WEBVTT - Bloomberg Intelligence: Oil Mega-Merger, Super Bowl

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on affle Card playing Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Business app. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at that oil deal a diamondback buying endeavor.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 2>You have bangstock, which is diamondbackstock. It is up by

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>ten percent. Wow, that is a really nice move. Vince

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Piasa is Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Energy Research analyst, and he

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>joins us now vinced you like the deal.

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 3>I think the deal ticks all the boxes that we're

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 3>going to need to see in this MNA wave. In

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 3>the permium, it grows diamondbacks, acreage, it grows locations, so

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 3>inventory is not going to be an issue in terms

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 3>of the that they paid. Look diamondback in my universe

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 3>of coverage, it was the highest had the highest premium.

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 3>So they're using their multiple to get this deal done

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 3>and so elevated currency along with some.

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 4>Cash and debt they are They do have a fairly

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 4>low leverage on their balance sheet, so I think this

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 4>picks all of the boxes they'll throw off significant free

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 4>cash flow in twenty twenty four and twenty twenty five.

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 3>So in terms of paying off whatever bank loans that

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 3>they're going to take on for this, I think it

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 3>works out extremely well, and you're seeing the response by

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the investors in the marketplace. It also works out for

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 3>the founding family of Endeavor. They get to monetize decades

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 3>of hard work.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 2>So, hey, I've got a question with that. I mentioned

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 2>that this is a merger of equals, and I got

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of laughed at, like, there's no merger of equals

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 2>and it comes to M and A, but in this case,

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 2>like is there though?

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, in this case, think about what Endeavor brings to

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 3>the table. It almost doubles of diamondbacks Midlan acreage, and

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 3>it brings sizeable oil production for the broader diamondback franchise.

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 3>So I would tell you that in terms of size,

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 3>it is a merger of equals, but the family will

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 3>get roughly thirty percent of diamondback with selling off almost

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 3>half the resource to diamondbacks, So it basically doubles diamondbacks

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 3>total size, and the founding family gets about thirty percent

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 3>of the new diamondback.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 5>Let's say Vince are there any regulatory issues here. A

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 5>lot of M and A going on in this space here.

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know it's going to get a looked at.

0:02:55.800 --> 0:03:01.239
<v Speaker 3>So Southwestern and Chesapeake getting together out in Apalachia, that's

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 3>a gas deal, but that will get a very very

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 3>clear look, a very very deep look by the regulators.

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 3>This will as well. I don't see why it wouldn't

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 3>because of the actual size of this entity. It's going

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 3>to be an enterprise value of north with sixty billion.

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 3>It will be the largest Permian pure play, So it'll

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 3>get looked at. All these deals will get looked at,

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 3>and it'll take a deeper look, same as Southwestern and Chesapeake.

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 2>I was talking to Jenrey this morning. She covers Anti

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Trust for Bloowberg Intelligence, and she's like, yes, like all

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 2>of these are going to have to get looked at.

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 2>They're particularly interested in the exon Permian Pioneer deal and

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 2>that all these deals are definitely gonna have the FTC

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of wide eyed looking at it. But you have

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 2>to wonder, though, if they want more oil, they're going

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 2>to have to do it, right, Vince, I mean, it's

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna I'm just trying to think of, like what the

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 2>rational will be to block and say this deal, but

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 2>like let Excell Pioneer go through, Like you can't.

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.839
<v Speaker 3>This deal is much more North America centric, much more

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 3>North America focused. So when you think about you know,

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Exon and Pioneer Pioneer fits within Exon's Permian portfolio. But

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Exon is a large, integrated multinational franchise. This is more

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 3>US centric and Permian centric as well. But look, they're

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 3>all going to get looked at. It is what it is.

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 3>This is a very large transaction. Like I said, Southwestern

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Chesapeake is getting looked at. This will get looked at

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 3>as well. It's an important resource. What you have here, though,

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 3>is you have resources now in stronger hands. You have Exon, Mobile, Chevron,

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 3>you have Diamondback. You have very large entities with big

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 3>balance sheets and the capability to take down even greater

0:04:55.279 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 3>levels of capital in order to move production from the

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 3>delineation phase into the production phase.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 5>So give me a sense, Vincent, I'm putting my banker

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 5>hat on. Can I keep doing a bunch of deals here?

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 5>I mean, how many players are left?

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a very interesting question. So we put out

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 3>last year the top twenty private privately held PE sponsored

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 3>names in the permian, in this case Endeavor being the

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 3>second largest Mewborn, which has mentioned that it wishes to sell.

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 3>That's the largest of the top twenty that'll go out,

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 3>we think, because it has been mentioned as a takeover candidate.

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Similar situation Founding family looking to move the assets. If

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 3>you think about the top five, three are now gone,

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 3>so there is a great deal of interest. There's interest

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 3>by the private players as well, especially the PE sponsored players.

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Your gay being close to these vintages that are aged

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 3>and now this capital needs to be recycled, so you

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 3>will see more of that. You will see public buying private.

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Public does have the currency. In the case of Diamondback,

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 3>they had a premium multiple elevated currency that they were

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 3>able to use to monetize the Founding families investment. And

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>you'll see that as well, especially in the permium, where

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 3>you do have this difference of large cap premium valuations

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 3>looking for assets and the smaller cap names trading at

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 3>a relative discount to peers, but trading at a discount

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 3>to the larger names as well.

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's really the thing. Private equity being like, oh,

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 2>thank god, we can kind of get these things out there.

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Is a vincement. I also found interesting I was reading

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 2>through some of your research on this just to get

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 2>more background on some of the private players, is just

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 2>how much these private guys have been responsible for bulk

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 2>of the drilling. And in some ways it makes sense,

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 2>right shareholders want the big guys to become capital discipline.

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 2>They're public, they got to report, so therefore they have

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 2>to be capital discipline. But a private guy doesn't have

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 2>to do that. They can do whatever they want. Walk

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 2>me through the importance though, of these guys within the

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 2>shell development.

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so we tend to think that the private players

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 3>have been responsible for at least half of the production

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 3>growth in the last few years. What we have seen

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 3>is these privately sponsored players putting out that production growth

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 3>to entice the public players to buy that asset. And

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 3>what the public players tend to do once they integrate

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 3>that asset is to slow that production growth down, remove

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 3>the rigs from that private player, and generate cash flow.

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 3>This enhances free cash flow and allows the public player

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 3>to pay down that debt to push out payouts, give

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 3>it ends or stop buybacks to the investment for rewarding

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 3>them sticking around post a deal. So that's what we've

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 3>seen production growth by the private guys. Public guys come

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 3>on in, buy the asset, turn down the volume, ratchet

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 3>down the speed, generate that free cash flow so that

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 3>the balance sheet, so that the income statement looks stronger

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 3>post a deal. And it's been working for the last

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 3>couple of years. And that's why you see such a

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 3>great reaction in the aftermarket whence these deals are announced,

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 3>especially this deal, and also if you take a look

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 3>at some of the gas deals that have been done

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 5>Hey, Vince, as an investor, do ike care about where

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 5>the rock is located? As Pennsylvania shale better than Texas

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 5>Shale's who whoa whoa?

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah you care?

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 6>You care?

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Tell me, yes, you care? You care? Because when you're

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 3>selling a commodity, concentration drives synergies, efficiency and productivity, but

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 3>especially so in places like elegacy play like the Permian,

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 3>or in places like Appalachia or in the Hainesville. Interestingly,

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 3>these last few deals that we've seen, we've seen in

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 3>those plays, those prominent legacy plays, those proven plays where

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 3>you have a lot of runway and you can buy

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 3>these assets, integrate them, grow that concentration and generate those efficiencies,

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 3>generate that productivity going forward.

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Who's next? Who's the next buyer?

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 3>You know what, I will tease the audience. Go on

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 3>to the terminal, look up our research. We put out

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 3>a piece highlighting the twenty private private sponsored E and

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 3>p's in the Permian. We go through that list. Mewborn

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 3>has been mentioned, so we can throw that name out there,

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 3>but there are plenty of names in that top twenty

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 3>list that seem to be putting themselves in a position

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 3>where some type of capital event could be announced.

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Events great stuff. Really appreciate it. Deep teas there, everybody.

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Check out Vincent's research on the Bloomberg Intelligence on the terminal.

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 2>He's Bloomberg Intelligence senior Energy research analyst. You have to

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 2>wonder how many buyers they're going to be right.

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 5>So rock is not rock, Rock is not rock?

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, rock is rock, but some rock is better than

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:22.719
<v Speaker 2>other rocks.

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 5>Some rock is better than other rock.

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Definitely.

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Otto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station just

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty A.

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 5>Great, great game, big, big platform for advertisers, arguably the

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:49.439
<v Speaker 5>biggest day of the year for the advertisers.

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 6>The question is these seems even work?

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 5>I mean as it worth. It is a worth seven

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 5>mili plus whatever your production.

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 2>I was not impressed.

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 6>I thought some good ones, some some ads were good.

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 5>I like to don't donuts. But there's some people who

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 5>actually measure this as a business. They don't just watch it.

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 5>They measured as a business. Our next guest Kevin Krim.

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 5>He's the CEO of Entertainment Data Oracle. Kids call it EDEO.

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 5>He joined his live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio.

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 5>He knows his way here. He's been in Bloomberg before. Kevin,

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 5>thanks so much for joining us here. We really appreciate

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 5>coming in. I thought there was some pretty cool ads.

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 5>From your perspective, What are brands trying to do here

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 5>at the Super Bowl and how do they measure if

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 5>it even worked or it was successful?

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 6>How do you think about it when marketers are thinking

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 6>about what they're trying to achieve in any marketing, but

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 6>especially on television, which is at the top of the

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 6>pyramid of value in advertising. At the very pinnacle of

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 6>that peak is the NFL and the Super Bowl is

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 6>at the absolute top when we've measured, we've measured nine

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 6>super bowls now, and what we're measuring is the consumer

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 6>engagement with the brands or products being advertised and any

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 6>marketers trying to achieve awareness and then engagement with their brands.

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 6>And we're measuring engagement as searches and branded website visits,

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 6>app usage, the kind of digital behaviors that are predictive

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 6>of sales lift, but they're immediate and they're easy to

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 6>collect large amounts.

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Of what's the time frame for that? Is it like

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 2>right after the ad airs? Is it in the next

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty four hours?

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 6>Most of that engagement happens within minutes of the ad airing,

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 6>But because of streaming, because of the ability to DVR

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 6>or tvo it, you do have a tail to that.

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 6>And we'll see activity for a week or more after

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 6>a big ad airing like like the Super Bowl, And

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 6>when we see what kind of engagement is driven relative

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 6>to what else you can get on TV, like let's

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 6>say an average thirty second spot on primetime broadcaster cable,

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 6>the Super Bowl does many, many, many multiples of that.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 6>We're talking the average advertiser would have to buy hundreds

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 6>of those thirty second spots on regular primetime to get

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 6>the same impact as a single area on this So

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 6>on a dollars basis, we find that the Super Bowl

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 6>is a very good rational decision for most marketers. But

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 6>then the pressures on the creative, and the creative has

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 6>to be strong or you're not getting your money's worth.

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 6>And that's where you know. We saw ads yesterday. Some

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 6>of them were fantastic, others I think played it too safe,

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 6>and you're going to see quite a range in how

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 6>much engagement is driven from those ads.

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 5>So from your perspective, maybe from the data's perspective.

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, a winner or two?

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 5>Which one did you?

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 6>Let's talk about real quick. The top five Number one

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 6>was Deadpool three number two.

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I have thoughts on that because I'm a huge deput person.

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Love it, but then again, he could come on, Ryan

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Renns could come on and say hello, and I'd be like,

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 2>that was brilliant, that was amazing.

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 6>It was a fun spot and the tease of having

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 6>Wolverine joining him is very satisfying for any Marvel fan.

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 6>Number two is the film that adaptation of Wicked. Another

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 6>interesting teaser Ariana Grande in one of the starring roles there,

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 6>So that's going to pick up a lot of attention.

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 6>And then number three three was the Volkswagen ad that

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 6>you know of harkened back to their heritage of bringing

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 6>the Beatle to UH to America and then it teased

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 6>their new all electric UH bus, so the VW Bus

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 6>returning to America after a long long gap. Number four

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 6>was Team or Temu as we all learned was how

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 6>to pronounce it? Last yesterday they ran six spots between pregame,

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 6>in game, and postgame. Six spots. That's a huge investment.

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 6>But this is an interesting one. A lot of people's

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 6>opinion of that kind of spot would say that it

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 6>was one of the worst.

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 5>And you know, actually, it doesn't even resonate with me.

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 5>What what what is it?

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 6>Coppening? It was, it's a it's a mobile shopping app

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 6>and uh. They they started their first real kind of

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 6>advertising in the US was last year's Super Bowl. That

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 6>kicked it off. They were one of the most downloaded

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 6>apps in the Google App Store and the Apple App

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 6>Store all of last year. They followed up with a

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 6>bigger bet this year, and it.

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Is discounts are insanity like it like if you go

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 2>on there, I mean you have to measure, like what

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 2>am I actually buying? Like there's that conversation we had,

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 2>but the number price, it's it's unreal. And there's like

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 2>extra deals like it's it's huge.

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 6>Temu and Shine or Sheen, I'm not sure how to

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 6>do it properly. Are both China based apps that are

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 6>about these giant discounts and are very popular apparently with

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 6>with Barbain discount shoppers.

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 5>How about Booze.

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 6>You know, we saw really interesting. We saw no liquor

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 6>ads this year. We saw a smaller number of beer

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 6>ads than last year. What we did see was some

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 6>top performers were soda ads, and we had Poppy in

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 6>our top five. Hoppy is this new? Yes, premium priced?

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 6>Would you call it? Like kind of like more popularized

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 6>kombucha maybe.

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 2>The way without the fermentation, Like I'll get poppy to

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 2>my daughter, but you can't have ka.

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 6>Right because it's trace mounts of Alcoholah, so it's got

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 6>slow sugar supposed to be good for you and two

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 6>dollars a can. Oh so the margins are incredible. It's

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 6>an independent soda company from Austin, Texas, husband and wife founders,

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 6>and you know, they made a big statement in popping

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 6>into the top five. That's gonna lead to a big

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 6>lift in their sales. I mean we can say that

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 6>with total confidence whether that stix or not is alex

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 6>Is saying it's it's it's it's good. So you know

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 6>they may have a shot at.

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 5>Being a to Okay, how about nostalgia In the nostalgia

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 5>driven TV reunions, a lot of reunions, I would say

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 5>they were a mixed bag and sort of in terms

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 5>of performance.

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 6>I loved most of those spots. I mean, the Duncan

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 6>spot was in our top twenty. That was probably the

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 6>best performing of the nostalgia based ads. We saw Jennifer

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 6>Anison and David Shwimmer reunite and.

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 2>The Uber eats like that one.

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 6>I thought that was a fun moment. Yeah, it was

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 6>a fun moment, you know. But again, Oh, and I'd

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 6>say the other top performing spot we had the parks

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 6>and Rec several of the leads in Park and Rec,

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 6>in the in the in the app for in the

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 6>ad for Mountain Dews, Baja Blast Soda, and that was

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 6>a lot of fun.

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 5>Interesting and we had to you know, I like you

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 5>putting in your notes here that streaming is the new syndication. Yeah,

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 5>that's where shows go to live forever. And one of

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 5>the examples and then maybe become popular again. One of

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 5>which is Suits, Suits, which is all over my social

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 5>media feed and I never even paid attention to it

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 5>when it was on whatever network it was years ago,

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 5>but they're making a huge comeback, right, So.

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 6>That was NBCUniversal originally, I think it was USA Network

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 6>when in its first run the top streaming series on

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 6>Netflix for last year, and you saw the Suits stars

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 6>and a bunch of other stars from a bunch of

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 6>the series that were hot maybe fifteen twenty some years

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 6>ago and are now top streaming series in their sort

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 6>of rerun stage on what it's Pea Cock or Netflix

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 6>or or others.

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 2>What else did out to you? What was like a

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 2>wild factor?

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I would say besides those those things that

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 6>we talked about, I would say the automotive category was

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 6>really interesting. All the ads outperformed the average. They were

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 6>all import or foreign automakers. They were not any of

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 6>the Big three and from Detroit, which is very unusual.

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 5>Was was that a did you hear anyth coming out

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 5>of Detroit saying hey, we're just.

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 6>You know, I didn't talk directly to all of them.

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 6>Some of them are my clients. I'll be discreet, but

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 6>I would say what I heard loud and clear. From

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 6>the industry overall, you've got to have the right product

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 6>to launch. You don't want to have a disruptive supply

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 6>chain when you're when you're doing a big Super Bowl ad,

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 6>it usually is best to use a Super Bowl as

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 6>the start of a big campaign, So to launch a

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 6>new model is key. And then, yes, if you're coming

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 6>off of bruising, you know, negotiations with your unions, probably

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 6>one of the better things to do is maybe just

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 6>sit it out, wait till next year.

0:18:57.680 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, what's their messaging. It's like, hey, guys, you know

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the we're still making them. You should buy one, but

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 2>we're also gonna do these ices and these are really cool.

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Go buy those like It's like they're enough, We're gonna

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 2>do all that money over there. I mean, it's a

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 2>pretty tricky line.

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 6>It's a tough balancing so to sit on the sidelines

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 6>for this year smart move.

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 5>Were you surprised that we didn't see any price inflation

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 5>this year from last year. Seven million dollars for a

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 5>thirty second spot. Usually we've seen you know, mid single

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 5>high single digit inflation year to year.

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 6>You know, I think it's it's it's a challenging market

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 6>as we shift from traditional to streaming. But I would

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 6>say anyone who bought an ad from CBS this year

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 6>got a fantastic deal, right, I mean, you know, it's

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 6>the super Bowl always performs consistently. But on top of that,

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 6>you had the Taylor Swift effect and you can't plan

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 6>on her team being in the super Bowl. That's that's

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 6>a bit much. But just if you were sitting there

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 6>last September as the season got started and you made

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.479
<v Speaker 6>a commitment to seven million dollars, you you had a

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 6>good hunch that this would be a sustainable positive effect,

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 6>a tailwind, if you will, for the whole sport with

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 6>Taylor involved.

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 5>All right, good stuff, Kevin Krim, thank you so much

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 5>for joining us. Kevin Crime to CEO of Entertainment Data

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 5>oracle Edo, joining slave here on our Bloomberg Interactive Brooker Studio.

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast Catch US Live

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>then broud Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch US live

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube.

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 2>So SMP five hundred, like you were saying, right, fifty

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight, and I take a look at the strategists

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 2>call for this year. The average is forty eight sixty seven,

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 2>the median forty nine fifty, the high fifty two hundred,

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 2>the low forty two hundred. So it's like either a

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 2>lot of people are wrong, We're gonna see a lot

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 2>of upgrades, or we're just gonna have a crash out

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 2>at some point, which is quite of interesting.

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 7>At the end of the day, it's all about making money.

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 7>So you do the earnings analysis on the S and

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 7>P five hundred, and the earning surprises so far this

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 7>quarter of those companies that have reported is something like

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 7>eighty percent at this point, so it's impressive.

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can make the argument that it's legit, and

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 2>then it's actually broadening out to a certain extent. Let's

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 2>ask Kim Forrest. She is founder in CIO, a book

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.479
<v Speaker 2>of capital partners. Hey, Kim, I take a look at

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 2>the strategist notespend for this year where we're trading at

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 2>right now? Is this a crash up, a melt up?

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 2>Does it continue or is it fundamental here at this point?

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 8>Well, I have to say, I think people by and

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 8>large are kind of terrible at forecasting, as we saw

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 8>last year, and maybe this is more of the same,

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 8>right And I think I think it's going to be

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 8>a crash up, I have to say, because the markers

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 8>have slow down, or more than slow down, are just

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 8>not there right So, and we'll see tomorrow and this

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 8>is a data rich week where we have more earnings,

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 8>but probably most importantly CPI and then retail sales to

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 8>see if the consumer continues to spend, but we believe.

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 6>It they do.

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 8>They do, so why not and the year above five thousand?

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 8>I think that's a good call at this point.

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 5>Why not own the magnificent seven? Why not keep buying

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 5>them today?

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 6>Is this AI thing real?

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 5>You've got a perspective here, don't you.

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 8>I think the AI thing is real. I have to

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 8>disclose this. I was a software engineer working in AI

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 8>before I moved on over to the world of finance

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 8>as a cell side equity analyst, and so have I

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 8>know of which I speak, so Kimba, it is for real,

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 8>but it's never going to play out the way investors

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 8>think at the beginning of a rush, right, they think

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 8>in Nvidia and Google and Amazon and all the rest

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 8>of the Magnificent seven are probably going to be winners.

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.479
<v Speaker 8>I think they are going to win, but there's going

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 8>to be other more nuanced AI applications that come in

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 8>and it might be the killer app I.

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 5>Mean, I'm looking at in Vidia here, up forty eight

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 5>percent year to date, two hundred and fifty trailing twelve

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 5>month basis in Nvidia overtakes Amazon and market value Bloomberg

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 5>News just across the tape here, do I just keep

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 5>buying these chips?

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 6>Is the chip? Are chips the way to play this?

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 8>I think chips are, But I don't know that in

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 8>Vidia is our final winner. If you notice, there's a

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.439
<v Speaker 8>theme in chip land, and that is to make chips

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 8>that are as good as in Nvidia, but maybe not

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 8>cost as much. Even Sam Altman, although he's kind of

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 8>a dreamer, that's the chat GPT guy, you know, he's

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 8>really going all in on trying to design his own

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 8>chips and getting people, you know, interested in funding this

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 8>new company. But I think that chips are a way

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 8>to go and it's going to allow for a more

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 8>as I say, nuanced approach. You know that we're going

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 8>to have to collect data and chips are the way

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 8>they do that to put into these models. So I

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 8>think chips by and large or a winner here as

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 8>a sector.

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 2>So Kim for individual names, then how do you play

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 2>it if it's not going to be in video?

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 3>Sure?

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean I remember I think in Vidia wins.

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 8>But does it continue to like double quadruple. I don't know.

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 8>I'm thinking no. So the next two closest competitors that

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 8>may have a product that can help, you know, people

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 8>build these large AI models at a lower price are

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 8>both AMD and Intel. Now they've been known for PC

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 8>chips and that's been dragging them down, but let's give

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 8>them credit for coming up the curve and serving this market.

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 8>I think that they have a good shot to do that.

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Kim.

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 5>We're about to a little more than sixty percent of

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 5>the way through the S and P five hundred reporting earnings.

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 5>Any themes for you either plus or minus coming out

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 5>so far?

0:24:56.040 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 8>Sure, I think the smaller companies are looking more interesting

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 8>to me because of mergers and acquisition. Potential mergers and

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 8>acquisition completely dried up in twenty two going into leaving

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 8>twenty two into twenty three, and it's largely because we

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 8>were in a rate hike cycle by the Fed. And

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 8>now that we seem to have reached peak interest rate,

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 8>maybe that is what is bringing people back into M

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 8>and A. And I think looking for high quality companies

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 8>in niche markets is another way to go.

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 2>So this doesn't be like a by the Russell here

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 2>at this point, wouldn't.

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 8>No, No, not at all. You're there's a whole lot

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 8>in the Russell. Look for those companies that have product

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 8>management that are creating and delighting their customers, and that

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 8>might go well with a larger company that needs that

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 8>niche product.

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 2>But by takeout targets, that's that's tough, isn't that. I mean,

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 2>that's that's a tough one.

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 8>It is, but it's exciting.

0:25:58.320 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 3>It's what were you here?

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Fair enough? Okay?

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 5>So Kim, are there any other sectors out there in

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 5>the market you're looking for or are there factors that

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 5>are kind of driving your process these days?

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, we take a kind of weird approach where we

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 8>say we are stock pickers and mirror the S and

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 8>P five hundred with our picks with respect to sector waitings,

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 8>So putting that aside that we're kind of sector neutral,

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:30.199
<v Speaker 8>I think it's really interesting. Tech is big, and I

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 8>think you should stay concentrated in that, but I'd also

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 8>look for some unloved areas, kind of like consumer discretionary.

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 8>You know, at the top of this segment you pointed

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 8>out most of the strategists think we're going to, you know,

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 8>go backwards from here. But if the consumer keep spending,

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 8>why not look at names where the consumer is spending

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 8>and that they are gaining market share.

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Like where Kim, well, retailers.

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 8>Are a big fascination of mine, and we're gonna at

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 8>the end of this earning season hear a lot more

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 8>from them. I don't really want to trot out any

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 8>of the names because I have smaller names in that section,

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 8>but yeah, I do like retailers, and I think they're

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 8>very much unloved at this point, given you know, we're

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 8>all looking for that poolbacker softness to occur this year.

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 5>All right, Kim, thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciated.

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 5>Kim Farest, founder and CIO of Boca Capital Partners, located

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 5>in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. So good stuff there.

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 5>And you got the dow of two hundred points. I'm

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 5>on forty thousand. Watch there were thirty eight eight hundred.

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 5>So I like those nice round numbers. We eclipse five

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 5>thousand a couple days ago in the SMP sixteen thousand

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 5>on Nasdaq, So I like some round habers there. Yeah,

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 5>and why not? But I know the pros do it,

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 5>and you know, do a little bit more analysis than

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 5>that than just no.

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 2>But honestly, if you just bought like an ETF for NDS,

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 2>you'd be fine.

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 5>All right, Let's check in with Jennifer Apple. She is

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 5>the founder and portfolio manager of Alpine Peaks Capital. She

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 5>joins us via zoom from New York. Jennifer, what do

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 5>you make of some of these heights we're hitting here

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 5>on these markets? I guess it really you know, started

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 5>this latest leg back there in November December last year,

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 5>kind of continuing into this year. What do you make

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 5>of these markets and these levels.

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, Hi, good morning, Paul and Alex, and thank you

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 9>so much for having me. It is really interesting we

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 9>saw this strength. I think it was really signaled by

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 9>the Fed signaling, you know, especially in early December, that

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 9>they were going to start cutting rates. They baked in

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 9>about three rate cuts as you guys know for twenty

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 9>twenty four, and a lot of commentators are expecting more

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 9>and see a lot of that optimism, I think get

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 9>priced into the market in December, and so it was

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 9>interesting in early January to see some names pull back

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 9>a little. We definitely saw some market volatility, which I

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 9>think is healthy by the way. It offers us all

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 9>opportunity today though as we're starting to I mean, it

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 9>will be interesting tomorrow we get the fresh inflation numbers,

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 9>so that's probably the best indicator of what the Fed

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 9>is thinking to do. But you know, so far, as

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 9>you were just pointing out, companies have been putting up

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 9>pretty good earnings as they posted for most of them

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 9>their fourth quarter results, and so that's definitely positive. It's

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 9>always interesting for people like myself to hear companies actually

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 9>report their outlooks for twenty twenty four and to get

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 9>that guidance. I think there's a lot of speculation as

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 9>to what companies will do, but it's always it's great

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 9>to hear it from the horse's mouth and actually get

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 9>the outlook from these companies.

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 2>So, Jennifer, we've seen the rally sort of broaden. I

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 2>appreciate that the equal weighted indext for the SMP and

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 2>had the breakout that the S and P has, but

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 2>the russels up there industrials, healthcare for the SMP, we're

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 2>doing really well as well. Do you buy the rally

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 2>breadth is good or the rally breath is bad?

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it's an interesting question where you have some some

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 9>real breakout strength continue and a handful of names. But

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 9>I think the economy and certainly lower rates will be

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 9>good broadly for the economy. So it makes sense to

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 9>me that we are seeing us more broadly, and that

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 9>is something that I would expect to continue. Obviously not universally.

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 9>It does matter what's happening on a company specific level,

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 9>and you do have winners and losers within that. But

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 9>I think the environment should be supportive for the breadth

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 9>of the valley, if you will, So, how.

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 5>Much or how important is this feeder reserve for you

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 5>and your investment outlook here, I kind of feel like,

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, the market's really just trading on where the

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 5>FED is going. I'm not sure there's paying as much attention,

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 5>perhaps to the earnings as we typically do. You view

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 5>the FED and it's impact on the market.

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, that's such a good point, and I agree with you.

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 9>It's interesting. So we have a five year average building pread,

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 9>and so we are taking that longer term view and

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 9>thinking about our companies across business cycles rather than just

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 9>what next quarter will look like. But I do think

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 9>that a lot of people are focused more on the

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 9>FED right now, and particularly getting excited about the prospects

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:29.479
<v Speaker 9>of perhaps accelerated rate cuts. We don't think that will

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 9>happen as quickly as some people do. But nonetheless, even

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 9>if you take the two to three cuts that are

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 9>kind of at the bottom end of the outlooks, that's

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 9>still helpful for this coming year. And so it's interesting

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 9>that we do see as companies report earnings, we do

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 9>see them revert more. I feel like there can be

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 9>a lot of momentum and excitement priced into names intra quarterer,

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 9>but we do see them return to typically return to

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 9>trading on their own individual outlooks as they were poort earning.

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:01.239
<v Speaker 9>So that's always a particularly esteem moment of truth for us.

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 2>If you will, you have some cool companies that you

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 2>look at Rolins If I said that, right, Roland Rollins,

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah he did. Yeah, Pest Control Services, which is take

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 2>r L walkers through while you like this one?

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, absolutely so. They are the leading pest control independent

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 9>pest control company in the United States. Their largest competitor,

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 9>termin X, was just bought out by a UK company

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 9>called rental Kill last year and leading love yes, okay, yeah,

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 9>And it's just a it's a compelling time in the

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 9>industry for there's a few broader macro reasons, if you will.

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 9>Global warming is supportive of past populations. Demographic demographically too,

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 9>our generation and younger generations are more likely to hire

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 9>somebody else to deal with pests rather than do it yourself,

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 9>as the baby baby boomers tended to do. And so

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 9>we're seeing oh go ahead.

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 5>No, no, go ahead, continue, okay.

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 9>Excellent, So it's a you know, it's a good environment

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 9>for the pests, if you will. And it's a time

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 9>where Round two Kill has always been a really strong

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 9>competitor in the area. They have really powerful door to

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 9>door sales, have been investing heavily in technology, also a

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 9>very clean balance sheet, and that's enabled them to typically

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 9>add between a third and half of their growth from acquisitions,

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 9>and so they continue to roll up smaller pest control companies,

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 9>share best practices with them over time, be able to

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 9>really improve margins there. It's created a very positive dynamic.

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 9>It's also making an interesting transition now from being a

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 9>family dominated company that Rollins family. Actually they just sold

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 9>off a portion of their stake, but they still own

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 9>over a third of the company to bringing them. Last

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 9>year was the first year that professional, a non family

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 9>member was appointed CEO. And so while if Rawlins family

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 9>has done a great job building the business, I think

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 9>there is a really interesting switch to a little bit

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 9>more of a bottom line line focused perspective right now. There.

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 5>We've had a aviation when we talk about Boeing, and

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 5>it has been in the news not for the good reasons.

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 5>You have a manufacturer of aviation parts, Hiko HgI is

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 5>a ticker what's tell us about that company and why

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:10.839
<v Speaker 5>you guys like it?

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:14.399
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, absolute, So they're a really interesting company. They make

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 9>what are essentially generic aftermarket aviation parts. So it's almost

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 9>akin to generic drugs if you think about pharmaceuticals, but

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 9>in this case. So they take what's called an om

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 9>part or original equipment manufacturer, and they reverse engineer it

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 9>to be made out of the same materials, to be

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 9>able to meet the same stress tolerances, to last just

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:38.760
<v Speaker 9>as long and has similar quality, and then that's approved

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 9>by the FAA. It's called Parts Manufacturing Authority or PMA

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 9>is the acronum used in the industry, and then by

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:49.399
<v Speaker 9>each individual airlines. And airlines like these parts because they

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 9>typically sell or starts at about thirty percent less than

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 9>the OEM price, and that can widen out to as

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 9>much as seventy percent over the year with volume discounts,

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 9>and so it's a great way for airlines to save money.

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 9>And Iiko's really the dominant player in this area. They

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 9>just bought actually their largest competitor, called a Wendcore, and

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:12.720
<v Speaker 9>it's a space they know really well. It's adding about

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 9>thirty percent on revenue to the company this year and

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 9>It's a very exciting time for them, you know, taking

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 9>the recovery and air travel that's happened post pandemic over

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 9>the last couple of years, and then market gains they've

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 9>made as they can help airlines improve their own economics.

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer, great stuff. We really appreciate you joining us. Jennifer

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Oppold a founder and portfolio manager of at Alpine Peaks Capital.

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Quite interesting.

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>each weekday, ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.