WEBVTT - William Kristol Wants Biden to Succeed

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Alec Baldwin and you're listening to Here's the Thing

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>from my Heart radio. In February, none other than Bill

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Crystal tweeted, we are all Democrats now. From one of

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the nation's leading conservatives, it was yet another sign of

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the chasm between moderate Republicans and Trump loyalists. Crystel earned

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>his political stripes serving in the Reagan and George H. W.

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Bush administrations, then as founder and editor of The Weekly

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Standard for more than two decades, he argued for hawkish

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy, lower taxes, and against universal health care. After

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the January sixth insurrection, Crystal says our democracy is facing

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>an internal crisis. It's all enough to make him regret

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton's two thousand sixteen loss. We would be much

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>better off. Just reckless disregard science and denial of truth

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 1>and demagoguery of Trump that's unmatched, in my view, really

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>by by a major party nominee of either of either

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>party in modern times, and bad enough that he got

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the domination. I thought that would do real damage to

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the country. But then winning the election, in which obviously

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that damage is by no means over or even beginning

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to be over. I think the degree to which having

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a really reckless demagogue, nativist, authoritarian demagogue as president for

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>four years, that takes a while to recover from. You know,

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 1>New York is always new Trump. Yes, Trump was a vacuous,

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean vapid nonentity in New York and people wouldn't

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>do business with him. Well, I mean, I think in

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>New York society, which I don't put myself in New

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>York society. I'm not an astor, if you will, but

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>but in my life of tickets and tables and going

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to charitable events for the last thirty thirty five years,

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump was always a drive by presidents. You know, he

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>had the tuxedo in the glove compartment, He jumped out

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>of the limo, snap snap on the red carpet on.

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Never a tablemate, never a conversation to be had. But

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>let me switch back. Your father was obviously this figure

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that looms large and the neo conservative movement. What was

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>your home life like? What was the intellectual were you

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>like the conservative Kennedy's at the dinner table you had

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to beat Foreign Affairs Magazine before you sat down for

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>your salad course. No, I think my parents of anything bent,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>were a little bit backwards to you know, let me

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>go play baseball or football or basketball and Riverside Park

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and and we were all big sports fans, including my father,

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>and so many of my memories, like everyone else's memories,

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I suppose of being ten, twelve, fourteen years old is

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>watching TV with my father and my mother, not so

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>much in sports, but watching, uh, the Jets and the

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Mets that I was. I was a big New York

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>sports fan. And it was the sixties. You were Jets, Mats,

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>not Giants Yankees. Yes, my junior senior in high school

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>featured the Jets winning the huge upset in the Super

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>bowlth three, sixty met swinning the World Series and sixty

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>nine and the nixt winning in nineteen seventy with Little

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Street hobbling onto the court. So that was where I

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>always felt like. I never was quite as much of

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a sports fan after that, because how can you do

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>better than root for these teams, which, as you say,

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty hopeless in the beginning of the decade when

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 1>I started to do do it for them, and one by

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of the decade. But when they won these titles,

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a shock to New York. Yeah, people forget

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that it's like, well, of course, you know Joe Namoth

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Willow Street, but it was it was in the Mets

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>were of course a total shock. So so that was

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>an exciting I had a good youth in that respect,

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 1>in terms of sports, and and honestly we watched a

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of mysteries on TV and stuff, so we were

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we were pretty um, I mean, my parents were intellectuals,

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and I grew up surrounded by more books, I suppose

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>than an average kid, and then therefore did pick up

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that obviously. But actually, and also in

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the sixties, this is sort of before neo conservatives, and

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>so they were kind of old fashioned liberals. They supported

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Hubert hung Free from president and sixty eight and what changed, well,

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they would say, and they would have said, and I

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>would agree with this, that the left, the old fashioned

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>lived list and got overtaken by the new left, and

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they didn't like that. Around what time, late sixties, I

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>would say, I mean, in New York the teacher strike

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>was a big deal. But the failure of John Lindsay

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>as mayor, the sense that domestic policy things were falling apart,

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>crime was increasing, the city wasn't being well governed. Some

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of these big government programs weren't working too well. And

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>then in foreign policy that kind of George willgoverned victory

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 1>and the Democratic Party a very decent man, but a

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>very devilsh view of America's well in the world. So

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>they moved to the right, and uh, methought they were

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>always kind of heterodoxy liberals, I would say, sort of

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>contrarian and didn't just take liberal pieties for granted. But

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, in the seventies they certainly that's when do

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>conservatives came into existence. It was originally a term of

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>opprobrium used by a Democratic socialist, Michael Harrington, who attacked

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>my thought. He thought it would sort of be the

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>It would discredit all these liberals who were retaking liberalism,

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to call them by the dread word. This is so

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>long ago conservative, ordo conservative. But he couldn't quite say conservative,

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>as they obviously weren't conservatives from youth. So they were

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>neo conservatives. And remember my father wrote My father wrote

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a piece I think in nine seventy four saying, Okay, look,

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess if they want to call me indio conservative,

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll accept the term. A lot of his friends resisted

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it throughout the seventies say no, we're the true liberals.

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>But you know how politics is, you sort of end

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>up with the term. They stick on you when you

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about McGovern, devish and so forth. And I come

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>from a different place where I believe that, you know,

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam is the stain we're never going to be able

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to wash away. That's when the country really took the

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>turn down, and we've never recovered from that, and and

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious as to whether we ever will because we

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>knew it was wrong way back when we knew Ran

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Corporation Elsberg all that we knew it was wrong, and

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>when we pressed on. But the point is that how

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>much longer do you think the United States can afford?

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And you can correct me if you think this is

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that this is not an apt description to be this

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>world policeman going around the world and telling everybody else

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>what to do all the time in order to benefit

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>ourselves economically. How much longer can we afford to do

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that financially? Well, I think we can afford to do it,

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>or in the sense I think the price we would

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>pay for not doing some of it is even greater.

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Vietnam was obviously in retrospect, I mean a mistake.

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we stumbled into it with decent intentions Kennedy

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and to some degree Johnson, people like McNamara, who was,

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, a person who wanted to do the right thing.

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And then we got out in a way that was

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>was understandable why we got out the way we did.

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>And then of course Vietnam fell on seventy five and Cambodia,

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty disastrous. On the other hand, Reagan came

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>back at eight and we won the Cold War, and

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it felt it really what I was that firing a shot.

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>And in the nineties, you know, we managed to help

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>construct a Europe that was kind of whole and free.

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>We defeated Milosovich. So I would still defend the kind

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of US, uh, the model of US internationalism and to

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>some degree of interventionism that held through most of those years.

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think we had a world that wasn't getting

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>better and in pretty good shape for all the mistakes

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that various administrations have made. But you believe that there

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:01.679
<v Speaker 1>are things that we need to do in this guy.

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>When I look at America now, I see, you know,

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>not just the floorboards creaking and the paint peeling. I mean,

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I see that this country is desperate for forget about

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the COVID and and and and as Howard Dean said

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>on this program, will be interviewed him. I said, will

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we be in trouble financially if we keep printing money

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to address the COVID economy? Said, We're gonna be in

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>trouble if we don't. We have to print this money

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to keep this economy going, or we'll be in real

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>trouble if we don't. But my point is that you

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>turn around and education, healthcare, infrastructure, what's going on in Texas.

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Everywhere you turn around, the country is fraying in terms

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of some kind of infrastructure. How much longer can we

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>go on giving the Pentagon a blank check to do

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever they want to do, to buy all this crap

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>bombs and planes and submarines, everything that we may or

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>may not need, when there's so many other things we

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>need to take care of this country right now. And

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the Pentagon is what about seven fifty billion dollars a year,

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>so it's about three and a half four percent of

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>g d P honestly, and we're about to spend one

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>point trillion dollars on the COVID relief bill, which I

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>think is fine, but it just shows how much it

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>dwarfs whatever saving is you're going to get for the

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Pentagon with fifty billion a hundred billions. So I really

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's fundamental. And I would say the COVID

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Covidge reminds us the world is inter connected. It matters

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to us how the w h O is governed, it

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>matters to us how China is governed. And so the

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>notion that we can just sort of not worry so

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>much about the world, I don't think it's correct. And

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>then I think the liberal answer what I just said

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>would be, well, we can worry about the world, but

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't need all the military side of it. But

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the military side backs up the diplomatic side.

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So I guess I'm I'm with the sort of Clinton

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>type Democrats on this now. And I think the Biden

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>administration and having reasonable defense preparedness and defense spending and

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>forward deployment to keep things stable and safe around the world.

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think and also free trade and some of

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>these things that are out of fashion. Look at the

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>vaccine development, which is really a tribute I would say

0:08:55.960 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 1>to the kind of integrated flow capital and and also

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of immigration accent only uh to America who they're They're

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>responsible for so many these scientific and medical breakthroughs out

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of also just the medical care we're getting. So I'd

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>say I'm I'm a pretty unembarrassed globalist, and I think

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>part of that is having a reasonable military, you know,

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:26.839
<v Speaker 1>capability neo conservative Bill Crystal. If you enjoy hearing from

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>independent minded conservatives, check out my two thousand and twelve

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Pulitzer Prize winning columnist George Will. Today, we

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>have this cornucopia of news sources. People define journalism on

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>their own terms, get it on their own time. I

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>was told by an activist in South Carolina during the

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>primary this year that a survey showed that sevent of

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>all Republican primary voters in South Carolina get all, not most,

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 1>all of their news from Fox News. On a Republican

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>candidate buys an ad on Fox News, he's not broad casting,

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>he's narrow casting right in the Republican voters. Here more

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of my conversation with George Will and here's the thing

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>dot org. After the break, Bill Crystal walks us through

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the recent history of the Republican Party right to the

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>point where Trump lost Crystal's vote. I'm Alec Baldwin, and

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to Here's the thing. Bill Crystal says his

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>initial enthusiasm for social media has faded. The changes have

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>been greater than I at first expected. I liked the

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the democratization of news to some degree. I

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>thought it was a healthy thing. I thought I discovered

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>personally a lot of people. I learned a lot from

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>whom I wouldn't have discovered in the old days, because

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't have been you know, fifty two year old

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>people who had moved moved their way, white males who

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 1>had moved up in the pecking order. And we're now

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>on partly frankly right. And so the kind of flowering

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of voices was in many ways a

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>healthy thing, and I underestimated the damage it would do. Though,

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the degree to which the echo chamber character of social

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>media Facebook, I think in particular, though, but also other

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>parts of social media have allowed people to live in

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>their own worlds and and believe that a lot of

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>things that aren't true. And also the kind of rewarding

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of extremism and of a sort of superficial hot takes

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to, you know, more serious consideration of things.

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Having said all that, you know, when I talked to

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>young people go college campus, you know there's still that

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>hunger I think for real information and thoughtful analysis of things.

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not despairing about it, but it does require

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>fresh thinking. I mean, I think in terms of regulation

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and how we structure or how what government centers we

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 1>provide and distincenters for organizations like Facebook. Um, that's something

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>we've just let it develop on its own. Maybe that

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was necessary for a while, understandable, but it is the

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>wild West, and it does require, Like the wild West

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>eventually did some law and order, some regulations, some sheriffs, Yeah,

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 1>some rules to try to get people to Uh, should

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we bring back the fairness doctrine? I don't know how

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:15.599
<v Speaker 1>important that would be at this point, honestly, and I

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>don't even know quite what it would applied to. I

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>guess is Fox News and news organization? Well, no, I

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>mean Fox News is so I was on Fox and

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Sunday Show mostly I've been every week and

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>then somewhat on on the Special Report panel when when

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Britt Hume was the host of special Report and then

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit with right there. I would say Fox

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>News was always conservative. It wasn't quite fair and balanced.

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>It was a sort of tugging cheek thing. But on

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, it was very different. It's very different

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>have a conservative leading or even conservative oriented a news

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>organization with some shows with a little bit of demagoguery

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>frankly from Bill O'Reilly and a little bit of silliness

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>from Sean Hannity, but still kept in check mostly, I

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>would say, and balanced by other networks. And that is

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>very different from the true conspiracy, theorizing no holds barred,

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>denagar green dativism, racism. Really that you now get. I

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's I remember when Trump did the birth of

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff inve I just thought it was ludicrous and dismissed

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it on Fox to use, and I would say most

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of my fellow panelists did as well. That Fox did

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>give him that platform on Fox and Friends, but we

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 1>thought that was kind of the ridiculous show in any way.

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>People thought it was just idiocy. We underestimated how much

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>damage it would do. Obviously, I'm not trying to say

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that it wasn't a big there'sn't a lot a lot

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of people, including me, should be held responsible for being

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>part of that organization to the degree we were, but

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the degree to which it spiraled out of control,

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a big difference between having a sort of conservative

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, pro tax cart, pro you know, conservative judges, whatever,

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>news organization and having one that truly deals and in

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>saying conspiracy theories and one that's a mouthpiece for the GOP.

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And as a total matter, yeah, we criticized. I mean,

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I was very I was pro the Iraq War, but

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I was very critical of rumsfelt thought he should be fired.

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 1>Was with McCain and wanting dout more troops in a

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>different strategy. And you know, I said that repeatedly on Fox.

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>It was a little bit of bristling at times. Was

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>they were already a little bit getting into the mode of, gee,

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to antagonize the Bush administration too much

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Obama to drive them a little crazy, especially in the

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>second term. And I I don't really understand why it's

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect. In retrospect, was President Obama such a radical president?

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Not really, But I feel like looking back at what

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I said to I mean, I don't think I said

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>anything terrible racist or you know, crazy, but the intensity

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>even of my opposition on some of the issues, uh,

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the President Obama, I can't, I gotta say, looking back,

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I find it a little startling, you know. I I

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>still would wish to structure healthcare reform differently and so

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>forth that he would, but I don't quite remember. It's

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>hard to put yourself back there. I don't think in

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>my case, honestly it was race. Maybe it wasn't some people's,

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>but the general spiraling of the right into a kind

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of insanity over the last decade is something that's going

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to take a while to just disentangled. But I do

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>think the media incent is what you began with like

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is an important part of it. The incentators were always

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to get more extreme. Who is a person speaking of

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the way that the the media has transformed over the

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>last many years, who's someone deceased? Who's the news for you?

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>You really admired from yesteryear, if you will, that you'd

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>love to see that kind of person come back. Yeah, No,

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's I mean you mentioned to brink Huntly Wrinkley and

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I got to know David a little bit, and it's

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>very last iteration when he hosted the Sunday Show on

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>ABC that I was on a few times when he

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>still did it, and I think six and that kind

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of worldly wisdom, a little bit of irony and a

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit of I've seen it all. I'm not going

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to get too worked up. At the time, I thought

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I was young, and fairly young, and I was a

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>little more kind of an enthusiast one way or the other.

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>But I thought, in a way, that is a healthy

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>thing for people to see, you know, what these things coming.

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's not think that every policy fight, every disagreement, every

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>confirmation of some on is the end of the world.

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that kind of wisdom someone who's

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>seen real war, World War two, who had seen real

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>social transformation and the civil rights movement and real battles

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>against you know, deeply in trans racism and so forth,

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of perspective is something that people don't

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have much these days. I mean, I miss my

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>friend Charles Craudhammer, who I think would say now today

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>probably what I would say about myself. They probably went

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a little a little too harsh and his statements on

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Obama and on the Democrats in that period, Where were

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you too harsh on Obama. Well, I don't even know

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that I would pull back too many of my differences

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>with him on some topics, whether it's Obamacare, which I

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>was critical of, or the Iran Deal and so forth.

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>But I just think the tone was too you know,

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>absolutist and uh just extreme in the sense that how

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>much damage Obama and the Democrats were doing and how

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>important it was to check him. And I mean, I'm

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>glad that he was checked in certain ways. But two

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine, for example, the Tea Party began, and I

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of thought, well, it's this sort of it's being

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>unfairly attacked. These are people who just don't like spending

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>all this money. You want to get back to a

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>world fashioned kind of conservatism. I think there was some

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of that, honestly. Obviously there are a lot of decent

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>people who just thought, to you, why we spending all

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>this money to bail out the banks. But in retrospect,

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it was it was an unleashing of passions that just

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>never got constrained. I mean, I think typically in American

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>history you get real passions. Sometimes they're for good, obviously

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 1>civil rights. Sometimes they're not so good, but then they

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of get reined in and and and turned into

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 1>legislative agendas and sort of merged you might say, into

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the parties and uh normalized a little bit

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>um and then the fringers get marginalized. But the opposite

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>happened here, the passions took over the party on the

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Republican side, and again Trump Trump's It's hard to say

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>what would have happened. But what if Trump hadn't run.

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 1>What if he had just been like as he had

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>in the past, sort of pretending, getting some publicity, and

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>then he shows not to postured, right, What if he

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>had just posture? What if therefore the nominee had been

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Marko Rubio or Jem Bush or anyone

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you want you know, or my favorite, Ted Cruz. Yeah, whatever,

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>what our politics be pretty different today. I guess I

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>on the one, and I think so because I do

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>think he's an important part of it. I mean, you

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>can have a lot of problems in our society and

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>our culture, a lot of bigotry, a lot of craziness, frankly,

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>but if it doesn't have a president willing to constantly

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>amplify it and magnify it, if you don't willing to

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>throw the match every day. You know, the gas, I

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>mean that the gas can sit there, could be bad,

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not healthy, but it can sort of be kept

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>under control. So I guess I often do come. People

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>say you're a little obsessed with Trump, but I don't

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>think I am. But if I am, it's because I

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>do think this one man has done a huge amount

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.959
<v Speaker 1>of damage. But I will hasten to say this. He

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>could not have done the damage without the enabling by

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party and the conservative elites. And that's if

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>you could have had a president who was a bit

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>of a crack pot, who was silly, who was the

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>demago was screened and yelled. But you know what if

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the party, beginning in January seen and said, look, fine,

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>your president, you propose your stuff, but we're going to

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>legislate soberly. We're not gonna echo you and everything crazy

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>you say. We're going to rebuke you when you go

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>too far, you would have had an unusual four years

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>in American politics, but not maybe an excessively damaging four years,

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>but the degree to which Republican elected officials, Republican donors,

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and I would say conservative intellectual elite, so that last

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>for me is the most painful in a way and

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the most disturbing just we're willing to go along with

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>him because they wanted to be part of the winning team.

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>That that did huge damage. I mean, I'm a pretty

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>moderate Democrat, and I think to myself, you know, there's

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>a finer line between Trump and lb J than people

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>want to admit. I mean, lb J was a haranguing,

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>furniture throwing I mean he was a real I mean,

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>no matter how much Bob Caro has sanitized by lbj's reputation, um,

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the the lb J was somebody who he didn't get

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>his way. He's gonna make your life hell. He's me

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>on the phone till four o'clock in the morning. He was.

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>He was a bit of a lunatic as well in

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of him pursuing his his goals. You know, it's funny,

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>can just say, I mean, I've often thought about that,

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>that it was I very much agree with that, and

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I somehow the system was set up maybe more to constraining.

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think if you look back, it's funny we

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>we we look back ideally on those posts called post

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>World War two years. It's kind of a little bit

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of a things were healthier than But I mean, look

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>at the presidents we had. Honestly, between lb J and Nixon,

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we had two people who were pretty disturbed. I think

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to say if you looked at it analytically, right,

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's one word. Yeah, I mean they were

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty they were they were, and we survived them and

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the people around them. I think we're more but we

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 1>paid a big price, as you were saying with Vietnam.

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>But as you pointed out, we had people that were

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>willing to oppose them. Yes, we in the Watergate era,

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>we had Republicans willing to vote to convict. We had

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>people that would stand up to the sky. I'm wondering,

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>um Pence has disappeared. Pence is laying low? Is he

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>following the same plan as he borrowing down? Getting ready

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 1>for I guess they're all getting ready for four. But

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is the big story for me of

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the months since Trump left. But really the three months

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>since the election is you could reasonably have thought, Okay,

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump loses, he doesn't lose his badly as people thought

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>he would, and as he would have been better if

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:15.959
<v Speaker 1>he had lost worse. And it's because it's not a

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>full scale of rdiation. They picked up seats in the house.

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>They ended up losing the set up, but it was

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>repudiation esque. Yeah, yeah, but that's a pretty big difference.

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But still, and you would have I would have said,

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it was not crazy to them to think, well, maybe

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 1>he really will start to fade away, and maybe more

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>people will say, okay, enough already, let's move on the

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>degree to which he was able to pull off the

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>big lie and keep the party on board at his

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>own administration on board, and and conservative elites to some

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>degree on board for the big lie, at least for

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a month or two. Then they finally broke a little

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>bit after December fourteenth, and then after January six, and

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>then after January six, a lot of people said, and

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>again this wasn't silly. Okay, that's in a finally in

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a way, it's horrible that had happened, but an opportunity

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 1>to finally get rid of Trump. And now look at it,

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>not at all out at all, right, I mean, Kevin

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy goes to visit them, they're all busy sucking up

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to him. The ones who don't want to suck up,

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>but just keeping quiet and hoping magically he goes away.

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I think for me that's the almost as depressing as

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the initial enabling of Trump is the current re enabling

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of Trump. Well, I think that people who are of

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>a certain stripe, it's either that or they have nowhere

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to go. If if you if you step away from

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump and you go into the other camp, you're gonna

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>be in the corner with a drink in your hand,

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>all by yourself. You're gonna be lonely. There's no turning

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>back for them now, and you're gonna be attacked bitterly.

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean that people do underestimate that. I mean, it

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>is silly, these county committees and the centers and all,

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>but if you're an actual politician, it's kind of your life, right,

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what you do on weekends. You go to these meetings.

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>You meet these people. You've known these people for a while,

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>they supported you, they helped you. You go meet your

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.959
<v Speaker 1>dotors and they're all attacking you. And that's why. Ultimately,

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, the voters are the problem. And but they

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>get it's sort of a catch train to the leader.

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>The elites need to tell the truth to the voters.

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to. They're intimidated, and so the voters

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>may continue in the delusions they've been led into by

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump and his and his enablers. Do you ever spend

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>any time with Trump? No, I mean I met him

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times, just as very marginally, and he

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>called this and I'll tell one story. So in the

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>summer after announced, uh, we were at the Trump at

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the Weekly Standard. But I wrote editorial

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>about three weeks into his um campaigns with June July,

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and I said, you know, Trump's getting some traction. We

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>do not we would never support Donald Trump for president

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>at the Weekly Standard, but we will say that he's

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>getting some traction and he's probably hit some themes that

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>the other candidates need to look at and figure out

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>how to dullify. They can't just assume Trump is going

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to go away. I had originally thought, like other candidates before,

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a Pep Buchanan or Herman Kine or something,

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, he would kind of fizzle out and the

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>establishment would as he always had win. So but I said,

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I was worried about Trump. So this senatorial was I

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>guess you might say, respectful of Trump as a political

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon that would be clear and like the second sentence

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>or something that we would never could never support him

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>bed for the country. So I get a phone call

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>on a Friday after the introal goes out, it goes

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>online Thursday night close the magazine and Thursday night then

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and Friday afternoon, I get a phone call. I'm kind

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of the office phone, and the receptionist comes back and says,

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>this someone on the phone. It's a woman and assistant

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 1>apparently saying that Donald Trump wants to talk to you.

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>So of course I figured it was some friend of mine, like,

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>goofing off, You'm playing a joke. But I was sitting

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>literally sitting my desk and it was kind of quiet,

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>so I said, okay, I get whoever it is, I'll

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 1>go along. And it was in fact Donald Trump's long

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>time personal secretary, and it was Trump and he was

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>calling from the plane, his plane that was about to

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>take off to go to Iowa. And it was like

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it was funny, he said, I remember the stell. He

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>said stuff like, hey, they tell me you what some

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>editorial that was pretty nice to me that you said

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't vote for me. But I'll talk you out

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>of that. But at least you understand that they should

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>take me seriously. And what was funny was they said,

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you vote the editorial. It was obvious and the editor

0:24:57.840 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>was seven words. You know, It's like it didn't even

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:01.959
<v Speaker 1>a heard of him that he would read the editorial.

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying is that of any vanity that it

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:05.439
<v Speaker 1>was like well written or anything. It's just kind of

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>funny that it's so much his world of people giving

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>him something and say, this guy Crystal is kind of

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 1>a pain. But you know, maybe you call him up

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and stroke him for three minutes and maybe he'll be

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>nice around when he's on TV or he and Trump

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was pretty good at that, I would say. I mean,

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was a kind of in a certain

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>way if you like that kind of thing. He's, hey,

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>well we've gotta get together sometime on the trail, you know,

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>by buy a coffee, and I mean by your drink.

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't drink, but you know, maybe you drink. And

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of a little bit of that New

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>York backslapping sort of thing. That was Friday. He took

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>off Iowa. He said, I gotta hang up taking off Ioway.

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, safe travels on on the trail and

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:41.719
<v Speaker 1>look forward to meeting you at some point, I suppose,

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and that he took off. The next day was the

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>day that he attacked McCain in Iowa and said that

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 1>McCain wasn't a hero. I don't like people who've been captured.

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>The day after, I was on actually on ABC on

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this Week and and said Trump's dead. I've never liked him,

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>but now he's he's dead. To be personally, I just

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>said so offensive what he just said. But also I

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>can't believe he could be the nominee. So that's my

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>political genius there. But that was a memorable two or

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 1>three days. So that was That's the last feel conversation

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I had with Trump. I'm told you have a very

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 1>record and prognostication politically. Is that true? Yeah? Yeah, because

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>I always like to it's like the mess, you know.

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>I always like to pick the long shot and be contrarian,

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes that doesn't work out. So well, yeah, right

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>now we're close to Garland probably being confirmed as the

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>attorney general. Yeah, this is the pivotal moment. I mean,

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Biden winning I'm happy about the Garland nomination is something

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that nothing has cheered me more than that Nothing's made

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>me happier than that. And I'm wondering which ones of

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump's appointees, because Bar is my choice of were the

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>ones that were the most troublesome for you. Yeah, I'd

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>say Bar because it's such an important department, and because

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I knew him a little bit, and I didn't quite

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>expect him to go as far as he did in

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>accommodating and enabling Trump. Why do you think he did?

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Because he liked being attorney general and it was power,

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe talked himself into some of that. And I'm

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>sure he also talked himself into the if I don't

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>if I do this, I probably can not do some

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>other things that would be even crazier. It's hard to

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>know with people. And look, you know this, it's people's

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>psychologies are complicated, so they they're not, you know, coldly

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.719
<v Speaker 1>calculating rational. They talked themselves into things and they kind

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of believe them. They start off not believing things and

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>they end up believing them. Pompeio similarly, who I it

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>was slightly and thought was pretty conservative and pretty partisan.

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>But the degree to which he just became a really

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of disgraceful secretary of State I think I wouldn't

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>quite have expected that either, So, but those are important

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>departments defense. I think until the very end when he

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>fired us after the election, you know, they mostly prevented

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the worst stuff from happening there, So I give them

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>some credit for that. How did you feel the way

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that Garland's Supreme Court nomination was handled as a lined

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>up against Barrett? Did that horrify you? The way that

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>McConnell's positioned that, Yes, it did, and I sort of

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I think we said so at the time, but in

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 1>a kind of oh its, we don't really think this

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>is you know, this is just taking partisanship to a

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>new level. But whatever McConnell's doing, and I didn't think

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you get away with it. I actually thought more Republican

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>senators even would say, you can't really do this as

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty unprecedented. But I know Garland very slightly, but I

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>respect him a lot. I was very pleased that he

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>was nominated. I think he wouldn't have been. This is

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>one of these cases where one thing at least to another.

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Because they won the Democrats one of those two Senate

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>races in Georgia January five, Biden felt he could afford

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 1>to nominate Garland, but he would then be able to

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>replace Garland on the DC circuit, very important, the most

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>important circuit below the Streme Court. So it's one of

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>these things where I don't think we would have Merrick

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Garland a security general if the Democrats hadn't pulled out

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>those upsets and Georgia were about to have him. Uh,

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>people think very well of him. I like most of

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Biden's appointments, you know, I mean most of the big ones.

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>What concerns you most about him? Because Biden is older,

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>he'll be eighty two years old or approaching eighty two

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 1>years old, what concerns you most about a Kamala Harris presidency.

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I have to agree. Personal concern earns. I mean, I

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>think she's a serious person and a pretty impressive person,

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, generally, as you would expect coming from where

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I've come, I prefer a more moderate Democrat. But I

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>would say this, I think politically what concerns me is

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that it'll be easier to portray her as radical, and

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>some of that is let's not get ourselves of race

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and gender, and that's not that's not her fault. I mean,

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not a negative. I'm just saying in the real

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>world of politics, it'll be a little easier for some

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>demagogic Republicans and ad makers to say Kamala Harris is

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>dangerous to you, as opposed to saying Joe Biden is

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:35.719
<v Speaker 1>dangerous too. So I am a little worried about the

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>politics in a general election of Harris. But if she's

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>been vice president for Biden for four years, when week

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>she will have a record, they'll have a record, and

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I assume she would run as the heir to the

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Biden records. So if Biden has been a good president,

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Democrats have a pretty good chance in four

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's important. I mean, I say this

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is someone who's still has some hopes that Republican Party

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>might come back someday. But I've got to say for

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the foreseeable few you, which for me is really I

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>don't see a Republican party that one could really support

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in good conscience. And I think it's important that Democrats

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>wind it to prevent this kind of authoritarianism and nativism

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and demagoguery from coming back. And if that's the case,

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important that Biden be a successful president.

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm obsessed with the fact that no one talks about

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Biden like everyone talks about Trump, which is understandable, and

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone talks about all these other things going on in

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the country and in the world, but it kind of

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>matters an old habit. Yeah, I want to see Joe

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Biden succeed. I think it's important for the country to

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>have a sort of successful president Bill Crystal. If you're

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>enjoying this conversation, tell a friend and be sure to

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to hear the thing on the I Heart radio app,

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. When we

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>come back, Bill Crystal talks about what it will take

0:30:55.320 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to loosen Trump's stranglehold on the Republican Party. I'm Alec Baldwin,

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and you were listening to Here's the thing. Bill Crystal

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>founded the Weekly Standard. In The Weekly Standard was closed

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>down by our owners because we were anti Trump. At

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the end of eighteen, I had given up being editor,

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but I was sort of editor at large as Steve

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Hayes was entor. And then it was closed down. Why

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>tell me? Because we were anti Trump and he was.

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>He's a wealthy business guy who is not himself like Trump,

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>but he wanted to get along with tru and the

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump people were pretty tough that way. They would let

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>people know, why why are you paying for and effects

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 1>upsidizing this magazine that's attacking us all the time, And

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe he just didn't like it. I don't know, so

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>he closed us down. He wouldn't let us find a buyer.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Is quite quite annoying. And so just a week later

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I was sort of sitting on I think, at what

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>should we do? And Jonathan Lasa, let's let's just start

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a website and we can probably get some readers we have,

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we can get some good writers. Charlie Sikes was there

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning to an other ex Republican, James Carver,

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>wrote for us. He went a very moving piece about hey,

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we're on the same side. Now this is the height

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of the election campaign obviously, so now, I mean, I'm

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>proud of it. It's been very I think it's been

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>open minded, it's been centrist, it's Republican, you might send

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>some issues and moderate Democrat on others. And above all

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the critical of Trump and of the accommodation to Trump.

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think the great insight Jonathan last and Charlie's

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>sakes have had is it's not going away. You can't

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>just tell yourself Trump is so longer president. Let's just

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>go back to being the kind of conservative Republicans. Are

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>moderately conservative Republicans we were in two or that does

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>not work. There was something wrong already that we didn't

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>pay enough attention to. But more importantly, whether it was

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>wrong or not, what's happened has happened, and the party

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>has got along with Trump and it's a different party.

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>And as we're seeing at the state level, these crazy

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>people are taking over the party at the local state level.

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>And then it's a big question what do we do

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>with third party? Try to fight to reform the Republican Party.

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I just wrote a piece yesterday say, yeah, maybe what

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>we do is try to help Joe Biden be as

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>good at president as possible and accepted for now where

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of ex Republican wing of the Democratic Party.

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And we're not gonna be happy with everything the Democrats do.

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>But what democrat is happy with everything the Democrats do?

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>You know? So I'm very proud of the Bulwark. That

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>website is the Bulwark dot com. The Bulwark dot com. Yeah,

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm so grateful to hear you say that. You want

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to hear Biden succeed, and I would want a McCain

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>administration or so forth to succeed as well. And I

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 1>just singled out Trump with I just thought Trump was different.

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>This is different, because that's what horrified me about the

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>election when they voted for him in two thousand and sixteen.

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought that my said, well, you didn't know. Now

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, you voted for him again and you knew

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>what you knew. I totally agree. I think such an

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>important point. I mean, I've said that an election night.

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>We did a live stream with the bullwork this you

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>know it and at midnight, and it was pretty clear

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that Biden was gonna win once the late vote you know,

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>came in and Philadelphia and so forth. But I was

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty depressed. And people said after this, and it was

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>because it wasn't enough of repudiation and because seventy four

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>million people voted for Trump after four years of Trump

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you could talk yourself into thinking, shake

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>things up, kind of useful business guy, and they'll keep

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 1>in lie and the other people of the party outside. Yeah,

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't agree with it, obviously, and I think

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>it was a short sighted and foolish but it was

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>you could be honestly a decent person and think that.

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I kind of talk yourself into it. I

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>have trouble. I mean with thete seventy four million people

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>for Trump after watching him for four years, there's something

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>really worrisome about that. Over the arc of your considerable career.

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying this to be kind. I mean,

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>you're such a smart and you're such a blazingly articulate guy.

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Why haven't you run for office? Did you ever contemplate that? Ever?

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, once or twice? This is funny. In the nineties,

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>so the Bush I was in the regular Bush administrations.

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>We lost, obviously, and so I was kind of a

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.320
<v Speaker 1>free person in January ninety three, trying to figure what

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to do next. Ended up starting the Weekly Standard magazine

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>about two years later, two and half years later. But

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and a few people did say, come back to New

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>York and run for something, and it just didn't seem

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the personality of a politician. I am not.

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 1>I am not a hail fellow. Well, Matt, I think

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm a polite person, but I'm probably too just not

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>really into the no retail politics for you now, I

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think sitting at all these long dinners and pretending

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to be interested by everyone's speeches and all that. I I,

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>what about appointments we ever approached about in an appointment? Wells,

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 1>I served in the regular Bush administration. I of course, yeah,

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 1>what did you do in those two administrations? So I

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>was I went to Washington eight five that this is

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty young thirty two, I guess. I was a

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 1>speechwriter for a bit for Bill Bennett and then became

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 1>his chief of staff of the Education Department. That was

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a different era. I think Bill was a you know,

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>he was controversial, but he was a forced for education

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 1>reform and stuff. We tried to be civilized where we

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>even though we caused some trouble. Then I went into

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the George H. W. Bush White House and worked for

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Dan Quayle, the vice president, and became his chief of

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>staff after a few months. And that, of course, yes,

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I got a thick skin, just like you do. You know,

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 1>after four years of being of taking grief for that,

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad we provided a lot of material for a

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Saturday out live of brothers. And he's a good man, honestly,

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and and I think you know, had some bad breaks

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of br and all, and I didn't do

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a very good job, probably assistive of staff helping him

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>overcome that. I think he was actually pretty good Vice president.

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>The George H. W. Bush administration was a pretty good administration.

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I think historians will judge. Signed some bipartisan legislation Clean

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Air Act, American's Disabilities that got the budget deficit going

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction, ended the Cold War peacefully and responsibly,

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 1>got Sadamo saying out of Kuwait, which I think was

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the right thing to do. We just got Cooberate, we

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.359
<v Speaker 1>got colloberd In No people want to change twelve years

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 1>of Reagan. Bush Clinton was an attractive candidate. Good lesson that.

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, election results don't always correlate maybe with what's deserved.

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, that was my last Uh yeah, I have

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>a good record of being on That was the one

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>campaign I was most involved in, the ninety two Bush

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Cuil reelect, and we got and we got and we

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:47.839
<v Speaker 1>got crushed. So that's my I've had a very I've

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>had a very consistent electoral That's what another reason I

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't get into electoral politics from the very beginning. I've

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>never been really much of a success in that area.

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Trump has anything to worry from side

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Vance and New York? Yeah, I don't know a thing

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>more than I've read, but yeah, I think he does. Yeah.

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>He certainly went out of his way, fought all the

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 1>hard to keep his tax returns and business records out

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of their hands. And usually if people do that, that's

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:11.919
<v Speaker 1>because they don't want prosecutors. They think they're worried about

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>what prosecutors will find. Why do you think the Republican

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Party can't shake their addiction to Trump? So? I think

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>for the elites it is it is somewhat fear and opportunitism.

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 1>But I think for a lot of the voters, I

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>just think we can't overestimate how much Trump unleashed a

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:30.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of things they had been feeling and anxieties, concerns,

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>but also bigotries and hatreds frankly, and resentments. And once

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>people are told it's fine, you should say things that

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't in the past, they might have thought these things.

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I don't have a polyaddish view exactly. That's

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>what I say to people. What Trump did was there

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>were things that we knew that half the country felt

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>this way. They have their prejudices, their racism, their anti semitism,

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>their misogyny or whatever. But he didn't say that, and

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it makes a big difference. If you don't say it

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and can't say it, because it does mean that you

0:37:56.520 --> 0:37:59.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of are acknowledging, then that's not quite respectable. Look

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in a better world, people wouldn't think it in the

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:03.919
<v Speaker 1>first place. But in a decent world, you can still

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>have a decent world where people keep it to themselves,

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, at least most of the time. But

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>once the president unleashes it and ratifies it and justifies

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it and fosters it, it's very hard to put that

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>toothpaste back in the tube. Bill Crystal, editor at large

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Bulwark dot Com. I'm Alec Baldwin and you're

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>listening to Here's the Thing. We're produced by Kathleen Russo,

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Carrie donohue and Zach McNeice. Our engineer is Frank Imperial.

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.