WEBVTT - Legally Brunette: Todd & Julie Chrisley

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Hi, guys, Welcome to another episode of Legally Brunette. I

0:00:04.640 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>will be your host today Emily Simpson with my sidekick

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Jane Just Shane. We want to give you a little

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>update first of all, on the Lively and Baldoni case.

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>We haven't talked about it for a while because it

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>hasn't had a lot going on. You know, they go

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to trial in March of twenty twenty six. However, there

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>have been some interesting things that have happened lately. So

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Blake Lively has dropped the emotional distress claims against Justin Baldoni.

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>So I was reading about this yesterday and it was

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of difficult to follow for me to actually

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>put a timeline together of what happened. But here's the

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>way I understand it. A few days ago, there was

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a teleconference between both sides, which is normal when you're

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in active litigation. Right, So you've got both sides, You've

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>got Baldoni's team, You've got Blake Lively's team, they have

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a teleconference. I guess there was a conversation that had

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to do with these emotional distress claims. There's an intentional

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>infliction of emotional distress and a negligent emotional distress claim

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>on Blake Lively's side against Justin Baldoni. And apparently during

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this teleconference there was a conversation where Lively's attorneys had

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>suggested that they were going to drop those claims now

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>after Apparently immediately after this conference between the attorneys, Justin

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Baldoni's attorney, Brian Friedman files emotion to compel her like

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>therapy notes or doctors against who against Blake Lively. Basically,

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the way I understand it is they're like, Okay, we're

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>going to.

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Drop these claims of distress.

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>So she's going to drop the claims of distress. Brian

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Friedman then files a motion to compel basically stating that

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>she's dropping those claims in order to not comply with

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>their discovery requests of medical records or therapy notes.

0:01:56.000 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 2>A medical records. That's my guess. My guess is Lively's

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 2>team was like, oh, we're going to have to provide

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 2>all these medical records or conversations or anything to.

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Show that there was some type of emotional distress distress.

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 2>And then they're and they're like, okay, Lively, can can

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 2>you start forwarding those documents? And then She's like, I

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 2>never went to the doctor. I didn't do anything because

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I was not Yeah, I have some texts with Taylor

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Swift where I was complaining, but I don't have anything else.

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 2>So they were probably like, then you don't have a

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 2>defense or a complaint. You can't you know, succeed on

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 2>this claim.

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, then so the judge dismisses the motion to

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.679
<v Speaker 1>compel because the judge is like, look, they said they're

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>going to drop these claims, and they did dismiss them,

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and so why are you filing a motion to compel?

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And then obviously Blake Lively's team says the only reason

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that Brian Friedman filed a motion to compel was for

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>what reason?

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, it would be probably to get her to not

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 2>comply and then maybe publicly it would look bad.

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Right he did. They claim it's a press stunt, you know,

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a dumb press seeking another round of press coverage.

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know about that. That sounds because he's

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 2>clearly experienced where if the claim is dropped, why would

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 2>you want to pursue discovery at a claim that's dropped.

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I guess his thinking was, Okay, they're just trying

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to avoid our discovery requests, so let's do a motion

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to compel. But really, you know Brian Friedman's He's excellent

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>at working the.

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 2>No I know, so I'm putting my trust in him.

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying, seeing the order of events, it sounds

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 2>like it was poorly executed, but time will tell, and

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure he knows what he's doing.

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>So Baldoni's side argued that Lively couldn't have it both

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>ways by making claims of emotional harm while also withholding

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>supporting records like medical records. In response, Lively's attorneys dismissed

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the request as a publicity stunt, as reported, and this

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>was an entertainment weekly. Actually it was an entertainment weekly.

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>But then I read several other articles because everybody jumps

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>on and starts writing about it. Also, I thought it

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting that Blake Lively's side consistently argues that

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>everything Brian Friedman does as a publicity stunt. But let's

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>not forget about the facts.

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's not forget about Lively and Reynolds and their lifestyle

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 2>as we.

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Go back in time. If you remember, the original complaint

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.559
<v Speaker 1>filed by Blake Lively's team was on December twentieth, twenty

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, and The New York Times published a report

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and published the filing on December twenty first, twenty twenty four.

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 1>So it was it's very I mean, it's easy to

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>see that they colluded with the New York Times, So it.

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't everything they do with publicity stunt, I believe.

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>So. So anyway, I also found it interesting that the

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>judge who is to judge Lewis J. Lyman, formally ruled

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that Lively's emotional distress claims were no longer part of

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit. Baldoni's motion to compel was denied on the

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>grounds that Lively had already agreed to withdraw the claims.

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, I know, yeah, he meant to drop the claims.

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 2>Was informal.

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>It was on that it was on the teleconference, so

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it was an.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Informal right, So he probably thought, I'm going to file

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the motion and compel, and I'm going to keep pursuing

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 2>my defense until you actually drop it. Yeah, So he

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 2>probably filed the motion to compel to keep the momentum

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 2>and to make.

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Sure that they actually dismissed the claim.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 2>I told you, I trust him.

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's a good attorney. I told you anytime, if

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm ever in trouble, who's the first call. It's quite

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Brian Friedman, It's my first call. Judge Lyman also directed

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>both parties to reach This is where it's going to

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>get interesting. He directed both parties to reach a mutual

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>agreement together on whether the dismissed claims would be permanent

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>with prejudice or allow for possible refiling later, which is

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>without prejudice. Regardless, the judgement clear that Lively would not

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>be allowed to introduce any evidence related to emotional distress

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>going forward because the claims have been officially dropped from

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>her filing. Lively's team responded to the ruling by calling

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Baldoni's motion completely unnecessary and framing the court's decision as

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a favorable outcome for their site. They always do that.

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>They always take every decision this judge makes and they

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>turn it around into some favorable like some big win

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>for them. So it's it's always.

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Like, so, what was this big win was that it's

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 2>dropped without prejudice?

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>No, it's he did he didn't. He told them that

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>they have to figure out together whether the claims are dropped.

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>With prejudice or without. So what do you think is

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>going to happen there? You think they're going to happen.

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh, they're not going to agree. Neither party is going

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 2>to Neither.

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Party is going to agree to that.

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 2>Let's explain what with prejudice and without prejudice means.

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so both of the emotional emotional distress claims have

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>been dropped. However, Lively's team is going to want them

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>dropped without prejudice. Now you explain what that means.

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what it means. I'm just kidding you too.

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Know what it means. If it's dropped with prejudice, that's

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the equivalent or close to a judgment in favor of

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 2>right or it's it's as if the judge ruled on

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 2>it and they're it cannot be brought up. It cannot

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 2>be brought up without prejudice means it's just a procedural thing.

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 2>We dropped it, but you can still pursue it at

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 2>a later date if you wish exactly so, then with

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 2>that case, Baldoni would want it with prejudice, so that

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 2>way it cannot be brought up again. And then of

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 2>course Likely's team will want it without prejudice, and I

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 2>think it should be without without knowing much more, it

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 2>should be without prejudice because the judge didn't review anything

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 2>really not in detail.

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>No, but I mean that's where I mean. The judge

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is basically like, Okay, you guys work it out together

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and figure out if it's with prejudice or without, and

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you think these two sides are going to be able.

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>That's very black and white. This isn't a gray area

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>where they can compromise and come up with something. There's

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>no middle ground on this. So I good luck with

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>those two deciding with or without prejudice.

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 2>So it'll allow for another update next week.

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It'll allow for more letters from Brian Friedman and more

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>updates from US and more updates from US. All right,

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>let's move on to Ditty Diddy. I thought it was

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting that there was some testimony and Diddy that was

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting this week. First of all, they called Eddie Garcia

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to the stand, who was a security supervisor at the

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>La hotel where Combs attacked Cassie back in twenty sixteen. Now,

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Eddie Garcia receives complete immunity to testify because when you

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>hear his testimony he clearly was involved in bribery an

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>obstruction of.

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Justice, so he was offered immunity because you're thinking, well,

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 2>witness should just testify if but he committed crimes right

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 2>by taking a bribery and whatnot. Yeah, I mean, so

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 2>he didn't.

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>He's going to perjure himself in the federal court.

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 2>So he would just plead the fifth which is I'm

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 2>not going to be able to answer these questions because

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 2>it would be self incriminating. So they're saying, well, we

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 2>want his testimony because we want to go for the

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 2>bigger fish exactly, and so we'll grant you immunity and

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 2>then you can freely speak as to what took place

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:56.839
<v Speaker 2>and keep your money.

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, keep your money. So Eddie Garcia takes a stand

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and testifies that he and two other employees at the

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>hotel received a lump sum of one hundred thousand dollars

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in cash from Combs to keep the video surveillance under wraps.

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is how it worked out. First of all,

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>he gets a phone call I think the evening after

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>this incident happened on his work phone, and it was

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Ditty's assistant. Her name is Christina Korum and she reaches

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>out to Eddie Garcia and says, hey, like, we would

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>like the video, and he basically tells her the only

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>way you can get it is you have to speak

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to higher than me or you have to subpoena. So

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>she gets nowhere. Then she makes a personal visit to

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>him at the hotel and she wants the video. And

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>this is all clearly under the direction of Ditty and

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>she makes it.

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 2>So she goes to the hotel she wants she wants

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 2>like the original copy to destroy it.

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So she goes to the hotel.

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Like this guy didn't make copies on his phone and

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 2>show his friend and so I don't know it until

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 2>you can pull it out.

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So she makes a personal visit at the hotel,

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>speaks with Eddie Garcia, doesn't get anywhere again, and then

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess off the record. He tells her that the

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>video is pretty bad. So then she goes back and

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>then later on he gets a third phone call on

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>his personal cell phone. I don't know how they got

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a cell phone number, but they got a cell phone

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>number somehow. She gets on the phone with him again.

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>She puts Ditty on the phone this time and he

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>testifies that Ditty is nervous during this phone call. He's stuttering.

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>He's saying, hey, man, you know I'll take care of you.

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>How can I get a copy of this video I

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>need to destroy. It's going to ruin my life. And

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you know I'll take care of you, which he testifies

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that he understands that I'll take care of you. Is

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you know I'll hook you up, I'll get you.

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 2>You're on the party list, but you're gonna you are

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 2>now a lifetime supply baby oil.

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>For you, sir, Yes, you get a Costco membership baby oil.

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Costco doesn't sell baby oil. It's for freak out.

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's right, that's right, that's right. We established that.

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>So then they meet at so I guess. So he

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>agrees to it, right, I guess. He goes back to

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>his boss, who security his boss and says the boss says, okay,

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>ask him for fifty grand. So he tells Ditty, okay,

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you the tape for fifty grand. He shows

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>up at some building to meet Ditty and his assistant

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in security. Security takes him up to a room. They

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>make him sign an NDA, a confidentiality agreement, basically stating

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that there's no other videos that it's been destroyed, that

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>he is the only one. He's handing it over.

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Clearly, Okay, keep going.

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>And if he breaches this agreement, this NDA that he's signing,

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that he's gonna, you know, be in breach for a million.

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Dollars up and he might kill right.

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's any in writing, but I'm sure

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that's implied in the contract. But what is in writing

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is that he would owe a million dollars back. So

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:50.839
<v Speaker 1>basically it's I mean, the guy makes ten dollars an hour,

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifty an.

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Hour, so he making that up? Are you really no?

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I read that. I read that he made that he

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>was a security guard. He was making ten dollars and

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty cents an hour. This is back in twenty sixteen, and.

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:04.719
<v Speaker 2>That so how did the tape because obviously it wasn't

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 2>the only copy.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's just finish this. So he goes to the hotel,

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>he hands over the video that he has, He signs

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the NDA, the confidentiality a confidentiality agreement. Combs comes out,

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>brings him one hundred thousand dollars in cash. Actually, he

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>counts the money on a money counter at first.

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Because that's what that's what criminals do. Yeah, they have

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 2>money counters, Yeah they do.

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>They have I don't have one. Do you have one?

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't either. So he brings out a money counter,

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>he cash. He counts one hundred thousand in cash in

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 1>front of him. He says, do you want to count it?

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>And he's like no, you know, I trust the money counter.

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So he puts one hundred thousand dollars in a bag

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and gives it to him. He leaves, He goes back.

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>He gives fifty grand to his boss, He gives twenty

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to another security guard that also witnessed the tape, and

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>he gives thirty thousand to himself.

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 2>This guy's too honest. He should have well, first of all,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 2>he should have said I only got fifty like you asked,

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 2>and then he keeps the fifty for himself and then

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 2>he just the other fifty, right.

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But so anyway, well he's an honest man.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 2>He's an honest recipient of bribes.

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so he ends up. Oh and also did he

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>tells him like, don't go make a big purchase, right,

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>So he's warning at like, you know, avoid tax fraud

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and everything else. He uses a thirty thousand to buy

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>himself a used car in cash. So I guess it

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't ever show up anywhere. It doesn't look suspicious.

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Apparently, why did he did he give him a tip of.

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I probably because he's just so happy the guys show.

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the guy's a billionaire. One hundred thousand's like

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>if I found a quarter in my pocket, So I

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>think he's or a nickel thank you. I think he's

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>just it's just so he's so happy as static. This

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>guy showed up in hands over the video, right. So anyway,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>apparently there was another security guard that worked that night

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that ended up making a video on his phone so

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>he can show it to his wife. I couldn't find

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I looked for articles or anything that connected it to

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>being in the footage that was eventually that CNN got

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>ahold of. So I'm assuming that's where the breach took place.

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, clearly, if he could have sold it

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 2>more to the media. For more to the media, I

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know what media pays well, I.

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Don't know, but here's where he went wrong. He could

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have gotten way more than one hundred thousand dollars from Diddy.

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Like this guy, I don't know, because if it's too

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 2>if he was being too greedy, then his car might

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 2>have blown up. And oh, so you're saying he just

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't negotiate with mobs and murderers.

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you don't know. All right, Well, then I

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>thought it was interesting that he testified that. Then Shawn

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Combs called him on Easter to wish him a happy

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Easter and call him an angel and tell him that

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>he was like a good guy and that good things

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>were going to happen to him.

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 2>And you know, the way I.

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Interpreted that, I feel like Sean Combs was being like, hey, oh.

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>He was really checking in. I don't like we're buddies.

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey, happy Easter.

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 2>So wait, when did the deal take place? That was

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Easter of the very next holiday? Like how much time

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 2>had passed it?

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, this was like March of twenty sixteen. Maybe, yeah,

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>But I thought it was interesting that it was like,

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a good Friday, happy Easter. In also there was

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's also another victim that is scheduled to testify

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that's actually today. Her name is Jane, and Jane is

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a pseudonym. And we didn't talk about this on this podcast,

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>but I did have a conversation with Aubrey o Day

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>last week, so if you want to listen to that podcast,

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you can find hers where we talked about. There was

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>another victim that testified last week and her name was Mia,

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>which was a pseudonym. Her real name isn't Mia, And

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I was saying, I understand that these witnesses come forward.

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>She talked about sexual assault, sexual abuse. She was Ditty's

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>assistant for a long time, and there were all these

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>incidents of sexual abuse and assault that she talked.

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>About against her or that she was.

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Her personally, So she had a pseudonym in Core And

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I was saying, I understand that she wants to keep

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>her identity on the download, but she's testifying in front

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of them, and testifying in court and testifying in front.

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Of the gym. The dangers people already know who she is.

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.479
<v Speaker 2>That's p Diddy here knows he's not gonna.

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Be like well, apparently she was trying to she was

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>testifying under a pseudonym to keep her name out of

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the media.

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I understand.

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he clearly knows who she is.

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I guess there's no cameras in the court room either,

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 2>So those crummy paintings.

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, But what happened is, of course someone finds out

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>her identity and there's a YouTuber.

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so hold on before you get any further. Yeah,

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I was already thinking this. When people always give a

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 2>fake name and they say not their real name, they

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 2>should just pretend that that's her real name, because if

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 2>she said my name is Mia, and she didn't say

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 2>that's my pseudonym or whatever, then this whoever would try

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 2>to search for her would keep searching for Mia and

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 2>they would never come up with her.

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you're saying they should just create a whole

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>false identity instead of instead of just declaring them, they're

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:04.120
<v Speaker 1>testifying under a pseudonym because they want to protect their identity. Well,

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>so what happened was the pseudonym and this whole, this

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>whole confidentiality that the court's trying to maintain in order

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to keep her identity under wraps did not work because

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 1>a YouTuber who was like live streaming and like talking

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>about the trial somehow knew her identity and released it.

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>And then there was a news outlet that posted her

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>identity on x So the prosecution was upset. They said

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that Jane who is someone that's also using a pseudonym,

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 1>is scheduled to testify today, and that she was nervous

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>about testifying because it had already been breached with this

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>whole mia pseudonym. Now, I tried to look for it.

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't find it, would you I was trying.

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 2>To find it.

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I looked. Yeah, I was looking for her real

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 1>identity because it had been breached, but apparently they'd scrubbed

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it pretty well. But the judge asked the prosecution to

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>draft a possible court order to bar the news outlet

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>from court. So there was a news outlet that released

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>her name on X and then.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 2>That was the need to do that. That's so stupid, I.

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know, especially when the judge made

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>it clear that this woman was testifying, you know, under

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and then then the judge the the YouTuber got kicked

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>out of court, like they're not allowed to come back,

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>but the news outlet is allowed to still be there

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>even though they released the name on X. And then

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the judge asked the prosecution to draft a possible court

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>order to bar the news outlet. I guess if they

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>draft this court order and then he rules on it,

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe he'll bar them from court. But anyway, that's people

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>not following. And also there was some I don't know

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>if you read this, but there was also some woman

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that uh uh went she went a little crazy. She

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>was inside the courtroom yesterday. Apparently she's been at court

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>every single day. Outside of the courtroom. Then she was

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in the holding area. I think she's just she's not

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a news report or anything.

0:18:58.200 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 2>She's just someone.

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes, she ended up in the courtroom yesterday and apparently

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>she started screaming.

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 2>And yelling and in whose defense.

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I tried to read what she said.

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>None of it really, I couldn't tell if she was

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 1>a fan of Ditty or she was a nut. She

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>was a nut.

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 2>She's probably at the Michael Jackson trial too.

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Probably, And they removed her from the courtroom, but they

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>did not bar her from court. She's still allowed to

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:20.959
<v Speaker 1>be in the holding area. So I didn't I was like,

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really understand that. But anyway, that is Ditty.

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>So that is an update on Blakelee, Blakely, Blakely, Blake

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Lively and Justin Baldoni, and an update on the testimony

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that's going on in Ditty. And I will say on

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>track of what happens with Jane, because I want to

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>see what she testifies too. But well, one more thing

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on Ditty. I was thinking this whole entire time we've

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>been talking about Ditty, how he's basically being tried not

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>only for well, he's being tried for RICO, which again, why.

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 2>She tells what RICO means, I mean what it stands for.

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what is RICO samsor.

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Stands for a racketeering, influence corrupt organization.

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, there's a party for you, if you're standing in

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>line to pick up your kids, you can tell everyone

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>about the Didny trial and that he's being tried under

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the federal statue to Rico, which was enacted for mobsters

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 1>because those guys at the top never actually commit any crime,

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>like al.

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Capone to get him on tax fraud before Rico, right,

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 2>but before Rico.

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>So now that there's Rico, you just have to establish

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that there's two criminal acts within a ten year time period,

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that there was a criminal enterprise, and.

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 2>The enterprise was designed to carry out the crimes.

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>And they're acting hard and they're acting on behalf of

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>or for a unified goal. Anyway, I was thinking in

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>this Ditty trial. So far, we have a lot of violence,

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and we know that he's a violent man, but are

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>we really is the prosecution doing a good job of

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>establishing that this is a criminal enterprise? And I think

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the testimony of Mia, who was under a pseudonym, was

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>not a girlfriend.

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 2>Oh she was an assistant? Was she?

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>She was an assistant? And now we have the security

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>guard with the hotel, with the bribery, So I feel

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 1>like the prosecution is now honing it.

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 2>It's becoming less of a domestic case and more of

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 2>organized or sophisticated cover ups and carry out, carrying out

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 2>further crimes, exactly paying off right, exactly.

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>At the direction of Diddy. So I think they're they're

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>doing better of establishing.

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 2>You from needing a money counter being in a cell.

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 2>That sucks.

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>That's all right, So let's go into the chrystalies. This

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>has been all over the news lately, so I feel

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 1>like we have to go down this road and talk

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>about it. So, first of all, how did Todd Julie

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Crisly first rise to fame? We know that they have

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>reality show, but I had to do some deep digging

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>because I've only seen one episode of the show. And

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna guess you've never seen them never.

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Never. I've seen them in headlines all over the place

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 2>years ago and then now again. But I don't know them.

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 2>And I was surprised they were married. Yes, yes, he

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 2>does not look like he would be married.

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't look like the marrying type.

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 2>No, let's leave it at that.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Todd Chrisly and his real estate empire. So Todd Chrislely

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>originally built his wealth in the early two thousands through

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>real estate investment and development. He ran a company called

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Chrisly Asset Management, which claimed to manage and liquidate distress properties.

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>During the housing boom, Todd made millions by flipping homes

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and investing and property. He projected an image of financial success,

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>frequently referencing lavish spending, designer clothing, upscale homes, and at

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>their peak, the Chrystlies lived in a thirty thousand square

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>foot mansion Geez and traveled extensively. In twenty fourteen, they

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>launched They Have a Counter. I'm sure they have a

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>money Counter. In twenty fourteen, they launched Chrisly No's Best

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>on the USA Network. It was a reality show portraying

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>them as wealthy, outspoken Southern family navigating parenting, business, and faith.

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>It became a hit, known for Todd's dramatic personality and

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>strict parenting. Success from the show led to spinoffs and endorsements,

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and the family made hundreds of thousands per season. Todd

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and Julia used their fame to their benefit, conducting brand deals,

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>public appearances, and even podcasting with their show Christly Confessions

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty eighteen. But along the way, there were

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>always some red flags with his family.

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 2>So the show is what put them in the spotlight.

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there were nobody's normies. Normies, yes, we now know

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the term Norman.

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, ormies.

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So there's some red flags throughout these years where

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they're building this real estate empire, and I put empire

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in quotations, enterprise, criminal, enterprise. Yes, well, so Todd filed

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>for Chapter seven bankruptcy back in twenty twelve. According to

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>court records from his bankruptcy filing, he had claimed to

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>have forty nine point four million in debt. He reported

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>just four point two million in assets and listed only

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty five dollars in a checking account and one hundred

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars in cash. His monthly expenses were more than fifty thousand,

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>including twelve thousand on clothing, six thousand on food, and

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeen thousand mortgage and written other household costs. He also

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 1>owed twelve million to Regions Bank and millions more to

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>other lenders.

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Wait, he owed twelve million, Yeah too, he found only

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 2>be four and a half million in debt.

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>No, forty nine point four million.

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Forty nine million.

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, did you miss that? That was the first thing

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I said.

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I thought you said four million.

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Forty nine point four million in debt. Fifty million dollars

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in debt.

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 2>What did he do for income before his TV show? Well,

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 2>I just told you that he Yeah, tell me again

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 2>now that it's forty nine Millionay, I want to know

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 2>what he did for work.

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>He was flipping homes, he was building, He building a

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>real estate home. Well, that's what he claims.

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 2>He opened off the banking industry, is what he was doing.

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Ran a company called Christly Asset Management where they managed

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and liquidated distress properties, and apparently allegedly he made millions

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 1>by flipping homes and investing in property. Then he files

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>for bankruptcy and he has forty nine point.

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Four million million dollars.

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, fifty million dollars.

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean he spent fifty million dollars or maybe more so.

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>During the bankruptcy process, there were allegations.

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 2>What would he spent fifty million dollars clothing? I know

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 2>it's one hundred and forty four thousand year clothing.

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>He said, cars, trips, lavish. I could spend fifty million

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a year.

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Like that, fifty million dollars.

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So during the bankruptcy process there were allegations of

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 1>concealed assets. Todd was accused of hiding income and failing

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to disclose assets, including trust and property possibly put into

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>his wife's name. Prosecutors later alleged that Todd and Julie

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>used Julie's bank accounts and other people's names to avoid

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>revealing income to the bankruptcy court and to the irs.

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>This is all leading up to their twenty nineteen federal indictment.

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So this is all going on right. Here's the way

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I understand it, and this is what I was trying

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>to read and decipher. It was, basically, from my understanding,

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:27.239
<v Speaker 1>a Ponzi scheme that had to do with loans. So

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they were taking out loans and then getting more loans

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to pay back the.

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Place, as you're saying, instead of getting investors to some

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 2>supposed snake oil, they were getting loans, helped pay back

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 2>other loans and then have more money, and they just

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 2>kept robbing Peter to pay Paul.

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Exactly allegedly, well not allegedly, I mean they were prosecuted

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>for it. So this leads to their twenty nineteen federal indictment.

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Prosecutors charged the Chrislies with one bank fraud, submitting falsified

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>documents to banks to obtain large loans. So that was

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the first part of this Ponzi scheme as I understand it.

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>First of all, in order to get all these loans,

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they had to falsified documents to make it look like

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they have more income or more assets than they do

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to get the loans.

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Second, this is why the world hates us, because people

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 2>go and get loans and spend all kinds of money

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 2>on clothes, then file bankruptcy and then thinking is walk

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 2>away right.

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Second, wire fraud using fake emails and bank records to

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>qualify for funding. Third, tax evasion not paying federal taxes

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 1>or filing returns for multiple years, and for a conspiracy

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to defraud the United States. They pled not guilty and

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>claimed that they were being framed by a former employee.

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>And this former employee also when they went to trial.

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he was convicted of three years. He was

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>like a financial advisor or something, which you told me

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>when I was telling you about this. You get sick

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of people blaming their financial advisors.

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I do as stupid. It's because they still have to

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 2>sign everything and they still need to be responsible. You

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 2>can't just hire a financial advisor to alleviate yourself and

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 2>create some veil where it's like, oh, I didn't know

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 2>he did it, not me, fifty million. You were stuck

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 2>on that fifty Yeah, I had no idea it was

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 2>fifty million dollars.

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>So then COVID comes along and delays their trial proceedings

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>from twenty twenty to twenty one.

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Flip homes and make that kind of money, so.

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>You think so you think, well, he's no. Well he

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 1>might have. He might have flipped a couple, or he

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>might have.

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 2>A couple couple, but not enough to.

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Have fifty million dollars in debt, not unless.

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 2>You falsify the loan documents.

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Well that's what they claim, and that's what they were

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>convicted of. Was falsifying loan documents. In June of twenty

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, their trial began. The prosecution's main evidence was

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>fake bank and financial documents. Julie Crisley allegedly created fake

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>fake financial documents, including falsified bank statements, fake credit reports,

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and altered financial audit letters. These were used to apply

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>for and receive over thirty million dollars in loans from

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>community and regional banks between two thousand and seven.

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 2>And they they got addicted. It was easy money, yeah,

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 2>and they just wanted more and more and more.

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>There's so other evidences, emails and text messages. Federal agents

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>recovered emails and text messages between the Chrystalies and co

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>conspirators that revealed that Julie allegedly emailed fake financial statements

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to third parties who submitted them to lenders, and Todd

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and other co conspirators discussed how to trick banks into

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>approving their loans golly.

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 2>And then when I go get like a loan for

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 2>a car, it seems like amount of paperwork, and I'm

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.719
<v Speaker 2>like trying to state my case and make it like

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.479
<v Speaker 2>I could afford it, and then these people just go

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 2>and get fifty million dollars.

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And loans and then file for bankruptcy and not pay

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>back the loans and then get more. Sorry, I think

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>they probably get more loans to pay back as many

0:29:57.880 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>loans as they can. But then when they start to

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>get to the point where it's like loans, then you

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>just file for bankruptcy and you just start over, and.

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 2>You say it's a Ponzi scheme. You know, it's called

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 2>the Ponzi scheme.

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know the history on the guy's name was Ponzi, Yeah, Charles,

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Charles Ponzi.

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in the twenties, and he was making a fortune.

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>What was what was his Ponzi?

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 2>His original business idea was valid?

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what was this? This is the twenties, the nineteen twenties.

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 2>In the twenties, he he it was there was international

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 2>stamps posted stamps that could be used to mail internationally

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 2>to other countries. Like countries got together and agreed that

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 2>this was a universal stamp. It was cheaper in Italy

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 2>the stamps. Why then, I don't know, exchange rate or something.

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 2>So he was like, hey, I'll buy the stamps there,

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I'll bring him to the States and I'll resell and

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 2>it'll be cheaper for the buyers, and I'll make a profit.

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Totally valid.

0:30:58.040 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a legitimate business plan.

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Legitimate business plan. Okay, it got out of control and

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 2>then he then he just ended up going into a

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Ponzi scheme where now he couldn't keep up with the

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 2>demand and he was just getting investors and he wasn't

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 2>actually buying the stamps, and he was paying people back

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 2>and he was then it turned into a true Ponzi scheme.

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So a true Ponzi scheme is when you have people

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>invest in something and then you just use that money

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to pay back some of your investors at the top,

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and then you just get more people and sometimes usually.

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Just pay a little bit like so, then then a

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 2>newspaper came and wrote a complaint about him that it

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 2>was a Ponzi scheme. Of course they labeled back then,

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 2>but they said it was fraud. He sued the newspaper defamation, yes,

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 2>and won five hundred thousand dollars in the twenties ties,

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 2>even though he was a crook and in that time prior,

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I think, when the media came out and said he

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 2>was a scam, he opened up his doors and said,

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I will pay all my investors back and they came

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 2>and he would pay him back with a little bit

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 2>of interest or whatever the agreement was. And then he'd

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 2>be like, see, I have money, are you sure you

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 2>wanted it back? And then they eventual he said no, no, no,

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 2>keep it, keep it, keep investing in. Yeah, and then

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 2>he won five hundred thousand dollars. And he had like

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 2>a heated pool for his mom in like the twenties

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 2>and all this like fancy home and electricity and cars,

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 2>and I think he had a permanent cabin on some

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 2>yacht for his mom that would go across the seas.

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 2>He was out of control. And then he got busted.

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>How did he finally get caught?

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 2>That I can't remember. Oh yeah, I can't remember.

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's the end of the story.

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 2>I didn't finish the book. But he didn't get caught.

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 2>He got extradited to Italy. And then Italy is supposedly

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 2>just like slapped him on the rest and said, yeah.

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>You're the bad boy.

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, don't do that again next time, don't get caught.

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, here's some pasta all right. So other further evidence

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in their original trial was testimony from a former business associate,

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a former employee Mark Braddock testified against the Chrystlies in

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>exchange for immunity. He claimed he helped Todd commit fraud

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>for years and was involved in faking documents, forging signatures,

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and submitting false applications. He also claimed they paid off

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>banks using newly fraudulently obtained loans, operating almost like a

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Ponzi scheme, which is what we talked about. And then

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>there's also evidence of spending beyond their actual income. Despite

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>claiming little to know income on taxes and bankruptcy forms,

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chrystlies spent tens of thousands monthly on luxury items,

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>paid for designer clothing, private school tuition, luxury cars, and

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:27.719
<v Speaker 1>rent for multimillion dollar homes. The prosecution highlighted this to

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.479
<v Speaker 1>show that the Chrystlies were not simply bad with money,

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that they were intentionally living beyond their means while lying

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to banks and to the government. And lastly, there was

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a pattern of concealing the income. The Chrystlies use various

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>strategies to avoid detection, including routing income through a production

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>company controlled by Julie to shield it from the IRS,

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and claiming to have little personal income while receiving thousands

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>per month via other entities.

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Losers.

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>The conviction and sentencing, the jury found them both guilty

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>on all counts in November of twenty twenty two. Todd

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>was sentenced to twelve years, Julie was sent in to

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>sentence to seven years, and both were also given sixteen

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>months of probation following their following release.

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, he had twelve years and so he got seven.

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 2>So they spent three years. Give her take what do

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 2>you mean?

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, less than three years?

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So in January of twenty twenty three, they report

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to prison. Todd reports to the Federal Prison Camp in Pensacola, Florida,

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>and Julie reports to Federal Medical Center in Lexington, Kentucky.

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So what happened to the children. At twenty five years old,

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Savannah Chrisley became the legal guardian and family spokesperson. She

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>took custody of her younger brother, Grayson, who's sixteen, and

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>niece Chloe, who was ten. And this was Todd and

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Julie's adopted granddaughter. Because Todd had two children from a

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>previous marriage, he was married before, so he's been married twice,

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>so he has two. He has two children from his

0:34:56.360 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>first marriage. He had a falling out I believe with

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the daughter, and she was kind of a strange from

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the family. I don't think she was part of the

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>reality show or anything, but I think she did offer

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>support for them publicly when they went to press.

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:11.919
<v Speaker 2>To be fair, we won't judge the family affairs because

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 2>we don't really know any Yeah, but the stealing money

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 2>is a problem, Okay, and then I'll judge all day long.

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>That you're going to judge. And he also had a

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>son from his first marriage who had Chloe, who is

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the granddaughter. And then I believe the son had some

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>substance abuse issues, so Todd and Julie adopted the granddaughter.

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 2>So they prior to going to prison.

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Prior to going to prison. Yes, she became the public

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>so we're talking about Savannah. Savannah became the public face

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of the family, frequently speaking out in interviews and on

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>her podcast Unlocked with Savannah Chrisly about the injustice she

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>believed her parents faced. She continually expressed being overwhelmed. I mean,

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>she is taking care of the kids, so I get that,

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.399
<v Speaker 1>but was committed to keeping the family together. Quote, I'm

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>helping raise two children while also dealing with the loss

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of my parents being in a way, she said in

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a twenty twenty three interview. Savannah's older brother, Chase, did

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 1>not become a legal guardian. However, he did support Savannah

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and helping with the two younger ones, Grayson and Chloe.

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>So Savannah has been the one that's been working tirelessly

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to have her parents pardon. Let's just talk about pardon

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.879
<v Speaker 1>power so that we know where that comes from. So

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the president's power to grant pardons comes from. It's outlined

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in article yes the Constitution, Article two, Section two, Clause

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 1>one of the Constitution. I like to give you guys

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:40.320
<v Speaker 1>this little bits of like interesting legal to me, it's interesting.

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I love the Constitution. I actually had a small pocket

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 1>version of the Constitution that I just had in my purse.

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean along with yeah, I would like to read

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it along with like snacks and you know, sandwiches. I

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>also have a copy of the Constitution.

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay. I never knew that this.

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Power is broad but not limitless, and it allows the

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>president to offer forgiveness and restore rights to individuals convicted

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of federal crimes. Pardon power is explicitly limited to federal

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>offenses only, not state offenses, and this means the president

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.760
<v Speaker 1>cannot pardon individuals for crimes committed under state or local laws.

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>So on May twenty seven, twenty twenty five, the presidential

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>pardon is granted. President Donald Trump issues full pardons to

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>both Todd and Julie Chrislely. The pardon cites claims of

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>unfair prosecution and procedural irregularities and the trial. The couple

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:37.359
<v Speaker 1>is released from prison having served roughly two years. All right,

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>first of all, what is your thoughts. I know we

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>were having this conversation, but you were saying you didn't

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>think that they should be pardoned. If anything, you felt

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>like their sentence should have been commuted.

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, because a pardon pretty much says you didn't do

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 2>the crime right, or you were unfairly prosecuted and you

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 2>know you shouldn't have been found guilty, or something to

0:37:56.480 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 2>that effect. I don't know. If there's there's paper trails,

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 2>it's a crime not of testimony, but of just like

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 2>their own signing documents. And I disagree based on what

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:14.720
<v Speaker 2>I know, I disagree with the pardon. If anything, commuting

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the sentence would have been better, because then it'd be

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:18.879
<v Speaker 2>like Okay, you know what, that's more like, you did

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:22.320
<v Speaker 2>the crime, You did enough time. Your sense was harsh.

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:24.760
<v Speaker 2>This is enough. You're not a risk of society. If anything,

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.399
<v Speaker 2>can be more productive, and we don't have to pay

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 2>for you to sit in jail, so you sent them out.

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I think a pardon was not a good idea. I

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:34.919
<v Speaker 2>disagree with that, and I think, and now that it's

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 2>fifty million dollars, I definitely think they should be in jail.

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Still in jail. Do you think two years was not

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>enough time?

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>No, you know what.

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 2>The the should be an eye for an eye. It

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 2>should be like you're not allowed to have more than

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 2>five hundred dollars in your pocket at any given time.

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.359
<v Speaker 2>You cannot be rich anymore because your phony. So you're

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 2>saying they lived a life or luxury and now they

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 2>should suffer.

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying, if someone commits fraud to live extravagant

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>life style, they should never be able to live in

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>extravagant lifestyle again, even if they earned it legitimately after

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 1>they came out of prison. You're just not allowed to

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>ever be rich again. That's your punishment.

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 2>So.

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>In other news, Savannah Christly addresses rumors about her parents' pardons.

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Days after Todd Christly and Julie Chrisly were released from prison,

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>their daughter addressed conspiracy theories about her year's long efforts

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to free her parents from behind bars.

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, the biggest misconception right now is that I either

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:38.240
<v Speaker 1>paid for a pardon or I slept for a pardon,

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Savannah told the media.

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:40.360
<v Speaker 2>A lot.

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 1>You Well, she's very attractive.

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 2>She looks like him. He is pretty. He is pretty.

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, she's pretty. They're both pretty. Savannah told the media

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:55.760
<v Speaker 1>alongside Todd during a May thirtieth press conference.

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.399
<v Speaker 2>I just have very little sympathy for people that take

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 2>other people's money knowingly. This isn't This isn't like a

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:06.399
<v Speaker 2>business venture that went bad or they kept throwing good

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:08.280
<v Speaker 2>money after bad because they were.

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 1>They were trying to have something.

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Authornically, they were genuinely trying something, even if it was

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 2>poor decision, they should have known better. Yeah, this is.

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Like intentional fraudulent. They were big fifty million dollars that

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>are doctored. Here's the argument, and this is where I

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think people like when you talk about Menendez, there's clearly

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>victims and brutality. When you talk about a crime like this,

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 1>there isn't. I think people look at it people, but

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think people see it that way. I think

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 1>people see it as a victimless crime.

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:41.360
<v Speaker 2>It's not I don't I never really understood victim. I

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:45.319
<v Speaker 2>guess meaning there's no individual person harmed, and I think

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 2>it's still a crime.

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I think also people I have a problem with capitalism

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and they feel like people like this are

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>just sticking it to like the you know, banks and

0:40:57.280 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the like there's no there's there's no actual victim.

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, when people don't pay their car payments and

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 1>they're like, so what so land Rover doesn't get my money?

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:09.399
<v Speaker 2>Or well, well that would that would be okay. If

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:12.880
<v Speaker 2>the person was fell flat, flat on flat on their

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 2>fees at the term and they had no money and

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 2>they couldn't pay, then it's not a it's not criminal.

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 2>It's just a financial situation. This is criminal. I'm sorry,

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 2>but you take fifty million dollars or more so, you

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 2>because you think you should live a certain lifestyle. Screw them.

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:33.439
<v Speaker 1>She also states during a press conference that if people

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>knew the countless hours and money in time I spent

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>going to d C literally with not a meeting scheduled,

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and I just got on a plane and went and said,

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be in the right room and the

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 1>right time, I meet the right people. So basically, I

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>know she spoke during the RNC and I think she

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>her She alleges that her parents were unfairly prosecuted and

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>gone after because they were supporters of Trump, so that

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it was a political She was wrong.

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 2>They were going after them because because they committed crimes

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 2>and owed fifty million dollars. She forgot that part.

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he claims in his press conference that they are

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:10.800
<v Speaker 1>completely innocent.

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 2>So I would But you know what, that's the thing,

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 2>the pardon. I bet you a million bucks that party

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:17.359
<v Speaker 2>may it like, see, we didn't do anything. See that's right.

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Now they can run around and claim innocence. But if

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 2>it was just commuted, then maybe they could not run

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 2>around and say we didn't do anything. They wouldn't have

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:25.840
<v Speaker 2>that argument.

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, I would love for them to take the opportunity

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to prove how they are innocent, because as far they.

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Already had an opportunity and they sucked at it and

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 2>they went to.

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Jail for I know, but I'm saying now after the fact,

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to do press conferences and continuously talk

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:41.880
<v Speaker 1>about how you're innocent and you didn't do anything wrong

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's why you were pardoned, then how are you innocent?

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's see it?

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Are we going to see him out? Bravo? Con I

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 2>don't know, beause I have some questions.

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Todd also spoke and maintained that he and Julie did

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 1>not commit the crimes for which they were convicted. Quote,

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>even though this pardon happened, I still was convicted of

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>something I did not do. It could be you, It

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 1>could be you, It could be any of you. He

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>said during a press conference that it.

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Could never be me because I will never take out

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:10.760
<v Speaker 2>a loan for fifty million dollars.

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Well it was falsified, fifi.

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:17.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't care whatever. I wouldn't falsify paperwork to get alane. Yeah,

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 2>so it will never be me.

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Chrisly Todd and Julie Cristly's alleged pricey demand for their

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>TV comeback raises eyebrows in Hollywood. This was an article

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on Daily Mail. Apparently they are shopping or they're being

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 1>offered a brand new reality series documenting their return back

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>into their normal life post prison. According to sources, that

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>might not be a problem, as many TV production companies

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 1>are considering signing the couple. However, their price may be

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a hindrance as they're seeking a seven figure payout. Recently,

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:51.920
<v Speaker 1>some television producers opened up to The Daily Mail sharing

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:56.240
<v Speaker 1>their thoughts about Todd and Julie's extremely high price tag. Quote,

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 1>we would love to work with them, but their price

0:43:58.320 --> 0:43:59.479
<v Speaker 1>tag is way too high.

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.799
<v Speaker 2>One the complication has no assets. Now he's got to

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 2>build up his wardrobe, right, He's got to catch up

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:08.879
<v Speaker 2>on whatever procedures he didn't get while he was locked up.

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 1>They also shared that they weren't entirely sure if Todd

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and Joy would be worth such a huge amount, that's

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Would people want to watch them? The producer asked.

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Another producer revealed that the specific amount Todd and Julie

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 1>were requesting. According to them, the couple is allegedly asking

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 1>for a whopping five million dollar minimum to make a

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 1>reality show post prison. That's where their conversation starts. Five million,

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>but they're hoping for a bidding war to take the

0:44:35.600 --> 0:44:36.840
<v Speaker 1>price even higher.

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 2>So it should be in the slammer.

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:42.319
<v Speaker 1>So you're not a fan, you're a fan. Listen, here's

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 1>my thoughts on pardoning. I understand and I understand the

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Constitution and the president has pardon power, and I agree

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:51.919
<v Speaker 1>with that. I feel, however, just because of the work

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:53.719
<v Speaker 1>that I do and the things that I'm involved in.

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean I look at cases and things, see things

0:44:56.400 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 1>all the time and meet people involved in the Innocence project.

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:00.800
<v Speaker 1>My mind, I'm.

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Thinking, why are we at those cases?

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Why are we not taking it deeper? Are why is

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:12.719
<v Speaker 1>there not a consultantdenzar.

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Or in addition to a pardons aar, they should have

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 2>a wrongly convicted zaar. Yeah, I would love it for

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 2>those because the lady that was appointed as the pardons are.

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Alice.

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 2>She's awesome, she is and she's lived up to her

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 2>end of the deal of just being a good person

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 2>to society and trying to help those who you know,

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 2>need to get back up on their feet. And she's

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:35.920
<v Speaker 2>the one that sought out the chrislies. I think in

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:39.759
<v Speaker 2>some fashion. I mean, she was probably approached, but she

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 2>did her homework because I watched an interview with her,

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:46.719
<v Speaker 2>she did her homework and she felt after doing her

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 2>homework that they were wrongly convicted or and definitely wrongly

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 2>sentenced or harshly sentenced. So I do know that she's

0:45:56.120 --> 0:45:58.400
<v Speaker 2>a pretty genuine good woman. So I hope that she

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 2>did her homework enough. But I still disagree.

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, you disagree on I disagree.

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Based on what I know, right, there might be things

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. No, I know what I know, you

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 2>know what you know. I don't think I know what.

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I guess. The point of what I was saying was

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in the in the field and the things that I

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:15.399
<v Speaker 1>work in, and you have been involved in a lot

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of it, and we meet a lot of people that

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:19.480
<v Speaker 1>have been wrongfully convicted, and my question is why are

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>we not investing more time and energy into those cases

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that the Innocence Project picks up and puts all this

0:46:26.239 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>time and energy.

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess the argument is if they were pardon

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 2>then the argument is they were wrongly convicted. So they were,

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 2>But I would.

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Rather I would just I would If we're going to

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 1>have pardoning power, we're going to pardon people. I would

0:46:38.880 --> 0:46:41.799
<v Speaker 1>rather pardon someone that has been in prison for a

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>long time that was either wrongfully.

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:45.719
<v Speaker 2>Convicted, like one of the cases that you help with,

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 2>or it takes they have evidence and now it still

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:52.839
<v Speaker 2>takes yes years, yes to actually yes, get it overturned.

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I am released, right.

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 2>But you're saying so when the president can just come in, well,

0:46:57.200 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 2>assuming it's a federal crime, when the president can come

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:00.880
<v Speaker 2>in or the guf A R could come in his

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:01.839
<v Speaker 2>boom and get him out.

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just I wish there was I just needed

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Christie should have a reality show where they

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 1>go around the prisons and they talk to people. That's

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:10.320
<v Speaker 1>what they should do. Did you hear that, Todd and

0:47:10.400 --> 0:47:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Julie Chrisly if you're looking for a reality show because

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they did complain. You see an interview with Todd Christly

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 1>where he does talk about the prison environment and how

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:24.319
<v Speaker 1>bad it is and how bad the food is, and

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 1>he did say he said that African Americans are treated

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>more poorly than the white prisoners, and he said he

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 1>received privileges because he was white, and he he made

0:47:35.760 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that known. He said it in an interview.

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:40.839
<v Speaker 2>See that's interesting. So you do your part and bring

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:43.799
<v Speaker 2>all that to the public and expose those things and

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 2>try to make it better.

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I there, that's a good solution. We together would

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 1>get behind a reality show with the Chrislies if they

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 1>want to do prison reform or do some type of

0:47:55.880 --> 0:47:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Innocent's project or or work with wrongly convicted and.

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 2>Then he has to give all his money back to

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the bank.

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:02.879
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, but because he has to give the money

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:08.080
<v Speaker 1>back to all right, that is the Chryslies will keep

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you updated and on things that have to do with

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Diddy and Lively and if there's any more that comes

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Chrystlies will be aware of whether they get

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 1>their reality show or not, or whether they listen to

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, and then we'll recap it, recap shot the

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>reality show. Yes, all right, thanks guys for listening to

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Legally Brunette. We appreciate it. And as always a lot

0:48:29.040 --> 0:48:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of you send me dms and tell me your thoughts

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 1>about cases and cases that you think that we should

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about. So I appreciate that, so please continue to

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:36.799
<v Speaker 1>do that.