Speaker 1: All right, glad you with us and write down our
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program. We've got the latest the President the
Speaker 1: Showdown Iran, and I am stunned at how people don't
Speaker 1: understand this guy when he's the single most transparent president
Speaker 1: in modern times. I don't they just they purposely don't
Speaker 1: want to understand him. We'll get to that. Oh, we
Speaker 1: have a preview of coming attractions with the big saying
Speaker 1: Democratic debate this week. It's gonna get entertaining if what
Speaker 1: happened down in South Carolina is any indication of where
Speaker 1: things are headed. I mean, the presidential candidates are going
Speaker 1: absolutely nuts. I mean, you know, I got the statistics
Speaker 1: for example on what do you call may mayor Pete
Speaker 1: Buddha judge. And he has atrocious track record, and we're
Speaker 1: gonna tell you what was said to him over the weekend,
Speaker 1: and I gotta tell you it really was awful. And
Speaker 1: then you look at everything else and what the people
Speaker 1: in the community think of this guy, and they hate him.
Speaker 1: How I don't even see him winning South Bend if
Speaker 1: he runs for dogcatcher at this point because his record
Speaker 1: is so atrocious. The President is giving well one more
Speaker 1: last chance, a two week window as requested by the
Speaker 1: Democrats to see if they can work out a deal
Speaker 1: on immigration. Don't hold your breath. As my prediction, he's
Speaker 1: already offered all of these things, saying wait, please, please,
Speaker 1: we need two more weeks. All right, I'll give it
Speaker 1: to you. Well, he had already put issues like Dhaka
Speaker 1: Dreamers on the table to the same people that now
Speaker 1: call Wall's immoral. But they weren't immoral Obama second term.
Speaker 1: They were paying for them in Obama second term. They
Speaker 1: supported them in Obama second term. Now they're talking about
Speaker 1: knocking him down like Robert Francis Boza O'Rourke. I mean,
Speaker 1: you cannot get more looney than what this left wing field,
Speaker 1: this democratic, extreme radical socialist party has become, and it's
Speaker 1: getting worse by the second. I want to start quickly
Speaker 1: with what's the latest with Iran and how people do
Speaker 1: not people is? Donald Trump is not complicated? He's not.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, there was a great inventor, forget
Speaker 1: his name, one said about inventors. I actually know two inventors,
Speaker 1: believe it or not. Years ago, I used to go
Speaker 1: to this invention convention and people come up with the
Speaker 1: craziest but really smart things. But the guy said about
Speaker 1: inventors that you know, the obvious is that which is
Speaker 1: often unseen until somebody expresses it clearly. In other words,
Speaker 1: a great invent it is always right in front of
Speaker 1: your eyes, and you say, oh, why didn't I think
Speaker 1: of that? You know, I've had people on the show
Speaker 1: they said something, Oh why didn't I think of that?
Speaker 1: Why didn't I say that? That's what inventors do. They
Speaker 1: see the obvious, They see things, they see a need,
Speaker 1: They fulfill a need. Goods and services people want, need
Speaker 1: and desire. I mean, whoever designed the dishwasher or the
Speaker 1: clothes washer? Think back to the days, you know, and
Speaker 1: there are people in many countries today they don't have
Speaker 1: washing machines. And you can see people that they have
Speaker 1: to still haul water up to, you know, wherever it
Speaker 1: is that they live. And it's like, you know, progress
Speaker 1: could be made. Whoever made the washing machine and then
Speaker 1: made it in such a way that it's so cheap
Speaker 1: it's ridiculous. You know, look at what Henry Ford did.
Speaker 1: Henry Ford designed a car that the average man and
Speaker 1: woman could afford. The model t he wanted to make
Speaker 1: it affordable for the people that worked on his assembly line,
Speaker 1: and it was brilliant change the world. Look at where
Speaker 1: we are now. Look at cars today. You can get
Speaker 1: really expensive ones, you can get little little baby cars,
Speaker 1: you can get green cars, you can get any car
Speaker 1: you want. SUVs, big SUVs, medium SUVs, small SUVs, sports
Speaker 1: cars go lore. All my friends love sports cars. And
Speaker 1: you know, I'll tell you this. They as a guy
Speaker 1: out there by the name of Igor Sikorski. You've heard
Speaker 1: of a Sikorsky helicopter. That guy had the same idea
Speaker 1: that Henry Ford did, which was he thought that he
Speaker 1: wanted to make helicopters. And by the way, they're one
Speaker 1: of the finest helicopters by the ways of Russian. I
Speaker 1: probably colluded with him, but yeah, I just read about
Speaker 1: how he His vision for the helicopter was that everybody
Speaker 1: use it. Everybody that that's how we transport people. And
Speaker 1: you know what, we could do it, but probably government
Speaker 1: doesn't allow it. Then you got the whiners and complainers
Speaker 1: like I give you an example. If you the big
Speaker 1: business in New York is they've got uber helicopters. They
Speaker 1: really do. It's called blade. I know that's one of them.
Speaker 1: They're other ones. I've never used them, but they have.
Speaker 1: In other words, it's like an uber and you book
Speaker 1: your helicopter flight if you're part of that crowd that
Speaker 1: goes out to the Hamptons every weekend, and maybe you
Speaker 1: need two seats, but maybe they see eight people. I
Speaker 1: don't know how many people in the helicopters. And anyway,
Speaker 1: it's Uber helicopter. It's kind of a cool idea. But
Speaker 1: the problem is in the people in the Hamptons complaining, Ah,
Speaker 1: I heard a helicopter. Excuse me. While I'm laying at
Speaker 1: the pool. Two helicopters flew over in an hour. It's outrageous, Like,
Speaker 1: all right, get over it. I mean it pretty much
Speaker 1: anywhere where I live in Long Island, New York, and
Speaker 1: the flight patterns change, you're gonna hear airplanes. Now, if
Speaker 1: you're really close to the airport, it's gonna be worse.
Speaker 1: But you knew that when you bought close to the airport.
Speaker 1: It's not like they just put in LaGuardia or JFK
Speaker 1: or whatever the airport Newark that you might be flying
Speaker 1: in and out of anyway. So Pete, Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: not complicated. If you look at the things that he
Speaker 1: has said during the campaign and you look back on
Speaker 1: his life, he's been very consistent. Now some of you
Speaker 1: will say, well, Hannity, but he gave money to Democrats
Speaker 1: and he wasn't. Now he's become the most pro life president,
Speaker 1: but he was one's pro choice. But he explained what
Speaker 1: changed his mind, and it was a profound moment for him.
Speaker 1: Nobody believed him. Nobody believed he was a conservative because
Speaker 1: in New York you got to kind of suck up
Speaker 1: to both parties, especially the Democrats, or else your building's
Speaker 1: not going up. Those plumbers, electricians, those construction workers are
Speaker 1: not going to be busy because they'll stop you. There's
Speaker 1: punitive you know politicians, Oh you don't want to donate
Speaker 1: to my campaign, We're fine. So he's donating to Republicans
Speaker 1: and Democrats so he can keep his buildings going up
Speaker 1: and workers working and making money. That's he would And
Speaker 1: he said it. He was like, wasn't my idea. That's
Speaker 1: their game. That's how it's played. I don't like it,
Speaker 1: but that's how it's played. And it's true. Now, is
Speaker 1: it bribery, No, it's just that you know that if
Speaker 1: you don't donate after you've been invited. And all these
Speaker 1: people would knock on his door and go up to
Speaker 1: Trump Tower and you know, sit before Donald Trump. He
Speaker 1: knew why they were there. They wanted money. Why they
Speaker 1: want then, I guess that gives you access to make
Speaker 1: a call. Oh, can you do me a favor that
Speaker 1: gives you the phone call access. It's just it's the
Speaker 1: whole thing sucks. That's why you should have politicians serving
Speaker 1: two years and out out the door. Anyway. So it's
Speaker 1: he everything he said he would do, like, for example,
Speaker 1: when he negotiates. If you ever read the art of
Speaker 1: the deal, and there will be people in the media speculating,
Speaker 1: well Hannity has these conversations with the president. Well, I'm
Speaker 1: a talk show host. Excuse me, I'm a member of
Speaker 1: the press, and yeah, I make phone calls and we
Speaker 1: do a lot of digging, which is how we were
Speaker 1: able to really for two years, break story after story
Speaker 1: after story after story, while the mainstream media went ahead
Speaker 1: with their lies, their collusion and their hopes and conspiracy theories,
Speaker 1: and we ended up being right and they were wrong.
Speaker 1: And so people literally people will write me from the
Speaker 1: media and how many times said you've talked spoken to
Speaker 1: the president, like, oh, give me a list. My answer
Speaker 1: is always saying, give me a list of all of
Speaker 1: your sources, and I'll consider maybe telling you one of mine,
Speaker 1: which I would never do. What do you mean, Hannity
Speaker 1: or a talk show host. Yeah, but I'm a member
Speaker 1: of the press and a talk show host. I can
Speaker 1: produce hours and hours of TV radio coverage. We're just
Speaker 1: doing straight news. Catastrophic event of shooting, bad weather, you
Speaker 1: know her katrein a war, I'm not doing opinion. I'm
Speaker 1: doing straight news reporting. We do investigative reporting. We've been
Speaker 1: doing it now over two years. That's what the mainstream
Speaker 1: media mob wouldn't touch, and they've been dead wrong lying
Speaker 1: to the American people, and we've gotten it right. We're
Speaker 1: proud of the work that our ensembled team here that
Speaker 1: we've been able to accomplish. Too many names to list,
Speaker 1: you know who they are. We did it with Obama.
Speaker 1: We've vetted him. They wouldn't vet him either. That's investigative reporting.
Speaker 1: We do straight reporting. We do investigative reporting. Yes, I
Speaker 1: do not hide the fact that I am an opinion host,
Speaker 1: an advocacy journalist. A lot of times I'm giving strong opinions,
Speaker 1: but I'm open about it, and I'm telling you who
Speaker 1: I am when i'm doing it. There's no I am
Speaker 1: a conservative. I'm a registered conservative. Conservatism as being practiced
Speaker 1: by Donald Trump works. So I'm transparent. And sometimes we
Speaker 1: do sports, you know, sometimes we have on herschel Walker
Speaker 1: or Tim Tebow, or cultural issues like first we'll deliver
Speaker 1: the baby and we'll make sure the baby's comfortable and
Speaker 1: then we'll let the mother decide if the baby lives.
Speaker 1: That would be considered a cultural issue, not as much
Speaker 1: a political one. In other words, I can't believe we're
Speaker 1: debating infanticide or you know, if the woman's in the
Speaker 1: middle of the birthing process and she's dilating, would you
Speaker 1: still support abortion? Yet our bill allows that during birth,
Speaker 1: after birth infanticide. That's not abortion. I refuse to call
Speaker 1: it abortion because it's not. So. The President has always
Speaker 1: been transparent. He said he was going to cut taxes.
Speaker 1: He did the biggest tax cuts in history. Said he
Speaker 1: was going to give you a list of Supreme Court
Speaker 1: justices and he would pick from that list. He did.
Speaker 1: He said he was going to have massive dearregulation made
Speaker 1: a big deal about it. He did it, he said
Speaker 1: to me many times, because my pet issue. I believe
Speaker 1: that we can raise the standard of living. You know,
Speaker 1: we could double the standard of living. Frankly, if in fact,
Speaker 1: we would become energy independent. We are for the first
Speaker 1: time in seventy five years, which makes the Straits or
Speaker 1: hor moves less important to us than ever before, which
Speaker 1: gives us leverage. And by the way, we can we're
Speaker 1: now a net exporter of energy and we're just we're
Speaker 1: just touching the surface because we've got more resources than
Speaker 1: all these countries that hate us, that we've been begging
Speaker 1: to give us the lifeblood of our economy for decades.
Speaker 1: You know, he kept that promise. President said he was
Speaker 1: going to negotiate new trade deals. He did it. You know,
Speaker 1: he's gonna make NATO pay more. Negotiated that every time
Speaker 1: he negotiates, so they get uncomfortable. Last week he single
Speaker 1: handedly said to Mexico, stop the migrant caravans or I'm
Speaker 1: gonna put a tariff on you have twenty five percent. Wow.
Speaker 1: Even Republicans, No, we don't want, we don't believe, and
Speaker 1: you know we want free and fair trade. We want
Speaker 1: free trade, free okay, But when you're getting taken advantage of.
Speaker 1: If you don't, if they don't believe you're serious, you
Speaker 1: have no negotiation leverage. Read the art of the deal.
Speaker 1: President Trump, are of the deal. If you're doing a
Speaker 1: business deal, never want it too much. Be able to
Speaker 1: walk away from the deal any second. He's fighting for
Speaker 1: the border. He kept his promise on Jerusalem, kept his
Speaker 1: promise on goal On, kept his promise. He has now
Speaker 1: put pressure on, massive pressure on the Iranians, which is
Speaker 1: why they're acting out. I like the fact that people
Speaker 1: have an impression of Donald Trump that is inaccurate. They
Speaker 1: literally Donald Trump said he'd do all these things, and
Speaker 1: he did them. It makes him unique. That's why he's
Speaker 1: not a politician. He's very, very predictable. And the fact
Speaker 1: that you know, he hasn't obliterated as he said he
Speaker 1: may have to the Iranians. I believe he will. But
Speaker 1: he did do a couple of things this weekend that
Speaker 1: nobody really seems to want to pay attention to, like,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, President Trump really did that. That's interesting
Speaker 1: to me. Yeah, because number one, the polls show that
Speaker 1: voters support the President's Iran strategy. Maxine Waters was actually
Speaker 1: accusing Trump of provoking Iran. Okay, why because he didn't drop,
Speaker 1: you know, cargo planesful of cash and of the currency.
Speaker 1: But the President has now announced more sanctions on Iran
Speaker 1: Supreme leader Ayatollah Kamane and the president also nobody seems
Speaker 1: to notice. We did strike back at Iran and their
Speaker 1: military computers this weekend. But the President said he may
Speaker 1: obliterate them, and guess what he may. And is he
Speaker 1: ever gonna get us into a foreign entanglement? No, he's
Speaker 1: dead set against it. But would he obliterate them? Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: Now if he would go too fast, everyone would be
Speaker 1: furious with him. I used that earlier, by the way,
Speaker 1: So I'm going to go to Okay, eight hundred nine,
Speaker 1: one shot one. We'll get to this. The fact that
Speaker 1: the media doesn't get it, it's amazing to me. So
Speaker 1: people want to just there's nothing Donald Trump can ever
Speaker 1: do that's ever going to be right in the eyes
Speaker 1: of those people that have decided they hate him. There's nothing.
Speaker 1: The cured cancer gave everybody ten million, it's not gonna matter.
Speaker 1: So the president, you know, the media saying, oh no,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, he's gonna get us his World War three starting. No, no,
Speaker 1: it's not. I do believe Donald Trump absolutely is standing back.
Speaker 1: He's watching, he's negotiating, and he's doing things that we
Speaker 1: don't know, and he will do it in his time.
Speaker 1: And if you doubt he has the ability and willingness
Speaker 1: to do what's necessary to obliterator Rand, then you don't
Speaker 1: know Donald Trump. But now me is acting and what
Speaker 1: he's done is we struck Iranian military computer's hard. Apparently
Speaker 1: over the weekend he's now put sanctions on the Ayatola himself.
Speaker 1: The president is being prudent. We have the ability to
Speaker 1: be more prudent than ever before in any Middle Eastern
Speaker 1: entanglement because of his decision to make us energy independent,
Speaker 1: which every other president before could have but never did.
Speaker 1: And it to me and if he does, he's not
Speaker 1: going to start a war with boots on the ground.
Speaker 1: So whatever he decides militarily is going to be devastating
Speaker 1: to Iran. I think were eventually one day as hard
Speaker 1: as it is, considering how big the Iranian landmasses and
Speaker 1: the location of their nuclear reactors, I think there's going
Speaker 1: to have to be a partnership to take all those
Speaker 1: facilities out and that's a very difficult military operation. I've
Speaker 1: talked to many generals about it. All right, twenty five
Speaker 1: now till the top of the hour, eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine four one sean, if you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of this extravganza, so I just I don't think
Speaker 1: the media will ever want to know Donald Trump. They
Speaker 1: just don't want And by the way, if you really
Speaker 1: want to be honest here, why do we have this
Speaker 1: problem with Iran? Because well, yeah, Donald Trump kept his
Speaker 1: promise and the sanctioned Iran and it's killing their economy.
Speaker 1: They're about to hit a forty percent inflation rate. Their
Speaker 1: contraction at four and six percent, you know yearly is
Speaker 1: now devastating their economy. The sanctions also have resulted in
Speaker 1: a massive reduction in oil exports for them and the
Speaker 1: United States independence. It couldn't be a better time because
Speaker 1: the Straits of Hormuz, which have always been strategically so
Speaker 1: dangerous for the world. Really in the end, it wouldn't
Speaker 1: be great. We get over it much more easily than
Speaker 1: ever before because of the President's amitment to energy independence.
Speaker 1: Do I think it's going to come down to the
Speaker 1: President's obliteration of Iran. I kind of don't, but anything's possible,
Speaker 1: and whatever happens is going to happen. It doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: They will choose ultimately what their fate is. It's not
Speaker 1: gonna be Donald Trump. It's not going to be a
Speaker 1: ground war. It's not going to be boots on the ground,
Speaker 1: and it's not going to be a protracted long but
Speaker 1: you know, no uparmored hum vs. Politicized. You know, a
Speaker 1: year later, you know, questioning whether we ever should have
Speaker 1: been there. Then you know, war mongers. You know it's
Speaker 1: gonna be you know, you have to think strategically, and
Speaker 1: you know, this is something that the country dealt with
Speaker 1: in World War two, the war that my dad fought in.
Speaker 1: If you think back after Pearl Harbor and you think
Speaker 1: back America's involvement in Europe, which I think we got
Speaker 1: in a little later than we should my own personal opinion,
Speaker 1: I don't think there's a lot of support for it.
Speaker 1: And Winston Churchill rightly was begging the United States because
Speaker 1: they needed our help. The world needed our help to
Speaker 1: defeat fascism and Nazism. We had our own issues after
Speaker 1: Pearl Harbor, and it was after that the Winston Churchill
Speaker 1: became the guests that would never leave the White House
Speaker 1: because he knew the importance of americasm. Bob. But we
Speaker 1: were the key to victory, and those guys we just
Speaker 1: celebrated and honored the men of Normandy and slamming the
Speaker 1: beaches of Normandy, and it's like, wow, courageous men. You
Speaker 1: just you can't even fathom. You know, Let's say you're
Speaker 1: the third, fourth, fifth wave of American soldiers just hitting
Speaker 1: shore and you're just looking at all thousands of dead bodies,
Speaker 1: hundreds of dead bodies, injured soldiers ahead of you, and
Speaker 1: you see that they've got the high ground, and you
Speaker 1: got to somehow we've got to defeat this. You know,
Speaker 1: you know you're walking in a certain death. But they
Speaker 1: did it and they won. And then you think of
Speaker 1: the decision of Harry Truman. You know, we got hit
Speaker 1: at Pearl Harbor, you know, an unprovoked attack, and where
Speaker 1: now involved in the Pacific. That's where my father fought
Speaker 1: for four years. He served four years in the Pacific.
Speaker 1: He's signed up and like so many other Americans of
Speaker 1: his generation, didn't love it, didn't like it, but knew
Speaker 1: it was important and did it and watch people die
Speaker 1: in front of him, told me didn't like to talk
Speaker 1: about it, like a lot of that generation, they don't
Speaker 1: want to go there, and I don't blame them. And
Speaker 1: you know, then you think of, well, Truman's deciding, all right,
Speaker 1: now we have this bomb and we can hit Hiroshima
Speaker 1: and Nagasaki and we can end the war. Maybe just
Speaker 1: one is needed, maybe two. And then you think of okay,
Speaker 1: well if it's a protracted conflict, and you'll let it
Speaker 1: go on, and it goes on on and on. How
Speaker 1: many Americans are going to die in the process. Nobody likes.
Speaker 1: If you have a human heart and soul, you don't
Speaker 1: like what we call collateral damage. It's not collateral when
Speaker 1: it's human life. These are real people, real lives, real men,
Speaker 1: women and children. And yet because of the actions of
Speaker 1: their government, we have to Now we're now involved in
Speaker 1: the decision we don't want to make, and that is
Speaker 1: all right, do we end the war. People are going
Speaker 1: to get hurt, innocence, will lose lives, People that had
Speaker 1: no beasts with the US. No, they've not even involved
Speaker 1: in politics. But it's going to end the war, and
Speaker 1: American lives are going to be saved and they started it.
Speaker 1: There's no question about who the aggressor is. And we
Speaker 1: can go on for many years and lose many American lives,
Speaker 1: or we can end it. What decisions the right decision.
Speaker 1: I am thinking more and more that wars need we
Speaker 1: need to re calibrate how we fight wars, and that
Speaker 1: is we need the next generation of weaponry where we're
Speaker 1: not going to have to have boots on the ground.
Speaker 1: We have the satellite technology and the drone technology and
Speaker 1: the ability to see, you know, with pinpoint accuracy, you
Speaker 1: know where the target is, where the enemy is, who
Speaker 1: the enemy is, and it's getting better every second, every
Speaker 1: hour of every day. That's, by the way, that's from
Speaker 1: our great intelligence people, the ninety nine percent that would
Speaker 1: never abuse the tools of intelligence that are so powerful
Speaker 1: a turn them against the American people ninety nine percent
Speaker 1: that keep us safe. But if we can fight the
Speaker 1: future wars instead of having kids with you know, in
Speaker 1: humbies in some cases of not up armor. That drove
Speaker 1: me nuts when we discovered that. Then the retro fitting
Speaker 1: them and I'm like, this is crazy, and then the
Speaker 1: Americans we had to you know, once you start you
Speaker 1: gotta win it. I just believe there's only there's no
Speaker 1: other answer. Victory is the only answer if you're going
Speaker 1: to be involved in a war. We've had two wars
Speaker 1: now that have become politicized Afghanistan, Iraq and Vietnam, and
Speaker 1: it doesn't end well. And I don't want to be
Speaker 1: sending kids to fight, bleed and die without the ultimate
Speaker 1: goal of victory. And I don't know, and I don't
Speaker 1: believe that the country is the stomach for any type
Speaker 1: of boots on the ground conflict or battle, especially in
Speaker 1: the Middle East where look, I don't believe we're going
Speaker 1: to change these countries the weight to defeat Shariah for example,
Speaker 1: or Caliphates. And what happened and Siri, we bombed the
Speaker 1: living crap out of them. People really weren't paying attention. Literally,
Speaker 1: they finally and the people in those countries did the groundwork.
Speaker 1: That's how we beat back isis that's how we did it.
Speaker 1: To the last city, the first city that was taken
Speaker 1: and all of the territorial ambitions pushed back, and that
Speaker 1: first city taken back, and that was Donald Trump bombing
Speaker 1: the living hell out of them day by day. Now,
Speaker 1: we didn't we had some boots on the ground. We
Speaker 1: had intelligence people on the ground, but the people that
Speaker 1: were actually doing most of the work upfront were people
Speaker 1: from those countries fighting for their country. Which is just
Speaker 1: if you're not willing to fight for your country, don't
Speaker 1: ask us to go fight for your country. You know, Frankly,
Speaker 1: anybody that we help out, you need to pay the
Speaker 1: costs of us fighting for your liberty and freedom. I
Speaker 1: think Trump was always right about that. We should have
Speaker 1: compensated military families with the oil from Iraq. We're going
Speaker 1: to bail you out of that dictatorship, and frankly Syria too,
Speaker 1: we could. We have every right to force you to
Speaker 1: pay for your own liberation and compensate American treasure. Are
Speaker 1: you know which is the men and women the fight
Speaker 1: these wars and their families. Yeah, millions of dollars absolutely
Speaker 1: per family. Absolutely sorry. You know, we didn't want to
Speaker 1: go there either, but we did it. You're safe, the
Speaker 1: world safer, but you're paying the price. I think that's
Speaker 1: a great idea anyway. So we'll see how this unfolds.
Speaker 1: But I do believe, like every other promise, Trump is
Speaker 1: not gonna get us into a long boots on the
Speaker 1: ground conflict and the next generation of warfare I think
Speaker 1: is going to be very different. We better get ahead
Speaker 1: of this, and I know that there are others that
Speaker 1: you know well. We believe that we should drop cargo
Speaker 1: planes of cash and currency on the tarmac and hand
Speaker 1: it over to mullows that hate our guts. The idea,
Speaker 1: we got a lot, We got a preview of coming attractions.
Speaker 1: So we're gonna have these democratic debates this week. Let
Speaker 1: me play a little bit of the crazy Democratic socialists
Speaker 1: in South Carolina this weekend, because this is pretty much
Speaker 1: what you're going to hear from now till November twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: It's madness. Let's take action and make sure that if
Speaker 1: Congress doesn't have the courage to pass mart gun safety laws,
Speaker 1: then we will get the job done. I believe in
Speaker 1: America where no politician tells a woman what to do
Speaker 1: with her body. I believe in an America well health
Speaker 1: care is a right and not a privilege for just
Speaker 1: those who can afford it. I believe in an America
Speaker 1: where children do not have to fear going to school
Speaker 1: for fear of the mass shooter. Let's recognize that climate
Speaker 1: disruption is a national security threat. And if we want
Speaker 1: to talk about national security, let us name and confront
Speaker 1: the rising tide of violent white nationalism that has claimed
Speaker 1: lives from Charleston to San Diego. That's national security. And also,
Speaker 1: for that same two cents, we can cancel student loan
Speaker 1: debt for ninety five percent of the folks who've got it.
Speaker 1: We are four ending the school to prison pipeline. We
Speaker 1: are four standing up to make sure that we don't
Speaker 1: stick our head in the ground on climate change. But
Speaker 1: this is a nation that leads us out of this crisis.
Speaker 1: My administration, we gave PreK, full day PreK to every
Speaker 1: child in our city for free. Do you want that,
Speaker 1: South Carolina? Do you think people need that? All over
Speaker 1: this country? Today? In New York, we are guaranteeing healthcare
Speaker 1: for everyone who does not have insurance. We will pass
Speaker 1: a law this year in New York guaranteeing and mandating
Speaker 1: two weeks paid vacation for every working person. Are you
Speaker 1: ready for that? In South Carolina, we will demand that
Speaker 1: the wealthy and large corporations start paying their fair share
Speaker 1: of taxes so that we can make public colleges and
Speaker 1: universities to wiship free and substantially reduce student debt in
Speaker 1: this country. I want the real thing, ladies and gentlemen,
Speaker 1: not just superficial things. I want a Department of Children
Speaker 1: and Youth. I want a massive realignment of investment in
Speaker 1: the direction of our children under ten. I don't want
Speaker 1: to just talk about medicare for all, although we need it.
Speaker 1: We need to talk about the chemical policies, and the
Speaker 1: environmental policies, and the food policies and the agricultural policies
Speaker 1: that are making us so sick. And I don't just
Speaker 1: want to talk about race based policies because if you're
Speaker 1: just talking about race based policies, you're leaving open the
Speaker 1: question as both fault. That is, we need reparations and
Speaker 1: we need reparations because reparations do more than pay money.
Speaker 1: They are spiritual power. They are an inherent mayaculpa. They
Speaker 1: are an acknowledgement of a wrong that has been done,
Speaker 1: a depth that is owed, and a willingness to pay it.
Speaker 1: Under my plan, whether you're covered by your employer, on
Speaker 1: your own or not at all, you'll be able to
Speaker 1: buy into an option of public healthcare option like medicare.
Speaker 1: We can easily afford free community college cutting in half
Speaker 1: to cost the four year colleges for everyone qualified to
Speaker 1: get in. And further than that, we have to do
Speaker 1: something and reduce the student debt, which I don't have
Speaker 1: time to go into now, but we will. I don't
Speaker 1: have time to get into Jenna, but we will. It's
Speaker 1: gone so far crazy Left, I mean crazy Bernie says
Speaker 1: it's not appropriate to deporting illegal immigrants even after a
Speaker 1: court orders the deportation. I mean the Democratic Party that
Speaker 1: they're open borders. And if I can't believe how hard
Speaker 1: they're pushing for during birth and after birth and fanticide,
Speaker 1: they're they're fighting hard. They want a seventy percent personal
Speaker 1: income tax rate, then they want a ninety percent corporate rate.
Speaker 1: Kill the economy, then eliminate all gas and oil, then
Speaker 1: a wealth tax on. Elizabeth Warren apparently wants reparations. Let
Speaker 1: me see, this was in the Daily Caller. She wants
Speaker 1: gay and lesbian couples to be added to the growing
Speaker 1: list of whom she would support for reparations. That's another
Speaker 1: big part of the Democratic enda. But you know, everything
Speaker 1: is free is interesting. How are you going to pay
Speaker 1: for that? Hang? Gonna pay for any of this? You know,
Speaker 1: I was watching the moment with Mayor Pete got the
Speaker 1: crap beat out of him when he was in South
Speaker 1: Bend over the weekend surrounding. You know, they say he's
Speaker 1: done nothing to help the black community in South Bend,
Speaker 1: and there was a prominent leader posed would seemed like
Speaker 1: a simple question to Mayor Pete during a private meeting,
Speaker 1: who in the African American community back home supports you?
Speaker 1: And he couldn't name anybody. Anyway, they had a recent shooting,
Speaker 1: controversial shooting, and he got his head handed to them.
Speaker 1: I went and looked at this guy's record. There was
Speaker 1: a survey of the good old Mayor Pete Buddha judge.
Speaker 1: Let's see. So sixty five percent of residents are dissatisfied
Speaker 1: with the maintenance of city street, sidewalks and infrastructure. Great record, Mayor.
Speaker 1: Fifty one percent of residents don't agree that they have
Speaker 1: an overall feeling of safety in their neighborhood. Sixty four
Speaker 1: percent of residents in South Bend disagree the city is
Speaker 1: safe a safe community for everyone. Seventy percent of residents
Speaker 1: don't agree that the city has vibrant, welcoming neighborhood. Seventy
Speaker 1: one percent don't agree that the city has strong as
Speaker 1: strong inclusive economy. Seventy two percent don't agree that all
Speaker 1: residents are empowered with education, mobility, and technology. And I mean,
Speaker 1: these responses are unbelievable. You know. Thirteen percent of residents
Speaker 1: believe agreed with South Bend as safe and a safe
Speaker 1: community for everyone. Thirteen percent. Sixty nine percent of Americans
Speaker 1: Americans in South Bend agreed that their community is safe
Speaker 1: for everyone. Would well, how is the mayor? And I
Speaker 1: watched them get the crapp eat out of him, and
Speaker 1: I'm like, he's a pretty crappy mayor. It's sort of
Speaker 1: like the worst mayor in New York City history is
Speaker 1: Big Bird or Comrade de Bazio. He's the worst. Does
Speaker 1: nothing and what he does do is dumb. Now we're
Speaker 1: gonna but no, we can't build skyscrapers in New York,
Speaker 1: so all building is gonna stop in New York. Well
Speaker 1: that's a genius move. I bet you're really happy if
Speaker 1: you work in the construction industry because you can't use
Speaker 1: glass and steel anymore. James Vis bring that in, you
Speaker 1: know the Well, I gotta take a break, all right,
Speaker 1: as we continue our two Sean Hannity Show toll free
Speaker 1: numbers eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean, you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program, joining us now.
Speaker 1: He is the chief counsel for the American Center for
Speaker 1: Law and Justice, also counsel to the President. Jay Sekula
Speaker 1: is back with us. How are you, sir? Very well? Sean, Well,
Speaker 1: we're learning a lot about the deep state. I guess
Speaker 1: we're gonna find out if Robert Muller is going to testify.
Speaker 1: We're running out of time. Adam Schiff said, I'm watching now.
Speaker 1: This is now the fifth separate investigation into so called
Speaker 1: Trump Russia collusion, the fifth, and we had the nine
Speaker 1: month FBI investigation and Peter Struck said, no there there,
Speaker 1: and Lisa Page behind closed doors testified and said we
Speaker 1: had nothing. This is before the appointment of Muller. We
Speaker 1: had the House Intelligence Committee nothing, Bipartisan Senate Committee nothing.
Speaker 1: The Muller report total victory for the president, no collusion.
Speaker 1: And I'm watching Gerald Nadler try to bring everybody back in.
Speaker 1: I saw a whole picks go in last week, and
Speaker 1: I cannot believe that Jerk literally referred to her four
Speaker 1: times as miss Lewandowski. I mean, really, that's how we're
Speaker 1: going to treat people to answer the same questions that
Speaker 1: they've already answered again and again. Because the president never
Speaker 1: once asserted executive privilege, gave one point five million documents
Speaker 1: to Muller. He literally answered Mueller's questions himself written answers.
Speaker 1: He did it, told everybody to cooperate. Everybody cooperated, they
Speaker 1: were encouraged to cooperate, and now we have to go
Speaker 1: for a fifth one and make people take on the
Speaker 1: legal fees associated with us. This to me is madness, punitive,
Speaker 1: This is abuse of power in its own right, and
Speaker 1: an abuse of the presidency the executive branch. Well, look,
Speaker 1: this is as you said, this is like round five
Speaker 1: of this, and frankly, the American people have had enough
Speaker 1: of it. What you saw last week, you know, Ted
Speaker 1: lou was te tweeting out pictures of Hope Pix giving testimony.
Speaker 1: This was supposed to be you know, a private testimony
Speaker 1: that would be later public by a transcript, but they were,
Speaker 1: you know, live tweeting this, which shows you that this
Speaker 1: is theater. This isn't real legal issues, this is pure
Speaker 1: political theater. Now I want to take it a step
Speaker 1: further though, Sean, and because you said talking about some
Speaker 1: of the issues with those within government that are trying
Speaker 1: to cause problems for this president. And we had a
Speaker 1: lawsuit that was captioned American Center for Law Injustice versus
Speaker 1: the United States National Security Agency was filed in the
Speaker 1: US District Court for the District of Columbia. This one
Speaker 1: was involving the famous Executive Order twelve three three three
Speaker 1: that was the one slow down here favorite your favorite. Okay,
Speaker 1: you're like the only person that knows and remembers that
Speaker 1: I brought this up a lot. Explain twelve triple three.
Speaker 1: So there was very limited sharing capability of what's called
Speaker 1: raw intel. This is raw intel, and it was very limited.
Speaker 1: Basically three agency heads could have access to it. All
Speaker 1: of a sudden, in the waning days, I mean the
Speaker 1: last days of the Obama administration, a decision is made
Speaker 1: to increase this sharing of this very sensitive raw signal
Speaker 1: intelligence to seventeen eight agencies. For eight years of the
Speaker 1: Obama administration, they didn't want to do this, but at
Speaker 1: the very end of the Obama administration, as President Trump
Speaker 1: literally was to be sworn in, they decided to change
Speaker 1: the distribution to increase it to all of these other groups,
Speaker 1: which would give all these other groups access to information.
Speaker 1: When the new president came in, and now we have
Speaker 1: obtained documents which show that the Office of Director of
Speaker 1: National Intelligence, under Director James Clapper, was not only eager
Speaker 1: and pushing to get these new procedures signed by the
Speaker 1: Attorney General quote before the conclusion of this administration, that's
Speaker 1: in the documents, and that the Director of National Intelligence,
Speaker 1: Office General Counsel, Robert Litt, this was his position, told
Speaker 1: the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense that we really
Speaker 1: want to get this done, and so does the boss.
Speaker 1: The boss there being we expect James Clapper. Then the
Speaker 1: nationalist the security administration discussed that they could have the
Speaker 1: signature from Loretta Lynch as early as this week, again
Speaker 1: quoting certainly prior to the twentieth of January January, which
Speaker 1: of course was inauguration day. So you had this entire
Speaker 1: change of the intelligence gathering apparatus take place force through
Speaker 1: at the end for what reason we know what reason,
Speaker 1: Crostfire hurricane on the so called Russia probe. Remember that
Speaker 1: probe was going on before the president was sworn in.
Speaker 1: So now we know exactly. Now you put that in context,
Speaker 1: in context with the five sub abuse, and now you
Speaker 1: really see what was going on here. And no wonder
Speaker 1: James Clapper is reacting the way he is, because now
Speaker 1: we've got the actual documents. I'm holding the documents in
Speaker 1: my hand. You can hear him here on radio where
Speaker 1: it says we've been coordinating with the ODN I stents.
Speaker 1: We could have the signature by the AG that's Loretta Lynch,
Speaker 1: certainly prior to January twentieth. I've got another one that says,
Speaker 1: these procedures absigned by the Attorney General before the conclusion
Speaker 1: of this administration. We really want to get this done,
Speaker 1: and so does the Boss as another one. So this
Speaker 1: can we go to soda the Boss for a second,
Speaker 1: because you're talking about Clapper and you're talking about bringing
Speaker 1: it to Lauretta Lynch then imposing on the new administration. Now,
Speaker 1: I think there's some contexts we've got to lay of
Speaker 1: foundation here for this before we get to you know,
Speaker 1: before the Boss comment, and that is that we've got
Speaker 1: to remember here that this is the same group of
Speaker 1: people that were involved in the exoneration writing an exoneration
Speaker 1: of Hillary without an investigation, and when they finally did
Speaker 1: interview Hillary for clear violations of the espionage I get
Speaker 1: is incontrovertible evidence she had top secret classified information on
Speaker 1: a secret server. And if you cared about obstruction of justice,
Speaker 1: but it's only the left only cares about Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: So you have an underlying crime, easily provable, even Comey
Speaker 1: admitted it on July fifth. Then of course the destruction
Speaker 1: of subpoena emails in multiple ways. And then of course
Speaker 1: then there was a real Russian dossier. How that was
Speaker 1: ignored during the Muller investigation is beyond me. Yes, they
Speaker 1: were supposed. Devinuon has warned about such chaos that would
Speaker 1: be created by Russia in twenty fourteen. Nobody in the
Speaker 1: Obama Biden administration paid attention anyway, It happens the dossier
Speaker 1: with funneled money from a law firm to anp research
Speaker 1: firm to Christopher Steele. Christopher Steele doesn't stand by his
Speaker 1: own dossier. Then the FISA application October twenty sixteen, an
Speaker 1: unverifiable document paid for by the opposition party candidate, becomes
Speaker 1: the bulk of information to get the warrant against Carter Page.
Speaker 1: Thus into the Trump campaign, thus into the Trump transition
Speaker 1: and the Trump presidency. So now, and that exactly intelligence sharing.
Speaker 1: So now, why did they go from three to seventeen,
Speaker 1: and why was their urgency? And who is the boss
Speaker 1: that we're talking about here? We think the as there's
Speaker 1: no way to tell, it would make sense that the
Speaker 1: General Counsel to the Office of D and I, Robert Litt,
Speaker 1: is talking about his boss, James Clapper. Now, could it
Speaker 1: be somebody else? It could, but it reads when you
Speaker 1: see it in the chain of emails, that's what it
Speaker 1: appears to be. Why do I think it could even
Speaker 1: be Obama? But I mean, well, I mean it could
Speaker 1: be I have no idea. I will tell you this,
Speaker 1: it's certainly James Clapper at a minimum. It could it
Speaker 1: be highed. But here's what we do know. We know
Speaker 1: that the Attorney General, the D and I director, We
Speaker 1: know the administration, including the President, was aware of this
Speaker 1: executive order, basically signed it. We know that they did
Speaker 1: it in look, for eight years, it was fine to
Speaker 1: have the raw signal intel only evaluated by the three
Speaker 1: agency heads. But in the last two weeks of the administration,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, now you want to have it
Speaker 1: where it goes to all seventeen and putting something this
Speaker 1: significant through, you would think they would give the new
Speaker 1: administration a chance to weigh in on it. Right, Well,
Speaker 1: not only do they not give him a chance to
Speaker 1: weigh in on it, They said we need to get
Speaker 1: this done, certainly prior to January twenty. These are these
Speaker 1: their emails. By the way, we really want to get
Speaker 1: this done, and so does the Boss. Another email procedures
Speaker 1: signed by the Attorney General before the conclusion of this administration,
Speaker 1: So they knew exactly what they were doing, and that
Speaker 1: was to get this information into these other agencies where
Speaker 1: they've got their people that are there forever to monitor
Speaker 1: this new administration that was coming in. And we of
Speaker 1: course know, as you just laid out, Sean so perfectly,
Speaker 1: we know about all of the investigations that were going
Speaker 1: on a year prior to the election. So now which
Speaker 1: happened now is it all makes sense? And I think
Speaker 1: when we see the five, I want you to pull
Speaker 1: up together for everybody from your perspective as a lawyer,
Speaker 1: which is extraordinarily smart and unique. Look, I think what
Speaker 1: you've got here is this was a soft coup. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's what this was. This was an attempt to undercut
Speaker 1: the incoming administration before they were sworn in, and they
Speaker 1: knew they had about two weeks to get it done,
Speaker 1: and they got it done, and they urged and seeing
Speaker 1: these emails in the texts and the and the messaging
Speaker 1: points from these various agencies, was to make sure it
Speaker 1: is done prior to January twentieth, so that whoever was
Speaker 1: going to still be there and there would be a
Speaker 1: lot of people still there in these in these positions,
Speaker 1: they would have access now to this raw intel that
Speaker 1: would not be available before. Why is it I think
Speaker 1: it all ties back to Crossfire Hurricane. That's what I
Speaker 1: think it is that this was an attempt when they
Speaker 1: you know, as as you talk about the Christopher Steel
Speaker 1: manufactured dossier, you talk about the fact that it was
Speaker 1: going over to Bruce or his wife. This is the
Speaker 1: number four the Justice Department at the time. His wife's
Speaker 1: working for Fusion GPS. Who's the organization that's putting this together?
Speaker 1: All right? So you put all that together, you now
Speaker 1: know that they wanted this signal intel increase, this Executive
Speaker 1: Order twelve three three three done prior to the administration
Speaker 1: coming in it was urgent. We now see it and
Speaker 1: literally in black and white because we went to federal
Speaker 1: court to get the documents. And the end result of that,
Speaker 1: I think is that we now know exactly what happened.
Speaker 1: This was the continuation of what they had already put
Speaker 1: in place. That's what this is. So when Lindsey Graham
Speaker 1: questioned the new Attorney General bar and said, you're confident
Speaker 1: the Mulla report, etc. Are you worried about Hillary's investigation, Yes,
Speaker 1: you're worried about fise abuse, yes, all right. So we
Speaker 1: also have the appointment of dorm We have a hold
Speaker 1: obviously on Michael Harrowitz's investigation, the Inspector General's investigation into
Speaker 1: FI abuse, I would argue probably be because of the
Speaker 1: appointment of mister Durham. And Dorham is now going to
Speaker 1: go interview and get information from Christopher Steel, and I
Speaker 1: think we have a very good idea what he will say,
Speaker 1: because in an interrogatory and under the threat of perjury
Speaker 1: in Great Britain, he said I had no idea if
Speaker 1: any of it was true, And yet it was being
Speaker 1: used as the basis for the FISA application. We had
Speaker 1: top intelligence officials leaking it to the media, The Washington Post,
Speaker 1: David Korne, Michael Izakoff. So I guess, now, with this
Speaker 1: revelation of the intensity of this what was the major
Speaker 1: purpose to protect the deep state by putting it all
Speaker 1: over the place so you couldn't figure out who was
Speaker 1: doing what it did? Two things. Number One, it allowed
Speaker 1: seventeen additional organizational groups to get it within the government,
Speaker 1: So that's more people. So it's harder to trace because
Speaker 1: it's really easy to trace when it's three. But it
Speaker 1: also gave people within those agencies who would have access
Speaker 1: to that information, So you got it's not just seventeen,
Speaker 1: it's seventeen times the amount of people that then had
Speaker 1: access to that information inside those various agencies. So literally
Speaker 1: when at that point did dozens of people? So the
Speaker 1: next question is, right, so where do you see this
Speaker 1: all going? They wanted the information flow to stay in place,
Speaker 1: That's what they wanted. So where is this all headed?
Speaker 1: Because I've said, you know, Barr was very clear, Muller's done.
Speaker 1: Muller's over, there's no obstruction, there's no collusion, but he
Speaker 1: is interested in attitude of the curtain has come up
Speaker 1: the deep state, vius of power all the things I've
Speaker 1: talked about for two years. Yep, what happened. This is
Speaker 1: where I think, this is where it's going. I think
Speaker 1: you've got Durham doing a thorough dive as a prosecutor.
Speaker 1: I think Harwitz's report will come out shortly. I think
Speaker 1: what we're going to see that some of these documents
Speaker 1: will be pursuing to the Attorney General's authority released and
Speaker 1: you're going to find out that what started as crossfire Hurricane,
Speaker 1: which continued with Executive Order twelve thirty three three, which
Speaker 1: continued during the Special Council's appointment, that all of that
Speaker 1: was coordinated, that they knew where this was going, that
Speaker 1: they had planned this from the beginning, and the documents
Speaker 1: speak for themselves. Three times before the conclusion of this
Speaker 1: administration want to get this done, so does the boss.
Speaker 1: Certainly prior to January twentieth, they knew exactly the timeframe
Speaker 1: they could operate under, and they did it. And that's
Speaker 1: what they did, and that's what the documents show. And
Speaker 1: we now know, of course, because look, some of this
Speaker 1: is you've got to play detective here. It's not just
Speaker 1: legally getting the documents, because the documents just sitting out there.
Speaker 1: It's are interesting documents. It's the context now of everything
Speaker 1: else we know. We know about Crossfire, hurricane, we know
Speaker 1: about the fires and warrants, We know about the Christopher
Speaker 1: Steele memos. We now know about the because of the
Speaker 1: foil laws, who we filed, what was going on inside
Speaker 1: on Executive Order twelve three three three. This is what
Speaker 1: it is. So what Bill Barrs, the Attorney General the
Speaker 1: United States, has said he's gonna find out who started this,
Speaker 1: how it started, and why, because, as he said, spying
Speaker 1: on a presidential campaign is a really big deal. And
Speaker 1: I don't care if you're a Republican, a Democrats, We're
Speaker 1: gonna do Spying on a presidential campaign is a big deal. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and illegal. And when you use phony Russian intelligence that
Speaker 1: Devin nun has warned you about was coming and you
Speaker 1: use it to spy on the campaign, like call me
Speaker 1: signed the first one. But then he lied about it
Speaker 1: in January twenty seventeen, said well, it's salatious, but it's
Speaker 1: not verified. The opposite. All right, we're gonna show everybody.
Speaker 1: Jay Sekulo will join us tonight on Hannity ninety Eastern Fox,
Speaker 1: and we're gonna actually show exactly the documents that he
Speaker 1: has been able to acquire. That's ninety Eastern Tonight exclusively Hannity,
Speaker 1: Fox News. Jay has always great to hear from you.
Speaker 1: Thanks for being with us as we roll along. Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity Show, eight hundred and nine. This is very interesting
Speaker 1: to me. Sidney Powell, who wrote the book License to Lie,
Speaker 1: has now become the attorney for and, by the way,
Speaker 1: the biggest nemesis, exposing people like Andrew Weissman, Mueller's pit bull,
Speaker 1: you know, having withheld you know, talked about the whole
Speaker 1: and run accounting issue, and you know, tens of thousands
Speaker 1: of Americans lose their jobs. He loses nine oh on
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court. He put four Meryl executives in jail
Speaker 1: and they went in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Speaker 1: for nothing. And she exposes all this withholding extolbratory evidence. Anyway,
Speaker 1: she is now the attorney for General Flynn. Sixteen months
Speaker 1: ago she said he ought to pull back and withdraw
Speaker 1: his plea. And I agree with that, especially after McCabe
Speaker 1: and called me a bragging that they set him up
Speaker 1: and said, oh, you don't need an attorney. I wouldn't
Speaker 1: do this in any other administration anyway. At the hearing,
Speaker 1: Emmett Sullivan is the judge, and the judge thanked Powell
Speaker 1: for the kind words about him and her book License
Speaker 1: to Live, because he handled the public corruption case at
Speaker 1: Senator Ted Stevens, who also was set up and with
Speaker 1: exculpatory evidence, with health, and he said he didn't need
Speaker 1: to recuse himself. The one thing you can all please
Speaker 1: count on. John Hannity is back on the radio when
Speaker 1: I ask what's going down with these the children in
Speaker 1: these micro camps. The stories are horrible, mister president. You
Speaker 1: have children without their parents, you have kids taking care
Speaker 1: of kids. Yeah, you've you've read these reports. I know
Speaker 1: people are coming to you. I know you think this
Speaker 1: is the Democrats a problem. Well and forget it. Why
Speaker 1: aren't you doing some of it? Are you ready? Are you?
Speaker 1: They are in terrible shape down there, mister president, down
Speaker 1: in Homestead, Florida, That's where I grew up. It's the
Speaker 1: conditions are terribly I agree, And it's been that way
Speaker 1: for a long time. Do something. And President Obama built
Speaker 1: the cages. Remember when they said that I built them?
Speaker 1: And then it was nineteen fourteen. Do two longs. Make
Speaker 1: it right. It was twenty fourteen. Just listen for one second. Separation,
Speaker 1: President Obama. I took over separation. I'm the one that
Speaker 1: put it together. What's happened though, are the cartels and
Speaker 1: all of these bad people they're using the kids there there.
Speaker 1: It's almost like slavery. Let's not punish the kids over
Speaker 1: this is the kids are getting punished year right. And
Speaker 1: this has been happening long before I got there. What
Speaker 1: we've done is we've created we've ended separation. You know,
Speaker 1: under President Obama, you had separation. I was the one
Speaker 1: that ended it. Now I said one thing when I
Speaker 1: ended it, I said, here's what's going to happen. More
Speaker 1: families are going to come up. And that's what's happened.
Speaker 1: But they're really coming up for the economics. But once
Speaker 1: you ended the separation, but I ended separation, I inherited
Speaker 1: separation from President Obama. President Obama built they call them
Speaker 1: jail cells. Let's talk about building out. Your administrations are
Speaker 1: not doing the recreation, not even schooling these kids anymore.
Speaker 1: You've gotten rid of all. They're doing a fantastic job
Speaker 1: under the circumstances. The Democrats aren't even approving giving us money.
Speaker 1: Where is the money? You know what? The Democrats are
Speaker 1: holding up the humanitarian aid. It looks like these kids
Speaker 1: are being used as some sort of is it hostage?
Speaker 1: Where they are the years they are being used by
Speaker 1: very bad people in the other second, where they've actually
Speaker 1: get paid with money is being made using them because
Speaker 1: our laws are so bad. Because if you have a child,
Speaker 1: you have an advantage. You know that better than anybody.
Speaker 1: And what should happen until at the political debate hurt
Speaker 1: the show? We could be effective impacted for a year.
Speaker 1: If the Democrats would change the asylum laws and the loopholes,
Speaker 1: which they refused to do because they think it's good politics,
Speaker 1: everything would be solved immediately. But they refused to do it.
Speaker 1: They refused to You know what, if they changed them
Speaker 1: as I say, I used to say forty five minutes,
Speaker 1: it's fifteen minutes. If they changed asylum and if they
Speaker 1: changed loopholes, everything in the border would be perfect, all right,
Speaker 1: twenty five now till the top of the hour, eight
Speaker 1: hundred nine, pot one Shawn Tolfree telephone number if you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. Now. The
Speaker 1: President just delayed the planned ice deportations for two weeks.
Speaker 1: The reason he did it was at the request of
Speaker 1: Democrats and to see if Democrats and Republicans to give
Speaker 1: them yet what is probably a tenth opportunity to get
Speaker 1: together and work out a solution which would be the
Speaker 1: best option to the asylum and loophole problem at the
Speaker 1: southern border. By the way, the President's right, I mean,
Speaker 1: these kids they are not they don't know who's bringing
Speaker 1: them across, and they're being used in some cases multiple times,
Speaker 1: and the attempts and efforts at reuniting them with their
Speaker 1: families are you know, at times, because I talked to
Speaker 1: these guys, a lot of work and even heroic because
Speaker 1: they work so hard to get the kids back with
Speaker 1: the families. So it's not exactly the way the phony, fake, lying,
Speaker 1: conspiracy theory, hoax media the mob is describing it. Now,
Speaker 1: Remember it did happen under the Obama administration and the
Speaker 1: Bush administration. It was very little to no coverage. As usual,
Speaker 1: the President did something they probably thought was unconstitutional. He said,
Speaker 1: now I'm going to stop it by executive order. So
Speaker 1: far it's been upheld. But the idea of the people
Speaker 1: don't respect our laws or sovereignty, and literally we don't
Speaker 1: know who they are, and they're making a mad dash
Speaker 1: for the border because at the end of this year,
Speaker 1: we expect four hundred miles now completed a border wall,
Speaker 1: and they see that time is running out. The President
Speaker 1: is won on the issue of his emergency executive action.
Speaker 1: We told you he would because legislatively, he has the
Speaker 1: right to build barriers and put up lights to stop
Speaker 1: drug trafficking corridors. That's again, that's legislatively, that is the
Speaker 1: law of the land, and also constitutionally, as commander in chief,
Speaker 1: if you look at we're losing three hundred kids a
Speaker 1: week when it comes to drugs and opioids, and ninety
Speaker 1: percent of it is crossing that border. So we have
Speaker 1: the cartels, and then we have the gangs, and then
Speaker 1: we have others that you are trying to integrate into
Speaker 1: the migration population with the hopes that they can get
Speaker 1: in and do damage to the US. They don't have
Speaker 1: our best intentions at heart. And then of course we
Speaker 1: have those criminal elements that have made it across and
Speaker 1: Americans victims of crime. You know, two thousand homicides in
Speaker 1: a year, thirty thousand violent sexual assaults, in a year,
Speaker 1: in two years, one hundred thousand violent assaults in two years.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's only so many statistics you can give
Speaker 1: out before you say wow, and then we do have
Speaker 1: a humanitarian crisis. We've had border patrol agents on this
Speaker 1: show that have spent long years of their life over
Speaker 1: a decade, some fifteen years involved just in the human
Speaker 1: trafficking side of things, and often is the case that
Speaker 1: young girls are trafficked into the United States for prostitution,
Speaker 1: girls as young as twelve and thirteen. And they have
Speaker 1: described a scenario which is pure and utter evil, where
Speaker 1: these young girls are raped thirty forty times a day.
Speaker 1: We've interviewed these people, they're telling us their story and yet, well,
Speaker 1: walls are immorl. No, they're not. They weren't immorl in
Speaker 1: the second year of the Obama administration. So anyway, that's
Speaker 1: what the president's position on. Nancy Pelosi, thanks Trump for halting.
Speaker 1: Now give us a giant amnesty. No, you're not getting
Speaker 1: amnesty in this. You cared about DACA, you cared about dreamers.
Speaker 1: There's always been this compromise out there, but they don't
Speaker 1: want it. And now that the president will use the
Speaker 1: authority he has as he's been doing every step of
Speaker 1: the way, and you know, literally start deporting those people
Speaker 1: out of the country that come in illegally is just
Speaker 1: the right thing to do. By the way, it's Mexico's policy,
Speaker 1: it's Australia's policy, it's New Zealand's policy. Tom Hohman has
Speaker 1: accused the acting DHS Secretary of resisting some of these
Speaker 1: right ICE raids. Then you have you know, states and
Speaker 1: cities that have made it their policy to aid and
Speaker 1: abit other crimes by not abiding by the law and
Speaker 1: handing over those that are even in jail, criminal illegal
Speaker 1: immigrants to ICE for deportation. After they serve their time
Speaker 1: in jail, they still won't release them. And now New
Speaker 1: York is going to give legal drivers licenses to illegal immigrants,
Speaker 1: and Comrade Cuomo is loving the idea. And then you
Speaker 1: have on top of that, you know it just it.
Speaker 1: Why Why why wouldn't we have the wall built, the
Speaker 1: protections needed, the drugs stopped, the cartels stopped, the human
Speaker 1: traffickers stopped. Why wouldn't we do that? What is what
Speaker 1: possible reasons do the Democrats have? Is it because it's
Speaker 1: Trump's idea? You know, are they looking at this politically thinking, well,
Speaker 1: you know, this might help us get more voters, okay,
Speaker 1: or what about others that want cheap labor? Republicans and Democrats,
Speaker 1: some of them have selfish motivations and always have had
Speaker 1: in terms of their desire for an open border. Congressman
Speaker 1: Andy Biggs Freedom Caucus member, born and raised down there
Speaker 1: in Arizona on the border. It's never been this bad.
Speaker 1: But what is the truth about what has happened? I
Speaker 1: think one of the reasons we're seeing this massive increase
Speaker 1: as we are of these migrant caravans, which the President
Speaker 1: single handedly stop by saying, well, we're just going to
Speaker 1: put a twenty five percent tariff on Mexico, and even
Speaker 1: some Republicans didn't hold the line, but he got it done. Anyway,
Speaker 1: Why are we seeing this massive increase. I think it's
Speaker 1: because people see that the window of opportunity is closing. Ye, Sean,
Speaker 1: you're exactly right. There's basically a and you know this,
Speaker 1: a grapevine of information that flows from the US down
Speaker 1: all the way into Central America. The cartels are up
Speaker 1: to date on the news that's happening in the US.
Speaker 1: They market based on that and right now, because the
Speaker 1: Democrats have been very difficult for us to work with
Speaker 1: in trying to get something done. The fact that we
Speaker 1: still have no haven't made this progress on the fence
Speaker 1: that we wanted. We still have bad asylum laws. You're
Speaker 1: seeing it telegraph to Asian and Africa. So we're seeing
Speaker 1: lots of folks coming in. But I think it's because
Speaker 1: Mexico is now stepped up on its southern border, so
Speaker 1: that's going to be a better thing. And the US
Speaker 1: with President Trump, has said, look, we're going to start
Speaker 1: deporting people who already have Sean here's the thing. They've
Speaker 1: already been through the deportation process, and the court has said, looking,
Speaker 1: your printing, presented your case, you need to be removed.
Speaker 1: And I think that the few the door is closing,
Speaker 1: and so they got to hurry up to get up here. Well, okay,
Speaker 1: so the way Chuck Todd and all the all the
Speaker 1: passion that the media mob is showing, why didn't they
Speaker 1: show this in the Obama years, Because we've showed the images,
Speaker 1: We've got them. Yeah, they didn't do it in the
Speaker 1: Obama years because they didn't want to have Obama and
Speaker 1: be embarrassed, right, so the didn't want him to be embarrassed.
Speaker 1: The reason that they've been so hard to work with
Speaker 1: here is because, and I've talked to some of them,
Speaker 1: they've told me, well, we don't want President Trump to
Speaker 1: get a political win. To me, that is shameful that
Speaker 1: they would place politics above the national security and also
Speaker 1: the humanitarian issue that this is. So that's really, as
Speaker 1: far as I can tell, that's their real motivations. Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: I think everyone's got real motivations. Do you agree with me?
Speaker 1: Some people, you know, left right? I mean, they're equally
Speaker 1: to blame those that have wanted open borders, some people
Speaker 1: wanting cheap labors, some people wanting what they think will
Speaker 1: be a voting demographic for them. Do you agree with that? Absolutely,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of blame to go around on this
Speaker 1: one shot. Yeah, all right, Andy, thank you so much
Speaker 1: for being one of us. We appreciate it as always,
Speaker 1: And you know, it's pretty unbelievable. What last thing here?
Speaker 1: You know, what did you think about the macalenan situation
Speaker 1: in the Senate humanitarian funding bills um when he says
Speaker 1: it doesn't go far enough, because that's the sort of
Speaker 1: the human humanitarian crisis of it. Well, the problem is
Speaker 1: both the bills and the one from the Senate and
Speaker 1: the House is they actually hamstring ice. They don't give
Speaker 1: him money for new beds, which is part of the
Speaker 1: humanitarian problem is we is we're keeping these folks in
Speaker 1: overcrowded conditions, and so we have to get new beds.
Speaker 1: But both bills prevent us from from buying and building
Speaker 1: beds and detaining folks that are here illegally. So you're
Speaker 1: going to continue, basically to have this catch and release
Speaker 1: situation that we have, and uh, it's going to continue
Speaker 1: to be a problem until we can just we can
Speaker 1: just stop playing politics with this and fund border security. Yeah,
Speaker 1: agreed fully completely. And the President, to his credit, you know,
Speaker 1: they weren't able to override his emergency action veto and
Speaker 1: he did have the transfer of funds. Past presidents have
Speaker 1: done it. And we did have reallocated money from the
Speaker 1: Defense Department that will now go down to the border.
Speaker 1: So the money is there. The President told me that
Speaker 1: in the last interview I had with him. All Right,
Speaker 1: Andy Biggs, thank you, sir, I appreciate it. All right,
Speaker 1: as we continue, let's hit our business e telephones eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine for one. Sean is our number. Dan
Speaker 1: is in Michigan, Dan High. How are you glad you
Speaker 1: called Sean, referenced the Iran thing, or use the military
Speaker 1: forks and even Venezuela. I'm an x arm Usami captain,
Speaker 1: by the way, thanks to our in Germany. But what
Speaker 1: driving me nuts is that the dictators and liberals like
Speaker 1: it when we say, well, we don't want another ground war. Well,
Speaker 1: of course we don't, but look at the Israelis when
Speaker 1: they're hit by Hamas, they come from the air, they
Speaker 1: smack the hell out of Hamas and after a few
Speaker 1: days Hamas is done. So if we decided to hit
Speaker 1: Venezuela or Iran or anyone, we'd never do ground troops anymore.
Speaker 1: Like you said, that day has come and gone. It
Speaker 1: doesn't want so Sean from missiles, from the sea, jets
Speaker 1: from this guy. Within three four days, I ran his toast.
Speaker 1: Thirty targets are toast. And then if they strike us again,
Speaker 1: we'd do another three days. If it goes on a month,
Speaker 1: they're gone. But we never have to put a single
Speaker 1: person on the ground. And so why do we sit there.
Speaker 1: Let's do a three day thing from missiles from the sea,
Speaker 1: just from the air, and see what they see if
Speaker 1: they want more. Look, you're like me, and I'm a
Speaker 1: natural fighter, and if somebody hits me, my natural instinct
Speaker 1: is to fight back. You know. One of the things
Speaker 1: that I do love about the President is that he's very,
Speaker 1: very very unpredictable and how he manages things. He's predictable
Speaker 1: in terms of where his position is. He was very
Speaker 1: clear he doesn't want to get us into any long
Speaker 1: intervention in the Middle East, etcetera, etcetera. That that's never
Speaker 1: gonna happen with him and Iran. I can tell you
Speaker 1: right now now being energy independent, that also, you know,
Speaker 1: the Straits of hor Moves are less important to the
Speaker 1: United States now than it has ever been in seventy
Speaker 1: five years, because remember a lot of foreign entanglements have
Speaker 1: always been with the Middle East about the free flow
Speaker 1: of oilt market prices. Well, for the first time in
Speaker 1: seventy five years, we're energy independent. We now are tapping
Speaker 1: into the vast resources, and if we ever really do
Speaker 1: it fully, we will raise the standard of living of
Speaker 1: every American in ways we never dreamed of. We will
Speaker 1: be those rich countries, except the people should benefit, not
Speaker 1: like Venezuela, not like countries in the Middle East eight
Speaker 1: hundred ninety four one Sean, thanks for the call if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. Final
Speaker 1: Hour Free for All is coming up straight out had
Speaker 1: Joe Conscha on the really insane side of the news
Speaker 1: media and these crazy democratic debates. Stay right here for
Speaker 1: our final news round up and information overloads. I think
Speaker 1: there's a blue wave starting to come here in South Carolina.
Speaker 1: Can you feel it? I feel like we have a
Speaker 1: blue state about to happen. We know that freedom can
Speaker 1: only come by way of education, which is why we
Speaker 1: need a president who will pool appoint a Secretary of
Speaker 1: Education who actually believes in public education. And we know
Speaker 1: that you're not free when your reproductive health is being
Speaker 1: dictated by male politicians. We need to do more than
Speaker 1: just endlessly prepare for war, and we need to do
Speaker 1: more than just say things like we need to bring
Speaker 1: the boys home. We need to challenge the underlying forces
Speaker 1: that make all this darkness inevitable. I know that we
Speaker 1: have in this White House a president who says he
Speaker 1: wants to make America great again? Well, what does that mean?
Speaker 1: Does that mean he wants to take us back to
Speaker 1: before schools were integrated. Does that mean he wants to
Speaker 1: take us back before the Voting Rights Act was enacted?
Speaker 1: Does that mean he wants to take us back before
Speaker 1: the Civil Rights Act was enacted? Does he mean he
Speaker 1: wants to take us back before Rob Wade was enacted?
Speaker 1: Because we're not going back. The first thing that I
Speaker 1: would do when I'm in office is that I would
Speaker 1: sign an executive order recommitting the United States to the
Speaker 1: Paris Climate Accord so that we lead again on sustainability,
Speaker 1: and then follow that up with investment to get to
Speaker 1: net zero and create more jobs in the new energy economy.
Speaker 1: Let's start with a wealth tax two cents on the
Speaker 1: top one tenth of one percent the biggest fortunes in
Speaker 1: this country. We ask him to pitch in two cents,
Speaker 1: and here's what we can buy for it. Universal child
Speaker 1: care for every one of our babies, Agency Road of five,
Speaker 1: Universal pre K for every three year old and four
Speaker 1: year old in this country. Provide universal tuition free technical school,
Speaker 1: community college, and four year college for every kid who
Speaker 1: wants to go. I'm running for office because I believe
Speaker 1: that we as a people can get to the mountaintop
Speaker 1: we are four in the United States of America once
Speaker 1: and for all, healthcare being a right for all Americans.
Speaker 1: Why am I an existential threat? Well, maybe it's because
Speaker 1: my administration will finally take on the insurance companies and
Speaker 1: the drug companies and pass a medicap for all single
Speaker 1: payer program. Maybe it's because we're gonna break up the
Speaker 1: major banks on Wall Street. Four more years of Donald
Speaker 1: Trump will permanently change the character this country. We can't
Speaker 1: let that happen. We have to beat Donald Trump as
Speaker 1: the overwhelming period that we have on day one. On
Speaker 1: day one, and I will move to eliminate Trump's tax
Speaker 1: cuts as well for the super wealthy. All right, there
Speaker 1: was the Democratic Socialism Convention in South Carolina over the weekend,
Speaker 1: and there they are, you at all the nuts in
Speaker 1: one place. And but you know the media is not
Speaker 1: going to cover this. You know, it's fast just two cents. No,
Speaker 1: it's not two cents. That would be two more cents,
Speaker 1: I guess of every dollar or two cents after you
Speaker 1: pay the seventy percent tax rate that Warren and others
Speaker 1: want for their new Green deal that eliminates the lifeblood
Speaker 1: of the economy, oil and gas and the combustion engine
Speaker 1: and everything's free. And now she's saying, basically, your child
Speaker 1: gets born, you could just hand it right over to
Speaker 1: the government. We'll take care of every need that child
Speaker 1: has from the day they're born to the day they die,
Speaker 1: cradle to grave, womb to tomb, two each according to
Speaker 1: their need, from each according to their ability. And just
Speaker 1: think about it. Ninety percent top corporate rate, Well, that's
Speaker 1: not going to help the economy. No oil and gas.
Speaker 1: That's not going to help the economy. By the way,
Speaker 1: you might want to invest in cows frozen and butchered
Speaker 1: because at some point they may be a rare commodity
Speaker 1: in the world based on the desire to get rid
Speaker 1: of cows because of the flatulence issue. And airplanes, well,
Speaker 1: they haven't quite figured out how we're going to get
Speaker 1: from the United States. Maybe you're getting a little sailboat
Speaker 1: and you'll cross the pond that way. Or I don't
Speaker 1: know how you get to New Zealand and Australia. God,
Speaker 1: you know, if you need to go to Asia, good
Speaker 1: luck getting there. I don't know. Maybe you can. Maybe
Speaker 1: we'll build bicycle routes above oceans. Joe conscience is with
Speaker 1: us he's laughing. I got to see him column this
Speaker 1: to the Hill, host of War tonight. And by the way,
Speaker 1: he does a lot in terms of covering the Sunday shows, etc. Right.
Speaker 1: By the way, we have two debates this weekend. I
Speaker 1: think that what we saw as a preview of coming
Speaker 1: attractions at in South Carolina this weekend we did show
Speaker 1: and you know, and I want to make sure a
Speaker 1: lot of people listen to while they're driving, right, I
Speaker 1: want to caution them right now, put both hands on
Speaker 1: the wheel because I'm going to broach Bill Maher from
Speaker 1: HBO and agree with him. And I think you're going
Speaker 1: to too. As far as the Democratic field in twenty twenty, ready,
Speaker 1: of course, I'm ready to go. Okay, excellent. He's always
Speaker 1: want to run a campaign based on reparations and concentration camps,
Speaker 1: then it's going to be very hard to win. And
Speaker 1: he also goes on to by the way, you can
Speaker 1: add one thing to that post birth abortion or during
Speaker 1: birth abortion, during birth abortion way that I actually refused
Speaker 1: to call it abortion college fantasting down border walls like
Speaker 1: better a Rourka wants to do instead of actually building
Speaker 1: and expanding them. You could go on and on in
Speaker 1: terms of some of the platforms and some of the
Speaker 1: ideas that have been thrown out. For giving trillions of
Speaker 1: dollars in student debt, Does that mean my five and
Speaker 1: three year old or at home? Do I get an
Speaker 1: advance on that so I don't have to pay for
Speaker 1: their college? How is that going to work? And who's
Speaker 1: gonna pay for you? Could go on and on, but
Speaker 1: then even any retroactively I pay back my student, do
Speaker 1: I get my money back? But exactly who where do
Speaker 1: you draw the line here? Everybody who has an active
Speaker 1: student loan? What about my wife who just paid off
Speaker 1: for twenty years her loans to go to medical school.
Speaker 1: It's n By the way, you mentioned reparations, Elizabeth Warren
Speaker 1: saying this weekend she wants reparations for same sex couples.
Speaker 1: He wants to add them to the list. Of course,
Speaker 1: why not when you're giving away stuff? Why stopped at
Speaker 1: just a couple of things? But everything's going to be free,
Speaker 1: And I think they see this as a way to
Speaker 1: the victory in twenty twenty and again, until you explain
Speaker 1: how you pay for these things without raising taxes. Remember
Speaker 1: the last guy to run on raising taxes and that
Speaker 1: you know it was open about it. Walter mondale, I
Speaker 1: believe he won one state in Minnesota his own, and
Speaker 1: Reagan very easily could have won that if he actually
Speaker 1: campaigned there but didn't want any Probably the guy too much. No,
Speaker 1: I think you would have liked embarrassing. I mean probably
Speaker 1: this wasn't thinking about it at the time. My guess.
Speaker 1: I'm just guessing may. But then Bill Marcos on to
Speaker 1: say says, young people look at Joe Biden like a
Speaker 1: typewriter's running for president. He referred to elizab With Warren
Speaker 1: as a three syllable woman in a one syllable country.
Speaker 1: It goes on to say, you know, Bernie Sanders an
Speaker 1: American hero in my book, but he's another one who
Speaker 1: has his cardiologist on speed dial. Then he says that
Speaker 1: Pete Buddha Jedge, we must ask the question is America
Speaker 1: ready to be led by a gay teenager? And then
Speaker 1: he begs Oprah to run. He says Oprah's the only
Speaker 1: one to get Pete Trump at this point because the
Speaker 1: current crop of twenty four doesn't have a chance because
Speaker 1: they're either bad candidates, they're awkward person personally like Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Warren is or their ideas are just so far out
Speaker 1: to the left that the independence aren't going to come
Speaker 1: home to vote for him. You know. I just I'm
Speaker 1: looking at this and I've never seen a party implode
Speaker 1: like this, and it's not going to be pretty in
Speaker 1: the end. I guess they think that this is going
Speaker 1: to help them win. I don't know. It's sort of like,
Speaker 1: you know, I've always said this is what the Democrats
Speaker 1: agenda really is, but they just never spoke openly about it.
Speaker 1: They were very clever in their ability to hide it,
Speaker 1: and they were you know, the usual playbook is now
Speaker 1: not every two and four years, it's every second, minute,
Speaker 1: hour of every day, which is Republicans a racist, sexist, misogynist, xenophobic, islamophobic, homophobic,
Speaker 1: and they want dirty air and water, and they want
Speaker 1: children to die, and they want to throw Granny over
Speaker 1: the cliff. Now that's every day. And if your name
Speaker 1: is Donald Trump, they just you bubble and fizz when
Speaker 1: you wake up in the morning like Alka Seltzer, and
Speaker 1: the energy of rage builds up and psychosis takes over
Speaker 1: and you think it is your god given duty to
Speaker 1: destroy this man because he is the embodiment of evil. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: we're setting records on the economy like we've never set before, right,
Speaker 1: and economy is always decide elections. And if this economy continues,
Speaker 1: it's hard to see what the Democrats message would be
Speaker 1: outside of all the social issues that they're talking about.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's several models that show that an incumbent
Speaker 1: is almost impossible to beat when you have certain economic
Speaker 1: metrics being met, like you know, under unemployment of four percent,
Speaker 1: that's insane. The GDP growing the way it is, the
Speaker 1: wages growing the way they are, and not just for
Speaker 1: the rich, but for African Americans, for minorities. You could
Speaker 1: go on and on and look, I agree with the
Speaker 1: President when he says I hope that I've faced Joe
Speaker 1: Biden in a general election because he's a bad candidate.
Speaker 1: We're seeing that, and not just like the usual laugh
Speaker 1: out loud kind of gaps. But I think what we're
Speaker 1: seeing from Biden is something that I've always known all along,
Speaker 1: is that he just goes where the wind blows. Sean,
Speaker 1: he has no core principles. There's nothing at his heart
Speaker 1: that he truly wants to accomplish. He's always failed upwards.
Speaker 1: And when you think about it right. He gets one
Speaker 1: percent of the vote in Iowa in two thousand and eight.
Speaker 1: So then Barack Obama chosen his vice president. Obviously, the
Speaker 1: plagiarism thing in eighty eight and so on. So yeah,
Speaker 1: I think Biden has been shown that he could be
Speaker 1: bullied into any position, particularly if it's a moderate one,
Speaker 1: then it will embrace the one on the left, and
Speaker 1: no one likes that. Say what you will about President Trump,
Speaker 1: he is definitive in his beliefs. He says what he believes,
Speaker 1: even if he knows it's unpopular among some circles. And
Speaker 1: that's who he is. And you could define Donald Trump
Speaker 1: hand to find Joe Biden and the other candidates all
Speaker 1: have flaws. I don't think that's going to be able
Speaker 1: to overcome. The other big thing that stands out to me.
Speaker 1: And you saw an energy in the Obama campaign and
Speaker 1: the media just went nuts and people went nuts, and
Speaker 1: he read a really good teleprompter, and you know, he
Speaker 1: came up with good slogans and hope and change and
Speaker 1: yes we can, Yes we can. Didn't meet anything. It
Speaker 1: was really just a well orchestrated it was a show.
Speaker 1: I don't think he had core beliefs except his radicalism
Speaker 1: which he was indoctrinated into, which the media would never vet,
Speaker 1: which was Frank Marshall Davis, the Chum Gang and Acorn
Speaker 1: and Olynsky and community organizations or community organizer and the
Speaker 1: Reverend Right and black liberation theology and Airs and Dorn
Speaker 1: and a guy that voted present and did nothing. All right,
Speaker 1: quick break more with Joe Concha of the Hill and
Speaker 1: wr Next, let's take action and make sure that if
Speaker 1: Congress doesn't have the courage to pass mart gun safety laws,
Speaker 1: then we will get the job done. I believe in
Speaker 1: America where no politician tells a woman what to do
Speaker 1: with her body. I believe in an America well healthcare
Speaker 1: is a right and not a privilege for just those
Speaker 1: who can afford it. I believe in an America where
Speaker 1: children do not have to fear going to school for
Speaker 1: fear of a mass shooter. Let's recognize that climate disruption
Speaker 1: is a national security threat. And if we want to
Speaker 1: talk about national security, let us name and confront the
Speaker 1: rising tide of violent white nationalism that has claimed lives
Speaker 1: from Charleston to San Diego. That's national security. And also
Speaker 1: for that same two cents. We can cancel student loan
Speaker 1: debt for of the folks who've thought it. We are
Speaker 1: four ending the school to prison pipeline. We are four
Speaker 1: standing up to make sure that we don't stick our
Speaker 1: head in the ground on climate change. But this is
Speaker 1: the nation that leads us out of this crisis. My administration,
Speaker 1: we gave PreK, full day PreK to every child in
Speaker 1: our city for free. Do you want that, South Carolina?
Speaker 1: Do you think people need that all over this country?
Speaker 1: All right? Joe Kansha continues with us. He's with the Hill.
Speaker 1: He works with wr Radio in New York right after
Speaker 1: me every day. And you know, I'm looking at you
Speaker 1: know what happened to poor Mayor Pete Buddha Judge this weekend,
Speaker 1: and I'm thinking, yeah, your record is atrocious, but nobody
Speaker 1: will cover it. But he got his head handed to
Speaker 1: him this weekend. And the problem is, you know the
Speaker 1: you know, I did a There was a recent survey
Speaker 1: that showed that sixty five percent of residents in South
Speaker 1: Bend are dissatisfied with the maintenance of city streets, sidewalks, infrastructure.
Speaker 1: Sixty four percent said us agree that the city is
Speaker 1: safe a safe community for everyone seventy percent don't agree
Speaker 1: that the city has vibrant, welcoming neighbors. I mean, maybe
Speaker 1: you ought to be staying home a little bit and
Speaker 1: doing his job, but when he did go home, he
Speaker 1: got an ear full listen. So, if I understood your
Speaker 1: question correctly, it's about a feature where when a gun
Speaker 1: is removed from its holster, that is then that automatically
Speaker 1: activates the body cameras that I'm sorry, I can't hear Jordan.
Speaker 1: I cannot hear Jordan speak. If you're chatting over him,
Speaker 1: please shot fire when a shot. I don't know that
Speaker 1: as so. Jordan, good question. That technology exists, but it's
Speaker 1: not implemented. Talk I asked. I had the same questions
Speaker 1: that you did, and I called the company myself and
Speaker 1: I talked to them myself and their best guess for
Speaker 1: the implement implemented let him talk. They don't even have
Speaker 1: it testable yet. It will not be out rolled out
Speaker 1: until the spring of this coming spring, is what the
Speaker 1: company told me. You can call and check and ask
Speaker 1: him with them same thing that I did. Call and
Speaker 1: ask him. What's your reaction to that, Joe Concho, And
Speaker 1: my reaction is that if you're running for president and
Speaker 1: you're a mayor, you're a governor. I think you should
Speaker 1: step down when that happens. I didn't like hi when
Speaker 1: Chris Christie did it. I live in New Jersey. I
Speaker 1: don't like it now with Bill de Blasio in New York.
Speaker 1: You know, he's an absent team mayor. You see with
Speaker 1: Pete Buddha judge, he's an absent team mayor. And you
Speaker 1: see that the city was already falling apart, and now
Speaker 1: it's even getting worse. And yeah, he got yelled at
Speaker 1: and he looked his age. Let's put it that way.
Speaker 1: That's already hurting him a lot that he's thirty seven,
Speaker 1: but he looks every bit the part of thirty seven.
Speaker 1: And by the way, with President Obama, as you talked
Speaker 1: about his campaign in two thousand and eight, yeah, that
Speaker 1: was run perfectly. I'll greet The two thousand and eight
Speaker 1: crash also helped, right, because then anybody who was in
Speaker 1: the incumbent party was probably gonna get beat. But as
Speaker 1: far as slogans, no one really talks about this. With
Speaker 1: President Trump, make America great again. You know what, that
Speaker 1: doesn't happen. It doesn't have his name, right, it wasn't
Speaker 1: about Trump. He made it about the country. So I
Speaker 1: think that his slogan he should continue to do what
Speaker 1: he's doing as far is this isn't about me. I'm
Speaker 1: doing this for you because he very's a good state
Speaker 1: at home and then ran a nice business and had fun.
Speaker 1: But he went ahead and did it for the country
Speaker 1: in slogan's matter and right now, keep America great again.
Speaker 1: Do you like that, by the way, as a slogan, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think it's gonna work. And you know what, America
Speaker 1: is doing great? You know what, do we have the
Speaker 1: best June in what how many years? Eighty? The best
Speaker 1: unemployment or employment situations in nineteen sixty nine. Demographically, those
Speaker 1: that are hurt the most are doing the best, thank God,
Speaker 1: and that I think wins the day. Peace and prosperity
Speaker 1: drive elections. All right, twenty five till the top of
Speaker 1: the hour, eight hundred and nine four one seawn. If
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of this extravaganza. All right,
Speaker 1: So the President says, two weeks, big door, big deportation begins.
Speaker 1: I think it's always going to give him another two weeks.
Speaker 1: Do I believe him? Yes? I think the President serious yes,
Speaker 1: do I think the Democrats are No. I don't think
Speaker 1: they ever ever want to see Donald Trump be successful.
Speaker 1: So he will expose them yet again as saying that
Speaker 1: they want things and they don't want them, because remember
Speaker 1: he sat there, offered them to offer to put Dreamers
Speaker 1: and DACA on the table, and wants the wall, the
Speaker 1: same wall they were funding and paid for and praising
Speaker 1: in the second term of Obama but never got done.
Speaker 1: And now all of a sudden, they're immoral and we
Speaker 1: got to break down those walls. That's what they're saying.
Speaker 1: I don't know what to make of a lot of
Speaker 1: people writing about this story about Congresswoman o'mar and whether
Speaker 1: or not you know, whether I guess it has to
Speaker 1: do with a marriage history. I just don't care about
Speaker 1: that story. Any of you care. I don't care. I
Speaker 1: don't care about it. I don't like what she says
Speaker 1: and doesn't get held accountable. That's what matters to me.
Speaker 1: Policy matters a lot more than their personal life to me. Yeah,
Speaker 1: of course, you know, saying the things she said. And again,
Speaker 1: the radical extremists led by Speaker Casio Cortez, you know,
Speaker 1: they're just they're running the show. You know, it's funny
Speaker 1: because I actually said, well, Pelosi, I think is speaker
Speaker 1: in name only Hannity's is advancing a conspiracy theory. He
Speaker 1: thinks that somehow there was a secret coup but we
Speaker 1: just don't know about it. That's not what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: I'm saying that Speaker Pelosi is beholden too and afraid
Speaker 1: of Congresswoman Accio Cortez, and she's capitulating to what Congresswoman
Speaker 1: Actio Cortez wants. And Acasio Cortez has a lot more
Speaker 1: influence over the Democratic Party in the House, Senate and
Speaker 1: even the twenty twenty candidates than she does. So I
Speaker 1: don't see why that's even an issue. It just is
Speaker 1: what it is. All right, Let's get to our busy phone.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, but of course, you know, she got called
Speaker 1: out on referring to the areas where people that have
Speaker 1: entered the country illegally as concentration camps. I'm like, really, wow,
Speaker 1: you mean like the concentration camps in Nazi Germany where
Speaker 1: they walk people to their death. That's what you're going
Speaker 1: to compare it to when our government gets food, water, medicine,
Speaker 1: medical attention supplies, takes care of the families. The President
Speaker 1: did something that neither Obama nor Bush had done as
Speaker 1: it relates to keeping families together, just saying Kasio Cortez
Speaker 1: giving illegal immigrants advice on how to evade federal law enforcement.
Speaker 1: It's a pretty fascinating time we live in. I will
Speaker 1: tell you that. All right, to our phones, we go,
Speaker 1: Let's say hi too. Scott is in Texas. Scott, Hi,
Speaker 1: how are you welcome to the program. You know a
Speaker 1: lot of people are going to Texas. But here's the problem.
Speaker 1: You know, and I did not know this, and I
Speaker 1: haven't checked it out, but I know Mike cuck he's
Speaker 1: usually right if he says it, the former governor, and
Speaker 1: he said, if you're taking a U haul from California
Speaker 1: to Texas, it's sixteen hundred bucks. If you take it
Speaker 1: from Texas back to California, he goes, you're pretty much
Speaker 1: doing U haul of favor and it's only four hundred bucks.
Speaker 1: And you can probably negotiate it even down from there.
Speaker 1: Isn't that? The only thing I worry about is all
Speaker 1: the Californians that are coming to Texas. I just don't
Speaker 1: want them to bring the stupid policies that destroyed California
Speaker 1: with them. Is that a concern for the people of Texas, Well,
Speaker 1: it is for me. I mean, it took a long
Speaker 1: time to turn Texas back red and you have a
Speaker 1: problem now with a lot of people that leave the
Speaker 1: area that bring that policy with them. But it's not
Speaker 1: surprising that it's cheaper to go to California than it
Speaker 1: is to goes to Texas, for sure. No, but that
Speaker 1: statistic is so revealing because you know, I think Texas
Speaker 1: came close to getting an additional four hundred people moving
Speaker 1: from other states to there, and California, New York, New Jersey,
Speaker 1: Illinois is in particular. Now they're losing population like they've
Speaker 1: never seen before. Well, it's business friendly. If you look
Speaker 1: at California crossing or the energy industry and how it's
Speaker 1: got a redistributing program. You can't make a living there.
Speaker 1: You've got to move out. There's just nothing you can do.
Speaker 1: So you got to go to another state. In Texas
Speaker 1: at least is friendly. So what's on your mind today? Well,
Speaker 1: I wanted to talk about the uranium one deal and
Speaker 1: how we've actually arrived at what Iran is now tied
Speaker 1: to the previous administration. And specifically if you take a
Speaker 1: step back and look at what they did with Trump
Speaker 1: and utilizing foreign entities to create narratives or get information
Speaker 1: that they could not legally do in the United States.
Speaker 1: And look at uranium one. They allowed all that uranium
Speaker 1: one deal had to be approved by a cabinet and
Speaker 1: ultimately to president. When you look at the Obamas administration
Speaker 1: and leaving they approved one hundred and thirty tons of
Speaker 1: uranium to be sold by Russia to Iran. You remember
Speaker 1: there was crushing sanctions. They lifted it, and then we
Speaker 1: gave them one hundred and thirty billion dollars from not
Speaker 1: mistaken or some of one hundred billion dollars to pay
Speaker 1: for it. The criminal acts that are taking place from
Speaker 1: the previous administration are finally starting to bear fruit. And
Speaker 1: I'm my only concern is I don't know if anybody's
Speaker 1: ever going to be held accountable to it, other than
Speaker 1: our young men and women that are serving in the
Speaker 1: military that have to undo all this stuff. Look, you know, uranium,
Speaker 1: we pull up on this. The only thing I knew
Speaker 1: is that there was some legal investigative activity ongoing in Arkansas.
Speaker 1: I don't know what the latest has come of it
Speaker 1: because we've been so wrapped up and obviously the deep
Speaker 1: state abuse of power corruption scandal, But it's not anything
Speaker 1: that's off my radar, and it's not anything that I
Speaker 1: think will lever give up on because we don't have
Speaker 1: enough uranium, the foundational material of nuclear weapons. We had
Speaker 1: William Campbell reported back to our FBI, we had a
Speaker 1: spy within Putin's network inside of the United States because
Speaker 1: they wanted to get a foothold in the uranium market
Speaker 1: in this country. We have recorded because I interviewed William
Speaker 1: Campbell and he told all of his bosses within the
Speaker 1: FBI and elsewhere what was going on that Putin's network.
Speaker 1: They were involved in bribery and extortion and kickbacks of
Speaker 1: money laundering, and then of course you got to follow
Speaker 1: the money. And Siphius then goes ahead and they make
Speaker 1: this approval and twenty percent of our uranium is going
Speaker 1: to uranium one. Bill Clinton tries sets up a speech
Speaker 1: paid for by the bank in Russia involved in the
Speaker 1: uranium one deal that pays him double his speaking fee.
Speaker 1: While there, he attempts to meet with the nuclear regulatory
Speaker 1: people of Russia. That meeting didn't happen. Because he got
Speaker 1: to meet with Vladimir Putin himself. Was it discussed? Guarantee
Speaker 1: it was discussed. And then you look at the people
Speaker 1: involved that profited from the deal as it relates to
Speaker 1: rossa tom and uranium one, and you see those are
Speaker 1: the very same people that kick back the equivalent of
Speaker 1: one hundred and forty five million dollars to the Clinton Foundation. Now,
Speaker 1: there were others that were involved in a lot of ways,
Speaker 1: but I can tell you that it certainly it makes
Speaker 1: no sense. It stinks to high heaven. The level of
Speaker 1: quote collusion with Putin as obvious, and the amount of
Speaker 1: money is corrupt. It doesn't pass the smell test, especially
Speaker 1: having an FBI spy in that network. So yeah, we're
Speaker 1: gonna get back to it. I just why doesn't the
Speaker 1: media care? Because the media mob only cares if Donald
Speaker 1: Trump did something wrong. If Donald Trump spit on the sidewalk,
Speaker 1: that would be far more important. If he jaywalked, it
Speaker 1: would be far more important than what I just described
Speaker 1: about uranium, the foundational material of nuclear weapons. Anyway, let's
Speaker 1: get to Let's see Donna is in Staten Island, our
Speaker 1: old friend Donna. Donna, Hi, how are you and We're
Speaker 1: glad you called hi. How are you? I'm good? What's
Speaker 1: going on? So I want to know. I wanted to
Speaker 1: see if you've noticed this, because I noticed that the
Speaker 1: new mantra from the last regarding Trump, they've abandoned Russia. Russia, Russia. Now,
Speaker 1: when you asked them on the left, why do you
Speaker 1: hate Donald Trump? To go, here's a liar, and they go, okay,
Speaker 1: so tell me specifically what has he lied about? And
Speaker 1: they don't have an answer. So then I usually counter with, okay, well,
Speaker 1: then let's talk about actual lies told by Obama and
Speaker 1: killery and they usually reply I don't want to talk
Speaker 1: about that, and they go, well, no, you brought up lying.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about actual lies. Let's talk about if you
Speaker 1: like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Then Gazi
Speaker 1: They's and furious the irs and all that other stuff,
Speaker 1: and they have no offense. But apparently that is the
Speaker 1: new mantra that they have been told to stew because Russia,
Speaker 1: obviously we all now has been disproven and it's like
Speaker 1: they all read from the same playbook. They don't even
Speaker 1: have a legitimate argument. It's just a healing. They've got
Speaker 1: nothing except rage and hatred. And they can't believe four
Speaker 1: investigations they didn't get what they wanted, you know. And
Speaker 1: the real sick part of all of this, and we've
Speaker 1: been extremely vocal about it. You know, they had this
Speaker 1: broad mandate where they're supposed to really be looking into
Speaker 1: any type of Russian interference. And okay, so they were
Speaker 1: able to identify Russian intelligence agents that you know, Devin
Speaker 1: Nunez told us about with a certainty in twenty fourteen,
Speaker 1: would be doing what they did. And let's try to
Speaker 1: mess with our election and create chaos, which didn't, apparently
Speaker 1: by every study, impact the election results. But then we
Speaker 1: have Hillary and the Ukrainians. They're willing to give us
Speaker 1: the evidence. Nobody care. Just like nobody cares about Hillary
Speaker 1: and the violation of the Espionage Act, they act like
Speaker 1: they care about obstruction of justice. Trump, there's no underlying crime.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump complaining loudly that he's innocent and wishing Muller
Speaker 1: would go away when under article too legally you get
Speaker 1: rid of Muller, but he doesn't get rid of Muller
Speaker 1: or complaining about Rod Rosenstein. To me, that's what innocent
Speaker 1: people do when they're charged. But yet Hillary has an
Speaker 1: underlying crime. She had subpoena emails, she destroyed them, deleted them,
Speaker 1: and then you know that would be destroying the evidence
Speaker 1: to obstruct justice. Nobody cares about that obstruction. They care
Speaker 1: about Kavanaugh in high school, the most obscene allegations. But
Speaker 1: we've got a lieutenant governor with real, credible allegations of
Speaker 1: violent rape, violent sexual assault two women. Nobody there's no
Speaker 1: eye believers. And for you know, walls are immoral except
Speaker 1: if Barack Obama's going to build them. There's no intellectual honesty,
Speaker 1: there's no consistency. It's not it's about bludgeoning Trump. Now.
Speaker 1: Everything is about bludgeoning this man and destroying him. And
Speaker 1: I again, if he cured cancer, Donna, I don't think that,
Speaker 1: and he gave every American ten million dollars, I don't
Speaker 1: think they'd like him, then there's nothing this guy can
Speaker 1: do that's ever going to win them over. If he
Speaker 1: cured cancer, they would turn around and complain that he
Speaker 1: put the chemotherapy industry out of business. It would be
Speaker 1: something I am convinced by the way that maybe sooner
Speaker 1: than later. I really do believe this that we're going
Speaker 1: to look back as as having lived in the Dark
Speaker 1: Ages as it relates to curing cancer, We've already seen it.
Speaker 1: I lost my cousin, Billy Kerwin, when he was young,
Speaker 1: was like thirty four. He's a New York City police officer, big,
Speaker 1: tall guy, tough guy, and he got um Hodgkins disease.
Speaker 1: And now it's like a ninety eight percent cure rate.
Speaker 1: Childhood leukemia used to be a death sense, Now ninety
Speaker 1: eight percent cure rate. And I think we're going to
Speaker 1: look back on a lot of other cancers and hopefully
Speaker 1: you know, we've done a lot better with breast cancer,
Speaker 1: a lot better with prostate cancer, a lot better with
Speaker 1: all these cancers. But I think we're going to look
Speaker 1: back and say we were really in the Dark ages.
Speaker 1: They're going to figure it out. I just believe that
Speaker 1: there are people that's smart, but of course we don't
Speaker 1: encourage them to go into medicine, just the opposite, because
Speaker 1: we're gonna tell you can only charge you after you've
Speaker 1: been through four years of college, three years of medical school,
Speaker 1: have a residency and an internship, and get paid nothing,
Speaker 1: and then you have all your student loans. But Bernie
Speaker 1: wants to pay him back for free. Everyone else know,
Speaker 1: and the same with Elizabeth Warren. But then you know,
Speaker 1: then you want to open an office, and then you gotta,
Speaker 1: you know, even borrow more money. And then after you
Speaker 1: borrow more money, then you can only charge twenty dollars
Speaker 1: a visit. And you're never going to keep your doors
Speaker 1: open because the government will tell you, and then insurance
Speaker 1: companies will tell you what you can and cannot charge.
Speaker 1: It's ridiculous. All right, back to our phones saying hi
Speaker 1: to Terry Is in Florida. Terry, Hi, how are you
Speaker 1: glad you called Hi? Thank you? Sean. My concern is
Speaker 1: is I saw that they had the nerve to request raises.
Speaker 1: They have no time to worry about the American people
Speaker 1: and do things to help us, but they have time
Speaker 1: enough to request a raise. Um. Look, I mean, there's
Speaker 1: nobody else that I know of that gets to vote
Speaker 1: themselves at the pay raise. Nobody, you know. And Acasto Cortez,
Speaker 1: you know, is trying to be a little cute I
Speaker 1: have by saying, well, I want every American to get
Speaker 1: a raise, hourly rage or salary increase. I'm like, okay,
Speaker 1: but you're not voting for everyone to get a raise.
Speaker 1: You're voting for yourself to get a raise. Nobody else
Speaker 1: gets to vote for that. All right, Hannay Tonight, nine
Speaker 1: Eastern Fox News. We are loaded up new deep state news.
Speaker 1: We got Jaseculo, Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan. Also, Yeah, we
Speaker 1: saw it over the weekend in South Carolina. We're gonna
Speaker 1: see it more this week. The insanity of Democratic candidates
Speaker 1: and it's only getting worse. All happening nine Eastern Tonight News.
Speaker 1: You won't get anywhere else on the Fox News Channel.
Speaker 1: I hope you'll join us, Hannity, Fox News, see tonight
Speaker 1: back here tomorrow