Speaker 1: All right, thank you Scott Shannon, and thanks to all
Speaker 1: of you for being with us. Right down our toll
Speaker 1: free telephone number if you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program, it is eight hundred and ninety four one,
Speaker 1: Shawn if you'd like to join us. This just breaking.
Speaker 1: Fulton County, Georgia District Attorney Fannie Willis has been ordered
Speaker 1: to pay more than fifty four grand for violating the
Speaker 1: state's open record laws in relation to the prosecution of
Speaker 1: President Trump. The county's superior court judge formalized her ruling Friday,
Speaker 1: ordered Willis to pay the money in attorney's fees litigation
Speaker 1: costs after intentionally failing to provide records requested by one
Speaker 1: attorney who filed the motion to disqualify Willis from prosecuting
Speaker 1: Trump on charges of allegedly interfering with the twenty twenty election. Oops.
Speaker 1: Today's sorry about her. We have a lot happening today
Speaker 1: and we do expect I don't know if you saw
Speaker 1: the video of the docking that took place over the weekend.
Speaker 1: It was really a beautiful sight to see. And this
Speaker 1: is the SpaceX rocket that made it to the International
Speaker 1: Space Station successfully. And then the astronauts that were on
Speaker 1: board the flight, meeting the astronauts that have been lost
Speaker 1: in space and abandoned for quite a long period of time.
Speaker 1: It was pretty cool to watch, I've got to admit,
Speaker 1: and I'll just pray for this safe return. It may
Speaker 1: be as early as tomorrow. We don't know for sure yet.
Speaker 1: They're working on a time for all of that. We
Speaker 1: do have a lot of news today, let me get
Speaker 1: right to it. On the immigration front. This is getting
Speaker 1: more bizarre by the day. And what have I been
Speaker 1: saying about the Democratic Party. I have been saying that
Speaker 1: they now are the party that are and we saw
Speaker 1: this in the Senate last week, that are championing the
Speaker 1: rights of men to play women's sports. They are the
Speaker 1: party that is putting the rights of illegal immigrants now
Speaker 1: even trend A a Ragua gang members over the safety
Speaker 1: and security of you, the American people. They're the party
Speaker 1: that is calling it a constitutional crisis. That DOGE has
Speaker 1: identified over one hundred and five billion dollars in waste, fraud,
Speaker 1: abuse and corruption, and they've only gotten started. And that
Speaker 1: number I expect to go much much higher. It will
Speaker 1: be in the hundreds of billions of dollars, and that
Speaker 1: is what this party has now become. And now they
Speaker 1: have gone even as far as you know, now championing
Speaker 1: and it's almost hard to believe, to be honest with you,
Speaker 1: but they're now championing the right of even gang members
Speaker 1: like Trendy or Ragwa gang members to stay in the country.
Speaker 1: And this is what I've told you about the left
Speaker 1: for a long time. What they can't win at the
Speaker 1: ballot box electorally, what they can't do legislatively when they
Speaker 1: have power, they use liberal courts to get their agenda pass.
Speaker 1: And that's why these liberal activist judges are so dangerous
Speaker 1: to the country. They don't care about the constitution. But
Speaker 1: President Trump has deported nearly three hundred gang members from
Speaker 1: Trenday Arragua under what's called the Alien Enemies Act. I'll
Speaker 1: go into more specificity in that in a second. The
Speaker 1: judge in the case. That order came on Saturday, after
Speaker 1: Trump issued a proclamation that he has signed the day before,
Speaker 1: targeting Trenda Ragua members for immediate deportation under a law
Speaker 1: that has been used on numerous occasions during the War
Speaker 1: of eighteen twelve, World War one, World War two, recent examples,
Speaker 1: Terry Truman is one, and anyway, it allows for the
Speaker 1: deportation without a hearing of anyone from the designated enemy country. Now,
Speaker 1: the President was asked about this and said, well, you know,
Speaker 1: well this isn't a war. He said, well, actually it is,
Speaker 1: and it's an invasion of our country. And we have
Speaker 1: known terrorists, gang members, cartel members, drug dealers in our country.
Speaker 1: We have people that are known murderers, rapists, and other
Speaker 1: violent criminals in our country, and the President wants to
Speaker 1: rightly get rid of them. On Saturday, this Obama appointed
Speaker 1: federal judge halted the deportation flights carrying these Venezuelan gang members,
Speaker 1: ordering actually the jets carrying them to turn around a
Speaker 1: mid flight. Now they had already left, so that was
Speaker 1: not a possibility. But shortly after the judge's temporary order
Speaker 1: was issued, Congressman Brandon Gill announced plans to file articles
Speaker 1: of impeachment against the judge. That drew praise from Elon
Speaker 1: Musk And obviously this judge is putting, like the Democrats,
Speaker 1: are the rights of illegals over the safety of the
Speaker 1: American people. Now, the President, on the other side of this,
Speaker 1: did thank the el Salvadorian president on Sunday, after the
Speaker 1: country's president shared dramatic video of hundreds of alleged migrant
Speaker 1: criminals landing in Central America in El Salvador after being
Speaker 1: deported from the US by the president. The rap sheet
Speaker 1: for those removed include kidnapping, sexual abuse of a child,
Speaker 1: aggravated assault, prostitution, robbery, aggravated assault of a police officer.
Speaker 1: And so it's true, then the good news is we're
Speaker 1: at a fifteen year low of illegal immigrants coming into
Speaker 1: the country, and that would be making our towns, in
Speaker 1: our cities more safe and more secure. Does a means
Speaker 1: of getting these people out of here as we identify
Speaker 1: them quicker and quicker? Saturday was two hundred and sixty
Speaker 1: one Biden Harris illegals you know, with really violent, serious
Speaker 1: criminal records deported and at least some people are cooperating.
Speaker 1: And then you've got the radical left and by the way,
Speaker 1: the Democrats are in complete dis array. They've all turned
Speaker 1: on each other. Jasmine Crockett, who's now emerged as one
Speaker 1: of the leading voices of the Democratic Party attacking the
Speaker 1: president over the weekend, but deporting members of Trende or
Speaker 1: Ragua which is now a designated terrorist organization. She made
Speaker 1: the remarks after the President invoked the aliens the Alien
Speaker 1: Enemies Act, and the gang is obviously associated with a
Speaker 1: lot of crime, human trafficking, drug dealing, including in your
Speaker 1: state of Texas. She was asked, and do you agree
Speaker 1: with this and if not, what is your problem with
Speaker 1: using any tool at our disposal as a country to
Speaker 1: remove undocumented violent people. And Crockett responds by claiming that
Speaker 1: the law did not need to be used because we
Speaker 1: already have tools that are available. No, they're not. Those
Speaker 1: tools keep these people in this country for unprecedented amounts
Speaker 1: of times. It's unbelievable. US Customs and Border Patrol as
Speaker 1: awarded a construction company now seventy million dollars to extend
Speaker 1: the border wall that he began in his first term.
Speaker 1: The president also has deployed on the US Mexico border,
Speaker 1: the USS gravely gravely, I think, I'm not sure how
Speaker 1: you pronounce it is on a mission of strength and
Speaker 1: security at the border. One sanctuary city lawyer, there now
Speaker 1: is a group of them actually that are plotting and
Speaker 1: planning to help illegal immigrants evade Ice. Well, now that
Speaker 1: they put out this Minnesota email shows an effort to
Speaker 1: push back against the Trump administration's crackdown, and even their
Speaker 1: Attorney General, Keith Ellison, issued a former legal opinion that
Speaker 1: the state law prohibits state and local law enforcement agencies
Speaker 1: from holding someone based on immigration detainer if the person
Speaker 1: would otherwise be released from custody. No, actually that dominion
Speaker 1: would be with the federal government. Nice try, but they're
Speaker 1: moving forward with it anyway. So what has emerged here
Speaker 1: is a controversy that really shouldn't be a controversy, but
Speaker 1: it is how the left acts in today's day and age,
Speaker 1: and that is they resort to the courts as a
Speaker 1: means of stopping the Trump agenda. There's now been fifteen
Speaker 1: injunctions against President Trump's executive actions and orders, and the
Speaker 1: left has gone to court some fifty times and these judges,
Speaker 1: you know, eventually, do I think Trump is going to win? Yeah?
Speaker 1: I do. The Attorney General Pam Bondi criticized this federal
Speaker 1: judge that blocked the deportations of these these gang members.
Speaker 1: The White House blasted them. There's no lawful basis for this,
Speaker 1: and this is this is radicalism on display. And if
Speaker 1: you look at the law, the Federal Judge, the Rule,
Speaker 1: the Alien Enemies Act. It is allowed for deportation numerous
Speaker 1: times as recently as you know. I think Harry Truman
Speaker 1: was the last president to use it. So it's not
Speaker 1: like even though it's an older laws, it has been
Speaker 1: used by presidents in the past, and I think the
Speaker 1: president is using it appropriately here in this case as well.
Speaker 1: But you look at a Democratic Party that doesn't have
Speaker 1: an identity anymore, and they've lost their identity completely. They
Speaker 1: don't know what to do. I don't know how to
Speaker 1: deal with any of this, and their poll numbers are
Speaker 1: showing it because they're falling apart, all right, and Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's numbers keep going up. The Democratic Party. Now we
Speaker 1: have three poles in a row that have their favorability
Speaker 1: at record lows in the twenty percentile range. Maybe if
Speaker 1: they weren't so petulant and didn't throw temper tantrums, maybe
Speaker 1: if they'd have the decency to stand for the first
Speaker 1: Lady of our country and the president of our country.
Speaker 1: Maybe if they had the decency if they're not going
Speaker 1: to stand for them, maybe they could stand for mothers
Speaker 1: that lost their children, that were being honored at a
Speaker 1: Joint Session of Congress. Maybe they could stand for a
Speaker 1: young man that beat his battle with cancer that has
Speaker 1: a dream of being in law enforcement, or a woman
Speaker 1: that lost her hero husband in law enforcement, or a
Speaker 1: young man that lost his father that was told he
Speaker 1: got into West Point. But if you look at these poles,
Speaker 1: it's an unmitigated disaster. You have. You know the NBC poll,
Speaker 1: for example, just twenty five percent of registered voters say
Speaker 1: they have a positive view of their party. These are
Speaker 1: Democrats saying this about their own party. And that is
Speaker 1: a a record low. If you want to go back historically,
Speaker 1: it's the lowest number that they've had since nineteen ninety,
Speaker 1: believe it or not, the lowest positive approval ratings since
Speaker 1: nineteen ninety. And you know that's bad. Now here's the
Speaker 1: worst part for them. And this is what I've been
Speaker 1: telling you. Remember I used to say that Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: was speaker in name only, and I would suggest that
Speaker 1: AOC was the real speaker. Well, when Democrats were asked
Speaker 1: to consider an open ended question the Democratic leader they
Speaker 1: feel best reflects their core values, the winner was AOC herself,
Speaker 1: followed by Kamala Harris, followed by Bernie Sanders, followed by
Speaker 1: Hakeem Jeffries with only four percent, naming Obama, President Obama
Speaker 1: and Texas Representative Jasmine Crockett. Now she's coming up there,
Speaker 1: tied with Obama and Schumer and a handful of others
Speaker 1: at just two percent. No wonder are our friend Stevid
Speaker 1: A smith is favorite is doing so well in the polls,
Speaker 1: But AOC stocking the party so that now we have
Speaker 1: a huge after Friday in the continuing resolution mess. I
Speaker 1: mean Nancy Pelosi, who coordinated and plotted and schemed and
Speaker 1: planned Joe Biden's demise with Schumer. Even she turned against
Speaker 1: Schumer and House Democrats a urging AOC now to go
Speaker 1: out in primary Schumer after funding the government something that
Speaker 1: he said he'd do for years. Even MSDNC is melting down.
Speaker 1: He had one of their liberal hosts, Simone Sanders Townsend
Speaker 1: tell you her fellow panelists on I guess some show,
Speaker 1: whatever show she's on that blasting Chuck Schumer and saying
Speaker 1: she's leaving the Democratic Party. Charlemagne the God calls for
Speaker 1: Democratic leaders to step down because they dared to vote
Speaker 1: to pass the funding bill to avoid the shutdown. What's
Speaker 1: the point of voting for them. Well, the point is
Speaker 1: Charlemagne may or may not know this, but for the
Speaker 1: decade they've been the party that says you can never
Speaker 1: have shutdowns. I'm not one of those people, by the way,
Speaker 1: I'm not afraid of government shutdowns. But they've just been
Speaker 1: unleashing hell on you know, the liberal talking head and
Speaker 1: punditry class. And I would say that officially the Chuck Schumer,
Speaker 1: you know, is on cancelation watch as we speak. He
Speaker 1: watched over the weekend Senator Chris Murphy tiptoeing around a
Speaker 1: direct question about whether he's interested in taking over as
Speaker 1: minority leader, you know, and you know, he said, oh,
Speaker 1: he has a very difficult job. I don't envy the job.
Speaker 1: And the question is really for members of the Democratic Caucus,
Speaker 1: meaning I'm open to it. Sure, one Democrat on fake
Speaker 1: news CNN threatening to bail on the party over their leadership.
Speaker 1: This is getting pretty interesting. One liberal group flat out
Speaker 1: calling for Schumer to step down. This is this is
Speaker 1: all the Trump effect. If we really want to know
Speaker 1: what this is, this is the force of Trump. He
Speaker 1: has left this party, the Democratic Party, in shambles. He
Speaker 1: has destroyed them because the only thing. They've been living
Speaker 1: on their manner from heaven has been hating him. The
Speaker 1: American people heard them loudly. They watched the law fair.
Speaker 1: They watch the abuse of power, they watched the corruption.
Speaker 1: They listen to them champion the rights for men and
Speaker 1: women's sports. They listen to the lies about Joe's cognitive state.
Speaker 1: They listen to the lies about the economy. They listened
Speaker 1: to the lies about open borders, and they decided to
Speaker 1: move away from that party. And Donald Trump even won
Speaker 1: the popular vote. Even Van Jones Chuck Schumer's in a
Speaker 1: blast radius of a volcanic volcanic eruption of anger from Democrats.
Speaker 1: The only one that sounds a little bit reasonable is
Speaker 1: John Fetterman. And the only other one that sounds reasonable
Speaker 1: isn't there anymore Kristen Cinema, you know who actually took
Speaker 1: on AOC and the Democrats mocking their change of heart
Speaker 1: because they've always been against shutting down the government and
Speaker 1: this is something I guess maybe they forgot. But for
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi to defy her comrade and arms Schumer and
Speaker 1: ask Democratic senators to defy Schumer on the cr pretty interesting.
Speaker 1: She doesn't really care about having any friends at the
Speaker 1: end of this run. It is not a small deal.
Speaker 1: I believe this is a tremendous mistake AOC. And just
Speaker 1: to go back Democrats now three separate polls hitting their
Speaker 1: all time low fake news comparing AOC's rise as the
Speaker 1: Democrat mentioned the most, which kind of surprised me a
Speaker 1: little bit. In a poll that came out AOC in
Speaker 1: an open ended question who best reflects the core values
Speaker 1: of the party, she came in number one. Chuck Schumer's
Speaker 1: down at the bottom. But you know, comparing AOC's rise,
Speaker 1: you know she best represents Democratic voters. Yasmin Crockett is
Speaker 1: even higher than Chucky Schumer. We will win, We will win.
Speaker 1: I mean, Chuck Schumer is now in a fight for
Speaker 1: his life. It would not shock or surprise me if
Speaker 1: there is an effort to remove Chuck Schumer as the
Speaker 1: Senate Minority leader. That would not shock me, especially with
Speaker 1: these new poll numbers. I mean, remember, I mean they
Speaker 1: can blame members all they want for their bingo cards
Speaker 1: and not standing at the joint session of Congress. For
Speaker 1: even mothers that lost their children and and a young
Speaker 1: man that lost you know that won is battle against cancer.
Speaker 1: But at the end of the day, they are the
Speaker 1: ones that signed off on this. This They did not
Speaker 1: act alone. They were not told. You know, it was
Speaker 1: well telegraphed in advance that they were going to carry
Speaker 1: on like a bunch of idiots, and yet they allowed
Speaker 1: that to continue and allow that to take place. In
Speaker 1: the media, by the way, is playing along as well.
Speaker 1: And you know, I love the fact. Caroline Levitt, she'll
Speaker 1: be on Hanniday tonight with the Hannity White House Briefing.
Speaker 1: She's not going to the White House Correspondence dinner. Why
Speaker 1: should she? I am proud of the fact. In all
Speaker 1: my years thirty five years in radio, twenty nine years
Speaker 1: on the Fox News Channel, I've never been to a
Speaker 1: single White House Correspondence dinner. And I used to get
Speaker 1: a lot of pressure to go. I have no desire
Speaker 1: to go because I don't really like them or respect
Speaker 1: what they do. Let me be blunt, and they probably
Speaker 1: don't like or respect what I do because I'm right
Speaker 1: usually and they end up being wrong. A group of
Speaker 1: media and political elites in Washington took a shot at
Speaker 1: President Trump by bucking a one hundred and forty year
Speaker 1: long tradition during a white tie closed door DC dinner.
Speaker 1: Multiple reports detailed the events Sunday as if anybody in
Speaker 1: I bet you, I bet you ninety eight percent of
Speaker 1: you don't even know what I'm talking about. They had
Speaker 1: the Gridiron Dinner. It's an event that goes back to
Speaker 1: the nineteenth century, quote, heavy hitters in the Washington media
Speaker 1: and political elite class. And they gather and engage and
Speaker 1: take friendly jabs at one another, as that's their description,
Speaker 1: and presidents have regularly attended. Trump has not been at
Speaker 1: the dinner since twenty eighteen. I'm sure he's got better
Speaker 1: things to do. According to one account of the proceedings,
Speaker 1: the attendees swiped a Trump breaking tradition that dates back
Speaker 1: to their founding in eighteen eighty five, and those in
Speaker 1: attendance did not toast the president for the first time
Speaker 1: in the dinner's history. They do they actually think, I mean,
Speaker 1: this is the first time that's ever happened in one
Speaker 1: hundred and forty years. Do they think that their symbolism
Speaker 1: actually means anything to anybody in the country, Oh, it doesn't.
Speaker 1: Getting rid of the illegal immigrants does, getting rid of
Speaker 1: known terrorists, murderers, rapist cartel members, gang members, Yeah, that matters.
Speaker 1: And you know, they're just like the Democrats with their
Speaker 1: bingo cards, is they basically are won over. At that
Speaker 1: hard hitting news show, The View, I notice Sonny Houston
Speaker 1: is claiming she is stuck in racist America and she
Speaker 1: wants to leave. He feels she would like to move
Speaker 1: out of the country, but she can't. He says, we're
Speaker 1: pretty racist. It's a pretty young democracy that doesn't seem
Speaker 1: to be working right now. Oh, because she didn't get
Speaker 1: her way, and she did the election didn't go her way,
Speaker 1: so it doesn't seem to be working for everyone. And
Speaker 1: I think Rosie O'Donnell's, you know, it's her prerogative. It
Speaker 1: doesn't work for her and her family, and she's just
Speaker 1: one of the few people that can pick up her
Speaker 1: life and move it somewhere. Most of us are stuck here.
Speaker 1: I don't think most people feel that they're stuck in America.
Speaker 1: Bill Maher actually, you know, trying to instill a little
Speaker 1: common sense into his party. Anyway, He had a segment
Speaker 1: on Friday, and he said that the environmental money spent
Speaker 1: by the Biden administration in their final days just funneling
Speaker 1: money to people who are not solving problems. He's right,
Speaker 1: and then he actually questioned, why do we need a
Speaker 1: Department of education? I talked about this last week. It
Speaker 1: was a big front page story on the New York
Speaker 1: Post about how they spend forty some odd you know,
Speaker 1: billion dollars on education for kids in New York City
Speaker 1: and that the kids in New York City, that the
Speaker 1: population of students is down what eighteen percent from just
Speaker 1: a few years ago, and they're asking for more money
Speaker 1: this year. The truancy rate is up thirty five percent.
Speaker 1: Proficiency in math and science are in the twenty percent
Speaker 1: twenty to thirty percentile range for fourth graders and the
Speaker 1: same for eighth graders. These kids are not getting an education.
Speaker 1: Why do we need a department of education that fails
Speaker 1: at that level? What's the point of it? Imagine, I'll
Speaker 1: go back to the example I used last week. You
Speaker 1: have ten families, say you gave them thirty thousand dollars
Speaker 1: in New York City each, Okay, and they get to
Speaker 1: spend the money on their kids' education, and you have
Speaker 1: standards that have to be met, and you have the
Speaker 1: expectancy that they're going to learn. And let's say those
Speaker 1: ten parents that they pooled their money together. That's three
Speaker 1: hundred thousand dollars. They can hire two teachers at a
Speaker 1: nice six figure salary with benefits, health care and retirement,
Speaker 1: and take good care of the teachers. Each teacher would
Speaker 1: be would be tutoring five students. Now, who do you
Speaker 1: think is going to do better on standardized testing? Those
Speaker 1: kids are the kids that are stuck in these private
Speaker 1: schools that are failing. The Daily Mail offered a few
Speaker 1: of the sixty one hundred Americans rich and famous elites
Speaker 1: who fled the US and applied for UK citizenship, terrified
Speaker 1: of the ghost stories told themselves about President Trump. I
Speaker 1: love how they write those up, dubbed the Donald bashers.
Speaker 1: They're bolting for New Zealand and the UK a twenty
Speaker 1: six percent jump from twenty twenty three and a record
Speaker 1: high in two decades. And if you look at the
Speaker 1: people that are leaving, I'm like, if you don't like
Speaker 1: it here, then then go. If Rosie O'Donnell, if Ellen DeGeneres,
Speaker 1: if they don't like it here, they can go. Avin
Speaker 1: Newsom is likely thrilled to be turning out next year
Speaker 1: so he can put it some distance between this. He's
Speaker 1: now doing his big podcast, trying to put on as
Speaker 1: many conservatives as he can. His biggest problem is he
Speaker 1: has a track record, and he's on tape. You know,
Speaker 1: he's been what the mayor of San Francisco, He's been
Speaker 1: the lieutenant governor for eight years and it will have
Speaker 1: been the governor for eight years. It's not like as
Speaker 1: he can run from that record. I don't think that's possible.
Speaker 1: That's the state of the modern Democratic Party. The president
Speaker 1: this weekend had used air strikes that took out many
Speaker 1: multiple leaders of the yemen Iranian backed Huti rebels. According
Speaker 1: to National Security Advisor and according to Donald Trump, the strikes,
Speaker 1: which are expected to continue as part of the US
Speaker 1: military's largest operations so far under President Trump's second term,
Speaker 1: are meant to serve as a direct warning to Iran
Speaker 1: and to clear and a clear escalation from where we
Speaker 1: have been under Biden, which was, oh okay, you can
Speaker 1: stop our ships from from sailing at international waterways. You
Speaker 1: know this this began. Central Command confirmed the large scale
Speaker 1: military bombardment across Yemen. Apparently they've taken out a lot
Speaker 1: of high level leaders. Anyway, the carrier was seen in
Speaker 1: the Red Sea and it's sent there to protect global commerce.
Speaker 1: The Pentagon estimates that the Hoodies have attacked US warships
Speaker 1: a wopping one hundred and seventy four times commercial vehicles
Speaker 1: one hundred and forty five times under Joe Biden since
Speaker 1: twenty twenty three. And the Hoodi attacks on American ships
Speaker 1: and aircraft and our troops are not going to be tolerated.
Speaker 1: And by the way, nor will it be tolerated what
Speaker 1: Iran is doing. And the President went right after Iran
Speaker 1: as well. He threatened today direct military action against Iran
Speaker 1: after military force has spent the weekend bombing the Hoodi rebels. Now,
Speaker 1: the only reason the Hoodies are even involved in this
Speaker 1: fight against Israel, against commerce and threatening international waterways is
Speaker 1: because they have the military backing of Iran, just like
Speaker 1: Hamas does, just like Asbola does, just like Islamic Jihad does,
Speaker 1: and Iran is the head of the snake, and they've
Speaker 1: been fomenting terror throughout the entire region anyway. NBC reported
Speaker 1: that the US killed fifty three combatants. A Hoodi ran
Speaker 1: A leader told the network that US strikes would only
Speaker 1: serve to inspire other attacks on ships. Okay, if they're
Speaker 1: passing through the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aiden.
Speaker 1: Go right ahead with that and see how that's gonna
Speaker 1: end up for you. Anyway, The President took the truth
Speaker 1: social and he is view. He said, let nobody be fooled.
Speaker 1: The hundreds of attacks being made by the Houties, the
Speaker 1: sinister mobsters and thugs based in Yemen who are hated
Speaker 1: by the Yemeny people, all emanate and are created by Iran.
Speaker 1: Any attacks, further attacks, retaliation by the Hoodies will be
Speaker 1: met with great force, and there is no guarantee that
Speaker 1: force will stop there. Iran has played the innocent victim
Speaker 1: of rogue terrorists from which they've lost control. But they
Speaker 1: haven't lost control. They're dictating every move, giving them the weapons,
Speaker 1: supplying them with money and highly sophisticated military equipment, and
Speaker 1: even in so called intelligence. Every shot fired by the
Speaker 1: Hoodies will be looked up from this point forward as
Speaker 1: being a shot fired from the weapons and the leadership
Speaker 1: of Iran and Iran will be held responsible and suffer
Speaker 1: the consequences, and those consequences will be dire. Now the
Speaker 1: world is faced with a moment of truth, and we're
Speaker 1: getting closer and closer to it, and that is, according
Speaker 1: to the IAEA, not exactly the most reliable organization, the
Speaker 1: International Atomic Energy Group. They the Iranians are within like
Speaker 1: a needle, you know, threading a needle to get nuclear weapons.
Speaker 1: They're that close. The world cannot afford allowing the Iranians
Speaker 1: to get nuclear weapons. Number One, it will create a
Speaker 1: nuclear arms race the likes of which nobody ever dreamed
Speaker 1: of in the Middle East. Then Saudis will be next,
Speaker 1: and then every other country will follow. So that's bad
Speaker 1: news for the world too. I mean that now we're
Speaker 1: risking a nuclear holocaust in our lifetime. But more importantly,
Speaker 1: they're twisted sick ideology of convert or die and their
Speaker 1: willingness to use even ballistic missiles against Israel. Their threats
Speaker 1: to wipe Israel off the map and wipe America off
Speaker 1: the map have to be taken seriously. And if we
Speaker 1: don't take it seriously and we wait too long, then
Speaker 1: I think it'll go down as one of the biggest
Speaker 1: mistakes ever. Now, all of this happened under Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: and we better understand that part of this equation as well.
Speaker 1: He helped the Iranians get rich. He put a blind
Speaker 1: eye towards their sanctions, and he even gave special approval
Speaker 1: for payments from Iraq and elsewhere and gave them billions
Speaker 1: of dollars so they can filment terror. They were going
Speaker 1: bankrupt when Donald Trump left office because Donald Trump's sanctions
Speaker 1: were actually working. So it's getting interested. But there's two
Speaker 1: targets that the US and Israel have to look at.
Speaker 1: Take out the source of their funding, which would be
Speaker 1: their refineries. That would be target number one if I
Speaker 1: was in charge. Target number two, take out their nuclear sites.
Speaker 1: Now the Israelis have already proven they can get past
Speaker 1: their air defenses, this has to be done before they
Speaker 1: build them back up again. Number one and number two.
Speaker 1: These facilities, according to all the intelligence that is in
Speaker 1: the public domain, are deeply buried underground. That likely means
Speaker 1: they'll need bunk or buster bombs and they'll need some
Speaker 1: American support. But I don't think we have much time.
Speaker 1: By the way, a new controversy has emerged. While the
Speaker 1: President was on Air Force one last night, he was
Speaker 1: asked whether the executive orders and pardons that were allegedly
Speaker 1: signed by Biden via an autopen are void as I think,
Speaker 1: so it's not my decision that's going to be up
Speaker 1: to a court. He said the pardoning documents were not
Speaker 1: explained to or approved by Biden. They knew nothing about them,
Speaker 1: and the people that did that may have committed a crime.
Speaker 1: I mean, when did a president start using an auto pen?
Speaker 1: I mean, is it that much work to take a
Speaker 1: pen to paper grief? I do it every day