WEBVTT - The Best of Bloomberg Opinion

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the best of Bloomberg opinion. I'm Vonnie Quinn.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>The divining event of two was undoubtedly Russia invading Ukraine February.

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>The war force continues latest tally's estimate, more than forty

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>one thou people dead, more than fifteen thousand missing, and

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>about fourteen million displaced. The invasion that chocked the world

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>saw Russian troops entering Ukraine from the northeast and south.

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Two months following that, I spoke with Ukrainian philosopher Vladimir

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>your Malenko in an effort to grasp the enormity of

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 1>what had happened. How do Ukrainians understand Vladimir Putin? If

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>he were to be removed by his own people or

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>an outside force, would Russia look different. I'm not sure.

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure it will look different. Obviously, the problem

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is not only putting it himself, and if there is

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a replacement for somebody else, most probably will have the

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>same personality or even the worse personality, although it's difficult

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to imagine worse. So Ukrainians do not have any illusion

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>with regard to this. We understand that Russia in its

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>current form is seeing itself as a wounded empire which

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>tries to, you know, regain what it understands this past

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>glory and conquering Ukraine or even annihilating Ukraine. Ukrainians independence

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and Ukrainian self consciousness is one of the key elements

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for restoring this empire. So for us, it's a real

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>existential fight. We understand that Russians want to conquer these

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>territories and have the Ukraine without Ukrainians. You wrote a

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>threat attempting to put into words why Russians hate and

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>humanize Ukrainians so much. It's producing a lot of cognitive

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>dissonance that Russia wants Ukraine to sort of come back

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>into the cradle. And at the same time there's so

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>much hatred directed at Ukrainians, which Vladimir Putin maintains come

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>from the same Soviets nest as you like. I think

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we have to understand that Russia is not a nation,

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it's an empire. So an illusion that sometimes you see

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it in America in Europe is to consider Russian generation

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>as a kind of a nation state, where for example,

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:29.679
<v Speaker 1>there are Russians living with certain homogeneity ethnic, cultural, linguisticy, etcetera.

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>It's not the case, especially actually a continental empire, which

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>conquered so many different technicities, which has its colonies inside

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>its body. So it also considered Ukrainians and Belarusians as

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>part of this kind of imperial body. And when it,

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, sees Ukrainians saying that no, look, we are

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>not Russians. We are a different nations with different organization

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of society, culture, language, etcetera, this produces very difficult feeling

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in Russia because it believes that Ukrainians and Delusians and

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 1>Russians is the same construct, the same nation, and every

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>deviation from this Russian nation, as they say, is an

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>example of Nazism, you know. So I think that they

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>are legging behind in developing their own national identity. Their

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>concept of empire means that empire doesn't have borders, Empire

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is always expanding. Ukrainians developed this idea that well, this

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is our land. We have certain borders. We don't want

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to go any further these borders. But here inside our borders,

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>we organize our society in the way we like, and

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to expand anywhere. And so a lot

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of where when people talk about a Soviet identity as

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a Ukrainian, what does that make you think is that

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>relevant to the current train. Well, in Ukraine, obviously there

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>are people who have some kind of nostalgia about Soviet Union,

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>but much less than in Russia. Russia really developed a

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>political project of coming back to this glorious Soviet past.

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian political imagination is not centered on the past. It's

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 1>centered on the future. For Ukrainians, the past is a

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>very traumatic thing. So basically Russian slogan was we can

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>do it again, meaning the victory in the Second World War.

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Our major slogan is never again, which is kind of

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a slogan also common with Europeans. Why Russians are developing

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>this idea of ruleski mere Russian world, it's also an

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>artificial construct to replace this idea of Soviet people. There

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of artificial invention in which every particular

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>group will be just assimilated into some kind of utopian

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Soviet people, which is very artificial. Let's talk about NATO

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 1>for a second. Do Ukrainians accept that Ukraine cannot be

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>at least as the world is now part of NATO. Well,

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.559
<v Speaker 1>public opinion polls show support of NATO membership is very high.

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>It has never been as high as now over seventy.

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, what is NATO. Nature is

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a security guarantee, and Ukrainians do need this because they're

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>living with such a monster neighbor. We understand that nature

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>is composed of many different countries, and you need consensus

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to get Ukraine into nature. Maybe it's better to have

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:44.799
<v Speaker 1>bilateral security agreements with the United States, with United Kingdom,

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>with Poland. The second thing is that Ukrainian army can

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>be very efficient and in a way Ukraine can turn

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>into kind of a security provider, not only security recipient,

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for other countries. So I imagine, for example, Ukraine in

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the future to be a kind of a country which

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>will share its military and security experience with other countries

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of the world, maybe with NATO members. Do Ukrainians understand

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>why Vladimir Putin might feel threatened by NATO. No, Ukrainians

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>don't understand it. So we just look at the map

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of Russia and we can't understand how Russia can be

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>encircled as they say, or fear the attack of NATO

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But the problem of Putin is that he

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>creates a reality which he constructs in his imagination. So

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>his propaganda was saying that Russia is not waging war

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>with Ukraine on Ukrainian territory, but with the United States

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>and nature. This was his propaganda for the past eight

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>ten years. So basically Putting created a reality which he

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>first invented in his head. And now this is the

0:06:56.279 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>reality that Ukrainians do have military support from the West

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it. Has the West lived up to

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>its expectations in the eyes of Ukrainians. I mean, there

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously have been attempts from the very beginning to punish

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Russia and to help Ukraine, But has it been enough,

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly since Ukraine has always looked West, has looked for

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>leadership and guidance and inclusion. Look, Ukraine was not taking

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>seriously all all those years. Our warnings were not hurt.

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So when we were telling the West that after Russian

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>invasion of Georgia, Ukraine will be next. After Ukraine, nature

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>countries will be next. When Ukrainians were warning Europe that

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.679
<v Speaker 1>dependency on Russian gas and oil exports is very bad,

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>we were warning Europe at least since two thousand and six,

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>We were not very much hurt attentively, and I think

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that Ukrainian self description as a kind of both the

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>land of the Western civilization and which is fighting against

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>something barbarian, undemocratic and the enemy of the civilized democratic war.

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>This self description is now more and more accurate, and

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>therefore the West should stop looking for compromises. Once it's over.

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Will Ukraine still want to be part of the likes

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of the European Union and other Western institutions, Yes? Why not?

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Why why shouldn't it strive to these institutions. So of

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>course it wants to be part of nature, part of

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the EU. But at the same time Ukrainians understand that

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>European Union has been made possible because security was guaranteed

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>basically by nature by United States since the end of

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the Second World War, and Europe concentrated its efforts on welfare, economy, equality,

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>human rights, etcetera. Unfortunately, Ukrainian situation is different. We will

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>be for decades with the country neighboring Ukraine a nuclear

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>power which WANs to destroy us. Therefore, we should think

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>primarily about our security, whether we are in nature, whether

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>we are in the EU. So I think that after

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>our victory, Ukraine will be a kind of a country

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>with very strong state presence in the security sector and

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>quite liberal economy, Vladimir, do you understand how Russia might

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>continue to be part of institutions, So, for example, the

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>U N. Security Council. I mean, it's out of the

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Human Rights Council, but it's still very much part of

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the United Nations. And in a far flung future, maybe

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>not even that far away, you might have to work

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>with Russia. I mean your own president has said that. No,

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand it. Frankly, I don't understand how U N.

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Security Council as an institution can function after these events.

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>It's unacceptable that any country of the world has a

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>veto power. If it's not able to reform itself. United

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Nations will be over as organizations. But you do accept

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that Russia, and it's one forty four million people, is

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>not going away, and at some point when this is

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>resolved somehow, it's still going to be a major player

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>on the world stage. Look, we don't know, because if

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>my interpretation is correct, and Russia is not a nation

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>state but an empire, Russia is the only empire that

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>survived the twentieth century, or the only European empire that

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>survived the twentieth century. But it doesn't mean that it

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>will survive the twenty first century. If you look at

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Russian interpretation of what's going on, they basically admit that

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>if they do not expand, they will collapse, as it

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>collapsed when the Soviet Union dismountled, and therefore the war

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine is so existentially important for them. Ukrainian philosopher

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Volatimer yo Malenko in April, this is the best of

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg opinion. You're listening to the best of Bloomberg opinion.

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Vonnie Quinn. Just more than six months after the

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>start of Russia's war on Ukraine, the man who presided

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>over the end of the Soviet Union died, the President

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Reagan and I of the Treaty on the Elimination of

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Intermediate and Short Arrange Muscles. Nikail Gorbachev won the Nobel

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Peace Prize in for quote the leading role he played

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in the radical changes in East West relations in the

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>scheme of history. However, his was a complicated role. I

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>spoke with Bloomberg Opinions Clara Ferra Marquez about the complex

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>legacy of the man who ended the Cold War. Clara,

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>what for you is the lasting legacy of Michael Gorbachev?

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really interesting and a far more

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>difficult question. And I think a lot of people realize,

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and particularly in the West, where we have a very

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>particular view of Gorbachev and what he did and what

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>he represents for many of us at the end of

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the Evil Empire, it's in reality a lot more complicated.

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>So he was clearly a man of the system, a

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>man who wanted to work within the system. Obviously, he

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>did not start out to collapse the Soviet Union. That

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>was unintended consequence largely of economic and this school reforms.

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>He changed the world. He was able to end the

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Soviet Union largely peacefully, and that is remarkable. But also

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that a lot of the ill conceived economic

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>reforms that he brought in, the chaos that he left

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in his wake, allowed kleptocracy to take roots, and in

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>many ways he is responsible for where Russia is today.

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Russians too, of course, putain many of us in the

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>West who supported the system, but the economic plundering that

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>was possible was to a degree because of right, there's

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more of a complicated legacy than just

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>he presided over the end of the ussr absolutely think

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>about him as a bit of a political rule shact test.

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, to us in the West, he's the man

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that Margaret Thatcher said she could do business with the

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Many and the former Soviet States, he's the man that

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>brought down the wall. But for Russians, and I think

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in particular what matters for us as we look at

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>this today is really what he means for the Britain

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>regime and for them, he is the man who lost

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>an empire, the man who brought national humiliation to a

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>great nation. And I think that's really very very important

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in undis ending where we are today. So just to

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>go back to Paristoica and Glass nows those reforms were

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>life changing events, countries, state changing events. Were there any

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>remnants of what Gorbach had introduced, Well, now that's a

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>difficult one. I'd say almost no. So if you think

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>about the three things that he really wanted to bring,

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>he really wanted a thriving economy, he wanted openness, and

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>he wanted democracy, and under putin, all three have been undone.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>But the concept of Parasto and the concept of glass

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and stars slightly different, and they are self reinforcing. Glass

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>means transparency, clarity, It was about openness, and really that

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>began very strongly after ch a novel which was a

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>failure of the system that kept so many secrets. And

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Peristoia was the reconstruction. So that's what Pedistroian means, to reconstruct.

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>And what happened, in fact is so relevant to today

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>because when he started to unpicket, he found that the

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Soviet Empire was also on nothing. It was built on violence,

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it was built on lies. And really that's what we

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 1>will find with the Putin regime. Archie Brown and The

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Guardian said, Gorbachev was asked a couple of years ago

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>what has epitaph should be, and he replied, we tried.

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 1>He was devastated, apparently by the war, and at the

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>same time, Clara, he must have seen this coming in

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>some ways. I don't want to compare it to other

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>rises and falls of other regimes and so on, but

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>in some ways these things are visible in advance, right

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and certainly in the case of Russia, this was potentially

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily visible, especially to a statesman like Gorbachov, who then

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>handed off to Yelson, who then handed off to Putin.

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, in terms of thinking about the collapse of

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet system. Two things are important. One is that

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>they themselves think about this. Beijing thinks about this, So

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Beijing spends an awful lot of time studying paristoric again

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>because going back to the Rulesha Act test, it really

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>says everything about fishing and not much about Mihil Gorbachev.

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>The second thing is just in terms of the visibility.

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>So when we look at the Soviet collapse, the most

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>important thing is really to think that what was obvious

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>was that it would come to an end. It wasn't

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>at all obvious how it would come to an end

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>or when. And I think the same as through today.

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>We have an extremely brittle system and a system that

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is hollowing itself out, stagnant economy and impossible plundering of

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>resources at the top of predicting when that can end,

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is almost impossible. You mentioned that Beijing

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>studied Paristroiker. What lessons did Beijing learn from this study?

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>What so called errors of Paristroika would Beijing seek to

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>try and avoid. I mean, interestingly, I would argue they

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>take all the wrong lessons from this. They look at

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>gorbashof I mean, obviously there were violent incidents, but by

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and largely was averse to violence, and Beijing sees certain

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you think they once made a comment about,

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you know that the iron grip that gorbashof did not have.

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>They really see this assay of demonstration that forces required.

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>If somebody wants to pull out of your empire, you

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>pulled them back in by force, and obviously that's what's happened,

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>for example with Hong Kong. The other thing they think

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>about it as economic and political reform, which comes first,

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and they really see as a problem that what happened

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in Russia was that political reform was done first, so

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that there was openness, there was an ability to discuss

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the errors, and everything was out in the open, and

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>they see that's as fundamental, but it is. It's a

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>really interesting study because it has chain and show over time.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>So Clara, you would have seen this happening when you

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>were a youngster in school and so on, but you

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>did arrive in Russia not that long after some of

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>these changes were enacted. What was it like. Was it

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a free and open society where there was a view

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>towards market economics and so on, or was the Yellson

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>era already showing signs of Strain. I think what the

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Alton era really showed was that we were heading towards

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the sort of personalist, kleptocratic system, and at the time

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it perhaps wasn't so obvious. We saw a different direction

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of travel. So I arrived in Russia in August nine seven,

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>so just before the financial crisis the year after, and

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it was a time that was extremely chaotic, extremely painful

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>economically and also quite violent. To be clear, this was

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>not an easy time at all, but it was a

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>hopeful time in the sense that people did see something

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>better down the line. They were sort of living through

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>this period, even during the crisis, which is absolutely catastrophic.

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd say a lot of that has been reversed, the

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>hope in particular, but also this idea that we could

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>escape stagnation. Take the auto industry or take the aviation

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>industry for example. Clara Putin, How would Vladimir Putin have

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 1>been shaped by the events that Mikhail Gorbachev oversaw. I

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>think there are two very important events I think important

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to understand where Puttin is today and the plistical man

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that he is one is effectively nine eight nine, he

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>was the young KGB officer in Dresden, in Germany, and

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>there's an episode that he's written about. He was at

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the KCB headquarters and there was a mob approaching, and

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>he was desperate to preserve what was inside, and he

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>called the Red Army and he asked for reinforcements and

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>they said we we haven't got to orders from Moscow,

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>so you can't do anything. And then they said something

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.719
<v Speaker 1>that stayed with him, which is they said Moscow is silent.

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>And this particular phrase for him was really a sort

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of demonstration of powerlessness. It was a humiliation. He felt

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the country no longer existed, and he wanted to reverse

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>this destruction of an emph He said later that the

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand years of our work was Undone the second important

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>moments is that he did consider the role that a

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>collapsing economy place. So for him, macroeconomic stability was and

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 1>remains absolutely crucial, and he very often positions himself in

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>contrast with the chaos of the nine nineties. Obviously, that's

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>very ironic given where we are today with the Russian economy,

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>where he himself has pushed the economy back to pretty

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:30.919
<v Speaker 1>much that period. How is Gorbachev seen by the majority

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of Russians? If there is a majority opinion one. Well,

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Russian's opinions on quite complicated and it depends to some

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.239
<v Speaker 1>extent what age you are. But I think for a

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>long time he was actually completely ignored. He was a

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>fringe figure. He complained about the Prutain regime. Though I

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>would say that he saw Ukraine in Russia's orbit the

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 1>way that prusin. I mean that doesn't mean he advocated

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.239
<v Speaker 1>an invasion. In fact, he clearly spoke up against it,

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't have a radically different view. I think

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>it's important to understand the role that political deaths play

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>in the regime like this, the political death funeral, the eulogy,

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole pageantry around it is not about the person

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>whose diet's about those stuff behind. The tributes have been

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly as you would expect. So Frutin criticizing the failures

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that he is now undoing, so the loss of empire,

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>but really glossing over some of the failures that tell

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you a lot about the region today. So for example,

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>excessive military spending, for example, the misadventures in Afghanistan, or

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the stagnating economy, all of that he will not talk about,

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>so he will use it in that sense and really

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>succeed the sort of Soviet tinged nostalgia. That is the

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>only thing that the current regime has to replace ideology,

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and they cannot pull the country together on the basis

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 1>of ideology, so they've gone back to a lot of

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the old Soviet imagery, the old Soviet narrative. Bloomberg Opinions

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that Clara Ferreira Marquez, this is the best of Bloomberg opinion.

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the best of Bloomberg opinion. I'm Vannie Quinn.

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>The war on Ukraine is having devastating effects. Beyond the

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>crucible of the war itself. The impact on global food

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>supplies was immediate and vast, thanks to port blockades, sharp

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>increases and prices, and countries implementing measures to protect domestic supplies.

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Food security, particularly in North Africa and the Asia Pacific

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>regions particularly impacted early in the food crisis. I spoke

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>with Boomberg Opinions David Fickling for an assessment of the

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>potential damage. I think we're approaching a quite unusual turn

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>in the sort of history of global food security. To

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>be honest, if you look back at the long history

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of this, you know one of the crucial things that

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>helped keep the world fed over the past fifty years

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>while the world population has doubled, is actually trade. People

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot about the growth of sort of chemical

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>fertilizers and farm machinery, which have both been very important

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>in the twentieth century in keeping the world fed, but

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>trade is a really important part of that because, of course,

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>if you have drought and crop failures in your region,

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>then there's no amount of fertilizer or farm machinery that

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>will solve the fact that your crop just won't grow.

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>So a really important thing that I think is underappreciated

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is that the cost of ocean freight in the nineteenth

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>century dropped by about and so you suddenly have this

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.719
<v Speaker 1>global trade in grains and about a quarter of all

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the calories we consume it and now traded across borders.

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 1>So it's very important that this is a global trade.

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think something's undappreciated is that it's quite a

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>concentrated trade. The world's bread baskets are rather few. There's

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>probably about six of them the US Midwest, the South America,

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of Argentina, Brazil, that area, areas of western Europe,

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>and the Ukraine and the former Soviet Union and Russia,

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think most importantly the playing between the Indus

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Ganges in northern India and Pakistan and eastern China,

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>between the Yank Sea and the Yellow Rivers. Those six

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>read baskets are absolutely crucial to the world's growth. Of

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>these relatively few number of crops that we depend on, wheat, rice, corn, soybeans.

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>More than half of wheat and rice and corn are

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>grown if you put those those areas together, soybeans disclosed.

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Now for most of the time, that's not too much

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of a problem because although there's just half a dozen

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>of these bread baskets, if you get a draft in

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>one region, it tends to pair with good rainfall and

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>another region that leads to higher crop yields, because essentially

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 1>the rainfall has to go somewhere. It evaporates on one

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 1>side of the ocean, it tends to drop on the

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>other side of the ocean, And when we talk about

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>things like El Nino and Landinia, that's essentially about rainfall

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>ending up in different places. However, as the climate is changing,

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that is getting a lot less secure

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>than it has been in the past. The weather has

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do with the fact that there's going

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a shortage. It is not just Russia's war

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine. Absolutely one of the world's top three wheat producers.

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>May be slightly surprising in fact, is India. You don't

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>think of India as a big wheat producer because there's

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.719
<v Speaker 1>not a big wheat exporter normally, because it's almost all

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>consumed at home. What we've seen in India over the

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 1>past a couple of months, we've seen this very extreme

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>heat wave and that has caused India to embargo exports

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of wheat. Places like the Middle East. They were very

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>dependent on wheat from Ukraine. That's obviously been damaged by

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>the war in Ukraine. The places they were hoping to

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>get their wheat supplies from with India, but now injury

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is not supplying that either. Obviously you see these high

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>prices in the US as well, So you really see

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>how some relatively small changes, and especially if you throw

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>gear politics in the mix, as with the war in Ukraine,

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>suddenly what looked like a decent spread of food baskets

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>can very quickly that are rather short. You also point

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>out on a recent piece food dependent nations can import nutrition,

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>but they must have the foreign exchange to pay for it,

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and we know that because of the dollar strength, that's

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in short supply in many of these countries. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and of course a weak currency becomes a problem for

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>especially the poorest in the country, even if there is

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the availability of imported nutrition. I mean, another interesting example

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>you look at Brazil. Brazil recently not a country that

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you really associate with a sort of open trade policy,

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>but they've been drastically cutting the tariff rates essentially to

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>zero for all food imports. The eye of values, of course,

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that the inflation is very high in Brazil, and it

0:23:58.359 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 1>is a problem for people in Brazil that they can

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>afford to eat. Well. That is a decent policy approach,

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:05.959
<v Speaker 1>but the problem is it's not nearly sufficient, because if

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you look at the way the real the currency has

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>fallen in recent years, Brazili the big food producer anyway,

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's probably not going to lead to any increase

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 1>in food imports because Brazilians simply can't afford the market

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>global price of food. Now, David, how bad does this

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>get in terms of people actually starving people in places

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you might even associate balmon and food and securityers. The

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>past few decades mostly have been an extremely successful period

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of bringing down rates of under nutrition under nourishment. That

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 1>progress continued to slow down through but then just in

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and then particularly twenties, since of course the covide pandemic,

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>we've really started to lose ground on that. Now part

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of that is essentially driven by the pandemic and driven

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>by incomes. People don't have the money to spend on

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>food that they used to have, but it's not just

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>because of that, and I think particularly at the moment,

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>we see all sorts of factors a eading to a

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>much more insecure environment for food. Clearly, you have the

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>crop failures that we're seeing. We're in the third year

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of a Landinia event, which causes all sorts of disruption

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to the food system in that way, that's why you

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of these low yields on crops from

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Latin America. That tends to be the case with it

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>with a landing near event. On top of that, of course,

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>energy prices are very high and that pushes up the

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>cost of fertilizer, so that's another thing that decreases yield.

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>And then you throw into the mix the war in

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine is a factor. Ukraine and Russia are both big

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>food exporters. Then you can add some of these export embargoes. Obviously,

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, an interesting one was India's wheat embargo follows

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>very rapidly on the heels of an export embargo in

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Indonesia for palm oil, which has actually now been revoked,

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>but went on for a while. Injury is one of

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the biggest importers of palm oil. India needs palm oil

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>for basic nutrition for Indians. They lose that nutrition from Indonesia.

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>They embargo their wheat exports elsewhere, and you see these

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>knock on effects everywhere. Malaysia embargoing exports of chicken, but

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 1>of course you've got an ava influenza atbreak around the

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>world at the moment, and the price of corn, which

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is essentially the price of raising chickens, is also very high.

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So there are all sorts of impacts like this. Can

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the World Food Program, for example, do much about this? Well,

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>traditionally that's exactly what the World Food Program is for.

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, it's its origins essentially are as a

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>US export program. It's deep origins are in World War

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 1>One when Herbert Hoover was seeing sort of famine in

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Belgium and decided to use some of the US's significant

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>agricultural surpluses to solve that problem. So that is what

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the World Food Program does. It uses the agricultural surplaces

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>from from the US and to a lesser extent, Europe

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>as a way of applying supplementary nutrition around the world.

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>That works as long as you don't have these simultaneous

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>bread basket failures and as long as they don't come repeatedly.

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>But that's the risk with climate change. And you know,

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I think a key instance here in twenty you had

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>very dramatic heat waves and drought in Russia that caused

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a real collapse in agricultural production there, and they were

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>head with flooding in Pakistan. Normally, of course, the rainfall

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it was the same climate system. Normally, you would say,

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a drought one place, there's rainfall elsewhere.

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But the flood in Pakistan was so severe that Pakistan

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>also suffered a collapse in production. So two of the

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>world's big wheat belts collapsed at the same time, which

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is not something that we've seen before, but it is

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>something that as global warming increases the risk of that.

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>And remember there's only fix or some of these red

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>baskets around the world. The risk of that goes up

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>quite substantially. Is Eastern in China at least a functioning

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>bread basket for the world at moment. China is an

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting case, but it also an interesting case around geopolitics.

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 1>You see occasional reports out of China saying that, you know,

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they're the agricultural yields are not as good as expected,

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and there are you know, there are sort of food problems.

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>But I would say China is pretty well supplied with

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>food at the moment, and actually over a police applied.

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the stockpiles that they have of

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>key grains, they are extremely high. They've got enough stockpiles

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to last, you know, in most cases well beyond a year,

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:01.959
<v Speaker 1>when a lot of other parts of the world are

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>very short. Now. I think in part that is actually

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a product of geopolitics. You know, China is less sure

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of its trading relationships than it was a few years ago,

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and there's a bit of a sort of fortress China

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>approach to that. So we did stop piling this stuff

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>at home, and it is not available for its its

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>trading partners, and other nations to feed their own shortages.

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>If there was to be a letter up on Russia's

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>war in Ukraine, how much would that alleviate the situation.

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't happen immediately because actually, to some extent, the

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>larger problem with Ukraine at the moment is of course

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that we've we've missed the planting season largely for a

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of the crops for this year, and that's pretty significant.

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at some of the US Power

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of Agricultures projections, the bigger supply crunch for wheats is

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>actually for the coming marketing year. For the coming marketing year,

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>they lose about a third of their output, So that's

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be the more significant one. Of course, a

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>big factor behind this is what happens with the global climate.

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>We are three years into a Landinia event and the

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>climate shifts that that causes. It's likely that we're going

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to see a shift into an Alnnio event, which favors

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>different bread baskets. But when we move into that, we

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>have the real core of the high prices that we're

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing for agricultural produce is that stocks are low and

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>stocks have been running down essentially over this three year

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>learning near event, So we need to rebuild those stocks,

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's not going to come overnight. That would be

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the product of a number of years. I suspect climate change.

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Notwithstanding that, we will again see very cheap prices for

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>food over the next decade, but it will be a

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>number of years before things really get back on track.

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinions, David Fickling. In March, Helen Thompson's book Disorder,

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Hard Times in the twenty one century. It was published

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the University of Cambridge professor of Political Economy, makes the

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>case that political turbulence around the world is founded in

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the tussles for fossil fuel energies, specifically oil. She says

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>they have fundamentally reshaped the global political order and will

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>continue to while energy transitions play out. Here's a small

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>part of our conversation. So, Helen, are we at a

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>pivotal point now in how the global economy oper rates? Yeah,

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that we are. I think we're actually at

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a pivotal point before the war. I think that what

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we could see during the latter part of last year

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and the months autumn before Omgon hit was that the

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>world economy is facing some pretty serious energy constraints. At

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>any point when there's any significant growth. The world economy

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.479
<v Speaker 1>is now running into high energy prices, and we're not

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>just talking about high oil prices. We're talking about high

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 1>natural gas prices and high coal prices too, And I

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>think high core prices has really taken a lot of people,

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>including myself. We try to follow the energy situation quite

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>by surprise, and I think that that goes to show

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the depth of the issues that we're now facing, particularly

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>when we bear in mind that we would like the

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>world economy to be moving away from coal as rapidly

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>as possible given the need to address climate change. One

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of your main visas is that the US failed to

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>secure the stability of its relationships in the Middle East,

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and that created an instability around energy, which reverberates. So

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in a sense, this shouldn't have taken any of us,

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and by surprise by that piece, that's right. I think

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that what we can see during the two thousands and

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>tens is that the United States, in terms of its

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>own energy needs, is in a much stronger position than

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it had been since the nineteen seventies. Because the shale

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas boom allowed the United States a higher

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>level of energy independence much reduced energy dependence. What was revealing, though,

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>was the way in which as the United States achieved

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that it's very success had so many disruptive consequences in

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East, in particular because it was very problematic

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>from the Saudi point of view to now find that

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>American shell producers were big rivals, and as that came

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>at a time when the United States and the Obama

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>was also trying to improve relations with Iran, and then

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>things didn't work out very well in Syria. Despite the

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that Saudies and States have started on the same side,

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>what we see through the two thousands and the end

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>as the shell boom goes on is a complete deterioration

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of US Saudi relations and although to some extent they're

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>repaired during the Trump presidency, is that Trump tries to

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>hug the hat is hard, he still isn't really able

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to influence the Saudis when it comes to the price

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of oil, and as the US shale boom foltered during

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, another American president was left trying to persuade

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>our oil producers to produce more oil. The problem now

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is the exception probably of Saudi Arabia and United Arab

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>em Ence, it's not quite clear how many of them

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>really can produce more oil, particularly I think there are

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>difficulties with Kuwait. So there's a great global energy rivalry

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>now between the US, Russia, and China. Are we doomed

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to see nuclear powers face off until this energy revolution

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>is somehow enacted? Yeah, I mean in a way. The

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>way to think about what's happened over the last decade

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in particular, is that two competitions ensued. The first actually

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was in Europe and in some sense as being the

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>most geo politically lethal, and that was a competition between

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the United States and Russia to sell natural gas in Europe,

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Russian point of view, that was a really

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>different situation and than the one that they've enjoyed in

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand's when they could take really the European

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>gas market for granted. I think the big change that's

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>happened in the United States, ironically in good part as

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a consequence of the U S SHL boom, is that

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia now has to think much more carefully about

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>who it's selling its oil too, and that means that

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>there's also a competition, I think between Saudi Arabia and

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Russia to sell oil to the Chinese. The Chinese leadership

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>have a very strong awareness of China's strategic vulnerabilities around energy.

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>China is also trying to influence the price by stockpiling.

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>So we've got complicated dynamics because it's not just actually

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a competition between the producers, We've got this very large

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>consumer in China not really prepared to accept a passive

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>position in all this. Cambridge University professor Helen Thompson, author

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of Disorder, Hard Times in the twenty one century. That's

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it for our special best of Bloomberg Opinion. Please do

0:33:57.480 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>reach out though with thoughts and opinions of your own.

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Email me at v Quinn at Bloomberg dot net and

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>don't forget where available as a podcast on Apple, Spotify

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>or your favorite podcast platform. Were produced by Eric mollow

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>till next year on Bloomberg Opinion