WEBVTT - Death of a Name | Reviving a Mobit

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I would like to ask you a question. Did

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you guys like to answer questions for us? A while back,

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I visited my alma mater. I'm talking about my first

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>alma mater, Wood Acres Elementary School in Bethesda, Maryland. Him

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>mister Raka, I went to this school. When I first

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>came to wood Acres in the third grade, I wasn't Mo.

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I was Maurice Raka. Maurice, a name which felt hopelessly

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:31.159
<v Speaker 1>out of style. I was the only Maurice in the

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>whole school. But maybe the name has a better rep Now, Okay,

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ask each of you question, and that's what

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I've come back to find out. I started off slowly, though,

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>asking about other names which peaked long ago.

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 2>When I say the name Mildred, what do you think of.

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 3>London?

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I think of an old British person.

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>All yeah, yeah, I agreed, me too. Okay, what about

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:00.279
<v Speaker 2>what about the name Tha?

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>An old lady?

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 2>That's fat?

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 4>I agree?

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 3>I agree, I agree.

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 2>It is unmity here.

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I must confess. I get what they're saying. In the

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty first century, names like Mildred and Bertha conjure certain images.

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Is it the er? Is it the thaw.

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that, yeah, all of it just all together.

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what about the name.

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Todd A tall person that plays golf kind of I'm

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 3>like middle aged, like in his forties, tall brown hair.

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:40.919
<v Speaker 2>I think they're kind of weird.

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a tar that's a tall.

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>That's finally I mustered the courage to ask them about

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>my name.

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 2>What do you think of the name Maurice?

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 3>I think of like an old French dude, like a

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 3>young person who travels a lot, maybe doesn't.

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Have a home, see on the run from the law.

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Why is he Maybe he just kind of like stays

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 3>in hotels and just goes everywhere.

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Like some like singer.

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 5>Maybe that's like they're not really known.

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're like a local kind of person, but they

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 3>still chase, they move a lot.

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Not really known, a local kind of person out But

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>it turns out there is a traveling singer named Maurice

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>van Hokee travel and Maurice is also a portly frenchman

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in Disney's Beauty and the Beast. Help don't help me

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>for Ree's wait, I need to help. But the name

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Maurice maybe permanently on the way out. We Maurice's reached

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the height of our popularity in the nineteen twenties, when

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>there were an average of about sixteen hundred born annually.

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Now just a few hundred come into the world each year.

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>What makes a name rise and fall in the ranks?

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>But makes a name pretty and popular to one generation

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and unique or downright ugly to the next. From CBS

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Morning and iHeart I'm Maurice Raka and this is mobituaries.

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>This moment the death of a name. I knew a

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>kid in elementary school named Jeff Heebner. He was friendly,

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>he was good at soccer, he was cool. He could

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>introduce himself with confidence. Because he was a Jeff. He

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>perfectly embodied his own name. I, on the other hand,

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>always felt awkward telling people my name. Maybe it was

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>because growing up I knew of only three other Maurice's.

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>There was children's book author Maurice Sendak, who wrote the

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>classic Where the Wild Things Are. Was the Maurice from

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that Steve Miller band song The Joker.

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Becoming Maice I speak of.

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>That was kind of cool, but that was canceled out

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>by French entertainer Maurice Chevalier. I m I see a

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>little girl of five or six or seven.

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 2>I can't resist the joy or.

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Spell that song he sang in Gigi Thick Kevin fall

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a little girl. I can't believe he hasn't been canceled

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>for that, But that was pretty much it. I was

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>born Maurice Albert Raca. My mother tells me my father

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>was the one who really wanted to name me Maurice.

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>She would have preferred Gabriel. My father is no longer living,

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>so I can't know for sure, but I think he

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted something on the gentler side, since Raca can sound brusque.

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 2>But I didn't like it.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>At one point I thought maybe I should go by

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>al I mean, which had been crazy. I mean, like,

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>when I think about it, I'm not crazy. It just

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>would have sounded odd al Raca. I talked to one

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of my former teachers about it. That day I visited

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>wood Acres. Her name is Miss Venisi, and she was

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>one of my all time favorites. She was patient, kind,

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and impossibly glamorous. More about that in a bit. Turns

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>out she could have made a pretty decent therapist too.

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Now you said you didn't like your name, so were

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 3>you teased in school?

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I was ever teased for my name.

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>It just felt so different, it felt foreign. Everything changed

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:44.239
<v Speaker 1>when I graduated from Wood Acres to Pile Middle School,

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and oddly enough, it was thanks to the aptly named

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Heebner.

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 3>I know him, I mean, I remember him. He was

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 3>very blonde, very blonde.

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And when I went to Pile, it's kind of scary

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>all the elementary schools feeding into the big junior high

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>and the fizz ed teacher there of the first days

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>did roll call and said, you know, when I get

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>to your name, if you have a name you prefer

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you as, I'll write it in the in the book.

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 2>And then she said Maurice Rock.

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>I said here, and then Jeff Heapner said, he's not Maurice,

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>He's Mo. And that's kind of how I got my.

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 3>I was going to ask you, so Jeff just came

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 3>out with it and you preferred it obviously.

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, kind of I liked that.

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>It was easy, yeah, and it kind of popped. But

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>now I love when people call me Maurice. So you

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>have to call me for this episode.

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm Maurice.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't sure and what to call you, whether I

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 3>should call you, Maurice Amo.

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And if there's anyone who would understand this kind of

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>confusion over one's own name, it's Miss Vanisi, Mildred Vanisi.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Despite what those kids said earlier, Mildred Venisi is not British,

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>but the granddaughter of Italian immigrants.

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 3>And there was a custom I doubt if it's still

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 3>in existence, that the firstborn I was the firstborn is

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 3>named either for the father's mother or the father's father,

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 3>of course, dependent upon the sex. My grandmother's name was Camella,

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 3>and I'm sure that my parents, being first generation, wanted

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 3>an anglicized name. Kamella's were called Milly. Millie is Mildred.

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Growing up, Miss Venisi didn't know any other Mildred's and

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>she didn't really like her name. Lucky for her, she

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>too got a nickname that eventually stuck.

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Somewhere along the line. I started being called Milly. Not

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 3>by family, my mother and father. I was still Mildred,

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 3>but my generation, my friends started calling me that. My

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 3>sisters call me Milly, and so now I introduced myself

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 3>that way. It just happened, just happened. I think the

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 3>name Millie flows better. It's a little more musical than Mildred.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 3>I just think Mildred is harsh.

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>She's not thoroughly modern Mildred.

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>No, right, that wouldn't sound good. That just would not

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 3>sound good.

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I also never thought Mildred was an appropriate moniker for

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Miss Venisi, with her luxuriant mane of dark curly hair,

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>her Jackie O sunglasses, her Jordash jeans or were they

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Gloria Vanderbilt?

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 6>Look?

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>All I know is that no other teacher looked like

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>she just walked off the setup and Aaron spelling nighttime soap. Honestly,

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Miss VANSI was so fabulous I could barely contain myself.

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you'll remember, so if you don't,

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like a confession.

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 5>I guess.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>But I remember in fifth grade waiting outside the all

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>Purpose room for lunch. But when you walked by, I said, Hey,

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>what's shake and Millie? He wheeled around. Yeah, and I

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>think you said something like, did you ever call me

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that again? I, Miss Venisi, I probably did.

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Teach.

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>The name Mildred reached its peak in nineteen twenty, when

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>more than eighteen thousand babies were named Mildred. It was

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the sixth most popular girls name that year popular enough

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that there are a number of notable Mildreds throughout history.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Mildred J. Hill was the composer of Good Morning to All,

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the melody of which became the Happy Birthday Song.

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 3>And then that movie Mildred Piers with Germany Crawft that

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 3>must have been in the forties.

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 6>Now I'm sure of one thing, at least, I want

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 6>my daughter back.

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Mildred Gillers an American who broadcast Nazi propaganda from Germany

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>during World War Two, also known as Axis Sally. She

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>was indicted after the war in charge with trees and Okay,

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>so that's not a good Mildred.

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 3>That's not a good Mildred. But I think I've heard

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 3>of Axis Sally.

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But after hitting its popularity peak in the early twentieth century,

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Mildred slowly slid down the list of the thousand most

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>popular names. In twenty seventeen, only eighty three newborn girls

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>were named Mildred in the US. Recent users on one

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>baby naming website dismissed the name as sounding too much

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>like Mildew wrote another makes me think of dreading something.

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 3>I was the only Mildred in all my years at

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 3>school there was a period of time when a lot

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 3>of girls are named Karen, and there was another period

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 3>of time where a lot of girls name Janet. I

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 3>don't know, but I just think that names have cycles,

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 3>and maybe something triggers.

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>It, as she so often was when I was growing up.

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>Mildred Venisi is right.

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 2>Coming up.

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk with linguist John mcwardo about what

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>makes names pretty, prickly or popular. But first in in

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>memoriam for another name that left us, Hortense. We hardly

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>knew you. Despite your French origins. Your name lacked the crisp,

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>bright bubbliness of champagne and the addictive qualities of your

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>country's cheeses. Disney must have had a thing for you,

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>because Hortense McDuck is Donald Duck's mother. Donald gets an

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>ostrich named Hortense, and his uncle Scrooge McDuck named his

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>horse Hortense Alas Disney was never going to create a

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>princess Hortense as a name, You're just not pretty. You

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>barely cracked the top four hundred names in the US

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>around the turn of the twentieth century, and you slid

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>off the top one thousand after nineteen forty one. Now,

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>ordensia does have a nice frame to it. It's the

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Spanish version of hortense or densia also means hydrangia. To

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>be clear, I'm not suggesting anyone named their daughter hydrangea hortense.

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>You are strictly past tense, gone, and yes forgotten. To

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>understand better why names come and go, I talked with

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>an expert, Columbia University Associates Professor of Comparative literature and

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>linguist John mcward. How did you become a John?

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm John Hamilton mcwarter the fifth, and John Hamilton mccuorter

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 5>the first was a slave, So I was named because

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 5>of that relentless succession and the idea that you don't

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 5>break it. And as a matter of fact, I know

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 5>if my father hadn't been John Hamilton mcquarter the fourth,

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 5>I would be named Bruce. That's what my mother would

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 5>have chosen. And I would have named my son John,

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 5>except he's a girl, and so the name had to

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.359
<v Speaker 5>stop with my two girls. So she has my middle.

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Name, Johanna. In Italian, you'd have Johnny and Johanna in

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>English Johnette, none of them. That just sounds like a

0:12:56.280 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>tiny little bathroom. We live in an efficiency. We only

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>have room for a John after John mcwarter was born

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen sixty five, when John was the second most

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>popular name in the country, and the name John isn't

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>going away. It's still in the top thirty names for

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>boys in the US. But if you go back in

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>time to the early twentieth century, John was far and

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>away the number one boy's name. America was producing John's

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in mass quantities. It was like the model t of names.

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, if you were born in that era, it

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>was really common for you to have a name that

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>was in the top ten. People just seemed to want

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to fit in.

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 5>You go back to that time and there is a

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 5>sense of what a normal American person is that would

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 5>strike us today as almost bizarrely homogenous. And that's not

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 5>to say that there weren't some ripples going on around

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 5>the edges, but there was a certain sense that America was,

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 5>you know, turkey and apple pie, and that's what one was.

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 5>One was very, very very white.

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Well that's so interesting because aren't there those are competing impulses, right.

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I want my child to have a name that makes

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>him or her special. I also want my child to

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>have a name that makes him or her fit in.

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 2>And that right.

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 5>So and back then, no special. I mean, if you

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 5>think of somebody naming their child in eighteen sixty five,

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 5>most people did not want something that would make the

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 5>child feel special, or it would be something going on

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 5>with the middle name, something that was less known. You

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 5>might play with it.

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Even when I was in school in the seventies and eighties,

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember the popular names were really popular. Oh yeah,

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean in junior high I was drowning in Jennifer's.

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 5>Oh, they were everywhere. That's right.

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>What was going on?

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 5>Jennifers and Jenny's.

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>That's right, there's so many Jennifers. Oh, it was a

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.359
<v Speaker 1>tsunami of them in school.

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Seven Jennifers.

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>But the days of a few names dominating are over.

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>At its peak, a full five percent of all newborn

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>male babies were named John one in twenty Fast forward

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to twenty twenty one, and the top names for females

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and males, Olivia and Liam, made up only around one

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>percent of babies born that year. In other words, the

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>most popular names are less popular. Parents today shoot for originality.

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 5>There's a sense that if you're going to name a child.

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 5>You spontaneously reach out and you think, how can we

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 5>have a little bit of fun with this, so you

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 5>don't want to torture your child. I once knew this

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 5>poor little boy. His parents had named him Rotunda Thanksgiving Jones. Oh,

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 5>and it was because he was born when John F.

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 5>Kennedy was laid out in the rotunda, and they named

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 5>him Thanksgiving just because, and of course he was made

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 5>fun of.

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a song, and have forgotten Gershwin musical.

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 5>That's because there were songs like that Rotunda Thanksgiving. Gents,

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 5>you can and this guy really had that name. It's

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 5>a tragic thing, but you want your child to be

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 5>somewhat different, probably not too different, but I think most

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 5>people think not the average thing, unless it's named after

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 5>a grandparent or a father or something like that.

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>John mcwarter says that trend towards uniqueness and away from

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>uniformity tracks with broader changes in American society.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 5>I think it's very much a spirit of individuality, and

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 5>of course many people would say that the spirit of

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 5>individuality is part of what being an American is. But

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 5>there's an extreme that happens, and I think it happens

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 5>after the nineteen sixties, with the sense of what was

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 5>called the Me generation in the seventies, and then the

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 5>greater respect for and awareness of the diversity of americannesses

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 5>that you get that really becomes default starting in the eighties.

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 5>That's when a certain browning of the culture happens. Think

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 5>about nineteen eighty four is when The Cosby Show becomes

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 5>a big hit. Vanessa Williams becomes the first black Miss

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 5>America and I new Miss America.

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>There's Mavnasillams.

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 5>Beverly Hills. Cop is almost the biggest selling movie in

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 5>the country. You know, this is the cleanest and nicest

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 5>police card ever been.

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 4>In in my life.

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 5>That's only eighty four and that's just black diversity. I

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 5>think we've become much more comfortable with America not just

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 5>being my three sons starting in the nineteen eighties.

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>As a part of that change, there's a shift in

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>naming traditions, especially among Black Americans. Nineteen eighty is a

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly interesting year for naming kids. That year, sixty percent

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of black girls are given a unique name, one that

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>no one else has. Mcwarterur points out that after the

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>civil rights movement of the nineteen sixties, afrocentrism gained traction

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies and eighties.

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 5>So once you get past integration as the watch cry,

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 5>and there's a certain kind of in some ways healthy

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 5>separatism that's afoot, then it becomes natural to be comfortable

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 5>making up a name. And so what happens, frankly is

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 5>I've often thought that black girls in particular tend to

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 5>have more interesting names because it's considered okay to just

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 5>make it up. And what you get are all of

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 5>these beautiful African style names for people born in the

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 5>United States. And it's all rather pretty, but it really explodes,

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 5>especially with the sense of Africa and the African heritage

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 5>rising in the nineteen seventies. That's when you get little

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 5>girls named Mikiba.

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm going to impress you right now and tell you,

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sorry if it sounds boastful. In college, I

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>was in a production of Little Shop of Horrors with

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Katanji Brown now Katanji Brown Jackson. I was Seymour, thank

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>you very much. She was run at and she was fantastic.

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>She was fantastically you notice, yeah, and she yeah, she

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>was not Crystal. I'm suddenly forging thelast one's name. But anyways,

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>did improv comedy together? But her name, I know you've

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>written about her name improv. H Wow, she thinks really funny?

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 5>Is she funny? She is?

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you.

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>We will because we are going to make sure that

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>hearings are now you know, the simulcast on Comedy Central.

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>I because she's that funny.

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 5>I want to know that about her. Yeah, that's a

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 5>perfect example that her name is Katanji. If she were

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.959
<v Speaker 5>a generation older, her name would probably be Carolyn. But

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 5>now it is Katanji Brown Jackson. And that's ordinary starting

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 5>especially with women of her generation. It's nice to see.

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Katanji is a much more interesting name than Carolyn.

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But one group of people, we expect original names from celebrities.

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>It's practically a rite of passage. The first time I

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>can remember this happening is in two thousand and four

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>when Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin named their daughter Apple.

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>At the time it was weird. Now totally normal. Kylie

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Jenner has a daughter named Stormy, and it's not with

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a y, it's with an eye at the end. Yeah,

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And Elon Musk has won that somebody can pronounce it's

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of symbols. I think by the way I

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>looked it up, it's pronounced x ash a twelve.

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 5>All of that is because they are public figures, and

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 5>so for them, naming is a public act. And if

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 5>it's going to be a public act, then you want

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 5>to do something that's going to stand out rather than

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 5>something that's going to bore people. If somebody like Gwyneth

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 5>Paltrow sets off a tradition, next thing, you know, everybody's

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 5>doing it.

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's sort of a celebrity contagion in a way.

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 5>I think I would put it just that way. What

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 5>Jay Z and Beyonce Blue Ivy. That's really beautiful, but

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 5>it's not African. It's not the usual tradition. That's something

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 5>they came up with all by themselves, as people who

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 5>knew that everybody was watching them having that child. So

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 5>that's where you get that tradition. And that seems to

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 5>actually cut across races with celebrities too. Yeah, it's it's

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 5>a show. It's a it's a kind of display, And

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 5>I don't mean that in a bad way.

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Most parents aren't going to resort to their kids after

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a combination of math aircraft and Elvin symbols representing artificial intelligence,

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>which is what Musk's baby's name represents. But throughout history,

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>parents have often taken naming cues from pop culture. Well,

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to quiz you on it right now. Actually

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>it's really fun, so I'll start off really easy. Shirley

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>saw a dramatic spike between nineteen thirty two and nineteen

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty five because of I wish mother.

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 5>Hair of Little Shirley Temple. And if you think about it,

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 5>nobody is named Shirley before then, and then all of

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 5>a sudden, everybody's grandmother is named Shirley by the late

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 5>twentieth century, and now the name is impossible. Meet little Shirley.

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Never Michelle entered the top twenty in nineteen sixty five

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>because that was the same year.

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 5>It has to be because of that song.

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 4>My Bell.

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Beatles song.

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 5>Nobody is named Michelle. Maybe in France ants you're just

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 5>kind of guessing, but not here, I mean you Michelle's.

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we've got a lot of Michelle's running around, women

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>named Michelle.

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 5>Women, but not here, not before then.

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I see what you're saying, Like, there's.

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 5>No first lady named Michelle. Right, and if you think

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 5>about it, Michelle there was no first lady name Michelle

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 5>good point right, only only after and she's named around that.

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Time Michelle Polk.

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 5>No Michelle Quincatams, Michelle quin No suffragette named Michelle, you

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 5>know that's that's right, it's Michelle Katie's.

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>The name Layelah first appeared in the top one thousand

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy two.

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 5>No, why then.

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Eric Clapton song Whoops, Yeah, I'm.

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 5>Not as good at modern pop.

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Now, that's fine.

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I love that you and I have the same definition

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of modern pop. Nineteen seventy two.

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Everything ends.

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>So this is a trick question. Rosanna shot up in

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty two because of that Toto song, Right, yes,

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed Patricia Arquette. That song was named after her sister,

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>also an actress, But Patricia pointed out to me that

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>her sister's name is really pronounced Rosanna.

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm Rosanna Arquette, and.

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm so they got the pronunciation of her name wrong.

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 6>Hi, Ronald Reagan, do solemnly swear, Hi, Ronald Reagan, do

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 6>solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 6>President of the United States at Iowa Faith.

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>After Reagan became president in the eighties, the name Reagan,

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>not Ronald as much, but the name Reagan surged in popularity,

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>landing in the top one hundred by twenty twelve. Now

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>here's what I think is fascinating is that Republican parents

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:56.959
<v Speaker 1>were more likely to pick the name Reagan for their

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>kid if they lived in a district that was purple,

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that was sort of evenly split between Democrats and Republicans.

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Then you make a statement exactly, then if they weren't

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a deep red Republican enclave.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 5>Right, then they don't need to stand out, They don't

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 5>need to stake their individuality exactly. And of course they

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 5>weren't thinking of this consciously. So much goes on subconsciously.

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 5>I doubt any of those families said, so many people

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 5>around here vote Democratic, that let's name her Reagan. It

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 5>was just part of the warp and wolf of their

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 5>psychology because of sensing themselves as a minority or as

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 5>not more than half of their district. Well, that's fascinating. Yeah.

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you're in a purple district and you name

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>your kid Reagan, do you plant the kid on the

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>front lawn during election time.

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 5>That's right, mommy, how long do I have to stand here?

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Spend some time with the Social Security Administration's baby named database,

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and you'll see a sort of pendulum swing over the

0:24:55.600 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>last century, especially among girls. Half of the most popular girls'

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>names started with vowels in the eighteen eighties. Then we're

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>all consonants. By nineteen fifty, Anna and Emma became Patricia

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and Deborah. Now vowels are back in a big way.

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>It makes you wonder why.

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 5>Certainly in terms of how we perceive beauty, at least

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 5>in English and in related languages, vowels are beautiful because

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 5>they involve no obstruction of the airflow. Stop sounds such

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 5>as those are the ugliest sounds because you have to stop.

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 5>Those are the ones that you're calling the jabbing sounds.

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 5>Then there's everything in between, so you get a buzz

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.719
<v Speaker 5>at least you get a hiss, and then with yeah,

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 5>whoa those might as well be vowels. So having more

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 5>vowels now could have something to do with people looking

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 5>for a certain mollifluousness in names. Now why people would

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 5>have valued it more during the McKinley administration than during

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 5>the Coolidge administers. I have no idea. I get the

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 5>feeling that is random.

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Statistical flutter mc water says that over time, fashions change gradually,

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and something you once found repellent you now find irresistible.

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 5>You know how, today, if you have a dinner party,

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 5>every second time you have brussel sprouts, probably with bacon

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 5>or something like that, imagine how unthinkable that was. Say,

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 5>even as recently as twenty five years ago, you didn't

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 5>give people you liked brussel sprouts.

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>You did not russels sprouts or were synonymous with something

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that was visible torture.

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 5>Torture, Yeah, I mean little cabbages. They sucked, and so

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 5>you wouldn't give them to anybody. And you don't even

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 5>have to dress them up that much now we're used

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 5>to them. That's partly fashion. I don't think that the

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 5>Brussels sprout's lobby created this. Sometime early in the George W.

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 5>Bush administration.

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>One recent trend boys' names ending in a certain consonant.

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 1>What is this with all these boys today? Baby boys

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>having an N at the end of their We've got

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>all these logans, Masons, Ethan's, Jackson's.

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 5>We subconsciously associate that un with a kind of a

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 5>gracious masculinity. It's what you want to name your little boy.

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>As opposed to Jack, which is always too severe.

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 5>Jack might be a bully. Yeah, not only old fashioned,

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 5>but Jack Jack's people up. You know, Ethan has conversations.

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>You imagine Ethan is open to change, like he's right, right.

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 5>He reasons right. Ethan reasons as opposed to Jack, who

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 5>just sits yeah.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>But even names that hit that right mix of vowels

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and and just right, ones that are pined after in

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>song or become famous in the names of movie characters

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>or the actors who play them. Well, just like we

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>as a society can birth the name, we can also

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>let it die. But first another in memoriam for sid

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>stan irv Cy, Shelley, and Morty. No, they weren't the

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>original white staff at the Carnegie Deli. In the late

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundreds, Sidney, Stanley, Irving, Seymour, Sheldon, and Morton were

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>all popular baby boy names with WASP that is, White

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Anglo Saxon Protestant parents. Then in the late nineteen twenties,

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>many American Jewish parents began choosing these names for their

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>baby boys to help them fit in. But America's wasps

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>apparently felt stung and took flight from these names. Soon enough, Sidney, Stanley, Irving, Seymour, Sheldon,

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and Morton were seen as stereotypically Jewish, and their assimilation

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>value greatly diminished. As documented by sociologist Stanley Lieberson, American

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Jews eventually abandoned the names as well. Incidentally, another name

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in that category was Morris, a sort of cousin to Maurice,

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>but at least Morris was the name of a terrifically

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>droll tabby who used to sell cat food on TV commercials.

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 6>Nine Live Seafood Pladder anchors away.

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Pop culture and big news events can correlate with names surging,

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>even when those events are disasters. After Hurricane Katrina, names

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that began with the letter K actually jumped by nine percent,

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>according to an analysis by professors at Wharton Business School.

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>The sheer repetition of the name Katrina, it seems, had

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a subliminal effect that K sound got stuck in people's heads.

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>But the name Katrina itself, well, Katrina had been a

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty popular name and even broke the top one hundred

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>for a while in the late seventies and eighties. After

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the storm, though the name quickly fell out of fashion

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and in twenty thirteen dropped out of the top one

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand entirely. Indeed, history can be a name killer as well.

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>The name Isis saw a burst of popularity in the

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen seventies thanks to a Saturday Morning superhero of

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the same name, and.

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 6>Found she was heir to the sacrets of Isis.

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And so it has since fallen out of favor with

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the rise of the Islamic State, which I find reassuring.

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>But Bertha toppled from a much greater height. In nineteen eighteen,

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>mothers birthed more than five thousand Berthas. Try saying that

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>five times fast. So what happened to Bertha? Well, Bertha

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>was the name of a German heiress to krupp Ag,

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a German weapons manufacturer, and during World War One the

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>company began making heavy guns. Those guns were dubbed big

0:30:54.160 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Berthas by the Germans. The Allies then this nickname that

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>was being called the Big Bertha, and they began using

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it for all heavy artillery, so it suddenly became synonymous

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>with big heavy portly right.

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 5>Right, yeah, So the next thing you know, Bertha is overweight.

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 5>Is it's associated with being large?

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>That's linguished John mcwater again. But is there also something

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>about just the sound of it birth thought? I mean it,

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of girth birth.

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 5>The error is not pretty because it's not as open

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 5>as other vowel sounds. The thuh is a little unpleasant,

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 5>and it begins with a stop consonant. But er, I

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 5>mean it's it's nasty in that way. But then, especially

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 5>just because it was associated with something that was portly.

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I work with a woman who was telling me about

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a person in her neighborhood that she doesn't like, and

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>she said, oh, I cut her a wide berth.

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 5>And it's a wide berth. Right. I never thought about that, right, Yeah.

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 5>And you wonder why that expression catches on? Yeah?

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Boy, I wonder what it would take for Bertha to

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>come back, Hi, Bertha, I don't see it. After World

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>War One, Bertha faded into obscurity and was off the

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>top one thousand list by the mid nineteen eighties. But

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a name doesn't have to become synonymous with military weaponry

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>or get added to a terrorist watch list to fade.

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 5>Sometimes names just wear out. They fall out of the

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 5>rotation in the same way you'll find a shirt that

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 5>you really like and it still fits, and it's in

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 5>your closet and you haven't worn it for five years

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 5>for no real reason. A name with ugly sounds can

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 5>last almost a counterintuitively long time. For example, Richard, what

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 5>an ugly name that is? And think about how much

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 5>uglier the nickname is, and how there were, until about

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 5>ten minutes ago, normal male people running around in Anglophone

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 5>America named Dick and nobody bad at a nine. It

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 5>wasn't only Dick sargent at dick yorke. I knew a

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 5>Dick back in the eighties.

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Has anything to do with the wedshed.

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 5>Dick Lincoln, and he was taken seriously as an executive.

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 5>Only with the past generation or two has that stop.

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 5>And not only is dick ridiculous and dick was used

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 5>to mean what it meant long before it went out,

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 5>but dick is an ugly word by these standards.

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Composer Cole Porter would beg to differ many time.

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 6>Time.

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>One of the other names I've been pondering is Todd.

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Todd showed up in the thirties and just grew and grew.

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>We hit peak Todd in nineteen sixty four. More than

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thousand were born that year. I used to know

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>tons of Todd's, but now I haven't met a baby

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Todd in decades. What do you think the appeal was

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in the first place.

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 5>I think it's partly because ah is the most basic

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 5>sound and humanity. It's the first sound that babies make.

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 5>And then with Todd, what you have is a kind

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 5>of a nice assonance, as it were, because tou and

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 5>duh are the same sound but different. Duah is too,

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 5>with a little bit of belly in it, so you

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 5>don't have to make a change. There was something pleasant

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 5>about Todd. Todd was like a little white potato that's

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 5>one of those little balls and it's boiled just right.

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:33.879
<v Speaker 1>That's like Todd, like a tater Todd. Yes, I guess

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>he would have to be deep fried as well as

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Todd off and a lovely woman named Millie with a

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>hairnet giving it to you. Personally. I like Todd, and

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I brought in one of my favorite Todds to defend

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>his name, Todd Bridges. Todd Bridges was born in nineteen

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:58.359
<v Speaker 1>sixty five, just one year after peak Todd, and when

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>he was a teenager, he got a starring role in

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the hit TV show Different Strokes as Willis Jackson, opposite

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Gary Coleman as Arnold.

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Phyllis is in.

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 5>Man, Why don't you ask her? How Arnold?

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:11.240
<v Speaker 4>Are you kidding? So starter?

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't even known me.

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 4>My mom said that she dreamed my name because there's

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 4>not very many black Todd's. I don't know if you

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 4>know that or not, but there isn't. I think I

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 4>know Todd Gurley, the football player, and that's about it.

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:26.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't think I know anybody else named Todd.

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 5>That's right.

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Even though Todd was near its peak when Bridges was born,

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it was indeed as white as those potatoes.

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 4>And I'll tell you what happened, which is really funny.

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 4>One time I got a check somewhere that I was

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 4>living at and it said Todd Bridges and I'm looking,

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't know of his company, and it's for a

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 4>couple thousand dollars. I'm like, I know, I say, this

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.399
<v Speaker 4>is not me. So what happened was the postman thought

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 4>it was me, and it was an address down the street,

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 4>and I went down the street and bringing the bell

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:55.760
<v Speaker 4>and I go, hey, man, is there a Todd Bridges.

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 4>He goes, yeah, it's me, and he goes, oh, hey Todd.

0:35:57.840 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 4>I go, hey Todd, and I gave him it was his.

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>There's another Todd Bridges right down the street.

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 4>It was right down the street fromhere I used to

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 4>live at. Yeah, another guy was a white guy.

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:09.399
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of crazy. People get their names made fun

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>of for all sorts of reasons. Is there anything you

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>can do with Todd? Were you ever teased?

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, a lot of people thought that Todd was short

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:19.919
<v Speaker 4>for Theodore, but I'm like, no, that's Ted.

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:21.320
<v Speaker 5>That show for Theodore.

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 4>Todd is just Todd.

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Then in the nineteen seventies, Todd fell off the baby naming.

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 4>Cliff oh Man. Todd fell off the Matt dang.

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.240
<v Speaker 1>In twenty fifteen, there were only two hundred and twelve

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>baby boys named Todd. And did you ever consider naming

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 1>any of your children Todd?

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 4>No? No. I named my son Spencer, but I spelled

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 4>it differently, Okay, I mean we spelled his SPN C

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 4>I R. And it's been serious.

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Now, why did you do that?

0:36:57.520 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 4>We just thought it'd make it just original because Spencer

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 4>is out there and it's you know, SBN cer. We

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:03.840
<v Speaker 4>just wanted to make it original, and it's original.

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Spencer, it totally is. George Carlin had a whole bit

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a routine in two thousand and one where he actually

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>made fun of the name Todd.

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 2>He made fun of a number of he really did.

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 4>I didn't see that.

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 5>What did he say?

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 4>And I'm getting.

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Really sick a guy's name Todd?

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:22.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, Yeah, it's just a goofy.

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 5>It's a goofy fucking name.

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Hi, what's your name? Todd? Is he still around?

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 1>He is not still around, but great stand.

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 4>He is lucky because I'd have to go choke him

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:37.919
<v Speaker 4>out messing with my name. It's not a goofy name.

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 4>It's a cool name. It's Todd.

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:55.800
<v Speaker 1>We end this episode with a nod to Western civilization's

0:37:55.920 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>earliest baby naming book, the Bible. From Adam and Eve

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to Ahab and Jezebel, there are well over a thousand

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>different names mentioned between the Hebrew Bible and Christian New Testament.

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 1>People have been blessing and sometimes saddling their kids with

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the names of patriarchs and prophets patriarchs in magi for

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>over one thousand years. The most recently popular baby names

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in the us have included Jonah, Elijah, Naomi, and Noah.

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised to see that even the name Lazarus

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>has risen from the dead. Of course, not every biblical

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 1>name is heaven sent. Judas, if we ignore your history

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 1>for a second, you're not terrible. Your spelling makes sense,

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:45.479
<v Speaker 1>and you have no off putting hard consonants. Then again,

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>your behavior toward Jesus was more.

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Than off putting.

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Your name has been permanently shunned. Earlier biblical outcasts haven't

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>fared much better. Sure, there were three hundred Canes born

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>in twenty fifteen, but nearly ten ten times as many

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Abeles were born that year. It doesn't pay to kill

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 1>your brother. Jesus, of course, is a popular name, especially

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 1>as Heesus. But Judas, I don't see you ever cracking

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the top one thousand.

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 5>Come here, little Judas, Yeah, there are more than time

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:16.959
<v Speaker 5>for your dip.

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 2>They're not.

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 5>Friendless, dateless little boy.

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Esther and Ruth your solid names, if not always easy

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 1>to say. Hey, Esther, meet me at Ruth's Christ's Steakhouse.

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:36.720
<v Speaker 1>You're the only two women with books of the Bible

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 1>named after you. But after the nineteen thirties, your name's

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>made a quick exodus, Yet history shows us that most

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>names are cyclical. What's old, sometimes very old is new again. Indeed, Genesis,

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the very first book of the Bible, has seen a

0:39:54.800 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>surge in popularity as a first name since the nineteen nineties. PS.

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:04.479
<v Speaker 1>If you ever see me out on the street, feel

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 1>free to call me Maurice. I kind of miss it.

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 1>I certainly hope you enjoyed this Mobituary. May I ask

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you to please rate and review our podcast. You can

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>also follow Mobituaries on Facebook and Instagram, and you can

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at Morocca. Hear all new episodes

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of Mobituaries every Wednesday wherever you get your podcasts, and

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>check out Mobituaries. Great Lives Worth Reliving, the New York

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Times best selling book, now available in paperback and audiobook.

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>It includes plenty of stories not in the podcast. This

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:49.280
<v Speaker 1>episode of Mobituaries was produced by Jake Harper and Aaron Schrank.

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Our team of producers also includes Wilcoe Martinez Caccero, and

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 1>me Mo Roca. It was edited by Mara Walls and

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>engineered by Sam Bear, with fact checking by Naomi Barr.

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Our production company is Neon Humm Media. Our archival producer

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is Jamie Benson. Our theme music is written by Daniel Hart.

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Indispensable support from Craig Schwegler, Dustin Gervais, Alan Pang, Reggie

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Bazil and everyone at CBS News Radio. Special thanks to

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Megan Marcus, Alberto Robina and the staff of wood Acres Elementary.

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>The inimitable Aaron Schrank is our senior producer. Executive producers

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for Mobituaries include Steve Razis and Morocca. The series is

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 1>created by Yours truly and as always undying gratitude to

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Rand Morrison and John Carp for helping breathe life into

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Mobituaries