WEBVTT - Quarterbacks and Snowblowers

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal hull that for me. I'm

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm.

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 2>For I've heard so many players say, well, I want

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 2>to be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You want to be happy for a day? Edith Steak

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>is that woo woof?

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:20.639
<v Speaker 2>And them and Tie, welcome back to the solid verbal

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 2>boys and girls. My name is Tie hilde Brand, joinny

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 2>me is always over there, the one and only Dan

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Rubustein and frigid snowy Chicago Bans Sir, how are you truly?

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>My back is is very, very sore because as always

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I have to carry this snow all over the place.

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:43.639
<v Speaker 1>There's something to you just think I was gonna say

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>show I claim I was. I'm in a worried Yeah,

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>where you were getting with that? A lot of shovely.

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we'll get to snow and shovel talk. Make people

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>stick around for the real juicy meat of this college

0:00:55.280 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>football shovel talk. Yeah, shovel talk. I'm all right, I'm alright.

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit sore, but I'm accomplished and I'm

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>ready to talk about quarterbacks and I suppose anything else

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>within the college football universe you want to talk about.

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I was just outside running the snowblower, just trying to

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 2>get ahead of things, cause we're I think, in the

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 2>throes of getting two feet here. So I got that

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 2>nice like gasoline smell that you get from running a

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 2>large piece of machinery. So I'm rough and humble. I'm

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 2>ready to jump on in and do what we do

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 2>here with it, which is a college wall podcast. Correct

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 2>year round can confirm soliverbo dot com is the website.

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Verballers dot com is the Patreon dan and love it. Look,

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 2>it's the off season. We're only doing two regular shows

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 2>a week, but if you're going out to verballers dot

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 2>com you can find what the bonus schedule looks like.

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Going to be releasing some bonus content out there. I

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 2>think it's been working well. We've been using Patreon as

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.639
<v Speaker 2>like the lab if you will, right, We've been trying

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 2>stuff out, throwing it against the wall, seeing what sticks.

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 2>We've got a teaming community of for ballers who are

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 2>out there. We got a great suggestion, you know, I've

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 2>been playing games on Twitch, the NC fourteen video game.

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 2>One of the folks who stops by on a regular

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 2>basis suggested that we should offer up player names. Player

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 2>names like that idea to our verballers. So you know

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 2>we've got the Patreon for ballers. Yeah, we've got hundreds

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 2>of Patreon subscribers that I should offer up to premium

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 2>for ballers. Metal Chance Tommy Lynn, Dan Klobekar. Yeah, all

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 2>those guys their chance to be emblazoned upon the Navy

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 2>dynasty that I have got some.

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Nathan league going on. Maybe as a wide out, I'm

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>looking the c meg bear to large nose tackle, a

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>war Daddy tie Jake, the good ag Span Drew. You

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>can build a pretty ridiculous squad here craseel of course,

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, Chick and Joe Freezy, shout out Jig and Joe.

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm saying. It's a great idea. So anyway,

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 2>for ballers dot com, that's Patriot, that's where you go

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 2>and find stuff out and find out details on the

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Navy franchise that is underway. Social media, you know, all

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 2>the usual hotspots. Subscribed to the newsletter solid verble dot com.

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 2>What are we doing today?

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>So I took a bunch of questions from social media

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>about quarterbacks, past present, future of any team, any situation,

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>what have you. We got a number of excellent questions.

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>We're going to go through them. It spans all sorts

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of college football areas and I don't is there news

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to get into? Tie? Is there something that's

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have some trend like Will Levis is

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>leaving Penn State. I don't know if you have thoughts

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on that. Well, you can dovetail into the Penn State

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>quarterback room with that, I think if we want.

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 2>I think we could transition into the first question, which

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 2>had to do with Sewan Clifford and Penn State and

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 2>the like, well, what kinds of questions did you tee up?

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean Teddy brew returning to the University of Arizona

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>as a senior advisor. Chipper Jones is going to help

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>some braves hit. There's no news you want to talk about.

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 2>It feels like kind of a slow news day, to

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 2>be honest.

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Eric Hilbert's going to Florida, which is pretty enormous

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and obviously Dan Maull Eric, right, Eric, Eric, Eric, like

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:23.239
<v Speaker 1>you're from You're from West Aaron, That's right, Eric, Yeah,

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>So we have do you want to play? Do we

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>have a sound for questions? You've got mail that kind

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of thing.

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's see what do I got here? Do I have

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>You've got mail?

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Do I have it?

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 2>I have it? It's not real, that's not it's mail. Sound.

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 2>It's been a while since I played the meal.

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:39.799
<v Speaker 1>It's all social media too, so it doesn't really matter.

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll find it all right, keep going. I have to

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 2>find the cell here it is. Congratulationsippy, you've got mail,

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 2>You've got may on the solid verbal. I've rearranged this

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 2>soundboard so many damn times that I can't find the

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 2>necessary sounds anymore. But yees, so we solicited messages. It's

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:00.919
<v Speaker 2>not all email. It's a lot of social media. But

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 2>you went out there earlier today and you try to

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 2>tee up a very specific line of questioning.

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was one of the things. By the way,

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>our verballa is on Patreon mentioned love to have more

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>specific Q and as, so I went with quarterback room basically.

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And we have a number of questions about a number

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of schools across different conferences. I guess let's start with

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Penn State because I mentioned it. I also enjoyed that

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Will Levis had kind of an off season, Ben Simmons

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>hitting a three pointer mixtape that was released on social media. Yeah,

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago of him completing passes against

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>air nothing against will evis who does Penn State roll

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>with Sean Clifford grad transfer somebody else? That's from Josh

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and then Ian also mentioned does it look like the

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>whole plane will be made of Clifford? Is this bad?

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with Penn State quarterbacking to really to really

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>sex up this college football talk in February.

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm content with anyone but Clifford. Okay, ABC, anyone

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 2>but Clifford? Is I think the answer for me? Yeah,

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 2>you went back. I know you said you watched some

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 2>of Clifford and your comment to me, I'm looking for

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 2>it here. He ain't it is that?

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm trying to let's avoid being mean as best

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>we can in some of these cases. Sean Clifford looks

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>like he just is not a high level quarterback. I

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>hope he has a bounce back year. And you know,

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty season, it's a very different experience for

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 1>all of these guys playing and between the opt outs,

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>between the different living situations and not seeing family, like

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you can understand how somebody could have a dip of

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a year and bounce back in a more normal season.

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Should we have that in our future? So I'm well,

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, somebody like Graham Mertz. So some of you

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:49.919
<v Speaker 1>know Jensen had a question about Graham Mertz, will be

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>like early season or late season Mertz. He got sick

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the year. He missed time, and

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>so there's an element to like, we don't fully know

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>hopefully who Grahamertz is quite yet, And I don't know.

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Sean Clifford led a team to a bunch of wins

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. They got to a New Year six game, right,

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>so we know that there is a version of Sean

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Clifford that can be pretty good if everything is operating

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>around him. That was a more talented team on offense,

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a more proven team on offense. I don't feel good

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>about where Penn State is right now. I suppose you

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>roll with Clifford. There's a new offensive coordinator, So depending

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>on how confident you are in Mike your six ability.

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>But again it's starting over once again. It's starting over

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>once again on offense. And you know, they had the

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>depth issues at running back and receiver. They had issues

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know Johan Dotson and they had a freshman

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>step up. Now his name escapes me. Washington, Parker Washington.

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Did I make that name up? Okay? And I don't

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>have their line depth in front of me right now,

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>but it just seems there is a definitive right now

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>with what he looks like seven to eight wins, ceiling

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>with Sean Welford.

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 2>So look here, here's the thing we talked about. Clifford

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 2>when he played twelve games in twenty nineteen, came in

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 2>with a fair amount of acclaim, and I felt went

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 2>the root of just never getting better. Had a fine year,

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 2>completed almost sixty percent of his passes in twenty nineteen.

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Did not feel to me like he got better, pretty good,

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 2>pretty good? He was fine. Yeah, this year if we

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 2>look at what he did in nine games again, completed

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 2>about sixty percent of his passes, sixteen touchdowns, nine interceptions.

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 2>The thing in particular that I was looking at going

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 2>into this year was are we going to see any

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of improvement? It was a new offensive coordinator, like

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 2>you said, circum.

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>What's his name? What's his name? And do we have

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a sound?

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Kirk Sharrock. I think we retired this sound now, No

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Rock good. That sound may have been a curse, possibly,

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 2>but you know, I understand there are circumstances, but I

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 2>also understand that Clifford again did not look like he

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 2>got much better, So I worry about that. I think

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 2>that the offense as a whole will be pretty fine.

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Johan Dotson coming back a big deal. Hopefully Noah Caine's healthy.

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 2>He'll be your number one running back again. The line,

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 2>they're moving some guys around, but it should be okay.

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 2>I feel okay about the offense, but I don't feel

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 2>great about the quarterback position. So personally, I'm willing to

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 2>roll the dice with Takwan Robertson. Personally, I'm willing to

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 2>roll the dice with Takwan Roberson or Christian Veoh.

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Roberson's a smaller guy though, right he's like five to

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>ten small is yeah, five ten, five eleven, Okay, I

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>mean that's its own list of challenges, but you know,

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen guys thrive at that height.

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Or Christian Voe my new favorite name, the true freshman

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 2>who committed early and is already on campus.

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 1>So I guess we can go through a lot of

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>these quarterback situations. Be it a quarterback battle that's going

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to play out over spring and fall, camp and perhaps

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>into the season at a lot of these places, and

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about guys that we've already seen play. Is there

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>room to grow or have they just have they hit

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that ceiling? Yeah, Clifford, I hear from you. He's hit

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the seal, Sean Clifford. We've seen the best of Sean Clifford,

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>whereas somebody he was actually at least statistically identical two

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen. Kyle Trask did not hit his ceiling

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen. No, and so he made that move

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in Shan Clifford didn't. I hope Sean Clifford has a

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>bounce back here because you've mentioned guys that would be

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>very fun to have a really good quarterback throwing to them.

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we've if you are counting on Penn State

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>bouncing back to New Year's six ish, and Sean Clifford

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>is starting all year, I have my concerns.

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 2>All right, what's the next one up here? Do I

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 2>see a JT. Shrout? Question?

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>You do see a JT shout? I actually kind of

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>like JT shut.

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 2>That's a deep cut going JT. Shrout. He comes over

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 2>from Tennessee.

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>These questions are no particular order. By the way, you

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>can you can ask whatever you want.

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 2>This question from Nate. Now, let's talk. Tennessee is noteworthy.

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 2>They're in the news. JT. Shroud transferring from Tennessee over

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 2>to Colorado. He's red shirt sophomore. He played in eight

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 2>total games during his time to Tennessee.

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>He came in relief against Florida and actually looked pretty

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>good in the second half. He relieved Harrison Bailey.

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Got a really strong arm. He's from the West Coast.

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 2>He's from California, so it's a little bit closer to

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>home going over to Boulder. I guess I like it.

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, do you have any strong opinions on this.

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>The quarterback last year, I believe was a converted safety.

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>That quarterback room is just thin, and so they ran

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball really well last year with Jarrick Broussard. I

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>think there are steps to be taken, for sure in Colorado.

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he's fine. I think he's totally fine. I

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>think they need bodies, they need an arm, they need

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 1>something lively, and I'm excited to see what he can

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>do if he is fully empowered as the starting quarterback.

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Jensen wants to know who is the real Graham Mertz. Well,

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 2>the real Graham Mertz, please stand up. Will he be

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 2>like early season or late season Mertz in twenty twenty one? That,

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 2>my friend, is a hell of a question.

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>So the good news for Graham Mertz is if we're

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>going to kind of throw away his post COVID stretch,

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>which was pretty bad, if we're gonna throw that away,

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to have a full year and presumably

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>spring and summer workouts and fall camp and just getting

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>used to the offense and getting used to being the

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>guy because if you remember what King Cone got hurt,

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's what thrust Graham Mertz into the starting position.

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>So the concern I have about Graham Mertz realizing his

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>potential is, well, one, he's gonna he should be behind

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a very good line, and I mean, these are the

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>positives that jalen Berger looks like he's going to be

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the guy at running back. Julius Davis also promising, but

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>jaalen Berger was the clear best running back in that room,

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>not Jonathan Taylor tailback. But that's encouraging for a team

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that does rely on play action to complete a ton.

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see an obvious dude pass catcher for Wisconsin.

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>They haven't gone out and found studs at receiver every year.

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>You look at their room right now, there's guys, but

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>they didn't seem to be in huge demand. The passing

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>game was pretty woeful last year in terms of separation

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>from where it was with Quintes Cephis the year before.

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>And they've had guys. But I just I don't know

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that Grammertz can even I don't know if we can

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>see his ceiling. I think there's fog in Madison because

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where winter wonders whatever. I don't know

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>where like an all big ten receiver is anywhere near

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this roster. It's just so hard to gauge. I don't

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>know if we can really get a good feel for

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>this one.

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Again. You'll recall October twenty third. I want to say

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Wisconsin against Illinois, first game of the year, twenty of

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 2>twenty one to five touchdowns, two forty eight against Illinois.

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 2>It was against Illinois, but that's a hell of an opening.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Stanza next week against Michigan on the road, twelve of

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty two, two touchdowns, no picks.

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>He didn't do much though he didn't really go down

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty seven yards. That was Michigan's offense

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>growing up a ton and was hundred's defense taking advantage

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty seven yards. He threw a touchdown

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the next week, but three interceptions against was Northwestern, excuse

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>me now, and then he went three straight games without

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>throwing a touchdown. Pass closed out the year that way.

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Threw one in the bowl game, but it was a

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 2>very like uneven, almost depreciating stat line for him as

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>he went from week to weeks. So I still think

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 2>that he's a really good quarterback. He seems like he

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 2>has the He seems as if he's got the skill set,

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 2>and I hate to use a cliche term, he does

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 2>seem as if he can make all the throws. But

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 2>there is a question out wide that I think you

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 2>rightfully bring up. The running game wasn't up to stuff

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 2>this year. Either. No, you know, maybe they found their guy.

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 2>But the Wisconsin offense, as we've come to know and

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 2>love it really does depend on having that strong running

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 2>game that it can lean upon and then play off

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 2>that in the passing game. So I think it's incomplete

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 2>at this point. We got to wait and see what

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 2>we get from Graham Mertz. Hopefully he gets a full

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 2>cycle where he can work on his game and improve.

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Forty one pass attempts, seven points against Northwest. Yeah, obviously

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>here in a very raucous Evanston area. But yeah, if

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>he threw the ball more than twenty two times small

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>sample size in a game this year, Wisconsin lost. And

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that's just more of a statement about where Wisconsin's offense

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>is or isn't right now. So I'm hopeful, I'm hopeful

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that his ceiling is higher. I think there's more reasonably

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>even Grammertz right now. The problem is again what his

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>surrounding offense looks like. Because there have been Wisconsin quarterbacks

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>these past few years who have had it good in

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of always having a tight end or two, always

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>having a clear number one option at receiver or two

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>very good options. Right now, it looks like there's a

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of a drought there.

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Eric wants to know about USC. This is a good question. Yeah,

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 2>USC's last two long term starting quarterbacks are either a

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>first round pick and Sam Darnold or projected to be

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Keaton Slovis. However, both required injured players ahead of them

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 2>to see the field Slovis needed two injuries. Why do

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 2>coaches fail to see the best quarterback in practice so often?

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Is a loaded question.

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a lot here, but yeah, do you have

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts about this?

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not always apparent. Sometimes it takes a circumstance to

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 2>figure out who your best quarterback is. You don't always know.

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I was talking earlier. I did the Shamrock with our

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 2>friends Pete Sampson and Matt Fortuna in The Athletic their

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 2>podcast Go and Check it Out, tweeted it out. I

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 2>think you did already. We talked a little bit about

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 2>ian Book. When ian Book came in for Brandon Wimbush,

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 2>it was sort of like, really, we're going to go

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 2>to Ian Book and not Brandon Wimbush. Wimbush came in

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 2>with much acclaim.

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, much bigger arm.

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 2>On paper, even in practice. I think look the part,

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 2>very much looked the part. Something about the game though,

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 2>for Brandon Wimbush did not compute, and Ian Book came

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 2>in against I think wake Forest and instantly took command

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 2>of the offense. From a skill standpoint, Brandon Wimbush was

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>way more athletic. I had much more in the way

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 2>of physical tools to work. But for whatever reason, Ian

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Book took command. Say what you want about him. Look,

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 2>there's nobody been more skeptical of Book than me. But

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 2>the numbers are there. He won a lot of games

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 2>at Notre Dame. No one will say anything that will

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 2>ever take that away. So it's just a very complex problem.

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 2>First and foremost, how does a guy react there when

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 2>he's out in the heat of battle? Does he perform

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 2>the same way he does in practice?

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Right, It's a mental thing, for sure.

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 2>There's a mental component also, especially at a school like

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 2>a USC. Again, say what you want about USC, but

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 2>recruiting quarterbacks to come in there and be in the

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 2>quarterback room is never really a hard thing to do.

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 2>They always have a lot of talent to pick from.

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 2>And so I think it's a combination of the mental side.

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 2>It's certainly a combination of the scheme. It's a combination

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 2>of staying healthy, which Eric brings up here in the

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 2>in the in the question. But you know, take JT.

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Daniels for example. JT. Daniels I thought looked really good

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 2>in his very short time at USC. He gets hurt.

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Keaton Slovis jumps in Now JT. Daniels still very good

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 2>just across the country for Georgia. So it's not all

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 2>on the coach. So in this specific situation, I have

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 2>heard firsthand from the coaching staff, from people on that

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 2>field that USC did not want to start Sam Darnold

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 2>in that first game as a red shirt freshman because

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 2>it would have been against Alabama, and throwing somebody into

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 2>that kind of arena, a Javier arena, if you will,

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm so sorry, I regret it already like that, throwing

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 2>somebody in their very first game as a young player

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 2>can do a lot of damage if it goes poorly

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 2>in terms of confidence, in terms of emotion, whatever. Max

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Brown had been in that program for a long time

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 2>as an upperclassman, had a command of the offense, and

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.479
<v Speaker 2>was beaten out as I believe a true freshman by

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Cody Kessler if I'm not mixing up my US quarterback timelines.

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 2>And so it was sort of seen as we think

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.959
<v Speaker 2>he's pretty good. He might not have the physical ceiling

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 2>of Sam Donald, he might not have the arm of

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 2>Sam Donald, who was I think wowing people in practice

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 2>the year before, but certainly raw Like, let's see what

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 2>we have in Max Brown? When the bullets are firing,

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 2>and it wasn't great. It just wasn't great.

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And so I imagine that it was USC coaches informed imagination,

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 1>knowing that Sam Donald had a higher ceiling, knowing Sam

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Donald was just much more of a playmaker, improviser, you know,

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't shrink away from the moment, but they didn't want

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.959
<v Speaker 1>to do him that harm, knowing that it wasn't going

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to be all that pretty against Alabama. Probably, so that's

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>why that happened. I don't think the USC coaches were

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 1>blind to the fact that Sam Donald was a better

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>quarterback than Max Brown. They're pretty good at what they do,

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe not the best in college football, they're pretty good.

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I think with Keaton Slovas, JT. Daniels was the arm talent.

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>He was just an injury thing, and they were I

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 1>think it was clear to anybody who was in that

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>practice that JD. Daniels was far closer to being a

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterback as a true freshman than Keaton Slovas showed

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>himself to be, even though he was impressive early on

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and eventually took over. USC had a crowded room, so

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's tough. I think it is that emotional

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>element of what does this guy look like in a game?

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>What does this guy look like at full speed when

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>guys are bearing down? And both Keaton Slovas and Sam

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Darnold obviously passed the test. But yeah, there's definitely a

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>difference in a comfort level and a confidence that guys

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>either have or don't when when things get real.

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:48.360
<v Speaker 2>This question to me, I'm going to change it. Oh okay,

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Matt says, is there an actor who has played more

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 2>quarterbacks than Keanu Reeves?

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh? This is guy. I posted a Shane Falco gift

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in the tweet.

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, only two, but I can't think of another actor

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 2>who has played more than one. Adam Sailor comes close,

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 2>but was but only one was a quarterback.

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Right, you've got a question Bobby Bouche and he was

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the longest yard as well.

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you've got a note here, who's your favorite? Originally

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.360
<v Speaker 2>a quarterback but moved to X. Could be a Bell

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Dozer type, could be a Joel Lanning Chas Serrat type,

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 2>could be a Braxton Miller type, could be a college

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 2>quarterback to NFL other position type like Terrell Pryor, et cetera,

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, et cetera. Right, I love that question. My

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 2>question was just going to be and I don't think

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 2>there aren't any that I know of who have played

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 2>quarterback more than once. I know Keano's done it. Do

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 2>you have a favorite TV quarterback, favorite movie quarterback?

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Favorite TV or movie quarterback?

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 2>You know? So, like we talk in, we could go

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Shane Falco since its topical.

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean Voodoo Tatum. I don't know the actor's name

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>from Friday Night Lights. He was real fun. I like

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a grizzled older quarterback.

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Was it?

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it Willy Beeman, Stephen Willie Beeman? Yeah, right, that's

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a good option. I haven't this is me on the

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>spot because you haven't given me.

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm partial. I'm partial to Johnny Mox from Varsity Blues.

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And have you seen his jeans? Have you looked back

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and seen pictures of his jeans in that movie's jeans?

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So look up mocks uh jeans in uh? Shoot, what's

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the name of the movie Arsity Varsity Blues? Look up

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 1>mox jeans Varsity Blues. Okay, Looking, he's a very serious character.

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>It should be the first image that comes up on

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Google image. He's a very serious character. He's got his

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>arm against the wall. He's talking to a lady friend.

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps he's got these gigantic genes.

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 2>These are like, these are like hampints. They're huge.

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>He's he's wearing jinkos in a serious scene because you

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>know the movie out when jeans were bag here and

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just a hilarious rewatch.

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Those are enormous. Dan from a denim perspective, right, good lord.

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a good movie. I don't have a favorite,

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>but do you have a favorite positional switch or positional

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>switch situation?

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I am partial to the quarterback to linebacker maneuver. I

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 2>love that. I think that's my favorite because you know,

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 2>if you if you get the right announcer, they're going

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 2>to play off that and say, oh, Chas Surrat's now

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback of the defense, of course, which could very

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 2>easily be a fantasy things selection could have been this

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 2>year with respect to Chas Surrat. So I think that's

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 2>probably my favorite.

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I personally enjoy the move to receiver just because there's

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>always that potential for a double pass and do you

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>get to learn do they still have it? There's always that,

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Antoine Randall, l Julianetta and troll. Pryor

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>actually tried to play quarterback in the NFL, And that's

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>a nice what if too. What would Terrell Pryor have

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>done to big ten defensive backs at six six and

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>an impossible red zone target? And he was a fantastic

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterback obviously for Ohio State, but what type of nightmare

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>would he have been for Ohio State? Oh Man, that

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>would have been amazing. So yeah, I think it is

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the receivers just because of the trip play potential, and

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>you get Cardell Stewart and he's slashed. And if you

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>get a guy who's just too talented, you get that

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>gravitational player too.

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's my answer. But I understand where you're coming from,

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>because there is an element of swallowing your pride if

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>you are your Chas Surat Joel Lanning type, where we

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>don't even want you on that side of the ball.

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>We think you're too aggressive. Go out and hit somebody

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>and read offenses instead of running one. Those guys thrive.

0:25:58.280 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I love it.

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 2>There's definitely some bit of cerebral overlap there going from

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 2>quarterback to quarterback of the defense, if you will, But

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're just so different from a skill standpoint,

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 2>quarterbacks don't have to tackle unless they throw a really

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 2>bad interception. How do you discover this in practice, that

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Chaz Surrat could play quarterback but may actually be a

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 2>first round NFL selection as a linebacker. It just seems

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 2>really hard to discover that. Even as a receiver. Well,

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 2>I imagine he probably played it in high school or something.

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I get this, Yeah, I get that, But how do

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 2>you test that? How do you test that if quarterback

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 2>depth is a thing, right, I don't know. It just

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 2>seems like there are two incompatible skill sets that would

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 2>be very tough to discern. Meanwhile, if you're a receiver,

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 2>you know you run the trick plays obviously, if you're

0:26:57.760 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 2>a guy like a Trell Prior, let's say it didn't

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 2>exactly happened for him that conversion in college, but like

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 2>he could go out and he could run roots and

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 2>he can catch balls in practice.

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we should drug Bud Elliott and Brandon Huffman

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and all sorts of recruiting people. And here the all

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>time chose to play the wrong position in college team

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and ended up screwing them, or maybe not screwing them,

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>as they went on to the NFL because I remember

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to this day, Brandon Huffman will tell med Anthony Thomas

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 1>should have been a corner and he cost himself a

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>ton of money playing you know, slotback or whatever he

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>did for Oregon. We got a couple of questions about

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Northwestern and Ryan Helensky. Okay, what does your take on

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Northwestern's quarterback situation with Ramsey out, Peyton Ramsey out and

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>new transfer Ryan Halinsky from South Carolina originally from the

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 1>West Coast coming in. Is Helensky the walk in starter

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>even after leaving South Carolina.

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Man, I was all in on the Hunter Johnson move

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 2>to Northwestern. Yeah, and that did not work at all.

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, here's the thing to me, I don't think you

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>go to Northwestern to revive your career as a future

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL quarterback or All American caliber quarterback. I think you

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>transferred to Northwestern because it seems stable. You're gonna win games,

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you get a good education, You're in a big city

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>if that's something you're into, or near a big city,

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and there's an element to Northwestern football that's just consistent,

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and if you're in a place that is pretty volatile,

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>like I think we can assume South Carolina has been

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>these past couple of years. Maybe that's what you're looking for.

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have a good defense, most likely on the

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>other side of the ball. It's just hard to see.

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Northwestern' is another situation like Wisconsin, possibly even lower.

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:53.959
<v Speaker 1>They lose their top four pass catchers. I believe our seniors.

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there any of them are coming back.

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>But this was not an amazing offense. It was an

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>improved offense this year with Peyton Rams. I think they

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>went from like one hundred and twenty ninth to seventy

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>fifth in points per drive. But I don't think it matters.

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he's fine. I think he's okay. He wasn't

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the answer in the SEC and you know, had moments,

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>made plays, but all in all, he was not somebody

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>who looked like he improved over the course of his year.

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Started thrust into a starting role when Jake Bentley got hurt.

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So I am I'm hoping for the best. I expect

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>at best an average Northwestern offense.

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think that's where we're at with this.

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>With this we got it, by the way, we still

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>are getting is so and so the next Joe Burrow

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>or Colvin wants to know, does Joe Burrow give enough

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>credibility to LSU to shed its bad quarterback developer baggage

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>got we got a Jack Cone next Joe Burrow, which no, no, no,

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>no, no no no, walk me through, all.

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, Well, let me go back here to this Ryan first,

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 2>go to Ryan Helensky. I don't think it matters either.

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it matters either. I feel like.

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>He's awful.

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 2>It matters if he's awful. And Peyton Ramsey was fine,

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 2>he was fine, he was fine my plays. But I

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 2>just I'm so over the quarterback situation at Northwestern. I

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 2>feel like it always lets me down. Unless you've got

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 2>somebody who can scramble around and make plays. It's just

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 2>not an offense. It's going to be that high flying.

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know how much it matters to have

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 2>a quarterback. You don't want someone who's gonna shoot you

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 2>in the foot, but outside of that, as long as

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 2>you have that guy, I'm just like, I think I'm

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 2>personally over it. I'm very disappointed because I thought the

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Hunter Johnson thing was going to be better than it

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 2>ended up being. And like in his case, he wasn't

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 2>going to play at Clemson. He went to Northwestern and

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 2>they had an opening. He was closer to home, and

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 2>it bombed horribly. I don't know how much of that

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 2>is his fault versus how much of that as the

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 2>coaches or the system, what have you. But I just

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of over it. So I hope it works

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 2>for Ryan Helenski, but I'm not going to hold my breath.

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>What I'm hearing from you subtext between the lines overs

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Dan Persas just don't grow on trees.

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right.

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>They grow at Liberty High School in Bethlehem, PA.

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right.

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm hearing. So I'm playing person. Oh did

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you I did?

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>They just dominate.

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 2>It's incredible. Yeah, I have breaking news TI Okay.

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>You want to play the sound or just want to.

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm still not going to yell, but my voice is

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 2>back to a two percent now. Oh I like it?

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, boo boo boo boo boo boo boop. We have

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a question from is Street ay y st I state

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I Street whatever? Who is Washington's next Jake? And the

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>breaking news is in neither the Class of twenty twenty

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one nor twenty twenty two. Is there a

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Jake or Jacob in the top hundred quarterbacks? WHOA the

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Jake Lake has been drained a man after Jake Locker,

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Eas and Jake Browning other Jakes who didn't play.

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>It looks like I mean Sam Hewartt is the quarterback

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of the future, son of Damon. By the way, if

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to feel old, the new prize quarterback at Washington,

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>there's not going to be a new Jake or Jacob

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for some time.

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Is there a Jake somewhere else in the roster who

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 2>could do the awkward position change two quarterback? Oh?

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Good question. I'll load it up right now.

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 2>I want them so full roster. We need to Janeer.

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Transferred to Fresno State where he was. Okay, I'm on

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the our lads, Our lads page. There's no there's no

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Jacob after Jacob Eason left. Is there another Jake at

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>least in the too deep there is not WHOA Dylan

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Moore yes as the starter right now? So if you

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>had to for this next I think Washington's in a

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>note like I think Dylan Morris is Okay, we'll see

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on sam Hewart. He's built pretty similar to Jake Browning.

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>But if you were to look at previous Jakes that

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>played for Washington, so that's Eason, Hayn, Browning. Locker really

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>have been a lot. I think Jacob Sermon just left.

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>He was one of the possible quarterbacks of the future.

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Crazy if you were to split the difference between Locker, Browning, Eason,

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Hayne or whatever, what does the next Jake bring to

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the table. So, Jacob Eason, this is such a weird question.

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Jacob Eason. Tall, with a big arm, not

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>super accurate, not a big winner. Jake Browning accurate, won

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a good deal, but physically, you know, he got hurt

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot and shrunk away, didn't really keep progressing after

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a really impressive early part of his career. Jake Locker

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 1>really physically impressive, really athletic. Are we playing a game

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of Make a Jake?

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Is that what we're doing here?

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:13.720
<v Speaker 1>We're playing makea Jake? Okay, So what is the next

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 1>very specific quarterback identity of the next Jake?

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 2>So I think it has he he'd have to be

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 2>a crazy scrambler, wouldn't he.

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's we had kind of that with Jake Locker.

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>He was the most physically gifted in terms of arm

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>strength and athleticism, but he was a big arm but

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not the mobility, right.

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I just think you have to go a hard swing

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.919
<v Speaker 2>in the mobility direction, like.

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 1>So like a Khalil Tait type.

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, just like a pure runner back there.

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, interesting, interesting, Okay, so that's that's your next Jake

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>prototype by Makeajake.

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 2>My next makead Jake.

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay. Next question, does Georgia and I want to

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>have a sub question for this, Does Georgia have the

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>best quarterback room in the country? This is from Colonel ag.

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why he's asking about Georgia, but if

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>he's a TEXTA, A and M fan. But I digress

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to you, what is a quarterback room specifically because of

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the volume of potentially amazing players or is it situation?

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Because to me, a great quarterback room is like a

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Chris leaked Tim Tebow where you've got your grizzled veteran

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>who you know is leaving and you've got your next

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 1>guy up who's getting time and offers something different. To me,

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a great complimentary room. What does what makes a

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>great quarterback room? And does Georgia to you have the

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>best quarterback room in the nation with J. T. Daniels

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>incoming brock Vanda Griff Yeah, I believe has red hair,

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>which I always like to see throwback to the Ginga

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Ninja Joe Cox, and I think it's Carson Beck, another

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>balloonship quarterback. And then the following season, following class is

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>another five star quarterback in Gunner Stockton.

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Great name, what a name? What a name is?

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Stets Is that the most impressive room to you? Yeah,

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Steady Bennett's still there as well.

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 2>So that's interesting to me because you know, so we

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 2>remember where the saul started. Stets And Bennett's quarterback Stetson.

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Bennett acquitted himself well early diminishing returns. Eventually they turned

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 2>it over to JT. Daniels. He kind of unlocks a

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 2>different dimension of that Georgia offense. And now we're all

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 2>in agreement that he's clearly the better of the two,

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 2>probably the best of that quarterback room.

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Sure, but they thought they were gonna have Jamie Newman, and.

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 2>They thought they were gonna have Jamie Newman, right, But

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 2>stets And Bennett has experienced now and so to your

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 2>point of the tebow leak thing. You have a guy

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 2>that you can fall back on if you need to

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:49.280
<v Speaker 2>if something lead back up. Yep, yeah, if something happens

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 2>to JT. Daniels who was coming off an injury, Stetson

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Bennett could be the guy that you fall back on

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.800
<v Speaker 2>if you have to. So you've got the depth. You also,

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 2>I think have some other options. You mentioned brock Fandi,

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Giff fand a griff excuse me, good name, good name,

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 2>really good prospect, really good prospect, big kid saw that

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 2>he compares out at least according to twenty four to

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 2>seven to like a Jared Stidham type, a big kid,

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 2>dual threat Carson Beck. I don't think quite has that

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 2>high of a ceiling, but still a really notal prospect

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:31.439
<v Speaker 2>to come in there and help boost the quarterback room.

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 2>So I just think I'm rambling here, but where I'm

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 2>going with this is You've got a guy on the

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 2>top line in JT. Daniels, so you know he can produce.

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 2>You've got someone in Stetson Bennett who, worst case scenario,

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, can come in and at least be a

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 2>game manager at worst. And then you've got quarterback of

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 2>the future in a vander griff In, a beck In,

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 2>a Gunner coming in. So you've got so many options there,

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 2>you'd be hard pressed to find many that are better

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 2>than this one.

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Are we just gonna skim over the fact that there

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:08.760
<v Speaker 1>could potentially be a room with the following first names JT.

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Brock Stets and Carson and Gunner. From a name standpoint,

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not bad.

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 2>It's very strong.

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>No, that's incredible. That is a very modern Southern living

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:25.800
<v Speaker 1>boy band, JT. Brock Stets and Carson and Gunner. Yeah,

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that's like all five of those names are on a

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>chalkboard of somebody who is far too public about their

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>baby name choosing process. I like a Pinterest board, right correct,

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a Pinterest board of a quarterback room. I think

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>right now i'd probably take in terms of proven commodities,

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd well, not proven commodities, but like the complementary nature,

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Like Oklahoma's room is really nice between the number one

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in the country this last recruiting class in Caleb

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Williams and Spencer Rattler. I think that's a really nice

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 1>one to in terms of, you know, these guys are

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be transferring at Georgia. You know, I like

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>where Clemson's room was this year, where we all know

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence has gone after this year, and Djung is

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>going to get time in games, and you're not worried

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>about him as a spot starter because he had shown

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:20.799
<v Speaker 1>enough and he's physically ready for everything, Whereas there's a

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 1>lot more unease about Like we know Stetson Bennett is

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:27.879
<v Speaker 1>not going to beat a really good SEC team at

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Georgia with all of the weapons and all of the

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.880
<v Speaker 1>advantages Georgia has. He's he struggled against Alabama. He just

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it became a little bit too much. We know that

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the ceilings are pretty high for guys like Gunner, Stockton,

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Carson Beck, and Brock Vandergriff, but they're still a pretty

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>great unknown. And this is where like is the backup

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>better than the starter comes in? I remember that Chase

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Daniel cover on ESPN the magazine I want to say,

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 1>don't even remember who his backup was that year, And

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>there were lines in that story and Chase Daniel's sensational like, well,

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:59.320
<v Speaker 1>backup's actually even more athletic, it might even have a

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:03.399
<v Speaker 1>bigger arm. I think doesn't mean doesn't mean a thing,

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's impressive what they're doing. I think right now

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State with their lineup of quarterbacks, nobody's proven anything.

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>It's Jack Miller and c J. Stroud, And people asked

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>us about that. I think c J. Stroud might be

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 1>a little bit closer to being the guy, just so

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 1>he looks in the limited amount of time I've seen

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>his tape that he might have a higher ceiling than

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Jack Miller. But what they're doing in Columbus is just ridiculous.

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, they're there are places usc as a quarterback

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of the future, and Keaton Slovas looks like he's going

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to be the guy. I don't know, there's there's not

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of places. North Carolina's recruited well, and it

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>looks like Sam Howe is going to be you know,

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in Chapel Hill for only a season or so, so

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there are options Georgia. The problem with Georgia

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:50.439
<v Speaker 1>is it's Kirby Smart that's managing them, and his track

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>record is not amazing.

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 2>All right, where we going next? Here? Where we going next?

0:40:54.760 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Next question? Let's let's talk about LSU a little bit.

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And and you know, Colvin asked, does Joe Burrow give

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>enough cred fallacy to shed it's bad quarterback developer baggage, yes,

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of to me, and it's we are at a

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 1>point where people are going to say, well, this guy

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:15.440
<v Speaker 1>transferred in and nobody thought he was going to be amazing,

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and then he was one of the greatest all time quarterbacks.

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow had lightning in a bottle at LSU, and

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:23.839
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know if it reflects all that well

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 1>on LSU because it was a year and I think

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for a school to shed quarterback baggage, you need consistency,

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you need year over year growth, and like, look, we

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 1>developed this guy into that when you got here as

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a freshman. He left as a junior and he was

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a top fifteen pick in the NFL draft, and then

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the next guy came, like what Clemson has done has

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>developed quarterbacks with LSU. Right now at Origern with a

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 1>dud of both hires last year, I think it's going

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to take some time. Still. Max Williams seems promising, but

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Max Johnson, Max Johnson, how to caare you the name?

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Max Johnson? I think it seems promising, but we also

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 1>have to remember this about Joe Burrow. If we're going

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to compare any quarterback to Joe Burrow, which I will

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>listen and figure it out. But Joe Burrow entered into

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a situation with Jamar Chase, Clyde, Edwards, Hilaire, a strong

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, justin Jefferson, who I think was the best

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:23.239
<v Speaker 1>rookie receiver in the NFL this year and didn't even

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 1>lead at that LSU team in receiving. Terrace Marshall like,

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it was a crazy good situation that a lot of

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>transfer quarterbacks are just not going to enter into. So no,

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think LSU has reached that point, and I

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>think there needs to be sustained development and results before

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 1>we start comparing any quarterback to one of the all

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 1>time greats.

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 2>It was Joe Burrow that was maybe the best season

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 2>a quarterbacks ever had in history, just ridiculous, maybe the

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 2>best ever. And look, we can talk about Joe Brady

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:01.840
<v Speaker 2>in the impact that he had on Joe Burrow. We

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 2>could talk about how ed Orgeron went out swallowed his

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 2>pride and made some moves on offense that switched that

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 2>offense into high gear. All of that certainly has a

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:17.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of validity. Joe Burrow, though, had the best season

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:19.400
<v Speaker 2>in the history of college football.

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:21.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean argue. I mean, you know, Cam Newton had

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a pretty ridiculous tea chiny manseilt. Like, there

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 1>have been recent guys who have been amazing, but in

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of just staggering numbers and destroying all comers in

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that way, it it.

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Was in my view, unparalleled and also and out of

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the blue. You know, I think of Joe Burrow's first

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 2>year at LSU. There were moments, but it was not

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 2>nearly as special. We as a playmaker, Yeah, we had

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 2>many a conversation on this show about yeah, he makes plays,

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 2>he has moments, but to see coming what we saw

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:05.880
<v Speaker 2>out of Burrow in that Heisman campaign, forget it. No

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 2>one could have seen that coming. So yeah, we're not

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 2>comparing anyone else to Joe Burrow. I understand that there

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:16.319
<v Speaker 2>is a desire to do that. Everyone wants the next

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Joe Burrow, the next Baker Mayfield. But look as I

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 2>as I look at this quarterback depth chart for LC

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 2>they got some interesting decisions. You know, Miles Brennan is

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.879
<v Speaker 2>I think the the go to guy, the number one,

0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 2>but Max Johnson came in got some result. He was

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:38.919
<v Speaker 2>calm back there, he was mobile. You've got a guy

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.680
<v Speaker 2>like a TJ. Finley's a really big dude, different kind

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 2>of player.

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a.

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 2>Garrett nuss Meyer who's on that rod. So like they've

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 2>got names that are worth following. I still think it's Brennan.

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:57.080
<v Speaker 2>But now that Orgeron is on the other side of

0:44:57.080 --> 0:45:00.400
<v Speaker 2>this national championship and Joe Brady's gone and Joe Burrow's

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 2>not walking back through that door, I think the pressure

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 2>is on again to figure out how do you get

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 2>the most at that quarterback position because before Joe Burrow

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 2>there was a whole lot of that.

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, there are many people who will know this better

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 1>than I. I don't think Louisiana develops a lot of

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 1>high level quarterbacks. And I've heard recruiting people talk about

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that the talent level is so high on defense that

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:30.279
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible to get good at quarterback. Growing up in Louisiana.

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 1>There's so much speed and talent on the field in

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 1>places like Louisiana and Florida. Now, good quarterbacks who come

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>out of Florida and LSU just relies so much on

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>recruiting and state because there is so much talent in state.

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:44.520
<v Speaker 1>But you see them going to Florida, going to California,

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 1>going wherever, obviously to Ohio with Joe Burrow to get

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback. I wonder if ed Rizron isn't better served

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 1>just keeping an extra scholarship open at the end of

0:45:58.280 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the year, the end of maybe every recruiting class whatever.

0:46:00.719 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everybody's gonna lose players to transfer, but saving

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that for that annual JT. Daniels Joe Burrow that one

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>intriguing transfer or grad transfer who has proven to be

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:19.759
<v Speaker 1>an above average, a pretty good quarterback. And I don't

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 1>know if it's a sustainable way to run a program,

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>but obviously it has been very difficult for LSU to

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>hit on quarterbacks consistently in state, out of state for

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason. And so they're one of those schools that

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>if you can guarantee a very high floor, more often

0:46:40.080 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 1>than not, you're gonna be able to surround that quarterback. Yeah,

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of advantages. And so that's one of

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 1>those teams that should be perennially just an eye askance

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>at the transfer portal. LJ says that Braxton Burmeister is

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the leading guy for Virginia Tech going into next year

0:47:01.920 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>with Hendon Hooker leaving.

0:47:03.960 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Is that good or bad? Dan, you have an opinion

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 2>on Braxton Burmeister, your boy.

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 1>It depends on what you want Virginia Tech to be.

0:47:12.120 --> 0:47:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he is a ten win answer, and

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 1>if that's the expectation of Virginia Tech eventually to get

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:22.439
<v Speaker 1>to with Justin Fuente, I don't think he's that guy.

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's that guy. I don't think he's

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a consistent downfield passer. I think he is a Stetson

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Bennett type of more athletic Stetson Bennett that he could

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 1>be a really strong backup. But it's hard for me

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to see Braxton Burmeister putting the majority of the acc

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 1>in the lost column after playing the Hokies, which is

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the expectation outside of Clemson and you know North Carolina

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:47:45.760 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 2>You remember when Justin Fuente was at Memphis, I do

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 2>fun watch His offenses were awesome, man, awesome. You think

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:59.440
<v Speaker 2>he's running that offense at Tech with Braxen Burmeister.

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Something trying to be who is the giant quarterback that

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:06.800
<v Speaker 1>he got drafted in the first round who was definitely

0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 1>not an NFL quarterback.

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Paxton Lynch really good though in College very good, not

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:14.480
<v Speaker 2>so much for the Denver Broncos.

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Is he still in the NFL?

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he is.

0:48:21.400 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 1>He did not play this year. He was a practice

0:48:25.640 --> 0:48:29.480
<v Speaker 1>squad Seahawk in twenty nineteen and caught. I don't know

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 1>if he's thrown an NFL pass in a long time,

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 1>so he has thrown an NFL passed since twenty seventeen.

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Do we think Braxton Burmeister is running that Memphis offense

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 2>at Virginia chech not to say that fluent is even

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:47.320
<v Speaker 2>trying to run that, but is he getting anywhere close

0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:50.760
<v Speaker 2>to it? I think the answer is no. It's rhetorical question, right,

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:52.680
<v Speaker 2>So no, it's not good. That's not good at all.

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>They had what's his name though, right the gerad Evans

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>He ran that pretty well, Jacy quarterback and shouldn't have declared.

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, last question, one more question. You get to

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:06.800
<v Speaker 2>pick one more.

0:49:06.400 --> 0:49:08.600
<v Speaker 1>We have a lot of We had a few questions

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:13.320
<v Speaker 1>about the Oregon quarterback situation, and Dati says, did Tyler

0:49:13.360 --> 0:49:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Schuck show enough for Oregon fans to have confidence for

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:20.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one? Is Anthony Brown a better option? Oregon,

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 1>like a number of schools, is now falling into a

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 1>situation that is awful. The situation is looking at a

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:37.840
<v Speaker 1>committed recruit, assigned recruit, an incoming, blue chip, celebrated recruit

0:49:37.920 --> 0:49:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and saying, that's the future, that's the guy. He's gonna

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:45.920
<v Speaker 1>save things. And if you are not living in the present,

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:50.880
<v Speaker 1>your situation downfield passing the ball, it's going to be

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:53.920
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to say, yes, I know things are bad,

0:49:54.000 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>but wait till this guy gets here. I don't see

0:49:58.160 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Oregon in a good situation because that guy is ty

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Thompson for Oregon, he's an incoming I think he's a

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:09.440
<v Speaker 1>borderline five star, whatever that means. But Tyler Shuck was

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:12.240
<v Speaker 1>not the answer. You look at the Oregon State game,

0:50:12.560 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the USC game. Even though they won that game, he struggled.

0:50:16.840 --> 0:50:20.319
<v Speaker 1>He struggled under pressure, like wait, are teams allowed to

0:50:20.360 --> 0:50:25.720
<v Speaker 1>blitz like that level of struggle? And Anthony Brown is fine,

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:29.240
<v Speaker 1>he's on too bad knees. And I don't think Anthony

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Brown a full season Anthony Brown will win Oregon the

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:35.240
<v Speaker 1>PAC twelve. And so are you gambling on a true freshman?

0:50:35.280 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>This is some same situation for the team of my

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:42.839
<v Speaker 1>other half, Michigan Wolverines, and it's I think JJ McCarthy. Oh,

0:50:42.880 --> 0:50:47.720
<v Speaker 1>but just wait, JJ McCarthy. I don't know that Michigan's

0:50:47.719 --> 0:50:50.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna win many games with Jim Harbaugh moving forward. I

0:50:50.840 --> 0:50:53.400
<v Speaker 1>think the situation is pretty dire in ann Arbor. And

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 1>so if you are putting that, if you're putting those

0:50:56.800 --> 0:51:02.760
<v Speaker 1>eggs that many eggs in a an unproven freshman basket,

0:51:03.680 --> 0:51:06.400
<v Speaker 1>your program's in a bad place in that situation, in

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:10.879
<v Speaker 1>that specific scenario. So I am not bullish. We'll see

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 1>what happens. I'm not bullish on on Tyler Shock or

0:51:14.000 --> 0:51:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Brown, And I understand starting a freshman if he

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is your best option. But the best option is probably

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:25.239
<v Speaker 1>starting Anthony Brown for a few games and hope ty

0:51:25.360 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Thompson or Jay Butterfield, one of the young, unproven quarterbacks

0:51:29.120 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is ready, because I don't see another way around it

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:35.920
<v Speaker 1>unless they go into the transfer portal after spring for

0:51:35.960 --> 0:51:36.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody else.

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:38.759
<v Speaker 2>Let me close it out with a question of my own.

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:45.879
<v Speaker 2>Who's the best quarterback in twenty twenty college football? Who's

0:51:45.880 --> 0:51:47.080
<v Speaker 2>the best quarterback next year?

0:51:47.760 --> 0:51:49.960
<v Speaker 1>The best quarterback in twenty twenty one.

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at a list of way too early Heisman

0:51:55.000 --> 0:51:58.319
<v Speaker 2>front runners. So Sam Howell's the first name that jumps out.

0:51:58.880 --> 0:52:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Sam Howell. Rout is up there, Spencer Rattler's up there

0:52:04.080 --> 0:52:08.960
<v Speaker 2>on this list. They've got Bryce Young and Djangala, both

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:11.799
<v Speaker 2>of whom I think bring a lot of promise. But

0:52:12.760 --> 0:52:15.680
<v Speaker 2>to put him this high on this list is aggressive. CJ.

0:52:15.840 --> 0:52:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Stroud's I think it'll be a name for Ohio State. Again,

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:21.080
<v Speaker 2>he's on this list. Haven't seen him yet, so.

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:23.839
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't thrown a meaningful pass. Yeah right.

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Some other names on here. J. T. Daniels, Keaton Slovas

0:52:27.320 --> 0:52:30.160
<v Speaker 2>two names that we discussed.

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>A huge Slovas guy. I think he's good, but I

0:52:32.640 --> 0:52:34.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm not bowled over.

0:52:35.520 --> 0:52:40.600
<v Speaker 2>What I'm seeing. Here is a couple good quarterback names

0:52:40.600 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 2>that I'm excited about, But outside of Sam Howell, no

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:46.000
<v Speaker 2>one that I feel I can really rely on at

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:49.239
<v Speaker 2>this point. Djang A, Look what he did against Notre

0:52:49.360 --> 0:52:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Dame was ridiculous.

0:52:50.800 --> 0:52:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And they get Tony Elliott back who and they get

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Tony Elliot flirted with Tennessee. Yeah, I mean.

0:52:55.239 --> 0:52:58.080
<v Speaker 2>He's going to be outstanding. We already know that. And

0:52:58.120 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 2>we know that who's ever quarterback high the States could

0:53:00.600 --> 0:53:02.880
<v Speaker 2>be very good? Like we know some of this is

0:53:02.920 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 2>baked into the cake. But in terms of who's the

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:09.160
<v Speaker 2>best quarterback outside of Sam Howell, let's say so, it's

0:53:09.200 --> 0:53:11.160
<v Speaker 2>an open question. I mean, I guess it could be

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Spencer Rattler too, but like there's just so much out

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:18.040
<v Speaker 2>there in the quarterback space that we just don't know

0:53:18.880 --> 0:53:21.279
<v Speaker 2>and can't really take for granted going into twenty twenty one.

0:53:21.840 --> 0:53:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's Rattler. I think if you're going

0:53:23.440 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to say, outside of Sam Howell, who do I have

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the most confidence in. I suppose we can see how

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Derek King heals up from his torn acl but he'll

0:53:31.280 --> 0:53:33.279
<v Speaker 1>be a different kind of quarterback if he's ready early

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:36.400
<v Speaker 1>on in the season physically, but certainly he is somebody

0:53:36.400 --> 0:53:40.239
<v Speaker 1>who I'm excited to see. Disappointed at Malik Hunningham step back.

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 1>It is Malik right now? Or did he go I

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:45.160
<v Speaker 1>can't remember. Is it Malik or Michale right now?

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:48.240
<v Speaker 2>I think it's Malik. I think went back, it is Malik, Okay, went.

0:53:48.120 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Back to Milike. You know, there's a number of guys

0:53:50.520 --> 0:53:55.560
<v Speaker 1>who I think could ascend to an interesting place, But yeah,

0:53:55.560 --> 0:53:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I think right now it's Rattler and Sam Howell,

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:02.120
<v Speaker 1>And then we'll know JT. Daniels made plays near the

0:54:02.200 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>end of the year for Georgia and it should be

0:54:03.480 --> 0:54:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in a position to win games. And somebody asked about

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Florida quarterbacks. You Mackenzie Milton's coming back, but he took

0:54:09.560 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a step back after Scott Frost left and hopefully physically

0:54:12.680 --> 0:54:16.359
<v Speaker 1>he's good to go. Emery Jones, I'm not crazy high

0:54:16.440 --> 0:54:20.160
<v Speaker 1>on at the moment, and I don't know if there's

0:54:20.160 --> 0:54:23.400
<v Speaker 1>anybody else in the Big ten, acc anybody else in

0:54:23.400 --> 0:54:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the Big twelve. Text is going to have a new starter,

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Spencer Sanders, Max Duggan, Like, there's just there's a lot

0:54:28.760 --> 0:54:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of to me be minus passing attacks out there, and exactly,

0:54:33.320 --> 0:54:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to see a number of these guys rising

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to anything beyond what we what we perceived their limit

0:54:39.800 --> 0:54:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to be. Right now, can I ask you something completely

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to do with what we started out the show talking about,

0:54:45.840 --> 0:54:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Please talking about Snow, what the f I'm supposed to

0:54:50.239 --> 0:54:51.279
<v Speaker 1>do with all of this.

0:54:52.920 --> 0:54:54.840
<v Speaker 2>You're really having a hard time with this, aren't you.

0:54:54.840 --> 0:54:59.160
<v Speaker 2>You're not no one really enjoys shoving. You're having a

0:54:59.200 --> 0:55:02.520
<v Speaker 2>hard time with this. Talk to me about your shoveling situation.

0:55:02.960 --> 0:55:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, this just gloves recently. Yeah, I have loves. I

0:55:05.640 --> 0:55:08.040
<v Speaker 1>have a shovel, I have a hat, I have AirPods,

0:55:08.040 --> 0:55:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll listen to podcast. I have good boots, get my

0:55:10.920 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 1>feet dry, grip well. Kind of what I want to

0:55:14.600 --> 0:55:17.840
<v Speaker 1>know is I don't know something from.

0:55:17.920 --> 0:55:19.880
<v Speaker 2>One of the curved ones that helps your back. Is

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:21.279
<v Speaker 2>it a push shovel? What do you have?

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:25.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a straight pull and a wide shovel

0:55:26.160 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and a decent grip. And that's all I have. There's

0:55:29.600 --> 0:55:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a that's all I have. I got it from Amazon

0:55:32.320 --> 0:55:32.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com.

0:55:32.880 --> 0:55:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Tye.

0:55:33.440 --> 0:55:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Okay, My question to you is you have a snowblower

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 1>now I do?

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:55:40.760 --> 0:55:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So, man, am I looked at as being like pulling

0:55:45.120 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 1>my weight and I'm a good neighbor because I shovel myself.

0:55:48.800 --> 0:55:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Is it an impressive reflection on me that I'm not

0:55:51.880 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 1>hiring somebody or that I'm not using machinery to clear

0:55:55.120 --> 0:55:58.799
<v Speaker 1>out my walk and path or whatever? Or is that

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:00.920
<v Speaker 1>just like just do what you need to do. It

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:02.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter about impressing your neighbors.

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:05.640
<v Speaker 2>It's it's work. Been like, it's a lot like journalism.

0:56:05.640 --> 0:56:07.239
<v Speaker 2>You know, you got to pay your dues until you

0:56:07.280 --> 0:56:12.920
<v Speaker 2>get up to some of the bigger stuff right now,

0:56:12.960 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 2>there is no pride in doing the shoveling if you

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 2>can afford to go snowblower, none whatsoever.

0:56:20.280 --> 0:56:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So how much does a snowblower set you back? A

0:56:22.680 --> 0:56:23.360
<v Speaker 1>decent one?

0:56:23.800 --> 0:56:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it's several hundred dollars, I don't know the actual

0:56:27.320 --> 0:56:27.879
<v Speaker 2>price tag.

0:56:28.000 --> 0:56:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But so you're pushing it like you would push like

0:56:31.960 --> 0:56:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a mailroom dolly almost sort of.

0:56:35.239 --> 0:56:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I did not get the Cadillac of snowblowers by

0:56:38.120 --> 0:56:40.960
<v Speaker 2>any stretch with what we've got out there. Now, I

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:43.319
<v Speaker 2>have it in first gear and I have to go

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:46.279
<v Speaker 2>very slowly down the driveway and along the sidewalks.

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:50.200
<v Speaker 1>But so you get two snow tires on that thing, correct,

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:52.759
<v Speaker 1>and then you're it's got like a bulldozer. So it's

0:56:52.880 --> 0:56:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it's shooting the snow to the side, correct, correct, Okay,

0:56:56.800 --> 0:56:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to each side. And it's not the easiest contraption to maneuver.

0:57:00.120 --> 0:57:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to lie.

0:57:01.160 --> 0:57:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I've operated other ones before and they seem like they

0:57:03.960 --> 0:57:05.440
<v Speaker 2>were much easier. But this is the one that I

0:57:05.480 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 2>bought because it was on sale.

0:57:07.200 --> 0:57:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like it'll be a grand or something like that.

0:57:09.600 --> 0:57:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And so it's it's fine. It gets the job done.

0:57:14.040 --> 0:57:15.640
<v Speaker 2>I had to go out and do it now because

0:57:15.640 --> 0:57:19.560
<v Speaker 2>we might get honestly, like a foot more tonight, and

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:21.720
<v Speaker 2>if I let that stack on top of what was

0:57:21.760 --> 0:57:24.640
<v Speaker 2>already out there, I'm not using my snowblower. This is

0:57:24.640 --> 0:57:27.040
<v Speaker 2>not going to work. So went out. Have you paid

0:57:27.040 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 2>for a service before, a shoveling service? Yeah, some sort

0:57:31.280 --> 0:57:35.120
<v Speaker 2>of clearance, I don't think so. Okay, No, I've never

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:38.360
<v Speaker 2>done that. I've always either done the shoveling or done

0:57:38.400 --> 0:57:41.280
<v Speaker 2>the snow blowing. But when we moved into our new house,

0:57:42.120 --> 0:57:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I did the shoveling once and then de sited. I

0:57:44.040 --> 0:57:45.920
<v Speaker 2>needed to get the snowblower because there's just too much

0:57:45.960 --> 0:57:46.200
<v Speaker 2>to do.

0:57:46.440 --> 0:57:51.080
<v Speaker 1>How long will a snowblow sash take you approximately.

0:57:51.840 --> 0:57:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Depends on how much snow. If we've got well over

0:57:54.560 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 2>a foot like we do now, I was out there

0:57:57.120 --> 0:57:59.840
<v Speaker 2>for a good hour and a half two hours earlier.

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:02.600
<v Speaker 2>What just doing a first pass at it and it's

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:03.400
<v Speaker 2>still not clean.

0:58:04.960 --> 0:58:06.560
<v Speaker 1>So you're well, will you live? You have like a

0:58:06.600 --> 0:58:10.120
<v Speaker 1>giant backyard right with good size backyard. So are you

0:58:10.280 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 1>clearing the backyard or you're just clearing your patio in

0:58:13.360 --> 0:58:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the front sidewalk? What are you clearing this.

0:58:15.040 --> 0:58:17.840
<v Speaker 2>This is I'm definitely not clearing the grass in the backyard.

0:58:18.000 --> 0:58:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, but what are you clearing?

0:58:19.920 --> 0:58:21.680
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot of gasoline that i'd need for that,

0:58:22.360 --> 0:58:27.680
<v Speaker 2>now I would. I I'm clearing off the driveway and sidewalks.

0:58:28.920 --> 0:58:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Driveway and sidewalks, and so you're going up and down

0:58:31.360 --> 0:58:34.920
<v Speaker 1>like it's a lawnmower. Essentially, you're pushing it. Right, You're

0:58:34.960 --> 0:58:36.040
<v Speaker 1>just in deep snow.

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:39.440
<v Speaker 2>It's got a little bit of its own self propulsion,

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:44.040
<v Speaker 2>which helps, right, But you know, unfortunately, because the snow

0:58:44.080 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 2>is so deep, I can't really go that quick with it,

0:58:45.880 --> 0:58:48.080
<v Speaker 2>just gotta turn my way through it.

0:58:48.560 --> 0:58:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Would you be quicker with a shovel?

0:58:50.720 --> 0:58:50.760
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:58:50.840 --> 0:58:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe more uncomfortable. No, you wouldn't be quicker with a shovel.

0:58:53.320 --> 0:58:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just asking, so, what percentage of people on your

0:58:57.080 --> 0:59:01.200
<v Speaker 1>block are snowblower versus shovel versus hiring a service.

0:59:02.040 --> 0:59:06.720
<v Speaker 2>My neighbor has, he's been going the shovel route, and

0:59:06.760 --> 0:59:10.200
<v Speaker 2>I've been trying to help however I can by doing

0:59:10.200 --> 0:59:14.320
<v Speaker 2>at least a snowblower on his sidewalks. But I think

0:59:14.840 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 2>most of the people in the neighborhood have snowblowers or

0:59:18.320 --> 0:59:19.760
<v Speaker 2>services that come and do it for them.

0:59:20.600 --> 0:59:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, see what you're saying to me is I'm an

0:59:24.840 --> 0:59:29.360
<v Speaker 1>impressive blue collar snow clearer with my shovel.

0:59:29.200 --> 0:59:32.360
<v Speaker 2>You are blue collar. I don't know if it's it.

0:59:32.360 --> 0:59:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Might not be that impressive. I don't know if it's

0:59:33.920 --> 0:59:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that impressive clearing a sidewalk and a little side path

0:59:37.640 --> 0:59:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to my house.

0:59:38.320 --> 0:59:40.680
<v Speaker 2>You could just be cheap. That's also a possibility.

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Now, I would love to throw money at this problem. Ty,

0:59:44.480 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm asking you. I would like nothing more

0:59:47.400 --> 0:59:50.280
<v Speaker 1>than to throw money at this problem. Because well, I

0:59:50.320 --> 0:59:55.160
<v Speaker 1>will say I slept beautifully last night after shoveling three times.

0:59:54.960 --> 0:59:57.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not worth it.

0:59:57.160 --> 0:59:59.520
<v Speaker 2>It's not worth it. If you could afford the snowblower,

0:59:59.520 --> 1:00:01.600
<v Speaker 2>get the snow blower. If you don't want the snowblower

1:00:01.680 --> 1:00:03.080
<v Speaker 2>and we want a service, get the service.

1:00:03.120 --> 1:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>But no, it's not worth like even for one winter

1:00:06.800 --> 1:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to say I did it the first window.

1:00:08.400 --> 1:00:11.480
<v Speaker 2>No, just no, no, no, no, this is not This

1:00:11.520 --> 1:00:13.440
<v Speaker 2>is not like going to a fancy restaurant for the

1:00:13.480 --> 1:00:17.120
<v Speaker 2>first time. Are going to like Cabo. It's that there's

1:00:17.160 --> 1:00:21.280
<v Speaker 2>no a lore. If you can afford to throw money

1:00:21.280 --> 1:00:22.480
<v Speaker 2>and fix the problem. You do it.

1:00:23.000 --> 1:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I think I probably have maybe fifty or sixty total

1:00:29.200 --> 1:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>feet of walk between the side and sidewalk side walk

1:00:33.040 --> 1:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and the side walking path to the side.

1:00:36.880 --> 1:00:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Are you snowblower curious?

1:00:39.320 --> 1:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I am? I am?

1:00:41.040 --> 1:00:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Do you?

1:00:41.440 --> 1:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Is there a Is there a time you won't snowblow

1:00:44.360 --> 1:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>before in the morning?

1:00:46.520 --> 1:00:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Um? Good question. Usually try to wait until at least

1:00:51.560 --> 1:00:52.320
<v Speaker 2>like eight o'clock.

1:00:52.680 --> 1:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that seems reasonable.

1:00:54.440 --> 1:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>But others are out there earlier, and they will be

1:00:56.920 --> 1:00:59.040
<v Speaker 2>out late tonight. For what it's worth.

1:00:59.360 --> 1:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>If you're up in Minnesota, if you're up there in Canada,

1:01:02.800 --> 1:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're up you know, Western New York, anywhere in Boston,

1:01:07.240 --> 1:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I gotta imagine you shovel once, maybe maybe five years

1:01:12.920 --> 1:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>while you're young. I think there are a finite number

1:01:15.760 --> 1:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of shovel years in me. Yeah, well, listen, possibly shovel days.

1:01:21.080 --> 1:01:24.040
<v Speaker 2>We have a lot of folks who listen from those

1:01:24.120 --> 1:01:26.720
<v Speaker 2>regions of the country in the world. They are clearly

1:01:26.960 --> 1:01:28.960
<v Speaker 2>a better authority on this than I am, because they

1:01:28.960 --> 1:01:31.560
<v Speaker 2>deal with more snow. We get the crazy nor'easters here.

1:01:31.600 --> 1:01:33.840
<v Speaker 2>It just so happens. I'm in, like, yeah, the perfect

1:01:33.880 --> 1:01:36.920
<v Speaker 2>spot to always take the full brunt of these Northeasterns.

1:01:37.640 --> 1:01:41.880
<v Speaker 2>But what I'd say is, let's get some feedback on

1:01:41.960 --> 1:01:46.080
<v Speaker 2>the best snowblower and the way to approach this problem.

1:01:47.400 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 2>I will say that my neighbor and I, who both

1:01:50.480 --> 1:01:55.520
<v Speaker 2>moved into this neighborhood the same year, basically made a

1:01:55.560 --> 1:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>pact with one another after that very first snowfall in

1:01:58.840 --> 1:02:00.760
<v Speaker 2>our new houses that now we can't do this.

1:02:00.720 --> 1:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Again, never again.

1:02:02.280 --> 1:02:05.320
<v Speaker 2>I had one shoveling session, that was it. I had

1:02:05.320 --> 1:02:07.080
<v Speaker 2>a snowblower the next week, and then it didn't snow

1:02:07.120 --> 1:02:09.600
<v Speaker 2>for a year and a half. But so far I've

1:02:09.640 --> 1:02:13.240
<v Speaker 2>been getting my money's worth out of it. Man.

1:02:13.280 --> 1:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>But an hour and a half snow blowing.

1:02:15.400 --> 1:02:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, deep snow, man, we're going to get like twenty

1:02:18.160 --> 1:02:22.000
<v Speaker 2>five inches from this. So will you do multiple clearances

1:02:22.040 --> 1:02:27.320
<v Speaker 2>a day? I'm not again, so you're not.

1:02:27.280 --> 1:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Ending up clearing two feet of snow that you're doing,

1:02:29.240 --> 1:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, eight inches of snow at a time.

1:02:31.600 --> 1:02:35.200
<v Speaker 2>I went out and did I think I saw fourteen

1:02:35.320 --> 1:02:38.360
<v Speaker 2>or fifteen out there? I went out and I did

1:02:38.440 --> 1:02:40.520
<v Speaker 2>that because I know that there's a lot more coming

1:02:40.640 --> 1:02:43.920
<v Speaker 2>and if I wait, it's going to be impossible to

1:02:44.000 --> 1:02:45.800
<v Speaker 2>use a snowblower it's just the one that I have

1:02:45.960 --> 1:02:48.160
<v Speaker 2>is not that big. So I had to go out there.

1:02:48.200 --> 1:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I had to do round one. I'm fully anticipating round

1:02:51.040 --> 1:02:52.520
<v Speaker 2>two is going to be tomorrow. It might be about

1:02:52.560 --> 1:02:54.800
<v Speaker 2>the same amount of snow, but I needed to go

1:02:54.840 --> 1:02:56.480
<v Speaker 2>out there and knock it down otherwise it was going

1:02:56.520 --> 1:03:00.280
<v Speaker 2>to be crazy. Anything over a foot, yeah, which is

1:03:00.320 --> 1:03:03.720
<v Speaker 2>a foot? Like that's the limit. You got to go

1:03:03.760 --> 1:03:06.000
<v Speaker 2>out You got to knock it down. Otherwise it's it's

1:03:06.000 --> 1:03:07.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of pointless.

1:03:07.640 --> 1:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>What's your ear situation? My ear situationsening to somebody, You're

1:03:12.160 --> 1:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>listening to music or're listening to podcast? Is it far

1:03:14.040 --> 1:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>too loud? It's too loud, like noise canceling something.

1:03:16.880 --> 1:03:19.360
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, it's too loud. It's too loud. It's

1:03:19.400 --> 1:03:20.959
<v Speaker 2>just me and mother nature out there.

1:03:21.040 --> 1:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, will do you put on like things just

1:03:25.040 --> 1:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to block out the noise? Nope, it's not that loud.

1:03:28.200 --> 1:03:28.959
<v Speaker 1>It's not that loud.

1:03:29.280 --> 1:03:31.080
<v Speaker 2>We're not like running a chainsaw out there.

1:03:31.240 --> 1:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>But you'll have to excuse me. I'm a soft person

1:03:34.320 --> 1:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>from California who's never done this before, and I think

1:03:40.080 --> 1:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I can make this public because we're all friends here

1:03:42.600 --> 1:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know what I'm doing in the Arctic

1:03:45.360 --> 1:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Circle that is Lake Michigan adjacent. So would you how would.

1:03:51.320 --> 1:03:53.840
<v Speaker 2>You feel confidence wise running a snowblower?

1:03:55.400 --> 1:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>If somebody showed me how pretty confident, I'd have to

1:03:59.080 --> 1:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>watch some YouTube video. How are you with machines? You

1:04:02.840 --> 1:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>do lawnmowers? I'm a podcaster, yea, My machine is my

1:04:08.280 --> 1:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>my throat. I am. I'm fine. I'm a good learner.

1:04:16.480 --> 1:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm a good student.

1:04:18.280 --> 1:04:20.560
<v Speaker 2>So you're not not against running the machine. You just

1:04:20.600 --> 1:04:22.040
<v Speaker 2>haven't had many opportunities or.

1:04:22.040 --> 1:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Renting a house right now, so the owner of the house,

1:04:24.320 --> 1:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>if something's really bad, he'll help out. And we have

1:04:26.840 --> 1:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody that mows our lawn, but that's pretty rare. That

1:04:31.400 --> 1:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen all the time. So I just take care

1:04:33.520 --> 1:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of things and I water stuff in the backyard all that.

1:04:35.760 --> 1:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But no, not a lot of heavy machinery in my

1:04:40.280 --> 1:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>life other than my car.

1:04:42.160 --> 1:04:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to send you a chainsaw. I don't know

1:04:43.760 --> 1:04:45.439
<v Speaker 2>what you're gonna do with it, but just to say

1:04:45.440 --> 1:04:45.880
<v Speaker 2>you have it.

1:04:45.920 --> 1:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm baking pizzas, I'm struggling to shovel. I'm

1:04:49.800 --> 1:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>doing my.

1:04:50.200 --> 1:04:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Thing, Okay, Well, send Dan shoveling tips.

1:04:54.360 --> 1:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Send me shoveling tips, send me like a new shovel.

1:04:57.240 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I just have a very basic one. Send me a

1:04:59.120 --> 1:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>new shovel idea, or send me snowblower ideas. I don't know.

1:05:01.520 --> 1:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It might be too late in the season to invest.

1:05:03.320 --> 1:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. I don't know.

1:05:05.080 --> 1:05:06.320
<v Speaker 2>You're in Chicago, man.

1:05:06.920 --> 1:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I know it's gonna last a while, isn't it.

1:05:08.560 --> 1:05:13.600
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna get snow for at least two more months. Snowblower,

1:05:13.680 --> 1:05:17.200
<v Speaker 2>I send me some Rex eight hundred bucks eight hundred okay,

1:05:17.240 --> 1:05:19.640
<v Speaker 2>and you're happy with it? Not really, but it does

1:05:19.680 --> 1:05:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the job.

1:05:20.840 --> 1:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>So find me something that you'd be happier with, something

1:05:23.080 --> 1:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you'd be happier with.

1:05:23.960 --> 1:05:25.200
<v Speaker 2>This is the only one I know. I don't know

1:05:25.200 --> 1:05:29.320
<v Speaker 2>anything about snow. Hardware told me to get this one,

1:05:29.400 --> 1:05:30.120
<v Speaker 2>so I did.

1:05:30.480 --> 1:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I researched cameras for two years before I bought a camera,

1:05:33.440 --> 1:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and once I got the camera, I was happy with it,

1:05:35.480 --> 1:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and I continued to research just because I always like

1:05:38.400 --> 1:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to know.

1:05:39.080 --> 1:05:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't really like the one I have, but

1:05:41.280 --> 1:05:46.919
<v Speaker 2>it'll be a trick. Today. Solidverbal at gmail dot com

1:05:46.960 --> 1:05:51.080
<v Speaker 2>talking quarterbacks and snowblowers here on an off season podcast.

1:05:51.080 --> 1:05:54.560
<v Speaker 2>We will be back on Thursday to talk more college football.

1:05:55.040 --> 1:05:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget to check us out soliverbal dot com for

1:05:57.120 --> 1:05:59.560
<v Speaker 2>ballers dot com is the Patriot Dan.

1:05:59.400 --> 1:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Who is your snowblower? Twenty twenty one quarterback gets the

1:06:03.720 --> 1:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>job done but not necessarily the best? Who is your workman?

1:06:09.120 --> 1:06:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Like? It could be Stets of Bennett.

1:06:12.400 --> 1:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Stet's and Bennet's on the bench. That's Ebendans in the garage.

1:06:16.200 --> 1:06:19.080
<v Speaker 2>All he needs just a very short season out of him.

1:06:20.080 --> 1:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>It's nice to have him, but I'm not fully happy

1:06:23.360 --> 1:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>with him. Yeah, Tala Tongo Vailoa, Malie Cunningham with the turnovers.

1:06:31.880 --> 1:06:33.120
<v Speaker 2>And that's a bad snowblower.

1:06:35.440 --> 1:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>He still finished like a top twenty five quarterback in

1:06:37.800 --> 1:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the nation. Probably.

1:06:39.240 --> 1:06:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the answer could be Jack Cone, even though

1:06:40.960 --> 1:06:43.560
<v Speaker 2>he didn't play. I feel like Jack Conk Jack Cone's

1:06:43.600 --> 1:06:45.960
<v Speaker 2>a very snowblower esque type of quarterback.

1:06:46.120 --> 1:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>How about Canny Pickett?

1:06:48.160 --> 1:06:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Can pick it? Can he pick it through for like

1:06:49.560 --> 1:06:50.680
<v Speaker 2>five hundred yards one game?

1:06:51.520 --> 1:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm saying sometimes if the situation is ideal six

1:06:55.320 --> 1:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>inches of snow, can he Picket's gotcha? If it's a

1:07:00.080 --> 1:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>an interesting Boston College defense, it's about Filtererkovic filger Kovic's

1:07:06.480 --> 1:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a really good snowblower. I like that filter.

1:07:09.000 --> 1:07:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Kovic's like medium to upper tier snowblower.

1:07:13.160 --> 1:07:15.479
<v Speaker 1>There you have it, forty five minutes of quarterback talk,

1:07:16.240 --> 1:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty three minutes of snow clearance.

1:07:19.120 --> 1:07:22.720
<v Speaker 2>For that guy over there, Dan Rubinstein, form myself, Tie Hildebrant.

1:07:22.760 --> 1:07:25.000
<v Speaker 2>We will talk to you all on Thursday. In the meantime,

1:07:25.480 --> 1:07:27.600
<v Speaker 2>stay warm, stay safe, and stay solid.

1:07:28.240 --> 1:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Nice