WEBVTT - Presenting Prodigy: The Polgar Sisters

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Hijack. It's a productive of I heart radio. Prodigies are

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>children that display rapid skill acquisition in a domain. A

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>domain is any specific area of activity or knowledge, like tennis,

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>or writing, or psychology or chess. Chess is a domain

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>where mastery is associated with a superior intellect. It's incredibly strategic.

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Yet it's simple enough that a child can play. But

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>some children do more than just play. My name is

0:00:45.120 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Lowell Balante, and this is prodigy. If you're like me,

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you believe that a prodigy is a rare combination of

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>genetic talent, environment and effort. But some people have made

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money selling the idea that talent doesn't

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>exist and that the driving force behind expert performance is

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>just effort. They also call it hard work or practice.

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>A common way they introduced this idea is by using

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the example of the Polgar sisters. Here is their story.

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Before his children were even conceived, Laslow Polgar believed they

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>would be prodigies. Laslow is a Hungarian educational psychologist born

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen forty six. As a university student, he studied

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and came to the conclusion that people who were

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>recognized as geniuses had early introduction to their domain. Laslow

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is quoted as saying, it's very interesting because when I

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>looked at the life stories of geniuses, I found the

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>same thing. They all started at a very young age

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and studied intensively. Mozart is a classic example because his

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>father was a music teacher. Mozart began learning to play

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the piano at three years old. He developed perfect pitch

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and became so famous that his name is interchangeable. A genius.

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>So Laslow theorized that early specialized education is far more

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>important than talent. He concluded that introduction should begin at

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>three years old and intensive education should begin at six.

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Laslow was so confident that he became determined to prove

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that he could turn any healthy newborn into a genius,

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and he decided he would do it with his own children.

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Laslo began courting the daughter of a family friend. She

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>was a Ukrainian foreign language teacher named Clara. They wrote

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to each other often, and in the letters Blow disclosed

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>his plan. Claire thought he was a little strange, but

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>became convinced, and after a year and a half he proposed.

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Laslow and Claire married and had a daughter they named Susan.

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>They considered various topics for Susan to specialize in, originally

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>considering mathematics and language, But one day the toddler found

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a chessboard in a cabinet and became intensely curious. Years later,

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Susan would say he could have put us in any field,

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>but it was I who chose chess. I liked the chessmen.

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>They were toys for me. Here's a quick introduction to

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the game of chess. The board is a square made

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>up of sixty four smaller squares. Each player has sixteen

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>pieces which control one fourth of the board. Those pieces

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>include six different types, made up of eight pawns, two rooks,

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>two nights, to bishops, one queen, and one king. Players

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>alternate turns with the goal of apping their opponents king.

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Once the game begins and each player makes their opening move,

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>there are now four hundred different possibilities for their next move.

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>After their second move, they're over seventy two. After three

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>moves there are nine million, and after four moves they're

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>over three eighteen billion. To put this in perspective, the

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>observable universe is estimated to have approximately ten to the

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>eighty atoms. That's a ten with eight zeros after it.

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>The number of possible permutations of chess is estimated to

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>be ten to the one twenty three, so the quantity

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of possible games is nearly unlimited. This is why chess,

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>while easy to learn the basics, has infinite layers. Chess,

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>Clara said, is objective and easy to measure. Chess is

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>what's known as a zero sum game, which means the

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>winner takes rating points from the loser. Those points out

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>up to your rating in what's known as an Elo

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>rating system. In an Elo rating system, two equally rated

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>players facing off should win an equal number of times,

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>thus winning and losing an equal amount of points. But

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>if a lower rated player defeats a higher rated player,

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>then they're awarded more points than if a higher rated

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>player defeats a lower rated player over the course of

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>many games. This system is designed to give players a

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>rating consistent with their skill level. Laslow only had an

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>amateur understanding of the game, so how would he turn

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>his children into grand master level players. He published a

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>book in nine titled Raise a Genius, where he discusses

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>his method. The first thing he states is that there

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is no secret to his system. It's based on the

0:05:53.400 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 1>following standard educational concepts. You can't achieve results through coercion.

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Too much severity will diminish the child's interest. Allow the

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>child to win sometimes so they are given the feeling

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of success. Play with a handicap, then gradually reduce it

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>as the student becomes better. The training must be age appropriate.

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Use games to awaken interest, because students master subjects much

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>more quickly when they are interested. So he gradually taught

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Susan the basics of chess one concept at a time,

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and kept her interested by making smaller games out of it.

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>The first thing he did was teacher the names of

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the squares using pieces of graph paper. Since chess consists

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of an eight by eight square grid, the row of

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>squares facing the player are labeled alphabetically A through H,

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>and the perpendicular squares are numbered one through eight. Laslow

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>gives Susan a location B three, for example, and she

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>would have to mark it with an X. Next, he

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>taught her the colors of the squares, which alternate between

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>black and white. After Susan learned the layout of the board,

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>he introduced the simplest piece, the pawn. They would play

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>pawn wars with the goal of reaching their opponents baseline.

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Then he introduced the next piece, and so on and

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so forth. Mastering the basics is a critical concept where

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Laslow believes standard education fail students. Without it, you cannot

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>master more complicated subjects. My father believes that innate talent

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>is nothing, that success is hard work. I agree with him.

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Susan Polgar. Susan is the firstborn child of Laslow and

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Clara Polgar. She played her first major tournament in an

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>eleven and under Championship at only four years old and

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>dominated with a perfect ten and no score. The media

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.239
<v Speaker 1>labeled her a prodigy, but there were many who were critical.

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>They believed little girls should play with dolls, not chessboards

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and wooden pieces. At six years old, it was time

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>for her to go to school. Her parents decided that

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>formal education would be more harmful than helpful and decided

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to apply for a permit to homeschool Susan. It was

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult process, but they did eventually receive permission.

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>The following five years were spent studying chess to improve

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>tactical and calculation skills. She read books, studied famous grandmaster games,

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>learned to play blindfolded and practiced her endgame. When Susan

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>was twelve, she won the sixteen and Underworld Championship. By

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>age fifteen, she was the number one ranked female chess

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>player in the world and remained in the top three

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>for the next twenty three years. She became the first

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>woman in history to qualify for the men's World Championship.

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>In nights one, she became the first woman in history

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to achieve the men's Grand Master title. In two thousand three,

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>she became the first woman to win the USO and

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Blitz Championship. She went on to win it again in

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five and two thousand six. She became the

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>first World champion in history to win the Triple Crown,

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>which consists of rapid, blitz, A and classical chess all total.

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>She is a five time Olympic champion. Susan was not

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>an only child, and when Sophia was born in nineteen

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>seventy four, chess was already taken seriously at home. When

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Sophia was five years old, she won the Hungarian Girls

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>eleven and Under Championship. She won the gold medal in

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the Under fourteen Girls World Chess Championship at age eleven,

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>when Sophia was fourteen, while playing in an open tournament

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in Rome, she delivered one of the strongest chess performances

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>ever recorded, defeating four grand master level opponents and scoring

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>an ELO rating of two thousand, eight hundred and seventy nine.

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>It has since become known as the Sack of Rome.

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>She finished second at the Rapid Women's World Chess Championship

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and s get in the World Junior Chess Championship. Although

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>she never reached the level of grand master and hasn't

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>played competitive ranked chess since two thousand ten, she was

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>at one point ranked six amongst all female chess players

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in the world by chess standards. Sophia is the least

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>accomplished of the three sisters, but Susan considered Sophia the

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>most naturally gifted of them. Susan wrote in her book

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Breaking Through that Sophia would give up fights easier, and

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>rather than focusing on one thing entirely, she diversified her interests.

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Two years after Sophia, Judah was born. By the time

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.559
<v Speaker 1>Juda turned three, both Susan and Sophia were playing competitive chess.

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>They lived in a small apartment and her older sisters

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>were training in the living room behind closed doors. Judah

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>was forbidden to go into the room, and as you

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>can imagine, she very much wanted to. Her parents told

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>her she could enter. Once she learned to play chess.

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 1>From an early age, Judah loved challenges. She would take

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the stairs when everyone else took the elevator, So the

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>challenge of chess suited her. Judah would become the strongest

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>female chess player of all time. She was the youngest

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>player to break into the top on international chess ranking

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>at only twelve years old. She achieved the title of

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>grand Master at age fifteen, several months younger than even

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Fisher. Gary Kasparov, considered by many to be the

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>greatest chess player of all time, once said she has

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>fantastic chess talent, but she is, after all, a woman.

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 1>It all comes down to the imperfections of the feminine psyche.

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>No woman can sustain a prolonged battle. Judah defeated him

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand two. After the loss, he has quoted

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>as saying the pulgar showed that there are no inherent

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>limitations to their aptitude, an idea that many male players

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>refused to accept. Until they had unceremoniously been crushed by

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.719
<v Speaker 1>a twelve year old with a ponytail. Jude was the

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>number one ranked female player in the world for twenty

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>one years. She's the only woman to have ever won

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 1>a game against a world number one ranked player. All total,

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>she has defeated eleven current or former world champions. Although

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>none of the sisters accomplished Laslow's goal of becoming the

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>world champion for both women and men, Judah did reach

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the overall rank of eight, which was an unimaginable achievement.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Chess had been completely dominated by men until the Polgar

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>sisters broke the gender barrier and proved that women can

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>compete with men at the highest levels of chess. Laslow's

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>educational experiment was incredibly successful, but as with any experiment,

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>it has to be repeatable. We'll get into that after

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. Still living in and manually taking notes,

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>start the new year with otter dot ai to generate

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>automatic notes for meetings, interviews, or lectures. With auto dot ai,

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you can search the meeting notes, insert images, playback the audio,

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and share them with your friends or coworkers. You can

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>capture action items, remember meeting details, and keep everyone informed.

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Auto dot ai works for in person or virtual meetings

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google meet. Sign up for

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>free at auto dot ai or download the app for

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>free auto dot ai. That's O T T E R

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 1>dot ai. Imagine fighting climate change. Every time you buy

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>groceries or pizza. Now you can. With the Aspiration zero

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>credit card. You can reduce your carbon footprint by making

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the same purchases you always make. Aspiration zero plants one

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>tree every time you make a purchase, or plant two

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>trees when you choose to round all your purchases up

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to the nearest dollar. Track your progress in the app

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and earn one percent cash back each month you reach

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>carbon zero for a limited time, Earn a three dollar

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>bonus when you open an account at asp ration dot

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 1>com and spend three thousand dollars in the first ninety days.

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Join the community that helps you fight climate change with

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>every purchase. Aspiration zero one card, zero carbon footprint. The

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Aspiration zero MasterCard is issued by Beneficial State Bank, pursu

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>into license by MasterCard International Incorporated. Beneficial State Bank Member

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>f d I C. Terms and conditions apply. Visit Aspiration

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash zero for more information. How do you

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>prepare your kids today to succeed in tomorrow's world? Meet Juni.

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Juni is an online learning experience equipping the next generation

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of students to solve the world's largest problems. Best known

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for their Steam courses like coding, investing, and novel writing,

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Junie is starting off the new year right by adding

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>even more great courses all new robotics, crypto app development,

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>three D design and more. So many options for kids

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>seven to eighteen and with varying types of learning formats

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and project at based curriculum, your student will be ready

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to take on the real world. See for yourself why

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Junie is trusted by thousands of parents and loved by kids.

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Go to j U and I Learning dot com and

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of a special invite to kick off the

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>new year. Enter promo code I Heart thirty at checkout

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>for thirty percent off. That's j U and I Learning

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com and promo code I Heart thirty for thirty

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>percent off all the great courses Junie has to offer.

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Prodigy. So I'm interested in the pollgars

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>actually were suited for chess or if this method could

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>be repeated with any child. I contacted a child psychologist

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>who has worked with gifted children for decades, Dr Spamanka Newman.

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I began by asking her to define what a prodigy is.

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>We have extraordinarily advanced and very early domain specific skill,

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and then we have a child who exhibits ability to

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>perform in the domain as he is a talented adult.

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>In popular media, sometimes people refer to very smart children

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>as geniuses, But genius is an adult. That adult doesn't

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>just have a skill in a domain, but transforms a

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>domain in a way that is irreversible. As a result

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of a genius, we start thinking differently about something that

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>is very important and it has a lasting value. Children

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>prodigies have early promise and they have early performance, but

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>they might not transform the field. They just perform in

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the field as though they are talented adults. I know

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this may be a different definition of genius than you're

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>used to. The word has evolved over time, and psychologists

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>seem to prefer not to base the word on an

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>IQ test result. Last lous ability to initiate and retain

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>interest in his children. It seems rather critical. What was

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the significance of his method. We are having extraordinary talent here,

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>but we are also having a child. You may have

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>potential to achieve in learning chess as an adult, but

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you are three year old. Three year olds play. Unless

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>learning is a play, it might not be sustained for

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Plays rewarding place, exhilarating, place, energizing. Like

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in every development of mastery in any field, there is

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a point later where there is going to be transitioned

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>from play to discipline. Mastery cannot be achieved without disciplined practice,

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>but that comes later. If that is introduced to early,

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it may kill the joy and so the child might

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>lose interest. Regardless of what I think, Laslow did state

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>what his plan was, and it worked, could it not

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>be reproduced with other children? There is that intersection of

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a parent who is already having a child with exceptional potential,

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>drive and interest. That can lead that potential into realization.

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think it can create a prodigy. Most

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>parents would try that if they don't have the child

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>with a potential and interest, create very angry, resentful children

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.479
<v Speaker 1>who actually at the end don't love what they are

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>exposed to. So Dr Newman believes that loudslow success was

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence and would not be as effective with the

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 1>average child. And she's not alone. Here's Dr Scott Barry Kaufman.

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Feldman noted, there's usually a lucky coinciding of lots of

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>different factors. You know, they usually do find a parent

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>who accelerates the process in some way. And here's Dr

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Feldman himself. I asked him about the belief that any

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>healthy child is a potential prodigy. That's the behavior of belief,

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people bought it and still do

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that you can make any child into anything, and it's

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>not true. So that they got to just is maybe

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>fortunate in their case. If they had tried something else,

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the probabilities are not in their favor. They probably would

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>not be known to us as the Polgar family, they

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.959
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't be known to us at all. Laslow believed

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that genetic predisposition was irrelevant. However, if that were true,

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't his daughters either have the exact same skill or

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>increasing skill As he refined his method. While the youngest sister,

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>jude It, was the most successful, the middle sister, Sophia,

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>was the least. To me, this shows the influence of genetics.

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Genetics can indirectly influence our attention and influence our drives

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to want to create experiences for ourselves. I mean, they're

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 1>all throughout the course of the day. We have a

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>million little micro decisions we have to make. These things

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>add up starting at a very very young age. I

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>think genes can help direct our attention to features of

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the environment that we find interesting and help us ignore

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>features of our environment that we don't find interesting. Based

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>on my research of Susan Paulgar, I think she might disagree,

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>so I reached out to her. I was very curious

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>whether she applied the same strategy to her own children.

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I began by asking her if inherent talent was important. Well,

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it definitely, how although I think it's very much overrated

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in many people's minds. I think hard work definitely is

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a much more important ingredient in someone's success. So I

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I certainly agree with my father's theory that success is

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>mostly hard work and sweat rather than the innate talent.

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't necessarily an extraordinarily talented chess player when I

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>was born, but rather that it took years of persistant

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>practice and devotion that resulted in my success. Do you

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>believe that you might have been born with genetic traits

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that were suited for chess. Well, it's obviously hard to tell,

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think I had a very special talent

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>for chess. There are other types of talents that are

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:51.239
<v Speaker 1>more generic, like having the patients to focus on a

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>particular subject for a lengthy amount of times and having

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the perseverance or this type of more generic human Well,

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it is I think I'm more important than than the

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>specific talent for a certain activity. Why do you think

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>early specialization is so important. I think that children rest

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>certain concept and dynamic of the various activities. It becomes

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>second nature as you grow up. You don't think of

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it as a study or work or anything like that.

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It just kind of becomes normal and natural for you.

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's something I think it is hard to teach,

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's a very important component of my

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>father's theories. The brain is like a sponge. You grasps

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the knowledge the dynamics of of the certain field just

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>so much clicker and naturally then than it would later.

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Often you find prodigies and families where a parent was

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>talented in the domain and accelerated the process. Was your

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>father a skuillt chess player, as well. He was not

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a professional chess player ever, or even a competitive as players.

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:04.959
<v Speaker 1>He had very limited skills as a chess player. However,

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>he was a teacher and a psychologist by education and profession,

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>so he had amazing skills patients and asking the right questions.

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And initially we were learning together. I mean he was

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>ahead of me a bit, but we were learning together

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>from books. The mark of a good teacher is to

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>a having the patience keeping the interest of the students,

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>and then not less importantly, keep asking stimulating questions and

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the right type of questions. And he was really really

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>good at that, in creating my interests and then keeping

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>my interests, which is not easy. I can tell you

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>as a as a mother and as well as a

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>coach that, especially of young children who are four or

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>five six years old, it's not easy to keep the

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>interest for an extended period of time. But he was

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>really good at it's making it's fun. I remember I

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>couldn't eight for for the next lesson, for the next discoveries.

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.479
<v Speaker 1>How exactly was he able to first get you interested

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>in chess? Well, he he made it sound like a

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>fairy tale story, you know, like the King and the

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>queen in the castle and the fortress, and it's not competitive.

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think the fact that he did not emphasize

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the competitive aspect of chess in the beginning was important.

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Susan was monumental in breaking the gender barrier that existed

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 1>in chess. She was the first woman to become a

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>men's grand master. But I was curious if she resented

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>missing out on a typical childhood. Well, at some point, obviously,

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I realized that my life is somewhat different than of

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>my peers. I certainly missed out on something. But I

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>understood also at the same time, even back then in

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>my teenage years, that while I am giving up on

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>some things, I'm getting a lot of other things that

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.959
<v Speaker 1>they miss out on and may never get those opportunities.

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Your parents dedication to your training must have been an

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>incredible amount of work. Did you use the same educational

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>method on your own children. I definitely did, consider it

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>did not exactly happen right like that for a number

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of reasons, partly because I got divorced pretty early on

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>from their father. Also, it takes a lot of sacrifice

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>from the parents perspective. I had to focus on my

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>career at the time, and wasn't in the position to

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>fully focus on them. You were obviously born from some

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>really intelligent parents. Do you think your father could have

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 1>reproduced the success with adopted children. I think it could have,

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 1>and I know that he was approached by some people

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>in trying to see if he can, and he was

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>ready and willing to do it, but he did not

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>want to do it with two children unless he was

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>able to actually legally adopt them. That was a little

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>bit complicated, and eventually it never happened. But he does

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>And if I believed that he could have done it,

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously a very long term experiment or project. It's

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>like a fifteen twenty year project, and it's a matter

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of having the energy to to do it all over again.

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, he believed that he would have been even

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>more successful because he had the experience, and he he

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>would have not had made some of the mistakes that

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>he made back with us, but he could have improved

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>on them. Also, we were growing up very poor, you know,

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 1>years later, and this was in question. He would have

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 1>had much more resources to make it easier. Since your

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 1>sister Sophia displayed such a strong aptitude. I was really

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>curious as to why she never reached the rank of

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>grand Master. Sophia has a different personality and she always

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of interest in art. She's quite a

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>good artist. She basically gave up relatively early and chose

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>a very different lifestyle, mostly to support her husband and

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the raised the family and and all that. But it's

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>also that she has skipped at one point a month

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>or month and a half from just away from home.

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>By the time she came back from that trip, her

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>younger sister Judd kind of made a Humongo's jump and

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of difficult for her, I think, to

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>handle that she is older, and before she left on

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the trip she was clearly ahead of Judy as she

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>was expected to beg than that she is older, and

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 1>basically the month month and a half or so that

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>she was away and didn't practice at all, it just

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 1>made a world of a difference. All of a sudden,

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Judy it was fitting her and the whole dynamics changed

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and her motivation level dropped. And on one hand, of course,

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>she was very happy for Judy's but at the same

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:56.479
<v Speaker 1>time for her own motivation it was white life changing,

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>I think. And then after that she never really why

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it got back, even though she showed some brilliants and

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>she had some amazing results even years later. But nevertheless,

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 1>I think she lost the belief that she will be

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>as good as student, even if the goal is not

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to create a grand master. Do you think it's beneficial

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to teach your child to play chess? Chess with your

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>children is definitely a verse, while endeavor, if for nothing else,

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to develop the mind, to develop good habits that can

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>are transferable for any other field. Susan has retired from

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>competitive chess. She's currently the head coach of the number

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>one rated collegiate chess team in the United States. She's

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>led them to five Final Four championships along with dozens

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of national, World, and Pan American titles. Remember those people

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned in the beginning that sell the idea that

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>talent is unimportant. Well, the reason why they used the

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Pulgar Sisters as an example is because when you first

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>look at their success, they seem like genetically talented prodigies.

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Once you dig into their story, you realize the massive

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>amount of training and practice they accrued by starting so young.

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 1>This reinforces their argument that the most important predictor of

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>performance is practice. The first issue I see here is

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that the example uses the demand of chess, but as

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>chess an accurate representation for other domains. We'll get into that.

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>After a quick break at Target, we come in for

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>black owned coffee and leave with change in our hands.

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 1>We come in for healthier snacks and leave feeling more

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>fulfilled at Target, better days are within our reach. What

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>we value most shouldn't cost more. This episode is brought

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to you by Royal Caribbean, an award winning global cruise line.

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>A vacation is what you make it, so are you

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>ready to make the most of it. A Royal Caribbean

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Adventure is the perfect opportunity to not just take a vacation,

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>but to take it for all it's worth. We know

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you're eager to get back out there, and with Royal

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Caribbean you can make the most of the moment and

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>rise to the vacation. This is not just a cruise.

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the biggest, boldest vacation on land or at sea.

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>This is pushing the limits of what could be done

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>at sea and on land, breaking records and earning honors

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>along the way. With over two hundred and seventy plus

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>destinations from the Caribbean, Alaska to Europe, and the biggest

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>ships in the world to take you there. Each one

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of our cruises is packed full of onboard features you

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>won't find anywhere else, like the tallest slide at sea

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and the tallest water slide in all North America. Plus

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>dining that takes your taste buds on a world tour,

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>jaw dropping entertainment, and award winning service delivered by a

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>crew that comes to us from over one hundred and

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>forty countries. So just don't take a vacation, Rise to

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the vacation, Come seek the Royal Caribbean. Visit Royal Caribbean

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com to learn more. This episode is brought to

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you by direct TV Stream, introducing direct TV Stream the

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>best of live TV and on demand, which means you

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>can get all your favorite sports, movies and shows together

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>so you can watch new episodes of your favorite reality

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>shows live or binge old episodes on demand. Either way,

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 1>get ready for some drama and the best part, Direct

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>TV Stream has no annual contract. Direct TV stream Get

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>your TV together at direct tv dot com requires high

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>speed Internet and compatible device. Content varies by package and

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>location restrictions supply, welcome back. If you want to learn

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>more about my guests, the research, my dog, or get

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>in touch with me, visit Prodigy podcast dot com. All

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>right back to the show. To me, competitive games like

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>chess are fun, But what I'm really interested in is

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>do these lessons actually apply to other areas like your career.

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Professor Robin Hogarth came up with the reason we should

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>differentiate domains like chess compared to others. He refers to

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>skill games and sports as kind learning environments. Yeah, you're

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>here is the following. When is an intuition going to

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>be successful? Where will an intuition be accurate? An intuition

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>will be accurate if, in fact, it's based on the

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>right information. So if you've learned learned about the situation

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you're involved with in the past, in an environment is

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>what I call kind where you've got good feedback, You'll

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to see all the data. Everything's been clear

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to you and it's well laid out. The environments are

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>going to change. That's what's what we call kind running environment.

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So in a kind learning environment, the rules don't change,

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>feedback is immediate and all the data is clear to you.

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Chess is a kind learning environment, so time accrued memorizing

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>patterns is valuable, and early specialization is an advantage. The

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>opposite learning environment he refers to as wicked. But on

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, you can also be in a wicked

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>learning environment where are you getting the wrong information, where

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of noise in the system, and perhaps

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>even where data is missing. So that's the difference in

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>your kind in a wicked learning environment, And we think

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it's very important to understand where you're forming your opinions,

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>whether you're in a kind environment or wicked environment. In

0:31:55.480 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>wicked environments, feedback is delayed, inadequate, or simply doesn't exist.

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Data can be ambiguous and even misleading. Hogarth used the

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>following example. An early twentieth century physician working in a

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>New York hospital developed a reputation for being able to

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>accurately diagnose typhoid before symptoms manifested simply by feeling a

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>patient's tongue. It turned out that the doctor was actually

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>infected and giving the patients typhoid. It's an extreme example,

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>but it shows how in a wicked environment, feedback can

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>teach the wrong lessons. So if you want to improve

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>your performance in a wicked environment, should you try and

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>turn it into a kind one. Absolutely. One of the

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting things about experience and learning is that we learned automatically.

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>We can't help it. We were just tuned to picking

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>up information so that we're exposed to and because of that,

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>if the environment is kind to learn the right thing,

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>environment is wicked. Rule in their own things, quick, accurate,

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and abundant feedback is critically important. Chess is a very

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>kind environment. The rules don't change, the games are easily recorded,

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and you can try cur rating as a measure of performance.

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>The pollgars had the benefit of grand master level coaches

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>throughout their training, so early specialization can definitely be an advantage,

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>but the major value in it might just exist in

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>kind learning environments. Also, early specialization might not actually be

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>much of an advantage at all. Professor Gulick, director of

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the Institute of Applied Sports Science in Germany, published a

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>study in the Journal of Sports Sciences that compared the

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>training history of eighty three Olympic medalists to eight three

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Olympic non metalists. The results showed that the medalists actually

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>started training in their main sport later than the non metalists. Additionally,

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the medalists accrued more time training in other sports. This

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting and I asked Professor Gulik what the

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>reason was, and the answer was, we don't know because

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it's really difficult to study. But he does have a

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of hypotheses. The first one is that early specializers

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>become mentally fatigued a k A. Burnout, were succumbed to

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the increased risk of injury. The other is something known

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>as the gene environment correlation. We'll get into this in

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a later episode, but briefly, the idea is that our

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 1>genetic traits have an influence on what environments we seek out.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>A basic example is, if you are a very tall

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and lean you may be drawn to the high jump. However,

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a person who specializes early in basketball due to these

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>same physical characteristics may not realize they are actually better

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>suited for the high jump. So late bloomers have more

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:33.359
<v Speaker 1>time and opportunity to find the domain best suited for them.

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's worth noting that Laslow didn't actually choose

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the domain, Susan did, so the claim that they could

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>have chosen any domain doesn't really hold much weight. Here's

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Dr Feldman, one of the few people who was actually

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>directly studied prodigies, And there is a whole movement making

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>this claim that talent is irrelevant, and I and others

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:56.760
<v Speaker 1>school have actually done the work have tried to show

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that the evidence does not support that claim, and it does.

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a reasonable claim if you're arguing that effort and

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>sustained effort and teaching are essential to high level performance,

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>and that is absolutely true that it's part of what

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I learned from my prodigies research. It's not something that

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>happens easily even with the most gifted, the most extraordinarily

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>talented kids. But to ignore the fact that they are

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily naturally talented kids, it's just ignoring the evidence. The

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>evidence is very clear, and anybody within any of the

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>fields that we've studied, people who actually do it, knows

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that that's true and will assert it. Everybody knows that

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Dr Kaufman has some really good advice about

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 1>finding your calling, finding a service from outside of yourself,

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>not just that you can do, but that also makes

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you feel intrinsic sense of joy and satisfaction when you

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 1>are engaging in it. That's enough. You don't have to

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:06.280
<v Speaker 1>be go go on the TV circuit for your amazing

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>ability to do one narrow thing in order to feel

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>like you've lived a meaningful life. The behaviorists who champion

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the power of practice don't just use sensationalized examples like

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the pollgars to make their argument. Another thing they do

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is cite a particular study that is at the very

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>core of their argument. It was published by a researcher

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>that would come to be known as the father of

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>expert performance, Dr Carl anders Ericsson. We're going to dig

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 1>into the details of that as well as how we

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 1>learn and what is physically happening in the brain when

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>we do. I have so many questions to answer and

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a ton of really interesting topics to cover. Thank you

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening, and please subscribe to the show

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 1>because I'll be back next week with another episode of Prodigy.

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Prodigy was created and produced by me Lowell Berlante. Tyler

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Klang is the executive producer. Without him, this show would

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>not have been made. If you want to learn more

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 1>about my guests, the show, my dog, or get in

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>touch with me, visit Prodigy podcast dot com. Dr Spomanka

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Newman performs psychological assessments and therapy in Tucker, Georgia. You

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>can find more information at Psychologist for Kids dot com.

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hogarth released a book titled The Myth of Experience,

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Why we learn the wrong lessons and Ways to correct them.

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Susan Polgar Foundation TACs chess and gives opportunities to young people.

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>You could find more information at Susan Polgar dot com.

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Dr Scott Berry Kaufman is host of the Psychology podcast

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and has a new book out. Visit Scott Berry Kaufman

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:46.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com for details. Dr Feldman is a brilliant psychologist.

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>He's currently retiring but hopes that more people will take

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the initiative to study the prodigy phenomenon. If you like

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the show's artwork, checkout Pam Peacock on Instagram at The

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Voyager Peacock Spell Show. Thanks to ban Kybrick, Tristan McNeil,

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael Meyer, Dave Kuston, Alison Canter, and Alex Cardinelli. For

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the I Heart

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>How do you prepare your kids today to succeed in

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow's world? With Juny the online Learning Experience Equipping the

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 1>next generation of students to solve the world's largest problems.

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Choose from popular Steam courses like coding, investing, novel writing

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and all new robotics, crypto app development, three D design

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and more. With all types of learning formats and project

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>based curriculum, your student will be ready to take on

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the real world. Visit j U and I learning dot

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.360
<v Speaker 1>com and enter promo code I Heart thirty at checkout

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>for thirty percent off. Still living in manually taking notes,

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>there is a better way to start the new year

0:38:57.280 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 1>with auto dot ai. Automatically get meeting notes. Auto dot

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>ai works for virtual meetings like Zoom, Microsoft Teams and

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Google Meet. Sign up on the web for free or

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 1>download in the app stores. Auto dot ai. That's O

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 1>T T e R dot ai. Still living in manually

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 1>taking notes? There is a better way to start the

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>new year with auto dot ai. Automatically get meeting notes.

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Auto dot ai works for virtual meetings like Zoom, Microsoft

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Teams and Google Meet. Sign up on the web for

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 1>free or download in the app stores. Auto dot ai.

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>That's O T T E R dot Ai. Gorgeous gaming,

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>stunning streams, unbelievable bandwidth. It's another lifestyles of gillionaires. Meet

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the a T and T Fiber customers winning it life

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>with hyper gig speeds. Meet gillionaire Terry Well. His love

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of streaming horror movies hasn't constantly on the edge of

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 1>his seat. His internet bill won't give him a scare.

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh don't go in there, I'm telling you, because since

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Terry upgraded to a T and T Fiber with hyper

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>gig speeds, he doesn't worry about data cap, store equipment

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>fees come. Oh man, it doors open for a reason

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and best yet, he also doesn't stress about a ice

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 1>increase at twelve months because with the amazing agillionaire lifestyle

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:08.800
<v Speaker 1>comes an exquisite sense of tranquility most of the time.

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Live like a billionaire gets straightforward pricing with a T

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and T fiber internet that upgrades everything, no data caps,

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>no equipment fees, and no price increase in twelve months,

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 1>limited availability in select areas. Visit add dot com slash

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>hypergig for details.