WEBVTT - Kyle Franz - Part 2

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for tuning into the Frida Egg Podcast. This is

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Part two of the Kyle Franz Pod. If you miss

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Part one, check it out on our website or in

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the iTunes or stitch your feet. And part two we

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>discuss golf in the British Islands, the ground game and

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>professional golf, desert golf, and we do our segment of

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>overrated and Underrated. Thanks again for listening and be sure

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to check out our newsletter. The easiest way to keep

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>up with golf sign up on our website, the Frida

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Egg dot com. And enough of me. Here's Part two

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Kyle Franz Pod.

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 2>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset.

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 3>When I find my ball in the bumper, I'm really upset.

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 3>And when I find my.

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Ball in a Frida Egg, Frida Egg, the dreaded Frida Egg, Friday,

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Frida Egg, Frida Egg, Bride Egg Lie.

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm about ready to run off the golf course.

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 4>So you've you've spent an extensive amount of time in

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 4>the in the British Isles.

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 3>Where would if.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 4>You were going to do one trip you know to

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 4>We'll say a certain area to see golf, uh and

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 4>architecture which which like small area would you focus on.

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's pretty hard to argue with Thelovians uh

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.759
<v Speaker 2>around around Edinburgh, you know, you get such a unique,

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 2>such a unique uh string of golf courses. You can

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 2>see that Mirrorfield is obviously such a great classic course

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 2>and really just like sturdy architecture that most everybody will like,

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, Uh, it kind of lacks to a degree

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 2>some of the kind of quirky stuff that a lot

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 2>of us appreciate and in golf in the UK, but

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 2>it's just a great sturdy course. You just really can't

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 2>argue with it as being one of the best courses

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 2>in the world. And then to the complete opposite end

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 2>of the spectrum you've got, you know, North Berrick is

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 2>just down the road, which you know, I I would

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 2>say most of my architectural friends, you know, people that

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I work with, people like Gil and Tom and uh Bill,

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:33.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, they all my friends, I think to a man,

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 2>would would rank North Berrick among their favorite courses because

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 2>you get just so much weird, fun, crazy British architecture.

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's great coastline, it's a beautiful place. But

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 2>where else do you get to play, you know, a

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 2>whole like like the same as pit where you know

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 2>you're batting your ball out in the fairway and tend

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 2>to stop it on a green right behind a rock wall.

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, you get to you get all the quirk

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 2>value that uh that you can get a great links

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 2>golf course architecture over there and in in one one

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 2>setting there and then there's a lot of you know,

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 2>like great secondary courses there. You know, obviously Golan's a

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 2>great old classic. A couple of courses there, you know, luffness, uh,

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, great great architecture. Dunbar just down the road

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 2>is a really good course that kind of flies under

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 2>the radar you when to talk about you know, under

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 2>the radar stuff. That's a pretty cool place. And you

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 2>know I've always that's that would be the one market

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 2>that I would love to personally, you know, jump into

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 2>as as a restoration architect. Uh is stuff over there.

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, I spent my year overseas studying golf courses

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 2>over there, and uh, that was the thing that I

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 2>always kind of thought about it, So go to places.

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 2>How much fun it would be the consult at a

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 2>at a place like that Dunbar or phraser Bor what

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 2>have you that uh, you know, with just a little

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 2>help on waterhole here, one hole there, one hole there,

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 2>you could do so you can turn one of those

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 2>call courses into something really, really amazing. They already are

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 2>really really good golf courses. But you know, it would

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 2>come as no surprise having worked on you know, uh,

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 2>the likes of Pacific Dunes and Barnbougle uh as I

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 2>started my career, and then having spent all the time

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 2>overseas in the UK, I'm a huge fan of links architecture,

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 2>so it would be fun to work on some of

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 2>those kinds of places over there, you know. And obviously

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 2>the financials of clubs are so different from the United

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 2>States that you know, uh, it requires somebody being really

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 2>patient and working with a club over a span of

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 2>probably two decades actually get it where they wanted to go.

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 2>But it's not like, you know, they have the financials

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 2>to do a massive you know, restoration or what have you,

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, summertime like we do here. So that's where

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, you know, mid Pins we did. You know,

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 2>we did the project essentially in house, with a bunch

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 2>of shapers and finishing guys that I brought in. No contractors,

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. You know, so I've always kind of been

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 2>having worked on this projects for Tom and Bill and Ben,

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, Pacific Dunes, there was no contract or whatsoever.

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>I've always kind of trying and build my business model

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 2>that I could potentially do, you know, projects kind of

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of like that someday. But that's really my favorite

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.679
<v Speaker 2>favorite region of the country is is there. It's all good.

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 2>I mean I have a hard time saying that over

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 2>some of the places we mentioned earlier with Dornick and

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Brora and and Taine and Gulspy up north.

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 5>But when you in.

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Terms of world class architects, it's pretty hard to beat.

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 2>The Lothians pretty good.

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 4>With regards to restoring courses in like Scotland versus.

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Like so in America we see like a.

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 4>Lot of the same problems with like overgrowth of trees,

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 4>shrinkage or greens.

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, narrow or far aways.

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 4>What are some of the issues that you see in

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 4>Scotland and Ireland and the UK at courses?

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Are they different or pretty much the same?

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 2>It's all the same game. It's it's it's about the

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 2>particulars that you're working on, you know, I think The

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 2>thing that I saw probably the most is it was

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 2>always clear to me that there were there was a

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of golf courses that I went to. There was

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:19.239
<v Speaker 2>like maybe one or two greens where it was obviously

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>it was probably like the coolest and craziest green in

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 2>the golf course. They didn't be kind of flattened out

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>and changed over the decades. Where it had just been

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of flattened out. It was something very bland and

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 2>it was not really indicative of of what it was

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 2>laid out to be. You know a lot of those

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 2>craziest greens over in the UK where it's just something

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 2>where it was on the ground that's what worked. And

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 2>they started bowing it there, you know, uh and uh.

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 2>And it had been kind of changed over time. You

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 2>know a lot of you know, bunker missing here, bunker

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 2>missing there, or you know a lot of the times

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's just as simple of moving a fairway

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 2>around a little bit, you know, just mowing another ten

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 2>yards to the right, moving in you know, ten yards

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 2>from the left where it is being mown a fair way,

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 2>or expanding them back out and narrowing them down in

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 2>the right place. It's just you know, simple sort of

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 2>simple sort of stuff, but in the end it ends

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 2>up making all the difference kind of in the world

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the time. So and also, you know,

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 2>in terms of bunker style, you know, there's a place

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 2>in southern England. I was just looking out on the

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 2>internet a couple of months ago there was an old

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 2>back to the previous architect that we talked about, Colt.

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 2>It was a course that he had done on the

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 2>coast that was on more uplan dy sort of ground.

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't sand dunes and a Lynks golf course, but

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 2>more of like uplan dy sort of terrain with big

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of like pebble beachy sort of cliffs, and you know,

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the bunkers had all been kind of turned into uh

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 2>more like simplified renditions of of what there was originally

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 2>supposed to look like. You know, obviously for anybody that

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of knows Cold's history built some really impressive bunkers,

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 2>really flashy and uh visually attractive stuff, and that stuff

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 2>had just been kind of white out on the golf

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 2>course over the span of you know, one hundred years.

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 2>So that's probably the main thing is, you know, restoring

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 2>bunker style, which is something that just doesn't really happen

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 2>over there, and I mean something has happened in the

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 2>last ten years or so. But I think if if

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 2>somebody had a really great restoration like stay in London,

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 2>one of those great old you know, coult courses, I

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 2>think it would probably break down the door to doing

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot more all over the city in the region.

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 2>And that's the same. The same holds true for the

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 2>for the coastline in Britain.

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, if if you'd hed a couple

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 2>of projects here, a couple of projects there, I think

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 2>it'd probably open the doors doing a lot of great

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 2>restoration working like that, and it's really kind of do

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 2>for it, you know. I think that's one thing that

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been Again. There's been a few projects the last

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 2>few years that have kind of touched on that the UK,

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 2>but it's still restoration is still kind of a new

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 2>and blossoming conversation over there where. It's something we've obviously

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 2>been working very hard on in the States for the

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 2>last you know, ten and fifteen years years almost thirty

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.479
<v Speaker 2>in some cases.

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 4>So we got a ton of questions from listeners. I

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 4>wanted to get to a few of them before we

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 4>get you out of here. So car for the course

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 4>had a good one here. Very few, if any, desert

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 4>courses are allotted as being architectural gems. How would you

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 4>approach a project in Palm Springs or like Scottsdale ever area.

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a very good question.

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, hmm.

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think the I think the thing that

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 2>I have not seen yet on a golf course out

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 2>of the desert, which I think would be very very

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 2>cool to see, would be something with a little bit more,

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more like Pineer's Number two or Saint

0:09:55.640 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Andrew's influence, where the golf course relies less on bunkering

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 2>and more on really really fun shots on and around

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 2>the greens. You know, I think I worked on Stone

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Eagle for for Calm yuh ten or fifteen years ago?

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Ten years ago, I guess. And then you know, I've

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 2>been to I've been to a couple of Bill and

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Ben's projects in the desert, and uh, I think that

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 2>I think those projects were all great. We've got some

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 2>really cool stuff at Stone Eagle, and I know that

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Yllan Ben built some great stuff there. But I think

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 2>that's probably the one little missing link is that I

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 2>would love to see more palms or sorry, Pineer's number two,

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Saint Andrewsy's sort of contouring, uh and even to agree,

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 2>like like prairie dunes where you get some really really good,

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>interesting kind of shot making and recovery shots aground with

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 2>the greens, you know, tipmo and a lot of interesting

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 2>fun kind of shots and uh stuff that almost like

0:10:58.240 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of forces you to play ground shots. You know.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Hard thing with uh with building cool architecture in the

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 2>desert is a requires quite a bit of water obviously,

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 2>and be the turf types that you're gonna have are

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 2>always going to be not particularly prone to good ground

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 2>game architecture, which, of course is you know, when we're

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 2>talking about Bill and Ben and and and and uh

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Tom and Gil, that's the one thing that I probably

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 2>should have started worth instead of uh ending with is

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 2>they're all committed to building great, classical cool ground game architecture.

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 2>And that's something that I'm always trying to push and uh,

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 2>but it's hard to do with warm season grasses because

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 2>it's so bushy and uh you know, so green and

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 2>uh and lush. You know, uh, so I think you'd

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 2>almost want to like over designed features, uh, you know,

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 2>on projects there and you know more Falloway greens, just

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 2>lots of cool st to really get it to where

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 2>uh you know, people want to try some really fun

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 2>interesting you know ground shots and and recovery shots. It's

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 2>it's it's harder harder to uh harder to do than

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 2>to just say it, you know. I think one of

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the things in the real Olympics golf course that certainly

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 2>was the biggest challenge was trying to get players to

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 2>play ground shots and warm season grasses because the balls

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 2>of them or like the bounce that much. In some

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 2>places we were successful with it. In other ways, uh,

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 2>probably not as much as I would have liked to

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 2>have seen it, But uh, you know, I think I

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 2>think it's the key is is just how severe your

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 2>building features and how really how really dedicated are to

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 2>really really building stuff that really forces people to hit

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 2>hit some cool crazy shots like uh like you do

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 2>in different settings.

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 3>So forcing like guys that hit the ground shots.

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 4>I feel like the pros just don't hit them because

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 4>they don't have to hit them regularly, so they don't

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 4>have to practice them exactly.

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 2>You know. Uh, if if I ever am lucky enough

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 2>to uh you know, doing you know, design work on

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 2>courses from scratches on my own. I think that's probably

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 2>the area that'd probably be exploring to a degree. Is

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 2>is uh, you know, with the chain and technology in

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 2>the last twenty twenty five years, it's almost it was

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 2>almost like some of the cool stuff that we were

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 2>building was kind of dated the second that it opened

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 2>for that caliber player, where it still works very well

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 2>for average players. You know, there's a very few kinds

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.839
<v Speaker 2>of holes in the world these days that'll make professional

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 2>level players thinking about, you know, hitting balls on the

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 2>on the ground and bouncing around some you know, obviously,

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, the road hole in Saint Andrews is still

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 2>the timeless example of that. But even see a degree

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 2>in a hole like you know number five at Augusta.

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, if the players hit into the rough on

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 2>the right hand side of that hole, they'll start thinking

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 2>about trying to hit the little skipper shot up onto

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 2>that little Saint Andrew's inspired ridgeline green because the you know,

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the hazards off the backside of the green are so severe,

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 2>and they'll try and they'll try and bounce it up.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 2>You know. I think oakmant is great for that and

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 2>the fact that you have so many fall away greens,

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 2>and in some cases of the greens are so severely

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 2>falling away from the players, you know, front to back

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 2>sloped greens that the players will are almost inevitably have

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 2>to give it a go like a whole, Like you know,

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 2>twelve at Oakmont, players have no choice if you're going

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 2>for that green, and so you have to think about

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 2>how it's going to bounce onto that green and even

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 2>the third shot, so you have to at least be

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 2>cognitive of the fact that the ball, even with a

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 2>wedge in your hand, isn't gonna spin like it normally would,

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 2>you know. So I think there's there's some interesting ways

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 2>to go about skinning that cat. And you know, it's

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 2>all about how you approach the overall theoretics of what

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 2>you're shaping, what you're designing, and uh, you know again

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 2>the paradox of scale that that we work what to

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 2>try and make architecture work wherever we are. So, but yeah,

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that would be a fun golf course to

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 2>play at a desert. I would I would I would

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 2>like to play that course of bit. That would be fun.

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So Pablo Toledo has a question here thoughs on

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 4>doing a strict restoration versus a renovation that modernizes and

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 4>attempts to reac create the original design philosophy and intent.

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 2>So I repeat that one for me, that one.

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 4>So like a true pure restoration, we're putting everything back

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 4>into place where we saw it on this aerial photo,

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 4>versus a renovation that you know, tries to take what

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 4>the intent was and modernize it for today's game.

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 3>So you know, you might move bunkers. So ye, you know,

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 3>thoughts on.

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Each and you know, well, I think that line is

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 2>always getting blurred, and I really don't know of I

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 2>don't think you can be successful in either format without

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 2>blurring them together. You know, I think that I think

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 2>that to do great restoration work, you really have to

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 2>put yourself in the mind of the original architect. And

0:15:57.720 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, certainly a lot of that is painting my numbers,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 2>looking at an aerial and uh and seeing what what

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the was on the golf course originally and precisely where

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 2>everything's sat. And but you also have to take that

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 2>step back and ask the question, well why, uh, you know,

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that if you know, if you went back

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 2>and and and attempted to do restoration by just simply

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 2>copying pasting, you know, uh, painting by painting by number,

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 2>you kind of miss uh that original intent. You know,

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 2>the game has evolved and changed so much that bunkers

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 2>will never only wind up in the wrong spot, or

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 2>if if you're not seeing the whole big picture very clearly,

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 2>you'll kind of miss the uh, the the end all

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 2>of what the original hole is trying to do. You know,

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 2>obviously we're talking about mid pints. Earlier, we were talking

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 2>about you know, Ross's intent with the styling of the holes,

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 2>and I think the thing that uh, you know, as

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>I alluded to, he try to make each of his

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 2>golf courses here a little bit different, uh. And the

0:16:55.680 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 2>best way I can describe the importance of of of

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 2>really really studying the original design is the differences and

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 2>courses you know here here in Pinehurst. You know, Piner's

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 2>number two was supposed to have big wide fairways, fifty

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 2>yard wide fairways, and then on the outside of the

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 2>holes you had an extra buffer of another twenty to

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 2>twenty five yards before you got to the edge of

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 2>the clearing line into the trees. So it was big,

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 2>big wide corridors and big wide fairways, and then he

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 2>had these big long runs of seeing in the famous

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 2>sandy hardpan areas on the eats on each side of

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the hole and midpines. His design philosophy was completely different.

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 2>The fairways were big and wide like Piner's Number two,

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 2>but he for the most part kind of excluded a

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of those sandy hardpan areas on the edges of

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 2>each hole. Instead of of having that buffer, it just

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 2>went right into the woods. In the trees, you'd have

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of sandy hardpan of wiregrass, but mostly

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the holes just kind of went right into the woods.

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>And in between the holes it was very dense, thick,

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 2>bushy terrain. It would be wiregrass and wisteria and all

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 2>kinds of who knows what else was you know, growing

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 2>out in the southern jungles of North Carolina. So the

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 2>the idea was that, you know, Piner Number two was

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 2>meant to be a little bit more of a resort

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 2>friendly golf course where it was a bigger wire the

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 2>players could find their ball and playing on where Midponds

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 2>was meant to be kind of this very very intimate setting,

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, hard golf course with the with the tighter

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 2>clearing lines and uh, the design evolved further from number

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 2>two in that in that category, you know, it has

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 2>more Midpinds has more bunkers front right and front left

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 2>of the green compared to number two, where most of

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the holes have quite a bit of bunkering. But there

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 2>are actually some holes where there's a whole bail side.

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, the first two holes at Pine Re Simber

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 2>two you can bail completely away into short type areas,

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 2>away from all the bunkering around the greens, whereas Mid

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 2>there wasn't two holes like that in the entire golf course.

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 2>So the idea was that, you know, players could hit

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 2>t shots into the right sections of fairways and give

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 2>themselves good angles past all these front bunkers. You know,

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 2>if the pin was front lest, they could play into

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 2>the far right hand side of the fairway for a

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 2>decent angle. Vice versa, the pin was front right, they

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 2>could play to the other side. But to hit it

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 2>to the good angles the honey spots on each hole

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 2>for a good angle win you had to take on,

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, all that brush and all the nasty stuff

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 2>that was lapping right at the edge of the fairways

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 2>as I was alluding to before. So there was you know,

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 2>to get to the good angles and strategize for a

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 2>good player on the t shots. They had to they

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 2>had to take on some some nasty stuff. They were

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of taking their life in their own hands. Again,

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.919
<v Speaker 2>just differences in philosophy. So when I was working on

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Midpinds this restoration, all that junglely stuff around the edge

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 2>of the holes had been removed over the decades to

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 2>make it more resort from all the trees were still there,

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.959
<v Speaker 2>so the general philosophy of the course still still kind

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 2>of held through to the original design. So a lot

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 2>of what I had to do was, you know, just

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of stand on the teas and visualize, well, all

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 2>that stuff has gone now, but the trees are still there.

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 2>But again it feels a lot is a lot less

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 2>in the way of blood pumping through or die field

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 2>of the t shots that originally was intended. So what

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 2>do we need to add to the equation, How do

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 2>we need to approach adding bunker here or maybe bring

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 2>the sandy hardpain areas into the holes a little bit

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 2>more there. You know, it's again just trying to add

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 2>or approach you know, the restoration of the strategic hazards

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 2>around the holes in a manner that they would balance

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 2>out the fact that these other elements had been eliminated

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 2>over the span of of decades, and well it was

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 2>going to take to get the kind of blood pumping

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 2>shots back into the equation that that Ross had originally intended.

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>And if I was just looking down at an aerial

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 2>the golf course, you'd never figure out any of that stuff.

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 2>You can't just paint by numbers and be like, well,

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 2>that's what was there. So that's what we need to do.

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, you need to kind of put yourself on

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 2>the head of what Ross would have been standing there

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 2>looking at in nineteen thirty five and the decisions that

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 2>you would have been making to to you know, lay

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 2>out the holes exactly to get the blood pumping kind

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 2>of shots that he wanted. And so that's how I really,

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, approach restoration is is that you know, you

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 2>got to get out on the field and you got

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 2>to stand there and kind of visualize what it would

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 2>have been like to have a hickory and one hundred

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 2>years ago, and what do we need to do to

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 2>make that all connect today? You know, So sometimes you

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 2>wind up in a scenario where you know you can

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 2>just simply paint by numbers, where it's purely restoration. But also,

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, getting it to fit into work and to

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 2>be appropriate for modern play requires you know, making making

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 2>it just and that too is restoration. So at the

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, it's all the same game. Uh,

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 2>you're all just you're just trying to get to where

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the the architecture matches up and plays as well as

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 2>it did today, as it did originally, or even better.

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 3>That's a that's a good, good answer to that question.

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 4>I think that's that's the way you gotta do it.

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 4>It's because it's so much has changed, so absolutely.

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 2>A long, a long explanation, but it really does arrive

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 2>at the at the point you know, you gotta you

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 2>gotta get in the heads of the original architects and

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 2>uh and figure out the details.

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 4>So if you could restore, we'll just say one, you know,

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 4>municipal or like a public access of course that you

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 4>don't know of having a consulting architect, so you know,

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 4>we avoid any you know, beef.

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 3>What what what course would it be? And from Andrew Bailey, Hmmm.

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I probably I probably mentioned a lot

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 2>of them in my uh uh, you know, just discussing.

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Uh the courses.

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, yeah, you know British British golf courses.

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:23.479
<v Speaker 2>In terms of the of the United States, I don't know.

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, Uh, one that always just pops to mind,

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 2>uh is uh Brain Melton. I can't remember the name

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 2>of it right off the top of my head. Uh.

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 2>There's a place in Portland, southeast Poortland. Uh that's uh.

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Uh it's an old h chances the League and golf course.

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 2>Uh that that I always was a big fan of

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 2>growing up, you know. Uh. But there's there's many, many

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 2>prime examples of of great courses in that category. You know,

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 2>if I if I had timis to kind of think

0:23:57.960 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 2>of it, I'm sure I could think of some even

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 2>right here in uh in North Carolina. I wish I

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 2>could remember the name of that golf course. It'll come

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 2>to me here in a secuh in Portland. Uh. But

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 2>you know a lot of places you know need old

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 2>places that are you know again great classic architects that

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 2>really have a lot of potential. Of the land is

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 2>still very good and nobody's really kind of broken broken

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 2>anything it would be fun to work at, and you know,

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean especially I think you probably would uh understand

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 2>immediately just from the conversation of the day that, you know,

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 2>the fact that I grew up on a public golf course,

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 2>it's always made me really intrigued with with doing great

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 2>public golf course restoration, you know, or just great public

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 2>golf in general. I mean that's what really, you know,

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 2>intrigued me the most about working on the the Olympics

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 2>course in Rio for Gill was the fact that, of

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 2>course it was cool to be involved in a project

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 2>where I was going to hold the Olympics and the

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 2>first Olympics and over one hundred years, but it was also,

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I think equally is important to me that it was

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.239
<v Speaker 2>going to be the first public golf course in Brazil

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 2>and one of the first, like great examples in South America,

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 2>a big tournament value that people could go and play. So,

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, having grown up on a public golf course,

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 2>public golf is really important to me. So really, any place,

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 2>uh you know that that you know has just great

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 2>old bones, great architecture, would be would be fun to

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 2>work on, work on, uh for a for a public benefit.

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Eastmoreland is the golf course I was thinking in Portland.

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I knew that was going to come.

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 4>To me eventually, so putting me on the spot. So yeah,

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 4>it's that's a cool part of the Olympic courses. And

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 4>and it looked like, you know, they just had the

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 4>Latin American Tour was down there and it looked like

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 4>is in good shape.

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 3>So that's that's really good.

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, going fine. You know, I mean I I grew

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 2>up on golf courses in the Northwest, you know, kind

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 2>of like that. Beyond the one that I even you know,

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 2>where I played every day. You know, there was a

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, one golf course that that I really liked

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 2>playing as a kid was this little Lynx golf course

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 2>on the Oregon coast called Gearhart that it was a

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Chandler Reagan effort. It was originally laid out by an

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 2>old scotsman out of the dunes, but he'd done work

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 2>on the golf course. And also, you know it's a club.

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 2>But Astorias right up the road from there's a neat

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 2>old dunes golf course. So you know, there's a little

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 2>cool places all over the place that that it would

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 2>be great to do, you know, restoration work over a

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 2>span of time that would be practical for them. It's

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 2>you're not gonna put him out of business. Uh, but

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 2>really could you know, take him to an extra level

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 2>and and expand their you know, potential potential. Uh yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean.

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 3>Uh, you know, you've got that's what they need to

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 3>invest in. It's their asset.

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 4>You can't just let it go to you know ship

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 4>over the course of time as that you get it, invest.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 2>In and make it better exactly. And there's been some

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 2>great examples of that that that have gone on around

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 2>the country. You know, I haven't been to it yet myself,

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 2>but I'd like to go see it. A place called

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Georgie Wright in Boston, uh, which which looks fantastic, you know,

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 2>and they've been doing just that, You've been working to

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 2>try and prove the last the last decade or so.

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 2>And it's a great old classic, you know, ross course

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 2>you want to talk about, you know, one of that

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 2>flies under the radar. It looks fantastic. I really need

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 2>to get over and check it out sometime. And that's

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 2>that's the prime example, you know. Uh, there's there's some

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 2>courses around the country that were you know, again laid

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 2>out by by great architects that uh that you know,

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the good practical plan, you know, especially that's where the

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 2>design builds philosophy comes together to to make project practical forms,

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, by removing the you know, exorbit and outside

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 2>contracted costs and doing you know, projects in a practical manner.

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 2>It's it's much it's more stressful on the architects to

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 2>that that way, but that's what we're here for, you know,

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 2>is to get the right product for the right price.

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 2>And so I really look at the next twenty years

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 2>in the United States as being a you know, a

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of watershed moment for that. You know, restoration has

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 2>certainly been a great, a great development in the club

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 2>club seen the last twenty and thirty years, and it's

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 2>great to see that it's started to shift through to

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 2>public golf in places and hopefully that that trend continues.

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 2>It's some that of you know, again, having been involved

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 2>or been a public golf person, my whole life would

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 2>be no almostly rewarding to be evolve us.

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that I kind of think needs to happen too.

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 4>It's it's some you know, it's a every you know,

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 4>so many people have on the podcast grew up playing

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 4>public golf. I grew up playing public golf. And it's

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 4>like that is so important is to have, you know,

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 4>the better the golf courses are to play, like, the

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 4>more people you're going to get to play.

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 3>And it's so we.

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Do this overrated underrated segment, so you know, I give

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 4>you something and you got to say if if you

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 4>think it's overrated or underrated, there's no properly rated Okay.

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 4>So so we'll start with nineteen twenties Donald Ross.

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And am I supposed to name a course or.

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Just in general?

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Was you know he has he has kind of three different,

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, distinct time periods of his design from the

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 4>ten in the twenties and thirties. Was nineteen twenties down

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Ross overrated or underrated?

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I would say absolutely underrated?

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 4>All right, what do you think about the other one?

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Is there one that was overrated?

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 2>You know? I think that I think that golf course

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 2>architects are interesting. You know some of them, some of

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 2>them arrive on the scene and they have all their

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 2>best ideas and they throw them out there. And that's

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 2>just simply kind of the the the career path that

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 2>they take, you know, is their early work is their best.

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, a lot of good prime examples of that,

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 2>and then other architects have a tendency to just get

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 2>better and better and better and better over the span

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 2>of their careers, and I think Ross was definitely in

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 2>the latter category. You know, his work was always good.

0:30:56.800 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 2>But you know, when I look back at the the

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 2>history of Piner's Number two, there's there's two things that

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 2>come to mind. How great it is today and how

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 2>great it's always been, but also how much it evolved.

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, I have never seen an aerial or a

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 2>ground photo of the golf course between nineteen thirty five

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 2>and nineteen oh seven where it was exactly the same.

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 2>He was constantly, constantly teekering with it, and the style

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 2>was completely different on all of them, you know, like

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 2>the original Piner's Number two was really severe. There was

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.479
<v Speaker 2>like you know, I'm sure for a lot of your

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 2>lists or they'd be familiar with, you know, Hell's half

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Acre at Pine Valley, this big famous hole in the

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 2>world that you have to cross in your second shot

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 2>of the seventh hole. Well, that's kind of what Pinehurst

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Number two was like originally. Instead of having these big,

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, clearly defined sweeping fairways that begin at the

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 2>start of the hole and go all the way the play.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 2>The last looks that we were talking about earlier. You know,

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 2>he had like these big stoppages in the fairways where

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 2>it would just go into like sandy hardpan and native

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 2>areas for for a stretch and then it would pick

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 2>back up the fairway would start again on the other side.

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of hills, half acrey, sorts of sort

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 2>of stuff out there. It was really hard. You know,

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 2>it's easy to see why his original design numbers. It

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 2>was pretty pretty controversial. And you know, I've been helping

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 2>a bit on the Pinter's Number three course the last year.

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, they changed a couple of holes to kind

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 2>of make way for gills par three course, and that

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of sort of evolved into you know, doing some

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 2>other work around the golf course. You know, myself and

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Kay Goldby and Blake Conant, all three of us kind

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 2>of did a little bit of different periods of stuff

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 2>on the golf course the last year, and which obviously

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, was put in my hands a lot of

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 2>the time. You know, the original area for thelf aerial

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 2>for his original design, and it's really very severe. You know,

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of pine alleys kind of stuff in places

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 2>out there. Now, whether that's that's good or bad or underrated, overrated,

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but it was a lot different, you know.

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 2>But I think that I think his career did it

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 2>take a nice, a nice turn what he decided to

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 2>start doing more playable stuff that would be more attractive

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 2>to to more normal people. So I think that he

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 2>had really fallen in with a really nice, really nice

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 2>groove with the stuff that he was designing by the

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 2>twenties and and especially the you know, as you got

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 2>towards the end of his career. I think the Pineers

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 2>number two is ranked his best course for a reason.

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 2>You know. It's it's it's all the different little elements

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 2>that he threw in his designer style throughout his career

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 2>combined with the more playable elements that he kind of

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 2>evolved to to arrive at his best course. But that's

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 2>not to say that the the nineteen ten stuff or

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 2>the earlier stuff is better or worse. Is just a

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 2>little bit it's a little bit different.

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 4>He's like a fine wine he got, you know, as

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 4>he as he aged, he got more sophisticated and uh.

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Fuller, Absolutely absolutely, But that's enough to say that the

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 2>early worlds are good too. Yeah, uh, you know, I

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 2>think that that's the thing that I personally hope that uh, that.

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 5>Will kind of show its way through and some of the.

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 2>Other things going on here.

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, Uh, I would love to see Gil kind

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 5>of throw some of that into uh, you know, his

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 5>work on course forward, just as a as a complete

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 5>curveball and departure to uh, you know, the.

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Work that we did on number two, the work that

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 2>uh that I've done on on mid pines and pine needles.

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:47.720
<v Speaker 2>You know. Uh, I've definitely adhered more to the later

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 2>period of Ross's work because I've always genuinely felt like

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 2>that was the best period of his work here. But

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't mean that you can do some really interesting

0:34:56.160 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 2>things with with his more uh you know, uh controversy

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 2>full and zany style stuff that he did during the

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 2>early portion of the of the century would be pretty

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 2>cool to see. So who knows what gildos.

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 3>All right, We'll get to the next one here.

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 4>Volcano par three's from Tom Smith Overrated.

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Underrated mm hmm.

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 2>I suppose it depends on the format. But I am,

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 2>I for one, am a big fan, you know, I

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 2>would be I would be hard pressed to say that

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 2>there's there's not a better hole on any of the

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:40.280
<v Speaker 2>golf courses that I'm considered currently consulting at than the

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:43.360
<v Speaker 2>the eleventh hole at the Country Clube Charleston, which for

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 2>anybody who has played in the Azalea, which is kind

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 2>of a well known amateur event down in the southeast,

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 2>which is at Country Clube Charleston. Every year the holes

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 2>were Dan or reverse for Dan, you know, it's uh

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 2>so all the kind of classic elements of you know,

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 2>diagonal green with severe back left bunkers or right and

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 2>depending off it's a reverse for an or not. But

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 2>in the case of Countries to Charleston, it's it's kind

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 2>of a forty five degree angle green from front left

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 2>to back right with these incredibly deep bunkers front right

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 2>and incredibly deep back left. It's basically it reminds me

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 2>more of like a Charles Banks design hole where it's

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:25.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of the classic Rainer McDonald template Verdeans,

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 2>but it's it's just absolutely jacked up to the maximum

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 2>in terms of difficulty, and it's been a famous hole

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 2>for that reason for a long time. There's been many

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 2>a player in the Asia that has actually been trying

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 2>to hold a lead that just laid up on it

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:41.760
<v Speaker 2>and put it up onto the green. So that severe

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.799
<v Speaker 2>of a of a hole, you know. So I love

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 2>any kind of any kind of green and green site

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 2>where you get on a par three where you're kind

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:52.919
<v Speaker 2>of jacking it up into the air and really leaving

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the players with some really severe question marks if they

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 2>if they miss the green, and especially the strategy involved

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 2>with the whole, like uh, like what I was just describing,

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, Uh, the history of the whole is actually

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of uh, kind of interesting. It. Uh. There's evidence

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:16.760
<v Speaker 2>that the uh that the big mounds you know, Charles's Flat,

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's no features naturally there, and uh, the

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 2>big mounds and features on the property are rumored to

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 2>go all the way back to the Revolutionary War. The

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 2>British at uh when they besieged uh Charleston built like

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 2>all these big things that they would you know, fortifications,

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 2>redoubts is what they were called. That it appears that

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 2>that's probably what the Greenside originally was, so uh, you know,

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of some interesting history to uh to wind

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 2>up at a very severe golf hole, you know, one

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 2>hole that uh that I always kind of come back

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 2>to is having been uh you know, influential in Ross's

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 2>careers is the second at Dornic, which EVE heard varying

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 2>degrees of the uh you know, you want to talk

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 2>about like a volcano. It falls away completely on on

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 2>three sides and with a false front on the front

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:09.799
<v Speaker 2>portion of it. And you know, I've I've heard vary

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:13.399
<v Speaker 2>degrees that Ross was involved in the construction of it,

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, other under John sutherlanda Dornic, and originally he

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 2>wasn't all that excited about the idea of what the

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 2>hole was going to be. Like don't quote me on

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 2>that because I've just heard it in varying degrees, but

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 2>that when they finished the hole, he thought it was

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 2>so cool that it was like the light bulb went

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 2>off for him. And I think that one thing you

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 2>see in Ross's work everywhere is is the willingness to

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 2>build a green site with a really severe fall off

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 2>off the back, and even going as far as to

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 2>place a green site on a downslope and just pushing

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 2>dirt out and out and out building bunkers and pushing

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 2>it out until you finally wound up with a really

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:53.399
<v Speaker 2>severe fall off off the rear side of it. And

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that was probably very influential in his career,

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 2>that that singular green site as you see that all

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 2>over the place. I Pinter's number two, whether it's you

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:04.959
<v Speaker 2>know the famous eighth Green where you know John Daly

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 2>had his mill down where he hit it over the

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 2>green and swattered his ball because he couldn't quite get

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.399
<v Speaker 2>it back up onto the green. Rusted that all the time,

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 2>and I think it comes back to you know, those

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 2>kind of those kind of philosophics, you know, and what

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 2>you get out of it is, you know, when you

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 2>have holes of such severe fall off on the backside

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 2>like that, it really does get you kind of thinking

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:27.359
<v Speaker 2>back to basics. You know, maybe I should wind up

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 2>short of this green and take that that mistake out

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 2>of play, or maybe even just try and bounce it

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:34.919
<v Speaker 2>up on the green where I just barely barely run

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 2>my way up onto the green, taking the aerial shot

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 2>that might land on the green and go running off

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 2>the backside or fly over out of play. You know.

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 2>So I'm a big fan of of you know, green

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 2>sites that are you know, kind of jacked up like that,

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 2>and you know, having done the Rainer McDonald restoration that

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:55.320
<v Speaker 2>that I have done. You know, I'm always going to

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 2>be a sucker for the for the famous short holes.

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, some of the best ones, UH are always

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 2>going to be kind of like that, you know, whether

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 2>it's uh you know, like Camargo is like a great example,

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean, that's about it. That's about it

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.319
<v Speaker 2>jacked up and the volcano issues you're ever gonna get

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 2>right there with with a severity around all all four.

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Are so example.

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.320
<v Speaker 4>It's amazing how easy it is to make a bogie

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 4>on one of those holes.

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Just by hitting a hitting a good but not great shot.

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you just get these putts that are just brutal,

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 4>and I think that's so cool because it's it's just

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 4>like it's a test of your wedge game. Like if

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 4>you hit it in the right spot, it's the easy birdie.

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 4>But if you just missed barely your play safe, it's

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 4>gonna be.

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Really hard to make par absolutely absolutely, you know. One

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 2>of the features funnest features that I restored is is

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:49.800
<v Speaker 2>UH eight at mid pins, which is a green exactly

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:51.839
<v Speaker 2>like that, you know, I think it is just right

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 2>out of the two at Dornica influence. UH that Ross

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 2>that ross got from that hole, you know, the greenest

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 2>just it's on a downslope and he just took a

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 2>bunch of dirt. You know, it's obvious that they went

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirty yards up the ferry just started shoving dirt

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 2>until they wound up with this tiny little press of

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:14.839
<v Speaker 2>a you know, volcano green on the downslope and if

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 2>you go over, it runs down into this sandy bunkery

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 2>native area patch behind the green. That's needless to say,

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 2>no fun at all to try and get up and

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 2>down from there. You know, I've had a standing offer

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 2>for anybody that I've been playing with for three years now,

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 2>I guess since the restoration that anybody that gets over

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 2>that green into that hazard and can get up and

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 2>down free beer on Kyle. And it happened. Yet the

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 2>closest was you know Pat McGowan, who is part of

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 2>the family that owns the resorts here and handles a

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 2>lot of the teaching and whatnot. And he was you know,

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 2>seventy seven I believe PGA to our Rookie of the

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.760
<v Speaker 2>year and he was as close as anybody has gotten

0:41:55.880 --> 0:41:58.439
<v Speaker 2>with out. It's those kind of holes are really fun,

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:00.040
<v Speaker 2>you know when you finally make a birdie on a

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.320
<v Speaker 2>whole like that. Uh, that's something you talk about. Uh,

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 2>that's that's the kind of stuff that you remember at

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 2>the end of the year, uh uh, no matter what,

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 2>and the kind of shot that you remind yourself or

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 2>or bring up, you know, chatting with friends for years

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 2>after that.

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, that's memorability is important with golf. Elser phelt

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:27.280
<v Speaker 4>has overrated underrated split fairways.

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that, uh that's almost a that's almost a

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 2>trick question, you know. I think that I think that

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 2>split fairways are an absolute fantastic design feature, But it's

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 2>all about the implement implementation and about uh doing the uh,

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 2>doing the design of the whole properly. You know. I

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 2>would love to, you know, if I remember doing you know,

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 2>design on my on my own, uh, from scratch. I

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 2>would love to try stuff like that, you know, especially

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of breaking holes up a little bit

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 2>more that way. You know, you don't really see a

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of that. You don't really see a lot of

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 2>people trying it and actually really really working out, well,

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 2>where do you want to you want to play to

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 2>each side? A lot of time it just sort of

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 2>winds up they're like, well, I'm going down that side,

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:21.239
<v Speaker 2>and that's where I'm going forever. Maybe if I have

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:24.439
<v Speaker 2>some reason to play the opposite fairway, I might try

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:25.879
<v Speaker 2>her once in a while. But the keys just good

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 2>getting it all the work. But there's also been some

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:32.759
<v Speaker 2>pretty poor examples of that over the last twenty and

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty and thirty years, you know, to where it was

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 2>they tried to do multiple fairways and it was just

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 2>added expense that you know, again for the reasons we're

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of talking about, it just didn't quite work out.

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 2>There was no reason to play to that side, or

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't the risk actually wasn't worth it was reward,

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:55.839
<v Speaker 2>or or it was just impractical. And it becomes when

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 2>you get into that category, it becomes very expensive maintenance.

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's maximum expenditure for almost no game. So, uh,

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 2>I'd suppose the answer to the question is if it's

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:08.880
<v Speaker 2>a really good architect that knows what they are doing,

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 2>absolutely I think it's something that we should be exploring

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:16.440
<v Speaker 2>even a little bit more. Uh. Whereas if it's if

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 2>it's in the hands of somebody that doesn't quite know

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:21.919
<v Speaker 2>quite how to implemat that, it's probably money that's better

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:22.760
<v Speaker 2>left unspent.

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 3>It's yeah, I mean it forces people to make.

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 4>A decision too, which is always good. You know, doubt

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 4>it might go in the right way. There's a great

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 4>one at Holston Hills, a ross course, that eighth hole

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 4>I think, or no seventh hole a part five where

0:44:41.280 --> 0:44:43.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, if you if you want to play aggressive,

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 4>you go up to the left, but you got to

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 4>hit a really good t shot to get it up there.

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 4>And uh, you know the safe play is right, but

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 4>you're blind and it's longer, but you know, it's.

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 2>A lot easier to hit absolutely absolutely, And you know again,

0:44:57.040 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it's something that that I think we should

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:01.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, if it's done right, we should be trying

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 2>to explore it. I think it's a really really cool idea.

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't remember what it was for, but

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:09.719
<v Speaker 2>it was a couple of years ago. Dope. You know,

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 2>he did basically like a raffle. You know, he he

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 2>sent out to a bunch of the guys who were

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:17.360
<v Speaker 2>either working for him or have work for him. Uh,

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:19.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, he was just asking what would uh what

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 2>would be some cool different ideas to try on a

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 2>project on a on a flat piece of land and uh,

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 2>and that's what I came back with was uh you know, uh,

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 2>I spent you know, maybe an hour or so sort

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:32.920
<v Speaker 2>of like sketching around and trying to think of, well,

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 2>what would be some good ways to uh do some

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 2>multiple fairway sort of stuff on a flat piece of

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:41.160
<v Speaker 2>ground to uh to add some uh some serious variety

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 2>into the equation and uh and the more I kind

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 2>of sketched around on it was like the you know,

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 2>it's not something that was the first time I had

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 2>done that before, uh, but it reminded me, uh that, uh,

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, that would be a pretty pretty nice way

0:45:55.960 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 2>to attack certain kinds of pieces of land where you

0:45:58.160 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 2>don't really have a lot of topography.

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:05.400
<v Speaker 3>You worked on Stonewall North, YEP. So I played the

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:06.240
<v Speaker 3>midam out.

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 7>There, and it reminds me like the split fairway is

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:14.880
<v Speaker 7>almost you almost got it. Guys almost did that on

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:17.319
<v Speaker 7>like the fifteenth there where you have the center the

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 7>center line bunker kind.

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Of acted that.

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 4>And for those that haven't seen it at that course,

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:26.800
<v Speaker 4>it's this fairway is ninety yards wide and they.

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:30.319
<v Speaker 6>Have like a fairway bunker right in the middle that's

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:34.319
<v Speaker 6>probably two yards wide, and you know it's tiny, but

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 6>we're playing the practice around.

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:38.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm playing with two of my buddies.

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 4>And we all look at it and like, what the

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 4>hell are we supposed to do here? If you play

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 4>left of it, there's some woods on the left, so

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, but that's a much better angle. You play

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 4>right of it, it's much longer hole, and you have

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 4>a really bad angle into a wild green. And you know,

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:56.799
<v Speaker 4>we all looked at each other and said, let's just

0:46:57.120 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 4>I think we just hit it right at it. And

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 4>sure enough, playing in the tournament and I hit like

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 4>one of my best friends of the day and it

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 4>just lands right in the middle of.

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 3>It, because I know, and it's just like that. But

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, we did. You know, I didn't make a decision,

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:14.920
<v Speaker 3>so I got penalized for it.

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely absolutely, And you know, I like three at Pacific, Dudes,

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 2>is always a hole that I come back to in

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 2>that category. You know, Well, two and three obviously have

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:27.279
<v Speaker 2>the center line has or something golf, of course, but

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 2>three is really more of a you know, more of

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 2>a full split fairway sort of arrangement with the bunkers

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:35.239
<v Speaker 2>that kind of stretched all through the middle. And what

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:39.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean that was that was something that always you know,

0:47:40.040 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 2>like really I marveled that. And the design is is

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:44.800
<v Speaker 2>there were some really cool fresh ideas that that Tom

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:48.319
<v Speaker 2>threw to the equation out there while it was still

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:50.360
<v Speaker 2>all practical for the average player. But what a what

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 2>a fun hole and what a uh what a great

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:54.839
<v Speaker 2>part five to really like put it on you right

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:56.560
<v Speaker 2>from the t shot that you've got to you've got

0:47:56.560 --> 0:47:58.759
<v Speaker 2>to have it together my mother mother going down the

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:01.440
<v Speaker 2>left hand lane, I'm really gonna have a legit shot

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 2>of getting uh uh to the green into or I'm

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 2>playing right and I'm playing safety uh the whole way,

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, uh. And you know that was what I

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 2>thought was really cool and and and really really fresh

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 2>about it, was the fact that there was a solid

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:21.280
<v Speaker 2>effort right from from the tee to make you force

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:24.360
<v Speaker 2>force you in a clear decision whether you're gonna simply

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 2>be playing playing concernably the whole way down the whole

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 2>very very cool way to uh to approach it. And

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:33.120
<v Speaker 2>that's where, you know, when I was referring to multiple

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:35.400
<v Speaker 2>fairwies or whatnot, I was thinking more in terms of

0:48:35.400 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 2>having fairy is completely disconnected from each other, whether it's

0:48:39.000 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 2>a you know, uh, you know, some sort of creek

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:46.120
<v Speaker 2>or or ditch or you know, running rapping sort of

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:55.040
<v Speaker 2>bunker thing like Riviera exactly exactly, yeah, you know, uh

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 2>that's I was more kind of referring to something like that.

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:01.319
<v Speaker 2>But you know, again, it all goes back to the

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:04.359
<v Speaker 2>same point, you know, center line hazards and forcing people

0:49:04.400 --> 0:49:08.319
<v Speaker 2>to make decisions, very very quick decisions and execute is

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 2>is really it's so much fun, you know. Uh, it's

0:49:11.520 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 2>just great architecture, and uh, whether it's in a h

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 2>a more uh you know, uh subtle format like a

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:22.360
<v Speaker 2>whole like three or two at Pacific Dunes or uh

0:49:22.800 --> 0:49:25.040
<v Speaker 2>or you know the other holes that we were describing,

0:49:25.080 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, so I think it would be fun to

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 2>explore more the uh the the former you know, where

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:33.880
<v Speaker 2>you're you're really separating sections of holes and and maybe

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 2>people trying to uh you know, really uh really figure

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 2>things out and make some really good concrete decisions. I

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 2>think there's I think it's something that uh that definitely

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 2>can can go uh even a little bit more aggressive

0:49:49.680 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 2>format in that category. But again, it all has to

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 2>come back to whether it's actually practical and you can

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 2>actually make the strategy of the holes work and not

0:49:57.080 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 2>to be kind of a three dollar bill.

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so much of golf architecture, so much of the

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:03.960
<v Speaker 4>strategies driven from.

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 3>The green back, you know, and well being able.

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 4>To force strategy off the T shot and off of

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 4>a specific T shot.

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Is it's cool because it's it's different.

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:19.319
<v Speaker 4>And like with everything golf architecture, variety is so.

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Important exactly, you know, And as we were discussing, you know,

0:50:23.560 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 2>right from the very opening of the podcast, I think

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 2>that you know, we always kind of wonder is how

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:32.920
<v Speaker 2>much to normal players really understand, like the little clues

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:35.640
<v Speaker 2>we try to give them and the strategy we try

0:50:35.680 --> 0:50:37.920
<v Speaker 2>to create. You know, a lot of a lot of

0:50:37.920 --> 0:50:41.120
<v Speaker 2>great architecture just about being able to do that. And

0:50:41.160 --> 0:50:43.719
<v Speaker 2>I'll make it too for confusing for people to figure out.

0:50:44.000 --> 0:50:46.320
<v Speaker 2>You remember Calm having said everyone something to the effect

0:50:46.360 --> 0:50:49.319
<v Speaker 2>that it takes more than two sentences to explain it,

0:50:49.360 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 2>that it's probably too complex. Uh. But you know, I

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:57.959
<v Speaker 2>think I think when you I think when you start

0:50:58.000 --> 0:51:01.120
<v Speaker 2>talking about multiple pharawers and multi different routes and all

0:51:01.160 --> 0:51:03.080
<v Speaker 2>those kinds of things, I don't think there's a person

0:51:03.120 --> 0:51:05.440
<v Speaker 2>under the sun that doesn't figure that out immediately. You know,

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:08.279
<v Speaker 2>They're like, well, these are clear options. To me, these

0:51:08.320 --> 0:51:12.239
<v Speaker 2>are clear strategy decisions that I have to make. You know,

0:51:13.880 --> 0:51:16.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it makes ah, there's there's a discussion be

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:18.600
<v Speaker 2>made there that it makes a little bit more accessible.

0:51:19.360 --> 0:51:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Arctsh are a little bit more accessible to uh people

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:25.680
<v Speaker 2>that aren't accustomed to, uh to learning the complexities of Well,

0:51:25.719 --> 0:51:27.640
<v Speaker 2>i've got a bunker front right of the green. Here,

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:30.120
<v Speaker 2>there's a bunker on the less hands side of the faraway.

0:51:30.600 --> 0:51:33.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, uh, most people don't get the simple stuff,

0:51:33.239 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 2>but it's when you start to get into the more

0:51:34.640 --> 0:51:37.400
<v Speaker 2>complex stuff that that people tend to notice maybe a

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 2>little bit less and uh you know again multiple fareaways.

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Stuff is uh as obvious and interesting as it gets.

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:49.719
<v Speaker 2>So certainly something to be said for the accessibility of

0:51:49.719 --> 0:51:52.960
<v Speaker 2>going that route design wise, mm hmm definitely.

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 3>So hey, hey, I think we've taken up enough of

0:51:56.680 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 3>your time.

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:00.680
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much for being so gener us with it,

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 4>and you know, we uh, we appreciate it.

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:06.319
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we just scratched the surface. We could

0:52:06.320 --> 0:52:08.240
<v Speaker 3>have talked for five.

0:52:08.080 --> 0:52:10.319
<v Speaker 4>More hours, but we don't want, we don't want to

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:11.640
<v Speaker 4>take up your whole afternoon.

0:52:12.040 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 3>So thanks so much.

0:52:14.360 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 4>For coming on and uh, well look forward to hopefully

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 4>having you on again in in the in the future.

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, thank you very much. An. It's a lot of fun,

0:52:24.640 --> 0:52:26.239
<v Speaker 2>glad to come on, and I've been a big fan

0:52:26.320 --> 0:52:29.880
<v Speaker 2>of your podcast for for a while, so uh uh,

0:52:30.160 --> 0:52:32.239
<v Speaker 2>fun fun to come on to contribute.

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, definitely, Thanks Kyle,