WEBVTT - BOMBSHELL: STATE V. D4VD AKA DAVID ANTHONY BURKE 

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Crime Stories with Nancy Grace breaking news bombshell State versus

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>D four v D aka David Anthony Burke as it

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>relates to the death of a little teen girl, Celeste Rivas,

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>found in the trunk of D four VD David Anthony

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Burke's tesla. What's taking so long? But now we have

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>seen a court document that says State versus David Anthony Burke.

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>You know about that secret grand jury proceeding that was

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>just an investigative tool looking into the death of Celestia Revas. No,

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>David Anthony Burke is named as the official defendant. Good evening,

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Nancy Grace. This is Crime Stories. I want to

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you for being with us, joining us an all

0:00:57.800 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>star panel to make sense of what we are learning

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. But I've got it in front of me.

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Dave Mac explain what we found.

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, when you look at this at the documentation from

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>the State of California, Nancy, it it flat out says

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 2>something that we've long thought was the case. But it

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 2>actually the bombshell the people of the State of California

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 2>versus David Anthony Burke. See, we thought, you know, it

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 2>was just an investigation, because that's what they said an

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 2>investigation into the death of Celestrevas Sernandez. However, this document

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 2>proves beyond the shadow of a doubt legal paperwork that

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 2>says the State of California versus David Anthony Burke.

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Now, what's interesting in this particular court document and what

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it is is an appeal to the Court of Appeals.

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>They're in Texas. The reason it's in Texas is because

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>his family, Burke's family is a Texas and they are

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>appealing a subpoena to come to the grand jury. Now,

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the title of that document is in the Court of

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Appeals for the First District of Texas in Ray Dowod Burke. Okay,

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean in the matter of Dowd Burke.

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>But in a footnote, in a footnote in this document

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you see the people of the State of California versus

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>David Burke. Okay, I'm going to get back to everything

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>else we are learning, but I'm going to go straight

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>out to a veteran trial lawyer, Joanna Nievis is joining

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 1>us from California criminal defense attorney and founder of the

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Nievis Law Firm. Joanna, thank you for being with us.

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So this is what's happening to my understanding, and you

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>jump in. Joanna, the family of d four med David

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Burke pronounced as David, has been subpoenaed, the whole

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>family to testify in a grand jury proceeding regarding the

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>death of Celesta Rivas, the little girl found in Burke's trunk.

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's see that tesla. It was part in spot to

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>spot to spot on Pass Street there in California until

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it was finally toad at the behest of one of

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the homeowners days sitting at the toe lot and it

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>started a stench. Why because Celesto Rivas was decomposing in

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the trunk. We were told there is an investigative grand

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>jury the US. I believe you will agree with me

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that grand juries have two tools, one a charging tool

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to indict people and one an investigation tool. For instance,

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in the John Binney Ramsey case. In the Ramsey case,

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the grand jury met and they met, and they met,

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and they met investigating John Benet's death. They ultimately did

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>issue an indictment, but that case was prosecuted. So a

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>grand jury can meet to investigate. They have subpoena power.

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>They can bring in witnesses or they can charge. We

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>were told this was an investigation into Celeste's death. Now

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we have an official court document filed by the parents

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>contesting them having to come from Texas to California to

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>textify in state the David Anthony Burke, So a case

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>against him, a case investigating him does exist, explain what's happening, Joanna.

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Right, Nancy, So, I do believe that it does outline

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 3>what the target of this investigation is. It's not just

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 3>trying to uncover who it may be and get more information. Obviously,

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 3>they're trying to focus their energies on identifying and criminating

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>information against this particular person that's named in the footnote

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 3>they're in the charging document. Assuming that that was cited properly,

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 3>I would guess that they took that from the grand

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 3>juries of pena that was perceived. The filing itself, I

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 3>think is kind of more procedural. Right, they're in Texas,

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 3>this is happening in California, and it's their attempt to say,

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 3>you know what, I don't really feel like California can

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 3>drag me over there based on this subpoena, and I

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 3>want a court to say that, yes, absolutely, you have

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 3>to you have the authority to make me come and testify.

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's kind of like one of those

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 3>procedural things where you're contesting the validity of a confidential informant,

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.919
<v Speaker 3>or you're contesting the validity of a warrant or the

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 3>validity of a search. They're really just saying, hey, just

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 3>make sure that you really do have the arms reached

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 3>to make me come from Texas to California.

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Here specifically what they are arguing it is de Woodburg,

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the father Dave four Fidi's mother Colleen, and his brother Caleb,

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>all summoned to testify at a California grand jury. Now

0:05:54.760 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>they are contesting that, claiming they're right have been violated.

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Why do they claim their rights were violated? They claim

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that they were given redacted versions of affidavits that were

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>used in the court order summoning them to be witnesses. Okay, really, Celeste,

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a little girl, a teen girl decomposing, and their sons Tesla,

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're claiming their rights were violated silent tear because

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the affidavits supporting that warrant, that subpoena for them had

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a name redacted. That's the leg they're standing on.

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Good luck, I think we see this pretty often though, like, hey, you,

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 3>there are rules that you have to follow, there is

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 3>information that we need, give me proper notice. That's the

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 3>basis of so many arguments when I even when I

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 3>just mentioned like a confidential informant, I'm that kind of

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 3>objection to the information is based on not being able

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 3>to see what was in the affidavit that was drafted

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 3>by the police officer, or even when contesting a search worm.

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 3>We see this pretty often, so I don't think that

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 3>they are making absurd arguments. I do think they're just

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 3>trying to protect their interests and of course the interests

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 3>of their son at this point, because he's still innocent

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 3>until proven guilty.

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I was waiting for you to say that. But this

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is not an adjudication of guilt or innocence. This is

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>telling a witness you must come to the grand jury.

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And yes, notice must be proper. In other words, they

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>have to be served with subpoena properly. There has to

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>be a date, a location, the name of the matter

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to which they will testify. But the fact that names

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>have been redacted in the affidavit. They don't even have

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to see an affidavit, all right, but they do have

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>an affidavit to support the subpoena. The fact that they

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>got noticed correctly, there is the name of the matter

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to which they will end up testifying to. That's what

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they need. It was registered, it was certified. Bam. They

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>don't need to know the state's case, and they don't

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>need to know sensitive information such as names that are

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in the affidavit that is not required under the law. Yes,

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you're right, they have to have noticed. Yes, you're right.

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>They have to know what the matter is on which

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>they will testify. But that's it. So they don't have

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>a leg to stand on. But I'm very curious. Let's

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 1>talk about privilege such as attorney client privilege. I'm sure

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that your clients speak very openly with you. They may

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>even confess they may prejudice themselves in front of you,

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>because you're their trusted lawyer, and your duty is or

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you will be disbarred if you violate the attorney client privilege.

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Right the rest of your life, you may not speak

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of it. That's the duty of a lawyer. I have

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>the same duty. So you've got the attorney client privilege,

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>You've got priests, parishioner privilege such as what you tell

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to your preacher, your priest, your religious counselor your rabbi.

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>That cannot be forced in court. The rabbi, the priest

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>cannot be forced to divulge what the defendant said. You've

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 1>got husband wife privilege. There are several privileges, but he's

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>my daddy. Ain't one of them. Neevice, no, for sure.

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 3>But you know, I do think there's a word that

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 3>David's dad does have some type of affiliation with the church,

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 3>and I do wonder whether or not he may take

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 3>some stand that his son to just say him from

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 3>that perspective, I.

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Thought you were going to hit me with the fact

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 1>that his father's a lawyer, so he could try to

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>use turning client privilege.

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 3>His dad is a lawyer.

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>But you're going he has an affiliation with the church.

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>What affiliation would that be? He drives by it on

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Sunday mornings, you know.

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 3>And here all of this is all reported, right, it's

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 3>reported that he's some type of reverend with the church.

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you know what, There's a reason you win so

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>many cases. See, she's smart, she's articulate, and she says

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>things like that, and you almost believe it. He has

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>some affiliation with a church. You just said that. Okay,

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So you're going from the angle that it is a

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>pre parishioner privilege. Is that correct?

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 3>It's an angle. I don't know that they're really actually

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 3>going to to go with it, but maybe some of

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 3>the conversations that have happened, if there really is this

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of affiliate, could fall under those protections. No, he

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have a father son privilege, and maybe he has

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 3>consulted his father in an attorney client way, but we

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 3>do know.

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 1>That he is. I shouldn't have given you that idea.

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I gave her a bound. She's running with it. Okay, Well,

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you know what, You're not half wrong, Joanna, as much

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>grief as I'm giving you. Remember when Rosie Greer, the

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>football player, went and counseled O. J. Simpson behind bars,

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and according to the sheriff, Sipson confessed that was kept

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>away from the jury under the same theory you're using

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>right now. Greer was some kind of a counselor or pastor,

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>some affiliation with the church, and it worked. The jury

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>never heard that OJ Sipson confession. So you know what,

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe he hasn't led to stand on with the dad.

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But what about the mom, Colleen and the brother. Okay,

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to hear this. Did they drive by

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the church on Sunday morning too? Well?

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, here's thing with that. We really don't know

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 3>how much they know. They're living in another state. David

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 3>is living in California. I mean, what do they know

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 3>that he's hanging out with Celeste? Do they really have

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 3>any details about whether or not there was a relationship.

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm still waiting to hear proof or some sort of

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 3>evidence that he was in a relationship that was inappropriate

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 3>besides contributing to the delinquency of a minor and you know,

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 3>maybe doing drugs and drinking alcohol, which we can kind

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 3>of gather from these photos. So there may have been

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 3>an inappropriate relation to the extent that he was doing

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 3>things that he should not have been doing, like engaging

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 3>in abuses of substances, giving her alcohol in But whether

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 3>or not there was a sexual relationship, we don't know that.

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 3>I've heard no reportings besides suspicions that there's any proof regarding.

0:12:52.160 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>That crime stories with anti Great Steve Fisher joining me

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, the Man of the Hour. He is a

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>missing person's private investigator, search and rescue specialist, and he

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>was hired by the owner of the mansion where D

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>four VD was living to basically find out what the

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>hay happened. Could you refresh Joanna Nievis's recollection regarding the

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>relationship that you have cobbled together through photos. I know

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you were not in the room when any alleged sex

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>activity occurred, which would be statutory rape because she's a child,

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>But you've seen a lot of photos. You even recovered

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a photo stick that the lapd left behind in their wisdom.

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Tell me what relationship based on the photos that you

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>have seen and what you have learned, what was the

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>relationship between D four VD and this little girl, Celeste Rivas.

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm certain that one thing that's become very apparent

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 4>is he was aware when cameras around and and he

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 4>made her aware of not to be in front of

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 4>the camera. It's very very apparent because you know, she's

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 4>captured in so few, you know, photos, although we know

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 4>we have other evidence the link are there, and but

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 4>is there direct evidence? I mean, I think it's this

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 4>is one thing that's worried me about this case is

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 4>that because it's the very highest level the of the

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 4>the DA's office. These are the d's that prosecute you know,

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 4>homicides and stuff. Will they if they can't meet that threshold,

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 4>will they go after the sex crimes?

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if they will, and that that worries

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 4>me when he I can.

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Tell you right now they won't. Yeah, I can tell

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you right now well that sex assault will likely not

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>be part of the claims against deforvid aka David Anthony Burke.

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And this is why Celeste is dead. Anthony will David

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Burke will likely never take the stand and without

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>any DNA from her body or her eyewitness testimony as

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a victim, it won't be a You can't prove it.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>If there is a witness that walked in on them

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>in any sex act, maybe they've got a leg to

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>stand on, okay, And there were so many people in

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and out of that house, as you know, that may

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>very well have happened if anyone ever saw him kiss

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>her on the mouth. If there are any texts that

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>surface romantic or sexual text between them, we may be

0:15:53.920 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>able to get a charge on in decent expres elude A.

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>But the state doesn't want to include account that is

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>weak because it will then dilute a murder charge or

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a homicide charge if it's not murder one. I would

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>not put that in my indictment. If I were indicting

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>this case, I might believe it, I might know it

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to be true. But unless I have a witness, gethan

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>tell they can tell me they observe D four VD

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>having full on sex with celestial revice, I would not

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>put that in the indictment. If I've got someone or

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>text proving something else, kissing, fondling, sexual text, anything like that,

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I would go with delinquency to a minor or child

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>molestation or leute acts. I wouldn't do anything that would

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>dilute the most important charge, and that would be homicide.

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I believe I would have one count of

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>homicide if I were prosecuting this case. Maybe account of

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>mutilation to a corpse, which means hiding the corps, bearing

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 1>the corpse, tampering with the corpse, because those are going

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to be provable according to reports. Now, Steve Fisher, we've

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>got this document proving in a footnote you have to

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>read it very carefully that there is a grand jury

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>investigation state the David Anthony Burke. What you're seeing right

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>there is from the family contesting their subpoenas. We can

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>only imagine what he may have told them, what they

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>know about this case, But they're going to have to testify.

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Just because you move to a different state or you

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>are in a different state does not mean you don't

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>have to testify in front of grand jury. Now, Steve Fisher,

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>bring me up to date with your latest findings.

0:17:55.640 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 4>We had the news of the car being say from

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:02.959
<v Speaker 4>going to auction at the very last minute. We were

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 4>hoping to take a look at that and that didn't happen.

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 4>These photos are showing now. We we released these photos,

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 4>uh to kind of show there's a couple of reasons

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 4>for this. I wanted to show some of the people

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 4>that were around a lot and they appear in this photo.

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 4>We believe Celeste is also just off frame here. And

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 4>and also you know we talked about the phone right

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 4>there that's shows that it's on connected to the Wi

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Fi system of the house. And we did this because

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 4>we wanted to let everybody we've heard I've heard recently

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 4>that there's a few people that still are not co

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 4>operating and or aren't being fully truthful, and I think

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 4>it's important that people realize that there are things like

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 4>the Wi Fi router at the house that it's gonna

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 4>log exactly when they were connected to that that router,

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 4>and you know what days and what times and and

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 4>things like that. So we just thought it might be

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 4>important for those people to think about and maybe it's

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 4>time to be fully truthful about you know, who was,

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 4>who was there, and who was I'm.

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, hold on, you cut out on it. You're saying

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that the LAPD can mine the Wi Fi connections in

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the home from the time they believe Celeste began living

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>there until her death, and they can determine who was

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in the home and get those cell numbers, connect those

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 1>cell numbers to owners, and then get witnesses. Is that

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>what you just said if if.

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 4>They did the forensics on the router. Look, you know,

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 4>we don't have that type of relationship with the LAPD

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 4>where they're telling us exactly what they've done. These are

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 4>things that we're throwing out there hoping that they are

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 4>being done because we think they're very important, especially if there's.

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot See Fisher, You're absolutely right, but I want

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you about a neo aka Neo the

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:59.959
<v Speaker 1>Asian aka hiding under mommy's bed and another jurisdiction refusing

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>to the grand jury. Guess what, he was arrested and

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>brought to the grand jury. So if d Forbidy's family

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want the same treatment, they better hop on over

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>to that California grand jury and start talking. Tell me

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>what you know about Neo the Asian. His words, not mine,

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>brought into the grand jury? Did he go to grand jury?

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Steve Fisher showed up at that building.

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 4>They showed the prosecutor arriving at that building. He was

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 4>only in there. They say thirty to forty minutes. The

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 4>only thing that I confer from that, and I don't

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 4>have any inside information on this, but I have to

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 4>believe that he bleeded the fifth because there's not I

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 4>can't believe there's a thirty or forty minute by the

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 4>time you would arrive, get sworn in and all that.

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, He's got a lot more information than thirty

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 4>or forty eight minutes worth, I would hope. So I

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 4>think he pleaded the fifth, which is obviously is right

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 4>to do so. But as a non lawyer, I can

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 4>look at that and say, well, that said something to me,

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 4>you know.

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>And well, you're right, Steve Fisher, that timing cannot be denied.

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>D four vd's friend D four vd's seemingly best friend,

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Neo Langston, did appear from of an LA grand jury

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>and the investigation into the death of Celeste Rivas. He

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>was arrested for failure to appear. He was dragged back.

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 1>He did go into the grand jury. The twenty three

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>year old was at the courthouse this past Wednesday, a

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>grand jury, as you know, convened since November investigating this.

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 1>But he didn't stay long, about forty minutes and then

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>left the courthouse, refusing to answer questions as he left. Now,

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>we tried to get a comment from the Deputy District

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Attorney Silverman, who was presenting case to the grand jury.

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>No good, wouldn't taught agree. Don't blame her, but I

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>do believe that Steve Fisher is correct. Straight back out

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to our friend Joanna and neevis veteran trial lawyer in

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>this jurisdiction. You know what, fine, if you don't want

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to testify, you can be put on as a co

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>defendant on that indictment, real simple, or you can be

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>an unnamed co conspirator or I'm very surprised the state

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't do this, Joanna. Give him immunity and make him testify,

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>because the reason you take the Fifth Amendment right to

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>rein silent is because it could hurt you at your

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>upcoming trial. But if the state says, okay, you have immunity,

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>like you know you're immune from the flu or you

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>get the COVID VATSA, you're immune, you think same thing.

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>You are not going to try you. And if we're

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>not going to try you, then you don't get to

0:22:56.080 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>take the fifth I'm very surprised. What do you think, Joanna?

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 3>I agree with you, Nancy. I mean, as a lawyer,

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 3>I would have been talking to my client beforehand, talking

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 3>to the district attorney and negotiating some type of immunity

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 3>deals so to protect this interest. And so that also

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 3>leaves that opening of like, okay, if he really went

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 3>in there and led the fifth or why didn't that

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 3>occur ahead of time? But maybe they just had some

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 3>very straightforward cross examination questions, except some very or i'm sorry,

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 3>investigative questions where they're getting their yes and no answers.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 3>And this is all I wanted from that witness and

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 3>leaving the door open to pursue something later on if

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 3>they need to. I just I do find it confounding

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 3>that they would not have negotiated something prior to him

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 3>going in there.

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>How about this, Joeanna. Maybe they put him up and

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>try to get him to testify without an immunity deal

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in place, and then when he would and then they

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>had to go meet converse decide whether or not to

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Granham immunity or to charge him, because put Steve Fisher up. Please,

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Steve Fisher, you went before LAPD did You thought of

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it before they did, and you executed it before they did.

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 1>You went to all the neighbors and you got their

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>ring cam, their doorbell cam. And we see how important

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that is in the Nancy Guthrie disappearance, right, how valuable

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that is. And you got video of someone moving Defour

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>VID's tesla around, we believe with Celeste body in the trunk.

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>And you're telling me tonight that it was or was

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>not Neo Langston.

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I'm not saying either of those. You know I

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 4>can't do that. Here's here's the the you know the

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 4>problem with the surveillance in that neighborhood. The car was there.

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this shoe was in that trunk for months,

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 4>and that overwrites. And so although there's a lot of

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 4>cameras in that neighborhood and there's a lot of surveillance

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 4>to get some of it, doesn't go back far enough

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 4>and from other ends.

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Steve Fisher again, Steve, I had no idea you could

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>do the backstroke. So well, isn't it true that you

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>told me, you told me you saw the face at

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>least once of a person moving the tesla? Yes, okay,

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that's all. No further questions, but you're not telling me

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and I understand that, but I'm going to keep asking.

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Dave Mack, have we missed anything? Nea Langston appears at

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the grand jury, apparently takes the fifth I believe Steve

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Fisher and Joeanna and theevis are exactly correct. He may

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>be named as an Underdidy codes Bert conspirator. He may

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 1>be not named and given immunity in exchange for his testimony.

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>The family refusing the family of d for we d

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>David Anthony Burke refusing to honor a subpoena. I've got

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>advice for them as a lawyer, not that you need it.

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Because mister Burke is a lawyer. Either HI tell it

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 1>over to grand jury in your own car, or you

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>can ride in the back of a sheriff's deputy. Those

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 1>are the choices. Have we missed anything, No, you.

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 2>Got everything, Nancy. The one thing that we talked about

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 2>yesterday was about what we actually saw at the very

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 2>last lines of the documentation yesterday, and that is the

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 2>people of the state of California versus David Anthony Burke.

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 2>That's our bottom line. We actually know that it's not

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 2>just an investigation into the death of Celeste, it actually

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 2>is an investigation of David Anthony Burke.

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>If you know or think you know anything about the

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>death of this little girl, Celeste Rivas Hernandez, please dial

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>two one three four eight six six' eight nine. Zero

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you to our guests for being with, us but

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>especially to you for joining us in our search for

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>justice For. Celeste Nancy gray signing, Off i'll see you tomorrow,

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>night and until, then good, night. Friend