WEBVTT - Bye Hard 2: Bye Harder

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of iHeartRadio. Time

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly source

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>for the nation's best fantasy.

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Speculation and advice.

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 3>Now along with the guys from.

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Guillotine Leagues dot com.

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 4>Here's your host, Paulo.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>It is a difficult bye week for fantasy owners.

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 3>We call this by Apocalypse two.

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 4>How about by NATO? I like by NATO two.

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>By NATO two or by Brian Johnson. Gave me this

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>one this week and I liked it a lot. Buye

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Hard too, Buy Harder Hard like that by Harder, I

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's really good too. Six teams on buye We

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>here to help you unearth some possible solutions to the

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>guys that you need to find.

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 3>It's a tricky, tricky spot.

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Paul Charchi and co host today Scott fish thor

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Nye Strum.

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Hey, guys, Killo.

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>It's really good to be back, and it is healthy.

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Last week it was not good for me.

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel so much stronger, so much vim and vigor.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Nice. I like it that I can see it. The

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 4>vigor is just out of poor coming right on to

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 4>my pores. It's a little too much vigor a little viscous,

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 4>but yes, uh.

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>We will go through all the usual stuff. This is

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the last week for premature speculation. We're down to a

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>point where there's not much time left to speculate, not

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>much return on that investment.

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 3>We'll give you the final three guys. We also pick

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 3>up that time.

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 2>I like mine? Do you like it? I like min?

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure?

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:31.199
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, good.

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out who they are towards the end of

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the show. We'll also give you the nine players upon

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>whom you can take a chance. Very important this week

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>in the bye week, and we'll answer three tough questions,

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>one of which is basically a personal question for me.

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Using the show for your own I really am to

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>suss out some of the problems.

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 4>You know what, after thirty years, I feel like you've

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 4>heard what.

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 3>I never do this.

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 4>Thirty years from now, you get another one.

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, good, Well we'll talk about that in twenty

0:01:58.360 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty five.

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh oh boy, jeez, Ian will be running the show.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Then he will be running the show. Then Falcons take

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Jets. Scott, Let's let's start with this one

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>right right here. I want to believe, yes, this can

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be Bjon Robinson's biggest game of the year.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 4>I have an A grade on him. I could almost

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 4>give him the ard Vark. Did you know that Atlanta

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 4>runs the ball at the highest rate in the NFL

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 4>and the Jets allow the highest run rate against in

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 4>the NFL? I love it. Yeah, that's an average of

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty eight rush attempts per game, and that's not even

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 4>the receptions that Brice Hally gets. So I feel and

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 4>Arthur Smith just loves loves running the ball by Jon

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 4>Robinson twenty three touches and nineteen touches in the last two.

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 4>The last five lead Backs versus the Jets averaged a

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 4>line of one hundred and five yards in a score.

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:51.839
<v Speaker 4>But I feel like's better than a lot of them.

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, for sure, absolutely, I do. Actually, I love they.

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Got ground touchdowns and back to bed weeks he did.

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 4>I love it. I love it. I do have l

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.399
<v Speaker 4>and Patterson on the bench, mostly because they're now splitting

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 4>and I don't know what like. If it was one

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 4>of them, I would give them a C grade because

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 4>they're gonna get some work in this one. But Patterson,

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 4>he played in the early part of the game, took

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 4>took about eight carries there, uh about six carries and

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 4>then two in the fourth, and Algier didn't really come

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 4>until the fourth, so it's almost like he supplanted him.

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 4>It's we're not it's Arthur Smith, though you have no

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.399
<v Speaker 4>idea what he's gonna do. Uh in the passing game.

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 4>I do have a C grade on Jake Drake London.

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 4>The Jets d is the only past to hold the

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 4>team's wide receivers wide receiver group under their season averaging

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 4>every single game, which means that you shouldn't start wide

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 4>receivers against them.

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Mostly, So why am I starting London here with the

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 3>C grade?

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 4>But Drake London is really their only wide receiver option.

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 4>He gets the volume and just recently, more recently, the

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 4>Jets allowed Wattle over one hundred, Tyreek Hill over one hundred,

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 4>Khalil Shakir over one hundred, DeVante Adams six for eighty six,

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 4>Keenan Allen eight Forray seventy seven. A lot of those

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 4>guys move around a lot, which is what Drake London does.

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 4>He plays about twenty seven percent from the slot, and

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 4>he's been moving to the slot way more often, which

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 4>he'll need to do to avoid DJ Reid and Sauce

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Gardner on the perimeters.

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 3>So they do that.

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 4>It's barely a C grade for Drake London, but I'm

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 4>giving it to him on the off chance that he's

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 4>on the idea that he's going to get like eight

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 4>or nine targets and find some way to make some

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 4>meaningful use of this game.

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 3>You know who's gonna Nazi Sauce Gardner and DJ Reid.

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 3>Who John O. Smith?

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 4>I actually have John Smith on the bench. He what

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 4>did he have zero targets last week? He's had his

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 4>snaps drop four consecutive weeks now.

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, But to be clear, Kyle Pitch isn't getting that action.

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Nope. I also have Kyle Pitts on the bench. You

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 4>could argue he's a slot guy that that you know

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 4>would have a good matchup here. But I really don't like.

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 4>I really don't like the option there, and I think

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 4>they're gonna run far too much. There's only one guy

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 4>in the past game. I think it's Drake London over

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 4>on the Jets side. I will say with six teams

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 4>on bye pits almost because almost becomes viable. That's what

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 4>it takes at this point.

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 3>If Brian had that matchup, it would be a grade.

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 3>It's right now.

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 4>Over on the other side, I like bris Hall. I

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 4>gotta be no tiw I'm barely touching on the quarterbacks

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 4>of the passing game because that's not what the Jets are.

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 4>The Falcons are about Brice Hall. I have a B

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 4>grade on the Falcons rank second against runners, but a

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 4>lot of that is because they haven't allowed a rushing

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 4>touchdown yet this season, and it seems a little unsustainable.

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 4>They've had a few receiving scores over the last five weeks.

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Kamara had one hundred and nineteen total yards, Connor seventy three,

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 4>Madison ninety three, Henry one hundred and twenty two. Like

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 4>backs are getting yardage on them, they're just not getting

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 4>in the end zone. That's the problem. That's kind of

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 4>why I have a B grade on Brise Hall, who's

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 4>getting fifteen touches per game, but he's got twelve catches

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 4>in the last two games. He gets the receiving any work.

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, your problem here is this, Yes, you stop Breese Hall. Yeah,

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and you stop the entire Jets off of his. Falcons

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to play to stop Breeze Hall. That'll be

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole scheme, this defense, and Tim Boyle's not beating anybody.

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I absolutely possible, that's why I would

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you move him down to a seat.

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 3>I'd have a sea grade on him, all right, at

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 3>no higher.

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 4>That's right, all right, that's fine, that's fine. Garrett Wilson.

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 4>I do have a C grade on I'm not comfortable

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 4>with it, but he has a thirty percent target share

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 4>from Tim Boyle. If Tim Boyle throws at thirty times,

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 4>that's ten targets. We saw it last week. He did

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 4>need the score. You're probably looking at four to six

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 4>catches fifty sixty yards out of Garrison. Garrett Wilson without

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 4>the score, and that's a low C is probably where

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 4>he's going to end up. I don't have a starting

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 4>grade on Tyler Coughland, No, but he's had some surprisingly

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 4>fantasy effective games three out the last five games and

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 4>Titan the Falcons are fifth worst against tight ends. It's

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 4>actually a decent spot if you're really really in a jam.

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 4>But I do have him on the bench. Tim Boyle's

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 4>just not fine, I know, right, just non functional quarterback.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 4>The college guy that you are. How many college touchdowns

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 4>did Tim Boyle throw.

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Uh man, I don't know if the top of my head.

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 3>One, Well, you have many interceptions. He threw thirteen. Wait really,

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 3>and he's in the NFL.

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 4>It's impressive.

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 3>That is impressive catch.

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm not even mad.

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Jesus no business being in an NFL starting line. That's unbelievable.

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Dolphins take on the Commanders Lions. Dolphins, Commanders.

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 4>Here we go.

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh there we are, all right, thank you.

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm thanking myself, by the way, arguably the best offense

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>against unarguably the NFL's worst defense. So this is gonna

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>be a one sided affair for sure. Yeah to Tyreek.

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek and Raheemos are just obvious a's. In Washington's last

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>three games, they've allowed two passing scores of Gino Smith,

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>three to Tommy DeVito, four to Dak Prescott. Jeez, by

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the way, they could go two, three, four, five. I'm

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:47.679
<v Speaker 1>not ruling out the five times game here for Tua.

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Washington's allowed the most by a mile points per game

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine and thirty five points per game over the

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:59.119
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks. So all those obvious starts are all a's.

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're not even going to mess with that

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>stock Jalen Waddle, who nearly comes in with an A grade.

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>He likely faces veteran Kendall Fuller the most, and he's

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the only passable cornerback for Washington. He's allowed just two

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>scores all season, Still very good matchup for Waddle. No

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>secondary surrendered more scores to wideouts than Washington's eighteen, so

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Wattle still comes in with a high B.

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 3>And then Devin H.

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Chan is the most interesting play out of the whole

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>matchup for sure, So total high risk, high reward play.

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 1>A Chan could have a massive game against a very

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>bad defense. The Dolphins could get way ahead. They could

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>rest most stirt with the big lead and give a

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Chan carries. Or you know, a Chan comes into this

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>game who's been you know, got injury issues of his

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>own with the knee injury.

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Or they could get way.

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Ahead and they could just run Jeff Wilson or something, right,

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>they could rest a Chan. So I mean there's a

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>wide variance of possible outcomes here. Ah Chan can catch

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and if he gets target volume, he can help through

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the air. The last four games, Washington's allowed for receiving

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in those four games to runners and a whopping

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine yards per game to running backs through the air.

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:11.079
<v Speaker 1>So a chan's going to help you a couple of

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>different ways. I've got to be great on him, but

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if he blew up here or if

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>they just get ahead and they dial back his usage.

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So high risk ky reward play there. Let's go to

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the Washington side, beginning with my guy, Sam Hoowell. It's

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>been a great season. You're league leader in completions, pass

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>attempts and passing yards and sacks and sacks absorbed. They

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>spine shattering fifty nine. I think he's up too, I

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>believe to throw yes, that could be both. By the way,

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>likely to be playing from behind throughout the entire game, right,

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of volume coming. Even though this is

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 1>a guy who already leads a league in passes per

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>game at forty one, he'll probably go over that in

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>this one. Washington's defense is going to give up that

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>big lead early game. Script is going to turn very

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>howley in this one. Miami's secondary looks much improved on paper,

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>but they've also they've also faced in the last month

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Aidan O'Connell, Tim Boyle and the Quadrice benched mac Jones.

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I had to look up what was after the rice.

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Mac Jones had been thrice benched for like a month.

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Now he's quadrice benched mac Jones. Miami has lost their

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>top edge rusher, Jalen Phillips, who's not expected to play here, well,

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>he won't play, and probably top safety Javon Holland is

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to play either. So there's a real opportunity

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>for Sam Howell here, even just garbage time. Be great,

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Sam Howell, be great, and Terry McLaurin. This is really interesting.

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's Sam Howell with all of this production. Terry mclaurin's

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>on the fewest yards per game of his career, oddly enough,

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>spreading the ball around to a lot of different players.

0:10:57.960 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>Now mclaurin's going to see a lot of Jalen ram

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 1>Xavian Howard. They're both playing well. Ramsey's allowing two receptions

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for seventeen yards in his coverage since coming off ir

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Howard giving up just three receptions for twenty five yards.

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, both elite numbers, but again, these guys have

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>seen some dreadful passing attacks and the last three quality

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>number one wideouts they faced, Davante Adams aj Brown, Adam

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Thielen all rocked the Dolphins. So I'm keeping a B

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>grade on Terry McLaurin. B grade on Curtis Samuel, who's

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>got targeted at wopping twelve times last week after Washington

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>fell behind early. Same game cript game script could be

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in play for Miami here, and that could help Curtis

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Samuel again. He's got a very positive matchup in the

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>slot against Cater Kouho, the weak link in the Dolphins secondary.

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>He's allowed five touchdowns in his coverage and a whopping

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>eighty five percent completion percentage, So very strong matchup for

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel with a B grade. Sticking with the passing game,

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Logan Thomas, Dolphins have given up at least forty one

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>yards to tight ends in seven consecutive games.

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 3>But see that's the problem.

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>That's about all you get from Thomas is like the

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>forty one yards. He doesn't score in no small parks.

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't get used in the red zone. He ranks

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>seventeenth among tight ends in red zone targets. Behind it

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>guys like Irv Smith, Kay Dotton, Logan, Thomas is better

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>than that. They just don't throw to him in the

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>red zone. He doesn't score touchdowns, so he can only

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>give you the C grade on Logan Thomas in this one.

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 3>And let's go to the Let's go to the running game.

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Brian Robinson likely to get games scripted out early for

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>this one. You know, again, presuming Washington falls behind early,

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be able to run. And Washington's

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>got the lowest run rate in the league anyway. No

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>back has top sixty six yards against Miami since Week six,

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>none of top eighty eight yards since way back in

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Week two, and the Dolphins haven't allowed a rushing touchdown

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>since back in Week seven, So it's all negative right now.

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>He's been Brian Robbins has been catching more passes late,

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>but Miami's terrific against receiving backs. The average running back

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>receiving game against Miami is twenty six yards, and if

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>he's got to split that evenly with Antonio Gibson, there's

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>just nothing left for Brian Robinson, and I can only

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>muster a C grade, and I considered a bench grade

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>on him altogether. All right, let's take a break when

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we come back, take a chance on me. Nine players

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not only in your starting lineup, many of these guys

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>around the.

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Waiver wire and you need the help. It's bye week

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 3>by Apocalypse too, you need the help.

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll find guys that you can start in a pinch,

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 1>including at least one tight end in a very thorny

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>tight end week. Find out who it is when we

0:13:41.240 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>come back Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>A segment we like to call take a chance on

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Me where we unveil a quarterback, running back, and receiver

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that you can in many cases pick up off the

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire and start. This week in Bipocalypse two, you

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>start the quarterback position in Scott Fish.

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Who you got.

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 4>Line's probably not on the waiver where I probably could

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 4>have gone a little bit deeper with six teams on

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 4>by here, but I went with brock Party getting an

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 4>Eagles team. He's only forty eight percent started in all

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 4>my one quarterback leagues. He's not started right now, so.

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 3>That's kind kind of a mistake.

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 4>That's what I thought too. That's what I thought too,

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 4>gaining an Eagles team. There's a lot of whopping. Seven

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 4>of the eleven quarterbacks they face to hit three hundred

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 4>and or multiple scores, they're allowing three point twenty five

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 4>touchdowns per game or the last four just a really

0:14:58.520 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 4>good spot for brock party.

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 3>All right, Sore, you take a chance on me quarterback.

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna go with Gardner Minshew against the Titans. So

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 5>Minshew is quarterback twenty one in fantasy points per game

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 5>since he took over in week six. But I think

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 5>this is a great matchup against a really bad Titan

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 5>secondary since since Week seven, the Titans are third worst

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 5>in completion percentage over expected allowed.

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I think Minshew can pop off this week.

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 3>I like Minshew this week as well. I've got a

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 3>starting great on him.

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, me too.

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make up for Scott's rather choky brock Perdy

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>by going the other way with a super high degree

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of difficulty. It's such a high degree of difficulty. Greg

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Luganis would get off the diving board and go back

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>down the ladder.

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Be like.

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Kenny Pickett.

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you want to know how many touchdowns Kenny Pickett

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>has thrown in the last six games?

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Three, two, two, one.

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Okay, you don't have any multi score touchdown games he

0:15:59.160 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 4>has in his career.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>One is one, but you know what we could get

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>one here? Okay, now, it's two reasons number one. And

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you guys saw this stat, but this, this

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>was a mind blowing stat.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Last week, the.

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers went for four hundred yards yes of total offense.

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>The last time they went for four hundred yards of

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>total offense was the game before Matt Canada became offensive

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>coordinator and in the forty.

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 4>Four games between the two and no forty yard games. Yep,

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 4>I saw that. I was like, that is staggering competence.

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>That is a bookend of incompetence for Matt Canada right there.

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Incredible.

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 3>It is so.

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Pickett, unshackled from Matt Canada last week, throws for seventy

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>three percent completion rate and two hundred and seventy yards.

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he looked good. Didn't happen to find the

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>end zone. But here comes Arizona. Every opposing quarterback has

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>thrown a touchdown. This is a great opportunity. Pigott's gonna

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>get at least one and prop not probably two. I can't,

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't go there. He's gonna get at least one

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>here and maybe two.

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 4>I like it.

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>In this matchup at PFF ranks, Arizona twenty seventh in

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>pass rush, twenty fourth in coverage, so there's a nice opportunity.

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford just threw four touchdowns. Who's been languishing all

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>year for touchdowns? Right, he just threw four against Arizona.

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>I like this game, Kenny Pickett, let's go to the

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>running back positions.

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 4>Got Yeah for the last one, I almost won with

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 4>Trevor Lawrence because I have him as my QB six

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 4>on the week, and I thought that's really high for

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Trevor Lawrence.

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 3>He's coming off to big games.

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, it's it's a good spot for him too.

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 4>My running back this week is to Ernest Johnson. Eight

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 4>plus touches for fifty plus total yards and back to

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 4>back this week. The Jags are eight and a half

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 4>point favorites. So when Ernest goes to Cincy, get it,

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 4>Like Ernest goes to jail, Ernest go back there to

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 4>the nineties. Yeah, I'm glad you've both got it, because

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.199
<v Speaker 4>I was really worried about the people would get that.

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 4>De Ernis goes to Citzy not to mention it, not

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 4>to mention etn Is coming in banged up with a

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 4>chest injury. So if they give him a lighter workload,

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 4>especially if they get ahead. Denis Johnson could see eight, nine, ten, twelve,

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 4>thirteen more touches. I like this spot for Johnson.

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I won't.

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I won't lie it hurts right now. Yeah, Okay, let's

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>go to Thorn. You take a chance with me running.

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna go with Royce Freeman in his game against

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 5>the Browns. So Royce Freeman against the Browns, this is

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 5>the bold part of that. Yeah, but their run defense

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 5>hasn't been quite as good this year. That pass defense

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 5>have been great. Riyce Freeman this year number twenty and

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 5>miss forest tackles per attempt, number fifteen in yards after

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 5>contact per attempt, and he's a top ten PFF graded

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 5>running back this year. Thirteen carries for seventy seven yards

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 5>in a touchdown while playing thirty four percent of the

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 5>snaps last week against the Cardinals. And this sort of

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 5>goes with what Fish was saying with his If the

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 5>Ram beat the Browns by double digits this week, the

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 5>same thing could happen with Freeman getting all the touches,

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 5>which would make him startable.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 4>Royce Freeman also top five in yards over expectation.

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, shocking.

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, this is nothing like the freeman known

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 1>in the past. I'm upgrade now he was Royce dropped

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 1>the piano freeman. I upgraded him to Royce dropped the

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>organ freeman because he was apparently running a little lighter.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make the move all the way up to

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Royce drop the flute.

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, I mean he's he is running like a

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 3>man unencumbered.

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 2>Sure is, Yeah, sure is.

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 3>If we have time.

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>At some point later in the showman asked you about

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Zack Evans and what the hell's gone horribly wrong? All right,

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I might take a chance on me running back. This

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>also hurts, I was.

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 4>I was not exactly right.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Damian Pierce has devolved into a take a chance on

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>me player, and barely even one at that. But this

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is the opportunity right here. Last week, Pierce returned after.

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 3>A month long layoff.

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Singletary still got most of the work, but Pierce is

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a week healthier. Singletary only managed eighteen yards with his

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>starting role last week, so maybe there's an opportunity for

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Pierce here against a Broncos defense giving up one hundred

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and forty rushing yards per game to running backs over

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks.

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:22.360
<v Speaker 3>If you have only given up.

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>One touchdown to the position six games. So maybe not

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown here, but Denver ranks dead lasts and runs

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>stuff win rate. They're twenty ninth in run defense by

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus. The opportunity is certainly there Damian Pierce,

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, dart throw opportunity. It's I would feel a

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of personal gratification if he could come through

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in this spot.

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 4>When talking about Singletary, I'm disappointed you didn't say, after

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 4>a couple of big games, motor stalled.

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, have a motor Singletary there you got?

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 2>That would have been finest.

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 3>Yes, listen, I.

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Don't play ma anybody for never listening to me about

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>anything I ever say about Damian Pierce. Again, anybody actually

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>take that advice? Go to the receivers. Who you got, Scott?

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I am going to go over to that Chargers

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 4>New England game and I'm gonna start Gerald Everett this

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 4>week in a game again against New England. Keenan Allen

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 4>is coming and dinged up. He wasn't even practicing this week.

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 4>If he gets a lighter workload, they're gonna need to

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 4>depend on someone. Everett back to full health last week

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 4>had four for forty three to score, and he's top

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 4>top five in tight end targets inside the ten. I

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 4>think it's not a great matchup, but he's gonna need

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 4>to be basically one of the only weapons.

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 3>That makes sense. All right, let's go to your take

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 3>a chance with your receiver four.

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna go with Brown's wide receiver Elijah Moore against

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 5>the Rams the aforementioned game against the Rams. More is

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 5>wide receiver sixty in fantasy this year, but he's been

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 5>coming on at least forty four receiving yards in each

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 5>of his last three games, and this is a pretty

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 5>solid matchup for him. The Rams have allowed the seventh

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 5>highest PPR points per target to opposing slots. I think

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 5>More could be a heavily used say ffty blanket for

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 5>Joe Flacco in this game. Get a lot of those

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 5>targets and maybe wrack up some points here.

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 4>Alright, I like that.

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh, you need a tight end. Six teams are on

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>by tight ends, always a thin position. Trey McBride may

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>very well not play, which is problematic. So you're looking

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for tight end help. I'm gonna give you two.

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh in the same team, So three in this segment

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 4>for people we're helping.

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>We are trying to help here, how about Taysom Hill

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and or Juwan Johnson. Okay, okay, So we'll take the

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>two Saints guys. So the top three Saints receivers are

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>expected to be out. In fact, they've two of them

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>are definitely out. Rashid Shaheed, our Guy Thor and I well,

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I think you might be on him to love them

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Andy and yes, he's been ruled out.

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 3>Michael Thomas is on.

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I are the only glimmer of hope, and I don't

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna happen, like five percent chance Chris Olave goes,

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>but all three top receivers are out, so they're gonna

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>have to make do with other players.

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I think the.

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Opportunity is going to be there for Taysom Hill, who's

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>been targeted twenty five times in his last six games

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>with with an average catch of twelve yards over that span,

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>and in the games that Derek Carr started and finished

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>since Week six, he'll seen at least nine to nine

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 1>total opportunities been targets and carries. Detroit allows four red

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>zone trips per game on the road, and New Orleans

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>gets inside the opponent's twenty yard line four times per game.

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>That's paydir time for potentially Taysom Hill. Now for Juwan Johnson,

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know this. He has the highest rate of

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>lining up in the slot of any tight end in

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the league, which is really surprising. So he's a natural

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to take over the slot routes that have been left

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>behind by Thomas and o'lave and Rashid Shaheed. So some

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for Juwan Johnson as well in this game. They

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.959
<v Speaker 1>gotta find somebody at Perry can only carry an offense

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>so much so Taysom Hill Juwan Johnson both startable in

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>this game.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's go back to the matchups.

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Thor you're up to bat baby Colts taking on the

0:23:55.280 --> 0:24:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Titans in this one. Zach Moss went off on the

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>previous time these teams met.

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but that's a total.

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Aberration for an otherwise very good Titans run defense.

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 3>So what do you think in this one?

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna give him a bee?

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 5>And of course Gardner minshew as might take a chance

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:13.959
<v Speaker 5>at me quarterback, but with Zach Moss, I'm gonna give

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 5>him a bee. Returns to the bell call role with

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 5>Jonathan Taylor out with his thumb injury weeks two to five,

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 5>when that was the case for Zach Moss as the

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 5>Belcow average twenty four touches per game and one hundred

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 5>and twenty three total yards per game. And to charge

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 5>his point, in Week five against these very same Titans,

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 5>Moss had one hundred and ninety five yards from scrimmage

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 5>and two touchdowns. He's gonna get all the touches and

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 5>all the use that should justify a be even borderline A.

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 5>Those were the two I was between, not B and C.

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 4>It was go.

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Now, I'm nervous because the Titans run defense other than

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that Zach Moss game has basically been shut down, and

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>over the last six weeks they're giving up two point

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>seven yards per carry for sure, So I have I'm

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a little more cautious on Moss than you are.

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and that's why I ended up going with the B.

0:24:57.720 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, I'm pretty bullish on him.

0:24:59.280 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 2>This week.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 5>I will give an a though to Michael Pittman, who

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 5>is quarterback proof, matchup proof, et cetera. And in this one,

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 5>it's a good matchup because he gets to go up

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 5>against Sean Murphy Bunning sixty five percent catch rate allowed

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 5>this year and Christian Fulton one hundred and twenty two

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 5>passer rating allowed on targets.

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 2>So Pittman's gonna eat here.

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 5>He's wide receiver seventeen in fantasy, and he's had a

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 5>twenty nine percent target share with Gardner Minshew under center.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 5>Gonna look to him early and often, and Pittman's going

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 5>to be beaten up on whoever's matchup across from him.

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 5>Not quite as good of a matchup for Josh Downs.

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna give him a c that. The Titans have

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 5>been better against the opposing slots this year, allowing the

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 5>six lowest PPR points per target. Roger McCreery, who I've

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 5>I was lower on the rest of his career, have

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 5>been playing a little bit better out of the slot.

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 5>He gonna beat up Downs and push him around. Very

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 5>physical player, maybe a little two handsy sometimes. Yeah, like that,

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 5>because you love that.

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 4>I love Downs.

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 5>The Titans run predominantly zone coverage, and over the last

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 5>four games, to be fair to Downs, Downs leads the

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.199
<v Speaker 5>Colts in target share percentage against coverage. But I have

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 5>to temper the expectations a little bit, just because McCurry

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 5>has been playing a little better, so i'll give down

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 5>to the Sea. You're gonna keep the Colts tight ends

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 5>on your bench, obviously moving over to the Titans, You're

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 5>also gonna be keeping mister will Levis on your bench.

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 2>DeAndre Hopkins, I'm gonna give him a c.

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 5>He does have an awesome first freed share ever since

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 5>will Levis took over. It's nearly thirty percent, but it's

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 5>led to only forty eight point eight receiving yards pol.

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Game, and that can't complete a pass because Will Levis

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 2>is not good.

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, just totally errant and he locks onto guys, which

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 5>is the one thing you can say for Hopkins, but

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 5>it's just not leading to the production so far. And

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 5>this is an average matchup for Hopkins. Even outside that context,

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.120
<v Speaker 5>India has been league average against boundary wide receivers since

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 5>the middle of the season, so nothing special with regards

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 5>to that. Chicka Coonquo is also going to be staying

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 5>on your bench. Derreck Henry, We're gonna give him a be.

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 5>He has not had twenty carries in a game since

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 5>Week eight. The Colts do have a below average run

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 5>defense and Indy struggles.

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Again zone runs. So the matchup is there, will the

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 2>touches be there?

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 5>But fifty six percent of Henry's carries this year have

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 5>been zone runs, and again Indy struggles against that. So

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 5>with all that stuff baked, and I'm gonna give Henry

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 5>a b and I hate to say, but you got

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 5>to keep Tajay Spears on your bench. He's been awesome

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 5>when he's been given the opportunity. He needs more opportunity

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 5>does number one in the NFL and explosive run rate

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 5>this year put Taja on the field more. Obviously, not

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 5>enough touches to start him. Sixteen point five total yards

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 5>per game average over the last two weeks not the best.

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we get plenty wrong here, but you know

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>one thing we got right was when Will Levis had

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that four touchdown breakout first game. Yeah, we said, look

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>at those four touchdowns. Yes, those were on errand passes.

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.199
<v Speaker 1>That took a lot to all those things, and he

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>had won that was a really nice pass and broken

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 1>coverages as well.

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, were like, you know what.

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, before we assume that this guy's gonna be

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns.

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Every he hasn't had four touchdowns since.

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it may not again.

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, total, Well, maybe we don't go quite that far.

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, Chargers taking on the Patriots. Austin

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Eckler has been very disappointing and this is a thorny matchup.

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you what to expect when we come back

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Churchi

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and Scott Fish and thorn Eystrom with you, Scott. Austin

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Eckler has been veryverwhelming, dominating fantasy back for years. He

0:28:55.520 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>ranks twenty first in yards over expectation, twenty five in

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>rushing efficiency. He's top the meager milestone of three and

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a half yards per carry in one game since the

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>opener YEP.

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 4>And even his yardage totals, even if you include the

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 4>receiving totals have been sub one hundred multiple times recently, which.

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Is good about this as a receiver among running backs. Yeah,

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>why do you think he ranks? Some Pro football focuses

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>just receiving receiving grade among running backs fourteenth fifty sixth.

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Jesus, I would never have guessed that because there doesn't

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 4>feel like that. I mean, there's a lot of running

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 4>backs in the NFL, but that's staying near dead last

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 4>of the ones that I do have a B grade

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 4>on him here, but I almost gave him a C grade.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 4>The lead back has scored in four straight against the Pats.

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned a lot of the stats you actually mentioned,

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 4>but he still gets eighteen touches per game, four being catches.

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 4>So in PPR leagues you're getting four points right there.

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 4>You probably gained sixty seventy eighty yards and they're giving

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 4>up touchdowns a lot recently for the Pats. I did

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 4>give him a B. I could see it being a

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 4>C over the passing game. Justin Herbert, I have a

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 4>B grade on If keenan Allen somehow doesn't go, all

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 4>likelihood is that he's going to go. He's been limited,

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 4>he's been working on the side, he's not doing the

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 4>full practices, but everyone seems to expect him to go.

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 4>If he doesn't go, I would push Herbert down to

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 4>a sea. But I do have a B grade on him.

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 4>Only three quarterbacks have multi score games on the Patriots,

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 4>which pushes him down. And Herbert himself has been pretty

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 4>hit or miss, But in the last five weeks he's

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 4>had three multi score games, two games around three hundred.

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 4>He's rushing a ton more. He's like one hundred and

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty yards rushing the least two games alone. That's insane

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 4>to me. I love it.

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 3>I love all this extra work for Ramondre. We're getting

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 3>the guy I want.

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 4>It all season. Yeah, over here. For Keenan Allen, I

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 4>have an A grade.

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, I got a little exciting jump.

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 4>He got way too excited. You love ram Stevenson. We're

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 4>mentioning a lot of nicknames on this show. I've noticed

0:30:57.920 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't have a rams sound to give you. Okay,

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Keenan Allen A grade if he goes. I know, limited practice,

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 4>but he's averaging nine catches for one hundred and two

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 4>yards on twelve targets, and he's a coin flip chance

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 4>for scoring. He scores about sixty sixty two games something

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 4>like that. Quentin Johnson and I do have on the bench,

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 4>but it's it's a good match up. And if Keenan

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Allen doesn't go, I can see trying to push Quentin

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Johnson or Jalen Guyton in. Gerald Everett might take a

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 4>chance on me players. So obviously I think I have

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 4>a secrete on him. You should, you know, try to

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 4>get him in if you have a rough matchup over

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 4>on the New England side, we don't know who the

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 4>quarterback is going to be. They're preparing mac Jones to start,

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 4>but if they keep benching him for Zappi, and they've

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 4>had Malie Cunningham working with the quarterbacks a little, and

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 4>now they have three wide receivers out, and Malie Cunningham

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 4>late in the week was working with the wide receivers

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 4>a little. So we don't even know what's gonna go

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 4>on with that. So I have the whole passing game

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 4>on the bench with tomorrow. Douglas is the only one

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 4>you would have wanted to start, and he's out DeVante Parker.

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 4>I can see him having a day, but you can't

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 4>trust that. So Ramander Stevenson gets the only starting grade

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 4>for the New England Patriots, averaging seventeen touches, gets like

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 4>three to four catches. He takes three quarters of the

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 4>two minute drill stuff, the long down and distant stuff,

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 4>the pass game, snaps two thirds in the snaps in general.

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 4>More recently he's got twenty three plus touches in back

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 4>to back, which I know Charge absolutely loves. I do

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 4>Chargers allowing the ninth most convoy yards to backs, including

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.719
<v Speaker 4>bottom three in yards and receptions to backs. So and

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 4>that's more Stevenson's game than Ezekiel Elliott's who's coming and

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 4>banged up. So I have Zeke on the bench. Not

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 4>a B grade for Stevenson, I didn't say.

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So, Yeah, I don't think he did. And that sounds

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>right to me too. Let's go to the Lions taking

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Saints. Saints were good defense, but has a

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>good offense. And I've got a lot of good starting

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, good starting grades for Lions, not great good,

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of B grades. But let's start with a

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>B grade. David Montgomery. He's scored in all seven games

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that he started. Yes, he's averaging one and a half

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>rushes from inside the five yard line, a pace that

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>leads the league, and carries from inside the five over

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the past month, the Saints are allowing two running backs

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to top forty three yards per game. So even if

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Gibbs and Montgomery both get plenty of carries here, you know,

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>still like Montgomery a lot, and I think he finds

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>his way to the end zone again. Jamiir Gibbs also

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>comes in with a B grade. He's seen at least

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>five targets in each of the last six games. But

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the Saints have been terrific against receiving backs, allowing the

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>fourth fewest receptions and the fourth fewest receiving yards allowed

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>per game, and they've only given up one receiving touchdown

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>allowed to running backs. He is getting some carries near

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the stripe, so he's not losing all the touchdowns to Monty,

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:42.479
<v Speaker 1>but it's still Montgomery's the touchdown first guy on volume.

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Jamiir Gibbs be great. Let's go to the passing game.

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff comes in with a B grade as well.

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Saints are a good coverage team. They rank seventh by

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus seventh and passing yards allowed, but the

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>pass rush isn't nearly as good and Marshawn Latimer, their

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>star cornerback, is out. New Orleans ranks thirty first in

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>pass rush win rate and no New Orleans quarterback and

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans has seen sorry I'm trying to say, and

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans has seen some awful quarterbacking, including eight opposing

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks who were either rookies, backups or been benched.

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 3>And that really leads them.

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>To I think some skewed stats in favor of the

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Saints that are not realistic here, I still like GoF

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>B grade for him, A grade for i'man Ross Saint Brown.

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course, slot receivers killing the Saints and including fractionally

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.720
<v Speaker 1>talented players like Darnell Mooney and Christian Kirk and Josh

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Downs are good players, but they are not I'm on

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Ross Saint Brown.

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 3>When he lines up on the outside.

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>He also gets a plus matchup with Marshall and Latimer out,

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>so I really do like Almen Ross Saint Brown.

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 3>A grade for him.

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Sam Laporta comes in with a B grade Saints or

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a neutral tight end matchup, but they've allowed five tight end.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Scores in the last six games.

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>The only thing holding the Laporter back from elite tight

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>end status is volume. He's posted between three and five

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>receptions in eight different games. That's not quite enough to

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>make you fantasy a Fantasy star tight end. And he

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>only gets a B grade in this game. And all

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the other receivers like Josh Raymond, Kalief Ramon, Josh Reynolds,

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Kalif Rayman, Jamison Williams.

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 3>On the bench, Let's go to the Saint side.

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I already gave you Taysom Hill and Juwan Johnson. Is

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance on me receivers at the tight

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:24.919
<v Speaker 1>end position. The only other guy that you could start

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>from the receiving game is At Perry. This is a

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>guy that Scott talked about last week last week, and

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>he's the number one wide receiver.

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Now I knew all those injuries we're gonna have exactly.

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>It's on all Covin against a pretty bad secondary. Perry

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 1>is a taller guy with decent speed, and we saw

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Christian Watson put up a huge game against the Lions

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the week before that.

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 3>It was DJ Moore.

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 4>So I sick are six foot five pounds four four

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 4>seven to be exact.

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, but wow, very nice, very nicely done. This is

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a dart throw, but the Lions are like twenty six

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 1>in coverage by Pro Football Focus. They give up the

0:35:56.760 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>seventh most fantasy points to receivers. So At Perry your

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.839
<v Speaker 1>official dart throw for me in this one. And then

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the other guy that we care about, Alvin Kamara. Tricky

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>matchup here. Lions are a good run defense, allowing just

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>three point four yards per carry. No back has top

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven yards against them all year, and Kamara has

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 1>only hit that mark sixty seven yards on the ground once. Now,

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 1>he does lead all receivers in targets, but Detroit is

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>not allowed at running back to he hit five receptions

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>or fifty receiving yards all year, and they haven't a

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of receiving score to the position all year either,

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So this is a tough spot for Kamara.

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm giving him a bee on volume.

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 1>I would too, but that is it, and we're not

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>playing Derek Carr and it's a very tough matchup missing

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>his top three receivers all right. Final matchup of this

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>segment is the Arizona Cardinals taking on the Steelers thor

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>anybody from the Cardinals side that you like.

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:51.399
<v Speaker 5>Here only because of bye weeks, starting with Kyler Murray,

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 5>who I'm going to give a C grade too. He

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 5>does have a rushing touchdown in all three of his

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 5>games back, which has really propped up his fantasy value

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 5>even when he's not throwing the ball well. But in

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.959
<v Speaker 5>those three weeks, quarterback thirteen, quarterback six, and quarterback nine

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.720
<v Speaker 5>in fantasy despite the poor passing numbers.

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 2>But this is not a great matchup here.

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:13.359
<v Speaker 5>Pittsburgh's pass defense has been great in recent weeks and

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 5>as you guys know, everyone is hurt on the Cardinals side. Yep,

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:20.280
<v Speaker 5>So we'll talk about the first one now, Hollywood Brown.

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna give him a seat if he plays. He

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 5>was on the injury report all last week with this

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 5>heeled deal, but played eighty seven percent of the snaps anyway,

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 5>which is why it was good news that he returned

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 5>to practice on Friday, trending towards playing in this game.

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:35.839
<v Speaker 2>Like I said, I'll give him a see.

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 5>If he does, he is likely to draw stud rookie

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 5>cornerback Joey Porter Junior from the Steelers.

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:44.799
<v Speaker 2>He looks so good, looks really good the past.

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 5>In recent weeks here, Porter Junior has shadowed Jamar Chase,

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 5>Amari Cooper, and DeAndre Hopkins. Of those three guys, only

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:56.839
<v Speaker 5>Chase got over forty yards forty nothing. Yeah, Porter's been

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 5>great and he's gonna get his hands all over Hollywood

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 5>coming off the line. That's the question you always have

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 5>with Hollywood, So that could be a bad matchup there.

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Trey McBride's another Sea guy if he plays. Currently he's

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 5>being deemed a game time decision and questionable with a

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 5>groin injury, and even if he does play, it's a

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 5>bad matchup for him too. The Steelers have allowed the

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 5>ninth fewest Fantasy points per game to opposing tight ends.

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 5>James Connor that the other Cardinals receivers and tight ends

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 5>you're gonna leave on your bench, obviously, James Connor, I'm

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 5>gonna give him a c Connor is typically played around

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 5>sixty five percent of the snaps when the game script

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 5>doesn't flip wildly against him, which, of course, playing for

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 5>the Cardinals, that's something that can happen. Connor's number nine

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 5>in explosive run rate, number four in miss tackles force

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 5>per attempt. It's again not a great matchup for him.

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 5>The Steelers have an above average run defense. That'll be

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 5>keying on Connor here because Kyler's not throwing well and

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:52.879
<v Speaker 5>all Kyler's weapons are hurt.

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 2>So we'll give Connor a see.

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 5>Moving over to the Steelers, Kenny Pickett of course, was

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:01.439
<v Speaker 5>charged to take a chance on me quarterback and j Bold, Yeah,

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean, just to add something to that, can you

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 5>Picktt last week? Number two and highly accurate throw rate

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 5>across the NFL's.

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Never a highly accurate passer you.

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:13.959
<v Speaker 5>Take take the shackles of Matt Canada off and maybe

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 5>we've got something here.

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Naj Harris. I'm gonna give him a bee.

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 5>Since Week seven, Naje Harris averaging sixteen touches per game

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.919
<v Speaker 5>seventy two total yards per game. He's also number four

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 5>overall in the NFL in explosive run rate this year. Cardinals,

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 5>as you guys know, miss a lot of tackles and

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 5>they also allow a lot of explosive runs. To think

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 5>capping Harris's value as always is sharing the usage and

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 5>the red zone touches with Jalen Warren. Those red zone

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 5>touches have been about divvid fifty to fifty, so you

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 5>have to keep that in mind. But I'm giving him

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 5>a bee. I'm also going to give Jalen Warren a b.

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 5>Last four games for Jalen Warren, he's averaging fifteen touches

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 5>per game and one hundred and eight total yards per game.

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 5>Warren is number his top two in explosive run rate,

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:02.479
<v Speaker 5>misstackles force per at ten and yards after contact tempts

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 5>now absolutely incredible when he's when he's been on the field.

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 2>This is a good matchup for him.

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:09.760
<v Speaker 5>As I was mentioned when I was talking about Harris,

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 5>but of course again Warren has to share the workload

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 5>with Harris, so we're gonna get both those guys.

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 4>A B.

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Deontay Johnson, he gets an A.

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.360
<v Speaker 5>Johnson has a twenty seven percent target share since he

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:23.800
<v Speaker 5>returned from injury in Week seven. He has a thirty

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 5>one percent first read share against too high coverage. Since

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:29.879
<v Speaker 5>that time, Cardinals run a ton of.

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Too high safety coverage.

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 5>Looks, the Cardinals have allowed the third highest points per reception,

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.800
<v Speaker 5>points per target. I'm sorry to perimeter wide receivers this season.

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 5>I think this is a game where Johnson eats George Pickens.

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:43.919
<v Speaker 5>Not as good of a matchup for him. We're gonna

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.319
<v Speaker 5>give him a C. I was talking about the thing

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 5>of how much too high the Cardinals run. Teams that

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 5>run too high against the Steelers are able to take

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 5>away the home runs the Pickens hits.

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 2>He got more help deep. He can't. He can't do

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:58.919
<v Speaker 2>his deep ball game. It's not as viable against too deep.

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 5>George Picks only has a fourteen percent target share versus

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:05.320
<v Speaker 5>that coverage since Deontay Johnson.

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Returned, So they don't even try it.

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 5>They don't even try it. Yeah, because he can't use

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 5>them to stretch it deep. So I think all the

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 5>use is gonna get funneled that Johnson in this game.

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 5>You can start pickings, of course with all the bye

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 5>weeks if you need to, but only giving him a C.

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 5>Pat Fryarmuth is the is the other guy with an

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:22.239
<v Speaker 5>awesome matchup. We're giving him an A. I think he's

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 5>gonna feast this week, last two weeks last I'm sorry,

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 5>last two games where Friarmuth played double high car against

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 5>double high coverage forty seven percent air yard share.

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I like that.

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 5>So they like to use him to use the space

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 5>that they get in whatever finding those spots down this

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:40.399
<v Speaker 5>seam over the full season, because you know, you could

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 5>be like, oh that's just two games, that's a small

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 5>sample over the full season. Twenty five percent first read

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 5>share versus too high for Pat Fryermuth. Very good matchup

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 5>for him. We're giving him an A as well.

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh I like it.

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I think he's in my top three love receiver our

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 1>tight ends for this week.

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 4>Love it charge. We got a minute here? Can I

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:00.120
<v Speaker 4>talk about fantasy cars for a second? Is that okay? Oh?

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 3>It would be great?

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 4>Thanks, So fantasycares Fantasycares dot Org is a five oh

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 4>one C three charity that I run, and we are

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 4>having a twenty five days of Christmas giveaway thing. We're

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 4>giving away signed memorabilia, memorabilia and SFB spots each day

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:16.799
<v Speaker 4>for the next twenty five days. If you go to

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 4>fantasycares dot org slash gg it stands for goodness, giveaway

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:25.240
<v Speaker 4>or giveaway goodness or something fantasycares dot org slash gg

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 4>and donate thirty dollars or more, you get entered in

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:32.280
<v Speaker 4>all twenty five days. Today we gave away a signed

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Lamar Jackson Jersey. We're giving aways sign.

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Time by him.

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:38.839
<v Speaker 4>Yep. Oh okay, well yep, that makes it better. Yeah, yeah,

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 4>I didn't sign it, but yeah I could have you

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 4>signed something I spills, but no, lots have signed awesome

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 4>stuff and uh yeah, thirty dollars. That's thirty dollars or

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 4>more fantasycares dot org slash GG.

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And you get entered into every day, all of them,

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 1>all twenty five days.

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Hear to Christmas, Yep, absolutely love it.

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Christmas celebration. Love to see it.

0:42:57.440 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, go in something that's a great it's a great call.

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, Fantasycaars dot org is the destination website to go

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to for more information on that. I love it, fantastic.

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for doing that, and we encourage people to

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>do that. You mentioned Deontay Johnson. Did you guys see

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>him watch the.

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Watching just not even care? Yeah, that was bad man.

0:43:17.520 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 2>I had a ton of effort there.

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:24.840
<v Speaker 4>That'd be zero between Claypool and Brown and Mike Wallace

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 4>had some time. They've had some interesting people.

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 1>They really haven't day pickings go into social media like

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:31.879
<v Speaker 1>you went out of the team and the whole thing's

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:34.959
<v Speaker 1>been pretty diseased over there. That wide receiver room for sure,

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:39.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but hopefully better days ahead without Matt

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Canada there. We'll find out our number two of Fantasy

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly coming up next, including three tough questions see

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:48.240
<v Speaker 1>if you can go three and ozer with our panel

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of experts, and we can continue breaking down games for

0:43:51.160 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the next hour as well. Stay tuned everybody our number

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 1>two Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charge and Scott Fish throw

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Nystrom with you. This is a game we like to

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>call three tough questions.

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Tough question number one rest of season.

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:21.759
<v Speaker 1>New Indianapolis starting running back Zach Moss will be a

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:26.280
<v Speaker 1>RB one an RB two flex or bench.

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 3>We begin with Scottfish first.

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 4>I can't wait until Tank Bigsby goes to another team

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:34.839
<v Speaker 4>and is behind the stud runny back.

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I was eventually right on Zach Moss. It just took

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 3>us three years to get there.

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:43.320
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that's all. That's all it is. It feels like

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 4>we're that way a lot though. We call sleepers out

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 4>and then it takes several more weeks or maybe a

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:51.279
<v Speaker 4>year or two. We are Look, we're usually early. We

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 4>always want.

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 1>The young guys to do good fast, and we don't

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 1>have the patients that the teams that acquired the players.

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah usually yeah.

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 4>Here are where? Here are where Zach Moss? Here is

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:08.800
<v Speaker 4>where Zach Moss landed in the five games he played

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 4>where either Taylor missed or he was limited getting back

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:14.879
<v Speaker 4>to action. This is the grades he would have had

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:18.840
<v Speaker 4>based on his stats A A, C, A B. That's

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 4>that's how I feel he would have landed stat wise.

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't remember how we would have graded him or

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 4>how we did grade him at the time, but his

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:28.400
<v Speaker 4>remaining matchups through the Fantasy playoffs, I would say our

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:31.399
<v Speaker 4>ballpark three middle ones, one bad one good one, good one,

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 4>and even the matchup that's that's a bad one. They allowed.

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 4>They allow a lot of volume to back, so volume

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.879
<v Speaker 4>season play, I think RB two seems like a lock.

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 4>He could get to a low end RB one for me.

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 4>Given the fact that that that team averages well over

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty touches for their lead back, I think I'm gonna

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 4>say low end RB one is very in play here.

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:54.439
<v Speaker 4>So RB one, RB one, I'm gonna do it. Sure,

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 4>let's get bold the.

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Rest of season. New Indianapolis starting running back Zack Bass

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:00.920
<v Speaker 1>will be in RB one, RB two flex or bench

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 1>RB one for me.

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:05.799
<v Speaker 5>Jonathan Taylor probably out three weeks. They say two to

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:07.800
<v Speaker 5>three weeks, but it's not going to be two. Probably

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:10.880
<v Speaker 5>gonna be three weeks. We're already in week thirteen, so

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:14.400
<v Speaker 5>that's thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, So maybe Taylor comes back sixteen.

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:17.560
<v Speaker 4>And we saw what happened when Taylor came back limited early,

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 4>you know exactly.

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, and Moss gets the Legiti bell call usage

0:46:22.520 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 5>when Taylor's out, Like we were talking about before, and

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:26.440
<v Speaker 5>like Scott was just talking about, I think you have

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 5>to consider him an RB one these next three weeks.

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Colts appear to be in the mix for a wild

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 1>card and we'll play it in the end of the

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>year and try to win, which I think is a

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:39.319
<v Speaker 1>factor in all of this. And you guys hit on

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 1>most of my key talking points here. He's going to

0:46:41.160 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>get a workhorse level of carries while Taylor's out. Now,

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I do I disagree that now with Taylor coming back

0:46:46.200 --> 0:46:50.239
<v Speaker 1>fully presumably fully healthy and not with a leg injury, yeah,

0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>handed your I think right.

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 4>Back, absolutely, I do think back once.

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>He comes back, probably the timetable is probably gonna be

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 1>three weeks. So I can't give an I can't give

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:04.839
<v Speaker 1>him an RB one grade when he might be a

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:09.439
<v Speaker 1>bench guy in weeks fifteen, sixteen, seventeen at So yeah,

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's just not you know, I think it's

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:14.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be. And by the way, and Thorn and

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:16.239
<v Speaker 1>I disagree a little bit about this. I think this

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is a tougher match up against Tennessee than Thorn does this.

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a tricky one. So I've got

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the correct answer RB two.

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:24.799
<v Speaker 2>Tough question number two.

0:47:25.520 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, it sabotage drops HeSE We've done sabotage questions

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>three straight shows, and you build the deal In this

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to drop a brand name player that is

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>good enough that your opponents will pick them up and

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:40.920
<v Speaker 1>start them and hurt themselves by doing so.

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:46.440
<v Speaker 3>It is a very difficult move to get correct. Should

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 3>you sabotage drop Gus Edwards we go to thorn Ice

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:52.360
<v Speaker 3>from first.

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:56.399
<v Speaker 5>No for me, because if Kethon Mitchell gets hurt, it's

0:47:56.440 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 5>the Zach Moss corollary all over again. The Ravens don't

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 5>have anyone else play, so then Gus Boss would become

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 5>the heavy belcow usage guy the rest of the season.

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:07.200
<v Speaker 5>So for that reason alone, I think you have to

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 5>keep him on your roster.

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 4>Scott, Yeah, so I'm gonna go injury agnostic here the

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 4>old Bob Harris quote of not playing time, not count

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 4>on injuries, not play towards injuries, And I'm gonna say, yes,

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:24.400
<v Speaker 4>he's We've seen his snaps go down more of a

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 4>three headed mach monster. Now, Mitchell gained the start, by

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 4>the way, Mitchell was one of my prespects before it

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 4>was cool when he was on IR. I remember that again,

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:39.200
<v Speaker 4>way too early. Yeah, Gus was fourth in and running

0:48:39.200 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 4>back snaps. Last week. He scored in five straight, but

0:48:41.880 --> 0:48:43.839
<v Speaker 4>he lost that work. The last game, he has no

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:47.360
<v Speaker 4>pass game work. His yardage totals, even in those touchdown

0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 4>games were between forty and sixty five yards. So if

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:52.120
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't score, he doesn't get it. I think the

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:54.640
<v Speaker 4>hope here is sabotage drop him. Someone spends it on him,

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 4>and he doesn't score, and then then it's a bust

0:48:57.120 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 4>of a game.

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Dropping the guy with the third most rush touchdowns sounds insane,

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it is, or maybe it's just crazy enough

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to work. Touchdown dependent players are good candidates for this.

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:16.800
<v Speaker 1>In the fantasy playoffs, you need to get three straight wins. Yeah,

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 1>can you count on a touchdown dependent player to not

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>dud in any of those three?

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Probably not. Now he's averaging just nine.

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Carries the past two weeks, and as Scott mentioned, he

0:49:29.960 --> 0:49:32.640
<v Speaker 1>does not catch. Let's go to the schedule, and here's

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the clincher. By this week, then Rams after that, they

0:49:37.719 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 1>give up the seventh fewest rushing touchdowns Jacksonville after that,

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the second fewest rushing touchdowns Niners after that, seventh fewest

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:51.920
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns Miami after that, twelfth fewest rushing touchdowns. If

0:49:51.960 --> 0:49:54.520
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't give you touchdowns, you get nothing out of

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards sabotage drop boom.

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, tough question number three.

0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, for the second consecutive week, I have a

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 1>conundrum in my Empire League, this time involving my own

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:15.400
<v Speaker 1>rebuilding team. Rosters are only fourteen players. I love short

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 1>roster Dynasty Empire leagues. I love them five my players

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:22.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the fourteen around by which is a common

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:25.960
<v Speaker 1>team's off right. But the other problem I got I

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:28.920
<v Speaker 1>have three more that are unlikely to play due to injury,

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 1>so that gives me eight of my fourteen not available

0:50:32.680 --> 0:50:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to me. I can't field a full lineup without dropping somebody.

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:40.200
<v Speaker 1>That's part of my long term rebuild. Right should I

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:46.239
<v Speaker 1>be required to drop somebody off of my rebuilding Empire

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 1>League team.

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 3>To help ensure that I field a full lineup? Scott?

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 3>This is right in your wheelhouse?

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Well say, I mean it's the same my borderline. The

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 4>same answer I gave last week about having by week

0:50:57.200 --> 0:50:59.920
<v Speaker 4>or injured players in your lineup for tanking. I feel

0:51:00.320 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 4>the unwritten rule is fielding a valid starting lineup.

0:51:04.080 --> 0:51:06.640
<v Speaker 3>What if I don't have a valid starting lineup, you got.

0:51:06.520 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 4>To make it work. That's why you like short benches

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:11.319
<v Speaker 4>is because you have to make the hard decisions. That's

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:13.759
<v Speaker 4>the entire reason you like this short bench is because

0:51:13.800 --> 0:51:15.840
<v Speaker 4>there's players on waivers and you have to make the

0:51:15.840 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 4>hard decisions. I will say, in my leagues, we have

0:51:19.440 --> 0:51:22.439
<v Speaker 4>really large IRS to allow for players that are out.

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:25.399
<v Speaker 4>We uh, I allow things like this, but if it's

0:51:25.400 --> 0:51:28.840
<v Speaker 4>not explicitly stated in the rules, generally, I say, you

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:30.920
<v Speaker 4>should be filling out your full lineup and if you

0:51:30.960 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 4>have to desision.

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but let me be clear about this, because I

0:51:33.920 --> 0:51:35.759
<v Speaker 1>don't think you're giving the ans. It's not that you're

0:51:35.760 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 1>not giving the answer I want. It's that you're not

0:51:37.520 --> 0:51:40.360
<v Speaker 1>giving an answer that addresses this. Okay, I don't have

0:51:40.360 --> 0:51:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the option to move to anybody to IR. Yeah, I

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:44.279
<v Speaker 1>got players who are out, like Chrystal Lave ruled out.

0:51:44.280 --> 0:51:46.359
<v Speaker 1>He's not an IR, but he's not going to play.

0:51:47.080 --> 0:51:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't I would have to drop a You're not

0:51:50.000 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 1>dropping a Lave.

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:52.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm not dropping Chris.

0:51:52.200 --> 0:51:54.760
<v Speaker 4>You're fourteenth player on the roster though, right different.

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 1>So, but you're saying even though these aren't players that

0:51:57.719 --> 0:51:59.719
<v Speaker 1>are out, these are just players who are hurt. I

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 1>would have to drop somebody.

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, probably.

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So you're saying you have to make it.

0:52:04.000 --> 0:52:07.200
<v Speaker 1>It sucks some position, yeah, and go try to cobble

0:52:07.239 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 1>together with Yeah.

0:52:08.320 --> 0:52:11.279
<v Speaker 4>I generally play in leagues where you you fix around that.

0:52:11.320 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 4>But if it's not staying the bilossie.

0:52:14.080 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, this is different than last week's question about a

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:17.400
<v Speaker 1>guy who's tanking.

0:52:17.520 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 3>He he was starting. Jeff Wilson is over.

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:22.560
<v Speaker 4>Jet, slippery slope.

0:52:23.120 --> 0:52:25.279
<v Speaker 3>I don't have anybody to play, right, all right.

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:27.799
<v Speaker 4>I could argue that guy could be somewhere on a

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:31.280
<v Speaker 4>radio podcast arguing that you're tanking by by.

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 3>By not having Crystal Lobby play through a concussion. I'm tanking,

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:36.640
<v Speaker 3>that's true, all right.

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Thor I can't feel the full lineup without dropping somebody

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 1>who's part of my long term rebuild.

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Should I be required to make a drop?

0:52:43.800 --> 0:52:46.239
<v Speaker 5>Well, this isn't going to change my my answer at all,

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 5>but I do have a clarifying question. Is this this

0:52:48.719 --> 0:52:52.319
<v Speaker 5>about etiquette or is this about conforming to the league rule?

0:52:52.440 --> 0:52:55.480
<v Speaker 3>The buyer is no league rule? Okay on this subject?

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, either way, my answer is no, you should not

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 5>be required to drop someone. And you bought the ticket,

0:53:01.080 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 5>you get to take the ride field the lineup you want,

0:53:03.719 --> 0:53:04.160
<v Speaker 5>you want.

0:53:04.360 --> 0:53:07.840
<v Speaker 2>You're not openly tanking here. This is just a contextual problem.

0:53:08.040 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 5>I don't think you should be saddled with a penalty

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:13.640
<v Speaker 5>because of circumstances, particularly in a rebuild, if your opponents

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 5>don't like it, whatever.

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:17.840
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of That's where I am on this, is

0:53:17.880 --> 0:53:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not doing it intentionally. I'm not trying to lose.

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I just happen to have fallen into us.

0:53:23.200 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 4>I think that's if I think that's your argument. I

0:53:25.560 --> 0:53:28.200
<v Speaker 4>think that's your argument to the league, is that it's

0:53:28.239 --> 0:53:28.960
<v Speaker 4>not intentional.

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm not trying to lose it, but I'm probably

0:53:31.840 --> 0:53:33.879
<v Speaker 1>going to lose if I have to start Chrystal Lave

0:53:34.400 --> 0:53:35.120
<v Speaker 1>my starting lie.

0:53:35.120 --> 0:53:36.759
<v Speaker 5>Who are some of these guys we're talking about that

0:53:36.800 --> 0:53:38.799
<v Speaker 5>you would have to drop, you know, like guys that

0:53:38.920 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 5>are important to the long term rebuild. Well, okay, I

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 5>mean granted, because we want to know if you're going

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:47.319
<v Speaker 5>to get in hot water because it's you know, someone

0:53:47.320 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 5>who's borderline.

0:53:48.680 --> 0:53:49.439
<v Speaker 3>Let me look here.

0:53:49.640 --> 0:53:51.840
<v Speaker 1>One of them, my worst guy and the guy that

0:53:51.840 --> 0:53:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I would end up dropping is.

0:53:55.400 --> 0:53:57.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, I have to start him. It would have

0:53:57.320 --> 0:53:57.840
<v Speaker 3>to be.

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Rashichi Heat. You don't have to be Rashii Heat would

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:02.799
<v Speaker 1>be the guy'd have to drop.

0:54:02.960 --> 0:54:04.400
<v Speaker 2>No, we can't.

0:54:03.760 --> 0:54:05.080
<v Speaker 4>I want to drop.

0:54:06.880 --> 0:54:08.359
<v Speaker 2>Got to keep right.

0:54:09.520 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 4>So is this the long term empire?

0:54:13.040 --> 0:54:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:54:13.440 --> 0:54:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah in an empire leaguef you don't know is

0:54:15.320 --> 0:54:16.640
<v Speaker 1>an it's a dynasty league.

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Ye.

0:54:17.360 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I'm not dropping t Higgins. I'm not dropping

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to drop Rashiki Heat and I don't

0:54:22.400 --> 0:54:24.600
<v Speaker 1>want to drop Chrysal And you shouldn't be forced to.

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't be forced to. This is not tanking. This

0:54:28.000 --> 0:54:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is just the circumstance that fell onto my roster this week.

0:54:31.760 --> 0:54:32.600
<v Speaker 2>That's it, all right.

0:54:33.280 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 4>It also very much affects the team you're playing against

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:37.880
<v Speaker 4>with potential playoff seedings.

0:54:38.440 --> 0:54:40.560
<v Speaker 3>That's I know. I don't like that part. Ye, but

0:54:40.600 --> 0:54:41.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm not you know, but I'm not.

0:54:42.960 --> 0:54:45.760
<v Speaker 4>I know. That's the league integrity part that that comes

0:54:45.760 --> 0:54:46.240
<v Speaker 4>into play.

0:54:46.400 --> 0:54:51.759
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to the Panthers taking on the butts of Bucks. Well.

0:54:52.120 --> 0:54:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Defense is playing like butt right now. Panthers cannot lie. Yeah,

0:54:56.840 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>let's let's go to the Panthers side of this.

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:01.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they're really well. I love Adam.

0:55:01.680 --> 0:55:03.359
<v Speaker 3>I think Adam Field's going to bounce back from last

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:04.000
<v Speaker 3>week's bad game.

0:55:04.120 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 4>I do too. And it's a completely new coaching staff,

0:55:06.080 --> 0:55:09.400
<v Speaker 4>so we don't even know what to expect from that.

0:55:09.480 --> 0:55:11.480
<v Speaker 4>I do have Bryce Young on the bench. We kind

0:55:11.520 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 4>of went over last week that the players that have

0:55:14.719 --> 0:55:17.399
<v Speaker 4>tagged the Bucks that make their pass ranks so bad

0:55:17.440 --> 0:55:20.000
<v Speaker 4>have been good quarterbacks. I don't know that I put

0:55:20.040 --> 0:55:23.360
<v Speaker 4>Bryce Young there yet in his career, so I have

0:55:23.520 --> 0:55:25.560
<v Speaker 4>him on the bench, even in a good spot. But

0:55:25.600 --> 0:55:28.560
<v Speaker 4>I do have Adam Thielen with a C grade Bucks

0:55:28.560 --> 0:55:31.439
<v Speaker 4>along the second most fantasy points to the slot where

0:55:31.480 --> 0:55:33.839
<v Speaker 4>he lines up like eighty percent of the time, eighty

0:55:33.880 --> 0:55:35.680
<v Speaker 4>seven percent of the time or something like that. This year.

0:55:35.719 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 4>Just a ridiculous amount dud last week, but twenty one

0:55:39.560 --> 0:55:42.640
<v Speaker 4>targets in the prior to mentioned different coaching staff, so

0:55:42.680 --> 0:55:44.560
<v Speaker 4>we don't know. They may just lean on their best

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 4>best weapon. But Bucks are bottom ten in yards and

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:50.200
<v Speaker 4>receptions to wide receivers. It's it's a great spot. I

0:55:50.400 --> 0:55:52.279
<v Speaker 4>just a great spot. I'm just I only have to

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:54.080
<v Speaker 4>see because I really don't know how they're going to

0:55:54.200 --> 0:55:57.400
<v Speaker 4>use him. We've seen duds recently.

0:55:57.560 --> 0:55:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Number one and different.

0:55:58.440 --> 0:56:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Coaching tight ends are out in this game. Hurst and

0:56:00.960 --> 0:56:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Tremble are out. I'm telling you, Pep, they're gonna Piper Island.

0:56:04.719 --> 0:56:07.080
<v Speaker 4>I know a lot of people have Jonathan Mingo as

0:56:07.080 --> 0:56:10.239
<v Speaker 4>after last week, but Jonathan Mingo is a sleeper for

0:56:10.280 --> 0:56:12.160
<v Speaker 4>this week. I have him on the bench. But again,

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 4>it's a decent matchup, all right, We'll see if Bryce

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:18.200
<v Speaker 4>Young can support that much. I have Chuba Hubbard here

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:20.920
<v Speaker 4>with a C grade. By the numbers, this is the

0:56:20.960 --> 0:56:23.160
<v Speaker 4>fifth hardest spot for runners, and a big part of

0:56:23.200 --> 0:56:25.640
<v Speaker 4>it is they're only allowing twenty four touches per game

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 4>to Bax because everybody passes against the Bucks. Jonathan Taylor

0:56:29.200 --> 0:56:33.120
<v Speaker 4>and Christian mccaffley just walloped them. But that's those two.

0:56:33.200 --> 0:56:35.760
<v Speaker 4>It's gonna be a volume C on a guy getting

0:56:35.800 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 4>twelve to twenty touches per game or less, you know,

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:42.080
<v Speaker 4>x amount of games since even since Miles Sanders came back.

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Two to five of those are catches. That's where he's

0:56:45.160 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 4>really going to make up the work and get to

0:56:46.760 --> 0:56:49.759
<v Speaker 4>that volume C. Is with that the pass catching over

0:56:49.840 --> 0:56:52.400
<v Speaker 4>on the Tampa Bay side in the past game. I

0:56:52.440 --> 0:56:55.000
<v Speaker 4>do have Baker Mayfield on the bench. The Panthers have

0:56:55.120 --> 0:56:58.680
<v Speaker 4>owned only allowed four quarterbacks to even surpassed two hundred

0:56:58.719 --> 0:57:02.520
<v Speaker 4>yards this season, and none since Week six. Dak had

0:57:02.560 --> 0:57:04.880
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and eighty nine, Stroud had one hundred and forty.

0:57:05.280 --> 0:57:09.600
<v Speaker 4>So if you're expecting Baker Mayfield to substantially perform those

0:57:09.640 --> 0:57:12.600
<v Speaker 4>two and that both of those are pretty recent. So

0:57:13.280 --> 0:57:15.920
<v Speaker 4>teams run on Carolina because they're terrible against the run,

0:57:15.960 --> 0:57:17.920
<v Speaker 4>they don't pass. I do have a B grade on

0:57:18.000 --> 0:57:21.120
<v Speaker 4>Mike Evans. It's possible for a couple receivers to do

0:57:21.160 --> 0:57:24.040
<v Speaker 4>okay even if Baker isn't startable. Evans has scored in

0:57:24.160 --> 0:57:27.080
<v Speaker 4>eight games this year, including five to the last six.

0:57:27.120 --> 0:57:30.080
<v Speaker 4>We keep talking about that forty percent end zone target share,

0:57:30.160 --> 0:57:32.880
<v Speaker 4>that's just it's now up to forty three percent after

0:57:32.920 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 4>last week it even moved up and he's actually second

0:57:36.240 --> 0:57:41.200
<v Speaker 4>in the NFL, which is which is pretty crazy. The

0:57:41.480 --> 0:57:44.760
<v Speaker 4>guy above him, Aj Brown, fifty two percent end zoned

0:57:44.960 --> 0:57:48.040
<v Speaker 4>target share. Half the time when Jalen Hurts throws it

0:57:48.080 --> 0:57:51.760
<v Speaker 4>into the end zone, it's going to him. That's insane.

0:57:51.800 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Be on Mike Evans. If Chris Godwin goes, I don't

0:57:55.080 --> 0:57:58.040
<v Speaker 4>know that he's gonna go. If he goes, I'm still

0:57:58.040 --> 0:58:00.520
<v Speaker 4>giving him a C because he's seen six plus targets.

0:58:00.720 --> 0:58:03.280
<v Speaker 4>His floor is that seven to ten PPR range, but

0:58:03.480 --> 0:58:06.880
<v Speaker 4>no second receivers top sixty five yards since week six,

0:58:06.960 --> 0:58:09.360
<v Speaker 4>and only one of them scored. It's a C grade,

0:58:09.360 --> 0:58:11.400
<v Speaker 4>but if he doesn't go, he's here on the bench.

0:58:12.760 --> 0:58:16.320
<v Speaker 4>A grade for Rashad White, however, against the Carolina Panthers,

0:58:16.440 --> 0:58:18.600
<v Speaker 4>I love this match. You could go a Fonsie, you

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 4>could go in Ardvark, whatever you want. It's the third

0:58:21.280 --> 0:58:27.680
<v Speaker 4>easiest matchup for opposing backs. They've allowed the most rushing touchdowns,

0:58:28.080 --> 0:58:31.440
<v Speaker 4>bottom five yards per carry and bottom five in yards allowed.

0:58:31.760 --> 0:58:34.920
<v Speaker 4>White averaging eighteen touches, four of those being catches, so

0:58:35.000 --> 0:58:37.000
<v Speaker 4>he gets work there too. He's just a bel cow

0:58:37.200 --> 0:58:38.080
<v Speaker 4>in a great matchup.

0:58:38.280 --> 0:58:42.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, four brownstaking on the Rams. You already told

0:58:42.080 --> 0:58:45.240
<v Speaker 1>us see like Elijah Moore is, Joe Flacco takes the

0:58:45.320 --> 0:58:48.520
<v Speaker 1>helm of there. I assume then that Amari Cooper's in

0:58:48.600 --> 0:58:49.480
<v Speaker 1>play here as well.

0:58:49.840 --> 0:58:52.960
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely yeah, we're gonna give Cooper a B. He's got

0:58:52.960 --> 0:58:56.720
<v Speaker 5>a twenty seven percent first read share. But since week seven,

0:58:56.760 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 5>the Rams have allowed the pretty decent matchup here. Rams

0:59:00.040 --> 0:59:02.840
<v Speaker 5>allowed the tenth most PPR points per target and receiving

0:59:02.920 --> 0:59:06.200
<v Speaker 5>yards per game to perimeter wide receivers. Cooper can be

0:59:06.240 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 5>started with confidence. Regardless of quarterback. Even though Joe Flacco

0:59:09.440 --> 0:59:12.400
<v Speaker 5>has been pulled from the retirement home to start this one, Flackaw,

0:59:12.440 --> 0:59:14.960
<v Speaker 5>you're keeping on the bench Jerome Ford, I'm gonna give

0:59:15.000 --> 0:59:17.919
<v Speaker 5>him a ce. He's played sixty four percent or more

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:20.800
<v Speaker 5>of snaps in three of the last four games. In

0:59:20.880 --> 0:59:23.280
<v Speaker 5>those three where he locked sixty four percent or more,

0:59:23.760 --> 0:59:27.720
<v Speaker 5>Ford average nineteen touches and eighty eight total yards per game.

0:59:28.160 --> 0:59:30.720
<v Speaker 5>Usage is going to be their Kareem Hunt status up

0:59:30.760 --> 0:59:33.640
<v Speaker 5>in the air with a groin issue. But it is

0:59:33.680 --> 0:59:35.800
<v Speaker 5>a tough matchup here. Charge you were mentioning how the

0:59:35.880 --> 0:59:38.880
<v Speaker 5>Rams suppress the touchdowns of the opposing running backs, the

0:59:39.000 --> 0:59:41.720
<v Speaker 5>Rams have also allowed the lowest explosive run rate and

0:59:42.000 --> 0:59:45.680
<v Speaker 5>the lowest yards after contact per attempt week seven, so

0:59:45.680 --> 0:59:49.360
<v Speaker 5>that run defense is playing pretty well. More of course,

0:59:49.440 --> 0:59:51.439
<v Speaker 5>was might take a chance on me wide receiver David

0:59:51.480 --> 0:59:54.440
<v Speaker 5>and Joku. Is that we've talked about some tight end

0:59:54.440 --> 0:59:55.840
<v Speaker 5>issues on the one side.

0:59:56.080 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Other tight ends that we love.

0:59:57.320 --> 1:00:00.960
<v Speaker 5>I love in Djoku since Week seven, and Djoku's number

1:00:01.200 --> 1:00:04.560
<v Speaker 5>four in target share and number five in first read

1:00:04.640 --> 1:00:08.160
<v Speaker 5>share with twenty eight percent. He's tight end seven in

1:00:08.200 --> 1:00:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Fantasy points per game since then, and Get this, twelve

1:00:11.840 --> 1:00:15.200
<v Speaker 5>red zone targets over that span since Week seven. This

1:00:15.280 --> 1:00:17.760
<v Speaker 5>is also a very good matchup for Ndjoku. The Rams

1:00:17.760 --> 1:00:21.080
<v Speaker 5>allow the second highest yards per route run to opposing

1:00:21.160 --> 1:00:24.680
<v Speaker 5>tight ends. Moving over to the Rams. Matthew Stafford the

1:00:24.680 --> 1:00:27.920
<v Speaker 5>aforementioned four touchdown game last time out. I don't think

1:00:27.920 --> 1:00:29.680
<v Speaker 5>he's gonna get there again this week. I'm gonna give

1:00:29.720 --> 1:00:32.959
<v Speaker 5>him a se That was only his second multi pass

1:00:33.080 --> 1:00:36.560
<v Speaker 5>touchdown game of this season. He doesn't look fully healthy

1:00:36.760 --> 1:00:39.520
<v Speaker 5>and this is a tough matchup against a good Browns

1:00:39.640 --> 1:00:43.960
<v Speaker 5>pass defense this week. Pooka Nakua, my boy, I have

1:00:44.040 --> 1:00:46.840
<v Speaker 5>to give him a greade, a even over the I'm

1:00:46.840 --> 1:00:49.520
<v Speaker 5>giving Pooka an a even over the four games with

1:00:49.560 --> 1:00:55.160
<v Speaker 5>Cooper Cupback. Get this stat, Pokinnakua twenty one percent designed

1:00:55.320 --> 1:00:58.480
<v Speaker 5>look play percentage in those games with Cooper cutback. Cooper

1:00:58.480 --> 1:01:02.480
<v Speaker 5>cups percentage of those per so they are still funneling

1:01:02.560 --> 1:01:05.080
<v Speaker 5>all the usage of Puka. He He's the Duty's the

1:01:05.080 --> 1:01:08.040
<v Speaker 5>straw that stirs the drink and everything. The Browns played

1:01:08.040 --> 1:01:11.000
<v Speaker 5>the highest percentage of single high in the entire NFL.

1:01:11.560 --> 1:01:16.360
<v Speaker 5>Guess who torches single high coverage, Mister Poka Nakua three

1:01:16.440 --> 1:01:19.600
<v Speaker 5>point three yards per route run in his four career

1:01:19.640 --> 1:01:22.520
<v Speaker 5>games against single high coverage. I realized that's a small sample,

1:01:22.760 --> 1:01:25.959
<v Speaker 5>but he's been lighting up coverage looks like this Cooper Cup.

1:01:25.960 --> 1:01:28.440
<v Speaker 5>I can only give him a see He's played eighty

1:01:28.440 --> 1:01:31.000
<v Speaker 5>four percent or more of snaps in the four games back,

1:01:31.040 --> 1:01:34.360
<v Speaker 5>but has averaged only twenty nine receiving yards per game

1:01:34.680 --> 1:01:37.960
<v Speaker 5>in those four Cup has only two red zone targets

1:01:38.000 --> 1:01:40.720
<v Speaker 5>over his last five games played. The Browns have allowed

1:01:40.720 --> 1:01:44.600
<v Speaker 5>the eleventh fewest PPR points per targets to opposing slots.

1:01:44.920 --> 1:01:47.960
<v Speaker 5>And again, they're not the design plays and everything like that.

1:01:48.080 --> 1:01:50.280
<v Speaker 5>The first reads that's all going to Puka, not Cup.

1:01:50.920 --> 1:01:53.680
<v Speaker 5>So we're gonna give him a Tyler Higbee. You got

1:01:53.680 --> 1:01:55.720
<v Speaker 5>to keep on the bench. He's been targeted more than

1:01:55.720 --> 1:01:58.440
<v Speaker 5>three times, only one time since Week four, going all

1:01:58.480 --> 1:02:01.919
<v Speaker 5>the way back to September Kyron Williams, though, we're gonna

1:02:01.920 --> 1:02:04.640
<v Speaker 5>give him an a Brian's Boy. Shout out to Brian

1:02:04.920 --> 1:02:08.240
<v Speaker 5>Kien's return to his bell cow status last week against

1:02:08.280 --> 1:02:11.200
<v Speaker 5>the Cardinals. Twenty two touches, two hundred four total yards,

1:02:11.360 --> 1:02:14.840
<v Speaker 5>two touchdowns. This is I was mentioned in this before

1:02:14.880 --> 1:02:16.800
<v Speaker 5>about how the Browns. They still have the really good

1:02:16.800 --> 1:02:19.720
<v Speaker 5>pass defense, but the run defense has regress sort of

1:02:19.800 --> 1:02:22.480
<v Speaker 5>under the surface a little bit. Browns have allowed the

1:02:22.520 --> 1:02:25.160
<v Speaker 5>Browns have allowed the highest explosive run rate in the

1:02:25.320 --> 1:02:27.480
<v Speaker 5>entire NFL since Week seven.

1:02:27.640 --> 1:02:27.960
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

1:02:28.120 --> 1:02:31.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so a little bit of regression there. Williams could

1:02:31.040 --> 1:02:34.080
<v Speaker 5>absolutely be a top three fantasy running back this week.

1:02:34.560 --> 1:02:37.280
<v Speaker 5>And because of the matchup, that was why Royce Freeman

1:02:37.360 --> 1:02:39.320
<v Speaker 5>was might take a chance on me running back. I

1:02:39.320 --> 1:02:40.800
<v Speaker 5>think that's worth looking into as well.

1:02:40.880 --> 1:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, when we come back, we'll talk about the

1:02:42.960 --> 1:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Broncos surging defense kicking on the Texans.

1:02:46.200 --> 1:02:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Can you start CJ Stroud.

1:02:47.880 --> 1:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>This passing game against suddenly solid Broncos not even suddenly

1:02:53.480 --> 1:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>even good for a while. We'll talk that through when

1:02:55.520 --> 1:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we come back Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly,

1:03:39.160 --> 1:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Paul Church and Scott fish Thor and Eystrom. You can

1:03:42.200 --> 1:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>check out all my play rankings available at Guillotine leagues

1:03:44.760 --> 1:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and in the Guillotine Leagues app as well.

1:03:47.640 --> 1:03:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Man, I'm still not over your third tough question charge,

1:03:50.480 --> 1:03:53.240
<v Speaker 4>Like I know for me, I am such team owners

1:03:53.280 --> 1:03:55.680
<v Speaker 4>should be able to manage their teams however they want,

1:03:56.400 --> 1:03:59.080
<v Speaker 4>like That's that's how I generally feel about things. So,

1:03:59.560 --> 1:04:04.400
<v Speaker 4>like you your question, it makes me feel things just

1:04:04.520 --> 1:04:07.240
<v Speaker 4>all over, like on both sides of the fence. I

1:04:07.280 --> 1:04:09.320
<v Speaker 4>see all the angles. I'm like, oh, I hate that.

1:04:09.480 --> 1:04:11.720
<v Speaker 4>I know this is a heat that spot spot right now,

1:04:11.760 --> 1:04:12.400
<v Speaker 4>I hate that spot.

1:04:12.440 --> 1:04:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't like it.

1:04:13.160 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know what I do like is Broncos taking

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>on Texans. We're gonna have a nice opportunity for Javonte

1:04:17.880 --> 1:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Williams here. I don't know how a guy who's really

1:04:20.120 --> 1:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the focal point of his offense like Javonte Williams is

1:04:23.600 --> 1:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>has no rushing touchdowns.

1:04:25.280 --> 1:04:26.040
<v Speaker 3>It's weird.

1:04:26.280 --> 1:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Week thirteen, still looking for his first touchdown. Sneaky, tough

1:04:30.080 --> 1:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>matchup against Houston. They're giving up sixty nine rushing yards

1:04:33.280 --> 1:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>per game to running backs.

1:04:34.400 --> 1:04:36.640
<v Speaker 3>That's very little. Over the last month.

1:04:36.920 --> 1:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Houston's allowed the fourth highest has the fourth highest run

1:04:40.680 --> 1:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff win rate.

1:04:41.560 --> 1:04:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's bad news too.

1:04:43.320 --> 1:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Williams lightly involved in the passing game and Houston's a

1:04:46.280 --> 1:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>neutral matchup there anyway, so I don't think he's going

1:04:48.280 --> 1:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to help out that much there. I can only get

1:04:50.720 --> 1:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you to a B grade and it's on volume. But

1:04:52.960 --> 1:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it feels like more like a c opportunity for Javonte Williams.

1:04:56.520 --> 1:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to tell you this is going to break

1:04:58.120 --> 1:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>his maiden for the season on the I hope, though

1:05:00.400 --> 1:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's gonna happen here passing game,

1:05:02.440 --> 1:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I only got two starters for you. Let's start with

1:05:04.720 --> 1:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Courtland Sutton. He's a touchdown dependent receiver.

1:05:07.920 --> 1:05:08.840
<v Speaker 4>But he scores a lot.

1:05:09.120 --> 1:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>He does score a lot, but you know it doesn't

1:05:10.680 --> 1:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>give up a lot. Houston giving up the second fewest

1:05:13.680 --> 1:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>wide out touchdowns. So if Houston plays like they normally

1:05:17.160 --> 1:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>do and Sutton doesn't score, he doesn't leave you with much. Now,

1:05:20.840 --> 1:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in fairness, he's scored in five to six games. The

1:05:23.920 --> 1:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>passer rating for Russell Wilson when Sutton is targeted one

1:05:28.560 --> 1:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty two really impressive. It's the highest mark

1:05:32.560 --> 1:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>among all wide receivers with at least fifteen fifty targets

1:05:35.600 --> 1:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>this year. So still starting Courtland Sutton here, but danger

1:05:39.400 --> 1:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>factor definitely in play.

1:05:41.200 --> 1:05:43.959
<v Speaker 4>Also, he's one of the above forty percent end zone

1:05:44.080 --> 1:05:45.080
<v Speaker 4>target guys.

1:05:44.840 --> 1:05:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Which wouldn't surprise him now.

1:05:46.920 --> 1:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson c grade here fantasy output is really capped

1:05:50.120 --> 1:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>by his low passing volume.

1:05:51.520 --> 1:05:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Just twenty nine pass attempts per game.

1:05:53.440 --> 1:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Houston secondary has been more vulnerable lately with Joe Burrow

1:05:56.760 --> 1:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and Trevor Lawrence posting big recent games, but those quarterbacks

1:06:00.000 --> 1:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>he's also averaged thirty nine pass attempts. That's obviously well

1:06:03.520 --> 1:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>over Wilson's so with Wilson in fact, hasn't even hit

1:06:06.560 --> 1:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine all year. He's thrown touchdowns in every game

1:06:09.640 --> 1:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to Russe's credit, but just one touchdown in half of

1:06:12.760 --> 1:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>his games. And it's worth mentioning the Texans have surrendered

1:06:15.520 --> 1:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the most quarterback rushing touchdowns, and Wilson's rush for at

1:06:19.240 --> 1:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>least thirty yards in five of the last seven games,

1:06:21.240 --> 1:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>so he might help you a little bit on the

1:06:22.360 --> 1:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>ground here as well. Just the C grade on Russell

1:06:24.760 --> 1:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Wilson and Jerry Judy doesn't even deserve discussion. In a

1:06:27.960 --> 1:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup, not saying it's impossible that he will score,

1:06:30.320 --> 1:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not taking him against an above average pass defense.

1:06:33.840 --> 1:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Houston side. I don't want to

1:06:36.040 --> 1:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>begin with I think I'll begin with the running game.

1:06:38.240 --> 1:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I already told you Damian Pierce's might take a chance

1:06:40.200 --> 1:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>on me runners, So I like the guy who's gonna

1:06:43.000 --> 1:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>get more work a lot more Devin Sanitary. The return

1:06:46.000 --> 1:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of Damian Pierced daggered Singletary's usage and snaps last week.

1:06:50.120 --> 1:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But this is such a good matchup you have to

1:06:52.000 --> 1:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>consider Singletary again here, Broncos. As I mentioned, I'll reiterate

1:06:55.400 --> 1:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the key points averaging one hundred and forty

1:06:57.240 --> 1:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game against Singletary on you usually active

1:07:00.560 --> 1:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in the passing game last week and if that could

1:07:02.480 --> 1:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>if that does continue, that would be helpful here. Denver

1:07:05.920 --> 1:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>dead last and run stuff WI win rate twenty ninth

1:07:08.280 --> 1:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and run defense by Pro Football Focus.

1:07:10.400 --> 1:07:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Singletary comes in with a B grade in this game

1:07:14.040 --> 1:07:14.680
<v Speaker 3>passing game.

1:07:15.000 --> 1:07:15.280
<v Speaker 4>C J.

1:07:15.400 --> 1:07:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Stroud with a B grade.

1:07:16.680 --> 1:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Denver's turned into one of the tougher passing matchups over

1:07:19.880 --> 1:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the last seven games. The Broncos have allowed multiple passing

1:07:22.680 --> 1:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns one time, and that came in Week seven when

1:07:26.320 --> 1:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love only managed one hundred and eighty yards but

1:07:28.560 --> 1:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>got two touchdowns. During that same seven game stretch, Denver

1:07:31.720 --> 1:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>also allowing just two hundred and sixteen passing yards while

1:07:33.880 --> 1:07:36.959
<v Speaker 1>averaging more than an interception per game. They've been very good,

1:07:37.200 --> 1:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>but so is CJ. Stroud and on volume and on

1:07:41.520 --> 1:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>just ability. I can't get him worse than a B.

1:07:44.000 --> 1:07:46.919
<v Speaker 1>It feels like a C game coming. But man, he's

1:07:47.120 --> 1:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>just Stroud is just so hot right now. I can't

1:07:49.560 --> 1:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>get myself to do it emotionally. I'm keeping him out

1:07:51.640 --> 1:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. Nico Collins and Tank Dell also coming

1:07:54.840 --> 1:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in on B grades. Let's start with the Nico side

1:07:57.680 --> 1:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of this. For him, back to back games with seven catches,

1:08:00.960 --> 1:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>He's coming off a one hundred yard game with a score,

1:08:04.080 --> 1:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and over the last four weeks his eight red zone

1:08:07.240 --> 1:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>targets is second only to Ceedee Lamb. For Tank Dell,

1:08:13.080 --> 1:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>he's scored five times in his last four games, and

1:08:15.440 --> 1:08:17.759
<v Speaker 1>he's got two one hundred yard games in that span.

1:08:18.120 --> 1:08:19.799
<v Speaker 3>But now all the bad news for these guys.

1:08:20.000 --> 1:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>The Barcos secondary has allowed the fourth fewest receptions to

1:08:23.000 --> 1:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>opposing receivers, and the matchup on the outside that's both

1:08:26.120 --> 1:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Dell and Collins primarily against Patrick's curtain is not good.

1:08:30.120 --> 1:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>He's allowing twenty five scoreless yards per game in his

1:08:33.160 --> 1:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>last month, and opposite certain Fabian Moreau is surging right now,

1:08:37.640 --> 1:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>allowing less than fifty six yards in his coverage in

1:08:40.160 --> 1:08:44.599
<v Speaker 1>every single game this year, so tough matchups. I still

1:08:44.640 --> 1:08:48.479
<v Speaker 1>am cautiously optimistic about Stroud, Collins, Dell, but they're tricky

1:08:48.520 --> 1:08:51.599
<v Speaker 1>spots here and then Dalton Schultz. Denver's allowed at least

1:08:51.680 --> 1:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards and a touchdown to tight ends in each

1:08:53.920 --> 1:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of the last three weeks. Linebacker Josie Jewel allows one

1:08:58.960 --> 1:09:01.599
<v Speaker 1>yard per route cover and Schultz is tied for fifth

1:09:01.600 --> 1:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and red zone targets among tight ends. He's got an

1:09:03.680 --> 1:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunity here, dud game last week. Better chance here, ce

1:09:07.240 --> 1:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>grade for Dalton sltz.

1:09:09.920 --> 1:09:12.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, next matchup, let's do it.

1:09:12.560 --> 1:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Forty nine ers taking on the Eagles. Yeah, his game

1:09:16.479 --> 1:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of the week for sure in this one. Every Eagles

1:09:19.040 --> 1:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>game is game of the week.

1:09:19.880 --> 1:09:21.719
<v Speaker 3>They are in. They are in the fourth of five

1:09:22.760 --> 1:09:24.160
<v Speaker 3>crazy difficult games.

1:09:24.240 --> 1:09:26.840
<v Speaker 4>Not not Eagles pats. Right, didn't that get demoted from

1:09:26.840 --> 1:09:30.600
<v Speaker 4>like a Sunday demoted? They're like Eagles, You're awesome. But

1:09:30.680 --> 1:09:32.559
<v Speaker 4>if we have to watch the paths, we're gonna move,

1:09:32.920 --> 1:09:36.720
<v Speaker 4>that's right. Uh yeah, So in the Eagles paths are

1:09:36.800 --> 1:09:39.840
<v Speaker 4>the foreign nine ers on the fortyniners passing side. Brock

1:09:39.880 --> 1:09:42.600
<v Speaker 4>pretty was my super super choky take a chance on me.

1:09:42.960 --> 1:09:48.880
<v Speaker 4>Players it's fairly Truecky, it was chocky. Go start Trevor

1:09:48.920 --> 1:09:51.440
<v Speaker 4>Lawrence then if you if you're worried about it. Uh,

1:09:52.400 --> 1:09:55.400
<v Speaker 4>Brendan Ayuk, I have an A grade on nineteen different

1:09:55.400 --> 1:09:57.880
<v Speaker 4>receivers in eleven games have had one hundred plus yards

1:09:57.880 --> 1:10:00.960
<v Speaker 4>and or scored on the Eagles. Yeah, that usually means

1:10:01.000 --> 1:10:04.200
<v Speaker 4>two or more a game has scored in three straight

1:10:04.240 --> 1:10:07.879
<v Speaker 4>Brandon ayukas I got a B grade on Deebo Samuel

1:10:08.000 --> 1:10:11.000
<v Speaker 4>over the last three weeks, Debos averaging seven point three

1:10:11.000 --> 1:10:13.640
<v Speaker 4>touches for seventy three yards. That's generally good for a

1:10:13.720 --> 1:10:16.000
<v Speaker 4>C grade right there. But this is an awesome matchup

1:10:16.040 --> 1:10:18.200
<v Speaker 4>as I just mentioned, and he's scored in two of

1:10:18.240 --> 1:10:21.800
<v Speaker 4>his last three. Deebo's target share jumps eight percent versus

1:10:21.880 --> 1:10:26.479
<v Speaker 4>zone Ayux drops ten percent, so naturally they rise with

1:10:26.520 --> 1:10:29.960
<v Speaker 4>the other the other way around. This matchup, the Egos

1:10:30.000 --> 1:10:33.240
<v Speaker 4>play man at the thirteenth highest rate rate, so it

1:10:33.360 --> 1:10:35.280
<v Speaker 4>might be a little bit more of an AUK game here.

1:10:36.760 --> 1:10:40.320
<v Speaker 4>And another thing with Deebo is he needs to do

1:10:40.439 --> 1:10:44.360
<v Speaker 4>twice the work just to get Ayuk's stats, because Auk

1:10:44.400 --> 1:10:46.599
<v Speaker 4>has twice the A dot two and a half times

1:10:46.640 --> 1:10:48.680
<v Speaker 4>the end zone targets two and a half times the

1:10:48.680 --> 1:10:53.200
<v Speaker 4>air yards. Everything about aux targets are more valuable. So

1:10:53.280 --> 1:10:55.559
<v Speaker 4>I have the A grade on Ayuk, the B grade

1:10:55.600 --> 1:10:59.040
<v Speaker 4>on Deebo Samuel, A grade on George Kittle. Tight ends

1:10:59.080 --> 1:11:02.000
<v Speaker 4>have scored in three less four against Eagles, and all

1:11:02.000 --> 1:11:05.639
<v Speaker 4>but one target tight end to see target six targets scored,

1:11:06.040 --> 1:11:08.599
<v Speaker 4>all ended up with a twelve top twelve finish as well.

1:11:08.680 --> 1:11:11.080
<v Speaker 4>I feel like that's where Kittle's gonna land if he

1:11:11.120 --> 1:11:15.040
<v Speaker 4>gets that kind of target volume here. Christian McCaffrey also

1:11:15.280 --> 1:11:17.880
<v Speaker 4>in A grade. It's just it's Christian McCaffrey. Man.

1:11:18.040 --> 1:11:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you don't have to flick all. We're all starting

1:11:20.080 --> 1:11:20.719
<v Speaker 3>Christian mccaffy.

1:11:20.720 --> 1:11:23.080
<v Speaker 4>It's it's a Yeah. It's a tougher spot because teams

1:11:23.120 --> 1:11:26.680
<v Speaker 4>pass on them, they don't run. But uh over on

1:11:26.720 --> 1:11:31.240
<v Speaker 4>the Eagles side, Jalen Hurts A grade. It's a tough matchup.

1:11:31.280 --> 1:11:33.679
<v Speaker 4>It should be a B for any other quarterback except

1:11:33.680 --> 1:11:36.519
<v Speaker 4>for Jalen Hurts. For NAR's d leads the NFL in

1:11:36.520 --> 1:11:39.920
<v Speaker 4>interceptions and allowing the third fewest passing touchdowns. But Jalen

1:11:40.000 --> 1:11:42.519
<v Speaker 4>Hurts has had multi score games every single week since

1:11:42.560 --> 1:11:45.600
<v Speaker 4>Week one, like that's just Jalen Hurts. A grade on

1:11:45.680 --> 1:11:49.439
<v Speaker 4>AJ Brown, who appears to be matchup proof except for

1:11:49.479 --> 1:11:52.719
<v Speaker 4>when he faces lagarious needed. Yes, that's how it's worked

1:11:52.720 --> 1:11:55.759
<v Speaker 4>this year. Highest end zone target share in the league

1:11:55.800 --> 1:12:00.000
<v Speaker 4>at fifty two percent, as we previously mentioned, averaging seven

1:12:00.120 --> 1:12:02.960
<v Speaker 4>catches on ten targets for a ninety five yards per game.

1:12:03.000 --> 1:12:07.280
<v Speaker 4>Just ridiculous stats there for AJ Brown this year. B

1:12:07.479 --> 1:12:11.920
<v Speaker 4>grade on DeVonta Smith has had a bigger day in

1:12:12.040 --> 1:12:15.120
<v Speaker 4>two straight games than AJ Brown, which seems a little

1:12:15.200 --> 1:12:20.719
<v Speaker 4>crazy going back to last year Devanta Smith without Goddard,

1:12:21.120 --> 1:12:23.720
<v Speaker 4>that data still tracks. We've mentioned a couple times this year.

1:12:23.760 --> 1:12:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Without Goddard, Davonta Smith basically takes all that work and

1:12:27.640 --> 1:12:31.760
<v Speaker 4>he has very fantasy viable work. That's not gonna that's

1:12:31.760 --> 1:12:34.439
<v Speaker 4>gonna factor again this week. We'll see if Dallas Goddard

1:12:34.479 --> 1:12:36.240
<v Speaker 4>is back next week though, it's where we want to,

1:12:36.439 --> 1:12:39.639
<v Speaker 4>you know, start to pull back. B grade on DeAndre

1:12:39.720 --> 1:12:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Swift getting fifteen plus touches every game since taking the

1:12:42.880 --> 1:12:46.160
<v Speaker 4>starting job. In that Minnesota game where he exploded, usually

1:12:46.160 --> 1:12:48.360
<v Speaker 4>gets a couple of catches. I will say the forty

1:12:48.439 --> 1:12:51.479
<v Speaker 4>nine ers only give twenty one running back touches per game,

1:12:51.479 --> 1:12:55.000
<v Speaker 4>but luckily Swift gets almost all of it. So it's

1:12:55.040 --> 1:12:56.920
<v Speaker 4>it's not the greatest spot. It's the kind of middle

1:12:56.960 --> 1:12:59.040
<v Speaker 4>of the pack spot, actually a lower spot in San

1:12:59.040 --> 1:13:02.720
<v Speaker 4>Francisco's top ten in a lot of categories. It's it's

1:13:02.720 --> 1:13:07.880
<v Speaker 4>a B grade here. Yep, fine, that's it. Yeah, that's it.

1:13:07.920 --> 1:13:09.240
<v Speaker 4>I was gonna I was gonna go on, but the

1:13:09.280 --> 1:13:12.200
<v Speaker 4>music started playing. But yeah, five five of the last

1:13:12.680 --> 1:13:14.640
<v Speaker 4>seven lead backs have scored, so I think there's a

1:13:14.720 --> 1:13:16.680
<v Speaker 4>chance for that, and he's gonna get more opportunities in

1:13:16.720 --> 1:13:18.400
<v Speaker 4>a good offense. So that's why he gets a B

1:13:18.479 --> 1:13:20.519
<v Speaker 4>as opposed to a lot of the other running backs

1:13:20.520 --> 1:13:22.479
<v Speaker 4>that San Francisco's had a good job stopping.

1:13:22.640 --> 1:13:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:13:23.000 --> 1:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>The catch, of course on touchdowns for DeAndre Swift is

1:13:26.439 --> 1:13:29.759
<v Speaker 1>this quarterback todown. Yeah, yeah, that's you know, that's the problem.

1:13:30.040 --> 1:13:32.040
<v Speaker 4>I also feel this game is gonna be gamescript is

1:13:32.080 --> 1:13:34.479
<v Speaker 4>going to be closer. Philly's blown out a lot of teams,

1:13:34.479 --> 1:13:36.599
<v Speaker 4>so the running backs don't run in this game.

1:13:36.600 --> 1:13:39.080
<v Speaker 3>He will when we come back.

1:13:39.240 --> 1:13:42.519
<v Speaker 1>Final segment of the show, Premature Speculation, Our final premature

1:13:42.560 --> 1:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>speculation of the year. This is it your last chance

1:13:45.320 --> 1:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to go unurge somebody nobody else in your league has.

1:13:49.120 --> 1:14:12.599
<v Speaker 1>Find out who it is when we come back. Final

1:14:12.640 --> 1:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>segment Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul charge and Scott Fish Thorneistrom.

1:14:17.080 --> 1:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>You can follow us on Twitter Matt Paul Chargi and

1:14:19.120 --> 1:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Scott is at Scott Fish twenty four yep, and thor

1:14:23.280 --> 1:14:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Is at thor ku.

1:14:26.240 --> 1:14:31.240
<v Speaker 3>You are rocketed right now, premature.

1:14:30.760 --> 1:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Speculation, our last one of the year. Give me some

1:14:33.960 --> 1:14:36.919
<v Speaker 1>guys that you'll want to pick up now that other people.

1:14:36.680 --> 1:14:37.679
<v Speaker 3>Will be trying to pick up.

1:14:37.560 --> 1:14:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Down the road, and they're already on your team, Scott.

1:14:40.240 --> 1:14:42.519
<v Speaker 4>So this is the time of year where I generally say,

1:14:42.720 --> 1:14:45.040
<v Speaker 4>go get back up running backs in case there's an injury.

1:14:45.320 --> 1:14:47.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm just gonna say that straight out again. I've said

1:14:47.320 --> 1:14:50.360
<v Speaker 4>it a few times. Get those backups. But also it's

1:14:50.360 --> 1:14:52.439
<v Speaker 4>the time of year where we start to see rookie

1:14:52.439 --> 1:14:55.519
<v Speaker 4>wide receivers get more action and start to break out

1:14:55.560 --> 1:14:58.800
<v Speaker 4>a little bit. And at least one of these prespects

1:14:58.840 --> 1:15:01.479
<v Speaker 4>here in this group is going to be a rookie

1:15:01.479 --> 1:15:03.640
<v Speaker 4>wide receiver. I'm going with Jalen Hyatt, who kind of

1:15:03.640 --> 1:15:05.639
<v Speaker 4>broke out in Week twelve and no one really talked

1:15:05.640 --> 1:15:08.679
<v Speaker 4>about he wasn't on Waiverwayer articles he had five catches

1:15:08.720 --> 1:15:11.479
<v Speaker 4>for one hundred plus day. Being on the Giants, they're

1:15:11.479 --> 1:15:14.080
<v Speaker 4>gonna be behind in a lot of games. I can

1:15:14.120 --> 1:15:16.360
<v Speaker 4>see him getting in a decent amount of targets in

1:15:16.479 --> 1:15:19.479
<v Speaker 4>negative game scripts and working his way to that, you know,

1:15:20.080 --> 1:15:22.080
<v Speaker 4>high high volume for the rest of the season.

1:15:22.120 --> 1:15:23.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, you kind of convinced me on that. I

1:15:23.720 --> 1:15:26.920
<v Speaker 3>like it. Thor your premature speculation.

1:15:26.439 --> 1:15:32.000
<v Speaker 5>Player Broncos wide receiver Marvin Mimms. Love Marvin Mims. His

1:15:32.080 --> 1:15:34.599
<v Speaker 5>playing time has been ticking up ever since Week ten,

1:15:34.720 --> 1:15:37.679
<v Speaker 5>and it's not showing in his receiving numbers quite yet.

1:15:38.040 --> 1:15:40.320
<v Speaker 5>I think it will down this stretch here. Marvin Mims

1:15:40.360 --> 1:15:42.960
<v Speaker 5>was named AFC Special Teams Player of the Week a

1:15:43.000 --> 1:15:46.120
<v Speaker 5>couple of weeks ago, so he has been playing pretty well.

1:15:46.160 --> 1:15:48.800
<v Speaker 5>But you know, in terms of the receiving opportunity here,

1:15:48.880 --> 1:15:52.280
<v Speaker 5>Jerry Judy has been terrible. Your Broncos tight ends haven't

1:15:52.280 --> 1:15:55.160
<v Speaker 5>been producing. You have a golden opportunity set up for

1:15:55.200 --> 1:15:57.840
<v Speaker 5>Marvin Mims down this stretch here because of the matchups

1:15:58.120 --> 1:16:02.920
<v Speaker 5>playing the Texans, the Chargers twice, Lions, Patriots, Raiders sets

1:16:03.000 --> 1:16:06.439
<v Speaker 5>up very well. Add him before this Texans game. Houston

1:16:06.479 --> 1:16:09.479
<v Speaker 5>has allowed the most PPR points per target to boundary

1:16:09.520 --> 1:16:13.280
<v Speaker 5>wide receivers since Week seven. Texans also run a lot

1:16:13.280 --> 1:16:17.240
<v Speaker 5>of too high coverage schemes. Mims leads the Broncos in

1:16:17.320 --> 1:16:21.200
<v Speaker 5>yards per route run and yards after catch versus too high.

1:16:21.240 --> 1:16:23.080
<v Speaker 5>Big fan of Marvin Mims, go pick him up.

1:16:23.760 --> 1:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was tempted to do any of a

1:16:26.680 --> 1:16:29.439
<v Speaker 1>variety of running back handcuffs because, as Scott mentioned, this

1:16:29.479 --> 1:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is handcuff season. This is when you want to have

1:16:31.120 --> 1:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the backups to your your workhorse backs. And I was like,

1:16:33.800 --> 1:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what I got a I've got a handcuff

1:16:37.400 --> 1:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver.

1:16:38.800 --> 1:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>You might want to pick up.

1:16:40.360 --> 1:16:40.559
<v Speaker 2>Now.

1:16:40.600 --> 1:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>You can ever bank on injury, but anything happens to

1:16:44.479 --> 1:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill or Jalen Waddle. Okay, Braxton Barrios is those guys.

1:16:50.400 --> 1:16:53.519
<v Speaker 1>He's one of these short, fast, slippery receivers who would

1:16:53.560 --> 1:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>walk right into the same kind of game breaking role

1:16:57.560 --> 1:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that those guys have because he's so stylistically sim more.

1:17:00.720 --> 1:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>You also, like Marvin Mims, you get some special team stuff.

1:17:03.280 --> 1:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Who knows, maybe you get lucky. Maybe as a rare

1:17:05.800 --> 1:17:09.919
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, handcuff Braxton Burrios.

1:17:09.520 --> 1:17:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Like Okay, I'm luke warm on it, but you never know.

1:17:12.360 --> 1:17:12.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you're in a.

1:17:12.920 --> 1:17:16.000
<v Speaker 4>Deep league watching with Trent sherfielder, who's the other guy.

1:17:15.880 --> 1:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>There, Cedric Wilson, maybe something like that. Chiefs take on

1:17:21.439 --> 1:17:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the Packers on Sunday night. Now, Patrick Mahomes, usualy just

1:17:27.200 --> 1:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>go Patrick Mahomes. Travis Kelcey obviously is the play has

1:17:30.680 --> 1:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>just been just not the same zeal right that you

1:17:34.360 --> 1:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>know that we've had in the past from those guys.

1:17:36.880 --> 1:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes is throwing exactly two touchdowns in each of his

1:17:39.400 --> 1:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>last three games, which is good, but it's not mahomesy

1:17:41.800 --> 1:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and good. And he's only averaged two hundred and twenty

1:17:44.240 --> 1:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>passing yards per game. That's not even close to Patrick Mahomes.

1:17:47.960 --> 1:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And here's Green Bay coming and despite injuries to it

1:17:51.160 --> 1:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a Jayi Alexander and they trade away Rasul Douglas improbably

1:17:54.640 --> 1:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the Packers allowing just two hundred and nineteen passing yards

1:17:57.200 --> 1:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>per game, just one point two passing touchdowns per game,

1:18:00.200 --> 1:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that's it. So it's still a grade. I'm Patrick Mahomes,

1:18:03.240 --> 1:18:05.880
<v Speaker 1>but not like the obvious a that we've had in

1:18:05.920 --> 1:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the past, So still a grade. Travis Kelcey, same as Mahomes,

1:18:10.520 --> 1:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>still a grade, but just not quite dominating like he

1:18:14.040 --> 1:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>used to. Still best of all from Travis kelce One

1:18:18.000 --> 1:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>dud game all year, that's it, and that's huge for

1:18:20.439 --> 1:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>fantasy tight ends.

1:18:21.280 --> 1:18:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Half what we're asking for us. Just don't kill me,

1:18:23.240 --> 1:18:24.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, fantasy tight end.

1:18:24.720 --> 1:18:26.799
<v Speaker 1>The Packers are middle of the pack tight end defense,

1:18:26.840 --> 1:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>but elite tight ends have had plenty of success against him,

1:18:30.840 --> 1:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and they've only really seen three and it was Sam

1:18:32.960 --> 1:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Laporta twice and TJ Hockinson. They averaged sixty four yards

1:18:36.800 --> 1:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>and two thirds of a touchdown. Travis Kelcey A grade.

1:18:40.280 --> 1:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Now the very controversial Rashee Rice. Every time I step

1:18:45.160 --> 1:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>out on a limb for Rashi Rice because I see

1:18:47.320 --> 1:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>something last week that makes me go, ooh, this is it.

1:18:50.280 --> 1:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>We can count on Rashie Rice. Then I get burned.

1:18:53.600 --> 1:18:54.599
<v Speaker 1>But I'm doing it again.

1:18:54.760 --> 1:18:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Yes, b grade, I'm with you. I'm actually with you.

1:18:57.640 --> 1:18:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Rice is scored in three of his last five games.

1:18:59.760 --> 1:19:02.719
<v Speaker 1>He's rush off his first one hundred yard games. Mahomes

1:19:02.720 --> 1:19:06.679
<v Speaker 1>has got a one hundred and twenty nine passer rating

1:19:06.720 --> 1:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>when he targets for Shee Rice. That's the third highest

1:19:09.920 --> 1:19:13.519
<v Speaker 1>among all wide receivers he's had. Last week, he had

1:19:13.560 --> 1:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a thirty one percent target share rate. That's the highest

1:19:17.400 --> 1:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of his career by a mile. Maybe that's a sign

1:19:20.960 --> 1:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of things to come. Now he lines up in the

1:19:22.760 --> 1:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>slot a lot that puts him up against the worst

1:19:25.439 --> 1:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Packers cornerbacks, Keishawn Nixon, who allows an astronomical

1:19:29.880 --> 1:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent catch rate. So I like Rashie Rice. Here,

1:19:33.360 --> 1:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm going out on him again. He keeps burning me.

1:19:35.560 --> 1:19:38.719
<v Speaker 1>But I'm trying to B grade. I'm Rashi Rice, Isaiah

1:19:38.760 --> 1:19:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Pacheco B grade and almost an A grade. He's running

1:19:41.360 --> 1:19:44.759
<v Speaker 1>with just tremendous intensity. I love him. Just just watch,

1:19:44.880 --> 1:19:48.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, watching him run. Pajecko's averaged seventy rushing yards

1:19:48.560 --> 1:19:50.479
<v Speaker 1>per game over his last three but he's run harder

1:19:50.520 --> 1:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>than that, and I think he's deserving of more than that.

1:19:52.720 --> 1:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>He saw five targets for only the second time last week,

1:19:56.200 --> 1:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>when he also scored a couple of touchdowns. Over the

1:19:58.479 --> 1:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks, opposing running backs of averaged one hundred

1:20:00.800 --> 1:20:03.719
<v Speaker 1>and twenty eight yards per game against Green Bay. That's great.

1:20:03.840 --> 1:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>He should get the majority of that one hundred and

1:20:05.360 --> 1:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight yards. They've also given up three touchdowns to

1:20:08.400 --> 1:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>running backs in the last three games, so I think

1:20:09.960 --> 1:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Pacheco finds the end zone here too, So I again

1:20:13.200 --> 1:20:15.919
<v Speaker 1>almost an A grade, but we're going B grade Isaiah Pacheco.

1:20:16.600 --> 1:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>The Packers only have a couple of middling C grades

1:20:19.000 --> 1:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to give you here. Let's start with aj Dillon. As

1:20:21.760 --> 1:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I've mentioned many times before, just because Aaron Jones is

1:20:24.840 --> 1:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>out does not mean Dylan is going to do particularly well.

1:20:29.479 --> 1:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>In fact, usually he does not. In eight career games

1:20:32.160 --> 1:20:38.799
<v Speaker 1>without Aaron Jones, Dylan averages forty four rushing yards. That's

1:20:38.960 --> 1:20:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it as the starter, just three point seven yards per carry,

1:20:42.280 --> 1:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's only chipping in thirteen receiving yards in those

1:20:45.000 --> 1:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>starting games as well. The Chiefs allow the second fewest

1:20:48.479 --> 1:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards to running backs, so I don't think he's

1:20:51.080 --> 1:20:53.519
<v Speaker 1>going to help you a lot here. Kansas City has

1:20:53.520 --> 1:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed at least seventy five rushing yards and or a

1:20:56.400 --> 1:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>score to running backs in five straight so there is

1:20:58.400 --> 1:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>some opportunity. But Dylan's but a total dud in these

1:21:01.680 --> 1:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>situations before, and I can only get you to a

1:21:04.160 --> 1:21:07.719
<v Speaker 1>C grade. Speaking of C grades, Jordan Love coming off

1:21:08.080 --> 1:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>two of the two best games yes for sure, but

1:21:13.200 --> 1:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>they came against two of the worst secondaries in the NFL,

1:21:16.320 --> 1:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Chargers and Lions. This is a dramatically harder matchup. Since

1:21:21.840 --> 1:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>getting handled by Kirk Cousins in Week six, the Chiefs

1:21:24.840 --> 1:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>are allowing per game averages of just one hundred and

1:21:28.560 --> 1:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy six passing yards and one point one passing touchdowns.

1:21:32.880 --> 1:21:33.320
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

1:21:33.760 --> 1:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Five of the past six quarterbacks have thrown zero or

1:21:37.800 --> 1:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown against the Chiefs. I can only get you

1:21:40.840 --> 1:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to the C grade until Jordan Loves proves that he's

1:21:42.840 --> 1:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>capable of beating a defense this good. Jaden Reid is

1:21:46.760 --> 1:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>questionable with the chest injury. Expected to go Sunday night.

1:21:49.600 --> 1:21:52.439
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of a poor man's Deebo Samuel. He's getting

1:21:52.439 --> 1:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>some carries. He's seen five carries over the last two games.

1:21:55.520 --> 1:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>He's hit at least four receptions in his last three games,

1:21:59.200 --> 1:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>scoring in two of them. Over the last five weeks,

1:22:02.479 --> 1:22:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City's allowed the fourth fewest receptions per game to receivers.

1:22:05.920 --> 1:22:08.479
<v Speaker 1>So I don't love Reid here. He runs from the

1:22:08.479 --> 1:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>slot that puts him up against Trent McDuffie. He's a

1:22:10.800 --> 1:22:15.719
<v Speaker 1>gambling cornerback who is willing to get burned. He's allowing

1:22:15.720 --> 1:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a passer rating of one hundred and forty three over

1:22:18.120 --> 1:22:20.519
<v Speaker 1>the last five weeks, so Reid is still startable, but

1:22:20.560 --> 1:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a tough matchup. C grade for him. Christian

1:22:23.240 --> 1:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Watson Romeo Dobbs also se grades. Number one cornerback Lagerius

1:22:26.640 --> 1:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Sneed has been suffocating over his last five games, allowing

1:22:30.320 --> 1:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>just three catches for forty two yards per game on

1:22:32.840 --> 1:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a fifty percent catch rate. But the catches Sneed normally

1:22:38.040 --> 1:22:42.479
<v Speaker 1>tracks the opposing number one outside receiver, but it's not

1:22:42.640 --> 1:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>clear on whether that's Dobbs or if that's Christian Watson,

1:22:45.880 --> 1:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>or if he's gonna follow neither. Maybe just goes by

1:22:49.320 --> 1:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>scheme or goes by side of the field. So I've

1:22:51.960 --> 1:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>got a C grade on both guys, but honestly, I

1:22:54.000 --> 1:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>don't love either one. I prefer you don't have to

1:22:55.720 --> 1:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>start either one, because if Sneed goes on either one, it's.

1:22:57.800 --> 1:22:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Game over for those guys.

1:23:00.040 --> 1:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>You can only hope that they would go up against

1:23:02.000 --> 1:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Watson, the other cornerback instead. I don't like those

1:23:05.040 --> 1:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>odds in an important game with the playoffs looming. Se

1:23:08.479 --> 1:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>grades on those guys, but I prefer you don't have

1:23:10.479 --> 1:23:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to start him. Our final matchup of the day is

1:23:13.439 --> 1:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the Monday Nighter Bengals taking on the Jaguars. Thur on

1:23:17.840 --> 1:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals side, Jake Browning really caps the upside for

1:23:21.560 --> 1:23:23.599
<v Speaker 1>really this whole offense sure does.

1:23:23.720 --> 1:23:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:23:24.040 --> 1:23:25.880
<v Speaker 5>Jake Browning, By the way, I don't know if you

1:23:25.880 --> 1:23:29.040
<v Speaker 5>guys knew this. He's from fulsom California, the places Johnny

1:23:29.080 --> 1:23:29.880
<v Speaker 5>Cash shang about.

1:23:31.080 --> 1:23:32.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, fulsome pritisan prison blues.

1:23:32.640 --> 1:23:35.519
<v Speaker 5>And if your fantasy roster is in quarterback prison this

1:23:35.640 --> 1:23:37.880
<v Speaker 5>week because of the bye week, I do think Jake

1:23:37.920 --> 1:23:39.880
<v Speaker 5>Browning might be started. Bull Why I'm giving him a

1:23:39.920 --> 1:23:43.160
<v Speaker 5>sea He was quarterback eighteen in Fantasy last week and

1:23:43.200 --> 1:23:45.679
<v Speaker 5>this is a decent matchup. The Jake Wars have allowed

1:23:45.680 --> 1:23:49.920
<v Speaker 5>the eighth highest passer rating since week seven, Jamar Chase,

1:23:49.920 --> 1:23:52.760
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna give him a B wide receiver thirty three

1:23:53.320 --> 1:23:56.080
<v Speaker 5>last week in Fantasy with Browning. Obviously, there's a clear

1:23:56.120 --> 1:23:58.720
<v Speaker 5>loss of value with Joe Burrow down, but this is

1:23:58.760 --> 1:23:59.880
<v Speaker 5>a decent matchup as.

1:23:59.760 --> 1:24:00.559
<v Speaker 2>Well for Chase.

1:24:00.840 --> 1:24:05.040
<v Speaker 5>Jayguiers have allowed the eighth highest points per reception per

1:24:05.320 --> 1:24:08.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry per target since week seven. T Higgins, I

1:24:08.640 --> 1:24:10.360
<v Speaker 5>think you got to keep him on the bench. He

1:24:10.400 --> 1:24:14.040
<v Speaker 5>missed practiced last week or missed last week with the hamstring,

1:24:15.160 --> 1:24:16.559
<v Speaker 5>hasn't been practicing this week.

1:24:16.920 --> 1:24:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's playing.

1:24:17.880 --> 1:24:20.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't think he's playing either. Even if he doesn't,

1:24:20.160 --> 1:24:22.160
<v Speaker 5>I would still keep Tyler Boyd on your bench. And

1:24:22.240 --> 1:24:25.360
<v Speaker 5>obviously the Bengals tight ends as well, just not going

1:24:25.400 --> 1:24:28.040
<v Speaker 5>to be the volume there. Joe Mixon, I'm giving him

1:24:28.040 --> 1:24:31.679
<v Speaker 5>a be only running back twenty two in Fantasy this year,

1:24:32.080 --> 1:24:35.000
<v Speaker 5>averaging eighteen touches for seventy eight total yards per game,

1:24:35.320 --> 1:24:38.559
<v Speaker 5>but he does rank number one in opportunity share, and

1:24:38.600 --> 1:24:41.719
<v Speaker 5>he has the opportunity for a strong showing here against

1:24:41.720 --> 1:24:44.439
<v Speaker 5>the Jaguars run defense that has allowed the fourth highest

1:24:44.640 --> 1:24:47.439
<v Speaker 5>explosive run rate in the league since Week seven. The

1:24:47.520 --> 1:24:51.600
<v Speaker 5>Jaguars also contextually stink against gap runs. That is a

1:24:51.680 --> 1:24:54.920
<v Speaker 5>Cincinnati Bengals staple as far as their offensive scheme goes.

1:24:55.320 --> 1:24:57.880
<v Speaker 5>Moving over to the Jaguars, I think Fish was talking

1:24:57.880 --> 1:25:00.320
<v Speaker 5>about this earlier, but both you guys were about how

1:25:00.360 --> 1:25:02.840
<v Speaker 5>well Trevor Lawrence had been playing. I'm gonna give him

1:25:02.840 --> 1:25:06.200
<v Speaker 5>an a even though only quarterback seventeen in Fantasy over

1:25:06.200 --> 1:25:08.719
<v Speaker 5>the course of the season, but the last two weeks

1:25:08.880 --> 1:25:13.320
<v Speaker 5>quarterback one, quarterback six in Fantasy. He's top eleven in

1:25:13.360 --> 1:25:16.519
<v Speaker 5>the league in yards per attempt and highly accurate throw rate.

1:25:16.840 --> 1:25:19.360
<v Speaker 5>This is also a strong matchup for him. The Bengals

1:25:19.360 --> 1:25:22.360
<v Speaker 5>have allowed the highest yards per attempt since the middle

1:25:22.400 --> 1:25:25.680
<v Speaker 5>of the season. Calvin Ridley, I'm also giving him an

1:25:25.680 --> 1:25:28.519
<v Speaker 5>a wide receiver twenty two in Fantasy over the course

1:25:28.520 --> 1:25:31.439
<v Speaker 5>of the season, but again, just like Lawrence, last two weeks,

1:25:31.479 --> 1:25:34.799
<v Speaker 5>he's been great. Ridley wide receiver one wide receiver eleven

1:25:34.800 --> 1:25:37.800
<v Speaker 5>in Fantasy those two games. He also, I was talking

1:25:37.800 --> 1:25:40.360
<v Speaker 5>about this with Fish before the show, seems to play

1:25:40.400 --> 1:25:43.400
<v Speaker 5>better when Jay Jones is on the field. Jay Jones

1:25:43.439 --> 1:25:46.600
<v Speaker 5>obviously back. The five games where Calvin Ridley's played with

1:25:46.680 --> 1:25:49.960
<v Speaker 5>Zay this year, average line of six catches for eighty

1:25:50.040 --> 1:25:53.120
<v Speaker 5>nine yards and a touchdown on more than eight targets

1:25:53.120 --> 1:25:55.599
<v Speaker 5>per game. In the six games where Zay Jones has

1:25:55.680 --> 1:25:59.120
<v Speaker 5>not played, Ridley's average line is three catches for thirty

1:25:59.120 --> 1:26:03.000
<v Speaker 5>six yards, no touchdowns on only five plus targets.

1:26:03.080 --> 1:26:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:26:03.280 --> 1:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't get that because it means a Jones barely

1:26:05.320 --> 1:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>impacts the game.

1:26:06.360 --> 1:26:06.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:26:06.840 --> 1:26:09.400
<v Speaker 5>Our buddy Matt Harmon did a breakdown on this where

1:26:09.400 --> 1:26:12.000
<v Speaker 5>he was talking about how it's difficult to press Ridley

1:26:12.080 --> 1:26:14.160
<v Speaker 5>when Jay Jones is on the field. I guess that's

1:26:14.160 --> 1:26:16.760
<v Speaker 5>what's opening them up. Okay, at least it shows in

1:26:16.840 --> 1:26:19.240
<v Speaker 5>the numbers we'll see. But you know, Zay back here,

1:26:19.439 --> 1:26:21.720
<v Speaker 5>this is also a good matchup. Even outside of that,

1:26:22.000 --> 1:26:25.640
<v Speaker 5>Ridley feasts against single high coverage. Bengals are an extremely

1:26:25.720 --> 1:26:28.880
<v Speaker 5>single high, heavy coverage scheme. So I like Ridley a

1:26:28.920 --> 1:26:31.280
<v Speaker 5>lot this week. Christian Kirk, I'm only going to give

1:26:31.320 --> 1:26:34.320
<v Speaker 5>him a C. He is wide receiver twenty four in Fantasy,

1:26:34.360 --> 1:26:37.200
<v Speaker 5>so we've been around where Ridley's been Any's thirty second

1:26:37.200 --> 1:26:40.479
<v Speaker 5>in deep targets. But I think the usage is going

1:26:40.520 --> 1:26:42.599
<v Speaker 5>towards Ridley this week. Is part of the reason why

1:26:42.600 --> 1:26:45.400
<v Speaker 5>I knock Kirk down to a sea. The Bengals have

1:26:45.479 --> 1:26:49.439
<v Speaker 5>allowed the third most PPR targets to Slot since Week.

1:26:49.360 --> 1:26:51.679
<v Speaker 2>Seven, so maybe I'm a little bit low on him.

1:26:51.560 --> 1:26:53.960
<v Speaker 5>But I skew it towards the Sea as opposed to

1:26:54.000 --> 1:26:56.280
<v Speaker 5>the b You're gonna keep Say Jones on the bench.

1:26:56.320 --> 1:26:59.040
<v Speaker 5>His biggest Fantasy utility this week might be opening.

1:26:58.800 --> 1:27:01.599
<v Speaker 2>Up Ridley for us again. Yeah, Evan Ingram, I'm gonna

1:27:01.600 --> 1:27:03.719
<v Speaker 2>give him an a what tight end.

1:27:03.680 --> 1:27:06.959
<v Speaker 1>Skioas no touchdowns on the season, Are you calling a touchdown?

1:27:07.000 --> 1:27:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Right here?

1:27:07.520 --> 1:27:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I am calling a touchdown? Okay, right here?

1:27:09.800 --> 1:27:10.240
<v Speaker 4>All right?

1:27:10.479 --> 1:27:13.000
<v Speaker 5>Tight end seven and Fantasy this year number four in

1:27:13.120 --> 1:27:15.960
<v Speaker 5>deep targets for Evan Ingram and this is an awesome matchup.

1:27:16.000 --> 1:27:18.479
<v Speaker 5>The Bengals have allowed the second most fantasy points per

1:27:18.560 --> 1:27:21.000
<v Speaker 5>game and the second most receiving yards per game to

1:27:21.040 --> 1:27:22.439
<v Speaker 5>opposing tight ends this year.

1:27:22.800 --> 1:27:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Last two guys Travis.

1:27:24.240 --> 1:27:27.320
<v Speaker 5>Etm were given a be Fantasy RB five, but he

1:27:27.360 --> 1:27:30.160
<v Speaker 5>has seen the snaps come down since Week ten in

1:27:30.240 --> 1:27:34.120
<v Speaker 5>those games, averaging seventeen touches sixty three total yards per game.

1:27:34.520 --> 1:27:36.559
<v Speaker 5>But since Week seven, the Bengals have allowed the ninth

1:27:36.640 --> 1:27:39.839
<v Speaker 5>highest explosive run rate and the fourth highest miss tackles

1:27:39.880 --> 1:27:42.840
<v Speaker 5>per attempt. So maybe ETN could get back going here,

1:27:43.120 --> 1:27:44.920
<v Speaker 5>dearness Johnson, I got to shout him out.

1:27:44.960 --> 1:27:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Of course.

1:27:45.320 --> 1:27:47.680
<v Speaker 5>Fish talked about him earlier in the show as has

1:27:47.680 --> 1:27:49.040
<v Speaker 5>take a chance on me running back.

1:27:49.160 --> 1:27:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I also think there's some value there potentially.

1:27:51.240 --> 1:27:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, so you've got to see grade on him.

1:27:53.160 --> 1:27:56.200
<v Speaker 3>I would assume yes, Scott's taking Ernest goes to since

1:27:56.280 --> 1:27:59.280
<v Speaker 3>the Ernest goes to Cincinnati. All right, thank you for

1:27:59.280 --> 1:28:01.160
<v Speaker 3>listening to Fantasy Football Weekly. Everybody.

1:28:01.560 --> 1:28:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Next week, it's the last week before the playoffs. Oh boy,

1:28:05.600 --> 1:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So next week's going to be a real grinder as

1:28:08.240 --> 1:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you try to find your way into the playoffs.

1:28:10.280 --> 1:28:12.559
<v Speaker 3>If you're not already there, we'll talk to you then, everybody.

1:28:12.680 --> 1:28:13.519
<v Speaker 3>Best of luck by on.

1:28:15.920 --> 1:28:19.519
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of iHeartRadio. For more

1:28:19.560 --> 1:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

1:28:23.640 --> 1:28:25.519
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows.