WEBVTT - Magic Eye Illusions

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, we're going on tour and you can come

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>out and see us in Orlando on August twelfth, Nashville

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on September sixth, and we're gonna wrap it all up

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>on September ninth in our hometown of Atlanta, GA.

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 2>That's right, And these are the last shows of the year.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>This has been a really good show this year. We're

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 2>super excited about it, and this is going to be

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 2>your only chance to be in the theater with us,

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 2>and you know, like fifteen sixteen hundred of your closest pals.

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>So go to stuff youshould know dot com and check

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>out our tour page for links and information, and you

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>can also go to link tree slash sysk for the

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>same stuff. We'll see you guys this August and September.

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Chuck and Jerry's here too. You can't see her, but

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you can if you relax your eyes lose focus, she

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>may just pop right out at you and be like, hey,

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jerry.

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Could meet youa you thought I wasn't real? All you

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 2>need her lazy eyes.

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>That's well, no, actually it doesn't work if you have

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>lazy eye.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I know that's the opposite.

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that later.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 2>I would love to see Jerry in in a Magic

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 2>I poster popping out in my room.

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.839
<v Speaker 1>All right. You know, well, you know, it's actually become

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>so easy to do. There's so many programs out there

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>now that you do it.

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Huh.

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You could at the very least a more capable and

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>skilled stuff you should know, listener, probably could.

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll just keep talking about it.

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>There you go.

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 2>That's what we're talking about.

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 3>Though.

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 2>If you are a person of a certain age, and

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 2>you were either like a teenager or up probably in

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen nineties early nineteen nineties, yep, then you probably,

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 2>at some point, much like Ethan Suppley in the movie

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Mall Rats, would stand somewhere in a shopping mall at

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 2>a wooden kiosk, staring at a poster, waiting for that

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 2>shark or that sale to come out from the background

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>of that poster. Yeah, the hidden, the hidden trick.

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I tried it so many times, and I think maybe

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>one out of fifty I was able. Oh yeah, I

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>was not good at it, but I have to say Chuck.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>After researching it yesterday and today, my eye muscles have

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>never been in better shape than they are right now.

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Did you try looking at them again?

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I've been popping and locking and like just I'll

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>be like here, give it to me, bam, I'll see

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that one. Oh, let's see another one.

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Actually, I've got it, Yes, I did.

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I finally relax. I guess is what it comes down to.

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>But I've gotten to the point where I can, once

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I see it, I don't have to keep that focus.

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I can actually look around inside the picture from like

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>different angles and stuff.

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.119
<v Speaker 2>It's really cool. Yeah. I got to that point too,

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 2>to where like at first I would do the trick

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 2>where you like in the book version, where you would

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 2>hold it very close to your face and slowly back

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 2>it away, because as we'll see, that's one technique to

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 2>see what the hidden picture. But then I got to

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 2>where once you once you sort of contrain yourself, then

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 2>you can just sort of look at it like you said,

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 2>and you know, the little trick with your eyes, and

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 2>then there's that polar bear or whatever.

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I should say it's been it's been brought

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to our attention. I guess ever since the Millie Vanilli

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>episode that even like that kind of definition is not

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>necessarily enough for some of our listeners. So I feel like, no,

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we should go a little further. If you've

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>never seen a magic eye poster or you know generically

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>called the stereogram, what we're talking about is a a strange,

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>seemingly random pattern of different colors almost splattered across a poster,

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and that if you relax your eyes is a certain

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>way so that you focus as if you're looking beyond.

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 2>The poster, like right through it. Yeah.

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Hm, in some sort of magic scientific way that will explain,

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of a three dimensional image suddenly forms. You suddenly

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>see a three D image that you cannot see if

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're not looking at it the right way. Yeah,

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>when you do see it, there's it's almost inevitable you're

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna say wow, oh, gosh or something like that. It's

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling every single time it is.

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 2>It appears to kind of jump away from the rest

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 2>of the image. But nice definition. But I think we

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 2>should go back because there's kind of a long and

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 2>winding road to how we eventually got to the early

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 2>nineteen nineties with these magic eye posters. That were you know,

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 2>they were real fad and we'll get to that. You know,

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 2>they sold a lot of those things in a short

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 2>amount of time. But it goes all the way back

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 2>to the early scientists of the world trying to figure

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 2>out how in the world when you have two eyeballs

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 2>that are spaced about sixty something millimeters apart. You know,

0:04:57.800 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 2>if they're spaced apart, they're gonna be seeing things f

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 2>from a slightly different perspective. And how in the world

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 2>do we do that and come up with like a

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.679
<v Speaker 2>solid focus on things?

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I had never really thought about it before,

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>but binocular vision is what you're talking about. And yeah,

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>by rights, we have two eyes, and like you said,

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>they're separated by a certain amount of distance, So why

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>don't we see two images of.

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 2>The world, Yeah, very lightly from one another. Right.

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>What It turns out that if we did do that,

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>we probably wouldn't be able to see with depth perception.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.679
<v Speaker 1>It's very crazy kind of It's called stereopsis is another

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>word for depth perception, and it is in combining those

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>two images that each eye gives the brain that we're

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>able to see in one complete picture that has depth

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and richness and uh, maybe even a little kindness depending

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>on what you're looking at.

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the brain does this immediately. It figures it

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 2>out so fast you don't even know what's happening. But

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 2>we can go all the way back to our friend Ptolemy,

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 2>who talked about quite a bit. Yeah, second century Roman astronomer.

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 2>And this is one of sort of the early ideas

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 2>that were was put forward. And you know, they, as

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 2>as with all things sort of science, they put forward

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 2>some ideas that aren't quite right and they're refined over

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 2>the years until they get to the reality of it.

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 1>This is an ain't quite right one.

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, ain't quite right because told me he thought that

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 2>your eyes sent out raise basically visual rays that hid

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 2>an object, and when we're seeing something in focus, that

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 2>means it's even it's kind of hard to explain how

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 2>bad it is that the eyeball rays will converge on

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 2>an object. And when they converge on that object, that's

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>when you can see something in focus, basically, and if.

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>They converge in it too much, they burn it to

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a cinder. Excellently, he had it, he picked up there's

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>two things. He had it backwards. We're actually accepting rays

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>rather than shooting him out, so he's kind of getting there.

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And then he noticed that our two eyes create an

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that's our focus. It can be wide narrow, depending on

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 1>what we're looking at. If it's far away, the focus

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to be at a sharper angle. If it's closer,

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be at a wider angle. And he

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>was onto something, but he didn't. He who wasn't able

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to really put two and two together, and then he

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>died and that was it for him.

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right. So up next, I guess we can

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 2>flash forward to this Arab scholar name all has In

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 2>is what I'm going to say.

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's great, right.

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 2>And he basically said, all right, what we have is

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 2>an ability to sense this convergence of our eyes when

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 2>they focus on an object. And what this is called basically,

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he even said the word depth,

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 2>but it helps us figure out how far something is,

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 2>which is depth.

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And so his idea was that we could we

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>had some sort of sense that we was so involuntary

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we weren't even aware of it, and that's how we

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>knew its true. Yeah, for sure, but still not quite right.

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>There about six hundred years later, Kepler and Descartes kind

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of picked up on something similar, and they said, rather

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>than being able to sense the degree of convergence that

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>our eyes are focusing, we actually can feel how our

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>eyes are rotating at any given point, and that's how

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we know where our eyes are focused or not focused.

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Descartes said, like googly eyes, you know exactly.

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And so like it was just wrong, wrong, wrong. Finally,

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteen thirties, an Englishman stepped up. His name

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>was Sir Charles Wheatstone. Yeah, and he said, I've got this.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Everybody check this out. I have invented an invention that

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>will prove that my hypothesis of binocular vision providing us

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>one single image with depth is actually from well take

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a chuck.

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know what's funny is in my notes I had.

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Wheatstone says, quote, I got this nice exactly what you said.

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>It's simpatico.

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 2>What were you setting me up for?

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, he had an invention. Can I just describe that

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 2>at least? Yeah?

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>The stereoscope.

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the stereoscope sat. The first version of this that

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 2>he introduced sat on a table. There's a great picture.

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 2>It turns out that Brian May of Queen is a

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 2>big wheatstone slash three D stereogram binocular vision enthusiast, and

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 2>so there's some cool pictures of him looking at this

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 2>through this original stereoscope. So it sits on a desk

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 2>and in the center you put your eyes up to

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, what looks like a little viewmaster or a

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 2>VR headset basically, and it has these two angled mirrors,

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 2>one for each eye. So when you look through it,

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 2>it angles one eye out to the right and one

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>eye out to the left, and in that peripheral vision

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 2>on each side there's a little small wooden wall with

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 2>a picture on each one. So one eye is looking

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:03.839
<v Speaker 2>at the left picture, the right eye is looking at

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the right picture, and you you know, it has two

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>little thumbholes that you hold. It's very elegantly a little

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 2>steampunk looking thing.

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>It definitely is.

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 2>And that was how he basically proved this, by having

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 2>each eye look at two separate things, but they're both flat, flat,

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>flat images of the same thing. Basically.

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>That's really that's key.

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you had an image of an apple cart.

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>You have two pictures of that apple cart, and your

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>eyes are seeing each one right, because there's that barrier

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in between your two eyes, so your eye is just

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing the left image, your right eye seeing just the

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>right image.

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Right. Yes.

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>The distinction here, Chuck, and this is where Wheatstone like

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 1>really laid the foundation for understanding binocular vision is that

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>each of those pictures has to be slightly different in perspective.

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>So either there's a slightly different angle, or you took

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>one picture and then moved a foot to the left

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and took the other picture, and those are what you're seeing.

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>And what he showed is that the brain can sense

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>those slight, slight differences in perspective and that's what it

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>uses when it combines two images into one image in

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>your field of view to give it depth. That's how

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it senses depth, those differences in perspective or angle that

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.359
<v Speaker 1>each eye is feeding the brain as an image.

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And if you're thinking this sounds like the little

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 2>viewmaster that you had when you were a kid, that's

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 2>exactly what it is, same exact thing.

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And the same way that like the computer went

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>from like a room size thing to a PC to

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a laptop to our phone. This this stereoscope did the

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>same thing. It was a big clunky thing, the steampunk version,

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and then it got increasingly smaller and easier to handle

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and more handy, although it was much less revolutionary than

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the computer.

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they made it like, they made it more handheld.

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Those in particular, there was in the eighteen forties there

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 2>was a Scottish physicist who will be pretty prominent in

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 2>this whole story named David Brewster, Sir David Brewster, and

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 2>he's the one that invented if you've ever seen one

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 2>of these in a museum or something, sort of the

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 2>early handheld version that looks like a little handheld steampunk

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 2>VR headset basically.

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like many binoculars with a slide yeah, coming out

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of it that you use for focus.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you hold it up to your eyes and

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 2>it blocks out the rest of the light and stuff.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 2>His more portable invention was coinciding with photography becoming more

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 2>and more developed in sort of like proper photography, and

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 2>so all of a sudden it was this popular thing,

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 2>and this was sort of the first fad of the stereogram.

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 2>There were a couple of big ones. It was one

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 2>of the nineteen nineties and one in the mid nineteenth century.

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Queen Victoria went nuts for this thing in eighteen fifty

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 2>one at the Great Exhibition at Crystal Palace, and all

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, people just wanted these things to play

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 2>with and look through and marvel at. Yeah.

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Right from the eighteen fifties to the nineteen thirties when

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>radio finally came in and took over that there was

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>basically not a parlor in the UK or America that

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't have one of these things. Like you just amused

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>yourself with them. The fact that there were companies that

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>were producing hundreds of thousands or millions of different stereoscopic

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>images for you to look at. I mean, you could

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>just spend endless hours of entertainment looking at one thing

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>or another. And they would take images of like scenic landmarks.

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Sure supposedly stereoscopic images of like Yellowstone. I think the

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Yellowstone Area actually convinced congressmen back east that there actually

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>was an amazing wilderness out there that should that's worth preserved. Yeah, exactly.

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>It really made it pop. In other words, they also

0:13:56.120 --> 0:14:00.599
<v Speaker 1>very quickly started making porn with it. Everything that you

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>would imagine people doing when they figured out how to

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 1>make pictures that really stand out with depth, Yeah you did.

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 2>They were like, these are fantastic, but what's better than

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 2>a landscape? Ladies' ankles? Pretty much the original The original

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 2>piece of equipment used to make these were stereo cameras,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 2>and they were these cameras with two lenses that kind

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 2>of mimic the eyes. They're said about eye with the

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 2>part and those were around for a while, and there

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 2>are still enthusiasts that own stereo cameras, as we'll see

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 2>in a little bit. That kind of figures into how

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 2>they became popular in the nineties. But in the United States,

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 2>while all this was going on, American surgeon Oliver Wendelholmes

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 2>senior papa of Oliver Wendelholmes Junior of the spring Court fame,

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 2>he's invented one in the United States and he's like,

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 2>you know what, this thing's so great, I'm not even

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 2>going to patent it. I want all kind of companies

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 2>to make these, and I want these spread far and wide.

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess he was a surgeon, so he wouldn't hurt

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 2>her anything, right, and people, I think he's the one

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 2>that coined the term stereograph, and then the word stereogram

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of became the go to for these images.

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, everybody's like close, we're gonna switch it up just

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. And still today, if you're an enthusiast

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>into stereoscopic photography, the stereogram is usually the term that

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd use.

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, I think that's a robust fifteen minutes.

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all of the nineteenth century stereogram viewers say bully, bully, bully.

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 2>That's right, bully in three D. So we'll be back

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 2>to talk about the next development, which was the auto

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 2>stereogram right after this.

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 3>If you want to know then you're in luck. Just

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 3>listen to joshcher seffus no.

0:15:55.560 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Stuffus, no, all right, check. Now we finally get to

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>this stuff where I'm fascinated. Yeah, just riveted, right because

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's enough that our friends Wheatstone and Brewster contributed

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the foundation to our understanding of binocular vision. But along

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>came in I think the nineteen fifties.

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Boy, that sounds like a craft cocktail bar, isn't it.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Wheatstone Andrews like, you have to have the armband

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>or else you can't get employed.

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 2>There. I just got really thirsty. Sorry, go ahead.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>There was a scientist a neuroscientist named Bella. ULA's had

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>tip to Chuck for that one who ran the Sensory

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and Perceptual Processes department at AT and T Bell Labs. Again,

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I think, I said in the fifties, and ULA's was,

0:16:55.880 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess kind of focused on visual perception and figure

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>something out. They just like just in the same way

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>that that Wheatstone's invention kind of led to this neat

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in this.

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Neat party toy toy.

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, ULA's invention kind of did the same thing, but

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>neither one of them were trying to create an amusement.

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>They were they were creating a way to prove a

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis that they were interested in. And what he did

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 1>was come up with the random dot stereogram.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is uh, he basically start by let's

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 2>say you have like a square or something that you

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 2>fill in randomly with black dots, and then within that

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.959
<v Speaker 2>square you picked a part of it and decide on

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>like maybe a shape or something. So within that that square,

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 2>you'll say, all right, well, I'm gonna select a circle

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 2>within that, like maybe right in the middle, and I'm

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 2>going to create a second square that's just like the first,

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 2>except that circle in the center that I've selected is

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 2>just going to be shifted just a little bit, kind

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 2>of like we were talking about, that slight, slight difference

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 2>of perspective. Yeah, and then when you put these two

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 2>squares side by side, and when you look at these

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 2>two squares, you can look at it through a stereoscope

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 2>if you have one. But the key here is is

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 2>that he would prove that, like, hey, you can just

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 2>do this with your naked eye if you learn the

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 2>trick that people will be trying to figure out, you know,

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 2>up until twenty twenty three with future podcaster Josh Clark,

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 2>where you unFocus your eyes and then those circles appear

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 2>to sort of separate from the background.

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and so those two separate images, you still see them,

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>but what they do is combine to make a third

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>image in the center, and that's the one that has

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the say, the circle popping out of it, right.

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>And Youlss obviously created the foundation for magic eye posters

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 1>with that. But what he did more than anything was

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>show that what our brain does when it takes in

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 1>those two separate images and slightly different perspectives because their

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>eyes are separated just ever so slightly, it compares basically

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>pixel for pixel each of the each of the images

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.959
<v Speaker 1>that the eye send it and matches it up, and

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 1>then when it finds parts that don't quite match up,

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it uses that to create the illusion of depth. And

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what his random dot stereogram showed that what your

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>eye is doing is taking those two those two pictures

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.239
<v Speaker 1>and matching up every single random dot in there and

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>then noticing all this is in a nanosecond, noticing what

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't match up, and then that's that circle that

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>pops out. And then the way that he proved it

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.719
<v Speaker 1>is because those two different pictures form a single image

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in the center. Right, Yeah, So if you weren't looking

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.199
<v Speaker 1>at two pictures, you were just using two eyes at

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>one picture, then that effect would still be produced. And

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it really just kind of laid the foundation in showing

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>just exactly how our brain makes binocular vision into depth perception.

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, So we're inching closer to the nineties and that

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 2>singular poster or coffee table book image that we all knew,

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>but it came to us in the nineteen seventies thanks

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 2>to a student of u Less's named Christopher Tyler, who

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 2>was a neuroscientist and he basically said, you know what,

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 2>we don't even need the two pictures. Everybody like you're

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 2>doing pretty good, but what if, like how mind blowing

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 2>would it be if we could do this all from

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 2>a single image. He called it the auto stereogram and

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 2>basically made it to where it's sort of like this,

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 2>like staring at a wallpaper. And in fact, I think

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 2>was he the one here? Then it was Brewster who

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 2>stared at wallpaper, and that's how they figured that out.

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 2>He was an odd duck, which is interesting. But Tyler

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 2>got together with a programmer named Maureen Clark and said, well,

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 2>we can probably figure this out with math, So that

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 2>they created an algorithm that could insert these images into

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 2>what looks like just almost like white noise on paper.

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And so they did away with all the crud,

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>those extra two images that still remain when that third

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>when they come together and form that illusory third image

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.479
<v Speaker 1>in the middle. Yeah, so that you just see something

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>as you normally would see it. But if you adjust

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>your eyes just the right way, then that three D

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:31.719
<v Speaker 1>image is going to come out. And now we finally

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>arrive in the nineteen seventies at the auto stereogram is

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>what they called it, which became better known eventually as

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the Magic Eye poster.

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, So, if you're listening to this and you're thinking,

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 2>all right, guys, this is the nineteen seventies. You keep

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 2>talking about the grunge era. How did we get from

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen seventies to the grunge era or why didn't

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 2>we get there quicker? Basically? And one of the reasons

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 2>is this guy named Tom Shay. He's from Connecticut. He

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 2>has sort of a sounds like, sort of a hippie

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 2>dippy backstory through the nineteen sixties, working all kinds of

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 2>crazy jobs, but was like a super bright guy, a

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 2>mathematician and musician. Eventually got you know, real grown up

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 2>type jobs like helped NASA make their navigation systems, working

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 2>with a company called Intermetrics, and in the early nineties

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 2>landed at a British tech company called Pentica. And this

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 2>thing all came together really in the in the thing

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 2>that we all knew in love in the nineties because

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 2>of advertising. They had a product Pentica did called the

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 2>mime Capital mim in Circuit Emulator, and they were Boushet

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 2>was tasked to designing an ad for this thing, and

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 2>so he said, Hey, let's put a real mime in

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 2>this advertisement. It's all very serendipitous because it really is

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 2>this mime that they hired. It's either Lab or labby

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Labb shows up on set and it turns out that

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 2>Lab was one of those stereo photography enthusiasts that still

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:10.719
<v Speaker 2>had those you know, dual lensed stereo cameras. He happened

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 2>to bring this thing in on the set and Bashet

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 2>was like, OMG, what is that thing and just was like,

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 2>sounds like it was just instantly sort of taken with

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 2>his idea.

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he said it was the most compelling optical illusion

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>I'd ever seen.

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 2>There you haven't in his own words.

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>So what he did he said, Okay, I really appreciate

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:31.959
<v Speaker 1>your help here, so I'm going to keep going with

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>this mime ad, but I'm also going to try to

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>make another ad using one of these auto stereograms, and

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>he did. He made one that had the hidden message

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>M seven hundred, which was a version of their in

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>circuit emulator that his company made.

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Which who knows what that is. I even tried to

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 2>figure it out.

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>So the best I could see is that it's a like,

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>rather than using your computer to figure out if a

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>circuit like a microprocess or a circuit board works. This

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>thing emulates either your computer or a circuit board so

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that you can find individual bugs and fix them. That's

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the best I could come up with. It's still very confusing,

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>but that's yeah, that's that.

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 2>And just so as a listener, you're not confused. That

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 2>has nothing to do with what happened. It was just

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 2>a product. It could have been a widget or whatever, definitely,

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 2>but the idea was it was another ad that he

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 2>actually used the technology to make a autostereogram for this ad.

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>And this ad was so it made such an impression

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>on people that it made it out of the pages

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of Embedded Systems Engineering Magazine into something of like the

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>general corporate culture. And all of a sudden, at his

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>desk at Pentica, but Shea starts getting faxes from people saying, Hey,

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>can you make me and my company one of those

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>really neat ads that you made? And he ended up

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of creating like a little mini side job for himself,

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>creating custom auto stereograms for people who faxed him and

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 1>asked for him.

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he was no artist, though, so very smartly. In

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety one, he hooked up with a woman named

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Sherry Smith, who was an artist, a freelancer, and I

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 2>think was also a computer graphics person, and so he said,

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 2>you're perfect. You're an artist and you know computer graphics,

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 2>so you can kick this thing up a notch and

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 2>basically make images that are a little more interesting to

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 2>look at. But it was still sort of an advertising

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 2>thing because they made one for American Airlines for their

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 2>in flight magazine that was really popular and apparently for

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 2>a while at least they would give away a bottle

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 2>of champagne. I would think a glass, but I guess

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 2>a bottle of champagne to the first person on the

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 2>flight who could find the image and say what it was.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Of course it was an airplane. But after the American

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Airlines ad thing, Boshe was like, wait a minute, like

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 2>people are going nuts for this in ads. But I think,

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 2>like people are going so crazy for this, I think

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 2>we could just sell these somehow, right.

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Take his job for making these four other companies and

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>just make them and sell them directly to the public.

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>And he actually started out doing mail order. He was

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>he realized he was onto something because he started doing

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>mail order in order to try to kick off a

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>fad that he could then go and license to other

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>people or partner with a big company and make himself

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that much more desirable. He really approached this in a

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>smart way.

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 2>A kickstarter of the time probably was mail order exactly.

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a really great analogy. And he created a

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>company or either he created it or he already had

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it and repurposed it. N period e period thing enterprises.

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Very clever, very very clever anything. Yeah, and he dieted everyone.

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>He just one hundred percent, just to make sure instead

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of N period e period what you're really saying is

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a and y.

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Thing anything anything.

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>We're anything enterprises, right, so anything N period e period

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 1>Thing Enterprises partnered with a Japanese company called Tenyoh and

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Tenya was a magic trick maker. They still are as

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>far as I can tell, and they said, this actually

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is amazing, and we think our friends in Japan are

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>going to go crazy for it, and they licensed it

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>and started publishing books based on the Magic Eye what

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>would come to be No Magic Eye as Magic Eye,

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>And apparently it was the ten Year company that said,

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>let's call it Magic Eye because the name you have

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 1>for it is stupid.

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 2>I disagree. They called it Magic Eye because, like you said,

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 2>they were a magic trick company and had a line

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 2>of magic this, magic that. But I think Boushat's original

0:27:53.320 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 2>name stereos hyphen or I guess Kama the Amazing Thing

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 2>gays toys, So you have to spell it out well,

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 2>S T A R E stare stereos. I kind of

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 2>like that. I think it's catchy. You forgot the hyphens, No,

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 2>S T A R E hyphen e hyphens right.

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>You know who would love this bishet? Guys Jonathan Strickland. Yeah,

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>he's a puny type, so I think Strickland would be like,

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>You're my kind of guy, for sure.

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I think you should tell everyone, though, the great great

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 2>name of or rather the great translated name of the

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 2>first book that they put out in Japan of these.

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>So thank you for that. It's called Muru Muru Mega

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>yaka Nadu MAGICI.

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Which means translated.

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Your eyesight gets better and better in a very short

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>rate of time. Colon MAGICI.

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>That's so good, and it was a hit.

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Apparently it was the best seller. Very quickly I think

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>they started I read they started selling them on street

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>corners and then very quickly after that, the first print,

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the first printing ran out and they they made an

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>huge run and that sold out, and it was just

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a hit in Japan. And it's interesting it went from

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>America to Japan and then back to America where it

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>really kind of blew up.

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess Bashad didn't have from what I could tell,

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 2>he was partnered in Japan, but I guess still had

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 2>the rights to do it in the United States, even though,

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 2>as we'll see, like he didn't own this idea like

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 2>no one did, because other people came along later. It

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 2>was it wasn't like a specific technology you could patent

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 2>or anything. But he was the first person in the US,

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 2>it looks like, to bring it over here and partner

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 2>with a guy named Bob Slitski who was a former

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 2>colleague at Pentica. And it sounds like Slitski was a

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 2>guy who just made a more robust computer program to

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 2>automate the stuff, to make it easier to come up

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 2>with different images, and then also colorize it so they

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 2>were previously black and white, and all of a sudden

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 2>you could do these things which made them look sharper. Evidently,

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 2>they hooked up with a licensing agent named Mark Gregorrek

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 2>who said, hey, this thing like we could license the

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 2>cred out of this person. Thing we had to do

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 2>was get in a book, which they did in nineteen

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 2>ninety three, and that was that very first what ended

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 2>up being super popular Magic eyebook.

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, think about how Saren dippis it is,

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>starting with Ron lab and then all of the people

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>he met along the way who ended up making this

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the fad that it became. He really lucked out. He

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>fell backwards into something really interesting. But they released a

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>bunch of books. But while the first Magic Eyebook in

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the United States was still fresh on the best seller list,

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>they released a second one and that quickly joined the

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>first one on the best seller list. America just went

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>nuts for these things.

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>One reason it went nuts is because there was a

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>certain measure of superiority that you could hold people who.

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Couldn't do it, like you'd see it.

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>There were people out there, including me, you just couldn't

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>do it, and you just get so mad and frustrated,

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and people who could do it found that really satisfying.

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I've always suspected.

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it took me a while. It wasn't like I

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 2>instantaneously got it. But I eventually did. And that was

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of the joke in Mall Rats. I don't know

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 2>if you ever saw that movie. I didn't, but it was,

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Kevin Smith movie, I guess, right after

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Clerk's and Ethan Suppley, like I said, would stare and

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 2>stare at it, and people were making fun of him,

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 2>and like there's one scene like these two little kids

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 2>came up and like got it right away, and he

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 2>just gets more and more frustrated.

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>So he's for that.

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's sort of playing into what you were talking

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 2>about with just like feeling like a dummy if you

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 2>couldn't get it.

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that definitely was a thing. I've read, you

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>know a number of like kind of retrospectives about it,

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and most of them were from people who couldn't get it,

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and they still seemed slightly bitter, but they still can't

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>get it, you know, thirty years on or whatever. But

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was enormous, not just at mal kiosks,

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>but in books. There is a comic strip that's still

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>around that you can license through UPI if you want.

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>It showed up on Honeynut Cheerios boxes. There were postcards,

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>other companies came a call in and said, hey, we

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>want you to make some of these for us, like Disney.

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I think CBS had them do something for like one

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of their internal sales booklets. It just started showing up everywhere,

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think the cream of the crop of like

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>additional stuff that came out of this was a book

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that Boshet put together, a magic eyebook for Christmas called

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>do you See What I See?

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 2>That just presses Yeah, that's good.

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't find one. I found a Christmas themed one,

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it was from the do you

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>See What I See?

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Book? That's disappointing. It was a little bit so Bishey

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 2>basically said in nineteen ninety four, in one year he

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 2>estimates that they raked in between two hundred and a

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 2>quarter of a million bucks or sorry, quarter of a

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 2>billion billion dollars and hundred and fifty million.

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that was I think the peak here in

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>ninety three or ninety four was it was huge.

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, So Bashe is going strong. Early nineties, Like

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I said, no one owned this idea. It's not a

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 2>particular technology. So people started jumping on board and doing

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 2>their own and the main standout to me, I think

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 2>is are the guys who if you saw them at

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 2>the mall kiosks, you probably saw the version from a

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 2>company called Hallusion art Prints.

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>And art prints emphasis on art I think.

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And so these guys, Paul Huber, who's an aerospace engineer,

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 2>and a software engineer named Mike Belinsky, they were turned

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 2>on by these things too, and they said, hey, this

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 2>is pretty great. We're two smart guys. We can build

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 2>our own computer program and algorithm to make these things ourselves.

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 2>And they started making these posters in ninety two, and

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 2>that those were the Hallusion art prints that you would

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 2>most likely those are the ones. Like I said that

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 2>you were seeing it at the kiosk for about twenty

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 2>to twenty five bucks. These guys were printing these things

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:13.879
<v Speaker 2>for a quarter. Even with like if they're wholesaling these

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 2>things to the kiosk, they're still making some pretty good

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 2>dough off of that. Yeah, kind of mark.

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe ten bucks something like that off.

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 2>A poster awsome a quarter. It's good return.

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Heck, yeah it is. And they started churning these things out.

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>But like I said, there's an emphasis on art prints,

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Like they kind of saw theirs as it was different.

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.879
<v Speaker 1>It was distinguished from the other ones because they were

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>just so well made. The problem is is people are like,

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that's great, I can still get the same effect from

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:41.919
<v Speaker 1>a similar one from one of your competitors for five

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars at Spencer's rather than twenty five dollars at your

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>admittedly very charming Kiosk. Right, I'm gonna go with the

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>five dollars one. And so they set themselves up for

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 1>some pretty serious competition out of the gate.

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, big time. And there are all kinds of people

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 2>pumping these things out. But like you said, you go

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 2>to the Kiosk, you get your ears pierced, sure by

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 2>a top quality seventeen year old twenty five times. Excuse me,

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.439
<v Speaker 2>Oh don't know. I meant purchase a top quality poster. Okay,

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, you're also getting your ear piers by a

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 2>top quality seventeen Claire's piercing Pagoda or Claies or something.

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 2>So Basha their company started to fade a little bit

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 2>because of the competition, and he thought, like when he

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 2>was interviewed in ninety four by Ink magazine, he thought

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 2>this was like, Hey, this is the beginning. We're going

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:36.799
<v Speaker 2>to be huge. His literal quote was talking about being

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 2>a Disney of the twenty first century and like making

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:43.879
<v Speaker 2>it into a big multimedia company. And then many years later,

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 2>in like the late twenty sixteen or twenty seventeen, he

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:52.760
<v Speaker 2>reflected back and said, well, as it turns out, maybe

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 2>that was just my fifteen minutes and it wasn't that

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 2>much fun and it was really exhausting. He ended up

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 2>selling his majority State and Anything to Smith and another

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 2>one of the employees there who renamed it Magic Eye

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.879
<v Speaker 2>and Smith's Cherry Smith still owns the company today.

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that original graphic artist he first partnered with, which

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>is pretty cool. I think that's great.

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I bet they still make some dough

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:17.800
<v Speaker 2>off of this. Yeah.

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine if today we were you know, you'd

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>tell your friend I'm going to Anything Enterprises this summer

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and then we say World or Land. Yeah, just doesn't

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>quite have that ring, you know, No, it doesn't. So, Yeah,

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that fad ran its course. Even during the heat of it.

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Everybody but Boshet was well aware this is a fad,

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and he knew, but he was hoping beyond hope that

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>he could turn it and parlay it into something else. Right. Yeah,

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But as much as the rest of the world kind

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of moved on from stereograms. They proved to be a

0:36:53.760 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>really useful training technique for people whose eyes don't align

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 1>properly because of poor muscular development, people with strabismus in particular.

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it almost they'll do like these little exercises. I'll

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 2>give you these exercises to do, and it's almost like

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 2>a workout for your eyeball, right, to build that muscle

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 2>back up.

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. Apparently there's a critical window when you're young,

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I think up to about three maybe four where your

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>brain learns to put together the two different pictures that

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>it's eye, your eyes are giving it into one cohesive hole,

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and that if your eyes aren't aligned properly, or there's

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>another condition where one eye is way more dominant than

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>the other, your brain just disregards the picture from the

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 1>non dominant or non aligned eye and just relies on

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the dominant or you know, straight eye and you don't

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 1>see in depth. You just have monocular vision. You're getting

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 1>information from both eyes. They both work just fine, but

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>your brain's just disregarding one and so you you're what's

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:04.240
<v Speaker 1>called stereo blind. And they can correct that through surgery.

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>But after surgery, they start showing you magic eye posters

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to train yourself.

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Ruby had something. It wasn't exactly this, but she

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 2>has has always had like when she's really tired, one

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 2>of her eyes can go wonky. Yeah it is. And

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 2>when she was little she wore a patch for a

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 2>little while and then you know, we've kept taking her

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 2>to the to the eye doctor all these years and

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 2>they finally were like, you know, it's fine, Like she's

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 2>she's basically corrected it. It still happens sometimes when she's

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 2>super tired, and I'll just say, I'll say, maybe, you know,

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 2>snap your eyes together, and she go zoop and she can.

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 2>She can do it on purpose, so she kind of

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 2>learned how to control it. I guess that's pretty cute. Yeah,

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 2>it's interesting.

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you wanted to make a magic eye puzzle, Uh,

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>there's just a few things you need to know. Actually

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you do. You don't really need to know anything about

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it because today there's so many free like like stereogram

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>building software available.

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, you need to know how to type the

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 2>word sailboat pretty much.

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, I was looking on how

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to make a stereogram. I found an Instructibles article and

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I opened it up said eight steps to making a

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>stereogram or auto stereogram image. Step one was download a

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>stereogram maker program. Key, yeah, exactly. But what you're doing is,

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:31.400
<v Speaker 1>i'd say, we just kind of talk about how they

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:33.359
<v Speaker 1>work real quick, okay before we eat.

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 2>I still don't quite get it. I mean I kind

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 2>of know how you can see one, but I still

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 2>don't quite get how they're made.

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh I don't either. Ohh so mean, okay, I don't.

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Actually there's a little bit that I kind of understand.

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>But from what I gather, they you take your image

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.799
<v Speaker 1>and you make it separately. Right, So when you're when

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at a magic I poster, there's usually not

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 1>much detail, especially in the ones from the nineties. It's

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a star, it's a ball, it's a I think it's

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a dragon kind of thing. It's just an outline a silhouette.

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>And they've gotten way more sophisticated since then to I

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:15.919
<v Speaker 1>saw one today that was a squirrel and you could

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 1>see the pupil in the squirrel's eye like it was

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:19.760
<v Speaker 1>really sophisticated.

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, they've.

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Gotten really good at it. But what they do whether

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:27.879
<v Speaker 1>it's primitive or really sophisticated. They're taking that image making

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a silhouette, but they're giving the silhouette depth using gray scale.

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:35.880
<v Speaker 1>So the lighter the gray color shading there is to

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the silhouette, the closer it is to you, the darker

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it is, the further way it is. Just like you

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't like a regular like a charcoal drawing of something, right,

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>except there's nothing in the middle. And then the computer

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>program takes that computer generated image and it assigns different

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>values depending on how light or dark along the gray

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:59.800
<v Speaker 1>scale each pixel is, and that's how much it gets displaced.

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:03.280
<v Speaker 1>The lighter it is, the further away it gets just placed,

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the more it's gonna pop out towards you, which indicates

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that this part of the pictures in the foreground, it's

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:12.240
<v Speaker 1>closer to you than say the rump of the squirrel.

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the white parts would be closer, the dark

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 2>parts would appear more distant, and that creates the depth.

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 2>But then you still have to have that repeating pattern

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 2>laid out over the top of it, right, And I

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:28.319
<v Speaker 2>mean that's basically you put that repeating pattern on top

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 2>and these vertical strips or rather a computer does, and

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 2>then that that program just translates the shades of those

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 2>pixels onto that depth map and via magic it all

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 2>comes together. Yeah, magic in program. It's neat.

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 1>And when I say sophisticated, I mean it. I saw

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>it in today. I'm really sad I didn't send it

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 1>to you. I meant to. But it is basically a

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:53.360
<v Speaker 1>coral reef scene with different you can tell the different

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:56.799
<v Speaker 1>kinds of fish, Like there's different clownfish closer in the foreground,

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>there's like triggerfish in the background, Like there's a middle

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:03.280
<v Speaker 1>ground to the whole thing. Like that's how good they've gotten.

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:05.839
<v Speaker 1>And like I was saying initially, when you see it

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and you really see it, you can start looking around

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 1>inside the image. It's they it's just so amazing. You

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>just look up, like I guess, I think I searched

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated stereograms or magic eye or something like that, and

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it brought up some really good ones.

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's uh. And what you mentioned earlier about like

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:29.959
<v Speaker 2>the fact that you couldn't see him for so long,

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 2>you can only have this feeling once, which is not

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 2>ever being able to see one, to finally seeing your

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 2>first one. And when that picture jumps out from the

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 2>poster the very first time. It is like it's a thrill.

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:48.399
<v Speaker 2>You're like, I finally got it. I see what you mean.

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Because there's also this idea, which of course isn't true.

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:54.720
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I remember when they first came around

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 2>that I thought it was like some people thought it

0:42:57.160 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 2>was like a snipe punt, right, Yeah, there is no picture,

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 2>and it's just a way you fool your friends and

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 2>staring at a thing for an hour. So when you

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 2>finally have it jump out and it's proven to you,

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 2>it's a pretty remarkable feeling.

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:11.919
<v Speaker 1>It is, And there were a couple over the last

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 1>day or so where I was like, wait a minute,

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>is this Surely somebody out there has done that for fun.

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the whole thing wasn't just a big in joke.

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:22.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure some people thought that for real.

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So the trick that you can use, there's a

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 2>few tricks. One is the one I mentioned earlier, is like,

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 2>if it's not a poster and it's a piece of paper,

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 2>you can hold hold it very close to your nose

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:36.919
<v Speaker 2>where you can't even really focus on it, and very

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 2>slowly pull it away, but try and keep your try

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 2>not to focus on it still. Some many of them

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 2>will have two little objects, like two dots above the

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 2>whole thing, and they say, like, stare at those and

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 2>unFocus until you see three of them.

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't able to do that.

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 2>I am not able to do that either, or maybe

0:43:57.480 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I didn't try long enough. But I always just base

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 2>once I did the nose trick, and you have sort

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 2>of taught your eye, like I said, you can just

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of get it by just sort of unfocusing in

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 2>the middle distance.

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, that's the way that I do it. Just

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 1>relax the eyes and let it. Yeah, you just gotta

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:14.280
<v Speaker 1>be patient.

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Gotta be patient.

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's it. I think basically everybody should go

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:23.280
<v Speaker 1>out and start looking at auto stereograms. Huh.

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're not a joke. Nope, they're really neat images

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 2>are really there?

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the first time, like you were saying, you see

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>one pyrotechnics go off and the final countdown starts playing,

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's triumphant.

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty well you always had the final catin I'm playing,

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 2>So that's probably what that was.

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I do you got anything else?

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:43.399
<v Speaker 2>I got nothing else?

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Everybody?

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>That means, of course, it's time for listener mail.

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:52.000
<v Speaker 2>So, my friend, I'm just gonna pick one at random.

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 2>And when I say randomly select, I mean randomly select

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:58.760
<v Speaker 2>from the large pool of people who wrote in about

0:44:58.760 --> 0:44:59.239
<v Speaker 2>your mask.

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh, we talk about this. I guess I did not

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>see this one.

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 2>If you remember from the short stuff episode recently on

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Fahrenheit to Celsius conversion, I even commended you on the

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 2>show for being brave enough to try public math again

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 2>and apparently didn't get it right again.

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it really a surprise to anybody though?

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, is it?

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Let me see here. Let's go with Jake Eichenberger. Hey, guys,

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 2>I haven't laughed out loud to myself in a while,

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 2>but hearing Chuck compliments Josh Bravery with attempting live math

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:39.719
<v Speaker 2>really hit the spot. I'm sure you get a lot

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 2>of emails. But for Celsius to Fahrenheit, you add the

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:48.400
<v Speaker 2>thirty two after the multiplication, not before. And I always

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 2>treat one point eight as diprection nine fifths because five

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 2>is easy to deal with. So, for instance, for twenty one,

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I would use twenty plus one because I use the

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 2>fact that twenty is easily to divide by five to

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:05.920
<v Speaker 2>my advantage here. So jeez, now I don't understand any

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:10.319
<v Speaker 2>of this, so blah blah blah math stuff. Now add

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:13.360
<v Speaker 2>the thirty two they came up with thirty six, So

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:16.319
<v Speaker 2>thirty six plus thirty two is sixty eight. And don't

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:19.200
<v Speaker 2>forget about the plus one from earlier. Every one degree

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 2>celsius is one point eight, so sixty eight plus one

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:24.759
<v Speaker 2>point eight would be sixty nine point eight as the

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 2>optimal butterfly temperature.

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like my version better, even though it produces

0:46:29.120 --> 0:46:30.279
<v Speaker 1>incorrect results.

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean I wouldn't even have tried it, So hats

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 2>off to you for that.

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you for still commending me, and thank

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you to uh who.

0:46:38.680 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 2>That was just Jake, and let's say all the others.

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Jake at all, I appreciate you guys for correcting me.

0:46:46.920 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for that. It's been a great day. If

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you want to get in touch with us, like Jake

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 1>at All did, you can send us an email. Stuff

0:46:56.560 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>podcast at iHeartRadio dot com. Stuff you Should Know is

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeartRadio.

0:47:04.520 --> 0:47:08.879
<v Speaker 2>For more podcasts myheart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:10.840
<v Speaker 2>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.