Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Get more from Buck by following him on
Speaker 1: social media at Buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Speaker 1: Welcome everybody, great to be here. Look. I was in
Speaker 1: Florida and it was amazing. It really was. It was
Speaker 1: like an advertisement for what can happen when your state
Speaker 1: is not run by people who are completely beholden the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party, when your state is not overtaken by those
Speaker 1: who either seek to control you or are too terrified,
Speaker 1: too anxious to make reasonable decisions to come to fair
Speaker 1: minded conclusions about the kind of trade offs involved in
Speaker 1: dealing with a pandemic like we're seeing right now. I
Speaker 1: was in Florida for a week, and what did I see?
Speaker 1: People going about their lives, going to businesses, going to restaurants.
Speaker 1: I went out to eat night after night, restaurants, open businesses, stores,
Speaker 1: imagine this. I realized that I needed something. I had
Speaker 1: to go buy something, and I didn't even have to
Speaker 1: call ahead and say, hey, are you no I went
Speaker 1: to a bookstore in Florida. It was almost like a
Speaker 1: time warp. And you might say, well, hold on a second, Buck,
Speaker 1: they must be engaged in an experiment a human sacrifice,
Speaker 1: there must be a tremendous amount of loss as a
Speaker 1: result of their reckless policies in the Sunshine State. And
Speaker 1: it turns out that's not true at all. In fact,
Speaker 1: Florida is, by the numbers, by fatalities, by hospitalizations, better off,
Speaker 1: has been throughout the course of the pandemic, and continues
Speaker 1: to be better off. And it's two nearest states for comparison,
Speaker 1: New York and California. Florida is better off. Now, let's
Speaker 1: understand this. I've seen all these objections that will be raised.
Speaker 1: I've seen all the people that say, oh no, look
Speaker 1: at the number of cases, and they pick some arbitrary
Speaker 1: Look at the cases in Florida from December eighteenth to
Speaker 1: December twenty first. See, it's not better off. It's pathetic,
Speaker 1: it's desperate. We can all tell what's going on here.
Speaker 1: Let's understand this. For lockdowns to be even remotely worth it,
Speaker 1: for lockdowns to be intelligent public policy, there should be
Speaker 1: no debate when you see the numbers between cases, hospitalizations,
Speaker 1: and deaths in states with the most stringent lockdowns versus
Speaker 1: those that have taken a more open approach. We should
Speaker 1: be having a conversation about how Florida has two or
Speaker 1: three times the COVID cases, two or three times the death,
Speaker 1: not that it actually has less then states that have
Speaker 1: been going through continuous lockdowns for months and months. It
Speaker 1: should be absolutely obvious, it should be clear, and yet
Speaker 1: it isn't. You don't even have to get into a
Speaker 1: debate about whether Florida is better than New York when
Speaker 1: it comes to how it has handled COVID, whether Florida
Speaker 1: is better than California. And yes, we're talking about a
Speaker 1: large Republican governed state versus two very large Democrat Democrat
Speaker 1: governed states. This is about politics now because political parties
Speaker 1: have made it so, because people that believe that Fauci
Speaker 1: is some kind of a saint have convinced themselves than
Speaker 1: anyone who doubts the wisdom of these catastrophic, irrational policies
Speaker 1: is a bad person, as a person who doesn't care
Speaker 1: about human death, doesn't care how many people lose their lives. Well,
Speaker 1: as it turns out those people were wrong, they were wrong,
Speaker 1: and we can see it, and we all need to
Speaker 1: understand this. You need to be secure in the knowledge
Speaker 1: that you have from seeing what's going on around you.
Speaker 1: With the country right now, you need to know that
Speaker 1: the experts are not going to come over to your side,
Speaker 1: because this has become the experts and the elites unified
Speaker 1: against those who believe that freedom and the Constitution and
Speaker 1: the right to ask questions aren't supposed to be suspended
Speaker 1: the moment there's an emergency. If Florida, I was at restaurants,
Speaker 1: I was out, I was seeing people living their lives.
Speaker 1: I was down there with brothers, my two brothers, and
Speaker 1: my girlfriend and seeing various friends, some of whom you'd
Speaker 1: even know from this show and from conservative media, people
Speaker 1: who either have moved down there and they were showing
Speaker 1: another way. You know, the states in our system are
Speaker 1: supposed to be experiments in a sense. There's the essence
Speaker 1: of the states as laboratories for different policies, and the
Speaker 1: Democrat obsession with the most stringent lockdowns possible, the Democrats
Speaker 1: obsession with making this as horrific and economic and emotional
Speaker 1: and psychological cost as possible from this pandemic. It's not
Speaker 1: going to stop. We have to stop them. We have
Speaker 1: to win the argument. They don't even see the results
Speaker 1: that we see and come to the same conclusion they
Speaker 1: don't turn around and say, you know what, you're right.
Speaker 1: We shouldn't have done this, This was a bad idea. No,
Speaker 1: they turn around, they say, we need more of it,
Speaker 1: we need more double down, triple down. Why hasn't it
Speaker 1: worked because we haven't done it well enough. They ignore.
Speaker 1: They always talked about the data in the early days
Speaker 1: of this, and Fauci and the others talk about their
Speaker 1: adherence to the data. Well, when you point out that
Speaker 1: compliance when it comes to masking, compliance when it comes
Speaker 1: to these draconian policies is higher than it has ever been,
Speaker 1: and particularly in places like New York and California. And
Speaker 1: I'm just most familiar with the numbers in those states.
Speaker 1: There are others you could put in there as well.
Speaker 1: But they said that they figured it out, they knew
Speaker 1: what to do, They had the facts, you see, and
Speaker 1: so they told tens of millions of people, Cancel Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: cancel Christmas, don't see your loved ones live in fear.
Speaker 1: Watch your business be shut down, watch your bank account,
Speaker 1: watch your life savings evaporate, because it's the only way
Speaker 1: you'll be safe. And now what you see is that
Speaker 1: we had to do all that. We had no choice
Speaker 1: they made us. They use the force of the state,
Speaker 1: and we're not safe. The numbers are off the charts,
Speaker 1: cases rising, as though this stuff we're doing doesn't really
Speaker 1: stop it at all. That's where we are observe it.
Speaker 1: See it for yourself. I came back from Florida, I
Speaker 1: was on the plane. I get to New York and
Speaker 1: sure enough there's members of the National Guard taking data
Speaker 1: because they insist, they insist that we fill out all
Speaker 1: this information about ourselves so that we can be tested
Speaker 1: and test and traced. What is that going to do.
Speaker 1: By the time they contact me, a week will have passed.
Speaker 1: I'll already be beyond the quarantine phase. They've got hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands, now a million New Yorkers say that they've
Speaker 1: tested positive for COVID. A million, that's the latest number
Speaker 1: you see. And the claim is what they're going to
Speaker 1: be able to call, every contact every person. You see,
Speaker 1: This was idiotic from the start. You cannot test and
Speaker 1: trace a million people. Remind the actual millions of people
Speaker 1: beyond that that you have no idea whether they have
Speaker 1: this or not. New York COVID hospitalizations are up eighty
Speaker 1: percent in four weeks. A million residents have tested positive.
Speaker 1: And what is Governor Cuomo doing. He's saying that they'll
Speaker 1: find people a million dollars. Now, any practitioner who gives
Speaker 1: a COVID vaccine to somebody who's not considered at the
Speaker 1: high priority, will we find a million dollars. Oh, that's right.
Speaker 1: Make it so that now there are enormous penalties attached
Speaker 1: to giving someone a vaccine that could save their life
Speaker 1: if it's not in the order that a bunch of
Speaker 1: feckless bureaucrats decide that's going to make the vaccine get
Speaker 1: distributed faster, that's gonna help. No, they haven't helped at all.
Speaker 1: They've been catastrophic failures. In fact, chief among them has
Speaker 1: been the governor of New York, although the governor of
Speaker 1: California is right behind him. And now we have this
Speaker 1: incoming Biden administration that has learned none of the actual
Speaker 1: lessons based on the data, and they're going to do
Speaker 1: exactly what has been done all along and that has
Speaker 1: failed all along. And if we don't stop them, if
Speaker 1: we don't win the argument and pushback and non comply,
Speaker 1: everyone will eventually see this as one of the greatest
Speaker 1: periods of national folly of the last hundred years. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is insane what we're doing. You can see it
Speaker 1: for yourself. I saw it. People are going about their
Speaker 1: lives in Florida. Yes there are cases there. Yes, it's
Speaker 1: a very serious disease. It's very dangerous to the elderly.
Speaker 1: And yet you can still allow life to continue while
Speaker 1: trying to take reasonable steps to protect yourself, reasonable precautions.
Speaker 1: What you see in these Democrat enclaves, and what you
Speaker 1: will see from the federal level from Biden Harris is unreasonable.
Speaker 1: You'll see unreasonable steps, not just continued, enhanced, expanded, they'll
Speaker 1: go even further into this, which is just the height
Speaker 1: of stupidity. We can have our freedom back, or at
Speaker 1: least much more of it than we've had. We can
Speaker 1: have our constitutional rights back. Freedom is our fight. This
Speaker 1: year twenty twenty one, I'm telling you right now, is
Speaker 1: going to be all about the fight for liberty on
Speaker 1: an individual basis and for a free society. You have
Speaker 1: the lockdowns, you have the tech censors. You have a
Speaker 1: Democrat party that increasingly bears its authoritarian things without any
Speaker 1: sense whatsoever of fair play and good faith toward the
Speaker 1: other side. Because they haven't had it for years because
Speaker 1: Trump defeating Trump in their minds, justified absolutely anything. This
Speaker 1: year is going to be about the fight for freedom.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake about it. I don't care who the
Speaker 1: president ends up being. I don't care who ends up
Speaker 1: winning the next two seats in this Georgia runoff. It's
Speaker 1: going to be about taking back our freedom from those
Speaker 1: who have taken it away from us and who are
Speaker 1: ultimately I think terrified about what would happen if the
Speaker 1: American people came to the realization that this was all for.
Speaker 1: What exactly the masked mania, the lockdowns, the constant lectures
Speaker 1: who are welly, and propaganda everywhere about hand washing and
Speaker 1: social distancing, What exactly did that save us from? Where
Speaker 1: are the results? Where's the upside of any of that
Speaker 1: as a policy? If you say that, they'll just yell
Speaker 1: at you that you don't believe in science, and then
Speaker 1: they'll tell you that there are more than two genders.
Speaker 1: That's the world we live in now in this country.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get
Speaker 1: the latest news and information from Buck by heading to
Speaker 1: Bucksexton dot com twenty four hours away. Give or take
Speaker 1: from I guess what would call it G Day for Georgia.
Speaker 1: Not quite D Day, but it's a big day Tomorrow.
Speaker 1: We have two Senate seats hanging in the ballots, and
Speaker 1: with those two seats control of the Senate. And if
Speaker 1: the Democrats were to manage to take this and if
Speaker 1: the current path which will have a Biden Harris presidency continues,
Speaker 1: which I think we all have to assume it will.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean we give up the fight, but it
Speaker 1: means that we have to prepare for this reality. And
Speaker 1: that's what I've been telling you for weeks, and I
Speaker 1: think now if we all look back at that, in fairness,
Speaker 1: that was the correct approach fight. But prepare right. This
Speaker 1: is that this means you, you know, you keep throwing,
Speaker 1: you keep throwing the ball, you keep running up the middle.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter if you're down two touchdowns, but you know,
Speaker 1: you also got to be ready for the possibility that
Speaker 1: you're not going to the super Bowl. But in Georgia,
Speaker 1: what we see are two Democrat candidates who are really
Speaker 1: particularly well suited to show you what the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: has has become in this moment, and notably this ass
Speaker 1: Off character, who is it's almost like a a elitist
Speaker 1: democrat created in a lab. I mean this guy, nothing
Speaker 1: about him, nothing about him speaks to strength or wisdom
Speaker 1: or a good judgment. He's just he's just a little
Speaker 1: little rich boy who wants to be important and powerful.
Speaker 1: And so he figures if he says, if he mouths
Speaker 1: the right slogans, if he says the right things, ass
Speaker 1: Off will get to be a center. And look, there
Speaker 1: are plenty of clownish politicians on both sides. And there
Speaker 1: are people who, yeah, they've got a lot of access
Speaker 1: to money, maybe from their family, whatever it may be,
Speaker 1: and they're not particularly impressive either. But this Assoff guy,
Speaker 1: I gotta say, not not somebody that you'd wanted your foxhole,
Speaker 1: that is for sure. Kelly Lefler. I was surprised that
Speaker 1: this was Kelly Leffler, able able to throw throw some elbows,
Speaker 1: wouldn't necessary here? She is play one. Georgia knows that
Speaker 1: John Assoff is a pathological liar. He's a trust fund
Speaker 1: socialist whose only job has been working for the Chinese
Speaker 1: Communist Party in recent years. And look, here's the deal.
Speaker 1: If we're gonna tell lies about my campaign, let's tell
Speaker 1: the truth about who he's campaigning with this is the truth.
Speaker 1: Radical liberal Rafael Warnock has been involved in child abuse,
Speaker 1: domestic abuse. He's someone who has praised Fidel Castro, Louis Ferricon,
Speaker 1: Carl Mars, James Cone. These are radicals. Has attacked our military,
Speaker 1: our police, our small businesses, and every Georgian who wants
Speaker 1: to live the American dream. So I'm not going to
Speaker 1: be lectured by some thirty three year old trust fund
Speaker 1: socialist who's a pathological liar. Let it rip, Kelly, let
Speaker 1: it rip. I like it, I like gosh. She gets
Speaker 1: right to it and decides that she's not not going
Speaker 1: to hold back on this guy, who really does remind
Speaker 1: me very much of that Obama eramime of pajama Boy,
Speaker 1: the guy picking if you remember, he was picking his
Speaker 1: Obamacare plan and his pajamas drinking tea. He kind of
Speaker 1: even looks a little bit like us off. But not
Speaker 1: that that matters. It's kind of funny, though, So Georgia
Speaker 1: matters a whole lot, because if we lose Georgia, well
Speaker 1: then we all recognize that if we lose Georgia, if
Speaker 1: we lose both of these Senate seats, the Democrats are
Speaker 1: almost certain to have unified control. And really, let's be honest, folks,
Speaker 1: it's ninety nine percent that that's what's going to happen.
Speaker 1: If they take those Senate seats, they will have unified
Speaker 1: control the government. Nancy Pelosi was just voted in as
Speaker 1: a Speaker of the House. You know, my favorite thing
Speaker 1: about that is talking about a chardonnay socialist. I mean,
Speaker 1: Nancy is should we call her Pino Nancy or Chardonnaye Nancy.
Speaker 1: She's among the most outrageous hypocrites and frauds you could
Speaker 1: find in the Democrat Party, which is saying a lot.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's quite impressive to pull off that feat.
Speaker 1: But Chardonnaye Nancy as now is now the Speaker of
Speaker 1: the House, and the next as the next Congress now
Speaker 1: is going about their business. And she also required the
Speaker 1: votes of some members of Congress who had recently tested
Speaker 1: positive for COVID. But we're told to fly in and
Speaker 1: vote anyway. I saw this. I just it's amazing, isn't it.
Speaker 1: You can't say it's unbelievable, because of course you believe it,
Speaker 1: Because of course COVID is so dangerous and so horrible
Speaker 1: that you can't be in the same home over the
Speaker 1: holidays as loved ones, including loved ones who just by
Speaker 1: nature of father time don't have much time left. You
Speaker 1: can't see them. But if a Democrat who's important is
Speaker 1: going to have a funeral, well, then the COVID rules
Speaker 1: get waived. If a Democrat needs votes on the floor
Speaker 1: of the Congress, then the COVID rules get waived. Almost
Speaker 1: like the virus has a political affiliation, you know, the
Speaker 1: virus will back off. And you saw this even over
Speaker 1: the over the last summer when suddenly mass gatherings were
Speaker 1: safe during COVID outbreaks because it was necessary for public
Speaker 1: health for BLM to burn down stores, loot buildings, and
Speaker 1: attack strangers for no reason. Yeah, that's the kind Those
Speaker 1: are the kind of public health experts that we've been
Speaker 1: listening to. No one to get me started on doctor Fauci.
Speaker 1: That guy is one of the biggest catastrophes to befall America.
Speaker 1: Fauci belongs in the history books alongside generals in World
Speaker 1: War One who sent thousands and thousands of men directly
Speaker 1: into the machine guns hoping the other side would run
Speaker 1: out of ammo. You're in the freedom hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton show podcast from more buck Head to
Speaker 1: Bucksexton dot com and remember to subscribe to the podcast.
Speaker 1: But while we are on the subject of socialism for
Speaker 1: the rich, which my Republican friends have suddenly become very
Speaker 1: concerned about, let me talk about the Trump tax proposal
Speaker 1: that was pushed very hard by Senator McConnell and the
Speaker 1: Republican leadership and where I think every Republican voted for it.
Speaker 1: You want to talk about socialism for the rich, it
Speaker 1: is not the bill that puts two thousand dollars into
Speaker 1: working class hands all over this country. That ain't socialism
Speaker 1: for the rich. This is socialism for the rich in
Speaker 1: that bill. Amazon. Oh by the way, I must say
Speaker 1: this if I may, we' are quoting the liberal Washington
Speaker 1: Post owned by Jeff Bezos, the wealthiest guy in the world.
Speaker 1: So here is Jeff Bezos's company Amazon, and they received
Speaker 1: a tax threebite. They paid nothing in two and eighteen
Speaker 1: in federal taxes. That's a corrupt tax system to begin with.
Speaker 1: But then on top of that, they received a hundred
Speaker 1: and twenty nine million dollars as a tax threebite. That,
Speaker 1: Senator Thune, is what socialism for the rich. There's one
Speaker 1: thing that Bernie Sanders knows that's socialism, that's for sure.
Speaker 1: He's not necessarily honest about socialism, but he certainly is
Speaker 1: quite familiar with it. Is it's his ideology. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's this guy's reason for being. It's why he is
Speaker 1: a senator. That's why he was almost the Democrat candidate
Speaker 1: for the presidency. And I wish he had been, because
Speaker 1: at least with Sanders, you get some honesty about what
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party is. At least with Sanders, they're more
Speaker 1: upfront about it. Notice how he goes after corporations and
Speaker 1: this is just all for show. It's almost like a
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders candidacy. It's to make it seem it's to
Speaker 1: make it seem like there's an openness about the radical
Speaker 1: aims of the Democrat Party to get the base all
Speaker 1: on board. But they're not going to let them really
Speaker 1: run the show because they don't understand the bargain. The radicals,
Speaker 1: the squad, the people in the Democrat Party on the
Speaker 1: far left, they're there to make noises about these things,
Speaker 1: but they're not the ones that are really going to
Speaker 1: run things. AOC just voted for Nancy Pelosi to be
Speaker 1: Speaker of the House. That happened. I think the whole
Speaker 1: squad actually voted for Nancy Pelosi. Now is what do
Speaker 1: we learn from all of this. The radical left, the
Speaker 1: activist class with the Democrat Party. They're there to pretend
Speaker 1: that all they care about is social justice, advancing minorities
Speaker 1: interests and advancing socialism for the poor, for the working class,
Speaker 1: and for the poor, but really for the poor, actually
Speaker 1: for the non working class, and for the elites. On
Speaker 1: the other side, you have Democrats like Pelosi, who this
Speaker 1: is the whole game. Who benefits from the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: the most. It's the people that are the most dependent
Speaker 1: on government and the people who benefit the most from government.
Speaker 1: And that does include very powerful corporate interest. That does
Speaker 1: include libs who run the tech monopolies. It includes the
Speaker 1: leftists who are in charge of places like Amazon and
Speaker 1: Google and others. Yeah, that's right. They like the government
Speaker 1: because it can be an anti competitive edge for them.
Speaker 1: It can prevent them from having to really deal on
Speaker 1: in a free and fair market place with opposition. Right,
Speaker 1: the more regulations you have, the more carve outs in
Speaker 1: the tax code, the more legal hurdles, and all the
Speaker 1: different individuals back office that you have to have to
Speaker 1: comply with the different dictates from DC. Well, if you're
Speaker 1: already a mega corporation, you're making a ton of money,
Speaker 1: you're good to go. Big business loves big government. Don't
Speaker 1: ever forget that there especially big business that can continue
Speaker 1: to find ways to benefit from things like the tax
Speaker 1: coach so Bernie Sanders railing on about two thousand dollars
Speaker 1: to Americans. This is where Trump and Bernie agree, And
Speaker 1: there is something because of the populous nature of some
Speaker 1: of Trump's ideas and some of Bernie Sanders ideas, there
Speaker 1: is something too the crossover. And there has been on trade.
Speaker 1: There has been on America first and the workers in
Speaker 1: this country getting the benefits of being Americans over foreigners,
Speaker 1: and having jobs outsourced and all the rest of it. Now,
Speaker 1: that work is far from done, and as we know,
Speaker 1: there are a lot of a lot of continued battles
Speaker 1: we have to deal with from the Trump from the
Speaker 1: Trump first term. But I'm just telling you right now,
Speaker 1: I don't know why Republicans. It's almost like they're trying
Speaker 1: to lose these two Georgia Senate seeds. It's almost like
Speaker 1: they don't want to be back in the mix. I
Speaker 1: don't know what to say. Now. There's there are two
Speaker 1: elements here. There are the Lynnwood I'm crazy going to
Speaker 1: say insane things about the election, which is so damaging
Speaker 1: because it undermines the very real questions and concerns about
Speaker 1: the election, about the integrity of the election, the fraud,
Speaker 1: all of that. Right, what's a great way to undermine
Speaker 1: real objections. It starts to feel like this guy Lynnwood
Speaker 1: is either crazy or he's a trojan horse for the left,
Speaker 1: because the best way to undermine the real objections is
Speaker 1: to constantly spout nonsense. And if you look at this
Speaker 1: guy's Twitter feed, I'm not even gonna get into it,
Speaker 1: but the guy's just gibberish. It's just crazy stuff that
Speaker 1: he's saying now, And there was a time I'm when
Speaker 1: I know many Trump supporters were looking to him because
Speaker 1: he was saying, oh, no, we're gonna it's all a
Speaker 1: fraud and we're gonna prove it. And I'm saying, okay, great,
Speaker 1: show me that proof. I think it was a fraud too,
Speaker 1: Where's where's the proof? And other people are looking at
Speaker 1: this and talking about double voting, and they're talking about
Speaker 1: dead people voting and those are the those are the
Speaker 1: real considerations of concerns. What do you have when you
Speaker 1: when you look at the lynn Woods of the world,
Speaker 1: What are they telling you? What are they saying? I
Speaker 1: can't even it's too silly to even repeat. I mean,
Speaker 1: he's talking about people being tried for treason and just
Speaker 1: just crazy stuff. So remember that there are those who
Speaker 1: pretend to be in this fight and they're actually helping
Speaker 1: the other side. There are those who are holding themselves
Speaker 1: up as the great champions of MAGA, and they are
Speaker 1: act satively assisting. They are aiding and abetting the pelosite
Speaker 1: left and the Democrats, the socialists, and they're doing so
Speaker 1: either because they're too stupid to know otherwise they're more
Speaker 1: likely they're frauds. They're frauds, and they understand exactly what
Speaker 1: they're doing. Actually, Dennison, exactly what's going on here? Now?
Speaker 1: There was this phone call over the weekend that was
Speaker 1: released by this Georgia Secretary of State, Raffensburger. And this
Speaker 1: guy again, he's a little rich boy, okay, and you
Speaker 1: know that's just the truth. So Raffensburger is a rich
Speaker 1: guy who wanted to be important in Georgia. So he
Speaker 1: becomes Secretary of State, really has no experience or knowledge.
Speaker 1: That's but okay, look, you know he's got the role.
Speaker 1: So we got to deal with this. And Trump called them,
Speaker 1: and I'm just gonna say this, there are certain things
Speaker 1: an honorable person doesn't do unless there are extenuating into
Speaker 1: extreme circumstances to it, and then you'd have to explain
Speaker 1: what those are. But you don't have a you don't
Speaker 1: have a phone call with the President of the United
Speaker 1: States that you surreptitiously tape and then publicly release. You know,
Speaker 1: if anyone, and I know, if anyone who worked for
Speaker 1: me or with me or around me did this, I
Speaker 1: would be right rightly outraged, just because it's a dishonorable,
Speaker 1: loser thing to do. And that is what Raffinsburger did.
Speaker 1: And you have to wonder what does he think, what
Speaker 1: purpose does this serve? I think it's because his own ego.
Speaker 1: He was worried that Trump was going to say things
Speaker 1: that he didn't like, so if he taped it, he'd
Speaker 1: have that as back up. But even still, if you're
Speaker 1: going to do that, tell the president that says, mister President,
Speaker 1: I would like to record this call. That's the honorable
Speaker 1: thing to do. You know, that would be the way
Speaker 1: to Now. I think Georgia has a one party consent,
Speaker 1: but I do believe it was across state lines anyway,
Speaker 1: I don't know. The recording laws are a bit complicated.
Speaker 1: They're definitely variable and they're a little bit complicated. Here
Speaker 1: is some of this phone call though, play clip twenty one.
Speaker 1: I just want to find eleven thousand, seven hundred eighty votes,
Speaker 1: which is one more that we have because we won
Speaker 1: the say so, tell me bred what are we gonna do?
Speaker 1: We won the election and it's not fair to take
Speaker 1: it away from us like this. Now what what's the
Speaker 1: media saying about this? How are they taking this? Well,
Speaker 1: they're claiming that Trump is trying to Trump is trying
Speaker 1: to cheat, He's trying to push and steal an election
Speaker 1: that Trump is trying to That's what they're doing. Now,
Speaker 1: what is Trump really saying here? His belief And I'm
Speaker 1: I would I would bet any amount of money that
Speaker 1: you want that Trump does think this, does believe this,
Speaker 1: Although I don't like to bet, so I'll take that away.
Speaker 1: But you know what I'm saying, I bet you. I'll
Speaker 1: just say it that way. I bet you that Trump
Speaker 1: really does believe that he won this election, that he
Speaker 1: won the election, and he thinks he won in Georgia.
Speaker 1: So all he's saying, and Trump's mind is, come on, man,
Speaker 1: you've got to get me the real answers here. There's
Speaker 1: no way, there's no way that the rate of absentee
Speaker 1: ballot rejection or mail in ballot rejection was so much
Speaker 1: lower this time around, with so many more ballots. It's
Speaker 1: not possible. So find out what happened here, and all
Speaker 1: you have to do is show me twelve thousand, roughly
Speaker 1: Ian he said, eleven thousand something, twelve thousand ballots that
Speaker 1: are invalidated from their side because they were illegal ballots.
Speaker 1: And I win. That's what he's That's what Trump is saying.
Speaker 1: But I know that the way that this has reported
Speaker 1: on is Trump is pressuring him. I mean, he's really
Speaker 1: going to pressurehim. He would make some kind of a threat.
Speaker 1: You would assume, right, he would do something beyond this.
Speaker 1: But now they're now they're at they're at def Con
Speaker 1: Defcon one against Trump. Now it's it's the usual panic.
Speaker 1: And you know, here's Senator Van Holland. Oh, it's a
Speaker 1: criminal act play seven. Well, I do think this has
Speaker 1: the elements of a criminal act, and there's been a
Speaker 1: lot of discussion about that. I think the authorities in
Speaker 1: Georgia and a future Justice Department need to look into
Speaker 1: that and make a determination about whether or not to
Speaker 1: bring charges. Obviously, this president is facing a lot of
Speaker 1: other potential civil and criminal liability when he leaves office
Speaker 1: for other acts he's committed, and this is you know,
Speaker 1: going to be part of that review by future administration.
Speaker 1: But I think or the authorities in Georgia, now, there's
Speaker 1: no criminal act here. This is just bullcrap from a
Speaker 1: from a clown. Well, what he's telling you is important
Speaker 1: to remember, and I want all of you to remember this.
Speaker 1: They will not be satisfied when Trump leaves office. They
Speaker 1: will not be satisfied with that it's not going to happen.
Speaker 1: They want him to be prosecuted. That is what the
Speaker 1: Democrats actually want to happen. They want to see him
Speaker 1: dragged into court, criminally prosecuted, and ruined. Because in the
Speaker 1: back of their minds, a lot of them must know,
Speaker 1: I mean, this has already come out. They recognize that
Speaker 1: what's gone on here look shady to tens of millions
Speaker 1: of Americans and beyond that, the Trump movement is going
Speaker 1: to continue. The Trump movement doesn't stop just because Trump
Speaker 1: isn't the president. And what really we need to start
Speaker 1: thinking about what are we going to call it? What
Speaker 1: is this conservative populism? Is a constitutional populism? We need
Speaker 1: to come up with award? Is it just you know,
Speaker 1: maga or what are we going to say about this?
Speaker 1: Because it's not stopping the It's more than even just
Speaker 1: a set of policies. It's an approach to politics that's
Speaker 1: not going away. So they want Trump to be prosecuted
Speaker 1: because they feel like that's the only way that they'll
Speaker 1: get to a point where all of a sudden, all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, it will all stop. It will be over,
Speaker 1: it'll be done. The nightmare of having to deal with
Speaker 1: this guy will come to conclusion. I'm just gonna tell
Speaker 1: you this right now. This is the rubicon, my friends.
Speaker 1: If Democrats bring a criminal charge against Donald Trump, and
Speaker 1: if you don't think they're capable of it, I got
Speaker 1: news for you. I think they are. At the state level,
Speaker 1: they'll bring some kind of RinkyDink mickey mouse criminal charge
Speaker 1: against President Trump and he leaves office. We need to
Speaker 1: be prepared for that, because notice how quickly it shifted
Speaker 1: from unity unity, which just meant shut up and do
Speaker 1: what you're told to. Well, now we're going to have
Speaker 1: to actually go after Trump criminally and go after his
Speaker 1: family members. They didn't miss a beat, no issue with,
Speaker 1: no problem with whatsoever, and they're serious about it, while
Speaker 1: our side has got Paul Ryan and other people going
Speaker 1: around telling all of us, you know, the gentlemanly way
Speaker 1: to act the Trump. Rather the Democrat side is saying
Speaker 1: that Trump needs to be criminally prosecuted. The Democrat side
Speaker 1: is saying that Trump is a huge, a huge target
Speaker 1: for retribution, and that's what they're looking to do. It's
Speaker 1: just a question when they get the opening. You're in
Speaker 1: the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Get more from Buck by following him on social media
Speaker 1: at buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. If I
Speaker 1: were the House Democrats, there's nothing stopping him right now
Speaker 1: from convening the Oversider Juiciary Committee, play the audio in
Speaker 1: full for an hour straight, make every members sit there
Speaker 1: and listen to it, and then vote on impeachment right there,
Speaker 1: because that there has to be a cost for these things,
Speaker 1: and even if he won't be removed and inducted about
Speaker 1: the Senate, President Trump deserves the historical stain, the permanent
Speaker 1: stain of impeachment. There's a reason why these processes exist
Speaker 1: in the first place. It's to have some measure of accountability,
Speaker 1: even if not in real time, but for the future,
Speaker 1: and for that context, it has to be made very
Speaker 1: clear by a coequal branch of government that what Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is caught on tape doing is illegal, it's wrong,
Speaker 1: it's undemocratic. They want to impeach him again, just just
Speaker 1: in case you're ordering, is buck going too far? They
Speaker 1: really want to product well, they want to impeach him again.
Speaker 1: We've got what three weeks, less than three weeks before
Speaker 1: there's a transition, and I know you look, I understand
Speaker 1: there's going to be an objection to the certification of
Speaker 1: the results. There should be more investigation. I agree with that.
Speaker 1: I agree that we should have more information, we should
Speaker 1: look into this, we should look for accountability. I agree
Speaker 1: with all of that. But I'm telling you the truth.
Speaker 1: A lot of other people are going to pander. I
Speaker 1: don't pander. The objections that these eleven senators are considering
Speaker 1: are not considering are not going to stop anything. They're
Speaker 1: not unconstitutional. It's not a crisis. It's fine, it's the
Speaker 1: right thing to do, but it's not going to stop anything.
Speaker 1: But they still, even with all of this, Democrats are
Speaker 1: out there talking about how they want to they want
Speaker 1: to impeach this guy. You know, well, how many people
Speaker 1: were talking about impeaching and prosecuting Obama? And when I
Speaker 1: say people, I'm not talking about you know, your random
Speaker 1: buddy Phil who lives down the street from you and
Speaker 1: mutters to himself a lot, I'm talking about actual elected
Speaker 1: Democrats in office. How many of them we're talking I'm sorry, Republicans.
Speaker 1: How many elected Republicans were actually talking about doing this. None.
Speaker 1: We're all happy that Trump had won in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: and we're thinking about the future. Well, not every Republican
Speaker 1: was happy, but a lot of us were. Now here
Speaker 1: we are now. What we see continues continues to play
Speaker 1: out and exactly the way that we should have expected along,
Speaker 1: which is that their hope is that they can get
Speaker 1: retribution against Donald Trump. Not enough to beat him. They
Speaker 1: want to get him, and not just him, people who
Speaker 1: supported him, people around him, maybe people who even say
Speaker 1: too many nice things about him on radio. You know,
Speaker 1: just just telling you right now, wait for it. I'll
Speaker 1: tell you when it happens. I RS. All of a
Speaker 1: sudden's gonna come knocking on the Bucksters door. Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: nice radio show. You got there be a shame of
Speaker 1: something happened to it. Trump's supporter. You're in the freedom hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast from more buck
Speaker 1: Head to Bucksexton dot com and remember to subscribe to
Speaker 1: the podcast. Big Week in Politics. How are we looking,
Speaker 1: my fellow conservatives? What are we dealing with now? My
Speaker 1: friend Sean Parnell joins us. He is a former Army ranger,
Speaker 1: author of Outlaw Platoon as well as other great books.
Speaker 1: He is a candidate for a congressional seat out there
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania. That fight continues on, but Sean joins us. Now, Sean,
Speaker 1: great to have you. Hey Buck, good to be back.
Speaker 1: I hope you had a great holiday season, my friend.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about Georgia first. I mean, you just you
Speaker 1: just ran in this last election for Congress, and you're
Speaker 1: very plugged into what's happening, and you certainly know in
Speaker 1: real detail the ways that this election was funky. I
Speaker 1: guess that's a way we could describe it, that there
Speaker 1: are problems here, there was clear fraud. But explain this
Speaker 1: to me, how do you how do you think we're
Speaker 1: shaping up right now in Georgia. I'm I've been worried
Speaker 1: for weeks about the apathy effect mixed in with some
Speaker 1: of the the lack of focus that I'm seeing from
Speaker 1: the GOP nationally and in Georgia. Yeah, I agree, I
Speaker 1: am very very concerned for Georgia. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: because a clear signal that the Supreme Court and other courts,
Speaker 1: federal courts and state courts have set a precedent that
Speaker 1: really the Constitution doesn't matter. Laws, election laws don't matter.
Speaker 1: When we saw laws as specifically here in the state
Speaker 1: of Pennsylvania buck that were violated, whether you know Pack
Speaker 1: seventy seven itself, our mail in ballot law was unconstitutional
Speaker 1: to the Secretary of State in Pennsylvania changing unilaterally changing
Speaker 1: election law to remove the postmark for mail in ballots
Speaker 1: and signature verification. All of these things are required by
Speaker 1: the legislature to change, but Pennsylvania changed them. And then
Speaker 1: you have this Mark Zuckerberg money, this Facebook money poured
Speaker 1: into the state of Pennsylvania and PA seventeen in Allegheny
Speaker 1: County alone got two point two million dollars, which basically
Speaker 1: paid judges of elections, boosted their salaries, paid for ballot
Speaker 1: drop boxes and satellite remote voting facilities. All of this
Speaker 1: stuff was changed on the fly, buck, all of it.
Speaker 1: And we're seeing the same things happen in Georgia. And indeed,
Speaker 1: what happened in the general election in Georgia there were
Speaker 1: there were ballot drop boxes, there, there were remote satellite
Speaker 1: voting facilities there. Paul watchers were denied meaningful access. And
Speaker 1: I mean when you think about the concept of a
Speaker 1: ballot drop box, I mean, come on, anybody with an
Speaker 1: ounce of common sense can tell you that they cannot
Speaker 1: be supervised twenty four hours a day, seven days a week.
Speaker 1: For what prevents any democratic activists from stuffing one hundred
Speaker 1: ballots in there every single day for a week. And
Speaker 1: in Georgia, they didn't scale back on any of this stuff. Buck,
Speaker 1: the Secretary of State in Georgia plussed up on ballot
Speaker 1: drop boxes. So now there are more. And so you
Speaker 1: add to all of these unconstitutional last minute voting changes, right,
Speaker 1: you add to that the level of what you said,
Speaker 1: the apathy that I feel like Trump voters are feeling
Speaker 1: like many And by the way, I think it's very
Speaker 1: important there's a clear distinction between a Trump voter and
Speaker 1: a traditional Republican voter, and first success, for there to
Speaker 1: be any level of success achieved in Georgia, both traditional
Speaker 1: GOP and Trump voters need to turn out in force
Speaker 1: in the base. The Republican base, the Trump base feels
Speaker 1: I will tell you they feel a sense of apathy
Speaker 1: because they feel like they were left behind by the
Speaker 1: courts and perhaps even some members in the Senate and
Speaker 1: the House who aren't fighting as passionately as I think
Speaker 1: they need to be to make sure that people have
Speaker 1: a sense of clarity with a selection. So I'm very
Speaker 1: worried about Georgia. Hopefully when the President goes down there today,
Speaker 1: he'll stir up the base in northern Georgia, because in
Speaker 1: Northern Georgia, those Republicans need to turn out in force.
Speaker 1: But I'm worried because, man, I feel like we are staring,
Speaker 1: we are staring into the abyss here man, this country
Speaker 1: stands on a thin line between hope and darkness, and
Speaker 1: if we lose, if we lose both races in Georgia.
Speaker 1: I mean, the Democrats have not made a secret about
Speaker 1: the fact that they will do everything that they can
Speaker 1: to fundamentally change America for generations. What do you think,
Speaker 1: Shawn about this plan? So we got we got Georgia tomorrow,
Speaker 1: and then you know, it's a big week, A lot
Speaker 1: going on here with Georgia tomorrow, and then you have
Speaker 1: the certification January sixth, right, the Electoral College results certification
Speaker 1: in Congress, you got eleven eleven senators who are saying
Speaker 1: that they will reject the electors from disputed states as
Speaker 1: not regularly given and lawfully certified unless a ten day
Speaker 1: audit is completed. You've got Senators Cruz, Johnson, Langford, Danes Kennedy,
Speaker 1: Marsha Blackburne, Mike Braun, Cynthia Loomis, Roger Marshall, Bill Haggerty,
Speaker 1: and Tommy Tuberville. They've all said they're going to vote
Speaker 1: against accepting election results unless there is a ten day audit.
Speaker 1: They want to extend this thing out. Just first off,
Speaker 1: what do you think about this at the macro level?
Speaker 1: Is this the right move and do you think it
Speaker 1: can do anything? Well, look, I agree with it. I
Speaker 1: do think it's the right move. I don't know if
Speaker 1: a ten day commission is going to have the time
Speaker 1: necessary to get the information required to do anything with it.
Speaker 1: I Senator Cruise, I think is right to push back
Speaker 1: on this issue because I'll tell you look, and this
Speaker 1: is just from my personal experience on the ground of Pennsylvania, Buck,
Speaker 1: I have no idea how any person Democrat or Republican,
Speaker 1: and I mean this can certify the race in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: I mean everything that I just mentioned about unconstitutional changes
Speaker 1: to election system, to our electoral process here last minute
Speaker 1: on the go, and add to that, like we're putting
Speaker 1: together an audit of the vote numbers using Pennsylvania's own
Speaker 1: reported numbers at a precinct by precinct level and across
Speaker 1: the state of Pennsylvania, there's a one hundred and twenty
Speaker 1: thousand vote deficit. And what that means is there are
Speaker 1: one hundred and twenty thousand more votes than voter statewide, right,
Speaker 1: than people who cast ballots in my district alone, throughout
Speaker 1: more votes than people who vote on election day. And
Speaker 1: this is data that can be taken from the short
Speaker 1: system in Pennsylvania. The short system is our official voter
Speaker 1: database and registry by law Buck by law, the state
Speaker 1: of Pennsylvania cannot be certified until those numbers are reconciled
Speaker 1: in the SHORT system. And we just swore in one
Speaker 1: hundred and seventeen Congress yesterday and those numbers have yet
Speaker 1: to be rectified. And Alleghany County hasn't updated the SHORT
Speaker 1: system since November twenty four. So this is clearly illegal
Speaker 1: and I don't know how anyone can certify the state
Speaker 1: of Pennsylvania. This election was just a disaster, and every
Speaker 1: day that goes by, we found out more information. It
Speaker 1: makes me less comfortable with the way the the election
Speaker 1: is conducted here in Pennsylvania. Sean, we're speaking with Sean Parnell.
Speaker 1: He was a candidate for congressional seat in Pennsylvania seventeenth district.
Speaker 1: He is a former Army ranger, best selling author and
Speaker 1: us all of you listen to the show. Note buddy
Speaker 1: of mine and Sean, I need to ask you this,
Speaker 1: Why is it so you know you tell me these numbers?
Speaker 1: For example, you mentioned Pennsylvania over one hundred thousand more
Speaker 1: votes than voters. What is the explanation for this? Because
Speaker 1: I feel like there's you know, one of the one
Speaker 1: of the problems is that there are these real objections
Speaker 1: and real fraud let's call them indicators that have been
Speaker 1: all mixed in with the you know, all the krack
Speaker 1: in is coming and there's a you know, Hugo Chavez
Speaker 1: was hang out with Paul pod and they hacked into
Speaker 1: machines and they flew them to Mars, and you know,
Speaker 1: there's all this nonsense out there too, and it is nonsense,
Speaker 1: and then there's the real stuff, and the nonsense is
Speaker 1: making it harder to get answers on the real stuff.
Speaker 1: So to do that, we have to ask the question, well,
Speaker 1: what would the other side say about this? I mean,
Speaker 1: it seems like it couldn't be any more clear. You
Speaker 1: have over one hundred thousand more votes than voters in
Speaker 1: just the state of Pennsylvania. What is the explanation for
Speaker 1: that or do they just say the data is wrong? Well,
Speaker 1: so they could. So we asked for a response from
Speaker 1: the PA Secretary of State and she basically said exactly.
Speaker 1: We even said, oh, yeah, you guys are wrong, but
Speaker 1: we're not wrong. We used Pennsylvania's own numbers that precincts
Speaker 1: reported in the state of Pennsylvania and we used the
Speaker 1: source system, which is again Pennsylvania's official voter registry, so
Speaker 1: our numbers are airtight. We are absolutely correct. What the
Speaker 1: Secretary of State in Pennsylvania would likely say is, you know,
Speaker 1: Alleghany County hasn't officially reported all their numbers yet. You know,
Speaker 1: there's air pandemic, more mail in ballots than they were
Speaker 1: used to dealing with. It takes time. But here's the deal.
Speaker 1: It's been what over two and a half months since
Speaker 1: the election was done. Alleghany County hasn't updated the short
Speaker 1: system in the state of Pennsylvania since November, and it
Speaker 1: is against the law to certify a race until those
Speaker 1: until those numbers are reconciled. So why then did the
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania Secretary of State along with Governor Wolf certify the
Speaker 1: race so November. How could they certify the race without
Speaker 1: reconciling those numbers they have? There is simply no explanation
Speaker 1: that they could have that would be sufficient for the
Speaker 1: amount of misconduct. And I would go so far as
Speaker 1: to say corruption that we're seeing here in the state
Speaker 1: of Pennsylvania, it's systemic and buck this what I just
Speaker 1: told you about the voter deficits. I mean, all of
Speaker 1: this will come out in the report that we're releasing
Speaker 1: the Morrow. But Buck, this is just a tip of
Speaker 1: the iceberg. It looks like, and again we can substantiate this,
Speaker 1: but the Secretary of State of Pennsylvania, Secretary Bookbar allowed
Speaker 1: certain left wing groups to have access administrative access to
Speaker 1: the short system again the official voter registry of the
Speaker 1: State of Pennsylvania and granted them Madman access to give
Speaker 1: sub access to the left wing groups. That's unprecedented. That's unprecedented,
Speaker 1: and so I don't know how anyone can certify the
Speaker 1: race in Pennsylvania until many of these questions are answered.
Speaker 1: And so to circle back to your initial question, if
Speaker 1: Senator Cruz, if Josh Holly, if these eleven senators and
Speaker 1: this ten day audit can somehow make that happen and
Speaker 1: help us answer those questions, boy, I think it would
Speaker 1: do a lot of good for this country because, believe me,
Speaker 1: a lot of people feel right now like their votes
Speaker 1: did not matter, like their votes were canceled out by
Speaker 1: illegal votes, like elections moving forward won't matter. And man,
Speaker 1: we got to get answers to this stuff now, because
Speaker 1: if if, if you think that that the radical left
Speaker 1: was good at manipulating the system the further their own
Speaker 1: goals in twenty twenty, they'll get better in twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: and they'll be even better in twenty twenty four. So
Speaker 1: we've got it, like at the end of the day.
Speaker 1: But the Constitution either for it doesn't. Laws and statutes
Speaker 1: either matter or they don't. And all I'm trying to say,
Speaker 1: I mean, the left would say, oh, you're trying to
Speaker 1: overturn an election. That's absolutely not true. I'm just trying
Speaker 1: to defend the election. I'm trying to make sure that
Speaker 1: laws were followed, and it looks like in Allegheny County
Speaker 1: they weren't. There's so much misconduct in this race in Pennsylvania, Buck,
Speaker 1: I don't even know where to start. I mean, I
Speaker 1: don't even think ten minutes is enough in an interview
Speaker 1: to even talk about it. And that's unfortunate. But you know,
Speaker 1: hopefully that the debate and the House and the Senate
Speaker 1: will give us some answers and some clarity moving forward,
Speaker 1: because I think that people deserve it, give us give
Speaker 1: us some sense of what When you say that you're
Speaker 1: releasing a report tomorrow, so people are getting a little
Speaker 1: preview of it here on this show. How did you
Speaker 1: bring together this report? What is it looking at? And
Speaker 1: then just give us the you know, the the executive summary,
Speaker 1: top line findings that you can as of now. Well,
Speaker 1: we commissioned a former intelligence analyst. This person wants to
Speaker 1: remain anonymous because they have a small business and they
Speaker 1: don't want they don't want to be targeted by the
Speaker 1: left and harassed. But all of the information that we
Speaker 1: have in this report will be sourced with links from people.
Speaker 1: If people don't trust me, and you know what, fine,
Speaker 1: don't trust me, I want you to go and think
Speaker 1: critically and get this information on your own. All of that,
Speaker 1: all of our source material will be in the report
Speaker 1: so people can go see with their own two eyes.
Speaker 1: It will show you the voter deficits and a voter deficit.
Speaker 1: It just means more votes than actual voters who showed
Speaker 1: up or voted on election day. It will show you
Speaker 1: left wing access. In twenty sixteen to the shore system,
Speaker 1: and in twenty twenty, we've had multiple requests for information
Speaker 1: to the Secretary of State in Pennsylvania. They've all fallen
Speaker 1: on death bears, silence crickets from the State of Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: So we don't The truth is, we don't know what
Speaker 1: left wing organizations had access to the shore system in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, but I bet you it's worse than twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: And another thing that we found was incredibly concerning was
Speaker 1: that Allegheny County was removed from the election map database
Speaker 1: in the SHORT system, which is supposed to be publicly
Speaker 1: available at all times. In fact, a couple of counties
Speaker 1: were removed from that database. We believe that they were
Speaker 1: removed to prevent further scrutiny from whatever audit that might
Speaker 1: come down the pipe. But the two counties that are removed,
Speaker 1: and again I can send you the information on this
Speaker 1: and you'll see it in the report, Alleghany County in
Speaker 1: Philadelphia County. Those are the only two counties in the
Speaker 1: state of Pennsylvania, I think right now where you can't
Speaker 1: go and pull up the election map to see how
Speaker 1: many mail and ballots were cast, how many provisionals were cast,
Speaker 1: how many how many in person votes were cast, and
Speaker 1: that information is critical that with regards to how they're
Speaker 1: going to reconcile this one hundred and twenty thousand votes
Speaker 1: statewide in sixty three thousand votes in my district, part
Speaker 1: of Alleghany County alone. Fuck forty eight percent of the
Speaker 1: voter deficit in the state of Pennsylvania happen in Alleghany County.
Speaker 1: And without Alleghany County available publicly on the election map,
Speaker 1: which again by PA statute, is supposed to be available
Speaker 1: to the public twenty four hours a day, seven days
Speaker 1: a week, It's not there. It's not there. Right now,
Speaker 1: you can go to then you can go to the
Speaker 1: website and look, Allegheny County general election is not there.
Speaker 1: And without that information there, how can how how can
Speaker 1: there be any transparency or accountability on how they reconcile
Speaker 1: these numbers. There can't be. So there there there cannot be. Well, Sean,
Speaker 1: we appreciate you continuing to stay in the fight. Let
Speaker 1: us know, and I know you've got this report. Tomorrow,
Speaker 1: release it. I'll be sharing it with people and we'll
Speaker 1: have you back on to talk about where this goes.
Speaker 1: Sean Parnell, everybody, thanks so much, my friend, Thanks Bud,