1
00:00:04,440 --> 00:00:12,360
Speaker 1: Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

2
00:00:12,400 --> 00:00:16,040
Speaker 1: and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

3
00:00:16,120 --> 00:00:19,400
Speaker 1: I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio. And how the tech

4
00:00:19,440 --> 00:00:21,920
Speaker 1: are you. It's time for the tech news for Thursday

5
00:00:22,320 --> 00:00:28,200
Speaker 1: August thirty, first, twenty twenty three. Where does the time go? Well,

6
00:00:28,240 --> 00:00:31,600
Speaker 1: you might be familiar with the fact that Meta has

7
00:00:31,720 --> 00:00:35,040
Speaker 1: an oversight board, which it established in the wake of

8
00:00:35,200 --> 00:00:39,480
Speaker 1: banning former President Donald Trump from Facebook a few years ago.

9
00:00:39,760 --> 00:00:43,000
Speaker 1: So the board's purpose is to make recommendations and also

10
00:00:43,040 --> 00:00:46,360
Speaker 1: to review Meta's decisions to try and keep the company

11
00:00:46,400 --> 00:00:50,360
Speaker 1: in line with its stated policies. So essentially, it's to

12
00:00:50,400 --> 00:00:53,400
Speaker 1: make sure that Meta is obeying its own rules. But

13
00:00:53,440 --> 00:00:56,880
Speaker 1: the thing is, Meta is not actually under any obligation

14
00:00:57,160 --> 00:01:01,680
Speaker 1: to follow whatever the oversight board recommends. So the board

15
00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:05,479
Speaker 1: can make recommendations and urge Metta to make changes, but

16
00:01:05,720 --> 00:01:08,800
Speaker 1: Metta doesn't actually have to do any of that at all,

17
00:01:09,160 --> 00:01:12,919
Speaker 1: which might make you wonder what purpose does the board

18
00:01:13,120 --> 00:01:17,120
Speaker 1: actually serve apart from optics. I don't have an answer

19
00:01:17,120 --> 00:01:19,880
Speaker 1: to that anyway, The issue has cropped up again this

20
00:01:19,959 --> 00:01:23,480
Speaker 1: week because the oversight board advised Meta to suspend the

21
00:01:23,520 --> 00:01:28,199
Speaker 1: Facebook account belonging to Hun Sen, a politician, a leader

22
00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:34,800
Speaker 1: in Cambodia. Hun Sen has a pretty awful international reputation.

23
00:01:35,480 --> 00:01:39,600
Speaker 1: He's dedicated a lot of effort to squashing independent press

24
00:01:39,640 --> 00:01:43,720
Speaker 1: and critics and activists, as well as the fact that

25
00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:48,520
Speaker 1: despite him being a democratically elected official, he wants to

26
00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:52,000
Speaker 1: pass his position down to his son and make a

27
00:01:52,080 --> 00:01:57,400
Speaker 1: hereditary position, not an elected one anyway. Recently, Hunsen posted

28
00:01:57,400 --> 00:02:01,680
Speaker 1: a video that contained many threatenings statements, including the promise

29
00:02:01,760 --> 00:02:05,560
Speaker 1: to quote arrest a trader with sufficient evidence at midnight

30
00:02:05,800 --> 00:02:09,120
Speaker 1: end quote, according to The Washington Post, and so the

31
00:02:09,160 --> 00:02:13,400
Speaker 1: oversight board recommended to Meta that they suspend his Facebook

32
00:02:13,400 --> 00:02:18,240
Speaker 1: account instead. Meta Leadership has chosen to allow Hunsen to

33
00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:22,639
Speaker 1: keep his Facebook profile, although they did remove the video

34
00:02:23,040 --> 00:02:26,040
Speaker 1: in question after it had been up for half a year.

35
00:02:26,600 --> 00:02:30,800
Speaker 1: As for the justification of allowing Hunsen to keep his profile,

36
00:02:30,880 --> 00:02:34,360
Speaker 1: Meta said it's because that while Hunsen's video contains stuff

37
00:02:34,400 --> 00:02:39,040
Speaker 1: that clearly violates Facebook policies, the video itself wasn't posted

38
00:02:39,120 --> 00:02:43,440
Speaker 1: during a time of civil unrest, and apparently civil unrest

39
00:02:43,919 --> 00:02:46,640
Speaker 1: is a prerequisite for Meta to suspend the accounts that

40
00:02:46,680 --> 00:02:50,239
Speaker 1: belong to public figures. The board states that hun Sen's

41
00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:54,680
Speaker 1: post undermine democracy in Cambodia, and as such, Facebook shares

42
00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:59,720
Speaker 1: responsibility for elevating Hunsen's platform, and therefore, you know, they

43
00:02:59,720 --> 00:03:05,359
Speaker 1: should probably stop doing that because it's undermining the democratic process.

44
00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:10,560
Speaker 1: Perhaps the threat of seeing Facebook access restricted in Cambodia,

45
00:03:10,960 --> 00:03:16,040
Speaker 1: because that's something that Hunsen's administration was threatening, has also

46
00:03:16,080 --> 00:03:19,360
Speaker 1: played a part in the company's decisions to dismiss the

47
00:03:19,440 --> 00:03:23,760
Speaker 1: board's opinion on this particular matter. Also, like I said,

48
00:03:23,800 --> 00:03:26,760
Speaker 1: they left that video up for half a year. They

49
00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:29,560
Speaker 1: only took it down when the Oversight Board started to

50
00:03:29,560 --> 00:03:34,040
Speaker 1: bring their concerns forward to Meta officials, and it was

51
00:03:34,200 --> 00:03:38,000
Speaker 1: clearly violating Facebook's policies, but it stayed up for half

52
00:03:38,040 --> 00:03:41,040
Speaker 1: a year. Human rights advocates continue to criticize Meta for

53
00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:44,200
Speaker 1: failing to show concern for user safety as well as

54
00:03:44,200 --> 00:03:47,000
Speaker 1: the democratic process in general, and those, of course, are

55
00:03:47,080 --> 00:03:51,640
Speaker 1: charges that Meta representatives deny. That being said, Meta has

56
00:03:51,720 --> 00:03:55,040
Speaker 1: reported that the company has removed more than seven seven

57
00:03:55,120 --> 00:03:58,200
Speaker 1: hundred accounts on Facebook that they say have links to

58
00:03:58,280 --> 00:04:03,240
Speaker 1: a Chinese backed misinformation campaign. Further, according to Meta, this

59
00:04:03,400 --> 00:04:07,320
Speaker 1: campaign hits a broad spectrum of social platforms, Beyond just

60
00:04:07,480 --> 00:04:12,720
Speaker 1: the Meta ones like Facebook and Instagram, they include TikTok, Reddit, YouTube,

61
00:04:13,120 --> 00:04:17,800
Speaker 1: and Twitter slash x. According to Meta, the main goal

62
00:04:17,839 --> 00:04:21,359
Speaker 1: for this campaign was to control the narrative regarding China's

63
00:04:21,440 --> 00:04:24,920
Speaker 1: human rights record. Essentially, the campaign looked to redirect attention

64
00:04:25,000 --> 00:04:29,520
Speaker 1: away from some truly horrific human rights violations, which is

65
00:04:29,520 --> 00:04:33,039
Speaker 1: putting it lightly, and instead to proclaim China's actually, you know,

66
00:04:33,160 --> 00:04:37,479
Speaker 1: really valuing human rights. Actually. According to Meta, many of

67
00:04:37,480 --> 00:04:39,920
Speaker 1: the profiles started out posting about stuff that didn't have

68
00:04:39,960 --> 00:04:43,680
Speaker 1: anything to do with human rights or politics, and they

69
00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:47,040
Speaker 1: were posting a lot of the same videos and pictures

70
00:04:47,320 --> 00:04:50,880
Speaker 1: that were focusing on stuff like food and fashion, things

71
00:04:50,920 --> 00:04:55,200
Speaker 1: that were not triggering as far as you know, saying oh,

72
00:04:55,320 --> 00:04:59,160
Speaker 1: this is a misinformation campaign. But gradually the accounts began

73
00:04:59,200 --> 00:05:03,560
Speaker 1: to incorporate China messages and also heap criticism on the

74
00:05:03,680 --> 00:05:06,279
Speaker 1: United States government as well as some other Western governments.

75
00:05:06,680 --> 00:05:09,119
Speaker 1: And Meta has said that the people responsible for running

76
00:05:09,120 --> 00:05:12,880
Speaker 1: the campaign they appear to be spread across China, but

77
00:05:12,880 --> 00:05:17,160
Speaker 1: they're all pulling content from the same source, and that

78
00:05:17,240 --> 00:05:20,919
Speaker 1: it's all likely connected to Chinese law enforcement. This is

79
00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:23,880
Speaker 1: by no means the only coordinated state backed effort to

80
00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:28,440
Speaker 1: leverage social platforms in order to spread misinformation. Meta representatives

81
00:05:28,480 --> 00:05:32,839
Speaker 1: noted that similar campaigns have originated out of places like Russia, Iran,

82
00:05:33,200 --> 00:05:37,400
Speaker 1: and Turkey. The Verge reports that the Allen Institute for

83
00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:42,080
Speaker 1: AI has released a new tool called Satlus. This tool

84
00:05:42,080 --> 00:05:45,560
Speaker 1: can do something to satellite imagery that makes me think

85
00:05:45,600 --> 00:05:49,279
Speaker 1: of the old Hollywood trope of zoom in enhance. Like

86
00:05:49,279 --> 00:05:51,919
Speaker 1: if you've ever seen any of those movies where someone's

87
00:05:51,920 --> 00:05:55,880
Speaker 1: looking at camera footage and they want the operator to

88
00:05:56,000 --> 00:05:58,799
Speaker 1: magically zoom in on one little corner of the footage

89
00:05:58,800 --> 00:06:00,680
Speaker 1: and then enhance it so you can see who it was.

90
00:06:01,520 --> 00:06:05,840
Speaker 1: You know that is mostly bogus as far as it goes,

91
00:06:05,880 --> 00:06:09,760
Speaker 1: because you can't you can digitally punch in on an image.

92
00:06:09,760 --> 00:06:12,159
Speaker 1: That's entirely possible. You know that, because I'm sure you've

93
00:06:12,160 --> 00:06:16,279
Speaker 1: cropped videos and images before. But you can't really enhance

94
00:06:17,000 --> 00:06:20,839
Speaker 1: an image without inserting new information, right. You have to

95
00:06:21,040 --> 00:06:24,960
Speaker 1: add information there. You can't just magically get access to information.

96
00:06:25,080 --> 00:06:27,120
Speaker 1: It's not like the information was sitting there all along

97
00:06:27,200 --> 00:06:30,039
Speaker 1: and you just had to zoom to see it. You

98
00:06:30,120 --> 00:06:32,039
Speaker 1: have to add information to be able to quote unquote

99
00:06:32,160 --> 00:06:37,080
Speaker 1: enhance That kind of is counter to identifying someone because

100
00:06:37,560 --> 00:06:39,560
Speaker 1: you don't know if the information you're adding is accurate

101
00:06:39,640 --> 00:06:42,159
Speaker 1: or not. But that's kind of what satlust is doing.

102
00:06:43,080 --> 00:06:47,360
Speaker 1: It sharpens satellite imagery by using deep learning to best

103
00:06:47,520 --> 00:06:50,840
Speaker 1: fill in details to make those images less blurry and

104
00:06:50,920 --> 00:06:55,480
Speaker 1: higher resolution. As for practical applications, the institute is focusing

105
00:06:55,760 --> 00:06:59,880
Speaker 1: pun intended on getting information about, you know, tree cover

106
00:07:00,160 --> 00:07:03,000
Speaker 1: and renewable energy projects that are going on around the world.

107
00:07:03,440 --> 00:07:05,480
Speaker 1: That data can then be part of a larger picture

108
00:07:05,560 --> 00:07:09,760
Speaker 1: about climate change and conservation and renewable energy. So the

109
00:07:09,800 --> 00:07:13,000
Speaker 1: hope is that by collecting information on a global scale,

110
00:07:13,320 --> 00:07:16,360
Speaker 1: scientists and activists can have a more accurate picture of

111
00:07:16,360 --> 00:07:19,800
Speaker 1: what's actually going on around the world where we could

112
00:07:19,920 --> 00:07:23,400
Speaker 1: perhaps concentrate future efforts to have the biggest impact, and

113
00:07:23,480 --> 00:07:25,480
Speaker 1: also to gain an idea of just how well or

114
00:07:25,480 --> 00:07:30,120
Speaker 1: how poorly policymakers are progressing with various plans to combat

115
00:07:30,360 --> 00:07:33,320
Speaker 1: climate change. Are they actually following through on their promises

116
00:07:33,840 --> 00:07:38,960
Speaker 1: or are the results antithetical to the goal of ending

117
00:07:38,960 --> 00:07:42,200
Speaker 1: climate change? And it's nice to have a new piece

118
00:07:42,920 --> 00:07:47,200
Speaker 1: about AI that's not a totally negative one, Like it's

119
00:07:47,280 --> 00:07:50,320
Speaker 1: nice to have something about AI where you start to see, oh,

120
00:07:50,400 --> 00:07:53,760
Speaker 1: this could be potentially really useful. However, I should point

121
00:07:53,760 --> 00:07:56,000
Speaker 1: out that the researchers who are working on this tool

122
00:07:56,040 --> 00:08:00,320
Speaker 1: have already noted that, just like other generative AI tools,

123
00:08:00,360 --> 00:08:05,400
Speaker 1: is not immune to hallucinations. That's when generative AI ends

124
00:08:05,440 --> 00:08:07,920
Speaker 1: up making stuff up when it determines it doesn't have

125
00:08:08,040 --> 00:08:10,720
Speaker 1: enough information to provide a good answer. So in the

126
00:08:10,760 --> 00:08:14,360
Speaker 1: case of SATLUS, sometimes that manifests as the tool drawing

127
00:08:14,480 --> 00:08:18,040
Speaker 1: building details incorrectly, and that could possibly be due to

128
00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:21,440
Speaker 1: things like the fact that architectural styles are not uniform

129
00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:25,320
Speaker 1: around the world, so it may be drawing from its

130
00:08:25,680 --> 00:08:28,160
Speaker 1: quote unquote knowledge of architecture in one part of the

131
00:08:28,160 --> 00:08:31,520
Speaker 1: world and then just applying those principles to another to

132
00:08:31,600 --> 00:08:34,240
Speaker 1: try and complete a picture, when in fact that just

133
00:08:34,400 --> 00:08:37,360
Speaker 1: ends up making it inaccurate. So it's by far a

134
00:08:37,400 --> 00:08:40,600
Speaker 1: perfect tool, but it is an interesting application of generative

135
00:08:40,679 --> 00:08:45,560
Speaker 1: artificial intelligence. The United States Federal Communications Commission, or FCC,

136
00:08:46,400 --> 00:08:49,680
Speaker 1: has some bad news for Internet service providers that have

137
00:08:49,760 --> 00:08:52,520
Speaker 1: been complaining that it's just too darn hard to list

138
00:08:52,520 --> 00:08:57,000
Speaker 1: out every fee they charge their customers each month. And

139
00:08:57,040 --> 00:09:01,400
Speaker 1: the bad news the FCC has is well tough because

140
00:09:01,400 --> 00:09:05,079
Speaker 1: he gotta. Five trade groups representing some of the biggest

141
00:09:05,080 --> 00:09:08,960
Speaker 1: broadband providers in the United States petitioned the FCC to

142
00:09:09,080 --> 00:09:13,120
Speaker 1: drop this requirement because, according to them, listing out all

143
00:09:13,160 --> 00:09:18,320
Speaker 1: the fees creates quote unquote significant administrative burdens. I'm not

144
00:09:18,400 --> 00:09:22,680
Speaker 1: sure how supplying essentially a bulleted list of various fees

145
00:09:23,040 --> 00:09:27,680
Speaker 1: is an administrative burden, but charging customers those fees isn't.

146
00:09:28,240 --> 00:09:31,160
Speaker 1: I mean, obviously the companies have to know what the

147
00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:35,679
Speaker 1: fees are. Otherwise how could they charge customers, Like, how

148
00:09:35,720 --> 00:09:38,920
Speaker 1: could they do that? So shouldn't the customer know what

149
00:09:39,120 --> 00:09:43,200
Speaker 1: fees they are having to pay? So they've said to

150
00:09:43,240 --> 00:09:45,320
Speaker 1: the FCC, No, no, this would be too hard, don't

151
00:09:45,360 --> 00:09:47,920
Speaker 1: make us do this. But the FCC has not budged

152
00:09:48,280 --> 00:09:50,920
Speaker 1: and said that the rules will go into effect and

153
00:09:51,000 --> 00:09:54,240
Speaker 1: that the broadband companies will not be getting any exceptions

154
00:09:54,320 --> 00:09:59,720
Speaker 1: or exemptions or anything like that. One FCC representative said, quote,

155
00:10:00,080 --> 00:10:03,920
Speaker 1: every consumer needs transparent information when making decisions about what

156
00:10:04,040 --> 00:10:07,080
Speaker 1: internet service offering makes the most sense for their family

157
00:10:07,200 --> 00:10:10,040
Speaker 1: or household. No one wants to be hit with charges

158
00:10:10,240 --> 00:10:13,760
Speaker 1: they didn't ask for or they did not expect end

159
00:10:13,840 --> 00:10:17,600
Speaker 1: quote to which I say, you're doggone right. I mean,

160
00:10:17,720 --> 00:10:19,920
Speaker 1: I'm sure I'm not the only one who is just

161
00:10:20,120 --> 00:10:22,760
Speaker 1: sick of the experience where you think you're going to

162
00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:26,080
Speaker 1: pay one price for a product or a service, but

163
00:10:26,120 --> 00:10:28,280
Speaker 1: then you find out that there were all these other

164
00:10:28,400 --> 00:10:31,000
Speaker 1: extra fees that get added on at the very end

165
00:10:31,080 --> 00:10:35,160
Speaker 1: of the transaction and it inflates the cost significantly. It's

166
00:10:35,200 --> 00:10:37,760
Speaker 1: not just broadband that does this, obviously, I'm looking at you,

167
00:10:37,880 --> 00:10:42,920
Speaker 1: ticket Master, your convenience fees convenient for whom? Okay, who

168
00:10:42,960 --> 00:10:47,560
Speaker 1: to whom? Is that convenient? Anyway? Why would broad band

169
00:10:47,600 --> 00:10:53,560
Speaker 1: companies oppose listing out all these fees, Well, it's not

170
00:10:53,800 --> 00:10:57,320
Speaker 1: because it's an administrative burden. It's likely because that there

171
00:10:57,360 --> 00:11:01,960
Speaker 1: are some charges that the government man dates that these

172
00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:05,319
Speaker 1: companies pay, and one of the things that will have

173
00:11:05,400 --> 00:11:09,520
Speaker 1: to happen by detailing all these different fees is that

174
00:11:09,559 --> 00:11:11,959
Speaker 1: the companies are going to have to show when and

175
00:11:12,040 --> 00:11:15,480
Speaker 1: how they pass those charges on to customers. So instead

176
00:11:15,480 --> 00:11:18,240
Speaker 1: of it being that it's the company's burden to pay

177
00:11:18,360 --> 00:11:22,040
Speaker 1: these fees, it's really the customer's burden to pay the fees,

178
00:11:22,080 --> 00:11:26,640
Speaker 1: because the company just passes the charge straight on to them,

179
00:11:26,960 --> 00:11:30,440
Speaker 1: which might be a little off putting. Also, there are

180
00:11:30,480 --> 00:11:33,840
Speaker 1: other fees that these companies add on that are not

181
00:11:33,960 --> 00:11:39,079
Speaker 1: mandated by the government, and by showing those, the companies

182
00:11:39,200 --> 00:11:41,920
Speaker 1: might be worried that they're going to really upset their customers,

183
00:11:41,920 --> 00:11:45,439
Speaker 1: who are like, yeah, but why does this fee exist?

184
00:11:46,040 --> 00:11:48,080
Speaker 1: And there may not be a good reason other than

185
00:11:48,320 --> 00:11:51,640
Speaker 1: we want your money. So there are lots of reasons

186
00:11:51,679 --> 00:11:54,000
Speaker 1: why companies could be opposing this, but so far, the

187
00:11:54,080 --> 00:11:57,480
Speaker 1: FCC hasn't budged that. Being said, the FCC, while it

188
00:11:57,520 --> 00:12:01,280
Speaker 1: does technically have the authority to do this, the whole

189
00:12:01,280 --> 00:12:04,840
Speaker 1: thing is still under review, so it's entirely possible that

190
00:12:04,920 --> 00:12:09,160
Speaker 1: another department within the government will change things. Anyway, we

191
00:12:09,320 --> 00:12:11,560
Speaker 1: just have to wait and see. Okay, I have a

192
00:12:11,559 --> 00:12:14,120
Speaker 1: few more news stories before we wrap up, but first

193
00:12:14,200 --> 00:12:27,240
Speaker 1: let's take a quick break. We're back. So X, formerly

194
00:12:27,280 --> 00:12:29,880
Speaker 1: known as Twitter, has asked a judge to dismiss a

195
00:12:29,920 --> 00:12:33,679
Speaker 1: pending lawsuit against the company that accuses it of disproportionately

196
00:12:33,800 --> 00:12:38,280
Speaker 1: laying off older workers once Elon Musk took over. So

197
00:12:38,400 --> 00:12:41,800
Speaker 1: discriminating employees on the basis of age is absolutely against

198
00:12:41,800 --> 00:12:45,040
Speaker 1: the law, and the lawsuit says that's essentially what happened

199
00:12:45,480 --> 00:12:48,079
Speaker 1: during the massive layoffs at the company. So, according to

200
00:12:48,120 --> 00:12:52,440
Speaker 1: this lawsuit, X laid off sixty percent of workers who

201
00:12:52,480 --> 00:12:55,319
Speaker 1: were fifty years of age or older. If they were

202
00:12:55,360 --> 00:12:58,040
Speaker 1: over the age of sixty, the percentage was closer to

203
00:12:58,160 --> 00:13:02,200
Speaker 1: seventy five percent, and younger employees saw layoff rates at

204
00:13:02,240 --> 00:13:06,480
Speaker 1: around fifty four percent. So essentially, what the lawsuit is

205
00:13:06,480 --> 00:13:09,080
Speaker 1: saying is that if age were not a factor, you

206
00:13:09,080 --> 00:13:13,160
Speaker 1: should see this layoff percentage be pretty even across all

207
00:13:13,240 --> 00:13:16,920
Speaker 1: age groups, but it's not. It's higher for people who

208
00:13:17,040 --> 00:13:20,280
Speaker 1: were older. The judge has not dismissed the case. They

209
00:13:20,320 --> 00:13:24,720
Speaker 1: denied X's request to dismiss it. However, they did instruct

210
00:13:24,720 --> 00:13:29,040
Speaker 1: the plaintiff that the lawsuit needs to be amended and

211
00:13:29,160 --> 00:13:33,319
Speaker 1: have better evidence to support the claim that the company

212
00:13:33,480 --> 00:13:37,760
Speaker 1: intentionally was laying off older workers or targeting over workers

213
00:13:37,800 --> 00:13:41,760
Speaker 1: during the layoffs, because as of yet, the current lawsuit

214
00:13:42,160 --> 00:13:45,600
Speaker 1: does not lay that out clearly enough, according to the judge,

215
00:13:45,800 --> 00:13:50,000
Speaker 1: So we'll have to wait and see if this moves forward. Meanwhile,

216
00:13:50,160 --> 00:13:52,920
Speaker 1: X is rolling out some new features. First up, if

217
00:13:52,920 --> 00:13:56,080
Speaker 1: you're a paid user on the X platform, you'll be

218
00:13:56,120 --> 00:13:59,520
Speaker 1: able to hide your likes. That means that other users

219
00:13:59,559 --> 00:14:02,240
Speaker 1: will not be able to pop onto your profile and

220
00:14:02,280 --> 00:14:04,360
Speaker 1: click on the little likes tab and get a look

221
00:14:04,360 --> 00:14:08,640
Speaker 1: at which posts you have liked in the past. They

222
00:14:08,679 --> 00:14:11,400
Speaker 1: will be able to see if you've liked an individual post.

223
00:14:11,600 --> 00:14:13,319
Speaker 1: Right if you've happened to like a post and they

224
00:14:13,400 --> 00:14:15,120
Speaker 1: see that post, they can see that you liked it,

225
00:14:15,400 --> 00:14:18,520
Speaker 1: but they won't have that aggregated tab that they can

226
00:14:18,600 --> 00:14:20,960
Speaker 1: check out to see if you're liking lots of stuff

227
00:14:20,960 --> 00:14:24,000
Speaker 1: that maybe you'd prefer people not see. If you're going

228
00:14:24,040 --> 00:14:28,040
Speaker 1: around liking a lot of folks who have very controversial opinions,

229
00:14:28,680 --> 00:14:31,200
Speaker 1: you might not want folks to know that about you,

230
00:14:31,240 --> 00:14:34,480
Speaker 1: for example. Now, on top of that, Elon Musk posted

231
00:14:34,520 --> 00:14:37,240
Speaker 1: earlier today, In fact, in the wee hours of the morning,

232
00:14:37,280 --> 00:14:41,200
Speaker 1: he posted that quote, video and audio calls coming to

233
00:14:41,560 --> 00:14:45,680
Speaker 1: X works on iOS, Android, Mac, and PC. No phone

234
00:14:45,760 --> 00:14:49,480
Speaker 1: number needed. X is the effective global address book. That

235
00:14:49,600 --> 00:14:52,760
Speaker 1: set of factors is unique. End quote. Now, he did

236
00:14:52,760 --> 00:14:56,320
Speaker 1: not indicate when this feature might actually launch. We also

237
00:14:56,400 --> 00:14:58,840
Speaker 1: don't know if it's going to be platform wide or

238
00:14:58,880 --> 00:15:01,360
Speaker 1: if it's only going to be a to paid subscribers.

239
00:15:01,520 --> 00:15:05,040
Speaker 1: I'd be shocked if it's available to just the general

240
00:15:05,520 --> 00:15:08,960
Speaker 1: populace of X. And I'm also wondering how it's gonna

241
00:15:09,000 --> 00:15:14,120
Speaker 1: work because I'm hoping that this feature won't allow just

242
00:15:14,240 --> 00:15:17,920
Speaker 1: anyone to make video or phone calls to anybody else

243
00:15:17,920 --> 00:15:21,880
Speaker 1: who's on the platform. That seems like that's a terrible idea,

244
00:15:21,960 --> 00:15:24,880
Speaker 1: So I imagine it's going to rely on something like

245
00:15:24,960 --> 00:15:27,560
Speaker 1: both people have to follow one another first before you

246
00:15:27,560 --> 00:15:30,560
Speaker 1: can make a call, Like you couldn't just call someone

247
00:15:31,160 --> 00:15:34,320
Speaker 1: you know, like cold call them or whatever. Otherwise people,

248
00:15:34,440 --> 00:15:38,280
Speaker 1: especially like notable people, would have their phones blowing up

249
00:15:38,320 --> 00:15:41,320
Speaker 1: all the time from phone calls and video call requests,

250
00:15:41,680 --> 00:15:43,720
Speaker 1: and that just seems like it's a great way to

251
00:15:43,840 --> 00:15:47,400
Speaker 1: drive people off your platform. So as much grief as

252
00:15:47,440 --> 00:15:51,120
Speaker 1: I give Elan Musk and the companies he owns or runs,

253
00:15:52,040 --> 00:15:54,160
Speaker 1: I don't think there's any way this feature is going

254
00:15:54,160 --> 00:15:57,040
Speaker 1: out without some serious guardrails in place. I'll be shocked

255
00:15:57,600 --> 00:16:00,920
Speaker 1: if he lets it go out without any restrictions at all.

256
00:16:01,080 --> 00:16:04,120
Speaker 1: So we'll see Back In October of twenty twenty one,

257
00:16:04,520 --> 00:16:08,200
Speaker 1: Google introduced a new subscription service called pixel Pass, and

258
00:16:08,240 --> 00:16:10,320
Speaker 1: the idea was that you would subscribe to this service

259
00:16:10,440 --> 00:16:14,560
Speaker 1: and you would get certain features, including some discounts on

260
00:16:14,880 --> 00:16:18,920
Speaker 1: other Google services, but you would also get a Pixel phone.

261
00:16:19,440 --> 00:16:21,200
Speaker 1: The type of phone you got would depend upon the

262
00:16:21,320 --> 00:16:25,480
Speaker 1: level at which you subscribed, and then every two years

263
00:16:25,680 --> 00:16:27,720
Speaker 1: you would get an upgrade to your phone as long

264
00:16:27,720 --> 00:16:30,800
Speaker 1: as you were still subscribed to the service, so two

265
00:16:30,840 --> 00:16:33,680
Speaker 1: years later you would get a brand new, state of

266
00:16:33,720 --> 00:16:37,040
Speaker 1: the art Pixel phone. It has been twenty two months

267
00:16:37,080 --> 00:16:39,800
Speaker 1: since Google launched the program, which means were just two

268
00:16:39,840 --> 00:16:43,600
Speaker 1: months out from the early adopters of that program getting

269
00:16:43,640 --> 00:16:47,040
Speaker 1: their first phone upgrade, which they will not get because

270
00:16:47,080 --> 00:16:50,560
Speaker 1: Google has scrapped the program just as those who had

271
00:16:50,600 --> 00:16:53,680
Speaker 1: signed up were about to get their brand new phone.

272
00:16:53,760 --> 00:16:57,840
Speaker 1: Google has decided the program is not working. They're canceling it,

273
00:16:58,240 --> 00:17:00,200
Speaker 1: which is kind of a bummer. They will continue to

274
00:17:00,240 --> 00:17:04,720
Speaker 1: provide service throughout the rest of the term of the subscription,

275
00:17:05,320 --> 00:17:07,479
Speaker 1: They're just not going to ship out any new phones

276
00:17:07,520 --> 00:17:12,280
Speaker 1: to subscribers and they're not renewing any subscriptions. So the

277
00:17:12,359 --> 00:17:14,880
Speaker 1: phone upgrade was a feature of this plan. It wasn't

278
00:17:14,920 --> 00:17:18,120
Speaker 1: the only one, but still it is a big bummer

279
00:17:18,440 --> 00:17:20,800
Speaker 1: to have the rug pulled out for the subscribers who

280
00:17:20,840 --> 00:17:23,760
Speaker 1: were just about to get a brand new phone. So

281
00:17:23,840 --> 00:17:26,520
Speaker 1: Google has altered the deal pray they do not alter

282
00:17:26,600 --> 00:17:30,600
Speaker 1: it further. A US science organization called noir Lab, which

283
00:17:30,640 --> 00:17:33,560
Speaker 1: has the coolest name ever, it actually stands for the

284
00:17:33,680 --> 00:17:38,400
Speaker 1: National Optical Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory, has said that hackers

285
00:17:38,400 --> 00:17:42,640
Speaker 1: have been targeting its telescopes and has brought down those

286
00:17:42,680 --> 00:17:47,440
Speaker 1: telescopes as well as the organization's website. The two big

287
00:17:47,480 --> 00:17:50,520
Speaker 1: telescopes that hackers have attacked are in Hawaii and Chile.

288
00:17:51,240 --> 00:17:54,520
Speaker 1: The organization says it's working with cybersecurity experts to return

289
00:17:54,560 --> 00:17:57,880
Speaker 1: the telescopes and the website to operational status as soon

290
00:17:57,920 --> 00:18:01,640
Speaker 1: as possible. That was on August twenty fourth. The most

291
00:18:01,640 --> 00:18:04,560
Speaker 1: recent reporting I could find doesn't have any information on

292
00:18:04,600 --> 00:18:07,760
Speaker 1: who might be behind these attacks or what their motivations

293
00:18:07,800 --> 00:18:11,320
Speaker 1: could be. That's not to say that the cybersecurity experts

294
00:18:11,440 --> 00:18:14,280
Speaker 1: don't have suspicions, or maybe that they you know, they

295
00:18:14,320 --> 00:18:17,280
Speaker 1: may already know who is responsible. They could just be

296
00:18:17,320 --> 00:18:19,679
Speaker 1: playing things close to the vest right now. We just

297
00:18:19,680 --> 00:18:24,160
Speaker 1: don't know. Yikes and now heads up, PlayStation owners, if

298
00:18:24,200 --> 00:18:27,679
Speaker 1: you subscribe to PlayStation Plus, expect your monthly bill to

299
00:18:27,720 --> 00:18:30,720
Speaker 1: go up starting September sixth unless you take action soon.

300
00:18:31,320 --> 00:18:34,280
Speaker 1: Sony is increasing the annual prices on each of the

301
00:18:34,359 --> 00:18:39,159
Speaker 1: three tiers of PlayStation Plus. So the base level was

302
00:18:39,440 --> 00:18:41,760
Speaker 1: sixty dollars per year, now it's going to be eighty

303
00:18:41,800 --> 00:18:46,440
Speaker 1: dollars per year. The Extra Plan went from one hundred bucks,

304
00:18:46,440 --> 00:18:49,160
Speaker 1: it'll go to one hundred thirty five bucks a year,

305
00:18:49,600 --> 00:18:52,200
Speaker 1: and the Premium plan is going from one hundred and

306
00:18:52,200 --> 00:18:54,720
Speaker 1: twenty dollars a year to one hundred and sixty dollars

307
00:18:54,760 --> 00:18:57,080
Speaker 1: a year. So, in other words, Tier one is increasing

308
00:18:57,119 --> 00:19:00,000
Speaker 1: by twenty bucks per year, Tier two by thirty five

309
00:19:00,040 --> 00:19:04,120
Speaker 1: five bucks per year, and Tier three forty bucks per year.

310
00:19:04,160 --> 00:19:06,280
Speaker 1: So not only is everything getting more expensive, but the

311
00:19:06,600 --> 00:19:09,440
Speaker 1: higher the tier, the more expensive it's getting. Now these

312
00:19:09,440 --> 00:19:13,239
Speaker 1: are the annual fee versions. If instead you're set up

313
00:19:13,280 --> 00:19:17,080
Speaker 1: to pay monthly or quarterly, there's no word yet on

314
00:19:17,119 --> 00:19:20,240
Speaker 1: whether those prices are going to change, but as it stands,

315
00:19:20,320 --> 00:19:22,440
Speaker 1: if you do pay for a full year, no matter

316
00:19:22,440 --> 00:19:26,320
Speaker 1: what the tier, it's still less expensive than subscribing monthly

317
00:19:26,520 --> 00:19:29,080
Speaker 1: or quarterly. You would be paying more per year if

318
00:19:29,119 --> 00:19:30,880
Speaker 1: you do it that way than if you do annually,

319
00:19:30,960 --> 00:19:34,159
Speaker 1: even with these price hikes. So the thing I would

320
00:19:34,359 --> 00:19:37,680
Speaker 1: alert you to is that you can actually stack years

321
00:19:37,760 --> 00:19:40,960
Speaker 1: onto your subscription. You can pre pay for years, so

322
00:19:41,040 --> 00:19:43,400
Speaker 1: if you go in and pre pay for a year

323
00:19:43,520 --> 00:19:46,679
Speaker 1: or two or three, you can actually extend your current

324
00:19:46,760 --> 00:19:50,919
Speaker 1: subscription at the current prices before those price hikes go

325
00:19:51,000 --> 00:19:54,480
Speaker 1: into effect. So just a little heads up for y'all.

326
00:19:54,560 --> 00:19:57,760
Speaker 1: All right, that's it for the news. I hope you

327
00:19:57,800 --> 00:20:01,600
Speaker 1: are all well, and I'll talk to you again really soon.

328
00:20:08,080 --> 00:20:12,720
Speaker 1: Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

329
00:20:13,080 --> 00:20:16,800
Speaker 1: visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

330
00:20:16,800 --> 00:20:17,879
Speaker 1: to your favorite shows.