WEBVTT - Secretary of State Antony Blinken Talks Conflict with Iran

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Sir Secretary, thank you

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:10.319
<v Speaker 1>very much for being here. Good to be with you.

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 2>We've heard from the President, Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense,

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. I'm curious at this point

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 2>what your understanding is of the case this administration has

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 2>made for the US going to war against Iran.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, the case keeps shifting. But the first thing

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to say is this, from my perspective, once our men

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and women in uniform are engaged in an operation or

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in war, my first thought is for their safety and

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>for their success, irrespective of what I think about how

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>we got there or even where this is going. So

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that's primarily what I'm thinking of. But having said that,

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we've heard, you know, number of shifting rationales. But I

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's important to take into account that we've got

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:52.639
<v Speaker 1>to be able to hold multiple truths in our head

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Is it a good thing that

0:00:56.120 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this iahtola is gone, Yes, terrible tyrant. Is it a

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>good thing potentially at least that Iran's nuclear program is

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess reobliterated because apparently it was obliterated last June,

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>But maybe not so much because they had to reobliterate it,

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>or it's missile program diminished, or it's navy sunk. Yes,

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:25.199
<v Speaker 1>But to do that and to take on the extraordinary

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>risks that go with it without having made the case

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>with the American people with citing imminent threats that apparently

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't exist, I think that's problematic. And the chances of

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>unintended consequences taking hold in any situation like this are

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>very real, very serious for our partners and allies in

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the region, and for ourselves, and of course with the

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Iranian people. I think a big question that everyone has is, Okay,

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>have we done regime change in Iran or just iotola change,

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>which is the way it looks right now.

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 2>You brought up the argument that there was an inminate

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 2>threat in years past, you'd warned the amount of weeks

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 2>before Ron could develop fissile uranium. Is that an argument

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 2>that's persuasive to you so much as that's been made

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 2>by the ministration that there it's.

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>An ironic argument in a number of ways. First, as

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I said, they claim to have obliterated the nuclear fissile

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>material program back in June, and now we're told, actually, no,

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>we didn't. And A number of US warned at the

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>time that one of the reasons why military action against

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the nuclear program might not do the trick is that

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians were likely to start to rebuild, maybe rebuild

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>deeper underground where we couldn't get at it. Whether that

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>was happening or to what extent, I don't know, because

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not privy to that information, but at least that

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 1>seems to be part of the rationale. The deeper irony,

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, is that we never should have been in

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>this position, insofar as the agreement that the President Obama

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>reached the Iran Nuclear Dealer, so called JCPOA, put Iran's

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>nuclear program in a box. It made sure that Iran

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>could not produce the facile material needed for nuclear weapon

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in less than a year, and so if they chose

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to break out of the box and go for that,

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we'd see it, and we'd have plenty of time to

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to do something about it. President Trump tore

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>up that agreement, said he'd replace it with something better.

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>He never did, and that's the road that we then

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>wound up on that led to in some ways to

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>where we are today with Iran, yes dramatically advancing its

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>production of facile material, so that that breakout time moved

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>from one year to a couple of weeks. But you

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>don't only need fysile material, actually need a weapon too,

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think, as has been publicly reported our intelligence

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>agencies and others, the IEA continue to conclude that Iran

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>has not made a decision to actually weaponize if and

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>when they do, or if and when they did, most

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>estimates had that timeline a couple of years. There are

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of weapons, less sophisticated ones you could build

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>on a quicker timeline. But the bottom line is that

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>on the nuclear side there was no imminent threat. There

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>was though the fact that, yes, in terms of facil

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>material production, they'd gone from the Obama deal more than

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a year to a few weeks.

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>The Supreme Leader who's been killed, of course, warned in

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 2>the run up to this that if there were US strikes,

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the US risked a wider regional war. How has what's

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 2>played out over these last few days, How does that

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 2>compare to what you expected would happen here? I imagine

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 2>in your old jobs there were planning meetings and war

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 2>games in which you kind of tried to figure out

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 2>what might happen here as we see this war, widen,

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 2>is that in keeping with what you expected when you

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 2>heard the Supreme Leader warned.

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Them, well, look, it's certainly something that should have been anticipated.

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And one of the striking features so far is that

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Iran has launched far more missiles and far more drones

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 1>at the Arab countries in the Gulf and in the

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>region that it has even at Israel, disproportionately so. And

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in part that's too because we have bases and presence there.

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>But they've gone beyond that. They've gone at infrastructure that

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>these countries have, the oil infrastructure. They want to try

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to inflict so much pain that we can't sustain the effort.

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.799
<v Speaker 1>And that's something that should have been anticipated. And David,

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we're looking at a couple of things going

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>forward in terms of where does this go and how

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>does this end? And it seems to me that there

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>are two critical factors to look at. Markets and munitions. Markets.

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Where are the oil markets, where's the stock market, where's

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the bond market? I know President Trump is very attentive

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to those. And if they go in a southernly direction

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and stay that way, or in the case of oil

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in a northernly direction. That's going to be possibly a

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>limited factor. Then munitions, there's there's really a race on

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>to figure out who expends their munitions first and fastest.

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>The Iranians put us in a position where we've used

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of interceptors to deal with defense or

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>even our offensive missiles to take out their their launchers,

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>or conversely, did they run out and we still have

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>need Again, I don't know the numbers here, I'm not

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>privy to that, but it is something we have to

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>be very very attentive to because these things are not

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in infinite supply. The production times are very long, and

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of course we're also using very in many cases very

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>expensive weapons to take down twenty thousand dollars drones. That's

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.239
<v Speaker 1>not a good equation if you keep that going over time.

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>What I'm worried about. One of the things I'm worried about,

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and this gets to the second and third order consequences,

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 1>is we so deplete our arsenal and it takes a

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>long time to rebuild it that that puts US in

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a disadvantageous position when it comes to say a China

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>or a Russia. All of those things need to be

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>factored in. And again it's one of the reasons why

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to undertake something like this, you've got

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that you've factored all of that in.

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And again it really should start with explaining to the

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>American people why you're doing something, why it's necessary. Why

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>now do.

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 2>You see an off ramp anywhere at this point?

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I do in the sense that one, as I said,

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the off ramp and if we'll be governed

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>by this question of munitions and markets, and then what

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.119
<v Speaker 1>is that off ramp? I think the President may simply

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>declare victory. He'll say, got rid of the Ayatola. We

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>diminished or degraded or destroyed their their nuclear program. Again again,

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>we did the same thing to the missile program. We

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>did the same thing to the navy. And as to

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the regime, well over the Iranian people, good luck to them.

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Hope they succeed, and if they don't, it's their fault.

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>If they do, we'll we'll take the credit. How Iran

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>response to that remains to be seen, and for the

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>for the regime survival of success. Right now, the expectation

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>seems to be at least as has been reported that

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the Iatola Sun is his successor. He's very tied into

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the IRGC, and so you may have a situation where,

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>much as we want and everyone should want to see

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a change in that regime, we have, you know, regime

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>changed without regime change, status quo, status status quo, and

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>even potentially even worse because it may simply ultimately reinforce

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the IRGC, the military as a specialized military. And part

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of the problem with these things is that it's very

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to produce regime change from outside. You can't bomb

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>your way to it. We've had a lot of experience

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>with that, and not such good experience over the last

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty years. It's not so likely to come from the streets,

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>even with extraordinarily courageous Iranian people. It's more likely to

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>come from kind of within the palace. And then it

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>could go in any one of you know, multiple directions.

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>You could get more pragmatic people, not good guys, but

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>more pragmatic people who are open to, you know, curbing

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the excesses of the regime, focusing at home instead of

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 1>focusing abroad doing deals. But right now it looks more

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>likely that you're going to have hardliners, and you know,

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the who had a song way back in the sixties

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>or seventies. You know, here's to the new boss, same

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>as the old boss that seem used to be right

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>now at least where we're headed.

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 2>You've warned of the dangers of US intervention many times.

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Twenty twenty four, you spoke at the Council on Form relations.

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 2>He said, effectively, I think if we looked the last

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty years, our experiments in regime change have not exactly

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 2>been resounding successes. CNN is reporting that the US is

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 2>considering arming the Kurds in Iron. Bloomberg hasn't confirmed that reporting.

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 2>When you hear that, what red flags does that raise

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 2>for you?

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh? The red flag it raises is this could be

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Syria reducts, or it could be Libya reducts. You've got

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you know Iran as a country where you know, the

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Shites make up less than half of the population. You

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>have all sorts of other groups, including Kurds, Azari's others,

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 1>who make up the bulk of the population. You could

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>see the country fracturing, imploding, or even exploding with refugees

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and migration, with the exporting of some of their problems,

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>with extremist groups taking hold in one part or another.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>It's incredibly fraud and incredibly dangerous. And as sympathetic as

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I am to the Curs who've been incredible partners for us,

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>incredibly brave, I don't think that getting into the business

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of arming these groups is ultimately going to be a

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>good thing. And then you're going to have other countries

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that pick their partners inside, and again you wind up

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>with something like Syria, something like Libya.

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a bit about diplomacy, the president posted on

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 2>truth Social they want to talk prefer to the Iranians.

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I said, too late? Is it too late for there

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 2>to be a diplomatic solution or to have those conversations

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 2>at this point?

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I I think it's never too late for diplomacy. The

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>question is is there a good moment? Is this the

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 1>right moment for it? I would hope so, because on

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>one level, the Iranians have never been weaker, at least

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>not in recent memory, militarily, politically at home, diplomatically abroad

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and so, and their proxies are for the most part

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>gone or vastly diminished. So that's why I was hopeful

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>before this, uh this action started, that maybe they actually

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 1>would get a renewed nuclear deal because Iran was had

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>a very weak hand to play. So there I think

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>there is a possibility of doing that. Whether the new

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever the new regime is or the continuation of the existing

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>regimes is ready to do that, wants to do that

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>to be determined. It also depends on what the what

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration wants to do, and I imagine Israel

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to have a say in this as well.

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 2>As the administration was marshaling all of this military might

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 2>to the Middle East, you had Jared Kushner, the President's

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 2>son in law, Steve Witkoff, his longtime friend now on

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 2>void to many conflicts and regions, meeting in Geneva in

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 2>meetings mediated by the Omanis. Do you think that those

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 2>were good faith conversations when you look at it now

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 2>in hindsight.

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Look, I can't. It's hard for me to tell, not

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>being in the room, not being privy to those conversations.

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 1>I certainly want to believe, So I don't know. As

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think Jared Kushner and Steve Woodkoff are

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>very able nego, but it was not clear to me

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that the expertise was also with them, which is very necessary.

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>When you're dealing with nuclear matters. When we did the JCPOA,

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 1>we had very senior diplomats, but we had tremendous technical

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>expertise at hand, because you know, it's complicated stuff and

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to make sure you're not making a mistake.

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure who was actually in the room

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and whether the people in the room could fully evaluate

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and assess is this a good deal? Is this a

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.599
<v Speaker 1>bad deal? And I've heard different versions of what the

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>Iranians were actually willing to do, not willing to do,

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 1>different versions of what we were willing to do or

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>not willing to do. Not being there, it's hard to tell.

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.599
<v Speaker 1>But you know, David, when President Trump tore up the

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>JCPOA back in the day first term, he said he

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>wanted to replace it with a better deal, and I

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>think there was actually an opportunity to do that because

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Iran was in so much of a weaker position now

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>than it was back when President Obama negotiated the deal.

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 2>You, of course, are a professional diplomat. You've dealt with

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 2>the Iranians directly, and I'm curious if you think that,

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 2>Steve Witkoff, Jared Kirsch, we're at some sort of inherent

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 2>disadvantage in those talks because you had professional diplomats on

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 2>one side and they were on the other. This isn't

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 2>what they've done their entire lives.

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Look, a number of the Iranians have been doing this

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, and we when we change administrations,

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>we change out the people who are doing these doing

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 1>these issues, and there's a certain learning curve and you

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>have to get up to speed and become genuinely expert

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in things. Again, That's why I think it's so important

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that you have the experts with you,

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>because they have they're the continuity. The Iranians have continuity

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's usually the same cash to characters. The same

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>guys have been doing this for a long time. Auranchi,

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the Foreign Minister, was Zerif's the then Foreign minister's deputy

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>back then, so he knows what he's doing.

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious what you are thinking as you watch the

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 2>chaos unfolding in the Middle East, particularly with Americans who

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 2>would like to leave and are being told different things.

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 2>It seems like there is no easy out, for lack

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 2>of a better two, for them to get out of

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 2>the region. What has happened there is you see, and

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 2>what needs to happen to make it so that Americans

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 2>can get back to the United States.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's not very America first to put American citizens last,

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.599
<v Speaker 1>and that seems to be what happened. I mean, it

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>was not until days into this that the administration thought

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>about maybe getting some planes out there to try to

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>get people out. A little bit late, and when people

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>at least initially were asking for help, calling for help,

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the answer they got was basically, get out, but we

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>can't help you. After October seventh, In the days immediately

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>after October seventh, we surged charter airplanes to Israel, boats,

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>cruise ships that could ferry the tens potentially tens of

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>thousands of dual nationals who were there out of harm's

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>way to Cyprus. When it came to boats, and as

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>long as the airport was operating to various places, the

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>boats were there because we thought the airports might be

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>be shut down. All of that happened very quickly, and

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>this was in response to something we obviously didn't know

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it was coming. And so I think doing this after

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact in a not very planned way, especially when

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you're the initiator, is unfortunate.

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 2>You've noted in the past that during war games, something's

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 2>come up where if there were to be this kind

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 2>of chaos in Iran, the regime might move uranium to

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 2>different places across the country. And going back to what

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 2>you were talking about a moment ago, the prospects of

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 2>there being a Libya esque or Syria esque civil war,

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 2>how worried should we be about that nuclear material being

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 2>effectively scattered across this country and they're being next to

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 2>no accountability for a where it is and be into

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 2>whose hands it falls.

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's a real concern. I would assume

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that the remaining material and again I don't know. We've

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>seen lots of reports that it's likely that they were

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>able to preserve safe guard a lot of urseraneum, but

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that for a fact. I would assume

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that they've tried to disperse it, as you said, presumably

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in places that the regime has some control over. But

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>if a country winds up in some kind of civil war, yeah,

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a real concern and something that we have to

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>factor into our thinking. If we're going to start, you know,

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>dropping matches there in terms of arming various groups, we

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>better watch out in terms of getting what we wish for.

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, of course, you've seen extraordinarily courageous people

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>beyond imagination who are out in the streets looking for change,

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>getting mowed down by this regime. And we all want

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to see a different future for them, different leadership for them.

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's very very hard, if not impossible, to do

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that from the outside, as we were saying, And the

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>risks now are that instead of having a change, having

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a transition, you have an implosion, and then maybe even

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>an explosion that has real effects outside the country. We

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>have partners in the region. I was talking earlier about

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>how one of the limiting factors on this, you know,

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:17.959
<v Speaker 1>goes to munitions. Our partners in the region have far

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>fewer interceptors air defense interceptors than we do. If it

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>gets to the point where they're running out, and the

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Iranians have enough to continue going at their infrastructure, at

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>their people, I think there's going to be a pretty

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>strong demand signal on the administration to take an off

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>ramp to stop. We've had other second and third order

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>consequences here at the very time when Russia is really

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>reaching a weak point because of its dependence on oil

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>to fuel its war economy, it's revenues. The government's revenues

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>are down almost twenty percent, in large part because the

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>price of oil has gone down. It's having more trouble

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 1>exploiting oil because of sanctions and restrictions that we put

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on technology. That's been a huge and growing factor. And

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the thing to do now, ideally would be to squeeze

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the shadow fleet that they have that's going around the world,

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's the one thing that's able to keep them going.

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>At the very time when that's possible, and that that

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>might force putin to finally cut a deal on Ukraine,

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 1>they get a lifeline. And the lifeline is the price

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>of oil is going up, and the value of that

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>shadow fleet oil is going up, and people will need

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it and want to buy it. The Europeans, in turn,

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>having moved away from Russian gas, are now more dependent

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Middle East, and if that gets tied up,

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>if the Straits of Hormuz remain problematic, that's going to

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of pressure on them. So mapping out,

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>gaming out, planning out, and then making sure you have

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>something in place to deal with all of these second

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and third order effects usually important. It's not at all

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>clear to me that that was done.

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 2>From where we sit today, are you confident that the

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 2>US can extricate itself from this without putting boots on

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 2>the ground in run.

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>It depends what the objective is. I think that yes.

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>In short, as I said a moment ago, you know,

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the President could theoretically declare victory tomorrow and claim that,

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, severe damage was done to the regime, to

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the missiles, to the nuclear program, to the Navy, and

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>say and call it a day. But then for what

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Most of that stuff ultimately can be rebuilt, and absent

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a change in the governance in the regime, which right

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>now in this moment doesn't seem to be forthcoming huge

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>risk without the support of the well without the in

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>effect of buying from the American people, that leaves us

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>actually potentially for some time and as strategically we can

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>position with regard for example, to China, Russia, because our

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>own stockpiles of critical long range position guided weapons are down,

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 1>our air defense stockpile interceptors is down. That's usually usually questionable,

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>but that is I think that is an off ramp

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that's available to the President if he wants to take it.

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 2>As you've pointed out President Trump pulled out of the

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 2>Iron Nuclear Deal during his first term when you were

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Secretary of State, there was an effort to reanimate that,

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 2>to get another iteration of it. What were the challenges

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 2>of that and why was it the case that in

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two of those talks broke down.

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Look, we tried very hard to get back to the deal.

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>But at that point in time, and especially with the

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>passage of time, there were two things that were critical.

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>One was that, of course the Iranians, not without reason,

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>said how can we trust anything. We could do it,

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>We can do a deal, and then maybe the President

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Biden's successor does exactly what President Trump does. So there

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>was a limiting factor there. But the bigger limiting factor

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>was getting the Iranians to agree to terms that we

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 1>deemed necessary and sufficient to make the deal the right

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>deal to do, and in particular re extending the timelines

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the constraints that the original deal had in them on

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the nuclear program. We couldn't get to where we thought

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we needed to be to make it worthwhile. And we

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>were doing it in partnership, in very close partnership with

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>our European friends and allies. With the French, with the British,

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>with the Germans, with the European Union, something that hadn't

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>been the case in the immediate previous years. And I

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>think we all agreed that the deal that the Iranians

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>were willing to sign on to was simply not adequate.

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I wish we could have gotten there, But more than that,

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 1>I wish the President Trump had not torn up the

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>original deal. We'd be in a very different position, in

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a very different world.

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel it all like perfection shouldn't be the

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:35.719
<v Speaker 2>enemy of the good here, that it would have been

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 2>wiser to find some sort of deal with them.

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Look, you have to make You always have to

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:41.479
<v Speaker 1>make judgments about these things, and you have to make

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>judgments about whether, yes, the good enough is good enough.

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And it was our judgment, our estimation, that we weren't there,

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>but you know were We continued to stay at it,

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>but the Iranians in that moment were not moving sufficiently

0:21:58.240 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>to get us to where we needed to be.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you about something that your successor

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 2>said this week. Secretary State Marco Rubia was talking about

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the motivations for this war. He said Israel was planting

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 2>attacks that could lead to reprisals on American troops, so

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 2>the US had to get involved militarily. He since walked

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 2>that back a bit, But what does that say to

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 2>you about the relationship between the US and Israel and

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 2>the influence that the US has over Israeli policy.

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Look, this has been a long story when it comes

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to Iran, and back during the Obama administration, the Israelis

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>were pushing President Obama to take military action against Iran

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and were warning that they would do it themselves if

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>he didn't, and he wouldn't because he thought the better

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>way to get at the nuclear program, which is what

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>we were focused on, was through very muscular diplomacy backed

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>up by very very strong sanctions that we rallied the

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>world to put in place, and then we got the

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Iran Nuclear Agreement. In the days after the October seventh

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 1>attack on Israel, the horrific attack on Israel by Hamas,

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the Israelis were insisting that in the north Hezbolah from

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Lebanon was about to attack and they wanted to strike

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>preemptively against Hezbolah. And President Biden said, look, well, we're

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>with you, will always be with you in defending Israel

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and if you're attacked, were there, but we're not there

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to start something, And we came within

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>about thirty minutes of having a war in the North

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>based on bad information that the Israelis had about an

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>imminent attack from Hezbolah. We were able to avert that,

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>but the President Biden was very insistent, We're not going

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to do something that you initiate, that you start. It's

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>very different than defending Israel one it's been attacked. I

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>can't speak to what the dynamic was this time. I

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 1>heard that. Then it was walked back. The President said

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it was the other way around. There's been a shifting rationale,

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a shifting explanation for why this, why now? And again

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that's why it's so important to have ideally laid this

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>out before the American people and our partners and allies.

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>We might have had less friction with them if there

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 1>was a compelling case to be made to make sure

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that we laid that out in advance and had them

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>with us on the takeoff, not mid flight or on

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the landing.

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 2>You have faced protesters when you've given speeches. I remember

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 2>there was an interruption in the press briefing room at

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 2>the State Department when you were giving remarks, and the

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 2>criticism you faced has been you and the administration. The

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Bide administration effectively gave cover to Israel and Prime Minister

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 2>and Yahoo for them to prosecute the war that they

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 2>prosecuted in gods that led to seventy five thousand people dying.

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 2>In hindsight, do you regret not exerting more pressure on

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 2>or trying to do more to constrain Yes, Israel, but

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 2>principally the Prime Minister in that war.

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Look, David, when there's been such terrible loss, such terrible suffering,

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>when so many innocent people Alastaini, men, women and children

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>lost their lives, You're always going to ask yourself. I

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>always ask myself, could we should we have done something different?

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And we had to make judgments in the moment to

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>try to achieve a number of objectives, and in a

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>way I should. I should really start with where we ended,

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>which is we ended with a ceasefire that we handed

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>off to the Trump administration. We ended with the hostages

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>coming out, prisoners being released from Israeli jails, tens of

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>thousands of trucks going into Gaza, I wish that.

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Was a mutual achievement between the BID and the Trump.

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it was. It was largely President Biden's,

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>but I'm very thankful for the role that Steve wood

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Cooff in particular played and supporting that in the moment,

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we were able to hand off and

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>then in that in that agreement, in the ceasefire agreement,

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it was it was for six weeks, and during those

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>six weeks, the notion was that the parties would negotiate

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the terms of an enduring ceasefire. That didn't happen. They

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>went back to war, and then finally President eight or

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>nine months later landed the currencies fire. But do I

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>wish that we could have gotten that sooner with less suffering. Absolutely,

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>But there were a lot of things that were going

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>on that we had to factor in. One was we

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>were trying, obviously to make sure that October seventh could

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 1>never happen again. And October seventh was almost written off

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>immediately by much of the world, starting practically on October eighth,

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and you had to traumatize Israeli society, and then now

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>you've had a traumatized Palestinian broader society from October athon,

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.360
<v Speaker 1>but we wanted to make sure that couldn't happen again.

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>We wanted to avert a wider war which would have

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>caused even more death, destruction and suffering and probably would

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>have prolonged Gaza even more. And so that meant making sure,

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>among other things, that there was a strong deterrent in place,

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>including Israel's deterrent. To say it would be aggressors who

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>were prepared to jump in pile in because they thought

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Israel was down, if not out, has Bollah, Iran, the Huthis, etc.

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Don't do it, and so we had to preserve Israel's

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>de turn we wanted to get. We thought the best

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>way to end this was through the deal that we

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>ultimately got, the sees fire and hostage deal. But part

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of the problem was part of the challenge was that

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Hamas was constantly strong arming things because of two factors. One,

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it thought the cavalry was eventually going to come to

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the rescue the Iranians has Belah, et cetera. And until

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it was clear, and that didn't happen until really September

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty four, with the death of Nasralla, with

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>other leaders who were taken out by the Israelis with

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the decimation, if not well or diminishment at least of

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>hesblat self. That wasn't clear till then, and that notion

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of the cavalry company the rescue was still there. The

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>second thing that was really problematic was that, and we

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>know this from all the information we had, Hamas was

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>looking for any gaps between us in Israel and Israel's

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>other supporters, and as soon as they saw something emerge,

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>they would step back. So in public it was critical

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that we preserve as much solidarity as possible, even as

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>in private we were hammering them every single day on

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>humanitterran assistance for Palestinian people, on civilian casualties, and of

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>course they were operating in a unique environment where Hamas

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>was hiding among and below all of the civilian infrastructure

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and civilians themselves in schools and mosque and hospitals. That

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't excuse some of the actions that Israel took in

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to get at Hamas, not at Palestinians, but it

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is necessary to understand that that was part of the environment.

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I also think, at the end of the day, this

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is just my judgment and I may be wrong. That

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this was perceived in Israel among the vast majority of

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the population, not just Prime Netnyaho people in his government,

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>but the vast majority of the population, including many who

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>don't like him at all, to be an existential matter,

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and irrespective of what we did or anyone else did,

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they were likely to continue with or without us. So

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>for us, it was how do we try, how do

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>we bring this to an end as quickly and effectively

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>as possible, again making sure that it's not likely to

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>happen again, averting a wider war, and all the while

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to look out for people who are caught in

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this horrific crossfire.

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Is it wrong to look at this as a continuum

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 2>that Prime Minister Netnya, who's able to prosecute the war

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 2>in the way in which he wanted, that led him

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 2>to feel them bold enough to take these strikes in

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 2>concert with the United States.

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Certainly there's a profound connection there, because I think in

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the past he has probably been reluctant to go at

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Iran directly because of the threat of retaliation a response

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>from Hesbolah, but with Hesbolah vastly to Mintic, even though

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>they did respond not in such a significant way, and

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, something truly remarkable. The president, the Prime

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Minister of Lebanon denounced Hesbolov for getting into this and

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>firing it at Israel. That's remarkable. But for sure, I

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>think the Israeli is Yes, we're in a position where

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>something they hesitated to do in the past, that is

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>direct confrontation with Iran because of the likelihood that others

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>would get in and go at them, that was taken

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>away and that did open the door to them doing

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>what they've done.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 2>I want to wrap up with where this leaves us,

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 2>where this leaves the world. And Prime Minister Mark Karney

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 2>of Canada spoke recently and he said this is just

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 2>another example of what he's talked about before, this rupture

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 2>in the global order that that's happened on two counts here.

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 2>There have been two failures. The first of which was

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 2>the multilateral institutions that we've relied on weren't able to

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 2>constrain Iran effectively.

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>That's one.

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 2>The second is you have the US and Israel now

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 2>going it together without the consent of the UN or

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 2>other multi latteral institute. Do you agree with him as

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 2>he talks about the way that that hegemony. The global

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 2>order has changed. Look, we're very much at an inflection

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 2>point in.

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>The global order, in the rules based order that we

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>spent eighty years building up, and that was premised on

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>one I think profound insight, and that was enlightened self interest,

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the notion that the success and strength of others would

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>be our own as well, and we were able to

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>build a system that avoided other countries ganging up against us,

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>as is usually the case when one country rises above

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the others. We had new markets for all the stuff

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to sell. We had new partners to deal

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>with different conflicts, different problems. We had new allies to

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>deter aggression, especially with NATO. And now that system is

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>being put in for now at least in the dust

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>bin and being replaced with They're different versions of this.

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Some people believe that the president's engaged in going back

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to a spheres of influenced world where the Russians do

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>what they want and they're part of the world, The

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Chinese do what they want, except maybe on the economic

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>issues in their part, and we do what we want

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to do in our part, particularly in the Western hemisphere.

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got these problematic areas that are dealt

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>with by force. That's a profound thing, and that's what's

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>happening now. But I think at the same time, and

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this is what's maybe most frustrating of all in the

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Middle East, is that there's also an extraordinary opportunity, if

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>very big, if this does produce some kind of real

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>change in Iran, then you have the prospect of a

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>region that heads in a very different direction, that is

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>integrated with its people, it's moving back and forth, it's

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>economies integrated, greater success, greater prosperity for folks. But there

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>remains one cat to that vision besides how Iran resolves,

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:07.479
<v Speaker 1>and that's the question of Israelis and Palestinians. The truly

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>big vision right now would be to actually resolve that question,

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>not to try to put it under the rug. Yet. Again,

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line is this, there are roughly seven million

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Jews in Israel, They're about two million Arabs, five million

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Palestinians between the West Bank and Gaza. No one is

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>going anywhere, despite the efforts of some on both sides

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to make that happen. And so tell me how this ends.

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how this ends without some kind of

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>genuine political accommodation that realizes the rights of Palestinians. This

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is the moment for that big vision because that brings

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 1>with it something incredibly powerful, normalization of relations between Israel

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and Saudi Arabia, and then potentially other countries will follow suit,

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>from Cutter to Indonesia. And then if the Iranian problem

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is diminished and Iran really has to face a choice

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>between being a pariah gadfly or mending its ways, I

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's the most likely way we're actually going to

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>see real change. Unfortunately, tragically, given the trauma on all

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>sides after October seventh, on the Israeli side and among Palestinians,

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it's awfully hard to get there. But that's where you

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>need people of vision to try to move things in

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that direction. There is actually an opportunity to do that.

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I worry that that opportunity will not be will not

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>be seized, and we're going to just see a continuation

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 1>among Israelis and Palestinians and also Iran is again likely

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 1>in this moment, if I had to bet again, we're

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 1>replacing one Iatola for another, and the nature of the

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>regime in this moment doesn't seem likely to change. I hope,

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm pleasantly surprised and the Iranians get the leadership that

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>they deserve. But the jury's very much out on that.

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 2>Something you warned about during your tenure Secretary of State

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 2>was the role that China could play in subverting or

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 2>reinventing the international order. How do you think about that

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 2>now in this moment, Well, you know, s reporse a vacuum.

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>If we're disengaged, if we're not leading in the effort

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to shape that order, then China's going to fill the void.

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you one example. At the during the Biden administration,

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the President took the lead in working with all of

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the frontier AI companies on getting voluntary commitments on safety

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and security for these AI artificial intelligence products that were

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>being rolled out, to make sure that they were adequately tested,

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that there was transparency, and that the guardrails were put

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 1>in against the misuse. For abuse is something that has

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>such extraordinary positive potential but also has real potential downsides.

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>And then we took that around the world and we

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>got the G seven to endorse it. We went to

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the United Nations, we got the first resolution ever on

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence from the entire United Nations. We were leading

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the effort to carry AI forward in a way that

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:58.280
<v Speaker 1>would be that would conform to our norms and basically

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>have them adopted by the world. Then the administration got

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>out of that business and said, no, it's just the

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 1>wild West, and it's too important that our companies be

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>able to do whatever they want to do whenever they

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 1>want to do it, however they want to do it,

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>because the competition with China is what matters the most.

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>But who picked up the banner on AI safety and security?

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>China did. There was a conference in Shanghai. Many of

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the other AI players from the United Kingdom to Singapore

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>or to others were there. And China may be the

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>one that's shaping some of these norms and rules, but

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 1>it's liking not to ours. So you know, there's a

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 1>as I've seen it again and again and again, if

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>we're disengaged, if we're not leading, then either someone else is,

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and most likely that's going to be China or no

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>one else is, and then you're going to have a

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>vacuum is filled by bad things before it's filled with

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:44.800
<v Speaker 1>good things. The flip side of that coin, David is

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:47.320
<v Speaker 1>We've got to be doing it with allies and partners.

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.800
<v Speaker 1>We need in all of these problem areas to be

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>working in concert, whether it's dealing with the problems that

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.760
<v Speaker 1>China poses. Were much stronger when we're allied and partner

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we successfully align countries around the world in dealing with

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the challenges the China post economically and on technology.

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>When dealing with China loan we're twenty or twenty five

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 1>percent of world GDP. When we're aligned with the Europeans,

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>with Japan, Korea, India, we're suddenly fifty or sixty percent.

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot harder, bigger weight that China has to

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 1>account for. And what I worry now is that as

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>a result of so many of the decisions that the

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>administration has taken that have alienated allies and partners that

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>have treated them worse than our adversaries, we're heading to

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a world where as much as these other countries want

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>to work with us, they are looking for ways to

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>work around us to make sure that they're never caught

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in this position again where the United States can bully

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>them into doing something it wants and they don't want.

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Seventy percent of Germans in a poll the other day

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>said said they see the United States as an adversary.

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Sixteen percent of Europeans now see US not as a

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 1>friendly country. Similar numbers when it comes to Canada and Mexico,

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>similar numbers when it comes to South Korea, Japan. That's

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 1>not going to be a good world for the United

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 1>States in the first instance. Yes, someone might take a

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>knee because they have no choice, but then they're going

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that they do everything possible not to

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>put themselves in that position again where the United States,

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>where the tariff can hammer them into doing something that's

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 1>not in their interest. Their limits to that the US

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>financial system is so central and so strong that their

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 1>limits to how far you can work away from or

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>around the United States. But that's what we're seeing, and

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that's not a world, in my judgment, that's in our interest.

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 2>Last question is what this war and around means for

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 2>President Trump's other ambitions, be that Cuba, be that Greenland,

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 2>continued project in Venezuela. How do you think about what

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 2>this mayriorment not lead to.

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, in some ways, Around's the outlier, because these other

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>areas that you just mentioned are all within what would

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>be our so called sphere of influence. And that's why

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I said, you know before, what we're seeing is at

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>least is one of the shifts I think we're seeing

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>is the President seems to see the world in terms

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of these spheres of influence, and anything within our sphere

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we should, in one way or another control, And there's

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:23.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of a very nineteenth century view that actually controlling

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the territory is the most most important thing, never mind

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that there's absolutely no need to do that. I mean,

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>in the case of Greenland, simply asking would have gotten

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the right answer in terms of putting more military forces

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>there or striking deals on their raw materials. But that

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 1>world is spheres of influence world where the big guys

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>on the block, and it is guys in this view,

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>get to do what they want in their area. That's

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the way things were for much of the latter part

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of the nineteenth century. But it didn't end well. We

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:58.880
<v Speaker 1>ultimately end up with World War One. What happens, the

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>big countries always want more elbow room, and so they

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 1>rub up against the other the other sphere, and that

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>produces conflict the smaller countries within a sphere, they get

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to a point where they don't like it, and they

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 1>band together and try to build their own strength to

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>take on the hegemon the people within the country exerting

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that hegemony. Typically it's in non democratic countries. They conclude

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 1>that this is not the life that I want to live,

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and rebel against it. And then if you have a

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>system where you've got these these spheres of influence, and

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 1>one of these shares is controlled by a democracy like

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and the others are controlled by autocracies,

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the autocracies, at the end of the day, can't abide

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the success of democracies because in a world of instantaneous communications,

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>their people get to see what's happening and conclude, oh,

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.319
<v Speaker 1>life looks a lot better there, And so they that's

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be a constant incentive for them to try

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to take us down, pull us down by meddling in

0:40:55.880 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>our elections, by trying to foment societal conflict. Except so,

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>that is not a recipe as I see it, for

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a world of peace, for a world devoid of conflict,

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:12.800
<v Speaker 1>for a world in which the United States can do

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:15.440
<v Speaker 1>everything that it needs to do to be successful. One

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 1>last thing is this, As much as I'm concerned about

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:23.799
<v Speaker 1>the diminishment of our alliances and our partnerships, the moving

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 1>away from enlightened self interest, the move toward shies of influence,

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 1>or some people have talked about building empire. I'm equally concerned, David,

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:37.760
<v Speaker 1>with another alliance that's been shattered, and that's an internal alliance.

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 1>When we started the twentieth century, there was not a

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:45.399
<v Speaker 1>major pursuit of science in which the United States led

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the world. By the time we got to the twenty

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:49.840
<v Speaker 1>first century, there was not a major pursuit in science

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.439
<v Speaker 1>and technology where the United States did not lead the world.

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>That didn't happen by accident. It happened because we built

0:41:55.160 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>an alliance between the federal government, universities, research institutions, national labs.

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 1>The amount of GDP that we dedicated to research and

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:06.399
<v Speaker 1>development went from about one and a half percent after

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 1>World War II to by the time President Biden left office,

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>three and a half percent, and that produced extraordinary innovation.

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Coupled with this welcome mat for the best and brightest

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 1>from around the world who would do their studies here,

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Attracted by being with the best and brightest and an

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 1>open system. Then they stayed around and created things that

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 1>made us a leader in all of these fields, which

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:33.880
<v Speaker 1>redounded to our economy and redounded to our national security.

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 1>As that system is being blown up, I think that

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>may be the biggest threat of all to sustaining America's

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 1>place of strength, of leadership and power. I'm gratified that

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the Congress has resisted a number of these cuts that

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the administration has been pushing, but a lot of damage

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>has been has been done. You know, when Mark Zuckerberg

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 1>was trying to hire the best AI talent in the country,

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 1>what about nine or ten months ago, taking it from

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.919
<v Speaker 1>other companies in the United States, there was a first

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>group of eleven people who he brought on board his ship.

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>And I looked at the list of eleven people and

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of striking, and I checked into it

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:16.879
<v Speaker 1>to see if I was right, and indeed, yes, every

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 1>single one of those was an immigrant, attracted again by

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the system that we had put in place to attract

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the best and vice to fund the work that they

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>were doing to the benefit of our companies, of our people,

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:34.359
<v Speaker 1>of our country. If we lose that, we lose a lot.

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Mister Secretary, thank you very much.

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Great to be with you.