WEBVTT - Religion and Conspiracy Theories (with Drew McCoy) - Part 1

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm John Cipher and I'm Jerry O'Shea. I was a

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>CIA officer stationed around the world in high threat posts

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, Russia, and in Asia.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 2>And I served in Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 2>and in war zones. We sometimes created conspiracies to deceive

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 2>our adversaries.

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Now we're going to use our expertise to deconstruct conspiracy

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>theories large and small.

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 2>Could they be true or are we being manipulated?

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>This is mission implausible.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 3>So John and Jerry, I'm excited to introduce you to

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 3>my friend Drew McCoy.

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Drew, Hey, thanks for having me guys.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:42.279
<v Speaker 3>So, Drew has a phenomenal YouTube channel, Genetically Modified Skeptic

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 3>where I think, Drew, it's fair to say you're one

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 3>of the most public voices of what's now known as

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 3>the ex evangelical movement, the movement of people who grew

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 3>up evangelical Christian no longer are evangelical Christians. None of

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 3>the three of us are particularly religious, and we're having

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 3>a chat about sure. See like there's a huge overlap

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 3>between conspiracy theories from QAnon to whatever the latest Trump

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 3>thing is and evangelical Christians. And we were like, why

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 3>is that.

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, hopefully my pain can help elucidate some of the

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 4>factors here, My childhood trauma might be able to help

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 4>you guys understand a little bit of this.

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 5>I hope.

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh great, Yes, we love childhood trauma. John Cipher, Well,

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 3>were you religious at all as a kid? Were your parents?

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Did you go to church?

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>My parents, my dad was a professor and mom was

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a teacher. No, we didn't go to church. We weren't

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>really religious. They weren't trying to promote atheism or anything

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>like that. And it wasn't until I was out of college.

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Once we were some function and somebody asked my father

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>what he was and he said, I don't. My friend

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>told me that they don't think I'm a Christian. Then

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>they explained what a Christian is. I guess that's right.

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I just never grew up with much religion, and so

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm intimidated about you guys.

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 2>And Jerry, you grew up well, okay, last Dave's o'sha

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 2>one of ten kids? What do you think all Altra boy? Drew,

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 2>you had the Baptists, we had the Jesuits. They're just

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 2>as mind bending for me. And to bring Cia into it,

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 2>and conspiracy theories. When I was younger, I fifth sixth grade,

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 2>I started to question just logically, like this doesn't make

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 2>any sense to me, and I was basically told lovingly

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 2>shut up and accept it. And it's about faith. And

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 2>in Cia we dealt with faith a lot, surprisingly so

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 2>people had faith in communism, feefle had faith and jihadism,

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 2>people had faith in their own ethnic superiority like in

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 2>South Africa, and people did terrible atrocities based on faith

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 2>their faith. And with Drew, I was if I could

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 2>kick it off, I'd like to know what you think

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 2>faith is, because in Cia we've seen faith Shia and

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Sunnis in Iraq where they slaughtered each other, and John

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 2>was in the killing fields of the former ex Yugoslavia

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 2>where people were murdering under each other for things we

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 2>couldn't understand, and it was all based on faith, not

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 2>just religious face, but also faith in a great leader

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 2>or an ideology so true. I was wondering if you

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>could tell us what you think faith is and how

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 2>we define it, because it's generally a positive word, but

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 2>I think in Ceeia we don't often tend not to

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 2>see it that way.

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 4>It's a good question, and I think that the answer

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 4>that's existed in the atheist sphere for quite a while now,

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 4>originating with people like Christopher Higgins and Sam Harris, is

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 4>fundamentally flawed. The atheist fear likes to say faith is

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 4>just bad epistemology. It's just believing in things for which

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 4>there is no evidence. And that's not completely incorrect in

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 4>certain instances, it's just that's not the entirety of the picture.

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 4>So I see faith as strong affiliation and identity with something.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 4>That can be a belief, but just as much it

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 4>can be a group, it can be an identity. It

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 4>can be like you said, affiliation with or love of

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 4>some kind of totalitarian leader. I don't think that faith

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 4>needs to be looked at just through a philosophical context,

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 4>thinking oh, it's just bad epistemology. It also needs to

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 4>be seen sociologically. What does faith do? Faith motivates people

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 4>to affiliate with certain groups, to do certain actions, And

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 4>that's how I prefer to think about faith.

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 3>That lines up with my I didn't grow up particularly religious,

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 3>although Jewish, but I did major in history of religion

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 3>in college because I was always fascinated, like, how do

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 3>people have faith? And a Christian apologist or any kind

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 3>of religious apologists would say, oh, you have faith in

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Darwinism and the Big Bang and stuff. So putting that

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 3>whole argument to one side, the kind of functional use

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 3>of faith the way you defined it makes a lot

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 3>of sense to me and also helps see like, oh,

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 3>that is a frame to look at conspiracy theories. We've

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 3>talked about on this show. How you know, if you

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.359
<v Speaker 3>suddenly believe in whatever, QAnon, whatever it is, you have

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 3>a community, you have a shared frame of reference. One

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 3>way I think about it is like you know what

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 3>to think and feel in the more when you wake up,

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 3>like you have a purpose, you have a goal, you

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 3>have an enemy, you have good guys and bad guys,

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 3>and so in that sense, it almost makes me wonder like,

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 3>where is the line between you know, sort of traditional

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 3>religious faith and believing in conspiracy theories?

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, And I actually have a little factoid here that

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to make sure and bring up at the

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 4>beginning of this just so that hopefully we can all

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 4>be on the same page about what an evangelical is.

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Per Ryan Burge, who is a political scientist at Eastern

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 4>Illinois University, I've had him on my channel. The identity

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 4>of evangelical is not something that is informed solely theologically,

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 4>and I think I would actually argue that it's informed

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 4>more by a certain kind of political action and identity.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 4>So the evidence of this is that when surveyed in

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty two, twenty three percent of people who are

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 4>Orthodox Christians identified as evangelical. Orthodox Christians come from places

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 4>like Russia and Georgia. They're very much not in line

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 4>theologically with evangelical Christians in the US. Now, to go

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 4>in a more extreme direction, thirty nine percent of Republican

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 4>voting Muslims in the United States identify as evangelicals. Traditionally

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 4>the enemy of the religious right in the US right,

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 4>but now they are identifying with the religious rights so

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 4>long as they vote Republican. Now, among Buddhists, twenty five

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 4>percent of Republican Buddhists in the United States identify as

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 4>born again or evangelical. For Hindus it's thirty seven percent.

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 4>We're most definitely not seeing evangelicalism act as a solely

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 4>religious category. It's a political category and identity maybe more

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 4>than anything else.

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you why is that?

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I know when I look back at my history, there

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is a tie between what became evangelical religion and anti

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>intellectualism in this country. Right, the early Puritans are rigorous

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>scholars and revered learning, and they built Harvard University all

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>those kind of things, and then the Awakening the mid

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century, true was intellectually be subordinate to the soul.

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 1>More about spontaneity, a focus on the spirit, personal Bible,

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>people can find their own relationship with God and those

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>type of things, and it was often tied with moving

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>away from that focus on For the Puritans, it was

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a scholarly clergy. But why did it become political? Whim

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>evangelicals now tied to politics in our minds.

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm glad that you brought up the Puritans and how

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 4>much they valued education within theology and authority as well.

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 4>The Puritans, the Congregational Church was one of the established

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 4>churches in the colonies before independence. And the thing that

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 4>kind of drove the advent of evangelicalism in the United

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 4>States we might recognize it today was the abolishment or

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 4>the abolition of state churches and the adoption of a

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 4>free market economy within the realm of religion. So I

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 4>think that points to a pretty clear overlap between just

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 4>an idea that free market values, free market approaches to culture,

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 4>to economics need to be valued, and this form of

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 4>Protestantism that we see today, evangelicalism is basically extreme libertarian,

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 4>free market Christianity, where the most inflammatory positions, where the

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 4>most eye catching rhetoric is going to be prized and

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 4>made into doctrine that gets repeated and spread.

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 2>I enjoy disagreeing with John, so let me just take

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 2>my pet pee for a walk. So I think it's

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 2>within the Pilgrim ideology that the first religious forces that

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 2>came to the US from Europe. I think conspiracy theories

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 2>are embedded in that. Within two generations, there's the sale

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 2>in witchcraft trials, right, and in the sixteen nineties and

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 2>at one point ten percent of the entire population was

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 2>being accused of witchcraft. From a very small population, thirty

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 2>five people were brutally murdered, and scholars look back now

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 2>and say, well, actually, yeah, it was religious hysteria arc

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 2>but it was also politics, it was also class and

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 2>it was also arguably a conspiracy theory that got out

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 2>of hand. And I think there's a straight line between

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the Salem witchcraft trials which were biblically based. There's the

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 2>thing in the Bible about suffer not which is to

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 2>live right, so that riches must be alive and you

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 2>must execute them to QAnon today and I'm throwing open

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 2>to the groups, what's the sense of politics, conspiracy theories

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 2>religion and what we have in the US.

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 4>The peak of witch trials in all of religious history,

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 4>as far as I can tell, or at least in

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 4>Christian history as far as I can tell, is actually

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 4>happening in early modern Europe as a result of Protestants

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 4>and Catholics fighting for the first time, because Protestants actually

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 4>came onto the scene printing press and Protestantism had really

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 4>a hand in hand relationship. And what I see Protestantism

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 4>as is a move toward a free market approach to

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 4>create Ristianity rather than this kind of high church liturgical

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 4>approach to Christianity with everything is just based in authority,

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 4>and for better or worse, it seems like free market

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 4>approaches to religion breed ideas that can be very much

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 4>steeped in fear, in moral panic, and inflammatory rhetoric, simply

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 4>because this is the type of human communication that cashes

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 4>human attention. The most Martin Luther really stoked moral panic

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 4>in accusing the Catholic Church of a bunch of things

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 4>which were of course maybe necessary to call out, but

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 4>and effective. This is that people get really scared, really

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 4>riled up. They start looking for enemies everywhere, and they

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 4>eventually start accusing what today we would just consider to

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 4>be maybe more masculine women, religious minorities, gay people of witchcraft,

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 4>and then unlike with the Salem witch trials, killing a

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 4>lot of them, not just accusing a few hundred and

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 4>killing something like night eineteen, but killing hundreds of them.

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 5>While I do.

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 4>With my Protestant roots, tend to think that a free

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 4>market approach to things is good, I think when it

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 4>comes to religion, I can't deny that there's a serious

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 4>connection between a free market religious economy and moral panic.

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 4>And that means conspiracy theories.

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean we see in countries today that have established

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 3>religions parts of Europe, the United Kingdom, Christian religious practice

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 3>is much less right and self identified. I mean, we

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 3>are now catching up with Europe in our the percentage

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 3>of Americans who don't have a religious belief, but we're

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 3>still as I understand it, way higher than a lot

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 3>of European countries where they have. In fact, I believe

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 3>there's strong evidence that separation of church and state was

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 3>as much for the church as it was for the state,

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 3>that there was an understanding that having one state religion

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 3>would actually hurt religious practice.

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 3>All right, we're going to get right back into that,

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 3>but first let's hear this.

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Evangelicals. Now, I tend to think about them in the

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>political sphere, and they tend to be very focused on

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>right wing politics, and as such, oftentimes I think that

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>they look down on people like me who aren't believers.

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>And maybe that's wrong, but it seems that they think

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that non believers sort of pretentious, are pompous intellectuals and

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>what have you. But is there an arrogance to being

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a believer? It seems to me that it's the height

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>of arrogance to claim that you know there is one

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>truth and you have a relationship with God and someone

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>else doesn't.

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 4>Now, there are a lot of religious traditions that do

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 4>stress kind of the death of the ego, thinking about

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 4>something like Sufi mysticism, even mysticism within the Orthodox Church.

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 4>To a certain degree, things like this things in New Age,

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 4>they very much lessen the esteem of the individual or

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 4>sense of identity of the individual and try to integrate

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 4>this self into a larger whole. But speaking specifically about

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Evangelic Christianity, there absolutely is a strong identitarian attitude. The

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 4>way that I mean identitarian attitudes are strong ideas that

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 4>you and your group or a specific identity group culture

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 4>should control everything, should have at least far more power

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 4>than anyone else. Within the Evangelical Christian Church, within Protestant

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:27.239
<v Speaker 4>churches generally, but especially when you start going very conservative,

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 4>there is a strong identitarian idea. When Jesus said to

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 4>go to the highways in the hedges, he was not

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 4>saying go to the highways and the hedges to make

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 4>sure that everybody goes to heaven. He was saying that,

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 4>but he was also saying, go to the highways and

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 4>the hedges and tell them that they need to basically

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 4>bow down before you and your control over politics, over culture,

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 4>over arguably economics, and so yes, I definitely think that

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 4>there is a form of arrogance and even narcissism within

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 4>a specific the type of Christian theology that is encapsulated

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 4>in evangelicalism right now.

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 2>And I'd expand that beyond just Christianity. So I spent

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time as his Adam in the Middle East,

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 2>and John has spent time in South Asia and dealing

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 2>with Muslims, right And it's not anti William, but this

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 2>is they have the same sort of thing. When I've

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 2>talked to al Qaeda people, we've captured al Qaeda fighters,

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 2>they have this religious not only just faith, but fervor

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 2>that they are not terrorists. We're the terrorists, but they

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 2>are actually the warriors of God. They are divinely ordained

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 2>to kill us. And as a CIAF are trying to

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 2>explain this to the US political establishment. It's not you're

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 2>not going to defeat them in Afghanistan. You're not going

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 2>to defeat them with bombs and bullets. What you're struggling

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 2>with here is faith and however you want to define it.

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 2>And I recall one particular instance when I was in

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 2>a rock just after Moses had fallen, and if you remember,

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 2>it was like three thousand Isis guys defeated fifty thousand

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Iraqi troops and Washington is like, how could this possibly be?

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 2>It's because one side believes they actually believe they're from God,

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>and Washington just couldn't get it, like, no, no, they

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 2>can't be true. It's got to be they got more money,

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 2>They've got this. It's like, you can't pay these guys

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 2>like an extra three hundred dollars to blow themselves up.

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 2>And that's again, that's something we struggle within the national

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 2>security space is understanding the fervency of this outside of the.

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 4>Beltleigh, Yeah, I think that I've witnessed this idea within

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 4>the atheist community, especially which very strongly exists with an

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 4>evangelical community of basically religious essentialism. There is some kind

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 4>of discernible fundamental essence of true religion that must exist

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 4>in order for something to be true religion. Religion in

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 4>its true form and its pure form, cannot be influenced

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 4>by outside factors. It just is as it is. And

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 4>so that means that people like Sam Harris have been

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 4>driven to say that what's fundamentally wrong with Islam is

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 4>the fundamentals of Islam. He does not factor in any

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 4>kind of outside influence into what he believes is true

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 4>Islam or true Christianity. These things are defined entirely through

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 4>a theological Lens.

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 2>I want to just jump in to say, the people

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 2>we were using to fight isis were other Muslims, right,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 2>So it's not like in Islam thing, it's what version

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 2>thereof or how you define faith and how it's exploited.

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 4>Perhaps, Yeah, definitely. Now, religious scholars and sociologists in general

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 4>over the last ten years I think have been really

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 4>they've always stressed this, but strongly stressing as a response

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 4>to public ideas about religion, that religion is fundamentally malleable,

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 4>and these ideas of fundamentalism that are really popular in

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 4>atheist and Christian circles alike today are a reductionist. They're

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 4>essentialist the kind of Islam that you are describing here.

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 4>While maybe they can make theologically salient arguments for why

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.239
<v Speaker 4>these things are linked to the Qoran, we like to

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 4>reduce the development of ideas like this to being oh,

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 4>they read the Koran and then they acted on it.

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Whereas when we look in different contexts we see Islam

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 4>in somewhere like Indonesia, in places where people are a

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:39.719
<v Speaker 4>bit wealthier, where it's very multicultural, where it's multi lingual,

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 4>we just don't see the same kind of radicalism and

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 4>fundamentalism popping up. To me, this means that there's got

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 4>to be some kind of other factor. There's got to

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 4>be economic factors, there's got to be social and cultural

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 4>factors going on. Maybe it's a bad idea for me

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 4>to pick a fight about foreign policy here with you

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 4>guys at all. That's not my expertise. You're a popular

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 4>American project has been to say that American foreign policy

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 4>does not have anything to do with the rise of Wahabism,

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 4>this kind of ultra fundamentalist and violent form of Islam.

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 4>While I wouldn't defend the idea that America created fundamentalist

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 4>is Lam, I think that's reductive too. I think that

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 4>we do need to look at social, economic, cultural political

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 4>factors when we're explaining why basically these fifteen year old

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 4>boys would go out and start murdering their fellow citizens

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 4>in the name of the same religion. Essentially.

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 3>I did a story in two thousand and two for

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 3>The New York Times. I interviewed a group of guys

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 3>who wanted to be suicide bombers, and I interviewed three,

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 3>and two of them disappeared. I don't know what happened, yes,

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 3>but we can guess. And this was in Jordan in

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and two. It was clear there was probably

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 3>going to be a war with Iraq. So there was

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 3>a handful of options and they were very aware of them.

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 3>There was Israel, which was their first choice, but the

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 3>hardest to access. There was Iraq coming up. They were

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 3>excited about that. The easiest, they said, was Chechhnia, which

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 3>at the time you just raised your hand and they

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 3>were in. At least that's what these kids told me.

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 3>You could be in Chech fairly quickly. They knew how

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 3>to get you in there. Kashmir, I was surprised to

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 3>hear was also a favorite spot they actually I witnessed

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 3>an interesting argument between them where two of them said

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 3>they might just stay in Jordan and kill Americans in Jordan,

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 3>and the other one saying, no, you can't in Jordan

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.719
<v Speaker 3>because the Quran says, and I don't know the Korah,

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if this is true, but says something

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 3>like you can kill an invading army, but not an

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 3>invited army. And since the King of Jordan had invited

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 3>the Americans, you couldn't kill them in Jordan. But the

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 3>second they cross into Iraq, it was fair game, and

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 3>that by this logic also anyone in Israel, it's fair

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 3>game because they see that the entire Israel as an invasion.

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 3>But one of these guys, who was by far the smartest,

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 3>and I will let you know, I'm still friends with him,

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 3>he actually gave up that way, and he lives in Texas.

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Now he's a lovely guy, honestly, no joke, Drew, I

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 3>should introduce you sometime. But he's still a devout Muslim,

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 3>but not he rejects violence. Now that's good, Yes, that's good.

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 3>But he was explicit. He just walked me through. He's like,

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 3>I am a poor Palestinian kid from a bad family

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 3>in Jordan. Like not a bad family, just a poor,

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 3>unconnected family. I'm a really good computer programmer, but I

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 3>can't get ahead because everywhere I go to get a job,

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 3>like the nephew of the owner who's an idiot, gets

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 3>promoted above me. And I want to be proud, and

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 3>if I could get a job at Microsoft, I'd much

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 3>prefer that to being a suicide bomber. But I don't

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 3>know any other way to be proud. And he was explicit.

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 3>He said, if I get a good programming job. I'm

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 3>not going to do it. If I don't, I will.

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 3>He did, by the way, get a good programming job,

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 3>and that's what he does in Texas. I spent time

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 3>in Haiti where I mean, obviously, Haiti's a religious country,

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 3>but it's not a religious lent. The violence isn't religiously tinged.

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 3>And John and Jerry, you both have spent time in

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 3>countries where there is no gredible promise of an improved

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 3>life over time, and when you feel a fairly high

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 3>likelihood that the existing system, the existing real world, the

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 3>existing economic order, political order, is just going to continue

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 3>to suck. You start to understand how the vast majority

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 3>of people in those conditions don't become suicie pommers or

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.959
<v Speaker 3>terrorists and don't turn to violence. But you can understand

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 3>how religious faith that it transports you out of those conditions,

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 3>that allows you to imagine other planes or other worlds

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 3>where there's an alternate, happier life, either happening now or

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 3>could happen in the future. It just feels obvious.

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a break, we'll be right back.

0:21:58.000 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 3>All right, back to mission implausible.

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 2>I really want to jump in and say that, So

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 2>there's the doc Trinle, Right, so there's everybody's got everybody.

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 2>All cultures have a religion, Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, Sikhism. What happens, though,

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 2>is there's a narrative that goes with it can be interpreted,

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 2>and I'd call it a conspiracy theory. Right. So within

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Islam there are people who are interpreting certain ways for

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 2>their own political power achieve a sense of aggrievement. John's

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 2>an expert on Yugoslavia, but they all got along fairly

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 2>well during the Yugoslav days. And yet when these conspiracy theories,

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 2>these narratives of Serb supremacy or of proat supremacy or

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is, they get involved and it becomes violent,

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 2>and there's there's radical polarization. And I'm concerned because I'm

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 2>starting to see that we're beginning to see that in

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 2>the US much more than we've ever had the sort

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 2>of the politics of agreement, the narratives of a larger

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 2>conspiratorial view of life. How you look at things.

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Du how would a real believer answer a question that

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I often wonder, like why aren't Christian values enough? Why

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>isn't it okay just to lead a good, clean Christian life, love,

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>they neighbor, etc. Without having to believe in personal God

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>or God at all.

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 4>First of all, the idea within evangelical Christianity is that

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 4>the ultimate basis for morality, the reason why human beings

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 4>have any sort of sense of morality whatsoever, is because

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 4>it was programmed into the human mind by God or

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 4>the human heart, actually, I should say by God. So

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 4>the only reason John, you are able to live a good,

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 4>clean life, as you say, is because you are borrowing

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 4>from God's plan, from God's design. If we want to

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 4>achieve a simulacra of or closeness to moral perfection, we

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 4>can't just trust our own moral nature. That is necessary.

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 4>We need to use our moral nature that God gave us.

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 4>But we also need to inform that moral nature every

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 4>day constantly by communing with God himself, and that can

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 4>be achieved through both prayer and specifically for evangelical Christians,

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 4>reading God's perfect, divinely inspired word in the Bible as

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 4>it is canonized for Protestants. At least, sure, most Evangelicals

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 4>actually wouldn't dispute that it's hypothetically possible to be a

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 4>quote good person in life as a non evangelical or

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 4>non Christian, but you're not going to be approximating moral perfection.

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 4>And maybe most importantly here, you're absolutely not going to

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 4>go to heaven. It doesn't matter if you are essentially sinless.

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 4>If you send one time, you're going to go to

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 4>Hell forever and burn for all of eternity. There's reasons

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 4>to want to get close to God, both in life

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 4>and for the sake of your afterlife.

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 2>It seems you're screwed, John.

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 3>I have a video.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 4>About how to go to Hell in every religion where

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 4>I get scholars to explain to me how you can

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 4>go to hell in the world's five major religions as

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 4>well as five life larger but minority religions. So if

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 4>you guys are interested in fleeing from moral perfection and

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 4>securing an afterlife of torment and terror, then you can

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 4>definitely like and subscribe.

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Don't go to Shintoism. That's a tough one for hell

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 3>is one thing I learned from your video. So, Drew,

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 3>I want to just switch to your Like, you grew

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 3>up in a would you say fundamentalists Christian home?

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Talk a bit about the world you grew up

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 3>in and how conspiracy theories, like were they around, how

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 3>they played a role in your childhood.

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 4>So I grew up in the independent Fundamental Baptist Church.

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 4>So you guys heard of the Scopes monkey trial. We

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 4>were rooting for the prosecution. We believed that God created

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 4>the world in six literal days, and on the seventh

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 4>day he rested. That's why we have the Sabbath. We

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 4>believed that the Grand Canyon and all other giant geological

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 4>features that obviously took a lot of time to make,

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 4>we're all created by the world wide flood that happened

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 4>about four thousand years ago or so. When we read

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 4>about the Tower of Babel and about how God confused

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 4>people to slow their efforts to approximate His godhood, that's

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 4>actually a story about where languages came from. The reason

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 4>why Sanskrit came into existence, the reason why Indo European

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 4>languages came into existence, the reason why Chinese eventually came

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:27.719
<v Speaker 4>into existence, was all because God essentially created these languages

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 4>when he scattered people at the Tower of Babel. We

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 4>explained everything through a very hyper literalist Christian framework, where

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 4>every story in the Bible, even if it's a parable,

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 4>actually literally happened, it's actual history. And when you grow

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 4>up in that way, your community develops ways to basically

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 4>circle the wagons. It develops infrastructure to reinforce the idea

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 4>that all of this stuff is real science, real history,

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 4>in order to defend its ideology, and it's very identity.

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 4>So I grew up in private Christian schools and homeschool

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 4>co ops where we essentially consumed religious propaganda as if

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 4>it was scientific content. And this was driven not by

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 4>just an idea that creation science is real science, but

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 4>also by the fact that if we are not teaching

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 4>creation as science to children, then our entire identitarian project

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:33.360
<v Speaker 4>of dominating the world will never reach fruition. So the

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:39.959
<v Speaker 4>pseudoscience is really driven by identitarian ideas within these communities.

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 4>And what is that other than a conspiracy theory. We

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 4>essentially thrived on an infrastructure that was meant to protect

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 4>identity through the propagation of conspiracy theories. So it's really

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 4>no wonder that someone who was raised as I would

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 4>would go on to believe in anti vax ideas and

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 4>planandemic ideas and all sorts of things into having conspiratorial

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 4>notions about the deep state, believing in cabals of Satanic pedophiles,

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 4>draining children of a drenochrone. And when you're primed psychologically

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 4>to accept conspiracy theories in order to defend your identity,

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 4>then it's pretty easy to hear something on four Chan

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 4>from q and adopt that and not really think that

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 4>you're doing anything out of the ordinary.

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 3>You're already like best case scenario if you see the

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 3>world that way. I mean, belief in creationism, rejection of evolution.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 3>It's a hard thing to poll, and the surveys are

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 3>all over the place, but it's forty percent. I mean,

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 3>it's a lot of Americans we believe in some version

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 3>of creationism. Some of them are have some kind of

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 3>hybrid synthesis. God started the process, but Darwinism took over.

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 3>But if you believe that the government, all teachers, all universities,

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 3>all science, all textbooks, all TV shows, all documenties are

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 3>lying already just as a base, like how much harder

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 3>is it to then believe? And they're also lying about chemtruch.

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 3>But then on top of it, and I've spent some

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 3>time with devout fundamentalists, at least for some the presence

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 3>of demons, of forces of Satan is a sounds like

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 3>a very active, real part of their day to day experience.

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 3>If they slip on the ice and break their ankle,

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 3>that's Satan's work. If their cousin dies from a drug overdose,

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 3>that's because there was a demon. If Joe Biden wins

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 3>the President c in twenty twenty, that satanic. The very

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 3>narrative of the universe is a very clean, simple story

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 3>of entirely good fighting entirely evil, and for various complex reasons,

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 3>much of day to day life is dominated by entirely evil,

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 3>right am, I over.

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh, absolutely absolutely. The community that I grew up in

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 4>was very strongly dualistic. I was in a form of

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 4>Christianity that was against alcohol, and the roots of our

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 4>denomination is actually found in the movement of pro prohibition teetotalers.

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry to interrupt. That always struck me as weird,

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 3>because Jesus did turn water into wine, which seems like

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 3>something of an endorsement.

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, Adam, you know what, does it say that he

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 4>got drunk? No, it does not, And do we know

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 4>that he wasn't drinking something that was a non alcoholic

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 4>grape beverage like Welsh's grape juice. This is a real argument.

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 4>By the way, we don't know that he actually had

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 4>alcohol within that and if he did, it was only

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 4>to basically cleanse the juice that he was drinking to

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 4>hydrate himself of harmful microbes. It had nothing to do

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 4>with getting drunk. Christians don't get drunk, and they never have.

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 5>I've seen a few is they're not true Christians. John, Yeah,

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 5>but I cut you off. You were saying you grew

0:30:56.840 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 5>up in this world and was Satan and demons part

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 5>of the world you grew up in.

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, The reason why we were so against alcohol was

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 4>not because it was unhealthy or increased vices through some

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 4>psychological process. It was actually because it's a tool of

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Satan to destroy God's kingdom. So I remember the first

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 4>time as an atheist going into a bar, being confronted

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 4>by the fact that I had been primed to be

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 4>afraid of this kind of place, and I found myself

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 4>almost you know the feeling when you watch a really

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 4>scary horror movie and then you walk around at night

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 4>at your house and you look over your shoulder and

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 4>look down the dark hallway and you're paranoid that the

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 4>Baba Duke is going to come and get you, even

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 4>though you know it's not going to. I would experience

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 4>that in a bar, thinking when this bottle moves across

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 4>the bar, there might be a spirit in the spirit right,

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 4>there might be a demon in the bottle. Quite literally,

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 4>it's a tool of the devil. And so there's demons

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 4>just infused in the these cocktails. Really wow. And yes,

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 4>you are looking over your shoulder constantly. You're looking for

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 4>the veil to be lifted, as they would say, constantly

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 4>they're trying to see behind the veil, the separation between

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 4>the natural and the supernatural, the spiritual and the natural.

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 2>There's a demon in everclear. I'll tell you that from Kylege.

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 6>We're gonna stop here for now and come back next

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 6>week with part two of our conversation with Drew McCoy.

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 6>Mission Implausible is produced by Adam Davidson, Jerry O'shay, John Cipher,

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 6>and Jonathan Stern. The associate producer is Rachel Harner. Mission

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 6>Implausible It's a production of honorable mention and abominable pictures

0:32:43.680 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 6>for iHeart Podcasts.