WEBVTT - Missing Pieces PT 2

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kate Winkler Dawson.

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm a journalist who's spent the last twenty five years

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:09.559
<v Speaker 2>writing about true crime.

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Paul Hols, a retired cold case investigator who's

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 3>worked some of America's most complicated cases and solve them.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 2>Each week, I present Paul with one of history's most

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 2>compelling true crimes.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 3>And I weigh in using modern forensic techniques to bring

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 3>new insights to old mysteries.

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 2>Together, using our individual expertise, we're examining historical true crime

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>cases through a twenty first century lens.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Some are solved and some are cold, very cold.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>This is buried Bones.

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Hey Paul, Hey Kate, how are you?

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm fine because I know everything about this story, and

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 2>you don't know anything about this story, and I know

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 2>you've been thinking about it, haven't you.

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, well it's so unusual because walking down this

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 3>John an Evelyn relationship and John ends up dead and

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 3>partially dismembered, and you're thinking, Okay, you know they took

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 3>care of a problem. But then you tell me there's

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 3>another body in a suitcase in Evelyn's residence, And now

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm extraordinarily curious as to where this is going

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 3>to go.

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I will say this part of the story surprised me

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. So let me go back just in

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 2>case people have forgotten the details of the story, which

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I cannot imagine you have, but you might have. So

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>we are in Ontario, Canada. We are in Hamilton, which

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:53.279
<v Speaker 2>is a medium sized city. Nineteen forty six, mid March,

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Torso is found partially dressed, and it turns out to

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 2>be a man named John Dick. He was a streetcar

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.919
<v Speaker 2>driver for a transportation agency in the city. He worked

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 2>it sounds like near or with his father in law,

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 2>whose name is Donald, and Donald's daughter is John's wife,

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 2>and her name is Evelyn. Certainly they had different approaches

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>to marriage because she admitted that she's been cheating on

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:26.839
<v Speaker 2>him before, during, and after marriage. That their marriage only

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 2>lasted a few months. They had a quick romance, a

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 2>quick engagement, a quick wedding, and then a quick ending.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 2>After three months, he moved out into his cousin's house

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 2>and Evelyn took up with a young man a couple

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 2>of years older than her, named Bill. And now the

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 2>police want to know about everything that's happening in this house.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 2>She had a car, a packer that had blood in it.

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 2>That was Type O, which was John's type. There are

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 2>bone fragments and teeth pieces in ashes outside of their house.

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 2>The police have now ascended the staircase to the attic

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 2>and have found a suitcase that has a body in it.

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 2>And that's where I left off with you, because we

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 2>weren't sure before we get to that other body. We

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 2>weren't sure about the father in law's involvement. Maybe the

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 2>mother in law's involved too. We know that John threatened

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Evelyn's father, Donald by exposing that Donald has been feeling

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, in today's money upwards of two million dollars

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 2>from this city department, which was very serious. So now

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 2>you've got somebody who's been threatened and he's very clearly

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 2>has body parts at this location. They're obviously involved in

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>some way. The question is how involved is Evelyn? Is

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>she just covering it up or was she directly involved?

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't matter? I think it will matter how involved she was.

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it absolutely does matter.

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I think one of the big questions

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 3>with the second body in the suitcase is who has

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 3>access to this location? You know, is this something where

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 3>people like Donald the father can freely come and go.

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I completely forgot about Bill, you know, this new boyfriend

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 3>of hers, you know, and what is his potential involvement

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 3>in John's homicide?

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 4>And then who is the second body is this? You know?

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 3>On one hand, maybe this is all wrapped around Donald

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 3>trying to protect his financial interests with this this I'm

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 3>assuming an embezzlement type scheme out of the railway.

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Or do we have some sort of predator you do?

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 3>We have this female serial killer on the loose, So

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm very curious to see how this progresses.

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Yep. And in the check box of where we feel

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 2>about Evelyn and Evelyn's involvement in anything criminal other than

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 2>being at a house, and it's seemingly covering up this

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 2>you know crime. So far, the police have said, well,

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 2>you know, they held her on vagrancy charges, which, just

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 2>as a little explainer, the vacrancy charges had been everything

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 2>from sex work to being homeless to you know, I'm loitering.

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it was like a catch all, and I

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 2>don't know if it's still like that now. I know

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 2>that vacrancy has been under fire, that sort of you

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 2>cannot arrest somebody simply for vagrancy. Is that right? At

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 2>this point?

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 3>I think the equivalent statute that I'm aware of out

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 3>of California is, you know this six forty seven PC,

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 3>which has all sorts of those subdivisions like sex work,

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 3>the drunken public. You know, there's various subcategories under six

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 3>forty seven. It sounds like this vagrancy statute up there

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 3>in Canada.

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 2>It's a big catch all, is my understanding. Yeah, But

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 2>they're holding her on these charges, that's why they're you know,

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 2>then going in and looking through the attic, they find

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 2>the suitcase and they open it up and inside they

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 2>find a baby.

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's not where I thought this was.

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Going, I know. So remember I told you she had

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 2>a series of kids. There was a stillborn baby. There

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 2>was a girl who's clearly alive, the one that she

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.119
<v Speaker 2>said cut her face, and that's where all the blood

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 2>came from. This is Peter. And when Peter left the hospital,

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 2>which was this was just a year and a half

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 2>to two years ago, the year before she met John.

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 2>So John is not the father. When she left the

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 2>hospital with Peter, he was ten days old and he

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 2>was healthy. She said that she took him to an

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 2>adoption agency. And obviously she didn't now what the pathologist says,

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>and I wish I had more details about this. What

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 2>the pathologist said was they believe that Peter had been strangled,

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 2>and he had been encased in cement and then put

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 2>into this suitcase, and he had been up in the attic.

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm assuming John didn't know about this for you know,

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 2>two years. Sure, so they're surprised, to say the least.

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 3>But it also speaks volumes about Evelyn. Assuming Evelyn is

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 3>the one that killed Peter, She's very willing to resort

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 3>to homicidal violence to get rid of somebody that is

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 3>cramping what I'm going to assume is cramping her lifestyle,

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 3>extrapolating that out to John, you know, And then the

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 3>big question is is that who else helped Evelyn? Did

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 3>anybody else help Evelyn? We know Evelyn is involved in

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 3>aspects of John's homicide. She's the one that is getting

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 3>that packered that car from the auto place and then

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 3>returning that car, you know, so, and that car has

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 3>obviously been used to transport John's body to dispose of

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 3>the remains. And whether or not John is killed in

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 3>that car, he's cut up in that car.

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Who knows at this point.

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 3>So Evelyn is involved, but to what extent is she

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 3>the killer? Did somebody else kill John? And then Evelyn

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 3>helped dispose of the body, maybe even helped with the dismemberment.

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Right now, we don't have any information, but you throw Peter.

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Into the mix.

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 3>In all likelihood, Evelyn is the one who strangled this

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 3>ten day old infant and then try to hide that

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 3>body with the cement. But again sloppy. Why is that

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 3>body still inside the residence inside a suitcase. There's so

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 3>many better ways to go about disposing of that body than.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 2>That process that nobody had found it true, with the

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 2>exception of you know, of course, her being under suspicion

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 2>for murdering her husband. And then they go up there

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 2>and start looking around, and I don't know how much

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 2>her parents know. I do want to go back to

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 2>John because they've searched the house, they find this body.

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 2>They're stunned by the discovery of this infant baby, and

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 2>then of course the bone fragments and the teeth of John.

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 2>So then they say, we need to get the hell

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 2>over to Donald and Alexandra's house. So Evelyn's parents big

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 2>search and this is what they find, and maybe this

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 2>will help you figure out the order of things, because

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 2>right now I'm curious about the order of events. They

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 2>find a pair of John shoes in the basement which

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 2>are blood stained, and there is also a large butcher

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 2>knife and an axe, neither of which seemed to have

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 2>blood on him, you know, according to the media, but

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 2>who knows. They also find a thirty two caliber revolver

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 2>that a ballistic expert would later say could have caused

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 2>the gunshot wounds. Remember, we don't have casings or bullets

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 2>or anything on his body. Does that make sense? Can

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 2>they kind of eyeball that and say, wow, this looks

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 2>like this kind of a bullet could have grazed his

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 2>body in this way, so it was probably a thirty

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't seem like hard evidence to me.

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 3>No, I can't really see where they could draw any

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 3>type of conclusion. You know, of course, a larger caliber

0:09:55.400 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 3>bullet could potentially leave a larger grazed wound. Dealing with

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 3>such an elastic surface in terms of the skin, there's

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 3>so many variables at play unless there's something just significantly

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 3>unusual that I can't think about. I think all they

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 3>could say is is that these appear consistent with the

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Gray's wounds from bullets, and there's no way you can

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 3>tie a gun or a caliber of weapon to that.

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.479
<v Speaker 3>So I think they overstretched on that conclusion.

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, at least it just shows that that Donald

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 2>has a gun. You know it's there. Yeah, So they

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 2>also find I thought you'd appreciate this. They also find

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 2>a magazine called Famous Detective Stories. I think this is

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 2>different from the true detective trash stuff we talked about before,

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 2>but still there is an article that they has been

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 2>here you're marked. That's how to dispose of a corpse

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 2>through incineration one oh one, how to do it. I

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 2>don't want to blame these magazines. I think it's sort

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 2>of silly. But at the same time, you know, we're

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 2>not talking about crime porn here. We're talking about how

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 2>to on how to get rid of a body. So

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 2>it sounds like Donald was doing some research. If we

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:12.079
<v Speaker 2>think that this is connected.

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 3>For sure, you know we see this today. There's reasons

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 3>why suspects computers and phones and tablets are confiscated during

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 3>an investigation and then searched underneath a warrant to see, well,

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 3>what are they looking at and what are they researching

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 3>leading up to the you know, the timeframe of a

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 3>crime being committed, and oftentimes, as I mentioned before, you know,

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>most of these offenders have never killed before, and so

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 3>now they're trying to find information on how to do it.

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 3>And it's just you know, here we're talking nineteen forty six.

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 3>You've got the paper magazine that has an article that

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 3>just happens to fit with how John's. Part of John's

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 3>body was disposed of.

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, they go back also and continue to do searching

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 2>of work the torso was found, because they're hoping to

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 2>find more information about whomever this person is who dumped

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 2>the torso in the rural area. And they find a

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 2>striped shirt that's found in the woods and it's identified

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 2>as the one that John was last seen wearing. The

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 2>shirt was completely buttoned up as it would have been

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 2>when it was worn, and both arms of the shirt

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 2>were cut off and the shirt was stained with blood.

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 2>I can't even picture what that means. So what happened

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 2>that you can tell so far? You know, the shoes,

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 2>there's blood, there's a butcher knife at Donald's house, at

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 2>her parents' house, and then the incineration. It sounds like

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 2>happened at their house, at Evelyn and John's house.

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, Well, and it appears that John is killed

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 3>and in all likelihood, like I talked about before, it

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 3>probably a gunshot wound to the head, and that can't

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 3>be proven because his head is gone and presumably incinerated.

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 4>But it does not appear that whoever.

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Is cutting up John is taking the time to take

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 3>the clothes off. You know, they're literally just cutting his

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 3>arms off, you know, sleeves and all. Now, the pathologists

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 3>should be able to determine from the cut ends of

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 3>the Let's say that the humorous on both arms, you

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 3>know what type of tool was used.

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 4>Was a saw used, you.

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Know, based on the tool marks that are present in

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 3>the end of the bone, or is it more consistent

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 3>with the axe. And that's not necessarily an easy thing.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 3>You know, you have to take multiple swings with the

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 3>axe in order to be able to hack through the

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 3>say the upper upper arm, and there's a good chance

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 3>you're going to miss and you're probably going to hit

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 3>part of the Torso doesn't sound like you have any

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 3>information in terms of the pathologists rendering an opinion on

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 3>the type of tool marks present on the bone ends.

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 2>No, no, And you know, like they said that the

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 2>axe and the other weapon that they found, it didn't

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 2>appear to have blood. I'm sure it did, they just

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 2>couldn't see it. Yeah, So what I mean, maybe not,

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what.

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 3>All depends on how how well the tool has been cleaned,

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 3>how bloody it got in the first place. You are

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 3>dealing with the dead body. So now the heart is

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 3>not pumping. You hack through these long bones and the

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 3>arms and the legs. I mean, there is going to

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 3>be blood that seeps out, but it's not gushing out

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 3>because there's no pump present. The heart is done. So

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's possible that, let's say that if this

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 3>axe or this butcher knife had been used, you know,

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 3>blood staining likely would be present, but it may not

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 3>be present where now it's seeping down in between the

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 3>blade and the handle and all that they just cleaned

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 3>it up.

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, so far this seems pretty damning. Is this circumstantial?

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how would you label this case so far?

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Against You've got Donald and you've got Evelyn. We don't

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 2>know anything about Bill just yet, and then we don't

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 2>know about them all Alexandra.

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's evidence. I will tell you from a physical

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 3>evidence standpoint, it is a strong case that these individuals

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 3>are involved. What you don't have is who's doing what

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 3>right And so this is where interviewing and it sounds

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 3>like if you've got parts of the crime scene at

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Donald's house and parts at Evelyn's house, sounds like, well,

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 3>we have multiple people involved, and you know, you think

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 3>father daughter may be very loyal to each other.

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 4>Maybe not.

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, you have to kind of play one against

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 3>the other in terms of what their statements are and

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 3>the jeopardy each one is subjected to. But then is

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 3>there a third person? And again I go back to

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 3>this new lover of Evelyn's, this Bill Evelyn sounds like

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 3>she's somebody who would be willing to seduce a man,

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 3>to get that man to commit a crime for her,

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 3>and then probably eliminate that man as a witness after

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 3>let's say the homicide of John is done.

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you their theory first, just about the crime,

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 2>and then I'll tell you about arrests. So I think

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 2>this is what we've been talking about, the theory that

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 2>the prosecutors say, once they've gathered all of this information,

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 2>they say that John was murdered in the packer, likely

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 2>from a gunshot wound too the head, like you said,

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 2>but of course the head has been destroyed, presumably in

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 2>the fire. It's theorized that he was dismembered at Donald's house,

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 2>but the limbs were incinerated in Evelyn's furnace, and then

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 2>John's torso was dumped in the woods, probably because it

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 2>was too It was actually too big to fit into

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the furnace, so I think they went, oh shit, we

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 2>got to put it somewhere, so they dumped it, you know,

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 2>in this place. That all makes sense to you, I'm

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>assuming rise or anything you disagree with in the prosecutor's case.

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 4>No, that makes sense.

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 3>I think it's it's interesting that they didn't bother to

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 3>further cut up the torso, to incinerate it. It's possible

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 3>that once they kind of got to the point where

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 3>they did with the dismemberment of John, they're going, oh,

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 3>this is unpleasant.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 4>You know, we just were not going to bother with

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the body.

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's just go dump it, you know, because it takes

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 3>a certain what do you want to say, disposition, you know,

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 3>to hack up a body and do it without possibly

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 3>having to go throw up or going oh, I wasn't

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 3>expecting this.

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 4>I think they abandoned.

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 3>The body disposal process early, considering that Donald had a

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 3>magazine article on how to dispose of a body through incineration.

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 3>So it seems like they didn't carry out the plan

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 3>as far as they could have in terms of getting

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 3>rid of the body through incineration.

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 2>We've got some arrests. So remember they were holding Evelyn

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 2>on vacrancy charges, really vague vagrancy charges, which to me

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 2>it sounded like because she doesn't have a full time job,

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe you know, I mean stealing money, it was just

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 2>a way for her to away from them, to keep

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 2>a hold of her for a little bit. Yeap, okay.

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 2>So they have brought charges for John's murder against Evelyn

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 2>and Donald and the mom Alexandra, who they think was

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 2>involved also, and Bill, who is Evelyn's I mean, I

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 2>think boyfriend is a pretty loose term for what he

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 2>probably was. I think you're right. I think he was

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 2>probably a little bit of a patsy. So Evelyn just

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 2>starts turning on people, which doesn't surprise me. She implicates

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Bill in the murders of John and this baby. I

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 2>will not drag this out. She didn't even know Bill

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 2>when she was pregnant. I was going to say with Peter,

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what is she thinking. So she's saying he

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 2>strangled my kid, and it was easily proven you know

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 2>that this was not the case. So I don't know

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 2>if she's just throwing she's not smart, she's throwing stuff out,

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 2>but she is trying to pin this on everybody but herself.

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Sure, you know, and again we've just seen this lack

0:18:55.800 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 3>of awareness and knowledge and how the crime scene has handled,

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 3>how sloppy it is. And now her statements are sloppy.

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 4>In many ways.

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, this is something that those investigators would be

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 3>able to easily see through. And when she's making those

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 3>types of statements which are obvious lies, you know, those

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 3>are just like ding ding ding, you know, both for

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 3>the investigators going okay, you know we're on the right track,

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 3>and for the prosecutors who will put that information in

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:24.719
<v Speaker 3>front of a jury.

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 4>You know. So and in part it may just be,

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, she's what twenty five years old.

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 3>In all likelihood, you know, this homicide of John is

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 3>much more complicated than what she thought it was going

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 3>to be you know, it's a ten day old infant.

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 3>She came up with the excuse of well, the reason

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 3>this infant is not Peter's not around anymore is because

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 3>I gave him up for adoption, when in reality he's

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 3>in case and Cement in a suitcase in her attic.

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, Evelyn and Bell are charged with the murder of Peter,

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 2>and you know Bill will get out of that once

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 2>they realize the timeline a little bit. So Donald and

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 2>his wife are both charged additionally with John's murder, and

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Donald is, on top of that, charged with stealing money

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 2>from the transport agency that he worked for. So this

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 2>becomes a huge media sensation, as you can imagine, front

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 2>page news all across the country. Lots of people show

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 2>up trying to grab a seat and they want to

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 2>gawk at someone they describe in the newspapers in the

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 2>forties as a femfetale, which that really pisses me off.

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 2>It's so dismissive. But they of course have photos of

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 2>her sort of like lounging in this chair. She is

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 2>an attractive woman, she's very hip looking. This sets up

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 2>for this media circus because her sex life comes out

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 2>all over this trial. And this is the slutshaming that

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I was talking about and how it plays into the trial,

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 2>because there is, for me, the Evelyn who very clearly

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 2>was involved in two murders. But then there is also

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the Evelyn who you know, when they put her on

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 2>trial it is just like your horror and you did

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 2>this because you're a whore. So it's hard to reconcile

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 2>the two together. And so I want to talk about

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 2>That's what we're heading next, is getting a fair trial.

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 3>In terms of the slut shaming aspect of Evelyn. I

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 3>guess I would need to know, Okay, what is being

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 3>attributed to how the media is portraying her, and then

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 3>what is how is she being portrayed in court? You know,

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 3>because in some aspects her relationships do play in to

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 3>the people the prosecutors laying the groundwork for motive, if

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 3>you will. But is it completely needed, you know, I

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 3>think it all depends on how the prosecutors are laying

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 3>their case out.

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, I wasn't going to tell you this until a

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 2>little bit later. I'm going to read you this a

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 2>little bit from the trial right now, just to give

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 2>you an idea of what it was like. She's on

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 2>the stand. Now, this is a preliminary hearing, but she

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 2>also testified at her trial. She is on the stand

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 2>and the prosecutor says, tell the court how many men

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:17.479
<v Speaker 2>you've had sexual intercourse with? And she says maybe one

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty. Now, I don't know if she's gigging

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 2>him or if that's accurate. Either way, that's her truth.

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I want you, this is the lawyer, I want you

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 2>to name these men for the court right now. Who

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 2>are they? She says, well, his son for one. She's

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 2>looking at the judge. The lawyer says, were you indicating

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 2>his honor? And she says, yes, the judge's son. The

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 2>judge immediately struck the testimony from the record and issued

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 2>a restraining order on the publication of the names of

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 2>these one hundred and fifty men that she's talking about.

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 2>That's where this trial is going. And I'm not saying that.

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, some parts of this are probably going to

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 2>be applicable, but this was pretty blatantly framed around her

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 2>being this temptress. So boy, I mean, I don't want

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 2>to ever defend Evelyn, but this is sort of a

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 2>case where I went this is gross. It felt so

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 2>gross reading the transcripts.

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 3>You know, well, that's that's extending out past what I

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 3>would say, you know, the nexus of the crime is, yeah,

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think her coming out and admitting that

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 3>she ended up having sex with a man within a

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 3>few days of being married, you know, really establishing how

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 3>she maintained a lifestyle involving multiple men outside of her

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 3>relationship with John kind of establishes this dynamic where people

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 3>would go, Okay, I can see where she really never

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 3>loved or cared for John, you know. So I can

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 3>see utilizing the relationships surrounding the crime to underscore sort

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 3>of the dynamic between Evelyn and John, but not bringing

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 3>in her entire love life from five years four. You know,

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't that doesn't equate. That sounds prejudicial.

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's switch over to another woman who takes in her

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 2>stage here, and that's Evelyn's mother, who flips on her.

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 2>So the men in this family seem sort of strangely

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 2>loyal or in this story no women or not. Alexandros

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 2>flips on Evelyn. She agrees to testify for the prosecutor

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 2>in exchange for legal immunity. Okay, so remember they kind

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 2>of took a net and arrested everybody and then said

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 2>let's sort it out. She does not say too much,

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 2>but she does say that even though Evelyn says, yeah,

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 2>I got the packer, but I was with my parents

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the whole time, she said, there was a long time

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 2>when she was not around. On March sixth, and she

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:47.959
<v Speaker 2>said that before the torso was discovered, but after John

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 2>had been you know, declared missing, that Evelyn had said

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 2>John's dead and you better keep your mouth shut about it.

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 2>And that's what she said to her mother. Boy this family.

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 2>So this is her mom testifying. This is specifically her trial,

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 2>so she's not testifying against her own husband yet, but

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 2>this is this is the way this is going. Are

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 2>you surprised by that?

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think it really comes down to the

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 3>family dynamics, because you know, when we started talking about

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 3>Evelyn and her upbringing and how it sounded like she

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 3>had an abusive childhood with Donald and Alexandra, I kind

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.719
<v Speaker 3>of wonder what the relationship between Donald and Alexandra was, Like,

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 3>maybe he's abusive to her obviously, you know, with mom

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 3>flipping at this point, it's self preservation and her self

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 3>preservation is superseding any mother daughter feelings that she has

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 3>with Evelyn.

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, and it sounds like I don't know how much

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 2>knowledge Alexandra had, but enough to be able to say, well,

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm not gonna risk my own skin for my daughter.

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 2>Evelyn's not particularly helping herself. She keeps changing her story

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot. Time magazine reported on it, and they said

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 2>that at some point she said a gang from another

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 2>town must have killed him. She said that also the

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 2>gang was hired by Bill the boyfriend, and that actually

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 2>Bill did the killing, but her father, Donald was the

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 2>one who strong harmed him into it. And you know

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Donald hated John. So who else you know, would have

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 2>been responsible for this. So the one thing she does

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 2>admit to is she says, you know, I did drive

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 2>that packer to the location where we dumped the Torso

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 2>so she's admitting to be I guess it would it

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 2>be an accessory, is at what she's admitting to if

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 2>if she's kind of covering it up.

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, she's she's minimizing her role. That's what

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 3>it sounds like. You know, all these statements that seem

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 3>to conflict about you know, who actually is doing what.

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's pointing fingers at the other players and

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 3>not her right, she's saying, well, I only did this

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 3>everybody else, did you know the really bad stuff? And

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 3>she's kind of taking a shotgun approach with her statements.

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 3>She's conflicting herself multiple times. You know, this just all

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 3>speaks to she's making things up on the fly with

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 3>hope something sticks.

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she really is, and not being very smart about it. So,

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, a lot of this case covers the evidence,

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 2>and we've talked about their physical evidence, their circumstantial evidence,

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 2>but we do talk a lot about the slut shaming

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 2>that happens. There is a lot about her black book,

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 2>and the black book has all of these very important

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 2>men who she's supposedly slept with. You know, that's why

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 2>there's a huge media circus around this as people want

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 2>to hear those names. And I think that the attorneys

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 2>on both sides are just constantly trying to keep the

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 2>names out because these are very important men in the

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:59.199
<v Speaker 2>area at the time. So as we move forward, do

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 2>you think of these people? So we've got Alexandra, who

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess it doesn't matter. She has gotten immunity, so

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 2>she's not going to be held or she won't be

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 2>convicted no matter what. But with Evelyn and Donald and Bill,

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 2>which we don't know very much about these three people,

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 2>who is the strongest case against Do you think it's Evelyn?

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if we're looking at first degree murder, obviously

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 2>this was planned kind of thing.

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 3>It seems like you have equivalent cases against both Donald

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 3>and Evelyn, and a lot of that has to do

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 3>with you know, you have the physical evidence found at

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Donald's place. He also the gun, which you can't conclude

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 3>is a murder weapon, but appears that he had the

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 3>ability or Evelyn did at Donald's place to shoot John.

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 3>And maybe Bill did you know, I don't know how

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 3>he's factoring into this at this point. But then you

0:28:56.480 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 3>also have all the evidence at Evelyn's place, you know,

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 3>And I think it really just comes back down to, well,

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 3>doesn't sound like Donald can alibi himself and say I

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 3>wasn't there. Of course, my daughter can go into my basement,

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, and spend time down.

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 4>There in terms of hacking up John. But as I.

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Mentioned earlier in this story, is well, who benefits from

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 3>this homicide? And the reality is is Donald probably financially

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 3>benefits the most because he's preserving his criminal operation through

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 3>the rare way and then buzzling two million dollars, and

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 3>with the level of income that Evelyn seems to possess

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 3>without actually having a job to point to as being

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 3>the source of the income, suggests that she's getting the

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 3>pass through money from her father, so she's financially benefiting.

0:29:55.800 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 3>And John became sort of a problem and he was eliminating.

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 3>So I think you have equal cases against both Evelyn

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 3>and Donald.

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't know about Bill.

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right now, we're just gonna deal with Evelyn because

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 2>this is her trial, and whatever the jury heard was

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 2>enough to convict her of his murder. There's still more

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 2>to this story, but she is given the death penalty,

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 2>which is something for a woman in nineteen forty six

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 2>in Canada. I was pretty surprised.

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm surprised. Okay, So before we.

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Talk about what happens after that, let me kind of

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 2>clean up everybody else. Bill is released of all charges

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 2>for everything. He wasn't dating her or sleeping with her

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 2>when Peter was born. They've proven that, and there's zero

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 2>evidence that he was involved at all with John's murder. Now,

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 2>he might have been, but they don't have enough evidence

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 2>and so ultimately they just let him go. I'm assuming

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 2>you agree with that. I mean, I think we just

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 2>think there's what is there he might have done something,

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 2>but there is nothing that says other than her word,

0:30:58.160 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 2>that he did anything.

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, it doesn't sound like they have any

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 3>type of case against Bill, and you know, I don't

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 3>know if he had any role in it. But I

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 3>also think that potentially Evelyn and Donald being arrested possibly

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 3>saved Bill's life.

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 2>I agree. I mean he could have been well, he

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 2>could have been a patsy. They could have killed him.

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we don't know. Yeah, you're right. I mean

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 2>they're very dangerous people. Donald. I don't agree with this.

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 2>He's found guilty of being an accessory to John's murder

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 2>five years, He's given five years, plus another five years

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 2>for robbing you know, the transport agency, and he's released

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 2>from prison in nineteen fifty one. I mean, he is out.

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm surprised at that.

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm a little bit too. And I don't know, it

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 2>doesn't sound like Alexandra, his wife, testified against him. It

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 2>sounds like they just didn't have enough evidence and maybe

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I mean, between the witnesses saying she

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 2>had the car. They're putting her with that car. She's

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 2>admitting she drove the car, and I think Donald probably

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 2>just said, listen, just because this stuff is at my

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 2>place doesn't mean I had any involvement, and they couldn't

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 2>prove anything. Yeah, you know, I mean his daughter has

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 2>access to his house. Likewise, he and his wife have

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 2>access to her house.

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 3>So and I think that that's when in assessing Donald,

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 3>it really does come down to what could they prove

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 3>in terms of where he was at at the time

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 3>John went missing, was likely killed. What kind of freedom

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 3>of movement does Evelyn have into and out of John's house? So,

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, on that front, I can kind of see, Yeah,

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 3>maybe they don't have as strong of a case against Donald.

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 3>I just go back to who benefited the most from

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 3>John's homicide, and it really is Donald.

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Well listen to the rest of this. She is given

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 2>the death penalty, but right after her sentencing she gets

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 2>mystery money together. It's not her dad. I don't know

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 2>where she's getting this money from, but she hires a

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 2>well known attorney.

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 4>I think she has probably multiple wealth.

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 3>The men that, based on past relationships, are concerned that

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 3>she might divulge that they were, you know, having a

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 3>sexual affair with her or whatever that they're now saying, Okay,

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 3>we'll give you money in order to keep your mouth

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 3>shut about our relationship together.

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so she hires a guy named John Robinette. He

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 2>appeals her conviction. Of course, he cites twenty five procedural

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 2>issues in her case. He says many of the statements

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 2>used against Evelyn and Court were improperly obtained by police.

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 2>He says that they did not adequately caution her after

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 2>charging her with murder. Remember they held her on vagrancy

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 2>charges where they cautioned her. So they don't have Miranda

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 2>warnings in Canada, but they have something very similar and

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 2>they did it for vagrancy apparently, but not for the

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 2>murder charges. And I would not be telling you about

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 2>appeals points if it did not work. And it worked.

0:33:58.520 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 3>On my other podcast, we interviewed a Canadian law enforcement

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 3>officer and they have a at least during the course of

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 3>his career, which is more recent than nineteen forty six.

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 3>They definitely have a very very similar requirement to what

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 3>we know as Miranda here in the United States. And

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember what he called it. And so I

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 3>can see where Evelyn is taken into custody and they

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 3>basically let her know her rights now that she's in custody,

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 3>and then she never leaves custody and is now in

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 3>essence arrested and charged with murder because of her custodial

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 3>status at least here in the United States, you know,

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:51.760
<v Speaker 3>that's where she needs to be told what her rights are.

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 3>In addition, there's also a scenario where because she's in

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 3>custody and she's represented by an attorne, then law enforcement

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 3>interviewing her for more charges can sometimes get a little dicey.

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 3>And I know, you know, because currently there's been some

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 3>people I'd like to go in and talk to who

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 3>have been convicted and possibly we're involved in other crimes.

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 3>But the DA's involved in the conviction are saying, don't

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 3>not well, he's represented and he's got an appeal going on, right,

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 3>And this is not Joe DeAngelo Golden State killer. It's

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 3>another guy, you know. But now her defense attorney is basically,

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, probably doing a pretty decent job in terms

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 3>of going look at you know, law enforcement, the prosecutor's side,

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 3>whatever they're called up there you know, they they misstepped m.

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this is a successful argument, and Evelyn is retried,

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:58.760
<v Speaker 2>and this time her attorney so she keeps this attorney.

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Robinette emphasiz this the possibility that Donald the dad, not Evelyn,

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 2>killed John, and he is very convincing that, just like

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.879
<v Speaker 2>what you said, who really had the motive here, who

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 2>had threatened John in the past, who was going to

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:20.839
<v Speaker 2>be exposed and arrested and fired and publicly humiliated in

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 2>all of that stuff, when John was going to come

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 2>out and report this, and John had already gone to

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 2>the police. So Robinette says all of this, and it worked,

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 2>and she has found not guilty of murdering her husband.

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 2>In this second trial, she pleads guilty to being an

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 2>accessory after the fact, but she is only then sentenced

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 2>to four years in prison. And it's not over yet.

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 2>But I will say, I mean, boy, when you have

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 2>a good attorney, they can work wonders. And he knew

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 2>exactly where to go with this. And I don't agree

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:51.839
<v Speaker 2>with this either.

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:54.879
<v Speaker 3>I don't necessarily agree with the outcome, but I think

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 3>I agree with the strategy. Yeah, yeah, because all Robinette

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 3>has to do for Evelynce is create reasonable doubt at

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 3>least that would be the term here in the United States,

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 3>and imagine it's a similar criteria, you know, for the

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Canadian court process, and that's what he could do because,

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, particularly in terms of the physical evidence side,

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to think of, is there anything that there

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 3>would be things that I'd be looking for, let's say,

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:27.879
<v Speaker 3>during the crime scene investigation that would support let's say

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Evelyn's presence, you know, at the time of the homicide,

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, gunshot. There might be something as an example,

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 3>And this is just kind of fabricating based on the

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 3>circumstances the type of evidence I'd be looking for. If

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:44.359
<v Speaker 3>John were truly shot in the head and possibly shot

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 3>in the head multiple times, the shooter potentially could have

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 3>backspatter from the entry wounds of the gunshots, in which

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:57.760
<v Speaker 3>blood and brain matter can spatter back onto the gun

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 3>as well as the shooter's hand, the sleeves down on

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 3>the pants leg. You could have shattered hair if it's

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 3>a close enough shot to the head where that shattered

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 3>hair would end up depositing on the shooter. So of course,

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:15.840
<v Speaker 3>trying to collect let's say Evelyn's clothing and Donald's clothing.

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 3>In this day and age, that would be a form

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 3>of evidence to try to determine who actually was the shooter. Now,

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 3>John could have been shot from a distance, and you

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.360
<v Speaker 3>don't have any of that back spatter coming back onto

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 3>the shooter, you know, And then now you have to

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 3>rely on the interviews and statements and finger pointing as

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 3>to well, who really is the shooter in this case?

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 2>But if he's shot from a distance, wouldn't that have

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 2>done damage to the packer, which the owner didn't mention

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 2>any kind of damage except hey, where's my cover to

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:47.720
<v Speaker 2>this seat? Wouldn't there a bullet have gone somewhere?

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 3>So when I say a distant you know, with a

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 3>thirty two caliber revolver, the back spatter is going to

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 3>be relatively minimal, you know. So you're talking about a

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 3>very close range shot, you know, and I'm just going

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 3>to throw out, like, you know, within two feet, and

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 3>unless there's actual shooting, we would do what's called distance determinations.

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 3>But you'd also try to get a sense for the

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 3>power of this this particular handgun and this particular ammo.

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Of course, the more powerful the weapon, the more gases

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 4>that are discharged.

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 3>From the weapon, let's say, like a three fifty seven magnum,

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:29.320
<v Speaker 3>there's a greater likelihood of having more blood brain matter

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 3>coming back, either as backspatter or from the rupture of

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 3>the skull itself. And now you see the shooter get

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 3>a fair amount of biological evidence on them. Okay, thirty

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 3>two caliber is not a very powerful weapon, but it's

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 3>something that when I say a distance, I'm talking yeah,

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 3>like the shooters actually within the vehicle that's where John

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 3>is shot, got it, but not up close.

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like John's settled. So you know, you've got

0:39:56.719 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 2>Donald who has been the scapegoat for Robinette, and as

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 2>an accessory, she has been given four years in prison.

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 2>The prosecutors are pissed off, and so she goes on

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 2>trial for murdering her infant son. Robinette does not have

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 2>anything clever except to say, we've got to get her

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 2>out of the death penalty, because they were going to

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 2>go for the death penalty here. And he could not

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 2>figure out a way to say somebody else did it.

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 2>It's clear she did it, so he said, because of

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 2>her trauma and abuse at the hands of her parents

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 2>as a child, she had been emotionally stunted. She didn't

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 2>understand that there were consequences for her actions, and the

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 2>jury buys it, and she has found guilty of manslaughter

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 2>and she's given a life sentence, right, so she spared

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 2>the death penalty. She's supposed to be spending life in prison.

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 2>But I think you probably know I'm heading down a

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 2>road where she does not spend life in prison for this.

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 2>So now she's been implicated and involved in two murders.

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess, you know, I just don't know what criteria

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 3>up in Canada is used to justify the death penalty.

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm really struggling to see, you know, the

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 3>death of the infant's son, how there would be an

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 3>argument for, you know, first degree murder with special circumstances

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 3>if in fact Peter was strangled that show's intent. Does

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 3>this come down to Peter is crying, Evelyn is just

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 3>getting so frustrated with this baby crying that she just

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 3>acts in sort of in the heat of the moment

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 3>and strangles Peter. This would be more kin to like

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 3>a second degree murder type of scenario in California. Manslaughter.

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:53.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm not having too much issue with what Evelyn is

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 3>ultimately convicted of. I'm surprised that if it's a manslaughter

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 3>of this ten day old infant, that would be a

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 3>life sentence, right.

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why that was a sentence. I will

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 2>tell you she does not serve life. She only serves

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 2>around eleven years total. In nineteen fifty eight, she's paroled.

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 2>She's only thirty eight years old. She gets a new

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 2>identity and totally falls off the radar. She's fully pardoned

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen eighty five. According to this newspaper, I mean,

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea. This is what it says. Her

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 2>government file remains sealed after she was granted a royal pejorative.

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 2>I guess is that what I would say?

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:36.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I have to rely on the attorneys in the

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 3>no to describe what that means.

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would say, okay. Her government file remain sealed

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 2>after she was granted a pardon in eighty five, a

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 2>special pardon that is awarded an exceptional cases of substantial

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:51.960
<v Speaker 2>injustice or undue hardship, which would not seem to apply

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 2>an Evlyn Dick's case. But many believe she had friends

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 2>in high places who helped her get this pardon. As

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 2>a wider strategy to muzzle stories about the people she

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 2>was having sex with. Yeah, so we're back to the

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:05.919
<v Speaker 2>Little Black Book. You know, this is when she's now

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 2>sixty five and she gets this full pardon where her

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 2>case is basically you know, sealed, so nobody knows anything

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 2>about it. And this is decades later.

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:20.279
<v Speaker 3>I mean, gosh, that's what it sounds like to me,

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, because it seems like that, you know, the

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Christ well, she was actually acquitted of John's homicide, right

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 3>or of his murder.

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 2>She was given four years as an accessory.

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Accessory murder, okay, and then and then life for Peter's murder.

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 3>Again, it's it's it's it's hard for me to to

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:44.879
<v Speaker 3>to figure out the life sentence, which seems like it

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 3>might be excessive, just depending upon you know, what kind

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:50.479
<v Speaker 3>of case the prosecutors laid out.

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, the.

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Black Book, the people in the Black Book, sounds like

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 3>she had some a at least one deep pocketed person

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 3>that was supporting her to be able to hire the

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:07.280
<v Speaker 3>fancy attorney. There may be multiple depocketed people who, of course,

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 3>over time, you know, probably continue to have influence and

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.319
<v Speaker 3>at any point if Evelyn ever felt that she had

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:17.359
<v Speaker 3>been betrayed by any of them. She could have divulged

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:21.760
<v Speaker 3>her secrets and so they're just trying to protect their asses,

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 3>would be my guess.

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. There were, of course rumors of where she went.

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:29.080
<v Speaker 2>People have been trying to figure out where she went,

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:33.759
<v Speaker 2>who she became afterwards, reporters and biographers. They said some

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:36.320
<v Speaker 2>people thought she moved to Winnipeg under the name Betty.

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:39.919
<v Speaker 2>Other people thought she married a wealthy man and left town.

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:43.600
<v Speaker 2>That actually seems on brand, and others insist she stayed

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:47.399
<v Speaker 2>somewhere in Ontario. I don't really care what she did

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 2>after she got out of prison. What I care about

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:53.960
<v Speaker 2>is a statement that you made long long ago, which

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:57.839
<v Speaker 2>was when we found out that Peter had been strangled

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 2>and then encased in cement into a suitcase. This baby,

0:45:03.800 --> 0:45:09.160
<v Speaker 2>this newborn baby, she did that, and she participated somehow

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 2>in the murder of her husband. This is someone who

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 2>is capable of removing an obstacle that is stopping her

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 2>from living the life she wants to live. And that

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 2>makes me concerned for whomever she was, whomever she encountered

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 2>after she left the life of Evel and Dick. And

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 2>that's that we don't know if she killed other people

0:45:32.680 --> 0:45:33.920
<v Speaker 2>because we don't know who she is.

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, she's a dangerous woman. She was thirty eight when

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:38.799
<v Speaker 3>she gets out.

0:45:39.440 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she would be one hundred and four last year.

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:46.759
<v Speaker 2>I would think not, but I mean, listen, she lived

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 2>to at least sixty five because she got an official pardon,

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 2>but nobody knew where she was when that happened.

0:45:53.080 --> 0:45:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because I'm just thinking, Okay, how would I figure

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 3>out who?

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 4>You know, who she became?

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 3>And you know, one way, is she still a child

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 3>bearing age at age thirty eight when she gets out?

0:46:03.480 --> 0:46:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Does she have any children? Have they had any children?

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Are they up in the genealogy databases? You know, would

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 3>we be able to triangulate back and identify Evelyn via

0:46:16.040 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 3>That means, you know, if there was a reason, you know,

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:26.320
<v Speaker 3>a justifiable reason to track her down, that's an avenue

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 3>to pursue.

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:27.400
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:46:27.440 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Of course there's the investigator side, but I think just

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 3>through genetics, just through genealogy, there's a way to identify

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:35.880
<v Speaker 3>what ended up happening to Evelyn.

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's possible that her daughter, Heather is still alive

0:46:39.800 --> 0:46:42.279
<v Speaker 2>because she was born in forty one, but we don't

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:44.400
<v Speaker 2>know what happened to Heather, And I don't know if

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 2>there would be a reason. It's interesting to hear that

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 2>if there needed to be a reason, there are possibilities,

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:51.880
<v Speaker 2>and Heather might have had children, you know, yep.

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Most early, and you know that there is a source

0:46:55.960 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 3>that could be used for genealogy and you could potentially

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 3>we identify Evelyn using DNA.

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting to bring up things like the slut shaming

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 2>and finger pointing and the black books and stuff like that.

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:12.719
<v Speaker 2>And normally for me, I feel like it's focusing on

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:17.800
<v Speaker 2>the victims and the prosecutor or the media or the perpetrator,

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the offenders being the ones who are doing the slut shaming.

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Who are you know, retraumatizing survivors, revictimizing victims, all of that,

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:30.719
<v Speaker 2>But to have the offender who clearly is an offender

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:33.239
<v Speaker 2>for me to say, God, I don't like the way

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:36.440
<v Speaker 2>this trial's going. I mean, I know, ultimately you have

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:38.680
<v Speaker 2>to go down different roads, but this was a pretty

0:47:38.760 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 2>ikey road for the prosecutors. At some point when you

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 2>go above and beyond explaining somebody's sex life, I think

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:49.400
<v Speaker 2>that having that on display with a very messy case

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 2>involving a family and threats and everything. Nobody's perfect in

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:56.920
<v Speaker 2>this story. We almost never have perfect people, Paul.

0:47:57.120 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, crime is messy, right, No, I kind of along

0:48:03.280 --> 0:48:07.240
<v Speaker 3>those lines. You know, this is where you know, there's

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 3>there's reasons why prior cases, prior behaviors by the defendant

0:48:13.480 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 3>don't get admitted into court because they're overly prejudicial. This

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 3>is where the judge has to, you know, step in

0:48:21.400 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 3>and the defense attorneys need to object. So you know,

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:29.280
<v Speaker 3>there is attempts at protection from what ended up happening

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:33.839
<v Speaker 3>to Evelyn in terms of her sexual relationships with all

0:48:33.880 --> 0:48:36.879
<v Speaker 3>these men. A lot of at least the way you're

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 3>telling it to me, doesn't seem to have any bearing

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:44.319
<v Speaker 3>on the crime itself. It really is just prejudicial. And

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:48.280
<v Speaker 3>of course that also could potentially influence jury selection.

0:48:48.760 --> 0:48:50.759
<v Speaker 4>You know, if the media is portraying this, you.

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Know, after prelim and now they have to select a

0:48:53.080 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 3>jury and they've seen the headlines about you know, this,

0:48:56.960 --> 0:49:01.359
<v Speaker 3>this woman and her relationship, how is that going to

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 3>impact a fair trial? So I think I definitely agree

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:11.160
<v Speaker 3>with you. It appears that Evelyn, as a defendant, her

0:49:11.320 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 3>right to a fair trial was potentially violated and ultimately

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 3>She ended up getting an attorney that was able to

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:20.880
<v Speaker 3>get her conviction overturned.

0:49:21.239 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm, and let a very very, very dangerous woman

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 2>out into the world to do god knows what. Hopefully

0:49:29.480 --> 0:49:31.759
<v Speaker 2>Jos live a quiet life and be done with it,

0:49:31.840 --> 0:49:34.839
<v Speaker 2>but I somehow doubt it. I don't know. Next week,

0:49:34.960 --> 0:49:37.759
<v Speaker 2>Let's hope we have a less dangerous woman. If they

0:49:37.800 --> 0:49:45.200
<v Speaker 2>are the offender, will see. We'll see that's unlikely. Female

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:47.480
<v Speaker 2>offenders are some of the most dangerous I have found.

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:49.720
<v Speaker 4>They're the most conniving for sure.

0:49:54.320 --> 0:49:56.759
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I will see you next week.

0:49:56.880 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Rust up, all right, We'll do take care.

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Thanks. This has been an exactly right production for our

0:50:07.200 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 2>sources and show notes go to Exactlyrightmedia dot com slash

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Buried Bones sources.

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Our senior producer is Alexis Emosi.

0:50:15.120 --> 0:50:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Research by Maren mcclashan, Ali Elkin, and Kate Winkler Dawson.

0:50:19.600 --> 0:50:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Our mixing engineer is Ben Tolliday.

0:50:22.200 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Our theme song is by Tom Bryfogel.

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Our artwork is by Vanessa Lilac.

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Executive produced by Karen Kilgaroff, Georgia hard Stark, and Daniel Kramer.

0:50:31.440 --> 0:50:34.799
<v Speaker 2>You can follow Buried Bones on Instagram and Facebook. At

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Ary Bones.

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Pod Kate's most recent book, All That Is Wicked, a

0:50:38.719 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Gilded Age story of murder and the race to decode

0:50:41.040 --> 0:50:42.879
<v Speaker 3>the criminal mind, is available now

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:47.480
<v Speaker 2>And Paul's best selling memoir Unmasked, My life solving America's

0:50:47.480 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 2>cold cases, is also available now