Speaker 1: Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.
Speaker 2: Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind listener mail.
Speaker 2: My name is Robert Lamb.
Speaker 3: And my name is Joe McCormick. And it's Monday, the
Speaker 3: day of each week we read back some messages from
Speaker 3: the mail bag. We've gotten a lot of good responses
Speaker 3: recently to our series on childhood amnesia to recent Weird
Speaker 3: House Cinema episodes. But before we get into all that, Rob,
Speaker 3: do you want to read this message we got from
Speaker 3: Chandra Shekhar about the artifact episode you did on the
Speaker 3: origins of the Pinata.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, and by the way, this is not the individual's
Speaker 2: full name. We just had to double check that off
Speaker 2: my care Anyway, they write in and say hello, gentlemen,
Speaker 2: thanks for the fantastic podcast. I was listening to the
Speaker 2: latest episode and when you read through the listener mail
Speaker 2: about the Philippines and the Pinata, it occurred to me
Speaker 2: that we have something similar in India too. Jean mash
Speaker 2: Tommy is the birthday of a Hindu hero god Krishan.
Speaker 2: He's widely known and one of the most popular gods,
Speaker 2: considering he spoke the Ghita Bagavad Gita closely translates to
Speaker 2: sayings of the God, where Bagavon equals God and ghita
Speaker 2: equals speech. On his birthday, one of the widely celebrated
Speaker 2: traditions is to crack open a pot tied onto a
Speaker 2: vertical pulley system. It is a game where the striker
Speaker 2: has a stick and they run up and jump to
Speaker 2: hit the pot. Simultaneously, the pot is hoisted up on
Speaker 2: the pulley by other players, making it go out of reach.
Speaker 2: The game continues until a striker breaks the pot, which
Speaker 2: is filled with butter, coconut water, honey, and all the
Speaker 2: delicious stuff. In other traditions of Hinduism, people form giant
Speaker 2: human pyramids to reach the pot that is held high
Speaker 2: up in the sky by a crane or some other contraption.
Speaker 2: And I bet you there are a hundred or even
Speaker 2: more ways. This same tradition is celebrated across India and
Speaker 2: the surrounding countries. Something you might find interesting. I would
Speaker 2: gladly listen to you to go down that rabbit hole
Speaker 2: and experience our beautiful culture spiral out.
Speaker 3: Really interesting. I'd never heard of this before. Thanks, thanks
Speaker 3: for sending this. Yeah, all right, so we got a
Speaker 3: lot of messages in response to our series on childhood amnesia.
Speaker 3: A lot of people wanted to share their earliest memories
Speaker 3: or memories that they think make have come from before
Speaker 3: they were three years old. Let's see. We certainly can't
Speaker 3: feature all of the ones we've gotten already on this episode,
Speaker 3: but we'll plow through as many as we can. So
Speaker 3: I'm going to start with this message from longtime correspondent
Speaker 3: Jim in New Jersey.
Speaker 2: Ah.
Speaker 3: Yes, Jim says, Robert and Joe, Some of my first
Speaker 3: memories involved seeing Mary Poppins in the theater in its
Speaker 3: original release. According to my mom, it was the weekend
Speaker 3: after the Kennedy assassination. She and some of her friends
Speaker 3: were growing weary of the depressing TV coverage of the
Speaker 3: tragedy in Dallas, Texas, so they decided to take their
Speaker 3: kids to the movies to see Mary Poppins. Based upon
Speaker 3: my mother's story, this would put my earliest memories before
Speaker 3: two and a half years. Kennedy's assassination was in November
Speaker 3: nineteen sixty three, but Mary Poppins wasn't released until August
Speaker 3: nineteen sixty four, about nine months later. My mom has
Speaker 3: definitely constructed a false memory of when we saw the movie.
Speaker 3: She loves this story so much that I don't have
Speaker 3: the heart to correct her. This place is my Mary
Speaker 3: Poppins memory at a bit after age three, which is
Speaker 3: a much more common age for early memory acquisitions. Once
Speaker 3: I realized the timeline disconnect, I tried to find what
Speaker 3: movie the moms could have taken the kids to see
Speaker 3: on that weekend. I was unable to find any Disney
Speaker 3: or family based movies that seem to fit the bill.
Speaker 3: The actual events are still a mystery to me, but
Speaker 3: I'm not curious enough to shatter my mother's memory by
Speaker 3: asking her. Jim.
Speaker 2: This is interesting because it brings to mind, just in general,
Speaker 2: earliest memories of films seen, because they occupy kind of
Speaker 2: an interesting place. Because on one hand, they are milestone events,
Speaker 2: you know, the first time you take a child to
Speaker 2: a movie theater, your first, your earliest cinema experiences. These
Speaker 2: are notable. They also can be attached to a timeline
Speaker 2: and can be fact checked to some degree. But the
Speaker 2: other interesting thing about them is that they seem highly
Speaker 2: susceptible to reinterpretation based on later viewings of the films.
Speaker 2: You know, like I think back on the movies that
Speaker 2: I know I saw at an early age, and it's
Speaker 2: very easy to sort of build a false memory of
Speaker 2: what that would be like because unlike other things in life,
Speaker 2: like the movie is largely unchanged. You can account for,
Speaker 2: you know, changes in film quality and cuts and so forth,
Speaker 2: but for the most part, like Mary Poppins is the same,
Speaker 2: and you can watch it now and you can get
Speaker 2: a one hundred percent accurate representation of what the movie
Speaker 2: would have been when you saw it in the theater.
Speaker 3: Of course, the interesting thing about seeing a movie is,
Speaker 3: of course it is not just the document that contributes
Speaker 3: to your experience. It's like, you know, you're what you
Speaker 3: understand going into it, the environment you saw it in,
Speaker 3: and all that stuff, especially when you're a little kid,
Speaker 3: because like when you're a little kid, you don't understand
Speaker 3: so many things about the stories told in movies. It
Speaker 3: just kind of like opens the door to all sorts
Speaker 3: of wild interpretations and associations that I think there would
Speaker 3: be less of when you're when you're an adult and
Speaker 3: you essentially perceive the machinations of a plot more straightforwardly
Speaker 3: or realistically. But also, Jim, I totally understand what you're
Speaker 3: saying about like, so, like the way your mother tells
Speaker 3: the story of when you saw Mary Poppins cannot be correct,
Speaker 3: but not wanting to, you know, go like tell her
Speaker 3: that this story that she loves remembering and sharing with
Speaker 3: the family is wrong, because I mean, I don't know
Speaker 3: what's really to be gained from that, right, So, yeah,
Speaker 3: that's weird. But it also makes you wonder why, so
Speaker 3: if this cannot be what literally happened, why did she
Speaker 3: put together that false memory? Like what is it about
Speaker 3: the experience of taking you to see Mary Poppins, which
Speaker 3: you do still remember that she came to associate with
Speaker 3: that weekend of the Kennedy assassination.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, fascinating to tease it all apart, all right.
Speaker 2: This next one comes to us from Ranata. Ranata's email
Speaker 2: is titled my earliest memories are Nightmares. One of the
Speaker 2: wondrous things about memory that I think about every day
Speaker 2: our ability to distinguish dream memories from other memories. Obviously,
Speaker 2: if I remember something totally strange and counterfactual, I will
Speaker 2: suspect it was a dream. But occasionally I do have
Speaker 2: to stop and think if a mundane work conversation was
Speaker 2: actually a real event or a dream. Yet, without fail,
Speaker 2: my brain picks up on something about dream memories that's different.
Speaker 2: It's like my brain puts that memory in a box
Speaker 2: called dreams, and if I find a memory there, it
Speaker 2: must be a dream. Like childhood amnesia, dreams seem to
Speaker 2: disappear really quickly in memory. Unless you write them down
Speaker 2: or rehearse remembering them, they get lost forever. And yet
Speaker 2: some of my earliest memories are dreams and in fact nightmares. Joe,
Speaker 2: you talked about a feeling of nostalgia that isn't like
Speaker 2: nostalgia from a toy or a moment, but more like
Speaker 2: being taken back to a specific emotional state of childhood.
Speaker 2: That's how I feel about marbles due to one of
Speaker 2: my earliest nightmares, which happened when my father had an
Speaker 2: exotic fish tank. He put marbles in the tank as decoration,
Speaker 2: and one night I dreamt that they floated out of
Speaker 2: the tank and chased me around the living room trying
Speaker 2: to bite me like pac Man.
Speaker 3: That is a really good childhood nightmare. I'm sure it
Speaker 3: must have been terrifying as a child, but yeah, the
Speaker 3: thumbs up.
Speaker 2: Now, I'm positive this was a real dream I had,
Speaker 2: and not an implanted memory, because why would anyone be
Speaker 2: telling me a story of my dream. I'm not sure
Speaker 2: I've ever told anyone this dream until now I know
Speaker 2: it must have occurred before my parents' divorce, so before
Speaker 2: the age of five. When I recall that dream, and
Speaker 2: anytime I look at a marble, I have that feeling
Speaker 2: of being transported, unfortunately not in a positive way. I
Speaker 2: don't have a phobia of marbles, but they have a
Speaker 2: sinister quality to me even now. Is it possible to
Speaker 2: implant a dream memory? I doubt it, but maybe. Plus,
Speaker 2: dreams and nightmares are bizarrely specific, so they aren't like
Speaker 2: memories of catching fireflies in a jar that could have
Speaker 2: been a more general experience. So early dreams and nightmares
Speaker 2: might be some of the earliest memories we can be
Speaker 2: sure are real memories, even though they are about things
Speaker 2: that never happened. I love the episodes about cognitive science
Speaker 2: topics best'na.
Speaker 3: Great email Ranata, so yes, as I said, I love
Speaker 3: the idea of killer marbles coming out of the fish
Speaker 3: tank attacking you like the ball from the Prisoner, except
Speaker 3: I guess they're much smaller. Yeah, I wonder about this.
Speaker 3: I mean, it is very interesting the way that we
Speaker 3: we have a tendency to really rapidly forget dreams. I mean,
Speaker 3: even on the course of minutes after waking, they can
Speaker 3: become hard to recall. In fact, I almost seem to
Speaker 3: remember that we've read hypotheses before about why that would be,
Speaker 3: but I don't actually remember what the proposed answers are now.
Speaker 3: But yeah, that is very interesting that we tend to
Speaker 3: forget them so fast. But there are some that really stick,
Speaker 3: and I would tend to think that those are the
Speaker 3: ones that, much like our earliest childhood memories, that we
Speaker 3: are likely to remember. They're the ones that we rehearse
Speaker 3: the most often, with the paradox being that by coming
Speaker 3: back to them and dwelling on them and thinking about
Speaker 3: them and talking about them more often, it's also more
Speaker 3: likely they are changing over time, and so we don't
Speaker 3: remember them actually the same way we did the first
Speaker 3: time we remembered them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this is a great topic though, because I know,
Speaker 2: in my case, there are nightmares I remember from my
Speaker 2: early childhood from time periods where I really probably don't
Speaker 2: remember much else around them, you know, I mean, there
Speaker 2: are other scattered memories but when you start lining them up,
Speaker 2: it's like, how many memories do I have from this
Speaker 2: year of my life? And and how how how many
Speaker 2: of them are our dreams and how many are reality?
Speaker 2: You know, like, what would be the percentile there? It's
Speaker 2: probably kind of telling Granada thanks for writing in. That's
Speaker 2: that's a twofer. We get an earliest memory and an
Speaker 2: account of a dream, okay.
Speaker 3: We also ask people, you know, if they have memories
Speaker 3: from before the typical threshold of about three years that's
Speaker 3: coming for most people, if they believe they have memories
Speaker 3: from before this period. With the caveat that, in most
Speaker 3: cases it's hard to verify whether these are real memories
Speaker 3: or later confabulations that now feel like memories. It's often
Speaker 3: hard to know for sure. But we did want to
Speaker 3: hear from people, and so we heard from Lindsey, who said, Hello,
Speaker 3: I often think about what it means to be alive
Speaker 3: but not remember, especially as an infant. So your latest
Speaker 3: show before you could remember part one was right up
Speaker 3: my alley. My earliest memory has to be when I
Speaker 3: was about fifteen months old. I know it's not from
Speaker 3: a photo or anything because of the way I remember it,
Speaker 3: although I did see a photo later to confirm that
Speaker 3: what I remembered was actually an event that happened. My
Speaker 3: great grandmother was in a nursing home until she died
Speaker 3: in April nineteen eighty six. In April nineteen eighty five,
Speaker 3: my great aunt took her out and brought her home
Speaker 3: for Passover slash Easter dinner. We didn't do a traditional Satyr,
Speaker 3: but had a meal that conformed with being Kosher four Passover,
Speaker 3: while also celebrating Easter for my dad, who was Catholic
Speaker 3: close parentheses. The memory I have is my great grandmother
Speaker 3: sitting in her wheelchair at the end of the table
Speaker 3: set up in my great aunt's living room. I'm taken
Speaker 3: out of my high chair and placed on her lap,
Speaker 3: sit there for a bit, and then clamber down to
Speaker 3: toddle over to the window. I remember walking up to
Speaker 3: the window and looking out because she had a very
Speaker 3: large picture window that went almost floor to ceiling, so
Speaker 3: the ledge of it was perfect for a toddler to
Speaker 3: lean on. The confirmation came from a photo taken of
Speaker 3: me sitting on my great grandmother's lap and looking at
Speaker 3: the camera. I saw this photo years later as a
Speaker 3: child of seven or eight, and I told my mother
Speaker 3: that I remembered my great grandmother being at dinner, but
Speaker 3: I didn't remember having a picture taken of us. She said,
Speaker 3: this was the only time my great grandmother had been
Speaker 3: home like this since she was in the nursing home,
Speaker 3: so it would have in a very special time all around,
Speaker 3: and that's why the photo of us was taken. Perhaps
Speaker 3: this contributed to me being able to remember it since
Speaker 3: it was a novel event. I am looking forward to
Speaker 3: hearing the other parts of the series. Sincerely, Lindsey. Yeah,
Speaker 3: I guess this would connect to research we talked about,
Speaker 3: I think in part two of the series, where you
Speaker 3: know there there is maybe some connection between the the
Speaker 3: richness or novelty of new declarative memories and one's ability
Speaker 3: to remember them from an early age, especially if they
Speaker 3: get rehearsed in the mind or in conversation as time
Speaker 3: goes on.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Now, for the sake of argument, it is interesting
Speaker 2: that this is a this is a memory of remembering, yes,
Speaker 2: and it's and there's also media involved in the stirring
Speaker 2: of that that memory. So there's there's a lot going
Speaker 2: on there that could you know, you can you can
Speaker 2: imagine where at a young age, you see this picture
Speaker 2: of yourself and you may be you know, encouraged to
Speaker 2: remember what is in the picture, or you may you know,
Speaker 2: create that memory based on the photographic evidence you're presented with,
Speaker 2: and then later as you remember that act of remembering,
Speaker 2: like you access the created memory of the thing. You know.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's totally true. Now again, of course, Lindsay, we're
Speaker 3: not telling you your memory is wrong. You don't actually
Speaker 3: remember that, but it's it is the thing that we
Speaker 3: all have to face about. Like, it's hard to know
Speaker 3: because if the memory were not real, it would still feel.
Speaker 2: Real, right, And this would be a case too of
Speaker 2: if this is a created memory, well then you have
Speaker 2: over time created a memory of value then and this, yeah,
Speaker 2: this is you know, it's not only harmless, it's it's beneficial.
Speaker 2: So like, yeah, why not embrace it totally? So thank you, Lindsey.
Speaker 2: All Right, This next one comes to us from Scott.
Speaker 2: Scott says, Hi, Robert and Joe, regarding your recent episode
Speaker 2: on childhood, amnesia and memory. I have an interesting first
Speaker 2: memory for you, as it is precisely of a moment
Speaker 2: of realizing I lacked certain kinds of previous memories I
Speaker 2: was always a precocious child, reading Doctor Seuss before the
Speaker 2: age of three, according to my parents, and having an
Speaker 2: early vivid imagination and interest in science and philosophy, which
Speaker 2: may help to explain the following event in my life.
Speaker 2: When I was about three years old in our central
Speaker 2: Minnesota home, I woke up in my bed in the
Speaker 2: middle of the night and had the strange feeling of
Speaker 2: never having been there before, or for that matter, having
Speaker 2: been anywhere before. What struck me as most puzzling was
Speaker 2: that I knew exactly where my room was in the house,
Speaker 2: where my parents' room was, and so forth. I was
Speaker 2: especially fixated on the fact that I knew where certain
Speaker 2: trees were in our front yard, though it was night
Speaker 2: and I wasn't even facing that way, so I couldn't
Speaker 2: see them. How then, I wondered, did I know these things?
Speaker 2: I walked to my parents' room and woke them up,
Speaker 2: explaining this experience as best I could by saying I
Speaker 2: just appeared in my bed. They didn't understand, so I elaborated,
Speaker 2: you know how a magician can make a rabbit disappear, Well,
Speaker 2: I just appeared. They still didn't understand, and how could
Speaker 2: they for I surely didn't understand it either, and gently
Speaker 2: put me back to bed. I have long interpreted this
Speaker 2: as being my first or very first, persistent awareness of myself.
Speaker 2: I had earlier memories of the house and the trees,
Speaker 2: et cetera. I even have a very distinct early memory
Speaker 2: of living temporarily in a relative's basement a few blocks
Speaker 2: away before we moved into this particular house, when I
Speaker 2: was only two years old, and my older sister and
Speaker 2: I were put to bed with raggedy ann and andy dolls,
Speaker 2: the scenario my parents later confirmed. But perhaps my earlier
Speaker 2: awareness was only of these various external objects, and it
Speaker 2: was only after months in the newer house that I
Speaker 2: became abruptly aware in some deeper and persistent sense of
Speaker 2: myself as a being in that world. My cousin reported
Speaker 2: a memory of a similar experience he had outside during
Speaker 2: the daytime of Oh here I am, But most others
Speaker 2: I have related it to, including a few psychologists, were
Speaker 2: unfamiliar with any similar reports and could shed no light
Speaker 2: on it. But surely other people have had or can
Speaker 2: remember similar experiences, So I wish this phenomenon could get
Speaker 2: more attention.
Speaker 3: Scott, that's very interesting. So the idea is that you
Speaker 3: suddenly became aware of yourself as as a subject independent
Speaker 3: from the world.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's interesting. I don't know that I have anything
Speaker 2: like that. I think I was just watching I watched
Speaker 2: TV instead.
Speaker 3: One way in which I can definitely relate to this
Speaker 3: is that I distinctly recall a feeling when I was
Speaker 3: a young child of having not exactly this realization, but
Speaker 3: lots of realizations that seemed to me incredibly profound, but
Speaker 3: not in a way that I could explain to anybody else,
Speaker 3: in the same way that realizations that people believe they
Speaker 3: have while on psychedelic drugs often are that there's like
Speaker 3: an ineffability of the profundity of your realizations, Like you
Speaker 3: try to put into words and it just doesn't sound
Speaker 3: all that interesting or compelling to somebody else, But like
Speaker 3: in the moment, it feels like you have stumbled across
Speaker 3: some type of truth that is earthshaking, and that truth
Speaker 3: might be the question of like why am I me
Speaker 3: when I could have been somebody else. I remember having
Speaker 3: that thought.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, this were there but for fortune moments,
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, it can be quite even you know today,
Speaker 2: when when you really stop and engage with those thoughts
Speaker 2: that it can be quite overwhelming.
Speaker 3: Okay, we're going to do a message about Weird House
Speaker 3: Cinema and then close things up.
Speaker 2: Yes, please read Lurch's email.
Speaker 3: Okay, Lurch says, subject line Weird House definitive explanation. Maybe so,
Speaker 3: this I think is related to our questions about the
Speaker 3: bird Eye Gordon movie Attack of the Puppet People. We
Speaker 3: were a little bit shaky on the title there, since
Speaker 3: the people in the movie who seem to be referred
Speaker 3: to as the puppet people in the title people Will
Speaker 3: Get Shrunk do not attack anyone except a literal, inanimate puppet.
Speaker 3: So I don't know, kind of confusing there, But Lurch says,
Speaker 3: good morning, gentlemen. After a brief hiatus, I'm binging stuff
Speaker 3: to blow your mind and just finish the Weird House
Speaker 3: episode covering Bert Eye Gordon's Attack of the Puppet People.
Speaker 3: I suggest the title is actually more accurate than you
Speaker 3: might think, though, I'm guessing the bulls Eye either ended
Speaker 3: up on the cutting room floor or came up a
Speaker 3: victim of a script rewrite. I'm betting the ladder, knowing
Speaker 3: what little I know of the divine Gordon's habits. Besides,
Speaker 3: if it's the former, my flight of fancy crashes on takeoff.
Speaker 3: So if you squint just a little and hold your
Speaker 3: tongue over your right lower molar, you can accept that
Speaker 3: mister Franz, the villain of the movie, as a puppeteer,
Speaker 3: could readily be considered a puppet person. Okay, assume a
Speaker 3: rewrite changed his old colleague to a past friend from
Speaker 3: a current collaborat. Thus you have the requisite plurality to
Speaker 3: justify the collective people in the title. There's no question
Speaker 3: mister Franz attacks his various victims. Of course, the title
Speaker 3: allows for this twofold interpretation, which seems to me to
Speaker 3: be a relatively common device from the era, especially when
Speaker 3: considering movies from Gordon or Corman for Indie Roger. Okay,
Speaker 3: so I think I see what Lurg is saying here
Speaker 3: that if there was an earlier version of the movie
Speaker 3: in which mister Franz was currently a puppeteer like his
Speaker 3: friend Amiel, they were both puppeteers, and they were both
Speaker 3: turning people into puppets, maybe to I don't know, use
Speaker 3: in their puppet shows or something like that, they would
Speaker 3: be the puppet people as in The Puppet Masters turning
Speaker 3: people into puppets, in which case they're obviously attacking people.
Speaker 3: It's not you know, there's no ambiguity there. Okay, Lurch
Speaker 3: goes on on another note, I'm glad one of your
Speaker 3: other listeners mentioned Ringo, Starr and Caveman. I actually saw
Speaker 3: this in a theater and it's been a guilty pleasure
Speaker 3: ever since. I've been compiling a small list of movie suggestions,
Speaker 3: and Caveman is right at the top, even above the
Speaker 3: happiness of the Katakuris. The list of actors is surprising.
Speaker 3: You mentioned Ringo, Dennis Quaid, and Barbara Bach, who is
Speaker 3: dumped by Ringo's character in the movie but married to
Speaker 3: him in real life. There's Shelley Long, Jack Guilford, John mattushak,
Speaker 3: Evan Kim dot dot. What's not to like? This does
Speaker 3: bring me to another guilty pleasure. Besides monster movies, I
Speaker 3: love utterly silly spy movies. James Bond is okay, But
Speaker 3: when Derek Flint, James Coburn, Matt Helm, Dean Martin, or
Speaker 3: Modesty Blaze Monica Viti are on, I'm parked on the
Speaker 3: couch wishing I could teach my dog to get me
Speaker 3: a soda and chips. I'm not sure if they strictly
Speaker 3: fit your weird house criteria, but they do fit mine.
Speaker 3: Keep your eyes on the road, your foot on the floor,
Speaker 3: and your gravy warm regards lurch ah.
Speaker 2: Oh, there's a lot of good stuff too to discuss there.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure what to make about the puppet people argument.
Speaker 2: I guess I can see, I can I have. It's
Speaker 2: a valid hypothesis as far as Ringo Star's Caveman goes. Yeah,
Speaker 2: my curiosity is is perked. And I don't know, in
Speaker 2: terms of spy movies, it would be neat for us
Speaker 2: to do a proper spy movie. I don't know that
Speaker 2: we've done a real, even a groovy, weird spy movie.
Speaker 2: And there that's the thing. There are plenty of weird
Speaker 2: spy movies out there. I mean, even the James Bond
Speaker 2: franchise gets weird enough for us with films like Moonraker.
Speaker 3: I think we could do Moonraker, or we could do
Speaker 3: maybe one of the Bava spy movies like Danger, Diabolic
Speaker 3: or something.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know, have nothing else. It's going to be
Speaker 2: a colorful affair, all right. Well, thanks for writing in lurch,
Speaker 2: and yeah, let us know if any other films than
Speaker 2: genres come to mind. And in the meantime, if you
Speaker 2: want to catch up on listener mail episodes, well those
Speaker 2: are on Mondays and the Stuff to Wild Mind podcast
Speaker 2: feed Core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays, Artifact on Snster
Speaker 2: Effect on Wednesdays, and on Friday, we set aside most
Speaker 2: serious concerns to just talk about a weird film on
Speaker 2: Weird House Cinema.
Speaker 3: Huge thanks to our audio producer JJ Posway. If you
Speaker 3: would like to get in touch with us with feedback
Speaker 3: on this episode or any other, to suggest a topic
Speaker 3: for the future, or just to say hello, you can
Speaker 3: email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind
Speaker 3: dot com.
Speaker 1: Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For
Speaker 1: more podcasts from heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
Speaker 1: or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.