WEBVTT - Ancient Oars on the Wine-Dark Sea, Part 1

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 3>My name is Robert Rant and I am Joe McCormick.

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 3>And today on Stuff to Blow Your Mind, we are

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 3>going to be kicking off a series looking at paddles

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 3>and oars, rowing and paddling the boats of the ancient world.

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Rob So you pick this topic out. What got you

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 3>thinking about paddles and oars?

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was kind of hungry for another dip into

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 2>the invention style episode that we frequently come back to.

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, something that talks about generally or as often

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>as the case, you know, some sort of ancient technology

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 2>and how it comes about, and what what what leads

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 2>to these innovations, you know, what is the environment that

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>they evolve in and so forth. And I started looking

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 2>around of some of my usual primary sources and I

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 2>was like, Oh, this looks like the perfect thing to

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 2>get into, like getting into the history of these ancient

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Mediterranean or powered boats. In many cases we're dealing with warships,

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 2>but this would have also applied to varying degrees to

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 2>various trade vessels as well. And it's one of those

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 2>topics when you really get into it, like all these

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 2>different disciplines converge because there's archaeology, modern maritime archaeology, there

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 2>is there's of course literary history. There are also all

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 2>these enduring mysteries and disagreements throughout the ages about how

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 2>to interpret what has been passed down concerning these vessels.

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Now with these ancient warships that were powered by many rowers,

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, and we can talk as we go on

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 3>about the different designs there, the different numbers of levels

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 3>of rowers and things like that is part of the

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 3>idea there that you would have these even in the

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.639
<v Speaker 3>case where it's a boat that could move under sail

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 3>power in some cases, but you would transition to ore

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 3>power to increase like maneuverability and speed during a battle.

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, this is a big part of it. Like

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 2>you could you could certainly get by with just sails,

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 2>but having the oars on hand meant that you could

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 2>absolutely have the power at your disposal when you needed it,

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 2>especially if you're dealing with an environment where the winds

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 2>might not cooperate with you. You can't necessarily count on

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the winds to be there for that push to the shore.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 2>If you're doing some sort of like a marine landing,

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 2>or you can't depend on the wind to help you

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 2>outrun or chase down another vessel. But if you have

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 2>your oars, well, then you're only limited by the amount

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 2>of skilled oarsmanship on board your vessel. And I think

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 2>that's an important That's one of the things that attracted

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 2>me to this too, because I feel like, speaking for myself,

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I felt like growing up, I pretty much had a

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 2>Scooby Doo level understanding of what it meant to have

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 2>or power on a vessel. You know, sort of like

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 2>thinking about maybe not Scooby Doo in particular, but various

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 2>fictions in which people were captured by you know, some

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of nefarious enemy thrown into the hold of the

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 2>ship where they have to pull the oars, and you know,

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 2>the idea here is like, oh, and we can easily,

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, imagine ourselves in that scenario like oh, I

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know how to pull an or mean, I've never

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 2>done this before, but now someone's going to whip me

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 2>if I don't, Well, why.

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Was that Scooby Doo? Does this happen in Scooby Doo?

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it happened in Scooby Doo, but

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 2>it may have happened in something consumed in that general area.

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, it probably happened on some of these old cartoons.

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Or Scooby and Shaggy would not be good at rowing.

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 2>But whatever you're imagining was Scooby Doo and Shaggy thrown

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 2>into the into a ship and made to pull an oar.

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Like that's kind of like where my head used to

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 2>be concerning this. But when you get into it, especially

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 2>in the ancient world, you're not dealing with a bunch

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>of like forced amateur oarsmen down there. You're dealing with

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 2>trained oorsmen. And it also non specialized doorsmen. Like it

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 2>might be very good, but this is not the only

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 2>thing they're going to be called on to do, so,

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 2>you know. Suffice to say, I feel like it's a

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 2>topic where I had a lot of long standing bits

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 2>of misinformation in my head, you know, and just assumptions

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 2>about what this world consisted of, and when you get

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 2>into the details, when you get into what is known

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and even what was written about in the ancient world,

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 2>it's a far more complex scenario. Yeah.

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 3>I like it when we can learn everything we assumed

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 3>was wrong.

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, now, I thought an interesting place to kick this

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 2>off would be to sort of jump ahead and talk

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>about one of the more extreme and unsustainable examples of

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the technology, sort of like looking at the spruce goose

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 2>before we talk about airplanes in general.

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, look at the lineage by seeing what's one of

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 3>the most ridiculous places that can go right.

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 2>And the place to start is, by all accounts, the

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 2>tessar Aranka terrace, which means forty road or simply forty.

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 2>This was an allegedly massive catamaran galley warship, an extreme

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 2>example of a polyrem or mini ORed vessel, and this

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 2>was like you can look up pictures of what this

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 2>may have looked like. There's a lot of guesswork and

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:31.679
<v Speaker 2>analysis involved here, but think about like an ancient world

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 2>aircraft carrier with oars, and you're kind of in the

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 2>right zone for this.

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 3>The version I'm looking at has like more oars than

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 3>you can count sticking out all the sides of it,

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 3>and it's got what looks like a giant gramophone horn

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 3>on it. I don't know what that's for.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 2>So this would have been the pride and joy of

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 2>the ruler Ptolemy the fourth philopatter that means lover of

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 2>his father, which I don't know. It sounds like if

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 2>that's your title, now I'm questioning your love for your

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 2>father because you're making such a big deal out of it.

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, he was the fourth Ptolemaic pharaoh of Egypt.

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 2>A little background. I think we've touched on the Ptolemies

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 2>on the show before, but the rule of the Ptolemies began

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 2>in three oh five BCE after the collapse of the

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Macedonian rule established by Alexander the Great. When Alexander's expansive

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 2>empire collapsed, his followers ended up competing with each other

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 2>for the fragmented remains of that empire, and his general

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 2>and companion, Ptolemy the First Solder or Ptolemy the Savior,

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 2>claimed the Egyptian territory, the Egyptian centered territory, and established

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 2>the Ptolemaic kingdom there. So the Ptolemies would rule over

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Egypt as essentially a Hellenistic state for three centuries until

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 2>the death of Cleopatra. That's when the Roman Empire conquered

0:06:55.120 --> 0:07:00.799
<v Speaker 2>Egypt in thirty BCE. Historians often point to make Egypt

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 2>as the longest and final Egyptian dynasty. During their rule,

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 2>they faced constant threats. Like at the very beginning, there

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 2>were the wars of the Diodechai. These were the successors

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 2>of Alexander, again fighting for the scraps of that empire.

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 2>There were multiple wars with the Seleucid Empire and the

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Kushite Empire to the south. There were rebellions in southern Egypt,

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 2>and then, of course, finally the Roman Empire which conquered them.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.559
<v Speaker 2>Now coming to Ptolemy, the fourth lover of his father,

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 2>who he would have ruled two twenty one through two

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 2>four BCE, generally held up as part of the dynasty's decline.

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Despite some successes in the Fourth Syrian War, it was

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 2>a period of rebellion in the south of Egypt, and

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 2>he was often criticized as being far more concerned with luxury,

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 2>ceremony and the trappings of empire rather than the severe

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 2>work required to prolong its era. But if nothing else,

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 2>he by all accounts had a massive boat, and that

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 2>is where the Tesla ronca terras comes into play. Now.

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 3>If he had a reputation for being being more concerned

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 3>with luxury and ceremony than with practicality does the boat

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 3>follow this design?

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>It seems like most of the sources I've looked at

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 2>argue that this is the case. That this was. I've

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 2>seen some quibbles, and we'll get into some of this,

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 2>but by and large, a lot of people are like, yeah,

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 2>this is exactly the sort of vessel that someone more

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 2>concerned with appearances and pomp would would want constructed, A

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 2>massive vessel that is maybe not actually an operational war platform,

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 2>but just a way to show off how awesome you

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 2>are and could potentially be in battle, as long as

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 2>you don't think too hard about how the ship's going

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 2>to get around. Okay, let's hear about it, all right.

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 2>So I mentioned it has a lot of ores. Depending

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 2>on how you try and reconstruct it on paper in

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 2>your head, you might have had more more than five

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 2>rows of ores. We'll get into the details of that,

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 2>probably more in the next episode. But seven naval rams

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 2>and flat on top an enormous aircraft carrier style deck,

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 2>and this would have been used to carry or at

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 2>least show off troops and or siege equipment. Now, to

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 2>be clear, we have no physical evidence of the Tessar

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Raga teris. We have archaeological evidence of some very old

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 2>boats and ships from around the world, and thanks to

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 2>twentieth and twenty first century maritime archaeology and all of

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 2>its technological innovations, we actually know more than ever before.

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I noticed that Michael Levinson had an article in The

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 2>New York Times from earlier this year get the point

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 2>that it's a golden age for shipwreck discoveries. We're just

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 2>able to see what's down there, detect things, and then

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 2>analyze them in ways that we couldn't even do last century,

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 2>and last century was a pivotal time for advancing our

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.719
<v Speaker 2>understanding of what came before. Well, it's interesting to think

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 2>about because, on one hand, an operational wooden ship, as

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I've seen pointed out, is just in a perpetual state

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 2>of decay. I mean, that's why we have the concept

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 2>of the ship of theseus. It's constantly rotting. Essentially, it wears,

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 2>it breaks, it requires upkeep and replacement, and if left

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 2>to the ravages of time, if conditions are not right,

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing is lost. For instance, one of the

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 2>main culprits, it's often pointed out, is the shipworm, as

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.599
<v Speaker 2>a simil pullock, a nautical archaeologist at Texas A and

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 2>M University and College Station pointed out, and this is

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 2>who was citing a that GEO article from twenty fourteen

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 2>titled five Shipwrecks Lost to Time that archaeologists would love

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 2>to get their hands on by Jane J. Lee, which

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 2>which does get into some ships from this time period.

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 2>But basically the idea is that this is this worm

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 2>is a wood burrowing mollusc. We may have talked about

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 2>it on the show. Before they can break down a

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 2>submerged wooden vessel apparently in as little as five years.

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 2>But the main way that ancient ships survive are by

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 2>winding up buried under sediment or buried under their own cargo,

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 2>such as you know, a bunch of ceramic andphora, you know,

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 2>basically earthenware containers that end up serving as man made

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 2>sediment to preserve the portion of the hull underneath it.

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 2>If you've watched any documentaries about, you know, ancient Mediterranean shipwrecks,

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.319
<v Speaker 2>you've probably seen some footage like this where it looks like, oh,

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 2>it looks like a bunch of urns on the bottom

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 2>of the ocean, and that's essentially what it is. But

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 2>then what is underneath those urns, what else is preserved?

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes we can learn a lot from what remains beneath.

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 2>And this is why harbors, rather than open ocean, are

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 2>often considered better hiding places for some of these ancient wrecks.

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 2>And there also may be factors related to just how

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 2>many of these ships operated and so forth, and how

0:11:56.480 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>they operated. But yeah, it's like it's one of these

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 2>these cases where, yeah, we have one particular giant vessel

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 2>that one's lost to history. But in terms of more

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 2>common vessels of this type, yeah, we do have examples

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 2>of shipwrecks we've been able to find and learn from,

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, especially in recent years. But as with the

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 2>fossil record, you know, depending on what we have to

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 2>depend on, has various holes in it. You know, we

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 2>have physical evidence of ships, and then we also have

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 2>the written word to turn to. But as Christopher E.

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Choffen discusses in the Tessaranka Terras reconsidered this is this

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 2>was a nineteen ninety one through nineteen ninety three a

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 2>publication of Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Technical

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 2>information in these ancient texts is uncommon, so it's you'll

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 2>have mentions of ships, but you know how many times

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 2>do they stop to really roll out the details and

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the stats for a given vessel. But I guess the

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 2>thing about the about a ship this big is that

0:12:56.400 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 2>there would be some descriptions, some stats. It's out there

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 2>since it is so novel. You know, it's kind of

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 2>like if you look in like biblical texts, are you

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 2>going to have this, you know, actual length and with

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 2>descriptions for a cart? Now probably not everyone knows what

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 2>a card is the arc of the covenant, well, and

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 2>then you got might get some details right. So, concerning

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the Tessaranka terras, there are two main sources that are

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 2>typically cited. One is a second century CE Greek source,

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the writings of Athenaeus of Necratis. This is more than

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 2>two hundred years after the reign of Ptolemy. The fourth.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Chaffin cites this one in his work, and among the

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 2>details included are the following two hundred and eighty cubits

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 2>in length, which, to understand this would be like four

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty feet or one hundred and thirty meters

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 2>a breadth of thirty eight cubits or fifty seven feet

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 2>seventeen meters. I'm not sure if this is per catamaran

0:13:55.800 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 2>hole seven naval rams. As we discussed proportions, breathtaking decorations.

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 2>This is all subjective. And then it's said to have

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 2>required four thousand oarsmen and four hundred sailors and officers.

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 2>That alone is is incredible, if not unbelievable. And if

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 2>it's said to carry two eight hundred and fifty.

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Marines, okay, and the marines would refer to like armed

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 3>soldiers who were not involved in the piloting or powering

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 3>of the vessel, so they could you know, if you

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 3>made contact with another ship at sea or made a landing,

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 3>they could disembark or board another vessel to attack.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeh, pretty much now in terms of whether they were

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 2>pulling the oars or not, as we'll get into maybe so.

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 2>But then you look at these stats, it's like, okay,

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 2>four thousand oarsmen. Even if every single marine was double

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 2>doing double duty and also pulling the oars, you still

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 2>would and also throwing the four hundred sailors and officers,

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 2>You're still short by a lot. You still need hundreds

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 2>and hundreds of additional oarsmen to power this thing.

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 3>So do experts have an opinion of like whether this

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 3>could be possible, whether this possibly existed as described, or

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 3>what's going on here?

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean it basically the big discussion comes down to

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 2>whether it was for show or operational, you know, like

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 2>because another detail that is mentioned in this text is

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 2>that it required this big specialized launching system in docks.

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 2>So it was like so huge that it required something

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 2>new to be built in order to even you know,

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 2>go up to it and use it to any limited

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 2>degree in the water. But even still ancient authors were

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 2>still skeptical about it as well, like for instance, another

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the other major description is a lot shorter, and it

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 2>comes from Plutarch. He lived forty six through one nineteen CE,

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 2>and he repeats some of the exact same stats, but

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 2>also add that the ship was just for show and

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 2>could only be moved with great difficulty and danger. So

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 2>he comments that it was not at all a practical warship,

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 2>but a spectacle, certainly in keeping with the reputation of

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Ptolemy the Fourth that has passed down through the centuries. Okay, now,

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 2>I guess you could get into a more nuanced discussion

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 2>about to what extent the spectacle is as useful or

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 2>more useful than a functional vessel. I mean, I guess

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 2>that's that's on the table. And then we have to

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 2>also take into account the reputation of ancient rulers as

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 2>becomes kind of submitted in the in the historical record.

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 2>So you know, there's a there's a lot of back

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 2>and forth to have there, But it sounds like there's

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 2>a strong case to be made that this was not

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 2>very a very functional warship, that it was just about

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 2>showing off your military mind. But I think it's an

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 2>interesting place to set out on our journey here. You know,

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 2>looking at the Tessaranka tear is something that exists as

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 2>the most outrageous and possibly grotesquely unrealistic example of an

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.439
<v Speaker 2>evolution of design in the ancient world. And I think

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 2>this is especially interesting in light of how absolutely on

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 2>point the engineering of the try Rem is considered to

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 2>have been. I'm going to share a quote from Chaffin

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 2>on this that I referenced earlier. To be clear, this

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 2>is he's not talking about the Tessaranga teris here. He's

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 2>talking about the more common and functional tri rem or

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 2>driven vessel. He writes it was a warship design at

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the very limits of available technology, incapable of further development,

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 2>expensive to maintain, costly and trained manpower, and in the

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 2>long run too costly for the resources of the city state.

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:46.719
<v Speaker 2>So I think it seems reasonable to think of these

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 2>almost as like jet fighters in the modern area, you know,

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 2>in terms of their upkeep and the technology involved, and

0:17:53.160 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 2>just how expensive they are to maintain and use. So

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 2>we're going to come back around to these, We're going

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 2>to come back around to the Tasaronkataris, We're going to

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 2>come back around to the Trireme, and they sort of

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 2>pinnacle of this technology as it develops in the ancient world.

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 2>But before we get into that, we need to talk

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 2>more basically about oars and paddles and other related technologies

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 2>that are the basis for all of this. So I

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 2>guess to kick off here just a discussion of some

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 2>of the basic terminology that is used here. I was

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 2>looking at the chapter in the seventy Great Inventions of

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 2>the Ancient World by Brian M. Fagan, and the chapter

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 2>that deals one of the chapters that deals with boats

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 2>has Sean mcgrail on there as the co author who

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 2>wrote the book Boats of the world. It covers the

0:18:55.800 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 2>basics of paddles, polls, and ores. So polling involves the

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 2>use of a long pole or setting pole, sometimes forked

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 2>at the end, to push a small craft along by

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 2>pushing it against the bottom of a body of water.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 2>And of note, this is a technology that may leave

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 2>no trace on the vessel itself, like it's you know,

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 2>you can imagine it. You've probably seen some version of this,

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the world around you, because it is

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 2>still used to this day. You know, it's just somebody

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 2>poling along.

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 3>Because they're especially useful in very shallow bodies of water

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 3>and shallow channels. You might often see them paired with

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 3>a kind of boat called a punt, which is a

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 3>more square shaped, flat bottomed boat that goes less deeply

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 3>into the water. So yeah, you'll see people out on

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, shallow reams and streams and rivers, punting out

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 3>on a kind of flat bottom boat, pushing along the

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 3>bottom of the pole.

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, you see, you see these out in the

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 2>world for sure. And then of course there are paddles.

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 2>Use of a paddle generally doesn't leave any evidence on

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 2>craft itself either, And then you have ores. Ores require

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 2>a pivot and possibly other specialized fittings, something that often

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 2>will leave evidence on a vessel, though you know, should

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 2>enough of that vessel survive and I guess, depending on

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 2>the materials used, you could also have like some of

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 2>these fittings alone survive.

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so yes, to pick up on that. This is

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 3>a distinction that I did not fully have in my

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 3>mind before researching for this episode. But there is a

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 3>difference between a paddle and an ore. I would have

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 3>previously used these words interchangeably. But a paddle is a

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 3>bladed beam that is held freely in the hands. And

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 3>you might have a blade just on one end you

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 3>paddle on one side of the boat, or you might

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 3>have a double sided paddle with two different blades, and

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 3>you can alternate which side, like you might use in

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 3>a kayak or something. So the paddle is held freely

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 3>in the hands, while an ore is mounted to the

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 3>boat in some way through a lock or a pin,

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 3>sometimes called an ore lock, though that is a false

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 3>cognate with the name or lock, as in count or lock.

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 3>It is skilled differently thoar locked. Okay, And as with

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the different names of these devices, the verb is different

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 3>as well, so Pushing through the water with a paddle

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 3>is called paddling. Pushing through the water with an ore

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 3>is called rowing. That's what rowing is. Now. If you

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 3>have no experience with canoes or row boats yourself, you

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 3>might not think of this. But there's a difference in

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 3>the orientation of the operator with these two different ways

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 3>of pushing through the water with bladed sticks. A person

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 3>operating a free hand paddle is usually facing the same

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 3>direction they're traveling, while a person rowing with a locked

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 3>or is usually facing away from their direction of travel.

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 3>So a canoe you're looking ahead, a row boat you're

0:21:58.240 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 3>looking behind.

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's interesting that I've done both of these before,

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 2>only a little bit of rowboat usage, mostly like canoe

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 2>stuff packing. But my mind instantly goes to how these

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 2>translate differently in cinematic usage. You know, like if you

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 2>have someone in a row boat and you want their face,

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 2>you want their emotions, their facial expression in the picture,

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 2>then you are focusing, you're looking at the rear of

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 2>the vessel and you're seeing them move away from the camera,

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 2>Whereas if you're going you want the same effect more

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 2>or less with someone in a canoe, where you're going

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 2>to have to have them coming towards the camera. So

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, you could probably get into a into

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 2>a into a big, you know, cinematic discussion about how

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the different technologies transfer differently to the screen and what

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 2>they say about the characters and their journeys.

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's interesting, you know. For some reason, I tend

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 3>to think of when you have a shot of somebody

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 3>powering a rowboat with oars with in oarlocks, so they're

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 3>facing towards the stern of the boat. They're usually talking

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 3>to somebody, aren't they Usually there's somebody sitting facing forward

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 3>opposite them, sitting behind them, talking to them, and it seems.

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 2>Like that, yeah, or they're like a lonely individual like

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 2>rowing away from the shore where our point of view is,

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 2>and it seems to like, you know, drive home a

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 2>sort of like sort of a negative connotation, like they

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 2>are leaving us, or they're going off into loneliness or something.

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 2>Whereas again, if someone's in the canoe, they're often moving

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 2>towards us. So I don't know, I guess there are

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 2>ways of sorting that out in our hands.

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 3>Rowing and paddling is like more interesting the more I

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 3>think about it. It reveals more kind of unappreciated physical

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 3>forces in play that I don't know are just invisible

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 3>to you while you're doing it. But one of the

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 3>other things I was thinking about that makes rowing a

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 3>powerful way of moving an object is the idea that

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 3>there is great resistance to a paddle blade moving through

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 3>water than there is to a paddle blade moving through air. Right,

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 3>so you have the ability at the surface of the

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 3>water to dip the ore in for a power stroke,

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:17.479
<v Speaker 3>and there's greater resistance there, which allows you to have

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 3>more force pushing the boat forward, and then you can

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 3>lift the ore up out of the water to move

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 3>it back into place for another power stroke. But while

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 3>it's moving through the air to go back for the

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 3>next stroke, the return stroke is not really offsetting your

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 3>movement very much, because the ore moves very easily through

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 3>the air, and in some cases you can even see

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 3>like practiced rowers tilting the blade so that it's like

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 3>sharp edge going through the air instead of flat edge

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 3>going through the air. I guess, to get even less

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 3>air resistance while they're moving it back.

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 2>This makes me think of various illustrations of like old

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 2>illustrations of possible submarines, only you would see ores on them, now,

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I guess, without getting into ancient submarine designs, I guess

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 2>sometimes these were depicted as ways that a submarine would

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 2>move along as a traditional boat, and not how they

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 2>would operate beneath the waters. But if you were to

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I guess you could operate ores beneath the waters, probably

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 2>having to turn the blade so that it could move

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 2>more easily back up to a starting position, but not

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 2>as easily as you'd be able to do this by

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 2>having the blade of the ore dip in and out

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 2>of the water.

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 3>That's right. Yeah, So I think you could still move

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 3>by a rowing motion under the water, And in fact,

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 3>you can think of the way some like a fish's

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 3>pectoral fins can kind of you know, move it around

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 3>a little bit with with a sort of rowing like

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:46.959
<v Speaker 3>motion in the water. But yeah, I think by all

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 3>accounts of oars would be much less efficient if you

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 3>were if you were only able to move them under

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 3>the water, you could probably still get some movement out

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 3>of them, like you said by yeah, like by orienting

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 3>the blades differently or going flat or going flat when

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 3>it's time to push and then for the return stroke

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 3>laying them, laying them sharp side forward. Maybe also by

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 3>this is a good question. I'm not sure if this

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 3>would work. Maybe also by altering the speed of movement

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 3>through the water, like with a fast power stroke and

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 3>then a very slow return stroke. I'm not sure.

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 2>It sounds reasonable to me, but I don't.

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Know for sure. I haven't tested it out. But yeah,

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 3>so it's like by existing, by floating on top of

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 3>the water, existing at the interface between the greater resistance

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 3>of the water and the lower resistance of the air,

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 3>you can get a greater advantage from the rowing movement

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 3>by having this resistance on the power stroke and then

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 3>relatively easier environment for the return stroke.

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. Yeah, so it's fascinating to break down the basic

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 2>physics behind these different methods, these different machines. But in

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 2>terms of when did they develop, well, this is one

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 2>of those questions. It's ultimately unanswerable, and we have to

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 2>throw in all the general caveats about wooden artifacts and

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 2>how frequently are lost. At the time of the publication

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 2>of Fagan's book, they cited the earliest known paddles dating

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 2>to seventy five hundred BCE in Germany and Britain. They

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Cite thirty two one hundred BCE is the oldest evidence

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 2>of polling from Mesopotamia and date rowing to third millennium

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 2>BCE in Egypt. Also, paddle use was apparently first illustrated

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 2>in the fourth millennium BCE in Egypt.

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we don't know for sure when the earliest paddle

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 3>driven boats were used, but we have some interesting pieces

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 3>of evidence from apparently fairly early use at least. So

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 3>One source I was looking at was a paper published

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 3>in a journal called Past Mobilities by Mark Dunkley called

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 3>Traveling by Water A Chronology of Prehistoric Boat Archaeology slash

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Mobility in England. This was published in twenty sixteen, and

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 3>the author here notes something interesting about the archaeological record

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 3>in Northern Europe at least, which is that the evidence

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 3>of the use of boats and water transport goes back

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 3>to very generally between the tenth and fifth millennium before present,

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 3>which falls within the Mesolithic or Middle Stone Age, but

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 3>that the earliest evidence for water transport is generally not

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 3>the physical remains of boats. Rather it is first of

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 3>all circumstantial evidence and Dunky sites, as one example here,

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 3>evidence of human settlement on islands such as the Inner

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Hebrides and Ireland, and in those cases this was by

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 3>the ninth millennium before present, during times when we can

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 3>be fairly confident that they were not connected to the

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 3>rest of Eurasia by land bridges or expanses that were

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 3>traversible in any method other than by boat. So this

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 3>implies there must have been some way for Stone Age

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 3>settlers to cross these large expanses of water. Thus they

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 3>likely had some form of watercraft. Another piece of evidence

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 3>early evidence that Dunkley mentions for water transport in northern

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Europe is paddles dated from the tenth to fifth millennium

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 3>before present, especially found in areas on the edge of

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 3>the Baltic Sea. And one example that I came up

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 3>when I was looking for I was looking for specific

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 3>examples of earliest known paddles in the archaeological record, and

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 3>one is the so called Duvincy paddle, which was discovered

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 3>in the nineteen twenties. I've seen two different dates on

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 3>this nineteen twenty six in nineteen twenty four, I'm not

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 3>sure which is right, but discovered in the nineteen twenties

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 3>at an archaeological site associated with Middlestone Age hunter gatherers

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 3>in northern Germany in a place now called du Vinci.

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 3>And this paddle is made of pine wood and based

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 3>on two different samples, it has been dated to between

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 3>eight and nine thousand years ago. Interesting note is it's

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 3>not huge. It seems that it was about fifty two

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 3>cinema in length, or you know, it's just over twenty

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 3>inches long. So that's kind of interesting to think about.

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Usually the paddles I think of today are longer, but

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 3>you can still paddle with a shorter paddle.

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And looking at the photograph here of the artifact,

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean it very much looks like paddle. You don't

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 2>have to read into it too much. I mean it

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 2>instantly reads as a paddle to just casual observation.

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So I was trying to understand the human context

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.719
<v Speaker 3>in which this paddle would have been used. I was

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 3>reading about the apparent Mesolithic settlement in this area in

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 3>a source called spade Paddling on a Mesolithic Lake, Remarks

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 3>on pre boreal and boreal sites from du Vinsi, Northern

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Germany by Klaus Bochelmann, published in twenty twelve in some

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of collection. It's called a mindset on flint studies

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 3>in honor of Dick Stapert Part three the Mesolithic and Neolithic,

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 3>and so the area of Lake Douvency, interestingly was likely

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 3>exploited at this time as a temporary encampment for the

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 3>harvesting of hazel nuts. You a fan of hazel nuts, Rob.

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. My mind instly goes to like hazel

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 2>nut coffee, and I say no, thank you, And no,

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I guess that what hazel nuts, and you

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 2>think of of various like hazel nut based chocolate spread.

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 2>So no, I'm I guess I'm very much in favor

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 2>of them in other contexts.

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 3>I guess they didn't have chocolate yet. But you're like

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 3>halfway to stone Age in nutella? Wait, is there even

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 3>chocolate in nutella? It's like brown and sweet.

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 2>There is chocolate and nutella. Yeah, okay, but nutella. Yeah.

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting because I think I've looked into this before

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 2>and it's like conceivable that you had some form of

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 2>ancient nut butter based on hazel nuts, but you could

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 2>not have possibly had nutella yet because you didn't have

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 2>access to chocolate from of course South America.

0:31:57.080 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Right, But about these people who were harvesting hazel nut.

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Bokelman writes, quote short term harvesting camps, sometimes under pine

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 3>trees and marked not by huts but by birch bark mats,

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.719
<v Speaker 3>were set up on muddy ground near open water and

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 3>on islets of the lake. These were optimal locations for

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 3>spade paddling harvesting trips to hazel groves in the vicinity

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 3>of the lake. Hazelnuts were roasted in hot sand in

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 3>open fireplaces, and the edible kernels were either consumed on

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 3>the spot or were stored for future use. Doesn't that

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 3>just sound cozy? I don't know, it sounds nice. So

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Bokeelman says that the evidence indicates that small family based

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 3>groups probably occupied the area for several days at a

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 3>time until the area became more thickly forested. I guess

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 3>there's some changing climate and flora around there, and as

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 3>the forest came in, this reduced the productivity of the

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 3>hazel groves and thus made Lake d Vinci less attractive

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 3>as a gathering location for humans because there were fewer

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 3>hazel nuts to harvest.

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Fewer nuts, less reason to go there.

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Right, But so this paddle was found, it seemed to

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 3>have been become buried in sediments sometime you know, eight

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 3>to nine thousand years ago and was preserved until it

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 3>was found in the nineteen twenties. And so somebody was

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 3>paddling obviously, somebody was paddling some kind of watercraft, some

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 3>very early watercraft through the water, possibly to harvest hazel

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 3>nuts in this area at the time. And now interestingly,

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 3>according to Dunkley, the author I mentioned earlier, these types

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 3>of paddles appear in the archaeological record before the earliest

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 3>evidence of log boats, leading to the speculation by an

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 3>author named Lanting in nineteen ninety seven that the earliest

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 3>watercraft were not log boats but were skin boats or

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 3>bark boats. So some kind of design that you know,

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 3>you might you would build around a frame and make

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 3>roughly waterproof, but would be less likely to be preserved intact.

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 3>And there are some sort of candidate pieces people have found,

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, like a piece of work to Antler, where

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 3>somebody's looked at this and said, ah, this might have

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 3>formed part of the skeleton of a skin boat or

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 3>a bark boat or something, but it's hard to be sure.

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I wonder if part of that The idea

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 2>here is that like a skin boat would perhaps be

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 2>easier to carry around. You could if you're having to

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 2>depend on a lifestyle then involves more of a transient

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 2>existence and moving from point A to point B with

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 2>the seasons and so forth. Then the skin boat you

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:35.760
<v Speaker 2>can carry with you, as opposed to a dugout canoe,

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:39.240
<v Speaker 2>which might be harder in some context to carry around.

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I wouldn't know for sure, but that makes sense

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 3>to me.

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Now. Much of what we'll be discussing here concerns the

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 2>seagoing vessels of the ancient Mediterranean or the wine dark Sea,

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 2>if you will, to invoke a common translation from Homer's

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.879
<v Speaker 2>Iliad in the Odyssey, But what was it about these

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 2>waters and what were some of the defining elements in

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 2>the development of ancient marine navigation here? Well, one of

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 2>my chief sources on this is The Ancient Mariners by

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:21.839
<v Speaker 2>Lionel Cason, published nineteen ninety one. He was to cease now,

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 2>he was, but he was one of the leading scholars

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 2>on ancient ships and marine operations. And as we progress,

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 2>we'll also try to incorporate added insight garnered via later

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 2>twentieth and twenty first century maritime archaeology. But Casein writes

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 2>that while historians have differed over the years on the subject,

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 2>evidence suggests that Mediterranean sailors kept mostly to this inland

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 2>sea the Mediterranean, and the key innovation that enabled them

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 2>to make use of the sea here was wind. So

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 2>prior to this they depended on poles for shallow navigation

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 2>and various forms of paddling and rowing if they needed

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:09.760
<v Speaker 2>to go farther out. But wind power, case In Wrights,

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:12.959
<v Speaker 2>was a real game changer. So I want to read

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 2>a quote here. This is from again his book The

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 2>Ancient Mariners nineteen ninety one. For the first time they

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 2>harnessed a force other than their own muscles, their servants,

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 2>or their wives. It was a discovery whose effect reached

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 2>down the ages. From this moment on, the easiest and

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 2>cheapest way of transporting bulky loads over distances of appreciable

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 2>length was by water.

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 3>And remain so today, by the way.

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so we get into this discussion though, and

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 2>we'll deal more with this in the next episode. But

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 2>so you're gonna end up with a situation where you

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 2>have wind power your disposal, which is very clearly awesome

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 2>and is a real game changer. But you also have

0:36:57.200 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 2>these technologies of the ore and the paddle. But on

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 2>top of this in the Mediterranean zone in particular, coming

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 2>back to Fagan and one of his other contributing riders,

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Boris Rankoff, who will come back to points out that

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 2>the galley, the sea going vessel powered by oars in

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:19.800
<v Speaker 2>the ancient world, this was, for all intents and purposes,

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 2>a Mediterranean phenomenon. Elsewhere at this time, ores were more

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 2>for powering small vessels on rivers and lakes, and you

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 2>often were able to lean more into the sail the

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 2>rest of the time. But they point out that a

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of the reason that we see this emphasis on

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 2>ores in the ancient Mediterranean it comes down to the

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 2>unreliability of the wind there. Unreliability by the way, as

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 2>it applies to high stakes, often conflict oriented sailing. None

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 2>of this is directly applicable to modern discussions of wind energy.

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 3>Ah, But what you're saying there makes sense as to

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 3>why you would often think of a trade ship as

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 3>being one that solely relied on wind power versus a

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:09.240
<v Speaker 3>warship being more likely to have lots of rowers and ores.

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, Because it comes down to a situation where you're

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 2>going to depend on the sales as much as you can.

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 2>But when it comes down to it, when you need

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 2>to close the distance between yourself and an enemy or

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:24.839
<v Speaker 2>try to greatly increase that distance, you might not have

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the wind on your side. You cannot necessarily count on it.

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 2>But what you can count on are the mechanisms of

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 2>the ores and the muscle power of the people to

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 2>pull those ores. So yeah, if you need that power

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 2>and you can't count on the wind or the wind

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 2>is not cooperating, well, then you bust out the oars

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 2>and you use or power to meet your objective. Nice

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:50.880
<v Speaker 2>So in the next episode, we'll come back in and

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 2>we'll talk at a greater length about this, and then

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 2>we'll get into some examples of ancient sea battles that

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 2>we know based on the written record and some illustrations,

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll get into the technology of these or

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 2>powered vessels that are so famous among the Greeks, and

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 2>then later the Romans.

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 3>I can't wait, all.

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 2>Right, so ramming speed in the next episode, but for

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 2>now we're gonna go ahead and close it out. We'll

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 2>remind you that Stuff to Blow Your Mind is primarily

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 2>a science and culture podcast with core episodes on Tuesdays

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and Thursdays. On Wednesdays, we do a short form episode.

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 2>We've been running a lot of monster facts recently, but

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:34.320
<v Speaker 2>in the weeks ahead, I'll come back with more Animalia stependium,

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 2>some more artifacts as we move forward. And then on

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Fridays we set aside most serious concerns to just talk

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 2>about a weird film on Weird House Cinema.

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:52.959
<v Speaker 3>to topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.760
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

0:39:55.760 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 3>your Mind dot com.

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.