WEBVTT - Businessweek Extra - Mahindra, Moynihan, Schwarzman

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Kelly and

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Carol Master. Welcome to the Bloomberg Business Week Extra.

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>It's our weekly podcast bringing you an in depth interview

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you will not hear anywhere else. And you're gonna hear

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>our full panel discussion with as I like to say,

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>group of ballers. They know a lot about the world economy.

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 1>As you rightly pointed out, three hundred billion dollars in

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 1>market cap. We're talking about Steve Schwarzen for Blackstone, a

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>non Mahindra of the Mahindra Group, and Brian moynihan, a

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America. Check it out, Steve, I'm gonna point

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>to you, what are you most worried about in the

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>world right now? Jeez, there's a lot to worry about,

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, because you know, first of all, just stepping

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>back from it, uh, you know, the social media and

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the Internet are making it very difficult for almost any

0:00:56.320 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>government to function. Uh. If you come out with a plan,

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you have instant uh mobilization of opposition to anything you're doing.

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>It even makes it difficult for companies. UH sometime with

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of this roving band of opposition. Uh. And and

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, financially, um you know, sort of the you

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>have a few weaknesses in the system. I think that

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>European banking system isn't is uh strong, certainly as the

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>U S which is in great shape. You have um

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>private investments in the technology area, which that we work,

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>um you know sort of non public offering has exposed

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>as as being uh you know, really uh pretty inflated.

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>When when you when you have an industry that more

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>or less marks up its positions, uh you know, in

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a closed circle among itself, and then it pops out

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>into the real world. The real world says, what are

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you thinking that? That's usually um, you know, sort of

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a wake up call, but it's you know that that

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>part of the world isn't big. That's that's a relatively

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>small uh set. Um. And I guess any of us

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on the stage, and then I'll finish, because I don't

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>want to dominate anything. When you have thirteen trillion dollars

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of negative interest rates, I don't even know what a

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>negative interest rate is. And in other words, why would

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I take my money and give it to somebody and

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>for the privilege of them holding it, I have to

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>pay them like it's a storage unit um. And I'm

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>supposed to get interest when I give people money. And

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>as as interest rates go down, uh, most of those

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>places that have those negative interest rates, it's not stimulative

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>because banks have trouble earning money, uh, you know, in

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that kind of environment. Uh. And if banks don't do well,

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>then they don't grow their capital. They can't then extend credit,

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and countries don't grow unless there's credit extension. And so

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>this whole movement, particularly in Europe, to negative interest rates,

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I think is some kind of uh warning sign, some

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>type of wake up call. How did we get in

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>that position? Why are we in that position? Not us

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>as Americans, but us as financial people looking at the world.

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So Brian may know more than I do, but it

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>just seems so, Brian, does this negative rate environment that

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>we increasingly see around the globe tell you that there's

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>some underlying weakness that maybe we're missing. We we know

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the obvious problems that are out there, but is there

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>something more substantial? Well, I think Steve's point is right.

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>There's the monetary policy decision, and to take rates as

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>low as possible to uh, to accommodate the economy, accommodate growth,

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're lower in this country than have been historically,

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>but they're still positive. In other places are negative, and

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a significant amount of it. I think there's a

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>debate whether it actually transmits the economy because if you

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>look in some of the countries where the rate structure

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>has been negative for five years, the banks still have

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to pay consumer depositors interest because to these point, they're

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>not gonna give us a hundred dollars and get ninety

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>five back and think it's a great thing. And so

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a great debate. The economists will hack out,

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>but the reality is it showing a weakness and economies armies,

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>probably more fiscal work done and more reform work done

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to stimulate those economies, and well, good luck with that,

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and good luck with that. The good news is in

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the US you already have an economy which is pretty

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>flexible and work talent people, uh, lots of capital, deep

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>capital markets at the banking system, that restructured, a set

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of rules that you can understand one law that covers

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>an economy. It's the largest in the world as opposed

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to multiple laws. And so you're seeing the US continue

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to grow, unemployments low, and consumers continue to spend. So

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the question really from the macro sense, is all that

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>parade of interesting things to ponder and worry about it

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>is only Wednesday is offset by seventy U s economy

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 1>has been speeding up its activity all this year, and

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that is as big as Chinese economy. And so when

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>was that tension just going to be really wrestled to

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the ground. And that's the question, well and so and on.

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I put that to you because you look across a

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 1>hundred countries, You're you're operating in a hundred countries, I believe,

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>is that are we at a breaking point where we

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>may see something snap here? Or can we continue on,

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>especially from a consumer perspective, in a nice upward, gentle trajectory.

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Let me start in a light or note first, because

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>when you asked Steeve this question, but what's on your mind?

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I do have a very weighty global problem on my

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>mind right now, and that is I have a two

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>year old grandson who lives in New York. His father's

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Mexican American and speaks to him only in Spanish. So

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>right now my major preoccupation is how to improve my

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Spanish so I can communicate with my grandchild. But if

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you look at it that's a lighter note. But frankly,

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>that to me is the real thing that what is

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>me about the world. You look at it from a

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>human centered point. When you try to operate in a

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred countries language communication, keeping the core of your business

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and the governance and the values of people is a

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>major problem. So I'm looking at more as a I'm

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.559
<v Speaker 1>not really worried about growth. I think we have enough

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>locuses of growth to come up. You heard the Prime

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Minister of India this morning, and I don't think what

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>he was talking about was hype. Steve, you've been out

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>there very often. I think he knows what the potential

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:55.119
<v Speaker 1>is if you look at the population, and he talked

0:06:55.160 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>about four ds this morning, the democracy, the demography as well,

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and he talked about demand and decisiveness. If India does

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>get moving again. And I think he's taken some steps

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>recently like the tax cut, which should do exactly what

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the tax cuts did here, you're going to get another

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>engine of growth for the world, for sure. And I Brian,

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and I see him more in India than I do here.

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think both these gentlemen understand what the potential

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of India is I'm really not worried about consumer demand

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>coming in from different parts of the world. We just

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>have to look around the world. All the focus has

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>been on America, rightfully, but I think you're going to

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>see an uptake and a lot of other parts of

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the world. But why does it feel And I know

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>we talked so much about recession, and I know you

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>spoke with David Western over the summer quote that we

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>used a lot on Bloomberg. We have nothing to fear

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>about a recession right now except for the fear of

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>recession T shirts, bumper stickers. I mean, but I just

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like it feels like if you talk to businesses

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and CEOs, they're hesitant to spend. But then you talk

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>about the strength and to constus, how do you reconcile

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>those two and and and are you still ruling out recession?

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>That nobody if you look at all the consensus, you know,

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the thirty eight economist. When I talked to David, I said, look,

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>there's nobody has a negative sign in front of any

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of their estimates. And so in the bottom five probably

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>average and the it's you know, five point five for

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>gdp US next year, and stuff. So even though people

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>saying the probability is going up, because that's the uncertain

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the question is nobodys predicting it is going to happen.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>The fear you have is going to your point, it's

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>only ones day and what's going on? Will you get

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the consumer confidence to to deterior right now? It's it's

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>come up, it's come down a little bit, and we

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>get intera if that starts to happen, that's the word.

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>You do not see that in your activity every day. Um.

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>The combination of housing prices still being constructive, which that

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>part of the wealth is constructive, the stock market still

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>being up, that part of their wealth is constructive, their

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>wages growing faster now than they have really since any

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>any point of last sight nine years. The employment levels

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>being high. So that's always the good news. The questions

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 1>what breaks set and that's what I worry about. The

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the psychology of business deteriorating somewhat again high high, still

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 1>very high, but tipped over a little bit. One do

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the one does a business owner convey to their teammates

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that it might not be as good for this next year.

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 1>I higher wages, a bigger boninus more incentive plans whatever,

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>or you get to keep your job. We don't not

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>see that in our Our middle market loans are growing

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>on a faster clip now and they were the last

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>few years. So it's all okay. And and that's the

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>question that we said. And I think the fear could

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>cause us to back up before the data will show

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you're there. So some of that fear and caution, Steve,

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>comes from this dispute between the U S And China.

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>There are a few people who have done as much

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>dare I say, shuttle diplomacy than you have between the

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 1>leaders leaders of those two countries. You write about it,

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>h in your book. Steve's book, by the way, is

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>on sale now. I don't know if anybody has heard

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>about what it takes um, but we'll have that commercial

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in a moment. But you do write extensively about China

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in the book, your experience there, the Schwartzman scholars, your

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:11.439
<v Speaker 1>relationship with President she How does this get resolved at

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>least to the satisfaction that the CEO s that that

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Brian is talking about, specifically feel good enough to start

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>spending money again. Yeah, I'll talk about that in one second,

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>but but just in terms of risk. Uh. I've always

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>felt that, you know, the cycle when it comes to

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>an end, won't do it from from normal you know,

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>business cycle issues, because because that seems to be managed

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. Uh, it'll be some type of geopolitical type

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of incident circumstance which which hits the confidence of consumers.

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>It won't be over production of goods and things like that.

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I could be wrong, but I've been thinking about this

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>for a few years, and we've got enough of these

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>major things that that could change people's attitudes. Uh. You know,

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>we're full employment. Uh. You know, so people have a

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>good situation, but their behavior may change if they're scared

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of something. Uh. As as to China us um Uh

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that's as it's an interesting situation because basically driven but

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that you know, in the last presidential election,

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>we discovered that that of Americans couldn't write a four

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>check in an emergency. So so if you think about that,

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>these are people who fundamentally don't have savings uh, and

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't earn much money. Uh, and their their education

0:11:55.640 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>American education has really slipped dramatically for the last thirty

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to forty years, and those those people are very unhappy.

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and they they in effect or demanding some

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>type of change. And part of that change happens when

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't and they don't get satisfied with domestic solutions. Historically,

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>with populism, um, you get angry at some foreign entity.

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And China's the target. And it was pretty obvious that

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be. And I talked to the

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Chinese about that right after the election, and they were

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>not sensitive to that, and I told them, don't don't

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>worry about it. We we didn't understand it either, uh,

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, which is why, you know, we had a

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>president elected that nobody thought would be elected except him.

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh And and so we all learned something. I said,

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>don't feel bad, you know, you didn't have bad staff work,

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>but now you know. And they they said, okay, well,

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, if that's the case, we're going to have

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to adjust to. China for four years has been growing

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>faster than any major country in history. Uh. And so

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this is like whatever practices they have which in history

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>when you're you know, sort of a we used to

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>call them, you know, developing countries or underdeveloped countries. Uh.

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Now we call them emerging markets. Uh. You know, they

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in the United States did this in the nineteenth century.

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>We hide behind terror falls, you protect your industries. Uh,

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't let foreigners in into certain things that you

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>know where they can compete. Uh. And and that world

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>lives until you become a more matured country and then

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you integrate well, I think I think in China, part

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of part of the interesting issue is they still think

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>they're poor and we sort of think they're rich. And

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>their their GDP per capita is ten thousand dollars are

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>is roughly sixty. But when they started this sprint forty

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>years ago, I think it was like four person So

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's been enormous progress, but there there's still you know,

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of like one six of us, and now we're

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>demanding our bottom and effect. Uh. And also European countries

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>don't like they have similar problems, uh that that we're

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>asking China to like become a more mature country and

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>join the rest of the world. Their attitude is we're

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>still poor. So so okay, if we have to make adjustments, Um,

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not our favorite thing to do. What what do

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>we do? And so what you've been seeing over the

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>last two and a half years is the US wanting them.

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's sort of the leader of the developed

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>world to come pretty far. And on the Chinese side,

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>UM are trying to figure out how far and how

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>fast they want to get someplace. So so so you know,

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the two countries got quite close um in May, at

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>which point the Chinese just withdrew they you know, they

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>had agreed to a variety of things. We thought, uh,

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and then they looked at the whole and they said, uh,

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, my goodness, let's not do that. And now

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that's just starting again. And meanwhile, what's happened in this

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>two and a half years is that the two countries

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>have started um as a results of false starts and

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in a variety of other tactical stuff, you know, are

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>are starting to decouple, which is very dangerous. Um. Well,

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>can we I want to dig a little bit into that,

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>because I do wonder. I think increasingly we're expecting this

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>world where it's China and its allies and the United

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>States and its allies is not used. It in a

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>very interesting place figuratively and literally between China and the

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>United States. How do you see it? I see it

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>as a situation of enormous opportunity I have to be mercenary,

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, absolutely because to be and I'm I'm just

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>being truthful here that for a long time, it wasn't

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>kosher for anyone in American policy positions to admit that

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>there was a kind of conflict with China and that

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>India in fact could be one of the players in

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this game as a buffer against China. That was just

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>no no. If you went to the Council on Foreign Relations,

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>nobody would admit that. I think it's now it's in

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the open, and I think President Trump has even made

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it more in the open. I mean going to Houston

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and listening to our Prime minister. I think he made

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it very clear what kind of alliance he had. I

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>think there's nothing but opportunity for India in this and

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we have to play our cards right and see that

0:16:55.240 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we are viewed now as a very very appropriate ally

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>for the US as a buffer both in defense terms. Frankly,

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the number of defense exercises between

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the US and India, they're proliferating dramatically. Defense procurement from

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>the from India is already burgeoning. We never used to

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>buy the used to buy more from the Russians and

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>frankly all the all the tenor of the relationship with

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>India's right. This is a democratic country, the country that

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>values I p R. There's a country that has scale

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and growth, so there is profit for global companies too

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>over there. So I think India has nothing but a

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>unique opportunity right now and we have to just play

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>those cards right, and I think it would be a

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>win win for both the US and for India. So

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I actually agree. And having been with a bunch of

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>CEOs with Prime Minister's Morning, all who are talking about

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.360
<v Speaker 1>their business expanding in India. It's been a natural recipient.

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think some of the bureocracy and things that

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>were difficult to operate, they have been doubt whether they

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>can be proved, and everybody knows. I think the broader

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>context here though, is is you know, global trade and

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and if you go back and say, if the China

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>US situation will take longer, the questions what can resolve

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in the interim, And this is where unfortunately I'm not

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:19.199
<v Speaker 1>sure what happens given the politics in the situation this

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>week to U S, m c A and things like that,

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>which are critical to get done because as much as

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>India is a beneficiary, Mexico and Canada in a in

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a trade with US is a beneficiary in a sense

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>or a way to operate. Let's make it simpler that

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>wage scale in Mexico is actually lower than the parts

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 1>of China. There's they could use the jobs. There's a

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of people can move to manufacturing there, there's already

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>integrated manufacturing supply chains. Canada's a different situation. So I

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>think to keep the US kind of moving forward, there

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>are three or four things to knock out. Everybody hopes

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>for China US, but there are a couple of things

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to knock out first, and one of them as a U,

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>S M C A. I just don't know politically if

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>they can push it through, even though I think O

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>sides seem to want it, and if they could push

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that through, that would be good and give more time

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>to work I think on China. So I want to

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>stick with something you said in the context of the

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>meaning that you had with Prime Minister Modi, which is

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>clearly CEOs are stepping into a brighter and maybe higher

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>expectation type spotlight. We hear it over and over again.

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel a greater responsibility now, especially given what's

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>going on in Washington, in London and capitals around the world,

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 1>to speak out both on your own issues related to

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>business but also social issues in the end of the day,

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>especially our company has been around for two d and

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty plus years and so we've been around through all

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>kinds of fun stuff if you think about it. But

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 1>but the round he is our job is to produce

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:54.479
<v Speaker 1>profits and make progress so much society needs to do.

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>And so the idea of the purpose statement by the

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>b R T the work I do that we all

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>do with your National Business Council and the World Economics

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Forum leadership for years, the you know Mike's leadership on

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the climate. You pick your thing. The idea is we

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>have to have companies can do both produce a great

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>profit and make sustainable make progress on the STGs. And

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>so I think all of CEOs agree with that. And

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I so the attribute where people say we're speaking out

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>publicly on an issue generally comes from the need on

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that second, but it also reverberates the first. If you

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>have teammates working for you and you went what we

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 1>went through the last five or six years on Post

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Nightclub Charleston, Vegas, Houston, Parkland, and you had teammates in

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>every one of the situations that led our team to

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>say we ought to take a stand on something. It

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>was not because we need to go out and make

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>some policy statement. It was because if you think about

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>to have great teammates to make that profit you have

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to make, you have to protect on HP two, which

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>was a North Carolina issue about we had to come

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>out because it was our headquarters town are people would

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>not travel there and so well, people are thinking this

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is about you know me or something. It's not. It's

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>about we have to represent the two hundred thousand teammates

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that five or six hundred thousand people in their families

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and ensure them well and pay them well. But also

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>we need them to be successful and to produce great

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>profit and sustain progress on the STGs and that and

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>is the key. And so as long as we can

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>do and the investors and stuff should stay with us,

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>and then it gives us the permission and the availability.

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But it comes from really the view that our customers

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>are teammates, our communities and our shareholders really are more aligned.

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>And it's nothing new. This is we came out of

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the community. We were formed by people saying we need financing.

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>To Steve's point, in this community two d and thirty

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago, So start to think about We've been through

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>all the impeachment proceeds. We've been through tough elections. That

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>one was a mess and maybe they made a nice

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>play called Hamilton's out of it right. We have been

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>there through this and we will be there through the

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>next one if we basically do both make great returns

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>for our shorewlers and deliver on the society needs. Because

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>any day that means communities grow, that means we grow.

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So in India we handle the same thing we bill

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>children's museum and Mumbai, Uh why because they never had

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.239
<v Speaker 1>a children's museum. You'd say, how's that consistent? Well, that's

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 1>what our teammates wanted us to do to help out.

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's work on both sides. Steve, I want

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to bring you back in because I'm curious, as you know,

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>on the campaign trail, some of the candidates have kind

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of put private equity UM on their radar and we've

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>been happy with that. We'll just watch the batons and UM.

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>But I am curious that's saying, you know, private equity

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is responsible for some of the inequalities that are in

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>our world. What do you say to that, Well, I'd

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>say there's a lot of misunderstandings. Um and Um. You know,

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the private equity industry is comprised of a lot of

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>different firms. And but basically what we do is leaving

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>other asset classes like real estate aside. Um, we buy

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>companies and we try and make them grow faster because

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 1>when you exit, you get to higher multiple for higher growth.

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh And and to do that, you have to invest

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in these businesses. They just don't grow faster because it's

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in your interest. So so you put more capital in them. Uh.

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And you come up with good strategies uh. And you

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you drive growth. So when you grow businesses, you typically

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>need more people. Uh and and so um, this is

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of a virtuous circle. Uh. And you know, from

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a financial risk perspective, UM, you know, we went through

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the global financial crisis, and private equity firms didn't didn't

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, have financial difficulties more than other kind of companies.

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So so so on the downside, UM, the industry hasn't

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>really created much difficulties. UM. On the upside, you arned

0:23:56.040 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>typically for your investors who were pension funds. The regular people,

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they're the fireman, the government employees, the corporate employees. You

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 1>make double the stock market indexes. So so basically this

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>is a really good model. Uh in the nine eighties. Uh,

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.719
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't so much like that in the eighties. There

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 1>were only a few firms and prices were so low

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>in the eighties that you could buy something and just

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>cut costs, uh, layoffs some people and you were successful.

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>That world is just gone. With the kind of higher

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>prices that you have to pay to buy anything today,

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you just can't be successful doing that. You you must

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>grow your way out of uh. You know, the creation

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 1>price and and so I think there's some leftover perceptions.

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>They are also an occasional, high profile type of situation,

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in the retail business. But but you must

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>look at retail generally, and Brian would know more than

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I do. But retail has been with the disintermediation of

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. The number of retail companies that have gone

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>busted are huge. The same way you could get a

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>private equity company that owns a newspaper that was in

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this political treatise that one of the candidates came up

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>with what's happened to newspapers. I mean, the vast majority

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of them have gotten into trouble. So you can take

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>one example and and make something out of it. But

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>but just to give you context, right, there were sixty

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.199
<v Speaker 1>six they were roughly a hundred and fifty one million

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>jobs in the United States. Uh, sixty six million people

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>change jobs in a given year. Right, US economy is

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable dynamic. The number of people who were fired in

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States was twenty one million. The number of

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>total job in the private equity owned companies is eleven million.

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So when you look at the massive amount of companies,

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>where do you get those twenty one million people who

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>lost their jobs. It's not from private equity. It's a

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>very small part of the whole economy. So so this

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>this argument is wrong. Uh, and it's sort of pyramids

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>mistake on mistake, and I think there's there's an ideology

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that goes with it, and also terrible marketing on the

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the private equity firms. You have to give

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>them a d for not being able to explain this.

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>This is pretty simple. Explain what you're doing. So because

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of where we are and all the discussions that we've

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 1>had at this summit about climate and sustainability. I think

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>it's fair to say that when we look back on

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.719
<v Speaker 1>this week, even this very newsy week, this star and

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>apologies to to all of you, is going to be

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a sixteen year old Gretta Fundberg her statement about what

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the world is doing or not doing related to climate change.

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to quote what she said to the

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>heads of state. People are suffering, people are dying. Entire

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>ecosystems are collapsing, where at the beginning of a mass extinction,

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and all you can talk about is money in fairy

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>tales of endless economic growth. How dare you that's memorable?

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Is she right? Are we not doing enough as governments

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and as companies to really face this and our corporate

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>leaders at least a non listening I think they were.

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I was very pleasantly surprised to see the number of

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>people who showed up at the climate events, the CEOs

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>who signed up wearing that large, ungainly badge about the

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>one point five degree ambition. That's not a pretty badge,

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>where that itself was not a fashion statement, not a

0:27:56.240 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>fashion statement. But people are committed, and you know, my

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I've had one statement I make about sustainability, and I've

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>been repeating it with monotonous regularity. I don't really intend

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to get into the debate of whether climate change is real,

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>who's the guilty party, who has not done it? Has

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the West polluted? Should the West be paying an India

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.400
<v Speaker 1>only benefiting, should be be getting money? I stay out

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 1>of that. My statement is, it's very simple. This is

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the biggest profit opportunity for business people in the next

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:36.360
<v Speaker 1>few decades. Why are you even me wasting time arguing

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>about who's right who's wrong, whether it's a sixteen year

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>old or it's the president of the US. You know. Frankly,

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody asked me the other day in a podcast. They said,

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>do you have a message for governments and do you

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>have a message for other companies? I said, yes, I

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>do a little tongue in cheek and I said to governments,

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I would say, please, don't fight climate change, don't invest

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in innovative technology. Let India do it, let us get

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the game, and then you come in after

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we've put ourselves right on the top. And to my

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>fellow company people in business, I would say climate change

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't real. Just stay out of the game, keep arguing

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>with the sixteen year old girl, we are making money

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>at everything we've done in renewables. Let Mahindra Group go out,

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they clean up the opportunities. You come in later. Because

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to me, the point I was making was this is

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>futile and we are just creating almost a media created

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>sensation of villain victim. And frankly, the winners are everybody

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>because everything our group has done in sustainability has actually

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>made money and the businesses we've started in the last

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>five years are amongst the fastest going waste to energy solar.

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Why are we even wasting time on arguments? We agree?

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd agree that the time, the debate, the debate and

0:29:56.560 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>arguments of what's going on scientifically stuff are just don't help.

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And I agree that, but the non that, Yeah, the

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>reality is we have to make progress, and we have

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to make a lot of progress. It costs about two

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars a year, UH is the estimate for the

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>environmental part of the SDGs six trillion overall all the

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>charity World's eight hundred billion a year. The US government

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>budgets only four trillion a year, so there's only no

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>government's gonna solve this, and no charity is gonna solve it.

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Who's gonna solve it is capitalism and driving the change.

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:28.239
<v Speaker 1>So in a lot, since two thousand seven to two

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen, we did a hundred twenty five billion dollars

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of stuff around the environment. In the next seven years

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>ten years, we'll do another three hundred billion. That is,

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, green bonds. That is, we're carbon neutral in

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty not five years from now, we're carbon neutral next year.

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Um it is sold installations across the country of India,

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>solar installations across UH, the prologst Uh warehouses in the

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>United States is a wind farm financing. There's a tremendous

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>business opportunity, but it's time for capitalism to come to

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>drive it because that's where the money will be. And

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>so it's how we operate as a company, and all

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of us have companies, you operate and driving them to

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>carbon neutrality and making that commitment. It's how we then

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>finance the build out. And it's the last part is

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to keep thing a non mentionance. We can't be in

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the western developed countries. We cannot be of a sort

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that we will not allow other countries to have the

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>energy that they need to have to develop. We have

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to produce the right energy form that it was sustainable

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>energy for all from the last un A Secretary General

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>where they figured out a plan and how much it costs.

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>That is the critical things. We can't be arrogant in

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the West or developed countries and say hey, you can't

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>have the power. We have to sit there and say

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>we will get you the power the right way. And

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that that is where we really got to watch what's

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>going on with coal and other things and somebody's econm.

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>We have to provide the replacement. EVA costs us all money,

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>but I think the business opportunity actually takes care of it.

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:52.719
<v Speaker 1>That goes back to point you can bruce a profit

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and you can make the bulls and if you look

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>at what we've done and this is this has become

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a large business force. And her right again about saying

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you're just focusing on money. I would just say, Gretta,

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>let it be about money, don't make it about either,

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>or you've got to ditch that dichotomy. So the only

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>argument I have with her, it's it's both. It's because

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>she's making it sound like give up your ways of

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>making money, and what about the environment. I'm saying the

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>real power is not that, So she is wrong. I'm saying,

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be a businessman, you're showing us the money. There is

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>money there, and the pursuit of profit and capitalism is

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in fact one of the answers to this solution. So

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I would argue with her if I met her, that

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>don't make it so, you know, black and white. But

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I think there's concerns that the goals that a lot

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of folks are laying out a more ambitious, ambitious than

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the actual initiatives. And I think that's some of the concerns.

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>But from what you folks are saying, I mean, I'm

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>listening to you talk and under Steve, you guys have

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>s G investments over Blackstone, so I know it's it's

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just the pounding effect. If everybody doing more and

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>more and more and and isn't going to be enough,

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>there would be great debate every year on the forty

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>years about that. The question is if we do more

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>next year than this year, and you get more people

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>doing more, and you get the investors, not only Steve

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>but also the mainstream investors to say, if you're not

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>doing something on this, we're gonna start to take the money,

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>not not the oil companies, but all of us, and

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>then you'll see the compounding effect to that, and it

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is powerful. I mean, just think of called an ambition loop,

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>which is already in. We set an ambition three years

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>ago about reducing our cobbin footprint by twenty percent in

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>three years. We did it in one year, so we

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>made another rollover. It just keeps MULTIPLI episodic, No, I

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>mean I think they've answered the questions. I mean, the

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>sale has been made. Uh on sustainability. It's a favorite saying,

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, really, you know there there's there's not

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>much bay right that that are we doing it fast enough?

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Because I think one of the things that was brought

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>up on one of the panels is we're kind of

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>running out of time. You can't reverse what's done, and

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so do we need to be more ambitious with our goals.

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's actually put the policies into place. I read a

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>book recently and said you should always go big. Excuse

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>me said, I read a book recently that said you

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>should always go big. I guess, well, that's one of

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the big takeaways. The you know, the hardest thing to

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>do is change what people think and inform a consensus

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I think on sustainability. Um, that's that's happened. Uh. And

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>virtually every business I know has concerns in that area. Uh.

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And as Annan was saying, um, it's it's very profitable

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to to address those issues. I mean, we we found

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>once we started looking at that area. You know, we

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 1>we owned a large retailer. Uh and um, you know

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we we we hired a t to start putting in

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>sustainability stuff. And I know this sounds almost like primitive,

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 1>but on the roof of every one of these retailing

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>units is some air conditioner condenser or something, and you

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>know it's it's what keeps the store uh, you know, cooled.

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.879
<v Speaker 1>And we just sent somebody up to look at every

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:25.840
<v Speaker 1>one of them. Uh. And what you found is that

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a little rubber you know, sort of thing that makes

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>some of these circular things do something. What it was

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>was was like tired. It wasn't taught. Uh. And as

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a result of that, the electric costs were way higher.

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>And by buying something as simple as like a two

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>three dollar you know sort of little part um, we

0:35:55.520 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>could cut electric bills by and you know who could

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 1>be against this. The practices at the beginning were the problem.

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>But what what's happened is there there's a the sensitivity

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>on these issues has driven the business community do all

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things that are basically there. Some of the

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>are not even so hard, and they're really important to mindset.

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>We only have a couple of minutes. We're gonna ask

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you to be kind of quick, but we'd like to

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>end on an optimistic note because we do feel like

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>we're all challenged every day with some of the headlines

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 1>that are coming out. So give us something, Brian, to

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>be hopeful about. I'd be hopeful about the human capital

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>in the world for lack of better term of ingenuity

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:47.839
<v Speaker 1>and ability to solve problems. And so if you look

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>at nineteen s nine in America today, we went through Vietnam,

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>we went through an appeachment reservation a president, we went

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>through the civil rights issues, We went to the DNC

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>with rights in the streets X six night, Bobby Kenny, Martin,

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Luther King. Twice as many people work in the US,

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>six million more working, less manufacturing, eighty million more people working,

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and the unemployment new claims today that are filed on

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a Thursday are the same nominally as they were back then,

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and the population has come from two fifty million people

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of three hundred and some million people and eighty million

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>people more work all because of the ingenuity in the US.

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a very optimist We'll figure our way through this,

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and if we configure out if there's and they configure way,

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>there's Europe configure way thors. It's just gonna take some time.

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:31.760
<v Speaker 1>But you have to be optimistic that all his talent,

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 1>he's eight seven billion, eight billion people in the world

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 1>are going to figure out solutions. We just have to

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>get them working. I'm going to keep it very simple. Um.

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Even though I gave an argument against greata earlier, I

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>find her one of the biggest causes for optimism. I

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>grew up in a generation of time of Woodstock, and

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, people from my generation missed the fact that

0:37:56.560 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>young people didn't seem to have the kind of search

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:03.439
<v Speaker 1>for identity that we went through. They weren't questioning anything.

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>There weren't those coffee room conversations questioning the world, existentialism sat,

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>where's all that gone? It was all Instagram now. And

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the protests in New York gave me hope because it

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>felt like the old days. It felt like people, young

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>people were beginning to question again. And you know in

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 1>America more than anywhere else that that generation is what

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>brought about real change that brought an end to the war.

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 1>So I'm optimistic because if if these young people are

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>going to become anything like what that generation was, you're

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 1>going to see real change, in very positive change. Last

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:42.720
<v Speaker 1>word to you, Steve Well, I I said a meeting

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 1>before lunch. Well, I guess we all were with with

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Prime Minister of India talking about the development

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:57.359
<v Speaker 1>of India, and he's a very special kind of head

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of a country. But what gave me enormous optimism because

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>they went around part of the room and and each

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>CEO was talking about what they were doing in India. UM,

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and each of these individuals, we're really amazing, Uh, what

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>they were doing, what they were innovating, what were they

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>were creating, the way they presented themselves, UM, the way

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 1>they were conceptualizing how to expand. It just happened to

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 1>be one country that I sort of looked at this

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>group of people and I said, this is a resource.

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Uh that's really unique. UM. The drive, the commitment the

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 1>creativity of every one of the speakers, And I said,

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've got a winning hand long term because

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 1>there are people in the back of each of those

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>people who are equally gifted. Uh And and I think

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a part of America we take for granted or

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't see it. But anybody who sat in that

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>room watching listening had to be dazzled by the people

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>who were in charge of substantial organizations trying to do

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>really interesting things. And those people will do that in

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 1>other areas as well. And that's what I think is.

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a really really under understood area of uniqueness

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in America and a reminder of everything going on behind

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of a crazy headline. That was our panel from

0:40:56.320 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Global Business War. You've been listening to Bloomberg

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Business Week X drop you short of tune into Bloomberg

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Business Week Radio Live Monday through Friday at gpm Wall

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Street Time. I'm Bloomberg Radio. I'm Carol Masser, and I'm

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly. This is Bloomberg