1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:13,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm m Keene 2 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: Jay Leye. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 3 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 1: and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 4 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:28,160 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. Yeah. 5 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:35,800 Speaker 1: I want to bring in our guest now. I'm really 6 00:00:35,840 --> 00:00:38,040 Speaker 1: please to say joining us here in New York with 7 00:00:38,080 --> 00:00:40,960 Speaker 1: a distinguished career in both public service and the private sector. 8 00:00:41,040 --> 00:00:45,320 Speaker 1: Our guest is Robert Hormats, the vice chairman of Kissinger Associates. Bob, 9 00:00:45,320 --> 00:00:46,720 Speaker 1: it's great to have you with us, and I was 10 00:00:46,800 --> 00:00:50,920 Speaker 1: just flicking through what is a fantastic career in public service. 11 00:00:51,520 --> 00:00:55,400 Speaker 1: You helped manage the Nixon administration's opening of diplomatic relations 12 00:00:55,400 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 1: with China's communist government. UM, as you know, typically these 13 00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:03,440 Speaker 1: are much orchestrated events when two leaders meets each other 14 00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:07,080 Speaker 1: with predetermined deliverables. Do we have any of that with 15 00:01:07,120 --> 00:01:11,160 Speaker 1: this Well, they're not predetermined at this point. But I 16 00:01:11,200 --> 00:01:15,120 Speaker 1: think that Trump has made a number of statements which 17 00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:20,240 Speaker 1: have been divisive in terms of US relations with Europe 18 00:01:20,240 --> 00:01:25,040 Speaker 1: and US relations with our allies, in particular in NATO. 19 00:01:25,120 --> 00:01:27,959 Speaker 1: But he also has an opportunity, as other heads of 20 00:01:28,040 --> 00:01:30,960 Speaker 1: state have had in the past, other American presidents have 21 00:01:31,040 --> 00:01:34,559 Speaker 1: had in the past, to really exercise leadership at the summit. 22 00:01:34,880 --> 00:01:38,759 Speaker 1: I wish the President well. I hope he succeeds to succeed. 23 00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:42,800 Speaker 1: I think is very important and other presidents have understood 24 00:01:42,800 --> 00:01:46,280 Speaker 1: this as well, to take a strong leadership role, particularly 25 00:01:46,319 --> 00:01:51,440 Speaker 1: in standing up to Russia or the past Soviet leaders, 26 00:01:51,480 --> 00:01:55,280 Speaker 1: and that is to really exercise leadership and say, we 27 00:01:55,360 --> 00:02:00,720 Speaker 1: need you to stop imposing your will and your pressure 28 00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:06,240 Speaker 1: and your disruptive measures on the Ukraine. We need you 29 00:02:06,280 --> 00:02:10,559 Speaker 1: to work with us in Syria to stop the continued 30 00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:15,680 Speaker 1: movement east in particular and southwest in particular of the 31 00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:19,840 Speaker 1: Syrian regime. We need you to work together to strengthen 32 00:02:20,720 --> 00:02:23,960 Speaker 1: the ties that we could have between us. So he 33 00:02:24,000 --> 00:02:28,480 Speaker 1: could make a leadership statement by making progress on cooperation, 34 00:02:29,040 --> 00:02:33,919 Speaker 1: constructive cooperation on Syria, constructive cooperation on Ukraine and u 35 00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:36,680 Speaker 1: and many other areas as well, and back off on 36 00:02:36,840 --> 00:02:39,360 Speaker 1: his meddling in the US. If the President were to 37 00:02:39,440 --> 00:02:43,639 Speaker 1: take a leadership role, he could really exercise a lot 38 00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:46,720 Speaker 1: of influence in this summit, strengthen our alliances strengthen our 39 00:02:46,760 --> 00:02:49,280 Speaker 1: relations with the EU. So I wish him well. It's 40 00:02:49,280 --> 00:02:51,799 Speaker 1: a great opportunity for him if he wishes to take 41 00:02:51,840 --> 00:02:55,280 Speaker 1: that leadership role as Reagan and Nixon and other presidents 42 00:02:55,280 --> 00:02:57,280 Speaker 1: have done before him. I would like to pick up 43 00:02:57,280 --> 00:02:59,919 Speaker 1: on that. What success, Bob, How do you define six 44 00:03:00,040 --> 00:03:04,680 Speaker 1: sense at a summit when there is no pre defined agenda. Well, 45 00:03:04,760 --> 00:03:08,000 Speaker 1: that's of course one of the questions. There's no defined agenda, 46 00:03:08,080 --> 00:03:11,040 Speaker 1: but doesn't mean you can't make progress on these issues. 47 00:03:11,120 --> 00:03:15,200 Speaker 1: One would be to have an agreement whereby the Russians 48 00:03:15,240 --> 00:03:20,200 Speaker 1: would stop the Syrian regime from moving eastward to the 49 00:03:20,240 --> 00:03:23,440 Speaker 1: eastern side of the Euphrates. America has troops there. We 50 00:03:23,480 --> 00:03:26,560 Speaker 1: need to keep those troops there until their stability and 51 00:03:26,639 --> 00:03:29,280 Speaker 1: not allow the Syrian regime to just go in. That 52 00:03:29,320 --> 00:03:33,000 Speaker 1: will simply strengthen the Russians and the Iranians. Also on 53 00:03:33,080 --> 00:03:36,880 Speaker 1: the question of Ukraine, to get uh some arrangement to 54 00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:40,960 Speaker 1: maintain the ceasefire that was once again reinforced or agreed 55 00:03:41,720 --> 00:03:44,880 Speaker 1: in July, but has now begun to deteriorate a little bit. 56 00:03:45,080 --> 00:03:50,560 Speaker 1: That would be a success and some degree of of progress, 57 00:03:50,680 --> 00:03:54,800 Speaker 1: or at least pressure on Putin to stop interfering in 58 00:03:55,480 --> 00:03:59,040 Speaker 1: American politics. We've already had these indictments. Those could be 59 00:03:59,120 --> 00:04:02,160 Speaker 1: a point of strange for the president if he takes 60 00:04:02,200 --> 00:04:05,440 Speaker 1: them seriously and says we have the evidence. We probably 61 00:04:05,440 --> 00:04:08,080 Speaker 1: have more evidence that we haven't released yet, and we're 62 00:04:08,080 --> 00:04:10,480 Speaker 1: going to do that if it will release it if 63 00:04:10,520 --> 00:04:13,040 Speaker 1: we have to. That's a big problem for you. Russia 64 00:04:13,120 --> 00:04:16,880 Speaker 1: needs closer economic cooperation with the US because economy is 65 00:04:16,920 --> 00:04:20,119 Speaker 1: not doing very well. So if you do these kinds 66 00:04:20,120 --> 00:04:23,679 Speaker 1: of things putin we will do something to be helpful 67 00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:27,000 Speaker 1: to you economical, but we need evidence that you're cooperating Syria, 68 00:04:27,360 --> 00:04:31,279 Speaker 1: Ukraine and backing off interference in the US. Tough order, 69 00:04:31,720 --> 00:04:35,720 Speaker 1: but areas where presidential leadership could be a very positive thing. 70 00:04:35,760 --> 00:04:37,840 Speaker 1: So I wish him well if he takes these kinds 71 00:04:37,839 --> 00:04:40,719 Speaker 1: of positions. I hope he does Investador harmts Um, I 72 00:04:40,760 --> 00:04:43,799 Speaker 1: think of the Imperial Hotel in Tokyo is a set 73 00:04:43,839 --> 00:04:48,040 Speaker 1: piece of Cold War architecture. I'm standing in one right now, 74 00:04:48,120 --> 00:04:52,599 Speaker 1: the acclaimed Hotel Vacuna build in nineteen fifty two, and folks, 75 00:04:52,680 --> 00:04:55,080 Speaker 1: if you ever want to see the ground zero of 76 00:04:55,120 --> 00:04:59,440 Speaker 1: Swedish and Scandinavian design, Bob I I assume you stayed 77 00:04:59,440 --> 00:05:04,360 Speaker 1: in this hotel various semi trips. Is well, this hotel 78 00:05:04,760 --> 00:05:07,600 Speaker 1: where I'm standing and brings back the nostalgia that President 79 00:05:07,640 --> 00:05:12,360 Speaker 1: Trump always seeks for. Are we wrong in our nostalgia 80 00:05:12,440 --> 00:05:15,880 Speaker 1: for another time, in our fading memory of the Cold 81 00:05:15,920 --> 00:05:20,520 Speaker 1: War and the tensions between Russia and America. Well, I 82 00:05:20,560 --> 00:05:23,880 Speaker 1: think we should bear in mind that during the Cold 83 00:05:23,920 --> 00:05:27,120 Speaker 1: War we were able, in fact to work with UH 84 00:05:27,160 --> 00:05:31,320 Speaker 1: then Soviet Union leaders to deal with some issues. And 85 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:33,320 Speaker 1: one issue that he can deal with, and you go 86 00:05:33,400 --> 00:05:37,440 Speaker 1: back to the Cold War, the so called New Start Agreement, 87 00:05:37,480 --> 00:05:42,360 Speaker 1: which is to continue to reduce nuclear capabilities on both sides. 88 00:05:42,720 --> 00:05:45,000 Speaker 1: That's something that we we did to a degree during 89 00:05:45,040 --> 00:05:47,360 Speaker 1: the Cold War with Start one. The other two starts 90 00:05:47,360 --> 00:05:50,680 Speaker 1: didn't work so well. But now we have a New 91 00:05:50,760 --> 00:05:54,919 Speaker 1: Start we could reinforce that. So we shouldn't we we do. 92 00:05:55,040 --> 00:05:58,680 Speaker 1: We should not yearn for another Cold War. We're fortunately 93 00:05:58,720 --> 00:06:01,120 Speaker 1: out of that period which was very dangerous, but we 94 00:06:01,279 --> 00:06:03,880 Speaker 1: don't want a new Cold War. And therefore, I think 95 00:06:03,920 --> 00:06:06,200 Speaker 1: it is important to bear in mind the lessons of 96 00:06:06,240 --> 00:06:09,520 Speaker 1: the past and figure out ways of working now with 97 00:06:10,000 --> 00:06:12,920 Speaker 1: who if he's willing to do it. But the only 98 00:06:12,920 --> 00:06:14,840 Speaker 1: way to do it is to be very strong and 99 00:06:14,920 --> 00:06:18,240 Speaker 1: resist his pressures in the areas that I mentioned. He 100 00:06:18,960 --> 00:06:23,120 Speaker 1: understands strength, and if he sees openings for dividing the 101 00:06:23,200 --> 00:06:25,880 Speaker 1: U S from its allies, the U S from the EU, 102 00:06:26,080 --> 00:06:29,800 Speaker 1: fragmenting Europe, he will take advantage of. So the strength 103 00:06:29,920 --> 00:06:33,560 Speaker 1: that President Trump demonstrates is going to determine whether we're 104 00:06:33,600 --> 00:06:37,000 Speaker 1: able to work with the Russians successfully or not. And 105 00:06:37,040 --> 00:06:39,719 Speaker 1: I hope he does show that strength because I wanted 106 00:06:39,760 --> 00:06:41,479 Speaker 1: to succeed. I don't want us to go back to 107 00:06:41,520 --> 00:06:43,560 Speaker 1: another Cold War. Well, let's pick up on that point. 108 00:06:43,640 --> 00:06:46,240 Speaker 1: You've just mate. Um. If President puts In sees an 109 00:06:46,279 --> 00:06:49,760 Speaker 1: opening to divide the rest of Europe from the United States, 110 00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:53,440 Speaker 1: it's that opening there at this summit. Well, if you 111 00:06:53,480 --> 00:06:57,279 Speaker 1: look at what the President has said about going it 112 00:06:57,360 --> 00:07:00,440 Speaker 1: alone and his criticism of the EU and some of 113 00:07:00,440 --> 00:07:07,680 Speaker 1: his criticisms of NATO, Trump may be inadvertently perhaps signaling 114 00:07:07,839 --> 00:07:10,280 Speaker 1: Putin that he can divide the West, that he can 115 00:07:10,320 --> 00:07:13,040 Speaker 1: divide the US from Europe. So, therefore, I think that 116 00:07:13,520 --> 00:07:18,000 Speaker 1: it's important that Putin be disabused of the notion that 117 00:07:18,080 --> 00:07:19,960 Speaker 1: whatever Trump has said in the past, that he can 118 00:07:20,040 --> 00:07:24,160 Speaker 1: continue to pursue his divisive ways and divide the US 119 00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:26,960 Speaker 1: from its friends and allies which are critical to our 120 00:07:27,040 --> 00:07:29,640 Speaker 1: security and to theirs. Bubbalo mats, it's great, can't you 121 00:07:29,640 --> 00:07:31,600 Speaker 1: have the really really appreciate your time here on the 122 00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:34,120 Speaker 1: bloom ducks of Islands. The vice chairman of Kissing To 123 00:07:34,320 --> 00:07:37,040 Speaker 1: associates with Tom Kaine in House, Saint kim My Saft, 124 00:07:37,080 --> 00:07:53,000 Speaker 1: Johnathan Pharaoh in New York City, John Farrell, and I 125 00:07:53,000 --> 00:07:55,840 Speaker 1: are now advantaged to have with this Charlie Saloni's pastor Neck, 126 00:07:56,320 --> 00:07:59,160 Speaker 1: who is well not a military brat, but he grew 127 00:07:59,200 --> 00:08:01,760 Speaker 1: up traveling the world as a banker brat. His father 128 00:08:01,960 --> 00:08:04,960 Speaker 1: was a leading banker, and he lived here, he lived there, 129 00:08:05,480 --> 00:08:10,320 Speaker 1: and he ended up in Middletown, Connecticut at Wesleyan University. 130 00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:14,200 Speaker 1: For a guy from Finland, what was the first day 131 00:08:14,320 --> 00:08:18,880 Speaker 1: on the perfect gorgeous liberal arts campus of Wesleyan University, 132 00:08:19,040 --> 00:08:22,760 Speaker 1: one of the toughest ants in America. Well, I exactly. 133 00:08:22,760 --> 00:08:24,960 Speaker 1: I wanted the liberal arts education because I wasn't sure 134 00:08:25,440 --> 00:08:27,760 Speaker 1: what I was gonna want to be. Um, it's a 135 00:08:27,760 --> 00:08:29,840 Speaker 1: little unusually in Finland, where you choose you're to be 136 00:08:29,840 --> 00:08:32,320 Speaker 1: a doctor or a lawyer or whatever you're gonna do. Um, 137 00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:35,840 Speaker 1: I loved it. I mean, you know, you get to 138 00:08:35,960 --> 00:08:39,559 Speaker 1: work every day with brilliant people, learn read and then 139 00:08:39,559 --> 00:08:41,160 Speaker 1: it's your job to see what you get out of it. 140 00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:44,800 Speaker 1: Right that The theme that you studied at Wesleyan at 141 00:08:44,880 --> 00:08:48,160 Speaker 1: Helsinki and your work with the Finnish Institute of International 142 00:08:48,160 --> 00:08:51,000 Speaker 1: Affairs is to pick up and look forward from the 143 00:08:51,000 --> 00:08:54,719 Speaker 1: Westphalian system over to a clash of civilizations. Maybe we 144 00:08:54,840 --> 00:08:57,920 Speaker 1: drag in for red Zakaria in a post American or 145 00:08:57,960 --> 00:09:01,280 Speaker 1: a post Finland world, and we staggered or whatever, we're 146 00:09:01,320 --> 00:09:04,960 Speaker 1: staggering too brief, Mr Putin and Mr Trump? What are 147 00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:08,880 Speaker 1: we staggering to right now in international relations that affects 148 00:09:08,880 --> 00:09:10,960 Speaker 1: all of us? Well, well, this is just it if 149 00:09:10,960 --> 00:09:14,360 Speaker 1: I if I'm looking looking at it from Helsinki right now, 150 00:09:14,880 --> 00:09:21,040 Speaker 1: it is unique that the US and Russian leaders both 151 00:09:21,120 --> 00:09:23,880 Speaker 1: seem hell bent, if I may use the expression to 152 00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:27,360 Speaker 1: weaken and divide boding, can we say hell bent on radio? 153 00:09:27,480 --> 00:09:29,880 Speaker 1: Is that? Okay? Yeah, okay, I got the big thumb up. 154 00:09:30,640 --> 00:09:33,720 Speaker 1: But but both so US and Russian leaders want to 155 00:09:33,800 --> 00:09:37,920 Speaker 1: divide and break up Europe and within it, maybe even 156 00:09:38,040 --> 00:09:42,360 Speaker 1: the EU. That is truly unique because if you're looking 157 00:09:42,400 --> 00:09:44,520 Speaker 1: at it from from across the Atlantic in the US, 158 00:09:45,280 --> 00:09:48,319 Speaker 1: US global power has been built on and is dependent 159 00:09:48,679 --> 00:09:53,840 Speaker 1: on these global alliances and friendships. The distinction to me is, 160 00:09:54,040 --> 00:09:56,959 Speaker 1: as you correctly stay from the Atlantic, it is a 161 00:09:57,000 --> 00:10:01,520 Speaker 1: coalesced Europe wrapped around the symbols of Germany, France, maybe 162 00:10:01,520 --> 00:10:05,520 Speaker 1: the United Kingdom. Europe, which is a larger economy than 163 00:10:05,559 --> 00:10:10,480 Speaker 1: the United States, is the Finland's the Lithuanias, et cetera 164 00:10:11,080 --> 00:10:15,720 Speaker 1: of Europe. How much do we get wrong the parts 165 00:10:15,760 --> 00:10:19,360 Speaker 1: in the sums of Europe. It's not just angela miracle 166 00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:22,120 Speaker 1: and what she says next, well, it's it's correct, and 167 00:10:22,360 --> 00:10:26,040 Speaker 1: it's a small ones that you can desperately needs something 168 00:10:26,920 --> 00:10:30,600 Speaker 1: bigger to belong to, like the EU, because Finland by 169 00:10:30,640 --> 00:10:35,160 Speaker 1: itself doesn't necessarily do well in the geopolitical game globally. 170 00:10:35,520 --> 00:10:39,520 Speaker 1: Um I I guess if you say, is it's where 171 00:10:39,559 --> 00:10:42,319 Speaker 1: you can have innovation. You can you can have small 172 00:10:42,360 --> 00:10:45,520 Speaker 1: business ideas, and then you go to bigger countries to 173 00:10:45,559 --> 00:10:48,320 Speaker 1: get the capital. You go to uh California or somewhere 174 00:10:48,360 --> 00:10:51,319 Speaker 1: else to get capital for for ideas on clean tech, 175 00:10:51,520 --> 00:10:56,440 Speaker 1: environmental stuff, so on. Can Finland become a Helsinki become 176 00:10:57,679 --> 00:11:02,160 Speaker 1: their version of California. Everyone tosses around the word innovation. 177 00:11:02,679 --> 00:11:06,600 Speaker 1: I met with Tyler Monaco, who's called this the most 178 00:11:06,640 --> 00:11:10,400 Speaker 1: livable city in the world. A huge buzzier finner had 179 00:11:10,400 --> 00:11:15,000 Speaker 1: a perfect flight up here from London. Can a California 180 00:11:15,080 --> 00:11:21,200 Speaker 1: ethos come to Finland that informs Europe about entrepreneurship? I 181 00:11:21,240 --> 00:11:24,800 Speaker 1: think it can. Um. There is a sense of wanting 182 00:11:24,840 --> 00:11:29,640 Speaker 1: to make things better. Um it's one of my colleagues said, 183 00:11:29,760 --> 00:11:32,040 Speaker 1: you know, Finns have this cross to bear, which is 184 00:11:32,640 --> 00:11:36,480 Speaker 1: to improve things continuously. And that's maybe why Helsinki is 185 00:11:36,520 --> 00:11:38,920 Speaker 1: such a livable city. Something may be good, but let's 186 00:11:38,920 --> 00:11:41,200 Speaker 1: improve it a little bit. And that I think is 187 00:11:41,240 --> 00:11:45,079 Speaker 1: one kind of startup mentality. Someone's already doing this, but 188 00:11:45,160 --> 00:11:48,120 Speaker 1: let's do it a little better. I'm thunderstruck coming here 189 00:11:48,120 --> 00:11:52,640 Speaker 1: as the ugly American fifty four miles to Westonia, twot 190 00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:57,520 Speaker 1: two miles to St. Petersburg. In my naivete of that 191 00:11:57,679 --> 00:12:02,920 Speaker 1: statue by the Helsinki Cathie rulers are Alexander. Americans were 192 00:12:02,960 --> 00:12:07,240 Speaker 1: clueless about this linkage of Finland to Russia. What is it? 193 00:12:07,320 --> 00:12:11,400 Speaker 1: In two thousand and eighteen. Well, we're neighbors, and as 194 00:12:11,520 --> 00:12:14,440 Speaker 1: as through history and and and through the world, neighbors 195 00:12:14,480 --> 00:12:17,120 Speaker 1: have to trade. You have to somehow communicate, understand what 196 00:12:17,240 --> 00:12:19,960 Speaker 1: is the what are the other people thinking about? And 197 00:12:20,000 --> 00:12:22,600 Speaker 1: that's not how I think most Finns view it. Trade 198 00:12:22,679 --> 00:12:24,719 Speaker 1: sent as many Finnish hockey players, if they don't go 199 00:12:24,760 --> 00:12:27,360 Speaker 1: to the NHL, go to the KHL, do all of 200 00:12:27,400 --> 00:12:31,040 Speaker 1: this stuff, but then prepare if the day comes when 201 00:12:31,160 --> 00:12:33,360 Speaker 1: when arms have to be picked up. So it's not 202 00:12:33,440 --> 00:12:37,000 Speaker 1: necessarily an antagonistic one, but it is certainly a wary one. 203 00:12:38,400 --> 00:12:42,040 Speaker 1: Within the trade is the issue clearly of the moment 204 00:12:42,080 --> 00:12:45,880 Speaker 1: across all of these populous debates, which is migration. How 205 00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:51,040 Speaker 1: is migration touched Finland. Well, broadly speaking, as we'll see, 206 00:12:51,440 --> 00:12:54,200 Speaker 1: not a great deal. But of course Finland and many 207 00:12:54,240 --> 00:12:58,080 Speaker 1: of the historical innovations were brought by migrants here. They 208 00:12:58,120 --> 00:12:59,920 Speaker 1: had something they wanted to do and they thought Finland 209 00:13:00,040 --> 00:13:02,319 Speaker 1: is a good place to do that. Uh. Now, about 210 00:13:02,400 --> 00:13:05,920 Speaker 1: three years ago we did have something very unhappy happened, 211 00:13:05,960 --> 00:13:10,400 Speaker 1: which is Russia quite purposefully released a set of migrants 212 00:13:10,480 --> 00:13:12,719 Speaker 1: or forced them to cross the border here. Uh, kind 213 00:13:12,720 --> 00:13:15,640 Speaker 1: of as a proof of concept. Saying, hey, we can 214 00:13:15,679 --> 00:13:18,600 Speaker 1: release people across the border, and depending on what you do, 215 00:13:19,200 --> 00:13:22,040 Speaker 1: we have millions more to go. Um. So that was 216 00:13:22,120 --> 00:13:28,160 Speaker 1: a less pleasant surprise. Always say when President Trump not 217 00:13:28,440 --> 00:13:32,119 Speaker 1: urgueser talks, but jaw bones if you will. About American 218 00:13:32,200 --> 00:13:35,880 Speaker 1: manpower in Europe, that's troops that may be not stationed 219 00:13:35,880 --> 00:13:39,360 Speaker 1: in Estonia, but they train in Estonia with British forces 220 00:13:39,840 --> 00:13:45,760 Speaker 1: and and such. Explain why that presence is important in 221 00:13:45,800 --> 00:13:49,520 Speaker 1: this special relationship with Russia. Why do we need American 222 00:13:49,559 --> 00:13:55,360 Speaker 1: troops training in eastern Europe? Well, again, because it almost 223 00:13:55,400 --> 00:13:58,680 Speaker 1: doesn't matter if anyone Washington doesn't know about Estonia or 224 00:13:58,720 --> 00:14:02,280 Speaker 1: tart or telling our health and it's the US global 225 00:14:02,679 --> 00:14:06,600 Speaker 1: military and trade power is dependent on these alliance networks. 226 00:14:06,840 --> 00:14:09,160 Speaker 1: And if the US, let's go of one of them, 227 00:14:09,200 --> 00:14:13,560 Speaker 1: shows he will not defend one ally, then across the world, Japan, China, 228 00:14:13,600 --> 00:14:17,760 Speaker 1: everyone else is following from Finland's perspective, which is doing deep, 229 00:14:17,880 --> 00:14:20,680 Speaker 1: deep cooperation with the US, deeper than I think most 230 00:14:21,000 --> 00:14:25,320 Speaker 1: Finns even realize. It's also important because we don't belong 231 00:14:25,360 --> 00:14:29,400 Speaker 1: to NATO, so you want to have potential partners everywhere 232 00:14:29,400 --> 00:14:30,960 Speaker 1: in the U. S S is an obvious one. You 233 00:14:30,960 --> 00:14:34,080 Speaker 1: mentioned hockey before. I've got one final question that Patrick 234 00:14:34,200 --> 00:14:38,640 Speaker 1: Lane is wonderful the Finnish conversation. Contribution to the National 235 00:14:38,680 --> 00:14:43,160 Speaker 1: Hockey League, to North American hockey is extraordinary. But there's 236 00:14:43,200 --> 00:14:45,760 Speaker 1: a gentleman that played for the Anaheim Button but Ducks. 237 00:14:46,000 --> 00:14:48,840 Speaker 1: I don't know why he had to retire. Tiamo Solani 238 00:14:49,440 --> 00:14:51,400 Speaker 1: was at the peak of his game. It seemed when 239 00:14:51,400 --> 00:14:54,440 Speaker 1: he retired, Boy did he go out with grace? He 240 00:14:54,680 --> 00:14:57,680 Speaker 1: he did go out well and and great to see him. 241 00:14:57,720 --> 00:15:00,520 Speaker 1: In fact, years ago, the first in of you ever 242 00:15:00,560 --> 00:15:03,160 Speaker 1: did was with Tim Moise Helen after it was season. 243 00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:05,600 Speaker 1: Uh so, yeah, great to see him and what a 244 00:15:05,720 --> 00:15:07,800 Speaker 1: what a great career. The best part of this is 245 00:15:07,800 --> 00:15:11,280 Speaker 1: our discussion of international relations. But frankly, the best part 246 00:15:11,280 --> 00:15:13,600 Speaker 1: of this is not talking the World Cup, as I've 247 00:15:13,600 --> 00:15:16,640 Speaker 1: been doing for six weeks. Charlie, thank you so much, 248 00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:21,000 Speaker 1: Charlie Solanes, pastor and achis with the Finnish International Affairs 249 00:15:21,200 --> 00:15:23,600 Speaker 1: John Farrell. That was one of those hockey talk How 250 00:15:23,640 --> 00:15:26,320 Speaker 1: did you squeeze in ice hockey? I got ice hockey 251 00:15:26,440 --> 00:15:29,240 Speaker 1: like eighty five degrees here and I got ice hockey 252 00:15:29,240 --> 00:15:32,240 Speaker 1: into it. I honestly don't know what you're up to 253 00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:48,200 Speaker 1: say this morning, without question, within the tensions of the 254 00:15:48,280 --> 00:15:52,120 Speaker 1: Soviet Union of the past the Russian Federation of the 255 00:15:52,160 --> 00:15:54,800 Speaker 1: present in the United States of America, this is the 256 00:15:54,840 --> 00:15:58,160 Speaker 1: interview of the day. George Friedman, you know from Stratford 257 00:15:58,200 --> 00:16:01,400 Speaker 1: and of course his work with geo political futures. But 258 00:16:01,520 --> 00:16:04,480 Speaker 1: maybe there's not the George Friedman who at age seven 259 00:16:04,720 --> 00:16:08,120 Speaker 1: wandered out of Hungary. Mr Friedman joins us in Austin, 260 00:16:08,160 --> 00:16:10,840 Speaker 1: Texas this morning. George, what was it like when your 261 00:16:10,880 --> 00:16:13,760 Speaker 1: family fled Hungry? Do you remember that as a child? 262 00:16:14,680 --> 00:16:17,960 Speaker 1: I remember very little of it. The Soviets had taken 263 00:16:18,000 --> 00:16:22,720 Speaker 1: over in the country. The borders are closed, mine fields everywhere, 264 00:16:23,560 --> 00:16:25,880 Speaker 1: and my father was on a list to be arrested. 265 00:16:26,080 --> 00:16:29,440 Speaker 1: So does either get out or get out? And we 266 00:16:29,480 --> 00:16:33,400 Speaker 1: went across the Danube in a rubber boat with machine 267 00:16:33,400 --> 00:16:37,320 Speaker 1: guns looking at us. Interesting time, Those are interesting times, 268 00:16:37,360 --> 00:16:39,840 Speaker 1: and that it's a reality from the past. Do we 269 00:16:39,960 --> 00:16:43,160 Speaker 1: need to be informed about machine guns on the Danube now? 270 00:16:43,560 --> 00:16:47,000 Speaker 1: And particularly does the president need to have an understanding 271 00:16:47,280 --> 00:16:50,440 Speaker 1: about about machine guns on the Danube now? Or is 272 00:16:50,440 --> 00:16:54,560 Speaker 1: that a distant past. Well, the machiners aren't on Danube 273 00:16:54,760 --> 00:16:58,400 Speaker 1: during the Carpathian Mountains. Potentially they're in the Polish border. 274 00:16:59,360 --> 00:17:02,040 Speaker 1: But the Russia and not anywhere as strong as the 275 00:17:02,080 --> 00:17:04,800 Speaker 1: Soviet Union was, and a great deal of what they 276 00:17:04,880 --> 00:17:09,280 Speaker 1: do is bluff. Their economy is pretty close to shambles. 277 00:17:09,880 --> 00:17:14,240 Speaker 1: The military is nothing compared to the American Uh. There 278 00:17:14,359 --> 00:17:19,040 Speaker 1: is of course a feeling of this super intelligence service 279 00:17:19,160 --> 00:17:22,760 Speaker 1: that hacked our elections when they stole some emails and 280 00:17:22,840 --> 00:17:26,520 Speaker 1: they send some twitters and some Facebook stuff. But we 281 00:17:26,560 --> 00:17:29,600 Speaker 1: need to keep this in perspective. The Russians have played 282 00:17:29,640 --> 00:17:32,520 Speaker 1: their hands beautifully, making them here at a global basis 283 00:17:32,560 --> 00:17:37,359 Speaker 1: that they're a major power, but they're struggling. Should we 284 00:17:38,200 --> 00:17:42,520 Speaker 1: put weight to the twelve officers that have been indicted? 285 00:17:42,960 --> 00:17:45,359 Speaker 1: Do you agree with Mr Mueller this is an important 286 00:17:45,400 --> 00:17:49,960 Speaker 1: item or does Mr point Mr Trump have points that 287 00:17:50,080 --> 00:17:55,359 Speaker 1: maybe it's overdone. Well, certainly, you know the idea of 288 00:17:55,440 --> 00:17:59,639 Speaker 1: indicting foreign intelligence officers now open his door for American 289 00:17:59,680 --> 00:18:02,720 Speaker 1: to tell officers to be indicted in foreign countries, which 290 00:18:03,160 --> 00:18:06,440 Speaker 1: you know it'll be tips for tat. But more important, 291 00:18:06,480 --> 00:18:09,840 Speaker 1: I'm really interested in wine Miller, knowing that a summit 292 00:18:09,880 --> 00:18:13,760 Speaker 1: meeting was coming, chose that time to issue the indictments. 293 00:18:14,600 --> 00:18:16,480 Speaker 1: He probably had a reason. He probably had a good 294 00:18:16,480 --> 00:18:20,119 Speaker 1: reason why. It's part of his investigation that had to 295 00:18:20,119 --> 00:18:23,560 Speaker 1: be done now. But it really reshaped the meeting between 296 00:18:23,600 --> 00:18:29,000 Speaker 1: the American and Russian presidents and seems to have pushed 297 00:18:29,080 --> 00:18:31,280 Speaker 1: Putin a little bit off the wall. He made a 298 00:18:31,280 --> 00:18:34,240 Speaker 1: tweet this morning it was extraordinary where he said the 299 00:18:34,280 --> 00:18:38,000 Speaker 1: declining relations with in the United States and Russia was 300 00:18:38,080 --> 00:18:40,800 Speaker 1: due to the stupidity of American foreign policy in the past. 301 00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:44,320 Speaker 1: That is a stunning statement for the President to ake 302 00:18:45,400 --> 00:18:47,919 Speaker 1: on walking into Putin. That certainly puts them in a 303 00:18:47,960 --> 00:18:52,040 Speaker 1: bad position to negotiate Georgia's right where I wanted to 304 00:18:52,080 --> 00:18:54,520 Speaker 1: go And folks, this is why this conversation when Mr 305 00:18:54,560 --> 00:18:56,960 Speaker 1: Freeman is so important. And we'll have this out on 306 00:18:57,040 --> 00:19:00,600 Speaker 1: our podcast I hope later. Uh at Apple and Spotify 307 00:19:00,640 --> 00:19:04,439 Speaker 1: and George Freeman. The bottom line is is Mr Pompeio 308 00:19:04,560 --> 00:19:06,320 Speaker 1: asked to pick up the pieces. Now. There was a 309 00:19:06,359 --> 00:19:09,760 Speaker 1: feature article full disclosure, folks, I can't remember right now 310 00:19:09,800 --> 00:19:12,919 Speaker 1: the New York Times or the Washington Post today about 311 00:19:12,920 --> 00:19:20,000 Speaker 1: General Maddis running essentially a separate Pentagon European policy. Can 312 00:19:20,040 --> 00:19:24,600 Speaker 1: our State Department run a separate policy from the president's rhetoric, 313 00:19:25,040 --> 00:19:28,280 Speaker 1: or is Mr Pompeo tied at the hip linked at 314 00:19:28,320 --> 00:19:31,880 Speaker 1: the hip with the President. I would put it this way. 315 00:19:32,840 --> 00:19:36,719 Speaker 1: General Madis can run a fire a separate policy because 316 00:19:36,840 --> 00:19:44,040 Speaker 1: US military forces are overwhelmingly powerful, and he can do that. Uh, 317 00:19:44,440 --> 00:19:47,720 Speaker 1: the United States economically is overwhelmingly props. And these are 318 00:19:47,760 --> 00:19:53,920 Speaker 1: the fundamental realities. Now, how the administration organizes itself is 319 00:19:53,920 --> 00:19:57,119 Speaker 1: an interesting question and an important question. But the most 320 00:19:57,160 --> 00:19:59,639 Speaker 1: important thing to bear in mind is the relative power 321 00:19:59,720 --> 00:20:03,080 Speaker 1: of the two countries. But it would seem very likely 322 00:20:03,200 --> 00:20:06,480 Speaker 1: that the General Maddie, who has really had control over 323 00:20:06,720 --> 00:20:09,920 Speaker 1: old military political dimensions of foreign policy up to this point, 324 00:20:10,920 --> 00:20:13,919 Speaker 1: is it kind of running the shop of Southsian delegates 325 00:20:15,840 --> 00:20:19,159 Speaker 1: if you're just joining us with us, George Freeman, Geopolitical futures, George, 326 00:20:19,160 --> 00:20:21,520 Speaker 1: I want to go granular now, and I want you 327 00:20:21,560 --> 00:20:26,040 Speaker 1: to inform our global audience and particularly American audience, about 328 00:20:26,080 --> 00:20:29,679 Speaker 1: this area of Syria that is a focal point of 329 00:20:29,760 --> 00:20:36,439 Speaker 1: tension between UH Russia between their support of Syria, between 330 00:20:36,520 --> 00:20:40,159 Speaker 1: Mr Yaho and Israel, between Iran and I guess with 331 00:20:40,240 --> 00:20:44,000 Speaker 1: America as well. And this is the distance of Syria 332 00:20:44,040 --> 00:20:47,600 Speaker 1: from the Israeli border, and what each of these parties wants. 333 00:20:48,000 --> 00:20:51,960 Speaker 1: What should America want about this most sensitive part of 334 00:20:52,000 --> 00:20:57,080 Speaker 1: the Middle East. Well, put it into broader context, the 335 00:20:57,119 --> 00:20:59,960 Speaker 1: Iranians have managed to take a great deal of control 336 00:21:00,240 --> 00:21:05,520 Speaker 1: in Iraq. They are the dominant force in Lebanon, they 337 00:21:05,600 --> 00:21:10,760 Speaker 1: have become a significant force in Yemen, and they're very 338 00:21:10,760 --> 00:21:16,040 Speaker 1: powerful force in Syria. What we've been seeing is uh 339 00:21:16,200 --> 00:21:19,760 Speaker 1: Iran kind of extending its power. Now it's thin on 340 00:21:19,800 --> 00:21:22,680 Speaker 1: the ground, it's not really powerful if it was challenged, 341 00:21:23,240 --> 00:21:26,040 Speaker 1: but it's there, and the Israelis are looking at them 342 00:21:26,240 --> 00:21:29,640 Speaker 1: very close to their border, knowing that they can fire missiles, 343 00:21:29,800 --> 00:21:33,919 Speaker 1: knowing that they could carry out covert operations, knowing that 344 00:21:34,040 --> 00:21:36,960 Speaker 1: they can do all sorts of things. The Israelis want 345 00:21:37,000 --> 00:21:40,160 Speaker 1: them back from the border. The Russians have agreed sort 346 00:21:40,200 --> 00:21:42,400 Speaker 1: of that they would force them to go back from 347 00:21:42,400 --> 00:21:45,440 Speaker 1: the border. But the question is how far Ten miles 348 00:21:45,760 --> 00:21:48,960 Speaker 1: doesn't make any difference to a missile. The real question 349 00:21:49,200 --> 00:21:55,320 Speaker 1: is here the Iranians are now threatening Israeli national security Metanya, 350 00:21:55,359 --> 00:21:57,800 Speaker 1: who said yesterday that he and the president had to 351 00:21:57,840 --> 00:22:01,000 Speaker 1: talk and they're very close together, and this is likely 352 00:22:01,040 --> 00:22:04,840 Speaker 1: to be the major issue, there are any substantial issues 353 00:22:04,840 --> 00:22:07,360 Speaker 1: at this kind of kind of disc ser I did 354 00:22:07,400 --> 00:22:11,560 Speaker 1: a TV special George last week at broadcast. Folks look 355 00:22:11,600 --> 00:22:14,080 Speaker 1: for it out. I'm Bloomberg Digital with Ian Bremer and 356 00:22:14,160 --> 00:22:18,120 Speaker 1: Robert Kaplan, and of course we talked about Marco Polo's 357 00:22:18,119 --> 00:22:21,960 Speaker 1: World and Kaplan's Duke Book and the Eurasia, which I'm 358 00:22:21,960 --> 00:22:24,000 Speaker 1: going to take from the Straits of Malacca all the 359 00:22:24,000 --> 00:22:27,199 Speaker 1: way around the Persian Gulf. Is there going to be 360 00:22:27,240 --> 00:22:30,840 Speaker 1: a band of geography from Tehran to burn Root? I mean, 361 00:22:30,920 --> 00:22:33,240 Speaker 1: is is that a new geography Americans have to get 362 00:22:33,320 --> 00:22:36,200 Speaker 1: used to? Not really, we don't have to get used 363 00:22:36,200 --> 00:22:38,440 Speaker 1: to it. We don't really have to decide to handle it. 364 00:22:39,119 --> 00:22:44,200 Speaker 1: Ran is well, it Ran is domestically unstable. Uh. There 365 00:22:44,280 --> 00:22:48,720 Speaker 1: was an uprising over the weekend Shiites throughout Iraq against 366 00:22:48,960 --> 00:22:52,560 Speaker 1: the pro Iranian government. So we have to understand one. 367 00:22:52,760 --> 00:22:55,720 Speaker 1: They have their footprint down. So did the Russians. To 368 00:22:56,000 --> 00:22:58,840 Speaker 1: underneath it all that, I'm very strong. So what has 369 00:22:58,920 --> 00:23:02,359 Speaker 1: happened is as do Wes has created, a vacuum has 370 00:23:02,440 --> 00:23:07,040 Speaker 1: been filled by second grade powers. We look at all 371 00:23:07,119 --> 00:23:11,000 Speaker 1: of this, watch China's response to the American trade initiative, 372 00:23:11,359 --> 00:23:14,399 Speaker 1: and it's kind of weak and very nervous. The United 373 00:23:14,440 --> 00:23:18,159 Speaker 1: States has to recognize the most important thing, which I 374 00:23:18,200 --> 00:23:21,680 Speaker 1: think Trump sometimes it doesn't really deal with really very 375 00:23:21,720 --> 00:23:25,640 Speaker 1: strong as a nation, and the one we're facing, like Russia, 376 00:23:26,359 --> 00:23:29,320 Speaker 1: what's the third world power? It lives off of export 377 00:23:29,359 --> 00:23:33,080 Speaker 1: oil and it can't control its price. Iran can spread 378 00:23:33,320 --> 00:23:37,000 Speaker 1: if there's no one resisting it, but it can easily 379 00:23:37,040 --> 00:23:39,600 Speaker 1: be rolled back. And the Chinese have their own powers. 380 00:23:39,640 --> 00:23:43,199 Speaker 1: So I regard this Eurasian thing as a coalition of 381 00:23:43,240 --> 00:23:46,960 Speaker 1: the week. They could get together. They can do these things. 382 00:23:47,000 --> 00:23:52,040 Speaker 1: But uh, in the end, once the United States becomes 383 00:23:52,080 --> 00:23:55,280 Speaker 1: coherent in its policy, there's no question that the guys 384 00:23:55,320 --> 00:23:57,679 Speaker 1: in the back is well. This sounds like a conversation 385 00:23:57,720 --> 00:24:01,280 Speaker 1: to continue. George Freeman just brilliant on this Elsinki and 386 00:24:01,359 --> 00:24:19,199 Speaker 1: the submit. I want to bring in Chris Granville. He 387 00:24:19,280 --> 00:24:22,920 Speaker 1: is a managing director for EMA and global political research 388 00:24:22,960 --> 00:24:27,800 Speaker 1: for TS Lombardimi of course Europe, Middle Eastern Africa. He 389 00:24:27,920 --> 00:24:30,560 Speaker 1: joins US from London. Chris Granville, thanks very much for 390 00:24:30,600 --> 00:24:33,720 Speaker 1: being with us. UM you've you've said that you believe 391 00:24:33,880 --> 00:24:38,359 Speaker 1: that the chances of Britain crashing out of the European 392 00:24:38,520 --> 00:24:45,639 Speaker 1: Union without a deal are negligible. Why do you say that? Hi? 393 00:24:45,720 --> 00:24:50,080 Speaker 1: There what It's a simple observation about the parliamentary arithmetic. 394 00:24:50,320 --> 00:24:54,160 Speaker 1: The there is no majority in the House of Commons, 395 00:24:54,720 --> 00:24:59,520 Speaker 1: the UK Parliament, that is, that would ever support a disorderly, 396 00:25:00,080 --> 00:25:06,000 Speaker 1: crash out style of UK Brexit. On the contrary, there's 397 00:25:05,600 --> 00:25:09,639 Speaker 1: a guaranteed majority that if the worst came to the worst, 398 00:25:09,920 --> 00:25:13,840 Speaker 1: would stop that happening. So whatever whatever else could happen, 399 00:25:13,840 --> 00:25:15,760 Speaker 1: there will be lots of political noise. There could be 400 00:25:15,880 --> 00:25:20,200 Speaker 1: changes of leadership, changes the Prime minister, even changes of government, 401 00:25:21,119 --> 00:25:26,560 Speaker 1: but that will not happen. So in our view, the 402 00:25:26,640 --> 00:25:31,200 Speaker 1: volatility of in the FX markets, so the pounds sterling 403 00:25:31,840 --> 00:25:34,360 Speaker 1: perhaps in why the UK assets is on the one 404 00:25:34,359 --> 00:25:39,119 Speaker 1: hand inevitable because there will be even higher levels of 405 00:25:39,119 --> 00:25:43,080 Speaker 1: political noise on the domestic UK scene than we've already 406 00:25:43,119 --> 00:25:46,120 Speaker 1: been seeing in the coming months until March next year, 407 00:25:46,160 --> 00:25:50,320 Speaker 1: which is the deadline for the Brexit process. But that 408 00:25:50,440 --> 00:25:54,040 Speaker 1: noise will not lead to a true economic and financial shock, 409 00:25:54,160 --> 00:25:58,160 Speaker 1: so there will be buying opportunities along the way. That's 410 00:25:58,240 --> 00:26:00,040 Speaker 1: that's how we look at it, Okay, But but you 411 00:26:00,119 --> 00:26:02,840 Speaker 1: make it sound as if Britain has complete control over 412 00:26:02,880 --> 00:26:06,440 Speaker 1: the process, where by the European Union surely has a 413 00:26:06,520 --> 00:26:10,080 Speaker 1: voice in how this works out. Good question, and I 414 00:26:10,119 --> 00:26:15,760 Speaker 1: should have added that important detail. If the UK Parliament 415 00:26:16,240 --> 00:26:20,040 Speaker 1: refuses to ratify whatever version of the Withdrawal Agreement, that 416 00:26:20,200 --> 00:26:23,600 Speaker 1: is the treaty instrument by which the UK would leave 417 00:26:24,000 --> 00:26:29,600 Speaker 1: the European Union, then um the same UK Parliament that 418 00:26:30,160 --> 00:26:34,120 Speaker 1: refused to ratify that agreement would then instruct with governments 419 00:26:34,880 --> 00:26:40,960 Speaker 1: to to avoid a crash out in March, and the 420 00:26:41,000 --> 00:26:43,480 Speaker 1: obvious way to avoid it would be for the UK 421 00:26:43,600 --> 00:26:47,560 Speaker 1: government to request an extension of the two year deadline 422 00:26:48,160 --> 00:26:51,840 Speaker 1: under the famous Article fifty of the European Union treaty. 423 00:26:52,280 --> 00:26:54,640 Speaker 1: So that is, a departing member state and member states 424 00:26:54,640 --> 00:26:57,600 Speaker 1: who wishes to depart notify as the European Union of 425 00:26:57,600 --> 00:27:02,440 Speaker 1: its wish gets two years to prepare. And now as you, 426 00:27:02,480 --> 00:27:05,400 Speaker 1: as your question implies, any such requests from the UK 427 00:27:06,000 --> 00:27:08,440 Speaker 1: would need to be accepted by the other side, which 428 00:27:08,480 --> 00:27:12,080 Speaker 1: is the other seven remaining member states of the European Union. 429 00:27:12,880 --> 00:27:16,679 Speaker 1: So an important part of our argument is that in 430 00:27:16,840 --> 00:27:21,439 Speaker 1: those extreme circumstances, we're talking about remote scenarios here, and 431 00:27:21,440 --> 00:27:24,800 Speaker 1: the mainstream is just a smooth brexit in name only 432 00:27:24,840 --> 00:27:29,080 Speaker 1: going into a stand still transition lasting a couple of years. 433 00:27:29,080 --> 00:27:32,840 Speaker 1: But in this remote scenario, then the other Member states 434 00:27:32,880 --> 00:27:38,280 Speaker 1: would certainly agree to an extension because a crash out 435 00:27:38,280 --> 00:27:42,240 Speaker 1: of the UK and disorderly circumstances would be for the 436 00:27:42,320 --> 00:27:45,520 Speaker 1: EU to allow that to happen despite the UK request 437 00:27:45,560 --> 00:27:48,640 Speaker 1: that it should not happen, would be an actors self 438 00:27:48,680 --> 00:27:52,120 Speaker 1: harm and they won't do that. A theme that I'll 439 00:27:52,119 --> 00:27:55,000 Speaker 1: be honest, folks, I didn't have until I got to 440 00:27:55,040 --> 00:27:59,680 Speaker 1: Finland is that we have a very three nations centric 441 00:27:59,760 --> 00:28:03,320 Speaker 1: view of Europe Germany, France, United Kingdom. And you come 442 00:28:03,359 --> 00:28:05,520 Speaker 1: to Finland and you really have in your face, folks, 443 00:28:06,240 --> 00:28:10,479 Speaker 1: the periphery in the many other nations of Europe. Do 444 00:28:10,640 --> 00:28:14,320 Speaker 1: they have a big voice in the Brexit EU debate? 445 00:28:14,400 --> 00:28:17,680 Speaker 1: I mean in Brussels, is it about waiting to see 446 00:28:17,720 --> 00:28:21,640 Speaker 1: what chance or miracle wants or Mr McCraw or does 447 00:28:21,720 --> 00:28:27,800 Speaker 1: Finland actually have power within the Brexit debate? Well in 448 00:28:27,880 --> 00:28:33,480 Speaker 1: the in when it comes down to dramatic and extreme 449 00:28:33,560 --> 00:28:36,600 Speaker 1: scenarios like the one I just mentioned Tom, then yes, 450 00:28:36,920 --> 00:28:41,080 Speaker 1: because the unanimous assent of all Member states would be necessary. 451 00:28:41,560 --> 00:28:45,320 Speaker 1: So even smaller countries like Finland, and Finland, by the way, 452 00:28:45,360 --> 00:28:47,480 Speaker 1: is by no means the smallest member states, and the 453 00:28:47,600 --> 00:28:51,719 Speaker 1: think of Cyprus or even Marta, but they would all 454 00:28:51,840 --> 00:28:54,000 Speaker 1: have a voice and they would all have to be 455 00:28:54,040 --> 00:28:56,680 Speaker 1: taken seriously in their concerns, if they had any concerns 456 00:28:56,680 --> 00:28:59,720 Speaker 1: they wished, would need to be listened to. But in 457 00:28:59,840 --> 00:29:04,800 Speaker 1: the day to day negotiations and in the Brexit process, 458 00:29:05,160 --> 00:29:09,200 Speaker 1: it's also the case that smaller, smaller countries have an 459 00:29:09,240 --> 00:29:14,240 Speaker 1: important weight, and in particularly the Republic of Ireland by 460 00:29:14,280 --> 00:29:17,560 Speaker 1: any standards, a small member state of the European Union, 461 00:29:17,640 --> 00:29:22,560 Speaker 1: but one who's vital interests are involved in the Brexit process, 462 00:29:22,640 --> 00:29:24,960 Speaker 1: and the interests of the Republic of Ireland are being 463 00:29:25,800 --> 00:29:30,719 Speaker 1: firmly defended by the central EU negotiatives in Brussels, because 464 00:29:31,840 --> 00:29:34,640 Speaker 1: the EU will always want to show that it will 465 00:29:34,680 --> 00:29:38,160 Speaker 1: stand up for its numbers, and this is certainly doing. 466 00:29:38,320 --> 00:29:44,040 Speaker 1: The Netherlands is a slightly less extreme example, but the Netherlands, 467 00:29:43,720 --> 00:29:47,400 Speaker 1: again a smaller state which would be at risk of 468 00:29:47,520 --> 00:29:51,120 Speaker 1: severe We've got Chris Grantville, We've got to leave it there. Emia, 469 00:29:51,280 --> 00:29:57,400 Speaker 1: Global political research director for t S. Lombard, speaking from London, 470 00:30:00,280 --> 00:30:08,240 Speaker 1: HMM Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe 471 00:30:08,360 --> 00:30:13,160 Speaker 1: and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever 472 00:30:13,360 --> 00:30:17,360 Speaker 1: podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene 473 00:30:17,840 --> 00:30:21,520 Speaker 1: before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm 474 00:30:21,560 --> 00:30:22,440 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio