WEBVTT - Fiction: Reality's Secret Master

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Julie Douglas. And

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>before we get into the podcast, uh, I just want

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to mention real quick we have a new sponsor, UM

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 1>new sponsor Netflix, So pay attention. Uh tune back in

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>later on in the podcast, We're gonna have a special

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>offer related to Netflix. And now for the topic of today, Yeah,

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>this one stems from your recent journey to New York

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>for the World Science Festival two thousand twelve. How was it?

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I like how you say journey like I was in

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a covered wagon. Well, it's kind of a you have

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>to go to Atlanta's airport, so that is a journey

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in and of it so traumatic. It was wonderful. World

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Science Festival two thousand and twelve. UM got to see

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really cool panels and one of them

0:00:55.720 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>was UM the Science of Narrative, and it had a

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people on it UM including Joyce Carol Oates,

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite authors, I mean, uh so it

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>was great to see her talk about the process of

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>writing and UM. Dr Kevin Oatley was another person's psychologist

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>who who talked about several others I don't have. Yeah,

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey eugen needs uh like Eugene and I d e

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>yes at the end if I'm saying that correctly. He's

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>also the author of Virgin Suicide and he read and

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 1>I think the marriage plotted this new one, right, Yes,

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>but he read an incredible um excerpt from Virgin Suicides

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about some of what we'll talk about today,

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>which is how readers are engaged in this world and

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>meant to feel as though they occupy it themselves so

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>much so that they began to um to really feel

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a reality in the text. And it's and what's awesome

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>about that too, is that sometimes the reality is you're

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>immersed in or kind of Nightmark Joyce Carol Oates, for example.

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I recently read her book Zombie, which is kind of

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a fictionalized narrative based on the life of Jeffrey Dahmer.

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>So you have a very disturbed individual who is plotting

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and trying to carry out these murders so that he

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>can create a zombie out of somebody and keep them

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>in his seller as a it's like kind of a

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>sex slave. So it's a very dark tale, but you're

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>so immersed in the narrative you find yourself kind of

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>rooting for the guy. I mean, you're feeling for him

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>because she's a talented writer, and via the narrative experience,

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you kind of become this character and on some level

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 1>you want him to succeed. And it's it can be

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a very weird feeling in some of these It really

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>messes with your mind. And that's really what we're gonna

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about today. We're gonna talk about this idea that

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that fiction we usually think of as separate from ourselves,

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>but the idea is can fiction transform our reality? And

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>we were discussing this earlier that you know, usually you think, okay,

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the truth is stranger than fiction, but sometimes that truth

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is actually inspired by fiction. And um, what I'm thinking

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>about and what we talked about is, uh, this incredibly

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 1>bizarre spate of bath salts that have been in the news.

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>And by the time this airs will probably have a

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>lot more information about this. But uh, if you guys

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard about this, this is actually a designer drug

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that is running a monk. Yeah. Not, it's not actually

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>bath salts, So you don't have to worry about. Oh

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, my grandma has some of those. She's going

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to have, right, She's gonna go have a cawgullan moment

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and then turn into a zombie. No. Uh, what we're

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about here again as a designer drug and the

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>key ingredients UM that go into it or something called

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>m D p V and I won't go way into that.

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Just think of it as a sort of like a

0:03:55.960 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>cross between meth and acid because the nervous him really

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>kicks in to overdrive and then a hallucinogenic state takes hold. Well,

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, math is pretty bad, but but maybe the

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>ideas here maybe if you had acid to it, if

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>he experiences somehow better. So let's talk about what we're

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about. You mentioned the guy eating the other dudes face.

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, I mean basically, I think the scenario was

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>you went out of town for a week and then

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like the zombie holocaust. Almost coincidence, I don't know. Well,

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>we did. We had the incident with in Miami with

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the individual who allegedly on bath salts. UH is running

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>around naked under an overpass. UH strips the homeless man

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and eats most of his face. Off eighteen minutes. Yeah,

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and then the police finally show up and uh, and

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>he like turns around and snarls at them, and they

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>end up shooting him down there in the street. And

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that alone was pretty crazy. And then you had all

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>these other incidents that were showing up, incidents that involve

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:54.119
<v Speaker 1>someone confessing to acts of cannibalism, man Um disemboweling himself

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>and throwing his guts at police officers when they came

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to attend to him, which incidentally reminds me of a

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 1>great scene from the Hong Kong film Story of Ricky

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and which, oh, the Ballad of Rickie Yeah, yeah, and

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>which it's like a prison movie with the most over

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the top violence everyon. There's a scene where an individual

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>um is he gets beat by Ricky because Ricky is

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>like a superman and he has to fight these these

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>other villains inside the prison, and the gore effects are

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>super cheesy but but kind of awesome. Like there's so

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it's so cartoony, you don't really feel the violence at all.

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's a character that Um splits his stomach in

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 1>an act of sepku and then reaches in and grabs

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>his own intestines out and starts strangling Ricky with them,

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it's hilarious, slash gross and also kind of awesome. Yeah,

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>but but it's the kind of thing it's hilarious slash gross.

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>When it's encountered in a cheesy Hong Kong martial arts,

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>perfectly fine there, but when it happens on the evening news,

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it is troubling. Well, and you know that the thread

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>through all of these is that is zombie like behavior,

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>right right, Mindless, flat, cheating behavior, cannot be reasoned with,

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>can only be apparently gunned down on the streets like

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a dog. It's troubling because it's one of those that

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>we we've been laughing about zombies for years now. I

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>mean it's become it's become to the point where we're

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>almost a little sick of it. Well, and it is

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>so much in the culture, right, I mean, The Walking

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Dead is a show that is enormously popular from the

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>graphic novel. Yeah, the CDC had in sort of Jess

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>had Zombie Survival Kit about a year ago. Yeah, because

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>they were raising i think we've mentioned in a past episode,

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>they were raising legitimate concerns about um, about diseases and

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the spread of disease and how to limit them, and

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>how to respond to a situation where there's been sort

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>of an outbreak or pandemic. All important stuff to know,

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and they were just sort of using zombies as a

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>cool launching point to discuss that topic, and so you

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>can kind of understand why the spate of incidents happened.

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And then people start to kind of go, wow, really,

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is it, like the zombie theme is fiction like that

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>so deeply ingrained that is being um acted out in

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>these very particular cases. Yeah, like me, because at first,

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>first people to comment and we're probably, hey, looks like

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the zombie apocalypse is is happening, And then they were like, oh, seriously,

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe it is, and they remind himself, no, that's impossible.

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>But maybe something is going on in our minds where

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the zombie is so ingrained in us

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>from our fiction that it ends up boiling to the

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>surface of our reality. Well, CNN interviewed a former Bath

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Salts user. Granted this is just one person, but Freddy

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Sharp is his name, and he described his own experience

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>with great Bath Salt user name Freddie Sharp. I know

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's got the Freddie from nightmare on Elm Street too, Um,

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Sharp anyway, it's got that sort of image. But anyway,

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Freddie described his experience when he was strapped into a

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>gurney in restrained by a paramedic. He said that when

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>he was hallucinating about being in he was hallucinating about

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>being in a mental hospital and being possessed by Jason

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Vorheis of you know Friday thirteenth. Oh he I figured

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>which one that is. There's a particular Friday thirteenth film

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>where Jason Vorhees does possess people. It's generally not highly

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>thought of in the in the saga, right, but he

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>does have bases uh in cannon for that behavior. Just

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>but it is it's very odd to see that. I mean,

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not on to know that we have this dark

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>side of our psyches and that we have these themes,

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>these horror themes that are couched there. I mean they

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>could be the fairy tales that we read when we

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 1>were little, or it could be you know Oedipus right,

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>um gouging out his own eyes, or Friday thirteenth or zombies. Um.

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I think what's scary is just to see that, you know,

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>some of it is being played out. But we what

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we really want to talk about is is why we

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>have these bits of fiction, these bits of storytelling in

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>our minds. Um, it's so deeply entrenched in our minds,

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>yet how we are actually working in concert with the material. Yeah,

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>because there's the there's one view on everything where you

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is the view that absolutely doesn't hold up

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to the research. But he's still encounter inmplity of people

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>where fiction it's fairy tales, it is for kids, it's

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the it's like it's this bubble of fantasy or this

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>bucket of fantasy that you stick your head into when

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to deal with everything else. Just pure escapism,

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>no connection to real issues, reality or anything. I've spoken

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to at least one friend of mine about the topic

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>where he has to actually defend reading fiction to his father,

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>who's who's who's totally into the nonfiction and you know,

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>philosophical historical work, so what have you, And he has

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to actually defend fiction is a worthwhile thing to read.

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>And I imagine that that's that's the sort of mindset

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>he's coming from. The father in this case, is that

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>fantasy and fiction is something that exists outside of the

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>norm and is completely detached. But as we'll see in

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>this episode, and as we saw in our research chere,

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the the roots of fiction uh are totally interwoven with

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>our reality. Yeah. I mean basically, your friend and other

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>listeners who may need to defend their own fiction consumption

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>habits or should emerge from this podcast with a list

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of bullet points about why you should read it. Um.

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things we want to talk about

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is how we lose ourselves in fiction and how that's

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>so important to something called theory of mind. Yes, so

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the theory of mind, um, which I'm sure we've discussed

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>this in the past, but uh, it entails the ability

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 1>of one person to understand another's perspective, all right, to

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>empathize with, communicate with, to deceive and uh, if you'll

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>think back to Blade Runner, uh, the motion picture, they

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>had an empathy test to tell if someone was replicant android,

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a fake human, or a real human and uh, and

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it was a rather elaborate test, but that we actually

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>have a test that we can use, particularly on children,

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>because the theory of mine only kicks in after a

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>certain point. But this test is called the false belief test,

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and it goes like this, Child one and Child Too

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>are playing with a marble in a room. When they're done,

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>they put the marble in a box. Child one leaves

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and child Too takes the marble out and puts it

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in a bag. When Child one returns to the room,

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>where will she look for the marble? The correct answer is,

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, the box where she left it last. But

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>children under the age of four always picked the bag

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>because they lack theory of mind. And so some researchers

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>argue that this is because before that age they lack

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the necessary language fluency to actually deal with the reality. Um.

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>There was a New Scientist article from two thousand nine

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>called language Maybe the Key to Theory of mind um

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>And in that article they take a look at a

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>fascinating case from Nicaragua in which a community of deaf

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>people created their own sign language. And then so they

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>create it on sign language, and the next generation improved

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 1>on that sign language, and when given the false belief test,

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the younger members with a more advanced sign language performed

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>better on the test. And we see that too with

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 1>kids who are who have a steady diet of fiction. Right,

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>they get a more nuanced idea of how other people's

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>minds work, because that is what theory of mind is

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>really for. It's this idea that you could kind of

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>map out someone else's intentions. So when you read fiction,

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, you're able to exercise this ability.

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 1>You identify with the character's longings and frustrations. You can

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>guess that they're hidden motives, their agendas, um and the

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>relationships in their lives. So this is a way of

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of your brain trying to occupy someone else. That's really

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is actually called experience taking. And when you

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>are lost in fiction, it's a little bit different from

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>perspective taking. Right, perspective taking you can just kind of say,

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I identify, I get what this person is going through.

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Experience taking is taking those experiences for your own. And

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>researchers at Ohio State University observed what happened when study

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>participants lost themselves in fiction. Uh. They took a bunch

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of students and they had them read an engaging story

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>about a person who had overcome adversities in order to

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>vote that day, and they gave several different scenarios um

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of this, uh, this piece of fiction, and one of

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the different scenarios was that the the protagonists went to

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the same school as the fiction readers, right, and you

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>know another protagonist did not go to the same school.

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 1>So what they found is that the people who um

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>who read the story about the protagonist going to the

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>same school as them, were something like sixty five per

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>cent uh likely to actually vote themselves or did vote

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>themselves um when they had to vote, you know, the

0:13:56.480 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 1>next week or so an election, as compared to the

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 1>readers who read about a protectonist from another school. So

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing is that actually like clear line of

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>action from this piece of fiction that they were absorbed

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in this person's trials and errors and trying to get

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to vote this this um you know, these obstacles in

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>this protagonist way to try to vote, and they felt

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>so in line with her that it actually influenced their behavior.

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>It's um. I mean, it's crazy when you think about

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like the nature of story, because on one level of

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the story is how we remember things. That's how we

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>process things that have happened to us. The discussing is

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>this in the past, you you take a series of

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>events that just happened, you form the story in your mind.

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>In which you were the center character or if you're

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>being if you're able to empathize and use that theory

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of mind, then you're you're creating that's a similar story

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>around another person to enhance your understanding of them. But

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>stories stories even really exist, are they? They're kind of

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>this linguistic viral thing that we have created to make

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>sense of the world and to to serve as the

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>bedrock for a culture. You know, because it's you. You

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>take it the most accurate nonfiction book, the most not

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>actuate accurate nonfiction story available, and you can still probably

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>poke holes in it. You can say, is this really

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>what is? Is Is this really what happened? And you have

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to say, no, it is a structure of what happened.

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>It is a structuring of events and characters and people

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and attitudes and emotions, um, that is presented in the

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>form of story. Yeah. And I do think it is

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting that a lot of it has to do in

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the way that it is presented, right, um, to to

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>motivate people. UM. And I mean I'm thinking about a

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>different study. Um. It was it was Ohio State as well,

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and this one had to do with sexuality and it

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>was administered to seventy heterosexual men. And so again they

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>have this narrative of this young man in different scenarios.

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>In one scenario he's pretty much outed at the beginning, um.

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And another scenario he's outed later in the story and um,

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and in the third he's heterosexual. Well, what happened is

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that they found that, um, the people's attitudes towards this

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>character when he was late outed, they felt much more um,

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>accepting of him as homosexual when they found out after

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>after sort of identifying with him, after going through this

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>journey with him in this story, as opposed to when

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he was at it at the very beginning. And so

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that's why I think it's so fascinating that a lot

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of it has to do in the in the way

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that um, we present the details, that we create these

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of realities, um, and that it would actually affect

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>how we perceive people. Yeah, I mean it's and you

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>can kind of look at it too in terms of

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a nonfiction book, especially a nonfiction book about say, political issues.

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>It's one person saying, hey, this is how the world works,

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is how it works best versus how it

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>is broken, Whereas a narrative puts you in the shoes

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of someone experiencing some uh some some level of those events,

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and be it something that is supporting the uh an

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>idea or opposing it. You know, you're you're put in

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>those shoes. Well, let's let's crack a bit a little

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>bit of science here and talk about mirror neurons and

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>why we react the way we do to narratives, whether

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a text for a piece of music or a movie.

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, So the phase mirror neurons or mirror neurons,

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want to say it together, refers to neurons

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>in the frontal cortex that fire both when you do

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>something and when you see something else being done when

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you see someone else doing it. Okay, Uh, The and

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and very important here a subset of these neurons fires

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.239
<v Speaker 1>during your own actions, um, but inhibit when you just

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>observe actions. So, uh, that way, the mirror neuron systems

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>signal whether the action in question is your own or

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody else's. Right, So that way, you're not acting on

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing. Right. So if you know that you're

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to be the passive observer, then you don't

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>try to go out on the baseball field. He'll and

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, try to hick that ball. UM. So yeah,

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, actually that's that's a good example. When you

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>perform an action like throwing a baseball for the first time,

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>this behavior gets encoded in a clutch of brain cells.

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>But um scientists discovered that these brain cells also fire,

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>as you say, when you see someone else perform the

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>same action. And it also ends up sucking in emotional

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>entanglement as well. And that's where it really gets interesting.

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to see an example of this,

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I invite you to view any sporting event, because you're

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing your neurons. You your neurons. It's like the mirror neurons.

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>These are mirror neurons in action. When you go to

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>the sporting event and you see a rabid crowd who's

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 1>totally into the action on the field. Clearly there is

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>one small group of people who are playing a game

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and being paid for it, and h then there is

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>there is another group of people, a larger group of

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>people that have paid to see the game and are

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>not actually directly involved in the action, but their enthusiasm

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>for it at times seems to not only equal but

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>surpass that of the individuals on the field. And it

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to mirror neurons. They're able to observe

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the actions of another UH compared to their own experience,

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 1>and the emotional context becomes intertwined between the two. What

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>I think is really interesting is what happens when someone

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>reads a text right, like, how do you know how

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>they're reacting to that? UM? And it turns out that

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you can actually map metaphor in the brain using m

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>r I. Researchers from Emory University had subjects read a

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>metaphor metaphor and meta far metaphor UH involving texture, and

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the sensory cortex lit up here, and that the sensory

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>cortex is responsible for perceiving texture through tough right, that

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>became active. So you had metaphors like the singer had

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 1>a velvet voice and he had a leathery hand, and

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this roused the sensory cortex, while phrases that matched for meaning,

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>like the singer had a pleasing voice and he had

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>strong hands did not. And I think that is what's

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>so interesting about why our mind does engage so fiercely

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>with literature or you know, really any kind of fiction,

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>because again, you're in that theory of mind and your

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>brain is reacting um to these words. I love that.

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I love that a leathery hand can can make your

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>sensory cortex go nuts. Um. And then in a study

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>led by the cognitive scientists Veronica of the Laboratory of

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Language Dynamics in France, UM, she had them scan um

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>words like or rather sentences like John grass the object

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and Pablo kicked the ball, and the m rs revealed

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that there was of course activity in the motor cortex.

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 1>So to me, what this says is that storytelling fiction

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is really I mean, if we've from more motor cortex,

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is is kind of lighting up here. All of this

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>is really important into the way that we actually developed

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>as human beings. That storytelling is intrinsic um to actually

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>motivating us and motivating the different parts of our body. Um,

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not just you know, part of our language center

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that is passive. Yeah. I found it interesting that, you know,

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>discussions of how mere and neurons allowed us to to

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>survive in an early stage because we're able to put

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:45.719
<v Speaker 1>our mind inside the mind of say a predatory animal

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>or an animal that is surviving a winner. We see

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>all the bear is surviving, and we can put ourselves

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in its footsteps in a way that it just cannot do. Um.

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>And and then I the idea too that near and

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.719
<v Speaker 1>neurons allow us to, uh, especially with metaphor, to essentially

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>run a simulation based on that metaphor. Metaphor enters in

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and we, no matter how silly or tried, the metaphor,

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and some level we can't help but fulfill it. To

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>take one of the most famous metaphors in the English language,

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>coaches from William Shakespeare from As You Like It says,

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 1>all the world's a stage, and all the men and

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>women merely players. They have their exits and their entrances,

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>so you can't help it on some level. Imagine then

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>everyone in your life standing on this stage, following these lines,

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>entering in and out, and then they're there. Are various

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>ramifications of what that scenario means. Likewise, metaphors that don't

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>really work kind of fall flat because of that. Take,

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>for instance, UH, this famous line she's a brick house. Now,

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously in the same way that we're not actually all

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>players on a stage, she whoever she is, is not

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>actually a brick house. And when I try to imagine

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>this mysterious her as a brick house. It never works

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for me. Maybe I'm missing something, but I just imagine

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a woman made out of ricks. Well, this is it's

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>attached to the song now, so of course there are

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>parts of my brain that are singing it. Yea, the

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>song is the song is is great. So it manages

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to make it fooliss into thinking that this means something

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>where I'm not convinced it actually means anything, or if

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it means anything, it means that someone made a woman

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>out of bricks, which is kind of cool too. Yeah,

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I kind of go alem kind of way. I guess, yeah, yeah,

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>well it's a funky way, right, and then then get

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>down way. Um, but I think it's just so cool too.

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>About you know, seeing that these mirror neurons are firing

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in the motor cortex, is that it's not just the

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>motor cortex. It's actually like corresponding with what you're seeing.

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So if you're seeing someone pitch baseball, then your motor

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>cortex neurons are firing, and and um, what would be

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>related to the area that moves your arm and uh,

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and then also if you see someone playing soccer and

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you see the lake movements, then it's the same thing

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>that that they're specific to with part of your body.

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just like, hey, this is the part

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of the of my brain that makes me move my limbs.

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 1>It's your specific limbs. So yeah, I don't know. I'm

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 1>burto echo. In his ugly it was in his book

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of essays, Six Walks in the Fictional Woods. Um, he

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>spends a lot of time discussing just the nature of fiction,

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and he discusses it on all levels. He's talking about

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>literary stuff, he's talking about comic books, he's talking about

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>b movies, and he's talking about pornography at times, all

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>levels of storytelling. By the way, this perfectly, this whole

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>conversation about mirror neurons explains pornography, right Like if anybody's

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>ever wondered why exists, which I don't think anybody probably

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>wonders that this is the reason right here right well indeed,

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and the Echo goes into this a lot in in

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that book. I recommend picking it up. But he discusses

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly the use of everyday activities in certain books and

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>certain films. For instance, he specifically mentions the James Bond novels,

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>which if you read, say, Doctor No, a lot of

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>crazy stuff happening, and the Bond is picting shooting people.

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>I believe in Dr No. In the book itself, he

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>wrestles a giant squid. It's easier to forget when people

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>get all up tied about about the purity of James

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Bond and fiction versus film. Just remember he did wrestle

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a giant squid. Ones But but then, a lot of

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>time is devoted in these books to Bond having dinner,

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to Bond eating things um or Bond having coffee, Bond

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>doing things that we can relate to. Most of us

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>cannot relate to being shot in the shoulder or wrestling

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a giant squid. There's only we can only become so

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>immersed in bad activity. But if the author immerses us

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in these other activities that we do have experience with.

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Although I will say this, I was watching True Blood

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:42.719
<v Speaker 1>and there's just one point in which, um, someone stabbed

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>another person in the hand with a fork. Now that's

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 1>not the first time I've watched that on film at

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>least um, But I immediately pulled my hand up because

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you can relate to something like that far more than

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you can to uh. I mean horr movies are a

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>great example of this, and and directors who understand horror

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>and how a version works for the viewer get this.

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 1>If someone loses an arm, if like Arnold Swartz narrogets

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>his arm blown off in a film or something, um,

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we can't relate to that. Most of us cannot relate

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to that. What that could be would be like it's

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it's out of our experience. However, if you have a

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 1>character hold up their hand against someone like strikes at

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>him a machete and they get a cut across the

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>palm or something like that, or even like a paper

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>cut times ten or yeah, yeah, we can relate or

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>just a paper cut. Have someone get paper cut in

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the film, you have an entire horror film based on

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>paper cuts, you know. But but we can relate to that.

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>It's a more of an everyday event. And uh in

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>any way, Burtlecca goes into it a lot more doubt.

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 1>He also gets into the use of every day I

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's car rides that he discusses in Like the

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>way to tell if you're watching a regular film or

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>pornographic film is how long a car ride last in

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the film. The longer at last more likely that you're

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>watching a pornographic film. All right, Okay, there we go.

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a marker. Um. All right, we're going to take

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:10.719
<v Speaker 1>a quick break, but when we get back, we're going

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about empathy and fiction. Can can you increase

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>your own empathy through fiction? And is there a downside

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the fiction? Alright, we're back. So empathy and fiction, as

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned, are there via mirror neurons, via theory of mine.

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>We're reading these stories and we cannot help but become

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 1>immersed in that character, be it James Bond wrestling a squid,

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:41.719
<v Speaker 1>or um the character in Zombie trying to kidnap somebody

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and keep them in their basement. Alright, so of course

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I have to mentioned study okay by Washington and Lee

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>psychologist Dan Johnson. He had people read a short story

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that was specifically written to induce compassion in the reader,

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and he wanted to see not only a fiction increased empathy,

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>but whether it would lead to actually helping someone. So

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>he found that the more absorbed subjects were in the story,

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the more empathy they felt, and the more empathy they felt,

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the more likely the subjects were to help. When the

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>experiment er accidentally in quotation marks UH dropped a handful

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of pens. UH. The highly absorbed readers were twice as

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:23.360
<v Speaker 1>likely to help out, which I thought was interesting that presumably,

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 1>UM the researcher does this while they're reading and they're

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>absorbed in the text. I would think that that would

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>be they would be so absorbed that they wouldn't even

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 1>notice the pens dropping. But that's a that's one little

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>test that has been carried out. And then there are

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>studies published in two thousand and six and two thousand

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and nine by Dr Keith Oatley. This is the guy

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that was at the World Science Festival UH. He reports

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the individuals who frequently read fiction performed better on theory

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of mind tests regardless of gender. Because we've heard this

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>before that women are are more compassionate or have more empathy,

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and UH is sometimes pointed to because of more mirror

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>neurons that they possessed. UM. But one such theory of

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>mind test is called the mind's eye test, which participants

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>look at photos of nothing but people's eyes and then

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>have to describe what the people are feeling. We took

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this on the Facebook, didn't we? We did you? It

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>fits the stereo thoughts you actually perform better on it

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>than I did. I get a thirty on it, which

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>is something. Yeah, I think the normal range is like

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty and anything over thirty like your super empathizer or

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>something like that. So what is bad under under two? Okay,

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm good. Yeah, you're cleared it by a couple points there. Um.

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>But there's this idea that you could actually increase your

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:44.719
<v Speaker 1>own empathy through reading fiction. Hi is just sort of interesting, right,

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's helpful if you decrede stuff like flat land

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>like flatland and flatland fan fiction. W you're just reading

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>about shades. Well, you know what. Here's the thing, though,

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is that you ascribe meaning to nearly anything. So there's

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a really cool um thing that they did

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>at the panel about the narrative of um or the

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>science of narrative. They actually showed a film of a circle,

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a square, and um a triangle and anyway, the shapes

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>move around inside this box and they kind of do

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>things to each other. And after they share the film,

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>they say that, how how many of you saw a

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>story in this? And nearly everyone except for like one guy,

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>raise their hand and then they sort to say, well,

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>who saw a female and then other people say, who

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>saw a male who saw someone trying to trap this

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>other person in a room, and it was amazing, Like,

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we can't help but to create these stories. So we

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>talked story of five like mad gods. Um. But then

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>there there comes a question could there be a possible

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>downside to this? Well? Um, I mean the big thing

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>here is that by engaging us uh in these stories

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that that often have have important social context to them,

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we can we can use fiction to change the world

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>for the better. But if we can change and when

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>we say change the world, obviously none of these stories

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>they are altering physical reality, but they can adjust culture

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>in the way we view the world, um, such as

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the way some sitcoms are able to change the way

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and or influence the way that we view various social issues.

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>All Right, there have been a bunch of studies that

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>say that when people identify with characters like such as um,

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the gay characters there, that people are that more accepting

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of them. Or even our current vice president said that

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>when talking about the gay marriage issue. UM, he said

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that he was really one over from watching what was which,

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>which everyone got to laugh out of that, but it

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it lines up exactly with what we know about the

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>power of of fiction and particularly popular media to alter

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the way that we view the world. So that's the thing, right,

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>because when you are involved in fiction or some sort

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of narrative that is fictitious, you lose your sense of skepticism.

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And the researchers have seen this over and over again.

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>When you are reading something that you know that is nonfiction,

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>then you're apt to be much more critical of it,

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>analyze a lot more. But if you know you're in

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a story, or you're lulled into a story, I guess

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you could say, um, then you you do lose skepticism.

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So if one sitcom could could influence me and help

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>me decide that, yes, this group of people deserve rights

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that they don't have, could another sitcompetentially make me say

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>this group of people do not deserve certain rights? Well, um, yeah, actually,

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's that's the fear. Here. There's Jonathan Gotshall

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>who is also on the panel. He wrote something called

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>The Story Storytelling Animal has said that we are suckers

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>for story. Lab studies show that we are deeply absorbed

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in a story. We lose our skepticism and we can

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>be made to feel and believe just about anything the

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>storyteller wants. And he actually brought up on the panel

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's mainly good. But then you think about the

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifteen film The Birth of a Nation, which inflamed

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>racist sentiments. This is the one where the clickklux klansmen

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>or are riding around like victorious nights, um and uh,

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're fighting the evil um black man. It's I mean,

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's. It's a very interesting and important film

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of film history. And and if you've ever

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>taken a history of film class, you've probably seen it

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.479
<v Speaker 1>or seen parts of it. Um. But it is not

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>enforcing um good moral ideas right right, and it has

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean the plotline obviously has been manipulated to in

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>do certain feelings and that actually did um that that

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>gave sort of new life to the KLi klux klan

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>um when the film was shown. So you know, he

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>says it can go both ways. Um. There's also the

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>idea of over consumption of media. Now when I say that, well,

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I see this this is for an entirely different podcast, um,

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 1>but I thought it was interesting to mention. And when

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I when I stayed media, I'm talking about games or gaming. UM.

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Computer scientists Stuart Staniford says that the room this is

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 1>is kind of interesting. I mean it's a little bit

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 1>out there. Said that as the robot population surpasses humans

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and takes most of our jobs, but the least disruptive

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>approach to managing this is for the underclass to disappear

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>into technology mediated secondary universes um and that he can't

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>help but see video games imagined here is a widely

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>used opiate. So this is the Yeah, this is this

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:48.479
<v Speaker 1>idea of over consumption. Because you know, there's there's this

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>um other idea that back in the day, if you

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted a good story, you hope that someone in your

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>circle was a really great aural storyteller. Right yeah, you

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>would have someone tell that story, that story, or that

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>joke or that whatever, that narrative experience. Let's go and

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 1>hear it. The storytellers come into town, you know, let's go,

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 1>let's go hear what they have to say. But now that,

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can have any type of story any

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>which way you want it, um from myriad bits of media,

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>right um. And so there's an idea that it's really

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>similar to an obesity epidemic that we evolved in a

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>world where food was scarce, so we're very comfortable right now.

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And and so that you have this idea of like

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 1>there's too much on the plate for us to consume.

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Because back in the old days they were there were

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>only so many stories that could think really, they passed around.

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>You had you had the creation story, the end of

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the world story. Um, and it is important, I guess

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>when I'm you know, half joking there. But but but

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the olden days you had all these stories

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that that had definite meanings, that were important culturally, that

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 1>culturally that were the bedrock upon which civilization existed. Um.

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean you had stories in which positive values were

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>tested and found to be held true, negative values are

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>tested and found to be false. Where something simple has

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>proven complex, where something complex has proven simple, where the

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>other has proven normal than normal has proven other. I mean,

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 1>these are all about maintaining a certain worldview. And today

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>are our stories of We have more of them, and

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>some of them are are less involved in maintaining the

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>fabric of our reality, but they're all still uh engaging

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in that conversation on one level or another. Well, and

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to that point, I wanted to to to leave you

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 1>with this um. This quote from Jonathan Gottshaw um about

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:43.720
<v Speaker 1>storytelling and no matter how much we consume or don't consume,

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 1>he says, humans aren't really Earthlings. Above all, we are

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:52.240
<v Speaker 1>citizens of an omnidimensional virtual world called Storyland. Of course,

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>our bodies are always fixed at a particular time and

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 1>place on planet Earth. But our minds are always free

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 1>to voyage in Storyland, and they you, They voyage through

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>stories from most of the day and into the night.

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>It's wrong to think of story as a mirror frill

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 1>in human life. We live most of our lives in

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>various kinds of story. Story, as much as upright posture,

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:16.280
<v Speaker 1>tool use, language, or intelligence, is what makes us human.

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So I thought was really interesting because we talked about

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:24.280
<v Speaker 1>even daydreaming, that that we uh, we daydream like half

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of our waking hours away. Right, I'm sorry, what are

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you saying? Nice? Nice? All right, Well, let's pull open

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the mail bag, bring it over here. I think it's funny.

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:40.319
<v Speaker 1>You calm robot, but I call him Arnie. We have

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>a different relationship with robot. You have more empathy. You

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you're firing up more of those mirror neurons. Do you

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>think he has a limp? It looks like he's not

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>walking correctly. All right, So here's a little bit of

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 1>listener mail from Ann and Wrightson says, sorry for the

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>slow response. I've been meaning to write until you have tickled.

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I was to hear your honorary air response my email below,

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and her email was the one about uh where she

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 1>said words and it was about how I used frank

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and beans to describe penis and yes, to do it

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 1>again with kind okay, but anyway, she was responding to

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to that, and and and we we addressed it, you know,

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and and sort of we gave our perspective on on

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>presenting material for various age groups and all. Anyway, she

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:30.760
<v Speaker 1>continues and says, it gave me an entirely new perspective

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>on some of the pressures and issues you were dealing with.

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I stand by my opinion, but definitely understand your position

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>better now see empathizing. I know we can't help ourselves. Um,

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 1>She says. I also wanted to let you know how

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>much I've been enjoying the Lucid Dreaming theme. I'm a

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:48.280
<v Speaker 1>world class dreamer. Last night was a multi generational saga

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 1>set in the early nineteenth century night and often have

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>quite bizarre dreams, dreams within dreams, whatever. But despite decades

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:58.959
<v Speaker 1>of interest in the topic, I've never managed a lucid dream.

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:02.280
<v Speaker 1>What I can't seem to do is make that first

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>step in the process, knowing that you're dreaming and taking control.

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, it doesn't stop me from flying and sometimes

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>even underwater swimming, which is pretty cool and I think

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>much more unusual. Good flying all the best, man, I'm

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna try that underwater flying. Yeah, well, I've I've definitely

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:21.240
<v Speaker 1>had underwater dreams before, like one where I was chasing

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a sorcerer across the ocean floor. He had a book

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>or something. But the other night I just had one

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of those dreams where I thought I'd pee pee the beds.

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>So those aren't very exciting, but happy ending I could

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 1>not pee the bed. Oh my goodness, what have you

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>had these dreams before? Yes, I'm sorry, there's so much.

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>There's so many words there that I want to playoff of,

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:49.360
<v Speaker 1>but I won't out of interest of um keeping it

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 1>clean folks. Okay, Well, I just find it in right

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 1>because I was talking to a group of friends and

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>out of four or five of us, only two of

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:59.359
<v Speaker 1>us claim to have had dreams in which they were

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>peeing that they it and then we'll to find find

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that they had not. So oh well, you know, actually

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I do take that back now, and I'm focusing more.

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Um yeah, my body is mainly it is basically saying, hey,

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 1>you need to get up and use the restroom. Yeah,

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 1>flying is better. I'm not. I'm something everybody wanted to know.

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 1>If there you go, let's keep to the flying all right. Well, hey,

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 1>if you want to write into us and you want

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to let us know about your fiction versus reality, um idea,

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Where do you stand on this? How do you think

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 1>fiction alters our perceptions of reality or does it, as

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 1>with the works of say Suttercane, actually change physical reality.

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Let us know. You can find us on Facebook where

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we are Stuffed to Blow Your Mind, or you can

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>find us on Twitter where we are Blow the Mind,

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 1>and you can always drop us a line at Blew

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the Mind at Discovery dot com. Be sure to check

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>out our new video podcast, Stuff from the Future. Join

0:40:57.120 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Work staff as we explore the most promising

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and flexing possibilities of tomorrow.