WEBVTT - America Is Rebuilding on the Bitcoin Standard | Matt Prusak

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.440
<v Speaker 1>So we joined up with the Trump brothers. Eric Trump

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>joined as a co founder, chief strategy officer. Donald Trum

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Junior came in as an investor and advisor to really

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>create that distinct American brand in the bitcoin space.

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting sort of where we see bitcoin ad and

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 2>why billionaire real estate developers seem to be abandoning the

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 2>real estate and coming over to bitcoin.

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a heck of a lot less work to accumulate

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin than it is to build enormous hotels and golf

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 1>course developments.

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 2>You have President of the Free World, you know, Donald Trump,

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 2>buying bitcoin and the Trump family buying bitcoin, and then

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 2>you still have like your cousin down the street telling

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:33.639
<v Speaker 2>you it's like a scam.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>What bitcoin is offering is a much easier way to

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>store value and store the efforts of your labor into

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>a commodity that, over time is becoming more and more valuable.

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 2>How do you approach thinking about building out the infrastructure.

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 3>For America with bitcoin mining?

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>There's really two kinds of infrastructure we're building out. There's

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:52.959
<v Speaker 1>the physical infrastructure of the mining, and then there's the

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>financial system infrastructure that you might find with bitcoin treasuries.

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 2>What's their experience, like trying to build this infrastructure out right.

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Now, this is something that unfortunately.

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, Matt, I'm excited to dig into this day.

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for taking the time to come and speak to me.

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Great to be here. Excited for the discussion.

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, we were just talking about Texas and Austin,

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 2>which obviously you're headquartered there. Sort of like the bitcoin

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 2>mining capital of the world, I guess, but I want

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 2>to I want to kind of get understanding from you,

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 2>sort of how you're looking at the world right now.

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty interesting what's happening from a macro standpoint. JP

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Morgan is talking about this debasement trade golden bitcoin. Then

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 2>we have this renewed interest in building the infrastructure of

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 2>the United States with bitcoin mining obviously. Then there's this

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 2>whole sort of new trend of companies buying bitcoin of

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 2>the balance sheet and treasury. So there's a lot of

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 2>fun stuff I want to cover with you. But let's

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 2>just talk about for a second. Since we were just

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about Texas, why are you in Austin. Why are

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 2>all the bitcoin miners in Austin or in Texas? What's

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 2>going on there?

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question. So I've been in Austin now

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>actually for five six years now, pre pre bitcoin mining.

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Actually I moved here initially I helped build COVID testing

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure for this state government. So we were doing at

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the time, my partners and I a bunch of COVID

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>laboratory work, building big, heavy infrastructure to help support country

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and need. And yeah, I realized how much I love

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the dynamism here, the ability to build, the ability to grow,

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the responsiveness of the government to making sure that private

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>enterprise can thrive. And so when the opportunity came to

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.399
<v Speaker 1>build large scale bitcoin infrastructure with at the time US

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin Corp, it was a chance to seize the moment

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and repeat a lot of that same playbook that we'd

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>crafted for a healthcare and apply that to heavy in

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>for a four bitcoin so hut eight. Our sister company

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>is actually headquartered in Miami. So in many ways, there

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>are two crypto capitals in the United States. Of the

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>New Cities, there's a there's a Miami style, a bit

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of the sizzle, and then of course you've got Texas which.

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Is as well. One is crypto and one's bitcoin.

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Are I think you're exactly right. I think I think

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Texas is the bigcoin.

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Help.

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, So you mentioned the sister company, HUT eight,

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 2>so you're a spin off of HUT eight. I thought

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 2>HUT eight was a Canadian company, right.

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>So why don't we rewind the clock a little bit?

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 3>So?

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>US Bitcoin Corp. Was a company founded in twenty twenty.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I was the chief commercial officer there. With my partners

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Mike and Asher, we grew US Bitcoin Corp. To become

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the largest private bitcoin mining companies in the

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>United States. Several years later, we decided to merge that

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>company into HUT eight. It was a great partnership. The

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>HUT eight team, which was Canadian, had a great bitcoin hoddle,

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>which is over a billion dollars worth a bitcoin. Still

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>have that on the balance sheet, great cabern markets, good

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>brand name, and a really exciting partner for what we

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>were able to bring operationally. So we merged with them

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and what at the time was one of the largest

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>mergers in the history of cryptel And in that merger,

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>we reflagged the company to an American company and moved

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the headquarters from up north in Toronto down to sunny Miami, Florida.

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, okay, So I wondered about that. Was that

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 2>right around the same time I believe I saw announcements,

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 2>you got some of the one of the Trumps, I

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 2>believe on board.

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. So fast forward a bit. We'd already

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>merged USBGC into hot Eate and created sort of a

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>more key publicly traded bitcoin and energy infrastructure company. But

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>as the old expression goes, there's really only two businesses

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in this world. There's bundling and there's unbundling. And the

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>time had come to unbundle a lot of this bigcoin

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>emphasis into a pure play brand that became American Bitcoin.

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>So we joined up with the Trump brothers. Eric Trump

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>joined as a co founder chief strategy officer. Donald Trum

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Junior came in as an investor and advisor to really

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>create that distinct American brand in the bitcoin space.

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Got it? Got it?

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you still have the mining facilities up in Canada

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 2>or have they all been also moved down to the

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 2>United States.

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>We have moved the majority of our hash rate to

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States. There's so much opportunity to grow here.

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Canadian enterprise, it's good. It's been

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a nice in many ways. They've joked that it's our

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty first state, so we appreciate that hash rate. But

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we've really been growing our operations here, especially in Texas

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>as we chase great opportunities and sort of fresh builds

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:56.799
<v Speaker 1>for the American Bitcoin team.

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, now let's talk about sort of this environment, this

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 2>macro environment that we're in right now with bitcoin. I

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of said earlier in the sort of that intro

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 2>lead up that JP Morgan just sort of came out

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 2>with what they're calling the debasement trade, and they're saying

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 2>what sort of bitcoiners have been talking about for ten years,

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 2>that governm's always going to debase the currency, so we

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 2>should buy hard assets, gold and bitcoin. But I think

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 2>it's interesting specifically for you because you've brought two of

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 2>the Trump sons on to your company, and it's interesting

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of where we see bitcoin ad and why billionaire

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 2>real estate developers seem to be abandoning the real estate

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>and coming over to bitcoin, which I think is pretty interesting.

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 3>I think people should be paying attention to.

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you're exactly right, So bitcoin is this really attractive

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>store value. So a lot of folks are appealed. Real

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>estate has a lot of appeal for folks if you

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>think about storing value and it's their nest egg, and

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>people are investing in their house and maybe some rental properties.

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 1>What bitcoin is offering is a much easier way to

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>store value and store the efforts of your labor into

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a commodity that over time is becoming more and more valuable.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So as people get excited about buying real estate, a

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of them are realizing that whole on this might

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>actually make more sense as of bitcoin trade. And so

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it's no surprise to me that a family that's so

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>steep in real estate development would see dpeel of what

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.799
<v Speaker 1>we're doing. It's a heck of a lot less work

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to accumulate bitcoin that it is to build enormous hotels

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and golf course developments. Now, building a bitcoin mine is

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of work. So we're still putting in

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the effort putting steel in the ground, but it's a

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>different sort of mission with a different sort of output.

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Right. But they've been getting involved in all types of

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin businesses, so from bitcoin treasury companies, bitcoin mining companies,

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, bitcoin exchange, right, so almost like spreading their tentacles.

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 2>And as I said, I think I think it's worth noting,

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 2>and that's why I wanted to bring it up. You know,

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 2>you still have interesting enough right where at this time

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 2>where you have Larry Fink, head of black Rock, the

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 2>largest asset manager in the world, saying to buy a bitcoin.

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Paul Tudor Jones has been all over the news for

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 2>years and now this week again about buying bitcoin, and

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 2>you have you know, President of the Free World, you know,

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump buying bitcoin and the Trump family buying bitcoin.

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 2>And then you still have like your cousin down the

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 2>street telling you it's like a scam.

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's an old quote where the Gibson about how

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the future is here. It's just not evenly distributed, and

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see that happening in real time. I

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>remember five, six, seventy to ten years ago trying to

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>explain to folks about Bigcoin as an inflation hedge, but

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that was not really getting a lot of attraction. People

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>would patiently tell me, you know, Matt, we don't really

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>have that. Inflation's calibrated two percent a year. We've kind

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of solved for that here in the United States. What's

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>really the appeal to any sort of inflation hedge and

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>then now here you and I talking about debasement in

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>real time, and it's suddenly that inflation hedge is looking

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty compelling.

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I mean, sure, what's wrong with two percent inflation? Well,

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 2>other than losing ten percent of your wealth every five years,

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, sure, nothing. I guess I would rather not

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 2>lose ten percent of my purchasing power every five years.

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 3>But maybe I'm just maybe I'm simple minded. I don't know.

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 2>And of course it's not two percent. I look at

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 2>inflation as the rate of that monetary debasement, right, And

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 2>so you can look at the money supply. The USM

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 2>two supply has increased by fifty percent in the last

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 2>really forty percent in the last five years. And how

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 2>much is gas up, and how much are homes up,

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 2>and how much is stake up?

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 3>And how much is gold up?

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 2>And right, everything's up forty fifty percent, right, So I

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 2>think that's the real number. But I think it's I

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>think it's exciting not just for the debasement trade, the

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 2>store value, but now all the businesses, all the industry

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 2>being built out, and you talk about building infrastructure. So

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 2>right now it seems like the Trump administration is really

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 2>focused on making America great again, making America investable again,

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 2>making America build again, and so building out the infrastructure

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 2>is a big piece of that. How do you approach

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 2>thinking about building out the infrastructure for America with bigcoin mining.

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.719
<v Speaker 1>In America, there's really two kinds of infrastructure we're building out.

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>There's the physical infrastructure of the mining and then there's

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the financial system infrastructure that you might find with bigcoin treasuries.

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So the Trump administration has actually been fantastic for both

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of those. So to the mining side of the business,

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>we have a pro energy government. We've got folks that

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>understand that we need more energy and we need it now.

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>We need generative capacity, we need better transmission lines, we

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>need more sophisticated forms of off taking. We need to

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.079
<v Speaker 1>be able to trade around peaks. These are all things

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that bigcoiners and bigcoin miners have been swimming for years.

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>So having an administration that's genuinely bullish on the electron

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it's good for us and good for what we want

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to deal on the power side. On the treasury side,

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole host of financial infrastructure that's also getting

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>built out in real time. Earlier this year we saw

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the Genius Act get through the government. That was a

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>fantastic piece of legislature. There's a few more market structure

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>bills that are in the works. These to me are

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>seminal texts. These are the sorts of laws that they're

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>going to look back on the way that oftentimes securities

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>lawyers look back on the nineteen thirties as the cornerstones

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of what created the American financial system. We're doing that over,

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>but we're doing on a blockchain.

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, some of the things I saw Trump doing in

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 2>some of the executive orders that he put through in

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 2>these initiatives that he started this year was also in

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 2>part of trying to really kind of reindustrialize the United States,

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 2>was to peel back a lot of the yellow tape,

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 2>the red tape that sort of bogs all of this

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 2>growth down. Experienced that I mean, as any of that

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 2>helped you, what's their experience like trying to build this

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure out right now?

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at past administrations, we'd same as

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>everyone else. We're dealing with the fairly hostile environment. And

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>it came to opening things like bank accounts. You would

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>be one day doing business, in the next day being

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>told that you frankly weren't welcome and your money was stuck,

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and so we were somewhat victims of our own financial

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>system as Americans. This is something that fortunately has really

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>stopped that operation showpoint era is over, and we're better

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>forward as a country. So those permittings and that chokehold

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that they had on the ins and out points of

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>crypto were pretty serious and things that really slowed down

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the ability to build this industry here in the United States,

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And now that that's been rectified, we're obviously seeing so

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>many of the jobs and so much of that energy

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>coming back stateside.

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so when you think about I mean just a

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 2>couple of things that we framed up already, I mean

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 2>from the debasement, trade people waking up to that, the

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration, the Trump family getting into bitcoin, which is

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 2>obviously a big signal. I think they probably know some

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 2>things we don't have access to, so probably pretty bullish

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 2>on its own. You look at the political headwinds that

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 2>have turned into tailwinds now and are lifting this space up.

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 2>So I'm curious from that macro standpoint, we look at

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of different factors, like what is your like,

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 2>what are you looking at bitcoin. What do you sort

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 2>of think is this bull case scenario. What are you

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 2>expecting over the next five ten years?

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Bigcoing on for is the average American this off ramp

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>from the FIAD debasement situation that really before there was

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>no good outcome. Your options were other FIAD currencies, real estate,

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>as we've discussed, you could buy some shiny rocks. You know,

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Gold's been on a bit of a tear itself. Yeah,

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 1>there's really nothing great about that is when it comes

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to a good store value in something that has a

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>compelling use case or financial future for the country. I'm

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>happy that the gold folks are feeling vindicated, but gold,

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to me is not an optimistic trade that is investing

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in this sort of pre monetary system as an escape

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>from modern day society. And look, well, I'm glad folks

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>have found a story value that works for them. Bitcoin

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 1>offers all that and more and more and more people

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>are seeing the value of having their money or their

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>their hardware stored in something that has that fungibility, that

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>ease of transferability, that verification on the blockchain. There's a

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of value add to bitcoin above and beyond what

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the goal or the gold premium would be for stoare value,

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that I only think is going to increase.

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So when you think about, you know, mining bitcoin,

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 2>how do you approach the actual bitcoin that have been mined.

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 2>So I'm just curious like what your strategy is. Is

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 2>it like we're selling this for revenue cover our costs

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 2>or do you have some sort of strategy maybe with

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 2>your shareholders a capital that you've raised that allows you

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 2>to hold it for the long term or are you

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 2>sort of more like opportunistic and maybe you'll sort of

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.719
<v Speaker 2>like buy and hold around cycles. I'm just kind of

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 2>curious what your viewpoint is on that.

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>American Bitcoin benefits from having that mining business pretty big

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty five eggs as today, scaling from there, and also

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 1>a treasury component. So we haven't sold a single satoshi

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>since we all this to the company in April. To

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>your point around financial structure, we actually have access to

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a multi billion dollar at the market offering vehicle that

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>we're able to use strategically to raise money to buy

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>more bitcoin to cover some of these expenses. So we

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>really haven't dipped into the till when it comes towards

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>liquidating satosis and paying for things, and that's not something

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that we foresee doing for us. Bitcoin is the end

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>all bl is what we're really geared towards accumulating, and

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.839
<v Speaker 1>as we think about our north star of bitcoin per share,

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really interested in things that would reduce the

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.359
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin per share that I can then offer my shareholders.

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 2>So then your publicly traded a bitcoin mining company is

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 2>quite a bit different than what you might see with

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 2>others Mara or Riot or something like that. Whereas they're

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 2>mining bitcoin, they're selling the bitcoin. Maybe some of it

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 2>they keep, but your policy is to get more bitcoin,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 2>whether you mine it or you buy it.

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Our attitude is that investors in a bitcoin mining or

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin treasury company really want one thing, which is

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>maximum bitcoin. So oftentimes I really refer to American Bitcoin

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>as a bitcoin accumulator for that reason, we're accumulating bitcoin.

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>It's that sym well, some of our they may want

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to sell, or they're trying to be strategic and trade

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>around it. My version of strategy is dollar cost averaging

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>into the hors asset on Earth. I'm not really interested

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in selling. I think that the energy arbitrage aspect is interesting,

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>but for me, that's just one part of the operational

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>discipline to grow your stack. So I'm very mindful of

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>things like s and a very mindful of the cost

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of power per month, curtailment, trading energy, things like that,

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>but really only in so far as it allows me

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to hoddle as much bitcoin as possible.

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Every day we see headlines about inflation and dead and

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 2>diminishing control over our own money. That's why I always

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 2>come back to bitcoin because it's built for generations, it's

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 2>built for legacy. But protecting your bitcoin legacy the right

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 2>way is not always simple. It demands discipline, focus and

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the right partner. Now, that's why I personally use Unchained Signature.

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a premium private client service for serious bitcoin holders

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 2>who want expert guidance, resilient custody, and an enduring partnership.

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Now Signature, you're paired with your own dedicated account manager,

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 2>someone who understands your goals helps you every step of

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 2>the way. You're going to get white glove onboarding, same

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 2>day emergency support, personalized education or reduced trading fees, and

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 2>priority access to exclusive events and features. Unchained collaborative custody

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 2>model is designed to provide the same security as the

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 2>world's biggest bitcoin custodians.

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 3>But for those who.

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Prefer to hold their own keys.

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, I've been using and recommending unchained for years.

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I even got my parents to set up with them.

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 2>So if you want to get set up, check out

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 2>unchained signature at unchained dot com, slash mark Moss and

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 2>as a loyal listener, I got a discount for you.

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Just use code Moss ten at checkout to get ten

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 2>percent off your first year. Because your bitcoin isn't just for.

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Life, it's for generations.

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's pretty interesting because as far as I'm aware,

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, all of the public trade bitcoin miners are

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 2>more like gold mining producers, if you will, right, So

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 2>they get in the raw asset, they kind of do

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 2>what they do, you know, do with it and then

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 2>and then they sell it back into the market. So

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 2>the bitcoin miners bring it in, they bring the bitcoin

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 2>in existence, they sell the bitcoin back into the market.

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 2>But your bitcoin mining company is not that your bitcoin

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 2>mining is your Your bitcoin mining is part of a

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 2>bigger strategy correc of a bitcoin accumulation engine and the bitcoin.

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 2>The bitcoin mining is one component of that business, but

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 2>the overall strategy of the over riding business is to

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 2>accumulate bitcoin.

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Well put, for us, the bitcoin mining is a way

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to accumulate at a discount. I want as much bitcoin

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>as possible, as fast as possible. If there's a means

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>for me to get it at a fifty percent discount,

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do that as long as I can,

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>as fast as I can. And that's what mining represents

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to us. It's this way for us to turn energy

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin we can go buy spot. So the things

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the treasury companies are doing, preferreds and converts and atfs,

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>these are all great financial instruments and each has its

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>own place. But to my knowledge, the only way to

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>accumulate any bitcoin at a structural discount is to mine.

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>So we struck the ground and we've been building big minds.

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's interesting. Now what are you seeing right now

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 2>in the performance of of the discount I should say

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the discount to mining bitcoin because a lot of people

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 2>would look at some of these bitcoin mining companies, the

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 2>public ones, and I mean actually the last couple of months,

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:10.919
<v Speaker 2>the stock's been doing pretty well on most of these

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 2>publicly traded bitcoin minors. But for the most part, you know,

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 2>last couple of years that hasn't really been performing that well.

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 2>It looks like their costs are so high it's not

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 2>that profitable for the mining bitcoin. What is the profitability

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 2>like to mine bitcoin right now?

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So when it comes to the profitability of mining bitcoin,

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I would really pull American Bitcoin out from our peer group.

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And here's why. If you were starting a brand new

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin company today, a new bitcoin mine specifically, you're really

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>wanting to really buy only one thing, which is the machines, substations, transformers,

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>electrical gear, concrete, all of that. The return of capital,

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a return on invested capital, I should say, is not

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that compelling. It's really going to come down to the

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>machines and being asset light and then also having as

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>few staff as possible that are pulling away from that

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>expenditure onto the eggsash. So when we were putting together

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the American Bitcoin model to begin this year, we thought

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we were almost reimagining what a successful bitcoin mining company

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>would look like. So for a peers to your point,

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>there's somewhat of a net drag. They have a lot

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>of full time employees, there's very high overhead costs. They're

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 1>not really watching construction costs the way we had but

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we were able to divide our core competency into the

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>mining side, where we own the machines that's American Bitcoin,

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and then the building and development, which HUT does. And

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 1>unlike other miners where they either need to vertically integrate

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>fully in their own business and then they're paying all

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the costs of everything all the time, or they're working

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>with the hosting provider, in which case someone else is

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to charge the margin. We've got a nicely aligned relationship.

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not antagonistic, it's cooperative. HUT wants us to grow

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 1>where their customer first resort when it comes to bitcoin.

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>They would love to see us take one, three, five,

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>ten gigawatts of bitcoin mining off take. And for us,

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>we see HUT as a great partner. That's a team

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that's already proven that that they can build these massive facilities.

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>And HUT eight is not really looking to get bitcoin returns.

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>They want energy development returns, they want energy infrastructure returns,

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and that suits us just fine on the bitcoin side.

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 3>Got it.

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 2>So you're leveraging HUT to then sort of host and

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:11.479
<v Speaker 2>run that for you, so then you don't have all

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 2>that initial capex investment. That to your point creates that

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 2>drag and it's so hard to get back to a

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 2>profitable state from you can buy the machines, deploy the machines,

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 2>have them running without having to invest that, and then

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 2>just give a small percentage of the revenue back towards

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 2>HUT to help them offset their capex investment.

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Precisely, My goal here is what they call lemonade, stand

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>economics energy and has your go in bigcoin comes out.

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>We hold a bitcoin. Not really interested in complicating that

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of other construction calls and things like that.

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>It should be very streamlined, and that's just the way

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I like it.

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just I just recorded a video. It hasn't

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.479
<v Speaker 2>hit my YouTube channel yet, but talking about Trump's one

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.719
<v Speaker 2>big beautiful bill and the bonus and accelerated depreciation that

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 2>got renewed thankfully, and how you can take one hundred

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 2>percent deppreciation in year one, and how a bitcoin minor.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Is a computer equipment that depreciates.

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Over a five year period and so you can buy

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 2>that bitcoin minor excel the depreciation for year one and

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 2>it works out pretty amazing to write off that taxable income.

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 2>And of course I talked about doing that and through

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 2>like a hosted minor. Most people, I mean, especially be

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 2>in California. I can't run a minor at my house.

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 2>My power is way too expensive for that. But from

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 2>a personal standpoint, when I do the math, I mean,

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 2>it looks very attractive. I'm assuming you're just doing the

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 2>same at massive scale.

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>That's well point for us. The bonus appreciation is one

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>technique or one allowance from the government among a host

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of changes that we've seen we hope to see that

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>make our industry much much happier here in the United States.

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>The bonus depreciation for us, it's good. I'm pro any

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>policy recommendation that's going to bring the jobs and hash

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>rate here to the United States. The depreciation, whether it's

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for a hosted peer of ours or for ourselves. To me,

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this is fantastic. I'd just much rather a hash rate

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>be here in this jurisdiction than overseas in some autocratic country.

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, the bonus appreciation is a good part of that.

0:20:58.440 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, when I think about bitcoin treasury companies, we talked

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 2>already about the goal of trying to get more bitcoin, right,

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 2>increase the bitcoin per share that they have. You mentioned

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 2>that mining bitcoin's only a way to get discounted bitcoin,

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 2>especially compared to like doing preferreds or something like that.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I mean they're they're going to pay out of

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 2>ten percent of that they keep they keep the spread.

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 3>I guess they ARBA charge on that.

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.880
<v Speaker 2>But I'm I guess I'm curious, Like when I think

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 2>about bitcoin treasury companies running a business alongside of it.

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Typically I think of that that treasury company deploying capital

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 2>into a working business as a less efficient way to

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 2>spend the capital.

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Most businesses don't.

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Do a fifty percent profit margin, and so to beat

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 2>the hurdle rate of just buying bitcoin, it seems like

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm destroying capital by putting in any business, not just

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 2>a bitcoin mining business, but any business.

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, no business is doing a fifty percent profit margin.

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 2>So I'm curious how you look at that, Like, I

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 2>have money came in, Should I buy bitcoin or should

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 2>I buy more bitcoin miners? And which one is actually

0:21:58.720 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 2>more creative to my business?

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>This is something that we think about every day in

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>America bitcoin. Where to put that dollar for the marginal

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>boost in hoddle. Sometimes it will be miners and sometimes

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it will be spot. It's really going to depend on

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.719
<v Speaker 1>quarter to quarter, week to week, where's hash price at today?

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Where our energy costs today? If I spend Fiat dollars

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to buy those miners, am I going to earn back

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>or mind back more bitcoin relative to what I could

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>buy today. It's actually a dynamic calculation. So there have

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>been periods where we bought Spot. So we did a

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>large minor purchase earlier this year. That was we believe

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in net a creative and strategy to us, but we'd

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>also explore Spot buying. We've participated in the markets in

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that front as well. It is certainly a quarter to

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>quarter thing, and you'll actually see as we grow involve

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>as a company, you'll see us doing one or the

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 1>other and that will give you some sort of indicators

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to where we see the pub going. For us, the

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>key thing on buying machines is to not get you fork,

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>don't chase. That applies to buy Spot and applies to

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>buying machines. We want to make sure that we're not

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>putting money into large orders when we believe there's going

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a cheaper machine opportunity on the horizon, better

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>hash rate, etc. You saw a market increase in efficiency

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>over the past two years we kept our powder dry

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.239
<v Speaker 1>at us Biccoin Corporate and Hot eight, and then now

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>with American Bitcoin, we've put the machines into play here

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that are really future proofd for that next having. And

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>so if we're gonna think about the having, and by

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>the way, it's maybe in two and a half, you know,

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>three years or so, I'm already still thinking about how

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>are we going to make sure that our mining business

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>can weather that storm. You really do have to be

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>very thoughtful about where you'rechoosing to deploy capital. One thing

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned is putting money into other businesses. I

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>would stress that at American Bitcoin, we're really only interested

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in companies that are on the Bitcoin standard. I don't

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>know how to run those other kinds of companies. I mean,

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>there are aspects of them that I think could be

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>net a creative. I would certainly look at any deal

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that would bring more bitcoin to our balance sheet, but

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it really needs to be part of our core thesis.

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't want to limit myself, but I also want

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that I'm not spending a lot of time,

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of brain calories on something that is

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:04.199
<v Speaker 1>not really related to over core competency. When I was a

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>consultant banded company. It was a line you'd always use

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>about the importance of profiting from the core. And for us,

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the core is bitcoin, whether that's bitcoin mining, whether it's

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the treasury strategy work, and some harnsing that volatility. Let's

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>let's stick to what we're good at and be very

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful about expansion.

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it say, you know, stay within your

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 2>core competency is what Warren Buffett would call his deal box,

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 2>right swinging at the ones I know that are going

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 2>to have a high chance of completion.

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 3>That makes sense.

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 2>And I was just saying in general, just in business

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 2>in general, is very rare to find any business, whether

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm a Bitcoin standard or not, that's going to have

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 2>a fifty percent return.

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Agree, So that that's kind of where I put the

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 3>hurdle rate for bitcoin.

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 2>So it's like, huh, if it can't get And even

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:46.479
<v Speaker 2>if you bought a business that's twenty five percent, I mean,

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I guess technically that's still a creative, it's just less accretive.

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 2>And so I guess is what you're saying, if I'm

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 2>repeating it back to you, is that every time you

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 2>look to deploy new capital, you're just sort of looking

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 2>at those and deciding which one is gonna be the

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 2>most accretive for the business, and you make your decision

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 2>and based off of that.

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Correct, we are looking for things that are the most

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 1>recreative in bitcoin terms. Again, for us, the north start

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 1>here is bitcoin per share. So if I look at

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>these deals and I think, hey, this is going to

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>result more bitcoin, then we started out with I'm interested.

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>But to your point, that's a very high hurdle. There's

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.719
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of businesses that have that bitcoin trajectory.

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know what if that means that we stick

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>to bitcoin, I'm cool with that.

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 2>So you're acquiring bitcoin, you're building bitcoin, you're mining bitcoin,

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 2>you're build up that bitcoin base. What is then the

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 2>next stage of the business. So you build up your

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin base and then what you mentioned, some of the

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 2>bigcoin treasury companies are doing preferreds or some other types

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 2>of securitized instruments on top of the bitcoin sort of

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 2>what's the strategy that you have or you see forward.

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>There is a layer in fact beyond that one. So

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>our business actually has three layers. Layer one is the

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin mining. That's our core competency. That's effectively accumulating bitcoin

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>into fifty percent gross margin. Layer two, that's the treasury strategy.

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>You've seen some of our peers using all sorts of

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>financial techniques. We're aware of them. We are strategically doing

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>what we want to do grow a bitcoin stack through

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the capital market side as well. But there's actually a

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>third layer of this business, which is what we call

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem amplification. And there's really two ways I would position

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>us for that. One is the American Bitcoin brand and

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>getting out there and getting known as a brand that

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is geared towards pure play Bitcoin accumulation is somewhat of

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a joke. Someone was telling me that when you search stocks,

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>they can be alphabetical, and there are times where we

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>search bitcoin and ABTC is above BTC, which sounds great

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to me. But we are offering folks that that bitcoin

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>accumulation product that the market doesn't really have in the

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>way that we offer are. There are ETFs that have

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>one to once and that's that's going well for the

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>black Rocks of the world, et cetera. There are financial

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>strategy companies. I mean, obviously micro strategy or not just

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>strategy has pioneered a lot of those techniques. There are

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the miners, but for us, it's about taking the best

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>parts of each. We want to be asset light like

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>we believe the best miners are. We also want to

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>be thoughtful about liquidity and volume like the best treasury companies.

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But this third level, this ecosystem play. That is where

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>over the coming quarters I would like to spend more

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of my time. That is, what does an ecosystem on

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bitcoin standard look like? Because bitcoin is to our

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 1>earlier conversation, it's not gold. It's better than gold, it's

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>different than gold. There is a lot of capital tied

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>up in bitcoin. What are the things that we can

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>be doing as a Bitcoin Standard company to support that growth?

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Is it financial services? Is it consumer facing products? Is

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it related to putting things at to bitcoin l twos

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>or do we want to start getting into swaps? What

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>are the things we can do to get people using

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin ecosystem Because all of that activity is net

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>a creative to bitcoin, both in the abstract sense but

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>also in terms of transaction fees, which routes right back

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to our mining business. So we're really trying to build

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a virtuous cycle here of mining and then treasury and

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>then ecosystem, and collectively you've got a pretty unique accumulator

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>among all these bitcoin companies.

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Governments will never stop printing money, So inflation it's not

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:58.959
<v Speaker 2>going away. Now. If your money is not earning at

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 2>least ten percent the year, you're losing purchasing power. Now,

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 2>that's why I talk about bitcoin. It's the number one

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 2>way to beat inflation and secure your future. And the

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 2>question I get asked almost every day is where do

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 2>you buy your bitcoin?

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 2>For years, I've personally used River dot com and I

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 2>only take on sponsors that I use and I trust,

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 2>and I trust them because River's bitcoin only. They have

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent reserve, and they keep your bitcoin safe

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 2>in cold storage with no middlemen, and you can actually

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 2>talk to a real person, a US based support, dedicated manager. Now,

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.360
<v Speaker 2>try getting that peace of mind from coinbase. Of course

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 2>you can't. Now the perks. If you set up auto buys,

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 2>you can pay zero fees plus instead of you're bank

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 2>paying you, you know, zero point four percent on cash,

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.959
<v Speaker 2>River pays you three point seventy five percent on cash

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.719
<v Speaker 2>paid in bitcoin. So if you're ready to build your

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin position with confidence, go to River dot com. Slash

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 2>mark moss and get up to one hundred dollars in

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin when you sign up, because freedom starts when you

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.239
<v Speaker 2>own your money, and your money starts with bitcoin. When

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 2>you think about the ecosystem part, is that like is

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 2>that like, you know, maybe like a venture capital hold,

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 2>old company private equity play where you're investing in supporting

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 2>in scaling your said earlier, bundling unbundling businesses that support

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the bigcoin ecosystem. Or is it more like you said

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 2>financial services, where it's like, well, now we have this

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin on our balance sheet, how can we mobilize the

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin the balance sheet to get it to create yield?

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Is it both or is it one or the other?

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I would argue the best of both. Right now, we're

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>not looking at venture investments per se. I am, however,

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at things that could create operational streams of bitcoin.

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So if there are opportunities for us to advance bitcoin

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to a group, or work with a group, or take

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a stake in a group and build their base, and

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that brings a stream of Satoshi's back to us, ideally

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>there are already a bitcoin native business, or they're a

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>business where I can quickly get them onto the Bitcoin

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>standard that to me is really exciting has not yet

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>been tried. What can we do to get more copanies

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in the bitcoin universe working together collaboratively. Folks basically were

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>building these products, and they say that first time founders

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>are very obsessed with product and second time founders are

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with distribution. After US Bitcoin Corp. Now I've got

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>American Bitcoin into American Bitcoin, I'm very very interested in distribution,

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>which is, how do we get all of these cool technologies,

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>all of these interesting layer one, layer two solutions or

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>bigcoin of products. How do we get those in the

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>hands of the users? Because that's something that, frankly, if

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at the wider crypto ecosystem, was always a complaint.

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>There were two questions I would get at these conferences.

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>One is where the institutions and then the other, more

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>perfect question is where exactly are the users of all

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff that's being built. My attitude is that

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>American Bitcoin is that the next of both the institutions

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>are coming. They want bitcoin exposure. We're starting to see it,

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's sovereign wealth funds, family offices, the big wealth managements,

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the ras. They are getting onto a bitcoin trade. Though,

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's spot or through an ETF for working with

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>an accumulator like us. The institutions are coming, the users

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>are also starting income. They might not even know with

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>stable coins and things like that that they're using a blockchain,

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.239
<v Speaker 1>but the users are starting to appear as well. And

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:09.479
<v Speaker 1>so if we can find a way to take the

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>benefits of both of these two incoming secular trends to

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin world, it's going to be very beneficial to

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>American bitcoin.

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've been deploying venture capital into the bitcoin space

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 2>now five six years. I'm a partner at the Bitcoin

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Opportunity Fund, and so we invest through the entire bitcoin

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 2>ecosystem and.

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 3>We've we've had some really good, really good plays.

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 2>We tend to typically do things that are a little

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 2>bit further stage, not early venture, but a little bit

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 2>further along already kind of prove it out. But I

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of got to this point, you know, the last

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 2>couple of years, where it's like we need less bitcoin

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 2>products and more bitcoin in everyday products, right to like

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 2>really really push that use case right and one to

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 2>the point that you just made one. I think it

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 2>was just yesterday, Morgan Stanley sent out messages to their

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 2>clients telling them they're going to start bringing in I

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 2>think both bitcoin and ethereum for people in their in

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 2>their Morgan stand account. So the rias the financial advisors,

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 2>they're pushing that down.

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty that's pretty powerful.

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 2>And then I think it just us last week, right,

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 2>we've seen Jack Dorsey announce with Square quite a few

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 2>things that they've integrated right into Square for the merchants

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 2>to start putting some of accept bitcoin at no fee,

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 2>be able to take a percentage of whatever they bring in,

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 2>and whatever they want to set to go directly into bitcoin.

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 2>And so we're seeing those things play out in real time.

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 2>It's it's pretty exciting.

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's tremendously exciting. Timing is everything, right. We're

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>hitting a point where the public not only is interested

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in bitcoin, but they're getting off of zero and they're

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>showing up, and we need to make sure that there's

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure to support them, whether that is financial products.

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Like you're describing more of this consumer work. I think

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the way you put it is so eloquent that we

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>need we need more Bitcoin in everyday products or products

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that day day users have. I think we're about to

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>see that shift coming the coming quarters, and American bitcoin

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to be.

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Part of that.

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Now you mentioned earlier like when you think about

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 2>buying the bitcoin minors and making sure that the machines

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 2>will last long.

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Enough to get to the next halving.

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 2>So the bitcoin having cycle is something that in the

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin space we've talked about consistently about every four years,

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 2>or not even really about like almost like clockwork. It

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 2>seems like we have, you know, a peak and then

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 2>a trial, and at that time the amount of new

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin be in mind every day gets cut in half.

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 2>And a lot of people have said that that supply

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 2>demand imbalance or shock or shift is sort of what

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 2>creates these highs and lows in that bitcoin space or

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 2>in that cycle. There's a growing narrative that I tend

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 2>to agree with that the four year cycle is basically

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 2>dead and maybe the four year cycle was always a

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 2>meme and it wasn't really about the four year cycle.

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 3>What's your take on that?

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, Look, I think doing four year cycles on an

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>asset that's not even twenty years old is a little

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>bit aggressive, and certainly they don't have enough data points correct.

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>There have not been enough four year cycles to declare

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a four year cycle with any degree of empirical certainty,

0:33:58.280 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>if I could be so humble as to say that,

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's something called hyperstition, which is when people

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>believe something new existing, and the four year cycle is

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.760
<v Speaker 1>one of those phenomenon that where when you think about

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>emission schedules and you think about the role that miners

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>playing the ecosystem, et cetera. There has been a grain

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of truth to it historically, and folks believing in the

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>four year cycle likely precipitated more of a four year cycle.

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 1>That being said, Bitcoin has had so many new adoptees

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 1>and new investors and fresh eyes on it these days

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not sure people are as immersed in the

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>lore of things like the four year cycle the way

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>they would have been in past bitcoin bull runs. So

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>when you lose that shared belief among the new investors,

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 1>coupled with the fact that miners now are only accounting

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for four hundred and fifty bitcoin per day at the

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>current emission schedule, it does take a little bit of

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the machine off the four year hypothesis. So I'm inclined

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to agree with you that while it was perhaps a

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>helpful heuristic historically, while we are on a run. I

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>think that part of the industry maturing is that we

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:06.839
<v Speaker 1>may be moving into a ten year supercycle. We don't

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>know yet, it's too early to tell, but the composition

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of investors is certainly changing in a way that's probably

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>making it a little less predictable than it used to be.

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 2>I think to the point you made, I think is

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 2>very accurate, where people believing it to be so sort

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 2>of almost then reinforces it to be so. And I

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 2>see it all over people ask me all the time.

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I see it online. A lot of people think that

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 2>they should not be buying right now, or they should

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 2>even start selling right now because we're at the peak

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 2>of the cycle, as if like it's just going to

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 2>happen on that day. And so to your point, that's

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 2>sort of like this self fulfilling prophecy, like they're not

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 2>buying or they're actually selling right now because November is

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 2>always the peak every year, November, eighteen months after the having,

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 2>and that could sort of force a sell off even

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 2>if the sell off wasn't coming right. So that's certainly

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 2>there now when the HAVING supply gets cut in half

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 2>to your point, four um and fifty, it's not that much.

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 3>The supply demand and balance is.

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.320
<v Speaker 2>So great, you know, between ETFs and treasury companies, institutions,

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 2>it's somewhere it ranges five and ten times more demand

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 2>than the new supply is being created. So you cut

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the supply in half, it's inconsequential. So for the average

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 2>hoddler who's thinking about the price of bitcoin, maybe that

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 2>kind of goes away. And I would argue that it's

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 2>the global liquidity cycle that's in the driver's seat here,

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 2>that's the dog wagging the tail. And obviously, when we

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 2>had the last peak of November twenty twenty one, we

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 2>were in a different world. We had just seen record inflation.

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Jerome Powell came out in November announced he was going

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 2>to start hiking rates, and the hike rates at the

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 2>fastest rate hiking cycle in history. And today he's not

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 2>hiking rates. He just announced he's just start cutting rates.

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's like we're completely different. And so for the

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 2>average hoddler, maybe the price stays up the same. But

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:48.360
<v Speaker 2>from a bitcoin minor perspective, you do have to be

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 2>prepared for the for the emission as you call it,

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 2>or the new inflation rate to be cut in half.

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, so it's interesting that you bring an M

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>two in Monteary supply as well as the FED rates.

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>The FED rates are interesting from minders because again we

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 1>build heavy infrastructure, so of course we're very mindful of

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>debt and things like that. We we do pay some

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of our bills obviously in FIAT, and so we're very

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>codis where FIAT is trading in what direction it's it's heading.

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>The market is already a wash in capital, and so

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>adding ray cuts is going to exacerbate that. Realistically, it's

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 1>this seems to be consensus. We'll see where that capital goes.

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>It's been an interesting time because you've seen almost this

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>U shape where I can't recall a period of time

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>where gold is hitting all time highs and so is quantum.

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is an interesting bar Barbelle. You're you're

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing these flight quasi flight to safety ideas that

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 1>are that are going to all time highs. You're seeing

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:45.760
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin here in ALTIMEI goldenre in all time high, silver,

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>all time high, et cetera. But then you're seeing quantum up,

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:51.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing flying cars absolutely ripping. You know, the the the

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the fringe risk on tech and the risk off assets

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>everything is rising, which makes you wonder, to the point

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you've been making, if in it's just the dollar falling

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're really just seeing the impact of the basement.

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Because although bitcoin is an all time highs in dollar terms,

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is not yet an ult time high in gold terms.

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And I remember going on some media tours maybe three

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 1>or four months ago, and some interviewers were new to

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin would ask me, you know, Matt, where where do

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you see this going? And I like using gold as

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a metric. I think bitcoin I can extoll the values

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of bigcoin is being far more useful than that gold is.

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 1>But it's a nice benchmark. Gold at the time was

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 1>at twenty one trillion and we were at two trillion,

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 1>and it seemed like a nice ten x. Gold today

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 1>is around twenty seven trillion. Yeah, so we keep chasing

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>this this high. So I guess that creates more of

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 1>a headroom for for for bigger there's more, there's more

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>room to advance to compare to the big brother of gold.

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Is that trad store value there. But time will tell

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to your point, if these if these cuts precipitate more

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>of an uptick, or if people start realizing to your

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>point that maybe we have at a peak.

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but how are you, as a bitcoin minor planning

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 2>for the new supply of bitcoin being cut in half?

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:05.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean does I mean theoretically, I would just think

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 2>back of the n appt in math that the price

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 2>of bitcoin has to double if the supply gets cut

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 2>in half for you to stay at the same profit margin.

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>There's no proverb that you can't control the win, but

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:19.359
<v Speaker 1>you can adjust your sales. So as we look at

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the having coming up in two and a half, three years, right,

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:24.839
<v Speaker 1>still always out, it's still always out. We'll be here

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 1>before you know it. But we're already being cognitive. How

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 1>do you adjust your sales? So, as we think about

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>where we would choose to deploy capital, knowing that it

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>would take some time to get the sites up and running,

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>shorten the runway pre having, we need to be very

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful about those expenses even today. These decisions made today

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>will have decisions for quarters to come. So we're very

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 1>aware of that and I already factor that into some

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 1>of our CAPEX discussions. We have a roadmap to get

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to fifty plus eggs ASH if we so choose. That

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.320
<v Speaker 1>being said, as we look at the opportunity to just

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>buy spot that could be compelling as well, so we're

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>constantly balancing the buying spot versus buying minor trade. The

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>other bit of the why buy miner's trade that I

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>think is relevant to your question is the last having,

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the literal day of the Having, by the way, was

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>our best ever revenue day, for my best ever, we

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>had transaction fees five six seven times what we were

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>making in terms of the block subsidy. That to me

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>was a four shock. So as they think about the

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:26.439
<v Speaker 1>next HAVING, I don't know yet what that transaction fee

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.360
<v Speaker 1>volume will look like. But not only do I anticipate

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that Bitcoin will have doubled by the next having, even

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>if we go through some sort of mini winter, I

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>think the next HAVING is a pretty appropriate time for

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that doubling effect. You're also going to hopefully see an

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>uptake in that transaction fee volume as well, so there'd

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:46.280
<v Speaker 1>be a double whaman. There's the need to get simply

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 1>appreciation on the underlying asset, but if we can get

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 1>any kind of increased velocity in the usage or the

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>utility of bitcoin itself, that actually rewrates the model. So

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>rather than us sitting here and conjecturing about a four

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to fifty decline mathematically to two twenty five, just constantly

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 1>getting machetied every four years. We start to wonder about

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:05.719
<v Speaker 1>what does it mean to own the future of what's

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>effectively the swift network on Bitcoin, and what is the

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 1>value accrule that a bitcoin minor or someone with massive

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:13.760
<v Speaker 1>amounts of hash rate would get from that network.

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, speaking of fees from the network, I believe today, well,

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't know when this recording is going to go out,

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 2>So at the time of this recording, we had the

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 2>V thirty get pushed through from bitcoin Core. Great, and

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 2>that increases the well at you know, the op size

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 2>got put in as a template standard default, I should say,

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 2>which has a lot of people on both sides of

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 2>the aisle. It seems like one of the reasons they

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 2>did that would pete to help miners create more fees.

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 2>What's your view on that whole debate.

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>You're making this stute observation, which is that with the

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 1>adoption of this upgrade, miners do win. There is a

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>likelihood that the transaction fear just the the amount of

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:04.239
<v Speaker 1>things that are described on the blockchain will increase. As

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 1>miners we are almost a service provider or infrastructure. People

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>want to go on the toll road. It's not my

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>business to ask where they're coming, where they're going. It's

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>my job to process those transactions and really keep the

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 1>toll road or that works safe so for us and

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>secure so for us. I take a macro view that

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of developers on both sides of this situation.

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I see the merits to wanting to really restrict what

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>bigcoin is for. But at the same time, I think

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a big part of the crypto libertarian ethos is letting

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>people do what they want to do if they're willing

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to pay for it. And so if people want to

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>really take advantage of these adjustments that have just been

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 1>made by the upgrade, we're going to support. Where the

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>community is is indicating that it wants to go again. Miners,

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you need to remember, are very conservative. So for us,

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing is that the blockchain stays up,

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 1>stay secure, is defensible against any sort of fifty one

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:02.320
<v Speaker 1>percent attack. We think while we think spam is a problem,

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I think an even greater problem would be anything that

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>we kind of jeopardize the blockchain itself. And unless we

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 1>see increased transaction fee volume over the long term, that

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:12.800
<v Speaker 1>security budget is going to get a little bit tricky.

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:18.359
<v Speaker 1>So Net I'm open to the increase that we've just seen. Yeah, yeah,

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean unless it unless it hurts it long term.

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I do think that knots coming out.

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Although I'm not really.

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 3>A fan of either.

0:43:25.640 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I wish we could sort of stay where we were,

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 2>but I think it is a healthy free market action.

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's try an alternative.

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 2>It is you.

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 1>You remind me of something, which is that you know,

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>governments hate competing. They hate it when you go when

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you get a driver's license in California and I live

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and get a driver's license in Texas, those departments and

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:47.719
<v Speaker 1>motor vehicles are not are not competing really, which is

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:50.839
<v Speaker 1>why the experience is not always the best. The only

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 1>place where governments historically have competed or the economics, and

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>then their defense budget and their defense industrial complex. And

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 1>so what's been interesting about this from a bitcoin perspective

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 1>is that your point, a little bit of competition in jets,

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit of rigor. So I'm glad that these discussions

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>are being had. I'm glad that there's a debate back

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:12.239
<v Speaker 1>and forth. To your point, changes can be made they

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:14.439
<v Speaker 1>could be reversed or retracted if it was being seen

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:18.359
<v Speaker 1>as jeopardizing the ecosystem. You really want to avoid a monoculture.

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 1>That is somewhat of what we're trying to escape is

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>this hegemony right, of this inability to get out of

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the Fiata basement situation. And so part of that is

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>offering a competitive alternative, and for things like knots as

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>an example, if they're willing to present an alternative, if

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>people want to vote with their feet, we'll channel er

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>inner cryptolibertarian and we'll see.

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 3>What they do.

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:42.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've heard of a third one trying to get

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 2>some legs under it, being run by a nonprofit that

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:47.279
<v Speaker 2>would run a third option that'd be more of like

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 2>an ossified code base, and it would only implement extremely

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:54.239
<v Speaker 2>urgent critical patches and it would not do any improvements.

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I'm all for the competition. That seems to

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 2>be where I would lean like, let's not try to

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:02.279
<v Speaker 2>make things better. That's what Sailor has been talking about

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the best way to ruin something to try to improve it.

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:07.479
<v Speaker 2>So how about we just if there's a critical patch,

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 2>we can put that in. Otherwise, let's just leave it

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 2>as is. I think layer two should figure out how

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 2>to move around Layer one, not the other way around.

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 3>I like that. I like that a lot.

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 2>Man, we covered a lot of good ground. I think

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:19.759
<v Speaker 2>that's a pretty good spot for us to stop. Do

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:21.760
<v Speaker 2>you have any big announcement you want to make anything

0:45:21.800 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 2>people should be watching out for, paying attention to what's

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 2>happening this year.

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Sure. So, look, it's a big year for American Bitcoin.

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>We launched April first, we went public September third. That

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:33.279
<v Speaker 1>was a splash, but it was just the beginning for us.

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:35.759
<v Speaker 1>We're going to put in some really exciting quarters here

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:38.239
<v Speaker 1>now of growth. That was not a finish line, it

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 1>was a starter pistol. So now we're out there. We're

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 1>growing our layer one that's the mining, We're growing our

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 1>layer two that's the treasury, and soon we'll be announcing

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>how we're growing our layer three, that's our ecosystem. So

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:49.319
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot to come. So I advise folks

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to keep an eye for the American Bitcoin story because

0:45:51.160 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 1>there's quite a lot ahead.

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Got it.

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:53.800
<v Speaker 2>We'll make sure to link all that down on the

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 2>show notes down below so everyone can follow along on

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Twitter and on their website. Now, with that we'll ahead

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 2>and wrap it up. Thanks so much, up, thank you, Mark,