WEBVTT - China's Chip Output and Apple's India Stores

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>We're from Marhard where innovation, money and power.

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hide and Ed Ludlove.

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 4>IM Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 5>Caroline Hides out today this is Bloombag Technology. China's semiconductor

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 5>and electronics output drops in the first quarter as a

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 5>bullish rebound in the economy is.

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 4>At odds with a smartphone slow.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 5>Down, and Apple pushes higher as Tim Cook opens the

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 5>iPhone maker's first store in India. We bring you the

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 5>details from Mumbai and California, and in Europe, bench capitalists

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 5>are on pace for their worst funding year since twenty fifteen.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 5>Race Capitals Alfred Trung joins US to talk private markets.

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 5>Does less capital mean fewer checks being cut? Well, first,

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 5>it's going to check on those market's move As Katie

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.559
<v Speaker 5>Greif found out in New York, Hi, Kittie Hi.

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 6>Ed, well, the bid has disappeared from the equity market.

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 6>You're looking at the S and P five hundred off

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 6>by about two tenths of a percent. The same thing

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 6>sort of goes for the NASAQ one hundred, those big

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 6>tech names. It's the financials that are interesting today. We're

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 6>actually off the session lows that sector down about three

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 6>tenths of percent.

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 7>We know that Goldman Bake of America big.

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 6>Wait today after reporting earnings earlier today, and the two

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 6>year treasure yield up slightly about two.

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 7>Basis points or so.

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 6>You can see we are above four twenty on the

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:35.559
<v Speaker 6>two year treasure field.

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 7>Let's get to the fun stuff though. Let's talk about Bitcoin.

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.639
<v Speaker 6>Bitcoin has been really interesting. It used to trade hand

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 6>in hand with those tech socks. You can see that

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 6>the relationship is really broken apart, and today's.

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 7>Action drives that point home.

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 6>You can see Bitcoin up by two and a half percent.

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 6>It is above thirty thousand once again. It's going to

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 6>be interesting to continue to watch this one and keep an.

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 7>Eye on that correlation.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 6>But let's go from the big picture to some of

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 6>those micro own names, and we should start with Nvidia

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 6>higher by almost three percent today. It had one cell

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 6>rating left that was HSBC that in lists changing its

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:12.239
<v Speaker 6>tune today a rare double upgrade. He went from a

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.239
<v Speaker 6>cell to a bye can see that is filtering through

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 6>to n video shares. We're also looking at AMD. Not

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 6>too much action there no real news that stock is

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 6>hired by about half a percent or so on some

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 6>heavy volume two, so keep an eye on that. And

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 6>Southworth West Airlines briefly halted all of its flights due

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 6>to a technology issue. As we understand, those flights of

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 6>rezumed stock still off by about one point six percent.

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we're going to get a deeper report in Southwest

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 5>later on in the show. But it is interesting to

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 5>note a little outperformance in the chip space. Thank you,

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 5>Katie Greifert out in New York. So despite a bullish

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 5>rebound in the economy, China's production of chips and other

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 5>electronics are declining from slower sales as well as competitive

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 5>pressures from factories that are in other locations joining me

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 5>here in San Francisco, Bloomberg's Ian King. There is a

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.399
<v Speaker 5>short term story here and there is a longer term story.

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Let's start with the short term. What's happening?

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, think about what the companies have told us.

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 8>I've said, Look, there's just too much inventory out there.

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 8>There isn't enough phone demand, there isn't enough PC demand.

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 8>We need to dig our way out of that mound

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 8>of inventory and then we can go back to shipping

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 8>towards what end demand is. The question is, well, where

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 8>is end demand? Are we pre pandemic levels or are

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 8>we at some level in between the pigs that we

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 8>saw during the pandemic. We'll see in the second.

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 5>Half that the broader debate is about supply chain de

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 5>risking or diversifying moving out of China. What does this

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 5>data signal about that?

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 8>I think the big underlying concern and we won't really

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 8>see that manifest itself until so the next year, the

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 8>year after when a lot of these factories get built.

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 8>Is governments everywhere around the world are saying, hey, we

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 8>want a chip industry, we want a chip industry, throwing

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 8>money at it. The economics that once drove where these

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 8>chip plans were made arguably being upturned. So are we

0:03:58.840 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 8>going to see excess.

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 5>Supply over the Taiwan straight there's a bit more feel

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 5>good about the state of chips and manufacturing TSMC. It's

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 5>interesting look at the data on the Bloomberg the subject

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 5>of our Techwatch column. A lot of bullishnists around that name.

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean TSMC is a conduit for everyone. So

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 8>if you believe in videos ai story, where does in

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 8>video get its chip mode in Taiwan at TSMC, So

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 8>you know, TSMC is kind of the way to play

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 8>every angle here. Even though smartphones and PCs are kind

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 8>of down, maybe AI is the play, as in videos

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 8>would suggest.

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 4>We I probably should have started with.

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 5>In video Katie mentioned it it's final cell rating gone

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 5>this morning, we'll bring up the where analysts see the

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 5>stop but lots of bullishnis and it's all, well, it's

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 5>partly about artificial intelligence.

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean the HSBC report which was the final

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 8>one to flip said, look, even though there aren't that

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 8>many AI chips in the world, these things cost ten

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 8>twenty grand each, right, that's ten times what a PC

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 8>GPU cost. So even if PCs are bad, AI is

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 8>good in terms of the ASP, the margins and everything else.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 4>That's the argument, all right.

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 5>Thanks to Bloombozine king on Everything Semiconductor, and we talked

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 5>about China. China's economy actually growing at the fastest pace

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 5>in a year in the first quarter, giving the market

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 5>some optimism, which I have to say was pretty short

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 5>lived because we're now getting some jitters over a report

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 5>that Saint Louis fed President James Billard is in favor

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 5>at this time of more policy tightening, joining us to

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 5>talk these markets. Emily Hill, CEO and founding partner of

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 5>Bawasok Capital. Let's go to China first, Emily, in very

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 5>basic terms, there was optimism and around that the reopening

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 5>of the economy, strong GDP print. How in the markets

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 5>do you interpret that?

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 9>Well, we got pretty good GDP numbers out of China,

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 9>four to five percent. The government's target for the year

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 9>is about five So I think it shows that reopening

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 9>is having exactly the effect that people anticipated. Consumers are

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 9>getting out spending and that will be inflationary for the

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 9>rest of the global economy. More demand for commodities, including oil,

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 9>and so while it will help economic growth from an

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 9>inflation perspective, is probably not a positive.

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 5>Let's bring it back here to the United States and

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 5>the FED, and I promise you we will talk about

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 5>the technology sector. But Fed's Ballard saying that basically these

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 5>ideas of recession are a little bit overdone and that

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 5>he wants to see the discussion around more hikes. What's

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 5>your interpretation of FED speak right now?

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 9>I think that the market is continuing to not get

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 9>the FED message, and I've been saying that consistently and

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 9>I think part of the issue is that all of

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 9>the hikes in recent memory, if you look back at

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 9>the last thirty years, took place in an environment that

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 9>was essentially disinflationary. We had low inflation. It was a

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 9>very different environment than one we have now. And so

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 9>last thirty years, the pauses by the FED have extended

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 9>from about six months to about fourteen months. And you're

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 9>still seeing large parts of the market expecting a rate

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 9>cut by the end of this year. And so I

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 9>think they're going to be some disappointed investors. And so

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 9>I think, you know, while you do have some dubbish

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 9>members FED, none of them are really talking about a

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 9>rate cut in twenty twenty three. If we were to

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 9>have a rate cut, it would mean that we had

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 9>a hard landing, and that's not good for stock Emily.

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology. Let's talk a little bit about

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 5>the technology sector. You know, if you expect this rate

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 5>and inflation regime to persist, where do you want to

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 5>position yourself within the technology landscape.

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, there's defensive tech, which I would put

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 9>Apple into that category, and I think it is sort

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 9>of Apple is the you know, Johnson and Johnson of

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 9>the twenty first century. Right, it's it's it's looked at

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 9>as a safe bet. You know, it now comprises seven

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 9>to eight percent of the S and P, which I

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 9>think is something that you know, should raise a few eyebrows.

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 9>But if the parts of you know, but I would

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 9>say that Apple and these this you know, safe defensive

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 9>tech is now a little bit richly priced. So if

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 9>I want to look in the tech sector for good values,

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 9>I'm going to look at or I would really actually

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 9>even look at tech adjacent sectors. So the parts of

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 9>the of the tech sector that have not gone through

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 9>the roof this year, you know, the NAVVAC one hundred

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 9>is up almost twenty percent, and I think that's overdone.

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 5>If you're going to be a little bit more dynamic

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 5>and look for opportunity in this market away from when

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 5>you call them a defensive riting, you're suggesting look at

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 5>the balance sheet, look at this company's staying power through session.

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 5>But technologically speaking, what are the corners of the market

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 5>that excite you?

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 9>Okay, well, I would say companies like Corning that are

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 9>manufacturing products used by Apple, so they make differentiated glass products.

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 9>They make the gorilla glass for iPhone ceramic shield. They

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 9>make ceramic substrates that are used in cutting carbon emissions,

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 9>and so they're you know, a less exciting, you know,

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 9>tech software innovative company. But this company has been innovating

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 9>for you know, one hundred and seventy years. So I've

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 9>got an alarm going off here that I'm going.

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 4>To now dealing with the technology in real time. We

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 4>love it.

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology, put it into practice.

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 10>Bostonmai and that in Deli. Customers are lining up as

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 10>Apple opens its first two stores in India. They may

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 10>not be as unique as the Cube in New York,

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 10>but they have all the features that Apple stores do

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 10>worldwide today in Apple Apple store trade ins and the

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 10>customery site of CEO Tim Cook at the front door

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 10>on the first day welcoming the first few customers. Now

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 10>between meeting Prime Minister Mobi of knobbing with business leaders

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 10>here in Mumbai and then in Delhi and eating Mumbai

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 10>Verapau with film stars. Tim Cook's visit to India and

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 10>these store openings mark a significant next step in the

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 10>India Apple relationship. India presents a critical supply chain diversification

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 10>opportunity for Apple China manufactures more than ninety percent of

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 10>iPhones to airports. Tim Cook says Apple is taking all

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 10>that it learned in China out of scale China and

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 10>bringing that to bear here in India. Compared to its neighbor,

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 10>India is a tiny market for Apple, with just about

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 10>six billion dollars in annual sales last year, but that's

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 10>about fifty percent more than the year before. Local manufacturer

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 10>will allow Apple to reduce some of the import taxes

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 10>that it pays and make its products less expensive for

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 10>Indian consumers. Two of Apple's three contract manufacturers here in

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:25.719
<v Speaker 10>the country are major beneficiaries of a flagship production incentive

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 10>scheme launched by Prime Minister or In Removie's government. India

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 10>too is hoping that Apple can pull a China here

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 10>help build a manufacturing ecosystem that boosts jobs and exports. Medikadoshi,

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 10>Bloomberg News.

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 5>That was Bloomberg's India Senior editor Mana Kadoshi. Let's guess

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.719
<v Speaker 5>more on Apple's new expansion in India and bring in

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Mark German Mark You reported a few weeks ago

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 5>that even internally, Apple has been restructuring to to serve

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 5>that market in India. What's the latest there.

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, India's all the hype for Apple right now. Really

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 11>outside of these two retail stores, right, these retail stores

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 11>probably not going to move the needle for Apple as

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 11>a company revenue wise, even in India itself. Most Apple

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 11>products in India and elsewhere, of course are going to

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 11>be bought by consumers at third party retail stores or

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 11>online or carrier partners, right. But this shows Apple's dedication

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 11>to the area. These stores are not small investments. You

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 11>have to hire one hundred people plus per store, You

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 11>have to do inventory. They're setting up the Genius Bar

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 11>and classes in India for the first time, and internally

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 11>this year, they're restructuring their sales organization. So the head

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 11>of India sales, right, what's known as their managing director

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 11>or country manager for India, is now going to report

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 11>directly to Apple's head of sales globally.

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 11>That's going to be a first. Previously you had a

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 11>vice president in between who oversaw India as well as

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 11>other emerging markets like Eastern Europe and Africa, So that

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 11>layer has been removed, sort of elevating the importance of

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 11>India within the company's operations itself.

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of data when it comes to Apple

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 5>flying out of India right now. You know that the

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 5>latest reporting from Bloomberg is from a sales perspective, six

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.559
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars for the twelve month period through March. That's

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 5>just one side of the story. The other is supply

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 5>chain and manufacturing, right and I think the latest reporting

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 5>from Bloomberg is the dollar value of exports or iPhones

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 5>constructed in that nation hitting new milestone as well. What

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 5>is the strategy for Apple in having a supply chain

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 5>base in that nation.

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, the strategy for Apple to have a supply chain

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 11>base in India is twofold one. You really need to

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 11>manufacture devices that you're selling in India in India itself

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 11>to save on some of those import taxes, right, which

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 11>are incredibly high as they are in Brazil, another place

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 11>where Apple has set up shop to produce iPhone. So

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 11>that's one part of it. The bigger component is diversification.

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 11>Right until now, Apple had mostly produced all of its

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 11>devices in China. But over the last four to five

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 11>years or so, you've seen issues related to tariffs, You've

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 11>seen the potential trade war between the US and China.

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 11>You've seen these COVID zero policies in China. You've seen

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 11>the impact of the virus in China on Apple's production,

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 11>so you've seen delay after delay to key products, the

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 11>MacBook Air last year, the iPhone fourteen Pro. This was

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 11>just at the end of twenty twenty two, right two

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 11>years plus into COVID, and you saw major shutdowns at Fox.

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 11>Cond prevented Apple from selling as many iPhone fourteen pros

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 11>as possible. So you really need to diversify to try

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 11>to avoid problems like that, and that's what you're seeing

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 11>Apple lay the groundwork for in India primarily, but also

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 11>in places like Vietnam, in Malaysia and Brazil as well,

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 11>plus a little bit of Ireland.

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 5>So that's the India story. Let's go a bit more global.

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 5>We asked our audience if you're going to buy an

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 5>Apple products, where do you do it?

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Install?

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 5>Online or as you explaining from a third party right

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 5>other retailers. Fifty five percent respondents online is where they're buying.

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 5>What is store strategy broadly for Apple? What is the

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 5>future of the Apple store with its shiny glass windows?

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 11>You know, I think the poll is a little skewed, right,

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 11>it was a Twitter poll and perhaps our audience on Twitter.

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 11>There are people who you know want to go to

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 11>an Apple store to buy an iPhone, or they live

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 11>near Apple stores. But the actual truth is that the

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 11>vast majority of iPhones, at least they're actually purchased through

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 11>third party retailers and carriers, right, whether that's your Verizon

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 11>store in the US, or your O two store in

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 11>the UK, or in Best Buyer Target or elsewhere in

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 11>the US, or Carphone Warehouse in Europe.

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 11>And so Apple really wants a lot more of those

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 11>sales to flow through its own retail stores, right. And

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 11>we've seen a slow down and expansion for retail stores

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 11>over the last three to four years or so, primarily

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 11>due to COVID.

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 4>And other reasons.

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 11>They have so many at this point, But what you're

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 11>seeing is they're pushing more stores now in that Asia area, right.

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 11>You have India, They've opened more stores in Korea recently,

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 11>and then they have stores coming in Malaysia as well,

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 11>So clearly their expansion is Asia related at this point.

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Mark.

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 5>The other big story of the week is Apple in

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 5>partnership with Goldman Sachs offering a savings account with a

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 5>four point one five percent yield.

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Why is Apple doing that?

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so this was actually introduced several months ago, right,

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 11>it was a little bit delayed. It's now rolling out

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 11>in the Wallet app if you have an Apple Card.

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 11>And you know, some people think that Apple has big

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 11>ambitions here, and that is absolutely true.

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 4>But the reality is is.

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 11>That this is still going to be US only and

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 11>still Apple Card only. Eventually, this is probably going to

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 11>expand as the Apple Card expands, hopefully. I know a

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 11>lot of people in Europe and Canada want to get

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 11>their hands on that. Four point one five percent is

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 11>a pretty good rate. That's actually a quarter percent higher

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 11>than the rate that Goldman offers if you were to

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 11>create a savings account through the Goldman website versus through

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 11>the Apple Card. And this is Apple wanting to give

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 11>more people reasons.

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 4>To hold onto their iPhone.

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 11>Right, if you have your savings account in your phone,

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 11>It's gonna make it all but impossible every time they

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 11>add a new layer or a new feature to switch away

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 11>to Android or to another product.

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 5>All right, Bloomberg's Mark German with all the latest on Apple.

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 5>Thank you coming up. Revenue from fixed income one of

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 5>the main highlights as big banks like Goldman Sachs but

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 5>also Bank of America report quarterly results. We'll get more

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 5>on how those lenders performed coming.

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 4>Up, But let's take a look at some of the stocks.

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.479
<v Speaker 4>How we're moving, how we're reacting. Some interesting numbers.

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 5>But you look at the equity markets in the banking space,

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 5>Goldman down one and a half percent, Bank of America

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 5>off by eight tens of a percent. Why we'll ask

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 5>that question next with Bloomberg shn Ali Bassak.

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg.

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 5>Coarsely results from Bank of America and Goldman Sachs show

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 5>different approaches to fixed income trading, with Bank of America

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 5>topping estimates as fixed income trading drives profits. Meanwhile, Goldman

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 5>Sacks failed to catalyze on the trend.

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Who else is.

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 5>Here but Bloomberg News Will Street Reports Shnalie Bassett give

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 5>me the banking scorecard this Tuesday morning.

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it's hard not to pay attention to those trading

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 12>numbers because they've posted. Goldman Sachs had posted a drop

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 12>relative to the others that was worth noticing because you

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 12>saw beats a JP Morgan City Group and at Bank

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 12>of America. However, I would still say that these are

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 12>broader market moves as well, because you have the commodities

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 12>business not as strong as it was a year ago

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 12>when you had massive volatility in the industry, and same

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 12>with currencies.

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 7>I do want to point to.

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 12>Some other things in the businesses here too, because remember

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 12>Goldman Sacks had cut some headcount here, while Bank of

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 12>America became the third big bank to show increasing headcount.

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 12>That is a fascinating story at a time where we've

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 12>seen a lot of pressure on jobs across the entire market.

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 12>I want to take a little bit of a technology

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 12>angle here as well, because as we know Goldman, as

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 12>people look to how they are reshaping the firm to

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 12>the consumer business, the business tied to Marcus is of

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 12>high attention, and you have David Solomon, the CEO of

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 12>Goldman Sachs, saying that they're exploring a sale of green Sky.

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 12>This is the installment lending platform they had bought just

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 12>a couple of years ago. So that is still something

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 12>as Goldman transforms is weighing on its results in the

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 12>near term. But again we're looking over to the other side.

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 12>Bank of America, by the way, pulling in lots of

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 12>deposits here and lots of new clients rather as deposits

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.959
<v Speaker 12>are under pressure as we watch to see how this

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 12>kind of banking trump tumble really starts to play out

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 12>so real quick.

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 5>There's also tension here for Goldman, right questions about hold

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 5>on you have Marcus, we also have now Apple savings

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 5>of four point one five percent yield. Don't they do

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 5>the same thing.

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 12>I'm really glad you asked that, because the answer is no.

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 12>On one hand, you do have a consumer business here.

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 12>They've folded into platform solutions by working with Apple at

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 12>four one point one five percent. This really intense yield

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 12>you're getting from that Apple savings product. With Goldman Sacks,

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 12>it's pulling deposits, lowering the cost of funding for gold

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 12>and Sacks, whereas they're selling loans associated with that Marcus

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 12>portfolio and as you know, lending to high networth individuals

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:17.479
<v Speaker 12>and private wealth instead.

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 5>All right, Bloomberg Shnali Bassek on the Wall Street Beat,

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology, Imed Lovelow in San Francisco.

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 5>Let's get a little check on the markets here. We

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 5>kind of turned a corner in the last few minutes,

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 5>and as that one hundred modestly hired just a tenth

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 5>to one percent, basically flat without performance in the chip sector.

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 5>Comments from Saint Louis FED President James Bullard basically saying

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 5>more hikes still on the table and the market digesting that.

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 5>Look at the short end of the curve, the two

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 5>year up by three basis points four point two two percent.

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 5>Bitcoin is Katie Greifeld was telling us earlier in the

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 5>program holding above thirty five, I was in US dollars

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 5>per token, So continue to track that. In the risk

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 5>asset space, There's one mover that we're keeping an eye on,

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 5>which is Southwest Airlines. A technology issue temporarily grounded a

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 5>number of flights that the Southwest team had to coordinate

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 5>with the FAA over We're off session lows, but still

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 5>lower one point two percent. Let's stick with that story

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 5>and get the latest details with Catherine Larkin, who's the

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 5>Global business editor at Bloomberg News. Simply put Kathy, what happened?

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 7>Oh, thanks for having me in.

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 3>So yet again we're seeing Southwest with a big operations problem.

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Today they had a sixteen minute groundhoult that delayed over

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 3>one thousand planes this morning. They said it had to

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 3>do with a vendor supplied firewall prevented planes from taking

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 3>off or leaving the gate. And this is just you know,

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 3>while a short term problem was you know, sixteen minutes,

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 3>it really caused a big mass for this morning was

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 3>air traffic.

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 5>So as I said, the stock down one point two percent,

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 5>we have been markedly lower. It was sixteen minutes of chaos. Basically,

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 5>how impactful was it for flights around the country.

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so the problems actually seem to emerge even before

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 3>that ground hault was put in place. So, like I said,

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 3>over one thousand flights, you know, we're delayed. We wouldn't

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 3>be surprised to see several of these flights be canceled

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 3>by the end of the day. This is really a

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 3>ongoing problem for Southwest. You remember in December they stranded

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 3>tens of thousands of passengers right around the holidays. They

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 3>are just seeing, you know, repeat problems with their operations

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 3>and their scheduling. And even here if it's a vendor issue,

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 3>that still ultimately comes down to management to be accountable.

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting because I remember last month there was a

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 5>partnership announce between Southwest and AWS on the cloud Side

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 5>to try and rectify some of the sort of long

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 5>standing systemic technological issues, begs the question of kind of

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 5>what happens next to Southwest?

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Cathy, No, they are going to have to answer questions.

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is something like you said, they've been

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 3>talking about for the last several months. They say that

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 3>they're putting new systems in place to prevent future issues,

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 3>and yet here we go again today with a major issue,

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 3>you know as a big Groundhoult, not something we see

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 3>every day. They're going to have their earnings and just

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, another like couple of weeks April twenty seventh,

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 3>and management's going to be asked to answer for this.

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 3>This is this is really unacceptable, and I think flyers

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 3>are going to start to think twice whether they want

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 3>a book with Southwest.

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 5>All right, Bloomberg's Global Business editor Katherin Larkin, thank you

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 5>very much. All Right, let's move from transport to cyber

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 5>and in cyber news, the European Union just proposed several

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 5>new cybersecurity efforts basically aimed at bolstering the block's response

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 5>to online threats.

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 4>The new plan, which.

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 5>Still needs to be approved, as is often the case

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 5>in Europe, would link national and cross border operations centers

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 5>across the EU to detect and act on threats, among

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 5>other measures. And what about the USA, how organizations grappling

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 5>with data security and what more can be done? Let's

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 5>ask people sending a CEO of Rubric who joins.

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 4>Me here in San Francisco.

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 5>You've just put out a pretty wide ranging report survey

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 5>based companies all across the country globally keep telling us

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 5>we're investing in cybersecurity data protection.

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 4>What did your report find?

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 13>Thank you so much for the opportunity. They are still

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 13>not secure. What we found was every organization has already

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 13>been infiltrated. Ninety nine percent of the IT and security

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 13>leader that we surveyed reported cyber incidents in their organization

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 13>and fifty two times last year, so almost one cyber

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 13>attack per week, which essentially means that all the preventions,

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:47.479
<v Speaker 13>tools and technology that they have purchased over the years,

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 13>while needed, is not sufficient. It's not working.

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 5>A part of your findings your survey was actually many

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 5>cases companies across all sectors, do you have a backup plan?

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 5>It's just the backup plan work. Is that a lack

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 5>of investment, a lack of care, a lack of strategy

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 5>are the what is it the core of that vulnerability?

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 13>So legacy backup was built for human error recovery or

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 13>natural disaster recovery. It was not built for cyber As

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 13>a result, it is vulnerable. In our finding, what we

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 13>found that the nine out of the ten organizations actually

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 13>saw an attempt to manipulate their backup And what was

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 13>interesting was that three out of the four attempts we

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 13>are successful. So folks, fundamentally, the bad guys know that

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 13>it is a vulnerability for most of the organizations and

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 13>they are going after it.

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 5>The behavior of attackers and the industry response really interesting.

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 5>Ransomware being a great example. There are lots of incidences

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 5>of late where in a ransomware attack, the hackers leaked

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 5>the information they obtained, the data they attained in order

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 5>to kind of induce a pay up.

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 4>How do you protect against that?

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 13>Ransomware is particularly nasty problem. What we found was that

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 13>over seventy two percent of the organizations we surveyed paid ransom.

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 13>That was an incredible stance. And what is interesting is

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 13>that only sixteen percent of these organizations, after paying ransom,

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 13>could recover their data using the decryptor tool from the

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 13>threat actors. So essentially, businesses are at their wits end

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:34.199
<v Speaker 13>to really take care of the ransomware problem, not only

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 13>in terms of the locking of their data, but as

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 13>you said, in terms of exposure of their business critical data,

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 13>whether it's customer data or their own internal data.

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 4>Rubrick, let's talk about the company.

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 5>I think you've been quite open about a cybersecurity incident

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 5>where hackers leak some data linked to you. Did you

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 5>pay a ransom in that case? What was the scenario

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 5>that played out?

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 13>I mean, a threat actor got hold of one of

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 13>our test bed system in the IT department, and we

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.719
<v Speaker 13>actually laid it out what happened. It's a case study

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 13>as a case study as how they entered and what

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 13>did they do as part of our blog post. And

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 13>then the threat actually put our name in their name

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 13>and shame website. People who don't pay ransom.

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 4>They get their name and pay their ransom, and I mean.

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 13>It is very clear what we did we did not

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 13>and then and then what we did was we used

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 13>Rubric's own technology to restore our services. And this is

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 13>our core message that attacks are inevitable and businesses need

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 13>to have resilience strategy as opposed to just prevention.

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 5>I know there's a lot of interest in Rubric from

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 5>investors globally. Cybersecurity space seems to have some momentum behind it,

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 5>some dollars behind it. So do you take the opportunity

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 5>in that and go public? Have you thought about a

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:55.959
<v Speaker 5>timeline to an IPO.

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 13>We want to be a public company. We want to

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 13>build a long term company. Going public is the is

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 13>the route. We are doing work on our end to

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 13>prepare ourselves. We are also looking at the at the

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 13>markets and trying to understand how where the market is.

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 13>We'll want to be public when the market is ready

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 13>and we are ready.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 5>Fil Senya, CEO Rubig, thank you for joining me here

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 5>in San Francisco. Now we ramp up to Earth Day

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 5>this Saturday. We considue to take a look at new

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 5>technologies in the fight against climate change, like air travel.

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Steve Rappaport has more.

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 2>The race to reduce carbon emissions from air travel has

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 2>seen multiple milestones this year, with two companies having completed

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 2>successful test flights of hydrogen powered aircrafts UK startup Zero

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Obvious said it successfully conducted a test flight of a

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 2>hydrogen powered nineteen seater plane in January and in March,

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 2>at universal hydrogen plane, ifquipped with the largest hydrogen fuel

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 2>cell ever to power in aircraft, had a successful fifteen

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 2>minute flight of a modified Dash eight aircraft in Washington State.

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>It is the beginning of a flight test campaign that

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>will ultimately culminate in a twenty twenty five entry into

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>passenger service of fifty to sixty seat regional airplanes starting

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>with the ATR seventy two.

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 2>The Paris Agreement has a goal of net zero emission

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 2>air travel by twenty to fifty, and hydrogen powered planes

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 2>present one of the most promising options.

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So aviation is one of the few sectors that's actually

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>forecasted to grow in emissions on the time horizon of

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the Paris Agreement by twenty fifty, and so hydrogen probably

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>represents the best that only hope the sector really has

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to make a meaningful dent right enough to offset continuing

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>traffic growth. The only alternative we as an industry have

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is curtailing traffic volumes in order to reduce emissions.

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Connect the Airlines, which operates regional flights between Toronto and

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Cargo and Philadelphia, has already placed in order to convert

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 2>seventy five planes to hydrogen power through Universal Hydrogen and

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Air New Zealand is working with a series of partners

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 2>as it looks to make its aircraft fleet zero emission. However,

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 2>several hurdles remain, including how best to transport the hydrogen

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 2>and space limitations of the hydrogen modules aboard the aircrafts.

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 2>But these test flights present a promising step in the

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 2>right direction as airlines work towards reduced emissions. Steve Rappaport,

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News.

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 5>Let's stick with the hydrogen story. Nikola shares jumping as

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 5>much as twelve percent on Monday, now up around nine percent,

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 5>coming off an all time low last Friday. What's astonishing

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 5>with this stock up for a second consecutive day, biggest

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 5>two day game.

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 4>Going back to October.

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 5>This is one of those companies that went public virus

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 5>back twenty twenty. But the long term story is around

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 5>not just building fuel cell trucks, but also the hydrogen

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 5>infrastructure to power them. But again very at all, you know,

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 5>really really heading towards penny Stock territory.

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 4>Interesting.

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 5>Now coming up, we're going to take a pulse of

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 5>the VC landscape and what generative AI has to offer

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 5>two bench capitalists with Race Capital General Partner Alfred Chuang,

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 5>that's next.

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg.

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 14>Time.

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Now for the VC roundup.

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 5>Let's start with Devon, the pioneer of the shale revolution

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 5>that reignited US oil and n actural gas production, is now

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 5>getting into geoform or renewable energy. A ten million dollar

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 5>investment into geofirm will startup Fervo Energy, and over in Europe,

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 5>Venge capital firms are on pace for their lowest year

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 5>of funding since twenty fifteen. A's the weaker stock market

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 5>rising interest rates is causing larger institutional investors LPs like

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 5>pension funds to pull back in the VC space. Let's

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 5>bring in Castle General Partner Alfred Juwang for his read

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 5>on the VC landscape here in the US, in Europe

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 5>and globally. You issued this like rallying cry in the

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 5>pandemic era. You wanted your founders and CEOs to be

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 5>more active, do more. You wanted your industry peers to

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 5>do more, and then the world sort of fell apart,

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 5>higher rates, the war in Ukraine. Where does your rallying

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 5>cry sit now?

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 14>Good morning and very good to see you. Thank God

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 14>for having me back most definitely. I think this is

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 14>an economic environment that clearly is for investing, is not

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 14>for the faint hearted at all. I think we have

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 14>seen VC funding for startups dropped over fifty percent down

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 14>to seventy six billion dollar in the first quarter.

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 4>That was globally. That globally, yes.

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 14>And then we saw all the specteal, the whole frenzy

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 14>went away. We also saw the IPR marketers and our

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 14>time law. We also heard Silken Value Bank went under

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 14>after four decades of service, specific specifically for our industry.

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 14>So these are a huge monumental impact that we've seen

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 14>in the industry yourself, so tough time.

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 5>I am really interested on the relationship between the public and

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 5>private markets, but also how you follow the same data

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 5>sets that the public market investor would be. So today

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 5>one of the stories is fed speak James Blood of

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 5>the Saint Louis fed saying actually more hikes. So if

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 5>you think about an inflation regime, the hike regime being

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 5>there for longer, how does that impact the mindset of

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 5>aventure capitalist.

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 4>So obviously it has.

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 14>An impact that's clearly have an impact on evaluation. So

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 14>if you look at like very lay stage deal like

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 14>Stripe is now down thirty percent during this time, so

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 14>we have to expect lay stage deals when its prices

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 14>goes down, it will triggle down all the way to

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 14>the earlier stage deal. The impact to the deals that

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 14>my team and I, that is capital are involved in

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 14>a very early they see than preseed in those particular

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 14>kind of investments, the impact has been a lot less

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 14>because people are still very helpful to look out a

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.800
<v Speaker 14>much longer period of time horizon for technological innovation.

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:18.280
<v Speaker 5>We discussed that contrast on the program Pretty dowur broad

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:22.240
<v Speaker 5>outlook from VCS. A lot of excitement about the seed

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.320
<v Speaker 5>and pre seed stage. Is it just simply because it's

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 5>easier to write a smaller check and not lose as

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 5>much sleep over it?

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, Actually I don't think that's the case. I think

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 14>actually it has a lot more to do the visas

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 14>of self. If you look at what we do, because

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 14>we're so early, we have the lookout for the kind

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 14>of company and technological innovation. What will happen to them?

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 14>What impact would they have ten years down the road

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:49.760
<v Speaker 14>or sometimes longer. So for that downturn has.

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 4>Always been proven.

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 14>I mean myself had gone through ran large companies, tech

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 14>public company during up and downturns, there's no better time

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 14>to invest in early stage things for new invention, for

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:03.720
<v Speaker 14>the outlook of how a world's going to be evolving

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 14>too ten years down the road artificial intelligence.

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:11.760
<v Speaker 5>How many times a day do you say, where's artificial

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 5>and intelligence?

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:16.359
<v Speaker 4>At the moment our offices in Palato not enough.

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 14>Every street corner, every conversation of Starbucks, every conversation and

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:22.240
<v Speaker 14>the office, every everything.

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 4>Is about generating.

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 5>You're investing in the area, of course we are, and

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:27.280
<v Speaker 5>how do you invest in the area.

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 14>So we have specifically focused on the impact of this

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 14>level of generative AI for automation in the enterprise. So

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 14>we think the biggest opportunity and the safest place to

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 14>deploy these type of technology is inside the enterprise itself.

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 14>Large banks, large telcos, pharmaceuticals, governments.

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Those are great places that you can wall.

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 14>In the learning itself and then be able to control

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 14>and pace and govern how AI will be used.

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 5>You kind of have this race between Alphabet and the

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 5>parent company of Google, Google and Microsoft and a person

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 5>he may have called heard of, called Elon Musk wade

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 5>into the middle of that. What do you make of

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 5>the Elon Musk saying, you know what, I'm going to enter.

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 4>The AI race.

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I think this will be something very difficult to end.

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:17.800
<v Speaker 14>You Just think about this, right, put it in context.

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 14>We have not seen a disruptive technology like this since

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 14>the late nineties. How the Internet has done the companies.

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 14>Remember what had happened to Microsoft, they were behind in

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 14>the browser war. So this is even bigger. We saw

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 14>Microsoft gone out to do a deal. There's ten billion

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 14>dollar plus with open Ai, a company nobody heard of

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:42.839
<v Speaker 14>until last year, right, so November November, Okay, So think

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 14>of this context. And now they're using this to disrupt Google,

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 14>which has a franchise have been going on forever on

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 14>search worth one point three trillion dollars. This is the

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 14>only time we've seen little company now have a chance

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 14>to impact and make huge impact in the innovation of

0:36:58.920 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 14>large companies.

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 5>We've been talking so much about AI that we haven't

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 5>talked so much about crypto, and that was an area

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 5>where you made some pretty fast and in some cases

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:12.760
<v Speaker 5>not as good bets. What is your reaction to that statement,

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 5>I suppose, but also do you you know, would you

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:18.359
<v Speaker 5>change how you do your due diligence now how you

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 5>look at that space.

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so with our adult crypto was you know, the

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 14>last excitement that we saw in twenty twenty and twenty

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:29.800
<v Speaker 14>twenty one. We made some vact some very extremely good bets,

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 14>you know, our contray to the believe itself.

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 4>So obviously we're in some bad bets. Oh and some

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 4>bed better.

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 14>I mean we learned a lot in this process, but

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 14>we didn't make huge bed bets, you know, so I

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 14>think that was what we are designed to do as

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 14>an early stage Friendshire from you.

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 4>Look at what had happened.

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 14>Twipto is addressing a much smaller addressable market, so it's

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 14>tem is far smaller than comparing to Lesli Jenei. So

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 14>the merger of I will say Race Capital as the

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 14>fun is. We always said we're all about infrastructure where

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 14>there is work who were free, we do them more.

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 4>So we have wa able to hash those kind of bets.

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 5>All right, Race Capitals ouverage one, thank you so much.

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 5>Lululemon is exploring the sale of Mirror only three years

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 5>after buying the fitness equipment maker. This, according to sources,

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 5>this comes as fitness focus hardware companies have struggled basically

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:28.439
<v Speaker 5>post pandemic as consumers head back to Jim's for in

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 5>person workouts. Leana deal Leanna Baker, who leads our deals

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 5>coverages here with more. It does feel like just yesterday

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 5>that we were talking about this deal going ahead in

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 5>the first place.

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 15>As a long time deals reporter, we tend to see this.

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 15>Companies will get in a mode where they're buying assets

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 15>and then just a few years later they'll sell assets.

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 15>Bankers luckily get to work on both sides of these

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 15>deals each time, so everyone's happy in terms of getting paid.

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 15>But lul Lemon, definitely here is looking to recoup some

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 15>of that five hundred million that they invested in this.

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, that raises the question ofvaluation. Are they going to

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 5>sell it for more than they bought?

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 15>At this point, we don't know what exactly this deal

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 15>will fetch, but it does seem pretty clear that they

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 15>won't get the five hundred million. I think they're just

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 15>trying to recoup some of the investment. But from what

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 15>I've seen, this hasn't performed that well for Lululemon.

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 7>It's unclear if it makes money.

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 15>The company took a charge of four hundred and forty

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 15>three million an impairment charge earlier this year, so clearly

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 15>it's not a huge money maker and that could weigh

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:31.800
<v Speaker 15>on the valuation.

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 5>It takes two to tango, sometimes more actually in a

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 5>complicated piece of m anda.

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 4>But who could buy Mirror?

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 15>It's a great question you mentioned before the changing habits

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 15>for remote fitness and working out at home, and a

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 15>lot of the companies in the space are challenged right now.

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 15>So Peloton, let's say it could make sense as a buyer,

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 15>but they don't have the money given all the challenges

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 15>that are going on their Tonal.

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:57.439
<v Speaker 7>Another company in the space, they.

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 15>Just switched out their CEO, they cut their valuation, so

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 15>it is kind of unclear if there's a strategic competitor

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 15>out there that could buy this potentially private equity. They

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 15>love to look at unloved assets to see if they

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 15>could do a turnaround, So I would imagine that the

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:15.880
<v Speaker 15>investment bankers that are working with Lululemon are casting a

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 15>wide net to find a potential buyer.

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 4>Very very quickly.

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 5>Anna, Do we have a timeline on this, Where is

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 5>this deal stage at.

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 7>At this point it's pretty early.

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 15>We do know there's a bank engaged on this, so

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:32.720
<v Speaker 15>I would say probably, you know, a few months from now,

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 15>but it's hard to say. With deals and Lulu Lemon,

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 15>of course, could always hold on to the asset. If

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 15>they don't get bis that they like, they might say, okay,

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 15>let's just shut it down or do something else with it.

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 5>We'll keep you posted, right bloombergs Leana Baker on the

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:46.359
<v Speaker 5>deal's beeed.

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much.

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:50.360
<v Speaker 5>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Stay

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 5>with Bloomberg in the next hour. Ryan Reynolds joins US

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 5>well known technology investor and football club owner. Don't forget

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 5>recap the show, check out the podcasts wherever you get

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 5>your podcasts, Apple, Spotify, iHeart, and all of the Bloomberg platforms.

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 4>From San Francisco, This is Bloomberg