WEBVTT - US Says Framework for TikTok Deal Reached

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Lovelow in San Francisco.

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 3>Coming up a framework to keep TikTok running in the

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 3>US reached and Donald Trump Warren out the details with

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Shijingping later this week.

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Plus, Elo Musk buys millions of Tesla shares following the

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 4>board's unprecedented pay proposals, and.

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 3>US Energy Secretary Chris Wright joins us later this hour

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 3>to discuss his big European swing, powering the AI revolution

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 3>and much more.

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, big swings still being taken in the market. Ed

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 4>nine straight days of gains on the nasback one hundred

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 4>longest winning streets is November twenty twenty three. We are

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:57.639
<v Speaker 4>at a new record higher up six ten percent. You're

0:00:57.640 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 4>looking at the individual stocks underneath this.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a very busy start to the week in

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 3>the world of technology. Elon Musk has bought a billion

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 3>dollars of Tesla stock.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 2>We will discuss it in the show.

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>It was on the same day that we spoke to

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 3>the board chair of Tesla Alphabet parent of Google has

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 3>joined the three trillion dollar market cap club and shares

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 3>are at all time high.

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 2>We'll get to that lage one two.

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 3>Then news a framework has been reached between the United

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 3>States and China for a deal that would allow TikTok

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 3>to continue in the United States. The market reaction was

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 3>in shares of Oracle. Let's understand why bringing Bloomberg Senior

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Tech editor Mike Shephard in DC.

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 2>So, we don't know a lot.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 3>We know a frameworks in place, we know the President

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 3>of the United States. We'll meet with g on Friday.

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 3>They'll discuss it. What else do we need to know, Mike?

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 5>The things that we need to know are pretty much

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 5>that a lot of the details remain unknown at this point.

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 5>We have not heard from the Chinese side yet to

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 5>confirm that they also view that a framework deal is

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 5>in hand that would allow TikTok's US operations at the

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 5>least to stay running. We don't know what the terms

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 5>are of the transaction, what Beijing would be willing to

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 5>hand over, and that includes ed the algorithm. This is

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 5>the recommendation software that is really viewed as a crown

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 5>jewel of TikTok's operations. Globally, and the question has always been,

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 5>would Beijing allow Byte Dance, the parent of TikTok, to

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 5>part with at least some of that recommendation software to

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 5>US based buyers. Unclear whether that's going to happen, and

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 5>unclear whether the terms of this transaction will satisfy the

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 5>national security terms. That the Chinahawks who pioneered the legislation

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twenty four, are requiring the divestiture by by

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 5>edance of TikTok or a ban, whether they will be

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 5>satisfied by whatever they see a lot. We'll ride on

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.279
<v Speaker 5>this phone call Friday between Xijiping and Donald.

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 4>Trump ed and boy, Mike, is there a lot to

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 4>discuss between Jijingping and President Trump and not just TikTok,

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.559
<v Speaker 4>but in video or another key chip within this whole negotiation.

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 4>And we understand that China is ruling that in Video

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 4>in some way is being deemed well a monopoly or

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 4>at least violating anti monopoly laws. Can you take us

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 4>up to.

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 5>Speed, Well, you know, Cara, the announcement today from China

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 5>from their state competition agency that found in Nvidia violating

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 5>anti monopoly laws in the country. It's no coincidence. The

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 5>relationship between the US and China is very tightly orchestrated

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 5>and stage managed, and this ruling that was announced earlier

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 5>this morning really is a message to the US going

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 5>after the most valuable company in the world, provider of

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 5>the chips that are powering the AI revolution that are

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 5>seen as essential not only for meta platforms and all

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 5>the other US hyperscalers, but a lot of other Chinese

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 5>companies that have favored the H twenty chip, for instance,

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 5>in building their own model that the Trump administration has

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.839
<v Speaker 5>recently given back permission to Invidia to resume sales of

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 5>that chip. But now we are seeing this headwind for

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 5>Nvidia in China, and it will be a test of

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 5>the transatlantic relationship not only for Donald Trump and Chi Jianping,

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 5>but also for Nvidia CEO Jensen Wang, who has cultivated

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 5>ties in Beijing as well, trying to ensure that his

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 5>company still has a sizeable enough footprint there to compete

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 5>with the likes of Huawei.

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 6>So we'll be.

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 5>Again watching this phone call on Friday between Trump and

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 5>she to see what is also said about Nvidia. Remember,

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump and Jensen Wong have forged this relationship a

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 5>close relationship, and he is betting on a Nvidia's success

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 5>as part of the administration's broader AI program.

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 4>Carol Mike Shepherd wrapping it all up from Washington. We

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 4>so appreciate it. Let's dig into what the investor sentiment

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 4>is like. Tiffany Wade, senior portfolio manager at Columbia thread Needle,

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 4>joins us in. Tiffany, if I just don't care ultimately,

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 4>and video is down about one and a half persore,

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 4>but it rallied more than six percent last week, and

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 4>you could say it's just a bit of profit taking.

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 4>More broadly, markets that are record high and focused on

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 4>the FED, should they be more worried about this tit

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 4>for tat China US.

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 7>I think that's a great point. In videos down a

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 7>little bit today. There was also headlines related to China

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 7>looking at some analog semi companies for dumping earlier in

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 7>the weekend. Those docks are barely down as well. So

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 7>I think what that's telling you is that investors think

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 7>that this is more of posturing by China in relation

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 7>to trade talks, and that there's not going to be

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 7>a significant impact on these companies' earnings over the long

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 7>term that it's really just posturing Tiffany.

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Another piece of news this morning the President posting on

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 3>social media that American companies should not be subject to

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 3>quarterly reporting, they should report earnings every six months, and

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 3>the President also acknowledged that would be pending authorization by

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 3>the SEC. But if somebody in the markets, would you

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 3>just react to that piece of news from the President please?

0:05:59.279 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 7>I think this is an interesting one, and there's arguments

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 7>on both sides of this. The you know, European regulator

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 7>only requires companies to report every six months, so there

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 7>is a model for this or a framework for this.

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 7>From a company perspective, it likely reduces some of the

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 7>reporting requirements for them, some of the reporting burdens for companies.

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 7>But I think from an investor perspective, what it does

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 7>is reduces volatility for or it reduces visibility for investors

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 7>since we have less information points from companies. Potentially also

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 7>increases the sort of information disparity between investors institutional investors

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 7>in retail investors, and then potentially also increases volatility because

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 7>you have less touch points with the companies, you know,

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 7>perhaps a greater disparity between estimates and actual numbers from

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 7>the company that could increase volatility around reports.

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 3>I love it in the context of data points. At

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 3>the top of the program, we had the headline that

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 3>alphabet has joined the three trillion dollar market cap club, right,

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 3>and if you think about the story at earnings, it

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 3>still was the Hyperscalers sharing with us their capital expenditures

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 3>plans a data set. You know, how would this idea

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 3>impact those kind of soft data points that now the

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 3>market really relies on.

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's interesting for the Hyperscalers and for the company

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 7>as they're developing AI models because they use data. Right,

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 7>the more data, the more powerful the models become. So

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 7>especially with regards to models that are maybe intended for

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 7>a financial analysts or that are intended to help analysts

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 7>with research, less data means less robust models.

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting is there's always this anxiety that the amount

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 4>of data, the amount of compliance means that it puts

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 4>off companies going public. For last week, we had the

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 4>busiest week for IPOs of a sizable nature in about

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 4>four years, according to some. So what do you make

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 4>of just this weighing up of demand insatiable investor demand

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 4>on one side, with compliance and overbearingness.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 7>On the other Yeah, I think we've had a tremendous

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 7>year for IPOs. This is certainly in contrast to the

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 7>last three years.

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 2>So the IPO.

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 7>Volume so far through the middle of September this year

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 7>is larger than it was for the full year of

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 7>twenty two, twenty three, and twenty four. So definitely some

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 7>pent up demand from companies that have wanted to go public.

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 7>I think it reflects certainly capital markets being open, you know,

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 7>stocks are at all time highs. Also a little bit

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 7>of improved investor sentiment around the confidence in the economy

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 7>as well as.

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 4>An asset manager should you be buying in. Initially the

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 4>barb was very high. Companies had to be profitable, they

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 4>had to be showing growth on the bottom line as

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 4>well as top line, But of late that seems to

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 4>be pushed out the window too.

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you're definitely seeing some of that. The growth stocks

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 7>coming back to market with no earnings or you know,

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 7>earnings in a couple of quarters or free cash flow

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 7>in a couple of quarters now is back certainly a

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 7>good indicator for companies and that growth yer part of

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 7>the economy that investors are willing to invest in. Some

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 7>more speculative companies, but we've also seen IPOs in the

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 7>last couple of weeks in the consumer space. There's another

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 7>one coming this week in the energy space that seems

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 7>to be very well subscribed. So it's not just in tech,

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 7>it's really across the board.

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 3>Tiffany, I want to end the conversation going back to

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 3>where we started today, which is the relationship between the

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 3>US and China. We have a framework for a TikTok deal.

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 3>The President will speak by phone with Ujingping on Friday

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 3>and in video is.

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Caught at the heart of this negotiation.

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 3>How much you expect politics and political volatility to play

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 3>into markets, particularly for technology, in the balance of this year.

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 7>I think technology is going to continue to be sort

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 7>of a hot spot for tariff negotiations, especially with China.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 7>It's kind of the biggest bargaining chip that both countries

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 7>have with each other. So I don't imagine that the

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 7>volatility around that will will quiet down, and it might

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 7>even continue into future years, depending on how the Supreme

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 7>Court rules on the AVA tariff.

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Yep tiffany Way, if Columbia freadneed or handling every single

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 3>new item of the day that we threw you, thank

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 3>you very much. Now coming up, Elon Musk buys about

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.319
<v Speaker 3>a billion dollars worth of Tesla shares. We're going to

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 3>explain why and also how next.

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk responded to an unprecedented pay proposal from the

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 4>Tesla board bym buying about one billion dollars worth of shares.

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 4>As you see, we're up six percent on the back

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 4>of that demand. Let's bring in Billium, Meg's Global Auto's

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 4>editor creatredel for more, who is also part of the

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 4>Elon Inc. Team. Just showing boldness, showing a support for

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 4>the company that investors seem to like.

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:42.719
<v Speaker 9>Here.

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 4>How did he orchestrate it on Friday?

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean he did it in the midst of

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 10>you and ed talking with Robin Denholm at Tesla, the

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 10>chair of the company. There's clearly a sort of coordinated

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 10>effort on the part of Musk and board to really

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 10>generate excitement about the future of this company at a

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 10>time when there's a lot of reasons to be really concerned.

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 10>Right in terms of the here and now business, we

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 10>continue to see signs of of you know, really difficult

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 10>demand issues. You know, we heard from Denholm that you know,

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 10>the board downplays the extent to which Musk is doing

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 10>damage to this brand with his politics and his involvement

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 10>in that realm. But he then proceeded over the weekend

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 10>to you know, do more politicing that you know, I

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 10>think raises a lot of eyebrows, particularly here in the

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 10>UK right. And so just how much there's really sort

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 10>of meat to this optimism I think is going to

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 10>be the question in the months to come.

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 3>So Caroline and I were explicit with Robin Denholm in

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 3>asking how did you the board define politics or political activity?

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.079
<v Speaker 3>Let's get some of what she She responded.

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 11>With as from a personal perspective in terms of his

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 11>political motivations, etc. Is up to him, I mean, clearly

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 11>from our perspective as a board, we're measuring him on

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 11>results and measuring him on what he does as a

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 11>CEO of TESLA.

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 3>So part of the reason we pose that question is

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 3>because literally in the days since the proxy hit in

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 3>the comp package was proposed, Musk has been very active

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 3>on X talking in particular Craig about UK politics. That

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 3>accelerated over the weekend. What's the latest.

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, this very far right convicted criminal Tommy Robinson puts

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 10>on this march that I think, you know, did surprise

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 10>a lot of people with how many people showed up.

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 10>Of course, we should note there was a substantial counter

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 10>protests that showed up for this as well. But a

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 10>lot of you know, anti Muslim rhetoric, a lot of

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 10>sort of you know, talk about this idea of civil war,

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 10>which we've heard Musk use.

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 2>That sort of rhetoric before.

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 10>We've you know, on the backs of this heard you know,

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 10>Cure Starmer's spokesmen and others in Westminster really you know,

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 10>express alarm about this sort of charge language that we're

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 10>hearing out of Musk. And you know, I think we're

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 10>also in the US, of course, hearing over the weekend

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 10>from the governor of Utah where Charlie kirk Kirk was

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 10>assassinated last week talk about the sort of evils of

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 10>social media and so on one hand, I think you know,

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 10>from those comments that that Robin denhol Holme gave, it's

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 10>clear that the board is willing to give pretty wide

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 10>latitude in terms of what Musk is up to on

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 10>a political basis. But if they're measuring four results, there

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 10>are indications that this is not helping Tesla's brand.

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's global cars are crazy delh thank you just very

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 3>quickly to buy those billion dollar shares. Musk used a

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 3>revocable trust. Quite a few of you reached out to

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 3>me to ask about that. It means that the trust

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 3>can be changed in Mus's lifetime. It's a pretty normal

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 3>tax focused tool that billionaires in the United States used

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 3>largely for inheritance planning. Another story, last week, Oracle founder

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Larry Ellison momentarily surpassed Elon Musk to become the world's

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 3>richest person. The shares of the tech giant surge starts,

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 3>posting a major increase in bookings, putting Ellison top of

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 3>the list, at least for a day.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 12>Here's the breakdown. For a few hours last week, the

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 12>richest person in the world wasn't Elon Musk. It was

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 12>Larry Ellison, whose personal fortune suddenly skyrocketed.

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 13>Larry Ellison's net worth soared by eighty nine billion dollars.

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 13>That was the biggest one day game ever recorded on

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 13>the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 12>The cause of this giant leap the company Ellison co founded, Oracle,

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 12>just had a bit of a moment.

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 14>Oracle shares half search pre market after the company posted

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 14>a major increase in bookings and gave an aggressive outlook

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 14>for its cloud infrastructure business.

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 12>Oracle made its name selling database back in the late seventies,

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 12>but in recent years it's become a tech behemoth thanks

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 12>to the key role it plays in cloud computing, and

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 12>it's that demand for cloud services that has driven the

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 12>company's recent stock surge.

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 13>Oracle's cloud computing business is really in demand by AI companies.

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 13>That's essentially allowed it to reframe its narrative around AI

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 13>and to ride the stock boom that's been connected with

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 13>other AI companies.

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 12>On September tenth, it was revealed that Oracle made a

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 12>deal with open Ai, the creators of chat GBT, worth

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 12>three hundred billion dollars.

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 13>And I think a lot of investors and analysts are

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 13>assuming that if it can do deals like that, there

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 13>will be more coming down the line. So if you've

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 13>been paying attention to Oracle, this has actually been a

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 13>while in the making. The last several quarters, this has

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 13>been the story of their earnings.

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 12>After years of sluggish growth. Oracle's revenue is expected to

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 12>take off thanks to the race for AI computing power

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 12>that sent sales in its cloud infrastructure unit Soaring. The

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 12>new deal with open Ai builds on a critical AI

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 12>agreement announced in July.

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 2>This is an non precedent cloud deal.

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 8>I mean, this is likely the largest single cloud deal

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 8>I ever signed.

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 13>Ellison and Oracle are part of a half a trillion

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 13>dollar announcement called Stargate that Trump made several months ago.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 13>It's a partnership between Oracle, Open Ai, and soft Bank

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 13>and the goals to build data centers for AI across

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 13>the US, and Oracle will be a key computing power

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 13>provider for that initiative.

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 12>Well, the likes of Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 12>have all vied for Donald Trump's attention, Ellison seems to

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 12>have succeeded in nurturing a lasting working relationship with the

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 12>US President.

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 8>I have a high respect for Larry.

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Iis in to somebody I know.

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 5>He's been really a terrific guy for a long time.

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 12>While Oracle's share price has tripled in the three years

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 12>since the arrival of chat GPT, the AI revolution wasn't

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 12>enough to keep Ellison as the world's richest person.

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 13>So this was a brief flirtation with the top spot

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 13>for Larry Ellison. He was surpassed by the end of

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 13>the day Wednesday by Elon Musk, again, who has been

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 13>in first place in the Bloomberg Billionaires Index for much

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 13>of the year. There are questions of how long this

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 13>boom in AI stocks can last. A lot of investors

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 13>have expressed concerns that at least some of these companies

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 13>are overpriced at this point, and there are fears that

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 13>if the economy starts to slow down that we could

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 13>see a pullback in these stocks. And of course, if

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 13>that happens, the billionaires whose wealth is tied to these companies,

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 13>including Larry Elson, will see a concurrent fall in their fortunes.

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:33.479
<v Speaker 13>Musk stands to potentially leap far, far ahead of all

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 13>of his billionaire peers in the coming years. It was

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 13>announced recently that Tesla's board has approved a one trillion

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 13>dollar pay package from US. He has to meet several

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 13>very ambitious milestones in order to get all of that money,

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 13>but if he does succeed in doing that, it could

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 13>make him the world's first trillionaire. And there's no one

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 13>else who would come anywhere close to that level as.

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Of right now.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 4>Boy, if we talked about that pay package at length

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 4>time now for Talking Tech and first up Sony Pictures.

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 4>Demon Slayer was the most popular film at the box

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 4>office this weekend, and it is that a new high

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 4>for the Japanese anime genre. It earned Sony million dollars

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 4>in the US and Canada, having already grossed about two

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 4>d eighteen million dollars worldwide going into the weekend. Plus,

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 4>Snap has a new operating system for augmented reality glasses

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 4>singly in the company is getting closer to launching a

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 4>consumer version of the device next year.

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 4>Snap OS two point zero includes an overhaul browser and

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 4>updated ar app. Snap is competing with the likes of Meta,

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 4>Apple and Google in Space and Charmi Well, it's aiming

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 4>to take on Apple with its later smartphones coming out

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 4>later this month. Currently, Charmi only has a silver a

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 4>sliver of the premium smartphone market globally, but it is

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 4>well positioned to make games in China, where the release

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 4>of Apple's i'vephone air it's been delayed.

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm going to bring you a story that broke

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 3>late Friday. Apple's Robbie Walker, one of the I film

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Maker's most senior artificial intelligence to executives is leaving the company.

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 2>That's according to sources.

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Walker's exit adds to an exodus of executives and engineers

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 3>from Apple's AI division, going to bring in Bloomberg's Global

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Consumer Tech Managing editor Mark German, the story broke Mark.

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 3>What was this executive's function and role that makes it

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 3>so notable that it's the latest and another departure from Apple.

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 15>Walker was in charge of Siri. It's as simple as that. Yeah,

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 15>he was leading Siri for the last several years, but

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 15>he was demoted out of that role in the spring

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 15>when Apple realized that it would need to delay its

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 15>new Apple Intelligence upgrade for Siri for upwards of a year.

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 15>And after that Walker was removed from his position. His boss,

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 15>John jen Andrea was removed from overseeing both Siri and

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 15>Apple AI robotics teams, and more recently, Walker has been

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 15>overseeing a team known as Answers Knowledge and Information. It's

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 15>called a KI internally. This is a new team spun

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 15>up Underwalker, and this group is responsible for helping build

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 15>a new AI based web search tool that's coming next year,

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 15>designed to compete with both Perplexity people. Going on to

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 15>Perplexity to do searches. Right, You've seen Google traffic go

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 15>down on Apple devices and favor some of these AI apps.

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 15>So Apple wants some skin in that AI web search game.

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 15>So he's been leading that or parts of that, and

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 15>so his departure is quite notable. And more broadly, he's

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 15>on the senior staff of John Jane Andrea. He's one

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 15>of a few people who are leading the company's overall

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 15>AI initiative.

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 4>And of course, time and time again, you many others

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 4>have been talking about how Apple is seeing me behind

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 4>on the general of AI fight, but they're trying to

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 4>remind us all of their prowess when it comes to

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 4>innovation from what things look like feel like. Talk to

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 4>us about the product innovation they've been talking on.

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, you know, Apple on this last keynote, it didn't

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 15>allow any distractions. It didn't raise prices, it didn't talk

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 15>about tariffs, it didn't talk about shipment delays, it didn't

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 15>talk about AI. It focused just on the core competencies.

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 15>That's hardware, that's design, that's engineering. None of the distractions

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 15>were there. All the focus is on these new devices

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 15>coming out on Friday. Except as you mentioned, the iPhone

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 15>air delay in mainland China, which is a whole other story,

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 15>but for all intentsive purposes, Apple's focusing on what it

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 15>needs to focus on, and it's probably setting up itself

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 15>up for a very solid holiday period.

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 4>Another really well read set of reporting for Markoman. We

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 4>thank you all Things power.

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 2>On Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Two technology stories is told through the markets. The first alphabet,

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 3>parent of Google, has joined the three trillion dollar market

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 3>cap club, joining Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The market is

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 3>talking about the idea that that antitrust ruling when in

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 3>its favor, not having to divest Chrome is a big catalyst.

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 3>But remember in earnings Google cloud platform really taking market share,

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 3>so there's momentum in that name. But it's a milestone

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 3>in technology history. The other big one, and actually this

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 3>is the most read story pretty much on the Bloomberg

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 3>terminal and on the website, is about BYD. So BYD

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 3>has seen it shares for all about thirty percent over

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.479
<v Speaker 3>the last four months from all time highs that were

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 3>hit earlier in the year.

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 12>And Caroline, what a reverse wind story.

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 3>We started the year talking about how BYD was overtaking

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Tesla in all these markets like Europe, and Asia, not

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 3>just with EV.

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 2>But hybrid as well.

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 3>That chart says things can reverse a little Tesla outperformance

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 3>in recent weeks byd really slumping. Check it out on

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg dot com.

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 4>You should and also look like to talk more about

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 4>China and particularly the trade talks with China, because US

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 4>Treasury Secretary Scott Bessen said a framework to keep the

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 4>TikTok app running in the United States has been reached

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 4>that President Trump and she can speak to complete this deal,

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 4>though the blueprint that's pretty unclear. Let's bring in Bloomberg

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 4>social media reporter Alexandra Levigne. What's really interesting, Alex is

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 4>we've been very close before. Remind us of how close

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 4>we came, but like six months ago, well.

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 16>We came extremely close back in the spring. I think

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 16>it was a couple weeks before the deadline had been reached.

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 16>Vice president of Vans said we are very close on

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 16>a high level deal, and then days before President Trump

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 16>basically said we are at the finish line. And then

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 16>within days the entire thing had all but imploded because

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 16>talks over tariffs between US and China had basically escalated.

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 16>So even though it could potentially be an exciting week

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 16>for TikTok and also for the roughly half the country

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 16>that uses the app. There is still a lot that

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 16>we don't know.

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 3>In the time that we've gone to air, there have

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 3>been these headlines from China's side confirming that this frame

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 3>works in place. So we have it from China and

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Treasury Secretary Besson and basically the negotiators for China is

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 3>saying that this is a good framework for both sides,

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 3>but that China won't sacrifice its principles for this TikTok deal.

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 3>I noted earlier in the show that one of the

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 3>reactions to the news was Oracle shares rising remind us like,

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 3>if a deal goes through, who is going to own

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 3>and operate and run TikTok in the United States.

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 16>So, again, the terms of the deal are still unclear. Oracle, though,

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 16>has for many months been floated as one possible leading

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 16>contender here among other US investors. Oracle would make a

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 16>lot of sense potentially because Oracle and TikTok have this

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 16>pre existing relationship. They had been working together in the

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 16>past on something called Project Texas, which was essentially a

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 16>program aimed at helping TikTok secure and separate all of

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 16>TikTok's US user data in the United States and keep

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 16>it basically separate from by Dance's global operations in China.

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Alexandra Levine, I have a feeling you'll be back

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 3>to talk about a TikTok deal in the days and

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 3>weeks to come.

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Stormtroopers from Style Wars, vlogging with a selfie, Steak Dogs

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 3>hosting a podcast. Such AI generator videos are taking over

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 3>social media subs, shooting for news and other kinds of

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 3>creative content all over our feeds as we enter the

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 3>early stages.

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Of machine generated media.

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 3>The debate has been centering around the impact on Hollywood,

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 3>but what about its impact on social media? Bloomberg BusinessWeek

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 3>editor Bradstone takes a deep dive in an essay. It's

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 3>hard to summarize, but basically, everywhere on social media there's

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 3>AI generated video. There are more tools than ever available

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 3>to do this, and we explain the industries that are

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 3>being hit. But you've penned it in some detail through

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 3>some case studies.

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 17>That's right, and you miss babies being interviewed. That's a

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 17>new one these days. But look, this is our an

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 17>opening essay for our screen Time issue, and I wanted

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 17>to examine you know, what I'm seeing and what a

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 17>lot of my friends are seeing in their social media feeds,

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 17>and it is really incredible.

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 2>A rubacon has been crossed.

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 17>I think back to this summer when you have this

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 17>video of bunnies bouncing on a trampoline everywhere on TikTok,

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 17>everyone are on Instagram. People thought it was real, and

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:06.120
<v Speaker 17>then there was an examination in the comments how one

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 17>bunny seemed to disappear, and in fact it was a

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 17>creation of a twenty two year old named Andy Kozovski.

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 17>He did it one night when he was bored. The

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 17>key here is Google's tool VO three. What's different about

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 17>VO three is it's not only raised the bar in

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 17>terms of video generation, but it has also raised the

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 17>bar in terms of audio generation. You can enter in

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 17>a few prompts, you can enter in a script, and

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 17>essentially you know the dogs who are talking, the babies

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 17>who are talking. Not only are they saying the written dialogue,

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 17>but their lips are moving. So it's really kind of

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 17>a perfect deep fake.

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 4>The twenty two year old basically made that funny disappear

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 4>on purpose to create the discussion around all of it, Brad.

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 4>But what's so interesting is he's really strong on saying

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 4>this is democratization as we see it. How much is

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 4>it upending actual creators work. How much we see Hollywood

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 4>adopt and embrace this or not this case?

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 17>Maybe, I mean it's really starting on social media. We

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 17>saw what the Hollywood strikes a few years ago, a

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 17>great resistance among the industry around the embrace of AI.

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 17>Now we are seeing that begin to change. I mean recently,

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 17>Amazon or a studio affiliated with Amazon, announced it would

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 17>be finishing orson Wells's film The Magnificent Amberson's using AI

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 17>to recreate some lost scenes. So it's beginning to see

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 17>about But you know, we're looking at the dog.

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Podcast right now.

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 17>That's a Montreal company called dog Pack App. They're trying

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 17>to market themselves and they've got dogs talking.

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 12>It's kind of cringe.

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 17>The humor is very dad joke, but you know people

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 17>are responding to it. You kind of see it everywhere

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 17>on social media right now.

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 4>Who doesn't have a dad joke? Bradstone, brilliant opening piece.

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 4>We're all so excited about screen time, thanks very much. Indeed, meanwhile,

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 4>coming up we can be talking about startup line of sciences.

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 4>It's aiming to turbo charge scientific discovery with guess what

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 4>using AI. Of course we'll talk to the CEO about

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 4>the latest funding round. It's big. There's a series as

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 4>a Bloomberg tech.

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Startup, Lilah Sciences has just closed a two hundred and

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 3>thirty five million dollar Series A funding round. The company

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 3>aims to create what it called scientific super intelligence by

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 3>developing AI that runs thousands of scientific experiments at once.

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring in Jeff on Molhal's the co founder and

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 3>CEO of Lilah Sciences. That is an eye catching Series

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 3>A and I think the best place to start, Jeff

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 3>is just with the basics of explaining what it is

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Leila wants to do. Because you know, maybe the money

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 3>gives credibility, it gives you the news headline, but there's

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 3>a very specific focus that you have.

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 6>Yes, first of all, thank you for having me. Lyla's

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 6>mission is the reason for this fundraise. Our mission is

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 6>scientific superintelligence to solve humankind's greatest challenges. That is, of

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 6>course a lofty mission, but what it means is that

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 6>we're trying to build a kind of beautiful mind that

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 6>can be a polymath across fields of science, materials, chemistry,

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 6>and life and become super intelligent within them by running

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 6>the scientific method itself.

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Jeff, we became accustomed in twenty twenty four to these

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 3>very large series a's all over the world, actually, particularly

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 3>those focusing on specific models.

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Why do you.

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Need that level of capital from the beginning, What is

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 3>it that requires that capital to be deployed?

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, First of all, I realize it by saying scientific method,

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 6>I've either given euphoria or PTSD to audience members that

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 6>may have enjoyed or not there most recent science class.

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 6>So what's special about Leilah is the realization that AI

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 6>is now positioned to be able to run every single

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 6>step of the scientific method. Scientific method is the most

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 6>valuable wheel that has ever existed, and the reason for

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 6>scale capital is running the scientific method at scale is

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 6>going to lead to scaling laws for scientific intelligence that

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 6>will go beyond what's possible with scaling laws of the

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 6>Internet and previous human knowledge alone.

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 4>Jeff, It's interesting where you stand. We've just seen the

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 4>interesting investors coming on board and the pension money, the

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 4>big pockets wanting to put money to work, But ultimately

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 4>call me a cynic. We've had an awful lot of

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 4>scientific AI companies coming in offering a new world of

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 4>medical advancement. Why are you different? It seems to be

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 4>something about the.

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 6>Lab so that the mainstay of scientific AI companies are

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 6>sitting in a small niche of science focused on a

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 6>specific application. The insight that led to Lilah is the

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 6>same kind of inside that led to the modern scaling

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 6>laws and ascent of large language models and reasoning capabilities,

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 6>which is that we no longer need to compartmentalized science

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 6>into a whole bunch of tiny subdomains, but instead one

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 6>can build a single kind of mind that can operate

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 6>across an immense diversity of scientific fields and pull new

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 6>knowledge into that single mastery of the way that the

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 6>world around us works. And we believe that this is

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 6>going to open up incredible frontiers across those subdomains and

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 6>between those subdomains in medicine, energy, new climate technologies, and

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 6>a lot more.

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Jeff, we started this conversation by saying that Lilah focuses

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 3>and running thousands of experiments at once using a.

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Single AI model.

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Is this you taking advantage of quantum compute? To do that,

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 3>or accelerated computing or both.

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 6>Primarily the ladder for now. But if you wild a

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 6>beautiful mind for science, it needs a new kind of body.

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 6>And those who are training only on data sets of

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 6>the past are going to hit a ceiling of scientific intelligence.

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 6>And that wheel of the scientific method, of course, has

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 6>been in human minds and hands for all of our existence.

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 6>And we believe the paradigm of what you're seeing behind

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 6>me allows science to ascend into a higher intelligence, higher scale,

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 6>and higher speed. And the implications of that are that

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 6>we're going to be able to pull inventions out of

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 6>the future like has never been possible before.

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 4>Wow, when you start announcing some of the pay customers,

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 4>you've got to come and tell us about it. Jeff

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 4>On Meltson, we appreciate it. Co founder and CEO of

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 4>LAE of Sciences. Now, let's talk about Macado Leebra las

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 4>In America's e commerce and fintech giant, just got a

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 4>new CEO. Ariel Schafstein, will be taking on the rains

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 4>January after Marcus Galprin, who co founded the company led

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 4>it to become the region's most valuable firm. Well, he's

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 4>handing of the reins and let's just hear about what

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 4>the incoming CEO had to say. When asked for his

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 4>vision for the company for the next ten years, he

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 4>spoke in his first exclusive interview with international media as

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 4>incoming CEO.

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 9>I think we've done tremendous things over the first twenty

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 9>six years, but the opportunity for us in the next

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 9>twenty six are equally big or even bigger and what

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 9>we've done in the first era of Marca Olive. I

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 9>think the opportunity to continue increasing the size of our

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 9>ecommerce business through ecommace. Penetration in retail is still very

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 9>big in Latin America. Digital advertising is nascent in Latin

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.959
<v Speaker 9>America and we are convinced that we can drive growth

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 9>in that atmosphere. And last but not least, fintech. Right so,

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 9>financial inclusion in Latin America is still pending, and we

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 9>can beat the probable lists of the process of bringing

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 9>more people into financial services across the region, as we

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 9>have been doing over the last few years.

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 4>The US and the UK will sign an agreement to

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 4>make it quicker for companies to build nuclear power stations,

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 4>but the countries will use safety assessments of reactor designs

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 4>from each other to fast track their checks. The announcement

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 4>comes as President Trump prepares to travel to Britain tomorrow,

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 4>with more economic deals expected to be announced. Already in

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Europe doing deals as US Energy Secretory Chris Wright, exactly

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 4>the person we want to talk to about the opportunity

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 4>of nuclear, particularly in our world of AI. How quickly

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 4>do you think it'll be brought online in the US

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 4>or indeed the UK, because your timeline is fast. It seems.

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 14>It's aggressive, Caroline, And that's President Trump. You know, he

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 14>came in fall in on nigular energy. And we will

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 14>have reactors, these next generation small module reactors critical next year.

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 8>In fact, I'm pretty confident will.

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.879
<v Speaker 14>Have one of them before July fourth of next year,

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 14>and several more.

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 8>During the year.

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:08.879
<v Speaker 14>Now, it's not the back ended electricity production, but it's

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 14>the whole nuclear system running demonstrating how it will work.

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 14>I think this expedite final permitting and sales and commercialization

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:17.240
<v Speaker 14>of the reactors.

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 4>It's going to move fast, not just fission but fusion

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 4>as well. Just how optimistic are you there? Eight to

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 4>fifteen years I saw? Is that realistic? And how self

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:29.759
<v Speaker 4>dependent would that make? The US for what five gigawatts

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 4>designs that we're currently seeing just coming from Oracle and

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 4>Open AI alone super exciting.

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 14>I worked on fusion energy in college forty years ago,

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 14>and we've seen steady progress for the last forty years,

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 14>mostly at the national labs at the Apartment Department of Energy.

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 14>But with AI and commercial fusion companies coming into space now,

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 14>the pace of innovation is faster than ever before. Yeah,

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 14>I believe we will know the commercial pathways to fusion

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 14>during the Trump administration, And as I said, I think

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 14>we'll see commercial electricity from fusion energy on could be

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 14>as fast as eight years, and I'd be very surprised

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 14>if it's more than fifteen coming.

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 8>It's coming and into exciting.

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Secretary, right as you travel across Europe and heads to

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:19.439
<v Speaker 3>the UK, what kind of instruction has the president given

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 3>you to put these energy deals in the context of

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:25.280
<v Speaker 3>national security and defense.

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 14>I think the President has talked from his campaign that

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 14>his goal was prosperity at home and peace abroad, and

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 14>he understands instinctively that both of those are intimately.

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 8>Tied to energy.

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 14>You need low cost, abundant, affordable energy at home to

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 14>lower costs for Americans and make businesses thrive. That's the

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:51.439
<v Speaker 14>same agenda overseas. Here I am in Europe. They're very,

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:54.240
<v Speaker 14>of course, shocked at what happened with the Russia invasion

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 14>of Ukraine and their energy dependence on Russia.

0:36:57.280 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 8>Everybody gets that as a mistake.

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 14>They want to switch that dependence from Russia on the

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 14>United States.

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:05.439
<v Speaker 8>We are bringing them assurances.

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 14>We can continue to wrap up natural gas exports into

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 14>Europe as a safe, secure partner. And of course there's

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 14>huge enthusiasm for American nuclear technology over here. You want

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:18.439
<v Speaker 14>to get your energy and your key strategic inputs from

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 14>your allies and not your adversaries.

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 3>When President Trump took office, he pledged to cut electricity

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 3>price in half within twelve months.

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 2>For everyday American secretary.

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Right in the time since the president's been in office,

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 3>electricity prices have risen ten percent. Is he still able

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 3>to make good on that election pledge? And how does

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 3>he get that?

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 14>Look, the President is a very ambitious, aim high guy.

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 14>He is absolutely committed to lowering energy prices in the

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 14>United States. We've seen that in gasoline and diesel and

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 14>oil products.

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 8>We're seeing screaming increase in.

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 14>US natural gas production and prices as well not rising

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:05.760
<v Speaker 14>at all. Electricity grids harder. It's just long time frames.

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 14>Long time frames change that whole system cost. But if

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 14>you look at it on a microscale, the President is

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:16.240
<v Speaker 14>ready to permit, and we are permitting immediately electric generating

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 14>capacity that will be less than half the cost of

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:21.280
<v Speaker 14>the stuff that was built under.

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 8>The Biden administration.

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:24.959
<v Speaker 14>So are we adding new capacity on the grid that's

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 14>less than half the cost of the Biden administration?

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, the presence Adam it about that.

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 14>For that to filter in, for the whole grid cost

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.280
<v Speaker 14>to come down imediately, that will take some time.

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 8>For rest assured. We're driving as hard as fast as

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 8>we can.

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Sanctuary, right, You've been driving hard and fast when it

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 4>comes to well updating. It feels like the Department of

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 4>Energies view on what to use when it comes to

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 4>energy sources, and in particular, I'm thinking about the thought leadership.

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:54.320
<v Speaker 4>Back in July, you put forward what was a report

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 4>it was deemed about the threat of climate change and

0:38:56.520 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 4>said basically it's exaggerated. Now that working group has been disbanded,

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 4>many have been critical of some of the findings. Do

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 4>you still stand by those findings that were ultimately saying

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the well climate views were wrong about

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 4>the speed of which the globe is getting hot, or

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 4>at least.

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 14>Actually no dispute at all about temperature and sea level data.

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 14>What we did was just popularize the data that the

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 14>climate alarmis and the politicians don't want to popularize. Ninety

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 14>percent of what's in our Climate report is in the Inner.

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 8>Governmental Panel on Climate Change reports.

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 14>I've been studying this issue for twenty years, so quite

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 14>familiar with it. Five fantastic scientists produced that report, and

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:43.280
<v Speaker 14>of course environmental groups that don't want in ofst and honest,

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 14>fact based dialogue about climate change sued over silly procedural

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 14>thing about the paperwork for one of the five. And

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 14>instead of fighting this in court, the climate scientists, I'm

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 14>sure they'll still respond to the questions. We've opened a

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 14>real dialogue about climate change, and that's exactly what we

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 14>wanted to do, and I couldn't be happy about it.

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 14>It's funny I go on more and more shows talking

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 14>about climate change and no one wants to ask me

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:09.359
<v Speaker 14>any questions about climate change.

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 4>I'll keep climate change. I'll ask you, because why did

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 4>your department undertake it in such a way it seemed

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 4>to that the study wasn't following usual procedures like the

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 4>omb's guidelines on science reports.

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 14>Now, this is when you publish a technical paper. When

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 14>you publish the paper, that's when the dialogue starts. We

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 14>wanted to publish This was from no scientists at DOEE,

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:33.360
<v Speaker 14>although we did.

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 8>Do peer review at DOUE.

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:38.759
<v Speaker 14>These are five independent scientists that we said, please write

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 14>a report. It just sort of summarizes the big picture

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 14>about climate change, so we can publish it, open it

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 14>up for public comment, and we've got tons of comments.

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 14>Lots of them are silly. But what you can see

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:53.879
<v Speaker 14>from the substance of the comments we received as there's

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:58.760
<v Speaker 14>very little disagreement with the data we published on temperature data, sea.

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 8>Level data, and models.

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:05.719
<v Speaker 14>People are complaining around the edges, or mostly complaining around Yeah, but.

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 8>The future might be different. That's true.

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 14>We don't know the future, but I heard twenty years

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:13.280
<v Speaker 14>ago that future might be different.

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 8>We're just publishing the real data on c level rise, on.

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 14>Temperature increases, on the effects of kerbon dioxide in the atmosphere,

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:25.320
<v Speaker 14>which makes the planet creer a little bit wetter. It

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:27.879
<v Speaker 14>kind of changes a real thing, but it's just been

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 14>so wildly exaggerated and misrepresented, and it's made the kind

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 14>of scientists that go on TV only the most dramatic

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 14>larvest ones that make TV us.

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 8>Most of the honest, sober ones are in the background.

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 8>We're bringing into the.

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Forefront US Energy Secretary Chris Wright, currently in Vienna, but

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 3>continuing through Europe. Thank you very much for joining us

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Tech. Just a quick update and video shares

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 3>have swung from a pretty notable decline to positive territory.

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 3>You remember the story broke this morning that China's market

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 3>regulator had said that in Video violated anti monopoly laws

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 3>on the twenty twenty acquisition of Melanox. That was a

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 3>bargaining chip pardon the pun, right carrot, in the context

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:11.359
<v Speaker 3>of these US China talks that are happening, and it's

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 3>a big week in that context.

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 2>It is.

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 4>I remember it was a big week from video stock

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 4>last week. I added about six percent, So maybe there's

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:19.839
<v Speaker 4>just a been a profit taking earlier today. That does

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:21.959
<v Speaker 4>it from this edition of Bloomberg Tech. But don't forget

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 4>to check out our podcast. Find it on the terminal

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 4>as well as online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart. From

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 4>New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Tech,