WEBVTT - Tech News: Meta Ignores its Oversight Board

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio. And how the tech

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>are you. It's time for the tech news for Thursday

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>August thirty, first, twenty twenty three. Where does the time go? Well,

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you might be familiar with the fact that Meta has

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>an oversight board, which it established in the wake of

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>banning former President Donald Trump from Facebook a few years ago.

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>So the board's purpose is to make recommendations and also

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to review Meta's decisions to try and keep the company

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in line with its stated policies. So essentially, it's to

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>make sure that Meta is obeying its own rules. But

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, Meta is not actually under any obligation

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to follow whatever the oversight board recommends. So the board

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 1>can make recommendations and urge Metta to make changes, but

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Metta doesn't actually have to do any of that at all,

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.919
<v Speaker 1>which might make you wonder what purpose does the board

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>actually serve apart from optics. I don't have an answer

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to that anyway, The issue has cropped up again this

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>week because the oversight board advised Meta to suspend the

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:28.199
<v Speaker 1>Facebook account belonging to Hun Sen, a politician, a leader

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in Cambodia. Hun Sen has a pretty awful international reputation.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>He's dedicated a lot of effort to squashing independent press

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and critics and activists, as well as the fact that

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>despite him being a democratically elected official, he wants to

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>pass his position down to his son and make a

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>hereditary position, not an elected one anyway. Recently, Hunsen posted

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a video that contained many threatenings statements, including the promise

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to quote arrest a trader with sufficient evidence at midnight

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>end quote, according to The Washington Post, and so the

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>oversight board recommended to Meta that they suspend his Facebook

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>account instead. Meta Leadership has chosen to allow Hunsen to

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>keep his Facebook profile, although they did remove the video

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in question after it had been up for half a year.

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>As for the justification of allowing Hunsen to keep his profile,

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Meta said it's because that while Hunsen's video contains stuff

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that clearly violates Facebook policies, the video itself wasn't posted

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>during a time of civil unrest, and apparently civil unrest

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is a prerequisite for Meta to suspend the accounts that

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.239
<v Speaker 1>belong to public figures. The board states that hun Sen's

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>post undermine democracy in Cambodia, and as such, Facebook shares

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>responsibility for elevating Hunsen's platform, and therefore, you know, they

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>should probably stop doing that because it's undermining the democratic process.

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps the threat of seeing Facebook access restricted in Cambodia,

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>because that's something that Hunsen's administration was threatening, has also

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>played a part in the company's decisions to dismiss the

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>board's opinion on this particular matter. Also, like I said,

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>they left that video up for half a year. They

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>only took it down when the Oversight Board started to

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>bring their concerns forward to Meta officials, and it was

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly violating Facebook's policies, but it stayed up for half

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a year. Human rights advocates continue to criticize Meta for

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>failing to show concern for user safety as well as

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the democratic process in general, and those, of course, are

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>charges that Meta representatives deny. That being said, Meta has

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>reported that the company has removed more than seven seven

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred accounts on Facebook that they say have links to

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese backed misinformation campaign. Further, according to Meta, this

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>campaign hits a broad spectrum of social platforms, Beyond just

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the Meta ones like Facebook and Instagram, they include TikTok, Reddit, YouTube,

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter slash x. According to Meta, the main goal

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 1>for this campaign was to control the narrative regarding China's

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>human rights record. Essentially, the campaign looked to redirect attention

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>away from some truly horrific human rights violations, which is

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>putting it lightly, and instead to proclaim China's actually, you know,

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>really valuing human rights. Actually. According to Meta, many of

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the profiles started out posting about stuff that didn't have

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with human rights or politics, and they

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>were posting a lot of the same videos and pictures

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that were focusing on stuff like food and fashion, things

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that were not triggering as far as you know, saying oh,

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a misinformation campaign. But gradually the accounts began

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to incorporate China messages and also heap criticism on the

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>United States government as well as some other Western governments.

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.119
<v Speaker 1>And Meta has said that the people responsible for running

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the campaign they appear to be spread across China, but

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>they're all pulling content from the same source, and that

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>it's all likely connected to Chinese law enforcement. This is

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>by no means the only coordinated state backed effort to

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>leverage social platforms in order to spread misinformation. Meta representatives

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>noted that similar campaigns have originated out of places like Russia, Iran,

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and Turkey. The Verge reports that the Allen Institute for

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>AI has released a new tool called Satlus. This tool

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>can do something to satellite imagery that makes me think

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>of the old Hollywood trope of zoom in enhance. Like

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever seen any of those movies where someone's

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at camera footage and they want the operator to

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.799
<v Speaker 1>magically zoom in on one little corner of the footage

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and then enhance it so you can see who it was.

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>You know that is mostly bogus as far as it goes,

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>because you can't you can digitally punch in on an image.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>That's entirely possible. You know that, because I'm sure you've

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>cropped videos and images before. But you can't really enhance

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>an image without inserting new information, right. You have to

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>add information there. You can't just magically get access to information.

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not like the information was sitting there all along

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>and you just had to zoom to see it. You

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>have to add information to be able to quote unquote

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>enhance That kind of is counter to identifying someone because

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't know if the information you're adding is accurate

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>or not. But that's kind of what satlust is doing.

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>It sharpens satellite imagery by using deep learning to best

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>fill in details to make those images less blurry and

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>higher resolution. As for practical applications, the institute is focusing

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>pun intended on getting information about, you know, tree cover

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and renewable energy projects that are going on around the world.

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>That data can then be part of a larger picture

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>about climate change and conservation and renewable energy. So the

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>hope is that by collecting information on a global scale,

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>scientists and activists can have a more accurate picture of

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>what's actually going on around the world where we could

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>perhaps concentrate future efforts to have the biggest impact, and

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>also to gain an idea of just how well or

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>how poorly policymakers are progressing with various plans to combat

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>climate change. Are they actually following through on their promises

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>or are the results antithetical to the goal of ending

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>climate change? And it's nice to have a new piece

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>about AI that's not a totally negative one, Like it's

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>nice to have something about AI where you start to see, oh,

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>this could be potentially really useful. However, I should point

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>out that the researchers who are working on this tool

0:07:56.040 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>have already noted that, just like other generative AI tools,

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>is not immune to hallucinations. That's when generative AI ends

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>up making stuff up when it determines it doesn't have

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>enough information to provide a good answer. So in the

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>case of SATLUS, sometimes that manifests as the tool drawing

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>building details incorrectly, and that could possibly be due to

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>things like the fact that architectural styles are not uniform

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>around the world, so it may be drawing from its

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote knowledge of architecture in one part of the

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>world and then just applying those principles to another to

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>try and complete a picture, when in fact that just

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>ends up making it inaccurate. So it's by far a

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>perfect tool, but it is an interesting application of generative

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence. The United States Federal Communications Commission, or FCC,

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>has some bad news for Internet service providers that have

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>been complaining that it's just too darn hard to list

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>out every fee they charge their customers each month. And

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the bad news the FCC has is well tough because

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:05.079
<v Speaker 1>he gotta. Five trade groups representing some of the biggest

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>broadband providers in the United States petitioned the FCC to

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>drop this requirement because, according to them, listing out all

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the fees creates quote unquote significant administrative burdens. I'm not

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>sure how supplying essentially a bulleted list of various fees

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>is an administrative burden, but charging customers those fees isn't.

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously the companies have to know what the

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>fees are. Otherwise how could they charge customers, Like, how

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>could they do that? So shouldn't the customer know what

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>fees they are having to pay? So they've said to

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the FCC, No, no, this would be too hard, don't

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>make us do this. But the FCC has not budged

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and said that the rules will go into effect and

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that the broadband companies will not be getting any exceptions

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>or exemptions or anything like that. One FCC representative said, quote,

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>every consumer needs transparent information when making decisions about what

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>internet service offering makes the most sense for their family

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>or household. No one wants to be hit with charges

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>they didn't ask for or they did not expect end

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>quote to which I say, you're doggone right. I mean,

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I'm not the only one who is just

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>sick of the experience where you think you're going to

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>pay one price for a product or a service, but

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>then you find out that there were all these other

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>extra fees that get added on at the very end

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of the transaction and it inflates the cost significantly. It's

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>not just broadband that does this, obviously, I'm looking at you,

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>ticket Master, your convenience fees convenient for whom? Okay, who

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to whom? Is that convenient? Anyway? Why would broad band

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>companies oppose listing out all these fees, Well, it's not

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's an administrative burden. It's likely because that there

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>are some charges that the government man dates that these

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.319
<v Speaker 1>companies pay, and one of the things that will have

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to happen by detailing all these different fees is that

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.959
<v Speaker 1>the companies are going to have to show when and

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>how they pass those charges on to customers. So instead

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of it being that it's the company's burden to pay

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>these fees, it's really the customer's burden to pay the fees,

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>because the company just passes the charge straight on to them,

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>which might be a little off putting. Also, there are

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>other fees that these companies add on that are not

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 1>mandated by the government, and by showing those, the companies

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>might be worried that they're going to really upset their customers,

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>who are like, yeah, but why does this fee exist?

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And there may not be a good reason other than

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>we want your money. So there are lots of reasons

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>why companies could be opposing this, but so far, the

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>FCC hasn't budged that. Being said, the FCC, while it

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>does technically have the authority to do this, the whole

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>thing is still under review, so it's entirely possible that

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>another department within the government will change things. Anyway, we

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>just have to wait and see. Okay, I have a

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>few more news stories before we wrap up, but first

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. We're back. So X, formerly

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>known as Twitter, has asked a judge to dismiss a

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>pending lawsuit against the company that accuses it of disproportionately

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>laying off older workers once Elon Musk took over. So

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>discriminating employees on the basis of age is absolutely against

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the law, and the lawsuit says that's essentially what happened

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>during the massive layoffs at the company. So, according to

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>this lawsuit, X laid off sixty percent of workers who

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 1>were fifty years of age or older. If they were

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>over the age of sixty, the percentage was closer to

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy five percent, and younger employees saw layoff rates at

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>around fifty four percent. So essentially, what the lawsuit is

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>saying is that if age were not a factor, you

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>should see this layoff percentage be pretty even across all

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>age groups, but it's not. It's higher for people who

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>were older. The judge has not dismissed the case. They

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>denied X's request to dismiss it. However, they did instruct

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the plaintiff that the lawsuit needs to be amended and

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 1>have better evidence to support the claim that the company

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>intentionally was laying off older workers or targeting over workers

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>during the layoffs, because as of yet, the current lawsuit

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>does not lay that out clearly enough, according to the judge,

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>So we'll have to wait and see if this moves forward. Meanwhile,

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>X is rolling out some new features. First up, if

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you're a paid user on the X platform, you'll be

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>able to hide your likes. That means that other users

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>will not be able to pop onto your profile and

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>click on the little likes tab and get a look

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>at which posts you have liked in the past. They

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>will be able to see if you've liked an individual post.

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Right if you've happened to like a post and they

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>see that post, they can see that you liked it,

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>but they won't have that aggregated tab that they can

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>check out to see if you're liking lots of stuff

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that maybe you'd prefer people not see. If you're going

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>around liking a lot of folks who have very controversial opinions,

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you might not want folks to know that about you,

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>for example. Now, on top of that, Elon Musk posted

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>earlier today, In fact, in the wee hours of the morning,

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>he posted that quote, video and audio calls coming to

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>X works on iOS, Android, Mac, and PC. No phone

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>number needed. X is the effective global address book. That

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>set of factors is unique. End quote. Now, he did

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>not indicate when this feature might actually launch. We also

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's going to be platform wide or

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>if it's only going to be a to paid subscribers.

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd be shocked if it's available to just the general

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>populace of X. And I'm also wondering how it's gonna

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>work because I'm hoping that this feature won't allow just

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>anyone to make video or phone calls to anybody else

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>who's on the platform. That seems like that's a terrible idea,

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So I imagine it's going to rely on something like

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>both people have to follow one another first before you

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>can make a call, Like you couldn't just call someone

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, like cold call them or whatever. Otherwise people,

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>especially like notable people, would have their phones blowing up

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>all the time from phone calls and video call requests,

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and that just seems like it's a great way to

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>drive people off your platform. So as much grief as

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I give Elan Musk and the companies he owns or runs,

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any way this feature is going

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>out without some serious guardrails in place. I'll be shocked

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>if he lets it go out without any restrictions at all.

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see Back In October of twenty twenty one,

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Google introduced a new subscription service called pixel Pass, and

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea was that you would subscribe to this service

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and you would get certain features, including some discounts on

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>other Google services, but you would also get a Pixel phone.

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>The type of phone you got would depend upon the

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>level at which you subscribed, and then every two years

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you would get an upgrade to your phone as long

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>as you were still subscribed to the service, so two

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>years later you would get a brand new, state of

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the art Pixel phone. It has been twenty two months

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>since Google launched the program, which means were just two

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>months out from the early adopters of that program getting

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>their first phone upgrade, which they will not get because

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Google has scrapped the program just as those who had

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>signed up were about to get their brand new phone.

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Google has decided the program is not working. They're canceling it,

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of a bummer. They will continue to

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>provide service throughout the rest of the term of the subscription,

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 1>They're just not going to ship out any new phones

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to subscribers and they're not renewing any subscriptions. So the

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>phone upgrade was a feature of this plan. It wasn't

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the only one, but still it is a big bummer

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to have the rug pulled out for the subscribers who

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>were just about to get a brand new phone. So

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Google has altered the deal pray they do not alter

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it further. A US science organization called noir Lab, which

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>has the coolest name ever, it actually stands for the

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>National Optical Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory, has said that hackers

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>have been targeting its telescopes and has brought down those

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>telescopes as well as the organization's website. The two big

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>telescopes that hackers have attacked are in Hawaii and Chile.

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>The organization says it's working with cybersecurity experts to return

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the telescopes and the website to operational status as soon

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>as possible. That was on August twenty fourth. The most

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>recent reporting I could find doesn't have any information on

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>who might be behind these attacks or what their motivations

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>could be. That's not to say that the cybersecurity experts

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have suspicions, or maybe that they you know, they

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>may already know who is responsible. They could just be

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>playing things close to the vest right now. We just

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Yikes and now heads up, PlayStation owners, if

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to PlayStation Plus, expect your monthly bill to

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>go up starting September sixth unless you take action soon.

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Sony is increasing the annual prices on each of the

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>three tiers of PlayStation Plus. So the base level was

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty dollars per year, now it's going to be eighty

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars per year. The Extra Plan went from one hundred bucks,

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it'll go to one hundred thirty five bucks a year,

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Premium plan is going from one hundred and

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars a year to one hundred and sixty dollars

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a year. So, in other words, Tier one is increasing

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>by twenty bucks per year, Tier two by thirty five

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>five bucks per year, and Tier three forty bucks per year.

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So not only is everything getting more expensive, but the

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>higher the tier, the more expensive it's getting. Now these

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.239
<v Speaker 1>are the annual fee versions. If instead you're set up

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to pay monthly or quarterly, there's no word yet on

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>whether those prices are going to change, but as it stands,

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>if you do pay for a full year, no matter

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>what the tier, it's still less expensive than subscribing monthly

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>or quarterly. You would be paying more per year if

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you do it that way than if you do annually,

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 1>even with these price hikes. So the thing I would

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>alert you to is that you can actually stack years

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>onto your subscription. You can pre pay for years, so

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>if you go in and pre pay for a year

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.679
<v Speaker 1>or two or three, you can actually extend your current

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>subscription at the current prices before those price hikes go

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>into effect. So just a little heads up for y'all.

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's it for the news. I hope you

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>are all well, and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.