WEBVTT - Re-Release  "Why Do Brains Dream"

0:00:04.740 --> 0:00:08.940
<v Speaker 1>Why do brains dream? And what's going on with the

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>bizarreness of dreams? Why doesn't your clock work in your dreams?

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>And even though you spend a lot of your day

0:00:16.140 --> 0:00:20.020
<v Speaker 1>working on cell phones and computers, why do those almost

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>never make appearances in your dream content? There are so

0:00:23.900 --> 0:00:26.140
<v Speaker 1>many cool questions that we're going to address today. Is

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:31.340
<v Speaker 1>dream content the same across cultures and across time? Are

0:00:31.420 --> 0:00:35.260
<v Speaker 1>dreams experienced in black and white or in color? Why

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.660
<v Speaker 1>do I think about dreams as the strange love child

0:00:38.740 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>between brain plasticity and the rotation of the planet? What

0:00:43.420 --> 0:00:48.020
<v Speaker 1>is the relationship between schizophrenia and dreaming? And in the future,

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.300
<v Speaker 1>will we be able to read out the content of

0:00:51.380 --> 0:00:58.290
<v Speaker 1>somebody's dreams? Welcome to Inner Cosmos with me, David Eagleman.

0:00:58.690 --> 0:01:01.710
<v Speaker 1>I'm a neuroscientist and an author at Stanford. And in

0:01:01.750 --> 0:01:05.890
<v Speaker 1>these episodes, we sail deeply into our three-pound universe to

0:01:05.950 --> 0:01:09.890
<v Speaker 1>understand why and how our lives look the way they do.

0:01:10.790 --> 0:01:15.429
<v Speaker 1>And how we experience our life includes our nocturnal life.

0:01:15.730 --> 0:01:21.140
<v Speaker 1>We spend hours and hours and hours A third of

0:01:21.230 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>our lives with our eyes closed, lying still and horizontal

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.500
<v Speaker 1>like a meat robot that's been switched off. But why?

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.979
<v Speaker 1>In the last episode, we talked all about sleep. Why

0:01:35.140 --> 0:01:38.140
<v Speaker 1>brains do that and why all animals do that and

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>what is happening in the brain during sleep. Today, we're

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 1>going to zoom in on one of my favorite subjects,

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a very strange thing the brain does, which we call sleep. dreaming.

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.030
<v Speaker 1>We spend a fraction of our sleep time locked in

0:01:54.090 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a different reality, swimming around in plots which aren't real,

0:01:59.670 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're often not even realistic, but which nonetheless convince

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:09.049
<v Speaker 1>us entirely. And today, we're going to see what that's

0:02:09.110 --> 0:02:12.910
<v Speaker 1>all about. Humans have been writing about dreams and pondering

0:02:12.970 --> 0:02:16.029
<v Speaker 1>about them for a long time. And essentially, we have

0:02:16.169 --> 0:02:19.190
<v Speaker 1>evidence of this from the beginning of writing. We see

0:02:19.350 --> 0:02:25.149
<v Speaker 1>detailed dream reports from ancient Egyptians and Romans and Chinese.

0:02:25.660 --> 0:02:28.260
<v Speaker 1>The Bible is full of dreams. Every culture in the

0:02:28.300 --> 0:02:33.020
<v Speaker 1>world has been fascinated by these strange nocturnal journeys that

0:02:33.060 --> 0:02:35.210
<v Speaker 1>we go on. And as we'll see shortly, there's an

0:02:35.350 --> 0:02:39.590
<v Speaker 1>interesting surprise, which is that dream content, in other words,

0:02:39.630 --> 0:02:43.049
<v Speaker 1>the kind of things that people dream about, is essentially

0:02:43.090 --> 0:02:48.250
<v Speaker 1>the same across cultures and across time. And that serves

0:02:48.389 --> 0:02:51.350
<v Speaker 1>as a clue that will allow us to unlock some

0:02:51.389 --> 0:02:56.500
<v Speaker 1>mysteries about what otherwise feels like a deeply mysterious experience

0:02:56.570 --> 0:03:00.260
<v Speaker 1>that we enjoy or suffer every night of our lives.

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>So strap in for an episode... full of surprises. So

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>let's start with a poem that Lord Byron wrote in

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:13.169
<v Speaker 1>1816 called The Dream. He wrote,' Sleep hath its own

0:03:13.290 --> 0:03:18.709
<v Speaker 1>world and a wide realm of wild reality, and dreams

0:03:18.889 --> 0:03:23.739
<v Speaker 1>in their development have breath and tears and tortures and

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:27.380
<v Speaker 1>the touch of joy. They leave a weight upon our

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:33.859
<v Speaker 1>waking thoughts.' So, dreams are indeed a wild reality. The

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>thing we all find so amazing about dreaming is its bizarreness.

0:03:38.940 --> 0:03:43.690
<v Speaker 1>Seeing new things, you hold strange beliefs and you fall

0:03:43.790 --> 0:03:46.790
<v Speaker 1>for it all. Hook, line, and sinker. Whatever your brain

0:03:47.190 --> 0:03:51.010
<v Speaker 1>serves up to you, you believe it entirely. So we'll

0:03:51.050 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about all this, but let's first zoom in on

0:03:53.900 --> 0:03:59.860
<v Speaker 1>what's happening inside the brain. Dreaming occurs during rapid eye

0:03:59.920 --> 0:04:04.410
<v Speaker 1>movement or REM sleep. where your eyes are darting back

0:04:04.450 --> 0:04:07.190
<v Speaker 1>and forth. There's nothing coming in the eyes, of course,

0:04:07.210 --> 0:04:12.100
<v Speaker 1>they're shut. So all the activity is internally generated. For

0:04:12.140 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>good housekeeping, I'll just note that REM sleep isn't necessarily

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:20.409
<v Speaker 1>equivalent to dream sleep, but that's when most dreaming occurs. Now,

0:04:20.650 --> 0:04:23.390
<v Speaker 1>how do we know that? Well, it's because if you

0:04:23.450 --> 0:04:26.770
<v Speaker 1>wait until someone enters REM sleep, their eyes are going

0:04:26.810 --> 0:04:28.990
<v Speaker 1>back and forth, and then you shake them awake and

0:04:29.029 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you say, hey, what were you just experiencing? They'll tell you, whoa,

0:04:34.250 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I was just panicking because I was at work but

0:04:38.020 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>realized I'd forgotten to put on pants and I was

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.820
<v Speaker 1>hiding behind the plant pots and figuring out how to

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:47.250
<v Speaker 1>escape before the meeting started. But if you wake them

0:04:47.350 --> 0:04:51.170
<v Speaker 1>up during the rest of the 90-minute sleep cycle, during

0:04:51.190 --> 0:04:54.710
<v Speaker 1>the stages that we call slow-wave sleep, and you say, hey,

0:04:54.810 --> 0:04:58.830
<v Speaker 1>what were you just experiencing? They'll generally say, nothing, I

0:04:59.130 --> 0:05:03.580
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there. Now, for completeness, I'll mention that sometimes people

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>report some form of mental activity during slow-wave sleep, but

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.669
<v Speaker 1>when they do, this is usually just a thought or

0:05:13.070 --> 0:05:17.270
<v Speaker 1>making a plan, but it lacks the visual vividness and

0:05:17.310 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the hallucinatory components of sleep. typical dreams. So, dreaming of

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:28.060
<v Speaker 1>the sort we're interested in today happens during REM sleep. Now,

0:05:28.339 --> 0:05:33.650
<v Speaker 1>although dreams seem so untethered and ethereal, there are specific

0:05:33.710 --> 0:05:37.270
<v Speaker 1>things happening under the hood. Dreaming depends on the normal

0:05:37.350 --> 0:05:41.589
<v Speaker 1>functioning of a particular network of brain areas. This is

0:05:41.630 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>primarily in the Now, we know that from brain imaging,

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>but also because damage in this network can produce temporary

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:57.450
<v Speaker 1>or permanent dream loss or impairment, like loss of visual

0:05:57.610 --> 0:06:01.130
<v Speaker 1>dream imagery. Now, not all of those areas might sound

0:06:01.170 --> 0:06:04.010
<v Speaker 1>familiar to you, but you've probably heard of the limbic system,

0:06:04.529 --> 0:06:08.250
<v Speaker 1>which sits at the heart of your emotions. So presumably,

0:06:08.610 --> 0:06:12.890
<v Speaker 1>this is why dreams are so overloaded with high emotion.

0:06:13.710 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And I also want to mention a brain area that

0:06:15.740 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is suppressed during REM sleep, and that is the hippocampus.

0:06:20.300 --> 0:06:24.060
<v Speaker 1>This is an area that's required to convert short-term memory

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.070
<v Speaker 1>into long-term memory. And this is why when you wake

0:06:27.110 --> 0:06:31.210
<v Speaker 1>up from a dream, you can remember it so clearly,

0:06:31.250 --> 0:06:35.180
<v Speaker 1>but after about 15 minutes, it just slips away from you.

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>You just can't hold on to what happened. This is

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.740
<v Speaker 1>because you have the short-term memory just fine, but you're

0:06:42.779 --> 0:06:46.650
<v Speaker 1>not converting it into long-term memory. And so it simply

0:06:47.170 --> 0:06:50.289
<v Speaker 1>fades before your eyes. And by the way, I think

0:06:50.310 --> 0:06:54.150
<v Speaker 1>this experience that we have every morning can enhance our

0:06:54.330 --> 0:06:56.690
<v Speaker 1>empathy for about what it would be like to have

0:06:56.750 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>something like Alzheimer's disease. Because a person with Alzheimer's says

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>on the phone, okay, I'll be right down there in

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.380
<v Speaker 1>a moment, and they hang up, and then the memory

0:07:06.420 --> 0:07:09.850
<v Speaker 1>of that just slips away. So even though you might

0:07:09.970 --> 0:07:13.430
<v Speaker 1>tell a relative with Alzheimer's, come on, just try harder

0:07:13.450 --> 0:07:17.150
<v Speaker 1>to remember. Just think about somebody telling that to you

0:07:17.630 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>about your dreams in the mornings. So back to the

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.860
<v Speaker 1>Byron poem. The line that I thought was interesting was,

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>they leave a weight upon our waking thoughts because they

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.190
<v Speaker 1>don't directly interact with our waking thoughts, but instead they

0:07:32.260 --> 0:07:36.210
<v Speaker 1>can just put a spin on our mood, even if

0:07:36.270 --> 0:07:40.220
<v Speaker 1>we don't remember why. Okay, so what do we see

0:07:40.260 --> 0:07:44.300
<v Speaker 1>in the brain when dreaming begins? Well, just before the

0:07:44.580 --> 0:07:48.250
<v Speaker 1>onset of your eyes darting back and forth, you have

0:07:48.310 --> 0:07:51.670
<v Speaker 1>a group of neurons in the brainstem, specifically in an

0:07:51.810 --> 0:07:55.250
<v Speaker 1>area called the pons, and these crank up. And these

0:07:55.310 --> 0:08:00.500
<v Speaker 1>trigger several consequences. The first is that your major muscle

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>groups get paralyzed. This is called atonia. So you've got

0:08:04.900 --> 0:08:10.420
<v Speaker 1>this elaborate neural circuitry that keeps the body paralyzed during dreaming.

0:08:10.900 --> 0:08:14.060
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the very elaborateness of this circuitry

0:08:14.580 --> 0:08:19.540
<v Speaker 1>emphasizes the biological importance of dream sleep. You don't get

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>this kind of complexity by accident. Presumably, dreaming would be

0:08:24.130 --> 0:08:28.980
<v Speaker 1>unlikely to evolve and remain without an important function behind it.

0:08:29.590 --> 0:08:32.010
<v Speaker 1>So why do we get this paralysis of the muscles?

0:08:32.470 --> 0:08:36.410
<v Speaker 1>It allows the possibility for the brain to experience things

0:08:36.490 --> 0:08:41.620
<v Speaker 1>and simulate reality without actually moving the body. The second

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>consequence of these neurons in the pons is that they

0:08:45.020 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>trigger these waves of activity known as PGO waves. And

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:53.990
<v Speaker 1>these are key to the experience of dreaming. These PGO

0:08:54.030 --> 0:08:58.030
<v Speaker 1>waves travel to a tiny area called the geniculate nucleus.

0:08:58.090 --> 0:09:01.230
<v Speaker 1>And from there, these waves of activity slam into the

0:09:01.670 --> 0:09:04.820
<v Speaker 1>occipital cortex at the back of your head. In other words,

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:09.700
<v Speaker 1>they drive activity into the visual systems. So that's why

0:09:09.740 --> 0:09:13.710
<v Speaker 1>these are called PGO waves, because they start in the pons, P,

0:09:14.110 --> 0:09:18.650
<v Speaker 1>move to the geniculate, G, and go to the occipital cortex, O, PGO.

0:09:18.990 --> 0:09:22.300
<v Speaker 1>I mention all this detail because PGO waves are the

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:28.820
<v Speaker 1>neural correlate of dreaming. the visual areas become alive with activity,

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:33.449
<v Speaker 1>allowing us to see our dreams. You blast activity into

0:09:33.470 --> 0:09:38.110
<v Speaker 1>the visual cortex and you enjoy visual experience, even though

0:09:38.270 --> 0:09:43.130
<v Speaker 1>your eyes are closed. Now, interestingly, when you measure electrical

0:09:43.190 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>activity across the brain with EEG, When you do this

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.470
<v Speaker 1>during REM sleep, it looks really similar to that during

0:09:50.710 --> 0:09:54.890
<v Speaker 1>the waking state. You see similar patterns in both states.

0:09:55.250 --> 0:09:58.670
<v Speaker 1>For example, lots of gamma wave frequency, which is generally

0:09:58.730 --> 0:10:03.459
<v Speaker 1>thought to reflect something about cognitive processing. With the exception

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of the paralyzed muscles and the lack of external visual

0:10:08.250 --> 0:10:11.530
<v Speaker 1>input because your eyes are closed, the states of REM

0:10:11.590 --> 0:10:15.050
<v Speaker 1>sleep and of wakefulness, they kind of resemble one another.

0:10:15.470 --> 0:10:17.590
<v Speaker 1>And this is what we might expect from a state

0:10:17.670 --> 0:10:23.979
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness that's altered, but it's some sort of consciousness nonetheless. Okay,

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>so that's what's happening in the brain when we dream.

0:10:27.300 --> 0:10:31.180
<v Speaker 1>But why do we dream? Well, there are various hypotheses

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.740
<v Speaker 1>about this. And I mentioned one last week, which is

0:10:33.780 --> 0:10:38.489
<v Speaker 1>that maybe dreams allow us to simulate rare situations. In

0:10:38.550 --> 0:10:44.770
<v Speaker 1>other words, these nocturnal neural simulations might allow us and

0:10:44.850 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>all animals to test out activities without the danger and

0:10:49.390 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>risk of doing so in the real world. So you

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:56.140
<v Speaker 1>can practice through different scenarios with your muscles all shut down.

0:10:56.850 --> 0:11:01.010
<v Speaker 1>So people who advocate this theory suggest that the periodic

0:11:01.110 --> 0:11:05.990
<v Speaker 1>stimulation of the cortex in this semi-random and nonspecific manner,

0:11:06.490 --> 0:11:10.250
<v Speaker 1>this can maintain circuits that are really important for survival,

0:11:10.730 --> 0:11:13.950
<v Speaker 1>but they rarely get activated because you don't run into

0:11:13.990 --> 0:11:17.210
<v Speaker 1>emergencies that often. So the idea is that you're just

0:11:17.309 --> 0:11:21.329
<v Speaker 1>sending in random activity, keeping the engine oiled in case

0:11:21.390 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you need one of these programs sometimes. And some researchers

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.470
<v Speaker 1>suggest that it's even more specific than that. A version

0:11:28.490 --> 0:11:33.349
<v Speaker 1>of this framework called threat simulation theory suggests that dreams

0:11:33.429 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>exist to simulate threatening events and to rehearse what to

0:11:37.390 --> 0:11:40.310
<v Speaker 1>do in the face of threat. And that seems on

0:11:40.350 --> 0:11:43.730
<v Speaker 1>its surface, at least consistent with the high prevalence of

0:11:44.150 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>violence and aggression in dreams. But I want to note

0:11:48.220 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that there's no data that directly supports this idea. And

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned last week that this theory suggests that people

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>exposed to more survival threats in waking life might have

0:11:59.580 --> 0:12:03.330
<v Speaker 1>a more common experience of threat dreams at night. But

0:12:03.370 --> 0:12:07.110
<v Speaker 1>the data do not support that. Also, the threat perception

0:12:07.150 --> 0:12:10.550
<v Speaker 1>theory doesn't explain the fact that most dreams are totally

0:12:10.610 --> 0:12:15.490
<v Speaker 1>meaningless and bizarre instead of involving any meaningful threat perception

0:12:15.530 --> 0:12:18.550
<v Speaker 1>or threat avoidance. So back to the question of why

0:12:18.650 --> 0:12:22.030
<v Speaker 1>we dream. A few years ago, my colleague Don Vaughn

0:12:22.090 --> 0:12:25.469
<v Speaker 1>and I proposed a new theory, which is the only

0:12:25.570 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>one that makes quantitative predictions across species and And if

0:12:30.210 --> 0:12:33.490
<v Speaker 1>you heard episode 11, you may remember about this. That

0:12:33.510 --> 0:12:36.510
<v Speaker 1>theory has to do with brain plasticity. And here's the

0:12:36.570 --> 0:12:39.370
<v Speaker 1>idea in a nutshell. We know that if a person

0:12:39.429 --> 0:12:43.810
<v Speaker 1>goes blind, other senses start to take over what was

0:12:43.850 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the visual cortex. In other words, the territory of the

0:12:47.030 --> 0:12:51.179
<v Speaker 1>visual system is not fixed permanently, but instead the wiring

0:12:51.220 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of the brain is quite fluid and there's a takeover

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that happens. Okay. Now, it turns out that if you

0:12:56.780 --> 0:13:00.750
<v Speaker 1>take a normally sighted person and you blindfold him, you

0:13:00.780 --> 0:13:05.310
<v Speaker 1>can start seeing the beginnings of this takeover in neuroimaging

0:13:05.910 --> 0:13:09.670
<v Speaker 1>starting in about one hour. And that really surprised us

0:13:09.730 --> 0:13:14.309
<v Speaker 1>because of how fast the takeover starts to happen. So

0:13:14.490 --> 0:13:17.850
<v Speaker 1>what does this rapidity of the takeover of the cortex

0:13:18.150 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>have to do with dreaming? Well, in the incessant competition

0:13:22.220 --> 0:13:25.740
<v Speaker 1>for territory in the brain, the visual system has a

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:31.660
<v Speaker 1>special challenge because of the planet's rotation. We experience darkness

0:13:31.700 --> 0:13:34.860
<v Speaker 1>for about 12 out of every 24 hours. And obviously,

0:13:34.900 --> 0:13:40.070
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about our evolutionary history, not the recently electrically

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:44.510
<v Speaker 1>blessed times. In other words, our ancestors all spent their

0:13:44.570 --> 0:13:49.550
<v Speaker 1>lives as inadvertent participants in a blindfold experiment every single night.

0:13:50.150 --> 0:13:54.710
<v Speaker 1>So how did their visual cortex defend its territory when

0:13:54.730 --> 0:13:57.530
<v Speaker 1>you've got no data coming in through the eyes? So

0:13:57.590 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>our proposal is that the visual cortex preserves its territory

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>by finding a way to remain active at night. And

0:14:05.100 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 1>we call this the defensive activation theory. And the purpose

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.550
<v Speaker 1>of dreaming here is to keep cells in the visual

0:14:13.610 --> 0:14:18.050
<v Speaker 1>cortex active. And that's how it resists conquest by the

0:14:18.130 --> 0:14:22.210
<v Speaker 1>territories of the Other senses. Vision is the only one

0:14:22.230 --> 0:14:26.010
<v Speaker 1>of the senses that's disadvantaged by darkness. You can still

0:14:26.350 --> 0:14:28.850
<v Speaker 1>touch and smell and taste and hear the dark. And

0:14:28.890 --> 0:14:32.810
<v Speaker 1>so it's the only sense that needs internally generated activity

0:14:33.290 --> 0:14:37.410
<v Speaker 1>to maintain its borders during the long night. So as

0:14:37.450 --> 0:14:41.090
<v Speaker 1>a result, about every 90 minutes, you get this internally

0:14:41.210 --> 0:14:46.270
<v Speaker 1>generated activity that blasts exclusively into the visual cortex. And

0:14:46.460 --> 0:14:51.910
<v Speaker 1>so dreams are experienced as primarily visual. So several predictions

0:14:51.950 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>immediately fall out of the defensive activation theory. First, because

0:14:57.060 --> 0:15:00.950
<v Speaker 1>brain plasticity diminishes with age, This would suggest that the

0:15:00.990 --> 0:15:04.690
<v Speaker 1>amount of time spent in REM sleep should also decrease

0:15:04.810 --> 0:15:07.850
<v Speaker 1>as one moves through the lifespan. And that turns out

0:15:07.890 --> 0:15:11.810
<v Speaker 1>to be exactly what happens. REM sleep in humans accounts

0:15:11.870 --> 0:15:15.170
<v Speaker 1>for half of an infant's sleep time, but as a

0:15:15.210 --> 0:15:20.100
<v Speaker 1>person grows older, the percentage of REM sleep decreases steadily.

0:15:20.170 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>In other words, diminishing plasticity of the brain correlates with

0:15:24.660 --> 0:15:27.860
<v Speaker 1>less REM sleep. But more importantly, we made a more

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>quantified prediction. We said, hey, maybe the more flexible an

0:15:32.900 --> 0:15:36.900
<v Speaker 1>animal's brain is, the more REM sleep it requires to

0:15:36.950 --> 0:15:40.290
<v Speaker 1>defend its visual cortex. So Dawn and I studied the

0:15:40.610 --> 0:15:45.070
<v Speaker 1>plasticity in 25 species of primates, and we found that

0:15:45.110 --> 0:15:49.300
<v Speaker 1>the species with more plastic brains spend more time in

0:15:49.420 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>REM sleep every night. So you'd think that these two measures,

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>REM sleep and brain plasticity, they would be totally unconnected.

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.380
<v Speaker 1>So it was very surprising to find that they are

0:16:00.500 --> 0:16:05.860
<v Speaker 1>tightly linked. So dreaming defends the visual cortex. Now, the

0:16:05.980 --> 0:16:10.990
<v Speaker 1>circuitry that underpins dreaming, this is so ancient and deeply wired.

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.210
<v Speaker 1>that even people who are blind have it. But note

0:16:14.270 --> 0:16:18.770
<v Speaker 1>that blind people don't have visual dreams. Instead, their nighttime

0:16:18.790 --> 0:16:23.630
<v Speaker 1>hallucinations involve the other senses, like feeling their way around

0:16:23.970 --> 0:16:29.050
<v Speaker 1>an oddly arranged kitchen or hearing strangers speaking. Why? Because

0:16:29.310 --> 0:16:34.510
<v Speaker 1>other sensory areas have annexed the underused visual cortex. So

0:16:34.550 --> 0:16:37.010
<v Speaker 1>think about it this way. People who can see and

0:16:37.030 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>those with visual impairments, they both have activity shooting into

0:16:40.340 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>their occipital lobe during dreaming, but the senses processed by

0:16:45.020 --> 0:16:49.990
<v Speaker 1>that territory are different. The defensive activation theory also makes

0:16:50.090 --> 0:16:53.970
<v Speaker 1>more general predictions. If dream sleep is triggered by the

0:16:54.210 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>absence of visual input during the night, We might presume

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:02.220
<v Speaker 1>that a person deprived of vision while awake could similarly

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:06.700
<v Speaker 1>experience dreamlike visual hallucinations. And that is exactly what happens

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.919
<v Speaker 1>when people have degenerating vision or they end up in

0:17:11.090 --> 0:17:14.609
<v Speaker 1>solitary confinement or even just in a dark float tank.

0:17:15.030 --> 0:17:18.770
<v Speaker 1>Any situation in which vision gets deprived, the brain starts

0:17:18.970 --> 0:17:23.510
<v Speaker 1>fighting back and and having hallucinations. So that's the idea.

0:17:24.230 --> 0:17:28.450
<v Speaker 1>Dreams are a screensaver. The brain puts activity into the

0:17:28.510 --> 0:17:33.290
<v Speaker 1>visual cortex to prevent it from getting ruined during the night. Okay,

0:17:33.310 --> 0:17:36.950
<v Speaker 1>so you might say, fine, your hypothesis seems plausible, but

0:17:37.430 --> 0:17:41.500
<v Speaker 1>why do dreams seem to be stories? After all, we

0:17:41.540 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>don't just see random snow like on an old television.

0:17:45.340 --> 0:17:49.700
<v Speaker 1>We experience stories. And in fact, There are various stories

0:17:49.740 --> 0:17:54.119
<v Speaker 1>of someone discovering something in dreams, like Krikuli thinking of

0:17:54.180 --> 0:17:57.050
<v Speaker 1>the structure of the benzene ring based on a dream

0:17:57.090 --> 0:18:00.330
<v Speaker 1>he had of two snakes biting each other's tails. Or

0:18:00.430 --> 0:18:03.930
<v Speaker 1>Paul McCartney dreaming the melody for the song Yesterday. So

0:18:03.970 --> 0:18:08.609
<v Speaker 1>what's up with dream content? The key is that the

0:18:08.710 --> 0:18:14.209
<v Speaker 1>brain is a storytelling machine. Your brain is deeply carved

0:18:14.570 --> 0:18:19.020
<v Speaker 1>with roadways that represent your experience in the world. And

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.619
<v Speaker 1>these are stored in what are called associative neural networks,

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.100
<v Speaker 1>which means that everything connects to other things based on

0:18:26.420 --> 0:18:28.860
<v Speaker 1>how they relate. So if I ask you to think

0:18:28.940 --> 0:18:32.770
<v Speaker 1>of a mouse that's physically connected in your brain's networks

0:18:32.810 --> 0:18:36.770
<v Speaker 1>to your concept of cheese or exterminators or Mickey Mouse

0:18:36.850 --> 0:18:40.850
<v Speaker 1>or mazes or running wheels or mouse traps or pet stores,

0:18:41.250 --> 0:18:45.430
<v Speaker 1>everything else you've ever associated with a mouse. So all

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>concepts are related and linked physically. So what happens during

0:18:51.060 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>sleep and dreaming? Well, the synapses that are used during

0:18:55.660 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the day tend to be slightly more chemically active. I'll

0:18:59.900 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 1>just say they're more hot from the activity of the day.

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And so your dreams usually involve something from the day

0:19:06.980 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>or something that's on your mind. They often involve the

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>memories and desires and fears and hopes that are brewing

0:19:14.380 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>in your inner life. But the associations are much looser.

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.150
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you have something about your boss or something

0:19:22.170 --> 0:19:24.889
<v Speaker 1>that happened in a class or whatever, but the dream

0:19:24.970 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>quickly goes off in some weird direction. The associations are looser.

0:19:30.859 --> 0:19:34.780
<v Speaker 1>And so we end up dreaming stories with looser associations,

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:39.010
<v Speaker 1>following paths along the associative neural network that we might

0:19:39.050 --> 0:19:42.820
<v Speaker 1>not otherwise take. But things make sense, at least in

0:19:42.859 --> 0:19:47.110
<v Speaker 1>the light of dream logic. So, even if the visual

0:19:47.210 --> 0:19:51.470
<v Speaker 1>cortex is just getting volleys of random attributes, you get

0:19:52.030 --> 0:19:55.630
<v Speaker 1>meaning out of it. You get some sort of story. Now,

0:19:55.750 --> 0:19:59.230
<v Speaker 1>people often wake up and say, no way, that wasn't random.

0:19:59.290 --> 0:20:02.109
<v Speaker 1>That was a metaphor. I'm trying to decide if I

0:20:02.150 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>should quit this job. And I had a dream that

0:20:05.260 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I went into the office and the floor was tilted

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>at 45 degrees, and no matter what I did, I

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>kept slipping back down. And that was a metaphor about

0:20:14.020 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the impossibility of my advancement there. That was a sign

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>from my unconscious. Okay, so maybe. The interesting thing about

0:20:22.660 --> 0:20:28.300
<v Speaker 1>interpreting the content of dreams is that they might be 100% random,

0:20:28.500 --> 0:20:31.659
<v Speaker 1>but they act like a Rorschach blot, which is to

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.940
<v Speaker 1>say you can assign any sort of meaning to them.

0:20:35.350 --> 0:20:37.889
<v Speaker 1>You remember a Rorschach plot, which is where you squish

0:20:37.930 --> 0:20:40.570
<v Speaker 1>some ink between two pages and then you pull the

0:20:40.609 --> 0:20:43.229
<v Speaker 1>pages apart and you get some random shape and you

0:20:43.330 --> 0:20:48.110
<v Speaker 1>ask people to interpret what they're seeing, to assign meaning

0:20:48.270 --> 0:20:50.610
<v Speaker 1>to it. And it's easy enough to say, yeah, that

0:20:50.650 --> 0:20:53.090
<v Speaker 1>looks like this thing in my life, maybe this issue

0:20:53.130 --> 0:20:56.010
<v Speaker 1>that's been chewing at me. And that's how Dr. Rorschach

0:20:56.190 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>used this to determine meaning. What had meaning in a

0:20:59.740 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>person's mind? But you would never say the blob of

0:21:03.420 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>ink carried meaning. It's all about the imposition of meaning

0:21:07.460 --> 0:21:11.220
<v Speaker 1>by the viewer. And this, I suggest, could be what

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:15.869
<v Speaker 1>happens with dreams as well. You interpret the ink blob,

0:21:15.970 --> 0:21:19.669
<v Speaker 1>and that interpretation might have significance to your life, but

0:21:19.690 --> 0:21:23.669
<v Speaker 1>you impose that meaning instead of it being inherent in

0:21:23.710 --> 0:21:28.230
<v Speaker 1>the dreams. Here's an interesting parallel. Pablo Picasso once said,

0:21:28.250 --> 0:21:31.689
<v Speaker 1>And that could be the same thing with dreams. They

0:21:32.090 --> 0:21:42.169
<v Speaker 1>are a lie that makes us realize the truth. So

0:21:42.290 --> 0:21:44.150
<v Speaker 1>in this sense, it's the same thing. If you're thinking

0:21:44.190 --> 0:21:47.310
<v Speaker 1>about some problem and you go to the bookshelf and

0:21:47.330 --> 0:21:49.770
<v Speaker 1>you pull off any random book and turn to a

0:21:49.850 --> 0:21:53.420
<v Speaker 1>random page and you read the sentence, often it will

0:21:53.460 --> 0:21:57.219
<v Speaker 1>very tangentially give you some push to the thing that

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:00.260
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to solve. But that doesn't mean the author

0:22:00.380 --> 0:22:03.459
<v Speaker 1>of the book cared about you and wrote that sentence

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>with that future moment in mind. It simply tells us

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.300
<v Speaker 1>that lots of things in the world are like lots

0:22:09.340 --> 0:22:13.340
<v Speaker 1>of other things and can therefore be interpret it. And

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.340
<v Speaker 1>I do just want to add one more word of

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>caution to the game of dream interpretation. By the time

0:22:19.100 --> 0:22:21.199
<v Speaker 1>you turn to the person next to you and say,

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, I just had the strangest dream. And

0:22:24.260 --> 0:22:28.350
<v Speaker 1>you tell them, you are forced to add another layer

0:22:28.590 --> 0:22:31.850
<v Speaker 1>of narrative scaffolding so that it makes sense as a

0:22:31.930 --> 0:22:35.610
<v Speaker 1>story that you're telling. So a narrative that's very thin

0:22:36.070 --> 0:22:39.210
<v Speaker 1>can seem to have more flesh after you've pushed it

0:22:39.250 --> 0:22:42.930
<v Speaker 1>through your storytelling machinery. In other words, we layer on

0:22:43.030 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>narrative structure to give our dreams a shape that they

0:22:46.130 --> 0:22:49.060
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually have. And so especially if you've had a

0:22:49.180 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>dream that you've told over and over, it usually has

0:22:52.420 --> 0:22:56.220
<v Speaker 1>more of a scaffolding than it actually started with. Nonetheless,

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the content of dreams has always fascinated humans, spurring societies

0:23:01.660 --> 0:23:05.939
<v Speaker 1>to invent cultural uses for dreams in religious ceremonies and

0:23:06.310 --> 0:23:12.870
<v Speaker 1>medicinal practices or doomed attempts to predict the future. Sigmund Freud,

0:23:12.910 --> 0:23:15.810
<v Speaker 1>who lived decades before modern brain science, he thought that

0:23:15.869 --> 0:23:19.889
<v Speaker 1>dreams provided an inroad into the underlying functions of the

0:23:19.930 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>brain and especially the subconscious. He suggested, as had many

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:29.580
<v Speaker 1>before him, that dreams concealed hidden meanings that were just

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>at the threshold of breaking through the barrier to consciousness.

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:38.990
<v Speaker 1>More specifically, he proposed that dreams constitute a disguised attempt

0:23:39.150 --> 0:23:43.930
<v Speaker 1>at wish fulfillment. Similarly, Carl Jung posited that dreams may

0:23:44.390 --> 0:23:49.030
<v Speaker 1>offset features of a character or personality that you might

0:23:49.170 --> 0:23:52.700
<v Speaker 1>ignore while you're awake. In general, both those theories have

0:23:52.740 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>been criticized because they can't be proven wrong. And critics

0:23:56.859 --> 0:24:02.500
<v Speaker 1>have pointed out that the wish-fulfillment interpretation seems improbable in

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:07.570
<v Speaker 1>view of the recurring nightmares that attend post-traumatic stress disorder.

0:24:07.970 --> 0:24:10.390
<v Speaker 1>So I'm, of course, not the first to propose that

0:24:10.470 --> 0:24:15.109
<v Speaker 1>dreams might have no inherent meaning. The psychiatrists J. Allen

0:24:15.150 --> 0:24:18.670
<v Speaker 1>Hobson and Robert McCarley suggest that dreams may have no

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>meaning at all, and they have a model they call

0:24:20.980 --> 0:24:25.690
<v Speaker 1>the activation synthesis model. which proposes that random activity from

0:24:25.710 --> 0:24:28.790
<v Speaker 1>the brainstem goes to the cortex, which tries to turn

0:24:28.830 --> 0:24:32.350
<v Speaker 1>it into motor output. But given the paralysis of the

0:24:32.390 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 1>major muscle groups, the brain has to explain the paradox

0:24:37.260 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>between outgoing motor signals and a lack of expected sensory feedback.

0:24:43.700 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>So in this situation, the cortex synthesizes an explanation, essentially

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>weaving a story from the random inputs. Now, Hobson and

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.940
<v Speaker 1>McCarley faced criticism for this aspect of their theory because

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:02.270
<v Speaker 1>dreams often do have a relationship to life experience. So

0:25:02.430 --> 0:25:05.790
<v Speaker 1>in that light, they made modifications to allow that dream

0:25:05.850 --> 0:25:09.290
<v Speaker 1>content relates to memories and fears and desires and hopes

0:25:09.330 --> 0:25:13.350
<v Speaker 1>and so on, but that these provide the background context

0:25:13.430 --> 0:25:18.109
<v Speaker 1>and not the exact content of the cortex's interpretation of

0:25:18.170 --> 0:25:21.510
<v Speaker 1>the random activity. So which is it? Does dream content

0:25:21.590 --> 0:25:24.619
<v Speaker 1>tell us anything at all or nothing? Well, here's how

0:25:24.660 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 1>we can approach the problem. When you look at one

0:25:27.980 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 1>person's dreams, like you think about your own dreams, you

0:25:30.940 --> 0:25:33.210
<v Speaker 1>may not be able to use the content as a

0:25:33.290 --> 0:25:36.610
<v Speaker 1>key to unlock much about the brain. But as you

0:25:36.730 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>move from considering one dreamer to doing the science and

0:25:41.140 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at thousands of dream reports and hundreds of thousands

0:25:44.380 --> 0:25:47.379
<v Speaker 1>from all over the world, you can start to see

0:25:47.420 --> 0:25:51.690
<v Speaker 1>the fence lines. You see that dreams aren't a wild

0:25:51.810 --> 0:25:56.869
<v Speaker 1>unleashing where anything can happen. Instead, dreams have particular rules

0:25:56.990 --> 0:26:00.369
<v Speaker 1>to the stories, and that gives us hints. So what

0:26:00.390 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>are those rules? Well, I recently read a very cool

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.270
<v Speaker 1>new book by my colleague Rahul Jandayal called This Is

0:26:06.369 --> 0:26:09.210
<v Speaker 1>Why You Dream. And he outlines a series of studies

0:26:09.690 --> 0:26:15.139
<v Speaker 1>that demonstrate a remarkable consistency of themes across cultures and

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>across decades. The same kinds of dreams are reported. For example,

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.369
<v Speaker 1>being unable to find one's way or being late for

0:26:24.390 --> 0:26:27.750
<v Speaker 1>an important event. In dreams, both men and women usually

0:26:27.790 --> 0:26:32.270
<v Speaker 1>experience more aggression than friendliness. Although men in almost all

0:26:32.310 --> 0:26:35.590
<v Speaker 1>societies have greater physical aggression in their dreams than women do.

0:26:35.990 --> 0:26:40.390
<v Speaker 1>Everyone experiences more misfortune than good fortune. People experience more

0:26:40.530 --> 0:26:45.300
<v Speaker 1>negative emotions than positive emotions. So the cross-cultural research suggests

0:26:45.380 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that dreams are similar across a wide range of cultures

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.500
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the subject matter, the level of aggression,

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.899
<v Speaker 1>familiarity with the people in the dreams. For example, let

0:26:54.940 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>me zoom in on this. Jandale points out that in

0:26:57.859 --> 0:27:01.780
<v Speaker 1>the 1950s, there were questionnaires given to college students in

0:27:01.820 --> 0:27:05.350
<v Speaker 1>America and college students in Japan. And the questionnaire asked

0:27:05.390 --> 0:27:08.930
<v Speaker 1>them what they had dreamt about, like showing up somewhere

0:27:08.970 --> 0:27:11.649
<v Speaker 1>with no clothes or flying or trying to do something

0:27:11.690 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>again and again or being buried alive or something involving

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>school and their teachers or whatever. And as it turns out,

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:22.310
<v Speaker 1>although American and Japanese students were living pretty different lives,

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:26.370
<v Speaker 1>their answers were essentially the same. So for the Americans,

0:27:26.710 --> 0:27:31.830
<v Speaker 1>the top five dreams were falling, being attacked or pursued,

0:27:32.410 --> 0:27:36.050
<v Speaker 1>trying again and again to do something, a dream involving

0:27:36.210 --> 0:27:40.629
<v Speaker 1>school or teachers or studying, and sexual experiences. And when

0:27:40.650 --> 0:27:43.210
<v Speaker 1>you compare this to the Japanese students, it was essentially

0:27:43.250 --> 0:27:47.940
<v Speaker 1>the same. Their dreams were ranked as being attacked or pursued, falling,

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.580
<v Speaker 1>trying again and again to do something, dreams about school

0:27:51.619 --> 0:27:54.820
<v Speaker 1>or teachers or studying, and being frozen with fright. And

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:58.730
<v Speaker 1>sexual experiences were number six. So halfway across the world,

0:27:58.850 --> 0:28:20.410
<v Speaker 1>very different cultures, same dream content. Now, 50 years after

0:28:20.450 --> 0:28:23.820
<v Speaker 1>that study, similar questions were given to students in China

0:28:24.020 --> 0:28:26.700
<v Speaker 1>and Germany, and they came up with essentially the same

0:28:26.900 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>answers again. You find people dreaming of being chased or

0:28:30.820 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>pursued or arriving too late, like missing an airplane or

0:28:33.900 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a final exam. Now, you might say, fine, but these

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.170
<v Speaker 1>are all industrialized countries, and maybe their lives are sort

0:28:39.190 --> 0:28:42.590
<v Speaker 1>of similar. But in fact, people have also studied indigenous

0:28:42.630 --> 0:28:46.570
<v Speaker 1>societies in Brazil and Mexico and Australia, and they find

0:28:46.650 --> 0:28:51.390
<v Speaker 1>extremely similar results. The cultures are quite different, but the

0:28:51.530 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>plots of the dreams are not. So there have been

0:28:55.180 --> 0:28:56.980
<v Speaker 1>lots of studies on this sort of thing now, and

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:00.300
<v Speaker 1>they all conclude that dream content is essentially the same

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:04.479
<v Speaker 1>across cultures and across time. As one example, wherever you

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:07.620
<v Speaker 1>are in the world, men dream more about other men,

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>while women dream equally of men and women. And all

0:29:11.500 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>people across cultures are more likely to be victims of

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:20.790
<v Speaker 1>violence rather than perpetrators. So dreams cover similar themes across

0:29:20.830 --> 0:29:24.090
<v Speaker 1>the world, irrespective of language and culture and time. It

0:29:24.190 --> 0:29:26.730
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to matter how rich you are, how poor

0:29:26.750 --> 0:29:29.070
<v Speaker 1>you are. So what does that mean? Well, what's the

0:29:29.150 --> 0:29:32.190
<v Speaker 1>one thing we all have in common? Our organs on

0:29:32.210 --> 0:29:35.370
<v Speaker 1>the inside and specifically the brain. As easy as it

0:29:35.570 --> 0:29:37.830
<v Speaker 1>is to look at different cultures around the world with

0:29:37.870 --> 0:29:42.620
<v Speaker 1>different governments and different religions and different costumes, this variability

0:29:42.660 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>has cropped up in the last millisecond of human history.

0:29:46.380 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And if you look just under the skin and the bone,

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.340
<v Speaker 1>you find the same brain in us all. It's the

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:56.719
<v Speaker 1>same engine under the hood. So whenever we find something clear, like, oh,

0:29:57.220 --> 0:30:00.709
<v Speaker 1>everyone dreams about the same thing, That tells us we

0:30:00.750 --> 0:30:05.570
<v Speaker 1>are looking at something fundamental and ancient and universal. And

0:30:05.590 --> 0:30:08.170
<v Speaker 1>we find all sorts of other interesting answers by looking

0:30:08.230 --> 0:30:12.020
<v Speaker 1>across thousands of dreams. For example, what if dreams are

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a way to live out fantasies like sexual fantasy? That

0:30:15.820 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 1>seems consistent with how we talk about dreams, a way

0:30:19.540 --> 0:30:23.980
<v Speaker 1>of acting out our desires. But... In studies across all cultures,

0:30:24.050 --> 0:30:27.890
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that fewer than 10% of dreams are sexual,

0:30:28.290 --> 0:30:31.910
<v Speaker 1>which I find fascinating given the way we talk about dreams.

0:30:32.450 --> 0:30:36.150
<v Speaker 1>If a young single person says to another single person, oh,

0:30:36.170 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I had a dream about you last night, then everyone

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>titters and makes assumptions about that. And we have terms

0:30:42.100 --> 0:30:45.959
<v Speaker 1>like dream girl or dream guy. But in fact, 90%

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:49.150
<v Speaker 1>of our dreams have nothing to do with that. So

0:30:49.210 --> 0:30:52.350
<v Speaker 1>the content is remarkably similar across the world, but where

0:30:52.390 --> 0:30:55.870
<v Speaker 1>things get really interesting is when we zoom in one

0:30:55.910 --> 0:31:01.030
<v Speaker 1>more level and really examine what dreamscapes look like in detail.

0:31:01.370 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not asking about what's in the dream script here,

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.940
<v Speaker 1>but if you look very closely across thousands of dream reports,

0:31:07.980 --> 0:31:11.700
<v Speaker 1>you can ask, what is not in the script? So

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to return to a question I posed at

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, which is that we live in a society

0:31:16.500 --> 0:31:19.830
<v Speaker 1>where we are constantly hunched over our cell phones and

0:31:19.870 --> 0:31:23.550
<v Speaker 1>our laptops. How come these essentially never show up in

0:31:23.610 --> 0:31:26.770
<v Speaker 1>our dreams? Isn't that weird? And even in the era

0:31:26.810 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>before computers, back when people read a lot more books,

0:31:29.940 --> 0:31:33.420
<v Speaker 1>how come no one sits around reading books in their dreams?

0:31:34.290 --> 0:31:37.060
<v Speaker 1>Why can't you even see any text in your dreams?

0:31:37.460 --> 0:31:40.860
<v Speaker 1>Why do you spend so much time writing stuff down

0:31:40.900 --> 0:31:43.980
<v Speaker 1>in real life, but you never can write stuff down

0:31:44.140 --> 0:31:46.740
<v Speaker 1>in a dream? How come you never do math in

0:31:46.780 --> 0:31:50.110
<v Speaker 1>a dream, like calculating a tip for a restaurant bill?

0:31:50.550 --> 0:31:52.510
<v Speaker 1>Even if that comes up in a dream plot, it

0:31:52.550 --> 0:31:56.950
<v Speaker 1>feels totally impossible to get the right answer. Well, all

0:31:56.970 --> 0:32:00.500
<v Speaker 1>of this serves as a big clue into the networks

0:32:00.540 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that are active during a dream. And this is pretty

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.930
<v Speaker 1>well worked out with brain imaging now, although anyone who

0:32:06.990 --> 0:32:09.850
<v Speaker 1>is being very observant probably could have guessed this all

0:32:10.310 --> 0:32:13.750
<v Speaker 1>even a century ago. What reading and writing and cell

0:32:13.790 --> 0:32:16.580
<v Speaker 1>phones and computers all have in common. is that they

0:32:16.620 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>require the use of a network in the brain that

0:32:19.340 --> 0:32:23.500
<v Speaker 1>we summarize as the executive network, which involves a lot

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.770
<v Speaker 1>of activity largely distributed in the frontal lobes and the

0:32:26.830 --> 0:32:31.970
<v Speaker 1>parietal lobes. And you need this for rule-based problem solving

0:32:32.290 --> 0:32:35.350
<v Speaker 1>and for making decisions when you've got a particular goal

0:32:35.390 --> 0:32:37.730
<v Speaker 1>in front of you that you're trying to solve. And

0:32:37.750 --> 0:32:42.300
<v Speaker 1>the key is that activity in the executive network is reduced.

0:32:42.340 --> 0:32:46.660
<v Speaker 1>I'll just say it's shut down. while you are dreaming.

0:32:46.980 --> 0:32:49.900
<v Speaker 1>So you're not able to read and write and launch

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>an app on your cell phone screen and so on

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>because that work requires the executive network. And that network

0:32:56.420 --> 0:32:59.660
<v Speaker 1>is off duty for the night. But what is on

0:32:59.780 --> 0:33:04.290
<v Speaker 1>is a network we summarize as the default mode network,

0:33:04.660 --> 0:33:07.690
<v Speaker 1>which is what kindles to life when you shut your

0:33:07.910 --> 0:33:11.490
<v Speaker 1>eyes and you're not involved in gathering information and acting

0:33:11.570 --> 0:33:15.110
<v Speaker 1>on some other tasks. So this is called the default

0:33:15.190 --> 0:33:20.390
<v Speaker 1>mode network. But many scientists are renaming this the imagination

0:33:20.450 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>network because this is what lets your storehouse of experiences fly.

0:33:26.170 --> 0:33:29.300
<v Speaker 1>You can piece ideas together and come up with new

0:33:29.660 --> 0:33:34.060
<v Speaker 1>hypotheses and thoughts. And this is what's firing on all

0:33:34.260 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>cylinders when you dream. So the executive network is reduced,

0:33:39.180 --> 0:33:42.690
<v Speaker 1>the imagination network is enhanced, and this is what gives

0:33:42.830 --> 0:33:47.530
<v Speaker 1>dreams their very untethered character. There are other clues you

0:33:47.570 --> 0:33:51.650
<v Speaker 1>can also gather from looking at detailed dream reports, which

0:33:51.690 --> 0:33:55.470
<v Speaker 1>is that sometimes objects will turn into other objects, but

0:33:55.510 --> 0:33:58.790
<v Speaker 1>they're always related in some way. What I mean is

0:33:58.810 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you might have your bicycle turn into a motorcycle or

0:34:02.900 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>your small house becomes a mansion or the cafeteria becomes

0:34:07.940 --> 0:34:11.779
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant or the hammer becomes a screwdriver, but you

0:34:11.900 --> 0:34:16.140
<v Speaker 1>don't find the bicycle turning into a restaurant or your

0:34:16.219 --> 0:34:20.089
<v Speaker 1>house turning into a hammer. What does that tell us? Well,

0:34:20.230 --> 0:34:23.250
<v Speaker 1>under the hood, we have what are known as semantic

0:34:23.450 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>maps and more than associations, which I mentioned before, semantic

0:34:28.620 --> 0:34:31.060
<v Speaker 1>maps refer to the way that all the stuff in

0:34:31.100 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>your brain is laid out in terms of relationships between concepts.

0:34:35.780 --> 0:34:39.500
<v Speaker 1>For example, in your semantic map, you have the concept

0:34:39.580 --> 0:34:43.910
<v Speaker 1>of an animal, which might include categories like mammals and

0:34:43.930 --> 0:34:46.750
<v Speaker 1>birds and reptiles and so on. And within one of

0:34:46.790 --> 0:34:50.610
<v Speaker 1>those categories, you might have more specific concepts like dog

0:34:50.650 --> 0:34:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and cat and eagle and salmon and snake and frog

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and so on. Things are laid out in your brain

0:34:56.100 --> 0:34:59.700
<v Speaker 1>based on their conceptual meaning. And what we find is

0:34:59.739 --> 0:35:04.020
<v Speaker 1>that dreams follow the semantic maps. In other words, they

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:08.020
<v Speaker 1>stay local in the little clusters of the maps. So

0:35:08.060 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>this is why you see the bicycle turning into the

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:14.950
<v Speaker 1>motorcycle because they're both forms of transportation, but not into

0:35:15.270 --> 0:35:18.050
<v Speaker 1>the screwdriver, which is a tool and in a totally

0:35:18.070 --> 0:35:22.930
<v Speaker 1>different category. These things live in different little neighborhoods of

0:35:23.010 --> 0:35:27.030
<v Speaker 1>the semantic map. So again, a careful look at dream

0:35:27.070 --> 0:35:30.770
<v Speaker 1>reports tells us important clues about what is going on

0:35:31.010 --> 0:35:33.650
<v Speaker 1>under the hood. And that tells us that while the

0:35:33.770 --> 0:35:37.770
<v Speaker 1>themes are universal, strife and falling and attempting to do

0:35:37.790 --> 0:35:41.210
<v Speaker 1>something over and over, the details are filled in with

0:35:41.250 --> 0:35:45.310
<v Speaker 1>the specifics of your semantic maps. And this all brings

0:35:45.350 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>me back around to a question I had since I

0:35:47.890 --> 0:35:52.260
<v Speaker 1>was a kid about whether dreams are experienced in black

0:35:52.300 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and white or in color. Now, when I was a child,

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.819
<v Speaker 1>I remember at some point that my parents told me

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:01.370
<v Speaker 1>that we dream in black and white. And I was

0:36:01.430 --> 0:36:03.900
<v Speaker 1>confused by this because I didn't seem to dream in

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:06.379
<v Speaker 1>black and white. As far as I could tell, my

0:36:06.500 --> 0:36:09.140
<v Speaker 1>dreams were in color. So I thought I must be

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:13.740
<v Speaker 1>somehow assessing that incorrectly because they were both very smart

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.969
<v Speaker 1>and educated. My mother was a biology teacher. My father

0:36:16.989 --> 0:36:19.950
<v Speaker 1>was a medical doctor. And as I grew older, I

0:36:20.010 --> 0:36:22.710
<v Speaker 1>asked my friends about this, but I couldn't find anyone

0:36:22.750 --> 0:36:26.270
<v Speaker 1>who thought that their dreams were not in color. Now,

0:36:26.340 --> 0:36:29.219
<v Speaker 1>because I genuinely knew that my parents were brilliant, I

0:36:29.260 --> 0:36:32.700
<v Speaker 1>thought maybe there was something they knew that I didn't,

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 1>like maybe we were dreaming in black and white but

0:36:35.380 --> 0:36:39.210
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize it. And then I found several large-scale surveys

0:36:39.290 --> 0:36:43.010
<v Speaker 1>that reported what my parents had said, that most people

0:36:43.090 --> 0:36:46.010
<v Speaker 1>dream in black and white. One study was from 1958,

0:36:46.010 --> 0:36:49.620
<v Speaker 1>and they said only 9% of people dream in color.

0:36:50.140 --> 0:36:54.219
<v Speaker 1>In a paper in 1942 reported that only 10% claimed

0:36:54.500 --> 0:36:57.739
<v Speaker 1>to frequently or very frequently dream in color. And a

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:02.490
<v Speaker 1>report in 1951 had the highest percentage. They said that 29%

0:37:02.489 --> 0:37:05.529
<v Speaker 1>of dreams are in color. But even this didn't make

0:37:05.550 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>things clear what was going on because dream reports from earlier,

0:37:11.030 --> 0:37:16.060
<v Speaker 1>like Freud's reports of dreams in 1900, often had explicit

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:20.130
<v Speaker 1>color descriptions in them. So somehow it seemed to be

0:37:20.750 --> 0:37:25.550
<v Speaker 1>only my parents' generation that dreamed in black and white.

0:37:26.300 --> 0:37:28.340
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out if you run the study now,

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:32.460
<v Speaker 1>almost everyone says they dream in color. As you may

0:37:32.500 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 1>have guessed by now, the hypothesis on this is that

0:37:35.580 --> 0:37:40.299
<v Speaker 1>people were influenced by watching black and white television and

0:37:40.340 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>black and white movies and black and white photographs. And

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:48.779
<v Speaker 1>once the technology changed to color, then so did dreams.

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting a very nice paper by Eric Schwitzgebel on

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:55.140
<v Speaker 1>my site that compiles all these studies through the years.

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and the change in the reports. Again, this demonstrates that

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:02.460
<v Speaker 1>the content of our dreams has to do with the

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.940
<v Speaker 1>experiences that we have. Now I'll tell you an interesting

0:38:06.020 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 1>side note on this. I happen to live in California

0:38:08.540 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and during COVID, everyone in my neighborhood wore masks and

0:38:12.060 --> 0:38:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it was a very weird time. And so we rarely

0:38:14.469 --> 0:38:17.150
<v Speaker 1>saw other human beings for a couple of years without

0:38:17.250 --> 0:38:19.850
<v Speaker 1>everyone being in masks. And one of the things I

0:38:19.890 --> 0:38:23.030
<v Speaker 1>remember from that time was that we would sometimes watch

0:38:23.070 --> 0:38:25.569
<v Speaker 1>a movie on TV. And it was so shocking that

0:38:25.630 --> 0:38:28.130
<v Speaker 1>people in the movie would push their way through a

0:38:28.210 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>dense crowd and sit so close to their friends and

0:38:30.890 --> 0:38:33.900
<v Speaker 1>the people they were talking with. And they were indoors

0:38:33.940 --> 0:38:38.140
<v Speaker 1>with such density. And it became in 2020 so noticeable

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:42.140
<v Speaker 1>and so shocking when we were in the middle of COVID. Interestingly,

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a little hard to remember that now, but I

0:38:44.020 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>remember it well because I was taking careful notes on

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.899
<v Speaker 1>what was going on with my dreams during this time.

0:38:50.020 --> 0:38:54.500
<v Speaker 1>And specifically, since my real life involved the very thinned

0:38:54.580 --> 0:38:57.930
<v Speaker 1>out crowds and everyone in masks, did that show up

0:38:58.010 --> 0:39:02.170
<v Speaker 1>in my dreams? And the answer was no. No. The

0:39:02.210 --> 0:39:04.870
<v Speaker 1>thing that struck me the entire time during lockdown is

0:39:04.890 --> 0:39:08.570
<v Speaker 1>that my dreams were totally normal. In my dreams, I

0:39:08.610 --> 0:39:10.370
<v Speaker 1>was at a big party and there were lots of

0:39:10.450 --> 0:39:13.370
<v Speaker 1>people around and no one ever had masks in my dreams,

0:39:13.910 --> 0:39:16.029
<v Speaker 1>which struck me as weird when I would wake up.

0:39:16.170 --> 0:39:20.950
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't my dreams reflect my daily experience? Now, this

0:39:21.010 --> 0:39:24.109
<v Speaker 1>is just a single person's report, and I didn't think

0:39:24.150 --> 0:39:26.050
<v Speaker 1>to study this carefully at the time by doing a

0:39:26.070 --> 0:39:29.550
<v Speaker 1>big online survey of everyone, but if it's generally true

0:39:29.590 --> 0:39:33.950
<v Speaker 1>that other people were having these very salient daily experiences

0:39:33.989 --> 0:39:37.130
<v Speaker 1>of lockdown and masks, and yet it wasn't appearing in

0:39:37.170 --> 0:39:40.380
<v Speaker 1>their dreams, the only interpretation I can make is that

0:39:40.430 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 1>our dreams reflect pathways that get laid down over our

0:39:45.300 --> 0:39:48.819
<v Speaker 1>youth when we're young. And if that's the case, then

0:39:48.860 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe we could still find some black and white dreaming

0:39:52.980 --> 0:39:56.250
<v Speaker 1>among older people now. In other words, maybe you'd still

0:39:56.290 --> 0:39:59.870
<v Speaker 1>see some of that now, even though those people have

0:39:59.890 --> 0:40:03.450
<v Speaker 1>been watching color television for 60 years now. With all

0:40:03.489 --> 0:40:05.069
<v Speaker 1>the things on my plate, I'm not going to have

0:40:05.130 --> 0:40:07.280
<v Speaker 1>time to pull off that study, but I would love

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:11.060
<v Speaker 1>it if listeners could ask their oldest living relatives, say

0:40:11.100 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a parent or grandparent or great grandparent, how they dream.

0:40:15.700 --> 0:40:19.470
<v Speaker 1>and determine if anyone still dreams in black and white

0:40:19.570 --> 0:40:37.739
<v Speaker 1>and what their age is. Okay, so that story of

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>black and white dreaming correlated with black and white television,

0:40:41.340 --> 0:40:43.460
<v Speaker 1>that seems like a clean story. But there's one thing

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that still bugs me about it. Although television and movies

0:40:47.100 --> 0:40:50.779
<v Speaker 1>were in black and white, obviously the world wasn't. When

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:54.439
<v Speaker 1>my parents walked outside, they saw green trees and blue

0:40:54.500 --> 0:40:57.380
<v Speaker 1>skies and red cardinals and yellow sunflowers and so on.

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:01.529
<v Speaker 1>So why didn't their dreams reflect that? Well, there are

0:41:01.550 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>two things to say here. First, not everyone dreamed in

0:41:04.260 --> 0:41:07.020
<v Speaker 1>black and white. Instead, it was between, let's say, 70

0:41:07.020 --> 0:41:10.510
<v Speaker 1>to 90 percent. So had I been alive in the 1950s,

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:13.020
<v Speaker 1>I would have studied the issue of how many hours

0:41:13.060 --> 0:41:16.860
<v Speaker 1>of television people watched each day and perhaps some measure

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:18.700
<v Speaker 1>of how many black and white movies they saw and

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:21.390
<v Speaker 1>how many newspapers with black and white photos and so on.

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and correlated that to whether or not they had black

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:28.750
<v Speaker 1>and white dreams. Second, I have a totally speculative hypothesis.

0:41:28.790 --> 0:41:30.630
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any evidence for this, but I'm going

0:41:30.650 --> 0:41:33.110
<v Speaker 1>to say it anyway. What if some part of the

0:41:33.150 --> 0:41:38.210
<v Speaker 1>brain knows at least in part that dreams are like

0:41:38.469 --> 0:41:41.270
<v Speaker 1>a fake movie? And in that way, it takes on

0:41:41.330 --> 0:41:45.010
<v Speaker 1>the property of fiction, which in those days was black

0:41:45.050 --> 0:41:47.310
<v Speaker 1>and white. Because note that even when you're in the

0:41:47.430 --> 0:41:50.180
<v Speaker 1>middle of a movie, some part of your brain still

0:41:50.260 --> 0:41:52.739
<v Speaker 1>knows you're watching a movie. And this is why when

0:41:52.780 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the train comes at the camera, you don't actually duck

0:41:55.940 --> 0:41:59.500
<v Speaker 1>and scream. So even though we're compelled by fiction, we

0:41:59.540 --> 0:42:02.940
<v Speaker 1>don't fall for it completely. Could it be that to

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the brain, dreams are more like movies? I don't know

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:10.700
<v Speaker 1>because I missed that era. So the opportunity seems gone

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:13.430
<v Speaker 1>to study that. But I'm wondering if we're going to

0:42:13.469 --> 0:42:18.070
<v Speaker 1>have another shot at studying this question once virtual reality

0:42:18.130 --> 0:42:21.890
<v Speaker 1>becomes ubiquitous and pervasive. And whether a big chunk of

0:42:21.950 --> 0:42:26.310
<v Speaker 1>the population will report dreams that are more like synthesized

0:42:26.390 --> 0:42:30.210
<v Speaker 1>virtual reality worlds than like our daily life. To me,

0:42:30.550 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 1>this would shed light on the mystery of the black

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>and white dreams and the details by which your dreams

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>are determined by your experiences in the world. Now, there's

0:42:42.180 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>still lots of stuff that I think we don't understand.

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>One is why we can have false implanted memories inside

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a dream. This is something I've wondered about for years.

0:42:52.700 --> 0:42:55.410
<v Speaker 1>For example, I had a dream many years ago about

0:42:55.469 --> 0:42:58.790
<v Speaker 1>my brother's wedding. And he was yelling at me and saying,

0:42:59.170 --> 0:43:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe you said that to Jenny and ruined

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:04.540
<v Speaker 1>my wedding. And I felt horrible. I felt as guilty

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:06.739
<v Speaker 1>as I've ever felt. Why did I do that? Why

0:43:06.780 --> 0:43:10.100
<v Speaker 1>was I so insensitive? And then I woke up. As

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:12.109
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, my brother had a lovely wedding that

0:43:12.130 --> 0:43:14.770
<v Speaker 1>went just perfectly. And I, of course, never said anything

0:43:14.810 --> 0:43:18.629
<v Speaker 1>bad to his bride, my lovely sister-in-law, Jenny, ever. There

0:43:18.670 --> 0:43:21.500
<v Speaker 1>was nothing. Never trouble of any sort there. So why

0:43:21.540 --> 0:43:24.500
<v Speaker 1>did I fall for the false memory? Why couldn't I

0:43:24.739 --> 0:43:27.739
<v Speaker 1>access my real memories of the wedding while I was

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:32.069
<v Speaker 1>inside the dream? In other words, the issue is that

0:43:32.190 --> 0:43:35.370
<v Speaker 1>not only did I have a false memory, but also

0:43:35.410 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I had no access to my real memory of the wedding.

0:43:39.510 --> 0:43:42.660
<v Speaker 1>One set of memories was replaced by another. And this

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:45.880
<v Speaker 1>is what freaks me out, not just about dreams, but

0:43:45.940 --> 0:43:51.219
<v Speaker 1>about our sense of reality. We buy whatever our brains

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:54.569
<v Speaker 1>serve up to us at every moment. We buy the

0:43:54.650 --> 0:43:58.069
<v Speaker 1>plot of a dream completely. And by the way, this

0:43:58.130 --> 0:44:01.950
<v Speaker 1>is one interpretation of what happens in schizophrenia. The way

0:44:01.989 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>psychiatrists used to describe this about a century ago is

0:44:06.180 --> 0:44:10.740
<v Speaker 1>that psychosis is is essentially an intrusion of the dream

0:44:10.820 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>state into the waking state. So the next time you

0:44:14.620 --> 0:44:17.340
<v Speaker 1>see a man talking to himself on the street and

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:20.140
<v Speaker 1>having an argument with someone who is not there in

0:44:20.260 --> 0:44:24.210
<v Speaker 1>front of him, interpret it through this lens that he

0:44:24.270 --> 0:44:28.430
<v Speaker 1>is having an awake dream, and you might understand what's

0:44:28.489 --> 0:44:31.590
<v Speaker 1>happening in a fresh way. So what we see here

0:44:31.700 --> 0:44:33.900
<v Speaker 1>and what we've seen in many of these episodes is

0:44:33.940 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that we accept whatever reality is served up to us.

0:44:38.100 --> 0:44:40.420
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I think this is why literature

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:44.670
<v Speaker 1>works with our species, because we can so easily adopt

0:44:44.850 --> 0:44:47.969
<v Speaker 1>a different reality. We can read a book and we

0:44:48.190 --> 0:44:53.430
<v Speaker 1>laugh and we weep. We are effortlessly deluded. And to

0:44:53.530 --> 0:44:57.020
<v Speaker 1>understand this, I think we shouldn't use the term suspension

0:44:57.060 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 1>of disbelief. It's the wrong term because it implies that

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:06.359
<v Speaker 1>disbelief is the standard. Disbelief is the normal operating mode.

0:45:06.420 --> 0:45:09.340
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it might be just the opposite. Our brains

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:14.750
<v Speaker 1>are perfectly willing to accept whatever they are fed. Now,

0:45:14.890 --> 0:45:17.170
<v Speaker 1>I want to hit one more question in today's episode,

0:45:17.210 --> 0:45:21.390
<v Speaker 1>which is where is dreaming headed? Would it be possible

0:45:21.790 --> 0:45:26.890
<v Speaker 1>to read out the content of somebody's dreams? Well, if

0:45:26.910 --> 0:45:29.950
<v Speaker 1>you happen to have heard my episode number 27, you'll

0:45:29.969 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 1>know that the answer is already yes, at least to

0:45:33.260 --> 0:45:36.700
<v Speaker 1>some degree. different research groups have been working since at

0:45:36.739 --> 0:45:40.049
<v Speaker 1>least 2011 to see if they can measure brain activity

0:45:40.090 --> 0:45:43.950
<v Speaker 1>in the visual cortex to assess what somebody is seeing

0:45:44.090 --> 0:45:46.489
<v Speaker 1>in front of their eyes. In other words, if you're

0:45:46.530 --> 0:45:49.900
<v Speaker 1>looking at a building, there's a different activity in your

0:45:49.940 --> 0:45:52.830
<v Speaker 1>visual cortex than if you're looking at a, puppy or

0:45:52.850 --> 0:45:54.830
<v Speaker 1>a cup of coffee and so on. And so the

0:45:54.870 --> 0:45:58.170
<v Speaker 1>research question is can you tell what a person is

0:45:58.210 --> 0:46:01.340
<v Speaker 1>seeing just by measuring the patterns in their visual cortex?

0:46:01.420 --> 0:46:04.020
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is that you can pretty well tell

0:46:04.380 --> 0:46:07.799
<v Speaker 1>what somebody is seeing this way. After that research came out,

0:46:08.340 --> 0:46:12.660
<v Speaker 1>people realized we might be able to measure dreams because

0:46:12.739 --> 0:46:16.819
<v Speaker 1>dreams are activity in the primary visual cortex. Dreams are

0:46:16.900 --> 0:46:22.060
<v Speaker 1>experienced as visual because it's activity in the visual cortex,

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:26.980
<v Speaker 1>and your brain understands that as visual experience. So, Yukiyasu

0:46:27.020 --> 0:46:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Kamatani and his colleagues published a paper a few years

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:33.219
<v Speaker 1>ago in which he took this same approach. He had

0:46:33.260 --> 0:46:35.509
<v Speaker 1>people look at a bunch of pictures and watch a

0:46:35.510 --> 0:46:37.910
<v Speaker 1>bunch of videos while they were in the brain scanner.

0:46:37.930 --> 0:46:41.870
<v Speaker 1>And then he used machine learning to decode how the

0:46:41.910 --> 0:46:45.709
<v Speaker 1>picture out there corresponds to the activity patterns in the brain.

0:46:46.489 --> 0:46:49.549
<v Speaker 1>And now you let people go to sleep in the

0:46:49.610 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 1>scanner and you measure their visual cortex and you use

0:46:53.739 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the machine learning model to decode what that activity would

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>correspond to. In other words, what they were presumably seeing

0:47:02.380 --> 0:47:05.750
<v Speaker 1>in their dream. And once the machine learning model gives

0:47:05.790 --> 0:47:09.610
<v Speaker 1>an answer, then you can make a little video reconstruction

0:47:09.650 --> 0:47:13.370
<v Speaker 1>of their dream. And you can watch what presumably was

0:47:13.450 --> 0:47:19.290
<v Speaker 1>the experience for the dreamer albeit with very low resolution. Now,

0:47:19.610 --> 0:47:22.930
<v Speaker 1>when you're decoding pictures or videos, it's easier to know

0:47:22.989 --> 0:47:26.890
<v Speaker 1>if you're getting it right. When you're decoding dreaming, it's

0:47:26.950 --> 0:47:29.760
<v Speaker 1>harder to know for sure that you got the right answer.

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:32.819
<v Speaker 1>You have to wake up your participants and say, hey,

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>what do you remember? And then you compare that to

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>what you think you might have decoded. But even with

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:42.610
<v Speaker 1>those caveats, this gives the rough start to a dream

0:47:42.650 --> 0:47:46.410
<v Speaker 1>decoder that could tell you what you were dreaming about.

0:47:46.810 --> 0:47:50.390
<v Speaker 1>And presumably this will only become higher resolution with time.

0:47:50.870 --> 0:47:53.509
<v Speaker 1>So it may be that in the future, we are

0:47:53.590 --> 0:47:57.109
<v Speaker 1>able to know what you dreamed, even if you can't

0:47:57.150 --> 0:48:01.899
<v Speaker 1>remember it. You could keep a digitized dream diary that way,

0:48:02.440 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 1>or you could share your dreams with a girlfriend or boyfriend. Or,

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:10.399
<v Speaker 1>less likely, a dream could be used in a court

0:48:10.420 --> 0:48:13.410
<v Speaker 1>of law someday. Who knows where this will all go,

0:48:13.469 --> 0:48:16.489
<v Speaker 1>but we can imagine that in 200 years from now,

0:48:16.910 --> 0:48:20.670
<v Speaker 1>dreams may be a very different sort of thing than

0:48:20.710 --> 0:48:25.290
<v Speaker 1>the entirely private experience that we enjoy now. So let's

0:48:25.350 --> 0:48:28.420
<v Speaker 1>wrap up. To my mind, the biggest issue that freaks

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:31.820
<v Speaker 1>me out about dreams is this issue that we believe

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 1>patently impossible situations and we accept false memories, even when

0:48:37.580 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>they contradict events that we know to be true in

0:48:40.660 --> 0:48:44.250
<v Speaker 1>waking life. This represents a deeper question about why we

0:48:44.270 --> 0:48:48.910
<v Speaker 1>can be so easily fooled. But many other questions about

0:48:48.969 --> 0:48:51.950
<v Speaker 1>dreams can be answered in the meantime. We're in a

0:48:52.050 --> 0:48:56.120
<v Speaker 1>moment of using the tools of neuroscience to tie specific

0:48:56.180 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 1>details of the biology to the experience of dreaming. We

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:02.340
<v Speaker 1>still have a long way to go. But some promising

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:06.569
<v Speaker 1>leads can come from the way that dream content changes

0:49:06.640 --> 0:49:10.370
<v Speaker 1>with drugs, for example. Dreams can be made more vivid

0:49:10.410 --> 0:49:13.730
<v Speaker 1>and frightening by drugs that affect the dopamine system or

0:49:14.050 --> 0:49:19.050
<v Speaker 1>by alkaloids. Antidepressants tend to reduce the amount of dream sleep.

0:49:19.570 --> 0:49:25.180
<v Speaker 1>Medication to reduce epileptic seizures. also seem to reduce nightmares.

0:49:25.540 --> 0:49:28.739
<v Speaker 1>So we can imagine in the near future having systematic

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:32.430
<v Speaker 1>studies to work out the effects of different drugs on

0:49:32.489 --> 0:49:36.290
<v Speaker 1>dream content and to do this in conjunction with brain imaging.

0:49:36.650 --> 0:49:39.350
<v Speaker 1>And we might be able to further nail down the

0:49:39.390 --> 0:49:45.340
<v Speaker 1>relationships between dream content and specific bits of the dream

0:49:45.400 --> 0:49:49.109
<v Speaker 1>generation network. And beyond drugs, we can also look to

0:49:49.489 --> 0:49:54.290
<v Speaker 1>disease because specific problems lead to the loss or impairment

0:49:54.330 --> 0:49:59.210
<v Speaker 1>of dreaming. People can lose dreaming with injuries to the

0:49:59.250 --> 0:50:03.370
<v Speaker 1>inferior parietal lobe on either side. Patients with certain forms

0:50:03.410 --> 0:50:09.149
<v Speaker 1>of dementia report bland dreams involving less aggression and less

0:50:09.210 --> 0:50:13.890
<v Speaker 1>narrative complexity and less emotional content. So by looking at

0:50:14.070 --> 0:50:18.469
<v Speaker 1>changes to the brain and corresponding changes in dreaming, we

0:50:18.510 --> 0:50:22.109
<v Speaker 1>can better map out the landscape of what is involved.

0:50:22.530 --> 0:50:28.130
<v Speaker 1>And fundamentally, studying dreaming may help us to comprehend consciousness. Why?

0:50:28.530 --> 0:50:32.660
<v Speaker 1>Because there are so many similarities between REM sleep and

0:50:32.700 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the awake conscious state. Now, there are major differences as well.

0:50:37.140 --> 0:50:39.780
<v Speaker 1>But it's important to note that we find both waking

0:50:39.840 --> 0:50:43.989
<v Speaker 1>life and dreaming equally compelling and believable. which tells us

0:50:44.030 --> 0:50:46.330
<v Speaker 1>that all you need to do is strike the right

0:50:46.489 --> 0:50:50.250
<v Speaker 1>notes on the neural piano and you have your totally

0:50:50.390 --> 0:50:54.670
<v Speaker 1>believable experience. But what would be cool is if there

0:50:54.690 --> 0:50:58.790
<v Speaker 1>were something like consciousness during a dream state that was

0:50:58.850 --> 0:51:04.770
<v Speaker 1>even closer to our daily normal conscious experience. And that's

0:51:05.090 --> 0:51:07.250
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to talk about next week. We're going

0:51:07.270 --> 0:51:11.710
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the very rare circumstance when you are

0:51:11.850 --> 0:51:15.609
<v Speaker 1>dreaming And you realize that you are dreaming and you

0:51:15.670 --> 0:51:20.879
<v Speaker 1>take control of your dream and become an active director

0:51:20.989 --> 0:51:25.899
<v Speaker 1>of the plot. You are essentially conscious, but living inside

0:51:25.980 --> 0:51:29.239
<v Speaker 1>the walls of your skull. So join me next week

0:51:29.640 --> 0:51:33.379
<v Speaker 1>as we sail into the very strange and amazing territory

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:41.379
<v Speaker 1>of lucid dreaming. Go to Eagleman.com slash podcast for more

0:51:41.390 --> 0:51:45.420
<v Speaker 1>information and to find further reading. Send me an email

0:51:45.660 --> 0:51:49.799
<v Speaker 1>at podcast at Eagleman.com with questions or discussion. And check

0:51:49.860 --> 0:51:53.520
<v Speaker 1>out and subscribe to Inner Cosmos on YouTube for videos

0:51:53.540 --> 0:51:56.870
<v Speaker 1>of each episode and to leave comments. Until next time,

0:51:56.890 --> 0:52:08.620
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Eagleman, and this is Inner Cosmos. Thank you.