WEBVTT - Credit Default Market Is Smaller Today, Eisman Says

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene with

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>David Gura. Daily we bring you insight from the best

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>of economics, finance, investment, and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and of course

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg. Joining us now in our Bloomberg eleven

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>three studios is Steve Iceman. He's a portfolio manager in

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>New Burger Berman. Great to have you with us here

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>once again. And I suppose we should start with the

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>bank earnings. We had three major banks reporting last week.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Two to come tomorrow. We have Goldman, sax and Morgan

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Stanley as well. Let's just take stock of what we've

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>seen thus far. Earnings have come in line with the expectations.

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, there's some quirkiness the third quarter earnings as well.

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>What you've been watching is as the bank earnings have

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>been coming in, Um, I've been ignoring them possible for what?

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>For what reason? Do explain that? Completely irrelevant? How self?

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>You know the bank artians will do whatever they'll be.

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>They're very similar to the second quarter. Um, you know,

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the analysts will print what they print about who did

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:15.839
<v Speaker 1>a little better, who a little, a little little worse

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:21.839
<v Speaker 1>as completely meaningless. Because the big story is the deregulatory story,

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's going to be coming down the pike

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>over the next six to nine months. Let's stick into

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that story a bit. A few months back, the Treasury

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Department released it's its first round of reports on on regulation,

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>How it sees regulation, what what it intends or hopes

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to do with regard to to regulation. How clear a

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>message on that front have we gotten from from this administration.

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>We can talk a bit about what Gary Cone had

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to say over over the weekend, but is there clarity

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>from this administration about how it would like to see

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that terrain change was It's as clear as day. Um.

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I wear two hats. I wear the hat

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of American American citizen, and this is what I would

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>do if I was God forbidden charge. Um. And then

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 1>there's the hat of I'm not in charge. And it's

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>very clear to me what the regulators are gonna do.

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean for bank stocks? I mean, if

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I was in charge, I would change very little. But

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not in charge. And as as it is very obvious, um,

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>And this is an administration that comes up with excuse

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>after excuse about why Dodd Frank is bad, and they

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>are not gonna be able to change, actually change Dodd

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Frank from a legislative perspective. So they're going to do

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it through the back door, through the regulatory process, because

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, Dodd Frank leaves a lot of them for interpretation. Um.

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, the prior regime under the OBAA administration was

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>very very strict about the banks. They took leverage down enormously.

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>They interpreted the vocal rule extremely strictly. Um, And you're

0:02:55.919 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>going to see a partial reversal of what has happened.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna go anywhere close to where we were

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.519
<v Speaker 1>pre crisis. You know. Just to give you a couple

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 1>of numbers, City Group used to be levered thirty three

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to one. Today it's levered ten to one. You know,

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>my expectations over the next few years maybe it goes

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to thirteen fourteen to one, which would not be a calamity, um,

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>but it would certainly make City Group a lot more profitable.

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's the direction we're gonna go in. It's going

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>to happen in a very bureaucratese technocratic, complicated ways. So

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be very hard for UM politicians to complain

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>about it because they won't understand it. And that's intentional. Yeah,

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>how how quickly can that happen? I look at the

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>way that Dodd Frank came into being. Having lived in Washington,

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I for a time was noting the thousands and thousands

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of pages of comments letter implementing these rules, going from

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>draft to draft to draft to final rule took a

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of time. If there is a lot of bureacrats,

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>as you put it, does does that slow down the

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>process at all? Help quickly in this come into play? Um,

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it will start to happen very quickly, but it's going

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to take about four years to actually happen. And what

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that is the FED regulates the banks

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to the annual stress test. Um, let's just say I

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's starting next year, they're going to grade on

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>an easier curve, and so you will see a higher

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>percentage of stock buy back and you'll see but but

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to let the banks buy back of

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>them income. You know, this year, y, you're able to

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>buy back a next year, I think there'll there'll be

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>something like so leverls are gonna start to inch up,

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on inch, so you know it's going to take

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>about a three or four years to to sort of

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>move the leverage anywhere in any meaningful sense. Do we

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>understand how big the banks are? One of the things

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I found over the years in the media is there's

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.799
<v Speaker 1>a complete misunderstanding of the scope and scale of these beasts.

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Revenue for JP Morgan Bill, revenue for City Group seventy billion,

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>operating income twenty three plus thirty four. Between the two

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of them, they have something like fifty seven billion dollars

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of operating income down income statement, is that your advantage

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>as an investor? Because we really don't understand the sheer

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>mass of these beasts. I don't know if that's you know,

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>people like to focus on that a lot um. You know,

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>they're big because the economy is really big. I mean,

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>so I don't pay all that much attention to it.

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>You know. One of the reasons why the big banks

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.919
<v Speaker 1>are so big today is that during the height of

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the crisis um the regulators basically begged some of the

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>larger banks to buy some of the other institutions. So

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Well's Fogleboat, Wacovia, um, you know, on and on and on.

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan is bigger because of what bear Sterns and

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Carebuich other institution it boy, but it port something else. Um,

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>so they were sort of stuck with it. But I

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>don't focus all that much on the size issue. I

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>focus much more on the leverage issue. Are we gonna

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>see our regional bank mergers? I think if we do,

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to first. So the stress test starts

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>at fifty billion in assets, So anybody in the stress

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>test but meaning fifty billion up ain't merging. My expectation

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is that that level, that number will probably go up

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to something like two hundred billion, and when that happens,

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll begin to see some mergers or some some fairly

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>significant size bags. But that's the first thing that has

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to happen. And to give you an idea of a

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion in the path, the two billion David City

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>groups total assets are one thousand, eight hundred eight nine

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 1>billion versus two. Again, the size issue is huge. I

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>know that you and Tom we're talking on TV about

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>these comments that Garry Cone made over the weekend at

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>this Group of thirty confab in Washington, d C. He

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>sounded declarion about clearing. He thought that that's particularly risky

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>at this point. A couple of weeks back, we had

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the new chairman of the CFTC sitting in the seat

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you're sitting in now, and he painted a fairly rosy

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>picture of his institution in the work that it's doing,

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>while commenting on the size, the immense size of the

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>derivatives marketplace. How at risk is that apparatus, that regulatory apparatus,

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and how far have we come from the financial crisis

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to now in terms of the power imbued into the CFTC.

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's ability to regulate that that massive space,

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's this is not my area of actorities. UM.

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think the derivative market is safer today

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>than it was, you know, the derivatives that you know,

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>lots of different kinds of derivatives. As there's interest rate swaps,

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think anybody really has a problem with. UM.

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>The area that was that was the problems credit to

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>fault swaps. That's a lot smaller to say than it was.

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I I gave an example UM in two thousand and sixteen,

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>between the end of January and February, the credit to

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.679
<v Speaker 1>fould swap spreads on Deutsche Bank went from a hundred

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>basis points to three hundred basis points and people started

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to freak out about that because that's an awfully big

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>move and reminded people of the crisis a little bit.

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And what they didn't know at the time was that

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the volume that was traded on that huge move was

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>seventy five million dollars now and during pre crisis on

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>such a move, the amount that would have been traded

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>would have been ten billion dollars. So it just gives

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you an idea of how much smaller than the credit

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to fuld s market is today. Stee, thanks for the visit,

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Steve icewand with this new today as we look at

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>bond markets and make note of his optimism. Overall his optimism,

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>he also did not mention when Selena Gomez will appear

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>with us to speak about Richard Taylor. And to that

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>reply on Twitter, Aty reached out talked to people. Effort

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>was she's a busy touring schedule. I was looking up

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma here David grew up and the presidential vote, Pama yes,

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and then I present Secretary Clinton got twenty nine percent

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of the vote, which the President got six of the

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>vote and Mr Johnson of the l Party got six

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>percent of the vote. But I find it interesting that

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Clinton got less than thirty percent of the vote.

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I did not know that he could bring in now

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.079
<v Speaker 1>the former U. S. Senator from Oklahoma. He's here to

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a decade in the U S. Senate, medical doctor turned congressman,

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>then Senator Tom Coburan joining us now on our phone lines.

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.199
<v Speaker 1>Tom quickly before I bring in the senator. One of

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>my favorite things about him was in two thousand and fifteen,

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>as his retirement date approached, he could tick off how

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>many days he had left until he was able to

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>leave the capital. A complex. Great to speak you this morning,

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Senator Cobourn. And let me ask you, as you've observed

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Washington since you left, over these last two years, how

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>much has has changed? How much is the story of

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>dysfunction of government in action the same as it was

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>when you left in two thousand fifteen. Oh, I think

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 1>it's the same. The last two years that I was

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate, there were seven amendments that were considered

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>on the floor. Uh, I mean, you know, and I

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>had several of those. Actually that was the last year.

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>The year before that, I think there were twelve. So

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the Senate had been shut down by Harry Reid because

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want to take hard votes. Uh. And so

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a disease that both Republicans and the Democrats have

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>is the next election is more important than the future

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of our country. And there are exceptions to that in

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>both parties, but by and large, the vast majority of

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>career politicians are more interested in the next election than

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>there are in terms of fixing problems. And the reason

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>what you even know that is who's working on the

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>medicure default that's coming, or the SOB security default that's coming,

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>or the SOB security disabilities already defaulted and we're stealing

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>from regular social security. Now, who's working on those things? Nobody?

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And so it means what they're doing is short term thinking, uh,

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that is politically beneficial to one party or the other,

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and in the long run, all the rest of America,

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>no matter which party is, loses. And that's why I left.

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Nothing was happening there that was going to fix the

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 1>real diseases, the real disease of our country, which is

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 1>we're spending money we don't have. We promised benefits that

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>we can't pay, and nobody wants to fess up and

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>start addressing man. How much of this is the responsibility

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of leadership? You mentioned that Senator read there if you

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>moments ago. Now, Mitch McConnell's in office, and in these

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>recent days we fre from a number of conservative groups

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>saying he needs to go. The Republican Party in the

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Senate shouldn't be led by by Senator Mitch McConnell. It's

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>time for some some new blood, some new leadership. How

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>confident are you that if he were to leave, if

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody knew where to lead the party in the Senate,

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we might see some of the changes you describe. I'm

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not confident of that. I'm not sure. You know.

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I would tell you that the vast majority of the

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Senate this career politicians. That's what they went into. I mean,

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>they may have some limitsed work to experience very early

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>in their careers, but most of them that's all I've

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>ever done. So I'm not certain that will happen. I

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>think you know, we're we're divided geographically, were divided, uh socially,

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>were divided fiscally. Uh. People who pay a small amount

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of tax thinks their taxes are too high. People who

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>pay a whole lot of tax I think their taxes

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.719
<v Speaker 1>are too high. But nobody's asking the question, what's the

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>acts that's gonna come on our children and grandchildren by

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>they're in action right now, so there's going to be

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing at the amount. You know, it's a hundred

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and twenty four threion dollars of unfunded liabilities it's going

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to be due over the next fifty years. Well, Senator,

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the great things about you, in

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>an oddity and rarity among human conditions, including our lovelies

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.599
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill, is the idea you went back and

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>got a medical degree at age thirty five? Is that right? Yeah?

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's something I think a lot of people

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>look at and are you kidding me? That's just outstanding.

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Where where do we go to get to compromise needed

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>for these big pieces of legislation right now Monday morning,

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at the failure in AFTA, We're looking at

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>some form of regurgitation of the Affordable Care Act, and

0:13:55.559 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the mystery attacks reform and and the nation all of

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 1>our listeners of all political persuasions are begging, begging for

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>doers like you are they left standing on Capitol Hill. No,

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I healthcare is going to fix itself, and that's because

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>greed conquerors technologic difficulties. And what we know is one

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>out every three dollars spent in healthcare today doesn't help anybody,

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't prevent him from getting well then, but doesn't prevent

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>him from getting sick, and doesn't cure him when once

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they are. So that's about one point three trillion dollars.

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And the one thing that's never happened since before World

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>War Two is we've never had real market forces working

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>because there's been no price discovery. And so one of

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the things I would suggest, if the Congress is gonna

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>do anything, just mandate price transparency everywhere. And well, did

0:14:56.160 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you laud the President for pushing this Debate Act to

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>people like you? Sure? Look, I travel around talking about

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>this all the time. I know a company in Tulsa,

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma is saving a quarter of a million dollars a

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>month right now, just based on price transparency, based on

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>an app that somebody developed to give them price transparency

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>for their employees. And so so you know, that's that's

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>three million bucks a year in their healthcare costs. And

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>so what my experience, tom is I delivered about Oh,

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many hundred Amish babies and took

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>care of Amish families, and they always bought health care

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>about thirty or five or less than everybody else because

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>they went and found out prices before they bought. And

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>so if we would just have price transparency all of

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, you know, Working's put out of an article

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in late April about the lack of competition of the

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>large hospital chains and how they increased the cost and

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>how we ought to have a significant antitrust activity going

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>after the large both nonprofit and profit based hospitals and

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>what that would do. The Federal Trade Commission has said

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the best care in the country at the lowest prices

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the position to owned hospitals. They've been banned under the

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Affordable CARA. I mean, let's let markets work, and if

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>we would, then what we would start seeing as ways

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>for people to figure out how to buy it cheaper.

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you and we need a safety that I'm

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>not benign that we need safety that we can do that,

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>but we don't you know. What we need is the

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>prices to come down, and transparency in terms of price

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>discovery will force a lot of that. What do you

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>say to the individual who has been relying on those

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>cost sharing steps these we see the President kicking this

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>over to Congress. It's up to them now whether or

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>not to appropriate that money. But there's some concern that's

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen. You describe the inaction on the

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill. Uh. Is that person not imperiled by what's

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>happened here? Yes, they are. But here here's a couple

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of things that are happening. Number one is they can

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>lower their cost by raising their deductible even further. And

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>if you had price discovery, most of that expense isn't

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be paid. Uh. They'll give you example that

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the typical hospital based m r I for the spine

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is about four thousand bucks. In a free standing clinic

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that does imaging it's about five So you see in

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>about seven to eightfold increasing costs. So if in fact

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>they could actually see what things cost, they're out of pocket.

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that's happening is direct primary care UM

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and David. The direct primary care for a family of

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>four is about twenty dollars a year. That's everything except

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>your hospitalization. So let them buy it. Let them buy

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 1>a hospitalization only policy, and that's about half of what

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the average deductible is today, and they're well on their

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>way to getting the preventative care shots, immunizations, getting stitched up,

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>getting broken arm thing. In other words, market will work

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>if we will allow and then we can create a

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>real safety for those that don't have the mean. But

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>remember this promise on Medicaid didn't gonna last because we're

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>not gonna have money to make it last. One final question,

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>if we could, senor very quickly here, how is the

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>support for the president and the President's Oklahoma? Is the

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>support us? It's solid, No, I think it's what he's

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>done is created a real division of between what he

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>says and what the press says. And of course most

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of the time they don't believe the press. I'm not

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>sure they all the time they believe him, but I

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>would tell you kind of throughout the country, what you

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>see is those people who voted for him, even though

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>at times they're embarrassed, they're still like the things that

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>the good Senator from Oklahoma heard Tom's talk of the

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>sooner has agreed to stay with us here for another

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>block on for surveillance. Senator Tom Coping before we send

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Tom Coping with us on our phone lines. And I

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>know you're on the Homeland Security Committee, Senator when you're

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>when you're in the in the Senate, and I wanted

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>to ask you just how you've observed the fallout from

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>these storms in the Caribbean and UH and and what

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you make of the government response so far the present.

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Now nominating somebody intending to nominate somebody to be the

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>next Secretary of Homeland Security. Well, I think that you know,

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>they learned from the large tragedy in the previous Houston

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and New Orleans UH hurricane. The problem in Puerto Rico

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>really wasn't getting the stuff there, it was getting it

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>distributed once it got there, UH. And they just weren't

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 1>capable drivers evidently to do it. But I think overall

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I get Homeland Security a good writing on how they responded,

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>how they pre staged things knowing that was coming, and

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>how they how they've got it dispensed. There's a long

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>time to go, a long way to go with both

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Houston and UH, the Southern Florida and uh Puerto Rico.

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 1>But overall, I think you know, those aren't easy things.

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 1>Government sometimes has tasked to do things that are very

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>very difficult. Something that that appears to be very difficult

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>has been the relationship with between the Congress and the

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>president over these last a few months. And I know

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that you enjoyed a fairly good relationship with the previous

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sit president. What what advice would you give this current

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>president about working how to work with Congress? How do

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you make that relationship better? Is it piecemeal? Let's it

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>go into the golf course one by one with with

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>members of the senatories. There are a better way to

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>understand how each of these institutions works and should work together. Well,

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I first of all, Donald Trump is

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a very complex, complicated guy, and uh it doesn't look

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>like he's gonna learning theory, doesn't appreciate appear to work

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>with him in terms of he does something good and

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>then steps on it, does something good and steps on it.

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh So I'm not sure. I think you just kind

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of got to take you Here's here's a guy that's

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna pop off and probably not smartly, but still does it.

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And it seems to recover from his base anyway. When

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>he does it, you know, I look deference and keeping

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>your mouth shut is oftentimes I had the feel a

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>problem with that myself, by the way. Uh, but you know,

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the real question is what are people's motives? And when

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you get into question the motives, then what your assumption

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>is is, uh, you're you don't have that same motive.

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'd say most people have well are well intentioned.

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>In the Congress, sometimes their politics gets in the way

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>of that, and I think you know what you do

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>is you count to ten before you react. And we

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen that much either from the President or other

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>people that he's talking to. Does Oklahoma? Does Oklahoma have

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a sanctuary city? Not that I'm aware of. Yeah, I

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say they don't. How do we get your

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the your neck of the woods back together

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:52.479
<v Speaker 1>with other necks of the woods identified by sanctuary cities.

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>How do we tom That's a great question. Uh. There,

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>But they're not looking at the real disease. They're looking

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>at the symptoms. Uh. The disease is rule of the law.

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>And what people in Oklahoma said, we're not anti Hispanic,

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not anti anybody. But if you have a law,

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>either change it and don't enforce it to eliminate it,

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>but if it's on the books, enforce it. And the

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.479
<v Speaker 1>former President Obama was really bad about that. He they

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>deferred on a lot of things that were not legal,

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>they just didn't enforce them. And so what happened was

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>is you got this big upright. I'll never forget the

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>first time I ran for the Senate, one of the

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 1>things I've heard the most was why didn't the rule

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of law being enforced? Because here's what ultimately happens. When

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the average Americans sees that the federal government doesn't enforce

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the laws that are on the book, then all of

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a sudden they start applying that themselves. Well it doesn't

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 1>apply to them, then then these laws don't apply to me,

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>and you have this breakdown. And it's one of the

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>key things that allows the republic to a vibe is

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>competence and the rule of law. So it's it's not

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not an issue of race. It's an

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>issue I think that's the problem. Would you suggest that

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>your competition, the Democratic Party, will come up with a

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>new Democrat Party that will tilt back towards the center

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and so many suggests will happen. Well, I think both

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>need to do that a little bit. I think they

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>need to come back with the realization that, you know,

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bernie Sanders movement, who's going to pay for the

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>student loans in medicare for everybody? But I mean, you know,

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a pipe drink. It's not out there. The capability

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to fund that in there. So you can think that, oh,

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>this is wonderful, but the reality is, we can't do that,

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and the markets aren't going to let us do that.

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>The markets are barely letting us do what we're doing now.

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And when we get back to normal interest rates on

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>our dead you know, our desk, it's going to skyrocket.

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, three interest rates coming next year

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and one more this year. And we're so short term

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>financed in terms of our our bar and as a country,

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>ultimately we're gonna get bitten by the and so you know,

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the Kents also need to compromise. You know, the Senate

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>was designed to force compromise. That's what the Philip was

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>all about. Let's sleep with their Sunday. We're gonna have

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to cut you off, thank you so much. The former

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Senator of Oklahoma, Mr Coburn, he notes Sooner's twenty nine Longhorns.

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. I'm looking at Eco go on the

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg time. I see the Empire Manufacturing Index out this

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>morning coming and higher than expectations thirty point to survey

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty point four. Help me make some sense of this,

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and then we can get near Dwight. And it's really

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>good to dearman Barbish this. Let me describe the chart

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and I will put this out on uh on on

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter for all of you Bloomberg Radio seeing it first,

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I gotta say, folks, it's to me

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a tertiary data point. It's like me too, and every

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>single bank has to do this. I believe they do

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it out of Buffalo for the New York FED. But

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>the answer is it's got a lot of information to it.

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>It is solid through two standard deviations going back fifteen years.

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>It's the first time it's ever done that, which is

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a good reason to bring in Neriman Barbish, always an

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>optimist with HS Global Insight. They did terrific uh work, Neriman.

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't really I I don't say that often, no,

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>but that I've got a series back fifteen years. That's

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>two standard deviations optimistic. Is the FED behind I I

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think so, Tom. I think I mean, this is

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>just sort of corroborates other data that we have that

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>suggests that the economy is on very solid footing. So

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>I think this is I don't you know, we can

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>debate about the pluses and minuses of various indicators, but

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>I think they're all pointing in the same direction, and

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where the Fed's coming from. In the end.

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it behind? You know, I don't think sup. Until recently, remember,

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>we were all worried about, you know, the strength of

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>its recovery, but all of a sudden, it's starting to

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>look like it's it's doing fairly well. So no, I

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's a fair assessment of where that F is.

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're not back to the high seen in

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand four David Gura, but we're getting there rapidly.

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's been on a diffusion index basis around zero.

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>We've gone from minus eighteen to plus thirty, which is

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a whole move nearon. Let me ask you what you

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 1>heard from the chorus of policymakers and bankers who were

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>gathered in Washington last week, and over the weekend we

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>had even as we've been discussing the IMF World Bank

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>annual meetings, there the Group of thirty banking for room

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. What's the what are the themes that you

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>pulled out of those meetings? Well, I read a very

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>interesting piece on Bloomberg this morning that suggested there was

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a split in this conference that the US policy makers

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and US bankers were fairly optimistic, whereas European policy makers

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 1>and bankers who are much more cautious. And I think

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that says something We've been We've been doing much better

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>than Europe for a sustained period of time, although we've

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>had our ups and downs, no question about it was

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Europe is still struggling to some extent. Their banks are

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>not as good shape as US banks, and so so

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>there is a sort of split, if you will. The

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Europeans worried as probably the way to say it, and

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>some of it because of political developments in in in

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the past few days, having to do with Austrian the

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Austrian election and so on, Catalonia, whereas in the US,

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>even though you know there has been a lot of

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 1>political uncertainty the senses that the economy, the banking sector

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>are all doing fairly well. This what's going on in Washington,

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So quite a difference in mood here. Yeah, David Gard

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Catherine Man, the O E c D. Said, yes,

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>she understood the optimism, and it's something that they bring

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>into their O E c D report in Paris. But

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>she was very cautious about all, you know, all multizing

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and the idea of the cliche of an escape velocity

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>has been had. She really pushed against the near and

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>how much of of of that change in sentiment or

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 1>bifurcation of Senate has to do with the regulatory landscape

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in each of these two places. Do do you think

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that there is a broadly speaking more optimism about the

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>regulatory landscape here in the US then in Europe? You know, David,

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a factor, There's no question. And

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I think bankers and other industries in the US are

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>feeling that the UH they will be facing a friendly

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>or business friendly or regulatory environment in the next few

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>years compared with the last few years, whereas in Europe,

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they set of the march towards greater regulation

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is with unrelenting um so I think that is definitely

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a factor. But I think, especially given that this was

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a gathering of financiers and bankers, the health of the

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>US banking system is much better than the health of

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the European banking system. Near an update your view on

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>investment in the next year, do we actually finally get

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a list in corporate investment? I think the answer is

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a cautious yes. And the reason is that global growth

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is strong now, stronger than it was a while ago.

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>The dollar has lost some of its strength, It's come

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>down a bit, although in just the last few days

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it's gone up a little bit. And so that combination

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>will will provide a couple of things. One is it

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>will make overseas profits of US companies UH greater value

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>m but but that it also provides an incentive for

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>companies to invest to meet foreign demand as well as

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>domestic demands. So our view is those two alone, aside

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>from the internal dynamics of the US, will help the

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>capital spending picture brighten a little bit. Now. I don't

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>want to get too carried away with the optimism, but um,

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>but hey, as you said at the beginning, I'm a

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:17.959
<v Speaker 1>half glass of halfus. But but but I think there

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>are a number of key factors that will drive a

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>little better story on capitalist Let's do this. Let's come

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>back and be totally gloomy with their parish of hs

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>as we consider where we are in this economy, and

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of course all of this front and center for the

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>FED calendar. Here on the middle of October, I should say,

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>six weeks away November one. Basically, Uh, David, I'm going

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to say at this point in non event, I'd love

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>for that to change December, as we're all eyes are

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>directed as well, and so good. Two meetings to meetings.

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>The next meeting is uh, what it's the It's Halloween,

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't it? I believe the next November, Lewyn, Yeah, I'm

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>working on my William mac chesney Martin Halloween all sat

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Janet as we call that what I should say. What

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a joy to see Stan Fisher at the IMF meetings,

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>his final weekend as vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve System.

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. It is good to speak to Neriman

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Bearish middle of October, setting up for the end of

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the year and in the next year. He's with I

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>h S. What I love about I h S is

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>they usually have three frameworks. Their center tendency they're optimistic Nerriman,

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>bearish tendency, and then the gloom tendency wrought by those

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>worried and worried. He is three percent run rate g

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>d P and any of your three tendencies Nerriman, Well,

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the answer is yes in the sense that briefly, if

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>there is a fair amount of stimulus that comes out

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of Washington. I don't only give that about probability, but

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>if it comes out of Washington, and if it if

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it's signed in a way that helps infrastructure, it helps

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>capital spending, uh, you know, grow at at a rapid pace,

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>then we could get to three. Probably not on a

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>sustained basis, but but for a few quarters. I think

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that's very much in the car. But there's a big

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>provisor if we get the right kind of stimulus, if

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>we get the right kind of tax cut. And what

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>what does that look like to you? What is the

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>right kind of stimulus, the right kind of of tax

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>cut is it? Is it anything like what's being bandied

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>about in Washington today. Well, as you well know, it

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>quickly gets political. I think in the end, you know

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>what's really required. You know, as we were talking about

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in the prior segment, what's really missing been missing in

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>this recovery is capital spending. You know, the consumers doing

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't her part. The capital spending has been very disappointing

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in many respects, and in particular spending on all this

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>new technology that's being developed. So, you know, my hope

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>would be the kind of investment uh encouraging enhancing policies

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>via the tax code and via other kinds of provisions

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that might uh in fact bring about this uh sort

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of unleashing of animal spirits, unleashing of the desire on

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the part of businesses to invest, an investment in particular

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of these new technologies. What we've been

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing is the tech sector is doing really well. I mean,

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the sense of productivity growth is good. They're you know,

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>they're investing in all these new technologies. The rest of

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the economy, which is by far the biggest part in

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of businesses, has not been And that's really what

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>we want to change here. And I'm detected here over

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>these last few weeks, even maybe maybe a few months,

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>last few weeks, more conversation about the role that technology

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is playing here are we are we seeing a seat

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>change moment here when policymakers are beginning to wrestle with

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the kind of technological change you're describing, well, I think

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the answer is yes, some of it is positive, some

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of it is negative. I mean, I think there is

0:33:56.320 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a concern rising in many quarters that the technology is

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>playing a bigger role but also has a bigger responsibility

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you know, the news aspects or faith

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 1>news aspects, in terms of you know, making sure that

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not quash squashing competition. A lot of worries about

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the size of some of these companies. So I think,

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the technology plays a big role in the

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>tech sector. I'm a big fan of the tech sector,

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>and yet you know, we have to start to look

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>at some of these issues because they are somewhat troubling. Yeah,

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and there, I mean, I look at productivity in the

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>in the overlay of it and all arranging debates. It's

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>something folks are really focusing on. As the beginner of

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:42.959
<v Speaker 1>coverage towards Davos in the World Economic Forum. What part

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of the productivity mix has your attention is ending at all?

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Including the new FED chairman. Hope The hope is the

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>word I use hope that productivity lifts. Well, there's no

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:58.800
<v Speaker 1>question that we all hope productivity will lift, and it

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>clearly plays a big role in terms of the overall

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>growth and long term growth of the economy. And it

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>matters to the FED a huge amount of the said,

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it's done a lot of studies on this very topic

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>over the last ten twenty years, you know, while Greenspan

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>was there after he left, and also on UM so

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>this is crucial. Now. How much the Fed itself can

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 1>do uh is really questionable in the sense that the

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:26.839
<v Speaker 1>interest rate policy alone will not do it. A lot

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 1>depends on the economic environment, a lot depends on tax policy,

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot depends on uncertainty. And this is the uncertainty factor,

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>which I think is a is a big deal. Policy uncertainty,

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>especially fiscal policy uncertainty, I'm convinced, has had a very

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>negative repect on capital spending. This is interesting you you

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you would wait policy uncertainty is businessmen wait to see

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in Washington, and you fold that right

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>into the productivity calculation. I think it is definitely a

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>part of it. I'm not saying it's the reason. I'm

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>all I'm saying is right now. It is a factor

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>because businesses, partly because of you know, the big recession

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>we went through a few years ago, but also partly

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 1>because of a lot of toing and throwing on fiscal policy,

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>have been rather cautious in terms of what they do.

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>They're not sure for examples environment that go with that.

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>But isn't the CFO of a company a lot more

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the artificial construct known as a yield curve? Now,

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>there's there's no question that financing is crucial here. But

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>but but but bear with me, Tom is you know,

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the interest rates are very low right now, and even

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:40.359
<v Speaker 1>if they're going to go up a little bit next year,

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the financing environment is going to remain quite friendly for

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies. So the question is, so why

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 1>aren't they spending like Gangbus? And I have to believe

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 1>there are other factors at play here, and I think

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the policy environment, fiscal policy environment is partly

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to blame. I don't I don't want to over emphasize

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that this thing is partly to blame. Let's look ahead

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of here to to do that is mentioned you're out

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with your your new outlook looking ahead to two thousand

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen. How does the consumer look at this point

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and how much of the health of the U. S.

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Economy is balanced on his shoulders at this point. Well,

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:15.359
<v Speaker 1>as we were saying earlier, the consumer is crucial here

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. Good news is things are going well. Uh.

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Income growth has been decent, Jobs growth has been decent.

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot of households have seen their net worth rise,

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:28.760
<v Speaker 1>not just because of the stock market, because the house

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>price is rising. Uh. And if you look at the

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>confidence surveys and consumers buy and large, yeah, it moves

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>up and down month to month. The buy and large

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>they're feeling pretty good about things. So this is good.

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>And I don't see that changing radically in the next

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>year or two unless inflation takes off or and the

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 1>FET has to really step on the brakes very hard.

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>So the good news is, I think the consumers. So

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>there is the bedrock basically of the of the U. S. Economy,

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and and that foundation right now it's pretty solid. I'll

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 1>ask you lastly here just about the dollar and dollar

0:37:59.880 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 1>weakness and the role that's playing in your forecast as

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you look ahead to two thousand eight. Do you have

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a clear sense of what this administration's dollar policy is

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and do you think we're going to see sustain weakness

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 1>in a In a word, no, I don't. I don't

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 1>have a good sense of where this administration is coming from,

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>because they've they've blown kind of hot and cold a

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit on this. I think in the end they

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't mind seeing the dollar a little bit weaker because

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it will serve help exports, it will help narrow the

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>trade deficits in the United States. But again, there's not

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot that either the Fed or the Treasury can

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>do about the dollars. The dollars very much market driven.

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Unlike other economies like China's, we don't control our currency,

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 1>so we have to live with the the ups and

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>downs in the market. And up until very recently, people

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>were dollar bullish, but then they turned a little bit,

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 1>partly because of the strong growth overseas. People started shoot

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 1>their focus to other parts of the world, so the

0:38:56.920 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar weakens. That was a miscall the summer by so

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>many people, and of course as we wander into a

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 1>seventy or eighty degree autumn, we keep waiting for the

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>turn dollars stronger. Here Over the recent days, the d

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 1>X y one nine shows that one week two week

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 1>dollar strengths we've seen Nerman BEARVERSH. Thank you so much, David.

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>That was great. He's without HS. I should say that's great.

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just to pars Away. You can't do that enough, don't.

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 1>You can do it all the time, but you gotta

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:28.800
<v Speaker 1>keep your eye on the basic economy dynamics. And I

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have a strong view three two point eight percent.

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to see that. The empire statistic that David

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Gura mentioned earlier was buoyant to say that least. Thanks

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you refer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene David Gura.

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that David Gura before the podcast? You can always

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.