WEBVTT - Barry Ritholtz: Use Your Disillusion II

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trillions. I'm Joel Webber and I am Eric

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>bel Tunis. We're still talking with Barry rid Holes because

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't stop. The first ever double episode or double

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.319
<v Speaker 1>album of this podcast if you've just joined. He runs

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>rid Holts Wealth Management. It's an advisor, heavy et F

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>user and also a Bloomberg Opinion calumnist. And yeah, and

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>big guy on Twitter. You know a lot of people

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>know this guy. He's phenomenal and we were so fascinated

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>by him. We just kept going. You left, you have

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to walk away. I know I had a hard stop.

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:41.919
<v Speaker 1>You like to stay, that's your favorite term, and I

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>had to go. But Barry was just in it. Well,

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't done, you could tell, and so you took

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>one for the team. You stayed with him and talk

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>for another forty five minutes. It was it was longer.

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>We had to edit it down. Uh. And you know

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the best part about talking with Barry is just that

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>he's he's a fabulous interview and of you were so

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that was we just kept It was like we brought

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>out a couch and he laid down on the couch

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and we just kept going. Yeah, you can tell talking

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to him that he's thought about most everything. So here's

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this equel use your disillusions too with Barry Ridthholtz. So

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you've done twos interviews for Masters of Business. What do

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you think are that things that you've really learned? That

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>the things that made you go ah ha, what are those?

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a handful of things that continue to surprise me.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Um and I think at this point I'm a pretty

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>good read it when people are just b SNG for spin.

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>So first, the role of luck in successful people's lives.

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>This isn't false humility. This is when you have people

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:55.559
<v Speaker 1>like Leon Kooperman and Howard Marks and Ray Dalio say,

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, it helps to be smart, but you gotta

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>get lucky. I've heard that over and over and over

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>again from people. But how do you how do you

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>think people get lucky? Well, there's an old line about

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>luck is what preparation meets opportunity, and there's a lot

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of that that's absolutely true. And I think if you're

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 1>born to middle class parents in the United States and

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the latter half post war era, you're lucky. You're ahead

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of you guess what you were born on third base?

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>You got your your head of eighty or maybe the

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world's population. I was born in Brooklyn,

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 1>I lived outside either in New York or outside of

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>New York my whole life. That's a huge bit of

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>luck for me, and somehow I wander into finance. That's

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>tremendously lucky. When you when you when when Ray Dalio

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>talks about that, when, um, I'm just going down the list.

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>When Cliff Astenest talks about serendipity, When when people like

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that say, hey, you know, I know I did well

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in school. Um, well, sometimes there's there's just fortuity. I

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you make yourself lucky. But but when

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and when Nobel Laureates say that, When when Richard Faylor

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>or Danny Kahneman or Robert Schiller says it helps to

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>be lucky, you don't dismiss. So that's that's one thing.

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>The second thing is is how many people are willing

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to say I was wrong. I got this wrong, and

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I realized I had to make a change otherwise I

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>was I was in trouble. The ability to be have

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>some humility and put your ego aside and recognize the

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>real world um is another theme that comes up over

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and over again. I'm impressed how often And I've added

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that as a standard question on the podcast. Hey tell

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>us about a time you failed and what you learned

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>from it? Oh god, Um, so I have a lot

0:03:54.920 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of failures. Um I uh, I'm I tend to be

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>dismissive of of people. I I sometimes get frustrated when

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to explain something that's obvious to me. How

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>do you not understand this? Mark Andreas, and I'm dropping

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>names left and right, keep going. Mark and Reason tells

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the story that their favorite investors are the guys who

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>they like peppering with questions, peppering with question and these

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>guys are getting frustrated. Hey man, you're supposed to be smart,

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>You're Marked and Reason. How do you not understand this?

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>He tells that story like you could see. These guys

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>are just they've thought it out so well, and it's

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>such a deep part of who they are. They're frustrated

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>that that he the venture capitalist, doesn't get it. And

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 1>he tells the story. It's very charming. He speaks even

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>faster than I do. Um. I love that story because

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 1>I totally relate to that, And sometimes I'm frustrated this

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is obvious how do you not get that? So that's

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a really terrible, UM personal habit. I think that's a

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>big failure that I've been working on. UM. There have

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>been decisions I've made over the years that I look

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>back and I just, oh, my god, how did I

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>make that decision that was so terrible? UM. I think

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a strength is your ability to recognize error and reverse yourself.

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 1>So I'm pretty agnostic. As as much UM as this

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>room can barely contain my my oversized sense of self,

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I am very comfortable admitting error and saying we have

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>to fix this, this is a mistake. There are a

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>bunch of of errors that are just way too embarrassing

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to even bring up. But trust me when I say

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I've made lots of errors. I've made lots of failures.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>That my my favorite part about failing is new ones,

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Like I try not to repeat the same errors. I'll

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>let all right, we've done that. Let's make a different

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>mistake and see what we can learn from that. I

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's a healthy philosophy. What's a challenge that you're

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>wrestling with right now? That's an interesting question. So anytime

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the future, anytime you're trying to figure out, UM,

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>what you want to be in what your company wants

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>to be. You're kind of projecting and extrapolating out, but

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>really beyond a quarter or two, everything gets really really fuzzy.

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And so you don't know what the economy is going

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to do. You don't know what the mark is gonna do.

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't know what sort of scandal is going to

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>come along that either helps or hurts your underlying business

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>or news event or whatever. And so I'm I'm wrestling

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.919
<v Speaker 1>with So we've been growing really rapidly. We started with

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>with five people and ninety million dollars. It's now ten

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>x on the assets and five x on the people,

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder at what point do we like have

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to throttle back? Uh. I did an interview with Ken Fisher,

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>who who's fascinating guy runs a hundred billion dollars probably

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the most successful r i A in the contrary and UM,

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and our farm is also on our I A. When

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>when Eric says you're an advisor, I interpret that as

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you you manage a registered investment advisory. So when we

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>UM when I had a conversation with him, he's like,

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys are about to be a billion dollars. You're

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>about to be five years old. Suddenly everybody who has

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>those restrictions they come off, and there's a different group

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of people who are waiting in the wings to talk

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to you, but have been unable to buy their own

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>by laws. What are you talking about, Kenna, I know

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of no such thing like that, So I hope he's right,

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>But that's going to be an interesting challenge when when

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>we get to that. So I have like an imaginary

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>pool of water that you just kind of like eventually

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>wait into. You know, institutional is a very different business

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>than high net worth and families and or even you know,

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>UM modest net worth on the on the robo side,

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on the on the lift off is are are automated

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>UM investor. It's a very different arc of conversation. When

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>most people come to us, they know who I am,

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they know Josh, they know Ben. You know, it's always

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the guys in the office was telling a

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>story that they're they're speaking to somebody and the person says,

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was reading bat Nick the other day

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, wait, we call him Batnick? How are

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you calling him Batnick? So it's it's it's that's a

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>very different interaction than writing up responding to an RFP

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>for an uh an investing statement and what does the

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>portfolio look like and what does the cost structure look like? Bloah.

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's a really interesting side of the

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>business that I don't want to say we've neglected. We

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>just haven't focused our attentions on it because we've been

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:52.719
<v Speaker 1>busy with everything else. I'm kind of fascinated by that

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>and somewhat concerned, Hey, is this something we could bite off?

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Do we have the skill set, do we have the personnel?

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Do we have the intellectual child ups to play in

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.839
<v Speaker 1>those waters? I think we do, or can easily shore

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>them up with one or two highers. But to me,

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>if if Eric is right about hey, is this active

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 1>to passive transition taking place on the institutional side. I

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>think it is. And whether we can and swim in

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the that ponds time will tell. But that's something I'm

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm really thinking about and kind of fascinated by. What

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>do you think you need to swim in it? I

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>think you need a multi year Gibbs track record. I

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>think you need a number of I hate the word products,

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>but a number of institutionally focused products that are more

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>than simply plane jane Um indices. We never want to

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>try and sell performance to people because then I think

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the worst side of the business. Because every you

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the turn rate at a lot of active shops,

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 1>and I don't mean giant active shops, I mean any decent,

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>well regarded shop with a relatively good track record that

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>is the least sticky money that money moves. I'll give

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you a perfect example. I won't mention the name because

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to embarrass anybody, because I think they're right. Also,

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that's why I don't want to embrass them. So value

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>has significantly underperformed growth for most of the past decade.

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Value typically goes through these long periods of time where

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it underperforms growth, but over over longer periods of time,

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>value actually significantly outperforms growth, not by a small margin,

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>by a nice junk of of performance. So if you're

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a value shop with a great long term track record

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and your past five years you've you've lagged by a

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>percent or three, I'm amazed how money flies out of

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>there um and and when you see these outflows, you

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>know that's the net outflow. You're not seeing the full churn.

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these firms are adding ten billion dollars

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>as they lose eleven billion dollars, so they're seeing a

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>billion in and and outflows, but really it's a multiple of

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that because of that gurn rate. And I'm I'm just

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>astonished at you know, what have you done for me? Lately?

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Seems to be the institutional active theme And what a

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>surprise that there is a move too passive, because you know,

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>West Gray at Alpha Architect wrote a wonderful piece. I

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>think Jack Vogel or one of his other guys um

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>was on this. Even God would get fired as an

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>active manager because God, with a perfect knowledge and omniscience

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of what various factors, what various attributes of a portfolio

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.439
<v Speaker 1>are Gonnau perform still means you go through an occasional

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>down draft when you When you look at Amazon and

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Netflix and Apple, all of them have suffered, and Google

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>for that matter, draw downs multiple times in their history.

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't matter how good a manager you are.

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're long Apple, if you're long Google, if you're

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>along Netflix and it's down, your clients are screaming at you.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Despite the fact that Hey, I'm omniscient. I'm telling you

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple is going to be the biggest market cap in

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the world. Google is going to be right behind it. Netflix, Flixes,

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon are gonna grow. Just ride it out. You're fired.

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Would you pick that guy up? Oh? God, as a

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager? Um, as long as we get a fair

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>few negotiation, I'll put him on stamp. What's that top

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>line of his resume? It looks like it just says God.

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>It's one word resume, God, God? Do you really need

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 1>more than that created the heavens in the earth? No,

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't need a what's this little thing about the flood?

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Can we have a conversation refined print on that one?

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I I don't think so. But it's called the Bible.

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>So another kind of meta question for you. When you

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>look at what you do, how you use et f s,

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>how you manage people's money, what do you think could

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>disrupt you? Well, you know, there's an inevitable market crash

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>out there. It's somewhere off in the future, and hopefully

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the day before we don't say something like I don't

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.959
<v Speaker 1>see your market crash coming for years and let's let's

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna introduce leveraging options. We want we want everybody

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>fully right fully taking a vent. So other than like

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>an unforced, really stupid error like that. Uh, you know,

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the next recession is going to be a challenge. Trump

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>is continually a challenge, not just because our clients are

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>left of center or right of center, whatever. It's just

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a random element that people have a hard time dealing with.

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I am constantly having the argument that you have to

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>separate the you know, the hand waving noise, the old

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>cap tweets, anything that doesn't impact discounted cash flow, profits

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and revenue, um, you have to ignore. So now we're

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to war with I ran that's a Russia distraction. No,

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>we're not. He not well, if he fires Mueller or not,

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>he'll have to deal with the repercussions of it. But

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>none of that impacts profits. Trade war and tariffs, even

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>though we've been told they're easy to win, it turns

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>out that may not actually be true. And my worst

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>case scenario is, and I'm on record saying ignore the

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>president until he does something really stupid, because most of

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>this is noise that doesn't matter. This is the first

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the camel's nose under the tent. This is

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the first entry to all Right, you've said and done

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a number of things that are sort of shocking and unprecedented.

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say it's not business as usual in d C.

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Because you're draining the swamp and all that other fun stuff.

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the first thing that you look at, even

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the tax cuts, which every analysis of them have said,

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this is not a well crafted tax reform, but hey,

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a couple of trillion dollars. And by the way,

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>clients hate one. I say this. I know you may

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>not be the biggest fan of especially if you live

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in a blue state and you lost your state and

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>local taxes. So we have a lot of clients in

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>California and New York and and Oregon and and um uh, Connecticut.

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>We don't you know, people in debt Texas and people

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in Florida. They don't have to worry about that. But

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just still a couple of trillion dollars. And yeah,

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>it's bad for the deficit, blah blah blah, but give

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>me a trillion dollars, I'll throw you a hell of

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a party. Someone much smarter than me once said, this

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>is the first thing that this administration has done that

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you could see the immediate effect in the economic data.

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>We're starting to see the push through for inflation, and

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that could lead to a series of dominoes that has

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a very negative consequence for the stock mark. Can we

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>talk more about that inflation? Like, I mean, that has

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>been such a theme for so long, Like, I mean,

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that's basically what hedge funds have lost their low INFLA

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>as lower for longer has been. I've been in that camp.

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And yet you know, as interest rates start to end

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit, we start to maybe enter a

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>world where that debt that we're all looking at gets

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot more expensive. Because sure, that's a big issue.

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>So although I don't think it's the apocalyptic issue that

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the the the faux deficit hawks have have pretended. So

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>play this out with me, like, what how much longer

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>can it stay low? And what does that end game

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>look like for us as investors? So to me, the

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>biggest two variables in inflation are commodities highly dependent on

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, and wages. We've started to see wages tick

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>up on the endpoints of the wage distribution curve. So

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a number of states and cities raise the

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>minimum wage that's ticked up if you're a Walmart, a Starbucks,

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a Target. You've raised wages at a number of other

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>companies just because there aren't enough bodies and people who

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>used to get hired who were perhaps not here fully illegally,

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>that that labor pool has gone away. So that's a

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 1>very sort of um that tends the non legal immigrants

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>tend to be a cash business, so we're not seeing

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that in the data, and they tend to be low

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>age workers taking jobs that Americans Americans don't want to

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>wash dishes or pick tomatoes or any of the other

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>or working Trump's kitchens. Right, So so you end up

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>with that hasn't had a wage and impact, hasn't an

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>inflation impact, either officially or unofficially. But when we look

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>at the tariffs and we look at so we've seen

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>some wages go up. On the low end, we've seen, uh,

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate went up, but for the right reasons,

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>more people coming back into the labor force. We like that.

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>On the high end, you've seen the STEM jobs science, technology, engineering, math,

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>and of course anything involving technology, coding, software, whatever. But

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>those have consistently been well paying jobs with good benefits.

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And stock options and what have you. But those continue

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to rise. When you see the rent costs in places

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>like San Francisco, that's just telling you the tech world

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is booming. And until the tech world stops booming, those

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>rents are going to continue to stay high. Uh So,

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's very regional. It depends on the industry, it depends

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on the region, It depends on your education level, how

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>much your wages are going up. But now we're starting

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to see um so that's not a big inflationary issue wages.

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>But when we look at commodities, what is half the

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>cost of car cars medals? What was selling sixteen seventeen

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>million cars a year and exporting a bunch and importing

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a bunch. That's potentially problematic. You look at what happened

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>with Harley Davidson, You look at some of the appliance companies,

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>so Whirlpool and who else said something. Uh GM GM

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>basically had decent numbers, but said perspectively, we see this

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 1>is right. We see this as a problem. This is

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna affect our our sales, this is gonna affect our profits.

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>The tariffs are really problematic for us. So you end

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>up with you know, if you want to call it

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.719
<v Speaker 1>self inflicted wounds or unforced there. That's before we get

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>to this insanity of using a depression era um, a

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>depression era a law to send twelve billion dollars to farmers.

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>How about this, let's not have a trade war. I

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>know it's I know that's a radical view. I know

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy, but it seems ridiculous to say, all right,

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have an eighteen billion dollar export tariff and

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna give you twelve billion dollars of it. Why

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 1>are the taxpayers funding tariffs for one sector just farms?

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>What about the manufacturers? What about the people who who

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 1>are are writing software? What about Apple and and that

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 1>sector that's gonna suffer from from these tariffs. It just

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.479
<v Speaker 1>seems that, you know, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I know everybody in the White House seems to think

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that the United States is on the losing ends of

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>of the world trade. When you break that down in

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 1>specific details, that's true for people with less education, less skills,

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in certain geographies in the country, in certain industries. So

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe rather than take twelve billion dollars and give it

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to farmers, which essentially is you're giving it to China.

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we do what smart countries around the world,

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>like Germany have done, and say for the people that

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>global international trade which has helped keep global peace and

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 1>helped boost the economy around the world, Let's do what

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>they do and train these people to get the skills

0:20:55.800 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to get into better paying jobs. If you were if

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you used to make socks at a mill in North Carolina,

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but that's a very low cost industry that's

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>moved elsewhere. Yet Americans are not very good at having

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>that conversation. Um, well, it depends do we want to

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>be realistic and do we want to be adults or

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>do we just want to yell at our perceived enemies. Yeah,

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>but the it's easy to do that until inflation comes

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>up and the Fed titans and we have a recession

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>wholly unforced error. And the unforced error, I'm guessing if

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>you went to masters of business, that would be one

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>of the things that they would say that they would

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>try to avoid our unforced airs. You know I have

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't ask that question. I asked you know who

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>your mentors? What are you reading? Tell us your favorite books? Um,

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>what what's the you know, what's the thing that most

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>people don't know about you but should like questions like that,

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this is such a specific question to such a specific

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 1>set of policy things that it's shocking. And you know,

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the outraged cycle has just exhausted everybody, so you're not

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>getting the intelligent debate. You know. I used to call

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>myself a Jacob Javits Republican growing up in New York.

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's a guy who was against the war in Vietnam,

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>was against unfunded spending, and that includes um, that includes

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>entitlements and tax cuts. But believe the government shouldn't be

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in the bedroom. The government had nothing, no business saying

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>who could get married, whether you can use birth control,

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>abortion rights, etcetera. And I thought, oh, that makes a

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense. And around twenty years ago, the Republicans

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>just made a hard tack to the right and left

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>rationality behind. And it took a long time for a

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of mainstream Republicans to sort of bolts. You look

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>at guys like uh Rick Wilson or Bill Crystal at

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 1>the end, r oh, they are a National Review, They're

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>not They're Reagan Republicans. They're not Trump Republicans. And under

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Bush you had people like Bruce Bartlett, who was in

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the Reagan administration on the Bush administration saying I don't

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>recognize the Republican Party, and a lot of people thought,

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>come on, Bruce, you're being a little you're exaggerating a

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Turns out he was right, and he identified

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a schism before the cracks were visible and the House

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>started to fall apart. The adults in charge of the

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party just can't seem to bring themselves about to

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>saying we're the party of free trade, We're the party

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>of non government intervention. What is right that it's so,

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't recognize this Republican Party and their affiliation. The

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>party affiliation was pre Trump. I don't know what what

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>happens post Trump, or maybe I'm wrong, Maybe the entire

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>former Reagan Democrats moved to UM moved to the Republican Party.

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>But it looks like poorly thought out economic policies could

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>lead to a very very significant damage. I still think

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a low probability event. I still think the adults

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>are gonna are gonna take charge, but it's a non

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>zero event. It's I don't know, possibility that this gets

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>bad and spirals out of control and gets worse. That's

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a happy note. Happy note. Back to portfolio management, how

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>do you see that changing the rise of quantz has

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:48.959
<v Speaker 1>been a huge, huge element that evidence based investing, rules

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>driven portfolios, things along those lines where it's not I'm

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>scratching my chin and saying I think we need a

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>little more semiconductor in this. That that stuff has gone

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>uh to a large degree the way of the DODO.

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And now we're you know the fact that you can

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>make an argument and say here's what the data shows,

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>here's what the evidence shows, and and here's what we

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>think takes place over long periods of time. The fascinating

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>aspect of the reflexivity of markets is whatever works currently

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 1>is likely to eventually stop working, Because isn't that a

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>wonderful thing? Yeah? It never ends, right, it's constantly So

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 1>you have to do, Yeah, you have to be aware

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>of what used to work that's not working anymore. And

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>is this temporary like value temporary being out of favor

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>or do the steam belt and leather steam steam engine

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and leather belt companies? Is this a permanent uh? Sayonara?

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.719
<v Speaker 1>And so that's that's a judge McColl and you have

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty reasonable to figure that out. So that's

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 1>a that's a big change the concept of are you

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>really active or you really pass of are they mutually exclusive?

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Can you be you know, two thirds passive one third active. Um.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an interesting discussion, And you know, I'm

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:13.199
<v Speaker 1>fond of saying if if you can come up with

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a defendable thesis for why you want to have some

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>percentage of your portfolio in an actively managed, non representative holding,

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a problem with it. We we have

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>certain clients who are young and want a very aggressive

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>active strategy and we don't like paying hedge fund fees

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and uh Sam with venture capital, so we found the

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>only outside manager we use has a micro cap funds

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>that seems to parallel venture capital investing without the lock up,

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>without the two and twenty uh James o'shanna see oh Sam,

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So that that might. Now the problem is it doesn't scale.

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>You can't put a billion dollars into it. But if

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you have someone right, but if somebody wants, well, you

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>can't because there's only so many micro caps. More. On

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, if someone has you know, five million

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars and wants to put half a million into something

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that is wildly volatile and but is gonna scream when

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the market goes higher. It's one of those. Uh, we

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>work with an outside manager from municipal bonds. We work

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 1>with an outside manager for just that. And it's a

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>certain kind of drug, right, We don't have the expertise

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in that. O'shannessy stuff is great. Go read What Works

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street is one of those seminal books that

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>really is amazing. Um. So I'm not like a proselytizer.

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not one of these people says no, never own

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 1>anything active. Hey, our tactical portfolio has to be considered active.

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>It's evidence based, its rules driven, it's it's done well.

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's not passive. You can't say that's a passive holding.

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>But there has to be to us. If that's the

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>emotional the valve that allows people to leave their main

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>portfolio alone during a market crash, then it served this purpose.

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we don't want to find ourselves rationalizing

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>things constantly. We don't want to find ourselves making excuses.

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>We try and think it through beforehand, and that's when

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:21.479
<v Speaker 1>you you add that sort of holding. I think that

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be more of that in portfolio management.

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I think rather than just saying this is the mad

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>pursuit of alpha, it's gonna be something closer to how

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>does this particular holding help you reach your long term goals.

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a very different conversation than I think X funds

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to outperform the SMP five. Well, what's your

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>what's your track record and picking X funds? How has

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>it done? Why should I think you have the ability

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to do that. So there's a funny story about this.

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Most people can't pick stocks, so they hire somebody to

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>be their stock picker. But most stock pickers can't pick

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>stocks an octopus, So you're you're right, you're hiring somebody

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>else to hire the person who's gonna pick stocks. And

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and you get that like recursive um fractal, So you're

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>hiring a person to hire the person to hire the

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>person to pick the stuff. And it simply doesn't work.

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>And when once you build in the cost structure over

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>long periods of time, it's a losing bet. A you

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>can't find those people, be finding the people who are

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>worth it um beyond their their fee structure. I'll give

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you another active fund that I think is kind of fascinating.

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Um Joel Greenblatt who ran Gatham Capital and put up

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>insane numbers in the nineties a year for ten years.

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>That's just insane. So he came up with a quantitative

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>way to look at the SMP five hundred. You want

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to own an index, here's what we're gonna do. We're

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna own the SMP five hundred that We're gonna run

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>around quantitative screen through this and I'm gonna add a

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>big slug of the best stocks in this index long.

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>So now we're like a hundred and I'm making up

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the number long. Now we're going to run a similar

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>screen and we're gonna find the worst stocks and we're

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be short that. So you're long the SMP five

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred and then balanced long short long the best, short

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the worst. In theory, if that works, the next time

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the market crashes, you'll do much better than the average INDEP.

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So you could you could rationalize that a little. We

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>can package that right, Yeah, And he has a three

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>year track record now, which is which is so? So

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the sort of I don't remember the g I

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>N d X. I think it's called index plus UM.

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I may be getting the ticker wrong, but it's Joel

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Green Black Index Plus. So what's what's incredible to me

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>about how ETFs have sort of changed investing is that

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that thing that you just described that is out there

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and the dude who used to put up massive returns

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like that guy can't do that anymore because there's this

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>other et F that can do it for well, I

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he can't do that anymore, I think

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>he after you've run a fund like that. By the way,

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Gotham at fifty a year, I want to say, about

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>halfway through its run, like Renaissance Technology said to the

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>outside investors, Hey, thanks for everything, but you're all a

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>pain in the ass. I'm going to just manage my

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>own money and continue to put up killer numbers. Okay, So,

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>speaking of managing your own money, how do you deal

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>with that? I eat my own cooking, my own four

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>oh one, my own portfolio, and all your wife, everybody

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in the firm invest in our own four o one,

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>our four oh one case are in our portfolio, our

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>personal investments on our own portfolio. Anybody who doesn't do that,

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I would never even remotely consider giving my money to.

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>And when someone says to me, Well, I want to

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>remain objective. You still have market exposure. You're not trading

0:31:56.800 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>individual stocks. It's a broad allocation. What do you care?

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So A hundred every single person in our firm, our

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>entire four O one k um. Although I think it

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was Rick Edelman said in My Pantheon of name Dropping said, um,

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm deeply invested in in speculative small cap company, meaning

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>his own company. So there's that. Also, if I had

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to pick my single biggest holding, it would have to

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>be me and my partners own the firm, were employee owns.

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh So eventually everybody in the firm will have an

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to be to be an owner. But we all

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>eat our own cooking. I don't see how you can

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>run an asset management shop and not. So I'm gonna

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>retitle the conversations with you the world according to Bury

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>rid Holes. But I'm gonna ask a question, okay, which is,

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>having talked about a lot of things, what is the

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>world of investing? According to Bury Dholes, I think investing

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is really misunderstood. It's weird. I was such a critic

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of Wall Street in Bailout Nation that I find myself

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:11.719
<v Speaker 1>defending Wall Street, Bogel recently said wall finance subtracts value,

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that that's true. We all carry

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>these powerful little computers in our pockets called mobile phones.

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>That company doesn't come public without Wall Street. When you

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the financing of bridges and tunnels and highways

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>back when America used to build bridges and tunnels and highways,

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street has has done that. The problem is that

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>we took was was essentially a support industry for the

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>rest of the country and turned it into a main industry.

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street should exist to service everybody else. It should

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>provide the ability for small companies to go public. It

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>should provide the ability provide the ability for um, mom

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and pop to make investments in the long term, be

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it their kids, college or retirement or what have you.

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And the entire universe of complexity and opaqueness and high

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 1>expense should really be replaced. And by the way, complexity

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and packness the it's not a bug, it's a feature

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's high cost. Opaqueness and complexity hides the cost.

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>It should be much more simple and much more transparent

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and much more lower cost. That process, while long overdue,

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is finally happening, Vanguard occupied the niche of low cost.

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>The impact of Vanguard has affected everybody. And I think

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that finance or fifty years from now, is going to

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>go back to that service industry that supports the rest

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of the economy as opposed to the tail wagging the dog.

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>And so there's still lots of things that I think

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:57.879
<v Speaker 1>finance does wrong, and there are lots of of UH

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>products that shouldn't be sold, and there are lots of

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>behaviors and lots of rules right. But overall, it turns

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.919
<v Speaker 1>out that this capitalism thing works that when Vanguard rolls

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>out a cheaper product that does the same thing, only

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it's better. Eventually the market place, you know I've described

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>um Gene Fama and E. M. H. I have an

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>OH five post called the mostly kind of sort of

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>eventually efficient market, and eventually markets get it right. It's

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>wrong for long, could be wrong for long periods of time.

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Eventually competition drives price down. Eventually, Look, we we had

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a a wrongly regulated market until the early seventies when

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the constraints on commissions dropped. Stop and think about Wait,

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you could do a trade for seventy five and that's

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>considered cheap. That was forty years ago. Now it's free

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>or or insignificant eight dollars. That competitive factor is driving

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 1>things towards the benefit for investors. We're not there yet.

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>We have a way to go, but you have to

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 1>be unless you're losing half your revenue because of companies

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 1>like Vanguard and black Rock and State Street and d

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:19.839
<v Speaker 1>f A and go down the list that are are

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>providing a service at a lower cost at a higher quality.

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>You have to like the direction this is moving towards

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the investors favor. What began as as Bogel's folly has

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>has expanded and where I don't know, maybe we're in

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the third or fourth ending of that set of changes.

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I could be completely wrong, but I like the direction

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>it's going. So what haven't we asked you? That we

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 1>should have asked you my favorite books? Who my mentors were.

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't want answering go down, so I I asked

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>those questions every week. Um, I don't know you. We

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we have been really narrow and trying to stay and

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 1>I know that's difficult. All with me. You've been great, man.

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit like a river. You know. We're

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 1>just gonna go with the current and go in to

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the UH. To me, the the most interesting change that's

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>taking place is how the millennial generation thinks about money.

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think my observation is working with a lot

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of young people in my office and just you can't

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>help but rub shoulders with millennials in Manhattan. They're far

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>less materialistic than previous generations. Although that whole concept of

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 1>experiences versus materialism, um, they're they're brutally blunt and honest.

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>It's very different than you know, you have a conversation

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>about money with a with a millennial and you say, well,

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 1>here's a math about small cap and value, and and

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>they're like, prove it, like they show me. They don't

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>want to take your word for anything. They want to

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 1>see it. Um. Like I walk around with a couple

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of bucks in cash in my pocket. They like, I

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>pull money out and it's like, what's that paying for lunch?

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 1>Pull out of twenty Why wouldn't you use a card? Well,

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you know it's all right that that's even even the

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>next generation. It's well, on my card, I get points.

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I get this, I get that I don't have to

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>walk around with cash. I know I have a record

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of everything I've done, why would you use cash? And

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I had to stop and say, habit, there's no good

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>reason to use cash. So but one of the things

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that you know, everybody talks a lot about monials, but

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>like one of the things that I don't think gets

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>talked about that when nobody wants to do anything about

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like the weather. But here's the thing though, it's like,

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>how are they gonna, how are they going to change?

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean they were gonna they would

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.800
<v Speaker 1>delta bed hand, they would dealta bed hand. They graduated

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>into a terrible recession, UM, a disproportionate numbers still living

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:55.800
<v Speaker 1>at home to save money. Uh. That that's you know,

0:38:56.640 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 1>those become seminal experiences that sometimes shape your views. So

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>if you remember or read about the post depression generation,

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 1>they never used debt, They paid cash for everything. There

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 1>was no credit cards, there's no loans. Uh. Maybe they

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:13.800
<v Speaker 1>took a mortgage on the house and then had a

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>mortgage burning party when they paid it off, usually early. UM.

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Very different headspace with with this generation. Yet that that

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 1>generation created the boomers. Yeah, again, they're every the pendulum

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 1>swings this way and then it goes too far. In

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the opposite direction. It swings that way, and that's a

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>continual set a headaches. There's no no getting away from that. Alright.

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Gonna wrap it up with my last question, Favorite E

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>t F ticker, Favorite E t F ticker. UM. I

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 1>don't believe weed is not a pot E t F

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that that has to be Uh. There was one I

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>heard about some time ago, but it did not come

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to fruition warm for global warming ticker um. And then

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>there was she is kind of an interesting ticker, although

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>although it hasn't attracted ascid outside of the Calister's fun

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, may that massive influ at the beginning and

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>then it just kind of sat there. It's so you know,

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned in the beginning the behavioral economics and how

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>important that is to not only manage your own emotions

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 1>but your own behavior. There's something fascinating about either stocks

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>or funds that have a memorable ticker. And I hate

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 1>to say this because it's so irrational, but if if

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:53.399
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a really good ticker like spy UM

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 1>or q q Q which turned out to be a

0:40:55.800 --> 0:41:01.319
<v Speaker 1>really good ticker, uh, you're starting as an et with uh.

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, you got a thirty pound pack on your

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>on your back and you're running up a mount because

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it's memorable if and you know, there's a whole narrative

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:16.719
<v Speaker 1>aspect that that humans love stories not data, and so

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 1>if you could tell a really good story about something um,

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it resonates, it's memorable, it it rationalizes the decision. And

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a ticker that follows that narrative story is the cherry

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>on top of the Sunday. And it's I hate to say,

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we go through all this, all this math and all

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this thinking about diversification and how do we keep our

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>costs low and how do we make sure people's behavior

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is good and blah blah blah, and then it's like,

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 1>but if you could tell a good story and have

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a good ticker, all that stuff goes out the window.

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 1>And that is really human investing in a nutshet. Thank

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you so much, Thank you guys for having me. This

0:41:55.480 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 1>has been directed. Thanks for listening to trillions. Until next time.

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>You can find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com,

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, and wherever else you like to listen. We'd

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:14.359
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from you. We're on Twitter. He's at

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Ritholtz R I T h O L t Z, I'm

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 1>at Joel Webber Show, Derek's at Eric Falchis. Trillions is

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>produced by Magnus Hendrickson. Francesca Levy is the head of

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg podcast Bye