WEBVTT - Fannie, Freddie $30 Billion IPO Being Weighed for This Year

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg business

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Week Daily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>stay ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>shaping today's complex economy, plus global business, finance and tech

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you checked out shares a Fannie

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>May and Freddie mac.

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean just say, soaring, soaring off the charts.

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 4>It's incredible too, and just given the where they've come

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.319
<v Speaker 4>and gone and being in that consumership since the height

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 4>of the global financial crisis.

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a really good point.

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 2>And it feels like we need a little bit of

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 2>a history lesson the news that's got the movie, We've got.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>We've got Fanny May. It's up about twenty percent. I'm

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>looking at Freddie Mack up about twenty two percent. And

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 2>this is after the administration is said to be preparing

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 2>to sell shares in an offering that could start as

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 2>early as this year. Again according to that senior administration

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 2>official with the latest on that, and kind of as

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I said, A history lesson blue Er TV and Radio,

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 2>International Economics and Policy correspondent Michael.

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 5>M bringing the old guys for thea.

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 3>The old guy.

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Like a fine line, Mike, you just get better and better.

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 2>But no, like there is history behind these two in

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 2>a big way.

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 6>Especially you look at Fanny May was chartered in nineteen

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 6>thirty eight. It's been around for a long time. Freddy

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 6>Mack came along in nineteen seventy. Stepping back for just

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 6>a second, here's what they do. They basically buy mortgages

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 6>from banks and mortgage lenders and package them into securities

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 6>and sell them to investors. And that way the banks

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 6>have more space on their balance sheets to make loans.

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 6>And because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mack have sold these

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 6>off to investors who are anxious to get the yield

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 6>on them, they can predict essentially what they're mortgage costs

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 6>are going to be, and so they can keep mortgage

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 6>rates generally fairly stable. Along the way, from the time

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 6>Fanny May was created, they created the thirty year mortgage,

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 6>which is we're the only country that has something like that.

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 6>But then of course they bought a lot of really

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 6>bad mortgages and the run up to the Great Financial

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 6>Crisis and basically went bankrupt and the government had to

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 6>bail them out, and they did and have put them

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 6>into conservatorship is what they did. But the way they

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 6>did it was they still left shares outstanding, and so

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 6>a lot of people who a lot of hedge funds

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 6>got into the business of buying up Fanny and Freddy

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 6>shares at pennies on the dollar and have been sitting

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 6>on them for seventeen years now. And the Biden administration

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 6>and the Obama administration had no desire to bring them

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 6>out of conservatorship. But the Trump administration seems bound and

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 6>determined to do that. They've been talking about it since

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 6>he came back to office. It's complicated, it will be difficult.

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 6>But boy, if you were Bill Ackman or John Paulson

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 6>pretty happy today, you're pretty happy today.

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Trump also met with the CEOs of Bank of America

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 4>City Group earlier this week, and then last week Bloomberg

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 4>News had a reported that he met with Jamie Diamond

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 4>and David Salman over at Goldman Sachs Group. So I'm

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 4>wondering how difficult will it be to pull off a

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 4>potential feet here when we're talking about an IPO.

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's not so much the selling the shares, although

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 6>it has to be designed in a sort of specific way,

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 6>because the government owns eighty percent of the shares right now.

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 6>And one of the big questions is are you going

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 6>to put the companies into receivership and basically bankrupt all

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 6>the existing shareholders, which is what you normally do with

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 6>a company that's going to come out of bankruptcy, or

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 6>do you leave them with equity in the new company

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 6>and then they make a huge profit. But the biggest

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 6>problem is that because they have been owned by the government,

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 6>and before that there was an implicit guarantee by the government,

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 6>rates were low. You didn't demand an extra premium because

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 6>you knew that they were insured and they were gonna

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 6>get paid. You were going to get paid either way

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 6>because the government would step in. And so if the

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 6>government steps out and lets this be a private company,

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 6>then maybe mortgage rates are going to go up, and

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 6>things like the mortgage rate lock when you lock in

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 6>a mortgage that could go away. So there are a

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 6>lot of questions about how this would be handled, and

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 6>that's one of the reasons it's very complex. Jesse we're

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 6>talking about the bank's meeting with the president. They're looking

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 6>apparently for a lead underwriter. Now, this is going to

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 6>be a huge sale, so they would, I'm sure, have

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 6>a consort, but somebody's got to be the lead, and

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 6>you know, not pauls and act and are going to make.

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Mike I feel like so many things this year we

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 2>are saying are complicated. But I do wonder that it

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 2>would be a very different entity. Both of them would

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 2>be different entities if they are publicly held and it's

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 2>not that quasi public private that we've seen.

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and nobody quite knows how this will play out

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 6>because you you would worry that rates will go up

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 6>if they don't have a government guarantee. But does the

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 6>government want to stay in the guarantee business if it's

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 6>a private company and we're basically subsidizing their low rates

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 6>and their profits. So it's a tough call the administration.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 6>This administration is very much a free market, you know,

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 6>get the government out of business stuff. So they're in

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 6>favor of this, as are some of Donald Trump's biggest

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 6>campaign downers. But it's not going to be easy to

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 6>put it all together, and a lot of people in

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 6>the mortgage industries have been concerned about it. I don't

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 6>wan say they're worried, but they are concerned because, as

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 6>they know, it's a complex issue.

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Complex and so not a given that this ultimately plays out.

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Mike McKee, thank you, thank you, and not all just smart.

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 3>That's what we love to have them on.

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, we're going to continue on the geopolitical because

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 2>it really seems to be a major theme when we

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 2>look at what's going on today.

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now is Wendy.

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Cutler, vice president of Asia Society Policy Institute. She joins

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 2>us from San Diego. Wendy, is so good to have

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 2>you here. We just did kind of a rundown from

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 2>our genda LOOI in terms of all the stuff that

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 2>is going on. You know, I want that whiteboard US, China, India,

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Russia around. Talk to us a little bit about the

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 2>news coming out of the news flow, about geopolitics and

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.040
<v Speaker 2>the US role and what they're trying to do. So,

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe we start with Russia because it is curious whether

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 2>or not something will ultimately get done to end this war,

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 2>because it does seem like President Putin is going to

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 2>stand pretty pat when it comes to his demands.

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Look, it's unclear how this is all going to.

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 8>Develop, but it's clear that the President is very determined

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:26.119
<v Speaker 8>to use his office to try and broker a cease fire.

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 8>What I'm watching on the trade front, however, is how

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 8>this may impact our relations with India right now, because

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 8>we are in a twenty one day period where the

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 8>President has threatened to increase India's tariffs by an additional

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 8>twenty five percent, taking them to fifty percent, due to

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 8>their purchases of Russian oil. But perhaps if indeed there's

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 8>some progress made with Russia that will provide an opening

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 8>to remove this threat and impending terrif hike.

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 4>Talk to us more about this would mean for say

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 4>India's relationship with Russia, or maybe even China's relationship when

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 4>it comes to Russia as well.

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so for India in particular. Look, we've spent twenty

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 8>odd years trying to strengthen our relations with India. The

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 8>past two weeks. The relationship has been spiraling downward and

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 8>it's going to be hard to rebuild. And I think

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 8>in many respects India is going to gravitate, you know,

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 8>not in a major way, but gradually more towards China

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 8>and Russia, viewing US as an unreliable partner.

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 3>So that's what I want to ask you.

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I like to remind or have someone remind

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 2>us about why it is so important that the US

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 2>continue to have positive relations in a positive relationship with India.

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Remind us about that and what be at risk if

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 2>India is much more aligned.

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 3>With China rather than the United States.

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 8>Well, we have looked to India as the counterweight to China,

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 8>both on the strategic front but also on the economic front.

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 8>On the economic front, we have been encouraging our companies to,

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 8>you know, to leave China, and one of the destinations

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 8>they've been gravitating towards is India. So many US companies

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 8>now are expanding their operations in India. And you know,

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 8>if relations start going south, this is all kind of

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 8>you know, throws things up in the air. And the

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 8>last thing the US business community needs right now is

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 8>more uncertainty. There's enough uncertainty with all of these tariff

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 8>announcements coming out on a daily basis.

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 4>Do you think there's been long term damage with that

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 4>bilateral relationship?

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely?

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 8>Again, you know, you could you spend years and years

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 8>building a relationship, building trust, but it can take just

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 8>a matter of hours or days.

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 3>To to break.

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 8>That trust and so rebuilding it is not going to

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 8>happen in a matter of hours or days. And we're

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 8>not just seeing this with India. I'm just back from

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 8>Japan and I'm kind of hearing the same thing that

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 8>you know, the Japanese have been a very strong ally

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 8>or looking at the past couple of months and how

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 8>they've been, in their view, kind of jerked around in

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 8>these trade negotiations and are also talking about like developing

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 8>some kind of Plan B where they become less reliant

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 8>on the United States. So this is long term implications

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 8>and again hard to rebuild trust, you know, in a

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 8>short period of time.

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 2>You know what has happened here because when the President

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 2>came back to the White House earlier this year, he

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 2>did look set to build upon kind of the warm

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 2>ties he had with Prime Minister Mody during his first term.

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 2>He had called the relationship the best it's ever been

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 2>between two leaders of the two countries, and the Prime

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Minister called President Trump my dear friend. Is this just

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, gamesmanship. I try to kind of understand,

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 2>and you know, what we hear, what we see sometimes

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 2>and then what's you know, a new set of headlines

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 2>that show something very different. So should we take this

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 2>at face value that the relationship really is breaking down

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 2>or is it just the negotiating process between leaders of

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 2>two really important countries.

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, a few.

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 8>Weeks ago everyone was saying we were on the verge

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 8>of an early trade deal with India, and there was

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 8>a lot of optimism about that, and somehow the trade

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 8>deal got derailed. It could be that the US was

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 8>asking for more but a combination of India couldn't make

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 8>those couldn't meet our last few requests, particularly in the

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 8>agriculture sector, which is very sensitive for them. But I

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 8>don't think that's the whole picture. Obviously something happened that

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 8>made the President extremely frustrated. Maybe he got the numbers

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 8>of how much oil India continues to buy from Russia

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 8>and that you know, somehow rubbed him wrong way. But again,

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 8>the words he's been using towards India. I don't think

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 8>this is something that you just turn around overnight. It's

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 8>pretty deep right now, and if you talk to the

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 8>Indian officials or the Indian public, I think that there

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 8>is a lot of deep seated anger and frankly, you know,

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 8>they don't really understand how this spiral down so quickly either.

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 4>What are your eyes on next? When it comes to

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 4>a timetable, I know August twelfth, that's that deadline for

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 4>the decision on Chinese tariffs coming up soon.

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 8>Exactly next Tuesday is key, I would I'm counting on

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 8>that we will roll over the tariff truce that we

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 8>achieved with China ninety days ago, and then I think

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 8>we are going to see a continuation of negotiations with

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 8>China to try and see if we can do some

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 8>kind of deal with them in the lead up to

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 8>a possible meeting or visit by the President to China

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.239
<v Speaker 8>around the Korea APEC meeting in late October.

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 2>What I wanted to ask you is just to kind

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 2>of wrap up here, Wendy, and again devils in the details.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 2>We'll see what ultimately happens and whether or not they

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 2>come back to the table and they become friends again.

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 2>But I guess if there is a broken relationship, which

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 2>is how it seems right now, and that lasts longer term,

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.479
<v Speaker 2>what's the cost to the United States with India.

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yeah, look, the cost is, you know, we we

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 8>have damaged a relationship with an extremely important partner that

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 8>is only becoming more important on the global stage, and

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 8>particularly at a time when we want to diversify away

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 8>from China.

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 3>This does present serious concerns. How much is China watching

0:13:59.080 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 3>this in your view?

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 8>Oh, very very closely, And I would expect that China

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 8>is going to make overtures to India right now in

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 8>an effort to bring India more in their camp. Now

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 8>let's form Let's keep in mind though China India relations

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 8>historically have never been good, and so I don't expect

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 8>India to move to the China camp. But again, I

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 8>think they're going to hedge their bets and view the

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 8>US as less reliable and gravitate both towards Russia and China.

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Franklin, and even that they could possibly talk, or that

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 2>we're even talking about them possibly talking, is just shows

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 2>that things could possibly be shifting.

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Wendy so Glad we could get.

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Some time with you on this Friday, a very very

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 2>busy friday, certainly when it comes to geopolitics. Wendy Cutler

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 2>back with us. She is vice president of Asia Society

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Policy Institute.

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Joining us from San Diego. Wendy, thank you again.

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting at two pm ST on Applecarplay and

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>station Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 2>We're going to go back to geopolitics, although this really

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 2>plays into geopolitics as well. We're going to get to

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Israel saying it will take control of Gaza City. It's

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 2>a move that could displace one million Palestinians leaving there.

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to the latest on what we are seeing,

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 2>what we are hearing. Bloomberg News Jerusalem journalist Dan Williams

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 2>is in Jerusalem. So Dan, what are you hearing about

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 2>new moves to take control of Gaza? What are you

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 2>seeing in and around?

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 7>Also right now, it's declarative, as you will have read

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 7>on Bloomberg and elsewhere the Israeli security Cabinet that's really

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 7>the top decision making form of the country, the war Cabinet,

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 7>if you like, decided, after a night long debate ten

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 7>hours behind closed doors a four am resolution that they

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 7>would order the storming of Gaza City as part of

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 7>Israel's efforts to end this war with what it would

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 7>define as a victory against Hamas. Now, Gaza City is

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 7>part of the twenty five percent of the Gaza Strip

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 7>yet to be overrun by Israeli tanks and troops, yet

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 7>to be under full control of the Israeli army, and

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 7>moving against it would be a long process, weeks or

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 7>months in the making. It would involve the evacuation, the

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 7>forcible evacuation potentially hundreds of thousand civilians, and then presumably

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 7>laying siege to the Hamas holdouts who are there in

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 7>the thousands. We're told of Hamas fighters, and also potentially

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 7>hostages which they're holding. It's worth remembering Hamas still has

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 7>fifty hostages, most of them from the October seventh attack

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 7>in twenty twenty three that sparked this war. Twenty of

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 7>them are believed to be alive. Previously, these ralies avoided

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 7>entering these areas of the Gaza Strip for fear of

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 7>endangering those hostages. It appears now the gloves are off.

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 7>But with that said, this will not happen immediately on

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 7>the ground. It will require apparently a doubling of these

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 7>RAREI forces deployed that will take potentially a week or

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 7>two to muster in terms of reinforcements, call ups of reservists,

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 7>and that does actually leave a window for Hamas to

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 7>think again about whether its tack in negotiated efforts to

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 7>achieve a ceasefire, perhaps negotiated enter this war needs to change.

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 5>So we will see.

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 7>There are indications that Hamas is sending out feelers that

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 7>it wants to renegotiate or review those negotiations. So until

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 7>we see the tanks and troops moving, all bets are off.

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Hey Dan, how's that Trump administration responded?

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 7>The Trump administration has been openly, openly supportive. We interview

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 7>the US ambassador to Israel just a few days ago,

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 7>and the ambassador made clear that Trump, as he put it,

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 7>is fed up. He actually said, has run out of

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 7>patients with Hamas. With Hamas stonewalling, as Israel and the

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 7>US have described it, in those negotiations, and the US

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 7>wants to see Israel end this war. Now, for the

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 7>Nittanel government in Israel, ending the war means winning it

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 7>through force and the absence of negotiations. However, many Israelis,

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 7>to judge by Poles, would prefer to see this will

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 7>ended by a review of Israel's objectives, basically abandoning the

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 7>objective destroying mass of returning all those hostages in a

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 7>negotiated deal that would keep Amass in power. And basically

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 7>what we have now is a government that's out of

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 7>sync with its people, to judge by the polls, but

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 7>insists that this is what the country needs to guarantee

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 7>its long term security.

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Is it also a government that's out of sync with

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the region and I just think about that, and also

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 2>out of sync with the Abraham Accords right, which we

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 2>know set a series of diplomatic agreements normalizing relations between

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 2>Israel and several Arab nations broken by the US the first.

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration the first term.

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 2>So are they out of touch to with their partners

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 2>and other Arab nations in terms of what they want

0:18:58.160 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 2>to see done with Gaza?

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 7>Well, to judge by open statements, absolutely the Palestinian civilian

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 7>suffering in the Gaza strip has become intolerable to many viewers,

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 7>certainly in this part of the world, where it's become

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 7>especially combustible in terms of public opinion. However, oftentimes what's

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 7>said behind the scenes isn't the same and it's the

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 7>same as what's said in public. I'd remind you that

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 7>some ten twelve years ago, WikiLeaks revealed that what was

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 7>being said between US aligned Arab powers and Israel behind

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.239
<v Speaker 7>the scenes to US diplomats was very different to what

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 7>was being said in public. In public, there was talk

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 7>of Palestinians behind the scenes, behind closed doors, the real

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 7>focus of the discussions was Iran. It's also worth remembering that,

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 7>to most assessments, Hamas triggered this war in part because

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 7>it wanted to scuttle those Abram accords Israel and Saudi

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 7>Arabia on the verge of establishing a peace deal. So

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 7>there is that worth remembering. I think everyone would like

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 7>to put this in their rearview mirror. The argument of

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 7>the Hawks in this equation is that the best way

0:19:59.880 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 7>to do that is to defeat ha mass militarily, even

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 7>if that requires weeks or a few months of intense

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 7>pain all around in the very near future.

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, sometimes we forget, you know, war. But as

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 2>you said, there are still hostages Israelis who are held

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 2>hostages hostage by Hamas. There's also Palestinians who don't have

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 2>any homes anymore.

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, where are the residents of Gaza City supposed

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 3>to go?

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 7>They will be evacuated, to judge by the previous course

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 7>of action taken by the Israelis, over several rounds of

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 7>these moves into population centers. They'll be evacuated to an

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 7>air called Al Muwassi that's on the southwestern coast of

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 7>the Gaza Strip. It's a large area of sand dudes

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 7>where the Israelis are convinced Hamas was not able to

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 7>establish bunkers underground tunnel systems and therefore there's no direct

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 7>military threat to concentrating people there. Effectively a very large

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 7>tense city at DP camp if you like. Conditions there

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 7>are not easy at all. It's worth remembering that the

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 7>Americans are now saying that they to quadruple in the

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 7>coming two months, and I think in the coming two

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 7>months that's a timeframe that's meant to work in tandem

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 7>with the Israeli the new is raeally move against Garza City.

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 7>They intend to quadruple the GHF, the Gazi Humanitarian Foundation that,

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 7>as you'll be aware, is a substitute a distribution system

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 7>set up by the Americans and the Israelis in hope

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 7>of sidelining UN agencies, the traditional humanitarian network that their

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 7>accused of being too close to Hamas, effectively propping up

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 7>a mass rules going back, rule going back are years.

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:35.679
<v Speaker 7>So if the Americans managed to quadruple that GHF operating volume,

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 7>it will go quite a long way to dealing with

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 7>the immediate needs.

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 5>Of those displaced people.

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 7>But obviously, living indefinitely in a camps, in a camp

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 7>that's composed of tents, knowing your house has been destroyed

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 7>not a pleasant prospect for anyone.

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 4>Dan. What's next and what's the window for her ma

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 4>ask to achieve cease fire?

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 7>A ceasefire talks stalled a month ago, and I think

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 7>these rallies and the Americans have made clear that if

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 7>they resume, the terms would be very different what we

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 7>had previously. And they've already been two ceasefires in this

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 7>war with partial hostage releases by Hamas in exchange for

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 7>prisoner releases by Israel increased to aid. That's no longer

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 7>the case. Those were largely instrumental. A ceasefire now would

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 7>be existential. In fact, rather than referring to them as

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 7>ceasefire talks or hostage talks, they'd actually be harmass talks,

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 7>because what's at the essence of the negotiations now is

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 7>whether Hamas gets to stick around. What it tried to

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 7>do is parley another truce of sixty days that was

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 7>proposed into an Israeli guarantee of an enter the war,

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 7>a full withdrawal of Israeli forces. Israel refused that it

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 7>will not withdraw forces. It will not end the war

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 7>until it's objective of seeing Hamas gone is achieved. Ha

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 7>Mass being gone means a total dismantling of the Hamas

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 7>power structure, a removal of the Hamas arsenal, the exiling

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 7>of Hamas leaders abroad. So what these Raelies in Americans

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 7>have been saying is you want more ceasefire talks, Fine,

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 7>but it's an all or nothing deal now, meaning a

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 7>full return.

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 5>Of all of the hostages.

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 7>There's fifty hostages and a full har Mass capitulation, meaning

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 7>you agree consentually to give up your weapons, to give

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 7>up power, and to leave quietly. It's basically the difference

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 7>between forced out or killed in the course of battle

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 7>or captured and leaving consensually in abandoning power. Kind of

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 7>a stark choice for Hamas. It's worth remembering this is

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 7>a group that's shunned by much of the West as

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 7>a terrorist group, and it's accused, including by the way

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 7>in the Middle East, given a resolution passed by the

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 7>Arab League just last week, of having needlessly started this

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 7>war with a very significant attack on Israeli civilians on

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 7>October seventh, twenty twenty three. I'm not sure there's much

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 7>sympathy for them in the region and beyond. There's certainly

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 7>a sympathy for suffering Palestine in civilians, but I think

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 7>a resolution like that where Hamas to surrender would be

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 7>welcomed all around.

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Thank you so much, Dan, We know it's

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 2>later there in Jerusalem. Thank you so much. Bloomberg News

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Jerusalem journalist Dan Williams.

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>In Jerusalem, you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast.

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Catch us live weekday afternoons from two to five PM Eastern,

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Man, it's been a busy week when it comes to

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 2>earnings Pinterest, Trede Desk, Expedia, Zillow, Lift, uber geor Dash,

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 2>Jose Alingo, Mountain, Spotify, and then the week before we

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 2>had Booking, Amazon Meta in Alphabet. The next guest covers

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 2>all of these companies. He is someone that is a

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 2>must read on Wall Street, closely followed certainly by our

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg community. Mark Mahaney is Senior Managing director and head

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 2>of Internet Research at Evercore ISI from San Francisco. He's

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 2>also the author of Nothing but Net ten, timeless stock

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 2>picking lessons from one of Wall Street's top tech analysts.

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 5>Mark.

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Really great to have you with justin myself.

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 5>How are you, hey, Carol. Nice to hear your voice,

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 5>Nice to see you.

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, same here. I mean, it's been quite a week.

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you just kind of big broad

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 2>macro because it seems like so much of our world

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 2>is being upended, or at least there's some uncertainties, certainly

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to various policies tech companies, sectors overall

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 2>definitely called out by the Trump administration. We've seen apples

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 2>Tim Cook at the White House. We've had the Intel

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 2>CEO just this week being called out in a negative

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 2>way by the President this administration. How do you think

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.239
<v Speaker 2>about it broadly in terms of policies and acts and

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 2>actions that are impacting could impact the technology industry and

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 2>the investment potential.

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 9>Well, shoot, I can think of a lot of different

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 9>answers to that question. I think the facts are this

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 9>is the most activist administration when it comes to business,

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 9>maybe since FDR. I don't know, I'm a history of you,

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 9>I'm a student of US history.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 5>But you're stretching me there.

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 9>But yeah, this is an extraordinarily activist administration. And anyway,

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 9>so I guess that's one. And maybe the most obvious

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 9>factor is tariffs, which are at the end of the day,

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 9>a tax, and so somebody's going to pay that tax,

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 9>and it's either American businesses or it's American consumers. So yeah,

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 9>that's out there. And then yeah, there's a lot of

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 9>pressure or attempts to influence these companies, So that's out

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 9>there too. Look, all of that's part of the backdrop

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 9>that all these CEOs and these executives have to deal

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 9>with they're paid to deal with this, these kind of challenges.

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 9>It's just unusually high, you know, in this administration. The

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 9>backdrop to the tech sector. However, there's some other things

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 9>that are well within their control that are really lifting.

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 9>You know, what's a three year bull market now in

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 9>tech stocks, and that's it's Jenny I and what we're

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 9>seeing in terms of reduced costs and improved processes and

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 9>improve products and solutions and offerings, it's really you know,

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 9>we're going through a major supercycle here when it comes

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 9>to Jenny I. I know it's been over hyped at times,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 9>but there's a lot of reality behind it. And there's

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 9>some companies that have had really good stock price performance

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 9>decisely because they're perceived as JENNII winners.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 4>That's right. And of course, when you're talking about AI

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.719
<v Speaker 4>have to bring up a semiconductor and chip maker's stocks.

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 4>When you think about the juxtaposition between former President Biden's

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 4>types of policies versus Presidents Trump's call just recently for

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 4>one hundred percent tariffs on chips coming into the US,

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 4>will all this make for more robust domestically located semiconductor industry,

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 4>or is that really possible break that down for US.

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 9>I'm not sure I've got a really thoughtful, educated answer

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.719
<v Speaker 9>to that question. You're asking a you're asking whether if

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 9>you want to promote US manufacturing, particularly in what are

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 9>considered to be highly strategic industries, whether it's better to

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 9>use incentives and subsidies. I think that crudely explains the

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 9>Biden administration policy, or whether it's better to use tariffs

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 9>and broadby companies to come back into the US.

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 5>And I'm not sure.

0:27:55.000 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 9>I mean, they're both active government policies into businesses, and

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 9>so I'm not sure. It is just an interesting step up.

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 9>I mean, we had a laissez faire economy. Generally government

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 9>stays out of the way of a business, and you know,

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 9>we've had a lot of what I look, I'm out

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 9>here in tech Land. Most of these companies are out

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 9>here and they've been very successful, run by entrepreneurs.

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 5>They come from different parts of the world.

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 9>They come to California area and other parts of the US,

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 9>and they create these extraordinary businesses and they've.

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 5>Done it on their own.

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 9>I mean, there's always some help there, but they've pretty

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 9>much done it on their own and I think that's

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 9>actually created a really good situation for people in this country.

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 5>I hope we don't I hope we don't spoil that.

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's get to some of the numbers that we

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 2>got this week and certainly the week before. I caught

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 2>some of your calls following the updates Zillo was out

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 2>this week. You raised your price target on it uber

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 2>to you raised your price target on that one to

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 2>one fifty. Door Dash you uped it to three sixty

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 2>the price target. What companies results show to you kind

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 2>of a more interesting investment thesis as a result, either

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 2>this week or last week, when we got some of

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the big major tech names.

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, I like to set up on a question.

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 9>So where I thought we had some just really surprisingly

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 9>constructive positive results.

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 5>I thought door Dash was in that list.

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 9>We had some record high operating margins out of that company.

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 9>Meta was definitely in that list, and most of the

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 9>other names.

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 5>I thought those are kind of two standout companies. Maybe

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 5>Booking dot Com was in that list too.

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 9>The other names, uh, you know, we had some good

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 9>prints out of names like Google. We had some good

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 9>prints out of names like uh, you know, Amazon, But

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:42.479
<v Speaker 9>but but the really strongest, kind of cleanest prints there were,

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 9>there were a few in there, and.

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 5>I would put uh, I'd put booking in.

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 9>There, door dash and yeah, those would probably be at

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 9>the top of the list. And and if you just

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 9>step back, because you've asked you we started off talking

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 9>about some of these macro concerns, and these companies give

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 9>you a very broad read into the economy they do,

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 9>into consumer demand, into some enterprise demand. And if I'd

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 9>use one single word to describe the results of this

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 9>earning season.

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:06.959
<v Speaker 5>It's resilience.

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 9>It's not like we had a positive inflection, though there

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 9>are a few cases where that happened, but generally, the

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 9>overall view is that spend has been relatively resilient and

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 9>it's at a relatively robust level for these companies.

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 5>It's this may change in the back half of the year,

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 5>but so far, so far, so good.

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Mark, You're comfortable with Meta in particular.

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we had some news today too that they

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 2>have selected Pimco on Blue Owl Capital to lead a

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty nine billion dollar financing for their data center expansion

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 2>in rural Louisiana. It's all about the race for AI infrastructure.

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 2>We know that this is according to people familiar that

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 2>major mega spend and the talent grab and what they're

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 2>spending for AI talent meta, you're comfortable with all of it.

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, I guess if they.

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 9>Keep putting up prints that we keep putting up a

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 9>fundamental result like they are doing where they're using AI

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 9>to improve their cost structure but also to improve their products,

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 9>like you're getting an ROAI, you know, return on ROI,

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 9>return on investment ROAI return on all that AI capex

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 9>spend and op x spend. They took their revenue growth

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 9>and they reaccelerated it despite being at the scale that

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 9>they're at, you know, one hundred and fifty billion ROUGHLYET

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 9>revenue run rate. They took they took their revenue growth

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 9>and accelerated to twenty percent.

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 5>They didn't come out of nowhere.

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 9>They were using AI to better target ad campaigns and

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 9>so marketers are getting a better return on their meta

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 9>ad spend and in consumers are finding the service better.

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 9>I mean, the evidence is that they're spending more time

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 9>with META, they're spending more time with Instagram. There's nothing

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 9>more objective than just time spent. So they've been able

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 9>to Meta has been able to use all that AI

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 9>investment to improve their product, to improve their service. And yeah,

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 9>so if you keep doing that, you absolutely you earned

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 9>the right to spend more, to invest more.

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 3>All Right, We've got to run unfortunately.

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, and I really appreciate you going

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 2>macro with us and then also drilling down a little

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 2>bit on some of the companies.

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 3>So appreciate it. Mark Mahaney.

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 2>He's Senior Managing Director, head of Internet Research over at

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Evercore ISI, author of Nothing but Net ten timeless stock

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 2>picking lessons from one of Wall Street's top tech analysts.

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Joining us out there out West.

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal