1 00:00:07,600 --> 00:00:10,639 Speaker 1: Hey, Jorge, have you been enjoying the donut revolution? 2 00:00:10,920 --> 00:00:14,960 Speaker 2: There's a revolution? Like, are donuts planning to overthrow the government. 3 00:00:16,480 --> 00:00:19,439 Speaker 1: Maybe it's more like a donut renaissance. You know, there's 4 00:00:19,480 --> 00:00:22,520 Speaker 1: all these creative donuts with cereal on top, or with 5 00:00:22,640 --> 00:00:26,520 Speaker 1: croissant dough, or with wacky flavors. Though I'm guessing you 6 00:00:26,560 --> 00:00:28,880 Speaker 1: probably prefer the original vanilla. 7 00:00:29,440 --> 00:00:32,479 Speaker 2: I enjoy a good crow nut and also a plane donut. 8 00:00:32,800 --> 00:00:35,120 Speaker 2: I think you have to be careful, otherwise you might 9 00:00:35,159 --> 00:00:36,199 Speaker 2: get a heart revolution. 10 00:00:38,280 --> 00:00:41,320 Speaker 1: I was recently tempted by a chicken and waffles donut. 11 00:00:41,840 --> 00:00:45,800 Speaker 2: Whoa is that like dinner, breakfast, and dessert in one bite. 12 00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:49,120 Speaker 1: You never even have to leave the house and you 13 00:00:49,159 --> 00:00:50,160 Speaker 1: can't afterwards. 14 00:00:50,920 --> 00:00:55,279 Speaker 2: Yeah, you might not be able to. How about a 15 00:00:55,400 --> 00:00:58,800 Speaker 2: universe donut? Have they made those? That's the donut version 16 00:00:58,800 --> 00:01:02,400 Speaker 2: of the everything bagel cosmic donut. Then you'll be everything, everywhere, 17 00:01:02,440 --> 00:01:19,960 Speaker 2: all at once. I am Orge Mack, cartoonis and the 18 00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:22,120 Speaker 2: author of Oliver's Great Big Universe. 19 00:01:22,520 --> 00:01:25,120 Speaker 1: Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor 20 00:01:25,160 --> 00:01:27,920 Speaker 1: at UC Irvine, and I don't remember the last time 21 00:01:27,959 --> 00:01:29,440 Speaker 1: I actually ate a donut. 22 00:01:29,560 --> 00:01:33,839 Speaker 2: Wait, what that's kind of sad. Donuts are great. 23 00:01:33,959 --> 00:01:36,720 Speaker 1: I hear they're pretty tasty, but I don't actually eat 24 00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:39,360 Speaker 1: breakfast or in lunch anymore. So there's a whole category 25 00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:41,080 Speaker 1: of foods I just don't get to have. 26 00:01:41,280 --> 00:01:42,679 Speaker 2: Wait, you don't eat desserts either. 27 00:01:42,800 --> 00:01:45,600 Speaker 1: Oh. I eat plenty of dessert after dinner, but it's 28 00:01:45,600 --> 00:01:47,800 Speaker 1: not very often people serve donuts for dessert. 29 00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:50,040 Speaker 2: You can have donuts at any time of the day. 30 00:01:51,880 --> 00:01:53,800 Speaker 1: That's why I was looking at that chicken waffle donut. 31 00:01:53,800 --> 00:01:56,360 Speaker 2: I was like, yeah, you can have it all in 32 00:01:56,400 --> 00:01:58,880 Speaker 2: one one bite, one treat. 33 00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:01,880 Speaker 1: Day is nutrition or at least calories. 34 00:02:03,720 --> 00:02:06,480 Speaker 2: More of the calories. Yeah, it's me seen some vegetables though. 35 00:02:06,720 --> 00:02:09,680 Speaker 2: It should be like chicken waffles salad. 36 00:02:09,560 --> 00:02:12,440 Speaker 1: On a donut, right, chicken broccoliate donut. 37 00:02:13,480 --> 00:02:16,480 Speaker 2: Oh my god, chicken pot pie donut. You just invented 38 00:02:16,480 --> 00:02:20,880 Speaker 2: the next food truck, crazy chicken ponuts. 39 00:02:21,840 --> 00:02:24,360 Speaker 1: Chicken potpoury. 40 00:02:24,760 --> 00:02:28,040 Speaker 2: That'll smell good too. But anyways, welcome to our podcast 41 00:02:28,160 --> 00:02:31,399 Speaker 2: Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio 42 00:02:31,560 --> 00:02:32,440 Speaker 2: in which we try. 43 00:02:32,240 --> 00:02:35,559 Speaker 1: To serve up the entire universe, all of its delicious, 44 00:02:35,720 --> 00:02:40,320 Speaker 1: creamy nature and mysterious feelings to you, not on a donut, 45 00:02:40,400 --> 00:02:43,400 Speaker 1: but in your ear. We think that everything that's out 46 00:02:43,400 --> 00:02:46,919 Speaker 1: there in the universe deserves to be explored and questioned 47 00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:51,000 Speaker 1: and understood as best as possible. We don't shy away 48 00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:53,440 Speaker 1: from the things that we don't understand. We embrace that 49 00:02:53,560 --> 00:02:56,040 Speaker 1: ignorance and take you right up to the forefront of 50 00:02:56,160 --> 00:02:57,040 Speaker 1: human knowledge. 51 00:02:57,240 --> 00:02:59,600 Speaker 2: That's right. We try to glaze the doughnut of your 52 00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:02,960 Speaker 2: brain by not glazing over all of the amazing details 53 00:03:02,960 --> 00:03:05,120 Speaker 2: that the universe has to offer and all of the 54 00:03:05,560 --> 00:03:08,880 Speaker 2: crazy mysteries that are out there still left to be resolved. 55 00:03:09,320 --> 00:03:12,040 Speaker 1: Because the questions about the universe are not just for 56 00:03:12,280 --> 00:03:16,560 Speaker 1: particle physicists and cosmologists in fancy offices or not so 57 00:03:16,720 --> 00:03:20,280 Speaker 1: fancy offices, as the case may be. Is for everybody 58 00:03:20,320 --> 00:03:24,320 Speaker 1: to wonder about the universe, and curiosity is totally democratic. 59 00:03:24,639 --> 00:03:28,079 Speaker 1: Everybody can ask questions, everybody can make progress, everybody can 60 00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:32,760 Speaker 1: push the boundaries of human understanding, and everybody deserves to understand. 61 00:03:33,240 --> 00:03:36,360 Speaker 2: Well, it sort of depends on where you live, though, doesn't. 62 00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:37,640 Speaker 1: It how fancy your office is. 63 00:03:37,680 --> 00:03:40,600 Speaker 2: You mean, I mean, whether you live in North Korea? 64 00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:44,680 Speaker 1: Perhaps, Hm, Well, I think those people deserve to understand 65 00:03:44,680 --> 00:03:46,680 Speaker 1: the universe, even if they're not allowed to talk about it. 66 00:03:46,760 --> 00:03:50,000 Speaker 2: Yes, yes, and everyone deserves donuts as well, which are 67 00:03:50,080 --> 00:03:53,640 Speaker 2: part of the universe, and maybe even they might be 68 00:03:53,680 --> 00:03:54,720 Speaker 2: the shape of the universe. 69 00:03:55,120 --> 00:03:57,840 Speaker 1: Yeah, are you trying to trigger a donut inspired revolution 70 00:03:57,960 --> 00:03:58,600 Speaker 1: in North Korea? 71 00:03:59,280 --> 00:03:59,760 Speaker 2: You know whatever? 72 00:04:02,120 --> 00:04:03,000 Speaker 1: That wasn't to know? 73 00:04:03,480 --> 00:04:06,120 Speaker 2: If it f I do that makes it happen. Let's 74 00:04:06,120 --> 00:04:06,440 Speaker 2: do it. 75 00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:08,560 Speaker 1: You gotta be careful now. We don't want to get 76 00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:09,520 Speaker 1: hacked by North Korea. 77 00:04:09,720 --> 00:04:13,000 Speaker 2: Oh yeah, what would they find though in our files? 78 00:04:14,600 --> 00:04:16,080 Speaker 1: Boys, secrets about the universe. 79 00:04:17,520 --> 00:04:20,440 Speaker 2: Don't think we're keeping those secrets and saving them for 80 00:04:20,480 --> 00:04:21,320 Speaker 2: a later podcast. 81 00:04:21,800 --> 00:04:23,680 Speaker 1: The puns that were so bad we didn't even use 82 00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:24,560 Speaker 1: them on the podcast. 83 00:04:24,720 --> 00:04:26,720 Speaker 2: There's no just thing as a bad pun, Danyl. I 84 00:04:26,720 --> 00:04:29,760 Speaker 2: think that's the definition of a pun. If it's good, 85 00:04:29,760 --> 00:04:31,320 Speaker 2: it's not really a pun. It's a good joke. 86 00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:35,120 Speaker 1: I dare you to hack us North Korea and find those. 87 00:04:34,960 --> 00:04:39,520 Speaker 2: Terror puns to hack Daniel please. I do have some 88 00:04:39,560 --> 00:04:42,200 Speaker 2: secrets I don't want out there. But yeah, like you said, 89 00:04:42,240 --> 00:04:45,239 Speaker 2: it all starts with questions, and everyone can ask questions, 90 00:04:45,279 --> 00:04:46,640 Speaker 2: including our listeners. 91 00:04:46,960 --> 00:04:50,080 Speaker 1: We'd love to hear your questions. If you are listening 92 00:04:50,120 --> 00:04:52,680 Speaker 1: to the podcast and something doesn't quite make sense to you, 93 00:04:53,040 --> 00:04:55,880 Speaker 1: or you're just walking down the street contemplating the universe 94 00:04:55,960 --> 00:04:59,160 Speaker 1: and something bumps in your brain, please reach out to 95 00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:02,760 Speaker 1: us to question at Danielandjorge dot com. Will you right 96 00:05:02,839 --> 00:05:03,960 Speaker 1: back to everybody. 97 00:05:04,200 --> 00:05:09,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, just don't bump into any cars, into any potholes. 98 00:05:10,160 --> 00:05:12,320 Speaker 2: But yeah, we like to take questions here on the podcast, 99 00:05:12,839 --> 00:05:20,560 Speaker 2: and so today on the program we'll be tackling listener 100 00:05:20,640 --> 00:05:22,320 Speaker 2: questions number fifty eight. 101 00:05:22,839 --> 00:05:25,840 Speaker 1: Thank you very much to everybody who sends in their questions. 102 00:05:25,920 --> 00:05:29,440 Speaker 1: It's delightful to read your thoughts about the universe. And 103 00:05:29,480 --> 00:05:32,159 Speaker 1: sometimes I ask people to send me a recording of 104 00:05:32,200 --> 00:05:34,200 Speaker 1: their questions so we can talk about it here on 105 00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:34,920 Speaker 1: the podcast. 106 00:05:35,120 --> 00:05:38,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, and so today we have three great questions from listeners. 107 00:05:38,360 --> 00:05:41,600 Speaker 2: The first one is about the shape of planets. There's 108 00:05:41,640 --> 00:05:45,960 Speaker 2: one about universe changing quantum events, and there's also a 109 00:05:46,040 --> 00:05:51,599 Speaker 2: question about extremely massive and extremely old galaxies. So let's 110 00:05:51,680 --> 00:05:55,240 Speaker 2: jump right in. Our first question comes from Eric from 111 00:05:55,279 --> 00:05:56,159 Speaker 2: the Netherlands. 112 00:05:56,560 --> 00:05:59,400 Speaker 3: Hi, Daniel and Hore. Eric here from the Netherlands. I 113 00:05:59,400 --> 00:06:01,800 Speaker 3: have a funk question. Should I think about donut planets? 114 00:06:02,200 --> 00:06:04,760 Speaker 3: So me and my friend were talking about space and 115 00:06:04,880 --> 00:06:07,760 Speaker 3: planets and what shapes they could take, and so he 116 00:06:07,839 --> 00:06:10,880 Speaker 3: pointed out that he saw an article once about how 117 00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:14,760 Speaker 3: planets could have a torah shape or a donut and 118 00:06:14,880 --> 00:06:18,800 Speaker 3: be stable. I recall as well seeing that paper, but 119 00:06:19,200 --> 00:06:21,560 Speaker 3: I tried to think about how that would work, and 120 00:06:21,680 --> 00:06:25,120 Speaker 3: I just I realized I couldn't really figured it out. 121 00:06:25,760 --> 00:06:28,640 Speaker 3: So I was wondering what you guys had to say 122 00:06:28,680 --> 00:06:32,400 Speaker 3: about that, like, how would a donut shape planet evolve 123 00:06:32,760 --> 00:06:36,200 Speaker 3: or like be created. Yeah, we'd love to hear you 124 00:06:36,240 --> 00:06:39,560 Speaker 3: guys thoughts. Thank you so much and keep making your 125 00:06:39,600 --> 00:06:40,440 Speaker 3: awesome podcast. 126 00:06:40,880 --> 00:06:43,080 Speaker 2: All right, do you think Eric was just hungry here? 127 00:06:44,960 --> 00:06:47,080 Speaker 1: Yeah? Well Eric is in the Netherlands, so who knows 128 00:06:47,200 --> 00:06:50,359 Speaker 1: what sort of substances he was under the influence. 129 00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:56,600 Speaker 2: Of his friends thinking, Oh boy, I think that's an 130 00:06:56,680 --> 00:06:57,640 Speaker 2: answer them reference. 131 00:06:58,400 --> 00:06:59,520 Speaker 1: Yes, I think it is. 132 00:06:59,839 --> 00:07:02,039 Speaker 2: I think there's a whole other there's a whole rest 133 00:07:02,040 --> 00:07:05,800 Speaker 2: of the country that's not associated with drugs, Danue. 134 00:07:07,480 --> 00:07:11,120 Speaker 1: I just said substances. You said drugs. Donuts might be substances, 135 00:07:11,160 --> 00:07:14,440 Speaker 1: that's right, sure, high on gleazing sugar or something. 136 00:07:14,840 --> 00:07:17,480 Speaker 2: Oh I see, yeah, yeah, well, sniffing some tulips I'm. 137 00:07:17,400 --> 00:07:22,560 Speaker 1: Sure, but it is a really fun question that goes 138 00:07:22,600 --> 00:07:25,360 Speaker 1: to the heart of like how do planets form? And 139 00:07:25,480 --> 00:07:27,880 Speaker 1: are the planets in our Solar system weird? Are there 140 00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:31,080 Speaker 1: weirder planets out there in the universe? What's the sort 141 00:07:31,080 --> 00:07:33,400 Speaker 1: of limit of planet topology? 142 00:07:33,800 --> 00:07:36,960 Speaker 2: Mm? Like what determines the shape of a planet? 143 00:07:37,240 --> 00:07:40,480 Speaker 1: Yeah? Exactly, Like why are most planets spheres? And are 144 00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:45,040 Speaker 1: other shapes possible? Spheres come make sense because gravity is 145 00:07:45,040 --> 00:07:48,200 Speaker 1: the thing that determines the shape of planets. Remember, planets 146 00:07:48,200 --> 00:07:51,440 Speaker 1: come together from little bits of rock, basically cosmic dust 147 00:07:51,440 --> 00:07:55,160 Speaker 1: and gas and ice that gravity has pulled together. Before 148 00:07:55,200 --> 00:07:57,760 Speaker 1: we had a Solar system, there was a massive cloud 149 00:07:57,840 --> 00:08:00,880 Speaker 1: of these ingredients of the Solar System. Some events, some 150 00:08:01,000 --> 00:08:04,320 Speaker 1: spark caused a gravitational runaway that formed the Sun, and 151 00:08:04,360 --> 00:08:06,880 Speaker 1: the rest of the materials that was orbiting too fast 152 00:08:06,920 --> 00:08:09,680 Speaker 1: to fall in continued to orbit in a plane which 153 00:08:09,720 --> 00:08:13,280 Speaker 1: then gathered itself together into asteroids and planets and stuff 154 00:08:13,320 --> 00:08:16,440 Speaker 1: like that. So it's gravity that shapes the whole Solar 155 00:08:16,440 --> 00:08:19,920 Speaker 1: System and gravity that tells us the shape of the planet. 156 00:08:20,360 --> 00:08:23,360 Speaker 2: Right. Without gravity, you wouldn't have planets, right, or anything 157 00:08:23,480 --> 00:08:24,360 Speaker 2: out there in the universe. 158 00:08:24,840 --> 00:08:27,120 Speaker 1: Without gravity, we would still be in the dark ages 159 00:08:27,600 --> 00:08:31,080 Speaker 1: of the universe. Very very early on, protons and electrons 160 00:08:31,080 --> 00:08:33,640 Speaker 1: found each other and became neutral hydrogen, and they were 161 00:08:33,800 --> 00:08:37,680 Speaker 1: just dark neutral hydrogen filling the universe. It was gravity 162 00:08:37,720 --> 00:08:40,600 Speaker 1: that pulled that together, made the first stars, which shot 163 00:08:40,640 --> 00:08:44,440 Speaker 1: out radiation and reionized at the universe and made it exciting. 164 00:08:44,880 --> 00:08:47,600 Speaker 2: M yeah, I guess it. Just the universe would just 165 00:08:47,600 --> 00:08:49,319 Speaker 2: be a giant soup if it wasn't. 166 00:08:49,160 --> 00:08:51,320 Speaker 1: For gravity, a big dark soup. 167 00:08:53,360 --> 00:08:55,240 Speaker 2: All right. Well, I guess the question then might be 168 00:08:55,440 --> 00:08:58,920 Speaker 2: what caused it to a planet? Like, how do you 169 00:08:58,960 --> 00:09:00,400 Speaker 2: define what a planet it is? 170 00:09:00,960 --> 00:09:03,280 Speaker 1: Oh man, that is a whole rabbit hole. You really 171 00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:04,200 Speaker 1: want to go there? 172 00:09:05,920 --> 00:09:09,439 Speaker 2: Oh, they got twenty minutes, let's do it. 173 00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:14,280 Speaker 1: The answer is it's complicated and inconsistent. There's several definitions 174 00:09:14,280 --> 00:09:18,000 Speaker 1: of a planet, depending on which international Astronomical Union you 175 00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:18,640 Speaker 1: subscribe to. 176 00:09:19,160 --> 00:09:23,240 Speaker 2: There are multiple ones. There are multiple ones, yes, like 177 00:09:23,320 --> 00:09:23,760 Speaker 2: how many? 178 00:09:24,040 --> 00:09:26,400 Speaker 1: Oh man? I have not surveyed them recently, but I 179 00:09:26,440 --> 00:09:30,560 Speaker 1: remember them disagreeing about some borderline cases. But the basic 180 00:09:30,640 --> 00:09:32,640 Speaker 1: idea is that you have some objects. 181 00:09:32,720 --> 00:09:35,640 Speaker 2: Wait, I'm super curious about this union. So like astronomers 182 00:09:35,640 --> 00:09:39,400 Speaker 2: have unions like they're like associations, like clubs or like 183 00:09:40,480 --> 00:09:41,640 Speaker 2: you know, government bodies. 184 00:09:41,840 --> 00:09:44,800 Speaker 1: They're more like professional societies. You know. They get together, 185 00:09:45,200 --> 00:09:47,920 Speaker 1: they eat stale cookies, they argue about who's a planet, 186 00:09:47,960 --> 00:09:50,959 Speaker 1: who's not a planet? You know. They build an International 187 00:09:51,080 --> 00:09:54,000 Speaker 1: Astronomical Union, which is not a union in the sense 188 00:09:54,000 --> 00:09:57,520 Speaker 1: that they don't like collectively bargain for astronomers rights or anything. 189 00:09:57,800 --> 00:09:59,840 Speaker 1: They just get together and talk about stuff. 190 00:10:00,200 --> 00:10:03,360 Speaker 2: I see, And what's the competing organization. 191 00:10:03,760 --> 00:10:06,280 Speaker 1: Well, there's the astronomers in the IAU, and then there 192 00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:09,520 Speaker 1: are planetary scientists that have other organizations that have their 193 00:10:09,520 --> 00:10:10,479 Speaker 1: own definitions. 194 00:10:11,480 --> 00:10:14,400 Speaker 2: All right, Well, generally what's the general definition? 195 00:10:14,440 --> 00:10:18,600 Speaker 1: Though? The general definition is a large, rounded astronomical body 196 00:10:18,840 --> 00:10:22,240 Speaker 1: that's not a star or it's remnant. It's something that 197 00:10:22,280 --> 00:10:25,640 Speaker 1: has cleared its path and its orbit around the star. 198 00:10:25,679 --> 00:10:28,960 Speaker 2: M and so it can be made out of anything, right, 199 00:10:28,960 --> 00:10:30,800 Speaker 2: It doesn't have to be rocks. It can also be 200 00:10:30,960 --> 00:10:32,160 Speaker 2: liquid or gases. 201 00:10:32,320 --> 00:10:34,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, it could be made out of ice, It could 202 00:10:34,040 --> 00:10:35,839 Speaker 1: be made out of diamond, It could be made out 203 00:10:35,840 --> 00:10:36,480 Speaker 1: of donuts. 204 00:10:36,559 --> 00:10:39,600 Speaker 2: Absolutely, WHOA, how about chicken and waffles. 205 00:10:41,679 --> 00:10:44,120 Speaker 1: I don't think the IAU has taken a stance on that. 206 00:10:44,240 --> 00:10:46,839 Speaker 1: But I don't see a reason why you can't that. 207 00:10:46,960 --> 00:10:48,920 Speaker 2: That might be the hair that breaks the camel's back. 208 00:10:50,520 --> 00:10:53,559 Speaker 2: There'll be so much disagreement, they'll disunionize. 209 00:10:53,679 --> 00:10:56,640 Speaker 1: Mm hm. And so the thing that makes these planets 210 00:10:56,760 --> 00:10:59,800 Speaker 1: is gravity. And if it was just gravity, then all 211 00:10:59,840 --> 00:11:02,680 Speaker 1: these planets would be spheres because gravity likes to roll 212 00:11:02,720 --> 00:11:05,080 Speaker 1: things downhill. And if you have a sphere with a 213 00:11:05,080 --> 00:11:07,760 Speaker 1: bump on it, gravity will want to pull that bump down. 214 00:11:08,160 --> 00:11:10,720 Speaker 1: And so if you only have gravity, then planets should 215 00:11:10,760 --> 00:11:13,960 Speaker 1: naturally become spheres. It's like the lowest energy state for 216 00:11:14,040 --> 00:11:17,320 Speaker 1: a big blob of stuff. Planets also do other things. 217 00:11:17,360 --> 00:11:20,600 Speaker 1: They spin, Like the Earth itself is not actually a 218 00:11:20,600 --> 00:11:24,240 Speaker 1: perfect sphere because it's spinning and that changes the shape 219 00:11:24,280 --> 00:11:24,920 Speaker 1: of the planet. 220 00:11:25,080 --> 00:11:27,200 Speaker 2: Wait, wait, are you saying the Earth is not round. 221 00:11:28,200 --> 00:11:29,960 Speaker 1: I'm not saying the Earth is flat, but the Earth 222 00:11:30,040 --> 00:11:33,720 Speaker 1: is not a perfect sphere. It's an ellipsoid because its 223 00:11:33,720 --> 00:11:36,640 Speaker 1: spin makes it bulge at the edges. 224 00:11:36,600 --> 00:11:38,360 Speaker 2: Like theypical force. Right. 225 00:11:38,600 --> 00:11:42,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, Essentially a counter acts gravity. For example, you weigh 226 00:11:42,400 --> 00:11:44,720 Speaker 1: less at the equator than you do at the poles. 227 00:11:46,040 --> 00:11:47,319 Speaker 2: How bulgy is the Earth? 228 00:11:49,720 --> 00:11:51,959 Speaker 1: The radius of the Earth is like twenty ish kilometers 229 00:11:52,000 --> 00:11:55,040 Speaker 1: different at the poles and at the equator, So it's 230 00:11:55,080 --> 00:11:56,040 Speaker 1: not a tiny effect. 231 00:11:56,360 --> 00:12:00,400 Speaker 2: Isn't the Earth like twelve thousand kilometers in diameter? It's 232 00:12:00,440 --> 00:12:02,560 Speaker 2: we're talking about like a zero point one percent. 233 00:12:02,800 --> 00:12:05,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's big compared to me or you or your 234 00:12:05,160 --> 00:12:07,559 Speaker 1: house or your breakfast, and it's small compared to the 235 00:12:07,640 --> 00:12:10,080 Speaker 1: radius of the Earth, so you might not even notice it, 236 00:12:10,120 --> 00:12:12,560 Speaker 1: Like if you're holding the Earth in your hand, you 237 00:12:12,640 --> 00:12:13,800 Speaker 1: probably couldn't detect it. 238 00:12:13,960 --> 00:12:17,720 Speaker 2: Mmmm, well, I guess going back to Eric's question, his 239 00:12:17,880 --> 00:12:20,840 Speaker 2: question was, can you have a planet that's not shaped 240 00:12:20,880 --> 00:12:23,320 Speaker 2: like a giant ball? Can you maybe have a planet 241 00:12:23,320 --> 00:12:26,080 Speaker 2: that is shaped like a doughnut or a trus. 242 00:12:26,120 --> 00:12:28,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a really cool question, and people have been 243 00:12:28,240 --> 00:12:30,600 Speaker 1: thinking about this for a long time. There's a long 244 00:12:30,679 --> 00:12:36,000 Speaker 1: history a smart physicists thinking about stable gravitational configurations. Essentially, 245 00:12:36,040 --> 00:12:38,800 Speaker 1: as you spin the planet faster and faster, you can 246 00:12:38,840 --> 00:12:41,760 Speaker 1: make more and more interesting shapes. If there's no spin, 247 00:12:41,920 --> 00:12:44,240 Speaker 1: you basically can only have a sphere. But if you 248 00:12:44,280 --> 00:12:47,199 Speaker 1: spin it you can make stable shapes that are not spheres. 249 00:12:48,160 --> 00:12:52,520 Speaker 2: But aren't all of those shapes basically like oblongs or 250 00:12:53,080 --> 00:12:54,319 Speaker 2: like squish balls. 251 00:12:54,200 --> 00:12:57,920 Speaker 1: Yes and no. Certainly ellipsoids are possible, And as you 252 00:12:57,960 --> 00:13:00,760 Speaker 1: spin the planet it gets fatter and fat, and then 253 00:13:00,760 --> 00:13:02,600 Speaker 1: eventually it might even break up and you start like 254 00:13:02,679 --> 00:13:06,640 Speaker 1: losing stuff into outer space. But according to the calculations, 255 00:13:06,840 --> 00:13:10,439 Speaker 1: you can also have a torus. You can have a doughnut, 256 00:13:10,679 --> 00:13:14,680 Speaker 1: which is gravitationally stable if it's spinning at the right speed. 257 00:13:15,320 --> 00:13:18,360 Speaker 2: Interesting, but I guess maybe it isn't another big factor 258 00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:21,280 Speaker 2: what the planet is made out of. Like it's made 259 00:13:21,280 --> 00:13:24,720 Speaker 2: out of gas, it probably can't hold any other shape 260 00:13:24,720 --> 00:13:26,120 Speaker 2: other than a sphere cannon. 261 00:13:26,320 --> 00:13:28,800 Speaker 1: It turns out to not be very important if it's 262 00:13:28,840 --> 00:13:31,480 Speaker 1: big enough, because if it's big enough like the typical 263 00:13:31,520 --> 00:13:34,120 Speaker 1: sizes of planets or even something like the Moon or larger, 264 00:13:34,520 --> 00:13:37,520 Speaker 1: then the gravity in the spin overwhelm any material strength. 265 00:13:37,559 --> 00:13:40,640 Speaker 1: It doesn't really matter what it's made out of. You 266 00:13:40,640 --> 00:13:43,480 Speaker 1: can think about this as like a drop of liquid, essentially, 267 00:13:43,720 --> 00:13:46,640 Speaker 1: whose shape is completely controlled by its spin and by 268 00:13:46,640 --> 00:13:49,720 Speaker 1: its gravity, not at all by its surface tension, because 269 00:13:49,760 --> 00:13:52,480 Speaker 1: like the material strength of rock is tiny compared to 270 00:13:52,520 --> 00:13:54,760 Speaker 1: the gravitational force of the whole Earth. 271 00:13:55,520 --> 00:13:59,640 Speaker 2: Meaning like even rocks are sort of liquid in a larger. 272 00:13:59,360 --> 00:14:02,240 Speaker 1: Scale, Yeah, exactly, And in the great pressure inside the Earth, 273 00:14:02,280 --> 00:14:06,040 Speaker 1: for example, they do flow and huge rocks and mountains 274 00:14:06,040 --> 00:14:08,840 Speaker 1: can be formed by these pressures. So even if you 275 00:14:08,880 --> 00:14:11,320 Speaker 1: have like a diamond planet, if it's big enough, then 276 00:14:11,360 --> 00:14:13,400 Speaker 1: the gravitational forces are going to be the only thing 277 00:14:13,440 --> 00:14:14,319 Speaker 1: you have to worry about. 278 00:14:14,920 --> 00:14:18,320 Speaker 2: So you're saying you can make a doughnut shaped planet, Like, 279 00:14:18,840 --> 00:14:21,440 Speaker 2: how does that even work when in it the whole collapse? 280 00:14:21,720 --> 00:14:23,720 Speaker 1: Yes, and no, Like you can find a solution where 281 00:14:23,720 --> 00:14:27,200 Speaker 1: it's in equilibrium, where everything is pulling on everything in 282 00:14:27,240 --> 00:14:29,880 Speaker 1: a balanced way, and so it doesn't collapse, but it's 283 00:14:29,960 --> 00:14:33,720 Speaker 1: very very unstable, Like a little bit of extra mass 284 00:14:33,720 --> 00:14:36,040 Speaker 1: here or a little bit of extra mass there can 285 00:14:36,080 --> 00:14:40,400 Speaker 1: break the thing up. So it's possible theoretically to construct 286 00:14:40,440 --> 00:14:42,840 Speaker 1: this thing and to set it spinning and to have 287 00:14:42,920 --> 00:14:45,680 Speaker 1: it avoid collapsing, but it's unlikely for it to appear 288 00:14:45,720 --> 00:14:49,120 Speaker 1: in nature or to last very long. But if it's 289 00:14:49,160 --> 00:14:51,760 Speaker 1: big enough, then it has enough like gravitational self energy, 290 00:14:51,760 --> 00:14:54,600 Speaker 1: sort of like along the tube to avoid collapsing. 291 00:14:55,240 --> 00:14:58,040 Speaker 2: I guess you just made me think of like Saturn's rings. 292 00:14:58,520 --> 00:15:01,960 Speaker 2: You know those rings are made out of ice and rocks, 293 00:15:01,960 --> 00:15:06,120 Speaker 2: and you know, assuming that maybe you could hop between 294 00:15:06,320 --> 00:15:10,000 Speaker 2: rocks in those rings, you could maybe consider that one 295 00:15:10,280 --> 00:15:13,360 Speaker 2: whole space body, couldn't you or maybe like if you 296 00:15:13,400 --> 00:15:17,200 Speaker 2: added more rocks to those rings, it eventually might be solid. 297 00:15:17,480 --> 00:15:20,360 Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, And that's actually one potential outcome for a 298 00:15:20,400 --> 00:15:23,080 Speaker 1: donut planet. If you start with a donut planet, it's 299 00:15:23,240 --> 00:15:25,400 Speaker 1: likely to break itself up into smaller bodies and then 300 00:15:25,440 --> 00:15:28,520 Speaker 1: you basically just have rings because if one spot is 301 00:15:28,520 --> 00:15:30,960 Speaker 1: a little bit more massive then another spot, it's going 302 00:15:31,040 --> 00:15:32,680 Speaker 1: to pull towards that. You're going to get this like 303 00:15:32,760 --> 00:15:35,840 Speaker 1: bead instability, where it tends to break up into beads 304 00:15:35,920 --> 00:15:38,280 Speaker 1: rather than being one continuous planet. 305 00:15:38,600 --> 00:15:41,160 Speaker 2: Right, But I think the idea is kind of the same, right, 306 00:15:41,200 --> 00:15:43,720 Speaker 2: like a donut shape planet would is sort of basically 307 00:15:43,760 --> 00:15:45,040 Speaker 2: like a ring, right. 308 00:15:45,080 --> 00:15:46,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think they're stable for the same reason, but 309 00:15:47,000 --> 00:15:50,000 Speaker 1: they're a little bit different. Like a ring is basically flat, 310 00:15:50,040 --> 00:15:52,640 Speaker 1: but a donut shape planet is actually a cylinder, so 311 00:15:52,640 --> 00:15:55,200 Speaker 1: it's a little bit different. This is something we're thinking about, 312 00:15:55,320 --> 00:15:58,200 Speaker 1: is like more massive and without a huge planet at 313 00:15:58,240 --> 00:16:01,000 Speaker 1: the center, and so it's gravity will pull it together 314 00:16:01,120 --> 00:16:03,640 Speaker 1: into a cylinder rather than keeping it in a flat 315 00:16:03,640 --> 00:16:07,000 Speaker 1: plane like a set of rings, but they are similar. 316 00:16:07,080 --> 00:16:08,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I guess what would it be like to 317 00:16:08,720 --> 00:16:12,320 Speaker 2: be on that planet? Like, could you walk around the 318 00:16:12,360 --> 00:16:15,920 Speaker 2: tube of the donut and stay on the planet or 319 00:16:16,000 --> 00:16:17,600 Speaker 2: do you fall into the center of the hole? 320 00:16:17,920 --> 00:16:20,120 Speaker 1: You could walk around the whole planet and stay on 321 00:16:20,160 --> 00:16:23,160 Speaker 1: the planet. Down would always be towards the center of 322 00:16:23,200 --> 00:16:26,200 Speaker 1: the ring, not towards the dot that's in the hole. 323 00:16:26,800 --> 00:16:28,960 Speaker 2: Oh, I see, because even if you're in the inner 324 00:16:29,040 --> 00:16:32,200 Speaker 2: part of the hole, you're spinning so fast you're sort 325 00:16:32,200 --> 00:16:35,960 Speaker 2: of being pressed against the donut, sort of like in 326 00:16:35,960 --> 00:16:38,600 Speaker 2: those carnival rides where you're spinning it inside. 327 00:16:38,320 --> 00:16:43,720 Speaker 1: A a graviton. Yeah, exactly, Well, the spin definitely contributes 328 00:16:43,960 --> 00:16:45,840 Speaker 1: and helps make this thing stable. Do you have a 329 00:16:45,880 --> 00:16:50,080 Speaker 1: combination of that spin and the actual gravity of this object? 330 00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:50,280 Speaker 2: Right? 331 00:16:50,320 --> 00:16:53,120 Speaker 1: It really is pulling on you. But the interesting thing 332 00:16:53,200 --> 00:16:55,080 Speaker 1: is that the gravity is not the same all the 333 00:16:55,080 --> 00:16:57,720 Speaker 1: way around the planet. Like on a sphere, you're always 334 00:16:57,760 --> 00:16:59,960 Speaker 1: the same distance from the center of the planet, right, 335 00:17:00,200 --> 00:17:02,880 Speaker 1: and so the gravity is basically the same. Okay, there's 336 00:17:02,920 --> 00:17:05,280 Speaker 1: small differences from the pole to the equator, as we 337 00:17:05,400 --> 00:17:07,960 Speaker 1: just talked about it, but essentially it's the same. But 338 00:17:08,119 --> 00:17:11,760 Speaker 1: on a Torus, it's significantly different gravity on like the 339 00:17:11,800 --> 00:17:13,280 Speaker 1: inside and the outside. 340 00:17:13,600 --> 00:17:17,440 Speaker 2: Whoa meaning, what's the difference is is it stronger or 341 00:17:17,480 --> 00:17:18,880 Speaker 2: weaker on the inner hole. 342 00:17:19,040 --> 00:17:21,800 Speaker 1: So if you're walking around the inside or the outside, 343 00:17:22,080 --> 00:17:24,679 Speaker 1: those are the two equators of the Taurus. Those have 344 00:17:24,720 --> 00:17:27,960 Speaker 1: the weakest gravity. The gravity is strongest if you're walking 345 00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:30,359 Speaker 1: on the poles. Now the poles are like a circle. 346 00:17:30,359 --> 00:17:32,879 Speaker 1: It's kind of hard to visualize, but like the you 347 00:17:32,880 --> 00:17:34,800 Speaker 1: have a north pole and a south pole where you 348 00:17:34,840 --> 00:17:38,120 Speaker 1: put the glaze right, yeah, exactly, either on the glazed 349 00:17:38,240 --> 00:17:40,119 Speaker 1: side or the not glazed side. 350 00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:43,760 Speaker 2: That a south pole has no glaze on it fun side, Yeah. 351 00:17:43,680 --> 00:17:46,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. So if you're walking along the glazed pole, 352 00:17:47,000 --> 00:17:49,280 Speaker 1: then that's where the gravity is the strongest. If you're 353 00:17:49,280 --> 00:17:52,000 Speaker 1: walking in the outside, you're kind of far away from 354 00:17:52,000 --> 00:17:54,280 Speaker 1: a lot of the mass and so gravity gets weaker. 355 00:17:54,480 --> 00:17:56,879 Speaker 2: What if you're from the Netherlands and you're walking around 356 00:17:56,920 --> 00:18:03,919 Speaker 2: glaze nice on the glazes that you should have some 357 00:18:04,000 --> 00:18:11,120 Speaker 2: chicken and waffles. You go for the munchies. Yeah. Interesting, 358 00:18:11,160 --> 00:18:13,399 Speaker 2: So as you're walking around the two of the doughnut, 359 00:18:13,480 --> 00:18:16,080 Speaker 2: you're going to weigh less or more or less right, 360 00:18:16,160 --> 00:18:16,680 Speaker 2: mm hmmm. 361 00:18:16,880 --> 00:18:19,840 Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, so life on this kind of planet would 362 00:18:19,840 --> 00:18:22,679 Speaker 1: be very weird. Although I don't think life could realistically 363 00:18:22,680 --> 00:18:24,639 Speaker 1: evolve on such a planet because I don't think it 364 00:18:24,640 --> 00:18:27,680 Speaker 1: would last very long. Again, it's an equilibrium, but it's 365 00:18:27,720 --> 00:18:29,960 Speaker 1: not stable, which means a small deviation is going to 366 00:18:30,040 --> 00:18:31,760 Speaker 1: end up breaking this thing up and collapsing it. 367 00:18:32,480 --> 00:18:34,840 Speaker 2: But I wonder if you can imagine, like taking one 368 00:18:34,880 --> 00:18:38,160 Speaker 2: of those big asteroids out there in the Solar System 369 00:18:38,200 --> 00:18:41,240 Speaker 2: asteroid belt and just carving a donut, you would sort 370 00:18:41,240 --> 00:18:45,600 Speaker 2: of technically be a doughnut planet, and it wouldn't be unstable, 371 00:18:45,640 --> 00:18:46,000 Speaker 2: would it. 372 00:18:46,520 --> 00:18:49,000 Speaker 1: You could build a small object like that that's a ring, 373 00:18:49,520 --> 00:18:52,200 Speaker 1: like a space station. Essentially, you could be constructed that's 374 00:18:52,240 --> 00:18:54,400 Speaker 1: a ring, and you could do the same thing using 375 00:18:54,440 --> 00:18:57,520 Speaker 1: the structural integrity of an asteroid. Yeah, but I don't 376 00:18:57,520 --> 00:18:58,879 Speaker 1: think that's really planet. 377 00:18:58,640 --> 00:19:01,000 Speaker 2: Sized, you know, mm if. 378 00:19:00,960 --> 00:19:02,920 Speaker 1: You want something really like the size of the Earth, 379 00:19:02,960 --> 00:19:05,480 Speaker 1: and you've got to use gravity and spin. But the 380 00:19:05,560 --> 00:19:08,040 Speaker 1: cool thing is that such a planet could have really 381 00:19:08,080 --> 00:19:11,760 Speaker 1: really weird moons, Like you could have moons that orbit 382 00:19:11,880 --> 00:19:13,399 Speaker 1: in the plane of the donut. You could also have 383 00:19:13,480 --> 00:19:18,760 Speaker 1: moons that orbit through the hole in the doughnut. Whoa, Yeah, 384 00:19:18,800 --> 00:19:20,880 Speaker 1: and there's some stable orbits where the moon just goes 385 00:19:21,000 --> 00:19:23,480 Speaker 1: up and down through the hole just like bounces, like 386 00:19:23,520 --> 00:19:24,879 Speaker 1: it's on a trampoline or something. 387 00:19:25,520 --> 00:19:29,520 Speaker 2: Oh wow, that'd be pretty fun, pretty interesting. But you're 388 00:19:29,520 --> 00:19:32,240 Speaker 2: saying these planets would be unstable, meaning like if you 389 00:19:32,320 --> 00:19:34,640 Speaker 2: knock it, they'll just crumble and collapse or or what 390 00:19:34,640 --> 00:19:35,640 Speaker 2: what does unstable mean? 391 00:19:35,720 --> 00:19:38,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, they rely on the symmetry of it, So they 392 00:19:38,400 --> 00:19:40,960 Speaker 1: rely on having exactly the same gravity from this chunk 393 00:19:41,000 --> 00:19:43,159 Speaker 1: and that chunk, which means they rely on it all 394 00:19:43,200 --> 00:19:46,119 Speaker 1: being the same density and having exactly the same shape, 395 00:19:46,680 --> 00:19:49,080 Speaker 1: and so it tends to break itself apart. If you 396 00:19:49,119 --> 00:19:52,000 Speaker 1: get hit by a pretty large asteroid for example, Now 397 00:19:52,040 --> 00:19:54,439 Speaker 1: you've broken that symmetry. This part is pulling harder than 398 00:19:54,480 --> 00:19:57,520 Speaker 1: the other parts, and the math tells us that while 399 00:19:57,520 --> 00:20:01,199 Speaker 1: this is a solution, it's wildly unstable and very easy 400 00:20:01,520 --> 00:20:02,720 Speaker 1: for it to break down. 401 00:20:02,840 --> 00:20:05,639 Speaker 2: So basically impossible for it to be out there in 402 00:20:05,680 --> 00:20:06,640 Speaker 2: real space, I. 403 00:20:06,560 --> 00:20:09,480 Speaker 1: Mean impossible in the infinite universe. It's pretty hard to say. 404 00:20:09,560 --> 00:20:14,800 Speaker 1: It's technically possible, but so improbable that it seems very 405 00:20:14,880 --> 00:20:17,880 Speaker 1: unlikely that it exists. Though if the universe is infinite. 406 00:20:18,000 --> 00:20:19,280 Speaker 1: You know anything can happen. 407 00:20:19,760 --> 00:20:22,400 Speaker 2: Well, I wonder, because it requires the process of making 408 00:20:22,440 --> 00:20:25,560 Speaker 2: the planet to be sort of like super duper precise 409 00:20:25,600 --> 00:20:27,119 Speaker 2: and symmetrical perfect. 410 00:20:28,440 --> 00:20:30,720 Speaker 1: The rocks are basically just have to come together into 411 00:20:30,760 --> 00:20:31,280 Speaker 1: that form. 412 00:20:31,640 --> 00:20:34,800 Speaker 2: Right, It's not like this process and then nothing could 413 00:20:34,800 --> 00:20:35,119 Speaker 2: touch it. 414 00:20:35,600 --> 00:20:37,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. 415 00:20:37,920 --> 00:20:40,600 Speaker 2: Well, I guess that's the answer for Eric. Planets can 416 00:20:40,680 --> 00:20:43,040 Speaker 2: be donut shape. You can carve a small planet maybe 417 00:20:43,080 --> 00:20:46,200 Speaker 2: into donut shape, and you could maybe make one out there, 418 00:20:46,240 --> 00:20:51,080 Speaker 2: but it's not probable and unlikely. My final question, Daniel, 419 00:20:51,160 --> 00:20:53,760 Speaker 2: is if you're on this donut planet, what does the 420 00:20:53,800 --> 00:20:56,359 Speaker 2: donuts look like? Do they look just look like balls 421 00:20:58,160 --> 00:21:02,280 Speaker 2: or like figure eights? Maybe? What do they call pretzels donuts? 422 00:21:03,119 --> 00:21:05,520 Speaker 1: I don't think I'm glazed enough to answer that question. 423 00:21:07,240 --> 00:21:12,040 Speaker 2: Just sprinkle some jargon there. All right, Well, thank you, Eric. 424 00:21:12,119 --> 00:21:14,600 Speaker 2: Now let's get to our second question, and this one 425 00:21:14,800 --> 00:21:20,520 Speaker 2: is about universe changing quantum events, So we'll dig into that, 426 00:21:20,560 --> 00:21:35,719 Speaker 2: but first let's take a quick break. All right, we're 427 00:21:35,760 --> 00:21:40,320 Speaker 2: answering listener questions, and our second question comes from Lauren Hi. 428 00:21:40,480 --> 00:21:46,080 Speaker 4: Daniel jrge My question is about the universe changing quantum 429 00:21:46,080 --> 00:21:50,000 Speaker 4: events like of a strange star and it's strange lids, 430 00:21:50,600 --> 00:21:54,800 Speaker 4: or if the higgs field de finds a more stable 431 00:21:54,840 --> 00:21:58,240 Speaker 4: state than what it is right now. If this were 432 00:21:58,280 --> 00:22:01,960 Speaker 4: to happen sufficiently far away from the Milky Way, such 433 00:22:02,160 --> 00:22:07,680 Speaker 4: that the origin point is expanding away from us relatively 434 00:22:07,920 --> 00:22:12,840 Speaker 4: faster than the sweet of light because of the universal expansion, 435 00:22:13,440 --> 00:22:17,280 Speaker 4: would that keep us safe from these events? 436 00:22:17,800 --> 00:22:23,159 Speaker 2: Thanks? Whoa interesting question. I feel like Lauren is basically saying, 437 00:22:23,240 --> 00:22:26,600 Speaker 2: can the universe end and we'll never notice? 438 00:22:27,440 --> 00:22:30,600 Speaker 1: No, she's actually saving the universe right, or she's talking 439 00:22:30,600 --> 00:22:33,159 Speaker 1: about how the universe might be saving us from its 440 00:22:33,200 --> 00:22:33,880 Speaker 1: own disaster. 441 00:22:34,359 --> 00:22:38,080 Speaker 2: Hmm, Well, let's break it down. First, she talked about 442 00:22:38,720 --> 00:22:41,320 Speaker 2: universe changing quantum events. What does that mean? 443 00:22:41,480 --> 00:22:43,800 Speaker 1: Well, on the podcast a few times, we've talked about 444 00:22:44,119 --> 00:22:47,720 Speaker 1: how our understanding of the nature of matter and reality 445 00:22:48,160 --> 00:22:50,440 Speaker 1: has given us some hints that there might be some 446 00:22:50,520 --> 00:22:54,920 Speaker 1: weird potential events that could be quite disastrous. For example, 447 00:22:55,400 --> 00:22:57,679 Speaker 1: now we know that the universe is filled with a 448 00:22:57,760 --> 00:23:00,760 Speaker 1: higgs field, and that higgs field has some energy to it. 449 00:23:01,040 --> 00:23:03,680 Speaker 1: Potential energy is stored in that higgs field, and the 450 00:23:03,720 --> 00:23:06,960 Speaker 1: way the higgs field interacts with other particles gives them 451 00:23:07,000 --> 00:23:10,520 Speaker 1: mass changes how their quantum fields vibrate in such a 452 00:23:10,520 --> 00:23:13,119 Speaker 1: way that they move with inertia. But we don't know 453 00:23:13,160 --> 00:23:16,080 Speaker 1: if that Higgs field is stable, Like it might be 454 00:23:16,160 --> 00:23:18,320 Speaker 1: that all that energy that's in the Higgs field is 455 00:23:18,560 --> 00:23:20,920 Speaker 1: sort of stuck in there, but it could get tipped over. 456 00:23:21,280 --> 00:23:23,600 Speaker 1: It could be like that donut planet that works for 457 00:23:23,640 --> 00:23:27,040 Speaker 1: a while, but you know, if something happens, some particle 458 00:23:27,080 --> 00:23:30,840 Speaker 1: collider triggers it, it could collapse. Then it collapses, that 459 00:23:30,880 --> 00:23:33,600 Speaker 1: would spread out at the speed of light. So that's 460 00:23:33,640 --> 00:23:37,720 Speaker 1: a potentially catastrophic event because if the Higgs field loses 461 00:23:37,760 --> 00:23:40,880 Speaker 1: its energy, all the particles lose their mass and nobody's 462 00:23:40,920 --> 00:23:42,080 Speaker 1: eating donuts. 463 00:23:43,080 --> 00:23:47,800 Speaker 2: Or at least would lose weight pretty quickly. But maybe 464 00:23:47,800 --> 00:23:49,600 Speaker 2: a question is how do we know this, Like, how 465 00:23:49,600 --> 00:23:52,399 Speaker 2: do we know the Higgs field is like that and 466 00:23:52,520 --> 00:23:54,000 Speaker 2: has this potential to collapse. 467 00:23:54,280 --> 00:23:57,040 Speaker 1: We actually don't know that the Higgs field could collapse. 468 00:23:57,200 --> 00:24:01,600 Speaker 1: The Higgs field could be stable or unstable or meta stable. 469 00:24:01,960 --> 00:24:04,879 Speaker 1: We're still figuring that out. We are measuring how the 470 00:24:04,960 --> 00:24:08,760 Speaker 1: Higgs field couples with itself and how the Higgs itself 471 00:24:08,800 --> 00:24:11,520 Speaker 1: gets mass, and that's going to help us understand the 472 00:24:11,600 --> 00:24:14,480 Speaker 1: sort of contours of the Higgs field, Like, the Higgs 473 00:24:14,520 --> 00:24:16,840 Speaker 1: field is different from every other kind of field. All 474 00:24:16,840 --> 00:24:19,399 Speaker 1: those fields like to relax at a minimum energy, but 475 00:24:19,440 --> 00:24:21,480 Speaker 1: the Higgs field like has a wiggle in it. It's 476 00:24:21,480 --> 00:24:23,960 Speaker 1: sort of like instead of having a canyon with just 477 00:24:24,000 --> 00:24:26,280 Speaker 1: a river at the bottom, there's a canyon with like 478 00:24:26,359 --> 00:24:28,800 Speaker 1: a channel along one of the walls where water can 479 00:24:28,840 --> 00:24:32,040 Speaker 1: also flow. But we don't really know how stable that is, 480 00:24:32,040 --> 00:24:34,160 Speaker 1: if it's totally stable, or if there's just a very 481 00:24:34,240 --> 00:24:37,400 Speaker 1: thin lip there that the universe could roll over down 482 00:24:37,440 --> 00:24:38,520 Speaker 1: to the bottom of the canyon. 483 00:24:38,720 --> 00:24:41,000 Speaker 2: I guess maybe your question is, how do you know 484 00:24:41,119 --> 00:24:43,359 Speaker 2: this about the Higgs field? Can you measure it? 485 00:24:43,680 --> 00:24:45,639 Speaker 1: Yeah, we have measured the Higgs field, and we have 486 00:24:45,680 --> 00:24:48,639 Speaker 1: a theory about how the Higgs works and the shape 487 00:24:48,680 --> 00:24:50,919 Speaker 1: of the Higgs potential, but we just don't know the 488 00:24:50,960 --> 00:24:51,920 Speaker 1: parameters of it. 489 00:24:52,040 --> 00:24:54,560 Speaker 2: Like, can you measure this little energy that the Higgs 490 00:24:54,600 --> 00:24:55,240 Speaker 2: field has? 491 00:24:55,440 --> 00:24:58,480 Speaker 1: Absolutely, we have measured that energy. We know that value. Yes, 492 00:24:58,800 --> 00:25:00,800 Speaker 1: we know the energy that's in the Higgs field. What 493 00:25:00,880 --> 00:25:03,680 Speaker 1: we don't know is how stable that is. That depends 494 00:25:03,720 --> 00:25:06,080 Speaker 1: a little bit about how the Higgs interacts with itself. 495 00:25:06,359 --> 00:25:09,879 Speaker 2: So what makes you think that it is maybe unstable. 496 00:25:09,400 --> 00:25:12,239 Speaker 1: Because if it interacts with itself in certain ways, that 497 00:25:12,400 --> 00:25:15,040 Speaker 1: changes the shape of this potential, like the canyon that 498 00:25:15,080 --> 00:25:17,720 Speaker 1: the water is flowing through, and it might mean that 499 00:25:17,800 --> 00:25:20,600 Speaker 1: lip is very very narrow, and in some very high 500 00:25:20,720 --> 00:25:23,080 Speaker 1: energy events, the Higgs field could get pushed out of 501 00:25:23,080 --> 00:25:25,480 Speaker 1: that little channel and roll all the way down to zero, 502 00:25:25,520 --> 00:25:27,879 Speaker 1: basically collapse to the true low energy state. 503 00:25:28,040 --> 00:25:30,760 Speaker 2: Mmm. So the idea is that, like, for some reason, 504 00:25:31,119 --> 00:25:33,239 Speaker 2: where we are in the universe, and as far as 505 00:25:33,240 --> 00:25:35,760 Speaker 2: we can see in the universe, this Higgs value has 506 00:25:35,800 --> 00:25:38,800 Speaker 2: this value to it, But you're saying that value could 507 00:25:38,840 --> 00:25:41,720 Speaker 2: suddenly change, and if it does, then it basically the 508 00:25:41,800 --> 00:25:43,760 Speaker 2: universe kind of collapses. 509 00:25:43,520 --> 00:25:46,600 Speaker 1: Exactly like the universe has been cooling for billions of years. 510 00:25:46,640 --> 00:25:49,040 Speaker 1: It used to be very hot and high energy, and 511 00:25:49,119 --> 00:25:52,240 Speaker 1: as it expands, everything cools and gets more dilute. But 512 00:25:52,240 --> 00:25:54,359 Speaker 1: the Higgs field sort of got stuck on this ledge, 513 00:25:54,359 --> 00:25:56,760 Speaker 1: and we don't know if that ledge is stable or 514 00:25:56,760 --> 00:25:58,919 Speaker 1: if it could keep collapsing. But our whole way of 515 00:25:58,960 --> 00:26:01,960 Speaker 1: life depends on it being stuck on that ledge. 516 00:26:03,200 --> 00:26:06,080 Speaker 2: Right, And the idea is that, like, if it collapses somewhere, 517 00:26:06,520 --> 00:26:09,399 Speaker 2: then that collapse is gonna spread out sort of like 518 00:26:09,400 --> 00:26:12,479 Speaker 2: a Yeah, you have a room full of dominoes that 519 00:26:12,520 --> 00:26:16,080 Speaker 2: are just standing there and you tip one over, that 520 00:26:16,480 --> 00:26:17,640 Speaker 2: collapse is going to spread out. 521 00:26:17,880 --> 00:26:19,959 Speaker 1: Mm hmm. Yeah, it's like if you pop a balloon, 522 00:26:20,040 --> 00:26:23,200 Speaker 1: you pop the whole balloon, not just where you stuck 523 00:26:23,200 --> 00:26:23,639 Speaker 1: the needle. 524 00:26:23,880 --> 00:26:26,760 Speaker 2: But why do you think that is? Could it be 525 00:26:26,760 --> 00:26:30,880 Speaker 2: contained or could in the universe just fill that back up? 526 00:26:31,240 --> 00:26:33,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a good question. It has to do with again, 527 00:26:33,200 --> 00:26:35,560 Speaker 1: how the Higgs field talks to itself. If one of 528 00:26:35,600 --> 00:26:37,040 Speaker 1: it has less energy, you. 529 00:26:37,000 --> 00:26:39,520 Speaker 2: Said, one of them, what does one of them mean? So, 530 00:26:39,560 --> 00:26:42,679 Speaker 2: if the Higgs field in one location loses energy, that 531 00:26:42,840 --> 00:26:45,840 Speaker 2: interacts with the Higgs field nearby, right, The Higgs field 532 00:26:45,880 --> 00:26:48,520 Speaker 2: is not a bunch of independent numbers in space. There's 533 00:26:48,520 --> 00:26:50,440 Speaker 2: all this math that connects the Higgs field here with 534 00:26:50,440 --> 00:26:53,000 Speaker 2: the Higgs field somewhere else, which is why like waves 535 00:26:53,040 --> 00:26:55,639 Speaker 2: can travel through the Higgs field, you know. And so 536 00:26:56,080 --> 00:26:58,320 Speaker 2: what happens one spot of the Higgs field affects the 537 00:26:58,359 --> 00:27:01,200 Speaker 2: rest of the Higgs field as well. Well. Lauren sort 538 00:27:01,200 --> 00:27:03,840 Speaker 2: of here in her question imagines maybe a good new 539 00:27:03,920 --> 00:27:08,040 Speaker 2: scenario where maybe this has happened or will happen, But 540 00:27:08,080 --> 00:27:11,280 Speaker 2: maybe it happens somewhere so far away this collapse is 541 00:27:11,359 --> 00:27:12,199 Speaker 2: never going to reach it. 542 00:27:12,600 --> 00:27:15,199 Speaker 1: Yeah, the real nightmare thing about the Higgs collapse is 543 00:27:15,240 --> 00:27:17,720 Speaker 1: it could happen anywhere in the universe and it could 544 00:27:17,800 --> 00:27:20,320 Speaker 1: reach us and we would have literally no warning because 545 00:27:20,320 --> 00:27:22,439 Speaker 1: it would be moving at the speed of light. So 546 00:27:22,480 --> 00:27:25,040 Speaker 1: there's no advanced notion. It could be any moment this 547 00:27:25,160 --> 00:27:28,399 Speaker 1: wave of Higgs collapse could wash over our solar system. 548 00:27:28,640 --> 00:27:31,679 Speaker 1: So that seems kind of terrifying. But Lauren is pointing 549 00:27:31,680 --> 00:27:35,399 Speaker 1: out that the universe has a horizon. There are things 550 00:27:35,440 --> 00:27:37,560 Speaker 1: out there in the universe that are so far away 551 00:27:37,600 --> 00:27:40,840 Speaker 1: from us that the expansion of the universe means we 552 00:27:40,880 --> 00:27:43,919 Speaker 1: will never see light from them, And so she's asking 553 00:27:43,960 --> 00:27:46,920 Speaker 1: if that also means that if the Higgs field collapses, 554 00:27:47,000 --> 00:27:49,200 Speaker 1: there are we protected from it. 555 00:27:49,359 --> 00:27:52,399 Speaker 2: Right or not maybe protected from it, but just isolated 556 00:27:52,440 --> 00:27:54,200 Speaker 2: from it by the expansion of the universe. 557 00:27:54,440 --> 00:27:58,040 Speaker 1: Yes, exactly isolated by the expansion of the universe. And 558 00:27:58,080 --> 00:28:00,720 Speaker 1: she's right, the answer is yes, if the Higgs field 559 00:28:00,800 --> 00:28:04,200 Speaker 1: collapses in a region of space that's so far away 560 00:28:04,200 --> 00:28:06,280 Speaker 1: from us that light from it can never reach us, 561 00:28:06,520 --> 00:28:09,360 Speaker 1: then also that Higgs field collapse can never reach us. 562 00:28:09,920 --> 00:28:12,560 Speaker 2: WHOA, that is super cool. I wonder how she thought 563 00:28:12,600 --> 00:28:14,879 Speaker 2: of this? Is this it a known thing or is 564 00:28:14,920 --> 00:28:16,199 Speaker 2: she the first one to think about it? 565 00:28:18,160 --> 00:28:20,280 Speaker 1: No, it's definitely a known thing. It's something people have 566 00:28:20,320 --> 00:28:23,520 Speaker 1: been wondering about, and it's something people think about because 567 00:28:23,560 --> 00:28:26,119 Speaker 1: this expansion of space is so strange. It like breaks 568 00:28:26,200 --> 00:28:29,040 Speaker 1: up the universe into little mini universes. You know, it's 569 00:28:29,080 --> 00:28:32,000 Speaker 1: strange that we have a horizon in our universe beyond 570 00:28:32,040 --> 00:28:36,000 Speaker 1: which we might never see if this expansion continues. You know, 571 00:28:36,080 --> 00:28:39,040 Speaker 1: all of this assumes that the universe is expanding, and 572 00:28:39,080 --> 00:28:43,520 Speaker 1: that expansion is accelerating and will continue to accelerate. This 573 00:28:43,560 --> 00:28:46,560 Speaker 1: is what we call dark energy. As the universe expands, 574 00:28:46,600 --> 00:28:49,400 Speaker 1: all the matter and the radiation gets more and more dilute, 575 00:28:49,640 --> 00:28:52,400 Speaker 1: but dark energy doesn't, and so it becomes a bigger 576 00:28:52,400 --> 00:28:55,560 Speaker 1: and bigger fraction of the energy budget of the universe, 577 00:28:55,680 --> 00:28:58,840 Speaker 1: which then drives its expansion even more, which is why 578 00:28:58,840 --> 00:29:03,160 Speaker 1: the whole thing is accelerating, and because it's space itself expanding. 579 00:29:03,240 --> 00:29:05,960 Speaker 1: As you get further and further away, you have more 580 00:29:06,000 --> 00:29:09,080 Speaker 1: space between you and something else that's expanding, and that's 581 00:29:09,080 --> 00:29:11,920 Speaker 1: why the expansion can become faster than the speed of light, 582 00:29:12,120 --> 00:29:15,760 Speaker 1: which seems like a violation of Einstein's relativity, but it 583 00:29:15,840 --> 00:29:17,280 Speaker 1: isn't actually right. 584 00:29:17,400 --> 00:29:20,000 Speaker 2: Right, although there are two sort of caveats here, Like one, 585 00:29:20,160 --> 00:29:22,640 Speaker 2: we don't know if the universe is going to keep expanding, right, 586 00:29:22,720 --> 00:29:25,360 Speaker 2: It might be that the universe stops expanding, in which 587 00:29:25,400 --> 00:29:28,360 Speaker 2: case this Higgs collapse is going to catch up to us. 588 00:29:28,440 --> 00:29:31,480 Speaker 1: Right, Yes, that's true, and the Higgs collapse could change 589 00:29:31,520 --> 00:29:33,160 Speaker 1: the way the universe is expanding. 590 00:29:33,360 --> 00:29:35,760 Speaker 2: That's another wrinkle, right, That's what I was going to say, Like, 591 00:29:35,840 --> 00:29:39,640 Speaker 2: maybe the collapse makes the universe stop expanding, in which 592 00:29:39,680 --> 00:29:41,520 Speaker 2: case it is going to catch up to us. 593 00:29:42,760 --> 00:29:45,800 Speaker 1: It's possible, it's possible. But there's another scenario there which 594 00:29:45,840 --> 00:29:48,560 Speaker 1: is really cool. And the connection between these two ideas 595 00:29:48,840 --> 00:29:52,280 Speaker 1: is actually pretty interesting because we don't understand what dark 596 00:29:52,400 --> 00:29:55,080 Speaker 1: energy is. We just know there's some energy in space 597 00:29:55,480 --> 00:29:58,440 Speaker 1: and that's contributing to the accelerating expansion. We don't know 598 00:29:58,480 --> 00:30:01,440 Speaker 1: where that energy is coming from. Some people wonder if 599 00:30:01,440 --> 00:30:05,080 Speaker 1: that energy is from the Higgs field, although current calculations 600 00:30:05,160 --> 00:30:07,680 Speaker 1: say those numbers don't really agree by like ten to 601 00:30:07,720 --> 00:30:10,800 Speaker 1: the one hundred. But if it is from the Higgs field, 602 00:30:11,240 --> 00:30:14,080 Speaker 1: then what's fascinating is that if the Higgs field collapses, 603 00:30:14,160 --> 00:30:17,000 Speaker 1: you no longer have dark energy everywhere in space, and 604 00:30:17,000 --> 00:30:20,520 Speaker 1: so you no longer have accelerating expansion in that bubble, 605 00:30:21,000 --> 00:30:24,520 Speaker 1: right because that collapse can't catch up with the cosmic horizon. 606 00:30:24,840 --> 00:30:28,200 Speaker 1: The rest of the universe keeps accelerating expansion and this 607 00:30:28,320 --> 00:30:29,480 Speaker 1: bubble just doesn't. 608 00:30:29,840 --> 00:30:34,360 Speaker 2: But wouldn't that bubble grow because the Higgs field is contagious. 609 00:30:35,920 --> 00:30:38,160 Speaker 1: That bubble grows, but at a smaller rate than the 610 00:30:38,200 --> 00:30:40,280 Speaker 1: rest of the universe is expanding. 611 00:30:41,520 --> 00:30:44,480 Speaker 2: Then it wouldn't reach us. Even if it's stopped expanding. 612 00:30:44,800 --> 00:30:48,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, you'd get these local collapsed bubbles where the Higgs 613 00:30:48,320 --> 00:30:51,280 Speaker 1: field is very very different in that little bubble, and 614 00:30:51,400 --> 00:30:54,640 Speaker 1: in that bubble you would also not have expanding space. 615 00:30:54,960 --> 00:30:55,200 Speaker 5: Mmm. 616 00:30:55,920 --> 00:30:58,120 Speaker 2: So basically, we have to hope that if the universe 617 00:30:58,160 --> 00:31:01,480 Speaker 2: ever collapses, it collapses outside of our horizon and not 618 00:31:01,560 --> 00:31:04,880 Speaker 2: within our horizon. Yes, because if it collapses within our horizon, 619 00:31:04,920 --> 00:31:05,720 Speaker 2: then we're toast. 620 00:31:05,640 --> 00:31:09,640 Speaker 1: Mm hmm exactly. The horizon right now is about five 621 00:31:09,840 --> 00:31:13,880 Speaker 1: gigaparsex away, So anything that happens further away than that, 622 00:31:14,240 --> 00:31:17,280 Speaker 1: any light that's emitted from objects further away than that 623 00:31:17,360 --> 00:31:20,959 Speaker 1: we will never see, and so any disasters sparked by 624 00:31:20,960 --> 00:31:23,560 Speaker 1: those objects also we're pretty safe from hm. 625 00:31:24,680 --> 00:31:27,640 Speaker 2: So I guess that reduces our risk, right, because it 626 00:31:27,720 --> 00:31:30,920 Speaker 2: means that because if the universe is super duper huge, 627 00:31:30,960 --> 00:31:33,640 Speaker 2: maybe infinite, then we're sort of dooming because it maybe 628 00:31:33,680 --> 00:31:37,560 Speaker 2: eventually it'll collapse somewhere. But then reduces our risk because 629 00:31:37,600 --> 00:31:38,600 Speaker 2: it's not going to reach us. 630 00:31:38,720 --> 00:31:41,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right. We're only at risk from an enormous, 631 00:31:41,240 --> 00:31:44,160 Speaker 1: vast region of space, not actually infinite space. 632 00:31:44,640 --> 00:31:47,600 Speaker 2: Hmm. So I wonder if that means that we're not 633 00:31:47,640 --> 00:31:50,320 Speaker 2: going to die soon so we should eat all the 634 00:31:50,320 --> 00:31:54,040 Speaker 2: doughnuts we can, or if that means that we're going 635 00:31:54,120 --> 00:31:57,360 Speaker 2: to live for a long time, and so therefore we 636 00:31:57,360 --> 00:31:58,720 Speaker 2: should eat all the donuts we can. 637 00:32:00,720 --> 00:32:03,400 Speaker 1: We should get fitness donuts. That's our next food truck. 638 00:32:03,640 --> 00:32:05,000 Speaker 2: Did you say fitness donuts? 639 00:32:05,200 --> 00:32:06,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, solid donuts or something. 640 00:32:07,120 --> 00:32:11,640 Speaker 2: Oh, those don't sound as delicious all right. Well, thanks 641 00:32:11,720 --> 00:32:14,560 Speaker 2: Lauren for this awesome idea and great question. It sounds 642 00:32:14,600 --> 00:32:17,840 Speaker 2: like the answer is, yeah, we would be safe from 643 00:32:17,920 --> 00:32:22,320 Speaker 2: those universes collapsing outside of our event horizon that we 644 00:32:22,320 --> 00:32:24,480 Speaker 2: can see. So as long as we can't see it, 645 00:32:24,520 --> 00:32:26,680 Speaker 2: we're safe. 646 00:32:27,600 --> 00:32:32,000 Speaker 1: Close your eyes and you won't die, Yeah, basically, or 647 00:32:32,040 --> 00:32:34,840 Speaker 1: I guess if it does, then there's nothing you can do. 648 00:32:35,280 --> 00:32:37,560 Speaker 1: You can always hide under the covers, right, covers protect 649 00:32:37,560 --> 00:32:38,200 Speaker 1: you from everything. 650 00:32:38,720 --> 00:32:40,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, there you go, There you go. All right, Well, 651 00:32:41,000 --> 00:32:43,719 Speaker 2: let's get to our last question of the day, and 652 00:32:43,760 --> 00:32:48,840 Speaker 2: it's about extremely massive and extremely old galaxies. So let's 653 00:32:48,840 --> 00:33:04,360 Speaker 2: explore that. But first let's take another quick break. All right, 654 00:33:04,440 --> 00:33:07,200 Speaker 2: we're asking listener questions here today and our last question 655 00:33:07,760 --> 00:33:11,800 Speaker 2: is about super duper old and massive galaxies. 656 00:33:12,400 --> 00:33:17,040 Speaker 5: Hello, Daniel and Jorge. This is Jamie in New Jersey. Recently, 657 00:33:17,120 --> 00:33:20,400 Speaker 5: I have read several stories reporting that teams have used 658 00:33:21,000 --> 00:33:26,120 Speaker 5: the web space telescope to observe several extremely massive galaxies 659 00:33:26,240 --> 00:33:28,800 Speaker 5: as early as one to two billion years after the 660 00:33:28,840 --> 00:33:33,080 Speaker 5: Big Bang. In that galaxies this early challenge our models 661 00:33:33,080 --> 00:33:36,240 Speaker 5: of the universe. I would be grateful if you could 662 00:33:36,280 --> 00:33:40,480 Speaker 5: explain why these galaxies conflict with our models and is 663 00:33:40,560 --> 00:33:44,479 Speaker 5: this revolutionary or does it just tug on the models 664 00:33:44,480 --> 00:33:45,040 Speaker 5: a little bit? 665 00:33:45,760 --> 00:33:49,840 Speaker 2: Thank you? All right, great question from Jamie. I feel 666 00:33:49,840 --> 00:33:53,520 Speaker 2: like he's referencing some kind of news that came out recently. 667 00:33:53,840 --> 00:33:56,120 Speaker 1: Yes, he is. There's a paper that came out in 668 00:33:56,240 --> 00:33:58,960 Speaker 1: Nature quite recently and a bunch of listeners sent this 669 00:33:59,040 --> 00:34:02,239 Speaker 1: to me and curious about what it meant. It has 670 00:34:02,280 --> 00:34:04,719 Speaker 1: to do with some observations made by the James Webbs 671 00:34:04,760 --> 00:34:07,160 Speaker 1: based telescope about the early universe. 672 00:34:08,080 --> 00:34:10,160 Speaker 2: What did they find and what did they report? 673 00:34:10,320 --> 00:34:14,000 Speaker 1: So, remember, the James Webs based telescope can see infrared light, 674 00:34:14,360 --> 00:34:17,359 Speaker 1: which means that it can see stuff that's older than 675 00:34:17,440 --> 00:34:20,719 Speaker 1: anything Hubble can see. Hubble works in the optical spectrum 676 00:34:20,760 --> 00:34:23,719 Speaker 1: like visible light that our eyes can also see. But 677 00:34:23,840 --> 00:34:26,440 Speaker 1: as things come from further away in the universe, they 678 00:34:26,480 --> 00:34:28,680 Speaker 1: get expanded more and more, they get more and more 679 00:34:28,760 --> 00:34:32,360 Speaker 1: red shifted. So James web can basically look further back 680 00:34:32,440 --> 00:34:35,640 Speaker 1: in time than Hubble can. There are photons that strike 681 00:34:35,680 --> 00:34:38,759 Speaker 1: Hubble that just don't get recognized by it. Because it's 682 00:34:38,800 --> 00:34:42,400 Speaker 1: an optical telescope. Those photons from the earliest moments of 683 00:34:42,440 --> 00:34:45,760 Speaker 1: the universe will be seen by James web So James 684 00:34:45,760 --> 00:34:49,080 Speaker 1: Webb can look further back in time at deeper redshifts, 685 00:34:49,120 --> 00:34:52,920 Speaker 1: at older stuff. And what they saw surprise them about 686 00:34:52,960 --> 00:34:55,560 Speaker 1: the formation of galaxies in the early universe. 687 00:34:55,800 --> 00:34:59,800 Speaker 2: Mmmm, they found a galaxy that's super duper extra old. 688 00:34:59,760 --> 00:35:02,279 Speaker 1: Yeah, Yeah, they found galaxies that are really big for 689 00:35:02,480 --> 00:35:05,320 Speaker 1: their age. Like we're talking about in the very early 690 00:35:05,440 --> 00:35:08,239 Speaker 1: part of the universe. So these galaxies are sort of 691 00:35:08,480 --> 00:35:10,879 Speaker 1: old in the sense that they were created a long 692 00:35:10,960 --> 00:35:13,719 Speaker 1: time ago, but they're young in that we're seeing them 693 00:35:13,719 --> 00:35:16,760 Speaker 1: when they were just made in the very early universe. 694 00:35:17,120 --> 00:35:19,360 Speaker 2: Right. It's like finding an old picture of your parents. 695 00:35:19,560 --> 00:35:21,840 Speaker 2: It's like they're old, but it's a picture of them 696 00:35:21,880 --> 00:35:22,439 Speaker 2: when they're young. 697 00:35:22,880 --> 00:35:26,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, And what they saw in that picture is 698 00:35:27,080 --> 00:35:30,080 Speaker 1: very confusing. We had an idea for how galaxies form. 699 00:35:30,440 --> 00:35:33,239 Speaker 1: The universe begins, you have big clumps of gases we 700 00:35:33,280 --> 00:35:36,279 Speaker 1: talked about earlier. You form stars, and that ends the 701 00:35:36,360 --> 00:35:39,640 Speaker 1: dark ages, and those stars come together to make galaxies. 702 00:35:40,320 --> 00:35:43,080 Speaker 1: But that whole thing takes time. You know, it's seated 703 00:35:43,160 --> 00:35:46,160 Speaker 1: by dark matter, because dark matter overwhelms the universe and 704 00:35:46,239 --> 00:35:49,080 Speaker 1: has most of the gravity, and so it shapes all 705 00:35:49,080 --> 00:35:52,160 Speaker 1: of this structure. But in our models, we expected this 706 00:35:52,239 --> 00:35:55,280 Speaker 1: to take a few hundred million years. You know, stars 707 00:35:55,360 --> 00:35:57,120 Speaker 1: take a wild to form and then for them to 708 00:35:57,120 --> 00:36:00,120 Speaker 1: get pulled together. Gravity is not that powerful a force. Yes, 709 00:36:00,800 --> 00:36:03,040 Speaker 1: and what we had seen before this as we used 710 00:36:03,080 --> 00:36:06,160 Speaker 1: hubble to look further and further back in time. Was 711 00:36:06,239 --> 00:36:08,680 Speaker 1: as we went back in time to the earlier universe, 712 00:36:08,760 --> 00:36:12,959 Speaker 1: we saw fewer galaxies and smaller galaxies, because as time 713 00:36:13,040 --> 00:36:15,920 Speaker 1: goes on, galaxies form and then they merge and make 714 00:36:15,960 --> 00:36:19,360 Speaker 1: bigger and bigger galaxies. And so Hubble saw this trend 715 00:36:19,440 --> 00:36:22,680 Speaker 1: towards smaller and fewer galaxies. And when we turned on 716 00:36:22,800 --> 00:36:25,239 Speaker 1: James Web, we expected to see more of the same, 717 00:36:25,320 --> 00:36:28,200 Speaker 1: to sort of extrapolate back down to the smallest and 718 00:36:28,400 --> 00:36:32,600 Speaker 1: initial early galaxies. But what they saw instead were big 719 00:36:32,800 --> 00:36:36,000 Speaker 1: Papa and Mama galaxies in the early universe already with 720 00:36:36,160 --> 00:36:37,239 Speaker 1: old stars in them. 721 00:36:37,719 --> 00:36:38,840 Speaker 2: What do you mean old stars? 722 00:36:39,080 --> 00:36:41,520 Speaker 1: So you can tell the age of a population of 723 00:36:41,560 --> 00:36:44,200 Speaker 1: stars by looking at the light that it puts out. 724 00:36:44,520 --> 00:36:46,680 Speaker 1: Big stars that don't burn very long tend to be 725 00:36:46,800 --> 00:36:49,960 Speaker 1: very hot, and they make more blue light. Small stars 726 00:36:49,960 --> 00:36:52,680 Speaker 1: that last a long time tend to make more red light. 727 00:36:53,120 --> 00:36:54,960 Speaker 1: So if you see a population of stars with a 728 00:36:54,960 --> 00:36:57,640 Speaker 1: bunch of blue light in them, you know they're fairly young, 729 00:36:57,719 --> 00:37:00,200 Speaker 1: because the blue stars don't live very long. If you 730 00:37:00,200 --> 00:37:02,560 Speaker 1: see a population of stars that are more red, you 731 00:37:02,600 --> 00:37:04,560 Speaker 1: know they're pretty old because all the blue ones have 732 00:37:04,560 --> 00:37:07,440 Speaker 1: already burned out, so they can measure the age of 733 00:37:07,520 --> 00:37:09,960 Speaker 1: a population of stars, and they see that these stars 734 00:37:10,040 --> 00:37:13,640 Speaker 1: look kind of old already. So they expected young, tiny 735 00:37:13,680 --> 00:37:17,200 Speaker 1: galaxies filled with blue stars, but they see big galaxies 736 00:37:17,239 --> 00:37:18,440 Speaker 1: filled with redder stars. 737 00:37:19,160 --> 00:37:21,680 Speaker 2: I guess how do you tell the difference between like 738 00:37:21,719 --> 00:37:24,680 Speaker 2: an old star that's really close by and a young 739 00:37:24,680 --> 00:37:25,680 Speaker 2: star that's really far away. 740 00:37:25,800 --> 00:37:27,360 Speaker 1: Oh, I see you're talking about like the spectrum of 741 00:37:27,360 --> 00:37:28,800 Speaker 1: the star versus it's red shift. 742 00:37:29,080 --> 00:37:31,160 Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean you're saying, like, we can tell how 743 00:37:31,200 --> 00:37:33,160 Speaker 2: young the stars are, but we can also tell how 744 00:37:33,160 --> 00:37:35,560 Speaker 2: far weight it is by the retins of it. How 745 00:37:35,640 --> 00:37:36,839 Speaker 2: do you distinguish the two? 746 00:37:37,280 --> 00:37:39,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's a good question. We can do that because 747 00:37:39,040 --> 00:37:42,440 Speaker 1: the star puts out light in many different wavelengths, Like 748 00:37:42,480 --> 00:37:45,120 Speaker 1: the fingerprint of a star, has energy from lots of 749 00:37:45,120 --> 00:37:48,319 Speaker 1: different atomic spectra, and so we can tell both how 750 00:37:48,360 --> 00:37:51,000 Speaker 1: far that whole spectrum is shifted, which tells us the 751 00:37:51,040 --> 00:37:53,279 Speaker 1: red shift to the star and therefore how far away 752 00:37:53,320 --> 00:37:56,000 Speaker 1: it is, and also how hot the star is, Like 753 00:37:56,200 --> 00:37:58,520 Speaker 1: are there more the blue lines than the red lines? 754 00:37:59,040 --> 00:38:01,080 Speaker 1: So we can tell the temperature of the star by 755 00:38:01,160 --> 00:38:04,560 Speaker 1: like the ratio of various lines in the spectrum, and 756 00:38:04,600 --> 00:38:07,080 Speaker 1: that we can tell how far away it is by 757 00:38:07,080 --> 00:38:10,160 Speaker 1: the shifting of those lines. So those are two separate 758 00:38:10,160 --> 00:38:11,120 Speaker 1: measurements mm. 759 00:38:12,239 --> 00:38:15,120 Speaker 2: And so what's weird about this measurement is that the 760 00:38:15,719 --> 00:38:19,280 Speaker 2: galaxies are too old to be that young in the universe. 761 00:38:20,080 --> 00:38:23,279 Speaker 1: Yeah, and too big and with old stars in them. 762 00:38:23,719 --> 00:38:25,120 Speaker 1: So it's really surprising. 763 00:38:25,480 --> 00:38:27,440 Speaker 2: WHOA, So what could it mean? 764 00:38:27,760 --> 00:38:31,400 Speaker 1: Well, nobody really knows yet. Everybody's puzzling over it, and 765 00:38:31,440 --> 00:38:33,800 Speaker 1: there's lots of fun ideas that are being bounced around. 766 00:38:34,440 --> 00:38:37,200 Speaker 1: Number one is like, well maybe we goofed. You know, 767 00:38:37,239 --> 00:38:40,680 Speaker 1: we're making these measurements of the red shift of these stars, 768 00:38:41,000 --> 00:38:43,800 Speaker 1: but it's hard, especially because we don't have measurements in 769 00:38:43,840 --> 00:38:46,960 Speaker 1: the optical spectrum to back it up. James Webb is 770 00:38:46,960 --> 00:38:49,319 Speaker 1: pretty precise, but these are difficult measurements to make if 771 00:38:49,320 --> 00:38:51,960 Speaker 1: you only have a few lines that you're using to 772 00:38:52,000 --> 00:38:54,879 Speaker 1: measure these red shifts. And you know, these galaxies are 773 00:38:55,080 --> 00:38:58,440 Speaker 1: very faint blobs, very very far away, and so it's 774 00:38:58,440 --> 00:39:00,640 Speaker 1: not like we can even really resolve and tell that 775 00:39:00,719 --> 00:39:03,319 Speaker 1: it's a galaxy. So the whole thing could just be 776 00:39:03,320 --> 00:39:04,840 Speaker 1: a measurement error, miscalibration. 777 00:39:05,120 --> 00:39:08,040 Speaker 2: Wait, wait, what we can't tell what would you see 778 00:39:08,040 --> 00:39:10,120 Speaker 2: like a pinpoint of light or what it's. 779 00:39:09,920 --> 00:39:12,520 Speaker 1: Like a few pixels, you know, these are blobs. One 780 00:39:12,560 --> 00:39:15,799 Speaker 1: explanation is that these aren't even galaxies. That in the 781 00:39:15,920 --> 00:39:19,600 Speaker 1: very early universe. There could be super massive black holes 782 00:39:19,880 --> 00:39:22,600 Speaker 1: that formed, and what we're seeing is light that's emitted 783 00:39:22,800 --> 00:39:25,720 Speaker 1: from the accretion disk of these very early universe super 784 00:39:25,719 --> 00:39:29,000 Speaker 1: massive black holes. So that's another possibility. 785 00:39:29,200 --> 00:39:32,200 Speaker 2: We just looked at a couple of pixels and they 786 00:39:32,239 --> 00:39:33,440 Speaker 2: assumed there was a galaxy. 787 00:39:33,640 --> 00:39:36,000 Speaker 1: Well, basically, galaxies are worth out there in the universe. 788 00:39:36,040 --> 00:39:39,040 Speaker 1: The universe is made of galaxies. That's the basic building 789 00:39:39,080 --> 00:39:40,200 Speaker 1: block of the cosmos. 790 00:39:40,400 --> 00:39:43,560 Speaker 2: Oh, I see when you're talking about that scale. Yeah, 791 00:39:43,960 --> 00:39:47,120 Speaker 2: you can't see individual stars beyond the Milky Way basically, 792 00:39:47,160 --> 00:39:48,520 Speaker 2: so if you see a source of light, it has 793 00:39:48,560 --> 00:39:49,240 Speaker 2: to be a galaxy. 794 00:39:49,320 --> 00:39:52,200 Speaker 1: You can see individual stars in some nearby galaxies, but 795 00:39:52,280 --> 00:39:55,080 Speaker 1: in general, yes, the most distant galaxies, we can basically 796 00:39:55,120 --> 00:39:58,240 Speaker 1: just tell there's a blob there, So probably it's a galaxy. 797 00:39:58,040 --> 00:40:01,960 Speaker 2: M or even like a any source of light out 798 00:40:01,960 --> 00:40:04,520 Speaker 2: there that far. It has to be a galaxy maybe 799 00:40:05,520 --> 00:40:07,040 Speaker 2: or not. It could be also a black hole age 800 00:40:07,040 --> 00:40:07,600 Speaker 2: you said. 801 00:40:07,719 --> 00:40:09,799 Speaker 1: It could be. Now, there's no explanation for like how 802 00:40:09,840 --> 00:40:13,480 Speaker 1: the early universe could have made supermassive black holes that 803 00:40:13,800 --> 00:40:16,279 Speaker 1: have these accrusion disks and admit that light. But it's 804 00:40:16,320 --> 00:40:18,520 Speaker 1: just like one fun idea. It gives you a sense 805 00:40:18,560 --> 00:40:21,839 Speaker 1: of like the craziness of the ideas people are exploring 806 00:40:22,000 --> 00:40:25,799 Speaker 1: to explain this unexplained data. That's the fun part of 807 00:40:25,840 --> 00:40:28,000 Speaker 1: physics and science when you're like, what this doesn't make 808 00:40:28,040 --> 00:40:30,839 Speaker 1: any sense, and it forces you to be creative about 809 00:40:30,840 --> 00:40:32,520 Speaker 1: what else could be going on in the universe. 810 00:40:32,760 --> 00:40:37,040 Speaker 2: Mmmm, what are some other possibilities for these weird measurements? 811 00:40:37,480 --> 00:40:42,120 Speaker 1: So possibility one measurement error, Possibility two weird unexplained black holes. 812 00:40:42,200 --> 00:40:45,879 Speaker 1: Possibility three is that maybe we are wrong about how 813 00:40:46,000 --> 00:40:50,440 Speaker 1: stars and galaxies formed in the early universe. We have 814 00:40:50,480 --> 00:40:53,120 Speaker 1: a model for how that happens, basically because we can 815 00:40:53,200 --> 00:40:56,480 Speaker 1: see it happen in nearby galaxies which are kind of old. 816 00:40:56,520 --> 00:40:58,520 Speaker 1: And what we see is that star formation is not 817 00:40:58,600 --> 00:41:01,920 Speaker 1: that easy, like our formation is kind of tricky. You 818 00:41:01,960 --> 00:41:04,920 Speaker 1: need a big blob of cold gas and you need 819 00:41:05,000 --> 00:41:07,600 Speaker 1: not too much radiation to like blow it apart. You 820 00:41:07,640 --> 00:41:09,680 Speaker 1: need to leave it alone for a while, so gravity 821 00:41:09,760 --> 00:41:12,600 Speaker 1: pulls it together. And there's lots of examples in the 822 00:41:12,719 --> 00:41:16,640 Speaker 1: universe where galaxies are not making stars anymore, like they're 823 00:41:16,680 --> 00:41:18,839 Speaker 1: just too hot or there's too much radiation from their 824 00:41:18,840 --> 00:41:22,120 Speaker 1: central black hole. This process is called quenching. So it 825 00:41:22,200 --> 00:41:25,080 Speaker 1: might be that our idea for how long it takes 826 00:41:25,120 --> 00:41:28,200 Speaker 1: to form stars it's been biased by looking at star 827 00:41:28,280 --> 00:41:32,200 Speaker 1: formation in the late universe when quenching happens. Maybe in 828 00:41:32,239 --> 00:41:35,160 Speaker 1: the early universe it was possible to form stars much 829 00:41:35,239 --> 00:41:38,279 Speaker 1: faster than it is today because you were still in 830 00:41:38,280 --> 00:41:40,719 Speaker 1: the dark ages and there wasn't all this radiation or 831 00:41:40,960 --> 00:41:43,480 Speaker 1: you know, these ideas are very speculative, but it could 832 00:41:43,560 --> 00:41:46,200 Speaker 1: just be that star formation could happen much faster in 833 00:41:46,239 --> 00:41:47,760 Speaker 1: the early universe than we thought. 834 00:41:49,040 --> 00:41:51,959 Speaker 2: I wonder if it could also be that maybe there 835 00:41:51,960 --> 00:41:53,880 Speaker 2: was just a pocket of a lot of stuff there 836 00:41:54,239 --> 00:41:56,839 Speaker 2: when the universe blew up, You know how there are 837 00:41:56,880 --> 00:41:59,959 Speaker 2: fluctuations in the amount of the density of the universe made. 838 00:42:00,080 --> 00:42:01,319 Speaker 2: It just happened to be a lot of stuff there. 839 00:42:01,400 --> 00:42:03,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's certainly possible that there are fluctuations like that. 840 00:42:03,960 --> 00:42:06,480 Speaker 1: We don't have a huge number of data points here yet, 841 00:42:06,520 --> 00:42:09,640 Speaker 1: so everybody's waiting to get more samples and more data 842 00:42:09,920 --> 00:42:12,280 Speaker 1: and look for more things and see are these weird 843 00:42:12,320 --> 00:42:15,480 Speaker 1: examples that can be explained by fluctuations. As you say 844 00:42:15,760 --> 00:42:18,600 Speaker 1: that these fluctuations would be pretty unlikely given our current 845 00:42:18,680 --> 00:42:23,080 Speaker 1: understanding of the cosmological model. But maybe that's wrong, right, 846 00:42:23,200 --> 00:42:26,480 Speaker 1: Maybe our understanding of the early universe has more fluctuations 847 00:42:26,680 --> 00:42:30,279 Speaker 1: than we expected. Maybe there's something else going on. It's 848 00:42:30,320 --> 00:42:32,680 Speaker 1: definitely a lot we don't understand about the very early 849 00:42:32,800 --> 00:42:35,279 Speaker 1: universe and the expansion of the universe in that time, 850 00:42:35,320 --> 00:42:38,080 Speaker 1: and the balance between dark energy and dark matter. So 851 00:42:38,120 --> 00:42:39,960 Speaker 1: there's definitely a lot to learn. And this could just 852 00:42:40,000 --> 00:42:42,680 Speaker 1: be like the thread that begins to unravel it, or 853 00:42:42,680 --> 00:42:44,480 Speaker 1: it could be just a measurement error. 854 00:42:44,760 --> 00:42:48,919 Speaker 2: Hmm, I wonder could it also just be like, maybe 855 00:42:49,040 --> 00:42:52,680 Speaker 2: these galaxies are a regular galaxy, but they're moving away 856 00:42:52,719 --> 00:42:56,279 Speaker 2: from us really fast. Is that a possibility. That's why 857 00:42:56,280 --> 00:42:57,320 Speaker 2: there were so red shifted. 858 00:42:57,560 --> 00:43:00,319 Speaker 1: So the red shift includes two different things. Is like 859 00:43:00,360 --> 00:43:02,839 Speaker 1: the expansion of the universe as a whole, and then 860 00:43:02,920 --> 00:43:07,600 Speaker 1: also galaxies can have velocity relative to that expansion, like 861 00:43:07,600 --> 00:43:10,120 Speaker 1: for example, Andromeda is moving towards us even though the 862 00:43:10,200 --> 00:43:13,960 Speaker 1: universe is expanding, right, so there's a peculiar local velocity. 863 00:43:14,200 --> 00:43:17,719 Speaker 1: And then the overall universe expansion, And I think you're saying, like, 864 00:43:17,800 --> 00:43:20,839 Speaker 1: could these action be closer and not as old as 865 00:43:20,880 --> 00:43:23,160 Speaker 1: we thought, they just happen to be moving away from 866 00:43:23,239 --> 00:43:26,560 Speaker 1: us really really fast. I suppose that's possible, but it 867 00:43:26,560 --> 00:43:29,520 Speaker 1: would be a really large, peculiar velocity. They'd have to 868 00:43:29,600 --> 00:43:32,360 Speaker 1: be like super zooming around, and that's not something we 869 00:43:32,440 --> 00:43:35,399 Speaker 1: expect either. Even in that scenario, that would be something new. 870 00:43:36,880 --> 00:43:40,600 Speaker 2: Why don't we expect it sort of speed limit for galaxies. 871 00:43:41,000 --> 00:43:43,000 Speaker 1: It's not that there's a speed limit, but we have 872 00:43:43,000 --> 00:43:45,040 Speaker 1: a model for how the universe was made and how 873 00:43:45,120 --> 00:43:48,000 Speaker 1: structure is formed, and if things are moving around and 874 00:43:48,080 --> 00:43:50,719 Speaker 1: much faster than that, it tends to disturb that structure. 875 00:43:51,239 --> 00:43:53,360 Speaker 1: And so we see the universe sort of like cooling 876 00:43:53,400 --> 00:43:56,200 Speaker 1: and crystallizing, and that tells us a lot about the 877 00:43:56,280 --> 00:43:59,600 Speaker 1: speed of matter and galaxies in the universe. If there 878 00:43:59,640 --> 00:44:02,440 Speaker 1: was zomom around much faster than the structure of the 879 00:44:02,440 --> 00:44:04,759 Speaker 1: whole universe would look different. But there could always be 880 00:44:04,800 --> 00:44:06,240 Speaker 1: a few weird oddballs, right. 881 00:44:06,200 --> 00:44:09,920 Speaker 2: Right, right, There's always a few weird oddballs in the 882 00:44:10,000 --> 00:44:13,840 Speaker 2: universe here on Earth, all right. So the answer for 883 00:44:13,920 --> 00:44:15,200 Speaker 2: Jamie is, we don't. 884 00:44:15,239 --> 00:44:18,560 Speaker 1: We're not sure it's super exciting because we don't know 885 00:44:18,600 --> 00:44:21,840 Speaker 1: what it means, and it's wonderful because it's a surprise. 886 00:44:22,280 --> 00:44:24,640 Speaker 1: That's the best outcome. Every time you turn on a 887 00:44:24,640 --> 00:44:26,600 Speaker 1: new kind of eyeball and look at a new spot 888 00:44:26,640 --> 00:44:28,160 Speaker 1: in the universe, you hadn't looked at it before, and 889 00:44:28,200 --> 00:44:30,440 Speaker 1: the universe shows you something new. 890 00:44:30,680 --> 00:44:33,920 Speaker 2: Right, right, More job security for physicists. 891 00:44:35,600 --> 00:44:38,560 Speaker 1: And more joy for everybody who's curious about the nature 892 00:44:38,600 --> 00:44:39,240 Speaker 1: of the universe. 893 00:44:40,680 --> 00:44:43,239 Speaker 2: I think more unknowns is not good for those of 894 00:44:43,280 --> 00:44:46,920 Speaker 2: us who just want answers. Like, if you're curious, you 895 00:44:46,960 --> 00:44:49,680 Speaker 2: want answers, right, But if you're making a living out 896 00:44:49,680 --> 00:44:51,719 Speaker 2: of the questions, then it's good news for you. 897 00:44:52,760 --> 00:44:54,600 Speaker 1: I think if you're curious, you want answers, but you 898 00:44:54,640 --> 00:44:55,920 Speaker 1: also want more questions. 899 00:44:57,600 --> 00:44:59,000 Speaker 2: Now you're trying to tell people what they want. 900 00:44:59,160 --> 00:45:01,160 Speaker 1: Yes, I'm Steve Jobs over here. 901 00:45:01,280 --> 00:45:05,600 Speaker 2: There you go, the Steve Jobs a physics. You're one 902 00:45:05,719 --> 00:45:07,480 Speaker 2: black turtleneck away from that. 903 00:45:07,800 --> 00:45:09,680 Speaker 1: I'm one donut away from not being able to wear 904 00:45:09,680 --> 00:45:10,600 Speaker 1: my turtle neck anymore. 905 00:45:11,440 --> 00:45:13,640 Speaker 2: I think they stretched, Daniel. Yeah, so I think they're okay. 906 00:45:13,719 --> 00:45:17,759 Speaker 2: All right, keep eating those donuts or not eating those 907 00:45:17,920 --> 00:45:21,279 Speaker 2: donuts for breakfast? All right, Well, thank you to all 908 00:45:21,320 --> 00:45:24,960 Speaker 2: of our question askers. It's always fun to see what 909 00:45:25,000 --> 00:45:27,960 Speaker 2: people are curious about and to get a sense of 910 00:45:28,000 --> 00:45:29,759 Speaker 2: what are the big unknowns out there. 911 00:45:30,440 --> 00:45:33,879 Speaker 1: Thank you very much everybody who shares your curiosity with us. 912 00:45:34,120 --> 00:45:36,960 Speaker 1: This is a ride we're taking together to explore the universe, 913 00:45:37,360 --> 00:45:39,600 Speaker 1: So please don't be shy to write to us to 914 00:45:39,800 --> 00:45:42,759 Speaker 1: questions at danieland Jorge dot com. We love to hear 915 00:45:42,760 --> 00:45:44,600 Speaker 1: from you and we'll always right back. 916 00:45:44,719 --> 00:45:46,880 Speaker 2: And send us some chicken and waffle donuts if you 917 00:45:46,920 --> 00:45:51,680 Speaker 2: can with your questions. Always appreciate it all right. We 918 00:45:51,680 --> 00:45:54,880 Speaker 2: hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for joining us, See you 919 00:45:54,920 --> 00:45:55,399 Speaker 2: next time. 920 00:46:00,120 --> 00:46:03,000 Speaker 1: For more science and curiosity, come find us on social 921 00:46:03,040 --> 00:46:07,920 Speaker 1: media where we answer questions and post videos. We're on Twitter, Discorg, Insta, 922 00:46:08,040 --> 00:46:11,720 Speaker 1: and now TikTok. Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel 923 00:46:11,760 --> 00:46:15,200 Speaker 1: and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio. 924 00:46:15,480 --> 00:46:20,640 Speaker 1: For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, 925 00:46:20,760 --> 00:46:23,120 Speaker 1: or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.