

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:56.799
<v Speaker 1>was the writer who was contributing it for free, like

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 1>left for a paying job. That's probably what U into

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the huff Real Misery and day Yeah. Um, I was

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>reading this guy, Tim McMahon. He has a site, or

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 1>he writes first site, I'm not sure it's his. Are

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>not called inflation data dot com. Jim McMahon, Tim his brother,

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>not the Super Bowl Shuffle, No, his brother. Um. So

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 1>he mentioned this two thousand one paper that concluded that

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 1>unemployment causes one point seven times more misery than inflation.

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>And so if you're doing any kind of misery index

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that uses those two, you need to first multiply the

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 1>unemployment number by one point seven before adding it to

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 1>UM the inflation number to to properly wait it, and like,

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 1>how did they come up with that? So I looked

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>at the paper. It was actually pretty clever. There's like

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty three years of this survey of life satisfaction and

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>happiness that these researchers looked at back in two thousand one,

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and they found that UM economically based or just like

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 1>how happy are you? Know, here's the thing, it was,

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>how happy are you? It was like a single question

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>like would you say, based on how you're feeling right now,

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that you are fairly satisfied, unsatisfied, very satisfied with your

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 1>life right now right? And then they took that that

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>measurement for that that country as a whole, and you

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>can do this for any country that participated in the survey.

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>And then they looked at inflation, and then they looked

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:22.800
<v Speaker 1>at UM unemployment for those years and they could figure

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 1>out the the variation between or the interplay between unemployment

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 1>and inflation and satisfaction, and they found that uh, that

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>UM that unemployment was one time one point seven times

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 1>more miserable than inflation in regards to life satisfaction, as

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 1>that survey. Guess it's pretty clever. It's a lot of

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 1>hocus pocus, but it's I thought it was pretty clever

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>how they did it. That makes sense to me because

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to be without work, like if you have a job

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:55.839
<v Speaker 1>and things inflation is happening, you still have your job, sure,

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, man, this sucks to pay this much more,

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 1>but you can still conceivably pay for Yeah, I'll cut

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>back here or there if you if you're unemployed, then

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of hope. Yeah, one, the number

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:09.239
<v Speaker 1>might be conservative here. Yeah, I agree with you. Very

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>interesting stuff. So that's uh, that's it, man, that's the

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 1>misery Index. You got anything else? No, but I'm looking

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>forward to hearing from economists that me too, like in

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 1>an unbiased way to try to explain things. Me too.

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>If you if you send just you know, these crazy

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:31.439
<v Speaker 1>political emails and they're they're gonna fall in deaf years

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>because everyone yells at each other that they're right. I

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>just want to hear some real numbers, do it, chuck. Uh.

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know more about the misery Index,

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>you can type those words in the search bar how

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. And since I said search bar,

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>just play an old search bar. It's time for a

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 1>listener mail. I'm gonna call this, uh, follow up on

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>vocal pride once again. Um. Regarding vocal pride, guys, Uh,

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys were offended because someone said local pride was repulsive.

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>But there is another side of this, dudes. I suffer

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>from a neurological disorder known as miss aphonia, which we

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 1>totally should do a show in this. It's a condition

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>where a person has extreme emotional response commonly occurring sounds,

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and I remember hearing a lot of times it's like

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 1>people chewing noises or gum or whatever. Um he said.

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>In my case, my trigger noise is the high pitched

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:30.319
<v Speaker 1>s sound when some people speak. Uh. It feels like

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 1>my brain is cringing, as if an allergic reaction is

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:36.240
<v Speaker 1>taking place. Cannot stress enough. This is not a mere annoyance,

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>as a legitimate mental disorder that can vary great and

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>greatly in severity. I don't visibly freak out when I

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>hear my trigger noise, but it really kills me inside,

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 1>gives me an instant headache. And that's why, which is

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>why I will get away from the noise if at

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:53.879
<v Speaker 1>all possible. Um, I believe in avoiding complaining in life

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:56.439
<v Speaker 1>and playing the victim. But this disorder really has made

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>my life like a subtle hell. It's been especially toxic

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:04.239
<v Speaker 1>to my emily relationships and my ability to learn in school. Um.

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I felt compelled to email you guys, because you definitely

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>appreciate interesting medical conditions. I think would be a great

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.399
<v Speaker 1>topic for a show someday. I was a documentary about

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 1>it called Quiet Please. If you watch the trailer, you

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:17.400
<v Speaker 1>might be inspired to watch it to learn what the

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>condition is. Huge. Thanks to everyone of Stuff you Should Know.

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:25.320
<v Speaker 1>You make a mundane parts of my life interesting and educational. Uh.

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna anonymize this from Texas because I didn't hear

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>back from him from text. Yeah, text PS was in

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 1>disbelief when Chuck said he had not seen Billy Madison

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>or Happy Gilmore. That's a good PS. I believe it.

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a good PostScript and post PPS right, not p

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 1>s S. I think it's post PostScript. Yeah, but people

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 1>who often put PSS what doesn't mean? Do you think

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know could ever become a television show? Well?

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Text never we actually did that. We we found out

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the hard way that it came Yeah, we did a

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 1>TV show on the Science Channel and it ran for

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 1>one full season that played out over the course of

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>several days, which we'll always have. We'll always have that

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>season of television we did once. It lasted nine or

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:14.879
<v Speaker 1>ten days. Yea, let's just show them all at once,

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:20.399
<v Speaker 1>out of order. But you never know, we might get

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:24.360
<v Speaker 1>another shot at stardom. But we're not looking to it. No.

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I like it in this room where no one's looking

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 1>at us. Jerry be there looking away in discuss That's right,

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 1>good idea about the mesophonia. I think we mentioned that before,

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Like that was I really like that vocal fry episode.

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And that was the one thing that I wish we

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 1>would have mentioned because it's a legitimate thing that it

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:47.279
<v Speaker 1>does affect some people. Um, but yeah, look for a

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>mesophonia episode at some point in the future. Text. If

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to get in touch with us, we're all

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>over social media. We're on Twitter and Instagram at s

0:43:57.160 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 1>y s K podcast, We're on Facebook dot com, slide

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know. You can send us an email

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:04.839
<v Speaker 1>to Stuff Podcasts at how stuff Works dot com, and

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:07.239
<v Speaker 1>you can join us at our very own home on

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the web. Stuff you Should Know dot com. For more

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics, visit how stuff

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com.