WEBVTT - Covid Cocktail Could Boost Immunity

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Well, among the COVID stories

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that are catching our attention, we've got one about how

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceutical exacts are mixing up their own vaccines to get

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>at a higher immunity. So maybe think about a drug cocktail.

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And then Tim, of course does Maderna headlines. Yeah, the Maderna.

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>The company is saying that it doesn't see signs that

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it's shot causes heart issue. The issue myocarditis, as well

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>as a condition called Perry card diitis. The company saying

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it has not established a causual association with its vaccine. Well,

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>let's get right into it with Dr Ian LUs Bader,

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>clinical Professor of Medicine at n y U Lane Goinges

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Medical Center, joining us this afternoon on the phone from

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Long Island. Dr les Beda, how are you on this

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Friday afternoon? Doing very well? Guys? Hope all is well

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>with you. Definitely some interesting stories that doesn't seem to

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>end when it comes to COVID and the vaccines. Yeah,

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it does, and well let's get right into it and

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about the m R and A vaccines Because the

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention it's identified a total

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>of two hundred and sixteen cases of heart inflammation after

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>the first dose of an m R and A shot

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>and another five hundred and seventy three cases after the

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>second dose. At the same time, Moderna coming out and

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>saying that it sees no sign that the shot causes

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>heart issues. How are you reading into this, Well, there's

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 1>definitely an increased incidents, right. We certainly know that myocarditis,

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>which is inflammation of the heart muscle and perrycarditis, which

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is the sack that the heart sits in, can occur.

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>That can occur at any age. We see viral inflammation

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of the heart we see UH, usually viral or other

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>infections that caused perrycarditis, but the number of cases, especially

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in young men, those under thirty, is definitely higher than

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>one would statistically think of in that population. So there's

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely an increased incidence UM, and it seems to be

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>associated with the mrn A vaccines. What we don't know

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is are they causing it or how they're causing it. UH.

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>The C d C I think is definitely looking into that.

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And this raises the question of as we're getting more data,

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>should we be kind of targeting vaccines for certain age groups.

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe young men should be thinking more about the J

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and J vaccine, the single dose, as opposed to young

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>women where we were seeing some perhaps increased clots with

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>astra zeneca, where this tts syndrome with J and J.

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, perhaps young women should be thinking more of

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the m R and A. We're really just sort of

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>getting that data and at some point down the line

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of hopefully soon we may be able to say, if

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you're in this group, this would give you the most

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>benefit with the least risk. UH. Clearly, these are not

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge number of cases, but obviously higher than we

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>would expect and you always try and reduce a risk

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>whenever you're giving any sort of treatment or prevention. So

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Dr LUs better are we getting to the point. It

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>was funny. I was having conversation a little parenthetical here earlier,

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and someone went went to get the vaccine. They're like, well,

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, because they were going to be given

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the fires of they can I actually have the J

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and J and they were able to kind of pick

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine they wanted. On the flip side, are doctors

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>getting to appoint the medical community saying, you know what,

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I've looked at your medical history, I've looked at your age,

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I've looked at some other factors. I think you should

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>get this vaccine. There are some patients who say what

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>should I get, and most don't really check in before

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>they get it. And many centers don't have every It's

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>not like a restaurant where you can say this one

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>or that one. I mean, at some point we may

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>get to that, but usually if you go to a

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>particular center, whether it's even a local pharmacy, they will

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>have a limited number of vaccines, you know, due to

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>storage and other and other ushers. And really for the

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>majority of people, they're all very effective, very very few

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>people actually get COVID. Cleveland clinic study to show that

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>they looked at fifty you know, patients not only who

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>have had COVID previously, but those with vaccines. So UM,

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>for most people it doesn't matter. But if you are

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in one of those groups, a young woman or a

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>young man, now that this data is coming through, it

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>may be worth talking with your doctor and saying, hey,

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>based on the data, is there one that may be

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>better for me. Well, let's talk a little bit more

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>about that Cleveland clinic study finding. Um, the idea is

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that there's not necessarily proof that we should be vaccinating

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>those who have had COVID nineteen take us into it,

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So that's study and it's from a very

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>reputable institution that Cleveland Clinics looked at about fifty two

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>employees and a certain percent had had COVID previously, and

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and they looked at those who were vaccinated and those

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>who were not vaccinated, and it turned out that really

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>is zero um people who had had the COVID UH

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>covid infection, the stars COVID to infection and had a

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>proof of having that they did not get a second infection,

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>so you can't get better than zero, you know, out

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>of fifty two thousands. So that's very reassuring. We have

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>been pushing even people who have had UM, the COVID infection,

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to say, hey, you take this. Uh, that's exactly why

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I was so skeptical when I saw this, and they're

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>so surprised when I saw this, because it flies in

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the face of what we've heard from the CDC. Well,

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it's an evolving picture, let's put it that way. I

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>think for people who have had it, they should be

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>very reassured. There's some you know debate, you know, in

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of vaccine availability. Should we be using all these

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>vaccines when other countries may need them? But I think

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>if you've had COVID, your risk of getting it again

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is very low. We certainly know the vaccines really boost

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>your antibody response. And for new variants like delta that's uh,

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you know from India, that could be a problem. It

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>may be that a vaccine would be very helpful for that.

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you know, right now, if you've had

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>covid um there's no panic to get a booster shot,

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>although it probably will provide some benefit. Alright, good stuff Hey,

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going to continue this conversation with Dr Ian lust

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>bedaor clinical professor of Medicine, n y U Land, going

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>with us on the phone in Long Island. Tim listen,

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it's as he said, you know, this is evolving, we're

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>finding our way through this. Yeah, I've said it before,

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it again. It's it's like a science experiment,

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 1>a study playing out in real time. And in a sense,

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>all medicine is like that. I've learned, right, looking what

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>happened with Alzheimer's in Biogen this week, right exactly, Let's

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>get back right to it with Dr Ian lust Beder,

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>clinical Professor of Medicine, n y U Langings Medical Center.

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on the phone from Long Island. Dr

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>LUs Beder. A story by our own Todd Gillespie that

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>came out earlier today, all about how pharmaceutical executives are

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of the way I thought of it was doing

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>experiments on themselves in in trying to determine whether or

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>not they can get a higher immunity from a mix

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of their own COVID shots, different vaccines. And it's it's

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>actually something that it's new to me, but it's not

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>new to doctors and people who study this stuff. It's

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>called heterologious prime boosting. What exactly is it and what

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>are these executives doing and how could it affect the

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>way that we receive vaccines in the future. So we've

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>known for a long time that the heterologous prime boosting,

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>basically giving one vaccine then followed by a different vaccine,

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>really gives you a more robust response. All of the

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>original studies just looked at individual companies doing their own testing.

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>So obviously you know UH Feiser was three weeks apart,

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Madurna four weeks apart, J and J just the single vaccine,

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>although there were some studies that show to follow up,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>but it turns out if you combine these, for example,

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of studies that show UH not

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.239
<v Speaker 1>in UH in a limited number of patients, hundreds of patients.

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 1>The studies have been done, but they show, for example,

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>like the astro Zenco which is an ad no virus

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>fact or similar to J and J, if you give

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that followed by either the Maderna m RNA or the

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>fiser U m RNA vaccine, they had up this seven

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>times higher antibodies and longer lasting and the hope. Yeah,

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's quite and that that may be the way

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of the future. That may be UM the standard approach.

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>And certainly patients who say, gosh, I missed my follow

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.079
<v Speaker 1>up dose. I was away, I couldn't get it. Can

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 1>I get a different vaccine? I think the answer is yes,

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you can, And that may be a good idea actually,

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>But the concern or the reason you may want these

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>higher antibody levels is exactly for the delta you know,

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Indian variant, which is more infectious, more deadly. Um, it

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>continues to multiply and mutate. I'll be see, You've got

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a billion people as your substrate of viral replications. So

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 1>the thinking is that if we combine these will get

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a more robust response that hopefully would defend the body

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>better against any variants that come along. That's not proven,

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>but that's the thinking. Yeah, and we continue to find

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>out more and more. Hey, listen, before we go, we

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of minutes left, and we've got to

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>ask you about biogen UH and it's Alzheimer's drug. The

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>story one of the stories today. A prominent Harvard Medical

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>UH School professor has resigned from an FDA advisory panel

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and protest over the agency's decision to improve to approve

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Biogen's Alzheimer's drug, And so he announced his departure. He

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>put out a letter, He's the third committee member to

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>quit in the wake of this highly controversial approval and

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>forgive me, this happened yesterday. How do you feel about

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this or what are you hearing? Well? I think, um,

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to be ethical about this. And Alzheimer's is

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a very tough disease. It's very tough to really prove

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>beneffort from these drugs. That this particular drug was approved

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>by the FDA because it lowered the levels of amyloid,

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>which is a protein in the brain. Alzheimer's is complicated.

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>There are many biochemical and physical changes in the brain.

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Amyloid deposits, neurofibrillary tangles, and so the drug did reduce amyloid,

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's very hard to really prove benefit because Alzheimer's

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is a progressive disease typically, so does it slow the progression,

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>does it stop the progression? Does it reverse the dementia?

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's how do you measure it? And more importantly,

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>so what if you lower amyloid, are you really clinically

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 1>affecting the outcome of the patient. You know, you may

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>be lowering this protein which is associated. And I think

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>these three professors resigned because I think they felt unconvinced

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're raising hopes of patients that this drug, very

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>expensive drug, is going to help them when the actual

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>clinical outcome is not well proven. I think that was

0:10:56.160 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>their key complainte ethical dilemma, Yeah, thirty seconds, Dr Lesi,

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>or does it set a dangerous precedent for the FDA

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and future approvals. I think you have to listen to

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>your advisory committees and and see if you there are

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>points are valid and I think in this case it

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 1>probably was valid um and they were going on kind

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of a different metric, maybe a useful metric that I

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>think that committee wanted more data. And anybody who's had

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a family member who's had Alzheimer's or even some other illness, UM,

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>if you can get a couple of months, a couple

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, a couple of years out of um A treatment,

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it means an awful lot. And that's where it's really

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.319
<v Speaker 1>great and fuzzy. Tim. I think that's perhaps why despite

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's fifty six dollars for treatment plus

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>plus more. UM investor saw it as something that is tenable,

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>right exactly, And there's a lot of folks out there

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 1>with Alzheimer's as well. Of course Dr Ian lost Better

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the best clinical professor of medicine. And why you land going?

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Joining us on the phone from Long Island. You're listening

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio, the Newishuoe Bloomberg business Week,

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it's in my hands, it's now a news stands, it's

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in Tim's hands, it's online and on the Bloomberg the

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>domestic cover asked who needs a margarita? Margarita? After this week?

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we all do that story and a bunch more,

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>including the international cover China Wolves and the New Age vs. G.

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's open up the issue with Bloomberg Business Week editor

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Joe Weber on the access line in Brooklyn. But before

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>we do that, Joel, congratulations, Oh thank you. UM and UH,

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you're referencing a national magazine award that Bloomberg Business Week

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>one last night for UH, a single topic issue that

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we did last spring called the Last Year. UM which

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the cover of it, we we

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 1>used that cover line on the issue that shipped March eleventh, UM,

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>which was as the world was sort of felt like

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it was falling apart, at least here in New York

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it did. Um. So it was a huge honor, uh

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to accept that on behalf of the staff in Bloomberg. Um,

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was I'm just going to say, yeah, it

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely feels that way. You know, I think I've fretted

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>for most of the year about was it going to

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>be less than a year because that would look bad?

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to be more than a year? But

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, Um, it was a bold call and

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and and the right one. And you know, I think

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the thing that these are kind of the oscars of

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the magazine world. And um, it means that you know,

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>our peers basically said, um, this was you at your best,

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>which we felt as well. So again quite an honor. Yeah,

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and Enjoel, one more question on that, because this is

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 1>such a big deal and and as Carol imagined it was,

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it was really impression of you and your team. And

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm wondering what it was that that made you realize, Look,

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 1>fifteen months ago at this point that would indeed be

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a last year. Well, I was in a meeting and

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>being in that meeting and realizing how, um, how so

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>many people were confused and um uh made me realize

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that that same conversation aation was happening in boardrooms across

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the country, in the world, frankly, um and as people

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>were just doing complete write offs for what their projections

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>would look like, that would be a pretty devastating gear

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>for the economy. And so that's that was the kernel

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of the idea. Um. And I remember walking out of

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that meeting and not sure if I wanted to do

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a cover to cover issue. And I walked out of

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that meeting thinking, not only are we doing a cover

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to cover issue, but we're calling it the last year. Well,

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a perfect segue into this week's edition,

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>which I think in a lot of ways symbolizes the

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>reopening of New York City. The cover here in the

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in the it's exactly right. So the cover story is

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>about Jimmy Buffett, who most of us know as a musician,

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm quite fine fond of that music for the record, uh,

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>And he actually turns out that he has a business

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>empire uh that basically has uh been the legacy of

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the song Margharitaville. And and not only has it uh

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>just boomed, it's um expanding. And he's just opening a

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>New York Times Square extension Margaritaville hotel with restaurants and

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>bars and everything. Um. And the timing couldn't be better

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>because just as New York coming back to life, you've

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>got a place to go have Margarite, Margarite's and dequeries

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in Times Square. We've been planning a road trip class

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>just like an offsite broadcasting from there. I mean, why not,

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>right yeah? Yeah, or just a meeting even like I'm

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>done with the zoom stuff. Let's just go see each

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>other face to face. But but it's crazy write a

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>song he wrote. It's crazy because it's a song he

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>wrote what a few minutes? Yeah, and it actually you know,

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>there's so much business wisdom in this story of like

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>he realized he had something, but he couldn't do it

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>on his own. Uh found somebody who became a great

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>partner and realized that they could put their brand on

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different things. And I think there's still

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>are growing out what they can put it on and

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, marijuana to dakary machines. They've they've really been

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>able to do it all. As I say, I don't

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>have a great segue to the next story. But we've

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about this story. Another drink of your that's it.

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>That's it. Well, maybe the Chinese Wolf Warriors need to

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>have among we talk about that one. So so Uh,

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Peter Martin wrote this story. Uh, he's got a book

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>coming out, so this is technically an excerpt um and

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>so so congrats to Pete on it on this book. Uh.

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>We obviously know that the Wolf Warriors have become um

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>like a diplomatic strategy of China's and and they're very

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>aggressive and um in expanding Chinese influence and and showing

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of bark at least um with

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>where China wants to go and and perhaps some bite

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>even and as writes, it's it's a it's a bold strategy.

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>But despite some rhetoric from um the top in Beijing,

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>like we we shouldn't expect any of that to back

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>down anytime soon, Joel. There's also a story in this

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>week's edition of the magazine Deep Dive into the X

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>on activists, victory MARKETI coming of age for E S

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>G Investing, Take us into it. Engine Number One. This

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>is a Sagel Kashan story. She worked with Joe Caroll

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>on about UM. A thing that I don't feel very

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>many people saw it coming. I mean I certainly didn't

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>when when the name Engine number one was first uttered

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>in the meetings that I was in, it was sort

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of like, who who the heck is that? And it

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>turns out that not only were they activists investors, but

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 1>it kind of shows a new age of activists investors

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that there, that they're willing not only to take on companies.

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as we've written in cover stories in

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Business Week, Xon ten years ago was on on top

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of the world. You know, there was no there was

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>no more valuable company than Exon. And how the mighty

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.959
<v Speaker 1>have fallen. And as they're falling, we're seeing how activists

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>can come in and attempt to probably work for more change.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's one to watch UM and and one

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that I think has taken a lot of investors and

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>boards by surprise. So I think definitely more to come

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>UM in this in this vein going forward. Yeah, massive

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>undertaking financially, certainly for Engine number one to take on

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>X on Hey uh Star. We've been also referencing, um

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the fomo economy. When Stanley, Druck and Miller gets fomo,

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you gotta sit up and take notice. Yeah, so this

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>was one that we ended up doing as the international

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:34.719
<v Speaker 1>cover story. I thought it was good enough to be global,

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>but that I just had to, you know, give everybody

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a margarita. The The idea really came from me from

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>just being on the playground and suddenly, you know, watching

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>my my son and having all these people interact that

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>I interact with telling me about how they've struck it rich.

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, am I the only one who's

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>not rich? Right now we're getting rich? Like what am

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I doing wrong? And and Leone, Leonel Laurent, who's a

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>great contribut in Bloomberg Opinion, wrote a story that basically

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 1>helps some all that up, whether it's doage coin or

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>housing or meme stocks, and you know, we could go

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>right now we're talking about a m C which was

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>on fire. You know, all of it just feels like

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a boy. I just feel like I've missed out on everything.

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And um, if you're if you've ever been taught, like,

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, sane approaches to investing or index funds. I

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>think you probably feel the same way, which is just like, wow,

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>what's going on exactly? Yeah, you're not the only one,

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>jol Hey, just in fifteen seconds that we have take

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>us down to Florida's Trump Coast with Josh Green. Yeah.

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>The Josh Green story is an epic one. It was

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>just like the moment that we knew mar Lago as

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>a destination. We said, Josh, can you go down there

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and just like give us a cultural uh letter from

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>from South Florida and he and he did, and I

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>think he found some really surprising stuff that was shows

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>how strong Trump's hold on the GPS. All right, everybody,

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>there's your weekend reading list. Check it out online, on

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>newsstands and on the Bloomberg. Joe Weber, thank you so much.

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations again, it's a great That issue was incredible. I'm

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>road a journal now, but you let me drive. Oh no,

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, drive home, honey, please, I'll do the riding.

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Drivel lets me. I want to drive, just drive, baby,

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the questions trying. This is the drive to the Globe community. Thanks,

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll drying us down on Bloomberg Radio. What two weeks

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.239
<v Speaker 1>it has been? This past week. I don't even know

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 1>what's compared to It's like every week feels like it's

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of wild, but hey, that's why we love what

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>we do. And a had a day and a half

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>off and it's still feel like two weeks. Let's get

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to a time for the drive to the clothes and back.

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 1>With us is David Deets. He's managing principal, senior portfolio

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>strategors are at Peapack Private Wealth Management, nine point four

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>billion in assets under management. David with us once again

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Summit, New Jersey. David, how do

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you make sense of a week like this past week? Well,

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the key metric this week has been this

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>higher than expected inflation number, the highest in thirteen years.

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Yet you would think that we'd see a big bond tantrum,

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>yields racing north, but we're not seeing that at all.

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>We're down by about basis points since March, and I

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>think Wall Street discretion their heads trying to make sense

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of this higher than expect inflation, yet no reaction to

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>bond market. Well wait a minute, wait a minute, we're

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>all smart here, and we know we went through a pandemic,

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and we know that everything fell off a cliff and

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>we're still bouncing back. These are still post pandemic coming

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>back numbers. So we're not like, we get it, don't

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we It was certainly you know, that's one of the

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>reasons that people are giving these high inflation numbers the path.

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we saw twelve percent mark up in terms

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of use car prices and people are saying, well, we're

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.239
<v Speaker 1>not going to see twelve percent each year. Uh? Did

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>know when it comes to airfares are not going to

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>be keep going up at this rate and some other things.

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, even when you strip out the food

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and energy, you've got this core CPI. Is that the

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>hottest since the ninety nineties. This is the central question, Carol.

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Is this transitory because this is just a bump up

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>when you compare it versus very depressed conditions a year

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>ago during the pandemic. Or is this something a little

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>bit more permanent that the bondmark is going to factor

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in and ultimately the fens going to have to take action. Well,

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I think if you know, when we talked a little

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>bit about this yesterday, when we got these figures. The

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>headline numbers were certainly hot, but if you took a

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>peek under the hood and you saw, actually, you know

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>what accounted for those significant changes. A lot of it

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>had to do with things that were transitory, especially when

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you take into account the base effect of one year

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>ago and what was happening one year ago. But even

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>things that were month over a month higher, like car

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>rental prices, for example, we know those are things that

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to come back down as uh, this pent

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>up demand kind makes its way throughout the summer in

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the early fall, right, And isn't that what the bond

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>market is telling us? Well, I think that's what it's

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>telling us. You know. The problem is, of course, is that, um,

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we haven't gotten now to back to full employment.

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>We know we're making progress. We're seeing each week better

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>or fewer claims for unemployment insurance. Um, we know we're

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>going to get back there as the pandemic waynes more

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>people have acteen and so forth, So we think ultimately

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be some upward pressure on wages and so forth.

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And even some of the sticky items uh in the

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>inflation numbers seem to be going up to and we

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>know that once wages and some of those sticks had

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to go up, they're not going to come back down.

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's what we're bracing for. But you know, again

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>with wages, we're seeing a lot of those increases in

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>hotel workers, the hospitality industry, restaurants. There are things that

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of companies and industries are doing to get

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>workers back, Um, who maybe a little bit nervous about

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>doing so. I mean, to Tim's point, David, the month

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>of a month increases came from six components. Use cars,

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>rental cars, vehicle insurance, I see a trend lodging, airfares,

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and food away from home. Yeah. Absolutely. So you know,

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>every time there's an inflation cycle, people always point to

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a few outlets and say, well that's the problem. But

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but here's what we're up against, Carol, is that, Um,

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, your tenure treasury now is at one point

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 1>four five. Yet the implied inflation on tips treasury inflation

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>protection securities for next ten years just two and a half,

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 1>so real yields are still negative. We know this economy

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is getting back on its feet. We've got more stimulus

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>prepped us away from an infrastructure bill, We've got the

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve twitting money into the system, and so eventually

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 1>interest rate target to go. But isn't it like a pendulum, right?

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>We sweet we just swung so dramatically one way when

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>everything fell off a cliff. Now we're swinging kind of

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>dramatically the back, you know, back. It's going to settle

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:02.439
<v Speaker 1>at some point. But we really won't know, David, right

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>until we are kind of out of this pandemic, what

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>really the economic numbers really are and what the real

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>inflation is for everybodyer there's a seller. But you know,

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>one way I'm looking at it here is that you know,

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we started the year tain here, treasuries were under one percent,

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>they got up to one seven five. Now they're one

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>four or five. You could still make a case that

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.719
<v Speaker 1>we're trending up here, you know, in two thousand nineteen,

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>which will eventually will get back to conditions like that.

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I think ten your treasurers as highest two point nine.

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 1>So the question is what do you do now? Do

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you expect to trace to stay low or do you

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>brace for higher rates higher economic growth going ahead? Okay,

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>how do you brace for it? What do you pick?

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>So we think economically sensitive stocks are the ones that

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.959
<v Speaker 1>you want to tilt your portfolio to. These would be

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>financial services. They love higher interest rates, they can charge

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 1>more for their mortgages, get more on their insurance portfolios.

0:25:55.800 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>We think materials energy Ultimately, for example, of this upcoming Thanksgiving,

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna be hitting the road, people are gonna

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>be flying. There's gonna be tremendous demand. No one wants

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to drill anymore, so we think things like that will

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>be going up, and that's where you should be tilting. Well,

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>things like pieces delivery and so forth. We're not going

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>to see that big increase in demand going forward, all right,

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>So what would you be buying here? You know, we

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>love Intel as a way to play both technology and

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a cyclical upturn. You know, we know there's a chip shortage.

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>We know we have to recreate manufacturing here on our

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Shore's uh, Intel's got new management with the engineer from

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Intel returning. Um. There's trading at just twelve times earnings.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>They're still at a cheaper price than they were. But

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>when you think of chips, autonomous driving, artificial intelligence, internet

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of things, you've got to think of Intel. We think

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a great way to you know, have a secular

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>trend but also take advantage of the cyclical upturn. Hey

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>what about a T and T. I know that's on

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>your list of companies that you're interested in. Why especially

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>as they go through the sort of recalibration back to

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a telecom company away from media company. Yeah, so they

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>got the new man in there, John Stanky. I think

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>he's doing the right thing. He is refocusing the company

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>on telecommunications, getting outside of the content. I think that

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>their announcement just recently to shed their entertainment Warner Media assets,

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 1>put into a separate company, merge it with Discovery will

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>allow them to better focus on the wireless the five

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>G opportunity. Let someone else deal with the entertainment assets.

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Of course, they still have something one percent of that,

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>but the opportunity here is they're paying a certain percent dividends.

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>They have to rationalize that it's going to come back

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>down to fourth percent. So you have the stampede of

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>people out who wanted the big dividends. I think people

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>are gonna come in and say, hey, it makes more

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:48.479
<v Speaker 1>sense what the company doesn't pay out to me as

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a dividend. They keeping the company that benefits my shares

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>That allows them to deleverage. So the start is down,

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>now I see it drifting up. Hey just got about

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty seconds letter x ON. I'm assuming dividend play is

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason you like x On, because it's

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>also been on quite a run more than this year.

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>But the dynamics longer term, most investors would argue it's

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely changing. So I think the argument for like any

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>energy company here is that the rush to get green

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>is happening faster than consumers can actually wean themselves off

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.360
<v Speaker 1>from their automobiles, wean themselves off from gas to heat

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>their homes and so forth, and I think ultimately that's

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna push prices up dramatically. X is the no brainer

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is the largest publicly treated integrated energy company. I think

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:36.719
<v Speaker 1>people are also on pause here because they've looked at

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>three up board seats which have gone to so called

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>um green directors. But guess what those green directors want

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to make money too? And of course why you're waiting

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>for things. You got that big six percent David and

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Carol story in the magazine about engine number one. Uh

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that you talk about what a little engine that definitely did.

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>David Deeds, thank you so much. Of a good weekend

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>managing Principal senior portfolio Strategies at Pepack Private Wealth man

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>TM at nine point four billion in assets under management,

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from summit. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and you can also listen to our radio

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News