WEBVTT - “Everyone Is Holding Their Breath,” Galea Says

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser. Every day

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing you the latest news from the world's of

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>business and finance, plus technology, politics. So much going on

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world of politics, economics, and it's all harnessing

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the power of Business Week reporters and editors. If you

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>can download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com. If you can also listen to our radio

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and be

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>sure to watch us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Global News. You are listening to Bloomberg Business Week. I'm

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Carol Master along with Tim Stanovic a Bloomberg quicktake, and

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>we got to talk about the virus. You and I

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:35.919
<v Speaker 1>just kind of rehash some of the headlines, but one

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>of the big ones is the Maderna news. Today. It

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>seems like every Monday we're getting some big vaccine news,

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>doesn't It does seem like every mondy. It's like everybody

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>working over the weekend, like we gotta get it out.

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>It's like a deal right now, like we gotta get

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it out. Let's get into it, because we do still

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 1>continue to see cases soaring globally we see a pullback,

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>shutdown of economies. Let's bring in someone who has been

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a friend of our show, Dr Sandra Galia. He's Dina

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Professor at Boston University School of Public Health. His author

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>pained uncomfortable conversations about the public's health, and he joins

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>us once again on the phone from Boston toctical A

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>great to have you here with Tim and myself. How

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>are you I am? I am very well all things considered, Carol.

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me and thank you for having

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>me on your show. We'll tell me how Boston is.

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you know, we're all like, wait,

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this movie before. Here we go again. I

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's fair to say Boston is a bit on

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the edge of its seat that we have had, like

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the country, another wave for Boston's probably

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the second wave. It's been a very attenuated compared to

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the first way which we had in March, April and May,

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and it has stayed relatively lower than it was then.

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And but I think everybody is anxious, everybody is nervous,

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think the mayor and the Governor have been

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>suitably cautious taking steps to try to contain the epidemic.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>As of right now, touch Wood, I think things remain

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>relatively contained here, but I think everybody, like myself is

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of holding their breath and waiting for tomorrow and

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the day after tomorrow. Yeah, and toctically. I wondered too,

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>what you were thinking. What was going through your head

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>when you saw those images of people in the airport

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>last week. We had more people check into T s

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>A last week than at any point since March before

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic hit, traveling despite what they heard from public

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>health officials. What were you thinking? Terrifying? I'm going to

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>tell you that's what I was thinking. What were you thinking? Well,

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it really really depends. It depends on

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what people were doing. The we we know that air

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>travel in and of itself is relatively safe. In fact,

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the number of cases spread through our travel are very few.

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>There really are at the level of case studies. It

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>really depends on where people were going, and the concern

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>was I think the concern was that they were going

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>to travel to spend time with their family during the holidays,

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>which we were told not to do. Well, that's well,

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the issue. The issue is the issue is our

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>people spending a lot of time in large groups without

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>taking precautions about wearing masks, being indoors. And that's what

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>we know is fueling spread. Was feeling spread is large

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 1>gatherings indoors. The travel in and of itself is is

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps an indicator of the But I would like to

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>give people benefit of the doubt that that everybody was

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>being careful and being suitably responsible. Of course, time will tell.

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>We shall see whether there are suitable where there are

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>spikes that follow the Thanksgiving weekends. Well, so I wonder,

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, sounder, do you anticipate that you know, I

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Is it a week from now ten days

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>where we'll get an idea if we see that Thanksgiving bump,

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>we shall, yeah, we should. We should know that if

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 1>there is thingsgiving bump, we should know in about the

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>week to ten days. You know, we have to be

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>very careful about interpreting these data. For example, there's been

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of written the American media about the Canadian

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>things giving bump, but if you look at the Canada,

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>but if you look at the Candian data, that's not accurate.

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the Canadian data where there was a steep

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>acceleration before things giving. Things giving happened and acceleration continued,

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>so there really was no clear evidence of a Thanksgiving

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>bump in Canada. So I I think we need to

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>be I think we need to be very clear in

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>our public health messaging that that we spread the virus

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>by being indoors and untemplated areas with a lot of

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>people coming from all over the place, hanging out together

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>like radio station. Long as we have well I'm not

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking how many how many of you there are there? Well,

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>we are socially distanced and they're very clean us. There

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you go. But if people if people are careful for that,

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>if people are careful for that, I think we we

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>should be able to get through this without seeing unnecessary increases.

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I do think there is a danger. There's a danger

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to telling people that they should not do things that

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>are fundamentally natural, that are that are essential for people

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to go on with a semblance of daily life. So

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the message has to be nuanced, and we

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>have been failing at providing a nuanced message in this country. Well,

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's interesting. I feel like that there's been

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of momentum and tim I don't know if

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you're hearing this too bad about education, that we've maybe

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>made some mistakes that the you know, education, I don't

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>know how you see it. I think we've made I

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>think we've made bigness education. And then there have been

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and there have been, and we've discussed this on your show, Carol.

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I've said constantly that that the schools should be open,

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>that the evidence that children transmit coronavirus is very low.

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Children do not really get sick from coronavirus. And there

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>have been new analysis coming out now, for example, that

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the number of years of lives that will life, what

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that will be lost eventually due to the lower educational

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>attainment of of children now probably dwarfs the number of

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>years of lives lost due to coronavirus. And and these

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>are kind of analysis that we can do. So so

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we have Look, when COVID hit, coronavirus hit in March

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of twenty we were all an enormous panic, and we

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>did everything that we could think of, essentially shut down

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the world to protect ourselves. And that was reasonable. That

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>was a crisis. But it's now December. We're no longer

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in a crisis. We need to be approaching this judiciously,

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>carefully and thoughtfully, and say, we know how this disease

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is spread, how do we minimize the ways the disease spread?

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>And how do we reopen parts of society that we

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>can reopen safely? Well? Does seem like public health officials

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and government leaders are starting to change the way they're

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking as we do get more information. We saw build

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>a Bladio over the weekend say wait a second, we

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>can reopen schools. I mean, how did you read into that, doctor?

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I I thought it was exactly what you have said him,

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that that we are beginning to get. Why is there

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and smart about this build a Blasio ahead? Of course,

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the three percent Kese positivity line red line that he

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>had drawn because of negotiations with the unions as our understanding, Well,

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>hard to know where three percent comes from? Whose five percent?

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>There's no magic number, of course, and it was it

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>was a line of convenience. And I think what he

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>came to is evidence is so overwhelming that children are

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>missing out by not going to school, particularly poor and

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>disadvantaged children, that there really should be the burden, the

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming burden of proof should be on something extraordinary that

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>makes us close schools, not closing schools by default, and

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he's right. I think he's right in changing

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>his mind, and I think we collectively This is why

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I pushed back about the Thanksgiving I think we have

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to be careful about saying, well, what what is the

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>high risk activity? Flying is not really high risk activity.

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>The high risk activity is gathering indoors unmasked without being careful.

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>He had to gather in it, and that's what we

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>should minimize. It is Bloomberg Business Week Master Tim Stanivic

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Cricktakes. So we are talking with Garna. Yeah, I

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>mean you heard Charlie just now saying as a Maderna

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>hired by sevent on this, Yeah, investor is pretty enthusiastic

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. Um, So Dr Galaa. So here we are

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Maderna a second press release. Someone said to me, are

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>listening to an interview earlier, second press release in two weeks,

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>but they've still not released some really key data point. Um,

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>tell me how you read the Maderna Maderna news. Well,

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I think there's no there's no way of reading it.

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>But there's very good news and of course we still

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>need to know some of the fine print. But MODERNA

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and fires, they're both use similar approaches to come up

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>with very similar answers in terms of effectiveness. This is

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a really dramatically good news. Who uses and marone technology

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>which didn't exist for a vaccine as recently as a

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>year ago. So I do think that it makes COVID

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a triumph of biomedical science. Of course, it leaves COVID

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a utter failure of a lot of other forms of science,

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>social sciences, and a lot of ways in which we've

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.239
<v Speaker 1>controlled it, but that's another discussion. But from a vaccine

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.559
<v Speaker 1>point of view, the fact that we are this close

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to having a vaccine that can be why distributed is

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>remarkable in such a short period of time, and I

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>do think it creates an opportunity for there to be

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>rapid vaccine development and future. So this is very good. Now,

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>there are details that still need to come out. Obviously

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>there needs to be FDA approval, but there is no

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>indication that the FDA process has been corrupted by political interference.

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>All indications to my mind are that this will be

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a rigorous, fair, robust process, one that we can all trust. Well,

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it does seem like the vaccine development process here has

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>just been nothing short of incredible from many different companies.

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder about the actual distribution and delivery of

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. We saw a lot of stories, including in

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg over the weekend, about what airlines are doing around

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the world to to try to be ready for those vaccines,

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 1>to bring them to far flung parts of the world.

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>When do we get this vaccine? As a question that

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>keeps coming up, when does that happen? Dr well, when

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>when when you heard the chair of Operation Works being speaking,

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think was today or yesterday, he said that the

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>first he anticipates the first people to getacinated December nine, tortent.

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>That is essentially a week and a half, And that

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem unreasonable. Now that that, of course is quite

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>different than tim than when you and Caroline be getting it.

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's reasonable to say that, assuming that

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>there are no unanticipated hurdles, that there will be widespread

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccination by Q two of so that means in spring one.

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Now the question is when do we get to a

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>functional normal, And the functional normal means enough of our

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>are vaccinated to get to her immunity, and her immunity

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>probably means about us, and that we're looking at maybe

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the summer, maybe summer. What about when it comes to

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>two kids, Because one issue that these trials have is

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 1>is who is in the trials and who's not in

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>these clinical trials, right, like not pregnant women, uh and

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and not kids? So so when do kids? What does

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine development process like in distribution process? When when

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 1>kids start getting new vaccines? And and these are some

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of the questions that the FDA will will have to

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>be addressing, and we will see, We'll see what emerges

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>from that. I I don't all the details of the

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>data are collected. My anticipation is that there will be

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>guidance on that and that there will be groups like

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>pregnant women for example, But the FDA will have to

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the side effect profile and make a determination

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>about about for whom is the vaccine? Is the vaccine

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is safe tactically. I'm amazed at the amount of people

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>who are smart, educated to come up to me and

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>like will you take the vaccine? Like there's a lot

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>of nervousness. I was having conversations this morning like right,

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>not the typical anti vax or crowd. How these questions? Right?

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So are you worried about that, Yeah, it's worried. It

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>worries me. I suppose my hope, Carol, is that is

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that once the vaccine is no longer sort of this

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>this mythical, mythical object clouds, once it becomes concrete, once

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>once we start seeing people taking once you start seeing

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the once you see the president elect or president take it,

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>then it will remove a lot of that fear, a

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of the stigma. Now, will there be some segment

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of the population that will not take it yet, But remember,

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't need everybody to take it. We really need

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>their immunity. Maybe people be nicer of its higher so

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we do not need everybody speak. So I'm on the

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>National Endowment for the Arts and Health, and I should

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>stay National Endowment for the Humanities. And because I googled

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Elvis Presley polio shot, remember that iconic shot of getting

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a polio vaccine. I imagine right now we're gonna have

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>like Instagram influencers who are actually getting the vaccine. And

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that would actually go a long way. And

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>I think we need public health officials thinking about how

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>we can get this message out to the grand general public,

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>right and getting communities go ahead. I agree, I agree completely.

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I actually think that's exactly what will happen when you

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>look at when you look at social change of public

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>health interventions and upstake of interventions. That's what happens. You

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>have whatever the social media of the time is, you

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 1>have influence, serious, you have politicians, have celebrities, have campaigns,

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and all of those will make a big difference. Right.

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>We've heard that about like politicians going out, like local

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>politicians going out to communities. You know, when people trust

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>different individuals. Sandra, always always wonderful to check in with you.

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Stay safe, uh, and we'll be in touch soon. Dr

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Sandracla Dina, Professor at Boston University School of Public Health.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Check out his book Pained Uncomfortable Conversations about the Public South.

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a really keepful point. I think there's going to

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>be huge influencers like showing I got the vaccine. There

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>needs to be, and there there also needs to be

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>politicians and members of Congress doing this too because there's

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>so much skepticism. Yeah, I agree with you. This is

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer from Bloomberg Radio. You're

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Karl Masser along with Tim

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Stanovic Bloomberg Quicktake, and so, Tim, it sounded like a

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>good idea, maybe even a great idea back in the

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>spring when the FED kind of came out with this

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>bowl plan they were going to save midsized firms that

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we're getting kind of lost in the cracks caused by COVID.

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Great idea, but as it turned out, not a great reality. Right. Yes,

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>so says Christopher Condon on our colleagues at Bloomberg business Week,

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 1>who have a new article out called the fed effort

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to save midsized firms isn't working and here's why. Chris

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Condon is Federal Reserve and US Economy reporter. He joins

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a sell the phone in Virginia along with Bloomberg business

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Week editor Jie Webber on the Access line in Brooklyn. Joel,

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>great idea, but not so when you take a look

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>at how it played out. Well, I gotta just start with,

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, like, of all the of the of all

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the people and organizations who have been heroes this year,

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the FED goes right near to the top.

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's really important to start with. Let's preface with that.

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>But do you think Jake Pale is listening is that

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>what's going on here? I mean, he's always listening, whether

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>or not he wants to acknowledge us as a different matter,

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know the I think the thing that

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris really hit on here is that, you know, they

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>did an enormous amount of good, but there's also sort

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of a size of company that the FED has effectively

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>not been able to help as much, and that's the

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>midsize company. Um So, Chris, what what did you guys

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>discover as you dug into this line of reporting? Right, Joel,

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>You're right, this was kind of the bridge too far

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for a central bank during a crisis. Um. I think

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>what it really comes down to is it gets very

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult when you ask a central bank to extend emergency

0:13:55.840 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>credit outside of capital markets. Capital mar gets have their

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>own established structures and commoditized instruments that the FED can

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>simply step into and act like a safety net, and

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they reassure all of the normal participants to get going

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>again and do what they normally do. But if you're working,

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to extend credit outside capital markets, you

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>have to do it one by one. So the FED

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in this case does not obviously have the personnel or

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>systems to do one by one loan underwriting, so they

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>had to turn to banks, and to make the bank

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>underwriting reliable, they had to make sure the banks had

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>skin in every loan. And if you make the banks

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>have skin and every loan, that means they have risk

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and they want a certain reward. And now you're getting

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>into a situation of tension between how much reward does

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the lender get and how attractive is it also to

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the bar work. And despite all their efforts, the FED

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>really just could never find a formula for this program

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that would make the lending attractive both for the banks

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that were trying to cover some risk. And don't forget this,

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>this this program had a big backstop provided by the treashury,

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>but that back stop was there only for the FED,

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>not for the banks. And the people would say, well,

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the FED was buying out of the loans, but in

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>doing so, they didn't really change the risk to reward

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>calculus on each dollar of loans from the bank. And

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>only I'd like to say it would take a twenty

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>million dollar crappy loan and turn it into a one

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>million dollar crappy loans. Banks didn't want to happen so

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>they never really were able to thread the needle and

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>get all the parties into something that felt attractive. So

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so what ends up happening to these small and medium

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>medium sized businesses that needed this money, Well, many of

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>them have just either limped on UM so I'm sure

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>have gone out of business, many have laid off people.

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>There's just a lot of economic suffering that is happening here,

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of UH and just what the Fed is

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to avoid, the long term scarring of the economy,

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of the labor market, UM and the Unfortunately, you know

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a lot of people will say this was

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>avoidable if folks had realized right at the beginning that

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>what this layer of the economy needed was was not lending,

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>because let's face it, were you're talking about companies that

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>could not get access to regular bank loans. There they

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>were struggling too much. But they did not need was

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>more debt. What they needed was transfers from the government

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to help them bridge a stressful period. So if you

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you can't convince Congress to appropriate tax marrier money helped

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>bridge these companies through the way they did for small

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>companies with the paycheck Protection program, then your it looks.

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>This shows that you're not going to get very far,

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>uh if you try to rope in the Federal Reserve,

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>which of course cannot give away money, it can only

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>lend money. Right, So let's Chris, let's let's go into

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of fantasy mode here, um and and talk about

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's some changes that are going to happen

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>at Treasury. Um. There's been conversations already about, you know,

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury's claw back of that FED money, How could

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>how could the Fed effectively sort of attempt to address

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>this midsize company as we look ahead to well, there

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of different avenues that have been suggested

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>if it still involves the Fed. Eric Rose and Grant,

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>who is president of the Boston Fed, which is the

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>portion of the FED that administered this program, that suggested

0:17:56.000 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that that Congress needs to be very explicit in telling

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>both the Treasury and Fed that it can lose money

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>with this program, that they need to take more risk.

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Not the banks involved, but they need to take more risk,

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and they're that Congress would be willing to back them

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>up and cover them. But that's you know, again, we're

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about a fiscal policy decision from elected officials is

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>required others. We also talked to barad Rama Morty, who

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>was a democratically appointed member of the commission that Congress

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>created to oversee cares expending, and he really thinks that

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they should just throw in the towel on the Main

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Street program and Congress should come together and appropriate a

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of money into a grant program, a grant

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>making program. Maybe it would be a guaranteed loan program,

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>which some of it would would morph into grants. Um.

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:04.439
<v Speaker 1>But something that's that's more congressional transfers directly to companies

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that are struggling through this what's obviously going to be

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>a continued tough period until the vaccines are available. So

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>in many ways it circles back over and over the Congress,

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>and then they shouldn't be dazzled by the idea of

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>levering up money with the Fed. They should realize that

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>what is much more effective, perhaps a smaller amount transferred

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>directly to companies. Um. Yeah, direct cast always is kind

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of a good thing. We're hearing that a lot. Now.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm up for it. Um, Chris, We're gonna leave it there.

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a great read, and it's just a reminder. I mean,

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have the playbook, but you really do wonder

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>about um. We know, small business important to the economy,

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>mid sized businesses important probably to the economy as well, right,

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>absolutely important, and they just don't have the same tools

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that the large, huge companies we talked about each day have,

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>right exactly, And I've really been forgotten in this. And

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you do wonder the next round of stimulus, whether it

0:19:57.680 --> 0:19:59.479
<v Speaker 1>or aid helps them out. All Right, We're gonna leave

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it there, Chris, and thank you so much of Bloomberg

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>News along with Till Webber, editor of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer on

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radios, indeed, Bloomberg Business Week on this Monday, Carol

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Master along with Tim Stanovic of Bloomberg Quicktake here in

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. So, Tim, we recently heard

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>about a new position in the upcoming Biden administration. It

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is the first climate star in the US. We're talking

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>about President Electo Biden naming John Kerry. This is a

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>big deal. It's a big deal, and it's a big

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>name for the position, exactly, and it brings to him.

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean he several positions Secretary of State, UH, senator,

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>almost president UM. So there's a lot in terms of

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>his own experience that he brings to this position. Well,

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it's totally a global issue, so it makes sense to

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>have a resume like his, totally along with somebody who

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.479
<v Speaker 1>takes the job, which is exactly what our Bloomberg New

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Economy editorial director Andy Brown writes about in his column

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>this week, and he joins us on the phone in

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Andy, nice to have you here with

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Tim and myself. Tell us about your thinking about John

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Kerry and in what kind of message this is sending,

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 1>perhaps to China as well. Yes, so everybody has focused

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>on the idea that you know that climate has been

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>elevated to a national security issue, given the fact that

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>John Kerry is going to sit in the National Security

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Council as climates are UM. But there's also another really

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>important message that it sends, and it's a message to

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>China UM. John Terry has been very clear that he

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>thinks that the US and China need to figure out

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>some area on which they can cooperate UM and climate

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>UM is is a promising area. He wrote a piece

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of weeks ago for The New York

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Times saying that US and China need to work together

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to preserve the Southern Ocean, to save the Southern Ocean

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>in Antarctica. And he has a long track record of

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>hands on engagement with China to fix problems, and it

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>dates all the way back to at least the most notable,

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>most notable recent episode was in two thousand and fourteen

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>when he figured out a way to get China and

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the US to sign an agreement to limit their carbon emissions.

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And that was the deal that paved the way for

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and fifteen Paris Agreements. So he has

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>a track record of success in this area. Well, it

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>does seem like the Biden administration. One thing is for

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>certain that they will inherit a lot to do with

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>China in the sense of a trade war that we've

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>been in for years at this point. How does John

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Kerry help ease the tension with it on a trade

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>war by using climate discussions? Yet, so, I think the

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>assumption is that, um the tensions that have bedeviled the

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>U S. China relationship under Donald Trump are not going

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 1>to go away under a Biden presidency, and in fact,

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>UH they may actually be exacerbated, particularly in the area

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of human rights as it relates to Hong Kong and

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the National Security Law and the detention camps in Shinjiang

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and so on. And in order to prevent these problems

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>spiraling into a crisis, into confrontation, potentially even military confrontation, UM,

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>you need to figure out how you can mitigate some

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of those tensions by working together in discrete areas. And

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the climate, of course, is hardly a discrete area, given

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that it crosses almost every other area of policy and

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>arguably is the greatest threat to UH, to humanity. So

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is a big project working with China,

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>but it's not the only area. I mean, there's pandemics, UH,

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>there's mass migration. But you know, a lot of people

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>are suggesting that climate is the most fruitful area that

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the two countries to work together, and particularly since they're

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>now both aligned, the US under a Biden presidency and

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>China on the need to get to to carbon neutrality.

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>She jumping the China Chinese president has promised to do

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that by two thousand and sixty. Biden talks about doing

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it by two thousand and fifty. Well, you know, and

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what I think, you know, Andy, just coming off

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg New Economy Forum, which you know, you and

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>your team put together. It was incredible aroundup of of

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>global speakers, you know, and one of the pillars was

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>all about climate. Like it feels like something is different

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>from even the Obama administration the few years that have

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:21.959
<v Speaker 1>passed that we are seeing increasingly the impact of climate

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 1>change in our environment and it's hard for global leaders

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to ignore. And so you do wonder China and the

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>United States where they can really step up on the

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>global stage and really make a difference here. Yeah, well,

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you now have this alignment, as you say, with between

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the US and China, but also Europe. You've got large

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>parts of the planet that are pulling together on you know,

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to towards common neutrality and and all of them putting

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in place programs for a green recovery, uh from the pandemic.

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Even though, as we did discuss in the New Economy Forum,

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 1>China is worryingly in the short term trying to juice

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>growth by building coal fire power stations. Nevertheless, it's also

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>installing at an incredibly rapid rate solar and wind You

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>know and and uh and doubling down on on renewable

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>energy technologies. Well, and I do wonder, you know, how

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>they will use business policy, trade policy, the US, maybe

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the world to get China to do what they need

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to do when it comes to climate. Yeah, I'm not

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surely. I'm not sure that leverage works in

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that direction. I really do think it's more a question

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of we know that we are going to have these problems,

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and and and as we heard in the New Economy

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Form Henry Kissinger warning that unless we can figure out

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>how to collaborate, you know, we we could we could

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>be looking at a World War one situation. More a

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>question of we know we've got problems, let's work on something,

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>whether where there is a potential joint solution. What about

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the critics who say that carry is during his time

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>as senator, Yeah exactly, what about them? Uh? Yeah, well,

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you know the clearly clearly there is there's a great

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>deal of skepticism within the political establishment, both both on

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the Democrat and the Republican side, on on on working

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>with China. Um and it's not it's it's it's not

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be easy. And from the Chinese side, um,

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, but Biden in many ways is their worst

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>nightmare because what he what he promises to do is

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>bring together US allies and friends to confront China. So

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 1>we've already's seen he said, you know, he wants a

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Summit of Democracy sometime next year. The EU has just

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>written to Biden proposing his summit in the first half

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Upbringing together, it says, a once in

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the once in a generation opportunity to build a coalition

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 1>with with the United States, a sort of Transatlantic access

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 1>And although they say they don't mention China, it's very

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>clear that this is that, this this access um and

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>indeed Biden's council, the Summit of Democracies, is intended to

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>counter the threat from China. Right, Yeah, so much. And

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting to watch in terms of how this

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>policy ultimately works its way through in the new administration. Hey, Andy,

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Bloomberg New Economy editorial director Andy

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Brown with us on the phone in New York City,

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Romco a journal Now, but you let me drive. Oh no,

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, honey, please, I'll do the writing drivel.

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Let me I want to drive, Just drive, baby. The

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>questions trying. This is the Drive to the Globe that funk. Thanks,

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll try us John on radios. All right, so it

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is time for the Drive to the close. I'm Karl

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Master with Tim Stanevik Bloomberg, Quietake, and we want to

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>bring in JJ Kinahan, whose chief market strategies at t

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>d A marriage trade. JJ back with us, joining us

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Chicago, j J. Nice to have

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you here. How's it going in Chicago? Always a pleasure.

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I saw some great pictures of your turkey on Thanksgiving

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>movie Delicious. It was really good. My husband's an incredible cook.

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>It was a great turkey. We also did a picnic

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>table for the squirrel. We had a little bit too

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>much time on our hand. We're a little crazy. No

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>wine involved. I'm just gonna tell you that. Um Chicago

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>though virus. I'm just curious how your world and what's

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>around you is kind of impacting how you think about

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the financial markets. Well, you know, I think it's very

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting right now in the fact that it feels like

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it's always, uh, vaccine Monday. Every Monday, we seemed to

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>be getting some news one way or the other on

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>which is good. But yeah, we're saying you gonna illinoisan

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago that the cases are coming down a little bit.

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>But as we know, God bless the healthcare workers have

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>been really overworked over the last few months, and you're

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>just hopening, hoping a planting out was really all we

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>need to see. I think if you get a flattening

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>out for the holidays, that's a victory, very honest with you.

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:20.719
<v Speaker 1>And so if we can get that, and you know,

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly the market has looked beyond the vaccine onto all

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the great things that can happen. The thing that makes

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>me nervous about doing so is we know that it's

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be a logistical circus to get things where

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>they need to be. And so I just warned people

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>not to get caught up too much into euphoria. It's

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:42.479
<v Speaker 1>wonderful we have these vaccines, and I hope they can

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>get out as quickly as possible, but we all know

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that the logistics are usually where the true test will

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>will come. Yeah, I mean, and I wonder too, just

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>about because we've seen this year and be really the

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>year of the retail investor j J. If we're seeing

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>retail investors stay in the market despite not having the

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>stimulus payments and get in on the vaccine run up

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen in the month November. You know what's interesting, Tim,

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we've had as you said, it's been an incredible

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>year in terms of volume and interest for the retail investor.

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>What was really interesting to me was when I looked

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>at Friday and the week that I'm calling out Friday

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>specifically is because this tends to be a slow week

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in every area of the of the market, and you know,

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously you would expect some fall off throughout the week.

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>We saw it fairly busy all week, So interesting, and

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>we saw people. Yeah, it was so strange. When I

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>saw the numbers at the end of the day, I

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>thought we'd made a mispace. I wonder if this is

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>because well, I wonder if this is because people weren't

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>out shopping at Black Friday. And it was sort of

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>similar to the narrative that we saw a play out

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:49.479
<v Speaker 1>over the summer. Right, people are stuck at home, they

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>have stimulus payments, trade checks, and they're trading, they're not

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>watching sports. Is that what you think happened? That could

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>be part of it. But this is one of the

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>first times when we've actually compete didn't with sports because

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>it was sports ide during the day Friday, which you

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>normally don't have, so uh, they can play draftings or whatever,

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, a sporting site they may want to go to.

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>So I actually think that's a good sign going forward

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that people continue to have an interested in this market overall,

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's not you know, there's been so much made

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>in the media of it being people just come in

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and take just day trading. I think we're seeing much

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>beyond that. In fact, as I look at some of

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the you know stocks that people who bought last week,

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple leading the way Tesla was, our clients have been

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>buying for years now. You do have MODERNA and Paliper,

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>which you know, you could argue haven't been as much

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>uh over years, but their technology is also a little

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>bit newer in both cases. So I think there is

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a very healthy mix of people who are in it

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>for shorter term and longer term investors. I think the

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>longer term investor has been sort of ignored in all

0:31:57.520 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of this because it's not as sexiest story. So that's

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. So that's what your clients are buying on

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Black Friday, Palentteer, Tesla Maderna and Apple. That's where you

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>saw action. Yeah, that's just really fascinating. I feel like

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of our world in a nutshell, to be

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>quite honest, Yeah it is. I mean, if there are

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>companies that we've been talking about for years, of course Apple,

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>but Tesla has been the name for November exactly. And

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to be quite honest, I mean that's really fast good

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>as say an Apple remains still the number one held

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>s thoughts at our firm. Parents started to jump in there,

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>but I think you're making a really important point, right

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and palant here right, that's the Teal company, right, Peter Teal, Like,

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just kind of fascinating. Well, okay, So Dave Wilson

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>was on earlier. He talked about his chart of the

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>day and talked specifically about the SMP five twenty year

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>old valuation peak. Uh. And we're talking about price to sales.

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you get a little concerned when you

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>start to look at the valuations of the marketplace. Yeah,

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to be a little bit concerned. Uh.

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>But and here's why I think you saw reflected a

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit in this earning season. And what I mean

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>by that exactly is think about the stocks that were

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>considered essential businesses, the home depots, the walmarts of the world.

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Their numbers were absolutely monstrous again this quarter, but their

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>stocks sold off on that. I think we may come

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to a point where we see a similar thing in

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the entire SMP five hundred, where yes, these these stocks

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that when people get back to work, when we go

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>back to you know, air quotes normal world, uh, that

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>things are going well, But can we keep can can

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the reality meet the expectation? Because I think at some point,

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>even though the numbers might be great, and they might

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 1>have great sales, etcetera, at that point people might say, well, yeah,

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>but I already expected this to beat this is in

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>order for me to want to buy more. And I

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's one of the bigger risks as we head

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>into this spring in early summer of next year, is

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that the reality won't be able to keep up with

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the expectation. I want to talk Slack here. It's a

0:33:58.080 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the stocks that you mentioned in your

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>recent article. Um of course, CNBC is reporting that a

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>deal force Slack from Salesforce could come as soon as Tuesday,

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>after the clothes were also expecting earnings. What are you

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>keeping an eye on when you see this type of

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>M and A. I think it's actually great, you know

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>we saw I feel like it's kind of shift. It's

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>still in the technology sector. Think about it. We just

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>had the chips all go through a wards that a

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>month and a half two months ago. Now we're going

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to other areas of technology where people are sitting on cash,

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not quite sure what to do with it. It

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>may be okay, we've invested all we can and what

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>we do, well, are there businesses which fit into what

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>we do? We can continue with our scale of distribution,

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>cut some costs out of and really make our offering

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>one that's very well rounded. So in this case, on

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:53.439
<v Speaker 1>its surface, it certainly does seem to make a lot

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of sense that that is exactly the model that Salesforce

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>would be following with slack. And as I said, it

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>know it was all well received when it happened in

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the chip sector. I think this is just a natural

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 1>extension and I would think that maybe you'll see more

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:08.839
<v Speaker 1>of it in different parts of the technology stuff. Well,

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>we know Salesforce is inquisitive and the other thing is

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg intelligence. Alice saying that, listen, there's stocks, they

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>do a stock deal, it's pretty easy for them to do, right,

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean in terms of the run up that they've seen.

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean for those two of us who

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>use slack changes always when there's a deal? All right?

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>J J? Thanks so much. J. J. Knham, Chief Market Strategy,

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a t D Merriage trade on the phone from Chicago,

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>checking out my turkey while my husband's turkey. Thanks so

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 1>much for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or at Bloomberg dot com, and be

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out our daily radio show at two

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, and be sure to watch

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.280
<v Speaker 1>us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Blobal News