1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:07,880 --> 00:00:10,000 Speaker 2: We'd like to thank Graphael Bostik for joining us here 3 00:00:10,039 --> 00:00:14,360 Speaker 2: on Bloomberg Television and Radio worldwide. They were just talking 4 00:00:14,400 --> 00:00:16,880 Speaker 2: about how the President came out a short time ago 5 00:00:16,960 --> 00:00:20,480 Speaker 2: and said the Fed should lower interest rates when he talks, 6 00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:21,720 Speaker 2: do you listen. 7 00:00:22,160 --> 00:00:23,640 Speaker 1: Well, we hear lots of voices. 8 00:00:23,800 --> 00:00:26,720 Speaker 3: I would say, my job is really to talk within 9 00:00:26,760 --> 00:00:29,840 Speaker 3: the sixth district and see where policies should go based 10 00:00:29,840 --> 00:00:31,920 Speaker 3: on what I'm hearing. In terms of the momentum of 11 00:00:31,960 --> 00:00:35,360 Speaker 3: the economy and today, what I would say is there's 12 00:00:35,400 --> 00:00:38,919 Speaker 3: a lot of uncertainty. Forecasting is maybe a bit more 13 00:00:39,000 --> 00:00:42,120 Speaker 3: challenging than it's been in the past. But look, I 14 00:00:42,159 --> 00:00:45,400 Speaker 3: state on my job to just talk to the business 15 00:00:45,400 --> 00:00:49,680 Speaker 3: folks that we see and hear from them to understand 16 00:00:49,840 --> 00:00:51,800 Speaker 3: sort of what's happening on the ground, and that really. 17 00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:54,240 Speaker 1: Is the thing that it informs me very much. 18 00:00:54,360 --> 00:00:56,440 Speaker 2: Well, this is the part where I'm normally going to 19 00:00:56,440 --> 00:00:58,639 Speaker 2: try to pry out of you some sort of guidance 20 00:00:58,960 --> 00:01:01,000 Speaker 2: on future interest rate moves. But when you look at 21 00:01:01,000 --> 00:01:04,800 Speaker 2: the summary of economic projections, the dot plot from last week, 22 00:01:05,280 --> 00:01:08,399 Speaker 2: one gets the impression that you don't really have a 23 00:01:08,440 --> 00:01:09,560 Speaker 2: clue at this point. 24 00:01:10,319 --> 00:01:12,520 Speaker 3: Well, you know, what we've heard, and what I've heard 25 00:01:12,640 --> 00:01:15,360 Speaker 3: is that we don't really know where the economy is 26 00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:18,120 Speaker 3: going to go. Business leaders don't know, families don't know, 27 00:01:18,680 --> 00:01:21,880 Speaker 3: and local policymakers don't know either. So one of the 28 00:01:21,880 --> 00:01:25,600 Speaker 3: things that really has impressed upon me is the idea 29 00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:28,400 Speaker 3: that people are taking on board information as it occurs. 30 00:01:28,800 --> 00:01:32,080 Speaker 3: What they're hearing or things that are leading to expectations 31 00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:35,080 Speaker 3: that there'll be upward pressure on prices so that inflation 32 00:01:35,120 --> 00:01:36,080 Speaker 3: will happen longer. 33 00:01:36,200 --> 00:01:37,520 Speaker 1: And I've taken that on board. 34 00:01:37,600 --> 00:01:40,200 Speaker 3: So my projection of where inflation is going to go 35 00:01:40,240 --> 00:01:44,240 Speaker 3: this year is pretty much sideways, and we won't get 36 00:01:44,280 --> 00:01:48,440 Speaker 3: back to a more neutral level of inflation or two 37 00:01:48,520 --> 00:01:51,840 Speaker 3: percent target. I don't project until sometime early in twenty 38 00:01:51,880 --> 00:01:55,960 Speaker 3: twenty seven, but it is very much hearing people taking 39 00:01:56,040 --> 00:01:58,320 Speaker 3: the latest news figure out what that means for them, 40 00:01:58,600 --> 00:02:00,480 Speaker 3: and then I will respond to that in terms of 41 00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:03,120 Speaker 3: how I think about the economy's trajectory and policy. 42 00:02:03,520 --> 00:02:04,120 Speaker 1: Last month, you. 43 00:02:04,120 --> 00:02:07,200 Speaker 2: Said you thought we would have two rate cuts this year. 44 00:02:08,080 --> 00:02:10,800 Speaker 2: The dot plot didn't change, still calling for two rate cuts, 45 00:02:10,840 --> 00:02:13,920 Speaker 2: but a number of people move their dots up to say, 46 00:02:13,960 --> 00:02:15,320 Speaker 2: maybe we get fewer than that. 47 00:02:15,400 --> 00:02:16,240 Speaker 1: Were you one of those? 48 00:02:16,360 --> 00:02:18,360 Speaker 3: I was one of those, So I was at two. 49 00:02:18,680 --> 00:02:21,200 Speaker 3: I moved to one mainly because I think we're going 50 00:02:21,280 --> 00:02:25,000 Speaker 3: to see inflation be very bumpy and not moved dramatically 51 00:02:25,040 --> 00:02:27,400 Speaker 3: and in a clear way to the two percent target, 52 00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:31,400 Speaker 3: because that's being pushed back. I think the appropriate path 53 00:02:31,400 --> 00:02:33,320 Speaker 3: for policy is also going to have to be pushed 54 00:02:33,320 --> 00:02:35,040 Speaker 3: back and getting us to that neutral level. 55 00:02:35,360 --> 00:02:37,680 Speaker 2: Well, some of your colleagues also move their dots down, 56 00:02:37,919 --> 00:02:42,119 Speaker 2: suggesting that we might see more rate cuts, probably because 57 00:02:42,160 --> 00:02:44,200 Speaker 2: they think the economy will weaken. What do you think 58 00:02:44,200 --> 00:02:49,280 Speaker 2: the odds of a economy weakening because of fiscal policies are? 59 00:02:49,960 --> 00:02:52,280 Speaker 3: Well, what I would say is I am hearing more 60 00:02:52,440 --> 00:02:54,600 Speaker 3: concerns about the trajector of the economy. 61 00:02:54,840 --> 00:02:55,720 Speaker 1: That's undoubted. 62 00:02:56,040 --> 00:02:59,320 Speaker 3: But what I also will say is the data that's 63 00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:02,160 Speaker 3: come in today has not actually shown that, and we've 64 00:03:02,160 --> 00:03:06,000 Speaker 3: still seen a resilient economy. I do know that consumer 65 00:03:06,040 --> 00:03:08,840 Speaker 3: sentiment has started to take a dip. And the question 66 00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:11,960 Speaker 3: that we face right now is is consumer sentiment going 67 00:03:11,960 --> 00:03:14,600 Speaker 3: to be a leading indicator like it was pre pandemic, 68 00:03:14,919 --> 00:03:16,600 Speaker 3: or is it going to be something that doesn't really 69 00:03:16,639 --> 00:03:20,240 Speaker 3: translate into actual observed behavior in the economy. That is 70 00:03:20,400 --> 00:03:23,120 Speaker 3: how it played out for most of the pandemic. Right now, 71 00:03:23,160 --> 00:03:24,880 Speaker 3: it's an open question and it's one of the things 72 00:03:24,919 --> 00:03:27,280 Speaker 3: I'm going to be watching very closely in the months 73 00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:27,560 Speaker 3: to come. 74 00:03:27,760 --> 00:03:30,360 Speaker 2: Well, it's hard to know for sure what consumers are 75 00:03:30,400 --> 00:03:32,400 Speaker 2: going to do, but you talk to business leaders all 76 00:03:32,440 --> 00:03:35,400 Speaker 2: the time. What's a general attitude of CEOs right now 77 00:03:35,440 --> 00:03:39,800 Speaker 2: about business outlook and about their plans for say, hiring 78 00:03:40,400 --> 00:03:42,600 Speaker 2: or even raising prices. 79 00:03:42,840 --> 00:03:46,000 Speaker 3: So we actually have started to ask our business leaders 80 00:03:46,040 --> 00:03:49,000 Speaker 3: exactly this question, where do you think pricing pressures are 81 00:03:49,000 --> 00:03:51,720 Speaker 3: going to go higher or lower? What we've heard consistently 82 00:03:51,840 --> 00:03:53,760 Speaker 3: is they think they're going to go higher. Then we 83 00:03:53,800 --> 00:03:55,160 Speaker 3: ask what do they think is going to happen in 84 00:03:55,240 --> 00:03:58,160 Speaker 3: terms of their sales, And they're also quite bullish. 85 00:03:57,880 --> 00:04:00,600 Speaker 1: On the sales rising as well, well, which. 86 00:04:00,400 --> 00:04:02,880 Speaker 3: Says to me they think that consumers are going to 87 00:04:02,880 --> 00:04:05,360 Speaker 3: be able to manage these higher levels of prices and 88 00:04:05,440 --> 00:04:08,080 Speaker 3: whatever changes in prices that happen moving forward. 89 00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:10,400 Speaker 1: We'll have to see if that actually plays out. 90 00:04:10,400 --> 00:04:12,480 Speaker 3: I think that'd be one of the big questions and 91 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:15,800 Speaker 3: stories that emerges through the course of twenty twenty five, 92 00:04:15,920 --> 00:04:19,400 Speaker 3: namely how the consumer manages in the face of these 93 00:04:19,640 --> 00:04:20,919 Speaker 3: elevated price levels. 94 00:04:21,120 --> 00:04:23,800 Speaker 2: Well, if companies are saying prices are going to go up, 95 00:04:23,839 --> 00:04:26,160 Speaker 2: are they going to pass that along if tariffs come 96 00:04:26,160 --> 00:04:30,000 Speaker 2: on and add to the cost of their materials. 97 00:04:30,240 --> 00:04:33,120 Speaker 3: Well, we've done survey question as well, and what we've 98 00:04:33,120 --> 00:04:36,720 Speaker 3: gotten in survey responses is yes, they're expecting to try 99 00:04:36,720 --> 00:04:40,760 Speaker 3: to pass these through. The expectations about unit price costs 100 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:43,680 Speaker 3: going up is clear. But if you look at in 101 00:04:43,720 --> 00:04:46,560 Speaker 3: our surveys about what they're expecting for price changes, the 102 00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:49,320 Speaker 3: amount of price change they're expecting almost matches the cost 103 00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:51,800 Speaker 3: change one for one, which says a complete pass through 104 00:04:51,880 --> 00:04:54,000 Speaker 3: is the expectation. And then again we'll have to see 105 00:04:54,040 --> 00:04:57,119 Speaker 3: what happens in terms of whether consumers take that on board. 106 00:04:57,240 --> 00:04:59,359 Speaker 2: What are they tell you about the labor market and 107 00:04:59,400 --> 00:05:01,320 Speaker 2: their plans for employment going forward. 108 00:05:01,480 --> 00:05:04,880 Speaker 3: Well, labor markets they're still tight, not as tight as 109 00:05:04,880 --> 00:05:07,720 Speaker 3: they were two years ago. But what we hear from 110 00:05:07,760 --> 00:05:10,200 Speaker 3: most businesses is that's not a source of worry for them. 111 00:05:10,360 --> 00:05:12,520 Speaker 3: I feel like if they can get if they need workers, 112 00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:14,920 Speaker 3: they'll be able to get them, and that wage pressures 113 00:05:14,920 --> 00:05:18,160 Speaker 3: are not really outsized relative to where they're pre pandemic. 114 00:05:18,360 --> 00:05:21,560 Speaker 3: So folks are feeling pretty good about the prospects in 115 00:05:21,640 --> 00:05:22,440 Speaker 3: terms of workers. 116 00:05:23,040 --> 00:05:27,560 Speaker 2: Border crossings are way down, and deportations are supposedly ramping up. 117 00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:29,760 Speaker 1: What do you hear from the service. 118 00:05:29,480 --> 00:05:33,480 Speaker 2: Industries about their abilities or even construction to find workers. 119 00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:36,360 Speaker 3: Well, we haven't been hearing this as across the board thing, 120 00:05:36,600 --> 00:05:40,520 Speaker 3: but we are hearing from particular sectors that there is 121 00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:43,559 Speaker 3: a shortage that's starting to emerge in terms of work 122 00:05:43,560 --> 00:05:46,599 Speaker 3: crews on housing, construction sites and a like. 123 00:05:46,880 --> 00:05:48,360 Speaker 1: We're just have to watch to see if. 124 00:05:48,240 --> 00:05:51,920 Speaker 3: That remains isolated or whether it becomes something that is 125 00:05:51,960 --> 00:05:55,640 Speaker 3: more widespread, which then will have implications for the ability 126 00:05:55,680 --> 00:05:58,359 Speaker 3: of the economy to meet the demand that's out there. 127 00:05:58,520 --> 00:06:01,160 Speaker 2: You were talking about the consumers set. What do you 128 00:06:01,200 --> 00:06:04,719 Speaker 2: make of the rise in inflation expectations, which, at least 129 00:06:04,720 --> 00:06:06,800 Speaker 2: in the Michigan survey has been fairly dramatic. 130 00:06:07,320 --> 00:06:10,720 Speaker 3: Well, as you know, for many, many years, short run 131 00:06:10,720 --> 00:06:13,640 Speaker 3: inflation expectations that really matched where people are. And I 132 00:06:13,680 --> 00:06:18,000 Speaker 3: think seeing the elevated prices, hearing the talk about the tariffs, 133 00:06:18,279 --> 00:06:21,839 Speaker 3: and hear the idea that tariffs push up prices, I 134 00:06:21,880 --> 00:06:25,480 Speaker 3: think has shaped people's expectations in the short run. It's 135 00:06:25,520 --> 00:06:27,200 Speaker 3: the medium in the longer term that I'm trying to 136 00:06:27,200 --> 00:06:31,240 Speaker 3: focus on much more. They're the reaction has been far 137 00:06:31,360 --> 00:06:34,720 Speaker 3: less dramatic. But to the extent that that starts creeping up, 138 00:06:34,839 --> 00:06:36,640 Speaker 3: that'll be something that I'll have to worry about. 139 00:06:36,880 --> 00:06:38,600 Speaker 2: Well, there was a lot of pearl clutching on Wall 140 00:06:38,600 --> 00:06:41,720 Speaker 2: Street when Chairman Powell suggested that the impact of tariffs 141 00:06:41,920 --> 00:06:44,400 Speaker 2: on inflation would be transitory. 142 00:06:45,240 --> 00:06:47,919 Speaker 1: Would you use that characterization? Well, I try not to 143 00:06:48,000 --> 00:06:49,000 Speaker 1: use that word anymore. 144 00:06:49,040 --> 00:06:51,400 Speaker 3: I will just say that, but I do think, Look, 145 00:06:51,440 --> 00:06:55,400 Speaker 3: we have to acknowledge that historically, when tariffs have played out, 146 00:06:55,440 --> 00:06:58,440 Speaker 3: there's been a one time jump in prices and then 147 00:06:58,760 --> 00:07:02,159 Speaker 3: the economy's return to its usual trajectory, so just that 148 00:07:02,200 --> 00:07:04,640 Speaker 3: policy doesn't have to respond to it. For me, I 149 00:07:04,640 --> 00:07:06,719 Speaker 3: think there is a question about whether that's going to 150 00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:07,520 Speaker 3: happen this time. 151 00:07:08,320 --> 00:07:09,360 Speaker 1: We've just gone through a. 152 00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:12,680 Speaker 3: Period of elevated inflation, so it is very much on 153 00:07:12,920 --> 00:07:16,240 Speaker 3: the consumer's mind, and I fear that they might be 154 00:07:16,320 --> 00:07:19,160 Speaker 3: more sensitive to higher prices today than they have been 155 00:07:19,200 --> 00:07:21,840 Speaker 3: in the past, but they might not, and we'll just 156 00:07:21,880 --> 00:07:23,200 Speaker 3: have to see how that plays out. 157 00:07:23,520 --> 00:07:26,200 Speaker 2: Well, this whole question of seeing how it plays out. 158 00:07:26,280 --> 00:07:29,440 Speaker 2: Given how we're getting government by tweeting, things change all 159 00:07:29,480 --> 00:07:33,040 Speaker 2: the time. Are you sort of foreclosed from acting preemptively? 160 00:07:33,200 --> 00:07:35,960 Speaker 2: Are you going to be necessarily behind the curve? 161 00:07:36,680 --> 00:07:38,400 Speaker 3: I don't think we're going to be behind the curve, 162 00:07:38,520 --> 00:07:42,480 Speaker 3: mainly because we know we're waiting, and so from my perspective, 163 00:07:42,520 --> 00:07:45,360 Speaker 3: the longer you have to wait, that means your actions, 164 00:07:45,360 --> 00:07:48,559 Speaker 3: when you decide that it's clear where the economy is going, 165 00:07:48,680 --> 00:07:50,240 Speaker 3: are going to have to be larger than they would 166 00:07:50,280 --> 00:07:53,040 Speaker 3: be otherwise. So I would say, we don't want to 167 00:07:53,320 --> 00:07:56,320 Speaker 3: make it's not in our interest to move in one direction, 168 00:07:56,720 --> 00:07:59,160 Speaker 3: find out that the economy is going in a different way, 169 00:07:59,160 --> 00:07:59,520 Speaker 3: and then have. 170 00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:00,000 Speaker 1: To undo that. 171 00:08:00,640 --> 00:08:04,240 Speaker 3: I'd much rather take the time make sure that when 172 00:08:04,280 --> 00:08:07,920 Speaker 3: we act, it's acting appropriately to where the economy is, 173 00:08:08,200 --> 00:08:10,640 Speaker 3: and we can make sure that we stay close to 174 00:08:10,720 --> 00:08:12,520 Speaker 3: our dual mandate objectives. 175 00:08:12,840 --> 00:08:16,640 Speaker 2: Now you produce the GDP now number from the Atlanta Fed. 176 00:08:16,720 --> 00:08:19,160 Speaker 2: It's gotten a lot of publicity lately, Yes, it has 177 00:08:18,960 --> 00:08:22,240 Speaker 2: not for its cheery news, but even adjusted for gold, 178 00:08:22,400 --> 00:08:25,040 Speaker 2: it's sort of unchanged, which is a big drop from 179 00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:28,080 Speaker 2: the growth rates we've seen. Do you think we're in 180 00:08:28,120 --> 00:08:30,800 Speaker 2: the midst of a real slowdown or was this just 181 00:08:30,840 --> 00:08:32,720 Speaker 2: sort of a temporary dip at the beginning of the 182 00:08:32,720 --> 00:08:33,240 Speaker 2: first quarter. 183 00:08:33,480 --> 00:08:34,480 Speaker 1: Well, we'll have to see. 184 00:08:34,520 --> 00:08:36,920 Speaker 3: You know, GDP now is a now cast, so it 185 00:08:36,960 --> 00:08:39,240 Speaker 3: takes data as it comes in through the course of 186 00:08:39,240 --> 00:08:43,000 Speaker 3: the quarter. What I would say is the drop from 187 00:08:43,040 --> 00:08:46,000 Speaker 3: the two point two percent down to anywhere from zero 188 00:08:46,160 --> 00:08:49,200 Speaker 3: to a half of percent is a sign that that 189 00:08:49,400 --> 00:08:51,319 Speaker 3: suite of data that set a data that came in 190 00:08:51,640 --> 00:08:54,000 Speaker 3: is suggesting slowdown. We'll have to see what that looks 191 00:08:54,040 --> 00:08:55,959 Speaker 3: like for the end of the quarter. I will say 192 00:08:56,040 --> 00:08:58,640 Speaker 3: most businesses I'm talking to aren't reporting to me that 193 00:08:58,679 --> 00:09:00,800 Speaker 3: they're seeing that kind of a slowdown, So we'll just 194 00:09:00,840 --> 00:09:02,079 Speaker 3: have to wait and see what happens. 195 00:09:02,240 --> 00:09:04,840 Speaker 2: Well, if the economy slows a lot, which would suggest 196 00:09:04,920 --> 00:09:08,200 Speaker 2: maybe that lower rates are needed, but inflation hasn't come 197 00:09:08,240 --> 00:09:11,319 Speaker 2: down to two percent, and you want to have higher 198 00:09:11,400 --> 00:09:16,679 Speaker 2: rates to quell inflation. If you have that sort of stagflation, 199 00:09:17,400 --> 00:09:20,360 Speaker 2: which do you choose to act on. 200 00:09:20,640 --> 00:09:22,719 Speaker 3: Well, I'm not jumping to stagflation yet, so I'm just 201 00:09:22,760 --> 00:09:24,600 Speaker 3: going to say that. But I've been saying for a 202 00:09:24,600 --> 00:09:27,360 Speaker 3: long time it is paramount that we get inflation back 203 00:09:27,400 --> 00:09:30,240 Speaker 3: to our two percent target. That's the thing that I'm 204 00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:33,400 Speaker 3: laser focused on to the extent that the labor market 205 00:09:33,440 --> 00:09:36,560 Speaker 3: and the economy does weaken and we're not seeing that now. 206 00:09:37,280 --> 00:09:40,160 Speaker 3: I'll have to manage that when that happens, but right 207 00:09:40,200 --> 00:09:42,600 Speaker 3: now it is let's get inflation back to two percent. 208 00:09:42,679 --> 00:09:45,640 Speaker 3: That's one of the reasons why I've been comfortable keeping 209 00:09:45,679 --> 00:09:48,199 Speaker 3: our policy in a restrictive stance to make sure that 210 00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:52,720 Speaker 3: we are trying to push that target and that measure 211 00:09:52,920 --> 00:09:54,480 Speaker 3: to the number that we're trying to get it to. 212 00:09:54,960 --> 00:09:57,560 Speaker 2: If I could say this politely, one of the constants 213 00:09:57,600 --> 00:09:59,959 Speaker 2: with the Fed's forecast about inflation is that you keep 214 00:10:00,080 --> 00:10:02,600 Speaker 2: pushing out the time frame for getting to two percent. 215 00:10:03,600 --> 00:10:07,920 Speaker 2: What's keeping inflation sticky at this point and what should 216 00:10:07,920 --> 00:10:09,520 Speaker 2: we look for to see a sign that it is 217 00:10:09,559 --> 00:10:12,000 Speaker 2: actually going to come down because PCE is expected to 218 00:10:12,040 --> 00:10:12,560 Speaker 2: come in up. 219 00:10:12,920 --> 00:10:15,360 Speaker 3: So I'll just say I haven't always been pushing it out, 220 00:10:15,520 --> 00:10:19,000 Speaker 3: like though the SEP and disambrac forward a bit because 221 00:10:19,000 --> 00:10:21,520 Speaker 3: the economy was progressing in a nice way. But what 222 00:10:21,520 --> 00:10:24,120 Speaker 3: I would say is this, we know housing numbers have 223 00:10:24,240 --> 00:10:28,240 Speaker 3: not come in is not normalized as fast as others have, 224 00:10:28,360 --> 00:10:31,600 Speaker 3: as well, we know the goods prices in the most 225 00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:34,360 Speaker 3: recent period have risen a bit, and we're going to 226 00:10:34,360 --> 00:10:34,800 Speaker 3: have to keep. 227 00:10:34,679 --> 00:10:35,200 Speaker 1: An eye on that. 228 00:10:35,320 --> 00:10:37,360 Speaker 3: You know, I hear a lot about eggs and the like, 229 00:10:37,720 --> 00:10:41,480 Speaker 3: And then we also know that service prices have seemed 230 00:10:41,480 --> 00:10:44,080 Speaker 3: to have leveled off. So one of the questions that 231 00:10:44,120 --> 00:10:46,680 Speaker 3: I have in my head is are we seeing a 232 00:10:46,760 --> 00:10:50,560 Speaker 3: fundamental change from the trends that we had been seeing 233 00:10:50,559 --> 00:10:54,880 Speaker 3: over the last two years. That's not my baseline outlook, 234 00:10:55,360 --> 00:10:57,320 Speaker 3: but it's a possibility and it's one of the things 235 00:10:57,360 --> 00:10:59,640 Speaker 3: that me and my team will be watching closely in 236 00:10:59,640 --> 00:11:02,320 Speaker 3: the next six to eight weeks. 237 00:11:02,480 --> 00:11:05,280 Speaker 2: Well, suppose inflation stays about where it is and remain 238 00:11:05,360 --> 00:11:08,640 Speaker 2: sticky but doesn't go up, is the Fed funds rate 239 00:11:09,200 --> 00:11:11,640 Speaker 2: properly calibrated for that level of inflation. 240 00:11:12,559 --> 00:11:15,760 Speaker 3: Everyone I've talked to has given me information to suggest 241 00:11:15,800 --> 00:11:19,480 Speaker 3: that it is. We will just have to see, with 242 00:11:19,640 --> 00:11:22,720 Speaker 3: all the other pressures that are going on, whether we 243 00:11:22,880 --> 00:11:26,160 Speaker 3: have to adjust and adapt based on new realities. So 244 00:11:26,240 --> 00:11:28,640 Speaker 3: I think it will be an interesting question the extent 245 00:11:28,679 --> 00:11:31,800 Speaker 3: to which we do see upward pressure on prices as 246 00:11:31,840 --> 00:11:35,480 Speaker 3: these teriffs come in, And it depends really on the 247 00:11:35,480 --> 00:11:39,040 Speaker 3: suite of terrifs that we see. It'll be interesting to 248 00:11:39,080 --> 00:11:41,520 Speaker 3: see how consumers take this on board. I think it'll 249 00:11:41,520 --> 00:11:44,880 Speaker 3: be the intersection of multiple factors and forces that will 250 00:11:44,920 --> 00:11:48,280 Speaker 3: determine really what level of policy we need. 251 00:11:48,160 --> 00:11:48,600 Speaker 1: To be at. 252 00:11:48,800 --> 00:11:51,280 Speaker 2: Well, do you think at this point you have a 253 00:11:51,320 --> 00:11:54,199 Speaker 2: problem with monetary policy transmission in the sense that you've 254 00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:58,199 Speaker 2: been cutting rates since September, but market rates have basically 255 00:11:58,280 --> 00:12:00,800 Speaker 2: stayed range bound and followed you down. 256 00:12:01,320 --> 00:12:03,839 Speaker 3: I don't think it's a transmission issue. I actually think 257 00:12:03,880 --> 00:12:07,360 Speaker 3: it's a collective, dynamic issue. As you know, the longer 258 00:12:07,480 --> 00:12:10,480 Speaker 3: rates are our function of things other than just what 259 00:12:10,520 --> 00:12:12,880 Speaker 3: we set our policy rate as, and there's been a 260 00:12:12,880 --> 00:12:14,960 Speaker 3: lot of change in there. To the extent that there's 261 00:12:15,120 --> 00:12:17,760 Speaker 3: uncertainty has gone up, you might expect rates to be 262 00:12:17,840 --> 00:12:20,440 Speaker 3: stubborn on the high side, and so I look at 263 00:12:20,480 --> 00:12:23,000 Speaker 3: it as a much more meta picture and really try 264 00:12:23,040 --> 00:12:25,920 Speaker 3: to keep in mind that we don't control the whole economy. 265 00:12:25,960 --> 00:12:28,560 Speaker 3: We control our policy rate, and that's not really what 266 00:12:28,600 --> 00:12:29,880 Speaker 3: we have to stay focused on. 267 00:12:30,400 --> 00:12:32,600 Speaker 2: Let me go back to the beginning of our conversation 268 00:12:32,920 --> 00:12:38,200 Speaker 2: and ask if you or the system have heard from 269 00:12:38,240 --> 00:12:43,520 Speaker 2: the administration besides these tweets or random comments the President makes. 270 00:12:44,160 --> 00:12:48,760 Speaker 3: I've not heard anything, and I will just keep reaching 271 00:12:48,840 --> 00:12:51,840 Speaker 3: out doing my job the way I have and hopefully 272 00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:53,560 Speaker 3: we will get to a place where the economy is 273 00:12:53,559 --> 00:12:57,360 Speaker 3: stabilized and both of our mandates are at target. 274 00:12:57,760 --> 00:13:00,120 Speaker 2: Well, you and your colleagues talk a lot about the 275 00:13:00,240 --> 00:13:02,839 Speaker 2: FED having no role in fiscal policy. Do you think 276 00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:05,439 Speaker 2: the administration should have any role in monetary policy? 277 00:13:06,080 --> 00:13:08,880 Speaker 1: Well, there is an opinion, and then this role. 278 00:13:09,120 --> 00:13:12,080 Speaker 3: To me, I would say, we are going to make 279 00:13:12,120 --> 00:13:14,959 Speaker 3: our decision based on the task that we have at hand. 280 00:13:15,320 --> 00:13:18,640 Speaker 3: We have an FMC, we have nineteen mention members, we 281 00:13:18,640 --> 00:13:20,800 Speaker 3: have the Federal Reserve Deck which guides us in terms 282 00:13:20,840 --> 00:13:22,840 Speaker 3: of doing that, and as long as that's the law 283 00:13:22,840 --> 00:13:25,040 Speaker 3: of the land, that's what I'm going to focus on doing. 284 00:13:25,360 --> 00:13:28,560 Speaker 2: Do you find any issue with the Fed's credibility from 285 00:13:28,640 --> 00:13:30,480 Speaker 2: all this outside chirping at you? 286 00:13:31,360 --> 00:13:33,160 Speaker 3: So, I'll just say, from the time I've been in 287 00:13:33,200 --> 00:13:35,680 Speaker 3: this job, folks have had comments on what the FEDS 288 00:13:35,679 --> 00:13:38,800 Speaker 3: should do, so that in and of itself has not 289 00:13:38,880 --> 00:13:39,760 Speaker 3: really been a factor. 290 00:13:40,440 --> 00:13:42,720 Speaker 1: I do think that we have a lot. 291 00:13:42,600 --> 00:13:45,199 Speaker 3: Of credibility, and I talk to lots of folks that 292 00:13:45,280 --> 00:13:48,400 Speaker 3: almost at the end of almost every meeting, I get 293 00:13:48,440 --> 00:13:51,440 Speaker 3: thanked for what we're doing as a collective, and to me, 294 00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:54,760 Speaker 3: that's the true measure whether when folks that are out 295 00:13:54,760 --> 00:13:57,840 Speaker 3: there in the economy doing real things talk to me 296 00:13:57,920 --> 00:14:02,360 Speaker 3: and provide feedback, the feedback has appreciation about how we've 297 00:14:02,400 --> 00:14:05,319 Speaker 3: approached a job and the desire for us to keep 298 00:14:05,320 --> 00:14:05,719 Speaker 3: doing it. 299 00:14:05,920 --> 00:14:08,080 Speaker 2: One last question for our friends on the money market 300 00:14:08,080 --> 00:14:13,199 Speaker 2: desks around Wall Street. You're cutting down on QT to 301 00:14:13,520 --> 00:14:17,280 Speaker 2: five billion a month for treasuries. Do you anticipate ramping 302 00:14:17,320 --> 00:14:20,560 Speaker 2: that up again or is this basically it until you 303 00:14:20,680 --> 00:14:21,440 Speaker 2: decide to stop. 304 00:14:22,320 --> 00:14:25,960 Speaker 3: So my preference would be to stay at this rate 305 00:14:26,120 --> 00:14:29,560 Speaker 3: for a while until we stop. As you know, and 306 00:14:29,600 --> 00:14:32,920 Speaker 3: as your friends on the desk, no, it's not clear 307 00:14:33,000 --> 00:14:36,320 Speaker 3: exactly what the threshold level of reserves is, at which 308 00:14:36,360 --> 00:14:40,200 Speaker 3: point money markets might start to function less smoothly. 309 00:14:41,000 --> 00:14:42,880 Speaker 1: I don't want to get to that level. 310 00:14:43,080 --> 00:14:45,320 Speaker 3: We're closer to it now than we were a year ago, 311 00:14:45,600 --> 00:14:47,760 Speaker 3: so for me slowing down to make sure we don't 312 00:14:47,760 --> 00:14:49,520 Speaker 3: go too far, it's fully appropriate. 313 00:14:49,640 --> 00:14:50,960 Speaker 2: Would you ever sell mortgages? 314 00:14:52,160 --> 00:14:53,080 Speaker 1: I would think about it. 315 00:14:53,120 --> 00:14:56,600 Speaker 3: You know, the Committee definitely has as a goal moving 316 00:14:56,680 --> 00:15:01,360 Speaker 3: out of the mortgage backed security space into tread. But 317 00:15:01,520 --> 00:15:04,000 Speaker 3: now we just have to make sure that if we're 318 00:15:04,040 --> 00:15:05,600 Speaker 3: going to go that route, and I'd say we've not 319 00:15:05,640 --> 00:15:08,120 Speaker 3: had any conversations on that, we do it in a 320 00:15:08,160 --> 00:15:12,400 Speaker 3: way that doesn't disrupt either the mortgage market or money 321 00:15:12,400 --> 00:15:13,200 Speaker 3: marguts more broadly. 322 00:15:13,360 --> 00:15:15,720 Speaker 2: All right, well, thank you very much, Rafael for joining 323 00:15:15,760 --> 00:15:19,160 Speaker 2: us today. Rafael Bastik, the President of the Federal Reserve 324 00:15:19,240 --> 00:15:20,400 Speaker 2: Bank of Atlanta,