1 00:00:06,000 --> 00:00:08,440 Speaker 1: Welcome to Trillions. I'm Joel Webber and I am Eric 2 00:00:08,480 --> 00:00:13,160 Speaker 1: bel Tunis. We're still talking with Barry rid Holes because 3 00:00:13,160 --> 00:00:16,759 Speaker 1: we couldn't stop. The first ever double episode or double 4 00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:20,319 Speaker 1: album of this podcast if you've just joined. He runs 5 00:00:20,560 --> 00:00:23,799 Speaker 1: rid Holts Wealth Management. It's an advisor, heavy et F 6 00:00:23,880 --> 00:00:28,240 Speaker 1: user and also a Bloomberg Opinion calumnist. And yeah, and 7 00:00:28,400 --> 00:00:30,600 Speaker 1: big guy on Twitter. You know a lot of people 8 00:00:30,640 --> 00:00:34,080 Speaker 1: know this guy. He's phenomenal and we were so fascinated 9 00:00:34,120 --> 00:00:37,280 Speaker 1: by him. We just kept going. You left, you have 10 00:00:37,400 --> 00:00:39,520 Speaker 1: to walk away. I know I had a hard stop. 11 00:00:39,800 --> 00:00:41,919 Speaker 1: You like to stay, that's your favorite term, and I 12 00:00:41,920 --> 00:00:44,400 Speaker 1: had to go. But Barry was just in it. Well, 13 00:00:44,440 --> 00:00:46,560 Speaker 1: he wasn't done, you could tell, and so you took 14 00:00:46,600 --> 00:00:48,479 Speaker 1: one for the team. You stayed with him and talk 15 00:00:48,520 --> 00:00:50,840 Speaker 1: for another forty five minutes. It was it was longer. 16 00:00:50,920 --> 00:00:53,840 Speaker 1: We had to edit it down. Uh. And you know 17 00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:56,440 Speaker 1: the best part about talking with Barry is just that 18 00:00:56,520 --> 00:01:01,040 Speaker 1: he's he's a fabulous interview and of you were so 19 00:01:01,080 --> 00:01:02,760 Speaker 1: that was we just kept It was like we brought 20 00:01:02,760 --> 00:01:05,080 Speaker 1: out a couch and he laid down on the couch 21 00:01:05,160 --> 00:01:07,200 Speaker 1: and we just kept going. Yeah, you can tell talking 22 00:01:07,240 --> 00:01:11,840 Speaker 1: to him that he's thought about most everything. So here's 23 00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:18,640 Speaker 1: this equel use your disillusions too with Barry Ridthholtz. So 24 00:01:18,680 --> 00:01:22,840 Speaker 1: you've done twos interviews for Masters of Business. What do 25 00:01:22,880 --> 00:01:26,320 Speaker 1: you think are that things that you've really learned? That 26 00:01:26,680 --> 00:01:29,679 Speaker 1: the things that made you go ah ha, what are those? 27 00:01:29,880 --> 00:01:33,520 Speaker 1: There's a handful of things that continue to surprise me. 28 00:01:34,200 --> 00:01:37,600 Speaker 1: Um and I think at this point I'm a pretty 29 00:01:37,600 --> 00:01:40,600 Speaker 1: good read it when people are just b SNG for spin. 30 00:01:41,600 --> 00:01:45,880 Speaker 1: So first, the role of luck in successful people's lives. 31 00:01:46,600 --> 00:01:50,600 Speaker 1: This isn't false humility. This is when you have people 32 00:01:50,680 --> 00:01:55,559 Speaker 1: like Leon Kooperman and Howard Marks and Ray Dalio say, 33 00:01:55,680 --> 00:01:58,760 Speaker 1: you know, it helps to be smart, but you gotta 34 00:01:58,760 --> 00:02:02,200 Speaker 1: get lucky. I've heard that over and over and over 35 00:02:02,240 --> 00:02:04,160 Speaker 1: again from people. But how do you how do you 36 00:02:04,200 --> 00:02:08,360 Speaker 1: think people get lucky? Well, there's an old line about 37 00:02:08,480 --> 00:02:11,320 Speaker 1: luck is what preparation meets opportunity, and there's a lot 38 00:02:11,360 --> 00:02:14,480 Speaker 1: of that that's absolutely true. And I think if you're 39 00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:18,079 Speaker 1: born to middle class parents in the United States and 40 00:02:18,160 --> 00:02:22,440 Speaker 1: the latter half post war era, you're lucky. You're ahead 41 00:02:22,440 --> 00:02:24,440 Speaker 1: of you guess what you were born on third base? 42 00:02:24,480 --> 00:02:28,560 Speaker 1: You got your your head of eighty or maybe the 43 00:02:28,560 --> 00:02:32,440 Speaker 1: rest of the world's population. I was born in Brooklyn, 44 00:02:32,639 --> 00:02:35,519 Speaker 1: I lived outside either in New York or outside of 45 00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:38,160 Speaker 1: New York my whole life. That's a huge bit of 46 00:02:38,240 --> 00:02:41,880 Speaker 1: luck for me, and somehow I wander into finance. That's 47 00:02:41,880 --> 00:02:45,640 Speaker 1: tremendously lucky. When you when you when when Ray Dalio 48 00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:49,400 Speaker 1: talks about that, when, um, I'm just going down the list. 49 00:02:49,480 --> 00:02:53,880 Speaker 1: When Cliff Astenest talks about serendipity, When when people like 50 00:02:54,040 --> 00:02:57,120 Speaker 1: that say, hey, you know, I know I did well 51 00:02:57,160 --> 00:03:03,680 Speaker 1: in school. Um, well, sometimes there's there's just fortuity. I 52 00:03:03,680 --> 00:03:06,160 Speaker 1: don't know how you make yourself lucky. But but when 53 00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:10,400 Speaker 1: and when Nobel Laureates say that, When when Richard Faylor 54 00:03:10,560 --> 00:03:14,120 Speaker 1: or Danny Kahneman or Robert Schiller says it helps to 55 00:03:14,120 --> 00:03:18,000 Speaker 1: be lucky, you don't dismiss. So that's that's one thing. 56 00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:21,480 Speaker 1: The second thing is is how many people are willing 57 00:03:21,520 --> 00:03:24,560 Speaker 1: to say I was wrong. I got this wrong, and 58 00:03:24,600 --> 00:03:27,640 Speaker 1: I realized I had to make a change otherwise I 59 00:03:27,840 --> 00:03:31,920 Speaker 1: was I was in trouble. The ability to be have 60 00:03:32,080 --> 00:03:35,320 Speaker 1: some humility and put your ego aside and recognize the 61 00:03:35,360 --> 00:03:38,840 Speaker 1: real world um is another theme that comes up over 62 00:03:38,880 --> 00:03:42,400 Speaker 1: and over again. I'm impressed how often And I've added 63 00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:45,320 Speaker 1: that as a standard question on the podcast. Hey tell 64 00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:47,400 Speaker 1: us about a time you failed and what you learned 65 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:54,880 Speaker 1: from it? Oh god, Um, so I have a lot 66 00:03:54,920 --> 00:04:00,440 Speaker 1: of failures. Um I uh, I'm I tend to be 67 00:04:00,520 --> 00:04:04,960 Speaker 1: dismissive of of people. I I sometimes get frustrated when 68 00:04:04,960 --> 00:04:07,480 Speaker 1: I'm trying to explain something that's obvious to me. How 69 00:04:07,480 --> 00:04:11,520 Speaker 1: do you not understand this? Mark Andreas, and I'm dropping 70 00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:14,520 Speaker 1: names left and right, keep going. Mark and Reason tells 71 00:04:14,520 --> 00:04:18,640 Speaker 1: the story that their favorite investors are the guys who 72 00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:21,560 Speaker 1: they like peppering with questions, peppering with question and these 73 00:04:21,560 --> 00:04:24,719 Speaker 1: guys are getting frustrated. Hey man, you're supposed to be smart, 74 00:04:24,760 --> 00:04:27,400 Speaker 1: You're Marked and Reason. How do you not understand this? 75 00:04:27,720 --> 00:04:31,120 Speaker 1: He tells that story like you could see. These guys 76 00:04:31,120 --> 00:04:33,960 Speaker 1: are just they've thought it out so well, and it's 77 00:04:34,000 --> 00:04:37,120 Speaker 1: such a deep part of who they are. They're frustrated 78 00:04:37,160 --> 00:04:41,279 Speaker 1: that that he the venture capitalist, doesn't get it. And 79 00:04:41,360 --> 00:04:43,719 Speaker 1: he tells the story. It's very charming. He speaks even 80 00:04:43,760 --> 00:04:46,880 Speaker 1: faster than I do. Um. I love that story because 81 00:04:46,920 --> 00:04:50,159 Speaker 1: I totally relate to that, And sometimes I'm frustrated this 82 00:04:50,279 --> 00:04:52,400 Speaker 1: is obvious how do you not get that? So that's 83 00:04:52,400 --> 00:04:57,560 Speaker 1: a really terrible, UM personal habit. I think that's a 84 00:04:57,560 --> 00:05:01,560 Speaker 1: big failure that I've been working on. UM. There have 85 00:05:01,760 --> 00:05:06,120 Speaker 1: been decisions I've made over the years that I look 86 00:05:06,200 --> 00:05:08,760 Speaker 1: back and I just, oh, my god, how did I 87 00:05:08,800 --> 00:05:11,840 Speaker 1: make that decision that was so terrible? UM. I think 88 00:05:12,240 --> 00:05:15,800 Speaker 1: a strength is your ability to recognize error and reverse yourself. 89 00:05:16,160 --> 00:05:20,039 Speaker 1: So I'm pretty agnostic. As as much UM as this 90 00:05:20,120 --> 00:05:24,800 Speaker 1: room can barely contain my my oversized sense of self, 91 00:05:25,240 --> 00:05:28,359 Speaker 1: I am very comfortable admitting error and saying we have 92 00:05:28,440 --> 00:05:30,839 Speaker 1: to fix this, this is a mistake. There are a 93 00:05:30,839 --> 00:05:34,960 Speaker 1: bunch of of errors that are just way too embarrassing 94 00:05:35,000 --> 00:05:38,320 Speaker 1: to even bring up. But trust me when I say 95 00:05:38,960 --> 00:05:42,040 Speaker 1: I've made lots of errors. I've made lots of failures. 96 00:05:42,320 --> 00:05:46,640 Speaker 1: That my my favorite part about failing is new ones, 97 00:05:47,080 --> 00:05:49,280 Speaker 1: Like I try not to repeat the same errors. I'll 98 00:05:49,640 --> 00:05:51,920 Speaker 1: let all right, we've done that. Let's make a different 99 00:05:51,960 --> 00:05:53,960 Speaker 1: mistake and see what we can learn from that. I 100 00:05:54,240 --> 00:05:57,560 Speaker 1: think that's a healthy philosophy. What's a challenge that you're 101 00:05:57,600 --> 00:06:02,800 Speaker 1: wrestling with right now? That's an interesting question. So anytime 102 00:06:02,800 --> 00:06:08,000 Speaker 1: you're looking at the future, anytime you're trying to figure out, UM, 103 00:06:08,040 --> 00:06:10,520 Speaker 1: what you want to be in what your company wants 104 00:06:10,560 --> 00:06:15,279 Speaker 1: to be. You're kind of projecting and extrapolating out, but 105 00:06:15,560 --> 00:06:20,600 Speaker 1: really beyond a quarter or two, everything gets really really fuzzy. 106 00:06:21,200 --> 00:06:22,880 Speaker 1: And so you don't know what the economy is going 107 00:06:22,920 --> 00:06:24,320 Speaker 1: to do. You don't know what the mark is gonna do. 108 00:06:24,360 --> 00:06:26,560 Speaker 1: You don't know what sort of scandal is going to 109 00:06:26,640 --> 00:06:29,960 Speaker 1: come along that either helps or hurts your underlying business 110 00:06:30,040 --> 00:06:34,080 Speaker 1: or news event or whatever. And so I'm I'm wrestling 111 00:06:34,120 --> 00:06:37,919 Speaker 1: with So we've been growing really rapidly. We started with 112 00:06:37,920 --> 00:06:41,560 Speaker 1: with five people and ninety million dollars. It's now ten 113 00:06:41,839 --> 00:06:44,520 Speaker 1: x on the assets and five x on the people, 114 00:06:45,120 --> 00:06:47,680 Speaker 1: and I wonder at what point do we like have 115 00:06:47,760 --> 00:06:52,400 Speaker 1: to throttle back? Uh. I did an interview with Ken Fisher, 116 00:06:52,520 --> 00:06:57,600 Speaker 1: who who's fascinating guy runs a hundred billion dollars probably 117 00:06:57,680 --> 00:07:01,279 Speaker 1: the most successful r i A in the contrary and UM, 118 00:07:01,320 --> 00:07:03,120 Speaker 1: and our farm is also on our I A. When 119 00:07:03,240 --> 00:07:06,960 Speaker 1: when Eric says you're an advisor, I interpret that as 120 00:07:07,160 --> 00:07:11,920 Speaker 1: you you manage a registered investment advisory. So when we 121 00:07:12,560 --> 00:07:15,080 Speaker 1: UM when I had a conversation with him, he's like, 122 00:07:15,160 --> 00:07:17,120 Speaker 1: you guys are about to be a billion dollars. You're 123 00:07:17,120 --> 00:07:20,720 Speaker 1: about to be five years old. Suddenly everybody who has 124 00:07:21,240 --> 00:07:25,040 Speaker 1: those restrictions they come off, and there's a different group 125 00:07:25,080 --> 00:07:27,000 Speaker 1: of people who are waiting in the wings to talk 126 00:07:27,040 --> 00:07:29,920 Speaker 1: to you, but have been unable to buy their own 127 00:07:30,280 --> 00:07:33,960 Speaker 1: by laws. What are you talking about, Kenna, I know 128 00:07:34,080 --> 00:07:37,240 Speaker 1: of no such thing like that, So I hope he's right, 129 00:07:37,720 --> 00:07:40,480 Speaker 1: But that's going to be an interesting challenge when when 130 00:07:40,480 --> 00:07:42,480 Speaker 1: we get to that. So I have like an imaginary 131 00:07:42,560 --> 00:07:45,080 Speaker 1: pool of water that you just kind of like eventually 132 00:07:45,080 --> 00:07:49,240 Speaker 1: wait into. You know, institutional is a very different business 133 00:07:49,240 --> 00:07:53,800 Speaker 1: than high net worth and families and or even you know, 134 00:07:54,240 --> 00:07:57,200 Speaker 1: UM modest net worth on the on the robo side, 135 00:07:57,200 --> 00:08:01,160 Speaker 1: on the on the lift off is are are automated 136 00:08:01,360 --> 00:08:07,320 Speaker 1: UM investor. It's a very different arc of conversation. When 137 00:08:07,360 --> 00:08:09,640 Speaker 1: most people come to us, they know who I am, 138 00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:13,080 Speaker 1: they know Josh, they know Ben. You know, it's always 139 00:08:13,440 --> 00:08:15,000 Speaker 1: one of the guys in the office was telling a 140 00:08:15,080 --> 00:08:19,520 Speaker 1: story that they're they're speaking to somebody and the person says, 141 00:08:19,720 --> 00:08:21,520 Speaker 1: you know, I was reading bat Nick the other day 142 00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:23,920 Speaker 1: and it's like, wait, we call him Batnick? How are 143 00:08:23,960 --> 00:08:28,840 Speaker 1: you calling him Batnick? So it's it's it's that's a 144 00:08:29,000 --> 00:08:34,360 Speaker 1: very different interaction than writing up responding to an RFP 145 00:08:34,520 --> 00:08:37,199 Speaker 1: for an uh an investing statement and what does the 146 00:08:37,240 --> 00:08:39,920 Speaker 1: portfolio look like and what does the cost structure look like? Bloah. 147 00:08:40,320 --> 00:08:43,200 Speaker 1: So I think that's a really interesting side of the 148 00:08:43,200 --> 00:08:45,960 Speaker 1: business that I don't want to say we've neglected. We 149 00:08:46,120 --> 00:08:48,600 Speaker 1: just haven't focused our attentions on it because we've been 150 00:08:48,600 --> 00:08:52,719 Speaker 1: busy with everything else. I'm kind of fascinated by that 151 00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:56,079 Speaker 1: and somewhat concerned, Hey, is this something we could bite off? 152 00:08:56,200 --> 00:08:58,160 Speaker 1: Do we have the skill set, do we have the personnel? 153 00:08:58,520 --> 00:09:01,280 Speaker 1: Do we have the intellectual child ups to play in 154 00:09:01,320 --> 00:09:04,839 Speaker 1: those waters? I think we do, or can easily shore 155 00:09:04,920 --> 00:09:08,480 Speaker 1: them up with one or two highers. But to me, 156 00:09:09,400 --> 00:09:13,240 Speaker 1: if if Eric is right about hey, is this active 157 00:09:13,280 --> 00:09:18,199 Speaker 1: to passive transition taking place on the institutional side. I 158 00:09:18,240 --> 00:09:21,240 Speaker 1: think it is. And whether we can and swim in 159 00:09:21,280 --> 00:09:24,360 Speaker 1: the that ponds time will tell. But that's something I'm 160 00:09:24,440 --> 00:09:26,800 Speaker 1: I'm really thinking about and kind of fascinated by. What 161 00:09:26,800 --> 00:09:29,840 Speaker 1: do you think you need to swim in it? I 162 00:09:29,960 --> 00:09:32,880 Speaker 1: think you need a multi year Gibbs track record. I 163 00:09:32,880 --> 00:09:35,440 Speaker 1: think you need a number of I hate the word products, 164 00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:39,040 Speaker 1: but a number of institutionally focused products that are more 165 00:09:39,080 --> 00:09:44,280 Speaker 1: than simply plane jane Um indices. We never want to 166 00:09:44,280 --> 00:09:47,880 Speaker 1: try and sell performance to people because then I think 167 00:09:47,920 --> 00:09:50,840 Speaker 1: that's the worst side of the business. Because every you 168 00:09:50,840 --> 00:09:53,360 Speaker 1: look at the turn rate at a lot of active shops, 169 00:09:53,679 --> 00:09:57,319 Speaker 1: and I don't mean giant active shops, I mean any decent, 170 00:09:57,840 --> 00:10:01,840 Speaker 1: well regarded shop with a relatively good track record that 171 00:10:02,000 --> 00:10:05,360 Speaker 1: is the least sticky money that money moves. I'll give 172 00:10:05,360 --> 00:10:07,800 Speaker 1: you a perfect example. I won't mention the name because 173 00:10:07,840 --> 00:10:11,760 Speaker 1: I don't want to embarrass anybody, because I think they're right. Also, 174 00:10:11,800 --> 00:10:13,800 Speaker 1: that's why I don't want to embrass them. So value 175 00:10:13,800 --> 00:10:17,400 Speaker 1: has significantly underperformed growth for most of the past decade. 176 00:10:18,120 --> 00:10:21,000 Speaker 1: Value typically goes through these long periods of time where 177 00:10:21,000 --> 00:10:26,000 Speaker 1: it underperforms growth, but over over longer periods of time, 178 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:31,520 Speaker 1: value actually significantly outperforms growth, not by a small margin, 179 00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:34,880 Speaker 1: by a nice junk of of performance. So if you're 180 00:10:34,920 --> 00:10:38,000 Speaker 1: a value shop with a great long term track record 181 00:10:38,280 --> 00:10:40,720 Speaker 1: and your past five years you've you've lagged by a 182 00:10:40,760 --> 00:10:45,720 Speaker 1: percent or three, I'm amazed how money flies out of 183 00:10:45,800 --> 00:10:50,720 Speaker 1: there um and and when you see these outflows, you 184 00:10:50,760 --> 00:10:53,360 Speaker 1: know that's the net outflow. You're not seeing the full churn. 185 00:10:53,960 --> 00:10:56,480 Speaker 1: A lot of these firms are adding ten billion dollars 186 00:10:56,920 --> 00:10:59,720 Speaker 1: as they lose eleven billion dollars, so they're seeing a 187 00:10:59,720 --> 00:11:02,920 Speaker 1: billion in and and outflows, but really it's a multiple of 188 00:11:02,920 --> 00:11:06,080 Speaker 1: that because of that gurn rate. And I'm I'm just 189 00:11:06,200 --> 00:11:09,360 Speaker 1: astonished at you know, what have you done for me? Lately? 190 00:11:10,480 --> 00:11:16,800 Speaker 1: Seems to be the institutional active theme And what a 191 00:11:16,840 --> 00:11:20,960 Speaker 1: surprise that there is a move too passive, because you know, 192 00:11:21,440 --> 00:11:24,880 Speaker 1: West Gray at Alpha Architect wrote a wonderful piece. I 193 00:11:24,920 --> 00:11:27,960 Speaker 1: think Jack Vogel or one of his other guys um 194 00:11:28,360 --> 00:11:31,880 Speaker 1: was on this. Even God would get fired as an 195 00:11:31,880 --> 00:11:35,760 Speaker 1: active manager because God, with a perfect knowledge and omniscience 196 00:11:35,800 --> 00:11:40,040 Speaker 1: of what various factors, what various attributes of a portfolio 197 00:11:40,040 --> 00:11:43,439 Speaker 1: are Gonnau perform still means you go through an occasional 198 00:11:43,720 --> 00:11:46,560 Speaker 1: down draft when you When you look at Amazon and 199 00:11:46,600 --> 00:11:49,920 Speaker 1: Netflix and Apple, all of them have suffered, and Google 200 00:11:49,960 --> 00:11:54,280 Speaker 1: for that matter, draw downs multiple times in their history. 201 00:11:54,640 --> 00:11:57,280 Speaker 1: So it doesn't matter how good a manager you are. 202 00:11:57,679 --> 00:12:00,640 Speaker 1: If you're long Apple, if you're long Google, if you're 203 00:12:00,640 --> 00:12:05,120 Speaker 1: along Netflix and it's down, your clients are screaming at you. 204 00:12:05,520 --> 00:12:09,240 Speaker 1: Despite the fact that Hey, I'm omniscient. I'm telling you 205 00:12:09,840 --> 00:12:12,320 Speaker 1: Apple is going to be the biggest market cap in 206 00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:15,480 Speaker 1: the world. Google is going to be right behind it. Netflix, Flixes, 207 00:12:15,520 --> 00:12:19,720 Speaker 1: and Amazon are gonna grow. Just ride it out. You're fired. 208 00:12:19,920 --> 00:12:22,720 Speaker 1: Would you pick that guy up? Oh? God, as a 209 00:12:22,760 --> 00:12:25,920 Speaker 1: portfolio manager? Um, as long as we get a fair 210 00:12:26,040 --> 00:12:28,960 Speaker 1: few negotiation, I'll put him on stamp. What's that top 211 00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:31,400 Speaker 1: line of his resume? It looks like it just says God. 212 00:12:31,440 --> 00:12:35,680 Speaker 1: It's one word resume, God, God? Do you really need 213 00:12:35,720 --> 00:12:38,839 Speaker 1: more than that created the heavens in the earth? No, 214 00:12:38,960 --> 00:12:41,840 Speaker 1: you don't need a what's this little thing about the flood? 215 00:12:41,840 --> 00:12:44,079 Speaker 1: Can we have a conversation refined print on that one? 216 00:12:44,240 --> 00:12:46,360 Speaker 1: I I don't think so. But it's called the Bible. 217 00:12:46,800 --> 00:12:50,480 Speaker 1: So another kind of meta question for you. When you 218 00:12:50,520 --> 00:12:53,640 Speaker 1: look at what you do, how you use et f s, 219 00:12:53,800 --> 00:12:56,680 Speaker 1: how you manage people's money, what do you think could 220 00:12:56,679 --> 00:13:03,480 Speaker 1: disrupt you? Well, you know, there's an inevitable market crash 221 00:13:03,559 --> 00:13:06,760 Speaker 1: out there. It's somewhere off in the future, and hopefully 222 00:13:06,880 --> 00:13:10,160 Speaker 1: the day before we don't say something like I don't 223 00:13:10,200 --> 00:13:12,959 Speaker 1: see your market crash coming for years and let's let's 224 00:13:13,240 --> 00:13:17,520 Speaker 1: we're gonna introduce leveraging options. We want we want everybody 225 00:13:17,520 --> 00:13:20,520 Speaker 1: fully right fully taking a vent. So other than like 226 00:13:20,600 --> 00:13:25,000 Speaker 1: an unforced, really stupid error like that. Uh, you know, 227 00:13:25,080 --> 00:13:28,120 Speaker 1: the next recession is going to be a challenge. Trump 228 00:13:28,240 --> 00:13:32,120 Speaker 1: is continually a challenge, not just because our clients are 229 00:13:32,200 --> 00:13:35,439 Speaker 1: left of center or right of center, whatever. It's just 230 00:13:35,559 --> 00:13:39,400 Speaker 1: a random element that people have a hard time dealing with. 231 00:13:39,880 --> 00:13:43,040 Speaker 1: I am constantly having the argument that you have to 232 00:13:43,120 --> 00:13:46,560 Speaker 1: separate the you know, the hand waving noise, the old 233 00:13:46,600 --> 00:13:51,800 Speaker 1: cap tweets, anything that doesn't impact discounted cash flow, profits 234 00:13:51,800 --> 00:13:55,640 Speaker 1: and revenue, um, you have to ignore. So now we're 235 00:13:55,640 --> 00:13:59,080 Speaker 1: not going to war with I ran that's a Russia distraction. No, 236 00:13:59,320 --> 00:14:02,360 Speaker 1: we're not. He not well, if he fires Mueller or not, 237 00:14:02,800 --> 00:14:05,000 Speaker 1: he'll have to deal with the repercussions of it. But 238 00:14:05,240 --> 00:14:11,440 Speaker 1: none of that impacts profits. Trade war and tariffs, even 239 00:14:11,480 --> 00:14:14,640 Speaker 1: though we've been told they're easy to win, it turns 240 00:14:14,640 --> 00:14:20,240 Speaker 1: out that may not actually be true. And my worst 241 00:14:20,240 --> 00:14:23,960 Speaker 1: case scenario is, and I'm on record saying ignore the 242 00:14:24,000 --> 00:14:27,120 Speaker 1: president until he does something really stupid, because most of 243 00:14:27,120 --> 00:14:30,000 Speaker 1: this is noise that doesn't matter. This is the first 244 00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:32,960 Speaker 1: you know, the camel's nose under the tent. This is 245 00:14:33,000 --> 00:14:37,240 Speaker 1: the first entry to all Right, you've said and done 246 00:14:37,240 --> 00:14:42,160 Speaker 1: a number of things that are sort of shocking and unprecedented. 247 00:14:42,240 --> 00:14:44,560 Speaker 1: Let's just say it's not business as usual in d C. 248 00:14:44,720 --> 00:14:47,440 Speaker 1: Because you're draining the swamp and all that other fun stuff. 249 00:14:48,080 --> 00:14:50,520 Speaker 1: This is the first thing that you look at, even 250 00:14:50,800 --> 00:14:53,560 Speaker 1: the tax cuts, which every analysis of them have said, 251 00:14:53,920 --> 00:14:57,040 Speaker 1: this is not a well crafted tax reform, but hey, 252 00:14:57,040 --> 00:14:59,360 Speaker 1: it's a couple of trillion dollars. And by the way, 253 00:14:59,360 --> 00:15:01,760 Speaker 1: clients hate one. I say this. I know you may 254 00:15:01,800 --> 00:15:04,760 Speaker 1: not be the biggest fan of especially if you live 255 00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:06,440 Speaker 1: in a blue state and you lost your state and 256 00:15:06,520 --> 00:15:08,880 Speaker 1: local taxes. So we have a lot of clients in 257 00:15:08,920 --> 00:15:16,280 Speaker 1: California and New York and and Oregon and and um uh, Connecticut. 258 00:15:16,360 --> 00:15:18,680 Speaker 1: We don't you know, people in debt Texas and people 259 00:15:18,720 --> 00:15:21,240 Speaker 1: in Florida. They don't have to worry about that. But 260 00:15:21,360 --> 00:15:23,840 Speaker 1: it's just still a couple of trillion dollars. And yeah, 261 00:15:23,840 --> 00:15:27,040 Speaker 1: it's bad for the deficit, blah blah blah, but give 262 00:15:27,080 --> 00:15:28,680 Speaker 1: me a trillion dollars, I'll throw you a hell of 263 00:15:28,680 --> 00:15:31,880 Speaker 1: a party. Someone much smarter than me once said, this 264 00:15:32,000 --> 00:15:37,360 Speaker 1: is the first thing that this administration has done that 265 00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:43,000 Speaker 1: you could see the immediate effect in the economic data. 266 00:15:43,240 --> 00:15:47,080 Speaker 1: We're starting to see the push through for inflation, and 267 00:15:47,200 --> 00:15:49,440 Speaker 1: that could lead to a series of dominoes that has 268 00:15:49,480 --> 00:15:51,640 Speaker 1: a very negative consequence for the stock mark. Can we 269 00:15:51,680 --> 00:15:54,560 Speaker 1: talk more about that inflation? Like, I mean, that has 270 00:15:54,600 --> 00:15:56,680 Speaker 1: been such a theme for so long, Like, I mean, 271 00:15:56,720 --> 00:15:59,960 Speaker 1: that's basically what hedge funds have lost their low INFLA 272 00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:03,400 Speaker 1: as lower for longer has been. I've been in that camp. 273 00:16:03,440 --> 00:16:06,800 Speaker 1: And yet you know, as interest rates start to end 274 00:16:06,920 --> 00:16:09,680 Speaker 1: up a little bit, we start to maybe enter a 275 00:16:09,760 --> 00:16:12,360 Speaker 1: world where that debt that we're all looking at gets 276 00:16:12,400 --> 00:16:15,480 Speaker 1: a lot more expensive. Because sure, that's a big issue. 277 00:16:15,560 --> 00:16:19,480 Speaker 1: So although I don't think it's the apocalyptic issue that 278 00:16:19,520 --> 00:16:23,240 Speaker 1: the the the faux deficit hawks have have pretended. So 279 00:16:23,680 --> 00:16:27,360 Speaker 1: play this out with me, like, what how much longer 280 00:16:27,360 --> 00:16:30,320 Speaker 1: can it stay low? And what does that end game 281 00:16:30,360 --> 00:16:33,440 Speaker 1: look like for us as investors? So to me, the 282 00:16:33,480 --> 00:16:38,680 Speaker 1: biggest two variables in inflation are commodities highly dependent on 283 00:16:38,720 --> 00:16:43,080 Speaker 1: the dollar, and wages. We've started to see wages tick 284 00:16:43,200 --> 00:16:49,080 Speaker 1: up on the endpoints of the wage distribution curve. So 285 00:16:50,120 --> 00:16:52,360 Speaker 1: we've seen a number of states and cities raise the 286 00:16:52,400 --> 00:16:56,040 Speaker 1: minimum wage that's ticked up if you're a Walmart, a Starbucks, 287 00:16:56,040 --> 00:16:59,240 Speaker 1: a Target. You've raised wages at a number of other 288 00:16:59,280 --> 00:17:03,000 Speaker 1: companies just because there aren't enough bodies and people who 289 00:17:03,080 --> 00:17:06,240 Speaker 1: used to get hired who were perhaps not here fully illegally, 290 00:17:06,960 --> 00:17:10,399 Speaker 1: that that labor pool has gone away. So that's a 291 00:17:10,560 --> 00:17:16,640 Speaker 1: very sort of um that tends the non legal immigrants 292 00:17:16,720 --> 00:17:18,840 Speaker 1: tend to be a cash business, so we're not seeing 293 00:17:18,880 --> 00:17:21,000 Speaker 1: that in the data, and they tend to be low 294 00:17:21,040 --> 00:17:24,600 Speaker 1: age workers taking jobs that Americans Americans don't want to 295 00:17:24,640 --> 00:17:27,240 Speaker 1: wash dishes or pick tomatoes or any of the other 296 00:17:27,680 --> 00:17:32,480 Speaker 1: or working Trump's kitchens. Right, So so you end up 297 00:17:32,520 --> 00:17:36,480 Speaker 1: with that hasn't had a wage and impact, hasn't an 298 00:17:36,520 --> 00:17:40,159 Speaker 1: inflation impact, either officially or unofficially. But when we look 299 00:17:40,240 --> 00:17:42,360 Speaker 1: at the tariffs and we look at so we've seen 300 00:17:42,440 --> 00:17:45,840 Speaker 1: some wages go up. On the low end, we've seen, uh, 301 00:17:45,880 --> 00:17:48,360 Speaker 1: the unemployment rate went up, but for the right reasons, 302 00:17:48,400 --> 00:17:50,920 Speaker 1: more people coming back into the labor force. We like that. 303 00:17:51,720 --> 00:17:55,920 Speaker 1: On the high end, you've seen the STEM jobs science, technology, engineering, math, 304 00:17:56,280 --> 00:18:00,439 Speaker 1: and of course anything involving technology, coding, software, whatever. But 305 00:18:00,560 --> 00:18:03,760 Speaker 1: those have consistently been well paying jobs with good benefits. 306 00:18:03,760 --> 00:18:06,480 Speaker 1: And stock options and what have you. But those continue 307 00:18:06,480 --> 00:18:10,800 Speaker 1: to rise. When you see the rent costs in places 308 00:18:10,800 --> 00:18:13,920 Speaker 1: like San Francisco, that's just telling you the tech world 309 00:18:13,960 --> 00:18:17,080 Speaker 1: is booming. And until the tech world stops booming, those 310 00:18:17,119 --> 00:18:19,760 Speaker 1: rents are going to continue to stay high. Uh So, 311 00:18:19,920 --> 00:18:23,080 Speaker 1: it's very regional. It depends on the industry, it depends 312 00:18:23,119 --> 00:18:26,600 Speaker 1: on the region, It depends on your education level, how 313 00:18:26,680 --> 00:18:31,120 Speaker 1: much your wages are going up. But now we're starting 314 00:18:31,119 --> 00:18:35,560 Speaker 1: to see um so that's not a big inflationary issue wages. 315 00:18:35,760 --> 00:18:38,560 Speaker 1: But when we look at commodities, what is half the 316 00:18:38,640 --> 00:18:43,240 Speaker 1: cost of car cars medals? What was selling sixteen seventeen 317 00:18:43,240 --> 00:18:46,960 Speaker 1: million cars a year and exporting a bunch and importing 318 00:18:46,960 --> 00:18:50,480 Speaker 1: a bunch. That's potentially problematic. You look at what happened 319 00:18:50,480 --> 00:18:53,920 Speaker 1: with Harley Davidson, You look at some of the appliance companies, 320 00:18:54,359 --> 00:18:58,520 Speaker 1: so Whirlpool and who else said something. Uh GM GM 321 00:18:58,560 --> 00:19:02,680 Speaker 1: basically had decent numbers, but said perspectively, we see this 322 00:19:02,720 --> 00:19:04,919 Speaker 1: is right. We see this as a problem. This is 323 00:19:04,920 --> 00:19:07,960 Speaker 1: gonna affect our our sales, this is gonna affect our profits. 324 00:19:08,240 --> 00:19:11,400 Speaker 1: The tariffs are really problematic for us. So you end 325 00:19:11,560 --> 00:19:14,560 Speaker 1: up with you know, if you want to call it 326 00:19:14,600 --> 00:19:17,719 Speaker 1: self inflicted wounds or unforced there. That's before we get 327 00:19:17,800 --> 00:19:22,399 Speaker 1: to this insanity of using a depression era um, a 328 00:19:22,480 --> 00:19:26,480 Speaker 1: depression era a law to send twelve billion dollars to farmers. 329 00:19:26,760 --> 00:19:29,520 Speaker 1: How about this, let's not have a trade war. I 330 00:19:29,560 --> 00:19:31,800 Speaker 1: know it's I know that's a radical view. I know 331 00:19:31,880 --> 00:19:35,280 Speaker 1: that's crazy, but it seems ridiculous to say, all right, 332 00:19:35,680 --> 00:19:39,320 Speaker 1: we're gonna have an eighteen billion dollar export tariff and 333 00:19:39,359 --> 00:19:42,000 Speaker 1: we're gonna give you twelve billion dollars of it. Why 334 00:19:42,119 --> 00:19:47,879 Speaker 1: are the taxpayers funding tariffs for one sector just farms? 335 00:19:48,320 --> 00:19:51,600 Speaker 1: What about the manufacturers? What about the people who who 336 00:19:51,640 --> 00:19:55,119 Speaker 1: are are writing software? What about Apple and and that 337 00:19:55,280 --> 00:19:59,199 Speaker 1: sector that's gonna suffer from from these tariffs. It just 338 00:19:59,240 --> 00:20:02,479 Speaker 1: seems that, you know, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. 339 00:20:02,920 --> 00:20:06,920 Speaker 1: I know everybody in the White House seems to think 340 00:20:06,960 --> 00:20:11,800 Speaker 1: that the United States is on the losing ends of 341 00:20:11,800 --> 00:20:17,399 Speaker 1: of the world trade. When you break that down in 342 00:20:17,600 --> 00:20:25,360 Speaker 1: specific details, that's true for people with less education, less skills, 343 00:20:25,960 --> 00:20:29,960 Speaker 1: in certain geographies in the country, in certain industries. So 344 00:20:30,160 --> 00:20:32,879 Speaker 1: maybe rather than take twelve billion dollars and give it 345 00:20:32,920 --> 00:20:36,040 Speaker 1: to farmers, which essentially is you're giving it to China. 346 00:20:36,680 --> 00:20:40,320 Speaker 1: Why don't we do what smart countries around the world, 347 00:20:40,440 --> 00:20:43,439 Speaker 1: like Germany have done, and say for the people that 348 00:20:43,560 --> 00:20:48,159 Speaker 1: global international trade which has helped keep global peace and 349 00:20:48,240 --> 00:20:52,679 Speaker 1: helped boost the economy around the world, Let's do what 350 00:20:52,720 --> 00:20:55,760 Speaker 1: they do and train these people to get the skills 351 00:20:55,800 --> 00:21:00,080 Speaker 1: to get into better paying jobs. If you were if 352 00:21:00,080 --> 00:21:02,480 Speaker 1: you used to make socks at a mill in North Carolina, 353 00:21:02,680 --> 00:21:06,680 Speaker 1: I'm sorry, but that's a very low cost industry that's 354 00:21:06,720 --> 00:21:09,720 Speaker 1: moved elsewhere. Yet Americans are not very good at having 355 00:21:09,760 --> 00:21:13,159 Speaker 1: that conversation. Um, well, it depends do we want to 356 00:21:13,200 --> 00:21:15,760 Speaker 1: be realistic and do we want to be adults or 357 00:21:15,760 --> 00:21:21,320 Speaker 1: do we just want to yell at our perceived enemies. Yeah, 358 00:21:21,359 --> 00:21:26,400 Speaker 1: but the it's easy to do that until inflation comes 359 00:21:26,480 --> 00:21:28,639 Speaker 1: up and the Fed titans and we have a recession 360 00:21:29,520 --> 00:21:34,000 Speaker 1: wholly unforced error. And the unforced error, I'm guessing if 361 00:21:34,040 --> 00:21:36,399 Speaker 1: you went to masters of business, that would be one 362 00:21:36,400 --> 00:21:38,639 Speaker 1: of the things that they would say that they would 363 00:21:38,640 --> 00:21:41,199 Speaker 1: try to avoid our unforced airs. You know I have 364 00:21:41,440 --> 00:21:43,760 Speaker 1: I don't ask that question. I asked you know who 365 00:21:43,880 --> 00:21:47,879 Speaker 1: your mentors? What are you reading? Tell us your favorite books? Um, 366 00:21:47,920 --> 00:21:51,320 Speaker 1: what what's the you know, what's the thing that most 367 00:21:51,400 --> 00:21:55,280 Speaker 1: people don't know about you but should like questions like that, 368 00:21:56,320 --> 00:21:59,480 Speaker 1: this is such a specific question to such a specific 369 00:21:59,560 --> 00:22:05,439 Speaker 1: set of policy things that it's shocking. And you know, 370 00:22:05,520 --> 00:22:09,720 Speaker 1: the outraged cycle has just exhausted everybody, so you're not 371 00:22:09,880 --> 00:22:14,000 Speaker 1: getting the intelligent debate. You know. I used to call 372 00:22:14,080 --> 00:22:17,359 Speaker 1: myself a Jacob Javits Republican growing up in New York. 373 00:22:17,760 --> 00:22:20,040 Speaker 1: Here's a guy who was against the war in Vietnam, 374 00:22:20,280 --> 00:22:25,160 Speaker 1: was against unfunded spending, and that includes um, that includes 375 00:22:25,320 --> 00:22:29,359 Speaker 1: entitlements and tax cuts. But believe the government shouldn't be 376 00:22:29,359 --> 00:22:32,680 Speaker 1: in the bedroom. The government had nothing, no business saying 377 00:22:32,720 --> 00:22:35,120 Speaker 1: who could get married, whether you can use birth control, 378 00:22:36,240 --> 00:22:39,840 Speaker 1: abortion rights, etcetera. And I thought, oh, that makes a 379 00:22:39,840 --> 00:22:44,240 Speaker 1: lot of sense. And around twenty years ago, the Republicans 380 00:22:44,359 --> 00:22:48,119 Speaker 1: just made a hard tack to the right and left 381 00:22:48,240 --> 00:22:52,080 Speaker 1: rationality behind. And it took a long time for a 382 00:22:52,119 --> 00:22:56,040 Speaker 1: lot of mainstream Republicans to sort of bolts. You look 383 00:22:56,080 --> 00:22:59,680 Speaker 1: at guys like uh Rick Wilson or Bill Crystal at 384 00:22:59,680 --> 00:23:03,199 Speaker 1: the end, r oh, they are a National Review, They're 385 00:23:03,320 --> 00:23:09,040 Speaker 1: not They're Reagan Republicans. They're not Trump Republicans. And under 386 00:23:09,160 --> 00:23:11,520 Speaker 1: Bush you had people like Bruce Bartlett, who was in 387 00:23:11,560 --> 00:23:14,280 Speaker 1: the Reagan administration on the Bush administration saying I don't 388 00:23:14,320 --> 00:23:17,560 Speaker 1: recognize the Republican Party, and a lot of people thought, 389 00:23:17,880 --> 00:23:20,080 Speaker 1: come on, Bruce, you're being a little you're exaggerating a 390 00:23:20,080 --> 00:23:24,480 Speaker 1: little bit. Turns out he was right, and he identified 391 00:23:24,480 --> 00:23:28,000 Speaker 1: a schism before the cracks were visible and the House 392 00:23:28,000 --> 00:23:32,600 Speaker 1: started to fall apart. The adults in charge of the 393 00:23:32,600 --> 00:23:36,040 Speaker 1: Republican Party just can't seem to bring themselves about to 394 00:23:36,160 --> 00:23:39,399 Speaker 1: saying we're the party of free trade, We're the party 395 00:23:39,480 --> 00:23:44,359 Speaker 1: of non government intervention. What is right that it's so, 396 00:23:44,560 --> 00:23:49,199 Speaker 1: I don't recognize this Republican Party and their affiliation. The 397 00:23:49,200 --> 00:23:53,320 Speaker 1: party affiliation was pre Trump. I don't know what what 398 00:23:53,520 --> 00:23:57,000 Speaker 1: happens post Trump, or maybe I'm wrong, Maybe the entire 399 00:23:57,160 --> 00:24:02,680 Speaker 1: former Reagan Democrats moved to UM moved to the Republican Party. 400 00:24:02,720 --> 00:24:08,160 Speaker 1: But it looks like poorly thought out economic policies could 401 00:24:08,280 --> 00:24:12,200 Speaker 1: lead to a very very significant damage. I still think 402 00:24:12,240 --> 00:24:15,160 Speaker 1: that's a low probability event. I still think the adults 403 00:24:15,600 --> 00:24:19,480 Speaker 1: are gonna are gonna take charge, but it's a non 404 00:24:19,600 --> 00:24:24,879 Speaker 1: zero event. It's I don't know, possibility that this gets 405 00:24:24,920 --> 00:24:29,800 Speaker 1: bad and spirals out of control and gets worse. That's 406 00:24:29,800 --> 00:24:40,840 Speaker 1: a happy note. Happy note. Back to portfolio management, how 407 00:24:40,840 --> 00:24:44,119 Speaker 1: do you see that changing the rise of quantz has 408 00:24:44,160 --> 00:24:48,959 Speaker 1: been a huge, huge element that evidence based investing, rules 409 00:24:49,000 --> 00:24:53,320 Speaker 1: driven portfolios, things along those lines where it's not I'm 410 00:24:53,359 --> 00:24:55,760 Speaker 1: scratching my chin and saying I think we need a 411 00:24:55,760 --> 00:24:58,720 Speaker 1: little more semiconductor in this. That that stuff has gone 412 00:24:59,560 --> 00:25:02,080 Speaker 1: uh to a large degree the way of the DODO. 413 00:25:02,320 --> 00:25:06,280 Speaker 1: And now we're you know the fact that you can 414 00:25:06,400 --> 00:25:08,600 Speaker 1: make an argument and say here's what the data shows, 415 00:25:08,640 --> 00:25:11,439 Speaker 1: here's what the evidence shows, and and here's what we 416 00:25:11,480 --> 00:25:15,240 Speaker 1: think takes place over long periods of time. The fascinating 417 00:25:15,320 --> 00:25:19,920 Speaker 1: aspect of the reflexivity of markets is whatever works currently 418 00:25:20,680 --> 00:25:23,879 Speaker 1: is likely to eventually stop working, Because isn't that a 419 00:25:23,880 --> 00:25:28,320 Speaker 1: wonderful thing? Yeah? It never ends, right, it's constantly So 420 00:25:28,400 --> 00:25:31,119 Speaker 1: you have to do, Yeah, you have to be aware 421 00:25:31,160 --> 00:25:34,359 Speaker 1: of what used to work that's not working anymore. And 422 00:25:34,520 --> 00:25:38,040 Speaker 1: is this temporary like value temporary being out of favor 423 00:25:38,359 --> 00:25:43,080 Speaker 1: or do the steam belt and leather steam steam engine 424 00:25:43,119 --> 00:25:46,480 Speaker 1: and leather belt companies? Is this a permanent uh? Sayonara? 425 00:25:46,600 --> 00:25:49,719 Speaker 1: And so that's that's a judge McColl and you have 426 00:25:49,800 --> 00:25:53,600 Speaker 1: to be pretty reasonable to figure that out. So that's 427 00:25:53,640 --> 00:25:57,879 Speaker 1: a that's a big change the concept of are you 428 00:25:57,920 --> 00:26:02,200 Speaker 1: really active or you really pass of are they mutually exclusive? 429 00:26:02,240 --> 00:26:06,800 Speaker 1: Can you be you know, two thirds passive one third active. Um. 430 00:26:06,840 --> 00:26:10,200 Speaker 1: I think that's an interesting discussion, And you know, I'm 431 00:26:10,240 --> 00:26:13,199 Speaker 1: fond of saying if if you can come up with 432 00:26:13,240 --> 00:26:17,040 Speaker 1: a defendable thesis for why you want to have some 433 00:26:17,160 --> 00:26:24,440 Speaker 1: percentage of your portfolio in an actively managed, non representative holding, 434 00:26:25,080 --> 00:26:26,760 Speaker 1: I don't have a problem with it. We we have 435 00:26:26,880 --> 00:26:30,520 Speaker 1: certain clients who are young and want a very aggressive 436 00:26:30,680 --> 00:26:34,320 Speaker 1: active strategy and we don't like paying hedge fund fees 437 00:26:34,400 --> 00:26:38,160 Speaker 1: and uh Sam with venture capital, so we found the 438 00:26:38,200 --> 00:26:43,639 Speaker 1: only outside manager we use has a micro cap funds 439 00:26:43,760 --> 00:26:49,639 Speaker 1: that seems to parallel venture capital investing without the lock up, 440 00:26:49,680 --> 00:26:53,240 Speaker 1: without the two and twenty uh James o'shanna see oh Sam, 441 00:26:53,560 --> 00:26:56,000 Speaker 1: So that that might. Now the problem is it doesn't scale. 442 00:26:56,040 --> 00:26:58,560 Speaker 1: You can't put a billion dollars into it. But if 443 00:26:58,600 --> 00:27:02,040 Speaker 1: you have someone right, but if somebody wants, well, you 444 00:27:02,080 --> 00:27:04,879 Speaker 1: can't because there's only so many micro caps. More. On 445 00:27:04,920 --> 00:27:07,280 Speaker 1: the other hand, if someone has you know, five million 446 00:27:07,359 --> 00:27:09,800 Speaker 1: dollars and wants to put half a million into something 447 00:27:09,880 --> 00:27:13,520 Speaker 1: that is wildly volatile and but is gonna scream when 448 00:27:13,560 --> 00:27:17,679 Speaker 1: the market goes higher. It's one of those. Uh, we 449 00:27:17,760 --> 00:27:20,720 Speaker 1: work with an outside manager from municipal bonds. We work 450 00:27:20,800 --> 00:27:23,919 Speaker 1: with an outside manager for just that. And it's a 451 00:27:23,920 --> 00:27:28,119 Speaker 1: certain kind of drug, right, We don't have the expertise 452 00:27:28,119 --> 00:27:31,920 Speaker 1: in that. O'shannessy stuff is great. Go read What Works 453 00:27:31,920 --> 00:27:34,560 Speaker 1: on Wall Street is one of those seminal books that 454 00:27:34,640 --> 00:27:41,000 Speaker 1: really is amazing. Um. So I'm not like a proselytizer. 455 00:27:41,040 --> 00:27:43,400 Speaker 1: I'm not one of these people says no, never own 456 00:27:43,440 --> 00:27:47,879 Speaker 1: anything active. Hey, our tactical portfolio has to be considered active. 457 00:27:48,280 --> 00:27:51,720 Speaker 1: It's evidence based, its rules driven, it's it's done well. 458 00:27:51,800 --> 00:27:56,200 Speaker 1: But it's not passive. You can't say that's a passive holding. 459 00:27:56,520 --> 00:27:59,399 Speaker 1: But there has to be to us. If that's the 460 00:27:59,400 --> 00:28:03,280 Speaker 1: emotional the valve that allows people to leave their main 461 00:28:03,359 --> 00:28:06,680 Speaker 1: portfolio alone during a market crash, then it served this purpose. 462 00:28:07,960 --> 00:28:11,240 Speaker 1: But you know, we don't want to find ourselves rationalizing 463 00:28:11,280 --> 00:28:14,520 Speaker 1: things constantly. We don't want to find ourselves making excuses. 464 00:28:15,200 --> 00:28:17,480 Speaker 1: We try and think it through beforehand, and that's when 465 00:28:17,520 --> 00:28:21,479 Speaker 1: you you add that sort of holding. I think that 466 00:28:21,520 --> 00:28:24,360 Speaker 1: there's going to be more of that in portfolio management. 467 00:28:24,359 --> 00:28:28,000 Speaker 1: I think rather than just saying this is the mad 468 00:28:28,080 --> 00:28:32,440 Speaker 1: pursuit of alpha, it's gonna be something closer to how 469 00:28:32,520 --> 00:28:36,040 Speaker 1: does this particular holding help you reach your long term goals. 470 00:28:37,200 --> 00:28:43,160 Speaker 1: That's a very different conversation than I think X funds 471 00:28:43,240 --> 00:28:46,680 Speaker 1: is going to outperform the SMP five. Well, what's your 472 00:28:46,800 --> 00:28:48,960 Speaker 1: what's your track record and picking X funds? How has 473 00:28:49,000 --> 00:28:50,800 Speaker 1: it done? Why should I think you have the ability 474 00:28:50,840 --> 00:28:54,400 Speaker 1: to do that. So there's a funny story about this. 475 00:28:54,680 --> 00:28:57,280 Speaker 1: Most people can't pick stocks, so they hire somebody to 476 00:28:57,320 --> 00:29:01,240 Speaker 1: be their stock picker. But most stock pickers can't pick 477 00:29:01,280 --> 00:29:04,480 Speaker 1: stocks an octopus, So you're you're right, you're hiring somebody 478 00:29:04,520 --> 00:29:07,400 Speaker 1: else to hire the person who's gonna pick stocks. And 479 00:29:07,400 --> 00:29:11,480 Speaker 1: and you get that like recursive um fractal, So you're 480 00:29:11,520 --> 00:29:13,560 Speaker 1: hiring a person to hire the person to hire the 481 00:29:13,560 --> 00:29:18,000 Speaker 1: person to pick the stuff. And it simply doesn't work. 482 00:29:18,000 --> 00:29:21,640 Speaker 1: And when once you build in the cost structure over 483 00:29:21,720 --> 00:29:25,960 Speaker 1: long periods of time, it's a losing bet. A you 484 00:29:26,000 --> 00:29:29,280 Speaker 1: can't find those people, be finding the people who are 485 00:29:29,360 --> 00:29:34,360 Speaker 1: worth it um beyond their their fee structure. I'll give 486 00:29:34,400 --> 00:29:37,040 Speaker 1: you another active fund that I think is kind of fascinating. 487 00:29:37,600 --> 00:29:41,400 Speaker 1: Um Joel Greenblatt who ran Gatham Capital and put up 488 00:29:41,400 --> 00:29:45,760 Speaker 1: insane numbers in the nineties a year for ten years. 489 00:29:45,800 --> 00:29:50,680 Speaker 1: That's just insane. So he came up with a quantitative 490 00:29:50,720 --> 00:29:52,640 Speaker 1: way to look at the SMP five hundred. You want 491 00:29:52,640 --> 00:29:55,120 Speaker 1: to own an index, here's what we're gonna do. We're 492 00:29:55,120 --> 00:29:57,760 Speaker 1: gonna own the SMP five hundred that We're gonna run 493 00:29:57,760 --> 00:30:00,880 Speaker 1: around quantitative screen through this and I'm gonna add a 494 00:30:00,880 --> 00:30:05,000 Speaker 1: big slug of the best stocks in this index long. 495 00:30:05,080 --> 00:30:08,120 Speaker 1: So now we're like a hundred and I'm making up 496 00:30:08,120 --> 00:30:11,920 Speaker 1: the number long. Now we're going to run a similar 497 00:30:11,960 --> 00:30:13,880 Speaker 1: screen and we're gonna find the worst stocks and we're 498 00:30:13,920 --> 00:30:17,240 Speaker 1: gonna be short that. So you're long the SMP five 499 00:30:17,320 --> 00:30:20,720 Speaker 1: hundred and then balanced long short long the best, short 500 00:30:20,800 --> 00:30:23,800 Speaker 1: the worst. In theory, if that works, the next time 501 00:30:23,800 --> 00:30:27,200 Speaker 1: the market crashes, you'll do much better than the average INDEP. 502 00:30:27,800 --> 00:30:29,800 Speaker 1: So you could you could rationalize that a little. We 503 00:30:29,840 --> 00:30:32,720 Speaker 1: can package that right, Yeah, And he has a three 504 00:30:32,760 --> 00:30:35,640 Speaker 1: year track record now, which is which is so? So 505 00:30:35,760 --> 00:30:39,360 Speaker 1: that's the sort of I don't remember the g I 506 00:30:39,480 --> 00:30:42,560 Speaker 1: N d X. I think it's called index plus UM. 507 00:30:42,600 --> 00:30:44,600 Speaker 1: I may be getting the ticker wrong, but it's Joel 508 00:30:44,640 --> 00:30:47,080 Speaker 1: Green Black Index Plus. So what's what's incredible to me 509 00:30:47,160 --> 00:30:50,280 Speaker 1: about how ETFs have sort of changed investing is that 510 00:30:50,520 --> 00:30:53,560 Speaker 1: that thing that you just described that is out there 511 00:30:54,120 --> 00:30:56,960 Speaker 1: and the dude who used to put up massive returns 512 00:30:57,080 --> 00:30:59,600 Speaker 1: like that guy can't do that anymore because there's this 513 00:30:59,720 --> 00:31:02,720 Speaker 1: other et F that can do it for well, I 514 00:31:02,760 --> 00:31:05,320 Speaker 1: don't know if he can't do that anymore, I think 515 00:31:05,400 --> 00:31:08,120 Speaker 1: he after you've run a fund like that. By the way, 516 00:31:08,440 --> 00:31:11,040 Speaker 1: Gotham at fifty a year, I want to say, about 517 00:31:11,080 --> 00:31:14,960 Speaker 1: halfway through its run, like Renaissance Technology said to the 518 00:31:15,000 --> 00:31:19,360 Speaker 1: outside investors, Hey, thanks for everything, but you're all a 519 00:31:19,400 --> 00:31:21,280 Speaker 1: pain in the ass. I'm going to just manage my 520 00:31:21,360 --> 00:31:24,440 Speaker 1: own money and continue to put up killer numbers. Okay, So, 521 00:31:24,560 --> 00:31:27,680 Speaker 1: speaking of managing your own money, how do you deal 522 00:31:27,760 --> 00:31:31,400 Speaker 1: with that? I eat my own cooking, my own four 523 00:31:31,400 --> 00:31:35,520 Speaker 1: oh one, my own portfolio, and all your wife, everybody 524 00:31:35,560 --> 00:31:37,560 Speaker 1: in the firm invest in our own four o one, 525 00:31:37,720 --> 00:31:39,760 Speaker 1: our four oh one case are in our portfolio, our 526 00:31:39,840 --> 00:31:44,880 Speaker 1: personal investments on our own portfolio. Anybody who doesn't do that, 527 00:31:45,680 --> 00:31:49,520 Speaker 1: I would never even remotely consider giving my money to. 528 00:31:50,040 --> 00:31:52,080 Speaker 1: And when someone says to me, Well, I want to 529 00:31:52,160 --> 00:31:56,760 Speaker 1: remain objective. You still have market exposure. You're not trading 530 00:31:56,800 --> 00:32:00,400 Speaker 1: individual stocks. It's a broad allocation. What do you care? 531 00:32:00,800 --> 00:32:05,040 Speaker 1: So A hundred every single person in our firm, our 532 00:32:05,200 --> 00:32:09,320 Speaker 1: entire four O one k um. Although I think it 533 00:32:09,440 --> 00:32:13,920 Speaker 1: was Rick Edelman said in My Pantheon of name Dropping said, um, 534 00:32:15,360 --> 00:32:20,040 Speaker 1: I'm deeply invested in in speculative small cap company, meaning 535 00:32:20,120 --> 00:32:22,800 Speaker 1: his own company. So there's that. Also, if I had 536 00:32:22,840 --> 00:32:27,080 Speaker 1: to pick my single biggest holding, it would have to 537 00:32:27,160 --> 00:32:30,800 Speaker 1: be me and my partners own the firm, were employee owns. 538 00:32:31,400 --> 00:32:33,680 Speaker 1: Uh So eventually everybody in the firm will have an 539 00:32:33,720 --> 00:32:36,960 Speaker 1: opportunity to be to be an owner. But we all 540 00:32:38,040 --> 00:32:40,560 Speaker 1: eat our own cooking. I don't see how you can 541 00:32:40,640 --> 00:32:43,360 Speaker 1: run an asset management shop and not. So I'm gonna 542 00:32:43,440 --> 00:32:47,960 Speaker 1: retitle the conversations with you the world according to Bury 543 00:32:48,080 --> 00:32:51,160 Speaker 1: rid Holes. But I'm gonna ask a question, okay, which is, 544 00:32:52,320 --> 00:32:54,800 Speaker 1: having talked about a lot of things, what is the 545 00:32:54,840 --> 00:32:59,600 Speaker 1: world of investing? According to Bury Dholes, I think investing 546 00:32:59,800 --> 00:33:02,680 Speaker 1: is really misunderstood. It's weird. I was such a critic 547 00:33:02,760 --> 00:33:05,720 Speaker 1: of Wall Street in Bailout Nation that I find myself 548 00:33:06,080 --> 00:33:11,719 Speaker 1: defending Wall Street, Bogel recently said wall finance subtracts value, 549 00:33:12,120 --> 00:33:14,320 Speaker 1: and I don't think that that's true. We all carry 550 00:33:14,360 --> 00:33:18,080 Speaker 1: these powerful little computers in our pockets called mobile phones. 551 00:33:19,200 --> 00:33:21,680 Speaker 1: That company doesn't come public without Wall Street. When you 552 00:33:21,720 --> 00:33:25,120 Speaker 1: look at the financing of bridges and tunnels and highways 553 00:33:25,640 --> 00:33:28,360 Speaker 1: back when America used to build bridges and tunnels and highways, 554 00:33:29,280 --> 00:33:32,920 Speaker 1: Wall Street has has done that. The problem is that 555 00:33:33,200 --> 00:33:37,360 Speaker 1: we took was was essentially a support industry for the 556 00:33:37,400 --> 00:33:40,280 Speaker 1: rest of the country and turned it into a main industry. 557 00:33:40,960 --> 00:33:44,280 Speaker 1: Wall Street should exist to service everybody else. It should 558 00:33:44,320 --> 00:33:47,600 Speaker 1: provide the ability for small companies to go public. It 559 00:33:47,640 --> 00:33:52,200 Speaker 1: should provide the ability provide the ability for um, mom 560 00:33:52,280 --> 00:33:54,640 Speaker 1: and pop to make investments in the long term, be 561 00:33:54,800 --> 00:33:57,440 Speaker 1: it their kids, college or retirement or what have you. 562 00:33:58,160 --> 00:34:04,760 Speaker 1: And the entire universe of complexity and opaqueness and high 563 00:34:04,840 --> 00:34:09,359 Speaker 1: expense should really be replaced. And by the way, complexity 564 00:34:09,360 --> 00:34:13,560 Speaker 1: and packness the it's not a bug, it's a feature 565 00:34:13,640 --> 00:34:16,960 Speaker 1: that it's high cost. Opaqueness and complexity hides the cost. 566 00:34:17,400 --> 00:34:20,560 Speaker 1: It should be much more simple and much more transparent 567 00:34:20,600 --> 00:34:25,840 Speaker 1: and much more lower cost. That process, while long overdue, 568 00:34:26,840 --> 00:34:32,440 Speaker 1: is finally happening, Vanguard occupied the niche of low cost. 569 00:34:33,080 --> 00:34:37,279 Speaker 1: The impact of Vanguard has affected everybody. And I think 570 00:34:37,600 --> 00:34:43,080 Speaker 1: that finance or fifty years from now, is going to 571 00:34:43,320 --> 00:34:47,000 Speaker 1: go back to that service industry that supports the rest 572 00:34:47,040 --> 00:34:50,040 Speaker 1: of the economy as opposed to the tail wagging the dog. 573 00:34:50,200 --> 00:34:53,719 Speaker 1: And so there's still lots of things that I think 574 00:34:53,800 --> 00:34:57,879 Speaker 1: finance does wrong, and there are lots of of UH 575 00:34:58,120 --> 00:35:00,360 Speaker 1: products that shouldn't be sold, and there are lots of 576 00:35:00,480 --> 00:35:06,120 Speaker 1: behaviors and lots of rules right. But overall, it turns 577 00:35:06,160 --> 00:35:09,919 Speaker 1: out that this capitalism thing works that when Vanguard rolls 578 00:35:09,960 --> 00:35:12,680 Speaker 1: out a cheaper product that does the same thing, only 579 00:35:12,719 --> 00:35:16,680 Speaker 1: it's better. Eventually the market place, you know I've described 580 00:35:16,960 --> 00:35:20,040 Speaker 1: um Gene Fama and E. M. H. I have an 581 00:35:20,120 --> 00:35:24,680 Speaker 1: OH five post called the mostly kind of sort of 582 00:35:24,880 --> 00:35:29,960 Speaker 1: eventually efficient market, and eventually markets get it right. It's 583 00:35:30,000 --> 00:35:32,200 Speaker 1: wrong for long, could be wrong for long periods of time. 584 00:35:32,600 --> 00:35:37,480 Speaker 1: Eventually competition drives price down. Eventually, Look, we we had 585 00:35:37,520 --> 00:35:42,600 Speaker 1: a a wrongly regulated market until the early seventies when 586 00:35:43,239 --> 00:35:47,520 Speaker 1: the constraints on commissions dropped. Stop and think about Wait, 587 00:35:47,680 --> 00:35:50,120 Speaker 1: you could do a trade for seventy five and that's 588 00:35:50,120 --> 00:35:53,520 Speaker 1: considered cheap. That was forty years ago. Now it's free 589 00:35:53,719 --> 00:35:59,799 Speaker 1: or or insignificant eight dollars. That competitive factor is driving 590 00:36:00,600 --> 00:36:04,799 Speaker 1: things towards the benefit for investors. We're not there yet. 591 00:36:04,920 --> 00:36:08,000 Speaker 1: We have a way to go, but you have to 592 00:36:08,120 --> 00:36:14,120 Speaker 1: be unless you're losing half your revenue because of companies 593 00:36:14,200 --> 00:36:17,719 Speaker 1: like Vanguard and black Rock and State Street and d 594 00:36:17,840 --> 00:36:19,839 Speaker 1: f A and go down the list that are are 595 00:36:19,920 --> 00:36:22,560 Speaker 1: providing a service at a lower cost at a higher quality. 596 00:36:23,800 --> 00:36:26,480 Speaker 1: You have to like the direction this is moving towards 597 00:36:26,560 --> 00:36:30,879 Speaker 1: the investors favor. What began as as Bogel's folly has 598 00:36:31,360 --> 00:36:35,000 Speaker 1: has expanded and where I don't know, maybe we're in 599 00:36:35,040 --> 00:36:37,440 Speaker 1: the third or fourth ending of that set of changes. 600 00:36:37,520 --> 00:36:40,360 Speaker 1: I could be completely wrong, but I like the direction 601 00:36:40,440 --> 00:36:46,239 Speaker 1: it's going. So what haven't we asked you? That we 602 00:36:46,280 --> 00:36:50,239 Speaker 1: should have asked you my favorite books? Who my mentors were. 603 00:36:50,320 --> 00:36:52,160 Speaker 1: I don't want answering go down, so I I asked 604 00:36:52,200 --> 00:36:55,200 Speaker 1: those questions every week. Um, I don't know you. We 605 00:36:55,400 --> 00:36:59,200 Speaker 1: we have been really narrow and trying to stay and 606 00:36:59,280 --> 00:37:01,759 Speaker 1: I know that's difficult. All with me. You've been great, man. 607 00:37:02,320 --> 00:37:03,680 Speaker 1: It's a little bit like a river. You know. We're 608 00:37:03,680 --> 00:37:06,279 Speaker 1: just gonna go with the current and go in to 609 00:37:06,320 --> 00:37:14,080 Speaker 1: the UH. To me, the the most interesting change that's 610 00:37:14,160 --> 00:37:19,840 Speaker 1: taking place is how the millennial generation thinks about money. 611 00:37:20,440 --> 00:37:24,160 Speaker 1: And I think my observation is working with a lot 612 00:37:24,200 --> 00:37:27,040 Speaker 1: of young people in my office and just you can't 613 00:37:27,080 --> 00:37:30,640 Speaker 1: help but rub shoulders with millennials in Manhattan. They're far 614 00:37:30,800 --> 00:37:35,880 Speaker 1: less materialistic than previous generations. Although that whole concept of 615 00:37:36,000 --> 00:37:40,840 Speaker 1: experiences versus materialism, um, they're they're brutally blunt and honest. 616 00:37:40,920 --> 00:37:43,880 Speaker 1: It's very different than you know, you have a conversation 617 00:37:43,920 --> 00:37:47,440 Speaker 1: about money with a with a millennial and you say, well, 618 00:37:47,480 --> 00:37:50,239 Speaker 1: here's a math about small cap and value, and and 619 00:37:50,280 --> 00:37:53,759 Speaker 1: they're like, prove it, like they show me. They don't 620 00:37:53,880 --> 00:37:55,520 Speaker 1: want to take your word for anything. They want to 621 00:37:55,560 --> 00:37:58,839 Speaker 1: see it. Um. Like I walk around with a couple 622 00:37:58,880 --> 00:38:01,200 Speaker 1: of bucks in cash in my pocket. They like, I 623 00:38:01,320 --> 00:38:04,200 Speaker 1: pull money out and it's like, what's that paying for lunch? 624 00:38:04,239 --> 00:38:07,799 Speaker 1: Pull out of twenty Why wouldn't you use a card? Well, 625 00:38:07,880 --> 00:38:13,680 Speaker 1: you know it's all right that that's even even the 626 00:38:13,760 --> 00:38:16,920 Speaker 1: next generation. It's well, on my card, I get points. 627 00:38:17,000 --> 00:38:18,680 Speaker 1: I get this, I get that I don't have to 628 00:38:18,719 --> 00:38:21,080 Speaker 1: walk around with cash. I know I have a record 629 00:38:21,120 --> 00:38:23,440 Speaker 1: of everything I've done, why would you use cash? And 630 00:38:23,440 --> 00:38:26,520 Speaker 1: I had to stop and say, habit, there's no good 631 00:38:26,520 --> 00:38:28,520 Speaker 1: reason to use cash. So but one of the things 632 00:38:28,600 --> 00:38:31,719 Speaker 1: that you know, everybody talks a lot about monials, but 633 00:38:31,800 --> 00:38:33,080 Speaker 1: like one of the things that I don't think gets 634 00:38:33,120 --> 00:38:35,120 Speaker 1: talked about that when nobody wants to do anything about 635 00:38:35,160 --> 00:38:38,120 Speaker 1: it's like the weather. But here's the thing though, it's like, 636 00:38:38,360 --> 00:38:40,480 Speaker 1: how are they gonna, how are they going to change? 637 00:38:42,040 --> 00:38:44,799 Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean they were gonna they would 638 00:38:44,800 --> 00:38:47,800 Speaker 1: delta bed hand, they would dealta bed hand. They graduated 639 00:38:47,800 --> 00:38:52,040 Speaker 1: into a terrible recession, UM, a disproportionate numbers still living 640 00:38:52,080 --> 00:38:55,800 Speaker 1: at home to save money. Uh. That that's you know, 641 00:38:56,640 --> 00:39:00,120 Speaker 1: those become seminal experiences that sometimes shape your views. So 642 00:39:00,360 --> 00:39:05,040 Speaker 1: if you remember or read about the post depression generation, 643 00:39:05,480 --> 00:39:07,960 Speaker 1: they never used debt, They paid cash for everything. There 644 00:39:08,000 --> 00:39:11,680 Speaker 1: was no credit cards, there's no loans. Uh. Maybe they 645 00:39:11,920 --> 00:39:13,800 Speaker 1: took a mortgage on the house and then had a 646 00:39:14,000 --> 00:39:18,120 Speaker 1: mortgage burning party when they paid it off, usually early. UM. 647 00:39:18,800 --> 00:39:22,680 Speaker 1: Very different headspace with with this generation. Yet that that 648 00:39:22,920 --> 00:39:29,880 Speaker 1: generation created the boomers. Yeah, again, they're every the pendulum 649 00:39:29,960 --> 00:39:32,800 Speaker 1: swings this way and then it goes too far. In 650 00:39:32,880 --> 00:39:35,640 Speaker 1: the opposite direction. It swings that way, and that's a 651 00:39:35,800 --> 00:39:42,040 Speaker 1: continual set a headaches. There's no no getting away from that. Alright. 652 00:39:42,040 --> 00:39:44,279 Speaker 1: Gonna wrap it up with my last question, Favorite E 653 00:39:44,360 --> 00:39:53,719 Speaker 1: t F ticker, Favorite E t F ticker. UM. I 654 00:39:53,840 --> 00:39:56,320 Speaker 1: don't believe weed is not a pot E t F 655 00:39:56,719 --> 00:39:59,640 Speaker 1: that that has to be Uh. There was one I 656 00:40:00,160 --> 00:40:03,080 Speaker 1: heard about some time ago, but it did not come 657 00:40:03,239 --> 00:40:08,520 Speaker 1: to fruition warm for global warming ticker um. And then 658 00:40:08,680 --> 00:40:13,600 Speaker 1: there was she is kind of an interesting ticker, although 659 00:40:14,320 --> 00:40:20,040 Speaker 1: although it hasn't attracted ascid outside of the Calister's fun 660 00:40:20,239 --> 00:40:23,400 Speaker 1: you know, may that massive influ at the beginning and 661 00:40:23,440 --> 00:40:26,960 Speaker 1: then it just kind of sat there. It's so you know, 662 00:40:27,239 --> 00:40:31,640 Speaker 1: I mentioned in the beginning the behavioral economics and how 663 00:40:31,719 --> 00:40:34,120 Speaker 1: important that is to not only manage your own emotions 664 00:40:34,200 --> 00:40:38,840 Speaker 1: but your own behavior. There's something fascinating about either stocks 665 00:40:39,320 --> 00:40:45,120 Speaker 1: or funds that have a memorable ticker. And I hate 666 00:40:45,160 --> 00:40:48,239 Speaker 1: to say this because it's so irrational, but if if 667 00:40:48,400 --> 00:40:53,399 Speaker 1: you don't have a really good ticker like spy UM 668 00:40:53,640 --> 00:40:55,719 Speaker 1: or q q Q which turned out to be a 669 00:40:55,800 --> 00:41:01,319 Speaker 1: really good ticker, uh, you're starting as an et with uh. 670 00:41:02,480 --> 00:41:05,200 Speaker 1: You know, you got a thirty pound pack on your 671 00:41:05,360 --> 00:41:08,840 Speaker 1: on your back and you're running up a mount because 672 00:41:09,040 --> 00:41:13,040 Speaker 1: it's memorable if and you know, there's a whole narrative 673 00:41:13,560 --> 00:41:16,719 Speaker 1: aspect that that humans love stories not data, and so 674 00:41:16,800 --> 00:41:20,279 Speaker 1: if you could tell a really good story about something um, 675 00:41:21,200 --> 00:41:24,880 Speaker 1: it resonates, it's memorable, it it rationalizes the decision. And 676 00:41:25,040 --> 00:41:30,360 Speaker 1: a ticker that follows that narrative story is the cherry 677 00:41:30,400 --> 00:41:34,000 Speaker 1: on top of the Sunday. And it's I hate to say, 678 00:41:34,080 --> 00:41:36,160 Speaker 1: we go through all this, all this math and all 679 00:41:36,200 --> 00:41:38,600 Speaker 1: this thinking about diversification and how do we keep our 680 00:41:38,640 --> 00:41:40,960 Speaker 1: costs low and how do we make sure people's behavior 681 00:41:41,080 --> 00:41:42,920 Speaker 1: is good and blah blah blah, and then it's like, 682 00:41:43,360 --> 00:41:45,440 Speaker 1: but if you could tell a good story and have 683 00:41:45,480 --> 00:41:47,560 Speaker 1: a good ticker, all that stuff goes out the window. 684 00:41:48,000 --> 00:41:53,480 Speaker 1: And that is really human investing in a nutshet. Thank 685 00:41:53,480 --> 00:41:55,360 Speaker 1: you so much, Thank you guys for having me. This 686 00:41:55,480 --> 00:42:03,799 Speaker 1: has been directed. Thanks for listening to trillions. Until next time. 687 00:42:04,040 --> 00:42:06,759 Speaker 1: You can find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, 688 00:42:07,160 --> 00:42:10,640 Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, and wherever else you like to listen. We'd 689 00:42:10,680 --> 00:42:14,359 Speaker 1: love to hear from you. We're on Twitter. He's at 690 00:42:14,520 --> 00:42:21,040 Speaker 1: Ritholtz R I T h O L t Z, I'm 691 00:42:21,200 --> 00:42:26,880 Speaker 1: at Joel Webber Show, Derek's at Eric Falchis. Trillions is 692 00:42:26,920 --> 00:42:30,600 Speaker 1: produced by Magnus Hendrickson. Francesca Levy is the head of 693 00:42:30,640 --> 00:42:32,719 Speaker 1: Bloomberg podcast Bye