WEBVTT - Bill Gates Made “A Grave Error In Judgement” With Epstein Relationship

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey, they folks did. It's Thursday, June eleventh, and another

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>high profile, famous, powerful man has been hauled in to

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>give testimony before Congress having to do with his relationship

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>with Jeffrey Epstein. And what did he testify to I

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know nothing, I ain't see nothing, I ain't do nothing.

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And with that, welcome to this episode of Amy and

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>TJ ropes. Not necessarily forbad him. I think Bill Gates

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>might have been a little more eloquent in he's how

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>he said it, but that's what he said.

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And this is, as you pointed out, one of

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 2>the most powerful men, billionaires in the world, who was

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 2>essentially being blackmailed by one of the most prolific pedophiles

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 2>in the world.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>He might have been one of the most prolific blackmailers.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>This follows a pattern. This is what people want. You

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>want leverage over people in some way. And this part

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>was interesting, really.

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 2>And that is where so many of the conspiracy theories

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 2>continue to have legs, because yes, it is true, it

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.199
<v Speaker 2>has been proven. And we heard directly from Bill Gates

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 2>that yes, he was among the men who Jeffrey Epstein

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 2>had goods on and threatened to use them to try

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 2>and continual relationship with or at least continue to use

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Bill Gates's good name at the time to benefit him.

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 2>And that is part of what the Congressional the House

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Oversight Committee is trying to come to terms with, to

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>try to figure out how Epstein rose to power, investigate

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 2>the investigation, and just try to give some more information

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 2>to a very curious American public.

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess we're getting a little more insight, a little

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>more detail. There's some curiosity here. I'm not sure, rogue,

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>do we got anything that overwhelmingly changes the narrative, but

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>it just I think it just adds to it a

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>little more understanding. But yeah, this is further evidence in

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that camp man. What did he have on everybody exactly?

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 2>And so this was a closed door deposition, and Bill

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Gates himself actually released his opening statement to the committee,

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 2>much like we saw from Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>when they were compelled to testify back in February. Bill Gates, however,

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 2>made it very clear he came voluntarily. And as he

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 2>was walking into the Capitol, of course, you know, you

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 2>had all those reporters throwing Mike's at him, and he

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 2>said he was there hoping that he could help lawmakers

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 2>quote fine justice for the victims.

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 3>As he went into testify, I was.

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Very surprised to see him stop and make a statement

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>of any kind. He didn't take questions, but he did.

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>He stood there and looked calm and confident. He looks

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>throwing in.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 2>He looked a little different, He looks thin. He did, right,

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 2>And that stood out to me. I don't know if

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>you noticed that too.

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess we don't see him that often. He's not

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>as prominent as far as up to date pictures, right,

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't see him that often. But yeah, I thought

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you looked pretty good.

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean when I said that, like, he looked healthy.

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 2>He didn't look sickly, he looked healthy. But yeah, he's

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 2>just the latest powerful person linked to Jeffrey Epsty to testify.

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 2>And I think you all probably remember that his name

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 2>did appear fairly prominently in some.

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Emails, prominently and frequently and.

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Embarrassingly in those files.

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 2>In some of these emails, in fact, that Jeffrey Epstein

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 2>emailed himself almost as if he were making notes to

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 2>remember what was happening, or maybe there were drafts. I

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 2>think it was suggested if emails he was going to

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 2>send to Bill Gates in that big DOJ Epstein dumping

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 2>those emails. The contents of them were frankly very embarrassing

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 2>to Bill Gates. It was the very material that Jeffrey

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Epstein was holding over his head to blackmail him.

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and as a reminder, I mean some of the

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>style least still draft email it suggested or said that

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates was surreptitiously trying to give his wife drugs

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to treat an STD that he had given her that

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>he gotten from having extramarital affairs. I mean, that's pretty

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>tough stuff.

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Correct in this file? Correct?

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Actually have in one of the emails, Epstein wrote to

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 2>add insult to the injury. You then subsequently, with tears

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 2>in your eyes, implore me to please delete the emails

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 2>regarding your STD, your request that I provide you antibiotics

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 2>that you can surreptitiously give to Melinda, and description of

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 2>your penis. So, yes, this was an email in the

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 2>DOJ dump.

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And yes, and it didn't make sense why Jeffrey Epstein

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>would write that draft to himself. Does this mean he

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>was I don't know, was he making this up and

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.799
<v Speaker 1>getting prepared to put that out or was this all true?

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>So Bill Gates at the time came out and made

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a statement and said all this stuff was untrue.

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And there was another email just to see where

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 2>we're going with and what he's referencing when we read

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 2>you as opening statements. There was another email from a

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 2>former Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation chief advisor who talked

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 2>about in this email about things he had been asked

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 2>to do that he felt were morally inappropriate or even

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 2>ethically unsound.

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 3>And he said from.

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Helping Bill to get drugs in order to deal with

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 2>consequences of sex with Russian girls, to facilitating his illicit

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 2>trysts with married women, to being asked to provide adderall

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 2>for bridge tournaments as I am a medical doctor but

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 2>have no prescriptions writing ability.

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 3>So all of this was back and forth.

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 2>With Epstein, and it just was it was a very

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 2>tough PR day for Bill Gates to say the least.

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he, from what I remember ropes, he responded

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty immediately to this and pretty extensively. He kind of

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>said a lot. I can't remember if he was on camera,

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>but oh, didn't he have to After this he spoke

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 1>to the foundation, didn't he have a meeting. In the

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>notes of that meeting got out he had to talk

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to them.

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>So yes, he has been out there and admitting and

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>saying I had aim miss this was a mistake to

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>have this relationship. So he gets hauled in robes. It

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like, based on the Epstein files and things that

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we are aware of, maybe he does know something. Maybe

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>he did see something, Maybe he was aware of something,

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe he was around something. Maybe he can help us

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>move this investigation along.

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well we have his opening statement, and in addition

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 2>to just thanking the committee and actually calling it an

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to appear before them, he actually said he was

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 2>looking forward to answering their.

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Question, saying all the right stuff.

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't seem that's how the Clintons opened, But okay, Bill

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Gates maybe started out a little friendly.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>What was Clinton's wonderful line at the Annie's fire away?

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Something great?

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 2>They didn't act as if they were excited about it.

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Ask her questions. But he begins with at the outset,

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I want to stay very clearly, I never witnessed, nor

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 2>had any indication that Epstein was engaged in ongoing criminal conduct.

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 2>I never went to his island, his ranch or his

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Florida home. I've never victimized anyone. While he may have

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 2>sought to foster a personal relationship, I was never interested

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 2>in that and never reciprocated.

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So, like I said, didn't know nothing, didn't do nothing,

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't see nothing.

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that was the verbatim of your synopsis.

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, he might as well just say that and say, okay,

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>give me questions. Okay, Well get it. I don't know

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>anything this guy that I knew. I am in here

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in Congress to testify about my relationship. Let me start

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>with this. I know nothing.

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, it was a five year relationship. Well,

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 3>uh okay.

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 2>So he goes on to kind of give some details.

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 2>He said, I was introduced to Epstein in twenty eleven

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.559
<v Speaker 2>through people I trusted in my professional and philanthropic work.

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Epstein claimed he could raise billions.

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Of dollars for global health from people for whom he

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 2>provided tax and estate services. I recall being aware that

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Epstein had faced prior legal issues, but I did not

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 2>fully understand the extent of the crimes he committed. I

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 2>accepted the introduction without applying the scrutiny I should have.

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>That's for a guy who's become one of the most

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>influential men in business the world has ever known, one

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of the most I mean, one of the richest men

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the world has ever known. I didn't do my homework

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on this new guy that was just handed to me.

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 3>It does seem a bit bizarre.

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 2>And when you find out he's acknowledging he knew he

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 2>was a convicted criminal. Did he not want to know

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 2>what he did? And when you heard predator, child sex offender, possible, well,

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 2>not possible, convicted pedophile, would you not? I mean, do

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 2>you gloss it over by thinking as she was probably sixteen?

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So what's the line there about what he was aware of?

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 3>He was aware that Epstein had faced prior legal issues.

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 3>That's how he phrased it. That's where you lose me.

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>He okay, come on, okay. I didn't realize he lost

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>us so early in his statement it sweetheart deal.

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Epstein' sweetheart deal was in two thousand and seven. This

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 2>is four years after the fact. There was information online

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 2>everywhere about him.

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.599
<v Speaker 3>At that point. It would have only required a Google.

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Sech we even when you meet somebody and before you

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>go on the first date, you can google him and

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>find this out to say he didn't do enough research.

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Sounds a little odd, but to this sounds legal. It

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>sounds lawyer. It's the way he put it. Be aware

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of he had some prior legal issues. Well, that's vague. Okay,

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to take him at his word here, but

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that's uh, that's vague and it's tough to believe.

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Agreed, So yes, Then he describes having like three meetings

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.839
<v Speaker 2>with Epstein in twenty eleven, a couple in twenty twelve,

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 2>and then he claims there were more extensive conversations in

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirteen and twenty fourteen, and so then he goes

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 2>specifically in twenty fourteen. So this is five years after

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 2>meeting him. After Epstein brought together a group he described

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 2>as potential donors, I realized that our prior discussions would

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 2>should have translated into meaningful, filling throat topic support were

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 2>a dead end. It was clear that no one in

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>the group was interested enough to move forward. At that point,

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 2>I concluded Epstein would never deliver on his promises. I

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 2>told him we would go no further and stopped communicating

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 2>or meeting with him. No vehicle for charitable giving was

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 2>ever created, and no funds were raised. So he claims

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 2>all of his interactions with Epstein ended in December of

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourteen, and he made the point to say that

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 2>was four years before new reports in the press shed

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 2>light on the extent of his crimes. Look, I was

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 2>doing investigative reporting on him in twenty sixteen, so maybe

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 2>he could say it was a few years away from

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 2>a renewed interest in what Epstein was doing.

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 3>But this was in the height of his criminal activity.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Help me with the convictions in Florida were twenty seven

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god. Okay, So he fires it up with

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>his guy in twenty eleven, yes, twenty fourteen, correct, fifteen?

0:10:57.920 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Correct?

0:10:58.400 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right.

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 2>So he claims then that he has an employee engaged

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 2>to engage Epstein into negotiating the separation, that they were

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 2>going to formally not be doing business together. But then

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 2>he says it was after this that I learned Epstein

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 2>had become aware of sensitive information about my personal life,

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 2>including the fact that I have been unfaithful in my marriage.

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 2>These affairs had nothing to do with my interactions with Epstein,

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 2>but they were painful for my family. As the public

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 2>can now see based on what has been released in

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 2>the files, Epstein was working to use information about my infidelities,

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 2>in addition to many lies that he layered on top

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 2>to pressure me to re engage with him.

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 3>He was unsuccessful in.

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 2>This effort, but it shows some of the ways he

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 2>tried to leverage his interactions with me to further his agenda. Look,

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 2>if he had no personal connection, no personal relationship with him,

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 2>if this were just a few business meetings that went nowhere,

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 2>how did Epstein have all this information about women and

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 2>drugs and STDs and all of these other things.

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>You know what, I wouldn't be surprised if Epstein had

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>his ways. Now, that's one thing I can I would

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>believe based on what we know about this guy. He

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>just knew stuff, and he knew how to get information.

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>He knew how to get into a room, he knew

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>how to get people together. He just seemed like a

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>guy who would have a file on everybody he does

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>work with.

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, But it's just interesting if you know that Jeffrey

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 2>Epstein was known to gather women from around the world

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 2>to be around these powerful men with money, it just

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 2>seems strange that that was independent of Epstein, that he

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 2>apparently had affairs with Russian girls.

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>You were saying he would have been rolling with Epstein

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>for some of his gig.

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 2>That is the implicator, and that is what you would think.

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 2>It'd be strange that those two things weren't connected in

0:12:57.880 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 2>a same way.

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And I had them disconnect because of the underage nature

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of what Epstein was doing. And we

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 1>should say, if we haven't yet, Bill Gates has not

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>been accused in any way of any criminals, not as.

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Consenting adults, consenting adults as who he has admitted to

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 2>having affairs.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>And those folks he was involved with are not connected

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to Jeffrey Epstein. Now, Rhodes, I haven't done with you.

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a lot of people are doing what you're doing.

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't do that. I didn't put the two things together.

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 2>And they might not go together, but it's hard to

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 2>imagine that there isn't a space where they could. So

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 2>I think that's where he's trying to distance himself, obviously

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 2>from those two things being connected, but they're in the

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 2>same vein the age obviously significant and certainly the women

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 2>who have been named, and there have been names, have

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 2>acknowledged a relationship that was consensual, So there's no criminal

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 2>implication for Bill Gates, but he went on to say,

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I should never have met with Epstein in the first place,

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 2>based on what I know now, I understand that even

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 2>if he had delivered the new donors he promised, it

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 2>would not have justified associating with him. And he goes

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 2>on to acknowledge that just by being associated with Bill Gates,

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 2>by allowing him into his life, he legitimized a criminal,

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 2>He legitimized the pedophile, at least by his association with him.

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So he is acknowledging that because now he has even

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>more clout because he's rolling.

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 3>With Bill Gates exactly exactly.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 2>And so this was the big thing that Gates testified

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 2>to that made headlines. He went on to say, meeting

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 2>with Epstein was a grave error in judgment and put

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 2>this work at risk, meaning his philanthropic work.

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 3>His behavior was.

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Antithetical to all my efforts to contribute to a world

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>where everyone has a chance to live a healthy and

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 2>productive life. If the time I spent with Epstein lent

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 2>him any credibility, I am deeply sorry, learned a significant

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 2>lesson and am now far more careful about who I

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 2>engage with, even in a limited capacity. That seems so

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 2>strange for the billionaire who founded Microsoft to have to say, now,

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 2>upon reflection.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I have to be careful about who I let it in.

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 3>My way, I've learned the lesson now what really fine.

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>But again, it's kind of one of those things. If

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:24.119
<v Speaker 1>somebody you respect that much walks in here and introduces

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you to a guy, you would just say, fine, this

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>person has to be legit. There are plenty of people

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in our lives. Well, I don't know why straight hand

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>comes the mind. If somebody like that, a friend, somebody

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you're close to, somebody you know is good in business,

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>introduces you to somebody, they are immediately legitimate in your eyes?

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Are they not?

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 2>It does lend them credibility, But it's still when you're

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 2>the person who Bill Gates was even at that time,

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 2>you still have to do your own due diligence.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't get me wrong. We google it makes everybody all right.

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 2>When we come back, we're gonna tell you what the

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>lawmakers who were grilling Gates for those six hours, by

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 2>the way, what they had to say about his testimony,

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 2>and who the next very powerful man this committee wants

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 2>to bring in to ask some questions about welcome back

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 2>everyone to this episode of Amy and TJ.

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 3>We are talking about.

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 2>A pretty stunning scene on Capitol Hill. One of the

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 2>most powerful men in the world, billionaire Bill Gates, Microsoft

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 2>fonder under oath, testifying before a House committee about his

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 2>relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. And we did get his opening statement.

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 2>He released it actually on the Gates Foundation website.

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 3>But what we didn't get to see.

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 2>And we do usually get these transcripts at some point

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 2>in time, was the grilling that he underwent for six hours,

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 2>with lawmakers from both sides of the aisle asking him

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 2>detailed questions, and when they came out during breaks, they

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 2>were offering different assessments about how he was doing or

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 2>what what was happening inside and it depended on who

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:11.719
<v Speaker 2>you asked what their reaction was.

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Shocking, I know, but it was odd.

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.479
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't simply split along party lines, that was it.

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't think so. So we had geopay GOP

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 3>representative Tim.

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 2>And I ended on a preposition when I tossed a

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 2>break and the wrong preposition. But let's just say some

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 2>of us only got two and a half hours of

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.959
<v Speaker 2>sleep last night. Thank you next, but thank you next seriously,

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 2>thank you next, yes.

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right.

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Uh. Congressman Burchett described the questioning as intense. Republican there

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 2>a Democrat came out and said Gates was combative and

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 2>not terribly forthcoming or candid, so that wasn't exactly a

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 2>glowing account of what happened. The top ranking Democrat, Congressman Garcia,

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 2>described gates act as a horrific judgment call and said

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 2>that Gates did push back on some of the questioning,

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 2>but he did say he is answering the questions. So look,

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 2>either it sounds like he was combative in moments, some

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 2>people felt like he wasn't being transparent or forthcoming, and

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.239
<v Speaker 2>to hear that it was intense. So I'm interested in

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 2>the transcript. I have no idea. I think he testified

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 2>one other time Gates did many many years ago, and

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 2>it was also described as intense.

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Isn't this How have they been in their turnarounds for

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the transcripts?

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 2>We use again a few bits a couple of days,

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 2>a couple of days we get to see how exactly

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 2>it went.

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 3>But look, this is a continuing process for this House

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Oversight Committee.

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 2>James Comer has been very vocal about who he'd like

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 2>to have sitting there facing members of Congress. He wants

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Alan Dershowitz next. And look, Alan Dershowitz has been a

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 2>cent figure in the Jeffrey Epstein saga. Look my interview

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 2>with Virginia's Euphrey all those years ago that never aired.

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 2>She talked specifically about Dershowitz, and he has been very

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 2>vocal in his denials about having anything to do with

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 2>any of the young women who were abused. But some

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 2>of these young women, women, especially Virginia, said otherwise. So, yeah,

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 2>it would be very interesting to hear what prominent former

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Harvard lawyer Alan Dershowitz would have to say. He would

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 2>definitely have to be compelled to testify. He is not

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 2>coming voluntarily. I feel very certain about.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>That, and I feel like he would have a very

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>good legal argument for why you can't compel him to

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>come testify. Oh my, how that showdown. There's no talk

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of subpoena and sending a subpoena to him just at this.

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Not yet, I think the wording was Committee Chair James

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Comer said he is planning to ask attorney Alan.

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:00.239
<v Speaker 3>Dershowitz to appear. That sounds very luck with that very

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 3>black comber.

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 2>He said he's also been in communication with the DOJ

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 2>because they would also like Attorney General Todd Blanche to

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 2>come in for questioning as well. And of course Blanche,

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 2>I think everyone can remember, very famously sat down with

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Gallaine Maxwell and shortly after that big sit down interview,

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 2>she was transferred to a minimum security camp fed a

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>hotel in Texas that has, you know, just a few locks.

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>You can't leave, but it's just a hotel.

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 3>It's like the Hotel California.

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, Todd Blanche, isn't he the one didn't Pam BONDI

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>just throw him under the bus recently?

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay, yes, but she's out of a job and

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 2>he's now the new Attorney general nominee and the acting

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 2>Attorney General.

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 3>So look, this is far from over. This has been fascinating.

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Not sure that there have been any massive new revelations

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 2>in all of this, but at least you are seeing

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 2>people held accountable to the point that they're being asked

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 2>formal questions. And eventually we will get to see the

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 2>full transcript of what Bill Gates had to say answering

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 2>question confirming Robes.

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, he is still on the list. The nineteenth richest

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.719
<v Speaker 1>person in the world. Bill Gates valued it over one

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred and three billion dollars. So he is still as

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>he's giving all of his money away, he still remain

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the richest. In my adult life, I think

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>he has been on the list of richest folks. He

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>just lives there on that list.

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 2>But ain't It's so interesting how the thought of getting

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.959
<v Speaker 2>more money for his charity, for his foundation blinded him

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 2>from what was right there. Easily Google old bull Google Google.

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I need to stop talking.

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately I'm a podcaster now, so that's gonna be tough

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of the day.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So bear with me. Everybody can't just sit here and

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>look pretty anyway.

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we could just have some fun. What's Amy going

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 3>to say next?

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, So stay tuned for the feed for what

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 2>could possibly come. But we always appreciate you listening to us.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Everyone. I'm Amy Roeboch alongside T. J. Holmes. We will

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 3>talk to you soon.