Speaker 1: The Gulf of Tonkin is one of the most famous
Speaker 1: or infamous examples of what is called a false flag attack,
Speaker 1: and that's the subject of this week's classic episode. Imagine
Speaker 1: if you we're running a government and for some reason
Speaker 1: you wanted a problem, you wanted something to rally your
Speaker 1: people and maybe to get them to stop asking all
Speaker 1: those pesky questions about when the election will actually happen,
Speaker 1: or why we're going to war? What if you created
Speaker 1: an enemy? And once again, as with many of these
Speaker 1: classic episodes, this is a concept that has truly proliferated
Speaker 1: in particularly in kind of fringe groups politically who are
Speaker 1: trying to demonize a particular group or a particular issue. Um.
Speaker 1: We certainly have some radical um political candidates that have
Speaker 1: used this to great effect to argue against gun controller
Speaker 1: and the like. So we sort of set the stage
Speaker 1: for that, and it's something that we've certainly seen rear
Speaker 1: its ugly head ever since. Yeah, and does anybody remember
Speaker 1: September eleven. I mean, just all of the all of
Speaker 1: the media that's been generated, the research that's gone into
Speaker 1: attempting to prove that that attack, that series of attacks
Speaker 1: was a false flag. If this is something that many people,
Speaker 1: including us, are fascinated by. And hey, we're going to
Speaker 1: jump in from UFOs two. Ghosts and government cover ups,
Speaker 1: histories writtled with unexplained events. You can turn back now
Speaker 1: or learn the stuff they don't want you to now. Hello,
Speaker 1: welcome back to the show. My name is Matt and
Speaker 1: I'm then we're here with our super producer Noel Castro
Speaker 1: Broun oh Man. Is that that's an upgrade? Let me
Speaker 1: full dictator right there? Well, you know he was already
Speaker 1: heading in that direction. I think we could all see
Speaker 1: the trajectory writ large. Isn't that right? No, that's smirk
Speaker 1: evil personified. So, ladies and gentlemen, today we are talking about, um,
Speaker 1: I don't know, let's start with this story. How about that,
Speaker 1: all right? Or just a hypothetical situations? Okay, So let's
Speaker 1: say super producer Noel Brown is a world leader, right,
Speaker 1: and she's a world leader in I don't know, pick
Speaker 1: kind of government. Let's say let's say it's democratic. Okay,
Speaker 1: he's a world leader in a democracy. But things are
Speaker 1: not going too well in this democracy. The economy is tanking,
Speaker 1: the population is impoverished, unhappy, crime is high, they're threatening riots.
Speaker 1: Political opponents are increasingly averse to spending, especially in foreign interventions.
Speaker 1: And since you're a Western leader, if you're Noel Brown,
Speaker 1: in this situation, you can't just make people do what
Speaker 1: you want, no, you you have to seek guidance from
Speaker 1: your people. Right, you can't just go out there and
Speaker 1: put an iron fist down. Right. They are in charge
Speaker 1: of you, right, you are. You are the person with
Speaker 1: three hundred something million bosses exactly. You know, theoretically these
Speaker 1: people vote, and that is how decisions have me they
Speaker 1: if least if it's in the US, the Republic of
Speaker 1: the U S. So this is not the best comparison. Uh,
Speaker 1: then they have the right to kick them out. If
Speaker 1: kick out their elected officials and get some new ones.
Speaker 1: So you have to get these people on your side.
Speaker 1: But what if circumstances change, Matt, What if Noel Brown
Speaker 1: is the president when an attack occurs? Oh, but all
Speaker 1: this bad stuff is happening already, it's still there. But
Speaker 1: then an attack occurred. I guess it depends on who
Speaker 1: attacked you, right, Yeah, what if a common threat brings
Speaker 1: a divided nation together supporting you, Noel Castro Brown. Uh?
Speaker 1: You know, and and at the risk of being a
Speaker 1: very cold person. This is Marckavellian and and effective. You know,
Speaker 1: it's it's a gift if this occurs. Sure, it's a
Speaker 1: terrible thing to happen in the short term, but in
Speaker 1: the long term for your goals. If you're that leader,
Speaker 1: Noel Brown, then yeah, blessing in disguise, right, and you
Speaker 1: can sit around and wait for something like this to happen,
Speaker 1: although that would not be very wise. No, what why
Speaker 1: not just do it yourself? Hang on there, Matt, Are
Speaker 1: we talking about false flag attacks? We're talking about false
Speaker 1: flag attacks. That is the nature of a false flag attack.
Speaker 1: And uh, we've got a quotation here that we'd like
Speaker 1: to open up the show with. Why. Of course, the
Speaker 1: people don't want war, but after all, it's the leaders
Speaker 1: of the country who determine the policy. And it's always
Speaker 1: a simple matter to drag the people along. Whether it's
Speaker 1: a democracy or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament or
Speaker 1: a communist dictatorship, voice or no voice, the people can
Speaker 1: always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That
Speaker 1: is easy. All you have to do is tell them
Speaker 1: that they're being attacked and denounced. The pacifists for lack
Speaker 1: of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works
Speaker 1: the same in any country. Who said that that was
Speaker 1: Herman Goring. Herman Goring, leader in the National Socialist Party
Speaker 1: known by most people today as the Nazis. This is
Speaker 1: not a unusual stance. It's just it's just put very
Speaker 1: plainly in that quotation. But a false flag ultimately, it's
Speaker 1: just a covert operation designed to look as though somebody
Speaker 1: else carried it out. And the term goes back a
Speaker 1: long time. The actual phrase, at least the story goes
Speaker 1: is that this goes all the way back to the
Speaker 1: days of sailing and and uh seaborn empires and yeah,
Speaker 1: if you're on the if you're sailing the high season
Speaker 1: and you're flying a flag, let's say you're in territory
Speaker 1: that's not yours or the country you're in, you fly
Speaker 1: a flag of that country. Like, let's say you're a pirate.
Speaker 1: Instead of throwing up the old black flag, just throw up,
Speaker 1: I don't know, let's say a British Empire flag. Right,
Speaker 1: nobody's gonna mess with you unless they get close enough
Speaker 1: to really like inspect your stuff, yes, or they will
Speaker 1: let you get much closer than they should. Uh. So
Speaker 1: this this concept can still be seen today because ships
Speaker 1: often are required to fly flag, even even in this time,
Speaker 1: in this day and age. But uh, it was much
Speaker 1: easier during that time too. You know, raise the Spanish flag,
Speaker 1: conductor raid leave, change your flag to you know, the
Speaker 1: Dutch flag or something. You could be almost anonymous. Just
Speaker 1: have a whole stack of different flags down there. And
Speaker 1: the word for studying the study of flags is vexillology.
Speaker 1: Now that's a fun word, and it's a weird one,
Speaker 1: isn't it. There real life vexillologists, which is which is
Speaker 1: how I learned about the various different pirate flags. It's
Speaker 1: not all skull and crossbones. It's it's very strange. There
Speaker 1: are some elaborate ones, and there are also a lot
Speaker 1: of poorly drawn skulls. I guess the guys were in
Speaker 1: a hurry. But but you know, when we're getting sidetracked.
Speaker 1: The thing is that ladies and gentlemen listeners there at
Speaker 1: home in your car running whatever you're doing, be aware
Speaker 1: that this is a real thing. This is not some
Speaker 1: there's not some fluke that happened once. This is not
Speaker 1: something that one guy did in you know, ancient Rome
Speaker 1: in fact, we have multiple examples of false flag attacks. Yeah,
Speaker 1: just just to reiterate what you said, Ben, it's not
Speaker 1: something that just the fringes are allowed to talk about, right,
Speaker 1: and to understand this is something a lot of times
Speaker 1: you'll hear on the fringes of news or media organizations.
Speaker 1: But it's something that I think we can and probably
Speaker 1: should talk about more. Sure. Yeah, we we're going to
Speaker 1: present some historic proven false flag attacks, and then we're
Speaker 1: going to look at some of the alleged false flag attacks,
Speaker 1: which that is more of the uh, the murky water
Speaker 1: for a lot of people. So the first one we'd
Speaker 1: like to talk about is something we we discussed in
Speaker 1: the video that we put out on Wednesday of this
Speaker 1: week called the Mukton instead it and this is when
Speaker 1: Japanese troops created an explosion on a train track in
Speaker 1: and they blamed it on China and the whole idea
Speaker 1: of this was to justify an invasion of Manchuria and
Speaker 1: um it's also known by the way as the Manchurian incident.
Speaker 1: That makes sense, not to be confused with the candidate
Speaker 1: no Um. And after a while this went to a
Speaker 1: trial in the Tokyo International Military tribunal UH and essentially
Speaker 1: a lot several of the people. The perpetrators who carried
Speaker 1: out this attack admitted to what they had done and
Speaker 1: it became public record at that point. We also know
Speaker 1: that this kind of practice existed on both sides of
Speaker 1: World War two Axis and allies alike. UH. During the
Speaker 1: Nuremberg trials, UH former SS major who was under orders
Speaker 1: from the chief of the Gestapo, he said that he
Speaker 1: and some others faked attacks on UH Germans and on
Speaker 1: resource centers so that they could blame it on Poland
Speaker 1: and justify an invasion. And then also during the Nuremberg trials,
Speaker 1: it was found out that this guy friends Halder, who
Speaker 1: was a general UH. He stated that he UH they
Speaker 1: set fire to the German parliament building and then also
Speaker 1: blame that on somebody else, this time on the Communists.
Speaker 1: And speaking of the Communists, did you know that Soviet
Speaker 1: leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute over
Speaker 1: twenty thousand UH Polish army officers and civilians in nineteen
Speaker 1: forty and then blame it on the Nazis. Jeez I
Speaker 1: remember this isn't just one side or the other. The
Speaker 1: British government has admitted that between um it actually bombed
Speaker 1: ships that were attempting to take Jewish people, families and
Speaker 1: people to who are trying to escape the Holocaust or
Speaker 1: what was occurring at the time, right civilians refugees, Yeah,
Speaker 1: trying to take them to Palestine. And so again the
Speaker 1: British government admitted that they bombed five ships carrying people
Speaker 1: to safety. And they even set up a group called
Speaker 1: Defenders of Arab Palestine, which was a pseudo group didn't
Speaker 1: actually exist. Once they set that up, they had that
Speaker 1: group claim responsibility for these attacks. And let's go to
Speaker 1: Uncle Sam. The CIA openly admits it hired Iranians in
Speaker 1: the fifties to pretend to be communists and stage bombings
Speaker 1: in Iran in an attempt to turn the country against
Speaker 1: its democratically elected prime minister. And of course we know
Speaker 1: that did not work. We also know that in nineteen
Speaker 1: fifty seven Dwight D. Eisenhower was working with the British
Speaker 1: government to uh or at least they approved a planned
Speaker 1: idea Eyes and our approved a plan to carry out
Speaker 1: an attack in Syria then blame it on the Syrian
Speaker 1: government as a way to you know, like they do
Speaker 1: try and make regime change, which you know, that's nineteen
Speaker 1: fifty seven. That's uh, I don't know, man. We've been
Speaker 1: learning a lot about the U. S. Government's interactions with
Speaker 1: regime change in the Middle East lately, right, Yeah, not
Speaker 1: just the US. The US is the one that is
Speaker 1: most commonly associated with that because they've admitted to it
Speaker 1: a couple of times. They got caught a couple of times.
Speaker 1: Maybe that's all right, But the United States did not
Speaker 1: what the United States was not the original regime changing
Speaker 1: power in Coll East. Okay, so we already talked about
Speaker 1: Operation Gladio, which we did a video about, and in
Speaker 1: Operation Gladio, NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization had secret
Speaker 1: armies that would stay behind and bomb stuff, yeah, bond
Speaker 1: stuff for various reasons, but usually to hold back some
Speaker 1: kind of invasion from communists or uprising. And we've seen
Speaker 1: a lot of other declassified plans or proposals to carry
Speaker 1: out some kind of false flag attack, Operation Northwoods being
Speaker 1: the biggest, the most famous, the plan to attack Miami
Speaker 1: and then blame it on Cuba. Uh, to justify war
Speaker 1: with Cuba. Right, and uh, this this is not the
Speaker 1: the first nor the last time these sorts of things
Speaker 1: will be suggested. In nineteen sixty one, the Joint Chiefs
Speaker 1: of Staff started talking about blowing up a diplomatic building,
Speaker 1: an Embassi consulate excuse me, in the Dominican Republic to
Speaker 1: justify an invasion. But these plans, fortunately, we're not carried out,
Speaker 1: and we you know, we see that that's not the
Speaker 1: only plan that was proposed. Yeah, the idea of blaming
Speaker 1: an attack on Cuba was kind of pervasive around that
Speaker 1: time because we really wanted to get in there and
Speaker 1: take back over. So in sixty three there was another
Speaker 1: plan to uh stage attacks on Polace like Trinidad and
Speaker 1: Tobago or Jamaica and then again blame it on Cuba. Right,
Speaker 1: And this wasn't just really restricted to the US and Cuba.
Speaker 1: There's the famous Gulf of Tonkin incident, and you can
Speaker 1: go to UM government run websites who will provide a
Speaker 1: fairly thorough narrative of what happened. But this reason UM,
Speaker 1: this this event in the Gulf of Tonkin was the
Speaker 1: reason that the United States became involved fully in the
Speaker 1: Vietnam War. But the problem is we didn't happen, it
Speaker 1: didn't really happen, not the way that it was stated
Speaker 1: at the time, as in something that happened, yeah, and
Speaker 1: then it didn't, right. But honestly, like there were the
Speaker 1: ideas that they were being um the idea is that
Speaker 1: uf U S ship was being fired upon right by
Speaker 1: North Vietnamese boats. But again, that didn't happen. And there's
Speaker 1: a question about whether this was just something misread in
Speaker 1: the fog of war or whether the National Security Agency
Speaker 1: purposefully mis old the American public. Che here's one that
Speaker 1: I find really interesting, especially with some of the videos
Speaker 1: we've done on co Intel pro in general, and on
Speaker 1: the assassination of Martin Luther King and a couple of
Speaker 1: other things. In the ninth through the nineteen fifties and
Speaker 1: nineteen seventies, a U S Congressional committee admitted that as
Speaker 1: part of this co Intel program that we've talked about,
Speaker 1: they actually used provocateurs during that time nineteen fifties to
Speaker 1: nineteen seventies to carry out violent attacks, could be anything
Speaker 1: really small to something maybe a little larger, and then
Speaker 1: blame those attacks on political activists to undermine those movements. Right. Yes,
Speaker 1: and this we you know, we see this also occurring
Speaker 1: in South Africa during apartheid when a group called the
Speaker 1: Civil Cooperation Bureau, which is part of the Defense Force
Speaker 1: at the time, it's asked a couple of experts to
Speaker 1: help them discredit the African National Congress by bombing a
Speaker 1: cop car and trying to frame the a n C
Speaker 1: for it. And we see that, Um, we see that
Speaker 1: this happens much more frequently than you might suspect. Right.
Speaker 1: But one big thing here that we also need to
Speaker 1: point out is that often when these occur, uh, they're
Speaker 1: created by factions within a government, not the entire government.
Speaker 1: It's quite possible, for instance, that the um president or
Speaker 1: prime minister of a country might not know what's going on,
Speaker 1: and they may believe it's a legitimate attack. To absolutely
Speaker 1: because you you'll have someone who is in a high place,
Speaker 1: maybe in the military, that just said, look, we need
Speaker 1: to get this done. This is hypothetical on my part,
Speaker 1: but if you, if you believe strongly, like we said before,
Speaker 1: enough in anything, you will do sometimes actions that are
Speaker 1: unconscionable to most of us. Right. Yeah, And this brings
Speaker 1: us to something that's that's a pretty sticky subject for
Speaker 1: a lot of people, which is um, the US going
Speaker 1: to Iraq after the attacks on nine eleven. Right. Uh,
Speaker 1: this this justification that the w m D or the
Speaker 1: the relationship, alleged relationship right between UM, the Saddam regime, right,
Speaker 1: Saddam Hussein's regime and terrorists didn't really pan out. It
Speaker 1: was something that UM, either the US was wrong about
Speaker 1: or fat actions in the US were purposefully misleading people.
Speaker 1: And the question here is often a question of intent.
Speaker 1: That's what makes a false flag operation different in comparison
Speaker 1: to just a typical operation, because people can make enormous mistakes, right,
Speaker 1: but people can also do enormously immoral things if they
Speaker 1: feel like they're working for a higher purpose. So we've
Speaker 1: we've got many many more list of possible a list
Speaker 1: of proven false flags, right, And the question again being
Speaker 1: you know, were these on purpose? Were these accidents? Were
Speaker 1: these mistakes? Uh? But let's talk about the alleged examples. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: the first one that everyone would yell at us if
Speaker 1: we didn't say it is just the September eleventh attacks
Speaker 1: on the World Trade Center of the Pentagon And uh,
Speaker 1: where did the plane fall down in Pennsylvania? M m um. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So we've heard this a lot. We get some flaks
Speaker 1: sometimes for not covering this subject as much as some
Speaker 1: people would like to. UM, it's a very sensitive subject
Speaker 1: and it's tough for me to even go there. But
Speaker 1: there are some fishy things that that are still there.
Speaker 1: We've made a whole video called Thirteen Unanswered Questions about
Speaker 1: nine eleven, and we'd love for you to check it
Speaker 1: out if you have a chance. Uh, you know, I
Speaker 1: here's the thing, man, I am very skeptical when I
Speaker 1: hear people say, like, you can't talk about this thing
Speaker 1: because of an issue of emotions, right in respect, but
Speaker 1: I I'm very suspicious when people are treated like there
Speaker 1: are certain questions a person is not allowed to ask.
Speaker 1: They might be stupid questions, they might be UM easily
Speaker 1: easily disproved or debunk, But you can't attack somebody for
Speaker 1: asking a question. That's just that's foolish, that's a UM
Speaker 1: it's a bullying technique of sorts. So with that, with
Speaker 1: that in mind, UM, we would love to hear your
Speaker 1: thoughts on weather. I don't know, tell us what you
Speaker 1: think about not just nine eleven, but the following. We
Speaker 1: also have a vlog that came out this week about
Speaker 1: the Oklahoma City bombing, which UM you wanted to cover
Speaker 1: because this is also the twenty year anniversary of that event. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that was. That's one of those events that I remember
Speaker 1: as a kid, not very well, but I remember it
Speaker 1: happening and seeing news stories and when my father and
Speaker 1: mother watching a lot of that stuff. But I knew
Speaker 1: nothing about it at the time, about what was going on,
Speaker 1: the circumstances. Over the over the years, I've learned a
Speaker 1: little more about it, especially then in two thousand one,
Speaker 1: right around the time when I was graduating high school,
Speaker 1: that's when McVeigh, Timothy McVeigh was lethally injected killed, And
Speaker 1: that's kind of when I started thinking about it. I
Speaker 1: wonder how much you've you've thought about it around that
Speaker 1: time or since then. M Uh, this this was if
Speaker 1: you if you can put yourself back there, ladies and gentlemen,
Speaker 1: if you were alive when this occurred, then you'll know
Speaker 1: that this was until uh nine eleven, this was a
Speaker 1: tremendous one of the biggest acts of domestic terrorism in
Speaker 1: US history, or at least all on US soil. And
Speaker 1: we also know that later as in you know, like
Speaker 1: what ten years later, two thousand five, two thousand six,
Speaker 1: maybe uh evidence emerged that, UM, federal agents were aggressively
Speaker 1: trying to, you know, break up possible terrorist attacks, and
Speaker 1: in several cases crossed the line um stopping his haterrorist
Speaker 1: attack to maybe manufacturing a terrorist. Yeah, to essentially entrap
Speaker 1: somebody basically saying, hey, you have these views that are
Speaker 1: pretty extreme, Well, what if you had a bomb? What
Speaker 1: if I could get you a bomb, you know, as
Speaker 1: an undercover agent, Let's teach you how to make it,
Speaker 1: put in your hands, drive you to the place. And
Speaker 1: so the question that people have about Oklahoma City is
Speaker 1: it often revolves around something like that. Was this a
Speaker 1: case where someone manufactured in McVeigh you know? Right? Uh?
Speaker 1: And there are interesting theories here. There isn't any conclusive
Speaker 1: proof at this point. There there are things that Um,
Speaker 1: there are definitely some strange things that are have and
Speaker 1: let's say, questions that have you have to be answered.
Speaker 1: We made a video about it. Uh. One of them
Speaker 1: that I found really interesting was the one of the
Speaker 1: first responders to the bombing. I and not remember his name,
Speaker 1: Terence ki Yeki, Terence Tiki. Yeah. He he was one
Speaker 1: of the first responders along with another officer, and he
Speaker 1: saved I think four people then ended up falling and
Speaker 1: injuring himself. Um. Then I forget how many years later,
Speaker 1: but a while down the road he ended up killing himself.
Speaker 1: And when they found his body, he had tried to
Speaker 1: cut his wrists allegedly and then had ultimately shot himself,
Speaker 1: but at an angle that didn't seem to make sense
Speaker 1: for one to kill themselves. Um. People alleged that he
Speaker 1: had information about the attack that he wasn't telling, and
Speaker 1: that perhaps he was threatening to tell. It's all allegations,
Speaker 1: and people on the other side of the argument that
Speaker 1: I believe that he just commits suicide say that he
Speaker 1: was having very difficult marital problems, and which he was.
Speaker 1: And again this is you know, as as you said,
Speaker 1: a lot of this is allegation and speculation. But this
Speaker 1: this exploration that we're talking about Oklahoma City. You can
Speaker 1: you can watch our videos. You can hear much more
Speaker 1: about it, um, with a little digging, because there are
Speaker 1: more facts that come to light. The one person you
Speaker 1: will not hear from is Terry Nichols because Terry Nichols
Speaker 1: is apparently not allowed to communicate with anyone. He is
Speaker 1: currently serving a life sentence. I think I don't know
Speaker 1: if he got the death penalty, but he's serving a
Speaker 1: life sentence and his idea was that or his story
Speaker 1: side of the stories that he was helping McVeigh make
Speaker 1: a bomb and take it to a truck, but he
Speaker 1: didn't know what was going to happen. And he he
Speaker 1: wants to give testimony, but he's unable to do so currently,
Speaker 1: right and and there's not really a question about whether
Speaker 1: McVeigh did it. He did it. He it's conclusive that
Speaker 1: he did it. The questions people are asking, or the
Speaker 1: questions that you were asking, were um the extent if
Speaker 1: any of other parties involvement. We we also know that
Speaker 1: in a Rock there was well we talked about that
Speaker 1: a little bit, the idea of weapons of mass destruction,
Speaker 1: which is not not really a false flag so much
Speaker 1: as it is either a mistake or misdirection. Sure, but
Speaker 1: we do know that these things exist. We know that, Uh,
Speaker 1: this is a way to learn more about what's called
Speaker 1: the deep state, which is the unelected, the unelected officials
Speaker 1: like I think high level military, think, high level agency
Speaker 1: people who don't have to, you know, run for a
Speaker 1: district to get voted back in every four years or
Speaker 1: so instead they have a much longer potential ability to
Speaker 1: plan right powerful offices and a let's say long your
Speaker 1: further vision for what they can achieve while they're in
Speaker 1: their office right right, which is not which is not
Speaker 1: necessarily a bad thing, because let's let's remember that there
Speaker 1: are unelected officials at the Army Corps of Engineers, you know,
Speaker 1: and they are able to leverage this disability to plan
Speaker 1: for things that are ten or twenty years down the road.
Speaker 1: It's just that this, this power that an unelected position
Speaker 1: can transfer is uh is dangerous, and it goes both ways.
Speaker 1: That's an excellent pointment. Hey, thank you, Matt. Uh. We
Speaker 1: would like to hear from you what you think. Uh.
Speaker 1: Do you believe that there are uh some false flag
Speaker 1: attacks that we should have mentioned, and if so, what
Speaker 1: are they? Do you think that people are exaggerating actual
Speaker 1: events by claiming that there's a conspiracy of foot where
Speaker 1: none exists. You can find us on Facebook and Twitter
Speaker 1: to tell us about it, and you can also email us.
Speaker 1: But just so you know that how important listener mail
Speaker 1: is to us, why don't we read a couple today?
Speaker 1: Sounds great? This is a message that comes from Katie.
Speaker 1: She says hello, gents, just finished listening to your podcast
Speaker 1: on big data, and I'm here to tell you that
Speaker 1: there is hope. Well, yes, the big data you see
Speaker 1: every day does generate the targeted advertising that is all
Speaker 1: around us. One of the biggest, yet least discussed uses
Speaker 1: is in healthcare. I work in predicative and analytics in
Speaker 1: the healthcare field, where we use big data to help
Speaker 1: predict and prevent catastrophic health events. Most of this is
Speaker 1: driven by clinical data used during taken during every doctor's appointment.
Speaker 1: And yes, your doctor is definitely selling your data, but
Speaker 1: we're moving into the future where you're buying. Eating and
Speaker 1: movement habits may help us even more accurately predict things
Speaker 1: like heart attacks and stroke. We also can predict how
Speaker 1: effective treatment is, especially in behavior real diseases such as
Speaker 1: type two diabetes, based on the information your cell phone
Speaker 1: knows about you. That's crazy, are accurate, It's hard to
Speaker 1: say when the results are an event not occurring negative observation.
Speaker 1: But if people get to live better lives, then does
Speaker 1: it really matter. Don't get me wrong, it's creepy as beep,
Speaker 1: but I I'd like to think that we're really helping
Speaker 1: people that's a cool perspective. That's a really cool perspective. Kay,
Speaker 1: that's not something that we had thought about before, at
Speaker 1: least that I had thought about before. I've heard of
Speaker 1: it using uh this information to see into your health future.
Speaker 1: It's still is creepy, like she says, but I don't know,
Speaker 1: what do you think, Ben, I mean, if it could
Speaker 1: save somebody's life, It could save somebody's life. And I
Speaker 1: was really glad to read this to see more of
Speaker 1: a positive look at the data. And we'd like to
Speaker 1: we'd like to hear more of that too. We have
Speaker 1: another letter and thank you for writing to as Katie.
Speaker 1: We really enjoy that perspective. We have another letter from
Speaker 1: Adam at Tonbridge Wells. Adam says, first, great work you do.
Speaker 1: Have been listening to you for under a year now.
Speaker 1: Always look forward to your next topic. Thanks Adam. One
Speaker 1: thing I was expecting you to discuss and forgive me
Speaker 1: if you did on the Big Data podcast was the
Speaker 1: police in the US who can predict where crime is
Speaker 1: likely to be due to masses of data that was
Speaker 1: put it that was put into this system to set
Speaker 1: the thing up. The police on patrol are told which
Speaker 1: areas to go at any one time. Uh, this is
Speaker 1: a specific police department he's talking about, and I had
Speaker 1: not I had not heard of this. But what's exciting
Speaker 1: is that it is possible. You know, there is enough
Speaker 1: there is enough data depending on the city, to predict
Speaker 1: where things are most likely going to go down. You know,
Speaker 1: it's interesting the time of day, what crime right the neighborhood,
Speaker 1: Like where do break INDs occur? When do they occur? Uh,
Speaker 1: So we're gonna dig in a little bit deeper and
Speaker 1: look at that as well. Adam, thanks so much for writing, Katie,
Speaker 1: Thanks so much for writing Adam. We hope that you,
Speaker 1: as well as the rest of the listeners enjoyed our
Speaker 1: episode here on False Flags, and we would like to
Speaker 1: hear from you if you are into this whole podcast thing.
Speaker 1: And then, buddy, do we have news for you. You
Speaker 1: can visit stuff they don't want you to know dot
Speaker 1: com where you can see here. Uh, so much stuff
Speaker 1: that we've done. And that's the end of this classic episode.
Speaker 1: If you have any thoughts or questions about this episode,
Speaker 1: you can get into contact with us in a number
Speaker 1: of different ways. One of the best is to give
Speaker 1: us a call. Our number is one eight three three
Speaker 1: st d w y t K. If you don't want
Speaker 1: to do that, you can send us a good old
Speaker 1: fashioned email. We are conspiracy at i heart radio dot com.
Speaker 1: Stuff they don't want you to know is a production
Speaker 1: of I heart Radio. For more podcasts from my heart Radio,
Speaker 1: visit the i heart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever
Speaker 1: you listen to your favorite shows.