WEBVTT - Lots More With Brad Setser on the Yen, a New China Shock and Excavators

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Bred what's going on with the yen?

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's, uh, there's a bit, a bit of an intervention.

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 3>The intervention took it from roughly one sixty to one

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 3>fifty two, and now it is drifting back up towards yes,

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 3>like round one fifty five. Broadly, the yen is just

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 3>really really, really really weak. Obviously, that's because Japanese interest

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 3>rates are very low relative to US and European rates,

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 3>and they the end reached a level where the Japanese

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Ministry of Finance, which has Japan's reserves, started selling dollars

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 3>buying yen to try to try to limit how we

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 3>can become.

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Joe, I gotta say I hate currencies. They are my

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>most hated a class locus everything No, because everything's relative.

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, the yen is down. But is it

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>dollar strength or is it yen weakness? It sounds like

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>from what brad Is said, it's more yet weakness. But

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's someone out there who will argue that

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it's actually the dollar.

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:15.559
<v Speaker 2>I did a deadlift one, okay, uh barges. This isn't

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 2>after school special, except.

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I've decided I'm going to base my entire personality going

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>forward on campaigning for a strategic pork reserve in the US.

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Where's the best with imposta?

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>These are the important question. Is it robots taking over

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the world? No.

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that like in a couple of years, the

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 2>AI will do a really good job of making the

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 2>odd launch podcast. And people say, I don't really need

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 2>to listen to Joe and Tracy anymore.

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 4>We do haveing perfect.

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to lots more? Will we catch up with friends

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:46.839
<v Speaker 2>about what's going on right now?

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Because even when odd Lots is over, there's always lots more.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 4>And we really do have the perfect guest.

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 2>We had our friend Hugh Hendry on the show just

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 2>this week and he was all telling this dollar story.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>But like, is there something wrong with Japan? Should we

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 2>be scared? Or is this just a natural repricing due

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:10.399
<v Speaker 2>to the interest rate differential?

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't think there's anything structurally or fundamentally

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 3>wrong with Japan. I mean, Japan obviously has had difficulty

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 3>generating sustained inflation over time, and the Bank of Japan

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 3>is determined to kind of get inflation up this time,

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 3>and so the Bank of Japan has been, you know,

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 3>running a monetary policy that's a bit at odds with

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 3>the policy of the Fed and the ECB. I mean,

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 3>clearly this is a case of yen weakness, because you

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 3>can look at the yen versus the dollar or the

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 3>yen versus the Euro, and either way it is weak.

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 3>But it has reached a level of kind of extreme weakness.

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 3>In real terms, the yen is back to its levels

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 3>of the early nineteen seventies, and so, you know, like

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 3>if you think of Japan's economy in the early nineteen seventies,

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 3>that is, before Pan's electronics industry took over the you know,

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 3>took on the world, before Toyota's export wave and the

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 3>globalization of Japanese automakers. It's just it's returned Japan to

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 3>a level of purchasing power that does seem a bit

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 3>at odds with the underlying strength of its economy. But

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 3>that's I guess, you can. You know, the debate is

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.239
<v Speaker 3>whether that's a natural consequence of interest rate differentials which

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 3>are large and now there's less of an expectation that

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 3>the Fed's going to cut, so the interest rate differential

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 3>will persist, or whether the yen has overshot a little bit.

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 4>It's reached such.

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 3>An extreme level of weakness that it is divorced even

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 3>from an interest rate differential that supports a weekend.

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>So we're speaking to Brad Setzer, senior fellow at the

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Council on Foreign Relations and someone we like to talk

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to to connect a lot of different things that are

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>going on in the world. And I'm just going to

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>ask one more question on the yen. And maybe it's

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of rephrasing Joe's question about should we be worried?

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>But we have seen all the talk about yen intervention recently,

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and since that supposed intervention, it looks like the yen

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>is weakening again. Is that something to worry about?

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 3>I guess it depends on what you mean by worry.

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 3>If you're the Ministry of Finance, you would rather that

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 3>the yen sort of just stay in a like a

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 3>range of one fifty to one fifty four. So if

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 3>you're the Ministry of Finance, I think you are worried

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 3>because the yen is drifting back towards one sixty, or

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 3>drifting back towards levels where you'd be expected to intervene

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 3>again the goal of intervention. Some people argue the goal

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 3>of intervention is to change the direction and go from

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 3>yen weakness to yen strength. I think that's an unrealistic goal,

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think that is Japan's goal. I think

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 3>the goal of the Ministry of Finance is to limit,

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 3>to set a floor under how weak the yen is.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 3>As the yen continues to depreciate, as it gets closer

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 3>to one sixty, I think there'll be increasing expectations of intervention.

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 3>And you know, in the short run, the intervention works,

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 3>and I think the longer one, I mean it works

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 3>in the sense that it will move the market back

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 3>towards one point fifty, and then it becomes a question

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 3>of whether the Ministry of Finance has to continuously intervene,

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 3>in which case eventually you will have a question about

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 3>whether it's running out of firepower, or whether the Bank

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 3>of Japan needs, if it's really worried, needs to join

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 3>the Ministry of Finance and adjust short term rates in

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Japan as well.

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, can I say something that has always bothered me?

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 2>And I don't mean Brad, don't listen to this part

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 2>because I'm going to question something that a professional economists

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 2>say all the time. But I'm always confused, and oh,

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 2>they didn't have enough inflation. They can't generate like we

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>have inflation now in the US. It doesn't seem that great. Meanwhile,

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.119
<v Speaker 2>Japan doesn't have much inflation. I don't know, it doesn't

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 2>seem that bad to me, Like, maybe just don't worry

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 2>about making inflation higher, doesn't wait.

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I do want to hear Brad respond to those.

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Look, I actually think it's a real debate in Japan. Okay,

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, Japan's economy did function for a while.

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I've never been there, but every time I've looked pictures,

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 2>it seems like a peaceful, prosperous society with great consumer

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 2>and food and not inexpensive housing and working rail and

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 2>all these things that we supposedly want. Like, okay, so

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 2>it's not there's not much inflation.

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 4>Who cares.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it did generate some you know, it was

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 3>perceived to generate some significant problems. I mean, zero interest rates.

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Zero inflation and zero interest rates doesn't leave much scope

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 3>for monetary policy to respond to downturns, and then it

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 3>makes wage adjustments more difficult. If some sector needs a

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 3>reduced real wage, you have to accept weaker nominal wages

0:06:57.800 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 3>and that yeah, that's just hard and people don't like

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 3>seeing there the dollar or yen value of their paycheck fall.

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 3>That said, I do think that there is a question

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 3>about whether whether low interest rates in a global environment

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 3>where other central banks have much higher interest rates, and

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 3>so your main transmission mechanism in theory is a week en,

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 3>about whether that's generating the right kind of inflation In Japan,

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 3>it's pushing up the price of imports. Imports in Japan

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 3>feed into consumer prices. They're also an input into some

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Japanese industry. But in general terms, a weekend raises the

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 3>cost of imported energy and food and reduces real wages,

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 3>which we've seen. There was a headline yesterday about falling

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 3>real wages for close to two years in Japan. And

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 3>so it isn't clear that if the main effect of

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 3>a week in is reduced real wages and you have

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 3>less fewer yen to spend on Japanese services, you can't

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 3>go out as much because you're spending more on imported oil,

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 3>whether that will generate rate a healthy, self sustaining process

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 3>of appreciation. The winners of a week yen in Japan

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 3>are the multinationals the big exporters, some of the financial

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 3>investors who had long dollar position in their portfolio. But

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 3>there isn't any immediate transmission from a big company which

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 3>is making more gives me more yen on its operations

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 3>in Thailand in the United States to real wages in

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Japan to increase spending in Japan. So it hasn't yet

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 3>generated the kind of inflationary dynamics that you've seen in

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 3>other economies. And so I do think there is a concern,

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 3>and that's why the Ministry of Finance is intervening and

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 3>trying to separately limit yen weakness. There's a concern that

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 3>yen weakness isn't actually helping reflate Japan's economy.

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Brad, you mentioned wages there, real wages, and I was

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>just thinking back to my wage when I was in

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>grade school in Japan, and I used to get one

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand yen every week for my allowance, which was ten dollars.

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And I have to say that exchange rate is forever

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 1>fixed in my mind as like what the yen should be.

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>It should always be around like one hundred to the dollar.

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>And when I look at the chart now, it's really

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of stunning. To me, But you also mentioned imports

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>getting more expensive, and this is something that we wanted

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>to speak to you about. Did you see the China

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>export data that came out this morning.

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 3>I did.

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So exports going up more than expected. I think

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it was like a one point five percent increase in

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>dollar terms versus a forecast for one point three percent.

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>And this has kind of burst into the public consciousness

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of at least finance Twitter recently, this idea that China's

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>exports have been relatively strong and this is one of

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the few bright spots perhaps in the Chinese economy. Can

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you talk a little bit more about that. Some people

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>are couching this as like a China a shock that

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>we should be worried about that the rest of the

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 1>world will struggle to respond to.

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 3>So I guess you know, if you just look at

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 3>the headline increase in dollars, an increase of one or

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 3>two percent doesn't seem that dramatic. So there's another important component,

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 3>which is that Chinese export prices have been falling quite significantly,

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, because of yuan weakness, because of lower price

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 3>war for electric vehicles, a price war for solar panels,

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 3>a price war for a lot of China's exports, so

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 3>export volumes are actually up more like ten percent. I mean,

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the numbers yet available for April, but

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 3>that was certainly the case for the first quarter, and

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 3>so it is in that context that one can think

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 3>of a new China shock. I think that the notion

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 3>of a new China shock is very much tied to

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 3>the auto sector and both the electric vehicle sector and

0:10:55.920 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 3>traditional combustion engines, where China has gone from basically being

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 3>a source of import demand. China imported high end luxury

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 3>cars from Germany, not so many from Japan, but few

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 3>from Japan, a lot from Germany, and five years ago

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't a big export or not of cars. Produced

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 3>some trucks for export, but not much. Past few years,

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 3>that's changed. China is now the world's biggest exporter of cars.

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 3>It's electric vehicle manufacturers are exceptionally competitive. They're taking market

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 3>share from the foreign joint ventures in China, and they're

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 3>really starting to try to export. And then some of

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 3>the old capacity that made traditional internal combustion engine cars

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 3>in China is being repurposed to serve global demand. So

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 3>this is just combining to really push up export volumes

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 3>in autos in an important way. There's also just enormous

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 3>capacity inside China to produce solar panels, to produce batteries,

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 3>and so you know, China can meet global demand for

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.599
<v Speaker 3>these products as it expands out of its existing capacity,

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 3>which makes it very difficult for other countries who want

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 3>to build up their own solar industry or their own

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 3>battery industry to get those industries going. I think that's

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 3>the sense in which China's exports are a bit of

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 3>a shock to the global system and why there's been

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 3>a bit of pushback. There's some technical factors as well.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 3>We all remember that during the pandemic, everybody bought a

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of computers, bought a lot of household appliances. That

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 3>drove China's exports up to a really, really high level.

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Two years ago, they kind of dip back down and

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 3>now they're coming back up. But there's a dynamic around

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 3>China's traditional exports, and then there's a separate dynamic around

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 3>cars and clean energy exports, and I think the China

0:12:54.440 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 3>shock is much more now around cars and clean energy.

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, I remember in the post twenty ten environment,

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 2>and there's a lot of talk about, you know, currency wars.

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 2>In this idea, everyone doing this beggar thy neighbor policy

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 2>of trying to have their currency weaker so that they

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 2>could sell more. Is that still a dynamic because the

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 2>end can fall, can keep falling. But it doesn't mean

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 2>they're going to have a national BYD. In fact, Toyota

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 2>isn't even really that into evs as far as I

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 2>can tell, or the Malaysian ring it is pretty weak.

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 2>But they don't have a BYD either, or a Shoumi

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>or a comac or whatever. It is, Like, how much

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 2>do currencies today play and trade competitiveness or in an

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 2>environment in which the big source of action seems to

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 2>be non commodity more cutting edge technological exports.

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm super retro on this question, Okay, in my view,

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 3>still matter, they matter.

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 4>There's our headline, you know.

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I'm really going out on a limb there. I look.

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I think the response of Japanese exports to yen weakness

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 3>has been relatively modest. I think there's a lot of

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 3>different reasons for that. I think Toyota has wanted to

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 3>protect its transplants, its factories in the United States. It

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 3>hasn't wanted to engage in a price war. It has

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 3>preferred to basically take the yeek week in as a

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 3>source of greater profit rather than really engage in a

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 3>fight for volume. If you look at the weak Korean

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 3>wand which is also veriry.

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Which always going to bring up because it sort of

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 2>shows that there is this commonality and it's not just

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 2>a yen story.

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 3>But yes, anyway, you know, if you look at Hyundai's

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 3>sales in the US and they're exports to the US,

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 3>they've responded very clearly to the to the week one.

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's been an enormous actually increase hasn't gotten

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of attention in Korean auto exports to the US.

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 3>And I also think the fact that in real terms,

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 3>because Chinese inflation has actually been very low relative to

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 3>inflation and the rest of the world, and the yuan

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 3>has come down against the dollar, you know, there's been

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 3>a roughly ten percent weakening of the yuan in real terms,

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 3>and I think that is one of the factors that

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 3>is contributing to this export boom. You see all these

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 3>comparisons of China's EV prices versus prices of evs elsewhere,

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 3>and of course part of that is just you know,

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 3>byd had got really good at making evs really fast.

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 3>But part of it is that the Chinese yuan is

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 3>below where it was fifteen years ago against the dollar,

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 3>and inflation differentials are now bringing cost in China down.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 3>My rule of thumb is that if the Chinese yuan

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 3>is not going up, if it's not appreciating, China tends

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 3>to gain global market share. And I think that is

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 3>a general rule that's held over time, and I think

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 3>it's asserting itself now. The interesting thing about China is

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 3>that it is not giving up its old competitive advantages

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 3>as it is introducing these new advantages. It's just exporting more.

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 3>And I think that is in part a function of

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 3>the week you on. So there's been some weirdness. Certainly

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of relationships broke down during the pandemic. But

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 3>my baseline thesis is that you're going to see a

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 3>reassertion of the traditional, well established relationship between currency values

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 3>and export volumes pretty clearly over the next couple of years.

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Wait, this is my chance to ask you about Chinese

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>excavators and what they maybe say about what's driving the

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>export boom and the debate between you know, interest rate

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>differentials and maybe currency contributions versus excess capacity, because that's

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that people are talking a lot about,

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>this idea that, well, there's so much excess capacity in

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese economy. If you can't sell into your domestic market,

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to try to sell more outside of it.

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Look, the reality is the two those factors tend to

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 3>go together. If you've got weakness in your domestic market,

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 3>you're going to have low interest rates and a weak

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 3>currency as a general rule, and that exchange rate signal

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 3>helps you take products that previously were produced for your

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 3>own market and sell them to the rest of the world.

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 3>They're not mutually exclusive explanations. A weak currency helps you

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 3>take excess capacity and sell it globally. There's two different

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 3>things that have happened with excavators, which are like the

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 3>big construction equipment with like a backo that helps you

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 3>dig out the foundation of a new building or help

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 3>build a road. They're like the base construction equipment you

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 3>know in the US would be like the thing Caterpillar makes.

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It's the thing that every guy I've ever met always

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>dreams of operating.

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Because they're cool.

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Exactly by the way, So on the point, sorry to intervine,

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 2>but on this point, Tracy, you know, I'm going to

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Las Vegas next week to see Dead and Co. With

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 2>a few friends at the sphere, and we're looking at

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 2>a few of the things that we can do, like

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna go see the big dam that's out there

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 2>and other stuff. One of the things that possibly will

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 2>be on our itinerary is this big amusement park where

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 2>adults and kids can dig up stuff with excavators.

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>So you may get a business model.

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 4>You may get a.

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Picture of me in about a week from today sitting

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 2>in an excavator or in the bucket part of it.

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, So yes, confirmed, all right, gor.

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 3>And in my youth, I think I had a Lego

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 3>set that where you had like the fancy gears and

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 3>you could like make it move and it was an

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 3>excavator and it was the total list. There's something amazing

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 3>about the mechanics of an excavator excavator. But you know,

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.239
<v Speaker 3>two things have happened. Like twenty years ago, there were

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot of excavators made in China. Even then, those

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 3>excavators were often made by Caterpillar or Komatsu. The big

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Japanese construction equipment company. And so over the past twenty years,

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Chinese companies have sprung up, developed, been able to produce

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 3>at a lower cost point, probably gotten a little local preference.

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you're a state back construction company, you're

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 3>probably going to use a Chinese excavator if it is

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 3>price competitive. And so inside the Chinese market, the Chinese companies,

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese marks have gained at the expensive foreign companies.

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 3>And then the second thing that happened is that as

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 3>China went through, you know, one of the world's biggest

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 3>property booms, there was just a lot of demand for excavators.

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 3>So capacity increased and China was producing a lot of excavators.

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Chinese companies were producing a lot of excavators that were

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 3>mostly being used in China as part of the construction boom.

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Construction boom turned to construction busts. Chinese companies are making

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 3>competitive excavators, and guess what those excavators are being exported globally.

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Same dynamics a little bit in steel. It is not

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 3>just a clean tech ev dynamic. The set of inputs

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 3>old industry inputs into construction. You know, construction activity in

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.880
<v Speaker 3>China's down. It's going to go down further, given all

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the difficulties in the property development sector, and given the

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 3>fact that China's overbuilt and you're going to have to

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 3>have an extended period of much reduced property construction. Those

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 3>inputs are in some small part being exported. I mean,

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 3>China could export more steel, but Chinese steel exports now

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 3>exceed US steel production. I think they exceed Japanese steel production.

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's just a and that has not exhausted

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Chinese export capacity. There's still capacity to export more. So

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 3>that's the kind of thing that makes a lot of

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 3>China's trading partners nervous. You know, China's can export one

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred million tons of metric tons of steel and still

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 3>export another one hundred million. China's exporting five million vehicles,

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 3>but there is clearly capacity inside China export ten wow.

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 3>And you know five is more than Japan, it's more

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 3>than Germany. Ten would be record breaking. So it's that

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 3>forward looking concern is very real.

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Tracy two things.

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm on Alibaba dot Com right now, and there's apparently

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 2>excavators you can buy for two thousand dollars from China.

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand how that has.

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 3>To be any man.

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but they look like something. But then the other

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 2>thing is like, you know, Tracy, just I just had

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 2>this light bulb moment where, you know, when the Internet

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 2>bubble happened in the US, everyone is like, well, yeah,

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 2>but there were some good spillovers because we got all

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 2>this unused fiber optics and that laid the groundwork for

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 2>the next twenty years China real estate bubble, creating this

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 2>incredible unused capacity of excavator and I know how to

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 2>make excavators for the rest of the world.

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 4>So there you go.

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Brad. The other thing we wanted to ask you about,

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>we could just turn this into an excavator.

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:01.679
<v Speaker 2>At the We got to get that guy on TikTok

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 2>who sells the Chinese excavators sometime.

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>That would be fun.

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Brad.

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:07.719
<v Speaker 1>The other thing we want to ask you, and this

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of ties into the discussion around well, it very

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>much ties into the discussion around China's export boom. You

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>just published a paper at the French Institute of International

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Relations called Power and Financial Interdependence, and you're sort of

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>tackling this idea of the China and US financial systems

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>being intertwined so China buys a lot of US treasuries

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>because it has to, basically because it's exporting a lot

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to the US. But you make the point that there's

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a difference between financial intertwining or interdependence versus the sort

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.479
<v Speaker 1>of real economy interdependence. Could you talk a little bit

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>more about that.

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, I think the paper has an ambitious title,

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 3>so hopefully people will read it as a paper with

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 3>some ambition, even if the conclusions are nuanced. I guess

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 3>I make a number of different observations about the link

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 3>between financial interdependence and real economic interdependence. One is the

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 3>one you made that if there is an enormous trade imbalance,

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 3>by definition, there has to be offsetting financing, and there

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 3>will be a financial imbalance, even if that imbalance is

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 3>a bit hidden, and even if it is hard to trace.

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 3>And one of the clear trends over the past fifteen

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 3>years is that China has gone from more or less

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 3>taking its export surplus, having the central bank buy it up,

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 3>buy up the dollars in investing in treasuries and agencies

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 3>doing a lot of more diverse things with its foreign

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 3>exchange reserves. There's a phrase that safe uses which I

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 3>like called the diversified use of foreign exchange reserves, which

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 3>actually it would be putting them things into financial assets

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 3>that are in no way foreign exchange reserves. And then

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 3>because of low interest rates, right now, the accumulation of

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 3>financial assets on the Chinese side has moved to the

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 3>export to the private side of China's economy, and so

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't show up as this huge sustained bid for treasuries.

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 3>So that's kind of one theme. The other theme is, hey,

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 3>if you're thinking about the exercise of power, there are

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 3>conditions when you really need financial assets. If you have

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 3>an overvalue currency and you want to defend that currency,

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 3>you don't want the currency to weaken, or if you

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 3>have foreign currency denominated debts that you really want to pay,

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 3>you need financial assets, and losing access to financial assets

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 3>can be a very powerful sanction. But China buy and large,

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 3>doesn't need access to its legacy financial assets to do

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 3>much of anything right now. It's got this big ongoing

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 3>trade ser plus, it doesn't have much foreign currency external debt.

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Obviously it does help with respect to intervention, but if

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day, the worst outcome that

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 3>for China from losing access to your foreign exchange reserves

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 3>is a weak Chinese yuan, that's probably something China can manage. Actually, Conversely,

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 3>those countries that are selling financial assets to China, they're

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 3>receiving real goods and surfaces, mostly goods, and if you

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 3>lose access to real goods in a crisis in certain contexts,

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 3>that can be quite devastating. You lose access to imported components,

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 3>and then the rest of your production process can't continue

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 3>until you find an alternative source. And for some products

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 3>there is no alternative source that's also not Chinese. So

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 3>I think you have to worry a little bit in this.

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 3>In a world where you know, so called interdependence has

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 3>been weaponized, and the US has weaponized interdependence chip export

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 3>controls or the classic example, financial sanctions or the other.

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 3>China has weaponized interdependence economic coercion, not buying commodities or

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 3>at least some commodities from countries where it don't say

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 3>nice things about China, famously with Australia are squeezing Korean

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 3>automakers after Korea agreed to the deployment of a powerful

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 3>US radar in Korea, or losing access to Chinese tourists,

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 3>because the Chinese State Tourism Bureau doesn't sell package holidays

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 3>to your country if you're not saying, if you're rude

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.159
<v Speaker 3>and mean to the Chinese people. So you know, there

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 3>are various ways in which interdependence can be weaponized, and

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 3>some of those involve limits on the use of your

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 3>foreign assets, financial sanctions, and some of those involve restrictions

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 3>on the real flow of goods. And I think in

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 3>the most extreme scenarios, the restrictions on the real flow

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 3>of goods may be more significant for the Sino American

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:51.719
<v Speaker 3>leverage than financial right.

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 2>That's basically my takeaway here that if the US did

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 2>to China at some point in the future what it

0:26:57.800 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 2>did to Russia, which I'm not even.

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 4>Sure that that effective.

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Against Russia, but against China it wouldn't have a big

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 2>impact necessarily, But if the China converted conversely did the opposite,

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 2>it would.

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Have a big impact on US. So it seems like

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 4>a bad situation for the US well.

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 3>But to be fair, one of the side effects of

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 3>the property boom in China, you know, Xi Jinping has

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 3>this idea that he can reduce his dependence on the

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 3>rest of the world by substituting out all the goods

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 3>that China now imports, all at least the manufactured goods

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 3>that China imports, and building up stockpiles of all the

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 3>commodities that China imports, And so if there was a

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 3>big interruption in trade, China's economy could continue to function

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 3>fair enough. One thesis. It's a pretty aggressive thesis. It's

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 3>aggressive in the sense that it's preparing for a negative contingency.

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 3>It's aggressive in the sense that it it engineers out

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 3>all of other countries' exports into manufactured exports into China.

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 3>But it doesn't change the fact that an enormous part

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 3>of the Chinese economy and a growing part of the

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Chinese economy. All the people making excavators, for example, are

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 3>internal combustion engine cars for export. They their jobs depend

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 3>on access to export markets. So China's dependence on external

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 3>demand has gone up very, very significantly over the past

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 3>three or four years, even as China's reliance on imported

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 3>manufactured inputs has gone down. So China does have its

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 3>own very significant vulnerabilities in that respect.

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>We're back to excavators as the prism through which to

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>understand China's Economy, lots More is produced by Carmen Rodriguez

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and Dashel Bennett, with help from Moses Onam and kel Brooks.

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Our sound engineer is Blake Maple's Sage Bouman is the

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 2>head of Bloomberg Pucks.

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Please rate, review, and subscribe to ad Blots and lots

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>More on your favorite podcast platforms.

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 2>And remember that Bloomberg subscribers can listen to all of

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 2>our podcasts add free by connecting through Apple Podcasts.

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:13.719
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening.