WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: April 2nd, 2026

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordert. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App. Stephen Shark of the

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Short grew of writing Homer's Remains at Risk and cease

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Fire Prospects a week pointing to a prolonged geopolitical disruption

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 2>to global flows, Stephen joins us now for more. Stephen,

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 2>welcome to the program. Let's just run with the base

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 2>case as presented by the President. Things can change, I

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 2>know that, but let's run with two to three weeks.

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Where would this energy market be? Where will it be

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 2>in two to three weeks?

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely so, with the rate we're going right now the

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 3>way we've modeled it for the next actually three weeks,

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 3>the current timeframe for the spot market right now is

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and three dollars at barrel. What was our

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 3>top was our initial we'll call it our one stemit

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 3>deviation envelope, and all of the simulations that we've run

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 3>potential price pats. Now that we are well beyond that,

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 3>what do we do we begin to look for that

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 3>next And because of the volatile that's been introduced, we

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 3>have extremely fat tails on the distributions of potential outcomes.

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Three weeks sense we could be looking at one hundred

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 3>and thirty three dollars in oil. So John, what we're

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 3>essentially looking at or doing is the United States. It's

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 3>oil and the contract that we're following in this case

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 3>nomics to WTI.

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 4>That's been the cheapest barrel in the world.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 3>And now what's happened is the arbitrage is well established.

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 3>So now you're having a tremendous amount of buying interest

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 3>coming in from Asia, coming in from Europe, and hence

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 3>we've been the cheapest barrel. But because of that buying in,

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 3>just because you just can't get oil from Asian refiner

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 3>from U typical sources, you're going to start bidding that

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 3>oil higher. And that's what I think we're starting to

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 3>see in the Gulf Coast is that US prices have

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 3>been suppressed over the past four weeks, but that now

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 3>it's starting to catch up to reality and therefore over

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the next three weeks, as this disruption continues, certainly the

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 3>path is higher to our second tier envelope, which is,

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 3>like I said, one hundred and thirty one hundred and

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 3>thirty four dollars a hour.

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that high enough to cause demand destruction for people

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to pull back on their use of oil or their

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>ability to get oil enough to get oil prices back

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>lower in the near.

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 3>Term based on recent observations and economic theory, noe, it's

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 3>not there yet.

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 4>We have to keep in mind that.

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Demand elasticities for guest line have changed tremendously. I'll give

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 3>myself as an example. I drive plugging electric hydrid. I

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 3>fill my car up about once every two to three months. Now,

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 3>juxtapose this back to two thousand and eight when oil

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 3>prices peaked that one hundred and forty nine dollars a barrow.

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 3>I was filling my SUV up every single week. So

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 3>that was an incredible pain point that has changed over

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 3>the last fifteen years.

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 4>So that part was that is.

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 3>So what has happened is back then, if we adjust

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 3>for inflation, three dollars and sixty cents at the pump,

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 3>was that that that pressure point, that's that inflection point

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 3>where demand started to fall off. We are higher because

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 3>we've introduced more variables into the equation.

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 4>So based on what we've seen recently, I e. We're

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 4>still a.

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Dollar below a gallon where we were in twenty twenty two,

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 3>and that did not destroy demand. So we'll look to

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 3>see oil prices up of one hundred and fifty hundred

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 3>and sixty dollars a level before I think we start

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 3>to see the market correct and demand destruction kick in.

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 5>Steven, are we done? You think what verbal intervention has

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 5>its run its course?

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, are we doing verbal? So you're trying to draw

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 3>on the market or try and do I don't think so.

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think it's just something as an analyst,

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 3>as a trade you just have to endure.

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 4>And so this is why we look at the spread markets.

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 3>So then the forward curve and any given market is

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 3>your indication of where we're potentially going. And so when

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 3>we see that, when we look at what is transpired

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 3>now with the past.

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 4>The week in wt I with the curve.

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 3>That is an extreme bid or price increase on the

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 3>front end of the curve for those prompt barrels, but

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 3>that is now also starting to cascade down long from

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 3>the curve. And then we look at a relationship between WTI,

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Dubai or you. For instance, we have oil production in

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 3>West Texas delivered into Houston that is trading at a

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 3>twelve dollars discount to the global price of oil, and

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 3>that arbitr excuse me, and there's a backgradation along that,

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 3>meaning that there's a strong bid for West Texas oil

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 3>and hence why we're still bullish on this market. And

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 3>so regardless, you could verbally, you could address in the

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 3>market and say anything you want. The market is reality,

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 3>and what the reality is telling us, it's that prices

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 3>are here higher and they're going to be higher for longer,

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 3>certainly over the next three weeks.

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, energy companies capitalized by actually reinvesting and expanding.

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Production eventually, but what we'll see now, and if you're

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 3>looking at quarterly earnings, quarterly earnings for if you are

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 3>a refiner, looked the great I mean, you have diesel

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 3>fuel that's trading out one hundred and seventy dollars a

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 3>barrel against one hundred dollars crude oil, or guess Liane

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 3>trading out one hundred and thirty dollars a barrel against

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 3>one hundred dollars oil. So the refinery margins are going

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 3>to look extremely great coming through the first quarter. Now

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 3>as we transition to this second quarter, as we've said

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 3>that US prices are starting to catch up, so that

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 3>is going to be a bigger hit now that that

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 3>is what has been a boom from Golf Coast refineries,

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 3>that wide margin between product.

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Prices and crude oil prices. That's catching up, and oil prices.

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Are catching up, and that's going to begin to squeeze margins,

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 3>so we're going to see a lot of volatility. What

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 3>was good for refiners last quarter is shaping up to

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 3>be especially when demand is starting to pick up coming

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 3>into the second quarter. So you've got the double wheremy

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 3>of domestic oil prices catching up to the global price

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 3>of oil at a time second quarter going into summer

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 3>where demand for the output of the refinery is going

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 3>to surge.

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Stephen, I don't just want to talk about price. I

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about shortages and outright shortages. This from

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the Australian Prime Minister. We mentioned his comment earlier on

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 2>today over the coming weeks, if you can switch the

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 2>catch in the train or bus or tramp to work,

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 2>do so. The EU Commission suggesting people travel less across Europe.

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 2>You can track, You've got visibility on the tankers that

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 2>are arriving and won't be arriving. You can see the

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 2>cushion that some of these countries have got the supply,

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 2>they've got the inventories. How close are we to a

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 2>shortage where these governments are actively tanning the people to

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 2>stop doing things in the same way that they are

0:06:58.120 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 2>in Asia at the moment.

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, absolutely so.

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Looking at the problem month, which has about three more weeks,

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 3>that time frame that the President supposedly says we're going

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 3>to be out of there or wrap this up. The

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 3>market's highly skeptical, So I'll give it that three week

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 3>time range where we'll start to see, certainly economies in

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 3>the Far East, and now we're starting to see economies

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 3>because that Atlantic basin spread is starting to tighten up,

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 3>economies in Europe begin to seize. Up here in the

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 3>United States, oil inventors are sitting.

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 4>Out of three.

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 3>We just got the weekly update yesterday sitting out of

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 3>three year high. So there is oil here, but the

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 3>problem is it's not where it.

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Needs to be.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 3>So even though we do have and the President might

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 3>want to say buy American oil, that's great, but tanker

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 3>logistics limitations, there's just a limit to how much stack.

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Can sate that.

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 3>So while here in the US, as we said, oil

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 3>prices or excuse me, oil supplies are fat three year highs,

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 3>they're really being the seaze up and that's why we're

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 3>starting to see the Brent mark it or WTI now

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 3>outperforming Brent at this point because European buyers refineries are

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 3>coming out of their once they come out of the

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 3>refined maintenance season, they're going to be buying a lot

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 3>more oil, a lot more US oil, but there is

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 3>a limit to how much. So we are two to

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 3>three weeks away from a shortage that we're already seeing

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 3>that that's going to grow.

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 4>Exponentially over the next couple of weeks. Stay with us.

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 2>More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this. So here's the

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.719
<v Speaker 2>laces this morning. The President's stirring investor anxiety, pledging more

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 2>aggressive action in a round without concrete steps to reopen

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 2>the stradit for Merz at Mills of Raymond James, writing,

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 2>the clear desire of the US and a round to

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 2>wind down the wall will need to be reconciled within

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 2>the very narrow diplomatic pathway it joins US. Now for

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 2>more ed, welcome to the program. Can you describe to

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 2>us in a way you've described it to clients for

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 2>the next two to three weeks might look.

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 6>Like, Yeah, John, I think that there's going to be

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 6>an intensity of the operations. I think there is a

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 6>higher probability of a ground operation.

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 4>I think that the market is prepared for.

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 6>At Raymond James, we've been highlighting to clients that it

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 6>will take a while for things to return to normal

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 6>once the straits of Hormoz has reopened. Our energy team

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 6>has been doing a considerable amount of work on that.

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 6>And I do think that there has been an expectation

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 6>in this market that things were going to go faster,

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 6>quicker and cleaner. That expected, and we have been telling

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 6>folks some cynicism here has been warranted, and the cynicism

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 6>has actually been the thing that has played out consistently

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 6>over this last month.

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 5>And when you say ground operation, do you mean to

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 5>open up the straight of Hormoves for normal traffic or

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 5>do you mean for military boots on the ground to

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 5>go seize the uranium.

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 6>I think, Amory, that's to be determined. I do think

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 6>that there is a history of President Trump. Once he

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 6>has built up a military capability, he uses that military capability.

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 6>So when we see how many troops have been positioned

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 6>in the area, I do think that there is an

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 6>obvious desire to reopen the straits of her moves. But

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 6>President Trump last night did talk about that as something

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 6>more natural than kinetic. There has been these conversations about

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 6>the potential operations to seize uranium. To me, that's probably

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 6>the higher probability. I don't know exactly how robust that

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 6>is going to be. I think some of that is

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 6>to be determined, but very clearly Emory here, President Trump

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 6>is building up pressure and was telling even the kind

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 6>of Iranians last night they have a choice still here

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 6>that the operations can get much more intense and less

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 6>they negotiate.

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 5>And why give this speech last night? It felt like

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 5>the tone of this speech was trying to get the

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 5>American people on board that maybe it should have been

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 5>given the first week or two of the operation.

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Emory, That's what we were discussing internally here at

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 6>Raymond James, because I think there was a hope and

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 6>an expectation that a speech a month into this was

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 6>a speech to wrap it up. The tone of the

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 6>speech was the first real rationalization directly from President Trump

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 6>speaking to the American people of exactly why and almost

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 6>preparing the American people for what comes next. When you

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 6>have all of those comparisons to the lengths of other wars,

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 6>it is somewhat ominous. We are hopeful that this is

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 6>two to three weeks from now, but there's no guarantees.

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 6>I think that there was a hope that it was

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 6>only going to be kind of less than a month

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 6>when this started a month ago. Now we're already extending

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 6>those timelines. So making that pitch to the American people

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.599
<v Speaker 6>because things are probably going to escalate before they de

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 6>escalate is kind of my biggest takeaway from that speech.

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Emmory, This to me is the key pointed that this

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>was essentially preparing the American people for whatever is to

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>come next. Do you have a sense of what that

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>could look like and how much it will come in

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>concert with United Arab Emirates, with Saudi Arabia, with other alliances.

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, we're seeing kind of more of those alliances that

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 6>take place. We're looking at the fact that AARAN in

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 6>their initial response, probably kind of drew the region more

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 6>together than split it. One of the key questions that

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 6>we've been asking has been how long does the United

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 6>States and Israel stay together? Because there is a big concern,

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 6>especially in the national security community that I talk to,

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 6>about whether or not the endgame for the United States

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 6>and the endgame for Israel are going to be aligned,

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 6>especially if this goes much longer than mid April here

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 6>and politically you do want to have those alliances, but

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 6>usually those alliances happened before an attack. Build those cases,

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 6>get the American people on board. As we've seen gas prices,

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 6>as we've seen inflation, as we've seen other impacts of this,

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 6>As we see a market reaction to that, the American

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 6>people are going to put more and more pressure on

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 6>members of Congress in on this administration to wrap this

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 6>up sooner rather than later.

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 2>And let's just stay on international relations. There's a very

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 2>strange dynamic to the addressed by the President yesterday, and

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 2>it's as follows. For a long long time this country,

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 2>successive governments have wanted to keep the likes of China

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 2>out of these regions, keep them well away, contain any

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 2>international ambition they might have. And now we're almost in

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 2>fighting the men to help solve a problem. Do we

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 2>really want the Chinese military in the straight offormers No.

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 6>And when we've talked to some of the national security

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 6>advisors and kind of China contacts that we have, there

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 6>is almost zero expectation that a Chinese military will be involved.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 6>But you do have the fact that Trump and she

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 6>will ultimately meet here over the next month and a half.

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 6>And Trump always pulls things together, and to the extent

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 6>that there are things that he is going to be

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 6>asking China for, China is going to be asking us for,

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 6>kind of adding in, hey, this is more of your

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 6>problem than my problem. Is really the subcontext of everything

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 6>that he's saying with this tracer for moves, it's like, yeah,

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 6>it's a big issue, but maybe Chinese is more, Maybe

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 6>NATO members outside of the United States needs more, maybe

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 6>France needs is more. In particular, come in protect that

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 6>it is not just our problem. I think this here

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 6>is a reflection John over the fact that he does

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 6>feel as if everyone has been willing to rally to

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 6>his side on what he sees as an existential threat

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 6>to the United States into the world.

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us more Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Equities lower following back to back gains with the presidents

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 2>turning up the pressure on a run once again. Sarah

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Hunt of Valpied saxon Words, writing, higher energy prices post

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 2>a real challenge to both earnings and the consumer. But

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 2>given the multiple compression and equity markets, valuations aren't becoming attractive.

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Sarah joins us now for more, Sarah, good morning, Good morning.

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Start with earnings. Is the outlook for earning solid or

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 2>analysts just really really slow.

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 7>I think that there is a problem with earnings that

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 7>is going to come through from energy, and it looked

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 7>like if we were going to get some sort of

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 7>a change over the last couple of days, maybe that

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 7>would be okay. I'm starting to think as that weill

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 7>back curve starts to move higher. I don't see how

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 7>earnings are going up for twenty twenty six. I think

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 7>that there to be some sort of a balance, and

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 7>I don't know where that balance is yet, but I

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 7>think that we are getting a little over our skis

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 7>on the arning.

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Makes the question if I should begin excited about multiple

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 2>compression with that in mind.

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 7>I think, you know, it's amazing you write something a

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 7>day ago and the next day it's already different, which

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 7>is why you know there's a lot of whiplash going

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 7>on on the narratives. I think that there was. You

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 7>could see how much the market was anticipating some sort

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 7>of an off ramp. It looked like there might be

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 7>some sort of discussions that might get to something. The

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 7>fact that we're back in this place a day later

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 7>tells you that this is going to be at least

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 7>for the next foreseeable whatever future that is twenty four

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 7>to forty eight hours, you are going to have more issues.

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 7>To your point about trying to get back to normal,

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 7>I think that because there was normal illustraight of horror moves,

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 7>it was okay that the Red Sea wasn't back to normal.

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 7>I think there's going to be a huge push to

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 7>get anything back as soon as you get it open.

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 7>But when that's going to be we don't know. The

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 7>longer that takes the higher energy prices are that's going

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 7>to feed through the earnings and people are not going

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 7>to like that. So yes, I think that that definitely

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 7>that tempers my usiasm for valuation compression because I don't

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 7>think that you're going to get a solution as quickly

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 7>as we thought just a day ago.

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>So when I hear you talking, I'm like, oh, yeah,

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the reason why I'm nervous. And then when

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I read your commentary, you see opportunities out there, I think,

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>what am I thinking about? I just obviously need to

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>go take a walk. So how do you get the

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>conviction to decide to buy given the level of uncertainty?

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 4>Have there really been.

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Enough selloffs in specific sectors or names to justify taking

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that risk.

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 7>I think that that's I think that's sort of the key.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 7>And I loved Jim zelter on earlier this morning because

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 7>he was like, take a step back, look, zoom out,

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 7>because it's also a timing question. Right over time, we

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 7>know that market problems eventually get resolved. Am I looking

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 7>at a five year window, at two year window a

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 7>six month window? In a six month window, I can

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 7>see a lot of volatility, and I would not be

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 7>as sanguine on a six month basis as I would

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 7>be on a longer term basis. Is there going to

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 7>be more volatility this year?

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 7>Do people are still thinking that we end the year

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 7>either higher than we are today or a flat to

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 7>where we started. That's really going to depend on the

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 7>next on the developments over the next couple of months.

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 7>And I think that a month ago this was let's

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 7>see how long it takes. Well, we're into a period

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 7>of time now where that compression and just the traffic

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 7>jam of getting through there is going to be a

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 7>problem and is going to keep energy levels high, and

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 7>that's going to be hard for growth. I don't see

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 7>how that doesn't impact earning.

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 4>So taking a.

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Step back, I took a walk and I'm thinking, well,

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>what has structurally changed if you take a look at

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>a three to five year horizon, And what a lot

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of people keep saying is maybe not the equity story,

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>not the AI story, but does the bond market story

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>change given suddenly the renewed need for fiscal the renewed

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 1>need to sort of support from a debt financing perspective,

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of social initiatives that are only getting more current.

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 7>Well, that turns into a much longer, deeper discussion about

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 7>what is the point at which the government cannot keep

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 7>throwing money at things? And at some point you would

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 7>think that there is a point at which bonds start

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 7>to get higher priced because everyone's worried about the fiscal

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 7>Every time I think that's to happen, it seems to

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 7>back off. So I don't know what that point is, right,

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 7>but it's true there should be a point. Maybe that's

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 7>why gold is sitting at forty five hundred dollars, because

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 7>people are going at some point every currency has a

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 7>problem because every government is too indebted. I don't know

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 7>what that point is, though, and that point keeps moving.

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 5>So why do you think the market is so fixated

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 5>on Trump's truths and just not looking at what he's doing.

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 5>Just this week again, another US aircraft carrier and two

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 5>destroyers were sent again to the region.

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 4>The troop build.

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 5>Up is consistent and it's getting higher.

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 7>I don't know if people think that that is a

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 7>strategic move, if that is an actual move, if that

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 7>is a syops move, I don't know. And I think

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 7>that the problem with dealing with a situation like this,

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 7>that's so fluid, and everybody has something to say, and

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 7>everybody has an agenda. It makes it really difficult to

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 7>parse out what's actually going to happen. You know, maybe

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 7>we could just be looking threatening. Maybe we're actually going

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 7>to go and put boots on the ground. People said no,

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 7>then they said yes, and they said no. I don't

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 7>know what the answer is, but I think that trying

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 7>to parse out what's happening from what people are saying

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 7>is increasingly difficult. The market is obviously not necessarily buying

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 7>that to the extent that it was in the beginning.

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:05.439
<v Speaker 4>So where do you hide?

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.479
<v Speaker 7>The term hide is such a tough one because when

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 7>you're managing money, you have to be managing money, right.

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 7>But I think this goes back to where we were

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 7>sort of positioned into the beginning of the year, which

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 7>is the balance sheets, cashle all those things really matter.

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 7>All of the money that is being spent by the

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 7>mag seven has made the mag seven less attractive than

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 7>it was. I think that was a place where people spend.

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 4>A lot of time.

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 7>There was a lot of money in there. Some of

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 7>that's come out because people are worried about that spend.

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 7>There's still a lot of companies that have good cash flow,

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 7>decent balance sheets, and are doing business that will continue

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 7>to do it. I think growth is going to slow.

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 7>It just makes it more tricky.

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 2>And Video has done nothing half a months. Microsoft was

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 2>down pretty hard in the month of March. Alphabet down

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 2>to you mess it down by double digits. What's going

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 2>on with those names?

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 7>I think the big concern is they're all spending a

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 7>lot of money. They're all spending a lot of money,

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 7>and we're trying to figure out what the returns on

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 7>that money are going to be right now, since they're

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 7>all running into it. It was fine for Nvidia for

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 7>a while, then people get worried about it. If you

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 7>start to see anybody pull back on Capex, that's going

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 7>to give that whole sector a scare because everybody who's

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 7>spending a lot of money is now borrowing.

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 2>Do you think we're close to that moment learning that release.

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 7>I think we're closer than we were. I think we're

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 7>much closer than we were because you start to see

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 7>the electricity issues with data centers too. Right, Maine just

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 7>said no data centers for two years. We want to

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 7>see what happens.

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 2>There is a.

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 7>Conflict now between energy and data centers that there wasn't

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 7>before that this is just exacerbating. I mean, it was

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 7>there before, but it wasn't in the headlines in the

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 7>same way before. And now you're starting to see that,

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 7>and I think that that could kick something like that off,

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 7>and I think that could be problematic.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that the reason why people don't see necessarily big

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>tech being the obvious leader out of this potential rut

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that we see in the equity market?

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 7>I think so. But on the other hand, I will

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 7>take the counter argument and also say they are in

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 7>the best position to weather this in the end. So

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 7>even if they do pull back CAPEX, even if they do,

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 7>even if people start to get really worried about that,

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 7>they're still generating a lot of cash. They're going to

0:20:57.880 --> 0:20:59.919
<v Speaker 7>generate a lot of cash. So to the extent that

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.640
<v Speaker 7>those multiples have compressed a little bit, that probably makes

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 7>that part more attractive because you don't know enough about

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 7>what's going to happen with some of the other sectors

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 7>that are pulled back, like software, although I definitely think

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 7>that's going to be an and and not an or

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 7>for AI.

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast bringing you the best

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, angio politics. You can watch the show

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always, on the

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app