WEBVTT - Self-Driving Bus Accident

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>A self driving shuttle bus in Las Vegas operated for

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>almost two whole hours before being involved in a minor accident.

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Are self driving vehicles really the safest option? Yes, they are.

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jonathan Strickland and this is text Updaily. Let's cover

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the news first. A French company called Navia developed an

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>autonomous electric vehicle designed to travel along predetermined routes. The

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>city of Las Vegas had such a shuttle to carry

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>passengers around the Fremont East district. The shuttle itself has

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a very modest route at just over a half mile.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>It's really just a convenience vehicle. In early November, after

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>being an operation for about two hours, one such shuttle

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>collided with a truck, or rather, it's more appropriate to

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>say a human operated truck backed into the shuttle. According

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to a Triple A representative, the accident was due to

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>human error, not the shuttle. Triple A, by the way,

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is a sponsor of this driverless shuttle pilot program. A

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>representative of the city of Las Vegas gave a bit

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 1>more information on the official Tumblr page for the Las

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Vegas City government. It read the shuttle did what it

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to do and that its sensors registered the truck,

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>and the shuttle stopped to avoid the accident. Unfortunately, the

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>delivery truck did not stop and graze the front fender

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.919
<v Speaker 1>of the shuttle. While the headlines may make it sound

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>like driverless vehicles are unreliable and unsafe, a closer look

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>at stories shows that that's not really the case. Google's

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>self driving vehicles have been in operation for a few years,

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>running tests quietly in northern California, and while the cars

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>have been involved in several incidents, nearly all of those

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>were due to human error. In some cases, the Google

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>vehicle was in manual operation mode at the time, meaning

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a human driver was at the controls and made a

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>mistake resulting in an accident. In other cases, drivers of

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>other vehicles failed to follow the rules of the road

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and caused an accident. In fact, before a Google spun

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>out its self driving car division into a new company

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>called Waymo, the list of incidents only contained one case

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in which the company determined the self driving system was

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>at fault. In that incident, a Google car was navigating

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a street in Mountain View, California, and approaching an intersection.

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>The car sinced an obstacle in the road. It was

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>a pile of sandbags around a storm drain. The car

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 1>moved slightly out of its own lane to pass the obstacle,

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>then attempted to get back into the lane it was

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be in. The only problem was that a

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>bus was approaching from behind and started to fill that space.

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>The self driving cars AI assumed the bus driver would

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>slow or yield to the self driving vehicle, and it

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>began to merge back into its lane. Then the self

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>driving car learned the valuable lesson that two objects cannot

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>coexist in the same physical space at the same time.

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>There was a low speed collision. Google admitted the car

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>was at fault for making a baseless assumption that the

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>human driver would yield, And yes, the apology did sound

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a bit like Google was throwing a little shade at

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>the bus driver, but only a little. If you look

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>at statistics, self driving cars are extremely safe, particularly if

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you're looking only for the times they are at fault

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in an accident. Google's cars have driven more than two

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 1>million miles on streets in the United States with only

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 1>one at fault accident. That's significantly lower than for human drivers.

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>New drivers are forty times more likely to get into

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>an accident than a self driving vehicle is. However, self

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>driving cars do tend to get into accidents caused by

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>human drivers at a rate higher than you'd see in

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>an experienced human driver. Self driving cars might be a

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>bit too polite and safe, avoiding aggressive tactics that can

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>sometimes prevent an accident. Maybe self driving cars place more

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>faith in humans to do the right thing when they

0:03:55.800 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>drive foolish robots that will be their downfall to be

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>serious for a moment. Self driving cars have the potential

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to make an enormous positive impact. For the year sixteen

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, the National Safety Council estimated that

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>forty thousand people died in motor vehicle crashes. From a

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>statistical standpoint, self driving cars have the potential to prevent

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>thousands of deaths every year. On a lesser note, they

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>could also reduce property damage incidents and reduce strain placed

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on emergency rooms and first responders. They could also help

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>alleviate traffic snarls and reduce commute times in dense cities.

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>While several companies, including Waymo, are aggressive in getting self

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>driving cars out on the streets and more real world scenarios,

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.679
<v Speaker 1>we also have to face some facts. The National Highway

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Traffic Safety Administration recognizes six levels of autonomy, from zero

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to five. At zero, you have a car that is

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>completely human operated. Levels one and two cover driver assist systems,

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 1>in which an automated feature might kick into gear when needed,

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>but the car is still largely under the control role

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of a human driver. A Level three system is largely

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>automated but can allow for a human to take control

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>in a safety critical situation. This one is tricky because

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>handing off the control of a vehicle isn't easy to

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>do in a seamless way. It's sort of like having

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a passenger reach over and grab the steering wheel to

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>yanket to the side in order to avoid a crash.

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>The passenger and driver might find themselves struggling against each

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>other for a moment. Level four is a fully autonomous

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>vehicle that can operate in an operational design domain or

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>o d D. That means the vehicle has restrictions on

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>where it goes and under what conditions it operates. This

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>is the level the shuttle bus I mentioned at the

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>top of the show is supposed to inhabit. The vehicle

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>should be capable of handling all situations that fall inside

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>that O d D. You could argue the shuttle failed

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to do this and that it didn't find some means

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of preventing the fender bender, though without all the details

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that's hard to say. Level five is a fully autonomous

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>system that can work under any dry driving scenario. That

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>would be a car that could adapt to conditions the

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>way human drivers can, no matter whether traffic or road conditions.

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Most experts in the fields say we are still a

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>far away away from this, as teaching machines how to

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>recognize a threat versus something that is ultimately harmless is tricky.

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Humans can extrapolate based upon experience. Machines have trouble with that.

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>All that being said, I'd still hop into a self

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>driving shuttle without hesitation, assuming I was confident in the

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>abilities of the company that made the sensors and software. I,

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>for one, welcome our robot chauffeur Overlords. To learn more

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>about autonomous vehicles and all other things tech related, subscribe

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to the tech Stuff podcast It's robot Approved. See you

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>again soon.