WEBVTT - Ep63 - Special Edition: Oscar Nominees

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>M m M. You're listening to Playback, a variety I

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Heart Media podcast. I'm your host of Variety Awards editor

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Chris Tapley. I just want to listen to this beat

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>for a second. Thanks to Stewart Park for the new jams,

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>new Playback, new jams. Yes, we're super excited to be

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a part of the I Heart Media family. So welcome

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to all new listeners. And this is Playback, a film

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>focused weekly podcast. We talked to movie stars, we talked directors,

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>basically exclusive conversations with the talents behind many of today's

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>hottest movies. That's what we do here. And the ninetieth

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Annual Academy Awards are right around the corner on Sunday,

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So first order of business. We've got a lot of

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>good movies, a lot of good performances, but a weird

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>year overall. I thought it never quite found itself, so

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of going into the Oscars here, we have a

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of question marks and a number of key races,

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>so it should be a pretty exciting night. We've talked

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to a number of this year's nominees here on the

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>show over the last twelve months, so today we thought

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we'd pull together a few of those conversations and anecdotes

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>make for a little trip through two thousand seventeen. We've

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:43.919
<v Speaker 1>got chats with actors like Gary Oldman and Searsha Ronan,

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and filmmakers like Christopher Nolan and de Reese, just to

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>name a few. So let's dive in the year started,

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>as it always does, at the Sundance Film Festival. It

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>was there that Universal Pictures decided to drop Jordan's Peel's

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>get Out as a surprise screening. It was a very

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>bold move, but it immediately set this genre film up

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>as more than a genre film. I mean, it became

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a critically acclaimed movie that clearly could be a prestige picture.

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And here we are a year later, the Proofs in

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the Pudding. The movie is competing for Best Picture, Best Director,

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Best Actor, and Best Original Screenplay. It's quite the whirlwind.

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And I spoke to Jordan just ahead of at least

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>way back on February twenty three, just over a year ago.

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>One of the things we talked about was the genre

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>bending quality of the film. It's a horror film, but

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it's also a social satire with comedy elements, and it

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>was classified as a comedy of the Golden Globes, which

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>caused quite a stir. But way before all that happened,

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Jordan and I talked about that nebulous quality of the film.

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So here's Jordan one that it felt like the comedy

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>education that I got, I've gotten the last you know,

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>decade or so worked perfectly in this film. Um. You know,

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel that both horror and laughter are ways we

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>we face our demons way ways that we deal with

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>our fears of death in a way, Um, it's about tension, tension, tension,

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and then release with a certain pinpoint precision. And you know,

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in in in a way the tension, tension, tension and

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>release is kind of a a metaphor for life and

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>death in a way. You know, we spend our whole

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>lives fearing the ultimate absurdity, which is that this is

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a temporary That's right, that's right, that's true. Uh. I

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>went to the You had the kind of premiere in

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>l A the l A live screening your Head that

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>last week, and you said beforehand that for you, growing

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>up race was like a nightmare, That's how you put it,

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and you wanted to put this nightmare on the screen.

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>What it got me thinking was what was the chicken

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and the egg? Like, did you want to make a

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>movie with those themes in mind? And then you kind

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of gravitated into a horror film? Or did you want

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to make a horror film? And these are the things

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that came up that you wanted to explore within that

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to make a horror film. Yeah, I just

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've I've I've I've had the this dream

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.799
<v Speaker 1>of being a director since I was since I was younger,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>being specifically a horror director, and um, you know, part

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.799
<v Speaker 1>of the process of figuring out what I could bring

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to the genre that would be of any worth or

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>anything I would be proud of. Um, you know, I

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I realized that I've sort of done enough thinking about race,

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>enough work in the comedy space about you know, walking

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that line how to deal with race and art, that

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of uniquely equipped to deal with it.

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Um you know, I think, you know, yeah, not only

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is race a nightmare for me, you know, I think

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that the greater point is that, um, you know, race,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>this country is is a and in the world is

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 1>this human demon. It is a monster that we is

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>in our d n A. And so I just felt

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>like race was I realized it's if anyone was going

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to make a modern move horror movie about race, it

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>should be me. Did you feel yourself like, were your

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>self governing it all, like, oh that's too far, I

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>need to pull back on that. Or did you just

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of let yourself go as far as you felt

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>like you wanted to go. It's it's yeah, it's all

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>self governing. Really, you know, it's you ask yourself, you

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of questions, but ultimately, um, you know,

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you sort of realize you can't write a movie with

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the taking into too far into consideration, how how the

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>people will react to it, whether or not you can

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>sell this movie. Um, I really wrote this movie for myself. UM,

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, look, this is gonna be a fun project

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to write. It is. Um if I was right a movie,

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>my favorite movie that doesn't exist yet? What is that movie?

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And I just followed that um fun Um. You know

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of you know, it's how I imagine um

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Tarantino works. It was one of the great Like you know,

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you can just tell he's not making a movie for

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>anyone else. He's making the movie he wishes. Um. Jordan

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>joined an elite group of filmmakers with his nominations as producer,

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>writer and director of get Out. By the Way, only

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Warren Beatty and James L. Brooks have managed that particular

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>hat trick on their debut film, so that's pretty exclusive company.

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Hats off to Jordan's. Nearly a year later, we spoke

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to the film's breakout star Daniel Kaluya, just after he

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>received his life changing Oscar nomination and when he was

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of promoting Black Panther. He stars as

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Wakabi in that film, by the Way, which has been

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>crushing it at the box office. I love this guy.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>He's so genuine, you don't feel like you're getting canned answers.

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>He's very thoughtful and conversational, and I don't know, he's

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>just a good dude. He's going to be doing this

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. And what I was particularly interested

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in talking about with him was the quiet nature of

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>his character, and get Out sort of calls on Daniel

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to be quite reserved in his performance. A lot going

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>on behind the eyes, under the surface, and as it

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>turns out, that's exactly the gear he prefers to work in.

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So here's Daniel. I mean itsunds in the sense that

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I learned so much on Sicario and Welcome

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>with that group of actors where the audacity to do nothing,

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the confidence and and and seeing him doing

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>it on set and not understanding it, but then seeing

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it on screen and go, well, but a Toro is

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>amazing in that film, Josh is amazing. He's amazing, and

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I kinda it's a and then you and I have

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>often I kind of had to rethink how I saw storytelling,

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>how I saw acting in a sense that like I

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want people to see him doing it, and I

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>can kinda. So it's just kind of like if you're

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>playing a real dude, he's a real dude, you mean,

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's like and he's going through this, and it's

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>about like people may not it may not be the

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>showy role, and you have to be okay with people

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>not noticing that you're doing what you're doing. But did

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>they notice the story? They are they feeling the beats

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of the story that that's the priority for me. So

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it was me engaging with kind of like just kind

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of death of like the acting ego in me, like

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>just kind of go, let me just do what I

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>feel feels right and and and feels real and and

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>with the internal is kind of like I find that.

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I just find a dynamics really interesting and stuff that

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I' probably doing life, and loads of people

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>do that in life. I find it interesting I watch,

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>so I find it interesting when someone says a kind

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of like, especially in the professional environment, especially in this industry,

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>people say a lot of lick stuff. Las weell absolutely

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.719
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of slick ship. It's encouraged. Let's say

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we say a lot of slick ship and then like

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>around that's kind of like but no one can say

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 1>it directly because I'm from a quite direct tone, so

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it's I'm having to learn that, and I can see

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>people react to it, but they can't really react to it.

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's what's being said on paper, what's being

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>said is nothing like, it doesn't mean anything, but underneath,

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>both parties know that there's something happening, and their faces

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>are given hints to something that's happening. So I just

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of was like, oh, I find that, really, I

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>find that more interesting to see in cinema, So it's

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, let's try and do that like in

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>But then I think I've with my intent. It's always

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>been like I don't want to feel like I'm showing

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>off what I can do. I don't. I don't want that.

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Like even when I was doing plays and there was

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 1>like a sequence where I had to show rage, I'll

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>be like, even in Black Mirror, like what I was

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>doing that monologue, I'll be like, is it too much?

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't want it. I don't want people

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to go because I probably find that quite over welming

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>me is And that's just my personal taste. And so

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we've get out. It was just kind of have this

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>in mind, but also as well conversations with Jordan and

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Allison and just going how do we ground this amazing

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>genre story, you know, like and and I just I

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>just kind of felt and that Jordan was like minded

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>about like you have to believe this character and believe

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>this relationship and believe that this is real, which grounds

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>all the kind of supernatural or other worldly like genre

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>elements to to the piece. If it's grounded, you know,

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're you're way more likely to believe a lot

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>more stuff, the stuff that's real. But you don't even

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>believe Jim. And it's like because of the gravity at

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the center of it Isn't It's rude Sunday. It was

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>actually a powerhouse uh for Oscar contenders last year. In

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>addition to Get Out, there was also Called Me By

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Your Name and mud Bound, as well as The Big Sick,

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>which was written by and stars Kumon and Johnny one

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite shows, HBO's Silicon Valley. Kumale was nominated

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>for Original Screenplay along with his wife, Emily V. Gordon.

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And this was about as personal an experience as you

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>can get. I mean, The Big Sick tells the story

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>of Emily's sudden coma when Kumaloe was courting her, and

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>how the experience both strengthened and tested their families. And

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you're pouring your soul out like that

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and literally telling your story on screen, you have to

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>feel somewhat exposed in a way I guess very few

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of us can identify with. So I wanted to talk

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>to Kumale about that over the summer when the film

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>finally released in theaters. So here's Kumale. Well, you know,

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>as a stand up. At some point I started taking

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>personal stories and personal experiences and talking about them on stage,

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>so I had a little bit of experience being personal

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>and sort of giving of myself in little ways. This

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the deal. I was thinking about this

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier today or last night when I couldn't sleep. You know,

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>there is a little bit of you lose a lot

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 1>of people see your vulnerability, right, but a little bit.

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's sort of the deal with the devil.

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>You have to make to do what I get to do, Like,

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>what you get is you get to live your dreams

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and tell your stories and it's really exciting. But what

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the price of that a little bit is that you

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>are giving a piece of yourself for everyone to analyze

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and judge. Um But I knew, like a few years

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>after these the events of the movie had happened. I

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 1>knew that I wanted to like do something with it,

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>like either do a show about it or something, because

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it felt like this very specific emotional thing that had happened.

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And I knew that nobody else had this story, and

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that only Emily and I were the ones who would

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to tell this story, like kind of if

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we didn't tell the story, the story would just not

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>get told. Nobody else has this so um and and

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I really think for me writing and I think the

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>best writing is sort of you're trying to deal with

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>your concerns and tackle stuff that's complicated and messy for you,

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And part of it's a little bit of like self

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>therapy working on something like this. So I knew that

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this was a story I wanted to tell. Emily took

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more convincing. I knew this was a

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>story I wanted to tell because thinking about it would

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>like paralyze me. And I knew that I had a

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of like stuff floating around inside this black box

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that I hadn't opened. And I knew that in in

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>order to be able to move on from this kind

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of crazy event and have to write about it and

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>really get into it and and and sort of figure

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>out how I felt about it, you know. And it's

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>very easy to be like, well that was a tough

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>time when you actually opened the box and think about

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>like what did I do this day? And then this happened?

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>And this happened is how that made me feel? Like

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>going through all the events piece by piece is it's

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>very difficult, but I think it's also allowed us to

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>get a handle on this big, big part of our life,

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>did you get swept up in any kind of emotion,

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>like in the moment in a scene that would obviously

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>remind you of this very emotional moment in your life.

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>There are some scenes that I cried when I wrote them,

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I cried when I rewrote them, I cried when I

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>hurt them, and and then shooting them was the same thing.

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised at how much of it actually felt

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>like going through the real thing. Part of it is,

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean more of the hospital stuff, because when you

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>were in a hospital. This wasn't a set. We shot

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in a real hospital. The sense memory of being in

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a hospital, and I hadn't that it had been about

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>nine years since that stuff happened. Just the lighting, the

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>smell of tape, the smell of addison, the sterility sound,

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the sounds, yeah, the weird beeps you hear, all that stuff,

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the sounds of wheels on um linoleum or whatever it is.

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>All that stuff took me back immediately, Me and Emily,

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>both of us like immediately. So it was actually more

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of a struggle to not uh go back into that

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>really sad space. It was actually more of a start

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of struggle to not do that than it was to

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like get into it, you know, like like waiting in

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the waiting room or all that stuff. I hadn't been

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in a hospital really since all that stuff happened to us.

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>And going back into it and shooting it there, it

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was very very It was very intense, and it was

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>very intense for Emily. It's about ten years ago, right,

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>there was two thousand seven. Like I mentioned, mud Bound

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>was a big sundance player as well. This year it

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>was acquired by Netflix for an astounding twelve point five million.

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's astounding, it was worth that certainly.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Um It's an amazing film and the movie's co writer

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and director de Reese uh is one of the most

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>headstrong and driven directors I've ever interviewed. She's already a

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>masterful artist just three films in, and her cinematographer, Rachel Morrison,

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>actually made history this year with her Oscar nomination for

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Best Cinematography. She's the first woman to do so, which

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is obviously a long time coming. We'd like to dig

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in on the craft of filmmaking on this show, and

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>something D and I talked about was settling on the

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>look of this post World War two drama and plenty

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of talk about her work with Rachel, So here's d

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about that. Yeah, so we didn't look at other films.

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>So like, for me, like the visual art world so

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>has been my inspiration and like you know, creating kind

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of images for the screen, and so for me inspirations

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>where there's artis named Winfield Lavel who does let of

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>tone on tone paintings to temporary artists, is a sculptor.

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I love Na Mary Frank who does a lot of

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>things that united bidenes and landscapes. And then Rachel had

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>like Dorothea Lang and all these w p A photos.

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So we really kind of worked from there and wanted

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the film to feel very kind of candid, very kind

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of like like honest in a way. And another thing

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I love, I love um Less Blank that does these documentaries.

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>He'd done this, like this documentary called The Truth of

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Corn and to Lightning Hopkins. So you know, we looked

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>at that and like wanted the film to have a

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>very kind of moving at the speed of life feel.

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't feel presentational, it doesn't feel stagy, which

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:27.959
<v Speaker 1>can be you know, the catch of a lot of

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>period pieces. But we wanted to move with the speed

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>of life and feel honest, you know, and yet it's

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't call it like a verity thing. I think

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's aesthetically beautiful, uh, you know, working I

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know what your budget was, but like were there

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>limitations that absolutely We shot this film in twenty nine

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>days for ten million dollars. So this is an indie

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>film that no one realizes as an indie film, and

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, and that was because Rage was able to

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>work so fast and use a lot of lighting, and

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a big you know problem was basically we

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>shot in actual sharecropper's cabin, so like a lot of

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the challenge was balancing like the inside versus the outside

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it and so she actually had to cut holes in

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the ceilings of these cabins to be able to put

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>lights like in the roof of these things, so that

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the value difference wasn't so great between the

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>X tears and interiors and just really you know, making

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>these characters feel like they're of the world. And I

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>really love to let actors move through the space and

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't like blocking that kind of inhibits kind of

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're flowing and that's all depend on having

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a DP. This want to be flexible with lighting and

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>being able to work with you so that the actors

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>have maximum freedom, that the actors are able to kind

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of do their best work. Moving out of Sundance and

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>into the release calendar, James Mangold's Logan hit theaters on

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>March three, which was less than a week after the

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>last year's Oscars were over. And the craziness of that

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>envelope snaff who, which I think James and I even

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about maybe or that might have been off the air,

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember, but in any case, I spoke to

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>James just before this film released, and I very much

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>doubt at the time he expected that, you know, a

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>year later he'd be sitting here sharing the first ever

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>screenplay nomination for a superhero movie with his co writers.

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>But here we are, uh, and I think it's well deserved.

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>This film stands out from the fray of superhero movies.

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel I'm a big fan of Westerns, as is James,

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and this movie has that genre and as DNA, which

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought was a brilliant flourish, so naturally we talked

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>about that. So here's James talking about the Western qualities

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of Logan. It's central to the entire story of this

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>character as well. UM. I mean for those who aren't

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>X men fans. UM. One thing has been essentially true

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>about Logan through his comic book history and movie history,

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>which is that he's carrying a ton of shame on

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>his back about dark deeds he committed when he was

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>younger and called weapon X in his incarnation as a

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of UM. When he was a gun slinger, he

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>was well, he was a drug drug pumped killer. UM.

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>But yes, but in the metaphor of the Western he

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>was he was a gun slinger and UM and UM

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people were hurt, and they weren't

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>all UM in it. They weren't all guilty in some way.

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't always the justified death, if you will. And

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the UM. I think that that's something that's been played

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>with throughout UM as I said, comic book history with

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>this character and in the movies. But the the idea

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>for me of coming of this character, coming to terms

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>um with his life UM in a final film seemed

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to me necessary to find some way to go deeper

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>into his own odd um relationship with violence. When did

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>this kind of conceit because it is it does have

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the dna of a Western When did that Did you

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>go into it with that conceit in mind, or did

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it develop as you developed the project like some of

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>some of some of some of that comes along with

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>just me meaning you know, my second film, Copland, which

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>all outward appearances is a kind of Sydney Lamett esque

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, kind of Peyton Place cop movie, uh, was

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>very much structured actually built on three tena Huma. The

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>idea of this kind of weakened mail in the center

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of this town of gun slingers who has called upon

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>to kind of find the reserves to stand up to

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>this um gun slinging bunch of corruption around him. Um

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the that's all very much. Um was hugely Western influence,

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And in fact that movie ends in a giant gunfight,

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>um the um. But a gunfight not like you'd see

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>in Heat, but one more like one you'd see in

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>High New and the Western has had a powerful effect

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>on me. Um. I couldn't completely explain why. But in

0:21:56.160 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of uh a classes I mean I'm not

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I I am from the same generation, Um that a

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>host of really talented kind of postmodern directors have come from.

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Probably the leader of all of them would be Quentin

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm a huge fan of his work. But I

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>couldn't do anything like that, Like, it's not the whole um. Uh.

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>There's something I'm always looking for, something very earnest. I

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>miss I miss amid all the really wonderful films made

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>along the lines I was just describing. I missed movies

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that mean it, that have something to say, that have

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a kind of gravity to them and are unashamed. It's

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.479
<v Speaker 1>in this kind of most sardonic of ages, it's almost

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>gotten um uncool to actually represent a true feeling UM

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that without quotes around it or or a snicker, and

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:58.719
<v Speaker 1>that that's something the Western for me embodies UM. And

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I was always offered kind of guidance on UM. If

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>for listeners who are hearing me describe, you know, Logan's backstory,

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of very logical if you think about movies

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>like Shane or Unforgiven, or Pale Rider or The Manner Shot,

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Liberty Valance. There's a lot of movies that in which

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the kind of bones lineage UM really lend themselves to

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>considering UM, considering how you might be able to use

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>some of those structures in a modern superhero movie. As

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>we moved through the spring, the industry geared up for

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the Can Film Festival in May. Can has kind of

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>fallen off in terms of launching oscar players lately, but

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the year's best I thought stuck out at

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>last year's edition, Sean Baker's The Florida Project. Legendary actor

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Willem Dafoe has been widely recognized for his work on

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the film all season, and he landed his third Supporting

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Actor nomination this year after Platoon and Shadow of the Vampire.

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting years that he's sort of a central note

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in this film. He's like the recognizable star surrounded by

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>all these non actors and green performers, and it just

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>makes for an interesting quality and even a bit of

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a family atmosphere on the set. So here's what I'm

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about. That it is true that it's a situation where, um,

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the company has made up of people that have been

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>cast from the streets, people have been casted from Instagram. Uh,

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>there's some professional actors, there's some new professional actors, there's

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>some kids, and then you know there's also me. And

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been around for a little while. Um, but it's

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>always the same on some level. That even even in

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>an industry movie, even in a studio film, sometimes you're

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>working with people from very different backgrounds and very different trainings.

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm always struck that it's in in in the profession

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of acting, particularly for Americans. Uh, there isn't a uniform

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>mony of training or a uniform methodology. And I don't

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's necessarily a bad thing at all. In fact,

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:12.959
<v Speaker 1>I think mixing it up helps because, Um, then with

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>each project you really have to to find what your

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 1>processes and you also have to find out how to

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>fit in with everybody and make the world so it

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.959
<v Speaker 1>doesn't become about you. It becomes about the thing that

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you're making and that frees you. Yeah, well let's talk

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>about that. Uh, that environment with these other actors. This atmosphere,

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, was it uh trying? Was it electric? Was it?

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Did it take you back to your roots at all?

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Like had a little bit you know, it was like

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a family, you know, and all film sets are like

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit. But these were people that this

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't saying old, same old. There was a cynical one

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in the lot because it was a new exciting experience

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>for them. And then also it was conditioned by the

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that we were shooting in a real ice so

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>as extras, Uh, you're having people that are really living

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>this life, this life that the story that we're telling

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.959
<v Speaker 1>is about. So they helped route the story as well

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in a reality. Um and for me playing the character,

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of wild because we're working in a

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>functioning motel. It's still functioning. I mean sometimes we had

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 1>to stop a scene because someone was checking into the motel.

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Didn't just take the whole building. We took the whole

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>building over. I mean, you know for certain, but in

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of you didn't like shut it down like people.

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>It was still functioning. It was still functioning. And it

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>would be literally like, oh, we gotta shoot that scene.

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>So the real manager would have to leave the room.

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd slide in there and we'd play the scene. In

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the summer Blockbusters Fear, the first slam dunk across the

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>board Oscar considered to actually open theatrically outside of the

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>festival circuit was Christopher Nolan's Dunkirk in July. Uh. You know,

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>not to play favorites, but I will. This is my

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>favorite of the Best Picture contenders. I think it's Nolan's

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>best film culmination of his tradecraft, if you will. The

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>film received eight Oscar nominations, including Best Picture and Best Director,

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and that director nomination was somehow Nolan's first in the category.

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>If you can believe that. This was a very technical

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>conversation which I wanted. I'm fascinated by Nolan's craft naturally,

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>and uh IMAX was a significant topic here as we

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 1>discussed his and cinematographer Hoita van Hoidema's efforts and pushing

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the medium as far as it can go. A lot

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of your choices about UM, who to work with a

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>very instinctive. They're about getting in the room with somebody

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and seeing if there's a creative spalk between you. Um.

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've seen the work you've done on other films.

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Let the right one in in particular my quite impression

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 1>on me Um. But really it was about meeting the

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>minds creatively, just in in talking about cinematography and his

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>approach to it and what I what I wanted in

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the photography and Interstellar, because it's more

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>than that. Relationship is about more than just lighting or

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>camera work. It's about storytelling, and you have to find

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody who will really be pulling in the same direction

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>as you in terms of how to tell that story

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and what the role of the photography will be in it.

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:36.360
<v Speaker 1>And so one of the more interesting things I think

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>about what Hoiter did in Dunkirk, which is deceptively simple,

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is he didn't ever want to discuss the look of

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the film. He didn't ever want to talk about it

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>as any kind of stylization. He had the confidence to

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>let it emerge from the material and what we were

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>actually going to stage and let that define the look,

0:28:56.080 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>which I think for for myself as a director, I

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of experience with large scale films. Um.

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>You know. I for me that wasn't maybe such a leap,

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>but for the for a cinematographer to sort of say,

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to put thousands of people on the beach,

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>We're going to get these airplanes, we're gonna get these boots,

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and then we're going to see how that informs the

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>creative process of the photography. Um. So, all of our

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>conversations in pre production, rather than being esthetic, they were technical.

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>It was okay, this is the format was shooting, this

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is the type of lens we need. This is how

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to move the camera around. Um And I

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>think that one of the things that I'm happiest about

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>with Hoyt's work on the film is the sincerity and

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the naturalness of the way in which he achieved these

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>remarkable images left from the heart. I mean, they're just

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody with a brilliant eye watching what's going on in

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>front of us and finding a way to capture that.

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So there's no imposed style on the photography in the film,

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and in the case of Imax photography is what hoy

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>has done in the IMAX format in this film is

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>really unique and groundbreaking in my opinion. Um. Yeah, I

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's the best use of the format you've had

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>so far. I mean, certainly. I saw one of the

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>early screenings at the Universal City Wall. I felt like

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I was just falling into the screen from the opening frame. Well,

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we had had a bit of practice by this time,

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>We've been doing it for ten years, and Hoyder on

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Interstellar finally broke that barrier that we hadn't been able

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to of how to hand hold the camera basically about

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>just picking it up and toughing it. But he was

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>able then suddenly to give me access to the IMAX

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>format as a spontaneous format, as an intimate format, and

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>so coming to Dunkirk, where my aspiration for the film

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>was an intimate epic, he is then able to put

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that lens right where a thirtyfive mill or a go

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>pro would be, you know, and and really give you

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that that intimacy with the characters. But on this incredible

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>format that is so it's transparent in a sense, it's

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>not stylized, it doesn't have its own look. It just

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>lets the screen disappear and immerses the audience in the action.

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I think always really trusted the format and

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>trusted his eye to just be there, follow the characters

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>through and find them the look of the thing that way,

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>rather than imposing a style on it. And I think

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's remarkable work that that answers my

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>next question, which was I was curious if you guys

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.479
<v Speaker 1>pulled any references, if you looked at photography or any artwork,

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>but obviously not, but in general, was that just for

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>this movie or is that something that you're typically interested

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in coming into pre production. I think it depends on

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the on the project. I've often done films where in

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the case of Inception, you know, working with Whalley, with

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>different storylines that intersect or interact, you know, there is

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a temptation to, well, we could do you know,

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>this one this particular color, or this process or put

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.959
<v Speaker 1>this look to it. I've always have come down on

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the side of naturalism, and that's why it works so

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>well with Molly Fister, It's why I think it works

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>as well with Van Hoyt. They're naturalistic photographers. They sort

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of trust the material in front of them in a way,

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and so you trust that the reality of the physical

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>differences of the different timelines will start to naturally achieve

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>some kind of a look. And I've always tried to

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>shoot on the highest quality format, the most transparent medium possible,

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>so that you are really just giving the audience access

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to the look and feel of the world that you

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>want them to respond to. The tactile quality that you

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>want people to watch Dunkerk in such a way that

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they know what everything would smell like. You know, that

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that kind of tacticality that that's very important. Now the

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Venice Film Festival has of folved into a significant Oscar

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>season launchpad. It's kicked off the journeys of films like Gravity, Birdman, Spotlight,

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and La La Land in recent years. This year's opener

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>was Garma del Toro's The Shape of Water, a gorgeous

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>fairy tale as only Garmo could conjure. I love talking

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to Garamo. I think everyone does. His passion is infectious

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and he really deserves all the love he's getting this year.

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Shape of Water was an idea that took root for

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Garmo when he was a child watching Creature from the

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Black Lagoon, and it was an idea that evolved to

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>take on a sort of low key socio political bent,

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's something we discussed. So here's Garamo. It's great

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's full circle in many ways for many reasons.

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>You know. It started when I was six and I

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>saw Julie Adams swimming and Creature from a like one

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Creatures swimming underneath contemplating her, you know, and

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought, what a beautiful image E went on eight six.

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I was enraptured by it, and I was enraptured by

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the love that it had, the romance it had, but

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.959
<v Speaker 1>of course they didn't end up together, you know, And

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and it was something I kept thinking about it. I thought, well,

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, this was a very unfair movie. I thought,

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>because they break into the home of the guy uh

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>and they kill him, basically that there's a very tragic movie.

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>For me, I've always seen monsters as very spiritual figures

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>for me, very metaphorical, you know, sort of embodied concepts

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>for me. And I stayed with that, and then in

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven, you know, the project started as such,

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and it took five or six years to get it

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 1>made and properly rendered and writing writing it. The scene

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that reunited is to go through the janitors, to go

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:56.439
<v Speaker 1>through the invisible people, the people without boys, because it's

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a movie about the other. It's a movie about embracing

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the other nest, finding the divine, the love of all

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the beautiful and the other as opposed to the fear

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and the rage and all these things that we are

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>living today. And and that's why I subtitle the movie

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.919
<v Speaker 1>it said, uh, the Ship of Water a fairy tale

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 1>for troubled times, because I felt it was like that.

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>For me. It was to talk about love without being corny,

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 1>to talk about emotions, which is now much harder. I mean,

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>I think we're in a very difficult age for emotions.

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, we we we can talk cynically, we can

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>talk with iron irony, you know, and it really sounds smart.

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>And when you talk about emotions normally you sound this ingenious.

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And I thought it, let's take the riskless embrace a

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>movie that's in love with love, in love with cinema,

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, make it a beautifully sort of classic Douglas cirque,

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>uh technical or all the beauty that we can put

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in the screen and and go at it with emotion.

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you think that is that? It's to your

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>point about sin is m today? I mean when you

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>say that, when you say that, like, you know, people

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>speak with irony and it sounds smart. It seems like

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>something that would be driven by the Internet age in

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:12.279
<v Speaker 1>a but it's driven by fear and isolation. Really, I

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>mean the look, the fact is ideologies. Uh, you know,

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:21.839
<v Speaker 1>there's a different, major difference between ideas and ideologies. And

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 1>when an ideology comes to play, is what separates you

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>from others. You know, then ideology is the only thing

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that allows a person to grab up a ton and

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>beat another human being because you are reduced to a thing,

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>You are reduced to your race, you're an immigrant, or

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you're reduced to your gender, and and it allows the

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>person to be humanize you, you know. And uh, the

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>key to that, the solution to that is love. Because

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I know this sounds silly, but it is. Is is

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the one cosmic force. The Beetles, Buddha and Jesus agree,

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and and it's because love is understanding is empathy, you know.

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>And when you empathize, when you walk in another person's

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>shoes for a couple of minutes, you understand the entirety

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 1>of their persona, not not just the identity that ideology

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 1>gave them. So we are like the discourse socially is

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>so exacerbated right now. It's so rife with anger and resentment.

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that partially, yes, you can talk about

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:33.840
<v Speaker 1>social media, but also politically, and we've come to the

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 1>point and it's one of the oldest techniques. There are

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>two possible explanations why your situation is bad socially A

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the people own about the world or

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 1>be quote unquote them whatever you want to call them,

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 1>immigration raise and the first one makes you take an

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>active role. The second one absolves you. There's one to

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:00.919
<v Speaker 1>tell you no no, no, you're right, You're fine. It's

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 1>dam that are the problem, and and very easily you

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:07.280
<v Speaker 1>pour the hatred into them. But that's not the real problem.

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that is used politically more and

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>more and more to deflect this tract, you know. So

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 1>there are many factors, and the movie is at the

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>same time very humane and very political, because look, the

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>moment when you take a stance in any narrative is

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a political stance. If you tell the story of Waterloo

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 1>from Napoleon's point of view is one movie. If you

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>tell it from the person iron in his trousers, that's

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>another one. And that's what we did on Shape of Water.

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 1>We we told you a story not through the agents

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and the scientists, but through the cleaning to the janitors

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>in the place, you know, the cleaning women that had

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>to wipe the toilets, empty the trashmans. And from that

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>moment and taking the point of view of not the

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>hero but the monster, you already are taking a political stance.

0:38:57.560 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Was nominated for Best Picture as a producer, as well

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>as Best Director and Best Original Screenplay. By the Way,

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>another Venice debut was Martin McDonough's Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri,

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 1>which has become quite uh quite the lightning rod this season.

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'll get into that in a minute. Let's start

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>with one of the film's stars and one of my

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:22.439
<v Speaker 1>favorite actors, Sam Rockwell. Sam plays a racist Missouri cop

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in the film, opposite Francis McDormand and Woody Harrelson, who

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.319
<v Speaker 1>were also nominated. One of the things that Sam and

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I talked about was his research for the part and

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 1>going down to Missouri and taking all that in. So

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 1>here's Sam talking about that. I met a couple of cops.

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I met one um Deemer in l A. Who would

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 1>he was with? I think Casey did a ride along

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:45.720
<v Speaker 1>with him. And then I met a couple of Missouri

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:49.360
<v Speaker 1>cops and Tay had them take my lines. My my

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 1>dialect coach Lewis Hamilstein found these cops in southern Missouri.

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.320
<v Speaker 1>We had we had to have some conversations, like I

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 1>emailed with Francis and Martin, like where are we gonna

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>where's this imaginary very Missouri town gonna be? Is it

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be southern or northern because there's a big difference

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in the way they talk, And so we sort of

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:09.839
<v Speaker 1>agreed that it was generally would be southern Missouri. And

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>then I then I knew what I had to find,

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and so it was cool to go down there to

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>southern Missouri. I did it right along um this beautiful guy,

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and he introduced me all these all these guys and

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, and so that was really cool. That was

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 1>really influenced a lot about the characters. Do you feel

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a sort of pressure though? Whenever? I mean, this is

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>this is a very complex character and obviously it's takes

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 1>it takes place in a fictional Missouri town, and the

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>unrest out of Ferguson that is obviously just playing on

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the fringes of this film. Absolutely, yeah, you know, does

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that provide a sense of pressure to make sure that

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you're not painting a caricature? Absolutely? And that's why I

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 1>went down there, you know. I mean, Martin wrote this

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:55.279
<v Speaker 1>before Ferguson, but um, I did. I did feel kind

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of obliged to find out the real story a little bit,

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and I asked those guys a lot of questions, you know,

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, the bottom line is I didn't

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>see racism down there. I mean I didn't. I I

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 1>saw a lot of stuff, but I didn't, Um, but

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I obviously it exists, and and so you know my job.

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 1>I didn't need to go to Missouri to play this part.

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it just helped me personally. I wanted I

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and I wanted to do it. But

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, the Dixon's Journey is important, I think

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to that topic, you know, and I think it does

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>say something. I'm not sure what quite what it says.

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 1>But that's what's so an enigmatic about the script. I

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>think it doesn't It doesn't even seem like it's actively

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 1>trying to say something to you, like it's trying to

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>dictake something. It's it just the way that the themes

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and the characters and all the interplay comes together. It

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:51.439
<v Speaker 1>just leaves you with this sense. Yeah. And I don't

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 1>even know how you put a word to it, but yeah,

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you could. You could put a bunch of labels. You

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 1>could put you know, feminism and you know, um racism

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and anti rad you could put a lot of labels

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:04.759
<v Speaker 1>these days, um anti violence and you know. But it's

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>just really at the end of the day, it's a

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 1>really entertaining and potent, uh screenplay, you know, in movie

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, Yeah, now, the film's director Martin McDonough and

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:17.919
<v Speaker 1>he was the surprise omission this year in the Best

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Director category, but he was nominated for his original screenplay.

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Three Billboards has attracted a lot of criticism for what

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:30.280
<v Speaker 1>some feel to be a blase or or tone deaf

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>handling of racism in America. There were a lot of

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>think pieces at the end of the year and after

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the Golden Globes where the film kind of swept uh.

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's around the time that Martin and I spoke.

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:44.839
<v Speaker 1>But I had not seen anyone really asking him about this,

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:49.279
<v Speaker 1>so I did. I asked McDonough about these criticisms and

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>what he was aiming for with his work on the page.

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So here's Martin. Well, I think some of it comes

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>from the idea that there's a uh that Sam's character

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 1>has redeemed at the end of the film. Um. I

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 1>don't think he is. No. I think at the end

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 1>he he's still the asshole that he was at the

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 1>start of the film. Um. But I think there is

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>hopefully by the end of it, he's he's seen that

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 1>he has to change almost you know. But but the

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>film isn't about simple heroes and villains, and he in

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>no way I think does he ever become become a

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 1>hero in it? The whole the whole part of one

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of the ideas of the stories, like who are the

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 1>villains and who are the heroes? And is anyone you know,

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is anyone really that heroic? But but certainly, you know,

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I did want to explore the idea of of Frances

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and a strong woman, you know, going against the police

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:52.319
<v Speaker 1>in the South, and I thought, I do believe that,

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the racial angle is definitely one of the

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 1>weapons she would throw at them, um so um. But

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea, the idea that human beings, that there's hope

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in a story like this, even with characters as as

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>despicable as as as Sam's is um. I thought that

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:13.759
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting thing to explore. Uh. Well, in any

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:18.839
<v Speaker 1>early drafts, did you ever have any thought towards using race,

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>like instead of using race as a backdrop or as

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a tool for her means? Was there any exploration of

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a black character and more in depth, or any depicting

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>any of these kinds of events as opposed to just

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of using them as backdrop? There was, I mean,

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we we filmed a few scenes with with and um,

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly with Francis's friend and a gift shop had a

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of extrachines that didn't make it into the finish film.

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Um so, but but the story is pretty much you know,

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 1>based and focused on on Francis's character. So so it's

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 1>her story, and you know, I'm sure the next film

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:57.879
<v Speaker 1>will be different, um just as this was like way

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 1>different to the sort of male centric films I didn't

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the first two. Um but because it's factis a story. Um,

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's her that I was concentrating on, and

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:10.879
<v Speaker 1>no one else really comes as through as strong as

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:13.959
<v Speaker 1>she does. Did you write with her in mind? Yeah? Yeah,

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the completely written for for frances I'm not sure

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>who I would have gone to if she just said no,

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 1>because she was just perfect for it. You know, she's

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 1>she's probably the best actress of her generation, I think.

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:29.240
<v Speaker 1>But if she's also got that kind of off screen

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of edginess too. You know, she doesn't really play

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the Hollywood game, and and that's kind of what was

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 1>great to tap into. Like even that seeing her like

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 1>breathe past the red carpets and not do interviews and

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 1>not do the awards circuit. It's kind of it's almost Mildred.

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, she just doesn't give her a doubt

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 1>about what you're supposed to do. And I think that's

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what's brilliant about her, much to mine in my colleagues,

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 1>should keep trying. Would love to have you on the show. Friends,

0:45:57.520 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 1>never moving out of us and into another late summer event.

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:05.839
<v Speaker 1>They Tell Your Ride Film Festival, which comes every Labor

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Day weekend up in the mountains of Colorado, has become

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the pre eminent showcase for would be Oscar contenders. Eight

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:17.839
<v Speaker 1>of the last nine Best Picture winners have screened there. Uh,

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and it's a very small exclusive lineup, like thirty or

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>forty films, so that's actually saying something. Many of those

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>were world premiers. In fact, this year's Best Picture Tell

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Your Ride debuts were Darkest Hour and Ladybird. For Lady Bird,

0:46:33.400 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I talked to writer director Greta Gerwig and Sarsha Ronan

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:40.920
<v Speaker 1>together and their energy together is just wonderful, which you'll

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:42.760
<v Speaker 1>see in this clip and certainly in the full interview.

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:46.400
<v Speaker 1>One focus of the chat was Search's excitement over playing

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a female character of complexity written by a woman, and uh,

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it was just different from from many of the roles

0:46:54.239 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 1>she reads on a daily basis. So here's Sarsha and

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Gretta talking about that and some other stuff. It's a

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 1>female character who's complex, you know, it's a it's a

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:07.920
<v Speaker 1>young especially for to read a young girl who's in

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:13.440
<v Speaker 1>real life. When you're a chick and you're like seventeen

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 1>years old, seventy, everything is changing, just like it is

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 1>for a boy. Like you're at that stage in your

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:22.120
<v Speaker 1>life where you don't know who you are, you don't

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>know where you're going. You're very driven, but you don't

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:27.880
<v Speaker 1>know what you're heading towards, like you're really you spend

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>those few years just figuring all this ship out. And

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 1>when I remember when I was seventeen eighty and I

0:47:35.920 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>had gotten so used to playing these really great, well

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:42.880
<v Speaker 1>written child roles, and then as soon as I became

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a teenage girl, they just weren't there. I couldn't find

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 1>them anywhere. And this is the first time, really, it

0:47:49.960 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 1>was the first time that I had read a teenage

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 1>girl that had all the complexities of a real teenager,

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, boy, or a girl who was who was

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a great friend and but was also drawn towards you know,

0:48:03.000 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the popular kids because she wanted to be liked, but

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 1>had our principles, but sort of veered away from them

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:11.360
<v Speaker 1>when she felt a little unsure of herself. And like

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it was. I mean, all the characters and are

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:17.759
<v Speaker 1>are so well rounded, and you just don't find that

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 1>very often when a teenage girl is at the helm

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of it, you know. Yeah, And I saw a lot

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of myself in it, funnily enough, I mean I graduated

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 1>high school, so some of the stuff was familiar to me.

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 1>And like I keep joking, like the Timothy shallow make character,

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I knew this guy was close and waxing, poetic,

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 1>coffee shop dwelling, Like I knew this guy. I might

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 1>have tried to be that guy. Yeah, but well it's

0:48:44.200 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 1>we can all be forgiven trying to be whoever we

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:49.880
<v Speaker 1>tried to be. I think even Lady Bird tries to

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:53.960
<v Speaker 1>be that guy. Yeah, that's what I mean. That's one

0:48:53.960 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of the things I love about Lady Bird is what

0:48:56.760 --> 0:49:00.040
<v Speaker 1>a good student she is in terms of, like the

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:02.760
<v Speaker 1>next time you see her after she's met Kyle, she's

0:49:02.800 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 1>got a copy of the People's History of It's because

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:09.480
<v Speaker 1>she pays attention. That's why he likes I will now

0:49:09.560 --> 0:49:12.319
<v Speaker 1>go get that book and also like it. And there's

0:49:12.360 --> 0:49:16.960
<v Speaker 1>something very like a sponge driven about that. You know,

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:21.360
<v Speaker 1>there's there's it's so great, like the scene where she's

0:49:21.400 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 1>just turned out eat saying she goes into the store

0:49:23.560 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and she's like, I'll have a packlet of cigarettes on

0:49:25.200 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a scratcher and a play girl. And I remember up

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>until recently because I think I definitely had a sort

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of delayed response to being like a young adult. And

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember when I moved to London, I had that

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I had like such anxiety when I would just like

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:43.399
<v Speaker 1>go to the supermarket because I was like, Okay, this

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is what normal grown ups do. And I remember I

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:49.239
<v Speaker 1>would walk around in this sort of floaty way and

0:49:49.239 --> 0:49:52.319
<v Speaker 1>I'd be like, okay, I need the eggs. Where the eggs,

0:49:52.320 --> 0:49:54.400
<v Speaker 1>where the eggs are eggs, And I'm like panicking in

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:56.440
<v Speaker 1>my head, but I'm looking around them like Okay, I

0:49:57.000 --> 0:49:59.799
<v Speaker 1>look normal. And I think you spend so much of

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 1>your later teenage years in early twenties pretending to be

0:50:04.880 --> 0:50:07.720
<v Speaker 1>an adult are like playing the role of an adult,

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's something that she does too, totally.

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I totally. It's also the first time you're at a supermarket.

0:50:13.560 --> 0:50:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I think when you're out of your own home, there's this. Also,

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:19.399
<v Speaker 1>I had this anxiety of like I'd only ever seen

0:50:19.440 --> 0:50:23.520
<v Speaker 1>my mom shop for a family of you know, five,

0:50:23.719 --> 0:50:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and and so I had like completely incorrect proportions about

0:50:28.080 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 1>how much one person. And it was like, you do

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>not need to buy the economy pack of cheerios that

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you will take you a year ago through that you

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:40.239
<v Speaker 1>can just buy the regular size cheers and move on

0:50:40.280 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 1>from there. But I feel like I'm so interested in

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, And I've always liked I've always liked

0:50:47.400 --> 0:50:51.200
<v Speaker 1>younger characters trying on adult morality because I feel like

0:50:51.200 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they're almost practicing for it. I put this in the script, no,

0:50:55.160 --> 0:50:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and I wrote Mistress America. We put this in and

0:50:57.719 --> 0:51:02.760
<v Speaker 1>like some character saying about another character who's is also eighteen,

0:51:02.840 --> 0:51:05.840
<v Speaker 1>like he was unfaithful to me. And it was just

0:51:06.160 --> 0:51:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like this idea of like, who are you doing

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this exactly? What is this? What are these adult rules

0:51:13.280 --> 0:51:18.319
<v Speaker 1>you're imposing on yourself at this moment? Yeah, but I

0:51:18.360 --> 0:51:22.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's it's how you learn how to do it. Yeah,

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how else you imitate it? Greta's nomination for

0:51:25.239 --> 0:51:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Best Director, made her just the fifth woman ever recognized

0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in the category ninety years. She was also nominated for

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Original Screenplay, while Sercha was nominated for Best Actress and

0:51:39.520 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 1>her on screen mom, Laurie Metcalf, picked up a nomination

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:46.360
<v Speaker 1>for Supporting Actress. Laurie's won Emmy's and a Tony. But

0:51:46.480 --> 0:51:49.359
<v Speaker 1>she's never found herself in the Oscar season until this role,

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:52.920
<v Speaker 1>so she's just soaking it up. She spoke about the

0:51:53.000 --> 0:51:56.439
<v Speaker 1>unique environment Greta creates on set, So here's Laurie talking

0:51:56.440 --> 0:51:59.799
<v Speaker 1>about that. It's all about her energy, I think. And

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:04.920
<v Speaker 1>energy on the set was a one of collaboration, of

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 1>support and feeling protected of watching her watch the monitor

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 1>with his big grin on her face and knowing that

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:15.439
<v Speaker 1>she was in her element, she wouldn't want to be

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else and that she had our back, and that

0:52:20.320 --> 0:52:25.000
<v Speaker 1>made everybody in the cast and crew feel very protected.

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Um and uh, there was a lightness about the set

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even a maternal quality because um, you felt

0:52:35.040 --> 0:52:37.759
<v Speaker 1>that she was watching out for everybody. Now, she had

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to have been going through stressful days because I think

0:52:42.520 --> 0:52:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that's inevitable as a director. Um maybe, and also a

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 1>first solo director. Um, nobody knew if that was the case. Um,

0:52:53.760 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 1>she just has an ease. She's just a natural at it.

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:58.759
<v Speaker 1>You'd never know it was her first time. Yeah. Well,

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 1>as I said just before the I first saw this

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:04.120
<v Speaker 1>movie at Tell Your Ride where it premiered. UM and

0:53:04.160 --> 0:53:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I walked out and I tweeted something like I love

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Ladybirds so much, I can't stand it. And four Is

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:13.000
<v Speaker 1>used it in their advertising, which, yeah, that's the truth.

0:53:13.080 --> 0:53:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean. And what's interesting to me is that it's

0:53:15.080 --> 0:53:18.040
<v Speaker 1>been such a universally beloved movie this year. I mean,

0:53:18.719 --> 0:53:21.080
<v Speaker 1>all the talk of the critically acclaimed, the rotten Tomato score,

0:53:21.120 --> 0:53:22.880
<v Speaker 1>all of that. Why do you think that it struck

0:53:22.880 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 1>such a universal core? You know, I saw it for

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the first time, I tell you right, Also, um And

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:32.719
<v Speaker 1>I was so I was right in the middle of

0:53:32.760 --> 0:53:35.239
<v Speaker 1>a group of with you seeing it for the first time.

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And I was literally seeing most of the movie for

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the first time myself because all my scenes were with

0:53:42.480 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 1>no I'm in like, I don't know it. And so

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I was having a blast seeing what all the high

0:53:50.520 --> 0:53:55.880
<v Speaker 1>school scenes were about. Um And and when I walked

0:53:55.880 --> 0:53:59.879
<v Speaker 1>out and where and I was hearing people saying I've

0:54:00.000 --> 0:54:02.279
<v Speaker 1>how to call my mother. I want to see this

0:54:02.320 --> 0:54:07.640
<v Speaker 1>with my daughter, UM father's or men saying I have

0:54:07.840 --> 0:54:11.719
<v Speaker 1>witnessed that mother daughter relationship and have also felt like

0:54:11.760 --> 0:54:14.759
<v Speaker 1>I was the outsider, Like Tracy's character is like just

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:19.560
<v Speaker 1>just just wanting to be um, non confrontational about it

0:54:19.600 --> 0:54:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and not really understanding it, not understanding how they can

0:54:24.120 --> 0:54:27.480
<v Speaker 1>flip on a dime, like in the thrift store scene

0:54:27.520 --> 0:54:30.400
<v Speaker 1>where they're looking for a dress together and arguing that

0:54:30.480 --> 0:54:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the classic passive aggressive banter going back and forth and

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:38.680
<v Speaker 1>then they find the perfect dress. Um. It's so it's

0:54:38.680 --> 0:54:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a complex relationship as far as the mother daughter scenes go.

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:46.240
<v Speaker 1>That Greta was able to walk such a fine line

0:54:46.280 --> 0:54:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and find the balance so that one is just not

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:52.680
<v Speaker 1>an ogre, you know, one is not doing all the

0:54:52.680 --> 0:54:56.760
<v Speaker 1>button pushing. The mother doesn't exist, just to show what

0:54:56.840 --> 0:55:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the daughter's homelike as home life is like and which

0:55:00.719 --> 0:55:02.839
<v Speaker 1>he has to put up with with parents who don't

0:55:02.960 --> 0:55:06.239
<v Speaker 1>understand her. You know she really I guess that's what

0:55:06.320 --> 0:55:11.879
<v Speaker 1>people are responding to that it's it seems very it's

0:55:12.800 --> 0:55:17.640
<v Speaker 1>very detailed. Um, it's not our own individual details that

0:55:17.680 --> 0:55:22.960
<v Speaker 1>are up there on the screen, but it's so close. Yes,

0:55:23.120 --> 0:55:25.680
<v Speaker 1>As for Darkest Hour, I was privileged to speak to

0:55:25.760 --> 0:55:28.440
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite actors of all time, Gary Oldman.

0:55:29.400 --> 0:55:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Gary has made a career of immersing himself in makeup

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to play iconic roles in films like bram Stoker's Dracula

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and True Romance and The Fifth Element. But after Hannibal,

0:55:40.560 --> 0:55:43.319
<v Speaker 1>which you might recall he was the guy that had

0:55:43.360 --> 0:55:46.840
<v Speaker 1>his face showed off in that movie, he took some

0:55:46.920 --> 0:55:49.960
<v Speaker 1>time off from that kind of thing. I can't imagine

0:55:49.960 --> 0:55:52.279
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the makeup chair every day for hours on end,

0:55:52.280 --> 0:55:55.839
<v Speaker 1>but he's certainly uh put in his time with that,

0:55:56.160 --> 0:55:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and we spoke about that. So here's Gary. Well, I

0:55:59.040 --> 0:56:03.759
<v Speaker 1>had a big, a big, big gap from it. I

0:56:05.040 --> 0:56:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the last time I was in that kind of makeup

0:56:10.000 --> 0:56:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I think was for Hannibal, the really Scott film, and

0:56:14.760 --> 0:56:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that was six hours. But then I would only I

0:56:20.520 --> 0:56:26.040
<v Speaker 1>would only work a four our day in it um.

0:56:26.400 --> 0:56:29.880
<v Speaker 1>And that was the whole thing with contact lenses and

0:56:29.920 --> 0:56:32.319
<v Speaker 1>they had they rigged up a device that held my

0:56:32.880 --> 0:56:35.360
<v Speaker 1>eyes open, so I had no eyelids, so I didn't

0:56:35.440 --> 0:56:42.960
<v Speaker 1>link and and you could only you could only it

0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:45.600
<v Speaker 1>was every fifteen minutes they had to give me eye

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 1>drops and release the eyelids to rest the eye. So

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it was a sort of very um, a crazy process

0:56:56.400 --> 0:56:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and I and I swore after that that I would

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:04.920
<v Speaker 1>never do it again. UM. And that was my you know,

0:57:05.000 --> 0:57:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that was my life. They're done with with with that

0:57:08.280 --> 0:57:12.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of makeup. UM. When this came up with Darkest

0:57:12.960 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Hour came on the scene, it was it was a necessity.

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It was the only way to go. So I knew

0:57:26.200 --> 0:57:35.360
<v Speaker 1>going in um and and and Hannibal was seven eight days,

0:57:35.600 --> 0:57:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you know. UM, so you're looking at Winston um. You know,

0:57:42.240 --> 0:57:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at fifty in that kind of makeup. UM.

0:57:48.440 --> 0:57:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And then we had test makeups. So I think it's

0:57:52.200 --> 0:57:55.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty one times that I had that I had the

0:57:55.200 --> 0:58:01.960
<v Speaker 1>makeup on UM And yeah, it's a lot, it's a lot.

0:58:02.160 --> 0:58:08.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot to go through it. UM. But of

0:58:08.120 --> 0:58:15.600
<v Speaker 1>course you're then working with Kazuhiro Suji who designed designed

0:58:15.640 --> 0:58:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the makeup. It was it was Lucy and Dave that

0:58:18.480 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that painted it and applied it on a daily basis,

0:58:21.320 --> 0:58:23.280
<v Speaker 1>But it was but it was Kazoo who came up

0:58:23.320 --> 0:58:26.080
<v Speaker 1>with the with with the look. And when you're working

0:58:26.080 --> 0:58:28.680
<v Speaker 1>with someone like that and that kind of material, I

0:58:28.680 --> 0:58:31.960
<v Speaker 1>mean it really is like a synthetic skin. It's not

0:58:33.080 --> 0:58:36.600
<v Speaker 1>cumbersome restrictive in any way. What does it do for

0:58:36.680 --> 0:58:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you psychologically? Like working in the space, putting you you know,

0:58:41.880 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 1>being disappeared into a role like that essentially, like is

0:58:44.760 --> 0:58:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it helpful for you? Does it feel like something you

0:58:47.640 --> 0:58:51.200
<v Speaker 1>have to act act past? Does it feel ever feel

0:58:51.240 --> 0:58:55.720
<v Speaker 1>like you know, just free you personally? Well, the whole

0:58:55.920 --> 0:59:07.520
<v Speaker 1>experience was very um immersive, um. Going back to the

0:59:07.520 --> 0:59:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the sort of work, the homework on the role was

0:59:12.520 --> 0:59:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a year um, and that was a year of all

0:59:17.880 --> 0:59:22.400
<v Speaker 1>really all things Churchill. I mean, it was just it

0:59:22.480 --> 0:59:25.800
<v Speaker 1>was constantly in my he was constantly in my head.

0:59:27.320 --> 0:59:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Then you had, um four weeks rehearsal, which is sort

0:59:31.800 --> 0:59:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of unheard up for a film where you got to

0:59:34.720 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>really physicalize and vocalize the character and the set that

0:59:41.720 --> 0:59:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the Sarah Greenwood's designs were just that they were so

0:59:47.400 --> 0:59:54.400
<v Speaker 1>immersive and so detailed, and then you're looking in the

0:59:54.440 --> 0:59:59.040
<v Speaker 1>mirror and you're at least seeing an essence of a

0:59:59.120 --> 1:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>spirit of of of Winsden, so you are stepping in.

1:00:04.520 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>It was a little bit like just really touching history

1:00:08.440 --> 1:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and stepping back. You know, when you you stepped back

1:00:13.040 --> 1:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in time. You know, it's sort of so the whole um,

1:00:20.600 --> 1:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>A great deal of that is doing the work for you,

1:00:22.760 --> 1:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and we've come to the end of the year. One

1:00:24.160 --> 1:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of the year's final OSCAR releases, which premiered at the

1:00:26.880 --> 1:00:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Toronto Film Festival, was Aaron Sorkin's directorial debut, Molly's Game.

1:00:31.760 --> 1:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Though Aaron is very accomplished as a screenwriter, you know,

1:00:35.000 --> 1:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>he won the Oscar for The Social Network, and he's

1:00:36.960 --> 1:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>nominated for writing again this year for this film, this

1:00:40.000 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>was his first stab at directing. H We talked about

1:00:43.400 --> 1:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>some of those insecurities going into the gig, but I

1:00:46.080 --> 1:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>think he managed just fine. The Director's Guild certainly agreed.

1:00:49.960 --> 1:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>He received one of the guild's debut director nominations this year.

1:00:54.080 --> 1:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So here's Aaron talking about saddling up as a director

1:00:57.520 --> 1:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for the first time. You know, it's funny. I did

1:01:00.680 --> 1:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a Padel last night where someone asked that question, and

1:01:04.880 --> 1:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>as I told the person who asked a question, not

1:01:08.840 --> 1:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>only was that the first time I'd ever been asked

1:01:10.720 --> 1:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that question, it was the first time I've ever thought

1:01:12.760 --> 1:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>about that question. Right in that moment when I had

1:01:16.600 --> 1:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to answer. It was the first time I ever thought

1:01:18.240 --> 1:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>about it, and the answer is absolutely yes, I would have.

1:01:22.880 --> 1:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I am so grateful that I didn't know, uh that

1:01:26.800 --> 1:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I was directing it when I was writing it, because

1:01:29.520 --> 1:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I would have been too scared, uh to to write

1:01:34.560 --> 1:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the scenes that I wrote. The whole opening sequence,

1:01:38.680 --> 1:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the first eight minutes has more action in it than

1:01:42.000 --> 1:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>every movie I've written combined. Right, I like, I write

1:01:45.840 --> 1:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>people talking in rooms, and it's like, the director will

1:01:48.280 --> 1:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>take care of this exactly right. The director is going

1:01:50.840 --> 1:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to know how we do this ski crash if um

1:01:53.800 --> 1:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the director is gonna know how to you know, do

1:01:55.840 --> 1:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the getting beaten up scene? Um on. The director is

1:02:00.200 --> 1:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>going to make these pokers things look fantastic. Uh. You

1:02:03.800 --> 1:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>know Fincher came along and made computer hacking look like

1:02:06.680 --> 1:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a bank robbery. Uh. That's what directors do. They take

1:02:11.040 --> 1:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this thing that I write, which doesn't have a whole

1:02:13.240 --> 1:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of visual interest, and uh and they give it

1:02:15.520 --> 1:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>visual interest. I write the lyrics, they write the music.

1:02:20.160 --> 1:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Um so. Uh So I am grateful that that I

1:02:24.600 --> 1:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't know. Uh. It wouldn't have been as good a

1:02:27.080 --> 1:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>screenplay if I had known that I was directing him.

1:02:30.480 --> 1:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Um So, what was the biggest learning curve just before

1:02:32.920 --> 1:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we get into Jessica and everything. You know, you never

1:02:35.520 --> 1:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>even I don't think directly like a television anything. I'd

1:02:39.200 --> 1:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>never directed anything before. I I'm not a complete production novice.

1:02:45.240 --> 1:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I've I've been on the set every day of every

1:02:47.960 --> 1:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>movie that I've written. UH. And as the show runner

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in television, you're involved in every aspect of production from

1:02:56.960 --> 1:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>prep to post, and obviously I write the script to UH. Still,

1:03:02.480 --> 1:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the biggest learning curve was going to be that, in

1:03:04.880 --> 1:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the twenty five years I've been a professional writer, I

1:03:07.840 --> 1:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>had managed to absorb none of the science of filmmaking

1:03:11.800 --> 1:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>at all. I couldn't pick a long lens out of

1:03:13.840 --> 1:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a police lineup. UH. Enter Charlotta Christiansen, our cinematographer, Charlotta

1:03:21.080 --> 1:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh flew over from Denmark, where she lives to meet

1:03:24.160 --> 1:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>with me. She had just gotten done shooting two movies.

1:03:27.960 --> 1:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>We talked about, UM, my vision for the look of

1:03:32.520 --> 1:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the movie and two separate looks when we were in

1:03:35.200 --> 1:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>present day and when we were showing the story of

1:03:38.600 --> 1:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Molly going from skier to UH to poker Princess. UH.

1:03:44.880 --> 1:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>But I told her, you know, listen, I'm just scared

1:03:50.160 --> 1:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that I don't have the vocabulary too that you that

1:03:55.440 --> 1:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you need the director to have for you to be

1:03:58.000 --> 1:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>able to do your job. Uh. And she said, no,

1:04:02.400 --> 1:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>don't worry about it at all. Here, here's what's gonna happen.

1:04:05.600 --> 1:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna we're gonna talk about the scene. Um. We're

1:04:09.480 --> 1:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>going to create a shot list of everything that you

1:04:14.000 --> 1:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>want to get and I'm I'm going to be very opinionated.

1:04:19.000 --> 1:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna tell you I also want to get this shot. Uh.

1:04:22.320 --> 1:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And this shot I'm never gonna tell you. No, I'm

1:04:25.160 --> 1:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>not gonna do your shot, but I'm gonna add a

1:04:27.160 --> 1:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of my own. But in terms of lenses and lighting,

1:04:31.840 --> 1:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I got this. Have this handheld device. I'm gonna snap

1:04:35.680 --> 1:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a lens on it, and you're gonna look through it,

1:04:37.840 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna tell me if you like what you see,

1:04:39.960 --> 1:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and if you do, I'm going to take the lens

1:04:41.920 --> 1:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>off the handheld device and put it on the camera. Um. Uh.

1:04:45.240 --> 1:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's how we do it. And UM, there was

1:04:47.920 --> 1:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot less for me to be scared of than

1:04:50.560 --> 1:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>uh than I thought. The truth of the matter is

1:04:52.920 --> 1:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that for every area of film production, there's an expert

1:04:58.200 --> 1:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>uh in that position. So UM, stand on their shoulders.

1:05:03.960 --> 1:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>It's exactly right. So that is by no means a

1:05:06.720 --> 1:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>complete snapshot of the Oscar season. There's a few films

1:05:10.200 --> 1:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and talent we didn't get to this year, movies like

1:05:13.200 --> 1:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Call Me by Your Name and Titania, Phantom Thread in

1:05:16.880 --> 1:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the Post, all of them competing for gold trophies this weekend.

1:05:21.280 --> 1:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>So check out the Oscars. It's on Sunday, March four.

1:05:25.120 --> 1:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Tune in good Luck to your favorites, and check us

1:05:28.160 --> 1:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>out every Thursday for more episodes of Playback. We've got

1:05:30.960 --> 1:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great guests coming up this year. A Duverne,

1:05:33.560 --> 1:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>David All, Yellow Woe, Jason Reitman. Then be talking to

1:05:37.440 --> 1:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Hawk. He's got a lot going on this year,

1:05:40.560 --> 1:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's gonna be a good slate. We'll be here

1:05:42.600 --> 1:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>every week. I hope you can make it once again.

1:05:45.120 --> 1:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Playback a variety. I heart Media

1:05:48.200 --> 1:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast